WESTERN CULTURE Linguistic Obscurantism

0

SYNOPSIS:  We live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD which is in continual flux, where the persisting VISIBLE FORMS are APPEARANCES in the manner of WHORLING IN FLOWING where the WHORLING “IS” THE FLOWING; i.e. it is HOW FLOWING “APPEARS TO US”.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DESIGN gives PRIMARY STATUS to the FORMINGS in the FLOWING by way of the “DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR” (Nietzsche), making it APPEAR as if the FORMS are LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and developments, rather than ‘THE OTHER WAY ROUND’ wherein, as understood in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism, Advaita Vedanta and affirmed by Modern physics, the persisting forms are “Schaumkommen” (appearance) as Schroedinger and Bohm and other Modern physics researchers have pointed out and affirmed with physical experiment.

So, while WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING to MATERIAL FORMS, as if these MATERIAL FORMS with their movements and interactions in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE were the PRIMARY REALITY, Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents employ LANGUAGE that correctly comprehends material forms as SECONDARY CONDENSATIONS of the PRIMARY ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD and the WESTERN CULTURE MISINTERPRETATION is the source of FRAGMENTATION since the CONDENSATIONS which are secondary to the all-including WAVE-FIELD are, in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, mistakenly elevated to PRIMARY REALITY STATUS, reducing the rightful PRIMARY REALITY CLAIMANT of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka THE WAVE-FIELD to a NON-PARTICIPATING VOID.

HERE WE SEE THE INNATE INTEGRATION of WAVE-FIELD REALITY GIVE WAY TO LINGUISTIC INTELLECTUAL DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATION.  

In other words, instead of a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in terms of overall FLUID WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION, an OVERALL (ALL-INCLUDING) TRANSFORMATION that is foundational, wherein the “APPARENTLY LOCAL and EXPLICIT” CONDENSATION is “APPEARANCE” associated with an INEXTRICABLE RELATIONAL FLOW-FEATURE in the all-including, CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD), … there is in the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, a BUILT-IN OBSCURANTISM which deceptively elevates the SECONDARY CONDENSING in the PLENUM to PRIMARY (PSEUDO-) REALITY STATUS, REDUCING in one fell swoop, the ALL-INCLUDING PLENUM to an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.

(NOTE: language gives us the means of, for example, objectifying the CLUSTERING of ants which occurs WITHIN A COMPLEX RELATIONAL TERRAIN by imposing the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR and saying ‘the CLUSTER is GROWING LARGER and CHANGING SHAPE’ and SHIFTING this way or that way, thus elevating, with the ABSTRACTION of LANGUAGE-IMPLIED “BEING”, an “APPEARANCE” within the CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, whereupon the full complexity of the resonance feature with its terrain-based FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING in conjugate relation with MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is OBSCURED as we shift our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION from the less simple CLUSTERING-IN-THE-TRANSFORMING-TERRAIN to the simple “CLUSTER” which we linguistically endow with INDEPENDENT BEING to by way of notional INCLUSION in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.  This REDUCTION of the QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein RELATIONAL FORMS are INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE to BINARY LOGIC BASED ‘INDEPENDENT THINGS’ WITHIN AN EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, is achieved with the “DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR”, as Nietzsche points out, which gives the sense of “LOCAL AUTHORING AGENCY”). 

This use of LANGUAGE achieves the REDUCING of less-simple QUANTUM LOGIC (the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM [PLENUM]) in which the condensing is forming, where this forming is, at the same time, the energy-charged PLENUM (WAVE-FIELD) it is included in, …to simple BINARY LOGIC (the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM, this EXCLUDED MEDIUM being understood as an EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER).  This reduction from QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION to BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION is OBSCURANTIST since it involves the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which is present where the CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM is at the same time, the ENERGY CHARGED PLENUM, the result of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE leaving in its ‘LINGUISTIC WAKE’ an ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT. 

[[Nota Bene:   The length and awkwardness of these above three yellow-highlighted paragraphs is due to first employing COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which supports simple BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION which is insufficient for conveying less simple QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.   For example, while the expression ‘the TOWN is GROWING’  is BINARY LOGIC  based, IMPLYING an EMPTY CONTINING SPACE, the expression ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’  is QUANTUM LOGIC based implying an ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD relation wherein there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING LANDSCAPE within which there is a MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DEVELOPMENT.  The repeated CONCEPTUALIZING statements, first in simple BINARY LOGIC mode of LINGUISTIC expression followed by their expanded corresponding less simple QUANTUM LOGIC mode of LINGUISTIC expression gives rise to the LENGTHY TEXT in this essay.  A comparison would be notices that are written in both BOTH FRENCH and ENGLISH for a BILINGUAL READERSHIP.]] 

 

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SUCCEEDS IN ‘PUTTING ITS LANGUAGE USERS ON THE SAME PAGE’ but that ‘PAGE’ is NOT that of CONTENT-CONTAINER UNITY as with CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, but as ABSOLUTE, LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS that purportedly move about and interact within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS of INFINITE EXTENT.  This WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based MATTER-AND-EMPTY SPACE PSEUDO-RELITY (wherein a material form EITHER exists OR does not exist) is SIMPLER than the QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE affirmed LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION wherein material forms are understood as CONDENDATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.

This essay reviews the logic (bringing both BINARY LOGIC and QUANTUM LOGIC into explanatory context) while supporting the Modern Physics QUANTUM LOGIC interpretation of our sense-experience reality which is AT ODDS WITH the WESTERN CULTURE POPULAR BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE based PSEUDO-REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION.

BOTH the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY and the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY support interpretive schemes that put us, as social collectives, ON THE SAME PAGE, however, the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC (EITHER RIGHT OR WRONG, GOOD OR BAD) based ‘SAME PAGE’  is very different from the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH RIGHT AND WRONG, GOOD AND BAD BALANCE-BASED) ‘SAME PAGE’. 

The FINDING in this review REAFFIRMS the REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION based on the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE STRUCTURE as is also affirmed by Bohm, Schroedinger, Nietzsche, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta,  Also explained is how the SIMPLER WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE is generating SOCIAL and PSYCHOLOGICAL FRAGMENTATION through a BINARY LOGIC based PURIFICATION orientation which contrasts with the QUANTUM LOGIC (WAVE-FIELD) BALANCING orientation of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM is perpetrated by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and employing one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ABSTRACTION using ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE as a SIMPLIFYING SUBSTITUTE or PATCH for the DROP-OUT.  This constitutes a restructuring of LANGUAGE  (and thus LANGUAGE based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION) that elevates the LOCAL and EXPLICIT to PRIMARY CONCEPTUALIZING STATUS , as the patch for DROPPING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (WAVE_FIELD).  This is OBSCURANTISM that substitutes BINARY LOGIC FRAGMENTATION for QUANTUM LOGIC INTEGRATION in WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTUALIZING.

* * * * * * 

 

 

The world of our sense-experience is a WAVE-FIELD, not only according to Modern physics but according to indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

This WAVE-FIELD structure of reality is easy to understand by way of our sense-experience wherein “To everything there is a season and time to every purpose’.   [[the SEASON is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE while the PURPOSE is the MALE ASSERTING ACTION]].

Or, as Shakespeare put it in Julius Caesar “There is a tide in the affairs of men, Which taken at the flood, leads on to fortune. Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries. On such a full sea are we now afloat. And we must take the current when it serves, or lose our ventures. [[The flood and ebb of the tide characterizes our sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD reality]]

These are ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS OF a WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.

So, while our WESTERN CULTURE language ‘HAS THE CAPABILITY of ALLUDING TO THE WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of reality, our Standard Average European Language architecture is based on a REDUCTION from this ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD) architecture which is QUANTUM LOGIC based, reducing our language to a BINARY LOGIC basis.

QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein, for example, ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’. 

Here we have the ANDROGYNOUS STRUCTURE of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING) … “within which” … there is a LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING MATERIAL STRUCTURE.

NOTA BENE:  How to understand and express this linguistically is where ‘the EAST’ meaning indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents … PART WAYS WITH ‘the WEST”, the latter (Western Culture Adherents) opting for the BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach while Modern physics along with the EAST, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, opt for the QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING APPROACH.

EXAMPLE:

 

BINARY LOGIC:  ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.  Here ‘the TOWN’ is implied to be a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing (thanks to NAMING) with the GRAMMAR-given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development.  This combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use to construct LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of REALITY in LOCAL and EXPLICIT terms.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC: ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.   Here ‘the TOWING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is implied to be a NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT relational dynamic which is A FEATURE WITHIN the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  As Schroedinger points out in general terms, this TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, is purely APPEARANCE (SCHAUMKOMMEN) based on relations that are continually in flux.  As Modern physics researchers such as Bohm also point out.  That is, material forms are only CONDENSATIONS within the one all-including WAVE-FIELD and while they have distinguishable forms, are NOT ontologically separate from the TRANSFORMING FLOW just as the WHORLING in the FLOWING is NOT SEPARATE from the FLOWING.

(more…)

LIES MY CULTURE TOLD Me.

