NOTA BENE! , … WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS “are to INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS as REAL NUMBERS are to COMPLEX NUMBERS”.
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION is LOCAL and EXPLICIT (as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING’) while INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’).
Let’s go straight to the point of how we USERS of NAME and GRAMMAR LANGUAGE are constructing a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is driving us NUTS. Note that BINARY LOGIC is to QUANTUM LOGIC as LOCAL and EXPLICIT is to NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
We can discern what is going on here from the following example of how we use language.
We have the THIN SKULL RULE which “blames” (IMPUTES LOCAL AUTHORING) to that MALE ASSERTING AGENT regardless of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate.
We blame the careless cigarette smoker for AUTHORING the FOREST FIRE regardless of the shift from a soppy wet to a tinder dry FEMALE ACCOMMODATING influence.
We insist that the movements of the planets are fully and solely due to the PLANETS (by imputing space to be empty) because it SIMPLIFIES the LANGUAGE we need to fashion a LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION of what is going on.
And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion
THE PATTERN IS CLEAR. IN ORDER TO SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION, WE EMPLOY LANGUAGE THAT REDUCES THE CONJUGATE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING- MALE ASSERTING NATURE OF REALITY, to a ONE-SIDED EMPTY-SPACE- MALE-ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY, replacing the wall-including WAVE-FIELD with its FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE-ASSERTING “CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM” or natural conjugate unity, to the combination of a MATERIAL MALE ASSERTING “BEING” in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.
STOP PRESS! HEADLINE: WE ARE TRANSFORMERS WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD, WE ARE NOT LOCAL AUTHORS!
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are “TRANSFORMERS” (NOT IN THE SENSE THAT WE HAVE THE POWERS OF AUTHORING TRANSFORMATION, BUT IN THE SENSE THAT ‘TRANSFORMING IS US’). This Language that we are communicating with at this moment has an ARCHITECTURE that gives a foundational role to BEING and to THINGS-THAT-EXIST when THERE ARE NO BEINGS in the WAVE-FIELD, aka the TRANSFORMING relational continuum. There is in LOCAL BEING and NO LOCAL AUTHORING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, everything is TRANSFORMATION. This does not mean that EVERY”THING” is undergoing TRANSFORMATION, which preserves the BEING based notion of THINGS, what it means is that our LANGUAGE and thus our language-influenced perception of reality has a problem in that it gives a foundational role to BEING. Every time we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS produce a language-based utterance whether in oral or textual form, we are PROMOTING BELIEF IN BEING!
“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.” —Nietzsche, “Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer”
Because we have developed a dependency on language-based sharing of understanding and because our WESTERN CULTURE language has an architecture which gives a foundational role to BEING, we generate PROBLEMS of MISUNDERSTANDING SIMPLY BY USING OUR LANGUAGE to construct SHAREABLE REPRESENTATIONS wherein we have BUILT-IN DEPENDENCIES ON ‘BEING’. There is NO WAY TO FASHION LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS of a purely FLUID WAVE-FIELD reality using a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that is BEING-based. For example, once I have said that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ (which imputes “BEING” to the TOWN), I have no way of ‘getting rid of the abstract impression of BEING and language invites us to BUILD on this basis of BEING by speaking of this LOCAL EXPLICIT THING we have NAMED “the TOWN” and are embellishing with GRAMMAR to impute to it its own powers of AUTHORING GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION of goods etc.
ONLY IN A VERY DIFFERENT LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE can we avoid giving a foundational role to BEING, as in the indigenous aboriginal languages which are relational or ‘flow-based’ wherein everything is in flux (i.e. FLUX IS ALL THERE IS and THINGS are only APPEARANCE) and by this I mean that TRANSFORMATION prevails and THERE ARE NO ‘THINGS’ implied by the word ‘everything’, other than the APPEARANCE of THINGS coming from TRANSFORMING FORMS in the flow. As we know form Modern physics, there are CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD which APPEAR as DISTINGUISHABLE in the FLOW which remain FEATURES OF THE FLOW as in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM where, for example, WHORLS in FLOW APPEAR TO HAVE THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT “BEING” while, to the contrary, they are in sense-experience affirmed reality, relational features in the flow WITHOUT their own INDEPENDENT “BEING”, such abstraction deriving purely from language-based CONSTRUCTIONS that invent BEING.
With respect to ourselves, there is no LOSS of our ‘INDEPENDENT BEING’ since it was only even an abstract inference coming from WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR. As inclusions within TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM of life/reality, we are co-creating that which we are moving through.
This is the QUANTUM LOGIC reality that is SYMBOLIZED by the Yin/Yang figure wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the MALE ASSERTING are ONE and NOT TWO, the FEMALE referring to the fluid body of the WAVE-FIELD and the MALE referring to the CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD. In physical terms the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD is PRIMARY and the MALE CONDENSATION is secondary. But our WESTERN CULTURE tendency has been to impute the capability of authoring actions and development to material (male-assertive) BEINGS rather than to FEMALE INDUCTIVE WAVE-FIELD INFLUENCES coming from WHAT APPEARS TO BE “EMPTY SPACE”. However, since what we have thought of as empty space is instead the electromagnetic field which is the source of the material CONDENSATIONS, these material CONDENSATIONS are thus exposed as SECONDARY aspects of the WAVE-FIELD rather than PRIMARY, the STATUS that the abstraction of “BEING” would like to give them.
Thus it is a mistake to understand the CONDENSATIONS (material forms) as INDEPENDENT BEINGS in the guise of MALES WITH THE ASSERTIVE POWER to STIR UP the WAVE-FIELD WHEN THE REALITY IS THAT THESE MALE AGENTS HAVE BEEN STIRRED UP BY THE WAVE-FIELD THEY ARE INCLUDED IN. This DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that invents the ASSERTING MALE is a mistake that derives from confusing the invisible WAVE-FIELD for passive EMPTY SPACE and thus WRONGLY attributing LOCAL AUTHORING influence to MALE ASSERTING AGENT instead of to the FEMALE INDUCTIVE OPENING) Here, we may think of the FEMALE – MALE geometry in a SPHERICAL SPACE, and while we may start off by arguing over whether change is coming from CONTINENTS DRIFTING (MALE ASSERTIVE) or SEAFLOOR SPREADING (FEMALE INDUCTIVE), we eventually COME AROUND to adding a FOURTH DIMENSION which transcends superficial dynamics ON THE SURFACE OF A SPHERE, and understand, instead the FULL BODY SPHERING DYNAMIC with the conjugate FEMALE outside-inward SUBDUCTION and the MALE inside-outward EXTRUSION, these two conjugates COMPRISING THE ONE DYNAMIC OF TRANSFORMATION. in which case there is NO LOCAL BEING-BASED AUTHOR NAMED “THE EARTH’, there is NO LONGER ANY BEING, there is only a CONTINUAL BECOMING as in the overall TRANSFORMING relational continuum.
