The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE GAME

0

 

The purported INDEPENDENCE of NATIONS is BULLSHIT, but recall the history of such POLITICAL CORRECTNESS PRESSURES as in the case of Giordano Bruno’s rebuke that ‘the Majority has no monopoly on the Truth’, in 1600, on being taken to be burned at the stake for the HERESY OF RELATIVITY, in the Campo dei Fiori near the Vatican in Rome.

 

DO I BELIEVE IN THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE UNITED STATES or any of the other “DECLARED TO BE INDEPENDENT NATIONS”?,… NO WAY!   AM I GOING TO GET ON A SOAPBOX IN TIMES SQUARE WITH A BULLHORN and GO ON A RANT ABOUT THE INSANITY OF BELIEVING THAT PEOPLE AND NATIONS ARE INDEPENDENT?

 

As far as I can see, the descendants of the VATICAN “burning at the stake” VICE SQUAD have been ‘reborn’ in an ecumenical wink wink, nod nod, ‘know what I mean’ volunteer vigilante clean-up group aka WESTERN CULTURE SOCIETY.

 

Re The BULLSHIT GAME we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “FORCE EACH OTHER (AND OUR CHILDREN) TO PLAY” WITH LANGUAGE

 

Here we go, … Ronald Laing, Jules Henry, Ernest Becker and David Bohm are being OPEN AND HONEST about WESTERN CULTURE, which is, to put it mildly, RARE in our common WESTERN CULTURE discourse.

  (more…)

A POCKET REFERENCE to WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC SCREW-UPS

0

 

INTRODUCTION (the POCKET REFERENCE follows the INTRODUCTION)

 

PART ONE: THE PROBLEM OF LANGUAGE-SOURCED BEHAVIOURAL (ABERRANT-) ‘NORMALITY’

Almost no-one is going to carry around with them reminders such as David Bohm’s, as to how our common WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing is SCREWING up our UNDERSTANDING of REALITY (the reality of our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum).   Meanwhile, many philosophical investigators have come to the same conclusion; i.e. that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES, including ENGLISH are screwing up our understanding of reality. Wittgenstein, for example, observes;

Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung  unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache” (Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

On the same tack, Psychiatrist R.D. Laing has written at length about how WESTERN CULTURE and its language is DRIVING US CRAZY;

 

What we call ‘normal’ is a product of repression, denial, splitting, projection, introjection and other forms of destructive action on experience.”   — R.D. Laing

 

This is ALSO what Bohm is talking about in his treatise on FRAGMENTATION.  What Bohm is describing is a WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC wherein the conditions considered NORMAL are growing INCREASINGLY TOXIC.  This was also the finding of psychiatrist Laing in “The Divided Self”, and also the finding of anthropologist Jules Henry in “Culture Against Man”, and also the finding of Ernest Becker expressed in ‘the “Denial of Death”.  This ‘screw-up’ is tied to our WESTERN CULTURE and what Benjamin Whorf classifies as Common Average European Language.   All of these psychiatrists, and anthropologists have homed in on the fact that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE PROBLEMS STEMMING FROM THE ARCHITECTURE OF OUR LANGUAGE.  SHARING WHAT THESE PROBLEMS IN OUR LANGUAGE ARE, BY MEANS OF THE VERY SAME LANGUAGE THAT HAS THE PROBLEMS, IS TRICKY, LIKE TRYING TO BITE YOUR OWN NOSE.  CLARIFYING what is going on here is the aim of this, “A POCKET REFERENCE to WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC SCREW-UPS”.   If we were speaking Ojibwa, or any of the flow-based languages, we would NOT be having this problem that Laing and the others are drawing to our attention. Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE PROBLEM is coming from our building our language on the basis of BEING rather than on the basis of RELATIONS.

EXAMPLE of the TYPE OF PROBLEM that our BEING based language generates for us.   We know from our sense-experience that there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING aspect to our reality which means that LANGUAGE that employs ONLY MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING propositions is MISSING SOMETHING (sometimes termed the DEA ABSCONDITA, “THE GODDESS IN HIDING”).   From the point of view of one who studies the MODERN PHYSICS WAVE-FIELD based structure of this world of our sense-experience, THIS MAKES SENSE because our Euroepan languages, such as this ENGLISH I am now using, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate.  For example, in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, the damage done by a skull-fracturing punch to someone’s head is considered to be FULLY and SOLELY AUTHORED by the thrower of the punch.  This ignores the ever-present FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE wherein the skull may an EGG-SHELL skull whose FRACTURING is due to BOTH the force of the “MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING” conjugate AND TO the “FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” of a fragile ‘eggshell skull’.

(more…)

Here’s HOW WESTERN CULTURE is CULTIVATING DEEPENING DYSFUNCTION

0

 

OVERVIEW:  The challenge of sharing our complex experience of living in a transforming relational continuum also known as “The Tao that cannot be told” (Lao Tzu), has led to the development of “LANGUAGE”, more appropriately termed “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING” to avoid the confusion that comes with the assumption that LANGUAGE is directly reporting on our sense-experience reality… IT IS NOT!  Language or “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING” comes with the issue noted by Korzybski that ‘the word is not the thing’ which is further complicated since as MODERN PHYSICS informs us, we share inclusion in a WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.   This ambiguous matter/field relation gives rise to the need for QUANTUM LOGIC in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of THE INCLUDING MEDIUM which takes into account the interconnected and interdependent (relational) nature of material forms as CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.   The cultures of EAST and WEST can be distinguished by the EAST’s use of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is QUANTUM LOGIC or FLOW-BASED (relational) as contrasts with the WEST’s use of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is BINARY LOGIC  or BEING-based.  This essay serves a ROSETTA STONE role in reviewing how the WEST’s adoption of a BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM that is NOT PRESENT in the QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme of the“EAST” (indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, as well as QUANTUM PHYSICS).

 * * * 

 

FORWARD:  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE comes with the potential for psychological confusion because it incorporatates a TOO SIMPLE, LOGICALLY INCOMPLETE “BEING-BASED linguistic conceptualizing scheme that Nietzsche has termed ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  This ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ gives us the impression of MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “LOCAL AUTHORING” without acknowledging the real-world conjugate of FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.  Only in an imaginary abstract flat space of infinite extent would the one-sided “male-asserting/actualizing” pseudo-dynamics of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION be possible.  In the sense-experience affirmed, all-including, continually transforming wave-field, the “male asserting/actualizing” of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION is only found in conjugate relation with the “female-accommodating/enabling’ dynamics of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION, co-constituting together the all-including wave-field dynamic of TRANSFORMATION.

While philosophers such as Mircea Eliade (Mephistopheles et l’Androgyne) and systems theorists such as Kenneth Boulding have pointed to the confusion in WESTERN CULTURE associated with how our linguistic conceptualizing handles “THE TWO AND THE ONE” (the English title of the aforementioned book by Eliade).  The standard BEING-based languages of Western culture are simple BINARY LOGIC based while the languages of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, in accord with MODERN PHYSICS, employ a less simple but more comprehensive QUANTUM LOGIC FLOW-based linguistic conceptualizing scheme.  The BEING based linguistic conceptualizing is dependent on an abstract ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE as an ‘operating theatre’ for dynamics that are imagined in the simple BINARY LOGIC terms of the movements and interactions of independent material bodies as if within an empty infinite space.  The FLOW based linguistic conceptualizing is dependent on RELATIONS as describe a NON-BEING-DEPENDENT transforming wave-field comprised of the QUANTUM LOGIC combination of wave-field and material forms that are condensations of the wave-field where the field and the condensations of the field manifest in a BOTH/AND LOGIC of the  INCLUDING MEDIUM (QUANTUM LOGIC) relation.

The QUANTUM LOGIC understanding requires a linguistic conceptualizing scheme that captures the BOTH/AND relation between “BOTH” material forms (condensations of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD) … “AND” the energy charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.   This QUANTUM LOGIC has an ANDROGYNOUS structure in that its “BOTH/AND’ capability acknowledges the ANDROGYNOUS (conjugate) combination of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING dynamic and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamic.  This means that GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION “DO NOT EXIST ON THEIR OWN” but are only found in conjugate relation with their”female-accommodating/enabling” “counterpart” dynamics of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION, the combination, rather than a mechanical sum-of-the-parts, being found in the sense-experience affirmed all-including wave-field dynamic of TRANSFORMATION.

WE KNOW THAT we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ a linguistic conceptualizing scheme that FLATLY “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and ‘goes with’ ONLY the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, hence we speak in terms of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION as if these dynamics WERE REAL when they are ABSTRACTIONS that are MISSING their FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugates of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION which together with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION co-constitute TRANSFORMATION.

Our sense-experience affirms that we are immersed in an all-including WAVE-FIELD based TRANSFORMATION, while our WESTERN CULTURE employs the tactic of using the simplified BINARY LOGIC based MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING pseudo-realities of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, which are only half the story.  But, as Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, our propositions involving GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION can be “TRUE” without being “REAL” due to their INCOMPLETENESS wherein, as mentioned, they DROP OUT (or fail to acknowledge) the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugates of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION, and it is only when we use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in a manner that would have us understand these MALE and FEMALE conjugates in their ANDROGYNOUS UNION of TRANSFORMATION that our LANGUAGE-INFORMED UNDERSTANDING has a chance of ‘matching up with’ our SENSE-EXPERIENCE UNDERSTANDING.

As it is, in WESTERN CULTURE, we have engineered ECONOMIES based ONE-SIDEDLY on THE UNREAL, ABSTRACTIONS OF GROWTH/DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, the TRUTH of which is convincing, without alerting us to the Goedel’s Theorem INCOMPLETENESS of such ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, which, TRUE though they may be, are nevertheless INCOMPLETE and thus fail in their linguistic conceptualizing, to inform us on REALITY, that REALITY being an all-including TRANSFORMATION which incorporates the conjugates of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION together with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.

Our WESTERN CULTURE USE OF BINARY LOGIC and the simplified abstract “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS” that such simple logic supports, distinguishes us from CULTURES USING QUANTUM LOGIC such as INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VENDANT ADHERENTS and the small minority of QUANTUM PHYSICISTS who have ‘switched teams’ (from the BINARY LOGIC, abstract being-based pseudo-reality-grounded team to the QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience-grounded team). While some fractions of the aforementioned QUANTUM LOGIC user-groups have ‘converted’ to the BINARY LOGIC based understandings that are built into WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, there continue to be holdouts; i.e. those who have managed to sustain their FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING practice.

This lengthy FORWARD is ‘made lengthy’ beause it is written in ENGLISH and ENGLISH is one of the “Common Average European” languages, in linguist Benjamin Whorf’s categorization, that suffers from BINARY LOGIC based DUMBING DOWN by way of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate.  That is, languages such as ENGLISH give a foundational role to BINARY LOGIC by way of simple LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, which Goedel’s Theorem “WARNS US” is “INCOMPLETE”, and we can easily see what is INCOMPLETE about it; i.e. it DOES NOT MENTION THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus OBSCURES in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, the LESS SIMPLE reality of TRANSFORMATION which comes to us with the conjugate combination of “BOTH” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION … “AND” … FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” as with SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION.

As Whorf points out, we would have no problem with our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING if we were using a QUANTUM LOGIC capable language like HOPI, but our use of ENGLISH with its BINARY LOGIC, BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “IS” a problem.  As Zen philosopher Alan Watts suggested, we users of English could avoid the BINARY LOGIC based DUMBING DOWN (from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC) by avoiding the use of NOUNS signifying BEING and instead using only VERBS as support understanding in RELATIONAL (QUANTUM LOGIC) terms.

THIS HASN’T HAPPENED AND IS UNLIKELY TO HAPPEN SOON because we have secured with PRIDE the foundational status of NAMES/NOUNS with, as Nietzsche points out, the associated DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that supports the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments which is solidly entrenched in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and is the basis for WESTERN CULTURE’S BEING based PURIFICATIONIST systems of REWARDS for GOOD BEINGS and PUNISHMENTS for BAD BEINGS.  This BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme is in radical contrast to the ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (we are all related) QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM understanding of indigenous aboriginal cultures.  The QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC linguistic conceptualizing approach is reaffirmed by MODERN PHYSICS, wherein our INCLUSION in the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD is LINGUISTICALLY ACKNOWLEDGED as in flow-based linguistic conceptualizations such as ‘THERE IS TOWNING AND HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” where material forms are understood as CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.