0

 

This NOTE entitled ‘LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME’ is a TITLE inspired by James Loewen’s ‘LIES MY TEACHER TOLD ME’, and also by Howard Zinn’s ‘A People’s History of the United States’, and then again by Charles C. Mann’s “1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus.  In all cases, there is the sense that the development of POPULAR historical impressions of REALITY  are impacted NOT ONLY by writers’ and speakers’ perspectives and particular experiences, but by THE LANGUAGE THEY ARE USING FOR SUCH “CONCEPTUALIZING”.  Here I use CONCEPTUALIZING to underscore the IMPOSSIBILITY of REPRESENTING  a FRAGMENT OF HISTORY OR a FRAGMENT of ANYTHING extracted from the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

For example, we may LOOSELY speak of a REPRESENTATION of the BIRTH of a VOLCANIC ISLAND where we show pictures of ‘the VOLCANIC ISLAND at various stages of “ITS DEVELOPMENT”, however, here we are using the SIMPLIFYING CAPABILITIES of LANGUGE and our sense-experience is affirming that what is going on is an overall TRANSFORMATION which INCLUDES “ISLANDING”, where there is no PHYSICAL FRAGMENTING of the ISLAND from the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM as would justify our use of LANGUAGE wherein we impute GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT “TO THE ISLAND”, a CONCEPTUALIZING only made possible by our IMAGINATIVE INVENTING OF THE ABSTRACTION of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, which is IMPLIED by the LANGUAGE based concepts of GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT.  This is NOT a “REPRESENTATION” of the physical reality, the physical reality is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which INCLUDES the “VOLCANIC ISLANDING” as a relational dynamic within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE REALITY.

WHEN WE USE LANGUAGE TO “CHOP OUT” A FRAGMENT such as ‘the VOLCANIC ISLAND’ and USE LANGUAGE TO SPEAK OF ‘ITS GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT’, this is NOT the REPRESENTATION of some REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE PHENOMENON, this FRAGMENTATION is an ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZING AND NOT A “REPRESENTATION”.  That is, what our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMS is that THERE IS ISLANDING in the PLANETING wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as is the nature of MATERIAL CONDENSINGS in the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

Because we are INCLUDED in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, WE CANNOT ‘GET OUTSIDE OF IT’ TO DEVELOP A ‘REPRESENTATION OF IT”.  IT IS ‘NON-REPRESENTATABLE’, i.e. ‘The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’ — Lao Tzu.

HERE we can see HOW IT IS that the language architectures of indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, because they give the foundational role to FLOW rather than BEING, … AVOID FRAGMENTATION, as for example, by saying ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ instead of, as with WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, giving the foundational role to BEING rather than FLOW and saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services. 

GIVING the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO ‘BEING’ CONCEPTUALIZES ‘the TOWN’ as a ‘LOCAL AUTHOR’ of actions and developments, by way of, as Nietzsche calls it, ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’).  In SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY as affirmed in Modern Physics, THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS as ‘THINGS THAT GROW’ such as ‘TOWNS’ or ‘HUMANS for that matter, since everything is in flux so that there is ‘TOWNING’ and ‘HUMANING’ within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (aka ‘the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM’ aka ‘the WAVE-FIELD’). 

HERE we can see HOW IT IS that the language architectures of indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, because they give the foundational role to FLOW rather than to BEING, … AVOID FRAGMENTATION, as for example, by saying ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE instead of, as with WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, giving the foundational role to BEING by saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’, which CLEARLY CONCEPTUALIZES ‘THE TOWN’ as a ‘LOCAL AUTHOR’ of actions and developments. 

The “LOCAL AUTHOR” CONCEPT is ABSTRACTION created by ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ (i.e. the TOWN is GROWING’).  By CONTRAST, in SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY as affirmed by MODERN PHYSICS, there are NO SUCH THINGS as ‘THINGS THAT GROW’ such as ‘TOWNS’, or ‘HUMANS’ for that matter, since EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX (as condensations in the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD) so that there is ‘TOWNING’ and ‘HUMANING’ within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

To use LANGUAGE that tells tales of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with GRAMMAR given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments … IS A LIE!  It is the LIE of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ . This EGO-BOLSTERED LIE of LOCAL AUTHORING is the source of FRAGMENTATION in both WESTERN CULTURE “PSYCHICAL” and “PHYSICAL” DYNAMICS.

* * * 

The AIM of this NOTE entitled “LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME”  is as much concerned with the ARCHITECTURE of LANGUAGE based LYING  as with the CONTENT of the LIES and in particular, the WESTERN CULTURE CHOICE OF SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC in preference to LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC as is the choice of MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA

What is CLEAR is that LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS CAN BE MORE OR LESS FAITHFUL TO SENSE-EXPERIENCE IMPRESSIONS in spite of the fact that LANGUAGE can never CAPTURE SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY; i.e. as Lao Tzu observes, The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’.

So, in some sense, ALL LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING is ‘LYING’ based, but this NOTE addresses how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of using BINARY LOGIC as a means of assessing WHAT IS TRUE versus WHAT IS FALSE and this COMPLICATES matters because SPEAKING THE TRUTH is not the same as REVEALING REALITY, and if I say, ‘the TOWN is GROWING, LOGICALLY, THIS MAY BE CORRECT but the REALITY lies beyond the LOGICAL TRUTH since, in this case, for example, there is at the same time the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS which is CONJUGATE to the GROWTH of the TOWN, and so while my LOGICAL PROPOSITION WAS TRUE or CORRECT, IT WAS AT THE SAME TIME “INCOMPLETE” since I made NO MENTION of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS and thus the overall TRANSFORMATION which is available to our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  This Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite logical propositions points to JUST ONE of the FOUR ‘LIES’ I am discussing in this note, the word ‘LIE’ pivoting from our WESTERN CULTURE use of the BINARY LOGIC based terms of TRUTH and LIES (aka FALSEHOOD).

While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS speak of TRUTH and FALSEHOOD as if they had ROCK SOLID MEANING, that is itself a FALSEHOOD, and having said that, I have stepped knee deep into the ambiguity that comes into play in regard to BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING which inspired Goedel’s research and his ‘Goedel’s Theorem’ of the incompleteness of all finite logical propositions. This “incompleteness” of all finite logical propositions casts a shadow over TRUTH in general;

 

What then is truth? A mobile army of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphisms — in short, a sum of human relations, which have been enhanced, transposed, and embellished poetically and rhetorically, and which after long use seem firm, canonical, and obligatory to a people: truths are illusions about which one has forgotten that is what they are; metaphors which are worn out and without sensuous power; coins which have lost their pictures and now matter only as metal, no longer as coins.

 We still do not know where the urge for truth comes from; for as yet we have heard only of the obligation imposed by society that it should exist: to be truthful means using the customary metaphors – in moral terms, the obligation to lie according to fixed convention, to lie herd-like in a style obligatory for all…” – Nietzsche  (On truth and lie in an extra-moral sense’)

 

In this NOTE, may aim is NOT SIMPLY to point to LIES but to point to LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME and to point out how these LIES lead to CONFUSION and PSYCHOSIS in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, as has been explored by Nietzsche and Bohm, putting the findings in this LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME format so as to SPELL OUT the DAMAGE DONE

and HOW TO AVOID THE PITFALLS,  since there are overall PATTERNS here, in particular the pattern of how we are infusing BINARY LOGIC into our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THOUGHT is such a manner as to FRAGMENT, not simply our WORLDVIEW but our basic THINKING APPARATUS, leading, as Bohm observes, to a WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED EXPOSURE TO PARANOIA and SCHIZOPHRENIA AND OTHER FORMS OF LANGUAGE-INFUSED FRAGMENTATION .  WHILE THE SOURCE OF THIS DYSFUNCTION IS THE “LIES” WE HAVE BUILT INTO OUR WESTERM CULTURE LANGUAGE” ARCHITECTURE, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE NOT YET, AS A SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, ‘TUNED IN TO” OUR LYING WAYS, AND THAT AWARENESS CAN ONLY COME WHEN (“AND IF”) WE SHIFT FROM BINARY LOGIC (e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING”) TO QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE (e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”)  WHEREUPON the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE WILL BE RESTORED AS WILL THE FULL ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD THOUGHT and LANGUAGE CAPABILITY. 

* * * 

 

What is presented is a series of EXAMPLES OF FOUR TYPES OF LIES AND HOW THESE LIES DO DAMAGE IN WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING” ;

 

LIE # 1.   “Kepler points out that in order to simplify our language based CONCEPTUALIZING of “REALITY”, we instead simplify (LIE ABOUT) the phenomena we are conceptualizing.” 

 

As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’

 

DAMAGE DONE:  Because it is EASIER to speak in the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms of, for example, CULTIVATING and DEVELOPING LAND without mentioning the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING LOSS OF WILDERNESS DIVERSITY, there is no MENTION, VALUE ASSESSMENT or OVERT CONSIDERATION of what is ACTUALLY GOING ON which is TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE.  This OBSCURANTISM conceals the LOSS of DIVERSITY and SUSTAINABILITY  

 * * * 

LIE # 2.   “Nietzsche points out that the COMMON DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR creates the LIE of FALSELY implying LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development”.

 

“Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”; – but this conclusion is already mythology:  it separates that which effects from the effecting.  If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.” – To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” — Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

DAMAGE DONE:  Because it is SIMPLER FROM A LANGUAGE MESSAGING POINT OF VIEW, to FRAGMENT THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING DYNAMIC WE SHARE INCLUSION IN, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ the LINGUISTIC SHORTCUT where we use the COMBINATION of NAMING and GRAMMAR TO IMPUTE LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, and avoid the difficulty of capturing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) dynamic of the all-including TRANSFORMATION (WAVE-FIELD) that we and all things are included in.  That is, we employ, instead, a VOYEUR view that we intellectually/linguistically reduce to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT where we are NO LONGER discussing our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  Our PLANS and ACTIONS, while our language based discourse has us reduce them to the BINARY LOGIC terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, are, IN REALITY, of a QUANTUM LOGIC NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (TRANSFORMATIVE) NATURE.  Because we are INTELLECTUALLY employing BINARY LOGIC and orienting to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT while we are in SENSE-EXPERIENCE, included in a QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, our linguistic reporting on ‘what is going on’ (which is in the BINARY LOGIC terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT) is AT ADDS WITH our QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

IN SHORT, THE MOMENT WE INTRODUCE the linguistic fragmentation of BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL AUTHORING by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we DROP OUT QUANTUM LOGIC based NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING.  The LIE of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ is particular to WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing.

