NONLOCALITY IS REALITY
Language is an immeasurably useful tool but of course it has to make compromises in capturing a REPRESENTATION of reality and this note homes in on the nature and impact of such compromises.
REPRESENTATION of how humanings in the Wave-field (the Tao) aka ‘humans’ ‘fit in to the overall fluid dynamic’ can be constructed if we invoke the use of binary logic based terminology to figuratively SPLIT APART “FIGURE” and “GROUND” so that we can address ONE THING AT A TIME. This gives us a picture of the INHABITANT within a separate and independent HABITAT which lends itself to the language based system of NAMING and GRAMMAR. With this type of LANGUAGE, we can notionally LIBERATE relational FLOW-FORMS and set them up, in language and thus in the PSYCHE as notional LOCAL things-in-themselves, notionally with THEIR OWN LOCAL powers of SOURCING actions and developments.
With this DOUBLE ERROR system, as Nietzsche has pointed out, we can build langauge-based REPRESENTATIONS of the dynamic world of our sensory experience. Thus, for example, the HUMANINGS in the flow (i.e. in the Wave-field aka the Tao) which is the transforming relational continuum which are RELATIONAL FEATURES WITHIN THE FLOW can be SPOKEN OF, … that is to say, be given a language-based representation, .. in the abstract terms of LOCAL things-in-themselves with GRAMMAR-given powers of LOCAL SOURCING of actions and development. That is, this reduction that language capture performs, allows the construction of representations in terms of LOCAL things-in-themselves, notionally with their own LOCAL SOURCING powers of movement and growth.
This DOUBLE ERROR language-based ABSTRACTION, by abstractly RE-PRESENTING the FIGURE as if SPLIT OUT FROM THE GROUND, combined with the GRAMMAR based simulation that lets us portray the FIGURE as if it were MOVING SEPARATELY through the GROUND (the terms INHABITANT and HABITAT are commonly substituted for FIGURE and GROUND) allows us to SIDESTEP the INEFFABLITY of the transforming relational continuum aka the Wave-field aka the Tao which is ‘everywhere at the same time’ (the all-including dynamic featuring relational forms within a continual transformation).
Of course, having used the DOUBLE ERROR to notionally EXTRACT the FIGURE from the GROUND and RECAST it as if it were an INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF with its own GRAMMAR-given powers of SOURCING actions and development, we imply the existence of a NEW CONTAINING GROUND which is no longer related to our now-independent FIGURE, and it is a notional (imaginary) CONTAINER which I no way SUBTRACTS from the GRAMMAR given notion that the FIGURE is the LOCAL SOURCE of ITS OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.
Now we are really ‘getting somewhere’ with this DOUBLE ERROR based NAMING and GRAMMAR REPRESENTION of fluid forms within the TRANFORMATION (i.e. within the transforming relational continuum aka the Wave-field aka the Tao) because this ABSTRACTED system is something we can use to SIMULATE the fluid reality by isolating the relational forms, reifying them as if they were LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES and RE-MOBILIZING THEM AS SUCH (thanks to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).
This DOUBLE ERROR ploy “SETS US UP” for constructing REPRESENTATIONS wherein the relational flow-forms now APPEAR (thanks to NAMING and GRAMMAR), as LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES in our INTELLECTUAL RECONSTRUCTIONS of the new NAMING and GRAMMAR encoded representation.
CAN WE ACTUALLY “SEE” these “INDEPENDENT FIGURES”?
We just IMAGINE SEEING THEM as we intellectually PROCESS the DOUBLE ERROR language based representations. When the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR comes to us saying; ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, … We can check this out by climbing a hill ‘overlooking the town’ (note that in this language usage I am conceding that there is such a thing as ‘the TOWN’ and that there is such a thing as ‘GROWTH’. I will probably report that, “YES, IT IS TRUE, THE TOWN “IS” GROWING”. Of course the old indigenous aboriginal who came with me will be saying WTF! are you blind, can you not see that what is going on here is TRANSFORMATION of the landscape which includes the LOSS of Wilderness? There is NO SUCH THING AS ‘THE GROWTH OF A TOWN’, … there is only TRANSFORMATION of the Landscape.
