In the BUMPER CAR analogy of social interaction, the concept of a LOCAL AUTHOR vanishes since the origin of a collision can be mapped backwards into the NONLOCAL dynamics of a relational continuum.

BINARIZING the NON-BINARY reality of BUMPER-CAR dynamics by injecting the abstract concept of ‘the AUTHOR’.

If we IGNORE (for the moment if not permanently) the NONLOCALITY and AUTHORLESSNESS of BUMPER-CAR dynamic, … we can instead make the COLLISION the ‘STARTING POINT’ and then set out to ANALYZE the COLLISION in a BINARY LOGICAL sense of a SUBJECT and OBJECT interaction.  In this case we inject a simplified BINARY LOGIC based construction in terms of a LOCAL EVENT whose SOURCING can be conceived of as coming from EITHER of only TWO options; corresponding to a PERPETRATOR – VICTIM BIPOLAR event wherein it could be either the case that a BUMPER-CAR STOPPED WITHOUT WARNING, or a BUMPER-CAR FAILED TO STOP.  AMBIGUITY then arises as to designating a PERPETRATOR and VICTIM.  Generally speaking, in WESTERN CULTURE, the designation of PERPETRATOR will go to the BUMPER-CAR that FAILED TO STOP.

In EASTERN CULTURES, as in MODERN PHYSICS, our sensory experience of inclusion in a NONLOCAL dynamic which is RELATIONAL and AUTHORLESS is taken to be the BASE-CASE REALITY.  Therefore, no BINARY LOGIC based REDUCTION is made and the understanding of MITAKUYE OYASIN (all our relations) is embraced wherein reality is NONLOCAL and AUTHORLESS.

Nietzsche points out how this abstract concept of an AUTHOR of dynamics is a FALLACIOUS language and grammar based abstraction arising from TWO mutually supporting ERRORS..

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

In the BUMPER-CAR dynamic which is innately NONLOCAL, the DOUBLE ERROR based structure of language which brings together NAMING and GRAMMAR to FABRICATE the notion of LOCAL SOURCING of actions and development, or in other words the “AUTHORING” of actions and developments, … the door is opened for the constructing of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based notional NAMING-instantiated  LOCAL THINGS-in-THEMSELVES with notional GRAMMAR-instantiated POWERS of AUTHORING actions and developments.  This allows the language stimulating of the INTELLECTUAL CONSTRUCTION OF A SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on SUBJECT-OBJECT SPLITTING which, when OUTFITTED with GRAMMAR-given AUTHORING POWERS.

The abstract concept of ‘the AUTHOR’ allows us to use language to SIMULATE a ‘BREAKING INTO’ the transforming relational continuum (the Wave-field aka the Tao) by REDUCING TRANSFORMATION to LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.

AMBIGUITY arises therein in the BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR sense of; ‘”EITHER” the HURRICANE AUTHORS the stirring up of the ATMOSPHERE, .. “OR” the ATMOSPHERE AUTHORS the stirring up of the HURRICANE”.  The former option is MALE ASSERTIVE, and the latter option is FEMALE-INDUCTIVE.

NOTA BENE!  This AMBIGUITY only arises when we IMPOSE a BINARY LOGICAL REDUCTION featuring LOCAL AUTHORING on inherently RELATIONAL natural phenomena wherein dynamics are NONLOCAL and AUTHORLESS, hence the title of this note; REALITY IS NONLOCAL AND AUTHORLESS

As individuals inside the purely relative, NONLOCAL and AUTHORLESS BUMPER-CAR dynamic at the circus, while we lack the power of LOCALLY SOURCING (AUTHORING) OUR OWN ACTION, since our action can only be relative to the TRANSFORMING WEB OF RELATIONAL DYNAMICS we are situationally included in, WE DO HAVE THE POWER to RELATIVELY slow, speed up, veer this way of that way, and PUT OUR ACTIONS IN THE SERVICE OF CULTIVATING AND SUSTAINING HARMONY (relational RESONANCE) in the unfolding relational dynamics we are included in.  We could also CULTIVATE DISSONANCE, but the CULTIVATING of RESONANCE or DISSONANCE involves using our intelligence to TRANSFORM what the dynamics that we are situationally included in.  This is not the same as AUTHORING our own actions, AS IF WE HAD A BLANK SLATE TO BEING FROM.

