INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL TRANSFORMATIONISM (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) VS. WESTERN CULTURE CONSTRUCTIVISM (LOCAL and EXPLICIT)

0

 

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL TRANSFORMATIONISM (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) VS. WESTERN CULTURE CONSTRUCTIVISM (LOCAL and EXPLICIT)

 

Like Bohm, Nietzsche and Schroedinger, One can follow (and I have followed) the path of psycho-philosophical investigation that informs us that different varieties of language (linguistic conceptualization) are giving us different understandings of REALITY which in turn give rise to what we know and refer to as differing CULTURES.    ‘Language and Culture Are Frameworks Through Which Humans Experience, Communicate and Understand Reality’ (Vygotsky, 1968)

 

The following aphorisms point to TWO CHOICES of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which “PUT US INSIDE OF TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES”.

 

“To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”….’There is a tide in the affairs of men”.   The former is from the Bible (Ecclesiastes 3:1-8) and the latter is from Shakepeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’.

 If we AGREE with this proposition, we thus agree that we can NEVER CLAIM PERSONAL AUTHORSHIP OF ANYTHING due the fact that, stated in WAVE-FIELD terms the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is ALWAYS, to SOME EXTENT ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, EXPANDED or DIMINISHED by the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONDITIONS it is SITUATIONALLY INCLUDED IN.  As FARMERS, FARMER ‘A’, may bring to harvest a BUMPER CROP and be celebrated for his skills and strong effort, and perhaps, his generosity and benevolent charity to ‘less productive’ members of the local community, while FARMER ‘B’ who skills and labors were equivalent to, or greater than FARMER ‘A’s, experienced crop failure due to hailstorms and flooding.

While our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME HAS US USING SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC TO STATE IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, FARMER “A” PRODUCED A BUMPER CROP, while FARMER “B” FAILED TO PRODUCE ANYTHING OF SUBSTANCE, and to CLAIM THESE PROPOSITIONS TO BE THE HONEST TRUTH.  However, as Goedel’s Theorem affirms, ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS (though they may be provably TRUE) are INCOMPLETE.  In this example, what was NEVER MENTIONED was the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the ambient dynamics which are CONJUGATE to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING actions of the FARMER, BOTH of which are CONTRIBUTORS to the UNFOLDING REALITY.

In other words, WESTERN CULTURE employs a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which is SOLELY MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING BASED, WHICH ‘DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE” which is INHERENT in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD in which WE and our PROJECTS are INCLUDED.  Farmer “A” found his crop-cultivating actions to be in harmonious relation with the ambient dynamics while Farmer “B” found his crop-cultivating actions to be in dissonant relation with the ambient dynamics, which is to remind ourselves of the Goedel’s Theorem INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, and they are INCOMPLETE because “BINARY LOGIC” PROPOSITIONS consist ONLY of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING activity which comes by DROPPING OUT the natural WAVE-FIELD FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate.

Aphorisms such as ‘to everything there is a season’ EXPOSE AS “TOO SIMPLE” the common WESTERN CULTURE ONE SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY linguistic conceptualizing scheme based on the abstraction of MATERIAL BODIES moving about in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which portray human dynamics in BINARY LOGIC terms of EITHER ‘in motion’ OR ‘at rest’, FAILING TO ACKNOWLEDGE the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein MATTER is a CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM such that MATERIAL FORMS are, as with WHORLINGS in FLOWING, “BOTH” themselves “AND” the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (WAVE-FIELD) they are CONDENSATIONS IN, WHERE “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” and where EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) by way of BEING CONDENSATIONS of the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

As David Bohm points out;

 

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

(more…)

The WESTERN CULTURE Hijacking of Quantum Logic by Binary Logic

0

 

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

 

What this means is that“WE ARE ALL RELATED” (mitakuye oyasin)  as with the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM where material “CONDENSATIONS -OF-THE-MEDIUM”, like WHORLINGS in the FLOWING, while having a DISTINGUISHING APPEARANCE, are INCLUDED FEATURES OF THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

 

The indigenous aboriginal culture understands this QUANTUM LOGIC pattern in NATURE wherein ALL THINGS ARE RELATED, where there is no such thing as LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, as is basic in the BINARY LOGIC based linguistic conceptualizings of WESTERN CULTURE.  In the aboriginal culture, the violent act is understood as having been cultivated in the relational social matrix so that the violent PERSON is seen as the CONDUIT through whom the tensions brewed in the social collective are vented.  RESTORATIVE JUSTICE by means of the HEALING CIRCLE is the natural response to outbursts of violence rather than scapegoating the CONDUIT through which community-brewed tensions are vented.

 

BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC IS TOO SIMPLE A BASE FOR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC REALITY IN THAT BINARY LOGIC REQUIRES EMPTY SPACE AS ‘INSULATOR’ TO SUPPORT THE ABSTRACTION OF SEPARATE OBJECTS which WESTERN CULTURE makes out to be the LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (using the device of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).  This is in marked contrast to the QUANTUM PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal ‘relational web-of-life’ understanding of actions and developments being of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational origin) and only LOCAL and EXPLICIT in APPEARANCE in the manner that SOLAR IRRADIANCE FIELDS which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT are the primary source of LOCAL and EXPLICIT high pressure and low pressure circulations in the oceans and atmosphere,’

WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, in spite of our sense-experience affirming that everything is in flux, employs the ‘DOUBLE ERROR” combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘push’ to the high pressure and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘pull’  to the low pressure, thus providing a pseudo-explanation of these CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD COMPONENTS in LOCAL, EXPLICIT terms.   This tactic may be popularly affirmed by the ‘petitio principii of ‘does this low pressure suck?’ … and… ‘does this high pressure push’?   The petitio pincipii error akin to Nietzsche’s example of ‘lightning flashes’ where the lightning IS THE flashing.  Likewise, the low pressure IS THE sucking and the high pressure IS THE pushing.  Meanwhile, the DOUBLE  ERROR construct WRONGLY implies LOCAL AUTHORING which is a a work-around for the problem faced by linguistic conceptualizing challenge associated with capturing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

