Aboriginal Physics Newsletter

This NOTE entitled ‘LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME’ is a TITLE inspired by James Loewen’s ‘LIES MY TEACHER TOLD ME’, and also by Howard Zinn’s ‘A People’s History of the United States’, and then again by Charles C. Mann’s “1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus.  In all cases, there is the sense that the development of POPULAR historical impressions of REALITY  are impacted NOT ONLY by writers’ and speakers’ perspectives and particular experiences, but by THE LANGUAGE THEY ARE USING FOR SUCH “CONCEPTUALIZING”.  Here I use CONCEPTUALIZING to underscore the IMPOSSIBILITY of REPRESENTING  a FRAGMENT OF HISTORY OR a FRAGMENT of ANYTHING extracted from the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

For example, we may LOOSELY speak of a REPRESENTATION of the BIRTH of a VOLCANIC ISLAND where we show pictures of ‘the VOLCANIC ISLAND at various stages of “ITS DEVELOPMENT”, however, here we are using the SIMPLIFYING CAPABILITIES of LANGUGE and our sense-experience is affirming that what is going on is an overall TRANSFORMATION which INCLUDES “ISLANDING”, where there is no PHYSICAL FRAGMENTING of the ISLAND from the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM as would justify our use of LANGUAGE wherein we impute GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT “TO THE ISLAND”, a CONCEPTUALIZING only made possible by our IMAGINATIVE INVENTING OF THE ABSTRACTION of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, which is IMPLIED by the LANGUAGE based concepts of GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT.  This is NOT a “REPRESENTATION” of the physical reality, the physical reality is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which INCLUDES the “VOLCANIC ISLANDING” as a relational dynamic within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE REALITY.

WHEN WE USE LANGUAGE TO “CHOP OUT” A FRAGMENT such as ‘the VOLCANIC ISLAND’ and USE LANGUAGE TO SPEAK OF ‘ITS GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT’, this is NOT the REPRESENTATION of some REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE PHENOMENON, this FRAGMENTATION is an ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZING AND NOT A “REPRESENTATION”.  That is, what our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMS is that THERE IS ISLANDING in the PLANETING wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as is the nature of MATERIAL CONDENSINGS in the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

Because we are INCLUDED in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, WE CANNOT ‘GET OUTSIDE OF IT’ TO DEVELOP A ‘REPRESENTATION OF IT”.  IT IS ‘NON-REPRESENTATABLE’, i.e. ‘The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’ — Lao Tzu.

HERE we can see HOW IT IS that the language architectures of indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, because they give the foundational role to FLOW rather than BEING, … AVOID FRAGMENTATION, as for example, by saying ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ instead of, as with WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, giving the foundational role to BEING rather than FLOW and saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services. 

GIVING the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO ‘BEING’ CONCEPTUALIZES ‘the TOWN’ as a ‘LOCAL AUTHOR’ of actions and developments, by way of, as Nietzsche calls it, ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’).  In SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY as affirmed in Modern Physics, THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS as ‘THINGS THAT GROW’ such as ‘TOWNS’ or ‘HUMANS for that matter, since everything is in flux so that there is ‘TOWNING’ and ‘HUMANING’ within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (aka ‘the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM’ aka ‘the WAVE-FIELD’). 

HERE we can see HOW IT IS that the language architectures of indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, because they give the foundational role to FLOW rather than to BEING, … AVOID FRAGMENTATION, as for example, by saying ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE instead of, as with WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, giving the foundational role to BEING by saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’, which CLEARLY CONCEPTUALIZES ‘THE TOWN’ as a ‘LOCAL AUTHOR’ of actions and developments. 

The “LOCAL AUTHOR” CONCEPT is ABSTRACTION created by ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ (i.e. the TOWN is GROWING’).  By CONTRAST, in SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY as affirmed by MODERN PHYSICS, there are NO SUCH THINGS as ‘THINGS THAT GROW’ such as ‘TOWNS’, or ‘HUMANS’ for that matter, since EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX (as condensations in the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD) so that there is ‘TOWNING’ and ‘HUMANING’ within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

To use LANGUAGE that tells tales of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with GRAMMAR given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments … IS A LIE!  It is the LIE of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ . This EGO-BOLSTERED LIE of LOCAL AUTHORING is the source of FRAGMENTATION in both WESTERN CULTURE “PSYCHICAL” and “PHYSICAL” DYNAMICS.

* * * 

The AIM of this NOTE entitled “LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME”  is as much concerned with the ARCHITECTURE of LANGUAGE based LYING  as with the CONTENT of the LIES and in particular, the WESTERN CULTURE CHOICE OF SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC in preference to LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC as is the choice of MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA

What is CLEAR is that LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS CAN BE MORE OR LESS FAITHFUL TO SENSE-EXPERIENCE IMPRESSIONS in spite of the fact that LANGUAGE can never CAPTURE SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY; i.e. as Lao Tzu observes, ‘The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’.

So, in some sense, ALL LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING is ‘LYING’ based, but this NOTE addresses how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of using BINARY LOGIC as a means of assessing WHAT IS TRUE versus WHAT IS FALSE and this COMPLICATES matters because SPEAKING THE TRUTH is not the same as REVEALING REALITY, and if I say, ‘the TOWN is GROWING, LOGICALLY, THIS MAY BE CORRECT but the REALITY lies beyond the LOGICAL TRUTH since, in this case, for example, there is at the same time the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS which is CONJUGATE to the GROWTH of the TOWN, and so while my LOGICAL PROPOSITION WAS TRUE or CORRECT, IT WAS AT THE SAME TIME “INCOMPLETE” since I made NO MENTION of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS and thus the overall TRANSFORMATION which is available to our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  This Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite logical propositions points to JUST ONE of the FOUR ‘LIES’ I am discussing in this note, the word ‘LIE’ pivoting from our WESTERN CULTURE use of the BINARY LOGIC based terms of TRUTH and LIES (aka FALSEHOOD).