Wouldn’t OUR EGO like it if we DID have a BLANK SLATE to WORK FROM.  Then we could claim to be AUTHORS of OUR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

In the SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the BLANK SLATE of EUCLIDIAN SPACE, we DO HAVE THE POWER OF AUTHORING, however, we only have such power in the SUBSTITUTE REALITY we construct with the DOUBLE ERROR of language and grammar; i.e. to repeat Nietzsche’s observation, we FABRICATE AUTHORSHIP;

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

CONCLUSION:

REALITY IS NONLOCAL AND AUTHORLESS

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of constructing a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.  We CONSTRUCT this INTELLECTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR

The reality of our sensory experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum is a reality that is NONLOCAL and AUTHORLESS (i.e. there is no LOCAL AUTHORSHIP).

But in our WESTERN CULTURE language based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to construct ABSTRACTION featuring LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.  In the ongoing game of BUMPER-CARS, we use the DOUBLE ERROR to (a) SNAPSHOT THE ACTION, and (b) USE NAMING to BUTT INTO the NONLOCAL RELATIONAL DYNAMIC and identify a PERPETRATOR and RECIPIENT so as to RECONSTITUTE a COLLISION … “AS IF IN ITS OWN INDEPENDENT RIGHT”.  In other words to impose LOCALITY over top of its inherent NONLOCALITY it LOCAL and conflate this ERROR with GRAMMAR to impose the notion of a LOCAL AUTHOR as the second part of breaking out A PIECE of the transforming relational continuum.

Now  WE CAN SPEAK IN TERMS OF CAR 17 smashing into CAR 51 WITHOUT MENTION OF THE NONLOCAL NATURE OF THE BUMPER CAR DYNAMIC.

NOTA BENE:!  LANGUAGE enables the following: —CHANGE AS IN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM IS NOW “DROPPED” due to its INEFFABIE-because-NONLOCAL-and-IMPLICIT nature (relational bootstrapping has to be used to imply transformation), … and AUTHORING IS BORN, CREATED BY THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.    The abstract concept of AUTHORING affords a means of constructing SUBSTITUTE REALITIES, the language-based conveying of which is NO LONGER TROUBLED by the AUTHORLESSNESS of relational transformation as in BUMPER-CAR LIKE DYNAMICS where LOCAL AND CONCISE CAPTURE is BLOCKED by the innate NONLOCALITY of the BUMPER-CAR DYNAMIC.

AUTHORING is the ANTIDOTE to overcome the INEFFABLE nature of TRANSFORMATION wherein dynamics are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  The INJECTION of LOCAL AUTHORING with the ABSTRACTING POWER of language via its DOUBLE ERROR capability of pairing up NAMING and GRAMMAR to fabricate a notional LOCAL AUTHOR conceptualization, that opens the way to a SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTION that is EXPLICIT and LOCAL.

Note also, that the EAST’s approach of overcoming the INEFFABLE-because-NONLOCAL-and-IMPLICIT nature of the reality dynamic of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, … TAKES A DIFFERENT PATH ENTIRELY which bypasses LOCAL AUTHORING and uses a SHARING CIRCLE to BOOTSTRAP an impression of  the AUTHORLESS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and makes use MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES, which, while they are articulated using LOCAL AUTHORING are used only to HARVEST the NONLOCAL relational dynamics which they IMPLY.

 

BOOTSTRAPPING: This approach, necessary when trying to REPRESENT a fluid reality starting from a base of words with frozen/persisting meaning, is called (by philosophers of modern physics such as Geoffrey Chew and John Wheeler) BOOTSTRAPPING (aka the Wittgenstein ladder approach) where, in spite of being forced to use a base of words with fixed meaning to try to get to something intrinsically fluid (the Wave-field), one can deploy such words in a manner so as to suggest a purely relational (fluid) dynamc;

Geoffrey Chew]: “when you formulate a question, you have to have some basic concepts that you are accepting in order to formulate the question. But in the bootstrap approach, where the whole system represents a network of relationships without any firm foundation, the description of our subject can be begun at a great variety of different places. There isn’t any clear starting point. And the way our theory has developed in the last few years, we quite typically don’t know what questions to ask. We use consistency as the guide, and each increase in the consistency suggests something that is incomplete, but it rarely takes the form of a well-defined question. We are going beyond the whole question­and­answer framework.”