BINARY LOGIC itself is a simplifying ‘ruse’ that when applied to explain the WAVE-FIELD phenomena DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate which makes it incapable of capturing the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD relation which is comprised of the conjugate relation of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING together with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.   BINARY LOGIC’S “EITHER/OR” linguistic conceptualization CAN ONLY ‘HANDLE’ the LOCAL and EXPLICIT such as “IS THE TOWN GROWING?”.   There is a problem here in that whether the reality and/or the answer is EITHER yes OR no, … this makes no mention of the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus no mention of the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.  This suggests that the question “IS THE TOWN GROWING” is NOT about our sense-experience reality since what is going on according to our sense-experience reality is that ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

Some may ARGUE that the simple BINARY LOGIC proposition (IS THE TOWN GROWING) and response is adequate but to an indigenous aboriginal who is likely to be sensitive to, and accustomed to speaking in the flow-based language terms, it is important NOT TO CONCEAL the reality that there is CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS together with GROWING OF THE TOWN.   The CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN PART is only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and this is standard in WESTERN CULTURE to DROP OUT mention of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and this has been called the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING) because the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM while the material CONDENSATION such as ‘the TOWN that is GROWING’ … IS NOT SOMETHING REAL, … IT IS ONLY APPEARANCE as is the case with all CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.  What is REAL is the CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

BINARY LOGIC is something we apply to “THE TOWN” as in “THE TOWN IS EITHER LARGER THIS SUMMER THAN LAST SUMMER, or NOT”.   SUCH A QUESTION DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE SO THAT IN USING BINARY LOGIC, WE ARE NOT ‘PLAYING WITH A FULL DECK’.  We have the issue of the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING).

WORSE THAN THIS!  BY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE we are DROPPING OUT THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and PRETENDING THAT THE MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, WHICH ARE ‘APPEARANCE’ only (THE WAVE-FIELD IS NON-VISIBLE) ARE THE OPERATIVE REALITY. 

The “TOWN that is GROWING “is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that suggests the presence of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, notionall with ITS OWN POWERS of AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.  That is the WESTERN CULTURE view.   In the indigenous aboriginal view as also the QUANTUM LOGIC view, what is going on is that we all share inclusion in the transforming relational continuum and in this case there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein everyting is in flux and there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES such as ‘TOWNS’ that ‘GROW’ and ‘DEVELOP’ and ‘PRODUCE GOODS’; these are the products of DIFFERENTIATING the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).

The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT provides CONTEXT for the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT, but there is a problem here when BINARY LOGIC is employed since BINARY LOGIC is ONLY CAPABLE OF ADDRESSING THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES SITUATED IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which means OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF THE CONJUGATE RELATION WITH THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE

THUS, THE POINT IS THAT BINARY LOGIC ACTS AS A FILTER THAT REMOVES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING’S ACCESS TO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE WHICH MEANS THAT BINARY LOGIC REMOVES ACCESS TO WAVE-FIELD BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION (BINARY LOGIC GIVES ACCESS ONLY TO MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING). 

BECAUSE LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE CONSTRAINED BY BINARY LOGIC “DROPS OUT” THE CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, THERE WILL BE DROP OUT OF THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which is the CONTEXTUAL CONTAINER that ENRICHES understanding of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘CONTENT”.

AS WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, WE HAVE ACCESS TO SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDING IN OUR UNDERSTANDING, but for those of us who place UNBALANCED DEPENDENCE on BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, there is NO SUPPORTING CONTEXTUAL GROUNDING and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, which, on its own (without CONTEXTUAL ENRICHMENT from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT), sources FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS. 

 

* * *AUTHOR’S NOTE:  The way I think of the above is that BINARY LOGIC, by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE that comes with QUANTUM LOGIC, brings in, instead, an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE which gives a FREE TICKET to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DOMINANCE which means that linguistic conceptualizing (expressibility of thought and language) is LIMITED to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (what the TOWN is doing) while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (transforming landscape influence) is DISABLED, but it is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that enriches the understanding constrained by the limited reach of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT that is generated by the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.* * *

 

* * * * * * * * *

 

The WESTERN CULTURE Hijacking of Quantum Logic by Binary Logic is the reason why we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are NOT on the ‘same page’ as indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, all of whom are, as David Point pointed out, in accord with QUANTUM PHYSICS.

WESTERN CULTURE is in serious trouble that is manifesting in FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTIST DROP-OUT built into our linguistic conceptualizing scheme.  The FRAGMENTATION is coming from the use of NAMING to invent LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING/S and the OBSCURANTISM is coming from the use of GRAMMAR to impute one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING agency (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’) which DROPS OUT the WAVE-FIELD conjugate of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as is the basic nature of the WAVE-FIELD.  WESTERN CULTURE’s use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCTING GOODS’ is linguistic conceptualizing that implies the EXISTENCE of a MATERIAL BEING (‘the TOWN’) that has its own powers of GROWING).

The REALITY affirmed by our sense-experience is that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ … where everything is in flux.   There can be no ‘TOWN THAT IS GROWING’ without a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, with both of these conjugates being aspects of the ONGOING, and ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is otherwise known the WAVE-FIELD.   The MATERIAL FIGURE or “TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is in a “QUANTUM BOTH/AND RELATION” where “THE TOWNING” is a CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is “BOTH” its “LOCAL, EXPLICIT SELF”, … “AND”, … at the same time, the ALL-INCLUDING, NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.   This QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH”/”AND” RELATION describes a relation such as a WHORLING in a FLOWING where there in only ONE dynamic entitity, the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD BUT THERE IS THE APPEARANCE of TWO; i.e. the WHORLING and the FLOWING which is just ONE since WHORLING is part of the APPEARANCE of FLOWING and we cannot ‘scoop out a WHORLING’ in a net and put it in a separate ‘holding tank’ because “IT” (the WHORLING) is APPEARANCE and is NOT a THING THAT EXISTS.

I am proceeding ‘carefully’ here as I compose my linguistic conceptualizations because what I am sharing here is a TRICKY MATTER that requires from us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS an OPEN MIND (so as not to be ‘held captive’ by our WESTERN CULTURE common linguistic conceptualizations that are erroneous but which we HABITUALLY employ on a routine basis in spite of their being ‘infected’ with errors.

The KEY POINT is that while our sense-experience is of INCLUSION IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is a WAVE-FIELD dynamic that requires QUANTUM LOGIC expression, our intellectual modeling and our simple BEING-based linguistic conceptualizations are SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based while QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE and requires a less simple lingiustic conceptualizing scheme.   In particular, in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of MODERN PHYSICS, which accords with the indigenous aboriginal linguistic conceptualizing scheme, EVERYTHING IS RELATED in the manner of CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in the PLENUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.  This is why researchers such as Zen scholar Alan Watts recommends that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “DROP” our BEING-BASED LANGUAGE and adopt a FLOW-BASED (relational) LANGUAGE.