While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS speak of TRUTH and FALSEHOOD as if they had ROCK SOLID MEANING, that is itself a FALSEHOOD, and having said that, I have stepped knee deep into the ambiguity that comes into play in regard to BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING which inspired Goedel’s research and his ‘Goedel’s Theorem’ of the incompleteness of all finite logical propositions. This “incompleteness” of all finite logical propositions casts a shadow over TRUTH in general;

“What then is truth? A mobile army of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphisms — in short, a sum of human relations, which have been enhanced, transposed, and embellished poetically and rhetorically, and which after long use seem firm, canonical, and obligatory to a people: truths are illusions about which one has forgotten that is what they are; metaphors which are worn out and without sensuous power; coins which have lost their pictures and now matter only as metal, no longer as coins.

 We still do not know where the urge for truth comes from; for as yet we have heard only of the obligation imposed by society that it should exist: to be truthful means using the customary metaphors – in moral terms, the obligation to lie according to fixed convention, to lie herd-like in a style obligatory for all…” – Nietzsche  (On truth and lie in an extra-moral sense’)

In this NOTE, may aim is NOT SIMPLY to point to LIES but to point to LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME and to point out how these LIES lead to CONFUSION and PSYCHOSIS in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, as has been explored by Nietzsche and Bohm, putting the findings in this LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME format so as to SPELL OUT the DAMAGE DONE

and HOW TO AVOID THE PITFALLS,  since there are overall PATTERNS here, in particular the pattern of how we are infusing BINARY LOGIC into our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THOUGHT is such a manner as to FRAGMENT, not simply our WORLDVIEW but our basic THINKING APPARATUS, leading, as Bohm observes, to a WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED EXPOSURE TO PARANOIA and SCHIZOPHRENIA AND OTHER FORMS OF LANGUAGE-INFUSED FRAGMENTATION .  WHILE THE SOURCE OF THIS DYSFUNCTION IS THE “LIES” WE HAVE BUILT INTO OUR WESTERM CULTURE LANGUAGE” ARCHITECTURE, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE NOT YET, AS A SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, ‘TUNED IN TO” OUR LYING WAYS, AND THAT AWARENESS CAN ONLY COME WHEN (“AND IF”) WE SHIFT FROM BINARY LOGIC (e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING”) TO QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE (e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”)  WHEREUPON the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE WILL BE RESTORED AS WILL THE FULL ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD THOUGHT and LANGUAGE CAPABILITY. 

* * * 

What is presented is a series of EXAMPLES OF FOUR TYPES OF LIES AND HOW THESE LIES DO DAMAGE IN WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING” ;

LIE # 1.   “Kepler points out that in order to simplify our language based CONCEPTUALIZING of “REALITY”, we instead simplify (LIE ABOUT) the phenomena we are conceptualizing.” 

As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’

DAMAGE DONE:  Because it is EASIER to speak in the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms of, for example, CULTIVATING and DEVELOPING LAND without mentioning the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING LOSS OF WILDERNESS DIVERSITY, there is no MENTION, VALUE ASSESSMENT or OVERT CONSIDERATION of what is ACTUALLY GOING ON which is TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE.  This OBSCURANTISM conceals the LOSS of DIVERSITY and SUSTAINABILITY  

 * * * 

LIE # 2.   “Nietzsche points out that the COMMON DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR creates the LIE of FALSELY implying LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development”.

“Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”; – but this conclusion is already mythology:  it separates that which effects from the effecting.  If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.” – To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” — Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

DAMAGE DONE:  Because it is SIMPLER FROM A LANGUAGE MESSAGING POINT OF VIEW, to FRAGMENT THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING DYNAMIC WE SHARE INCLUSION IN, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ the LINGUISTIC SHORTCUT where we use the COMBINATION of NAMING and GRAMMAR TO IMPUTE LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, and avoid the difficulty of capturing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) dynamic of the all-including TRANSFORMATION (WAVE-FIELD) that we and all things are included in.  That is, we employ, instead, a VOYEUR view that we intellectually/linguistically reduce to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT where we are NO LONGER discussing our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  Our PLANS and ACTIONS, while our language based discourse has us reduce them to the BINARY LOGIC terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, are, IN REALITY, of a QUANTUM LOGIC NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (TRANSFORMATIVE) NATURE.  Because we are INTELLECTUALLY employing BINARY LOGIC and orienting to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT while we are in SENSE-EXPERIENCE, included in a QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, our linguistic reporting on ‘what is going on’ (which is in the BINARY LOGIC terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT) is AT ADDS WITH our QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

IN SHORT, THE MOMENT WE INTRODUCE the linguistic fragmentation of BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL AUTHORING by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we DROP OUT QUANTUM LOGIC based NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING.  The LIE of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ is particular to WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing.

* * *

LIE # 3.  “Goedel’s Theorem EXPOSES THE LIE that while “finite systems of logical propositions” are presented as if they are TRUE, “all finite systems of logical propositions are INCOMPLETE”; e.g. While it is “TRUE” that “the Avalanche crashed down the Mountain into the Valley, it is “INCOMPLETE” since, as our sense-experience informs us, it is NO LONGER THE SAME MOUNTAIN and NO LONGER THE SAME VALLEY (while the simple BINARY LOGIC based rhetoric in the one-sided MALE ASSERTING terms of the AVALANCHE and its actions is TRUE, it is “INCOMPLETE” and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED “REALITY” is informing us of our inclusion in an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION. 