The DYSFUNCTION that is intensifying in our WESTERN CULTURE social dynamic is shaped by linguistic conceptualizing that is DUMBED DOWN from needed less-simple QUANTUM LOGIC, WAVE-FIELD competent linguistic conceptualizing, to simple BINARY LOGIC MECHANICS (material-objects-banging-about-in-empty-space linguistic conceptualizing).  This simplistic BINARY LOGIC conceptualizing DROPS OUT acknowledgement of the conjugate SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION that work together with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION in the TRANSFORMING of the RELATIONAL CONTINUUM of our sense-experience.

In spite of the WARNINGS of Nietzsche, Bohm, Schroedinger and others as to how our WESTERN CULTURE over-simplistic LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is the source of rising FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, we continue to move forward down a path of intensifying BINARY LOGIC fuelled DYSFUNCTION, punctuated with MASS SHOOTINGS and MILITARY CONFLICTS that, instead of having a QUANTUM LOGIC orientation to resolving RELATIONAL IMBALANCE, have a BINARY LOGIC orientation to BEING-BASED PURIFICATIONISM.

* * *

The SHORTFALL in BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS PERSIST IN USING, is CLEARLY IDENTIFIED by Nietzsche, in his following two comments that ‘set the stage’ for the need to UPGRADE to QUANTUM LOGIC BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which is FLOW-BASED (NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT) and is NOT DEPENDENT on (LOCAL, EXPLICIT) MATERIAL BEINGS and, DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based “LOCAL AUTHORING”.  In Nietzsche’s following two comments, he rejects the notion of BOTH “BEING” and “BEING-based LOCAL AUTHORING”.

 

In its origin language belongs in the age of the most rudimentary form of psychology. We enter a realm of crude fetishism when we summon before consciousness the basic presuppositions of the metaphysics of language, in plain talk, the presuppositions of reason. Everywhere it sees a doer and doing; it believes in will as the cause; it believes in the ego, in the ego as being, in the ego as substance, and it projects this faith in the ego-substance upon all things — only thereby does it first create the concept of “thing.” Everywhere “being” is projected by thought, pushed underneath, as the cause; the concept of being follows, and is a derivative of, the concept of ego. In the beginning there is that great calamity of an error that the will is something which is effective, that will is a faculty. Today we know that it is only a word.” – Nietzsche, ‘Twilight of the Idols’

 

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

Note that Nietzsche is CRITIQUING both the use of NAMING to impute BEING (e.g. “lightning”) as the SUPPORT STUB for CONTRIVING BEING-based AUTHORING; …  Everywhere “being” is projected by thought, pushed underneath, as the cause …

Nietzsche’s exposing of this major SHORTFALL in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (an engineered-in dependency on BINARY LOGIC based BEING and its GRAMMAR based cohort “LOCAL AUTHORING”). which conflicts with the WAVE-FIELD view of reality wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED AS CONDENSATIONS WITHIN AN ALL-INCLUIDING FLUX.  Nietzsche agrees with Heraclitus’ that “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” and holds a QUANTUM LOGIC-like view of the world as ‘ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM’;  “And do you know what “the world” is to me? Shall I show it to you in my mirror? This world: a monster of energy, without beginning, without end, a firm, iron magnitude of force that does not grow bigger or smaller, that does not expend itself but only transforms itself “ —Nietzsche, “The Will to Power”

Thus, Nietzsche makes an important critique of the WESTERN CULTURE “BEING-BASED” linguistic conceptualizing scheme.  Today, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS continue to give BEING a foundational role in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme  in spite of its REJECTION BY Heraclitus, and as is also evident, by Nietzsche and MODERN PHYSICS.

 * * * * *

 

 

 

Here’s HOW WESTERN CULTURE is CULTIVATING DEEPENING DYSFUNCTION

 

By ‘Deepening Dysfunction’, I am referring to unfolding events such as HAMAS’ INSANE MASSACRE of Israelis and Netanyahu’s “INSANE” RESPONSE.

(more…)

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME

0

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME

 

ABOUT THE TITLE: ….We live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD, the PRIMARY SUBSTANCE of which is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, which, like the Electromagnetic Field, is NOT DIRECTLY VISIBLE but IMPLIED by what APPEARS to be OPEN SPACE “BETWEEN” the MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

[[NOTA BENE: Here’s where the SPLIT comes in where “EAST IS EAST and WEST IS WEST AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET”, since the “EAST” which includes indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents understanding of reality where EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) while the WEST’s understanding that ALL MATERIAL FORMS ARE INDEPENDENT and move about within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.]]  

What is going on here is that the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and its TRANSFORMING is the BASIC REALITY and the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS are SECONDARY ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (APPEARANCES) as Schroedinger terms them (they are like WHORLINGS in FLUID FLOWING; i.e. visible features of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLOWING that appear to possess LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘MATERIAL BEING’ which is NOT TRUE).

Not only can we NOT IGNORE the TRANSPARENT BODY OF THE WAVE-FIELD and cast it as EMPTINESS in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, our sense-experience compels us to understand the TRANSPARENT WAVE-FIELD as the PRIMARY REALITY.  This means that we must RESIST the tendency to, for example, conceive of the man leaving the town for the countryside since “it is no long the same town”, …and, “the man is no longer the same man”, and the “countryside is no longer the same countryside” since “everything is in the flux of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

What is going on here is that while material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME INVERTS OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY, and in the process, SYNTHETICALLY and MISTAKENLY PROMOTES the SECONDARY MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM to PRIMARY (PSEUDO-REALITY) STATUS in the guise of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS situated within, and moving about and interacting in, … A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE..

YET, in the understanding coming from our PRE-LINGUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, wherein all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, “EVERYTHING IS RELATED” (mitakuye oyasin). However, after we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ the tool of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, which in our case is BINARY LOGIC BASED, we come up with an INTELLECTUAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION wherein material forms are NO LONGER “SEEN/UNDERSTOOD” as RELATED.   This SPLITTING APART of the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM comes about where BINARY LOGIC is used to DIFFERENTIATE the multiple, innately related CONDENSATIONS OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to “pop them out” as if they were INDEPENDENT MATERIAL ENTITIES moving about and interacting within a NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.

What happened to the “EVERYTHING IS RELATED” SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED reality wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including, all-connecting ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM?

The INTEGRATED REALITY of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM that includes MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, … IS FRAGMENTED BY LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION USING WHAT NIETZSCHE CALLS “THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR”, as where NAMING is used to impute LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING, a FIRST ERROR that is CONFLATED with a SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR that imputes to the NAMING-INSTANTIATED MATERIAL BEINGS, THEIR OWN GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

In the SENSE-EXPERIENCE SUPPORTED REALITY WHEREIN MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX, … “ONE CAN’T STEP INTO THE SAME RIVER TWICE because it is NOT THE SAME RIVER and NOT the SAME MAN STEPPING INTO IT.   In other words, ALL MATERIAL THINGS are CONDENSATIONS in the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is undergoing CONTINUING TRANSFORMATION as is the nature of the WAVE-FIELD.

The FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM which is rife in the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC derives from the MISTAKEN INTELLECTUAL, BINARY LOGIC REDUCTION to LOCAL, EXPLICIT INDEPENDENT BEING-BASED PARTS, of what our sense-experience is informing us NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (relational) MATERIAL FORMINGS in the TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.   This FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM is the product of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.  It supports UNREAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS THAT HAVE BECOME the POPULAR WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE.  Thus, while people support the GROWTH OF THE TOWN, … there is NO MENTION OF THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, an OBFUSCATION that is leading to increasing unintended FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

* * * * * *

 

 

In order to understand MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING behaviors, one needs to understand the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ambiance in which the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is transpiring in.   In other words, in order to understand what is ‘going on’, … CHERCHEZ LA FEMME.

 

This applies in MODERN PHYSICS because WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD where there is NOT ONLY a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PUSH” but also, in conjugate relation, a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “PULL”.   This ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY is something that is ACKOWLEDGED in indigenous aboriginal, LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES but NOT in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, and this is the reason for the title CHERCHEZ LA FEMME, because although the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING INFLUENCE is the PRIMARY INFLUENCE that is shaping our WORLD DYNAMIC, our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, making it LOOK LIKE (in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING) the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PUSH” is “ALL THERE IS”.

 

In WESTERN JUSTICE, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the EGGSHELL SKULL that collapses in association with the blow from a FEEBLE PUNCH, is IGNORED because in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, because it is BINARY LOGIC based, all we have in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME to explain the shattering of the EGGSHELL SKULL is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PUSH” of the PUNCH whereas, by contrast, in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING WHICH IS FLOW-BASED, the OPERATIVE LOGIC is QUANTUM LOGIC which is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein MATERIAL FORMS are understood as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD whereby  CHERCHEZ LA FEMME makes total sense because in this QUANTUM LOGIC mode of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM is “PRIMARY” while the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is “SCHAUMKOMMEN” (Schroedinger) aka “APPEARANCE”.

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME (look for the NONLOCAL FEMALE INFLUENCE) is NOT ONLY ABOUT the dynamics associated with MALE-FEMALE RELATIONSHIPS in our HUMAN SOCIAL DYNAMICS, but this is CHARACTERISTIC of our WAVE-FIELD REALITY in GENERAL.   In the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, we employ ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE and simply DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, SUBSTITUTING IN ITS PLACE “ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE” so that all our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME has to ‘take care of’ is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate;  For example, we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate “WITHOUT MENTIONING” the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS so that there is NO WAY, in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUJISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, TO CONVEY the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC which is the basis of TRANSFORMATION.

 

TRANSFORMATION is what is going on where the GROWTH OF THE TOWN associates with the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS within the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

 

WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE “SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS” and IN ITS PLACE SUBSTITUTES ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE so as to simplify the task of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, as if the only thing that is happening is that the TOWN is GROWING… FULL STOP…

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME!   … because while we can use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to do ALL THE SIMPLIFYING WE WANT, .. it so happens that we OPEN UP AN INCREASING GAP BETWEEN our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY, so that, for example by our FAILING TO MENTION THE “MISSING FEMALE” i.e. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING  “OPENING UP” to enable the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH OF THE TOWN, we truly do LET LOOSE the DEA ABSCONDITA, the missing FEMALE (goddess) and it is the FEMALE conjugate that is PRIMARY in WAVE-FIELD physics while the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT is Schaumkommen (APPEARANCE) in which case what our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME IS DOING IS CONSTRUCTING A PSEUDO-REALITY BASED SOLELY ON MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in this example where we speak in the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms of ‘the TOWN GROWING’ without mentioning the REAL, SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED “CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS” and leaving the FALSE IMPRESSION that ALL WE NEED TO ACKNOWLEDGE IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING IS THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

 

THIS IS A BIG MISTAKE AND THIS IS WHAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE DOING AND THIS IS WHERE THE FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC IS COMING FROM and CONTINUES TO SCREW US UP (the latest is the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between ISRAELIS and PALESTINIANS and then again between RUSSIANS and UKRAINIANS) where there is no sign of acknowledgement that NAMING-INSTANTIATED “BEING” IS INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION and that WE and EVERYTHING are RELATEED as in the indigenous aboriginal aphorism MITAKUYE OYASIN, which is supported by the Modern physics understanding wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the all including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

 

The BIG MISTAKE is in the BANISHING by way of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which is made easy because “SHE” is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the nature of the ‘WAVE-FIELD’ which is the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY PLENUM wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS.

 

The SIMPLEST (but not the most trouble-free) MEANS of devising A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME given this physical reality wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the energy-charged PLENUM is to SUBSTITUTE EMPTY SPACE  for the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which case there can be a focus on the MATERIAL FORMS and THEIR MOVEMENTS relative so a FIXED REFERENCE FRAME so that EACH MATERIAL FORM can be seen as HAVING ITS OWN MOVEMENT and DEVELOPMENT, … the alternative that honors the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM forcing the development of MUCH LESS SIMPLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION SCHEME wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (to honor the understanding that material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

 

OK, so we have wrestled that one to the ground, and it is clear that when we adopt the SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME where we only have to address the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate as if this action was transpiring in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, we are ALL SET to speak in such terms as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING (it is now in an absolute empty space that simplifies our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING by letting us DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

 

PROBLEM!  The CHERCHEZ LA FEMME PROBLEM, … the female seductive instigator of actions and development is INVISIBLE (it is the WAVE-FIELD which we are dropping out all mention of by substituting absolute empty space for it in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME and going SOLELY with LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING THAT IS IN “ONE-SIDED” terms of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  MATERIAL FORMS, notionally operating within an absolute empty space of infinite extent.