As in FEMALE geographical basins on earth, FEMALE basins induce and organize rivulets to come together as streams and streams to come together as powerful rivers to transport matter and DEEPEN the FEMALE BASIN that is orchestrating the evolving MALE ASSERTING This ‘coniunctio oppositorum’ is the basic structure of the WAVE-FIELD which manifests as an all-pervading TRANSFORMATION. While we can architect language that allows us to speak of the FEMALE and MALE as if they are TWO separate BEING-based things, the physical reality involves the FEMALE-MALE “coniunctio oppositorum’ as captured with the Yin/Yang symbol and the Medieval Ouroborus (the snake that forms from swallowing its own tail). The implication is that the THESE TWO; i.e. the FEMALE OPENING AND ACCOMMODATING, … and the MALE ASSERTING and PENETRATING, … “ARE ONLY ONE”. This TWO-IN-ONE symbology describes the Modern physics relation between the dual aspects of the WAVE-FIELD; i.e. ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE-FIELD and MATTER as CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD. NOTA BENE! This whole essay is concerned with the WESTERN CULTURE practice of CONSTRUCTING a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE-ONLY, BEING-BASED (i.e. DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR, LOCAL AUTHOR BASED) SUBSTITUTE REALITY which we, AT GREAT COST TO OURSELVES, are employing as our OPERATIVE REALITY.
HOWEVER, that BEING-BASED LOCAL AUTHORING SUBSTITUTE REALITY is a BINARY LOGIC based understanding while the WAVE-FIELD dynamic is a QUANTUM LOGIC understanding wherein LIFE is not something separate from the universe and is something found only in a so-called LIVING ORGANIC realm which, with BINARY LOGIC is split off from a so-called DEAD, INORGANIC realm. WHY THIS BINARY LOGIC LIVING and DEAD SPLIT? To answer this, we might turn to the question and answer regarding the THIN SKULL rule in WESTERN JUSTICE where the ‘guilty’ takes the victim as it comes’, meaning that the INJURY to the RECIPIENT of the BLOW is deemed FULLY ATTRIBUTABLE to the “AUTHOR” of the blow. This comes from the same desire for SIMPLIFICATION as in Copernicus justification of saying ‘THE EARTH TURNS ROUND’ which imputes pure on-sided MALE ASSERTING, liberating (notionally) the EARTH from any innate ‘connection’ with what is DECLARED by this ONE-SIDING of action to be EMPTY SPACE rather than an ALL-INCLUDING (electromagnetic) WAVE-FIELD in which ‘the EARTH’ is a CONDENSATION. as requires QUANTUM BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium.
So, THE UNIVERSE IS THE WAVE-FIELD and QUANTUM LOGIC describes the relation between, … “NOT SPACE and MATTER’, … but “FIELD” and “MATTER”, … so NOT MATTER-IN-SPACE as implies BINARY LOGIC based MUTUAL EXCLUSION, but MATTER-IN-FIELD as a NONDUALITY; i.e. as FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE ASPECTS of the ONE, all-including WAVE-FIELD, a WAVE-FIELD with areas of CONDENSATION that we call MATTER, so we have MATTER IN FIELD and NOT MATTER IN EMPTY SPACE and thus we need to employ QUANTUM LOGIC and NOT BINARY LOGIC if we wish to REPRESENT in LANGUAGE what is ACTUALLY GOING ON PHYSICALLY, which is TRANSFORMATION wherein there is no place for the acbstract
This is the GENERAL REALITY as affirmed in Modern physics, thus the HUMANINGS in the WAVE-FIELD are in this QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM RELATION.
So, THE WORLD is NOT something SEPARATE from the MATERIAL FORMS such as ourselves, offering us an EMPTY SPACE that we are able to MOVE THROUGH as if FIGURE and GROUND (MATTER and SPACE) were TWO SEPARATE ONTOLOGIES. Instead, MATERIAL FORMS such as ourselves are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD and the basic dynamic is TRANSFORMATION as where there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE being our limited visual view of the transforming relational continuum.
The WAVE-FIELD is NOT SOMETHING SEPARATE FROM US BUT INCLUDES US and is ALL-INCLUSIVE. That is, WAVE-FIELD is not something we are ‘BORN INTO’ and ‘DIE OUT OF’, WE ARE THE FIELD and our material aspect is CONDENSATION based, thus we are included in the all-including TRANSFORMATION (the transforming relational continuum).
The QUANTUM LOGIC understanding that corresponds with (but is LESS SIMPLE than) WESTERN CULTURE “BINARIES” of “LIFE” and “DEATH”, is in terms wherein everything is transforming in the manner of the CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD (which is our material phase of life) and when we are ‘not there’, everything is transformed by our having been ‘ASSIMILATED” within the WAVE-FIELD. THIS IS NOT HOW WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE ACCUSTOMING TO UNDERSTANDING THINGS. Our ACCULTURATED UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IF WE MOVE OUT OF TOWN, THE TOWN HAS A ‘BEING’ BASED NATURE AND THUS PERSISTS. ALTHOUGH WITH A FRAGMENT NOW MISSING (SCRATCH ONE OFF THE CURRENT POPULATION STATISTIC). That is BINARY LOGIC at work, but in a QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, what is going on is TRANSFORMATION as in ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ wherein SOME OF THE WILDERNESS DIVERSITY LAND is transformed into SOME OF THE CULTIVATED LAND. WHAT IS “NOT” GOING ON is the GROWTH of the TOWN as would be the BINARY LOGIC based understanding which is grounded in BEING.
We can repeat here, for the purpose of EMPHASIS, that “BEING” is UNREAL ABSTRACTION:
“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.” —Nietzsche, “Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer”
There is a REALITY SHIFT when we use language to shift from TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE to ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING’, .. in that the latter representation of GROWTH imputes to the TOWN “LOCAL BEING” which establishes a notional FIXED, LOCAL, EXPLICIT “BEING” which is the AUTHOR OF ITS OWN GROWTH. Since “THE TOWN” as a LOCAL BEING is said by our DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to be an INDEPENDENT BEING with POWERS OF AUTHORING ITS OWN GROWTH, such DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR language allows us to BREAK OUT OF THE LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein THERE IS NO BEING and instead we have only TRANSFORMATION wherein what we are calling the GROWTH of the TOWN is NOT SIMPLY THAT (as if it were happening within an EMPTY SPACE), is instead in conjugate relation with the SHRINKAGE of the WILDERNESS which amounts to TRANSFORMATION OF THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE. As Goedel’s theorem of the incompleteness of all finite systems of logic points out, we can rightly claim that we are being TRUTHFUL in our claim that ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ but WE ARE NOT BEING COMPLETE since what is ‘really’ going on in our ‘sense-experience’ based reality is LESS SIMPLE, in that there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS DIVERSITY. TOGETHER, these CONJUGATES of GROWTH OF the TOWN and SHRINKAGE of the WILDERNESS constitute TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE which is comprised of both MALE-ASSERTING TOWN and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WILDERNESS, a TRANSFORMATION wherein the BALANCE of TOWN and WILDERNESS is shifting. To speak only in terms of the GROWTH of the TOWN is to DROP OUT MENTION of the CONJUGATE ACCOMMODATING SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS.