So, for example. while it may be proven true that the TOWN is GROWING, this logical proposition is INCOMPLETE since it fails to mention that there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS which takes us BEYOND BINARY LOGIC (the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM) to QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  The BINARY LOGIC based concept of the TOWN GROWING implies … ‘within an absolute empty and infinite containing space’, … while the QUANTUM LOGIC based concept of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE implies that the TOWNING is INCLUDED within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and thus lacks the INDEPENDENT STATUS necessary for ‘its own GROWTH’.   Here we see how BINARY LOGIC, in referring to GROWTH, implies an INCOMPLETENESS relative to sense-experience reality wherein there is NO GROWTH in its own BINARY LOGIC ‘right’, there instead being a QUANTUM LOGIC CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the including WILDERNESS (rather than the BINARY LOGIC supporting ‘EMPTY SPACE’), where the OPENING UP (SHRINKING) of the WILDERNESS plays a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING role in CONJUGATE RELATION with the GROWING of the TOWN.

We might therefore say that the INCOMPLETENESS of BINARY LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO contrasts with the  COMPLETENESS of QUANTUM LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND are ONE.

DAMAGE DONE:  Our WESTERN CULTURE FAILURE to acknowledge THAT “THAT WHICH IS LOGICALLY TRUE” is …. “NOT (sense-experience) REAL”, …  is the source of much damaging and confusing action.  While it is LOGICALLY TRUE to reckon that the DOUBLING of our CULTIVATED LAND AREA will produce DOUBLE THE VOLUMES of GRAIN, FRUIT and other “PRODUCE”, this LOGICAL TRUTH FAILS TO CAPTURE THE SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY OF THE CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS DIVERSITY which plays an ESSENTIAL ROLE in the SUSTAINING of general health and fertility of the OVERALL LANDSCAPE which INCLUDES the CULTIVATED CROPLAND.  Thus the TRUTH of the GROWTH OF PRODUCTION is an INCOMPLETE TRUTH as is the case for ALL LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS as proven in Goedel’s Theorem.  This WESTERN CULTURE IGNORING OF THE RADICAL DIFFERENCE between ‘LOGICAL TRUTH’ and ‘SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY’ is the source of much LINGUISTIC MISREPRESENTATION which plays out in MISGUIDED BEHAVIOURS that deliver UNINTENDED RESULTS.  

LIE # 4.   “David Bohm points out how we are using LANGUAGE to FALSIFY our CONCEPTUALIZING of “REALITY”, creating UNTRUE FRAGMENTED INTELLECTUAL PSEUDO-REALITIES that we are using as our OPERATIVE REALITY.”

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

DAMAGE DONE:

The DAMAGE summarized here by Bohm is coming from FRAGMENTATION that is the SPECIALITY of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITURE, as described in LIE #1 (the DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, … LIE #2, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that FALSELY IMPUTES LOCAL AUTHORING, and LIE #3, the GOEDEL’S THEOREM RELATED LIE where we CONFUSE LOGICAL TRUTH (which is ALWAYS INCOMPLETE) for REALITY as in the example ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ which is TRUE but INCOMPLETE and OBSCURANTIST (it is A LIE) in that it FAILS to acknowledge the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS the LOSS of the important LIFE and HEALTH SUPPORTING DIVERSITY.

FRAGMENTATION, LIE #4, IS THE RESULT OF THINKING DISTORTED by LIE #1, LIE #2 and LIE #3 that CO-CONTRIBUTE to FRAGMENTATION. That is, …. LIE #1; the DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, LEAVING MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING TO SERVE UP REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS ‘ON ITS OWN’, … LIE #2 the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that FALSELY IMPUTES ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING based LOCAL AUTHORING, … and LIE #3, the GOEDEL’S THEOREM RELATED LIE where we IGNORE THE INCOMPLETENESS OF LOCAL PROPOSITIONS AND THUS, FOR EXAMPLE DECIDE that the LOGICAL PROPOSITION ‘PRODUCTION IS GROWING’ is a “GOOD THING”, without considering the INCOMPLETENESS of this logical proposition “PRODUCTION IS GROWING” SINCE IT FAILS TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.  LIES #1, #2, and #3 ALL SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION of a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY PSEUDO-REALITY which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, leading to a simplified PSEUDO-REALITY based one-sidedly on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.   

THAT IS, … THESE THREE LIES #1, #2 and #3 SUPPORT LIE #4 which is FRAGMENTATION which is the overall distinguishing characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE (i.e. the FRAGMENTING by way of ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE and by way of CATEGORIZATION (LGBTQ, BLACK, WHITE) etc wherein we put DIFFERENTIATION BASED CONCEPTUALIZING into PRIMACY over INTEGRATION BASED CONCEPTUALIZING, in CONTRADICTION to MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta wherein the understanding of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is that ALL THINGS ARE RELATED by way of material forms being CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

“FRAGMENTATION” is THE CULMINATION of BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING wherein we REDUCE QUANTUM LOGIC NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION to BINARY LOGIC LOCAL and EXPLICIT BEING-based FRAGMENTATION.  THIS LIE OF A FRAGMENTED REALITY BASED ON BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS IN TERMS OF LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE IS A HUGE LIE THAT IS THE SUPPORTING CENTRE-PIECE OF WESTERN “REALITY”, the LINGUISTIC PSEUDO-REALITY that IS SUPPORTED AND SUSTAINED THROUGH OUR CONTINUING USE OF IT..

* * * SUMMARY: …. The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD Me * * * 

These FOUR LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME all have a BINARY LOGIC based, strongly distorting influence on my PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC conceptualizing of REALITY that is the source of, as Bohm has said, a FRAGMENTED VIEW (UNDERSTANDING) of REALITY.

BECAUSE WE HAVE BUILT THIS FRAGMENTATION INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, WE “KEEP REPEATING IT TO OURSELVES, OVER AND OVER AGAIN THROUGH OUR CONTINUING USE OF OUR “LIE-INFUSED” LANGUAGE.

There is a kind of CATCH-22 ENTRAPMENT here in that the NEEDED FIX to resolve the LIES could be compared to changing the wheels on one’s car while one is speeding down the road in it.

