TIME TO GET HONEST: It’s time to ACKNOWLEDGE that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’0
We, ourselves, and all things are INCLUSIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which is a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM that is IMPOSSIBLE TO ‘REPRESENT’ with LANGUAGE. Not only Lau Tzu is on record as reminding us that ‘the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’, Modern physics has likewise pointed out that we live in an all-including WAVE-FIELD in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.
As has been pointed out, the WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, because it is designed for DIFFERENTIATION, where we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to IMPUTE LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING to CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, and pretend that the all-including WAVE-FIELD, because it is not accessible to our visual sensing, DOES NOT EXIST or in other words, that what exists is ONLY MATERIAL BEINGS that purportedly move about and interact within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE. This is an unreal, unsupported by sense-experience and unsupported by Modern physics ILLUSION that, as Benjamin Whorf shows, COMES FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE wherein we DUMB DOWN the INTEGRAL, ALL-PERVADING WAVE-FIELD with its material CONDENSATIONS, a reality with a QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC structure (the condensations are at the same time the containing wave-field there are included in, so that there is no such thing as MOTION (which implies things with persisting ‘being’), but instead only TRANSFORMATION which is purely relational.
A LANGUAGE based on DIFFERENTIATION is a MISTAKE since it FRAGMENTS not only ‘what we are seeing out there’, but ‘what we are thinking in here’. WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE “IS SUCH A MISTAKE” as pointed out by Nietzsche in that our WESTERN CULTURE language habit is to give a foundational role to LOCAL AUTHORING in spite of the fact that there is no such thing as LOCAL AUTHORING within the real world of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. Thus THE WORLD OF WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE (not to be confused with the WORLD OF DIRECT SENSE-EXPERIENCE that does NOT have to depend on DUMBED DOWN reductions from sense-experience to intellectual linguistic construction. But we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have become habituated (mesmerized? addicted?) to employing the DUMBED DOWN “LOCAL AUTHORING’ based linguistic constructions of a simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY as our OPERATIVE REALITY, making believe that LOCAL AUTHORING is legitimate … hence the writing of this note entitled “TIME TO GET HONEST: It’s time to ACKNOWLEDGE that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ .
There’s no problem convincing indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING because that’s where they have been ‘coming from’, and who could have stopped the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL-ORGANIZATIONAL BEHEMOTH from IMPOSING and ENFORCING at least feigned public belief in such LOCAL AUTHORING abstractions as WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-ENDOWING POWER (of both INENTING INDEPENDENT BEING by way of DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE and imputing LOCAL AUTHORIN POWERS to the INDEPENDENT BEINGS. Anyone who tries to state the obvious and expose the WESTERN CULTURE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES, it likely to re-learn that same lesson that Giordano Bruno learned when he was burned at the stake back in 1600, for the HERESY of relativity and his comment that ‘The majority has no monopoly on determining TRUTH’. Of course, a more experience based wisdom was that cited by Lafontaine; ‘La raison du plus fort est toujours la meilleure’ (‘the reasoning/truth of the most powerful is always the best’.)
The WESTERN CULTURE MAJORITY has decided that ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ is something ‘real’ and not simply a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR MALE ASSERTION as when we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ while DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE ‘the WILDERNESS is SHRINKING’. So, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, in spite of protests and mocking even, of the indigenous aboriginals and Taoists etc. have in fact supported the language-based promoting of a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” in which “LOCAL AUTHORING” is a MAJOR PLAYER, leading to pervasive FRAGMENTATION, not only in terms of DECLARATIONS OF NATIONAL AND HUMAN-BEING INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE but in the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-CONDITIONED PSYCHES that play along with such unfounded abstraction.
“LOCAL AUTHORING” is a WESTERN CULTURE “MYTH” and “CRAZY-MAKER” but it has become the OPERATIVE TRUTH of the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT SOCIAL COLLECTIVE which is currently THE MOST POWERFUL and as the indigenous aboriginal cultures have seen, protest by way of laughing, mocking or resisting this WESTERN CULTURE “EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES” fiasco has not succeeded in ‘bringing it down’ because the abstraction of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ is, as systems science would described it, ‘LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS’.
Foremost among these HIGH SWITCHING COSTS is the cost of the loss of INFLATED EGO of those claiming to be the ‘LOCAL AUTHORS’ of amazing achievements, ignoring the SENSE-EXPERIENCE affirmed QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of our inclusion as CONDENSATIONS within the all-including NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the GREAT HARMONY of the indigenous aboriginals aka the Tao of Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents. There is NO LOCAL AUTHORING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.
The WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR ABSTRACTION of the LOCAL AUTHOR (notionally) transfers the power that is innate in the transforming WAVE-FIELD that manifests THROUGH CONDENSATIONS (which are innately included and never ‘separate out’ as would reduce the QUANTUM LOGIC FIGURE-AND-GROUND-ARE-ONE RELATION to a BINARY LOGIC FIGURE-AND-GROUND-ARE-TWO relation). LOCAL AUTHORING is an artifact of LINGUISTIC ARCHITECTURE REDUCTION from “BOTH/AND” QUANTUM LOGIC to “EITHER/OR” BINARY LOGIC; e.g. from the HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD to the ‘HUMAN’ in the ABSOLUTE INFINITE EMPTINESS of ABSTRACT EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY.
* * *
The choice of the ‘TIME TO GET HONEST’ title is to point out the need to OVERTLY DISTINGUISH between BINARY LOGIC which is ABSTRACTION that is responsible for the ABSTRACT notion of LOCAL AUTHORING, on the one hand, and QUANTUM LOGIC which is THE WAY OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN NATURE’S TRANSFORMATION based WORKINGS. QUANTUM LOGIC captures the reality of our being CONDENSATIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.
The NITTY GRITTY of WESTERN CULTURE FRAGMENTATION0
FORWARD: Linguistic Obscurantism is the pathway wherein WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE to construct a SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein MECHANISTIC CREATION and DESTRUCTION is SUBSTITUTED for QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION.
We Western Culture Adherents, when we are in talking mode, are now PSYCHOLOGICALLY living in LANGUAGE-based SIMPLIFED SUBSTITUTE REALITY even as our sense-experience reality is based on awareness of inclusion in TRANSFORMATION, a physically affirmable reality acknowledged by the indigenous aboriginal, Taoists/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta LANGUAGE GROUPS as well as by Modern Physics. Developing from this SPLIT between intellectual-linguistic and sensory experience realities is the MAJOR GAP between the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY and our INTUITIVE SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY wherein the SIMPLIFIED INTELLECTUAL-LINGUISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY is seen through the LINGUISTIC-LENSES of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based abstraction of “LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS” while the actual sense-experience affirmed REALITY comes in the form of ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION (the transforming relational continuum) which includes HUMANINGS-in-the-TRANSFORMING UNUUM. We understand this in the sense of QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the including medium as in the all-including WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION.
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE uses a REDUCTION technique to SIMPLIFY/REDUCE the ANDROGYNOUS (QUANTUM LOGIC) dynamic of WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION to one-sided (BINARY LOGIC) MALE ASSERTING LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF based ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT (thanks to the ‘double error’ of naming and grammar), thus reducing WAVE-FIELD NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMATION wherein MATERIAL FORMS are BOTH distinguishable-forms-with-distinguishable behaviours while they are at the same time inclusions in the transforming relational continuum also known as the WAVE-FIELD.
The sense-experience affirmed ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD REALITY which manifests as all-including TRANSFORMATION is thus REPLACED, by way of this REDUCTION, to a LANGUAGE based SUBSTITUTE REALITY using the WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European Language Architecture, that DROPS OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD dynamic, creating an abstract one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ that serves as the WESTERN CULTURE “OPERATIVE REALITY”.