The WAVE-FIELD forms include an ASSERTING MALE which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT in conjugate relation with an INDUCTIVE FEMALE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT. We can understand this in terms of the relation between the HURRICANE and THE ATMOSPHERE where the HURRICANE is a LOCAL, EXPLICIT FIGURE whereas the ATMOSPHERE is the CONTAINING FIELD which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT. While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS might wrestle with whether (A) EITHER the HURRICANE is a MALE-ASSERTIVE influence which is STIRRING UP THE ATMOSPHERE, (B) OR the ATMOSPHERE is a FEMALE-INDUCTIVE influence influence which is STIRRING UP the HURRICANE.
Indigenous aboriginal culture as well as Modern physics would understand the cosmic reality in terms of the all-including WAVE-FIELD which manifests not only as material condensations but also as the solar energy field and the gravitational field. The key point here is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the WAVE-FIELD and the MATERIAL FORMS where the latter are CONDENSATIONS of the FORMER.
But in regard to LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have found that we can simplify LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE-INDUCTIVE CONJUGATE because of the LESS SIMPLE challenge of capturing its NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature, … and so instead, going only with the MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT to construct representations of ‘reality’; i.e. NOT ANY LONGER “REALITY” (since the FEMALE conjugate is replaced with the SIMPLIFYING abstraction of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE), but a distorted ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ABSTRACT ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’.
ALL we need n our SUBSTITUTE REALITY is the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE. We KNOW HOW TO VISUALIZE ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, thanks to the fact it is LOCAL and EXPLICIT, but to capture the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT we would need he FEMALE CONJUGATE. As with the gathering and scattering aka ‘clustering’ of ants within a complex ecosystem, to speak in the once-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE TERMS, we can invoke the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR where we say ‘the CLUSTER if GROWING’ (and/or SHRINKING) however, THERE IS NO ‘CLUSTER’ with “ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING GROWTH, that is just ABSTRACTION coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes BEING and conflates this to LOCAL BEING BASED AUTHORING..
The imputing of BEING-based LOCAL AUTHORING is now playing a foundational role in WESTERN CULTURE language-based representations of reality a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are MISTAKENLY USING AS OUR OPERATIVE REALITY which is leading to FRAGMENTATION, SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA (e.g. the COVID 19 PANDEMIC which is an IMBALANCE in the microbial assemblage misinterpreted as a “PATHOGEN ATTACK”).
“TRANSFORMATION” is the primary reality and we, as included participants, are “TRANSFORMERS”. There ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS of “EITHER” good “OR” bad actions and developments (such abstraction derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR), there is only TRANSFORMATION aka the WAVE-FIELD dynamic, as understood in indigenous aboriginal cultures where the language architecture supports the imagery of TRANSFORMATION (e.g. ‘there is TOWNING iN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) while our WESTERN CULTURE language supports LOCAL ASSERTIVE ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PREODUCING) which are all ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING DYNAMICS in which the FEMALE CONJUGATE is removed (DEA ABSCONDITA).
* * * .
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE BASIC OBSERVATIONS which support the Modern physics understanding of reality as well as the indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta understanding of reality,… which in turn exposes the ERROR in the WESTERN CULTURE understanding of reality as arising from giving a foundational role to the abstractions of LOCAL BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING, the latter coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.
INTRODUCTION: WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have grown up learning a language which is LADEN with ABSTRACTION which, by installing the language and giving it a foundational role in the construction of representations of reality, are giving ourselves an exposure to introducing distorting SIMPLIFICATIONS into these language-based representations which have psychological implications. In this case, our WESTERN CULTURE languages are CARRIERS of BINARY LOGIC which simplifies our representations of reality (i.e. REPRESENTATIONS which are no longer ‘of reality’ but of a SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY).
Our sense-experience reality is of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD which involves a QUANTUM LOGIC representational structure wherein our language acknowledges that material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including electromagnetic field. QUANTUM LOGIC captures the WAVE-FIELD reality wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE; i.e. the MATERIAL FIGURES we see are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, hence the need for QUANTUM LOGIC in our language-based representations which then gives us, for example, ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where there is no ABSOLUTE SPLIT between the FIGURE (the TOWNING) and the GROUND (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE aka all-including, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD).
There are NO LOCAL AUTHORS in the transforming relational continuum wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) as is necessarily the case where the FIGURES are CONDENSATIONS in the GROUND of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD aka transforming relational continuum.
This essay addresses how WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, because the Common Average European language architecture builds representations using BINARY LOGIC which splits FIGURE and GROUND into TWO through the assumption that MATTER and SPACE are mutually exclusive and that SPACE is an ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT. This BINARY LOGIC based MODEL OF REALITY sets up the SIMPLIFYING SITUATION wherein we need only concern ourselves with the MALE-ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE and its action since the FEMALE CONJUGATE; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD itself, has been REPLACED by the ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
This OBSCURANTISM which removes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD by substituting EMPTY SPACE paves the way for one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE ONLY representation. INSTEAD OF ACKNOWLEDGING the natural primacy of THE FEMALE CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD relative to its MALE CONJUGATE CONDENSATION in the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation, there is a WESTERN CULTURE RE-CASTING which INVERTS the natural order, imputing PRIMARY REALITY STATUS to the MALE CONJUGATE CONDENSATION and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE FOR THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD.
We thus build OBSCURANTISM into our language with the REMOVAL of the PRIMACY of the FEMALE CONJUGATE (the WAVE-FIELD PROPER) while PROMOTING THE ‘CONDENSATION” which is the secondary MALE-ASSERTING feature of the WAVE-FIELD, to an unnatural PRIMACY. In the indigenous aboriginal culture as in Modern physics, the WAVE-FIELD is PRIMARY and being as it is NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (relational) the language architecture must reflect this primacy of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and establish the secondary nature of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD. This is NOT THE CASE in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE where we have the OBSCURANTISM of incorrectly PROMOTING the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATION (the material content) into an UNNATURAL PRIMACY OVER THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD (the immaterial containing field).
IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WE LOSE THE ENERGY-LOADED PRESENCE OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD through the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE, while the “CONDENSATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD”, aka the MATERIAL FORM, “TAKES OVER” as the PRIMARY PRESENCE; i.e. as THE LOCAL AUTHOR of ITS OWN actions and developments as is ‘written up’ using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR. This “LOCAL AUTHOR DELUSION” is OBSCURANTISM that serves as the WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY.