(more…)

Moving Beyond Our Western Culture BINARY LOGIC World View

0

 

MOVING BEYOND OUR WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC WORLD VIEW

 

 

 

IS THERE A “NOBLE SAVAGE” IN US ALL THAT OUR BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE HAS REMOVED?

 

FIRST, …PRESENTATION OF EXPLANATORY TIPS FOR THE WESTERN CULTURE READER OF THIS ARTICLE: 

 

If the reader is a WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT like myself, there is an important TIP that is helpful if brought to mind, to fully comprehend this message, which involves LIFTING our cognitive AWARENESS (as in the Erich Jantsch AWARENESS levels classification) from the lower levels (2 and 3) to level 1, … all of which is explained in this article, but which it may be helpful to briefly review UPFRONT.

Our WESTERN CULTURE AWARENESS is generally operating at the lower awaremess levels which are BOTH BINARY LOGIC based as with the CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL viewpoints.  Examples of BINARY LOGIC are the “EITHER” innocent “OR” guilty determinations of the WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE SYSTEM, and the EITHER my ENTITLEMENT OR not my  ENTITLEMENT, wherein an individual “EITHER” owns “OR does not own, certain rights and privileges.

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL AWARENESS which is QUANTUM LOGIC BASED accepts this LESS SIMPLE “BOTH/AND” relation as with WHORLING in FLOWING where WHORLING is PART OF THE APPEARANCE of FLOWING and THERE IS NO ACTUAL LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF “WHORL”.

WESTERN CULTURE, ‘armed with’ NAMING and GRAMMAR based “LOCAL AUTHORING AGENTS” such as “WHORLS”, commonly CONSTRUCTS BINARY LOGIC BASED PSEUDO-REALITIES based on NAMING-INSTANTIATED, LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEINGS” (such as WHORLS), notionally with GRAMMAR-given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING.

So, at the SIMPLEST AWARENESS LEVELS we support the CONSERVATIVE (AWARENESS LEVEL3) MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamic as in ‘the HURRICANE is STIRRING UP the ATMOSPHERE’, while at the next LESS SIMPLE AWARENESS LEVEL we support the LIBERAL (AWARENESS LEVEL 2) FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING dynamic as in ‘the ATMOSPHERE is STIRRING UP the HURRICANE’. AWARENESS LEVELS 3 and 2, the lower two levels, cultive POLARIZED OPPOSITION, which is RESOLVED in AWARENESS LEVEL 1, however while AWARENESS LEVELS 3 and 2 are accessible with BINARY LOGIC, LEVEL 1 AWARENESS is QUANTUM LOGIC based.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC vis-à-vis BINARY LOGIC

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE is NON-BINARY in that there is NO ASSUMPTION that the person HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN is the LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHOR of a “CRIME” whether JACK THE RIPPER or DONALD TRUMP and this has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SEVERITY OF THE ACTIONS AND EVENTS IN QUESTION, but rather to do with the precedence of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  In MODERN PHYSICS also in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE, emergent events are understood as being of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT origin, in which case the response to emergent VIOLENCE or SYSFUNCTION is the forming of a HEALING CIRCLE because the understanding is that when an INDIVIDUAL GOES BALLISTIC, the SOURCE is not in the INDIVIDUAL but in the web-of-relations in which the individual is a SINGLE STRAND. Indigenous aboriginal justice does NOT, therefore. seek REMEDIATION by ELIMINATING or INCARCERATING the ‘individual SMOKING GUN’ who is the CONDUIT for VENTING tensions cultivated within the relational matrix of society.  The indigenous aboriginal JUSTICE convokes a HEALING CIRCLE in order to resolve the TENSIONS in the relational social matrix which source the VIOLENT VENTING that manifests through the ‘IDENTIFIED PATIENT’ or the ‘MINER’S CANARY’.    This indigenous aboriginal understanding of TORT is that it belongs to the social relational collective and merely VENTS through an individual.

In the indigenous aboriginal and QUANTUM PHYSICS view, the LOGIC employed is QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM rather than simple BINARY LOGIC, the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (i.e. the presumed EMPTY SPACE MEDIUM which constrains the AUTHORING of actions to the MATERIAL OCCUPANTS of the notional EMPTY SPACE).   OUR OWN SENSE-EXPERIENCE INTUITION informs us, nevertheless, the WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE notion of INNOCENT UNLESS PROVEN GUILTY is a SMOKE-SCREEN for a DYSFUNCTIONAL ‘NORMALITY’; i.e. “What we call ‘normal’  (in our WESTERN CULTURE) is a product of repression, denial, splitting, projection, introjection and other forms of destructive action on experience.”   — R.D. Laing

In other words, dysfunction within the dynamics of the social collective which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) is the source of LOCAL, EXPLICIT aberrant actions and developments, so that the REMEDY is to heal the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT tensions in the social relational matrix, which is what the HEALING CIRCLE is designed for.  To MIS-IDENTIFY as the SOURCE, the LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘VENTING AGENT’ through which tensions in the social relational matrix find manifest expression, is to absolve the social collective while SCAPE-GOATING the one holding the smoking gun.  WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC JUSTICE MISINTERPRETS the LOCAL, EXPLICIT VENTING AGENT as the AUTHORING SOURCE when the reality is that the SOURCING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) arising from tensions generated within the social relational matrix of community, in which case REMEDIATION is achievable through the QUANTUM LOGIC means of restoring balance by resolving relational tensions, rather than by BINARY LOGIC means of ELIMINATING or INCARCERATING the SMOKING GUN, WRONGLY IDENTIFIED as the AUTHORING SOURCE while only the VENT through which the build up of relational tension find expression.

The problem being stirred up by TRUMP is coming from the DYSFUNCTION that is inherent in the use of BINARY LOGIC based reasoning which can be split into CONFLICTING VARIANTS which are CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL, both of which are OVER-SIMPLIFIED and IN ERROR, being seeming alternative ways of explaining LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development, the CONVERVATIVES believing that the INDIVIDUAL is the ROOT SOURCE of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments and the LIBERALS believing that the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is the ROOT SOURCE of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.  Whereas, indigenous aboriginals and QUANTUM LOGIC is affirming that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT results, there is only TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC based).  For example, there is TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, but THERE IS NO ‘TOWN’ THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING things as if ‘in its own local authoring right, as in a BINARY LOGIC based PROPOSITION.