* * *

 

 

LIE # 3.  “Goedel’s Theorem EXPOSES THE LIE that while “finite systems of logical propositions” are presented as if they are TRUE, “all finite systems of logical propositions are INCOMPLETE”; e.g. While it is “TRUE” that “the Avalanche crashed down the Mountain into the Valley, it is “INCOMPLETE” since, as our sense-experience informs us, it is NO LONGER THE SAME MOUNTAIN and NO LONGER THE SAME VALLEY (while the simple BINARY LOGIC based rhetoric in the one-sided MALE ASSERTING terms of the AVALANCHE and its actions is TRUE, it is “INCOMPLETE” and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED “REALITY” is informing us of our inclusion in an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION. 

So, for example. while it may be proven true that the TOWN is GROWING, this logical proposition is INCOMPLETE since it fails to mention that there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS which takes us BEYOND BINARY LOGIC (the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM) to QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  The BINARY LOGIC based concept of the TOWN GROWING implies … ‘within an absolute empty and infinite containing space’, … while the QUANTUM LOGIC based concept of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE implies that the TOWNING is INCLUDED within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and thus lacks the INDEPENDENT STATUS necessary for ‘its own GROWTH’.   Here we see how BINARY LOGIC, in referring to GROWTH, implies an INCOMPLETENESS relative to sense-experience reality wherein there is NO GROWTH in its own BINARY LOGIC ‘right’, there instead being a QUANTUM LOGIC CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the including WILDERNESS (rather than the BINARY LOGIC supporting ‘EMPTY SPACE’), where the OPENING UP (SHRINKING) of the WILDERNESS plays a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING role in CONJUGATE RELATION with the GROWING of the TOWN.

We might therefore say that the INCOMPLETENESS of BINARY LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO contrasts with the  COMPLETENESS of QUANTUM LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND are ONE.

 

DAMAGE DONE:  Our WESTERN CULTURE FAILURE to acknowledge THAT “THAT WHICH IS LOGICALLY TRUE” is …. “NOT (sense-experience) REAL”, …  is the source of much damaging and confusing action.  While it is LOGICALLY TRUE to reckon that the DOUBLING of our CULTIVATED LAND AREA will produce DOUBLE THE VOLUMES of GRAIN, FRUIT and other “PRODUCE”, this LOGICAL TRUTH FAILS TO CAPTURE THE SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY OF THE CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS DIVERSITY which plays an ESSENTIAL ROLE in the SUSTAINING of general health and fertility of the OVERALL LANDSCAPE which INCLUDES the CULTIVATED CROPLAND.  Thus the TRUTH of the GROWTH OF PRODUCTION is an INCOMPLETE TRUTH as is the case for ALL LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS as proven in Goedel’s Theorem.  This WESTERN CULTURE IGNORING OF THE RADICAL DIFFERENCE between ‘LOGICAL TRUTH’ and ‘SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY’ is the source of much LINGUISTIC MISREPRESENTATION which plays out in MISGUIDED BEHAVIOURS that deliver UNINTENDED RESULTS.  

 

 

LIE # 4.   “David Bohm points out how we are using LANGUAGE to FALSIFY our CONCEPTUALIZING of “REALITY”, creating UNTRUE FRAGMENTED INTELLECTUAL PSEUDO-REALITIES that we are using as our OPERATIVE REALITY.”

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

 

DAMAGE DONE:

The DAMAGE summarized here by Bohm is coming from FRAGMENTATION that is the SPECIALITY of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITURE, as described in LIE #1 (the DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, … LIE #2, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that FALSELY IMPUTES LOCAL AUTHORING, and LIE #3, the GOEDEL’S THEOREM RELATED LIE where we CONFUSE LOGICAL TRUTH (which is ALWAYS INCOMPLETE) for REALITY as in the example ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ which is TRUE but INCOMPLETE and OBSCURANTIST (it is A LIE) in that it FAILS to acknowledge the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS the LOSS of the important LIFE and HEALTH SUPPORTING DIVERSITY.

FRAGMENTATION, LIE #4, IS THE RESULT OF THINKING DISTORTED by LIE #1, LIE #2 and LIE #3 that CO-CONTRIBUTE to FRAGMENTATION. That is, …. LIE #1; the DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, LEAVING MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING TO SERVE UP REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS ‘ON ITS OWN’, … LIE #2 the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that FALSELY IMPUTES ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING based LOCAL AUTHORING, … and LIE #3, the GOEDEL’S THEOREM RELATED LIE where we IGNORE THE INCOMPLETENESS OF LOCAL PROPOSITIONS AND THUS, FOR EXAMPLE DECIDE that the LOGICAL PROPOSITION ‘PRODUCTION IS GROWING’ is a “GOOD THING”, without considering the INCOMPLETENESS of this logical proposition “PRODUCTION IS GROWING” SINCE IT FAILS TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.  LIES #1, #2, and #3 ALL SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION of a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY PSEUDO-REALITY which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, leading to a simplified PSEUDO-REALITY based one-sidedly on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.   

THAT IS, … THESE THREE LIES #1, #2 and #3 SUPPORT LIE #4 which is FRAGMENTATION which is the overall distinguishing characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE (i.e. the FRAGMENTING by way of ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE and by way of CATEGORIZATION (LGBTQ, BLACK, WHITE) etc wherein we put DIFFERENTIATION BASED CONCEPTUALIZING into PRIMACY over INTEGRATION BASED CONCEPTUALIZING, in CONTRADICTION to MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta wherein the understanding of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is that ALL THINGS ARE RELATED by way of material forms being CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

“FRAGMENTATION” is THE CULMINATION of BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING wherein we REDUCE QUANTUM LOGIC NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION to BINARY LOGIC LOCAL and EXPLICIT BEING-based FRAGMENTATION.  THIS LIE OF A FRAGMENTED REALITY BASED ON BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS IN TERMS OF LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE IS A HUGE LIE THAT IS THE SUPPORTING CENTRE-PIECE OF WESTERN “REALITY”, the LINGUISTIC PSEUDO-REALITY that IS SUPPORTED AND SUSTAINED THROUGH OUR CONTINUING USE OF IT..

 

 

* * * SUMMARY: …. The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD Me * * * 

 

These FOUR LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME all have a BINARY LOGIC based, strongly distorting influence on my PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC conceptualizing of REALITY that is the source of, as Bohm has said, a FRAGMENTED VIEW (UNDERSTANDING) of REALITY.

BECAUSE WE HAVE BUILT THIS FRAGMENTATION INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, WE “KEEP REPEATING IT TO OURSELVES, OVER AND OVER AGAIN THROUGH OUR CONTINUING USE OF OUR “LIE-INFUSED” LANGUAGE.

There is a kind of CATCH-22 ENTRAPMENT here in that the NEEDED FIX to resolve the LIES could be compared to changing the wheels on one’s car while one is speeding down the road in it.

Meanwhile, the FOUR LIES cited above continue to appear in BINARY LOGIC based USAGE such as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, SHUTTING OUT ACCESS to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC alternative ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’. 

Like the Cuckoo that lays is eggs in another LESS SIMPLE bird’s nest, when the SIMPLE CUCKOOS HATCH OUT  in the nest, and  they do so prior to the natural offspring in the nest, they PROMPTLY PUSH THE INCUMBENT’S EGGS OUT OF THE NEST so that the full resources of the non-Cuckoo parents are devoted to the nurturing of the fledgling freeloader Cuckoos.

AS  with this relation between the SIMPLE and LESS SIMPLE, so it is with LIES, and because LIES are often SIMPLER than the TRUTH, they can easily DISPLACE the TRUTH; i.e.  ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ can easily DISPLACE ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ since the former’s BINARY LOGIC (LOCAL, EXPLICIT) STRUCTURE is SIMPLER than the latter’s QUANTUM LOGIC (NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT) relational structure.

Note that the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC option has a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING-ONLY LOGIC STRUCTURE while the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC option has an ANDROGYNOUS, TWO-SIDED FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING — MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE; i.e. a QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE..

* * * 

 

‘The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD Me’  have not only been TOLD TO ME, but I have been inadvertently PASSING THEM ON TO OTHERS.

It is EVIDENTLY A MAJOR CHALLENGE to LIVE, within the WESTERN CULTURE SYSTEM, ON THE BASIS OF NO LONGER ADHERING to THE LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME.   I would compare this to the MAHAVIT – ATMAVIT challenge of ADVAITA VEDANTA discussed by Erwin Schroedinger, whose orientation to the WORLD ACCORDING to MODERN PHYSICS (wherein everything is related and everything has the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE) is difficult to overtly comply with in one’s manner of behaving as would be the way of the ATMAVIT, but where it is possible, to at least intellectually understand and ‘partly follow’, while sustaining relatively good relations within the WESTERN CULTURE social collective, trying at the same time to encourage a shift from the BINARY LOGIC INTELLECTUALLY ABSTRACT WESTERN WORLD to QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONFORMANCY.