The MISSING FEMALE CONJUGATE or DEA ABSCONDITA that is ‘sacrificed’ to ‘open the way for the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING LOCAL AUTHOR DELUSION, is the victim of WESTERN CULTURE’S SUBSTITUTING of EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC (CONJUGATE SPLITTING) for BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC (CONJUGATE BALANCING).
WE ARE “NOT” MALE-ASSERTING AGENTS, WE ARE TRANSFORMERS WITHIN THE GREAT TRANSFORMING (WAVE-FIELD). As inclusions within the GREAT TRANSFORMING we recognize that ‘our assertive actions’ in cultivating the land are NOT ASSERTIVE ACTIONS. WE ARE NOT INDEPENDENT ASSERTING AGENTS, WE ARE TRANSFORMERS WITHIN the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (WAVE-FIELD). Our movements within the crowd are RELATIVE and thus TRANSFORMATIVE (to portray them as assertive is OBSCURANTISM), WE ARE NOT ‘INDEPENDENT ACTORS’, we are INCLUDED TRANSFORMERS.
We like to “SPEAK” in terms of OUR OWN ACTIONS or of AN INDIVIDUAL’S ACTIONS but there is NO SUCH THING since our movements are RELATIVE and comprise the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM we share inclusion in; i.e. there is NO ABSOLUTE FIXED REFERENCE FRAME as would be necessary to speak in terms of LOCAL EXPLICIT ACTIONS, or DEVELOPMENT or PRODUCTION. Because the notions of LOCAL and EXPLICIT are ABSTRACTION, it follows that RELATIONS are the FOUNDATIONAL reality RATHER THAN ‘LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS, notionally with “THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT” The reality is that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.
A man’s wisdom is to know that all ends are momentary, that the best end must be superseded by a better. But there is a mischievous tendency in him to transfer his thought from the life to the ends, to quit his agency and rest in his acts: the tools run away with the workman, the human with the divine. – Emerson.
The construction of exquisite HOMES and TOWNS are PSYCHOLOGICAL impressions coming from FRAGMENTATION. TRANSFORMATION is the REAL dynamic because there is a connection between the SHRINKAGE of FORESTS and the GROWTH of WOODEN HOME communities covering the same formerly forested hill country; i.e. the SHRINKING of FORESTS and the GROWTH of HOMES are conjugate aspects of the ONE DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION. To speak of the GROWTH of TOWNS is OBSCURANTISM.
* * *
THERE IS A PROBLEM COMING FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE: – THE LOCAL AUTHOR DELUSION.
Our sense experience informs us that we are included within a transforming relational continuum which Modern physics affirms is the all-including WAVE-FIELD and while indigenous aboriginals and Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents have evolved LANGUAGE USAGE that supports this sense-experience grounded understanding, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that gives the primary foundational role to LOCAL AUTHORING. This LOCAL AUTHORING is NOT REAL but it leads to the construction of A LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which we are USING AS IF IT WERE REALITY. This is the source of FRAGMENTATION in our view of the world, as Bohm points, is PSYCHOLOGICAL and NOT REAL (i.e. not sense-experience supportable). Nietzsche identifies the same problem in slightly different terms; i.e. in terms of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is how we use LANGUAGE to construct a fragmented, abstract SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the abstraction BEING. The language based contrivance of BEING is behind the FRAGMENTATION, and can be seen in terms of our construction of ‘IDOLS’, hence Nietzsche’s ‘Twilight of the Idols’ meaning that these things have to go, and this is where his commitment to PHILOSOPHIZING WITH A HAMMER’ comes from.
THIS IS A “BREAKTHROUGH” for me, in my understanding and it concerns the relationship between FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.
Consider the following two ‘views of reality’;
The ‘thin skull’ rule
The thin skull rule makes the defendant liable for the plaintiff’s injuries even if the injuries are unexpectedly severe owing to a pre-exisiting yet stable condition. The defendant must take the victim as they find them with whatever peculiar weaknesses and predispositions they might have, and is liable even though the plaintiff’s losses are more dramatic than they would be for the average person.
The ‘tide in the affairs of men” understanding; (from Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’;
“There is a tide in the affairs of men Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries.”
* * *
In the LATTER aphorism, there is an acknowledgment of our being included in a dynamic greater than ourselves, (this is the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including electromagnetic field) wherein WE ARE “NOT” AUTHORS OF OUR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS (as the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR asserts) but, gives us to understand that we are immersed in world of potentials that INVITES OUR PARTICIPATION.
The following SYNOPSIS gives an abbreviated account, elaborated in the body of the essay, of how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are employing a language architecture that incorporates OBSCURANTISM wherein the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD nature of reality is OBSCURED by our infusing of a SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY. Note that our sense-experience gives us access to the full WAVE-FIELD nature of the world while it is only our WESTERN CULTURE language architecture that OBSCURES the natural WAVE-FIELD reality by infusing SIMPLIFIED (dumbed-down) BINARY LOGIC “EITHER” matter “OR” empty space ABSTRACTION.
SYNOPSIS: We (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) could learn from asking ourselves why we have the THIN SKULL rule in our BINARY LOGIC based system of LAW ENFORCEMENT (where if we “abide by the law’ we are among the masses of INNOCENTS UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY). The answer is, the THIN SKULL rule AVOIDS having to deal with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (as in the easily collapsible skull) which is an innate part of our WAVE-FIELD world with its QUANTUM LOGIC dynamics which are ANDROGYNOUS. It is not simply WHAT WE DO that ‘counts’, which is the MALE ASSERTIVE conjugate since reality includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING aspect as pointed out in Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’ … “There is a tide in the affairs of men Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries.”
But even if such FEMALE accommodating ‘opportunity’ opens up for us, our WESTERN CULTURE interpretation is to give us FULL AUTHORING CREDIT regardless. We do the same thing with BLAME as in the example of the THIN SKULL rule, because it is SIMPLER to just ‘GO WITH THE MALE’ (BINARY LOGIC as in ‘He “EITHER” is “OR” is not responsible for AUTHORING this “EITHER” good “OR” bad action and development) rather than to go with the LESS SIMPLE FEMALE-MALE (androgynous) understanding as in Modern physics and as in indigenous aboriginal culture justice where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING aspect is ALSO taken into account and NOT JUST the MALE ASSERTIVE. But we like to simplify things with BINARY LOGIC and attribute EVERYTHING to the MALE-ASSERTING as if the action were unfolding within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (our WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY which gets rid of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE).