YES, IT IS TRUE THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME ARE GIVING FULL AND SOLE CREDIT FOR ‘REALITY’ TO THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and BACKFILLING THE HOLE WITH ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

 

By DROPPING OUT the ENERGY-ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the PLANEUM and TRANSFERRING ALL MOTIVE AUTHORING to the SECONDARY ‘CONDENSATION’, thus promoting the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT to PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENCY, so that we NO LONGER HAVE ACTUALIZING CAPABILITY THAT IS FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLIN, PUTTING OURSELVES IN THE SITUATION WHEREIN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS ‘MORE SIMPLE’ but ‘LESS TRUE’, … and now for the COMPLAINTS of this WESTERN CULTURE “DUMBED DOWN” LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

 

* * * * * * * * * *

 

THE COMPLAINTS DEPARTMENT HAS RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING COMPLAINTS IN REGARD TO THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINT # 1 coming from Johannes Kepler who acknowledges both the convenience of the simplification (dropping out the female accommodating/enabling conjugate), and also the SCREWING UP when we OVERLOOK the consequences of having made it.

 

As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’

 

While Kepler went to great pains to capture the HARMONIES OF THE WORLD in planetary motion in his master work by that name (Harmonies of the World), he was bothered by the common habit of DUMBING down, in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, the harmonic complexity in nature’s dynamics.  Kepler did not limit the movements of the planets to that of MATERIAL BODIES in EMPTY SPACE as in a BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION but allowed for FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING co-authoring influence.  In the excerpt, he is making note of how the movement of the ferry is not pure MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING MOTION but is tapping into the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “AETHER” (the energy-charged PLENUM).

 

On broader rivers they [Ferrymen] make the skiffs go in circles, send them hither and thither, and play a thousand tricks, without touching the bottom or the banks, but by the use of the oar alone, directing the unified and most simple flow of the river to their own ends. In very much the same manner, the power moving out into the world through the species is a kind of rapid torrent, which sweeps along all the planets, as well as, perhaps, the entire aethereal air, from west to east.” – Kepler, Astronomia Nova, 1609

 

This COMPLAINT #1 is essentially saying that our WESTERN CULTURE habit of reducing our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS to a SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC basis, while it makes for simple LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, is DROPPING OUT RELEVANT UNDERSTANDING with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ENABLING influence.

 

* * * * * * * *

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINT NUMBER #2 coming from Jill Astbury in ‘the Making of Women’s Madness’.  The FEMME that I am writing about is the FEMALE that goes missing in our WESTERN CULTURE mode of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING, which assigns ALL AUTHORING OF DEVELOPMENTS to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING INFLUENCE.  In this example the FEMALE INFLUENCE OF A TOXIC CONTAINING ENVIRONMENT which

 

Jill Astbury raises questions in regard to the LOCAL AUTHORING assumption in ‘Crazy for You: The Making of Women’s Madness’ in her inquiry into the World Health Organization study showing that women have twice the incidence of ‘affective disorders’ (depression, bipolar disorder etc.) as men.

 

Astbury makes the point that psychological stress can manifest in an individual experiencing the stress of being in a group of differing others whose sensitivities may be lower and where the group may be cultivating an environment which is highly stressful so that a sensitive minority may manifest problems which are then assumed to be coming from defectiveness rather than sensitivity of a subset of the group. Research into ‘psychological illness’ will pull the patient out and study the patient and not the group, which thus will be ‘missing the point’ since the stress may be a ‘group based’ phenomenon involving a toxic environment;

 

“The research stemming from this viewpoint had a systemic blindness. It could literally not see what it was doing, as the normative quality of its own presuppositions had made them invisible.” – Jill Astbury

 

In other words, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS and our MEDICAL and PSYCHIATRIC mainstream services TEND to constrain their investigations of “ILLNESS IN THE PATIENT” to investigating the PATIENT to find out WHAT’S WRONG WITH HER, as in the case of a MENTAL BREAKDOWN without considering the MINER’S CANARY effect where what shows up as ILLNESS in the individual is being induced by the TOXIC FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENVIRONMENT so the ABNORMAL MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT of the SENSITIVE INDIVIDUAL are SECONDARY (the crazy male asserting/actualizing behaviours of the miner’s canary are secondary and are brought on by the TOXIC ENVIRONMENT .

 

* * * * * * * * * *

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINT NUMBER #3 The TWIN BROTHER FARMERS who are highly respected in their community for their PRODUCTION of grains and vegetables become divided by one of the brothers being the consistent earner of large income and winner of prizes for his consistent superior production while the other brother, in spite of his equal skill and equal effort, experiences a succession of crop failures from hail storms and local flooding and loses his farm to the mortgage company that forecloses due to his inability to keep up the payments.    As the Folk song goes, “There but for fortune, go you or I”.

 

* * *

 

IN THESE THREE “CHERCHEZ LA FEMME” COMPLAINTS, the pattern is established that in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, we can CHOOSE between BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING where we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS as in crediting the RICH FARMING BROTHER with being THE AUTHOR OF HIS OWN SUCCESS.    Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS tells us that while such propositions may be TRUE, they are inevitably INCOMPLETE, and Modern physics informs us that part of that INCOMPLETENESS is coming from our dropping out mention of the ever-present influence of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS, and as in the indigenous and Modern physics understandings of how different LANGUAGES relate to SENSE-EXPERIENCE reality. 

 

IN SIMPLE TERMS, we cannot (in reality) reduce LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC DYNAMICS which are ANDROGYNOUS, involving, as primary, the ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) in which the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS are included, … to a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY.  But WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “CAN” and “DO” use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that imposes this SIMPLIFYING REDUCTION so , as Kepler points out, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.”

 

 

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME SUM-UP :

 

The MISSING FEMALE is the MISSING “ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE” as in the example where we speak of the GROWTH of the TOWN, and there may be a lot of PRIDE here and going into detail of all of the NEW DEVELOPMENTS, …  DROPPING OUT ALL MENTION OF THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS WHICH IS PART OF THE UNFOLDING REALITY.    WHEN WE ‘CHERCHEZ LA FEMME’, we discover that, sure enough, the ENVELOPING WILDERNESS LANDS and the DIVERSITY WITHIN THEM is undergoing SHRINKING in conjugate relation to the GROWING of the TOWN, in which case, what is happening here is NOT the GROWING OF THE TOWN but, INSTEAD, the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE which included “BOTH” the GROWING of the TOWN “AND” the conjugate SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, or in other words, TRANSFORMATION of the overall LANDSCAPE.

 

All three of these examples, and there are countless more, point the FACT that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is COMMONLY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, MAKING IT APPEAR AS IF THERE IS A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC (e.g. the TOWN IS GROWING) AND THAT IS “ALL THERE IS”, and that reduced representation is due to the fact that ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE as Goedel’s Theorem asserts.

 

LET’S FACE IT, THIS IS A PROBLEM WITH OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING ARCHITECTURE that OTHERS, such as the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS DO NOT HAVE because in using a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as in a WAVE-FIELD where MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS in the TRANSFORMING FLOW in the manner of WHORLINGS in the FLOWING of river or tidal water.   The WHORLINGS are INCLUSIONS IN THE FLOWING in the manner of STRANDS in an ALL-INCLUDING WEB-OF-LIFE.  In other words, there is no way to SEPARATE the WHORLING from the FLOWING because the WHORLING IS PART OF THE APPEARANCE OF FLOWING SO THAT THE ONLY PHYSICAL PHENOMENON IS THE FLOWING AND THE TREATING of the WHORLING with LINTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING THAT USES THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL BEING with LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT is INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION that serves as COMMUNICATIONS TOOL where all that matters is that the participants in the language group are willing to accept the SAME BOGUS MOCKUP AS THE COMMON REFERENCE that gives MEANING to the SHARED MEANING WORDS the members of the GROUP are USING.  That SHARED MEANING DOES NOT HAVE TO BE GROUNDED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, THE LANGUAGE could be BUILT FROM A FAIRY TALE which is close to what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have done in the architecting of our language with this DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.

 

For example, the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of the ISRAELI – PALESTINIAN CONFLICT in terms of TWO INDEPENDENT GROUPS ATTACKING ONE ANOTHER as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE as is the formulation of our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING has NO BASIS IN REALITY, but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are WORKING WITH LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS of a SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC nature where we say things like THEY DID IT which implies LOCAL AUTHORING (i.e. “THEY DID IT” is exemplary of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).  First we use the NAME ‘THEY’  to impute LOCAL, INDEPENDENT BEING, and we conflate this with  the VERB “TO DO” so as to construct the impression of LOCAL AUTHORING involving only TWO INDEPENDENT BEING things as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE, which is an important condition dictated by our imputing of INDEPENDENCE to the TWO BEINGS, … which are NO WAY TWO INDEPENDENT BEINGS in MODERN PHYSICS and/or indigenous aboriginal cultures, where they too are STRANDS IN THE ONE WEB-OF-LIFE aka CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).

 

In the more realistic understanding wherein we are all strands in the ONE WEB-OF-LIFE aka CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, the AUTHORING of actions is NOT NEARLY SO SIMPLE (i.e. that PSEUDO-SIMPLICITY OF PURPORTED “LOCAL AUTHORING” COMES FROM WESTERN CULTURE EGO fuelled by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).

 

In Indigenous aboriginal cultures, the HEALING CIRCLE demonstrates the understanding that emergent events are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) in origin and there is NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.  We all share inclusion within a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM and where there are ERUPTIONS OF MURDEROUS VIOLENCE, THOSE HOLDING THE SMOKING GUNS ARE THE CONDUITS THROUGH WHOM THE BUILDUP OF TENSIONS IN THE SOCIAL RELATIONAL WEB, (which have gathered energy from strands in the web connecting both sides of the polarized matrix) FIND VENTING.  The notion of the VIOLENCE HAVING LOCAL ORIGINATION FROM A SQUAD OF INDEPENDENT EVIL BEINGS, means that the REMEDY is NOT, as would ‘make sense’, to convene HEALING CIRCLES to reconcile and subsume tensions that have been building in the relational social matrix, … BUT orienting instead to the ELIMINATING of the SQUAD of INDEPENDENT EVIL BEINGS, so as to PURIFY THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE.

 

HOW CRAZY IS THAT?  — In the understanding of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, IT IS TOTALLY INSANE.

 

IT IS INSANE because WE ARE ALL RELATED (MITAKUYE OYASIN within the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein material forms such as ourselves are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD).

 

 

-2-  QUANTUM LOGIC INCLUSION OF MAN-IN-EARTH (CONDENSATION OF WAVE-FIELD IN WAVE-FIELD):  This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”

 

___

 

 

-1-   BINARY LOGIC SPLIT OF MAN AND EARTH (MATERIAL BEING IN EMPTY SPACE): Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

 

IT IS ONE THING TO OVERCOMING DISSONANCE AND IMBALANCE THROUGH RESTORING AND SUSTAINING BALANCE AND HARMONY IN THE RELATIONAL WEB, IN THE WAKE OF EMERGENT VIOLENT DISSONANCE, …  and quite another to SEEK OUT AND ELIMINATE “EVIL INDEPENDENT BEINGS” as ISRAELIS SEEK TO ELIMINATE HAMAS AND VICE VERSA.

 

IN THIS CHERCHEZ LA FEMME SUM-UP, AN IMPORTANT POINT OF NOTE IS THE FOLLOWING: 

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME SUM-UP 

 

 

While QUANTUM PHYSICS and Bohm and Schroedinger, and indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents give a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in their LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME TO QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (which is the LOGIC of BALANCE and IMBALANCE), WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS give a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in their LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME to BINARY LOGIC, the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (i.e. absolute empty and infinite space medium). 

 

THE MAJOR DIFFERENCE between these two LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES is that IN THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, there is TOTAL EXCLUSION OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/INCLUDING CONJUGATE (i.e. the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM) THAT IS THE MAINSTAY OF THE QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME Of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

 

So, in the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC ‘excluded medium’ LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, INSTEAD OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM as the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING MOTHER OF MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, there is AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT wherein everything that is NOT EMPTINESS is ACCORDED MATERIAL-based BEING thus forming a BINARY LOGIC (EITHER something OR nothing) based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.