This LANGUAGE based scheme develops a SUBSTITUTE for the ‘real’ world dynamic of the all-including WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION “BY DROPPING OUT” THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, creating a LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY where action and development is attributed FULLY and SOLELY to MALE-ASSERTING AGENCY, as for example, in the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’.
It is this DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, which is the PRIMARY INFLUENCE in TRANSFORMATION that reduces language based constructions to, in mathematical terms, the REAL component of the COMPLEX SIGNAL which gives the APPEARANCE that the MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT is the FULL and SOLE REALITY AUTHORING SOURCE, hence the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ and many more linguistic DROPOUTS of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.
Since the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is DROPPED OUT in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, the result is FRAGMENATATION since all actions are captured in language as MALE ASSERTING actions which is the ‘REAL’ component in the ‘REAL’ + ‘IMAGINARY’ WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE. The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based DROP OUT turns the tables by erroneously PROMOTING the material condensations, which are secondary APPREARANCES, to PRIMARY REALITY STATUS within the SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while DROPPING OUT of the REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING ENTIRELY, the ‘IMAGINARY’ component which is the all-including WAVE-FIELD within which material forms are ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN” (APPEARANCE).
While the CONDENSATIONS give VISIBILITY to the dynamic of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, the VISIBLE aspect is the secondary CONDENSATION, and since it is the REAL component of the COMPLEX REAL + IMAGINARY (MALE ASSERTING + FEMALE ACCOMMODATING) WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE, we have the situation within the language based construction where that which is REAL and VISIBLE CONDENSATIONS are, in sense-experience reality, secondary APPEARANCE while the IMAGINARY and NON-VISIBLE (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING) TRANSFORMING WAVEFIELD WHICH INCLUDES THE CONDENSATIONS is the PRIMARY sense-experience reality. For example, when we are driving in the flow of freeway traffic, our movements are inductively shaped by the opening of relational channels. RATHER THAN OPENINGS CREATED BY MATERIAL FORMS MOVING APART TO EXPOSE A SUBSTRATE OF ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE THAT ACCOMMODATES THE ACTION-AUTHORING DYNAMICS OF ‘MATERIAL FORMS’, THE RELATIONAL OPENINGS ARE A FEATURE OF THE OVERALL TRANSFORMING OF THE WAVE-FIELD WHEREIN MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD.
THERE IS A PSYCHOLOGICAL-VISUAL INVERSION HERE WHERE WE MISTAKENLY CREDIT THE MATERIAL FORMS AS THE ACTION AUTHORING SOURCE AND ASSUME AN EMPTY PASSIVE CONTAINING SPACE. THIS BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF REALITY THAT DROPS OUT THE FEMALE AUTHORING AGENCY BY SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE MEPTY SPACE FOR ENERGY-CHARGED FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘WAVE-FIELD’. SO, IN REALITY WHAT LOOKS LIKE ‘EMPTINESS’ IS THE FULLNESS OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM. WHAT APPEARS TO BE MATERIAL BEINGS WITH THEIR OWN SOURCE OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT, ARE INSTEAD, CONDENSATION OF AND IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, WHICH REQUIRES THE LESS SIMPLE (THAN BINARY LOGIC) QUANTUM LOGIC TREATMENT IN LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION..
THUS, THE VISIBLE QUANTUM LOGIC MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS ARE ONLY SPOTS IN A NOT-DIRECTLY VISIBLE WAVE-FIELD PLENUM. THIS CONFLICTS WITH THE BINARY LOGIC UNDERSTANDING, BUILT INTO WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, WHERE THE MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS ARE JUDGED TO BE REAL, ABSOLUTE MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES SITUATIED WITHIN AN ABSOUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE THUS LEFT OURSELVES WITH A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THAT PROMOTES THE SECONDARY WAVE-FIELD CONDENSATIONS TO PRIMARY REALITY STATUS WHILE DISMISSING THE PRIMARY WAVE-FIELD REALITY AS AN ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT, PROMOTING THE CONDENSATIONS TO PRIMARY REALITY STATUS BY ANOINTING THEM WITH ABSOLUTE FIXED, INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEING STATUS AND GRAMMAR GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION of goods and services.
In this modeling of reality, the MALE-ASSERTING PUNCH “APPEARS” to prevail GENERALLY and have its way because of its visible material form, but as Lao Tzu points out, the greater reality with the clay vessel or the wheel is the HOLE in the middle. The concave valley hole organizes the rainfall runoff and trickles by inductively pulling them together into streams and streams into the mighty RAGING RIVER which is then acclaimed for its MALE ASSERTING POWER of PLOUGHING THE CANYON FURROW, the natural primacy of the FEMALE INDUCTIVE INFLUENCE being lost in the LINGUISTIC WORD-SHUFFLE..
YES, it is possible to architect LANGUAGE that will support the construction of a MATERIAL BEING (MALE ASSERTING) SUBSTITUTE REALITY as has been done in WESTERN CULTURE as constituted by one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (dropping out the FEMALE CONJUGATE) and to use this LANGUAGE BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY as the OPERATIVE REALITY for organizing what we linguistically connote to be male asserting actions and developments; i.e. the MALE without the FEMALE, the REAL without the IMAGINARY, CONSTRUCTION and DESTRUCTION without TRANSFORMATION.
This DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (the substituting of empty space) is the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DESIGN. While this LANGUAGE supports the construction of SIMPLIFIED SUBTITUTE REALITY, its constructions are seriously ‘at odds’ with SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY due to the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.
IT IS ALSO POSSIBLE to architect LANGUAGE that will support our sense-experience of inclusion in ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION which has a QUANTUM LOGIC structure wherein female-accommodating and male asserting are in conjugate union, an understanding that is in contradiction to the OBSCURANTISM built into the ‘Thin Skull Rule’ which instead DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD and gives a foundational role to the MALE ASSERTING conjugate on its own. The Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta ANDROGYNOUS, QUANTUM LOGIC language architecture, with its exemplars such as Rheomode and Algonquin, is manifest in constructions such as ‘there is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, capturing the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation. This is a LANGUAGE BASED ‘REALITY’ that involves the sending of COMPLEX (real + imaginary conjugate or MALE-ASSERTING + FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate SIGNALS that conform with SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD.
The WESTERN CULTURE orientation to one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (dropping out the FEMALE CONJUGATE) and to use this LANGUAGE BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY as the OPERATIVE REALITY is the continuing source of FRAGMENTATION in both a PSYCHOLOGICAL and SOCIAL-RELATIONAL context.
* * *
We Live in a WAVE-FIELD and this works fine but if we want to TALK ABOUT IT, this requires a COMPLEX LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE in the sense that it has both a REAL and IMAGINARY component.
Indigenous aboriginals HAVE such a LANGUAGE while WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have a SIMPLIFIED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE where the simplification is the REDUCTION of the needed COMPLEX LANGUAGE to just the REAL component, which we get by DROPPING OFF the IMAGINARY component. Here’s an example;
The indigenous aboriginal language is COMPLEX; e.g. the COMPLEX language construction is; “There is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM” which means that there is HUMANING in the WAVE-FIELD in the sense that the material forms we call HUMANS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD. This relationship where the HUMANING is BOTH ITSELF AND at the same time a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD is the QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION. It is like the WHORLING in the FLOWING of a whirlpool in a stream where what we are actually seeing is the TRANSFORMING FLOW of the stream since the WHORLING is INCLUDED in the FLOWING. This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is general in nature and is supported by Modern physics which is where the term QUANTUM LOGIC comes from which is referring to this BOTH/AND relation where the WHORLING is “BOTH” its WHORLING SELF “AND” its FLOWING self. This is to say that THERE ARE NOT “TWO THINGS HERE”. THE WHORLING is NOT INDEPENDENT OF THE FLOWING, the WHORLING IS A FEATURE OF THE FLOWING. THIS IS WHAT QUANTUM LOGIC MEANS and it is the PHYSICAL REALITY. WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IMPOSES BINARY LOGIC BASED SIMPLIFICATION that ABSTRACTLY SPLITS APART “WHORLING'” and “FLOWING”.