The THIN SKULL RULE demonstrates how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS reduce our language based representation to re-cast the QUANTUM LOGIC reality within a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, wile the ‘tide in the affairs of men’ points to the QUANTUM LOGIC reality wherein what comes of our actions depends upon the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “IN CONJUGATE RELATION WITH” THE MALE ASSERTING. We do not live in an EMPTY SPACE, we are INCLUDED IN THE WAVE-FIELD so that there is a BALANCE between MALE-ASSERTING agency and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING agency. The THIN SKULL rule is an INTELLECT based OBSCURING of the QUANTUM LOGIC conjugate (androgynous) nature of sense-experience reality by allowing intellectual acceptance of “ONLY” MALE ASSERTIVE language-based representations while the ‘tide in the affairs of men’ representation ACKNOWLEDGES the CONJUGATE (accommodating-asserting) nature of sense-experience reality. WESTERN CULTURE has an EGO problem wherein there is an insistence on imposing the abstraction of one-sided male-assertive “AUTHORING” of actions and developments, by SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the FEMALE accommodating conjugate. The ‘tide in the affairs of men’, rather than being seen in terms of QUANTUM LOGIC balance of MALE ASSERTING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING MAKE THE MISTAKE OF IMPUTING FULL AUTHORING CREDIT TO THE MALE ASSERTIVE, thus OBSCURING the role of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.
This OBSCURANTISM has been built into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE by way of the BINARY LOGIC based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (which implies one-sided male-assertive action and development). We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed a comprehensive intellectual abstraction based infrastructure which supports the construction of a BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are now using as our OPERATIVE REALITY. There is no FEMALE CONJUGATE in this one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE, DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, therefore the person throwing the punch that shatters the THIN SKULL’ is charged with AUTHORING the deadly damage done, and likewise those who are masters of profiting from the “tides in the affairs of men” (e.g the Elon Musks etc.) are credit with AUTHORING the tides rather than being manipulators of phenomena based on sensitive dependence on initial conditions (the skier that dislodges snow that turns into an avalanche is not the AUTHOR but the TRIGGER for the avalanche, just as the smoker who carelessly discards his cigarette is not the AUTHOR but the TRIGGER for the resulting conflagration (the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the forest when it is dessicated by solar irradiance).
As in all of these examples, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed a language architecture that OBSCURES THE ACCOMMODATING ROLE OF THE FEMALE and explains all things in the one-sided terms of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (employing the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).
The REDUCTION of the ANDROGYNOUS QUANTUM LOGIC of sense-experience reality to one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE-ONLY BINARY LOGIC constructions INFUSES “OBSCURANTISM” into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT representation. WHAT ‘GOES MISSING’ is the FEMALE CONJUGATE and with it, the WAVE-FIELD understanding of our sense-experience reality.
* * *
OBSCURANTISM: The practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.
SYNOPSIS: BINARY LOGIC is playing a CAT-and-MOUSE game with QUANTUM LOGIC in our language-stimulated understanding of reality. If BINARY LOGIC gets into our mind FIRST, it LOCKS OUT QUANTUM LOGIC yet QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE and thus able to bring deeper understandings. The words “on EARTH as it is in HEAVEN’ in the Christian Lord’s Prayer presupposes a BINARY LOGICAL structure to reality, and EASTER celebrates the existence of this BINARY LOGIC based PAIR which is the very definition of mathematical MUTUAL EXCLUSION. In the indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, we have a QUANTUM LOGIC structure to reality wherein as suggested by the Yin/Yang symbolism where the Material aspect and the Spiritual aspect are NOT mutually exclusive but are related like MATTER and WAVE-FIELD where MATTER is CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD. This relational defines QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium (i.e. the WAVE-FIELD includes the condensations that present as MATERIAL forms in the manner that the spirally WHORLS in river flow, while they seem to be ‘their own thing’ as if separate and independent of the flow, as in fact condensations of the flow as defines the QUANTUM LOGIC relation.
The LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES of “EAST” and ‘WEST’ differ in that the former employs a QUANTUM LOGIC foundation while the latter employs a BINARY LOGIC foundation. It is IMPORTANT to note that the BINARY LOGIC language architecture is SIMPLER than the QUANTUM LOGIC language architecture in the respect that BINARY LOGIC portrays FIGURE and GROUND as TWO separate ONTOLOGICAL entities, QUANTUM LOGIC portrays FIGURE and GROUND as ONE FLUID DYNAMIC. In the EAST’s QUANTUM LOGIC structure we have BOTH female AND male aspects within a conjugate unity, so that QUANTUM LOGIC language architecture can speak of “TOWNING-IN-THE-TRANSFORMING-LANDSCAPE” which is an ANDROGYNOUS (female and male as ONE) conjugate dynamic. In the WEST’S BINARY LOGIC structure, we have only to concern ourselves with MALE ASSERTIVE aspect; i.e. with THE TOWN and its GRAMMAR given MALE ASSERTIVE powers of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.
The difference wherein the EAST’s QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE than the WEST’s BINARY LOGIC shows up in our LANGUAGE based REALITY REPRESENTATIONS. For example, the WEST’s BINARY LOGIC based language presumes that FIGURE and GROUND are TWO SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT ENTITIES, (e.g. where the TOWN) is INDEPENDENT of the landscape it is included within) which we ‘arrange’ by IMAGINING via our LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS that the TOWN sits within an ABSTRACT EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT. The EAST’s QUANTUM LOGIC based language, on the other hand, presumes that FIGURE and GROUND are ONE where the language capture of this is in terms equivalent to THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, keeping TOWNING and TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE together as ONE. The QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the TOWNING and TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is thus one of MUTUAL INCLUSION based on BALANCE, the dynamic form of which is RESONANCE as reaffirms the WAVE-FIELD nature of reality. Thus the EAST and WEST language-based ‘realities’ differ on the basis of their respective QUANTUM LOGIC and BINARY LOGIC foundations, the former being LESS SIMPLE than the latter in the sense that the relation between the WAVE-FIELD and its CONDENSATIONS is LESS SIMPLE than the relation between EMPTY SPACE and MATERIAL EXISTENCE.
While EASTERN CULTURE language architectures preserve the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC relation, WESTERN CULTURE language architectures employ the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC relation. The shift from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC constitutes “OBSCURANTISM”
OBSCURANTISM is achieved when the understanding conveyed is reduced from;
(A) the less simple FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE architectural foundation to;
(B) the simple MALE-ASSERTIVE architectural foundation.
EXAMPLE: OBSCURANTISM is achieved by the reduction from;
(A) There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE to,
(B) The TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING within a notional ABSOLUTE, EMPTY, INFINITE SPACE.
NOTE: (B) constitutes a SIMPLIFYING MALE-ASSERTIVE SUBSTITUTE for the FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD. This common WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLIFIED LANGUAGE based representation brings out a loss of expressive capability that suggests the term, DEA ABSCONDITA. This term points to the fact that the FEMALE CONJUGATE which is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (nonlocal, implicit relational continuum aka ‘wave-field’) and thus THE WHOLE ALL-INCLUDING FIELD, is DROPPED from the representation leaving only the ORPHANED MALE-ASSERTING AGENT TO ‘POSE’ as the LOCAL AUTHOR of the manifest actions and developments. The DROPPING OUT of the PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENCY, the FEMALE CONJUGATE which, in the example, is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, WHICH “INCLUDES” the “TOWNING”, explains the choice of “DEA ABSCONDITA”. NOTIONALLY ENDOWING THE TOWN “ON ITS OWN” with POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS INCLUDING GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION of goods and services, stems from MALE EGO and is achieved through the LOCAL AUTHOR abstraction created with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche points out.