   * * *

(more…)

HITLER WAS RIGHT! (about one thing)

0

 

WESTERN CULTURE PEOPLE FALL FOR THE BIG LIES, and it is SO OBVIOUS that the WESTERN CULTURE ESTABLISHMENT, the whole matrix of TOP-DOWN ADMINISTRATIONS, is FALLING FOR THE LIE of “LOCAL AUTHORING” which comes from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.   HEY!  LOCAL AUTHORING IS THE “BIG LIE” THAT IS THE ACCEPTED FOUNDATION OF WESTERN CULTURE.

 

No matter that Chief Seattle and the whole population of indigenous aboriginals tried to get us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to WAKE UP from our MESMERIZATION by, as Nietzsche also pointed out was a LIE, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based BELIEF IN ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ that has been ENDORSED by the ABRAHAMIC RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

 

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING.  IT IS A HUMONGOUS LIE that IS (MIS-) SHAPING WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS.AS IN THE BINARY LOGIC BASED SPLITTING OF PEOPLE INTO THE OPPOSITE CATEGORIES OF ‘GOOD’ and ‘EVIL’ based on the “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR that is the SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

 

This BIG LIE of “THE LOCAL AUTHOR” is ENFORCED in WESTERN CULTURE by a BINARY LOGIC based system of REWARDS and PUNISHMENTS which REWARDS the “PERCEIVED” AUTHORS OF “GOOD” actions and developments and PUNISHES the “PERCEIVED” AUTHORS of “BAD” actions and developments as part of a PURIFICATIONIST PROGRAM aimed at ensuring that GOOD prevails over BAD in ‘WESTERN CULTURE SOCIETY”.

 

THIS BIG LIE, where one is taught from childhood to BELIEVE that WE ARE “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” WITH OUR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, a HUMONGOUS LIE which OBLIGES A FOLLOW-UP LIE whereby we notionally IMAGINE OURSELVES to be SITUATED WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, which means that that the ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS of the INDEPENDENT BEINGS that move about and interact within that space CAN ONLY BE ATTRIBUTED TO THE INDEPENDENT BEINGS.

 

HEY, NONE OF THIS FUZZINESS of the indigenous aboriginal cultures IS ALLOWED in our WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizings), where the belief is that ‘EVERYTHING is RELATED’ as is also supported by Modern Physics where all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ONE, All-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.  NOT EVEN THE ‘SYSTEMS SCIENCE’ that has SUPPORTED the indigenous aboriginal understanding that WE SHARE INCLUSION in a world characterized by global interconnectedness an mutual interdependence  …  has been unable to ‘gain access to the microphone’ so that public transmissions continue to be DOMINATED by supporters of the BIG LIE of LOCAL AUTHORING. 

 

ON AND ON GOES THE BIG LIE OF LOCAL AUTHORING, IMPERVIOUS TO THE CONTINUING DEBUNKING EFFORTS, which continue to BOUNCE OFF THE “BIG LIE”, LOCKED IN AS IT IS BY ‘HIGH SWITCHING COSTS’ including the WESTERN CULTURE LOCAL AUTHORING BASED SYSTEM OF REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS, that put those who are MOST REWARDED as PROTECTORS of the WESTERN CULTURE “BIG LIE” of LOCAL AUTHORING and its COHORT, the ‘INDEPENDENT BEING’, which is a BINARY LOGIC based SOURCING AGENT that has been BUILT INTO the FOUNDATIONS of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE via DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING.

 

SO, HITLER WAS RIGHT!  (about one thing), … that PEOPLE FALL FOR THE “BIG LIE” and what could be a MORE HUMONGOUS LIE than the the one being probagated in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE every time w we speak in terms of the LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, as when we make statements like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’!   NO!   NO!  NO!, … that is a HUMONGOUS LIE.  What is actually going on does not involve a BEING thing (the TOWN) that is its own LOCAL AUTHORING source of GROWING, … what is actually going on is the BEING-LESS RELATIONAL TRANSFORMING OF THE ALL-INCLUDING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, as in the indigenous aboriginal and SYTEMS SCIENCE understanding that WE SHARE INCLUSION in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.

(more…)

The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE GAME

0

 

The purported INDEPENDENCE of NATIONS is BULLSHIT, but recall the history of such POLITICAL CORRECTNESS PRESSURES as in the case of Giordano Bruno’s rebuke that ‘the Majority has no monopoly on the Truth’, in 1600, on being taken to be burned at the stake for the HERESY OF RELATIVITY, in the Campo dei Fiori near the Vatican in Rome.

 

DO I BELIEVE IN THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE UNITED STATES or any of the other “DECLARED TO BE INDEPENDENT NATIONS”?,… NO WAY!   AM I GOING TO GET ON A SOAPBOX IN TIMES SQUARE WITH A BULLHORN and GO ON A RANT ABOUT THE INSANITY OF BELIEVING THAT PEOPLE AND NATIONS ARE INDEPENDENT?

 

As far as I can see, the descendants of the VATICAN “burning at the stake” VICE SQUAD have been ‘reborn’ in an ecumenical wink wink, nod nod, ‘know what I mean’ volunteer vigilante clean-up group aka WESTERN CULTURE SOCIETY.

 

Re The BULLSHIT GAME we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “FORCE EACH OTHER (AND OUR CHILDREN) TO PLAY” WITH LANGUAGE

 

Here we go, … Ronald Laing, Jules Henry, Ernest Becker and David Bohm are being OPEN AND HONEST about WESTERN CULTURE, which is, to put it mildly, RARE in our common WESTERN CULTURE discourse.