For example, while there are pressures within WESTERN CULTURE to commit to the BINARY LOGIC genre of support for the UKRAINE in its CONFLICT WITH RUSSIA when one’s QUANTUM LOGIC understanding is in terms of conflict as IMBALANCE where the remedy is RESTORING BALANCE, rather than in the BINARY LOGIC terms of “RIGHT” against “WRONG” or “GOOD” against “EVIL”.  While the BINARY LOGIC mission is to SURMOUNT and OVERCOME if not DESTROY/ELIMINATE the forces of EVIL, the QUANTUM LOGIC mission is to RESOLVE the RELATIONAL DISSONANCE and RESTORE RELATIONAL RESONANCE.

The combination of ‘INDEPENDENT TRIBAL IDENTITY’ in the sense of INDEPENDENT BEING without the MITAKUYE OYASIN (all things are related) ethic of indigenous aboriginal cultures and Modern physics, leads to knee-jerk fallback to PURIFICATIONISM where the challenge is understood in terms of WE, THE GOOD or SUPRIOR PEOPLE are overcoming THEY, THE BAD or INFERIOR PEOPLE, rather than resolving relational dissonance within one all-including relational collective.  The indigenous aboriginal ‘eating the heart’ of a courageous enemy warrior taken down in battle signals an understanding of life as a relational web or matrix rather than a hierarchy

(The WESTERN CULTURE “great chain of being” is a hierarchical structure of all matter and life, thought by medieval Christianity to have been decreed by God. The chain begins with God and descends through angels, humans, animals and plants to minerals.)

In the Modern Era, the BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT BEING or the INDEPENDENT TRIBE has been BOLSTERED by the MODERN TREND to ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE’ which now DIVIDE the people of the world which CONTRASTS with the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding that ALL THINGS ARE RELATED.   The understanding of Modern physics, meanwhile, is that ALL THINGS ARE, in a PHYSICAL REALITY SENSE, CONDENSATIONS of and within the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

This QUANTUM LOGIC understanding continues to be TOP-SIDED AND OBSCURED by the BINARY LOGIC based INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION of self-declared ‘INDEPENDENT NATIONS’ (195 of them), such intellectual abstraction being put into an unnatural primacy over the sense-experience of all things being related (mitakuye oyasin).  The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD me include this LIE of the INDEPENDENCE OF NATIONS on the basis of LANGUAGE based INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION pivoting from ‘DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE”  which is ENTIRELY “WITHOUT SUPPORT” from SENSE-EXPERIENCE, and which leads to the further LIE of SUBOPTIMIZATION of a notional INDEPENDENT NATION that DOES NOT, in sense-experience reality, EXIST

 

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

 

The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME …. ARE LIES WE CONTINUE TO TELL,  and these lies CONTINUE TO FORM THE BASIS OF THE PERSISTING UNREAL PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC  PSEUDO-REALITY of the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, promoted through BINARY LOGIC infused LANGUAGE and GRAMMAR.  This BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE CONTINUES to be the WESTERN CULTURE POPULAR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE CHOICE and it is NOW “LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”, NAMELY THE WESTERN CULTURE “EGO” DERIVING BACKING OF THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR BASED “LOCAL AUTHORING” ABSTRACTION.

 * * * 

REALITY Conceptualized in LANGUAGE based on QUANTUM LOGIC versus BINARY LOGIC

0

INTRODUCTION: 

Because we live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD, our LANGUAGE based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING must capture the FLUID nature of WAVE-FIELD REALITY in order to construct LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION consistent with our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  Consistent with this requirement, David Bohm developed a ‘Rheomode’ language and the language structures of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents employ a FLOW-BASED ARCHITECTURE.

Meanwhile, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES have used a LANGUAGE DESIGN that, rather than CONCEPTUALIZING our FLOW-BASED SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, has instead been based on the NAMING of INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS, reducing RELATIONAL FORMS to ABSOLUTE LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECTS by way of NAMING, inventing GRAMMAR to ANIMATE these abstract LOCAL, EXPLICIT NAMING-INSTANTIATED ENTITIES.

The MOTION that is immanent in our sense-experiencing of inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM is, in this WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SCHEME, RELOCATED by way of the LINGUISTIC INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS of NAMING and GRAMMAR, to the INVENTED MATERIAL OBJECTS so as to RE-SITUATE the AUTHORING ORIGIN of  ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT to LANGUAGE-based INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS in the guise of NAMING-INSTANTIATED LOCAL, MATERIAL OBJECTS with GRAMMAR-GIVEN “NOTIONAL” POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

This WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DESIGN thus creates and INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based PSEUDO-REALITY which, for example, REDUCES the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, to the INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS of (a) giving it a notional, LOCAL, EXPLICIT TOWN-THING-IN-ITSELF  EXISTENCE , (thanks to the INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTING POWER OF ‘NAMING’), … and CONFLATING this ‘FIRST ERROR” (as Nietzsche refers to this DOUBLE ERROR) with the ‘SECOND ERROR’ of GRAMMAR that ENDOWS the NAMING-instantiated ‘LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING’ with notional GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A LANGUAGE-BASED “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” triggered in our LANGUAGE-STIMULATED INTELLECTUALIZING MIND, based on the “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR, consisting of NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE BEING based MATERIAL OBJECTS, notionally with GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

“TOTO, I’ve a feeling were not in Kansas anymore”.

This  LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, architected for the convenience of its SIMPLICITY and its (artificial) CONCISENESS, being comprised by LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS (thanks to NAMING) that move above and interact in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE (thanks to GRAMMAR GIVEN POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT).  THIS INTELLECTUAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY is an EXPEDIENT for SHARING, … NOT OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCES, but of a REDUCED and SIMPLIFIED SURROGATE SUBSTITUTE REALITY, in which for example, ‘TOWNS’ are seen to GROW as if ‘in their own right’ as if they were SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT of the world.  This LANGUAGE-based INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION, avoids the encumbrance of having to have a language architecture that affirms our sense-experience understanding where there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.

Indigenous aboriginals, on the other hand, opted for the high road in LANGUAGE ARCHITECTING, honouring our sense-experience reality (mitakuye oyasin – ‘everything is in flux’), as also Modern physics, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

The price we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are PAYING for our TWO BASIC LINGUISTIC SIMPLIFICATIONS of NAMING and GRAMMAR are “FRAGMENTATION” and “OBSCURANTISM”, both of which derive from the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, which, together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE equips LANGUAGE with the capability of WAVE-FIELD grade QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION as lies INNATELY BEYOND THE CAPABILITY of BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.

The DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE in LANGUAGE, as has been done in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, leaves the LANGUAGE innately INCAPABLE of WAVE-FIELD GRADE (QUANTUM LOGIC) CONCEPTUALIZATION, an incapacity that has been built into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES.  While the WESTERN CULTURE GOAL of SIMPLIFYING the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE has been achieved (the reduction from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC), the PRICE that is being PAID for this SIMPLIFYING OF LANGUAGE is TWOFOLD; i.e. FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, and because the DOUBLE ERROR based SIMPLIFICATIONS are infused into our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE at a level deeper that the SIMPLIFED level which we are at in formulating our LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE, we have an exposure of the type that Kepler spoke of;

As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’

For example, because we simplified the sense-experience affirmed ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, reducing this to; … ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’ (note the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR used in this simplification), … we are infusing our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING with FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM by giving “TOWNS” “LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING” where we CREATE as many as we want using the combination of “NAMING” (FRAGMENTATION) … and by using “GRAMMAR”  to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS to the “LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING” we OBFUSCATE the THE REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT AUTHORING OF THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM .

Since the SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is that THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT, AUTHORING IMMANENT IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (RELATIONAL CONTINUUM) SUBSUMES the NOTIONAL AUTHORING purportedly by “LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL AGENTS”.

“HAVING SHOWN THAT  LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL AGENTS ARE LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR (double error) BASED ABSTRACTIONS THAT ARE INFECTING OUR CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF REALITY WITH FRAGMENTATION AND OBSCURANTISM, IT REMAINS FOR US TO MAKE THE APPROPRIATE CORRECTIONS TO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, HOWEVER, THIS IS A TASK AKIN TO CHANGING THE TIRES ON ONE’S CAR WHILE SPEEDING DOWN THE FREEWAY IN IT.

FINALLY,  for this INTRODUCTION, to close the loop so as to point to the utility of Dr. Clauser’s QUANTUM LOGIC views on PLANETARY WARMING AND COOLING, the above discussion affirms that the influences bringing about transformative change are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as in a WAVE-FIELD world) rather than LOCAL and EXPLICIT (as in a matter in empty space world), affirming the need for LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING since BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING is INNATELY TOO SIMPLE to capture the relations between the WAVE-FIELD and its CONDENSATIONS wherein the CONTENT is INCLUDED in the CONTAINING PLENUM, in contrast to the BINARY LOGIC “MATTER IN EMPTY SPACE” where the CONTENT is INDEPENDENT of the CONTAINING EMPTINESS.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE NOW IN THE SITUATION WHEREIN WE HAVE BECOME DEPENDENT USERS OF A BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE THAT IS FRAGMENTATIVE AND OBSCURANTIVE AND LACKS THE NECESSARY COMPLEXITY TO CONVEY QUANTUM LOGIC.   I am speaking of LANGUAGE NOT AS WORD BASED CONSTRUCTIONS but AS A SYSTEM COMPRISED OF FAMILAR SIGNALS THAT ASSOCIATE WITH PARTICULAR UNDERSTANDINGS. For example, I could, in ENGLISH, say, ‘there is TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, but for recipients who are already well-schooled in English, this can spontaneously be DUMBED DOWN to the BINARY LOGIC SIMPLIFICATION wherein ‘the TOWN’ is GROWING’  and situated  within a CHANGING LANDSCAPE along with OTHER LOCAL EXPLICIT ENTITIES such as HILLS and RIVERS and VALLEYS..  OUR LANGUAGE thus INFUSES FRAGMENTATION which OBSCURES the reality of the ALL-INCLUDING PLENUM where “EVERYTHING IS RELATED” (mitakuye oyasin).  WE have the problem of HUMPTY DUMPTY in that we have architected LANGUAGE that FRAGMENTS our sense-experience REALITY using the DOUBLE ERROR combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR, and even if we do recognize our LANGUAGE-INFUSED problems of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, the challenge of ‘putting HUMPTY back together again’ is non-trivial because the simple BINARY LOGIC foundation is INCAPABLE of supporting QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization.