Thus, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that SIMPLIFIES and describes this QUANTUM LOGIC reality with BINARY LOGIC whereby we change our articulation of the WHORLING IN THE FLOWING wherein we re-capture WHORLING-as-an-action, as a THING, by substituting the noun ‘WHORL’ and then we use (as Nietzsche has pointed out) the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING (WHORL) and GRAMMAR (the WHORL is growing, developing and producing a disturbance), so that as far as our LANGUAGE usage goes, instead of there only being ONE DYNAMIC (WHORLING IN THE FLOWING) we put together the DOUBLE ERROR construct so that we are speaking as if there are TWO SEPARATE THINGS; i.e. the WHORL and the FLOW and we are saying that THE WHORL IS “A DISTURBANCE” THAT IS MOVING “THROUGH THE FLOW” which is SEPARATE from the FLOW.
OK, I switched from HUMANING to WHORLING because I thought it might be easier to get the point across (without getting ‘personal’) but the procedure whereby we use language to reduce FLOW-based QUANTUM LOGIC to THING-based BINARY LOGIC applies generally and ONLY THE FORMER (QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE) IS SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE and that is ‘THERE IS WHORLING IN THE FLOWING’ which is the QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization since that is the ACTUAL PHYSICAL RELATIONSHIP where there is WHORLING IN THE FLOWING or HUMANING IN THE FLOWING. The FLOWING is the WAVE-FIELD so MODERN PHYSICS is telling us that we live in an all-including WAVE-FIELD or in other words, an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which there are CONDENSATION based features (that WE RE-CAST with LANGUAGE and GRAMMAR as INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS) that are so common and familiar to all of us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, BUT ONLY BY WAY OF LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTIONS because there are no such things as ‘INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS’ in the real world of sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, there are only CONDENSATIONS that are intrinsically INTEGRAL to the all-including WAVE-FIELD and only APPEAR ‘to have a ‘life of their own’ (as WHORLS and HUMANS ‘on their own’ in ’empty space’ instead of WHORLINGS and HUMANINGS in the TRANSFORMING PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.
But when it comes to USING LANGUAGE to TALK ABOUT THESE MATERIAL FORMS, the indigenous aboriginal language and Modern physics languages, like Bohm’s ‘Rheomode’ flow-based language, make use of the QUANTUM LOGIC based language which is COMPLEX (has real and imaginary components) which captures the BOTH/AND relationship where the WHORLING is, at the same time, the FLOWING which is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation. This relation requires the COMPLEX language of WAVE-FIELD dynamics which means LANGUAGE that is implying BOTH a REAL and an IMAGINARY COMPONENT.
OK, ‘IMAGINARY’ is an unfortunate choice of labels for what might instead be called “the-FEMALE (accommodating trough) conjugate-that-goes-together-with-the-MALE (pushing out peak). So, I will use the terms MALE-ASSERTING conjugate for the ‘REAL’ wave component and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate for the ‘IMAGINARY’ wave component.
I am using this alternative vocabulary just to SIMPLIFY the language-based presentation. I am NOT changing the Physics.
LANGUAGE: by way of INTEGRATION versus DIFFERENTIATION0
PREFACE: The ARCHITECTURE of LANGUAGE has been shaped by THREE different ways of CONCEIVING of REALITY which range from SIMPLE through LESS SIMPLE to LEAST SIMPLE which could be called ‘DIFFERENTIATION, INTEGRATION and TRANSFORMATION. EXAMPLES;
DIFFERENTIATION: ‘the HURRICANE is (male, assertively) STIRRING UP the ATMOSPHERE’,
INTEGRATION: ‘The ATMOSPHERE is (female, inductively) STIRRING UP the HURRICANE’ and,
TRANSFORMATION: ‘SOLAR IRRADIANCE is INDUCING HURRICANING IN THE ATMOSPHERING’.
These three REALITY options have made their way into LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which in turn has spawned division into CULTURAL VARIANTS. The simplest options of DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION support mindsets with POLAR OPPOSITE views we term CONSERVATISM and LIBERALISM. The Conservative belief is that the world works by way of independent things that ‘assertively stir things up’ in a male-asserting forceful manner. The Liberal belief is that the world works by way of independent things ‘inductively stirring things up’ in a female-inductive seductive manner. While we can well picture the POLARIZING FRAGMENTATION of a social collective on the basis of the Conservative – Liberal SPLIT in understanding reality, this leaves out the people of the indigenous aboriginal culture, who encounter STRIFE in a less simple (than binary logic) manner; i.e. in a QUANTUM ‘BOTH/AND’ LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium manner. In a weather metaphor, we can see all THREE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE REALITY PORTRAYING SCHEMES in relational context.
The DIFFERENTIATION scheme corresponds to the HURRICANE which is like a WILD MALE, BREAKING things up into pieces and scattering the pieces. The INTEGRATION scheme is like the ATMOSPHERE which is a SEDUCTIVE FEMALE who is gathering up and integrating the pieces so the ATMOSPHERE is FEMALE INDUCTIVE and SUCKS or PULLS while the HURRICANE is MALE ASSERTING and BLOWS or PUSHES and these mental models are used as organizing ‘go-bys’ for social collectives, and BOTH seem to have their ‘relative merits’ which sets up interminable polarizing arguments since ‘Conservatives put PUSHING or ENFORCING in first priority while Liberals put PULLING or ENCOURAGING in first priority. The THIRD and LEAST SIMPLE OPTION takes things to a HIGHER DIMENSION, the metaphor for which is SOLAR IRRADIANCE, the influence-giving LOGIC pervading the all-including energy-charged PLENUM which INCLUDES BOTH ATMOSPHERE GATHERING AND HURRICANE SCATTERING and if we ‘position our viewing selves’ within this all-including SOLAR IRRADIANCE WAVE-FIELD, we are no longer constrained to the BINARY LOGIC options of the Conservative PUSHING (hurricane stirring up the atmosphere) or Liberal PULLING (atmosphere stirring up the hurricane). In Modern physics, this third level of logical understanding is termed ‘the including third’ (e.g. see ‘Stéphane Lupasco et le tiers inclus. De la physique quantique à l’ontologie’, by Basarab Nicolescu).
The “INCLUDING THIRD” is the WAVE-FIELD within which material forms are CONDENSATIONS as gives rise to QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium. In this QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of reality, which, by the way, is the indigenous aboriginal traditional understanding wherein ‘everything is related’ (mitakuye oyasin) by way of all things being CONDENSATIONS within an all-including WAVE-FIELD aka ‘the GREAT MYSTERY’.
So, LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES OF ALL THREE TYPES EXIST and have their respective FOLLOWINGS although the WESTERN CULTURE is currently DOMINANT in the world and because it has chosen a BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, it is now in the throes of a POLARIZING FRAGMENTATION wherein roughly half of the WESTERN CULTURE FOLLOWER GROUP embraces the CONSERVATIVE reality understanding where ‘reality works by male pushing’ and the other half embraces the LIBERAL reality understanding where ‘reality works by female pulling’. WITHOUT some kind of PSYCHOLOGICAL JOLT to get the polarized opposing mindsets UP to the less simple level of the including third where the logic is BOTH/AND rather than EITHER/OR, we remain STUCK with an interminable BINARY LOGIC based STANDOFF of Conservative versus Liberal.