Meanwhile, the FOUR LIES cited above continue to appear in BINARY LOGIC based USAGE such as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, SHUTTING OUT ACCESS to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC alternative ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’. 

Like the Cuckoo that lays is eggs in another LESS SIMPLE bird’s nest, when the SIMPLE CUCKOOS HATCH OUT  in the nest, and  they do so prior to the natural offspring in the nest, they PROMPTLY PUSH THE INCUMBENT’S EGGS OUT OF THE NEST so that the full resources of the non-Cuckoo parents are devoted to the nurturing of the fledgling freeloader Cuckoos.

AS  with this relation between the SIMPLE and LESS SIMPLE, so it is with LIES, and because LIES are often SIMPLER than the TRUTH, they can easily DISPLACE the TRUTH; i.e.  ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ can easily DISPLACE ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ since the former’s BINARY LOGIC (LOCAL, EXPLICIT) STRUCTURE is SIMPLER than the latter’s QUANTUM LOGIC (NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT) relational structure.

Note that the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC option has a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING-ONLY LOGIC STRUCTURE while the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC option has an ANDROGYNOUS, TWO-SIDED FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING — MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE; i.e. a QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE..

* * * 

‘The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD Me’  have not only been TOLD TO ME, but I have been inadvertently PASSING THEM ON TO OTHERS.

It is EVIDENTLY A MAJOR CHALLENGE to LIVE, within the WESTERN CULTURE SYSTEM, ON THE BASIS OF NO LONGER ADHERING to THE LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME.   I would compare this to the MAHAVIT – ATMAVIT challenge of ADVAITA VEDANTA discussed by Erwin Schroedinger, whose orientation to the WORLD ACCORDING to MODERN PHYSICS (wherein everything is related and everything has the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE) is difficult to overtly comply with in one’s manner of behaving as would be the way of the ATMAVIT, but where it is possible, to at least intellectually understand and ‘partly follow’, while sustaining relatively good relations within the WESTERN CULTURE social collective, trying at the same time to encourage a shift from the BINARY LOGIC INTELLECTUALLY ABSTRACT WESTERN WORLD to QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONFORMANCY.

For example, while there are pressures within WESTERN CULTURE to commit to the BINARY LOGIC genre of support for the UKRAINE in its CONFLICT WITH RUSSIA when one’s QUANTUM LOGIC understanding is in terms of conflict as IMBALANCE where the remedy is RESTORING BALANCE, rather than in the BINARY LOGIC terms of “RIGHT” against “WRONG” or “GOOD” against “EVIL”.  While the BINARY LOGIC mission is to SURMOUNT and OVERCOME if not DESTROY/ELIMINATE the forces of EVIL, the QUANTUM LOGIC mission is to RESOLVE the RELATIONAL DISSONANCE and RESTORE RELATIONAL RESONANCE.

The combination of ‘INDEPENDENT TRIBAL IDENTITY’ in the sense of INDEPENDENT BEING without the MITAKUYE OYASIN (all things are related) ethic of indigenous aboriginal cultures and Modern physics, leads to knee-jerk fallback to PURIFICATIONISM where the challenge is understood in terms of WE, THE GOOD or SUPRIOR PEOPLE are overcoming THEY, THE BAD or INFERIOR PEOPLE, rather than resolving relational dissonance within one all-including relational collective.  The indigenous aboriginal ‘eating the heart’ of a courageous enemy warrior taken down in battle signals an understanding of life as a relational web or matrix rather than a hierarchy

(The WESTERN CULTURE “great chain of being” is a hierarchical structure of all matter and life, thought by medieval Christianity to have been decreed by God. The chain begins with God and descends through angels, humans, animals and plants to minerals.)

In the Modern Era, the BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT BEING or the INDEPENDENT TRIBE has been BOLSTERED by the MODERN TREND to ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE’ which now DIVIDE the people of the world which CONTRASTS with the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding that ALL THINGS ARE RELATED.   The understanding of Modern physics, meanwhile, is that ALL THINGS ARE, in a PHYSICAL REALITY SENSE, CONDENSATIONS of and within the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

This QUANTUM LOGIC understanding continues to be TOP-SIDED AND OBSCURED by the BINARY LOGIC based INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION of self-declared ‘INDEPENDENT NATIONS’ (195 of them), such intellectual abstraction being put into an unnatural primacy over the sense-experience of all things being related (mitakuye oyasin).  The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD me include this LIE of the INDEPENDENCE OF NATIONS on the basis of LANGUAGE based INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION pivoting from ‘DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE”  which is ENTIRELY “WITHOUT SUPPORT” from SENSE-EXPERIENCE, and which leads to the further LIE of SUBOPTIMIZATION of a notional INDEPENDENT NATION that DOES NOT, in sense-experience reality, EXIST

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME …. ARE LIES WE CONTINUE TO TELL,  and these lies CONTINUE TO FORM THE BASIS OF THE PERSISTING UNREAL PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC  PSEUDO-REALITY of the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, promoted through BINARY LOGIC infused LANGUAGE and GRAMMAR.  This BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE CONTINUES to be the WESTERN CULTURE POPULAR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE CHOICE and it is NOW “LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”, NAMELY THE WESTERN CULTURE “EGO” DERIVING BACKING OF THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR BASED “LOCAL AUTHORING” ABSTRACTION.

 * * * 

CONDENSATIONS IN AN ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM (QUANTUM LOGIC) CONSTITUTE THINGLESS TRANSFORMATION.

MATERIAL OBJECTS IN EMPTY SPACE (BINARY LOGIC) MANIFEST AS THING-BASED MOVEMENT AND INTERACTION

“LINGUISTIC NAMING AND GRAMMAR” IS THE DIFFERENTIATOR THAT REDUCES TRANSFORMATION TO MATERIAL MOTION.