 * * * 

(more…)

The CONFUSION that BINARY LOGIC is CAUSING in MEDICINE and JUSTICE

0

 

CONDENSATIONS IN AN ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM (QUANTUM LOGIC) CONSTITUTE THINGLESS TRANSFORMATION.

MATERIAL OBJECTS IN EMPTY SPACE (BINARY LOGIC) MANIFEST AS THING-BASED MOVEMENT AND INTERACTION

“LINGUISTIC NAMING AND GRAMMAR” IS THE DIFFERENTIATOR THAT REDUCES TRANSFORMATION TO MATERIAL MOTION.

EASTERN QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY AND WESTERN BINARY LOGIC REALITY ARE THE TWAIN THAT NEVER MEETS

 

PREFACE: Having ‘grown up’ in a WESTERN CULTURE family and environment, I was taught the REALITY-SHAPING language that is standard in WESTERN CULTURE which is BINARY LOGIC based where EVERYTHING IS INDEPENDENT as if material forms were LOCAL, EXPLICIT objects in an empty containing space, while my indigenous aboriginal brothers and sisters were being taught the REALITY-SHAPING language that is standard for them, which is QUANTUM LOGIC based, wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED in the manner of CONDENSATIONS within an all-including FLOWING (energy-charged PLENUM).  Anthropologist Mircea Eliade explores the respectively differing CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY in his book dedicated to this ONE REALITY-SHAPING LANGUAGE CHOICE; i.e. ‘Mephistopheles et l’Androgyne’, the English Title being ‘the TWO and the ONE’.

Having spent time studying, and contemplating these TWO LANGUAGE-BASED REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING OPTIONS which inform our understanding of REALITY by the STEALTH of packaging ONE OR THE OTHER of the BINARY LOGIC or QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES into the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE so that we WESTERN CULTURE CULTURE ADHERENTS grow up accepting the simpler BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY, while indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents grow up accepting the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY and these differing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF REALITY are the source of DIFFEREING BEHAVIOURAL TRAITS.

The BINARY LOGIC behavioural patterns of WESTERN CULTURE assume the INDEPENDENCE of material forms as if within a notional ABSOUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, while the QUANTUM LOGIC behavioural patterns of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta CULTURES assume the INTERDEPENDENCE of material forms as if CONDENSATIONS within an ALL-INCLUDING energy-charged PLENUM otherwise known as the WAVE-FIELD.

The incorporating of LOGIC into LANGUAGE at the foundational level makes it UNREACHABLE in the course of using the LANGUAGE so that simply by using the language of the culture we are born into, our CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY as we speak and think about it, already includes the basic bias of whether reality has a BINARY LOGIC or QUANTUM LOGIC structure; i.e.

BINARY LOGIC REALITY BUILDS INTO THE UNREACHABLE FOUNDATIONAL LEVEL OF LANGUAGE, the abstract notional REALITY employing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based on LOCAL, EXPLICIT material forms that move about and interact in an absolute empty and infinite space..

QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY BUILDS INTO THE UNREACHABLE FOUNDATIONAL LEVEL OF LANGUAGE, an abstract notional REALITY employing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based material forms that are CONDENSATIONS within an all-including energy-charged PLENUM; i.e. a WAVE-FIELD wherein  based on relational forms that are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT inclusions within the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  Indigenous aboriginal language based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are based on this QUANTUM LOGIC structure, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM and in Modern physics terms, this NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ‘fluid’ ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM with its material condensations manifesting the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation, matches the REALITY of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, which is NOT TRUE of BINARY LOGIC which is INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based and which DOES NOT match the REALITY of our SENSE EXPERIENCE.

EXAMPLE of QUANTUM LOGIC in LANGUAGE:  “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  Here we have the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “TOWNING” as a relational dynamic within a TRANSFORMING landscape wherein everything is in the nonlocal and implicit WAVE-FIELD flux and THERE IS NO ‘LOCAL and EXPLICIT’.

EXAMPLE of BINARY LOGIC in LANGUAGE: “the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”. Here we have the LOCAL and EXPLICIT TOWNS that are INDEPENDENT hanks to a notional EMPTY AND INFINITE “CONTAINING” SPACE.

Here we see the source of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based FRAGMENTATION of REALITY, which CONTRASTS with the Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal THINGLESS-CONNECTEDNESS which AGREES with our SENSE EXPERIENCE wherein EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX in a relationally interdependent ENERGY-CHARGED CONTINUUM.

So, our ‘CHOICE’ of LANGUAGE (the choice that our CULTURE MADE FOR US) serves up for us a language-based “REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION”, which BLOCKS the language user from ‘messing with’ the FOUNDATIONAL LOGIC built into the language. The FOUNDATIONAL LOGIC built into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is BINARY LOGIC wherein our LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS can be EITHER TRUE OR FALSE and those are the only options.  This EXCLUDES the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING  MEDIUM where PROPOSITIONS can be BOTH TRUE and FALSE at the same time, as in Heraclitus ‘‘we can’t step in the same river twice because it is not the same river and we are not the same person stepping into it’.   When we say that the AVALANCHE crashes down the MOUNTAIN into the VALLEY, it is NOT THE SAME MOUNTAIN and NOT THE SAME VALLEY. In other words, what is going on in the overall GESTALT view is TRANSFORMATION which the MOUNTAIN and VALLEY are INCLUDED IN which is QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.

When we use BINARY LOGIC and ask whether there was an avalanche, YES OR NO?  We are asking for affirmation of a BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITION which is TOO SIMPLE to capture the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE based) phenomenon.  Did Jean Valjean steal the loaf of bread YES OR NO?  This is TOO SIMPLE to capture the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE-BASED) phenomenon that gives us a deeper understanding of the unfolding events.  QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM whereas BINARY LOGIC is the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM.   The INCLUDING MEDIUM is the ALL-INCLUDING relational WAVE-FIELD we share inclusion in

There is a SHORTFALL in the CONCEPTUALIZING CAPABILITY in our ENGLISH LANGUAGE (and Common Average European languages) relative to the needs of Modern physics and relative to what has been built into indigenous aboriginal, and the adapted languages of Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, at the basic language architecture level.  This SHORTFALL in WESTERN CULTURE language architecture “SHOWS UP” in such anecdotes as ‘the THIN SKULL RULE‘ in WESTERN JUSTICE where the LAW is limited to LANGUAGE based on ‘WHAT THINGS DO’ which constitutes a REDUCTIVE SIMPLIFICATION of WAVE-FIELD REALITY which captures the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABING —MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE, … by way of simply DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and SUBSTITUTING an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

In the WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE system’s THIN SKULL RULE, one is NOT ALLOWED to acknowledge the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as with the EGG-SHELL COLLAPSING that is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘PUNCH’, even though this supported by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is, meanwhile, based on INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION which only allows for MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING of actions and developments and this goes hand-in-hand with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the SUBSTITITING IN ITS PLACE of ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

In other words, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE uses BINARY LOGIC which constrains our understanding to ‘WHETHER THE PUNCH CAUSED THE SHATTERING OF THE SKULL OR NOT’.  which is a quest to establish “A LOCAL, EXPLICIT CAUSE’ which, while this has no place in our sense-experience grounded understanding of physical phenomena as supported by Modern physics, wherein the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT prevails while the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is ‘APPEARANCE’.

‘APPEARANCE’ is captured in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE in terms of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that implies LOCAL AUTHORING; e.g. ‘the PUNCH SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL’.  WESTERN JUSTICE speaks to support the whole one-sided reduction of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY built into WESTERN LANGUAGE in sayings like ‘TAKE YOUR VICTIMS AS YOU FIND THEM’ which is in effect saying, our traditional way of using language to CONCEPTUALIZE REALITY is to DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE because it is SIMPLER to use language that constrains the conceptualizing to just the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.

This means that we can constrain our language based conceptualizations to terms of ‘what material things do’ as if in an absolute empty space of infinite extent. This language based simplification of our INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY is rooted in our historical cultural development, going back to Copernicus and his attempt to simplify the language based articulating of complex movements of the planets, wherein the Modern physics findings would be understood in terms of the QUANTUM LOGIC relation of PLANETINGS (condensations) in the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD.

Note in the following quote that Copernicus language-based conceptualizing scheme puts INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based DESCRIPTION into primacy over sense-experience (i.e. sense-experience of inclusion in a reality which, as Lao Tzu says, is beyond the direct reach of language; “the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’)

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

The point to remember is that LANGUAGE is not capable of DESCRIBING or REPRESENTING the WAVE-FIELD REALITY of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, … LANGUAGE is ONLY CAPABLE of constructing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS we can use as a supportive ‘go-by’ that is NOT THE TRUE TAO but is THE TAO THAT CAN BE TOLD.