* * *
There seems to be a fortuitous (?) synchronicity to my being at the point of summarizing a major problem in our LANGUAGE, as Bohm and Nietzsche have identified, the problem of FRAGMENTATION and the associated confusion of OBSCURANTISM which is where we reduce the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC to SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC. The OBSCURANTISM comes into play as we employ “BINARY LOGIC” in our language based representations where the phenomena of NATURE demands a QUANTUM LOGIC representation. For example, where the indigenous aboriginal languages say ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, our Common Average European language architectures SIMPLIFY this by DIFFERENTIATING OUT ‘the TOWNING’, making it over into a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as Nietzsche refers to it. What this does is to SIDESTEP the innate interdependent inclusion of the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, by abstractly using NAMING to impute LOCAL BEING and conflating this FIRST ERROR with the SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR which we use to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWER to the NAMING-instantiated LOCAL BEING.
THIS DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR IS THE BIRTH OF BINARY LOGIC IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.
THERE IS NONE OF THIS BINARY LOGIC SPLITTING APART OF FIGURE AND GROUND IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE AND WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS NOW KNOW WHY FROM MODERN PHYSICS WHICH HAS SIMPLY REMINDED US OF THE QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE OF REALITY WHEREIN THE MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING (electromagnetic) WAVE-FIELD. WHCH ANSWERS THE AGE-OLD QUESTION OF ‘THE TWO AND THE ONE’ (see anthropologist Mircea Eliade’s ‘Mephistopheles et l’Androgyne’, Engish title ‘the TWO and the ONE’). That is, there has been division in understanding over whether MATERIAL FORMS MOVE THROUGH THE ‘ETHER’ or whether the ETHER has LUMPS IN IT (now we know that SPACE is the WAVE-FIELD while MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD, a reality that means that QUANTUM LOGIC is the basic LOGIC OF THE WORLD WE LIVE IN.
QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which is just restating the fact that MATTER is a CONDENSATION of the ALL-PERVADING ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD. That is, ‘matter’ is a concentration of field strength within the field which makes that intense lump of field visible and tangible. And because the WAVE-FIELD is in flux the patterns where the intensity is higher (which we recognize as material objects) can change and move without there ever being any persisting ‘material body’ involved. This is why the world has been described by some as a holographic universe because a hologram has this same property where we can physically distinguish between content and container but rather than this being due to MATTER and EMPTY SPACE, it is due to CONDENSATIONS OF FIELD WITHIN FIELD.
RIGHT HERE WE HAVE THE ISSUE OF HOW QUANTUM LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND (matter and space) ARE ONE rather than as BINARY LOGIC would have it, FIGURE and GROUND (matter and space) are TWO, an issue which divides the indigenous aboriginal culture from the “WESTERN EUROPEAN” cultures and which is captured in the respective language architectures.
We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game. If we show ourselves we see we are, we shall break the rules and we will punish ourselves We must play our game, of not seeing we see the game.” — after R. D. Laing (Knots)
“OBSCURANTISM”, “The practice of preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.”
OBSCURANTISM is a game that WE HAVE BUILT INTO WESTERN CULTURE, INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE by way of the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR with its LOCAL AUTHORING ILLUSION. The LOCAL AUTHORING is the basis of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on BINARY LOGIC which is SIMPLER than our QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.
There is OBSCURANTISM in reducing the QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTATION “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” to the BINARY LOGIC REPRESENTATION. “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCTING goods and services”, … for once we LATCH ON to thinking in the SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC terms of LOCAL AUTHORING, the LESS SIMPLE understanding in QUANTUM LOGIC terms is OBSCURED. Instead of the QUANTUM LOGIC “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which captures the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD “CONTENTS-AND-CONTAINER-ARE-ONE” reality, the INJECTING of the SIMPLIFYING BINARY LOGIC NAMING and GRAMMAR FRAGMENTATION into “the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services” OBSCURES the LESS SIMPLE “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.
This OBSCURANTISM which injects a SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” in place of the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience-affirmed REALITY PERVADES WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS and as David Bohm has pointed out, is the source of much FRAGMENTATION and DYSFUNCTION in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC.
OBSCURANTIST LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS SUCH AS RUSSIA ATTACKS UKRAINE …. psychologically break out RUSSIA and UKRAINE like two ISLANDS in the OCEAN, OBSCURING the reality that the profiles of these TWO ISLANDS can be followed down their respective flanks, down below the water’s surface, down into the depths to the ocean floor to the CONTINUOUS surface of the SPHERE of the earth, informing us that the TWO are in fact only ONE, that FIGURE and GROUND are only ONE as is a STATEMENT of QUANTUM LOGIC, which, in our WESTERN CULTURE PENCHANT FOR BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS is OBSCURED. BINARY LOGIC obscures QUANTUM LOGIC which is LESS SIMPLE and cannot be conveyed by BINARY LOGIC.
This note ‘started off’ to be an explanation of the relationship between BINARY LOGIC (two-state EITHER/OR LOGIC) and QUANTUM LOGIC (three state BOTH/AND BALANCE LOGIC). BINARY LOGIC pervades our WESTERN CULTURE while QUANTUM LOGIC pervades indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta. This gets into the different use and influence of LOCAL and EXPLICIT vis a vis the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
In terms of WAVE-FIELD theory, these are referred to as the REAL and IMAGINARY components of a COMPLEX REALITY (the WAVE-FIELD).
EMERSON and NIETZSCHE focused, respectively, on the IMAGINARY and REAL components while BOHM focused on the WAVE-FIELD itself.
So, I have ‘adjusted’ the orientation of this ‘note’ to serve the BRINGING INTO CONNECTIVE CONFLUENCE, all THREE of these contributions to understanding the WAVE-FIELD nature or reality. Emerson is using romantic language to allude to the often forgotten NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT aspect of reality. Nietzsche is alluding to the WESTERN CULTURE popularized LOCAL and EXPLICIT with an aggressive approach that aims to SHATTER its pretention to ‘completeness’ by WESTERN CULTURE language architecture’s attempt to foist the MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE on us, as if to declare that that is all that is necessary for capturing ‘reality’.
Nietzsche’s ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ label is an intentional pejorative used to SMASH the concept of the LOCAL AUTHOR and show that it is an ARTIFICIAL CREATION achieved by GLOMMING TOGETHER the language operatives of NAMING and GRAMMAR so that the NAMING establishes a LOCAL PRESENCE and the GRAMMAR conflates this by imputing the POWER OF AUTHORING ACTION to the LOCAL PRESENCE. The LOCAL AUTHOR concept is thus a DECEPTION that needs to be SMASHED in the same sense that the Celts SMASHED STATUES since they implied that something innately spiritual (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) could be reduced to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.