(The STANDOFF is interminable because the reality is less simple than can be explained by EITHER the Conservative view where the HURRICANE [individual] assertively stirs up the ATMOSPHERE [crowd] OR the Liberal view where the ATMOSPHERE [crowd] inductively stirs up the HURRICANE [individual] in that the less simple reality is that the SOLAR IRRADIANT WAVE-FIELD [ambient tension] is IMMANENT in the TRANSFORMING PLENUM that includes BOTH male asserting AND female accommodating POLAR AGENCIES.)
An IMPORTANT LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “ANCHOR” that is BLOCKING our embrace of the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM lies in the LESS SIMPLE structure of DIFFERENTIATION which plays a foundational role in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE as compared to INTEGRATION which plays a foundational role in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL ‘BOTH/AND’ language induced thinking. That is, the language-based use of DIFFERENTIATION imposes BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC as in ‘that is EITHER part of the TOWN OR part of the LANDSCAPE’ while the language-based use of INTEGRATION imposes QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.
Our use of DIFFERENT LANGUAGES based on different ARCHITECTURES thus CONDITIONS the THINKING PATTERNS of our PSYCHE and it is, in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES, the influence of DIFFERENTIATION by way of BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC that is satisfying, in a manner akin to planting a simple Cuckoo’s egg in another less simple bird’s nest, a slot that is in need of a LESS SIMPLE fulfilment. In other words, the influence of INTEGRATION is ONE LEVEL LESS SIMPLE in a similar sense to the TOO SIMPLE DIFFERENTIATION based question of whether the HURRICANE assertively stirs up the ATMOSPHERE or whether the ATMOSPHERE inductively stirs up the HURRICANE; i.e. by OPENING OUR MIND to the less simple level of the SOLAR IRRADIANCE FIELD, we upgrade from DIFFERENTIATION to INTEGRATION and thus from EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC to BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC. We are in VOYEUR viewing mode when we split our options into whether the HURRICANE assertively forces changes in the ATMOSPHERE or whether the ATMOSPHERE inductively pulls forth HURRICANES. The VOYEUR IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE EVENTS HE IS IMPOSING JUDGEMENT ON.
In shifting to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC, the COMPREHENDING MIND IS NO LONGER A VOYEUR BUT IS ‘the included third’ and is thus ONE-WITH-EVERYTHING which is described as follows in the terms of understanding in ADVAITA VEDANTA as shared by Schroedinger, who points out that this thinking in terms where GOD or ‘the GREAT MYSTERY’ is the whole non-visible all-including WAVE-FIELD PLENUM. The following two quotes from Gnostic and Vedic belief both point to the transcendent “LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM’ as also in Modern physics, wherein material forms are secondary as in QUANTUM LOGIC (the all-including WAVE-FIELD is primary while material forms [condensations] are secondary) rather than primary as they are in the BINARY LOGIC based duality of ABSOLUTE MATERIAL BEING in ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS.
“Again when Jesus saw infants being nursed by their mothers he said, “These infants being suckled are like those entering the Kingdom.” And the disciples asked, “Shall we, then, as little children, enter the Kingdom?” He answered them, “When you make two one, and when you make the inside the outside and the outside the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and female one and the same…then you will enter (the Kingdom).”
… Jesus said, “What you look forward to has already come, but you do not recognize it…the Kingdom of the Father is spread out on the earth, but men do not see it.” The Gnostic Gospel of Thomas
* * *
… In Christian terminology to say: ‘Hence I am God Almighty’ sounds both blasphemous and lunatic. But please disregard these connotations for the moment and consider whether the above inference is not the closest a biologist can get to proving God and immortality at one stroke.
In itself, the insight is not new. The earliest records to my knowledge date back some 2,500 years or more. From the early great Upanishads the recognition ATHMAN = BRAHMAN (the personal self equals the omnipresent, all-comprehending eternal self) was in Indian thought considered, far from being blasphemous, to represent the quintessence of deepest insight into the happenings of the world. The striving of all the scholars of Vedanta was, after having learnt to pronounce with their lips, really to assimilate in their minds this grandest of all thoughts.
Again, the mystics of many centuries, independently, yet in perfect harmony with each other (somewhat like the particles in an ideal gas) have described, each of them, the unique experience of his or her life in terms that can be condensed in the phrase: DEUS FACTUS SUM (I have become God).
To Western ideology the thought has remained a stranger. – Erwin Schroedinger, ‘What is LIfe’, ‘Epilogue: On Determinism and Free Will’
So, what I have tried to do in this preface is to point out that we have available to us, THREE OPTIONAL FORMS of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE for reality construction and that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are HUNG UP in a polarizing debate over whether the Conservative (simplest) level is better than the Liberal (next less simple) level or vice versa. This ongoing polarizing debate is a distraction that blocks accepting the naturally more comprehensive (least simple) third level of reality supported by the LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which RESOLVES the POLARIZING DIFFERENCES coming from BINARY LOGIC wherein BOTH the Conservative and Liberal factions consider themselves to be made up of INDEPENDENT BEINGS with their own POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING, and differ over whether the local authoring is by way of pushing (male asserting) or by pulling (female accommodating). There is NO SOLUTION to this Conservative – Liberal polarizing issue since THERE ARE NO INDEPENDENT BEINGS that move about and interact within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT, an imaginary realm wherein the unresolvable POLAR Conservative-Liberal CONFLICT and FRAGMENTATION originates.
Instead of empty space populated by absolute material beings, there is a QUANTUM LOGIC all-including WAVE-FIELD with CONDENSATIONS that have no INDEPENDENT BEING, thus the understanding of reality in terms of the all-including WAVE-FIELD PLENUM in which material forms are condensations is a QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC REALITY that HAS NO EXPOSURE TO THE SIMPLISTIC BINARY LOGIC based CONSERVATIVE VERSUS LIBERAL POLARIZING disagreement. There is no polarizing disagreement since QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS are innately LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS in the sense that the INTEGRATION based QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING of the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS, is LESS SIMPLE than the DIFFERENTIATION based BINARY LOGIC UNDERSTANDING of the TWO PART MATTER and EMPTY SPACE ONTOLOGY which leads to ambiguity over whether MALE MATERIAL BEINGS assertively fill FEMALE EMPTY HOLES or whether FEMALE EMPTY HOLES induce filling by MALE ASSERTING BEINGS. In the QUANTUM LOGIC world of Modern physics reality, there are no FRAGMENTATIVE BINARY LOGIC based ambiguities as in a choice of POLAR OPPOSITES, there is only BALANCE and IMBALANCE.
END OF PREFACE:
Russell Brand’s critiques of BOTH Fox News and MSNBC0
Now we are getting somewhere. To say that those biased to the LEFT are just as off-base as those biased to the RIGHT points to the greater reality that there is a deeper level issue and that deeper level issue is with the concept itself, of “EITHER RIGHT OR WRONG”, or in other words, the PROBLEM IS WITH GIVING A FOUNDATATION ROLE TO BINARY LOGIC which is a PROLBME peculiar to WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENCY.
I don’t suppose Russell Brand is going to say; “It’s time for everyone caught up in the WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLISITIC BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ to make the needed MIGRATION to the LESS SIMPLE EASTERN CULTURE QUANTUM LOGIC where we no longer encounter POLARIZING DIVISIONS of RIGHT versus WRONG or GOOD versus EVIL, … because QUANTUM LOGIC is all about RELATIONAL BALANCE AND IMBALANCE.
In fact, if we examine the options of INTEGRATION (QUANTUM LOGIC based) and DIFFERENTIATION (BINARY LOGIC based), we are likely to conclude that as far as a stable LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE goes, by choosing INTEGRATION as with QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium … we will stay out of the PITFALL of FRAGMENTATION which comes with DIFFERENTIATION based EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC.