For example, we say that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which is SIMPLER than ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, the former employing BINARY LOGIC which SPLITS THE TOWN OUT from the LANDSCAPE, and the latter employing QUANTUM LOGIC which acknowledges the INCLUSION of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

While the BINARY LOGIC conceptualization is SIMPLER than the QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization, IT COMES WITH THE SAME SORT OF PROBLEM AS RAISED WITH the THIN SKULL EXAMPLE wherein our use of SIMPLIFYING LANGUAGE which SIMPLIFIES the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE,… RUNS INTO TROUBLE of the THIN SKULL RULE type where LANGUAGE that is simplified and constrained to CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based only on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, are actually SIMPLIFYING REALITY (using simplified language-based reality conceptualizations) and introducing OBFUSCATION by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE ‘painting a picture’ wherein the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING can proceed, notionally, without any engagement with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, as if it were transpiring in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE, which ‘works’ as far as INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based CONCEPTUALIZATION goes, but which LACKS CONSISTENCY/AGREEMENT WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.

In SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING … NEVER OCCURS OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF … CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.  For example, WHERE THERE ARE ‘TOWNS THAT ARE GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ (the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALING CONJUGATE), there is ALWAYS, at the SAME TIME, CONJUGATE WILDERNESS that is SHRINKING, and GIVING UP RESOURCES.  The overall REALITY is this TRANSFORMATION which is affirmable by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, and the talk of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION is only INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION which are one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamics that live only in the world of INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION and which, in sense-experience reality, are never WITHOUT THEIR FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as is the nature of our sense-experience of inclusion in WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

In other words, in sense-experience reality, there is only TRANSFORMATION and no such thing as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, all of these being one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PSEUDO-DYNAMICS.  THERE IS NO GROWING OF A TOWN WITHOUT A CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS (in the spherical space of our actual sense-experience), which together ‘point to’ TRANSFORMATION  as being what is REALLY GOING ON.  THE GROWTH OF A TOWN is intellectual abstraction that we ‘conjure up’ with LANGUAGE; i.e. with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.

THIS PREFACE is intended to point out the problem of FRAGMENTATION that we build into our INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING by using our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with its DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.   This contrasts with the flow-based languages of Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta where we use QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualizing in saying, ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in which the TOWNING is innately INCLUDED in a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND SENSE).

This PREFACE has been lengthy because we are using the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE architecture to try to convey how the QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE is capable of LESS SIMPLE CONCEPTUALIZATIONS. The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USER, because of the habitual way of interpreting language in BINARY LOGIC terms will HEAR the QUANTUM LOGIC “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ and reflexively interpret that as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, dropping out the QUANTUM LOGIC relation in the process as if it was not adding anything to the intended meaning.   This practice is grounded in such understandings as when hearing ‘there is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT is raised with the understanding that the HUMAN is an INDEPENDENT BEING, an INHABITANT that is SEPARATE FROM THE HABITAT in the manner of CHRISTIAN BELIEF which is BINARY LOGIC based and unlike the Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal belief which is QUANTUM LOGIC based as in ‘there is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM as with CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD’.

HERE WE SEE THE LANGUAGE BASED SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION which is TROUBLING WESTERN CULTURE which is NOT A PROBLEM in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta where the understanding is ‘mitakuye oyasin’ aka ‘everything is related’ as consistent with the Modern physics understanding of material forms including HUMANINGS as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

The following article; The CONFUSION that BINARY LOGIC is CAUSING in MEDECINE and JUSTICE explores how the SHORTFALL of BINARY LOGIC based conceptualizations relative to QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualizations is creating problems in WESTERN CULTURE MEDICINE and JUSTICE, pointing to the need for an UPGRADE to QUANTUM LOGIC based UNDERSTANDING.

* * * * * *

 

 

I am NOT a BELIEVER in WESTERN CULTURE ‘allopathic medicine’ although I am now largely dependent on it since ‘cancer’, which in Modern physics as also in indigenous aboriginal culture ‘medicine’ would be understood as ‘imbalance’, is understood in Western Medicine as ‘the attack of pathogens’, hence the remedy is to ELIMINATE THE PATHOGEN, as for example in RADIATION TREATMENT for CANCER which is aimed at the DIFFERENTIAL ELIMINATING of the BAD (CANCEROUS) CELLS while doing as little damage as possible to the GOOD HEALTHY CELLS.

 

THIS WESTERN MEDICINE “GOOD CELLS and BAD CELLS” BINARY LOGIC SPLIT IS BULLSHIT coming from the USE OF SIMPLIFYING BINARY LOGIC BASED INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION.  There is NO BINARY LOGIC SPLIT INTO EITHER GOOD OR BAD!   As Modern physics attests, BINARY LOGIC is SIMPLIFYING ABSTRACTION which is displacing our use of LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE and IMBALANCE.

 

Likewise the GOOD HUMANS and BAD HUMANS SPLIT is based on the SIMPLIFYING USE OF BINARY LOGIC in WESTERN JUSTICE.  IN REALITY, there is only BALANCE and IMBALANCE.

 

I am NOT MAKING THIS UP.  This is the understanding not only of MODERN PHYSICS but also indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedant adherents.  In this understanding, ILLNESS is IMBALANCE and HEALTH is BALANCE and MEDICINE is the RESTORING of BALANCE where there is IMBALANCE.

 

Why I am taking “RADIATION” treatments for “CANCER” which is said to destroy MORE cancer cells than HEALTHY cells in such a manner that the growth of new cells will increase the ratio of healthy to cancerous cells.

 

Because, while my view is that ILLNESS is IMBALANCE, just as in RICH and POOR IMBALANCE, when there is an accelerated growth of REBALANCERS (i.e.. ‘thieves’), while the ultimate solution is RESTORING BALANCE, the short term objective may be the reduction of rebalancers together with the longer term objective is the restoring of balance.

 

What I am saying is that because our WESTERN CULTURE MEDICINE persists in the anti-pathogen approach, and that is the form that all publicly supported and easily accessible medical services take, it makes sense to partake of it even though my belief is that the anti-pathogen orientation is mistaken and that what is really going on is that illness is a falling out of balance and the remedy is restoring balance.   In some areas of medicine, this understanding of illness as imbalance (e.g. a deficiency of vitamin C which shows up as scurvy and pneumonia, and a deficiency of important microbial strains in the microbial assemblage of the gut; e.g. in the wake of having been administered an anti-biotic, can be remediated by the infusion of the missing members of the out-of-balance microbial assemblage. 

  (more…)

HOW WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is FRAGMENTING REALITY

0

OVERVIEW: Western Culture Language Architecture incorporates a SIMPLICITY that distinguishes it from the LESS SIMPLE LANGUAGE of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal languages, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta languages.  Instead of the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC foundations in the LANGUAGES of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, WESTERN CULTURE employs a SIMPLER LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on BINARY LOGIC, which, in terms of WAVE-FIELD structure, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and EMPLOY “ONLY” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.  For example, where Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals employ ANDROGYNOUS language structures such as ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which includes “BOTH” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING (‘TOWNING’) “AND” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (‘in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) . 

Note that ‘TOWNING’ is a relational dynamic  which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) rather than an abstract LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘THING-IN-ITSELF’ called ‘the TOWN’ as in standard WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVEOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

NOTE ALSO that ‘TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND expression where the TOWNING and the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE are ONE THING and there is ONLY THE APPEARANCE OF TWO THINGS.   As in turbulent flow, there is WHORLING in the FLOWING and it is NOT POSSIBLE to use a dip-net to scoop out the WHORLING form the FLOWING and store it in a separate TANK because the WHORLING is the APPEARANCE of the FLOWING, and is NOT a separate thing, IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES, BECAUSE THEY GIVE A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO BINARY “EITHER/OR” LOGIC rather than QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC, serve up a conceptualization that SPLITS APART INTO TWO SEPARATE FRAGMENTS, “THE WHORL” and “THE FLOW”, as if the “WHORL” were a separate development within the flow that is capable of INDEPENDENT MOVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT.

THIS IS “NOT” THE CASE in the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, but LANGUAGE can ‘DO WHAT WE WANT’ and in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATION, the COMBINATION that Nietzsche calls ‘the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ is used to CONCEPTUALLY LIBERATE the FORMING-in-the-FLOWING from this natural QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION and RE-CAST it in the BINARY LOGIC terms of ‘THE FORM that is MOVING THROUGH the FLOW’, in effect using LANGUAGE (the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR) to RE-RENDER the QUANTUM LOGIC FORMING IN THE FLOWING in the BINARY LOGIC terms of the ‘FORM IN THE FLOW’, whereby we are using language to CONVERT the FORMING IN THE FLOWING into the simpler BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of the ‘FORM’ that is ‘MOVING THROUGH’ the ‘FLOW”.

This REVISION of the LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY, which REDUCES the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND relation of the FORMING in the FLOWING to the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC FORM IN THE FLOW, synthetically LIBERATING the FORM and re-animating it AS IF IN ITS OWN RIGHT, by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is the general pattern of WESTERN CULTURE language based CONCEPTUALIZATION, so that instead of understanding REALITY as a QUANTUM LOGIC FLUID DYNAMIC wherein the FIGURES in the FLOWING are APPEARANCES (in the manner of quantum logic BOTH/AND relation of WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute “REAL BEING’ to the NAMING-instantiated relational forming in the flowing, and CONFLATING this “FIRST ERROR” with the “SECOND ERROR” of GRAMMAR that imputes to “THE FIRST ERROR (the NAMING-instantiated-BEING”, … “ITS OWN” POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.  This gives is the means of ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZING using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is in terms of ABSTRACT LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES AND WHAT THEY DO.