TODAY, we are in possession of a HUGE ARCHIVE of WRITINGS, most of which are giving a foundational role to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is imputing LOCAL AUTHORING. THESE CONSTRUCTIONS NEED TO BE SMASHED in order to get to the sense-experience affirmable understanding which is FLUID as in the WAVE-FIELD dynamic.
Bohm’s orientation has always been to GET IT RIGHT IN THE FIRST PLACE by employing a FLOW-BASED language architecture (e.g. his Rheomode language, which he has pointed out, is a language architecture that has already been developed and exists in the indigenous aboriginal languages). So, here is where EMERSON, NIETZSCHE and BOHM are respectively “COMING FROM”
Emerson: Pointing out in The Method of Nature, that the ALL-INCLUDING FLUID ASPECT of NATURE is DROPPED OUT by our language architecture and we end up ‘going only with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, having dropped out the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT;
A man’s wisdom is to know that all ends are momentary, that the best end must be superseded by a better. But there is a mischievous tendency in him to transfer his thought from the life to the ends, to quit his agency and rest in his acts: the tools run away with the workman, the human with the divine. — Emerson
In other words, in our use of thought and language, the local and explicit which is meant only as a Wittgenstein Ladder to INFER the fluid reality; i.e. the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM that lies beyond the reach of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, that latter having utility BUT ONLY AS TOOL OF INFERENCE of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
The WESTERN CULTURE SCREW-UP IS THUS the DUMBING DOWN (SIMPLIFYING) of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT. This SIMPLIFICATION or “SIMPLI-FICTION” is done simply by injecting a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which IS capturable in LOCAL, EXPLICIT language constructs, so that is what we END UP WITH using, i.e. bunch of LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘IDOLS’ which are like the STATUES of GODS and MEN that Brennus and the Celts SMASHED because the very existence of these statues implied that the SUBJECTS could be reduced to LOCAL and EXPLICIT components. This was the same issue as induced Charles Dickens to write ‘HARD TIMES’ wherein the school teacher Gradgrind, is mocked for his attempts to PURGE THE POETIC (the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) from his students thinking entirely.
Charles Dickens in ‘Hard Times’ in the sequence where ‘Sissy Jupe’s relational understanding of a horse is ‘put down’ by her teacher Thomas Gradgrind who insists on grounding all understanding in ‘being’-based ‘facts’ as is the way of mainstream ‘science’;
“Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to Facts, sir!”
‘Bitzer,’ said Thomas Gradgrind. ‘Your definition of a horse.’
‘Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds coat in the spring; in marshy countries, sheds hoofs, too. Hoofs hard, but requiring to be shod with iron. Age known by marks in mouth.’ Thus (and much more) Bitzer. — Charles Dickens, ‘Hard Times’
THERE IS A BATTLE GOING ON IN WESTERN CULTURE WHICH HAS BEEN PUSHING THE OVERALL SOCIAL COLLECTIVE IN THE DIRECTION OF GOING EXCLUSIVELY WITH THE ‘LOCAL AND EXPLICIT’ AND ‘DROPPING OUT ENTIRELY’, THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT.
THIS IS NOTHING OTHER THAN THE REDUCTION OF THE WAVE-DYNAMIC WHICH IS MATHEMATICALLY CONSTITUTE BY BOTH ‘REAL’ (LOCAL, EXPLICIT) AND ‘IMAGINARY’ (NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT) ‘COMPONENTS’.
For example, the indigenous aboriginal language will convey the equivalent of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which captures BOTH the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘TOWNING’ but keeps it in context with the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’. MEANWHILE, our WESTERN CULTURE language will SEPARATE OUT the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and use GRAMMAR to ANIMATE IT as if it were an INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF with its own POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and development, strutting its stuff within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE. as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING products and services.
OK, THAT IS A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF WHERE EMERSON AND NIETTZSCHE ARE COMING FROM; i.e. EMERSON is employing poetic language to get to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT aspect of reality and pointing out that we have abandoned it and are instead making EXCLUSIVE use of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT which one might say is the LESSER ASPECT. NIETZSCHE IS NOW LEFT TO DEAL WITH THE WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHEREIN THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT IS GIVEN THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE (WHICH IS WHERE BINARY LOGIC WHICH AFFIRMS THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT AS IN “EITHER” IS “OR” IS NOT IS GIVEN PRECEDENCE OVER QUANTUM LOGIC WHICH AFFIRMS THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT AS IN BALANCE AND IMBALANCE).
LAST BUT NOT LEAST, DAVID BOHM WHO HAS ‘HELD OUT’ FOR A FULLY ‘WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE’ LANGUAGE (A FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE) SO THAT WE DON’T EVEN BEGIN TO GENERATE MASSIVE FILES OF SCREWED UP LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION BASED ON THE INNATELY DEFICIENT COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WITH ITS DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR, LOCAL AUTHORING STRUCTURES.
BINARY LOGIC IS A DEVICE FOR SERVING UP A SIMPLIFIED REPRESENTATION OF REALITY, OR MORE ACCURATELY, “CONSTRUCTING A SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHICH IS SIMPLER”
There are ANALOGIES here such as (A) The Cuckoo’s egg that inserts a more simple bird into a less simple bird’s supportive milieu, or, (B) Putting a simple Volkswagen engine into a PORSCHE because ‘the simpler thing CAN FIT INTO THE SLOT meant for something LESS SIMPLE. Analogies also include WHAT GOES ON WITH THE ILLNESS “COLITIS” which comes in the wake of the administering of an ANTI-biotic that KILLS many of the BODY’S “ESSENTIAL” (good) COMPLEX MICROBES who’s places are then “OCCUPIED” (‘taken over’) by SIMPLER MICROBES that ‘CAN’T DO THE LESS SIMPLE JOB’ but whose ‘OCCUPATION’ of the key slots BLOCKS THE RETURN of the NEEDED, LESS SIMPLE MICROBES. The ‘work-around’ for this is to RE-LOAD the FULL MICROBIAL ASSEMBLAGE complete with “SOCKETS AND THEIR PROPER OCCUPANTS”.
This process, termed “Fecal Microbiota Transplantation” or FMT resolves the dilemma wherein the ‘fancy microbe apartments’ that were ‘cleared out’ by the antibiotic and then re-occupied by simpler microbes BLOCK RE-ENTRY of the needed “LESS SIMPLE’ microbes. The problem is that the microbes arrange themselves so as to form ‘openings’ based on a full complement of the full diversity of microbes which come together so as to form custom slots hat accommodate the full diversity arranged so as to open up custom slots for each other where the OCCUPANT must MATCH THE SLOT, and the LESS SIMPLE SLOT must be filled with the corresponding LESS SIMPLE OCCUPANT.