 

ll these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the end for which he form’d them; and these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation.”  –Isaac Newton, Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light

 

This sets forth a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING (in empty space) LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which supports ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY AS WITH LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS such as THE TOWN IS GROWING.  In this case, there is no FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as there is in the indigenous aboriginal and MODERN PHYSICS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, where one employs QUANTUM LOGIC as in “THERE IS TOWNING (male asserting/actualizing) IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (female accommodating/enabling)”

 

POINTS OF NOTE:

 

-1- WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which gives a foundational tole to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in in ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

 

-2- Indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta employ less simple QUANTUM LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which gives a foundational role to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the PLENUM in a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC RELATION

 

-3- The THREE “CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINTS all showed physical situations which could NOT BE CAPTURED IN SIMPLE ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TERMS.  This was because there was a need, in all three cased, to acknowledge the role of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM as was IMPLIED but not directly mentioned in the case studies being pointed to.  For example, Jill Astbury NATURALLY ASSUMED THE REAL POSSIBILITY OF A TOXIC ENVIRONMENT could alter the behaviour of the person or canary within it.  To make the assumption that aberrant behaviour is being authored fully and solely by the ‘independent human being’ that is displaying it, means that he patient can be taken into a clinic and her ‘individual workings’ analyzed to come up with an explanation for her anomalous behaviour.   This limited view is the BINARY LOGIC view where the patient is deemed INDEPENDENT of the environment she is situated in.   CHERCHEZ LA FEMME is a reminder that there is always, in our sense experience of inclusion in the energy-charged PLENUM, a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING wave-field conjugate that comes together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.

 

For example, if the GROWTH OF AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CONTINUES FOR A LONG TIME, the quality of the crops may decline and pollination by bees etc. may become problematic because while the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION “GROWTH OF DEVELOPMENT” does not capture it, there is also CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and the bees and nutrients and other influences that are in decline as a result will be contributing to overall TRANSFORMATION as the WILDERNESS DIVERSITY SHRINKS in conjugate relation to the GROWTH of CULTIVATED CROPLANDS, in which case, it is UNREAL to speak in terms of the GROWTH of the CROPLANDS since there is no mention of the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS LANDS.

 

This ERROR is NOT MADE by indigenous aborignals due to their QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE where they speak in terms of ‘there is CROP-CULTIVATING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which includes FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING (the transforming landscape which is the receptacle for the male asserting/actualizing CROP-CULTIVATING)

 

To DROP OUT MENTION of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and go SOLELY with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘WE ARE GROWING THE CROPLANDS’ is to give the impression that the GROWTH OF CROPLANDS IS “SOMETHING REAL” and in fact SOMETHING GOOD.  However, the GROWTH of CROPLANDS may be OUT OF BALANCE in the sense that what is UNMENTIONED is the SHRINKING OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WILDERNESS LANDS which is part of the REALITY of what is going on, and which figures in the changing BALANCE by way of SHRINKING WILDERNESS DIVERSITY and GROWING of CULTIVATED MONO-CULTURE.

 

WE WESTERN CUILTURE ADHERENTS, by using BOGUS TERMS such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, … all of which are one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY conjugates are at the same time DROPPING OUT of the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which, together with the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “GROWTH”, “DEVELOPMENT” and “PRODUCTION” is referring to the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE that is what our SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS INFORMING US, without dependency on our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING METHOD OF CHOICE. 

 

NOT MODERN PHYSICS, NOT INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, NOT TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and NOT ADVAITA VEDATA FALL INTO THE TRAP OF DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJGUATE in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, however, that is the MISTAKE of WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as with ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’, .. which differs basically (radically) from the MODERN PHYSICS and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, TAOIST/BUDDHIST AND ADVAITA VEDANTA QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which RETAINS the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING conjugate and thus retains a WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATION CAPABILITY.

 

 * * * * * * * * *

THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING IS the ‘MOTHER OF’ MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING..  The MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is “APPEARANCE”, “SCHAUMKOMMEN”. The FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING VALLEY, brings together rain rivulets into streams and streams into mighty rivers which SO WE SAY, CHURN OUT MASSIVE CANYONS, OR IT THE OTHER WAY ROUND?  DO THE VALLEYS ORGANIZE THE RAINFALL GIVE IT ITS SCULPTING POWERS?   When RAIN is falling onto the CONVEX out flanks of the mountain, the RAIN SCATTERS rather than GATHERS, so it appears as if the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT VALLEY possesses the primary authoring power and the power we attribute to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT RAGING RIVER is only APPEARANCE since the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (the WAVE-FIELD) seems to be the AUTHORING SOURCE.

 

The BOTTOM LINE IS, … CHERCHEZ LA FEMME!

 

* * * * *  

 

FOOTNOTE re the NON-UNIVERSALITY OF BINARY LOGIC.

 

“At the core of our spiritual beings we make no artificial distinction between the sacred and the profane. Unlike Western culture, we have not suffered through that artificial separation”

https://anishinabeknews.ca/2015/05/13/divergence-traditional-aboriginal-spirituality-and-mother-earth/

 

According to Tomoko Masuzawa, any cosmology without a sacred–profane binary was rendered invisible by the field of religious studies, privileging Christianity at the expense of non-Christian systems because the binary was supposed to be “universal”,  –Wikipedia

How Sorcery Persists in the WESTERN CULTURE World View

0

AUTHOR’S PREFACE:

The term “SORCERY” commonly refers to Magic (supernatural), the application of beliefs, rituals or actions  employed to subdue or manipulate natural or supernatural beings and sorces. —Wikipedia” 

In my philosophical investigations, as in those of others such as Nietzsche, Bohm and Schroedinger, it is EVIDENT that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is used to INCORRECTLY impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS (i.e. SOURCING POWERS) to figuratively manipulate things so that they are seemingly given life and existence by way of the common ritual of NAMING, along with POWERS of LOCAL SOURCING (unreal) with the “magic” of GRAMMAR.   The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT influences of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD are thus re-cast in the form of material BEINGS, notionally endowed with their own POWERS of LOCALLY SOURCING actions and developments.

For example, while the reality is that there is“TOWNING within the fully fluid context of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX”,  in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, in place of acknowledging the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of dynamics, we make the COMMON ERROR of imputing “LOCAL SOURCING” as in the construction of  “the TOWN IS GROWING”, though this LOCAL SOURCING of GROWTH is UNREAL and it falls into the category of ‘human manipulating of natural beings and forces”.

 

The GROWTH OF THE TOWN is IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS in which case, THERE IS NO LOCAL SOURCING as in “GROWTH” of something LOCAL and EXPLICIT but TRANSFORMATION that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

 

In reality, there are “humanings in the transforming relational continuum aka the energy-charged PLENUM” and there are NO SUCH THINGS as HUMANS that are BEINGS with POWERS OF LOCALLY SOURCING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.  That ERRONEOUS (but common in WESTERN CULTURE) impression is coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

 

In other words, we (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) are commonly using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to contrive the impression of LOCAL AUTHORING, and this LOCAL SOURCING has the credentials of SORCERY in that where we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’‘, we are implying LOCAL SOURCING  of this action and development which is NOT REAL but simply the impression gleaned from our use of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.  WHAT IS REAL is that …’there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ and there is NO LOCAL SOURCING involved since ‘The TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, being included within the overall TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’;.

 

That is, the notion of LOCAL SOURCING derives from the WESTERN CULTURE practice of SIMPLIFYING our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which we have made DIFFICULT (complicated) upfront by imputing a BINARY LOGIC, MATERIAL BEING-IN-EMPTY-SPACE based FOUNDATION in place of the actual QUANTUM LOGIC ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM with its MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS.

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ a BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in our rhetoric; i.e. a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, that reduces (notionally) the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

 

In MODERN PHYSICS as also in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, THERE IS NO “CONJURING UP”, with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, of LOCAL POWERS OF SOURCING actions and developments as there is in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIOATIONS of WESTERN CULTURE, and instead, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, as is the nature of the all-including WAVE-FIELD world we live in where material forms are CONDENSINGS in which case THERE IS NO LOCAL SOURCING as is FOUNDATIONAL in COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.

 

THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, in this manner, gives a foundational role to the application of “beliefs and actions employed to manipulate natural beings and forces” by using propositions such as “The TOWN IS GROWING” which, by DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, impute LOCAL SOURCING POWERS that DO NOT EXIST, to the TOWN.

 

However which way we DRESS THIS ACTION UP IN WORDS, it is EVIDENT that SOMETHING that LOOKS, SMELLS and TASTES like “SORCERY” lurks within what LINGUACIST BENJAMIN WHORF classifies as COMMON, AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE.  As Bohm points out, this IMPUTING of LOCAL SOURCING POWERS to notional NAMING-INSTANTIATED THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with GRAMMAR is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANISM; i.e. the FRAGMENTATION of using NAMING to IMPUTE INDEPENDENT BEING to NAMING-instantiated TOWNS and the OBSCURANTISM of DROPPING OUT OF OUR MENTAL  ACKNOWLEDGING, the SHRINKING WILDERNESS that is CONJUGATE to the “APPEARANCE” and “GROWING” of “TOWNS”. 

 

The CONJUGATE RELATION of SHRINKING WILDERNESS and GROWING TOWN is NOT a ‘SIMPLE CONJUGATE RELATION’ as involves the MECHANICS of TWO SEPARATE THINGS, CLINKING into a CONJUGATE RELATION LIKE TWO RAILWAY CARS HOOKING UP TOGETHER, but a COMPLEX AFFILIATION with REAL and IMAGINARY components  where the RESIDENTS OF THE GROWING TOWN are not only AWARE of the INNATE RELATIONAL GATHERING-SCATTERING NATURE of what is better understood in the DYNAMIC TERMS OF ‘TOWNING’ since the developing MATERIAL STRUCTURE is like the ‘the CLUSTER”  or dynamic GATHERING-SCATTERING CLUSTERING of ants induced by some ATTRACTOR such as a DROP OF HONEY or TRADING CENTER. The IMPRESSION of A PERSISTING BEING or LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘ENVELOPE’ or ‘CLUSTER’ does not OVER-RIDE the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT NATURE of the overall TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE within which the RESONANT RELATIONAL FORM is an “APPEARANCE” within the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

 

Here we see the BINARY LOGIC —QUANTUM LOGIC LINGISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DIFFERENCE that underlies the expression “EAST is EAST and WEST is WEST and NEVER the TWAIN SHALL MEET” (Rudyard Kipling). 

 

While the “WEST” employs LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that uses SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC such as the PROPOSITION “THE TOWN IS GROWING”, … without acknowledging the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate”  (i.e. here, there is PERSISTING BEING in the form of a LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECT (the TOWN) where the LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECT IS THE ONLY THING “MOVING” or “CHANGING”), … the “EAST” employs LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based as with the PROPOSITION “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  (i.e. here, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, where theTOWNING is INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

By the “WEST” , I am referring to the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach, and by the “EAST”, I am referring to the QUANTUM LOGIC, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach.

ACHTUNG! … NOTA BENE!…

It is imortant to keep in mind the intrinsic difference between simple BINARY LOGIC in that it “IS NOT CAPABLE” of QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION while QUANTUM LOGIC “IS CAPABLE” of QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.  This has already been mentioned but it is tricky because it concerns the difference in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES associated with BINARY LOGIC versus QUANTUM LOGIC; i.e. this example was already given but I am repeating it because it is KEY to understanding how we are using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that can either DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate or INCLUDE IT.

THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, in this manner, gives a foundational role to the application of “beliefs and actions employed to manipulate natural beings and forces” by using propositions such as “The TOWN IS GROWING” which, by DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, impute LOCAL SOURCING POWERS that DO NOT EXIST, to the TOWN.

Consider the relationship between ‘the TOWN’ and ‘the WILDERNESS’ first of all in a FLAT SPACE WORLD, and then again ini a SPHERICAL SPACE WORLD (the spherical space equates to the WAVE-FIELD).

In the FLAT SPACE, the TOWN can GROW in a one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING manner WITHOUT THERE BEING ANY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE because that only arises in a SPHERICAL SPACE or WAVE-FIELD.  Thus we are perfectly correct in using the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING when the TOWN grows on a FLAT PLANE.  CONVERSELY, by USING BINARY LOGIC, WE IMPOSE THE SIMPLE FLAT SPACE CONDITION ON OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS AND THAT IS A MISTAKE BECAUSE WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD WHICH REQUIRED WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION such as in Bohm’s Rheomode language, and in the indigenous aboriginal languages, the Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta use of language (as in the flow-based examples of Zen guru Alan Watts).