  (more…)

A POCKET REFERENCE to WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC SCREW-UPS

0

 

INTRODUCTION (the POCKET REFERENCE follows the INTRODUCTION)

 

PART ONE: THE PROBLEM OF LANGUAGE-SOURCED BEHAVIOURAL (ABERRANT-) ‘NORMALITY’

Almost no-one is going to carry around with them reminders such as David Bohm’s, as to how our common WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing is SCREWING up our UNDERSTANDING of REALITY (the reality of our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum).   Meanwhile, many philosophical investigators have come to the same conclusion; i.e. that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES, including ENGLISH are screwing up our understanding of reality. Wittgenstein, for example, observes;

Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung  unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache” (Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

On the same tack, Psychiatrist R.D. Laing has written at length about how WESTERN CULTURE and its language is DRIVING US CRAZY;

 

What we call ‘normal’ is a product of repression, denial, splitting, projection, introjection and other forms of destructive action on experience.”   — R.D. Laing

 

This is ALSO what Bohm is talking about in his treatise on FRAGMENTATION.  What Bohm is describing is a WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC wherein the conditions considered NORMAL are growing INCREASINGLY TOXIC.  This was also the finding of psychiatrist Laing in “The Divided Self”, and also the finding of anthropologist Jules Henry in “Culture Against Man”, and also the finding of Ernest Becker expressed in ‘the “Denial of Death”.  This ‘screw-up’ is tied to our WESTERN CULTURE and what Benjamin Whorf classifies as Common Average European Language.   All of these psychiatrists, and anthropologists have homed in on the fact that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE PROBLEMS STEMMING FROM THE ARCHITECTURE OF OUR LANGUAGE.  SHARING WHAT THESE PROBLEMS IN OUR LANGUAGE ARE, BY MEANS OF THE VERY SAME LANGUAGE THAT HAS THE PROBLEMS, IS TRICKY, LIKE TRYING TO BITE YOUR OWN NOSE.  CLARIFYING what is going on here is the aim of this, “A POCKET REFERENCE to WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC SCREW-UPS”.   If we were speaking Ojibwa, or any of the flow-based languages, we would NOT be having this problem that Laing and the others are drawing to our attention. Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE PROBLEM is coming from our building our language on the basis of BEING rather than on the basis of RELATIONS.

EXAMPLE of the TYPE OF PROBLEM that our BEING based language generates for us.   We know from our sense-experience that there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING aspect to our reality which means that LANGUAGE that employs ONLY MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING propositions is MISSING SOMETHING (sometimes termed the DEA ABSCONDITA, “THE GODDESS IN HIDING”).   From the point of view of one who studies the MODERN PHYSICS WAVE-FIELD based structure of this world of our sense-experience, THIS MAKES SENSE because our Euroepan languages, such as this ENGLISH I am now using, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate.  For example, in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, the damage done by a skull-fracturing punch to someone’s head is considered to be FULLY and SOLELY AUTHORED by the thrower of the punch.  This ignores the ever-present FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE wherein the skull may an EGG-SHELL skull whose FRACTURING is due to BOTH the force of the “MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING” conjugate AND TO the “FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” of a fragile ‘eggshell skull’.

(more…)

Here’s HOW WESTERN CULTURE is CULTIVATING DEEPENING DYSFUNCTION

0

 

OVERVIEW:  The challenge of sharing our complex experience of living in a transforming relational continuum also known as “The Tao that cannot be told” (Lao Tzu), has led to the development of “LANGUAGE”, more appropriately termed “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING” to avoid the confusion that comes with the assumption that LANGUAGE is directly reporting on our sense-experience reality… IT IS NOT!  Language or “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING” comes with the issue noted by Korzybski that ‘the word is not the thing’ which is further complicated since as MODERN PHYSICS informs us, we share inclusion in a WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.   This ambiguous matter/field relation gives rise to the need for QUANTUM LOGIC in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of THE INCLUDING MEDIUM which takes into account the interconnected and interdependent (relational) nature of material forms as CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.   The cultures of EAST and WEST can be distinguished by the EAST’s use of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is QUANTUM LOGIC or FLOW-BASED (relational) as contrasts with the WEST’s use of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is BINARY LOGIC  or BEING-based.  This essay serves a ROSETTA STONE role in reviewing how the WEST’s adoption of a BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM that is NOT PRESENT in the QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme of the“EAST” (indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, as well as QUANTUM PHYSICS).

 * * * 

 

FORWARD:  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE comes with the potential for psychological confusion because it incorporatates a TOO SIMPLE, LOGICALLY INCOMPLETE “BEING-BASED linguistic conceptualizing scheme that Nietzsche has termed ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  This ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ gives us the impression of MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “LOCAL AUTHORING” without acknowledging the real-world conjugate of FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.  Only in an imaginary abstract flat space of infinite extent would the one-sided “male-asserting/actualizing” pseudo-dynamics of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION be possible.  In the sense-experience affirmed, all-including, continually transforming wave-field, the “male asserting/actualizing” of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION is only found in conjugate relation with the “female-accommodating/enabling’ dynamics of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION, co-constituting together the all-including wave-field dynamic of TRANSFORMATION.

While philosophers such as Mircea Eliade (Mephistopheles et l’Androgyne) and systems theorists such as Kenneth Boulding have pointed to the confusion in WESTERN CULTURE associated with how our linguistic conceptualizing handles “THE TWO AND THE ONE” (the English title of the aforementioned book by Eliade).  The standard BEING-based languages of Western culture are simple BINARY LOGIC based while the languages of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, in accord with MODERN PHYSICS, employ a less simple but more comprehensive QUANTUM LOGIC FLOW-based linguistic conceptualizing scheme.  The BEING based linguistic conceptualizing is dependent on an abstract ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE as an ‘operating theatre’ for dynamics that are imagined in the simple BINARY LOGIC terms of the movements and interactions of independent material bodies as if within an empty infinite space.  The FLOW based linguistic conceptualizing is dependent on RELATIONS as describe a NON-BEING-DEPENDENT transforming wave-field comprised of the QUANTUM LOGIC combination of wave-field and material forms that are condensations of the wave-field where the field and the condensations of the field manifest in a BOTH/AND LOGIC of the  INCLUDING MEDIUM (QUANTUM LOGIC) relation.

The QUANTUM LOGIC understanding requires a linguistic conceptualizing scheme that captures the BOTH/AND relation between “BOTH” material forms (condensations of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD) … “AND” the energy charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.   This QUANTUM LOGIC has an ANDROGYNOUS structure in that its “BOTH/AND’ capability acknowledges the ANDROGYNOUS (conjugate) combination of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING dynamic and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamic.  This means that GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION “DO NOT EXIST ON THEIR OWN” but are only found in conjugate relation with their”female-accommodating/enabling” “counterpart” dynamics of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION, the combination, rather than a mechanical sum-of-the-parts, being found in the sense-experience affirmed all-including wave-field dynamic of TRANSFORMATION.