 

TO CONCLUDE THIS CONCLUSION to the note REALITY IS NONLOCAL AND AUTHORLESS

The main TAKE-AWAY is that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN “AUTHOR” of action or development.  That is the NATURE of our sensory experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the Wave-field aka the Tao.  What we can capture and share in language is a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which IS based on LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments and we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to CONSTRUCT such SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  The DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR serves up ABSTRACTION which in which TRANSFORMATION is SPLIT into a MALE-ASSERTIVE and FEMALE-INDUCTIVE pseudo-realities as depict MALE ASSERTIVE EXTRUSIONS of the SPHERING dynamic along with FEMALE-INDUCTIVE SUBDUCTIONS of the SPHERING dynamic.

Language thus affords us a means of talking about SPHERICAL TRANSFORMATION featuring the COINCIDENTIA OPPOSITORUM of EXTRUSION (male assertive) and SUBDUCTION (female inductive).  While language is limited in its reality capture capability to either the MALE or FEMALE conjugates, our INTUITION is capable of being stimulated so as to make the leap to understanding TRANSFORMATION.  For example, we can imagine a sphere covered with little volcanoes spewing out extrusions and also covered with little sinkholes where crustal material is simultaneously being subducted.

SINCE the FIELD-DYNAMIC is the greater reality or MOTHER dynamic within which we are conceiving of this CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM of Male extrusion and Female subduction, we can understand what is going on here as a FIGURE-and-GROUND-AS-ONE dynamic, is the basic topology in Modern physics.  In other words, TRANSFORMATION is the dynamic of the FIELD and it is NONLOCAL and INEFFABLE so we don’t (can’t) talk about it (the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao). While we can talk about the MALE ASSERTIVE dynamic of extrusion and the FEMALE INDUCTIVE dynamic of subduction, these address the FIGURE and GROUND as TWO separate entities although the primary reality is TRANSFORMATION which is INEFFABLE-because-NONLOCAL-and IMPLICIT.  We can speak of reality in the reduced terms of the MALE ASSERTIVE EXTRUSION and the FEMALE INDUCTIVE SUBDUCTION because these are VISUALLY PERCEIVABLE LOCAL phenomena which meanwhile portend the NON-VISUALLY PERCEIVABLE NONLOCAL-IMPLICIT real phenomena.

WHILE THE REALITY is TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and thus NOT AVAILABLE TO LOCAL VISUAL SENSING, we INTUIT that NONLOCAL TRANSFORMATION is IMPLIED by the CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM of EXTRUSION and SUBDUCTION.

ALTHOUGH OUR VISION AND LANGUAGE CANNOT CAPTURE THE ALL-INCLUDING NONLOCAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC, our INTUITION informs us that SPHERING is something belonging to the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC … AND IS NOT “A SPHERE-THING-IN-ITSELF” notionally gifted with ITS OWN POWERS OF AUTHORSHIP.

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: – Nietzsche

Because we are constructing SUBSTITUTE REALITIES based on LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, we chop out of BUMPER-CAR DYNAMICS a notional BIPOLAR COLLISION DYNAMIC whereby we can impose the abstract notion of LOCAL AUTHORING by invoking the BINARY LOGICAL notion of SUBJECT and OBJECT SPLITTING (SOURCE and RECEIVER, PERPETRATOR and VICTIM).

THIS SUBJECT AND OBJECT SPLITTING IS EXPEDIENT ABSTRACTION to let us SEEMINGLY (within our language and grammar based constructions of SUBSTITUTE REALITY) BREAK IN to the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

GREAT!  NOW WE CAN SHARE VISUAL EFFIGY BASED REPRESENTATIONS of our respective experiences.  These REPRESENTATIONS are AMBIGUOUS SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS wherein HURRICANES source the stirring up of the ATMOSPHERE or where the ATMOSPHERE sources the stirring up of HURRICANES that are only good for use as TOOLS OF INFERENCE to awaken our INTUITION to the reality of TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and INEFFABLE, which language is only good for INFERRING.

Our WESTERN CULTURE ERROR is to let this TOOL run away with the workman, the HUMAN (LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORING) with the DIVINE (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION).

* * *