EASTERN QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY AND WESTERN BINARY LOGIC REALITY ARE THE TWAIN THAT NEVER MEETS

PREFACE: Having ‘grown up’ in a WESTERN CULTURE family and environment, I was taught the REALITY-SHAPING language that is standard in WESTERN CULTURE which is BINARY LOGIC based where EVERYTHING IS INDEPENDENT as if material forms were LOCAL, EXPLICIT objects in an empty containing space, while my indigenous aboriginal brothers and sisters were being taught the REALITY-SHAPING language that is standard for them, which is QUANTUM LOGIC based, wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED in the manner of CONDENSATIONS within an all-including FLOWING (energy-charged PLENUM).  Anthropologist Mircea Eliade explores the respectively differing CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY in his book dedicated to this ONE REALITY-SHAPING LANGUAGE CHOICE; i.e. ‘Mephistopheles et l’Androgyne’, the English Title being ‘the TWO and the ONE’.

Having spent time studying, and contemplating these TWO LANGUAGE-BASED REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING OPTIONS which inform our understanding of REALITY by the STEALTH of packaging ONE OR THE OTHER of the BINARY LOGIC or QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES into the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE so that we WESTERN CULTURE CULTURE ADHERENTS grow up accepting the simpler BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY, while indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents grow up accepting the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY and these differing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF REALITY are the source of DIFFEREING BEHAVIOURAL TRAITS.

The BINARY LOGIC behavioural patterns of WESTERN CULTURE assume the INDEPENDENCE of material forms as if within a notional ABSOUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, while the QUANTUM LOGIC behavioural patterns of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta CULTURES assume the INTERDEPENDENCE of material forms as if CONDENSATIONS within an ALL-INCLUDING energy-charged PLENUM otherwise known as the WAVE-FIELD.

The incorporating of LOGIC into LANGUAGE at the foundational level makes it UNREACHABLE in the course of using the LANGUAGE so that simply by using the language of the culture we are born into, our CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY as we speak and think about it, already includes the basic bias of whether reality has a BINARY LOGIC or QUANTUM LOGIC structure; i.e.

BINARY LOGIC REALITY BUILDS INTO THE UNREACHABLE FOUNDATIONAL LEVEL OF LANGUAGE, the abstract notional REALITY employing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based on LOCAL, EXPLICIT material forms that move about and interact in an absolute empty and infinite space..

QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY BUILDS INTO THE UNREACHABLE FOUNDATIONAL LEVEL OF LANGUAGE, an abstract notional REALITY employing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based material forms that are CONDENSATIONS within an all-including energy-charged PLENUM; i.e. a WAVE-FIELD wherein  based on relational forms that are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT inclusions within the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  Indigenous aboriginal language based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are based on this QUANTUM LOGIC structure, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM and in Modern physics terms, this NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ‘fluid’ ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM with its material condensations manifesting the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation, matches the REALITY of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, which is NOT TRUE of BINARY LOGIC which is INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based and which DOES NOT match the REALITY of our SENSE EXPERIENCE.

EXAMPLE of QUANTUM LOGIC in LANGUAGE:  “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  Here we have the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “TOWNING” as a relational dynamic within a TRANSFORMING landscape wherein everything is in the nonlocal and implicit WAVE-FIELD flux and THERE IS NO ‘LOCAL and EXPLICIT’.

EXAMPLE of BINARY LOGIC in LANGUAGE: “the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”. Here we have the LOCAL and EXPLICIT TOWNS that are INDEPENDENT hanks to a notional EMPTY AND INFINITE “CONTAINING” SPACE.

Here we see the source of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based FRAGMENTATION of REALITY, which CONTRASTS with the Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal THINGLESS-CONNECTEDNESS which AGREES with our SENSE EXPERIENCE wherein EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX in a relationally interdependent ENERGY-CHARGED CONTINUUM.

So, our ‘CHOICE’ of LANGUAGE (the choice that our CULTURE MADE FOR US) serves up for us a language-based “REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION”, which BLOCKS the language user from ‘messing with’ the FOUNDATIONAL LOGIC built into the language. The FOUNDATIONAL LOGIC built into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is BINARY LOGIC wherein our LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS can be EITHER TRUE OR FALSE and those are the only options.  This EXCLUDES the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING  MEDIUM where PROPOSITIONS can be BOTH TRUE and FALSE at the same time, as in Heraclitus ‘‘we can’t step in the same river twice because it is not the same river and we are not the same person stepping into it’.   When we say that the AVALANCHE crashes down the MOUNTAIN into the VALLEY, it is NOT THE SAME MOUNTAIN and NOT THE SAME VALLEY. In other words, what is going on in the overall GESTALT view is TRANSFORMATION which the MOUNTAIN and VALLEY are INCLUDED IN which is QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.

When we use BINARY LOGIC and ask whether there was an avalanche, YES OR NO?  We are asking for affirmation of a BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITION which is TOO SIMPLE to capture the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE based) phenomenon.  Did Jean Valjean steal the loaf of bread YES OR NO?  This is TOO SIMPLE to capture the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE-BASED) phenomenon that gives us a deeper understanding of the unfolding events.  QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM whereas BINARY LOGIC is the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM.   The INCLUDING MEDIUM is the ALL-INCLUDING relational WAVE-FIELD we share inclusion in

There is a SHORTFALL in the CONCEPTUALIZING CAPABILITY in our ENGLISH LANGUAGE (and Common Average European languages) relative to the needs of Modern physics and relative to what has been built into indigenous aboriginal, and the adapted languages of Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, at the basic language architecture level.  This SHORTFALL in WESTERN CULTURE language architecture “SHOWS UP” in such anecdotes as ‘the THIN SKULL RULE‘ in WESTERN JUSTICE where the LAW is limited to LANGUAGE based on ‘WHAT THINGS DO’ which constitutes a REDUCTIVE SIMPLIFICATION of WAVE-FIELD REALITY which captures the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABING —MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE, … by way of simply DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and SUBSTITUTING an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

In the WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE system’s THIN SKULL RULE, one is NOT ALLOWED to acknowledge the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as with the EGG-SHELL COLLAPSING that is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘PUNCH’, even though this supported by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is, meanwhile, based on INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION which only allows for MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING of actions and developments and this goes hand-in-hand with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the SUBSTITITING IN ITS PLACE of ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

In other words, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE uses BINARY LOGIC which constrains our understanding to ‘WHETHER THE PUNCH CAUSED THE SHATTERING OF THE SKULL OR NOT’.  which is a quest to establish “A LOCAL, EXPLICIT CAUSE’ which, while this has no place in our sense-experience grounded understanding of physical phenomena as supported by Modern physics, wherein the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT prevails while the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is ‘APPEARANCE’.