WE KNOW THAT we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ a linguistic conceptualizing scheme that FLATLY “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and ‘goes with’ ONLY the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, hence we speak in terms of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION as if these dynamics WERE REAL when they are ABSTRACTIONS that are MISSING their FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugates of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION which together with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION co-constitute TRANSFORMATION.

Our sense-experience affirms that we are immersed in an all-including WAVE-FIELD based TRANSFORMATION, while our WESTERN CULTURE employs the tactic of using the simplified BINARY LOGIC based MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING pseudo-realities of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, which are only half the story.  But, as Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, our propositions involving GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION can be “TRUE” without being “REAL” due to their INCOMPLETENESS wherein, as mentioned, they DROP OUT (or fail to acknowledge) the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugates of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION, and it is only when we use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in a manner that would have us understand these MALE and FEMALE conjugates in their ANDROGYNOUS UNION of TRANSFORMATION that our LANGUAGE-INFORMED UNDERSTANDING has a chance of ‘matching up with’ our SENSE-EXPERIENCE UNDERSTANDING.

As it is, in WESTERN CULTURE, we have engineered ECONOMIES based ONE-SIDEDLY on THE UNREAL, ABSTRACTIONS OF GROWTH/DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, the TRUTH of which is convincing, without alerting us to the Goedel’s Theorem INCOMPLETENESS of such ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, which, TRUE though they may be, are nevertheless INCOMPLETE and thus fail in their linguistic conceptualizing, to inform us on REALITY, that REALITY being an all-including TRANSFORMATION which incorporates the conjugates of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION together with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.

Our WESTERN CULTURE USE OF BINARY LOGIC and the simplified abstract “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS” that such simple logic supports, distinguishes us from CULTURES USING QUANTUM LOGIC such as INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VENDANT ADHERENTS and the small minority of QUANTUM PHYSICISTS who have ‘switched teams’ (from the BINARY LOGIC, abstract being-based pseudo-reality-grounded team to the QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience-grounded team). While some fractions of the aforementioned QUANTUM LOGIC user-groups have ‘converted’ to the BINARY LOGIC based understandings that are built into WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, there continue to be holdouts; i.e. those who have managed to sustain their FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING practice.

This lengthy FORWARD is ‘made lengthy’ beause it is written in ENGLISH and ENGLISH is one of the “Common Average European” languages, in linguist Benjamin Whorf’s categorization, that suffers from BINARY LOGIC based DUMBING DOWN by way of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate.  That is, languages such as ENGLISH give a foundational role to BINARY LOGIC by way of simple LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, which Goedel’s Theorem “WARNS US” is “INCOMPLETE”, and we can easily see what is INCOMPLETE about it; i.e. it DOES NOT MENTION THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus OBSCURES in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, the LESS SIMPLE reality of TRANSFORMATION which comes to us with the conjugate combination of “BOTH” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION … “AND” … FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” as with SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION.

As Whorf points out, we would have no problem with our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING if we were using a QUANTUM LOGIC capable language like HOPI, but our use of ENGLISH with its BINARY LOGIC, BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “IS” a problem.  As Zen philosopher Alan Watts suggested, we users of English could avoid the BINARY LOGIC based DUMBING DOWN (from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC) by avoiding the use of NOUNS signifying BEING and instead using only VERBS as support understanding in RELATIONAL (QUANTUM LOGIC) terms.

THIS HASN’T HAPPENED AND IS UNLIKELY TO HAPPEN SOON because we have secured with PRIDE the foundational status of NAMES/NOUNS with, as Nietzsche points out, the associated DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that supports the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments which is solidly entrenched in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and is the basis for WESTERN CULTURE’S BEING based PURIFICATIONIST systems of REWARDS for GOOD BEINGS and PUNISHMENTS for BAD BEINGS.  This BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme is in radical contrast to the ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (we are all related) QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM understanding of indigenous aboriginal cultures.  The QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC linguistic conceptualizing approach is reaffirmed by MODERN PHYSICS, wherein our INCLUSION in the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD is LINGUISTICALLY ACKNOWLEDGED as in flow-based linguistic conceptualizations such as ‘THERE IS TOWNING AND HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” where material forms are understood as CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.

The DYSFUNCTION that is intensifying in our WESTERN CULTURE social dynamic is shaped by linguistic conceptualizing that is DUMBED DOWN from needed less-simple QUANTUM LOGIC, WAVE-FIELD competent linguistic conceptualizing, to simple BINARY LOGIC MECHANICS (material-objects-banging-about-in-empty-space linguistic conceptualizing).  This simplistic BINARY LOGIC conceptualizing DROPS OUT acknowledgement of the conjugate SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION that work together with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION in the TRANSFORMING of the RELATIONAL CONTINUUM of our sense-experience.

In spite of the WARNINGS of Nietzsche, Bohm, Schroedinger and others as to how our WESTERN CULTURE over-simplistic LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is the source of rising FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, we continue to move forward down a path of intensifying BINARY LOGIC fuelled DYSFUNCTION, punctuated with MASS SHOOTINGS and MILITARY CONFLICTS that, instead of having a QUANTUM LOGIC orientation to resolving RELATIONAL IMBALANCE, have a BINARY LOGIC orientation to BEING-BASED PURIFICATIONISM.

* * *

The SHORTFALL in BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS PERSIST IN USING, is CLEARLY IDENTIFIED by Nietzsche, in his following two comments that ‘set the stage’ for the need to UPGRADE to QUANTUM LOGIC BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which is FLOW-BASED (NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT) and is NOT DEPENDENT on (LOCAL, EXPLICIT) MATERIAL BEINGS and, DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based “LOCAL AUTHORING”.  In Nietzsche’s following two comments, he rejects the notion of BOTH “BEING” and “BEING-based LOCAL AUTHORING”.