When we consider the relationship between ‘the TOWN’ and ‘the WILDERNESS’ in the CURVED SPACE WORLD aka the WAVE-FIELD WORLD, this must included “BOTH” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE AND the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, … in their TOGETHER STATE as a “CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM”, they are INVISIBLE.  The material CONDENSATIONS are what we can SEE, yet the WAVE-FIELD is the PRIMARY PHENOMENON.  This is why BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DOES NOT WORK (leads to FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM) and why we need a FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME such as the indigenous aboriginal languages.

 

We could alternatively say, putting on our LANGUAGE ARCHITECT’S HAT, that the LAST THING we need is a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME THAT GIVES A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO “MATERIAL BEING” since what we have been thinking of as “MATERIAL BEINGS” are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD such as “TOWNINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  By giving “BEING” PRIMARY STATUS as with ‘the TOWN’, we DEMOTE that which is PRIMARY; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD, to exactly NOTHING (absolute empty infinite space), while ELEVATING ‘APPEARANCES’ to PRIMARY REALITY STATUS. 

 

Thus, while we are SENSE-EXPERIENCING INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, which includes the SHRINKING WILDERNESS together with our growing selves and the growing MATERIAL ‘TOWN’ we say we are constructing, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, thanks to our BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING CHOICE are DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and EMPLOYING A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that is constrained to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, hence we use language to report on ‘the TOWN GROWING’ FULL STOP (as if in an absolute empty and infinite space), as if that were ‘REALITY’.

 

LIKEWISE, NETANYAHU is reporting on ‘HAMAS ATTACKING’ FULL STOP, …as if that cherry-picked one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate linguistic conceptualization constituted ‘REALITY’.

LANGUAGE is DRIVING US NUTS!  Or, as Wittgenstein puts it;

 

Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung  unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache”

(Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)”

– Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

 

WESTERN CULTURE POLITICIANS seem too preoccupied with their BINARY LOGIC game play to have time for philosophy.

 

END OF AUTHOR’S PREFACE:

 

(more…)

Where the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT WORLD (GLOBAL SOCIAL DYNAMIC) IS HEADED.

0

 

Bohm, Nietzsche and others have MADE THIS PREDICTION but VERY FEW IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE ARE PAYING ATTENTION because IN ORDER TO SEE where we are headed, we need to shift from BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING, and at the present time, OUR WESTERN CULTURE WAY OF CONCEIVING OF REALITY is BINARY LOGIC based which is TOO SIMPLE to convey the REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE affirmed QUANTUM LOGIC dynamic that we share inclusion in.

 

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS common construct LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of “REALITY” a PSEUDO-REALITY which is BINARY LOGIC based as where we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ …. WITHOUT MENTIONING THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.

 

What this DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS …. DOES TO OUR PSYCHE, IS THAT IT HAS US THINKING AND UNDERSTANDING IN TERMS OF “REALITY” A PSEUDO-REALITY which is SIMPLER than the “REAL REALITY” of our “SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE WAVE-FIELD” and it is SIMPLER in the respect that in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, we are DROPPING OUT all mention of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and “PRETENDING” that “REALITY” can be LINGUISTICALLY CONCEPTUALIZED in the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING TERMS of NAMING and GRAMMAR; e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.

 

This kind of LINGUISTIC CONCETUALIZING, … SUBSTITUTES a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “INTELLECTUAL” “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION” for the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC (transformation) of our actual SENSE-EXPERIENCE (of inclusion therein).

 

The WORLD OF OUR PHYSICAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE is very different from the WORLD OF OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.  For example, we speak about the GROWTH of the TOWN or the growth of the HUMAN BEING as if GROWTH were something REAL in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE VERIFIABLE CONTEXT, but THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “GROWTH’ outside of BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, since EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX (as is the nature of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD).

 

THIS REAL-WORLD (sense-experience affirmed) FLOW aka TRANSFORMATION is ANDROGYNOUS meaning that IT IS NOT SUFFICIENT to PORTRAY REALITY in the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms of ‘the TOWN is GROWING.  This ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWING OF CULTIVATED LAND is IMPOSSIBLE in its own right and must be in conjugate relatiol with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.

(more…)

WESTERN CULTURE Language-based PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIA

0

INTRODUCTION:

Western Culture, by using a form of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that DROPS OUT the natural FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and employs ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE as if within an EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (the OBSCURANTIST SUBSTITUTE for the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka “WAVE-FIELD”, because it FRAGMENTS our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of REALITY (inducing schizophrenia) and OBSCURES the primary authoring agency which is the energy-charged plenum (inducing paranoia due the shortfall of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY TERMS).

If the MURDERER is NOT the FULL and SOLE AUTHOR OF THE KILLER ACT but is caught up in relational dissonance wherein tensions that have developed within the relational matrix of community FIND EXPRESSION THROUGH AND INDIVIDUAL who is then labelled ‘the LOCAL AUTHOR’ of the KILLER ACT, we not ony have the situation wherein what we mislabel as ‘the LOGIC AUTHOR is instead a CONDUIT for the expressing of pent-up relational tensions THAT “BELONG TO” the full relational matrix.

As with the phenomenon of the MINER’S CANARY and the IDENTIFIED PATIENT SYNDROME, there are CONDUITS that release RELATIONAL TENSIONAL BUILDUPS that ‘BELONG TO’ the full NONLOCAL relational matrix of community that MERELY FIND LOCAL, EXPLICIT EXPRESSION through the sensitive MINER’S CANARIES and the IDENTIFIED PATIENTS but whose ORIGIN IS, in our sense-experience reality, NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT.   As POGO SAYS, WE HAVE FOUND THE ENEMY AND HE IS US, but such an ENLIGHTENED view is UNCOMMON in WESTERN CULTURE where the JUDICIAL PRACTICE IS TO CONSIDER EVERYONE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY” where there is no equivalent ‘MITAKUYE OYASIN’ (we are all related) understanding and thus no HEALING CIRCLE brand of RESTORATIVE JUSTICE, the BINARY LOGIC VERSION OF JUSTICE  (the CHOICE of WESTERN CUSTICE) being PURIFICATIONISM, the ELIMINATING OF EVIL DOING BEINGS so that GOOD DOING BEINGS may prevail.

The WESTERN CULTURE CHOICE OF REALITY IN TERMS OF LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, which prevades LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, because it DROPS OUT THE PRIMARY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE creates SPOOKS sincein the general case of relational interactons, such situations as where a PUNCH engages with a recipient’s skull and the skull shatters and given that the skull was EGGSHELL THIN, it is OVER-SIMPLISTIC to ATTRIBUTE THE SHATTERING OF THE SKULL FULLY AND SOLELY TO THE FORCE OF THE PUNCH, but this is the standard approach in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and this OBSUCURANTISM (the dropping out, in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALYZING, of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate).

(more…)

Our Impending Ascension from Binary Logic to Quantum Logic

0

PREFACE:  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are continually LOCKING HORNS in SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based EITHER/OR DISPUTES.  There is a MORE SENSIBLE (sense-experience grounded rather than intellectual abstraction based) WAY and it is the way of QUANTUM LOGIC where there is NO GETTING STUCK IN POLARIZING STANDOFFS as we do in using BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC because QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which is BALANCE-based LOGIC.

We assume the BINARY LOGIC relation in posing such questions as; “Is the HUMAN POPULATION GROWING”.  Here we have the imagery of a single BLOB that is undergoing a one-sided MALE ASSERTING EXPANDING OUTWARDS, continually increasing in its areal expanse, setting up the conditions for BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of EITHER yes OR no with respect to the question of GROWTH.

In this case we are imputing the ABSTRACTION of “BEING” (the MATERIAL PRESENCE of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF) to the “HUMAN POPULATION” so that we are really SMUGGLING INTO the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, this abstract notion of “BEING”, aka a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF (could even be a CLOUD) designated by the NAMING of the THING (e.g. “HUMAN POPULATION”), and THIS NAMING serves as a STUB for GRAMMATICALLY CONFLATING, with GRAMMAR, INTO A NOTIONAL LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE such as is done with the WORD (action verb) GROWING as in the construct, “The HUMAN POPULATION IS GROWING”.  This is an ABSTRACT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that gives the sense of some SOLITARY THING-IN-ITSELF that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT”, which “MAKES NO MENTION OF” THE EMBEDDED “POPULATING”  which is an INCLUDED RELATIONAL FEATURE WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  THERE FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM going on here which is standard in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, and which has been termed by Nietzsche, ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’.

Indigenous aboriginal languages and/or MODERN PHYSICS, on the other hand, employ LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is based on NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) FLUID FORMINGS (CONDENSATIONS) within an ENERGY-CHARGED FLUID PLENUM (Bohm) wherein “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” as is the nature of WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION.

This Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, because it is grounded in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, is a form of CONCEPTUALIZATION that differs fundamentally from the WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD CONCEPTUALIZATION that is in terms of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEINGS and their ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENT and INTERACTIONS as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

That is, in the QUANTUM LOGIC relational language architecture; e.g. ‘THERE IS HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’, the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the nature of the FLOWING WAVE-FIELD wherein “EVERYTHING IS RELATED” since the material forms in the flow are NOT SEPARATE from the FLOW but “ARE THE FLOW” in the sense that material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the continually transforming ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

(more…)

Consciousness is NONLOCAL! Consciousness is NOT LOCAL!

0

PREAMBLE:  LOCAL AUTHORING is WESTERN CULTURE MYTH that comes from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche pointed out, and it is SECURED BY ‘PRIDE’.   For example the PRIDE of BELONGING to something or of SOMETHING BELONGING to ONE-SELF (e.g. one’s child) is characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE noun-based inguistic conceptualizing.

Noun-based language: a language, such as English, that relies on nouns (people, places, or things) to convey meaning. Verb-based language: languages, such as Dee- ni’ and other Indigenous languages, rely on verbs (actions) to convey meaning.

In indigenous aboriginal verb-based languages, there are only RELATIONAL DYNAMICS as if in an all-including transforming relational continuum or ‘wave-field’ wherein there is NO LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT and thus NO PRIDE in the sense of INDEPENDENT AUTHORING or OWNERSHIP of actions or developments, since unfolding developments in a relational continuum derive from ‘all my relations’ (mitakuye oyasin).

David Bohm notes that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES support NOUN based CONCEPTUALIZATION which is FRAGMENTATIVE (and OBSCURATIVE).

What is needed, Bohm argued in his book Wholeness and the Implicate Order, is a new sort of language, one based on processes and activity, transformation and change, rather than on the interactions of stable objects. Bohm called this hypothetical language the “rheomode.” It is based primarily on verbs and on grammatical structures deriving from verbs. Such a language, Bohm argued, is perfectly adapted to a reality of enfolding and unfolding matter and thought.

 

David Bohm had not known when he wrote of that concept that such a language is not just a physicist’s hypothesis. It actually exists. The language of the Algonquin peoples was developed by the ancestors specifically to deal with subtle matters of reality, society, thought, and spirituality.

 

A few months before his death, Bohm met with a number of Algonkian speakers and was struck by the perfect bridge between their language and worldview and his own exploratory philosophy. What to Bohm had been major breakthroughs in human thought — quantum theory, relativity, his implicate order and rheomode – were part of the everyday life and speech of the Blackfoot, Mic Maq, Cree and Ojibwaj.” – F. David Peat, ‘Blackfoot Physics’

 

There is NO SENSE OF “LOCAL AUTHORING”, in either MODERN PHYSICS or in indigenous aboriginal langauge-based conceptualization, nor in Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.  In what we call ‘OUR OWN ACTIONS or the ACTIONS of ‘OUR COUNTRY’, … EVENTS are NOT, in sense-experience reality, LOCAL and EXPLICIT as we present them with the DOUBLE ERROR combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  In fact, THEY ARE NOT EVEN ‘EVENTS’ but are relational BOILINGS UP within the unbounded web of relations that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).  What is LOCAL and EXPLICIT are the INTELLECTUAL REDUCTIVE FRAGMENTATIVE ABSTRACTIONS of DUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LANGUAGE while what is affirmed in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT sense-experience grounded FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE is the all-including WEB of RELATIONS aka the all-including WAVE-FIELD in which PEOPLE are CONDENSATIONS.