As the indigenous aboriginals have discovered by their choice of an INTEGRATION based language architecture (i.e. a QUANTUM LOGIC language architecture) where one speaks in such terms as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where ‘everything is in a relational balancing based flux, this continual INTEGRATING of TOWNING and TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE never does lead to FRAGMENTATION as with the BINARY LOGIC based splitting apart of TOWN and COUNTRY into TWO MUTUALLY EXCLUDING THING-IN-ITSELF ONTOLOGIES.
WHERE DOES TOWN STOP AND COUNTRY START? IT SEEMS TO KEEP SHIFTING and we refer to this SHIFT in terms of the GROWTH of the TOWN, … and SO WHAT HAPPENS TO THE COUNTRY aka the WILDERNESS? In keeping with BINARY LOGIC, we only need concern ourselves with what happens to ‘the TOWN’ as if there was nothing but EMPTY SPACE as background container so that all we need to capture in language is the foreground FIGURE in the GROUND such as the TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services, as if the TOWN were a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing-in-itself with an INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE.
This is the conceptualizing scheme we call DIFFERENTATION where we SPLIT OUT (FRAGMENT OUT) a FIGURE from the GROUND as if the FIGURE were a LOCAL, EXPLICIT INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF (thank you very much, LANGUAGE based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR). Now we are in the LALA LAND of BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS and NO LONGER in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) world of QUANTUM LOGIC wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) in the manner of CONDENSATIONS in a FLUID CONTINUUM aka the all-including WAVE-FIELD.
So, when Russell Brand critiques BOTH Fox News and MSNBC, he is critiquing both the MALE ASSERTING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING options of BINARY LOGIC reduction, for LANGUAGE based SHARING convenience within the NARROW REDUCTIONISM that is the constraint of a LINGUISTIC MATTER and EMPTY SPACE based ABSTRACT PSEUDO-REALITY where we must ask; Should our understanding of this pseudo-reality be consistent with;…
-1- a MALE-FEMALE relation as where the MALE ASSERTING HURRICANE (forcibly) stirs up the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ATMOSPHERE as appeals to the CONSERVATIVE mindset and FOX NEWS REPORTING, or,
-2- a FEMALE-MALE relation as where the FEMALE INDUCTIVE ATMOSPHERE (seductively) stirs up the MALE ASSERTING HURRICANE as appeals to the LIBERAL mindset and MSNBC NEWS REPORTING?
WHAT DO THESE TWO POLAR OPPOSING CONCEPTUALIZINGS OF REALITY HAVE IN COMMON, that RUSSELL BRAND IS TAPPING INTO?
The DROP-OUT in going from SENSE-EXPERIENCE informed PSYCHE to LANGUAGE-informed PSYCHE that is a function of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.0
Indigenous aboriginal INTEGRATING language architecture is to Modern physics’ QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC as Western European Culture DIFFERENTIATING language architecture is to Newtonian physics BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC
In plain terms, my philosophical investigations have ‘followed up’ on the findings of Nietzsche and Bohm in regard to MISCONCEPTIONS that come to us through THE LATTER of TWO DIFFERENT FORMS of LANGUAGE based communications; INTEGRATION and DIFFERENTIATION:
INTEGRATION: In Indigenous aboriginal languages as in Modern physics, in the form of INTEGRATION where FIGURE and GROUND are only ONE (i.e. where the GROUND is the all-including WAVE-FIELD and the FIGURE is a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD which is the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation).
DIFFERENTIATION: The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE employs DIFFERENTIATION where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO (i.e. the GROUND is conceived of as ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT and the FIGURE is conceived of as a MATERIAL BASED ABSOLUTE BEING which is captured in a BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR relation.
Languages, such as the Common Average European Languages (Whorf’s classification) are DIFFERENTIATION based and lead to FRAGMENTATION in both the WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHE and in the WESTERN CULTURE social dynamic, a DIFFERENTIATION that is the source of SOCIAL DYSFUNCTION in the form of FRAGMENTATION (see excerpt entitled ‘FRAGMENTATION’ from Bohm’s Wholeness and the Implicate Order in this essay). The WESTERN CULTURE DOMINATED GLOBAL SOCIAL DYNAMIC is ON A PATH OF PROGRESSIVE FRAGMENTATION that is being SOWN and FUELLED by the DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE of WESTERN CULTURE that is due to the LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTING of ‘EMPTY SPACE’ for the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, so that LANGUAGE-based ‘REALITY’ CONSTRUCTIONS are in a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY language architecture as exemplified by ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, which paints a picture of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, as contrasts with EASTERN (indigenous aboriginal) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which incorporates the full ‘ANDROGYNOUS’ WAVE-FIELD structure as in ‘there is TOWNING (male-asserting) in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (female accommodating).
THIS ESSAY reviews how WESTERN CULTURE social dynamics are FRAGMENTING as a result of the SIMPLIFIED COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and thus ONE-SIDEDLY orienting to the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE. In MATHEMATICAL TERMS, this means that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is based on a REDUCTIVE SIMPLIFICATION of the REAL + IMAGINARY COMPLEX SIGNALLING to a ONE-SIDED ‘REAL ONLY’ SIGNALLING SYSTEM. This SIMPLIFICATION can also be described in terms of a REDUCTIVE SIMPLIFICATION from ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE language structure to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY language structure. This DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (the equivalent to dropping out the IMAGINARY component of a complex signal), as is the case in the Common Average European Language architecture, is the source of progressive FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONSTRUCTIONS of an OPERATIVE REALITY . This WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE BASED DYSFUNCTION, for example, REDUCES the WESTERN SYSTEMS OF JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE by SIMPLIFYING the QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH/AND) relation of BALANCE and IMBALANCE to the BINARY LOGIC (EITHER/OR) options of either IS or IS NOT.
This sets the stage for the reductive substituting of EITHER/OR DIFFERENTIATION in place of BOTH/AND INTEGRATION and thus ‘the TOWNS are GROWING’ in place of ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’. In the latter INTEGRATION based conceptualizing, our understanding is that everything is in flux giving us a sense of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of FIGURE (TOWNING) and GROUND (TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) as with the CLUSTERING of ants, which contrasts with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT nature of the DIFFERENTIATED FIGURE (the TOWN) as with the ant CLUSTER. In the former DIFFERENTIATION based conceptualization, the imputed BINARY LOGIC BEING based ‘CLUSTER’ serves as the LOCAL, EXPLICIT influence base for GRAMMAR-given LOCAL AUTHORING of actions such as growth and development, whereas in the latter INTEGRATION based conceptualization , the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘CLUSTERING’ serves as a gathering-scattering influence which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in keeping with the overall ANDROGYNOUS (COMPLEX as in the REAL plus IMAGINARY) relational dynamic of TRANSFORMATION.
In WESTERN CULTURE, the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE OPTION has been the SIMPLIFYING OPTION which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMODATING CONJUGATE (the ‘imaginary signal component’) and formulates constructions by way of the REDUCTION of the WAVE-FIELD to the one-sided MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE (the ‘real’ signal component) by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE. This is the equivalent of switching from INTEGRATION to DIFFERENTIATION as the basis for language-based CONSTRUCTIONS of SUBSTITUTE REALITY; i.e. switching from the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ to the BINARY LOGIC ‘the TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’, as if it were an INDEPENDENT LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHORING AGENCY in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT. Such MISINFORMED FREEDOM invites actions DEEMED INDEPENDENT due to BINARY LOGIC language based on DIFFERENTIATION, actions which are instead, as understood in a QUANTUM LOGIC language based on INTEGRATION, actions within a world of global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence, the WESTERN CULTURE MISINFORMED FREEDOM being the source of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE influenced social dynamics.