 

In its origin language belongs in the age of the most rudimentary form of psychology. We enter a realm of crude fetishism when we summon before consciousness the basic presuppositions of the metaphysics of language, in plain talk, the presuppositions of reason. Everywhere it sees a doer and doing; it believes in will as the cause; it believes in the ego, in the ego as being, in the ego as substance, and it projects this faith in the ego-substance upon all things — only thereby does it first create the concept of “thing.” Everywhere “being” is projected by thought, pushed underneath, as the cause; the concept of being follows, and is a derivative of, the concept of ego. In the beginning there is that great calamity of an error that the will is something which is effective, that will is a faculty. Today we know that it is only a word.” – Nietzsche, ‘Twilight of the Idols’

 

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

Note that Nietzsche is CRITIQUING both the use of NAMING to impute BEING (e.g. “lightning”) as the SUPPORT STUB for CONTRIVING BEING-based AUTHORING; …  Everywhere “being” is projected by thought, pushed underneath, as the cause …

Nietzsche’s exposing of this major SHORTFALL in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (an engineered-in dependency on BINARY LOGIC based BEING and its GRAMMAR based cohort “LOCAL AUTHORING”). which conflicts with the WAVE-FIELD view of reality wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED AS CONDENSATIONS WITHIN AN ALL-INCLUIDING FLUX.  Nietzsche agrees with Heraclitus’ that “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” and holds a QUANTUM LOGIC-like view of the world as ‘ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM’;  “And do you know what “the world” is to me? Shall I show it to you in my mirror? This world: a monster of energy, without beginning, without end, a firm, iron magnitude of force that does not grow bigger or smaller, that does not expend itself but only transforms itself “ —Nietzsche, “The Will to Power”

Thus, Nietzsche makes an important critique of the WESTERN CULTURE “BEING-BASED” linguistic conceptualizing scheme.  Today, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS continue to give BEING a foundational role in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme  in spite of its REJECTION BY Heraclitus, and as is also evident, by Nietzsche and MODERN PHYSICS.

 * * * * *

 

 

 

Here’s HOW WESTERN CULTURE is CULTIVATING DEEPENING DYSFUNCTION

 

By ‘Deepening Dysfunction’, I am referring to unfolding events such as HAMAS’ INSANE MASSACRE of Israelis and Netanyahu’s “INSANE” RESPONSE.

(more…)

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME

0

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME

 

ABOUT THE TITLE: ….We live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD, the PRIMARY SUBSTANCE of which is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, which, like the Electromagnetic Field, is NOT DIRECTLY VISIBLE but IMPLIED by what APPEARS to be OPEN SPACE “BETWEEN” the MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

[[NOTA BENE: Here’s where the SPLIT comes in where “EAST IS EAST and WEST IS WEST AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET”, since the “EAST” which includes indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents understanding of reality where EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) while the WEST’s understanding that ALL MATERIAL FORMS ARE INDEPENDENT and move about within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.]]  

What is going on here is that the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and its TRANSFORMING is the BASIC REALITY and the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS are SECONDARY ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (APPEARANCES) as Schroedinger terms them (they are like WHORLINGS in FLUID FLOWING; i.e. visible features of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLOWING that appear to possess LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘MATERIAL BEING’ which is NOT TRUE).

Not only can we NOT IGNORE the TRANSPARENT BODY OF THE WAVE-FIELD and cast it as EMPTINESS in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, our sense-experience compels us to understand the TRANSPARENT WAVE-FIELD as the PRIMARY REALITY.  This means that we must RESIST the tendency to, for example, conceive of the man leaving the town for the countryside since “it is no long the same town”, …and, “the man is no longer the same man”, and the “countryside is no longer the same countryside” since “everything is in the flux of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

What is going on here is that while material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME INVERTS OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY, and in the process, SYNTHETICALLY and MISTAKENLY PROMOTES the SECONDARY MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM to PRIMARY (PSEUDO-REALITY) STATUS in the guise of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS situated within, and moving about and interacting in, … A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE..

YET, in the understanding coming from our PRE-LINGUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, wherein all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, “EVERYTHING IS RELATED” (mitakuye oyasin). However, after we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ the tool of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, which in our case is BINARY LOGIC BASED, we come up with an INTELLECTUAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION wherein material forms are NO LONGER “SEEN/UNDERSTOOD” as RELATED.   This SPLITTING APART of the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM comes about where BINARY LOGIC is used to DIFFERENTIATE the multiple, innately related CONDENSATIONS OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to “pop them out” as if they were INDEPENDENT MATERIAL ENTITIES moving about and interacting within a NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.

What happened to the “EVERYTHING IS RELATED” SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED reality wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including, all-connecting ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM?

The INTEGRATED REALITY of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM that includes MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, … IS FRAGMENTED BY LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION USING WHAT NIETZSCHE CALLS “THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR”, as where NAMING is used to impute LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING, a FIRST ERROR that is CONFLATED with a SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR that imputes to the NAMING-INSTANTIATED MATERIAL BEINGS, THEIR OWN GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

In the SENSE-EXPERIENCE SUPPORTED REALITY WHEREIN MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX, … “ONE CAN’T STEP INTO THE SAME RIVER TWICE because it is NOT THE SAME RIVER and NOT the SAME MAN STEPPING INTO IT.   In other words, ALL MATERIAL THINGS are CONDENSATIONS in the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is undergoing CONTINUING TRANSFORMATION as is the nature of the WAVE-FIELD.

The FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM which is rife in the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC derives from the MISTAKEN INTELLECTUAL, BINARY LOGIC REDUCTION to LOCAL, EXPLICIT INDEPENDENT BEING-BASED PARTS, of what our sense-experience is informing us NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (relational) MATERIAL FORMINGS in the TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.   This FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM is the product of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.  It supports UNREAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS THAT HAVE BECOME the POPULAR WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE.  Thus, while people support the GROWTH OF THE TOWN, … there is NO MENTION OF THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, an OBFUSCATION that is leading to increasing unintended FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

* * * * * *

 

 

In order to understand MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING behaviors, one needs to understand the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ambiance in which the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is transpiring in.   In other words, in order to understand what is ‘going on’, … CHERCHEZ LA FEMME.

 

This applies in MODERN PHYSICS because WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD where there is NOT ONLY a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PUSH” but also, in conjugate relation, a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “PULL”.   This ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY is something that is ACKOWLEDGED in indigenous aboriginal, LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES but NOT in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, and this is the reason for the title CHERCHEZ LA FEMME, because although the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING INFLUENCE is the PRIMARY INFLUENCE that is shaping our WORLD DYNAMIC, our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, making it LOOK LIKE (in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING) the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PUSH” is “ALL THERE IS”.