IN WESTERN CULTURE, HOWEVER, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR gives foundational grounding to “PRIDE” and the EGO-INFLATING that comes with PRIDE OF ACHIEVEMENT or PRIDE OF POSSESSION, the ‘FULFILMENT of an operation or task’.  As is evident, LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES such as those employed in WESTERN CULTURE that develop concepts such as ‘the COMPLETION OF A TASK’ imply, erroneously, both FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.  The highway signs that say, on their flip sides, ENTERING THE TOWN OF PLEASANTVILLE and LEAVING THE TOWN OF PLEASANTVILLE leave the ‘reader’ with the impression that there exists (as long as sufficient influential people feign belief in it) is a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing-in-itself.

This ‘announcement’ called ‘the TOWN of PLEASANTVILLE’ which is intellectual abstraction that the four-leggeds and winged and crawling ones do not have to deal with; i.e. they do not have to deal with the psychological FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM that NOUN-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING BRINGS WITH IT (i.e. the PRICE of using a SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that uses INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS that DROP OUT MENTION of the basic RELATIONAL nature of the world of our sense-experience of inclusion therein).  This is a huge pice that is paid for by submission to FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM are the RESULT of our WESTERN CULTURE USE of SENSE-EXPERIENCE-SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  For example, while our sense-experience is of “INCLUSION IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD’, … as sense-experience affirmed reality which “IS CAPTURED” in indigenous aboriginall FLOW-BASED LANGUAGES which are capable of sharing the equivalent of “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  (which is the FULL sense-experience affirming androgynous wave-field reality).

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES that employ BEING-based CONCEPTUALIZATION schemes REDUCE the QUANTUM LOGIC relation associated with material CONDENSATIONS of the all-including fluid WAVE-FIELD, and SUBSTITUTE the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC relation associated with ABSOLUTE MATERIAL OBJECTS notionally moving about and interacting within an ABSTRACT ABSOLUTE, EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

This change in the INFORMING of our physical actions, SHIFTING from our sense-experience of INCLUSION in NATURE’S QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD PLENUM WITH ITS MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, over to an INFORMING by INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based BINARY LOGIC SIMPLIFICATION which ENGINEERS LINGUISTIC SIMPLIFICATION BY DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE ENTENT.

THE “PSYCHOLOGICAL COST” of this WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DROP-DOWN from QUANTUM LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION to BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION is FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, neither of which occur in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedantat where the relational nature of our sense experience of inclusion in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) is captured in our language-based CONCEPTUALIZATION, hence, … ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (wherein everything is in flux) this more complete QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION being employed instead of the WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLIFIED OBJECT-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, ‘‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

To assess the DIFFERENT PERSONAL EMOTIONAL IMPACTS of these different LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, consider the  huge difference in emotional impact of  the QUANTUM LOGIC “THERE IS HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM” as is the understanding of MODERN PHYSICS wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, … AS COMPARED WITH ,…. the emotional impact of the BINARY LOGIC “The HUMAN COMMUNITY IS GROWING , DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services””.

 

It is evident that in the latter BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is in play which implies LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, whereas in the former QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, there is one overall dynamic that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and is referred to as TRANSFORMATION.

Belief in the BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING gives rise to the BINARY LOGIC emotions of EITHER PRIDE OR SHAME depending on the BINARY LOGIC intellectual assessments of the LOCAL AUTHORING as being EITHER GOOD OR BAD, HELPFUL OR HARMFUL, ENRICHING OR IMPOVERISHING.

BELIEF in the QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience affirmed assessment of relational BALANCE/RESONANCE and IMBALANCE/DISSONANCE wherein there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, it is clear that there is no way to UNDERSTAND (in a sense-experience affirmable way) TOWNING out of the context of its QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND INCLUSION of the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM it is INCLUDED IN, in which case the QUANTUM LOGIC relation can be seen as LESS SIMPLE but MORE COMPLETE than the BINARY LOGIC relation since the BINARY LOGIC relation is too simple to capture the less simple GESTALT as the WILDERNESS SHRINKS in conjugate relation to the GROWTH of the TOWN.   NOT MUCH TOWN AND LOTS OF WILDERNESS has a ‘different aesthetic feel to it’ as an overall ‘package’ (GESTALT) than A LOT OF TOWN and a small remnant of WILDERNESS.

As Goedel’s Theorem WARNS US, all finite systems of logic propositions are INCOMPLETE, and in this case, we can say for sure that IT IS TRUE THAT THE TOWN IS GROWING, but it is INCOMPLETE in the sense that there is NOTHING in the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY abstraction of GROWTH that informs us of the SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDED impact of TRANSFORMATION where we INCLUDE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, these two conjugates COMPRISING THE ONE ANDROGYNOUS DYNAMIC OF TRANSFORMATION (where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘wilderness is shrinking’ and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘growing of the development’ are two faces of a single coinage.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is the way things go in a spherical space of finite extent, as contrasts with the BINARY LOGIC relation which is the way things go in a flat space of infinite extent.

THERE ARE HIDDEN ERRORS IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as in the DUMBING DOWN from less simple QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, … to simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (EMPTY SPACE MEDIUM).

 

There is a LOT tied up in this lingistic sleight of hand, including the REDUCTION FROM LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC, by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes JUMP-START MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in in EMPTY SPACE, thanks to the OBSCURANIST DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, as in the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY of the OPENING UP AS IN ‘SHRINKING’ OF THE WILDERNESS in conjugate relation with the GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT of the TOWN.

YES, OUR “LOGICAL PROPOSITION” that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is “TRUE” but at the same time, “IT IS INCOMPLETE” in that it fails to acknowledge that is ALSO TRUE that the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING in which case we are being DECEPTIVE when we employ LOGICAL TRUTHS such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ since such truthful logical propositions fail to report on the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.

THIS GOEDEL’S THEOREM AFFIRMED DECEPTIVENESS IN COMMON LOGIC SHOCKED THE HELL OUT OF MATHEMATICIANS in the 1930’s when GOEDEL PROVED IT, but the message didn’t get out to the masses and stop us all from putting so much FAITH IN, and the DESIGN OF PLANS AND ACTIONS based on LOCAL PROPOSITIONS that always have this INCOMPLETENESS EXPOSURE.  These INCOMPLETENESSES in our LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS are the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM IN WESTERN CULTURE and Bohm writes about FRAGMENTATION but not so much about OBSCURANTISM, although they are both coming from the same source of the INCOMPLETENESS of BINARY LOGIC.

OBSCURANTISM IS, well, MORE OBSCURE than FRAGMENTATION even though it is coming from the same source, the SUBSTITUTING of SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONCEPTUALIZATION [the TOWN is GROWING] for LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based  ANDROGYNOUS CONCEPTUALIZATION [there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE]… is OBSCURED by the fact that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION is the VISIBLE, TANGIBLE because LOCAL, EXPLICIT component of complex WAVE-FIELD reality even though THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT IS ONLY ‘APPEARANCE’ or ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ because the real body of WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  In order to architect language based conceptualizing in this case, the language must avoid all dependence on the absolute, local, explicit material, and thus must employ NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (relations) IN THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in the linguistic conceptualizing.  For example there is HUMANING in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, … which brings us full circle back around to how WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING is SCREWING UP OUR PSYCHE.

 

There is a CIRCULAR ECONOMY in WESTERN CULTURE that REWARDS those that SUPPORT LINGUIST CONCEPTUALIZATIONS that while BOGUS like SELF-PROCLAIMED BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT NATIONS that attain notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTED EXISTENCE.

INDEPENDENT NATIONS are ABSTRACTIONS supported by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies the ‘existence’ of a LOCAL THING (e.g. the ‘Independent ‘Nation State’).

These abstractions, which overtly conflict with the world of our sense-experience wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED, PERSIST as we have an EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO THEM.   While life is MORE THAN POSSESSIONS, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed a powerful emotion associated with the PRIDE of POSSESSION.

PRIDE associated with the LOCAL, EXPLICIT and TANGIBLE (e.g. material possessions), …  ‘SWELLS THE HEAD’, …while INSPIRATION coming from the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT and INTANGIBLE ‘FILLS the HEART’.

Recall that indigenous aboriginal mocked the WESTERN CULTURE for its LANGUAGE BASED FRAGMENTING OF REALITY, a FRAGMENTATION that FRAGMENTED HUMANINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM out into a VAST UNBOUNDED EMPTINESS call SPACE.

In our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES, we notice the strong ties arising between PRIDE and the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION and how DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE have set up a FRAGMENTED GRID upon which the COLLECTION of SWOLLEN EGOS have been giving themselves their own separate LAUNCHING PADS to STRUT THEIR STUFF, a blatant FRAGMENTATIVE/OBSCURANTIST “INTELLECTUAL-LINGUISTIC” denial of our sense-experience affirmed global interconnectedness and interdependence wherein;

This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”

There is sufficient evidence here, then some, to establish that the reality we share oursense experience of inclusion in, which is the same reality AND FOR for MODERN PHYSICISTS like Bohm, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, and others like some of the Systems Sciences investigators, the LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are the same; i.e. they are QUANTUM LOGIC based while the DOMINATING MINORITY of people, due to the GLOBALLY DOMINANT EUROPEAN LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING STANDARD, A BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING STANDARD.

This BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE STANDARD is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, as is written about in this essay.   THIS FRAGMENTATION AND OBSCURATION IS NOT PRESENT IN THE REALITY SHAPING CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE, nor in the REALITY-SHAPING CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of MODERN PHYSICS, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, as elaborated on in by David Bohm and F. David Peat, AS WELL AS BY “CHIEF SEATTLE” in the above note.

NOW, AS WE WATCH THE FRAGMENTATION OF OUR WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES INTO MORE AND MORE SUB-CATEGORIES LIKE JEWS, CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS WHICH BREAK DOWN INTO THEIR SUBCATEGORIES, WHAT DO WE SEE GOIG ON?  THE INTELLECTUAL RENOUNCING OF WHAT OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS INFORMING US, The earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— OR, IN OTHER WORDS,, THE WORDS OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE; 

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

Suboptimization is where there is DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE of some thing or group together with policies and programs that aim to IMPROVE the health and overall ‘well-being’ of the NATION or GROP that has been ‘DECLARED INDEPENDENT’.  We know one thing for sure, if Modern physics, Systems sciences, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta are on target with their understanding that we live in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence”  then we can expect, in our operative world dynamic, FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM because that is what our WESTERN CULTURE use of our BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, as our OPERATIVE REALITY, is GOING TO DO TO US; i.e. “IS DOING TO US”.

We have FRAGMENTATION because almost all of our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are operating as if the reality we are living in is the BINARY LOGIC based pseudo-reality of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.  We have OBSCURANTISM because even though the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE of the all-including WAVE-FIELD REALITY is overtly mainifesting; e.g. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS that is conjugate with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH of the TOWN, … WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SPEAK OF THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN as if that were REALITY.

It may be ABSTRACT BINARY LOGIC BASED INTELLECTUAL REALITY WHERE WE GET AWAY WITH DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE because we are forgetting Goedel’s Theorem which warns us that all finite LOGIC PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ are “INCOMPLETE”, and the DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, which we are DROPPING OUT, is NO SMALL DEAL, because only if we acknowledge BOTH IN CONJUGATE CONTEXT do we understand that what is going on IS ‘NOT GROWTH” of this and ‘NOT SHRINKING’ of that,but OVERALL TRANSFORMING that is ALL-INCLUDING, EVERYWHERE AT THE SAME TIME as is the nature of the ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

 

 

From the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING there is consistency with DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE, and all of this is PUT DOWN by the Systems Sciences that use the term ‘the Name of the Devil is Suboptimization.

PRIDE is an intoxicating high that often associates with the FALSE notion of LOCAL AUTHORING which is a WESTERN CULTURE EXPOSURE that comes by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.   The foundations for this DELUSION are put in place by DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE which gives synthetic legitimacy to those making the declaration.