The thing is, the indigenous aboriginal language does not employ the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to JUMPSTART LOCAL GROWTH, so the indigenous aboriginal is instead, understanding the same dynamic in terms of the all-including transforming relational continuum aka the Wave-field aka the Tao, … which explains why David Bohm discovery that indigenous aboriginal languages ARE ALREADY MODERN PHYSICS COMPLIANT; i.e.
What is needed, Bohm argued in his book Wholeness and the Implicate Order, is a new sort of language, one based on processes and activity, transformation and change, rather than on the interactions of stable objects. Bohm called this hypothetical language the “rheomode.” It is based primarily on verbs and on grammatical structures deriving from verbs. Such a language, Bohm argued, is perfectly adapted to a reality of enfolding and unfolding matter and thought.
David Bohm had not known when he wrote of that concept that such a language is not just a physicist’s hypothesis. It actually exists. The language of the Algonquin peoples was developed by the ancestors specifically to deal with subtle matters of reality, society, thought, and spirituality.
A few months before his death, Bohm met with a number of Algonkian speakers and was struck by the perfect bridge between their language and worldview and his own exploratory philosophy. What to Bohm had been major breakthroughs in human thought — quantum theory, relativity, his implicate order and rheomode – were part of the everyday life and speech of the Blackfoot, Mic Maq, Cree and Ojibwaj.” – F. David Peat, ‘Blackfoot Physics’
BE THAT AS IT MAY, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE NOT ONLY DEVELOPED A DOUBLE ERROR BASED LANGUAGE FEATURING NOTIONAL NAMING-INSTANTIATED THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES WITH GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL SOURCING, AS A USEFUL TOOL FOR OVERCOMING THE “INEFFABILITY” OF REALITY AS THE WAVE-FIELD OR ‘FLOW’ THAT IS IN CONTINUAL FLUX AKA “TRANSFORMATION”, BUT WE HAVE ALSO, AND HERE IS WHERE THE PROBLEM LIES, EMPLOYED IT “NOT JUST” AS A TOOL OF INFERENTIAL REPRESENTATION OF THE FLOWNNG REALITY THAT LIES BEYOND CAPTURE BY THING-IN-ITSELF BASED LANGUAGES, BUT AS “SUBSTITUTE REALITY IN ITSELF”.
Hence ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ abstractly SPLITS OUT THE TOWNING IN THE LANDSCAPE, USES NAMING AND GRAMMAR TO RECAST IT AS A LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF WITH ITS OWN (NOTIONAL) POWERS OF SOURCING GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.
BUT THAT “DOUBLE ERROR” IS “NOT THE HALF OF IT!”
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS MAKE THE SAME “DOUBLE ERROR” WITH OUR REPRESENTATIONS OF “OUR SELF” SO THAT “HUMANINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”, ARE, WITH THE HELP OF THE “DOUBLE ERROR”, RE-CAST AS “LOCAL THINGS-IN-OURSELVES WITH OUR OWN (NOTIONAL) POWERS OF SOURCING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS”.
GOODBY EASTERNERS/ABORIGINALS, … HELLO WESTERN CONDERATION OF DUNCES.
There’s nothing wrong with the DOUBLE ERROR ploy as a CONSCIOUS PLOY to give a language based rendering, by way of reduction, of the INEFFABLE WAVE-FIELD aka TAO, … provided that we were to use it, knowingly, as a tool of INFERENCE of the fluid reality (TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM) that lies out of reach of DIRECT capture by language but which language can be used to INFER, for example, by constructing SUBSTITUTE REALITIES which are good for INFERENCE but which are not fit for DIRECT USE AS REALITY. Thus, “the TOWN IS GROWING” is inference that ‘the LANDSCAPE IS TRANSFORMING’ as if the TOWN was lie a bruise on an apple which WE MAY SAY “IS GROWING” even though the reality is that “THE APPLE IS UNDERGOING TRANSFORMATION”.
“THE TOWN IS GROWING” thus TAKES US INSIDE A SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein the TOWNING which is like the bruising on the TRANSFORMING apple, … is INSTEAD UNDERSTOOD AS A LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF SITTING ON ITS OWN IN A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS (an intellectual abstraction we call Euclidian space), with lots of unimpeded space (notionally) to allow the possibility of the abstraction of ITS OWN GROWTH AS IF IT WERE AN INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF).