This BINARY LOGIC based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR PSEUDO-REALITY which imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development by means of NAMING-instantiated LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES is the SIMPLE basis of WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing of QUOTE/UNQUOTE “REALITY”.  This WESTERN CULTURE conceptualizing based on SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC rather than being based on LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and ‘runs’ with ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, so for example, ones speaks in terms of THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN, WITHOUT MENTIONING THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS.  This is CONFUSING BECAUSE of the GOEDEL’s THEOREM understanding that ALL FINITE SYSTEMS OF LOGIC ARE INCOMPLETE in which case we can speak in terms of LOGICAL TRUTHS (the TOWN is GROWING) which are AT THE SAME TIME “INCOMPLETE” (there is mention of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS).

Because WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS tend to formulate action and development efforts on a BINARY LOGIC TRUTH BASIS; e.g. “IF WE DOUBLE THE AREA OF CROP CULTIVATING, WE CAN DOUBLE OUR PRODUCTION”, this understanding which is based ONE-SIDEDLY on  MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING while we CLASSIFY this as TRUTH, is INCOMPLETE and is therefore UNREAL since it fails to acknowledge the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS LANDS that are an outcome that is in INNATE ASSOCIATION with THE GROWTH OF CULTIVATED CROPLAND, therefore our LOGICAL PROPOSITION in terms of the perceived DOUBLING of CROPLANDS generating a DOUBLING OF PRODUCTION, while TRUE, is INCOMPLETE since it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is EVER-PRESENT in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC we share inclusion in; i.e. in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, is commonly MISINTERPRETED as an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT deemed a NON-PARTICIPANT in material dynamics.

* * *

(more…)

The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS IN LANGUAGE

0

 

INTRODUCTION: This essay, entitled; “The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS IN LANGUAGE”  explores the manner in which WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE simplifies and abbreviates conceptual constructions to the point that the conceptualization of the ‘common language ground’ (serving as a ‘COMMON REALITY’) that enables group communications is no longer consistent with our sense-experience affirmed REALITY, but employs an intellectual conceptual SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on BINARY LOGIC and ‘TRUE’ but ‘INCOMPLETE’ LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.  For example, whereas INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL languages and Modern physics fashion language that speaks in QUANTUM LOGIC terms such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’, … WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS support the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based expression; the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services.

 

NOTE:

QUANTUM LOGIC is based on BOTH/AND logic as with WHORLING in the FLOWING where the WHORLING and the FLOWING are ONE.

BINARY LOGIC is based on the EITHER/OR logic where the WHORLING is understood to be separate from, and MOVING THROUGH the FLOWING.

Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals have the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding that HUMANINGS are included in the TRANSFORMING relational continuum, while WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have the BINARY LOGIC understanding that HUMANS are independent beings that author their own actions and behaviours while moving about within a separate and independent passive containing space.

 

While this here LINGUISTIC communication is in MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms (i.e. in terms of ‘what things do’) which is BINARY LOGIC based, this communication is INCOMPLETE in that it is DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, unlike indigenous aboriginal language (and Modern physics) where BOTH MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AND FEMALE ACCOMMMODATING/ENABLING are included as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where we have a QUANTUM LOGIC proposition that incorporates BOTH MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in ‘TOWNING’ and also FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as in ‘IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

THE FIRST ‘WHAMMY” of The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS IN LANGUAGE can thus be seen as the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which REDUCES QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC to BINARY EITHER/OR LANGUAGE.  In the WAVE-FIELD structure of nature’s dynamic, we have “BOTH” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “AND” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugates, as in the actual sense-experience affirmed physical reality on inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD.

GIVEN THAT the purpose of LANGUAGE is to come up with signal-based messaging with the capability of sharing conceptualizations of sense-experience affirmable dynamics, we must be ‘on guard’, in this case, for a DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is the INTEGRATING agency in language based conceptual constructions.  The effect of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is to impute FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING CAPABILITY to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC, which gives rise to ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ (MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY) WITHOUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING AS ‘IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’)

WHY WOULD WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS JUST DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE IN OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, since it is INNATELY INCLUDED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY?

(more…)

Why Western Culture Adherents Need a NEW LANGUAGE!

0

 

WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD.

 

WE AND ALL MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD.

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE MAKING A HUGE MISTAKE BY BASING OUR LANGUAGE ON MATERIAL FORMS.

 

THE NOTION OF MATERIAL FORMS MOVING ABOUT AND INTERACTING IN EMPTY SPACE IS BINARY LOGIC BASED ABSTRACTION.

 

MODERN PHYSICS AND INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTAT ADHERENTS USE QUANTUM LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE aka VERB-BASED LANGUAGE WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, CONSISTENT WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

 

AN EXAMPLE OF QUANTUM LOGIC VERSUS BINARY LOGIC IS… ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (THIS QUANTUM LOGIC EXPRESSION IMPLIES A ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION SINCE ‘TOWNING’ IS A FEATURE WITHIN THE ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’), … VERSUS ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING GOODS’ (THIS BINARY LOGIC EXPRESSION IMPLIES AN ‘EITHER/OR’ RELATION SINCE THE ‘TOWN’ IS AN ‘INDEPENDENT’ THING-IN-ITSELF WHICH RELATES TO ITS SURROUNDINGS BY WAY OF ‘INPUTS AND OUTPUTS’ RATHER THAN QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND’ RELATIONS.

 

THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY IS FRAGMENTATIVE AND USES ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ IN AN UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE OVER ‘INTEGRATION’, HENCE ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ IN PLACE OF ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ WHERE THE FIGURE AND GROUND RELATION IS UNDERSTOOD AS A QUANTUM ‘BOTH/AND’ LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM.  THE INCLUDING MEDIUM AKA THE ‘GROUND’ IS THE WAVE-FIELD, THE INCLUDED FIGURE AKA THE ‘FIGURE’ IS A CONDENSATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD/GROUND AS CONSTITUTES THE QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION.

 

THAT IS, THE QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION IS A BOTH/AND RELATION WHEREIN THE INCLUDING MEDIUM AND THE INCLUDED ‘FIGURE’ ARE ‘SEPARATE’ ONLY IN APPEARANCE, BUT NOT IN SUBSTANCE, IN THE MANNER THAT A WHORLING IN A FLOWING APPEARS TO BE TWO THINGS; I.E. A FIGURE AND A GROUND AS IN OUR INTELLECTUAL “EITHER/OR” BINARY LOGIC BASED UNDERSTANDING, BUT IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE UNDERSTANDING, THE FIGURE IS INCLUDED IN THE GROUND AS IN THE QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION.  (more…)

The INVERTED LOGIC of WESTERN CULTURE

0

 

QUANTUM LOGIC (i.e. NON-BINARY LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND are ONE as with CONDENSATION) …  is in a NATURAL PRIMACY over BINARY LOGIC (where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO as with MATTER and EMPTY SPACE).  We have a CHOICE of which to give the foundational role to, and the choice we make has a profound impact on the UNDERSTANDING of the world that we draw from our language-based CONCEPTUALIZING of our SENSE-EXPERIENCING of the world, a world-in-flux wherein the NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT is in a NATURAL PRECEDENCE over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.   This is the finding of MODERN PHYSICS wherein material forms (the local and explicit) are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD (the nonlocal and implicit).

BINARY LOGIC , where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO, … while simpler, is intellectual abstraction for which there is no equivalent in our natural SENSE-EXPERIENCE world wherein FIGURE and GROUND are only ONE. 

That is, when we use the simplifying abstraction of BINARY LOGIC in our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, we are IMPOSING this SIMPLIFYING CONCEPTUALIZATION by using LANGUAGE to ‘CONSTRUCT’ impressions of a simplified BINARY LOGIC based PSEUDO-WORLD.  These BINARY LOGIC based simplified CONCEPTUALIZATIONS …. ARE NOT “REPRESENTATIONS” of something that ‘exists out there’, but are instead INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS ‘in here’ that construct a simplified SUBSTITUTE pseudo-world OUT THERE.

Indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGES employ this RELATION wherein the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is INCLUDED in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, implying a QUANTUM LOGIC relation; i.e. the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as is the relation between the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and the MATERIAL FORM that is the CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

The CONDENSATION is at the same time “BOTH” the MATERIAL FORM “AND” the INCLUDING MEDIUM (the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD) so that UNLIKE THE BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION where the MATERIAL FORM ‘moves through’ an EMPTY SPACE, … HERE WE HAVE THE QUANTUM LOGIC SITUATION where THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “THINGS THAT MOVE” as where MOVING FIGURE and STATIONARY GROUND are TWO SEPARATE THINGS, there is only TRANSFORMATION where THERE IS ONLY the “APPEARANCE” of a MOVING FIGURE that is associated with the OVERALL TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

Or in other words, “THE MOVING/CHANGING FIGURE, BE IT A TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING OR A HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING, IS ONLY ‘APPEARANCE’ whereas overall TRANSFORMATION is the REALITY.

TRANSFORMATION, as CONCEPTUALIZED using the BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC conveying of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, IS LESS SIMPLE than than the “EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC matter and space LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY”,  in that the QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is fully FLUID as in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (ACTION-VERB-based) WITHOUT DEPENDENCY ON THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT (i.e. without NAMED-BEING-BASED DEPENDENCY).  i

THERE IS A PROBLEM in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IN THAT PRIORITY IS GIVEN TO THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING which is BINARY LOGIC based and ONCE THE CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION IS LAID DOWN WITH BINARY LOGIC which is SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC, it is NOT POSSIBLE to incorporate, on that SIMPLE LOCAL and EXPLICIT base, the QUANTUM LOGIC CONSISTENT NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZATION.