‘APPEARANCE’ is captured in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE in terms of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that implies LOCAL AUTHORING; e.g. ‘the PUNCH SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL’.  WESTERN JUSTICE speaks to support the whole one-sided reduction of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY built into WESTERN LANGUAGE in sayings like ‘TAKE YOUR VICTIMS AS YOU FIND THEM’ which is in effect saying, our traditional way of using language to CONCEPTUALIZE REALITY is to DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE because it is SIMPLER to use language that constrains the conceptualizing to just the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.

This means that we can constrain our language based conceptualizations to terms of ‘what material things do’ as if in an absolute empty space of infinite extent. This language based simplification of our INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY is rooted in our historical cultural development, going back to Copernicus and his attempt to simplify the language based articulating of complex movements of the planets, wherein the Modern physics findings would be understood in terms of the QUANTUM LOGIC relation of PLANETINGS (condensations) in the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD.

Note in the following quote that Copernicus language-based conceptualizing scheme puts INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based DESCRIPTION into primacy over sense-experience (i.e. sense-experience of inclusion in a reality which, as Lao Tzu says, is beyond the direct reach of language; “the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’)

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

The point to remember is that LANGUAGE is not capable of DESCRIBING or REPRESENTING the WAVE-FIELD REALITY of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, … LANGUAGE is ONLY CAPABLE of constructing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS we can use as a supportive ‘go-by’ that is NOT THE TRUE TAO but is THE TAO THAT CAN BE TOLD.

For example, we say that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which is SIMPLER than ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, the former employing BINARY LOGIC which SPLITS THE TOWN OUT from the LANDSCAPE, and the latter employing QUANTUM LOGIC which acknowledges the INCLUSION of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

While the BINARY LOGIC conceptualization is SIMPLER than the QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization, IT COMES WITH THE SAME SORT OF PROBLEM AS RAISED WITH the THIN SKULL EXAMPLE wherein our use of SIMPLIFYING LANGUAGE which SIMPLIFIES the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE,… RUNS INTO TROUBLE of the THIN SKULL RULE type where LANGUAGE that is simplified and constrained to CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based only on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, are actually SIMPLIFYING REALITY (using simplified language-based reality conceptualizations) and introducing OBFUSCATION by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE ‘painting a picture’ wherein the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING can proceed, notionally, without any engagement with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, as if it were transpiring in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE, which ‘works’ as far as INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based CONCEPTUALIZATION goes, but which LACKS CONSISTENCY/AGREEMENT WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.

In SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING … NEVER OCCURS OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF … CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.  For example, WHERE THERE ARE ‘TOWNS THAT ARE GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ (the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALING CONJUGATE), there is ALWAYS, at the SAME TIME, CONJUGATE WILDERNESS that is SHRINKING, and GIVING UP RESOURCES.  The overall REALITY is this TRANSFORMATION which is affirmable by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, and the talk of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION is only INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION which are one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamics that live only in the world of INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION and which, in sense-experience reality, are never WITHOUT THEIR FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as is the nature of our sense-experience of inclusion in WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

In other words, in sense-experience reality, there is only TRANSFORMATION and no such thing as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, all of these being one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PSEUDO-DYNAMICS.  THERE IS NO GROWING OF A TOWN WITHOUT A CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS (in the spherical space of our actual sense-experience), which together ‘point to’ TRANSFORMATION  as being what is REALLY GOING ON.  THE GROWTH OF A TOWN is intellectual abstraction that we ‘conjure up’ with LANGUAGE; i.e. with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.

THIS PREFACE is intended to point out the problem of FRAGMENTATION that we build into our INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING by using our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with its DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.   This contrasts with the flow-based languages of Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta where we use QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualizing in saying, ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in which the TOWNING is innately INCLUDED in a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND SENSE).

This PREFACE has been lengthy because we are using the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE architecture to try to convey how the QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE is capable of LESS SIMPLE CONCEPTUALIZATIONS. The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USER, because of the habitual way of interpreting language in BINARY LOGIC terms will HEAR the QUANTUM LOGIC “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ and reflexively interpret that as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, dropping out the QUANTUM LOGIC relation in the process as if it was not adding anything to the intended meaning.   This practice is grounded in such understandings as when hearing ‘there is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT is raised with the understanding that the HUMAN is an INDEPENDENT BEING, an INHABITANT that is SEPARATE FROM THE HABITAT in the manner of CHRISTIAN BELIEF which is BINARY LOGIC based and unlike the Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal belief which is QUANTUM LOGIC based as in ‘there is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM as with CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD’.

HERE WE SEE THE LANGUAGE BASED SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION which is TROUBLING WESTERN CULTURE which is NOT A PROBLEM in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta where the understanding is ‘mitakuye oyasin’ aka ‘everything is related’ as consistent with the Modern physics understanding of material forms including HUMANINGS as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

The following article; The CONFUSION that BINARY LOGIC is CAUSING in MEDECINE and JUSTICE explores how the SHORTFALL of BINARY LOGIC based conceptualizations relative to QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualizations is creating problems in WESTERN CULTURE MEDICINE and JUSTICE, pointing to the need for an UPGRADE to QUANTUM LOGIC based UNDERSTANDING.