* * *
TITLE: The DROP-OUT in going from SENSE-EXPERIENCE informed PSYCHE to LANGUAGE-informed PSYCHE that is a function of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.
The SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION of WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES0
LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is the SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION of WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DOLLECTIVES
In my continuing philosophical investigations, things continue to fit together and make more sense. This note summarizes findings to date, which are supported by the work of many including Nietzsche (double error), Bohm (fragmentation), Vygotsky (good clue in his insight on the union of nonlocal and implicit with the local and explicit and more).
The key take-aways are with respect to how living in a wave-field plays out in our language architectures and language-influenced thinking. Of course our sense-experience is primary but our modern culture is using ‘language to put it all together’ and as Emerson warned, the tool of language is running away with the workman which is also what Nietzsche is saying using different words. Schroedinger puts it must succinctly in the terms; ‘subject and object are only one’, … which we can also relate to Bohm’s finding that we live in an all-including energy-charged PLENUM in which there are figures such as ourselves which are CONDENSATIONS of the PLENUM which manifests the QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the material forms and the ‘space that is not empty but full’ in which they are condensations.
Given that our language imparts a foundational role to binary logic which splits apart matter and “empty space” while Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents all have the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding that material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka ‘the wave-field’ there is a whole lot of consistency of understanding in these QUANTUM LOGIC oriented groups and everything I have studied and experienced puts me in that same camp.
Ok, I have read Bohm and listened to ‘Bohmians’ and while I agree with what is being said, for the most part, it does not make all of the connections that can be made, like the connections of Vygotsky and also Ernst Mach who sort of got left behind even through he was adamant about the links between the psyche and physics, saying that we needed to understand the two as one psycho-physical system.
Indigenous Aboriginal QUANTUM LOGIC and Western Culture BINARY LOGIC0
FORWARD: This FORWARD is a bit of a mea culpa which is to point out that I have often fallen into the habitual trap of speaking in terms of REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY which turns out to be a CLEAR MISTAKE because language does not support the construction of REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY (the reality of our sense-experience in the transforming relational continuum is much too complex; e.g. as Lao Tzu says; ‘The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’.)
What LANGUAGE provides is not the capability of constructing REPRESENTATIONS but the capability of SENDING SIGNALS and it is up to the RECEIVER to put Humpty Dumpty together again which, depending on the receiver’s history of sensory experiences and visual imagination, may come up with something that will call for the ritual of giving one another the ‘HIGH FIVE’ indicating that ‘we have arrived on the same page’. However, there is no screen projection showing the respective visualizations side-by side, and if there were, it might show, when two American citizens who bump into one another in darkest Africa and HIGH FIVE each other, whereupon they may shortly thereafter discover that one of them is a right wing Republican and the other a left wing Democrat. There point is, agreement can be shallower or deeper and we don’t always dig down deep enough to check out the fullness of our agreement.
Thus the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT may communicate in the SIMPLE Common Average European language architecture which is BINARY LOGIC based since the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, having been ‘colonized’, had learned to speak English, even though learned as a ‘first language’, an INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL language that is QUANTUM LOGIC based and which is less simple than WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES which are BINARY LOGIC based. For example, while the indigenous aboriginal would speak in terms that meant “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, he would nevertheless understand what the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT meant by ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING things’, even though this is a SIMPLIFYING REDUCTION of the afore-mentioned ANDROGYNOUS ‘TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING’ proposition. So it is easy for those indigenous aboriginals who grew up learning the LESS SIMPLE form of LOGIC (the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium) to deal with the “DUMBED DOWN” to BINARY LOGIC (the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED medium) LANGUAGE discourse.
GOING in the opposite direction from the SIMPLE to the LESS SIMPLE, when one has not ‘grown up with’ the LESS SIMPLE, is not so easy; i.e. the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT who has learned a LANGUAGE that encourages THINKING in ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING BINARY LOGIC terms such as “the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ will have more difficulty in shifting from this SIMPLE view to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (ANDROGYNOUS) terms of “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which includes the CONTENT and CONTAINER in conjugate relation.
In mathematical terms, this LANGUAGE shift, in the DUMBING DOWN direction, corresponds to shifting from the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE to the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC STRUCTURE, which is EXACTLY what is happening when we shift from ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE ACCOMMODATING RECEPTION in conjugate relation with MALE ASSERTIVE EFFECTING) … to ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’, (ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE AUTHORING).
This shift from indigenous aboriginal language architecture which is QUANTUM LOGIC based to WESTERN CULTURE language architecture which is BINARY LOGIC based is the equivalent of the mathematical shift from COMPLEX to REAL signal.
What is the difference between real and complex signal?
A real signal at any given time takes its value in the set of real numbers, and a complex signal takes its value in the set of complex numbers.
AN IMPORTANT POINT HERE is that LANGUAGE is not a system that employs REPRESENTATIONS, it is a system that employs SIGNALS that trigger the coming-to-mind of some sense-experience based situation that is in general unique to the individual. The words SEXUAL INTERCOURSE signal recall of a certain sense-experience. Those same words trigger very different sense-experience recall in the FEMALE than they do in the MALE.
SO, the PROBLEM is NOT that ‘THE WORD IS NOT THE THING’. The PROBLEM IS THAT LANGUAGE DOES NOT, as assumed in WESTERN CULTURE, TRANSMIT REPRESENTATIONS; LANGUAGE TRANSMITS SIGNALS that induce sense-experience recall.
* * * end of INTRO * * *
Woven together with the KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID penchant for BINARY LOGIC based SIMPLIFICATION is the following COMMON WESTERN CULTURE CONFUSION deriving from the BELIEF IN “THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES”;
Polish-American scientist and philosopher Alfred Korzybski remarked that “the map is not the territory” and that “the word is not the thing”, encapsulating his view that an abstraction derived from something, or a reaction to it, is not the thing itself. –Wikipedia
THERE ARE NO “THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES”. WE LIVE IN AN ALL INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA THE WAVE-FIELD.
So, while Korzybski is saying that SOMETHING IS AMISS in our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, … HE IS MISSING THE KEY POINT which is that THERE ARE NO THINGS, but there are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM also known as the WAVE-FIELD.
WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS generally ACCEPT this comment of KORZYBSKI because it is evident that SOMETHING IS AMISS in our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, but his statement doesn’t DIG DEEP ENOUGH. Korzybski’s proposition GIVES BACK-HANDED SUPPORT TO THE BELIEF THAT THERE ARE “THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES” and simply PUTS DISTANCE between the LINGUISTIC DESCRIPTION OF THE THING and THE THING, … reaffirming that THERE ARE THINGS and its just that its not straightforward to use WORDS to IDENTIFY the THING.
THE ‘REAL ISSUE’ is that “THERE ARE NO THINGS” since we share inclusion in an all-including fluid dynamical world aka the WAVE-FIELD WORLD which is a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.
GOODBYE BINARY LOGIC! … HELLO QUANTUM LOGIC!
It is the notional EXISTENCE OF THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES that forces us to INVENT an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE which is necessary for there to be THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES because THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES are INDEPENDENT of the world in which they share inclusion.
Of course, MODERN PHYSICS has fallen in line with INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, TAOIST/BUDDHIST and ADVAITA VEDANTA understanding wherein the WORLD IS AN ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (the WAVE-FIELD) locally populated by CONDENSATIONS where these CONDENSATIONS, like clouds in the atmosphere, are BOTH themselves AND the all-including energy-charged PLENUM. This is the QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH/AND” relation which is the understanding of the basic make-up of the world of Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “ARE NOT PICKING UP ON THIS UNDERSTANDING” BECAUSE OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS BINARY LOGIC BASED AND BINARY LOGIC IS INNATELY SIMPLER THAN THE QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC WHICH captures the relationship between the ALL-INCLUDING PLENUM and the VISIBLE, TANGIBLE CONDENSATIONS OF THE PLENUM, a BOTH/AND LOGIC that is called “QUANTUM LOGIC”.