SO MUCH FOR THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR, THE REALITY REMAINS “THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, but lets’ not throw the baby out with the dirty bathwater; i.e. this DOUBLE ERROR based representation IS NOT THE PROBLEM. THE PROBLEM IS THAT THIS TOOL IS GOOD FOR INFERRING THE INEFFABLE TRANSFORMATION THAT LIES BEYOND ITS GRASP, BUT IT IS VALUABLE AS A METAPHOR FOR THE REALITY IT CANNOT DIRECTLY EXPRESS.
“A MAN’S REACH CAN EXCEED HIS GRASP OR WHAT’S A META PHOR?’ McLuhan et al
If we can explicitly tie down the fact that the earth is the source of EXTRUSION and also the source of SUBDUCTION then in the case of a spherical dynamic, what is going on is not these TWO LOCAL THINGS (extrusion and subduction) as in BINARY LOGIC, but the ONE NONLOCAL DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION.
PROBLEM: NONLOCAL dynamics are INEFFABLE in binary logic based representation. We would need QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDED medium to express TRANSFORMATION in place of EXTRUSION AND SUBDUCTION.
Just because TRANSFORMATION IS INEFFABLE does not mean that IT IS NOT REAL. IT IS REAL, it is just INEFFABLE in DOUBLE ERROR based language and grammar where we reduce reality to the notion of LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with GRAMMAR-GIVEN powers of LOCALLY SOURCING actions and developments.
* * * That’s the basics; i.e. We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are ‘letting the tool run away with the workman’, the HUMAN with the DIVINE, as EMERSON put it. This implication of “letting the tool run away with the workman’ can also be phrased in terms of letting the LOCAL run away with the NONLOCAL which is what trading out the Wave-field base for the Material base is all about; i.e. the former is NONLOCAL while the latter is LOCAL. * * *
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION TIME!
What is this SCREW UP of using the SUBSTITE REALITY … NOT SIMPLY AS A TOOL OF INFERENCE, … BUT AS A REPLACEMENT REALITY, … DOING FOR (TO) US?
FOR STARTERS, WE ARE ABSCURING TRANSFORMATION (THE REAL NONLOCAL DYNAMIC) BY SUBSTITUTING “GROWTH” THE UNREAL LOCAL DYNAMIC, THROUGH THE REDUCTION OF THE REALITY OF OUR SENSORY EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (AKA THE WAVE-FIELD AKA THE TAO), … TO THE PSEUDO-REALITY FEATURING THE NOTIONAL “GROWTH” OF NOTIONAL “LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES” (instantiated by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).
EXAMPLE: “TOWNING” IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, thanks to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is something we use language to reduce to ‘THE TOWN” that is GROWING LARGER AND MORE POPULOUS AND PRODUCTIVE”. That is, we RE-PRESENT it as a local thing-in-itself with its own (notional) powers of action and development/production. SO ITS “GOODBYE” NONLOCAL TRANSFORMATION, HELLO LOCAL GROWTH and HELLO, ALSO, AN ABSTRACT EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE AS IS NEEDED TO COMPLEMENT OUR ABSTRACTION OF LIBERATING THE “TOWN” FORM THE “COUNTRY”, the TWO being ONE in their natural condition as a relational feature within the transforming relational LANDSCAPE.
* * *
HERE ARE SOME OF THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THE TRADE-OUT OF THE LOCAL GROWTH OF THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES FOR THE REALITY OF NONLOCAL TRANSFORMATION:
SUBOPTIMIZATION: Once we NAME something and impart to it the abstract status of a notionally INDEPENDENTLY EXISTING THING-IN-ITSELF, such as a COUNTRY, we are free to use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to REPRESENT the country as if it were a LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF with its own LOCAL POWERS OF SOURCING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT. To treat this as REL is DELUSIONAL and leads to SUBOPTIMIZATION (see systems scientist Martine Dodds Taljaard’s paper; ‘the NAME of the DEVIL is SUBOPTIMIZATION’.