* * * * * *

I am NOT a BELIEVER in WESTERN CULTURE ‘allopathic medicine’ although I am now largely dependent on it since ‘cancer’, which in Modern physics as also in indigenous aboriginal culture ‘medicine’ would be understood as ‘imbalance’, is understood in Western Medicine as ‘the attack of pathogens’, hence the remedy is to ELIMINATE THE PATHOGEN, as for example in RADIATION TREATMENT for CANCER which is aimed at the DIFFERENTIAL ELIMINATING of the BAD (CANCEROUS) CELLS while doing as little damage as possible to the GOOD HEALTHY CELLS.

THIS WESTERN MEDICINE “GOOD CELLS and BAD CELLS” BINARY LOGIC SPLIT IS BULLSHIT coming from the USE OF SIMPLIFYING BINARY LOGIC BASED INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION.  There is NO BINARY LOGIC SPLIT INTO EITHER GOOD OR BAD!   As Modern physics attests, BINARY LOGIC is SIMPLIFYING ABSTRACTION which is displacing our use of LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE and IMBALANCE.

Likewise the GOOD HUMANS and BAD HUMANS SPLIT is based on the SIMPLIFYING USE OF BINARY LOGIC in WESTERN JUSTICE.  IN REALITY, there is only BALANCE and IMBALANCE.

I am NOT MAKING THIS UP.  This is the understanding not only of MODERN PHYSICS but also indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedant adherents.  In this understanding, ILLNESS is IMBALANCE and HEALTH is BALANCE and MEDICINE is the RESTORING of BALANCE where there is IMBALANCE.

Why I am taking “RADIATION” treatments for “CANCER” which is said to destroy MORE cancer cells than HEALTHY cells in such a manner that the growth of new cells will increase the ratio of healthy to cancerous cells.

Because, while my view is that ILLNESS is IMBALANCE, just as in RICH and POOR IMBALANCE, when there is an accelerated growth of REBALANCERS (i.e.. ‘thieves’), while the ultimate solution is RESTORING BALANCE, the short term objective may be the reduction of rebalancers together with the longer term objective is the restoring of balance.

What I am saying is that because our WESTERN CULTURE MEDICINE persists in the anti-pathogen approach, and that is the form that all publicly supported and easily accessible medical services take, it makes sense to partake of it even though my belief is that the anti-pathogen orientation is mistaken and that what is really going on is that illness is a falling out of balance and the remedy is restoring balance.   In some areas of medicine, this understanding of illness as imbalance (e.g. a deficiency of vitamin C which shows up as scurvy and pneumonia, and a deficiency of important microbial strains in the microbial assemblage of the gut; e.g. in the wake of having been administered an anti-biotic, can be remediated by the infusion of the missing members of the out-of-balance microbial assemblage. 

  (more…)

INTRODUCTION: This essay, entitled; “The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS IN LANGUAGE”  explores the manner in which WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE simplifies and abbreviates conceptual constructions to the point that the conceptualization of the ‘common language ground’ (serving as a ‘COMMON REALITY’) that enables group communications is no longer consistent with our sense-experience affirmed REALITY, but employs an intellectual conceptual SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on BINARY LOGIC and ‘TRUE’ but ‘INCOMPLETE’ LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.  For example, whereas INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL languages and Modern physics fashion language that speaks in QUANTUM LOGIC terms such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’, … WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS support the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based expression; the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services.

NOTE:

QUANTUM LOGIC is based on BOTH/AND logic as with WHORLING in the FLOWING where the WHORLING and the FLOWING are ONE.

BINARY LOGIC is based on the EITHER/OR logic where the WHORLING is understood to be separate from, and MOVING THROUGH the FLOWING.

Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals have the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding that HUMANINGS are included in the TRANSFORMING relational continuum, while WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have the BINARY LOGIC understanding that HUMANS are independent beings that author their own actions and behaviours while moving about within a separate and independent passive containing space.

While this here LINGUISTIC communication is in MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms (i.e. in terms of ‘what things do’) which is BINARY LOGIC based, this communication is INCOMPLETE in that it is DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, unlike indigenous aboriginal language (and Modern physics) where BOTH MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AND FEMALE ACCOMMMODATING/ENABLING are included as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where we have a QUANTUM LOGIC proposition that incorporates BOTH MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in ‘TOWNING’ and also FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as in ‘IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

THE FIRST ‘WHAMMY” of The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS IN LANGUAGE can thus be seen as the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which REDUCES QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC to BINARY EITHER/OR LANGUAGE.  In the WAVE-FIELD structure of nature’s dynamic, we have “BOTH” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “AND” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugates, as in the actual sense-experience affirmed physical reality on inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD.

GIVEN THAT the purpose of LANGUAGE is to come up with signal-based messaging with the capability of sharing conceptualizations of sense-experience affirmable dynamics, we must be ‘on guard’, in this case, for a DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is the INTEGRATING agency in language based conceptual constructions.  The effect of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is to impute FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING CAPABILITY to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC, which gives rise to ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ (MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY) WITHOUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING AS ‘IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’)

WHY WOULD WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS JUST DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE IN OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, since it is INNATELY INCLUDED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY?

(more…)

QUANTUM LOGIC (i.e. NON-BINARY LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND are ONE as with CONDENSATION) …  is in a NATURAL PRIMACY over BINARY LOGIC (where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO as with MATTER and EMPTY SPACE).  We have a CHOICE of which to give the foundational role to, and the choice we make has a profound impact on the UNDERSTANDING of the world that we draw from our language-based CONCEPTUALIZING of our SENSE-EXPERIENCING of the world, a world-in-flux wherein the NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT is in a NATURAL PRECEDENCE over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.   This is the finding of MODERN PHYSICS wherein material forms (the local and explicit) are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD (the nonlocal and implicit).