Declarations of Independence GO HAND-IN-HAND with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that sets up the ABSTRACTION of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS’ where there is NO SUCH THING since we live in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence, aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD”

The DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE is a formal announcement of the intention to use THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING, the new NAME DISTINGUISHING YET ANOTHER FRAGMENT, THE NEW LOCAL AUTHOR, INCREASING THE FRAGMENTATION and concretizing the deal with new NATIONAL ANTHEMS where an oath is worn (but only by the two-leggeds since that is the price of residency status, since people began buying and selling pieces of the PLENUM and where military presence was the only inhibitor to a claim-staking gold rush.  Once established, the colonizing armies who were playing musical chairs with the properties traditionally inhabited by long-time ‘local residents’ recast themselves as anti-theft police, the police forces having pulled the plug on the musical chair game, the timing for the freeze having been chosen by the currently most successful and most powerful of the colonizers (‘La raison du plus fort est toujor la meilleure’)

Since this was originally intended to be a PREAMBLE, I will stop it here and now, on the day that the Israeli’s under Netanyahu are in the middle of the throes of BINARY LOGIC based conflict where the usual POLARIZATION is manifesting which has been built into Judaic-Christian-Islamic BINARY LOGIC based linguistic conceptualization, even as the QUANTUM LOGIC linguistic conceptualizing of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC terms of balance/imbalance and/or resonance/dissonance.  In this QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, there are no endless see-saw reversals of the BINARY OPTIONS of GOOD and EVIL in LOCAL, EXPLICIT FORM based on the presumption of LOCAL AUTHORING by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which by the way, is playing the foundational role in the concept of PRIDE which has been the mainstay of FRAGMENTATION into notionally ‘INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS’.

The DROPPING OUT, in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of the conceptualizing capability of INSPIRATION which is FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING, is what has left us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS with a SIMPLE one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conceptualizing scheme, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE having turned the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE INTO A PUMPKIN of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

* * * 

 

 

We live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, a WAVE-FIELD dynamic which is ANDROGYNOUS, having BOTH FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING … AS WELL AS … MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING influences.   For example, THE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWING OF THE TOWN … is, at the same time, … THE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS.

These TWO developmental approaches are co-contributors to TRANSFORMATION as when there is a SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS … IN CONJUGATE RELATION… with the GROWING of DELIBERATELY DEVELOPED TOWNS..

Transformation can bring with it an overall change in GESTALT.  For example, for those animals whose survival depends on finding shelter from their predators, their security may take a sudden DROP if conditions change so that there are no more ‘hollow logs’ to protect small animals ‘of prey’ from their predators, or no more vesicular rocks that povide hiding places for insects to protect them from larger animals such as bears.

The point I want to explore is our differing INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL (and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta) VERSUS WESTERN CULTURE assumptions about CONSCIOUSNESS and how it impacts our LANGUAGE based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING.

For example, for indigenous aboriginals and also MODERN PHYSICS, CONSCIOUSNESS is a property of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD while in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, CONSCIOUSNESS IS SOMETHING ‘LOCAL’  THAT SUPPORTS THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING DYNAMICS OF ‘THE INTELLECTUALIZING BRAIN’.

It is possible, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF ‘REALITY’, to DIVIDE ‘the CREATION’ up into the CONSCIOUS (e.g. HUMANS) and UNCONSCIOUS (e.g. ROCKS), however, in indigenous aboriginal cultures as in MODERN PHYSICS, the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD is a FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS.

“For most of human history, the word ‘consciousness’ was generally taken to indicate not the sort of individual awareness to which the word now refers, but rather a universal entity variously named Atman, Brahman, Allah, Jehovah, God, the Unmoved Mover (Aristotle), Absolute Spirit (Hegel), or any number of other names according to who was writing about it.” — Dr. Susan Pockett, University of Auckland

(more…)

BINARY LOGIC’S DOUBLE WHAMMY OF FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

0

 

 

BINARY LOGIC’S DOUBLE WHAMMY OF FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

 

THERE IS A LANGUAGE-BASED SOURCE of WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYSFUNCTION and it is B I N A R Y  L O G I C  which HIDES WITHIN IT, THE DOUBLE WHAMMY of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

Not only do we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS FRAGMENT ‘REALITY’ by buildling into our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE the UNREAL (ABSTRACT) EITHER/OR SPLIT of MATTER and SPACE, we COMPOUND this FRAGMENTATION with LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM of the ‘Thin Skull Rule’ where we ARCHITECT LANGUAGE to FALSELY give FULL and SOLE AUTHORING CREDIT for ACTION and DEVELOPMENT to a purported MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE and “NO AUTHORING CREDIT AT ALL to the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.

When a person is punched in the head, there is an ambiguous combining of the female accommodating ‘giving in’ of the skull together with the male assertive ‘forcing’ of the punch that establishes the unfolding development. Here we see in action, in our THOUGHT and LANGUAGE, the COMBINATION of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, a combination that is EVER-PRESENT because THE WORLD WE SHARE INCLUSION IN, IS A WAVE-FIELD according to our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, our REALITY-SIMPLIFYING BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE NOTWITHSTANDING.  Here we encounter a MISMATCH due to the FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM infused into our LANGUAGE in our efforts to SIMPLIFY our LINGISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF OUR COMPLEX SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

While the WAVE-FIELD is a CONTINUUM, our LANGUAGE FRAGMENTS IT WITH BINARY LOGIC into MATTER and SPACE.

While the WAVE-FIELD is ANDROGYNOUS and embodies BOTH a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING together with a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, our WESTERN CULTURE SCHEME OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION “NOT ONLY” DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING FLUIDITY (here comes the FRAGMENTATION) BUT ALSO PUTS IN ITS PLACE AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT WHICH IS OBSCURANTISM since the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SEAMLESSLY OBSCURES ALL EVIDENCE of the CONTINUING SENSE-EXPERIENCE EXISTENCE of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD NATURE OF REALITY IS “NOT GOING AWAY” just because the WORDS FOR SYMBOLIZING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE ARE “GOING AWAY”.

 

“FRAGMENTATION” and “OBSCURANTISM” are reatures within the CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of LINGUISTIC PSEUDO-REALITY  “BUT ALSO”.  Our SENSES continue to bring us the full, unfragmented, unobscured EXPERIENCE regardless of our INTELLECTUAL GAME-PLAYING on the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING FRONT wherein we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are dabbling in “FRAGMENTATION” and “OBSCURANTISM” so as to “SIMPLIFY THE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF REALITY” thus PUTTING OUR SIMPIFIED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF REALITY “AT ODDS” WITH OUR “SENSE-EXPERIENCING OF REALITY” by INFUSING “FRAGMENTATION” and “OBSCURANTISM” into the “SIMPLIFED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF REALITY”, for example when we say things like “THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE IN THE TOWN” (FRAGMENTATION) when thereality is the transforming relatoinal continuum where “THERE IS PEOPLING IN THE TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”

The PEOPLING IN THE TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is all according to our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION THEREIN, while the FRAGMENTATION into a notional MULTIPLICITY OF ‘INDEPENDENT HUMAN BEINGS’ is ABSTRACT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF REALITY WHICH IS SIMPLIFIED INFERENCE MEANT TO SERVE AS A SIGNALLING SYSTEM TO SHARE SYMBOLS that can put people on MORE OR LESS THE SAME PAGE for the purpose of coordination within the transforming relational continuum.  If, thanks to our simplifying language, a group of us believe we are working together to ‘CONSTRUCT A TOWN’, this is BALONEY but it is USEFUL BALONEY with respect to being a SILLY ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZATION that nevertheless helps us “COORDINATE ACTIONS” which are, MEANWHILE, NOT TO DO WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TOWN (that is pure ABSTRACTION) but to continuing variations within the context of our CO-INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.   When we ‘put it to language’ we get USEFUL BALONEY such as ‘WE ARE EXPANDING THE TOWN BY ADDING MORE NEW STREETS AND NEW AVENUES and shifting the signs that say “ENTERING PLEASANTVILLE” and “LEAVING PELEASANTVILLE” in keeping with the GROWTH of PLEASANTVILLE.

OF COURSE, “GROWTH” is ABSTRACTION that, once we UTTER IT within our ABSTRACT WORD COCKTAILS, we have INFUSED FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in our PSYCHE, the FRAGMENTATION associated with the GROWTH of the TOWN notionally WITHIN an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT, and OBSCURANTISM of FAILING TO MENTION THE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, a reality that exposes the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY NONSENSE imputed by the word “GROWTH”.  Because the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is a WAVE-FIELD WORLD; i.e. a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, WE CANNOT (without losing our PSYCHOLOGICAL GROUNDING in sense-experience reality) DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

That is, IN SPITE OF A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION THAT INCLUDES the ABSTRACT NOTION OF ‘GROWTH’ as in ‘the CHILD IS GROWING’ or ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, our sense-experience DOESN’T BUY THE PURPORTED VALIDITY OF THIS WORD-CONCEPT ‘GROWTH’ because our SENSE-EXPERIENCE informsus that there can be NO GROWTH of the TOWN or the CHILD without CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the CONTAINING LANDSCAPE, and in fact this GROWING and CONJUGATE SHRINKING are NOT TWO LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS but, as our PRE-LINGUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMS US, ONE THING which we can call TRANSFORMATION, or more appropriately, ‘THE TRANSFORMING’ since it is going on EVERYWHERE AT THE SAME TIME which is the nature of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD in which WE and ALL MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS so that FIGURES and GROUND are ONLY ONE and so LINGUISTIC FRAGMENTATION INTO IS NOT REAL; i.e. NOT SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE and it is OBSCURANTIST because so long as we have it in our minds the BINARY LOGIC FRAGMENTATION of ‘the TOWN THAT IS GROWING’, we CANNOT, AT THE SAME TIME, COMPREHEND THE LESS SIMPLE SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC REALITY WHEREIN “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” .

LET’S FACE IT, … WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE SOME MAJOR ISSUES WITH THE SIGNIFICANT ‘DISCONNECT’ BETWEEN our LINGUISTIC BINARY LOGIC BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY.  For example, in the former we have the more simple BINARY LOGIC ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ (as if within an absolute empty and infinite space) in the latter, which is meant to be addressing the same thing, we have the LESS SIMPLE “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN AN UNBOUNDED FLOWING CONTINUUM so that relational forms are APPEARANCES within the all-including TRANSFORMING.   It is only WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING THAT conjures up the APPEARANCE of LOCAL, EXPLICIT material forms as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, that being INTELLECTUAL LINGUAGE BASED ABSTRACTION, is CONCEPTUALIZING that is BEYOND THE NATURAL LIMITS OF SENSE-EXPERIENGE INFORMED DEVELOPMENTS.

For example, ‘The GROWTH OF A TOWN’ is LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is BEYOND THE NATURAL LIMITS OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED DEVELOPMENTS since THERE IS NO ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ‘GROWING’ ON ITS OWN, there can only be GROWING within the conjugate relation with SHRINKING, these two conjugates being a simple way of conveying the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD within which MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS (the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC RELATION).

BINARY LOGIC IS ABSTRACTION BASED LOGIC WHEREIN THE PROPOSITIONS ARE ALWAYS, NECESSARILY, “INCOMPLETE”.

QUANTUM LOGIC, which requires a LESS SIMPLE, more NUANCED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as can capture BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM “AVOIDS” THE PROBLEMS of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM (i.e. ‘fragmentation’ as in splitting OUT ‘MAPS’ (fragment based conceptualizations) of SO-CALLED ‘TOWNS’ (the IMAGINARY ENVELOPE of gathering-scattering resonance features) which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT and are SUBSTITUTED for the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT gathering-scattering patterns.  By NAMING the standing form resonance features they are imputedly given LOGAL INDEPENDENT BEING status and by inventing GRAMMAR, it is possible to develop a system of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which now has a STABLE (LOCAL, EXPLICIT, PERSISTING) BASE and all is thanks to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR where the LOCAL AUTHORING AGENCY is shifted, notionally, from the CLUSTERING which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to the PERSISTING LOCAL ENVELOPE which gives the APPEARANCE of a LOCAL THING that GROWS and SHRINKS and SHIFTS, which we are calling ‘the CLUSTER’, and are pretending that is a LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF with ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

 

USING THIS “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which we PASTE LIKE LABELS over resonance features, we DEVELOP LANGUAGE that GIVES INDEPENDENT LIFE (notionally) TO LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS which are, in our sense-experience reality, RESONANCE FEATURES “OF THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT RELATIONAL CONTINUUM'”; i.e. EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX HERE and there is only THE APPEARANCE of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS based on RESONANCE PHENOMENA.