The point is that this abstraction of INDEPENDENT BEING instantiated by way of NAMING and endowed with LOCAL SOURCING POWER by GRAMMAR (which, by the way, is the source of inflated EGO), is a DOUBLE ERROR which succeed in ABSTRACTLY breaking into the NONLOCAL DYNAMIC of the transforming relational continuum, establishing a LOCAL BEACHHEAD to notionally JUMPSTART the SOURCING of actions and development from so as to deliver EFFABILITY which is missing in the REAL WORLD PHENOMENON of the transforming relational continuum. This new, language and grammar constructed SUBSTITUTE REALITY serves us to the INTELLECT a pseudo-reality that we can now TALK ABOUT by getting it settled down in one place and making it still so we can use our VOYEUR GAZE to scrutinize “IT”. As heavenly VOYEURS we can say; ‘LOOK, THE TOWN IS GROWING LARGER AND BECOMING MORE POPULOUS AND PRODUCTIVE’.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR, BECAUSE YOU TWO HAVE REDUCED THE INEFFABLE BECAUSE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM) TO THE EFFABLE BECAUSE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT.
BUT, OF COURSE, THAT ONLY HAPPENS WITHING THE DOUBLE ERROR BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY.
QUESTION: “HEY! What happens if we forget and start thinking of the SUBSTITUTE REALITY as if it really were REALITY?
ANSWER: We get “WESTERN CULTURE”.
What other abstract crazy notions come with it?
As Systems scientists (e.g. Martine Dodds-Taljaard) have pointed out, the reality of our sensory experience is of inclusion in a relational continuum as acknowledged in the indigenous aboriginal expression “mitakuye oyasiin” everything is related. Meanwhile, the DOUBLE ERROR of language and grammar allows us to RE-PRESENT reality in terms of notional NAMING-instantiated things-in-themselves with GRAMMAR-given (notional) POWERS of LOCAL SOURCING of actions and developments. This gives rise to bloated EGO, not only in the case of NAMING instantiated “LOCAL” indivdiuals, but also in the case of NAMING instantiated “LOCAL” nations, corporations, organizations etc. and this EGO is characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.
-2- CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL SPLIT
As Erich Jantsch points out, and one can find this same interpretation in Nietzsche and Bohm, .. our sensory experience of reality is of inclusion in THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the Wave-field aka the Tao, … but our LANGUAGE is incapable of capturing this reality and it can only SUBSTITUTE a reduction of the continually transforming reality. Because WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS opted for a system of language based on the DOUBLE ERROR of splitting the flow up by NAMING relational forms and using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to make them out to be LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with their own GRAMMAR-GIVEN powers (notional powers) of SOURCING actions and developments, we deployed a system with innate ambiguity built into it.
This innate built in ambiguity emerges from the fact that the WAVE-FIELD has an ANDROGYNOUS ‘topology’ as can be seen in the sphere of the earth which is both the SOURCE of EXTRUSIVE PRODUCTION (male assertive aspect) and the RECIPIENT of INTRUSIVE SUBDUCTION (female accommodating aspect). We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have found it convenient to construct language based on the one-sided MALE concept of LOCAL SOURCING of actions and developments which goes hand-in-hand with EGO. Thus we speak proudly of the GROWTH of cultivated land (no mention of the diversity we have transformed into monoculture in the process) as if GROWTH were REAL, when it is clear that TRANSFORMATION is what is REALLY going on, … TRANSFORMING implicitly includes the LOSS of Wilderness that is conjugate to the GROWTH of cultivated land. The FEMALE opening up of the Wilderness to accommodate the MALE ASSERTIVE growth of the cultivated land is given short shrift in our WESTERN CULTURE DOUBLE ERROR based language system which celebrates the MALE ASSERTIVE GROWTH so much so that the conjugate SHRINKAGE of Wilderness DISAPPEARS FROM OUR COGNITIVE AWARENESS.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “GROWTH” IN THE REALITY OF OUR SENSORY EXPERIENCE, there is only TRANSFORMATION. The abstraction of “GROWTH” is a one-sided male cheap way (reductive approach) to INFER TRANSFORMATION by setting up a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is EFFABLE because LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in the MALE ASSERTIVE DYNAMIC. THIS DOES an END RUN around the INEFFABILITY of NONLOCAL TRANSFORMATION (the REAL REALITY).
But this SUBSTITUTE REALITY is ABSTRACTION that comes with a basic AMBIGUITY as to the MALE or FEMALE approach to representation. Does the HURRICANE source the stirring up of the ATMOSPHERE or does the ATMOSPHERE source the stirring up of the HURRICANE?