In other words, after we have used language to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS TO THINGS as if in an EMPTY SPACE (BINARY LOGIC) in our LOCAL AND EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZATION, we cannot mix and match language that imputes BOTH/AND STATUS to MATERIAL FORMS BECAUSE IN THIS CASE AUTHORING AGENCY IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as in overall TRANSFORMATION).

BINARY LOGIC is like the Cuckoo, a simple bird that takes over the nest of less simple birds in that its eggs hatch first and the Cuckoo chicks push out the less simple birds eggs before they hatch, so that the simple supersedes the less simple.

In other words, once BINARY LOGIC is infused in the CONCEPTUALIZING STREAM, it TAKES OVER.  If we start off saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, we have established the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC MODE OF CONCEPTUALIZING (which implies :LOCAL AUTHORING, implying an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER) and our continuing story is then in terms of THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT which BLOCKS THE ENTRANCE of the QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ , … where there is NO SENSE OF LOCAL AUTHORING as “the TOWNING is INCLUDED WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in a BOTH/AND SENSE;” i.e. the TOWNING is to the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE as the WHORLING is to the FLOWING in a FLUID DYNAMIC (Figure and Ground are ONLY ONE).  

As in the Cuckoo’s egg hatching metaphor, once the starting out of a linguistic exchange commences on the basis of BINARY LOGIC conceptualization, the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization is shut out.

The use of simple BINARY LOGIC in LANGUAGE is OBSCURANTIST in that its LOCAL and EXPLICIT configuration BLOCKS THE  EXPRESSION OF the less-simple NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as where everything is in flux and THER IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING) which is PRIMARY in SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.  That is, if we use BINARY LOGIC and say “THE TOWN IS GROWING” we have assigned the AUTHORING POWER to the TOWN for its own GROWTH and this “LOCAL AUTHORING” is innately SIMPLER that if we had said ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which gives the AUTHORING POWER to the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (i.e. to the WAVE-FIELD rather than than to the material CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD).

This is the REDUCTION of QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC that changes LANGUAGE-BASED-UNDERSTANDING in a manner that is a CULTURE SHIFTER since it applies not only to ‘the TOWN’ but to ‘the HUMAN’ and while indigenous aboriginal culture LANGUAGE speaks in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, Common Average European LANGUAGE speaks in the BINARY LOGIC terms of HUMANS as LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEINGS with “THEIR OWN (grammar-given) POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

WESTERN CULTURE, because of the popular use of BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE, persists in the use of LANGUAGE that is OBSCURANTIST, reducing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING which in our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is in an INNATE PRIMACY over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING requires QUANTUM LOGIC as in the languages of Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is putting SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC into an unnatural primacy over LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC with the result that LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, instead of being based in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION, is based in LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING sourced ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.  The result is that WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING, by virtue of giving the foundational role in LANGUAGE to the SIMPLE LOCAL and EXPLICIT, is DROPPING OUT the LESS SIMPLE ALL-INCLUDING, ALL-CONNECTING, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”, the wave-field base, and because WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE engineers this DROP OUT in its language based conceptualizing, the conceptualizations, (REDUCED FROM QUANTUM LOGIC NON-LOCAL and IMPLICIT to TO BINARY LOGIC LOCAL AND EXPLICIT)  are FRAGMENTING both WESTERN CULTURE INTELLECT and BEHAVIOUR.

* * *  

 

(more…)

REFERENCE NOTES

0

These REFERENCE NOTES are temporary for ease of reference.

 

JUST TO EMPHASIZE THE KEY POINTS IN THE PREVIOUS NOTE;

 

WHILE WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE BEEN ‘BROUGHT UP’ TO BELIEVE IN LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘GROWTH’ and ‘PRODUCTION’, which are INTELLECTUAL BINARY LOGIC based, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE informs us in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “TRANSFORMATION” terms which are QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC based.

 

The use of BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE is pervasive in WESTERN CULTURE social discourse, … UNLIKE indigenous aboriginal social discourse where QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE is pervasive.  For example, WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS speak in terms of GROWTH and PRODUCTION where INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS speak in terms of TRANSFORMATION.

 

It is EVIDENT that this difference comes from two different LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, THE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE where we say things like ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’,… while the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS are saying there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, since the understanding is one of INCLUSION in the all-including GREAT MYSTERY aka the transforming relational continuum aka the Modern physics WAVE-FIELD.

 

These two different LANGUAGES are NOT simply DIFFERENT WAYS OF SAYING THE SAME THING,!

 

THE FIRST (WESTERN CULTURE) language architecture IS BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM) based and employs CONCEPTUALIZING that is in terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING.

 

The SECOND (INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL AND MODERN PHYSICS) language architecture is QUANTUM (BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM) based and employs CONCEPTUALIZING that is in terms of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) where the structure is ANDROGYNOUS, employing A FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE in CONJUGAL UNION with A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.

 

* * *

(more…)

The PONZI SCHEME known as THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

0

In a Ponzi scheme, a con artist offers investments that promise very high returns with little or no risk to their victims. The returns are said to originate from a business or a secret idea run by the con artist. In reality, the business does not exist or the idea does not work in the way it is described.  –Wikipedia

The “DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE” is a form of PONZI SCHEME, as in COLONIZATION wherein the abstract notion of OWNERSHIP OF LAND is used in conjunction with a DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE to invoke the INTELLECTUAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL ABSTRACTION of BEING-based FRAGMENTS of REALITY which are said to have an INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE that can notionally be supported by LOCAL, INTERNAL AUTHORING POWER known as GOVERNMENT.  This has all the trappings of a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that INCARNATES a notional LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and developments.

 

Unlike the Advisory “COUNCILS” in indigenous aboriginal cultures that undertake to cultivate and sustain INNER-OUTER BALANCE in what is understood as a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation with the overall world they are included in, the GOVERNING SYSTEMS in WESTERN CULTURE ‘DECLARED-to-be-INDEPENDENT NATIONS’ manage their activities AS IF THEY REALLY WERE ‘INDEPENDENT’ OF THE OVERALL SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED CONTINUUM (the all-including, transforming relational continuum).  RIGHT HERE is a PSYCHOLOGICAL SPLIT between LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION and SENSE-EXPERIENCE.

The DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE is thus the initiating of an UNDECLARED PONZI SCHEME wherein the supporters must submit to being GOVERNED on the basis of BELIEF IN, and SUPPORT FOR the “SUBOPTIMIZATION” of an imaginary linguistic (double error of naming and grammar) formulation that PURPORTS, by ‘DECLARATION’ TO BE AN INDEPENDENT NATION”.   This WESTERN CULTURE “DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE” based “PONZI SCHEME”, supported by LANGUAGE-CULTIVATED DELUSIONS of the LOCAL BEING-based EXISTENCE of INDEPENDENT NATION-FRAGMENTS, is the source of a TRANSNATIONAL (in reality ‘unbounded’) SOCIAL COLLECTIVE developing the characteristic dysfunctions of SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA.

The DEEPLY INFUSED and STERNLY ENFORCED (by establishing the absolute NEED for ‘CITIZENSHIP’) PRETENCE OF ‘INDEPENDENCE” secured by the abstract BELIEF in the BOUNDING POWERS of imaginary lines used to DEFINE the “INDEPENDENT NATION” has induced, in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL BEHAVIOURS, on the scale of FRAGMENTED NATIONS, the incidence of Schizophrenia and Paranoia.  Inhabitants of unbounded natural landscapes in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence,  are transformed as a result of the PONZI scheme-like INVESTMENT in the FRAGMENTATIVE BELIEF IN NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE, in spite of this being in FULL contradiction to our sense-experience informed awareness of our inclusion in the UNBOUNDED transforming relational continuum, into INDEPENDENT BEINGS living in INDEPENDENT NATIONS, to which OWNERSHIP can be applied to finalize the seal the PONZI scheme like deal.

* * * A comment from Bohm is appended as a reminder of the psychological confusion deriving from the use of fragmentation.

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

 * * * * * * 

 

 

 

 

SERIOUSLY, try this on for a bogus business idea.  It is possible, with armed back-up, to DECLARE THE INDEPENDENCE of a LAND AREA within the transforming relational continuum nd designate it as being OWNED, a intellectual abstract ‘secret’ idea (if one had never seen the purported ‘supporting documents’ or been apprehended by ‘those in know’, one would never know) based on nothing more than the confidence of the operating collective who are taking control of land and who are given shares in the OWNERSHIP investment.  The COST of the shares will be the commitment to BEAR ARMS and give one’s life, if necessary (as determined by random chance similar to a dice toss).  The ‘stake-holders’ themselves will constitute the resources necessary to take control of an area of prime land that will be designated OWNED property. The operating collective may begin to collect dividends from the time of commitment through access to the ‘fruits of the soil’ even though stakeholders may not yet have been called on to make any significant payment.  Random chance is involved here since the call for payment as in military service may come early to some and may be delayed for many to such time that income from stakeholder access to the land has become significant.

 

The DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE opens the way to FRAGMENTATION and to the DECLARATION OF OWNERSHIP (of resources) and this is backed up and secured by POLITICAL SUPPORT leading to PARANOIA and SCHIZOPHRENIA an the scale of the FRAGMENTED INTER-NATION basis.   That is, there are extremely strong political and military/police based PRESSURES to ensure that one’s BEHAVIOURS conform with the ABSTRACT POLITICALLY SUPPORTED PSYCHOLOGICAL FRAGMENTATION (i.e. IN CONFLICT with our sense-experience which affirms the reality of our being included in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.  The socio-political pressures in support of FRAGMENTATION that does NOT exist in sense-experience reality is a continuing contributor to rising rates, In WESTERN CULTURE, of schizophrenia and paranoia.

(more…)

Go to Top