This scheme is FOILED in the wake of the antibiotic administering since many microbial species are ELIMINATED IN A WILLY-NILLY manner, so that the matched arrangement of SOCKETS and OCCUPANTS is MESSED UP and we have the WRONG OCCUPANTS in the WRONG SOCKETS and the manifestation of this screw-up is COLITIS, the REMEDY for which is to assist the body in restoring the healthy arrangement of SOCKETS and OCCUPANTS in the microbial assemblage. MORE ANTI-BIOTICS to kill more strains of microbes is NOT the REMEDY since the PROBLEM of COLITIS is the ABSENCE OF ESSENTIAL MICROBES, hence the successful REMEDY of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation which RESTORES those microbial strains THAT HAVE BEEN ELMINATED BY THE ANTI-BIOTICS, a RESTORATION that cannot be achieved by administering MORE ANTI-BIOTICS since ANTI-BIOTICS only REMOVE microbes and COLITIS is resolved by RESTORING essential microbes that are no longer present, having been removed by the antio-biotics.
It is IMPORTANT to note that the IMBALANCE in microbial content has led to the MISTAKEN JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS when observing that unusual ‘rogue’ strains of microbes are proliferating in the body, that these ‘rogue’ microbes ARE THE CAUSE OF ILLNESS. THEY ARE NOT THE CAUSE OF ILLNESS, they are symptomatic of IMBALANCE in the microbial assemblage, THE REMEDY FOR WHICH IS RE-BALANCING the microbial assemblage, for which the 90+ percent successful remedy is Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.
* * *
WHY SO MUCH VERBIAGE ON FMT WHEN THE MAIN TOPIC IS TO ELUCIDATE ON BINARY LOGIC VIS A VIS QUANTUM LOGIC? I.E. …
How WESTERN and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES DIFFER in their SHORTCHANGING REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY.0
AUTHOR’S PREFACE: Understanding the PSYCHO-DYNAMICS of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE
Imagine YOURSELF as an ARCHITECT of LANGUAGE. If you do, you will come to a GREAT DIVIDE in ARCHITECTURAL OPTION which can be compared to observing the GATHERING and SCATTERING of ants as the fetch from a pool of honey beneath a dripping bees nest high above. On the flat ground, the ants come and go in WAVES; i.e. they GATHER and SCATTER as the come to collect and depart to deliver the honey. What the OUTSIDE OBSERVER SEES is a GATHERING and SCATTERING pattern which, although it is in continuing flux, impresses upon us a REPRESENTATION featuring “A CLUSTER” which undergoes cycles of GROWTH and SHRINKAGE, even though the actual dynamic is cluster-ING and the CLUSTER part of it is APPEARANCE and WE HAD BETTER BE CAREFUL because if we ARCHITECT a LANGUAGE which employs the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we will end up IMPUTING LOCAL BEING to ‘the CLUSTER’ and compound this FIRST ERROR with the SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR which imputes to the FIRST ERROR, i.e. ‘the CLUSTER’, its own (notional) POWERS OF AUTHORING GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.
This DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING where there is one, gets to play an AMAZING ROLE in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC by GETTING INTO THE PSYCHE OF THE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT through the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR LANGUAGE-BASED FRAGMENTATION scheme. So, instead of an understanding in terms of GATHERING-SCATTERING as in CLUSTERING (an innately fluid dynamic), we INVERT our understanding and CONJURE UP a SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring LOCAL AUTHORING of GROWTH and SHRINKAGE. Instead of WAVES of GATHERING and SCATTERING as in CLUSTERING, we have ‘the CLUSTER’ and instead of the GATHERING phase of CLUSTERING, we have GROWTH of the CLUSTER, and instead of the SCATTERING phase of CLUSTERING, we have SHRINKAGE of the CLUSTER, such the we end up constructing a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which imputes AUTHORING POWER to the CLUSTER, a vision-and-psyche contrived ILLUSION.
The SIMPLIFYING of REALITY by reducing the RESONANCE based WAVES of GATHERING and SCATTERING to a LOCAL AUTHOR based SUBSTITUTE REALITY is what distinguishes indigenous aboriginal languages from WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European languages. Instead of acknowledging as BASIC, the RESONANCE based features such as the CLUSTERING or the TOWNING, our WESTERN CULTURE approach to LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION is to SIMPLIFY, the TOWNING in the same sense as the CLUSTERING EXAMPLE, using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche) to impute LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.
GOODBYE RESONANCE BASED TRANSFORMATION, …HELLO FRAGMENTATION.
UNDERSTANDING the PSYCHO-DYNAMICS of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS WHAT THIS ESSAY IS ALL ABOUT.
* * *
That is, the SHORTCHANGING in the REPRESENTATION of REALITY in indigenous aboriginal languages “IS FAR LESS” than the SHORTCHANGING of REALITY in WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European language architectures, and the following explains (a) how this is the case, and (b) some of the important ramification that come from our ACTING on the basis of these INACCURATE LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS..
There must first be a reminder that there are two basically different types of language architectures (A) flow-based (nonlocal-implicit) as with indigenous aboriginal language and Bohm’s ‘Rheomode’ language architecture, and (B) object-based (local, explicit) as with the Common Average European language architecture;
–1- EXAMPLE of FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE: “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”. Note the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING combined inference, characteristic of FLOW.
–2- EXAMPLE OF OBJECT-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE: “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services. Note the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE inference (This come with the SUBSTITUTION of absolute empty and infinite space IN PLACE OF the FEMALE accommodative conjugate).
THAT IS; THERE ARE TWO LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES; (-1-) the “LESS-SIMPLE” (quantum logic) NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FLOW-BASED (indigenous languages, Bohm’s Rheomode) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is capable of DIRECTLY expressing BALANCE and IMBALANCE, and, (-2-) the SIMPLE (binary logic) LOCAL, EXPLICIT OBJECT-BASED (Western Culture Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE) which is INCAPABLE of DIRECTLY expressing BALANCE.
The respective examples illustrate the fact that the FLOW-BASED language architecture (e.g. ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ avoids any LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONSTRAINING so that the entire FIGURE and GROUND combination is free to transform as ONE; i.e. This language architecture which is capable of expressing FIGURE and GROUND as ONE is said to have a QUANTUM LOGIC capability. This can be understood in that the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is like the BOILING in rapidly flowing stream where BOILING and the FLOWING are ONE. For example, we would be in error to speak of the BOIL ‘growing’, ‘devloping’ and ‘producing turbulence’ as if it HAD ITS OWN LOCAL AUTHORING POWER, which would also, at the same time, imply its INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE, a inference that would FORCE on the viewer the necessity of CREATING an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.
In other words, for FLOW-BASED language architecture supports the representation of “FIGURE” and “GROUND” as “ONE” as captured with ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) , … and DOES NOT INVOLVE the SPLITTING APART of “FIGURE” and “GROUND”, so that the THEN-LIBERATED “TOWN” is free to do its own one-sided MALE-ASSERTING “ACTION”, “DEVELOPMENT”, “PRODUCTION”.