NOTA BENE: This ambiguity only comes into being because we can’t capture TRANSFORMATION in words (because it is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the nature of the Wave-field aka the Tao). SO we SUBSTITUTE abstraction that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT, but which comes at the price of infusing AMBIGUITY in the MALE or FEMALE sense; i.e. Does the HURRICANE source the stirring up of the ATMOSPHERE or does the ATMOSPHERE source the stirring up of the HURRICANE?
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS DIVIDE INTO OPPOSING CAMPS on the basis of this AMBIGUITY that is NOT REAL but which comes into play through our attempt to EFFABLE-IZE the INEFFABLE (the transforming relational continuum which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) by recasting it in a SUBSTITUTE REALITY populated by the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.
WHILE THE AMBIGUITY IS ARTIFICIAL, IT NEVERTHELESS DIVIDES US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS into polarized opposing camps; the one camp CONSERVATIVE opting for the pseudo-reality wherein the imputed LOCAL SOURCING is MALE-ASSERTING and the polar opposite camp LIBERAL opting for the pseudo-reality wherein the imputed LOCAL SOURCING is FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING.
So do we give preference to CONSERVATIVE or LIBERAL?
-3- INVERSION that puts intellectual abstraction over sensory experience
The CONSERVATIVE VIEW is ABSTRACT and RATIONALITY BASED as in the case of the story of ROBIN HOOD who is sensitive to IMBALANCE and is activated (throws himself bodily into the flow of restoring BALANCE). This is sensory experience driven from empathy with the empty tummies etc. However, the CONSERVATIVE understanding of reality is based on the abstract rule of law. There is a potential issue here since the LAW may be precipitated by the FEELINGS of the RICH who enjoy the IMBALANCE that they are the beneficiaries of, at the EXPENSE of others who may lack the power to reposition the BALANCE. IN other words, the conservative action comes from abstraction that over-rides sensory experience, leaving an exposure for the ‘system’ to become UNABALANCED in the extreme since the conservative approach is to put hard logic in precedence over sensory-experience informed intuition.
The LIBERAL VIEW is ABSTRACT although it is INFORMED by sensory experience emotions which detect IMBALANCE. It is ABSTRACT in the sense that it sees IMBALANCE in terms of the TWO-BODY (BINARY LOGIC BASED) problem, as formalized within WESTERN CULTURE NEWTONIAN THINKING which can only handle BINARY problems and solutions.
“An exact solution for three bodies, exceeds, if I am not mistaken, the force of any human mind”
– Isaac Newton
The problem of understanding the simultaneous relational motion of three or more bodies takes us out of the LOCAL and puts us into the NONLOCAL which is understood intuitively by our relationally attuning senses, but is INEFFABLE-because-NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT. We can use our intuition to ‘skate to where the puck is going to be’ without having to fallow a rational plan of action, but this intuitive mode is INEFFABLE since it is as if we are in a game of BUMPER CARS at the circus and the concept of our being RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR OWN ACTIONS as in the TWO-BODY case of BINARY LOGIC goes ‘out the window’.
The point is that simply moving from the CONSERVATIVE VIEW where we label ROBIN HOOD a PATHOGEN because his REBALANCING actions ‘break the rational thinking based rules’ to the LIBERAL VIEW where we support the REBALANCING does not address the limitations of TWO-BODY BINARY LOGIC, and it thus sets up an ANTAGONISM between CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL as might happen in one country which becomes disproportionately rich compared with ‘other countries’ (these notionally independent DOUBLE ERROR concepts). Thus the IMBALANCE is in general, a THREE+ body problem as associates with relational DISSONANCE and, where in BALANCE, RESONANCE.
To fight civil wars within a RICH COUNTRY is to try to resolve a TWO BODY PROBLEM as in BINARY LOGIC. The TWO BODY MODEL is ABSTRACTION and the associated BINARY LOGIC leads to SUB-OPTIMIZATION where balance is sought between TWO “LOCAL” FACTIONS where the reality is NONLOCAL and involving MANY FACTIONS.