BINARY LOGIC , where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO, … while simpler, is intellectual abstraction for which there is no equivalent in our natural SENSE-EXPERIENCE world wherein FIGURE and GROUND are only ONE. 

That is, when we use the simplifying abstraction of BINARY LOGIC in our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, we are IMPOSING this SIMPLIFYING CONCEPTUALIZATION by using LANGUAGE to ‘CONSTRUCT’ impressions of a simplified BINARY LOGIC based PSEUDO-WORLD.  These BINARY LOGIC based simplified CONCEPTUALIZATIONS …. ARE NOT “REPRESENTATIONS” of something that ‘exists out there’, but are instead INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS ‘in here’ that construct a simplified SUBSTITUTE pseudo-world OUT THERE.

Indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGES employ this RELATION wherein the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is INCLUDED in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, implying a QUANTUM LOGIC relation; i.e. the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as is the relation between the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and the MATERIAL FORM that is the CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

The CONDENSATION is at the same time “BOTH” the MATERIAL FORM “AND” the INCLUDING MEDIUM (the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD) so that UNLIKE THE BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION where the MATERIAL FORM ‘moves through’ an EMPTY SPACE, … HERE WE HAVE THE QUANTUM LOGIC SITUATION where THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “THINGS THAT MOVE” as where MOVING FIGURE and STATIONARY GROUND are TWO SEPARATE THINGS, there is only TRANSFORMATION where THERE IS ONLY the “APPEARANCE” of a MOVING FIGURE that is associated with the OVERALL TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

Or in other words, “THE MOVING/CHANGING FIGURE, BE IT A TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING OR A HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING, IS ONLY ‘APPEARANCE’ whereas overall TRANSFORMATION is the REALITY.

TRANSFORMATION, as CONCEPTUALIZED using the BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC conveying of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, IS LESS SIMPLE than than the “EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC matter and space LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY”,  in that the QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is fully FLUID as in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (ACTION-VERB-based) WITHOUT DEPENDENCY ON THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT (i.e. without NAMED-BEING-BASED DEPENDENCY).  i

THERE IS A PROBLEM in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IN THAT PRIORITY IS GIVEN TO THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING which is BINARY LOGIC based and ONCE THE CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION IS LAID DOWN WITH BINARY LOGIC which is SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC, it is NOT POSSIBLE to incorporate, on that SIMPLE LOCAL and EXPLICIT base, the QUANTUM LOGIC CONSISTENT NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZATION.

In other words, after we have used language to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS TO THINGS as if in an EMPTY SPACE (BINARY LOGIC) in our LOCAL AND EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZATION, we cannot mix and match language that imputes BOTH/AND STATUS to MATERIAL FORMS BECAUSE IN THIS CASE AUTHORING AGENCY IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as in overall TRANSFORMATION).

BINARY LOGIC is like the Cuckoo, a simple bird that takes over the nest of less simple birds in that its eggs hatch first and the Cuckoo chicks push out the less simple birds eggs before they hatch, so that the simple supersedes the less simple.

In other words, once BINARY LOGIC is infused in the CONCEPTUALIZING STREAM, it TAKES OVER.  If we start off saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, we have established the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC MODE OF CONCEPTUALIZING (which implies :LOCAL AUTHORING, implying an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER) and our continuing story is then in terms of THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT which BLOCKS THE ENTRANCE of the QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ , … where there is NO SENSE OF LOCAL AUTHORING as “the TOWNING is INCLUDED WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in a BOTH/AND SENSE;” i.e. the TOWNING is to the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE as the WHORLING is to the FLOWING in a FLUID DYNAMIC (Figure and Ground are ONLY ONE).  

As in the Cuckoo’s egg hatching metaphor, once the starting out of a linguistic exchange commences on the basis of BINARY LOGIC conceptualization, the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization is shut out.

The use of simple BINARY LOGIC in LANGUAGE is OBSCURANTIST in that its LOCAL and EXPLICIT configuration BLOCKS THE  EXPRESSION OF the less-simple NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as where everything is in flux and THER IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING) which is PRIMARY in SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.  That is, if we use BINARY LOGIC and say “THE TOWN IS GROWING” we have assigned the AUTHORING POWER to the TOWN for its own GROWTH and this “LOCAL AUTHORING” is innately SIMPLER that if we had said ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which gives the AUTHORING POWER to the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (i.e. to the WAVE-FIELD rather than than to the material CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD).

This is the REDUCTION of QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC that changes LANGUAGE-BASED-UNDERSTANDING in a manner that is a CULTURE SHIFTER since it applies not only to ‘the TOWN’ but to ‘the HUMAN’ and while indigenous aboriginal culture LANGUAGE speaks in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, Common Average European LANGUAGE speaks in the BINARY LOGIC terms of HUMANS as LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEINGS with “THEIR OWN (grammar-given) POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

WESTERN CULTURE, because of the popular use of BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE, persists in the use of LANGUAGE that is OBSCURANTIST, reducing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING which in our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is in an INNATE PRIMACY over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING requires QUANTUM LOGIC as in the languages of Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is putting SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC into an unnatural primacy over LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC with the result that LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, instead of being based in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION, is based in LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING sourced ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.  The result is that WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING, by virtue of giving the foundational role in LANGUAGE to the SIMPLE LOCAL and EXPLICIT, is DROPPING OUT the LESS SIMPLE ALL-INCLUDING, ALL-CONNECTING, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”, the wave-field base, and because WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE engineers this DROP OUT in its language based conceptualizing, the conceptualizations, (REDUCED FROM QUANTUM LOGIC NON-LOCAL and IMPLICIT to TO BINARY LOGIC LOCAL AND EXPLICIT)  are FRAGMENTING both WESTERN CULTURE INTELLECT and BEHAVIOUR.

* * *  

(more…)