Tonto’s Conversion of the Lone Ranger0
LONE RANGER: Tonto, I would like to return to our discussion on language and while I appreciate that the Comanche language has some subtle capabilities beyond the capability of English, I am still not clear why you do not acknowledge the superior clarity and precision of English.
TONTO: Kemo sabe, sometimes, clarity is achieved in language at the expense of reality, as in the common practice among English speakers of applying the simple EITHER is OR is NOT logic which we Comanche’s do not use since our logic comprehends BOTH is AND is NOT.
LONE RANGER: That’s part of the lack of clarity that I am referring to, a clarity that is readily achieved in the English language.
TONTO: We Indians are all for clarity, providing that it does not involve a sacrifice of understanding, as is the case in English language clarity which is based on DIFFERENTIATION which DROPS OUT perception of INTEGRATION. Where you say, ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, which differentiates the TOWN from the transforming landscape, we say the equivalent of ‘there is TOWNING in the transforming landscape’.
LONE RANGER: But this is exactly my point since that is more information than we need. We don’t need to draw a map of the world in order to address what is going on in a local town.
TONTO: When we Comanches use words to describe reality, we are describing THE WORLD WE ARE INCLUDED IN and NOT some limited portion or FRAGMENT that we pick up with a Crow’s eye voyeur stare. In other words, our language is designed to let us speak in terms of the INTEGRAL WHOLE within which we all share inclusion in, as is intended in ‘mitakuye oyasin’. Our language is NOT designed to FRAGMENT reality as the White man’s languages do.
LONE RANGER: But you must be able to see the benefits of ‘homing in’ on the specifics of our immediate local and explicit concerns, like the need to construct shelters for our families. For this we need language that helps us coordinate actions needed to construct the local and explicit house or town we are working on, and this language must have the capability of breaking things down into parts as used in construction.
TONTO: What you are describing is the fragmentation that we indigenous aboriginals avoid which is YOUR use of DIFFERENTIATION based language where WE use INTEGRATION based language. While you speak of the GROWTH of the TOWN, we speak of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING continuum which is what is actually occurring in the world we all share inclusion in. In other words, our language speaks from the point of view of INTEGRATION rather than DIFFERENTIATION, acknowledging that we and all things are included in this ONE world so that if any of us mess it up, we all experience the consequences.
LONE RANGER: But language capable of DIFFERENTIATION allows us to focus in the LOCAL and EXPLICIT so that we can optimize our overall environment by improving each part, such as a TOWN with a well-focused improvement initiative such as the CONSTRUCTION of new homes, schools and businesses.
TONTO: While your language of DIFFERENTIATION may develop the ILLUSION that what you call SUBOPTIMIZATION is possible, our language of INTEGRATION reminds us that SUBOPTIMZATION IS AN ILLUSION due to the reality that ‘everything is related’ or as we say, ‘mitakuye oyasin’. While DIFFERENTIATION in your language may have you thinking in terms that your TOWN is a little isolated FRAGMENT of reality that you can ‘improve’ ‘on its own’, the reality is that we all share inclusion in the ONE “GREAT HARMONY” wherein everything is related.
Simplified Summary of Psycho-Linguistic Reality Construction0
Following below this ‘technical’ introduction is a short summary of Psycho-Linguistic Reality Construction, the techniques we use to GIVE VOICE to our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, also referred to as the all-including WAVE-FIELD and ‘the Tao’. It is evident that our views are DIVIDED as in the aphorism ‘EAST is EAST and WEST is WEST and never the twain shall meet’ (Rudyard Kipling) and this DIVISION sheds light on how THOUGHT and LANGUAGE can be ‘connected in more than one way.
This structural difference comes from a ‘preference’ as to whether we prefer to ‘SEE THINGS’ by way of DIFFERENTIATION or INTEGRATION; i.e. for example, do we want to psychologically use DIFFERENTIATION to SPLIT OUT ‘the TOWN’ and proceed to give a detailed ‘break-down’ that describes ‘the TOWN’ as if it were a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING that can be ‘taken apart’ so that we can come to know ‘IT’ by ‘its’ component parts. Or, do we want to acknowledge that ‘everything is in flux’ so as to understand that there is “TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” in which case there are no assumptions of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘BEING’ based entity and we thus need a LANGUAGE that is capable of working with NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT relations that are the stuff a fluid world (such as a WAVE-FIELD world) is made of.
We thus have the option of TWO DIFFERENT BUT RELATED LANGUAGE-based CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES. Acronyms may be useful here for recalling these two different CONCEPTUALIZING OPTIONS; i.e. INTEGRATION and DIFFERENTIATION.
L.E.A.P. stands for Local, Explicit, Asserting, PART. (example, a WAVE ‘PEAK’)
N.I.R.T. stands for Nonlocal, Implicit, Relational, Transformation. (example, WAVE ‘TROUGH’)
*NOTE that in the spherical space of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, the female ‘seafloor spreading’, being nonlocal and implicit is ‘higher dimensional’ and not the simple opposite of the local and explicit ‘continents that drift’, the latter expressing one-sided male-asserting action with no mention of the ‘female accommodating conjugate’. The DROP OUT of the female accommodating conjugate leaves in its place, the impression of absolute infinite emptiness thus ‘freeing us up for constructing a language architecture based solely on one-sided male-asserting actions and development’.
Had we oriented our language architecture to the less simple ‘seafloor spreading’ as in a spherical space, this ‘nonlocal, implicit female accommodating’ sea-floor spreading is QUANTUM LOGIC transformation, … while the simpler local, explicit, male-asserting ‘continents drifting’ is BINARY LOGIC based wherein things-in-themselves such as ‘continents’ “EITHER” move “OR” do not move and ‘IF they move, they move as if without need of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.
Here we see, because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have chosen one-sided MALE ASSERTING and DROPPED OUT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, a language architecture that is ONLY ASSERTING and NEVER ACCOMMODATING which is the language-based source of FRAGMENTATION since there is nothing ‘connecting’ the ‘local, explicit, male-asserting, drifting continents’ in our language based construction.
However, our sense-experience-primed intuition will be influencing our thoughts to keep everything in relational balance and demanding an interpretation of overall INTEGRATION as in transformation, our language being nevertheless free to construct a DIFFERENTATION based FRAGMENTATION comprised of LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONTINENTS notionally with their own (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) POWERS OF DRIFTING-ACTION and DEVELOPMENT. Note that there is this scenario no notion of an ALL-INCLUDING PLENUM IN WHICH MATERIAL FORMINGS SUCH AS CONTINENTINGS ARE CONDENSATIONS as in Modern physics.
As far as the LOGIC of these DETACHED, ‘drifting’ CONTINENTS goes, as Goedel’s Theorem points out, all finite systems of logic, while logically TRUE, are INCOMPLETE, thus we are free to speak in terms of the LOGICAL TRUTH of one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY “CONTINENTS DRIFTING” without mentioning any FEMALE CONJUGATE such as SEAFLOOR SPREADING. On the other hand, if our language architecture is designed to give the foundational role to the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING SEAFLOOR-SPREADING, then the MALE ASSERTING is ‘implicitly included’. One might even conclude that the MALE ASSERTING is NOT NEEDED since it is IMPLIED by the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING; i.e. in the all-including energy-charged PLENUM (WAVE-FIELD), MALE ASSERTING MATERIAL FORMS ARE SCHAUMKOMMEN (APPEARANCE).