Our INTUJTION informs us that we are included in a THREE-BODY+ reality which constitutes a NONLOCAL DYNAMIC wherein there is TRANSFORMATION but NO LOCAL SOURCING. The CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL factions, meanwhile, are locked into POLAR OPPOSITION by their belief in LOCAL SOURCING and their argument over whether LOCAL SOURCING is MALE-ASSERTIVE or whether LOCAL SOURCING is FEMALE-INDUCTIVE; i.e. is it the case that the HURRICANE is assertively sourcing the stirring up of the ATMOSPHERE or is it the case that the ATMOSPHERE is inductively sourcing the stirring up of the HURRICANE?
THERE IS NO SOLUTION TO THIS DICHOTOMY BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SOURCING AND IT IS THIS ABSTRACT NOTION OF LOCAL SOURCING THAT IS SETTING UP THIS AMBIGUITY SINCE THE REALITY, WHICH IS INEFFABLE BUT NEVERTHELESS REAL, IS TRANSFORMATION.
-4- TWO-BODY thinking replacing THREE+ body relations
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE FALLEN INTO THE TRAP OF CONFUSING OUR DOUBLE ERROR LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR BASED ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ FOR THE “REAL REALITY” OF OUR SENSORY EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. THIS IS A MISTAKE THAT IS SOURCING SOCIAL DYSFUNCTION IN MANY WAYS, INCLUDING THE CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL POLARIZATION.
We often intuitively, as a threesome, break up the two-body polarizations that begin to emerge by introducing a third option which induces relational TRANSFORMATION in the unfolding conceptualization. However, WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENCIES with, for example, two dominant and mutually opposing political parties may GET STUCK WITH LOCKING HORNS because of the lack of THREE BODY RESILIENCE.
The CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL split IS NOT BASED ON ANYTHING REAL. IT IS BASED ON THE ABSTRACT NOTION OF LOCAL SOURCING, SUSTAINED IN WESTERN CULTURE BY “EGO”, and as discussed, … once LOCAL SOURCING is invoked, because it is an innately ambiguous abstraction, it can POLARIZE people into TWO opposing camps; the CONSERVATIVE POLARIZATION where the belief in SOURCING is understood as having its ROOT SOURCE in the INDIVIDUAL and the LIBERAL POLARIZATION where the belief in SOURCING is understood as having its ROOT SOURCE in the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE.
BUT REALITY is TRANSFORMATION in which THERE IS NO LOCAL SOURCING.
UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY IN TERMS OF TRANSFORMATION is found in Modern Physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.
ONE CAN’T GET TO TRANSFORMATION by way of EITHER of the TWO FLAVOURS of LOCAL SOURCING; i.e. the CONSERVATIVE FLAVOUR wherein the HURRICANE sources the stirring up of the ATMOSPHERE (MALE ASSERTIVE ABSTRACTION) , or from the LIBERAL FLAVOUR wherein the ATMOSPHERE sources the stirring up of the HURRICANE (FEMALE, SEDUCTIVE ABSTRACTION).
Our WESTERN CULTURE language usage sets up a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which obscures the REAL REALITY of TRANSFORMATION, insofar as we lean on language to get to a conceptualization of REALITY. Our INTUITION coming directly from our SENSORY EXPERIENCE is not subject to the same sort of misinterpretations.
MEANWHILE, the WESTERN CULTURE EGO based on belief in LOCAL SOURCING keeps both CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL DISTRACTED BY THE ENDLESS ARGUMENT over whether the INDIVIDUAL is the ROOT SOURCE of actions and developments, or whether the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is the ROOT SOURCE of actions and developments. This crops up not only in handing out REWARDS and RECOGNITIONS for GOOD ACTIONS AND EVELOPMENTS but also in handing out PUNISHMENTS and VILIFICATIONS for BAD ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL SOURCING in MODERN PHYSICS nor in the indigenous aboriginal culture nor in Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedana because there is an acknowledgement that REALITY is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which means we can’t PIN THE BLAME on particular SOURCING AGENTS (there are no such thing), but we must instead move so as to subsume relational dissonance and cultivate relational resonance.
GOODBYE PATHOGENS, hello relational dissonance which may have such long roots that searching for a SOURCE is FUTILE and, as if in a game of bumper cars in the circus, the alternative to finding and correcting the perpetrators of pathology is to move so as to cultivate harmony and subsume dissonance without stopping everything to ascertain and remove the notional SOURCE as in the DOUBLE ERROR conceptualizing within a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is EFFABLE-because-LOCAL and EXPLICIT.
* * *