This is how LANGUAGE IS CREATED that SUBSTITUTES for the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT RESONANCE FEATURES, BASED ON ‘APPEARANCES”; i.e. RESONANCES WITHIN THE FLOW-CONTINUUM THAT APPEAR TO BE what we now think of as “LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITIES. notionally with “THEIR OWN” GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

 

This is an ABSTRACT LANGUAGE-BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION, A ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ that “could have been” a USEFUL TOOL, were it not for what has been happening;

A man’s wisdom is to know that all ends are momentary, that the best end must be superseded by a better. But there is a mischievous tendency in him to transfer his thought from the life to the ends, to quit his agency and rest in his acts: the tools run away with the workman, the human with the divine.  —Ralph Waldo Emerson

While there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and that TOWN as it is in any particular moment is continually being superseded by something new, perhaps better, but certainly different, and just as there is TOWNING in the TRANFORMING LANDSCAPE, so also is there HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, … and it would be a good idea to do like the indigenous aboriginals and continually remind ourselves that we are a strand in the overall transforming web-of-life thus a product of our unique situationally inclusion therein, but the TOOL OF LANGUAGE lets us TALK OF OURSELVES as if we were INDEPENDENT BEINGS notionally with actions and developments deriving from INTERNAL ‘ORGANS’ such as ‘LUNGS’ and “HEART’ and ‘CIRCULATION SYSTEM’ and other MACHINES-OPERATING-IN-EMPTY-SPACE LIKE ANALOGIES which have become stubbornly persisting LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED DELUSIONS.  It is from this LANGUAGE BASED DELUSION that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS construct our FRAGMENTED, OBSCURANTIST LINGUISTIC PSEUDO-REALITY wherein we are IN DENIAL of our natural fully-integrated presenece as CONDENSATIONS of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

The FRAGMENTATION comes with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and the OBSCURANTISM comes with the ‘COVER-UP’ of hiding the REMOVAL of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE by imposing the notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

We can this COMBINATION of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM occurring in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as associates with the RESONANCE features of the GATHERING and SCATTERING of ANTS stimulated by a DROP OF HONEY.  This RESONANCE phenomenon is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (purely relational and not deliberately planned and executed) but our WESTERN CULTURE TENDENCY perhaps because of having some experience with DELIBERATE ORGANIZING.  The SIMPLICITY of some LANGUAGE PATTERNS relative to others, or perhaps it is EGO, invites to use language to CONCEPTUALIZE what is going on with the CLUSTERING in terms of the FORMATION OF A CLUSTER.  This world CLUSTER is, in this example, out of the BLUE and seems to associate the opportunity to impose the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR which then enables us to form such abstractions as ‘the CLUSTER IS GROWING’.  I say ‘abstractions’ since we have nothing coming from our sense-experience that suggests that what we are referring to as ‘the CLUSTER’ is some kind of SENTIENT BEING that has CONSCIOUSNESS OF ITS OWN and is deciding to GROW ITSELF as in ‘the CLUSTER IS GROWING’ (and shifting towards the stream, or DISTRIBUTING THE HONEY, all of these language constructs implying an INTELLIGENCE within THE CLUSTER that is directing its GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of FORMS and MOVEMENTS.

 

HAVING TAKEN THE INTELLIGENCE OUT OF THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (WAVE-FIELD), we have instead resituated ‘the SEAT OF CONSCIOUSNESS, INTELLIGENCE AND BEHAVIOURAL INTENT within the RESONANCE FEATURE although this can only be based on APPEARANCE and our own VOYEUR IMAGININGS.

This shift of the INTELLIGENCE from THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD to particular LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS separated by UNINTELLIGENT EMPTY SPACE is a WESTERN CULTURE REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING CHOICE which is FRAGMENTATIVE and OBSCURANTIST.  It is FRAGMENTATIVE in that, as with the example of ants in a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) clustering phenomenon, we inject into our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to ‘CREATE’ (in our language-stimulated psyche) the ABSTRACTION of a LOCAL AUTHOR with its own POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  Now we have ‘the CLUSTER’ which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and notionally the seat of INTELLIGENT BEHAVIOUR in what is now “A CLUSTER”, a notional “LOCAL THING-ITSELF’, notionally with ITS OWN INTERNAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

QUESTIONS:

Whatver happened to the RESONANCE FEATURE within the ALL-INCLUDING NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM?

If we check over our shoulder, we see that the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, TAOIST/BUDDHIST AND ADVAITA VEDANTA CULTURES STILL HAVE THIS UNDERSTANDING OF THE PRESENCE OF A NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT ALL-PERVADING CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH IS LOCALLY POPULATED WITH MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS WHICH ARE “NOT” INDEPENDENT OF THE NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT, ALL-PERVADING WAVE-FIELD OR ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM OR ‘FIELD OF CONSCIOIUSNESS’.

In this MODERN PHYSICS consistent understanding of NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS, while there is CLUSTERING “THAT BELONGS TO THE NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT ENERGY-FLOW FIELD”, there are NO INDEPENDENT CLUSTERS notionally with their own LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT, THAT BEING an artefact of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

The POLITICS that come with these two different models or reality, the QUANTUM LOGIC MODEL understanding that all things are related as with material condensations of an all-including WAVE-FIELD and the other understanding that all things are INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS isolated by being in an infinite empty space and OBSCURANTIST in that THEY PRETEND TO BE THE MASTERS OF THEIR OWN ACTIONS, as they would have to be if the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD REALLY WAS AN EMPTY SPACE, which it clearly is NOT.  And in admitting that the HUMANINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD are ‘STRANDS IN AN INTEGRATED WEB-OF-LIFE’, as acknowledged by the Systems Sciences in the terms that we are living “…in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence…” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences

This cannot be interpreted in terms of a need to become SUPER-CONSCIOUS of ALL OUR RELATIONS, because THAT IS WHO WE ARE and we don’t have to consciously think about it so that we can GET IN STEP WITH EVERYTHING, … it implies, that, if we can can ‘get in touch with it’, our ‘self’ ALREADY IS “ONE WITH EVERYTHING”

In Taoism, attaining a state of emptiness is viewed as a state of stillness and placidity which is the “mirror of the universe” and the “pure mind”.  The Tao Te Ching claims that emptiness is related to the “Tao, the Great Principle , the Creator and Sustainer of everything in the universe”. 

So, ONCE WE IMPOSE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING, we WITHDRAW SUPPORT from the understanding that CONSCIOUS INTELLIGENCE IS INNATE IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

Clearly, there is an understanding waiting for us wherein we are HUMANINGS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein everyone is related, including those in HAMAS  and those in the Kibbutz

in which case the remedy for violent relational dissonance is restoring relational harmony.  The BINARY LOGIC of PURIFICATION by way of ELIMINATING the BAD DEVILISH BEINGS and become submissive to the GOOD ANGELIC BEINGS doesn’t work, … not BECAUSE there is an ENDLESS SUPPLY OF EVIL BEINGS but because there are no such things as BEINGS, there are only relational forms in the transforming relational continuum and when relations become violent, it is the RELATIONS that are the problem we must work on and this problem is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as are the relational influences in the WAVE-FIELD.

When we find ourselves focusing on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, it’s time to recall the reality that CLUSTERS are only ‘APPEARANCES’.  If we see ‘the CLUSTER GROWING’, whether it is the HAMAS cluster or the IRGUN cluster, it is only “APPEARANCE” while the reality is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

 * * * 

 

 

 

While David Bohm has done a great job EXPOSING THE FRAGMENTATION that is built into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and  summarizes THE DAMAGE BEING DONE BY FRAGMENTATION in the two paragraphs cited here from “Wholeness and the Implicate Order’, and while Bohm explains how FRAGMENTATION derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, Bohm does not mention that there is an inter-relating DOUBLE-DOUBLE ERROR in WESTERN CULTURE “BINARY LOGIC” .

 

The FIRST of the DOUBLE ERRORS is FRAGMENTATION (by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which (1a) uses NAMING to impute BEING, and (2a) uses GRAMMAR of imply powers of LOCAL AUTHORING, and the SECOND of the DOUBLE ERRORS being OBSCURANTISM (by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of (1b) DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, and (2b) SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT for the DROPPED OUT FEMALE CONJUGATE.

While I have made plenty of mention in my notes, of the ERROR of FRAGMENTATION, as was so well documented by Bohm, I spent less time on the ERROR of OBSCURANTISM, but BINARY LOGIC INCLUDES BOTH OF THESE ERRORS while QUANTUM LOGIC INCLUDES NEITHER.  For example;

EXAMPLE of FRAGMENTATION: Fragmentation comes with the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING as in the TOWNS are GROWING.  In this LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, each TOWN is a new centre of growth which means that there are many disconnected TOWNS (or COUNTRIES etc.) and this FRAGMENATION derives from the use of the abstraction of NAMING.  By contrast, in a VERB based language such as the indigenous aboriginal languages and the language usage in Zen Buddhism etc, we could have said ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein everyhing is included in a relational flux aka TRANSFORMATION.

 

EXAMPLE of FRAGMENTATION.

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

 

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

 

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

 

* * *

OK, Bohm describes FRAGMENTATION without mentioning BINARY LOGIC and why should he?  We commonly use BINARY LOGIC in our language based conceptualizing of things, in this case FRAGMENTATION which is the home ground of BINARY LOGIC usage, but I NEED TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN “SIMPLE” BINARY LOGIC and “LESS SIMPLE” QUANTUM LOGIC not only because I want to directly discuss their difference, but of the problem of OBSCURANTISM which I am trying to explain because of its significance in regard to how our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONCEPTUALIZING “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  For example, Goedel’s Theorem tells us that ALL SYSTEMS OF BINARY LOGIC are INCOMPLETE which gives us an EXPOSURE TO CONFUSION since come of our LOGIC “IS MORE COMPLETE THAN OTHERS’ and yet we give both the STAMP OF APPROVAL OF BEING ‘TRUE’ even when we may be studying the same phenomenon so that TWO LOGICIANS may be ARGUING over the QUALITY of their RESPECTIVE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, BOTH of which are TRUE but one of which is MORE SIMPLE than that other.

This can lead to confusion since our INTUITION may inform us that even though two logical propositions are TRUE, one may seem ‘more complete’.

First True BINARY LOGIC Proposition: ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.

Second True BINARY LOGIC Proposition: ‘the TOWN is GROWING and the WILDERNESS is SHRINKING’.

QUANTUM LOGIC LESS SIMPLE PROPOSITION: there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

There is a weakness in that our everyday WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE employs a BINARY LOGIC structure because it is SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC, but the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC is exposed to both FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM;

 

 

 

The Judaic/Christian/Islamic BINARY LOGIC FIASCO

 

JEWS, CHRISTIANS and MUSLIMS have a LANGUAGE supported tendency to ‘be coming from’ a COMMON ‘REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING PRACTICE’ which is BINARY LOGIC BASED. 

 

The BINARY LOGIC based REALITY with its BELIEF in a world constituted by MATERIAL FORMS in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE has been BUILT INTO the differing languages used by these groups, and that is where there is overall consistency in their BINARY LOGIC based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION, … which is very different from the QUANTUM LOGIC based REALITY of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists, Advaita Vedanta adherents, … and, … MODERN PHYSICS.

 

The QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY is based on ‘mitakuye oyasin’, … everything is related, in the manner of CONDENSATIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  This is where QUANTUM LOGIC ‘comes from’; i.e. it ‘comes from’ the BOTH/AND RELATION of material CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD and the WAVE-FIELD, … which is analogous to the WHORLING in the FLOWING of a transforming watercourse.  Note that the WHORLING and the FLOWING are one and the same; i.e. we could not get a fishing net and LIFT OUT THE WHORLING because the WHORLING is how the FLOWING is APPEARING which means it is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL), so the next time we fall into the trap of using ‘the WHORL in a NAMING and GRAMMAR DOUBLE ERROR COMBINATION such as ‘the WHORLING is MOVING ACROSS THE TURBULENT RIVER FLOW, … WE NEED TO CORRECT THIS ‘DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ because the WHORLING is the “APPEARANCE” OF THE FLOWING.

 

In other words, “THE WHORLING” is NOT SOMETHING WE COULD GATHER UP IN A FISHING NET, because it is simply how FLOWING is APPEARING.   Thus, we are wrong if we LOCAL THING-IT-ITSELF BEING with LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT to ‘the WHORLING’.  As MODERN PHYSICS has affirmed and as was already the understanding built into indigenous aboriginal linguistic conceptualization and understanding, THE WHORLING AND THE FLOWING ARE ONLY ONE AND NOT TWO.

 

IN GENERAL THE WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS QUANTUM LOGIC BASED AND NOT BINARY LOGIC BASED, as understood in MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoists/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY.

(more…)

Go to Top