Thus, if we have a flow-based language architecture as in Modern physics and as in indigenous aboriginal culture and say; ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ or there is ‘CONTINENTING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, we avoid falling into the TRAP of using language that FRAGMENTS reality as happens when we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to suggest MALE ASSERTING LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments as with, for example, ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ and ‘the CONTINENT is DRIFTING’ which gives a FRAGMENTED PICTURE due to the connecting role of the FEMALE CONJUGATE (the all-including WAVE-FIELD PLENUM) having gone MISSING due to language-architecture choices.
When we use MALE ASSERTING propositions such as ‘CONTINENTS ARE DRIFTING’ and ‘TOWNS ARE GROWING’ without mentioning the FEMALE CONJUGATES of SEAFLOOR SPREADING and ‘WILDERNESS SHRINKING’ which, if they were mentioned in our language constructions, will guide our thinking so as to comprehend the overall “INTEGRATED GESTALT’ of TRANSFORMATION, avoiding an understanding in terms of FRAGMENTATION that comes when we DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (wave-field) CONJUGATE.
The FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE IN LANGUAGE is essential in establishing the QUANTUM LOGIC relation as between the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE where the latter is a CONDENSATION of the former in which case there is no FRAGMENTATION, and that which language and APPEARANCE casts in the BINARY LOGIC terms of MATERIAL BEING and EMPTY SPACE, must instead be understood in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD and CONDENSATIONS therein, which constitute a BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium.
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE COULD HAVE OPTED FOR A QUANTUM LOGIC FOUNDATION AS IN MODERN PHYSICS AND INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, BUT THE SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATION WAS CHOSEN INSTEAD, THE RESULT BEING ‘FRAGMENTATION’ BASED REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATIONS which, as Bohm has pointed out, are the ongoing source of schizophrenia and paranoia in WESTERN CULTURE social collectives (due to the infusion of BINARY LOGIC into language based conceptualizations to serve up simplified (binary logic based) substitute realities).
That there are problems of FRAGMENTATION arising from WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based Psycho-Linguistic Reality Construction is the communications aim of this note. The following abbreviations are to help retain the main elements of how our language can be confusing our understanding; in particular, the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE embodies a DIFFERENTIATION based reduction from the sense-experience affirmed reality of an all-including INTEGRATION; i.e. a DIFFERENTIATION based reduction from the N.I.R.I. to the intellectual SUBSTITUTE REALITY of the L.E.A.F.
N.I.R.I stands for Nonlocal, Implicit, Relational, INTEGRAL. (example, WAVE ‘TROUGH’)
L.E.A.F. stands for Local, Explicit, Asserting, FRAGMENT. (example, a WAVE ‘PEAK’)
If we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS were using N.I.R.I. capable language architecture there would be no need for these mind-jogging acronyms because we would already by working on the LESS SIMPLE plane in which the MORE SIMPLE plane is included. But because we are using, as our understanding-supporting language, the simpler L.E.A.F. language architecture, we get stuck trying to come up with language based articulations of phenomena that are beyond capture in the simple L.E.A.F. language architecture. If we do not remind ourselves of the limitations of our language architecture with respect to capture capability, we are exposed to endless reformulations of language based explanations in the belief that our problems of not reaching agreement are due to the limitations in our argument rather than to limitations in our language The former can be fixed by improving the argument but the latter cannot be fixed without improving the language.
Those who polarize on the BINARY LOGIC issue of whether the (male-asserting) hurricane stirs up the atmosphere or whether the (female accommodating) atmosphere stirs up the hurricane, … if they can pause to become aware of their being immersed in the heat of the sun overhead, may become aware of the QUANTUM LOGIC structure of the phenomenon where it is no longer a BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR issue since the AUTHORING AGENCY is coming from the solar irradiance infused WAVE-FIELD, and thus from NEITHER the MALE ASSERTING HURRICANE NOR the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ATMOSPHERE. but from the ENERGIZED MEDIUM (the WAVE-FIELD) which includes BOTH the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and THE MALE ASSERTING.
We are reminded here of how our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE supports our DROPPING DOWN to the BINARY LOGIC based SIMPLIFICATION and this is the popular default in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based representation, which is a PITFALL THAT IS NOT PRESENT in indigenous aboriginal culture because of the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE rather than TWO (this is simply a restatement of the BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC structure). Once we use the L.E.A.F. based ‘dumbing down’ to LOCAL AUTHORING by way of the LINGUISTIC DEVICE of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we take it for granted that what we are talking about is REALITY as if our language could only serve us in our articulating of the reality that comes to us from our sense-experience of inclusion in the world.
However, our LANGUAGE is NOT SIMPLY PUTTY IN OUR HANDS, not when we allow it to DUMB DOWN our linguistic articulation of our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum to VOYEUR DIFFERENTIATION. The abstract tool of DIFFERENTIATION used in language based constructions allows us to FRAGMENT OUT the HURRICANING IN THE ATMOSPHERING (a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION), and use the Linguistic DUMBING DOWN of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to construct a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring the HURRICANE as a notional LOCAL EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF notionally with its own GRAMMAR-given POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT as if IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE (a substitute for the all-including PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD).
BOTTOM LINE: our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE has us SUBSTITUTE for our N.I.R.I. sense experience of integrated inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, our L.E.A.F intellectual construction of fragmented interactions isolated from each other in an absolute, empty and infinite ‘insulating’ space.
N.I.R.I stands for Nonlocal, Implicit, Relational, INTEGRAL. (example, WAVE ‘TROUGH’)
L.E.A.F. stands for Local, Explicit, Asserting, FRAGMENT. (example, a WAVE ‘PEAK’)
* * * * * *
SIMPLIFIED SUMMARY of MY FINDINGS (from philosophical investigations into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based social dysfunction)
My findings mirror the key findings of Nietzsche and Bohm which both point to language-induced psychological confusion within a fragmented reality.
GESTALT or FRAGMENTATION: How LANGUAGE shapes “REALITY”0
Language Architecture comes in two forms, the nonlocal-implicit QUANTUM LOGIC GESTALT form which assumes INTEGRATION (see upper part of above diagram)
And the local-explicit BINARY LOGIC “DIFFERENTIATION” form which assumes EMPTY SPACE SEPARATION (see lower part of above diagram)
INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA adherents along with MODERN PHYSICS see the world as FLUID INTEGRATION as in a WAVE-FIELD.
WESTERN CULTURE, with its concepts such as EVOLUTION see the world in terms of DIFFERENTIATION (how did all those different INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS come to “BE”?
BUT WHO SAYS THEY ARE ‘INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS’? EVIDENTLY, ‘LANGUAGE SAYS SO’, … however, we know that Copernicus FRAGMENTED the model of the cosmos by suggesting that ‘the EARTH TURNS ROUND’ which implies a BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between ‘the EARTH’ and whatever it is TURNING AROUND IN’, … so if the EARTH is made of MATTER as was the WESTERN CULTURE notion.
All these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the end for which he form’d them; and these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation.” –Isaac Newton, Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light
HELLO BINARY LOGIC SPLITTING OF REALITY INTO MATTER AND SPACE (DIFFERENTIATION)! GOODBYE QUANTUM LOGIC INCLUSION OF MATTER IN FIELD (INTEGRATION).
HELLO ALSO, with DIFFERENTIATION, to the concept of EVOLUTION of the FORMS “WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE DESIGNED LANGUAGE TO DIFFERENTIATE”. (once we linguistically differentiate and split out relational flow forms, resituating them in empty space, their continuing development is no longer comprehended WITHIN a transforming relational continuum).
Most Recent Comments