 

In WESTERN JUSTICE, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the EGGSHELL SKULL that collapses in association with the blow from a FEEBLE PUNCH, is IGNORED because in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, because it is BINARY LOGIC based, all we have in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME to explain the shattering of the EGGSHELL SKULL is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PUSH” of the PUNCH whereas, by contrast, in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING WHICH IS FLOW-BASED, the OPERATIVE LOGIC is QUANTUM LOGIC which is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein MATERIAL FORMS are understood as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD whereby  CHERCHEZ LA FEMME makes total sense because in this QUANTUM LOGIC mode of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM is “PRIMARY” while the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is “SCHAUMKOMMEN” (Schroedinger) aka “APPEARANCE”.

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME (look for the NONLOCAL FEMALE INFLUENCE) is NOT ONLY ABOUT the dynamics associated with MALE-FEMALE RELATIONSHIPS in our HUMAN SOCIAL DYNAMICS, but this is CHARACTERISTIC of our WAVE-FIELD REALITY in GENERAL.   In the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, we employ ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE and simply DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, SUBSTITUTING IN ITS PLACE “ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE” so that all our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME has to ‘take care of’ is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate;  For example, we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate “WITHOUT MENTIONING” the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS so that there is NO WAY, in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUJISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, TO CONVEY the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC which is the basis of TRANSFORMATION.

 

TRANSFORMATION is what is going on where the GROWTH OF THE TOWN associates with the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS within the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

 

WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE “SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS” and IN ITS PLACE SUBSTITUTES ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE so as to simplify the task of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, as if the only thing that is happening is that the TOWN is GROWING… FULL STOP…

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME!   … because while we can use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to do ALL THE SIMPLIFYING WE WANT, .. it so happens that we OPEN UP AN INCREASING GAP BETWEEN our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY, so that, for example by our FAILING TO MENTION THE “MISSING FEMALE” i.e. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING  “OPENING UP” to enable the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH OF THE TOWN, we truly do LET LOOSE the DEA ABSCONDITA, the missing FEMALE (goddess) and it is the FEMALE conjugate that is PRIMARY in WAVE-FIELD physics while the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT is Schaumkommen (APPEARANCE) in which case what our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME IS DOING IS CONSTRUCTING A PSEUDO-REALITY BASED SOLELY ON MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in this example where we speak in the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms of ‘the TOWN GROWING’ without mentioning the REAL, SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED “CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS” and leaving the FALSE IMPRESSION that ALL WE NEED TO ACKNOWLEDGE IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING IS THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

 

THIS IS A BIG MISTAKE AND THIS IS WHAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE DOING AND THIS IS WHERE THE FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC IS COMING FROM and CONTINUES TO SCREW US UP (the latest is the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between ISRAELIS and PALESTINIANS and then again between RUSSIANS and UKRAINIANS) where there is no sign of acknowledgement that NAMING-INSTANTIATED “BEING” IS INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION and that WE and EVERYTHING are RELATEED as in the indigenous aboriginal aphorism MITAKUYE OYASIN, which is supported by the Modern physics understanding wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the all including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

 

The BIG MISTAKE is in the BANISHING by way of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which is made easy because “SHE” is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the nature of the ‘WAVE-FIELD’ which is the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY PLENUM wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS.

 

The SIMPLEST (but not the most trouble-free) MEANS of devising A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME given this physical reality wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the energy-charged PLENUM is to SUBSTITUTE EMPTY SPACE  for the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which case there can be a focus on the MATERIAL FORMS and THEIR MOVEMENTS relative so a FIXED REFERENCE FRAME so that EACH MATERIAL FORM can be seen as HAVING ITS OWN MOVEMENT and DEVELOPMENT, … the alternative that honors the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM forcing the development of MUCH LESS SIMPLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION SCHEME wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (to honor the understanding that material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

 

OK, so we have wrestled that one to the ground, and it is clear that when we adopt the SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME where we only have to address the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate as if this action was transpiring in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, we are ALL SET to speak in such terms as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING (it is now in an absolute empty space that simplifies our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING by letting us DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

 

PROBLEM!  The CHERCHEZ LA FEMME PROBLEM, … the female seductive instigator of actions and development is INVISIBLE (it is the WAVE-FIELD which we are dropping out all mention of by substituting absolute empty space for it in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME and going SOLELY with LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING THAT IS IN “ONE-SIDED” terms of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  MATERIAL FORMS, notionally operating within an absolute empty space of infinite extent.


YES, IT IS TRUE THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME ARE GIVING FULL AND SOLE CREDIT FOR ‘REALITY’ TO THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and BACKFILLING THE HOLE WITH ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

 

By DROPPING OUT the ENERGY-ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the PLANEUM and TRANSFERRING ALL MOTIVE AUTHORING to the SECONDARY ‘CONDENSATION’, thus promoting the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT to PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENCY, so that we NO LONGER HAVE ACTUALIZING CAPABILITY THAT IS FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLIN, PUTTING OURSELVES IN THE SITUATION WHEREIN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS ‘MORE SIMPLE’ but ‘LESS TRUE’, … and now for the COMPLAINTS of this WESTERN CULTURE “DUMBED DOWN” LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

 

* * * * * * * * * *

 

THE COMPLAINTS DEPARTMENT HAS RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING COMPLAINTS IN REGARD TO THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINT # 1 coming from Johannes Kepler who acknowledges both the convenience of the simplification (dropping out the female accommodating/enabling conjugate), and also the SCREWING UP when we OVERLOOK the consequences of having made it.

 

As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’

 

While Kepler went to great pains to capture the HARMONIES OF THE WORLD in planetary motion in his master work by that name (Harmonies of the World), he was bothered by the common habit of DUMBING down, in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, the harmonic complexity in nature’s dynamics.  Kepler did not limit the movements of the planets to that of MATERIAL BODIES in EMPTY SPACE as in a BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION but allowed for FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING co-authoring influence.  In the excerpt, he is making note of how the movement of the ferry is not pure MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING MOTION but is tapping into the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “AETHER” (the energy-charged PLENUM).

 

On broader rivers they [Ferrymen] make the skiffs go in circles, send them hither and thither, and play a thousand tricks, without touching the bottom or the banks, but by the use of the oar alone, directing the unified and most simple flow of the river to their own ends. In very much the same manner, the power moving out into the world through the species is a kind of rapid torrent, which sweeps along all the planets, as well as, perhaps, the entire aethereal air, from west to east.” – Kepler, Astronomia Nova, 1609

 

This COMPLAINT #1 is essentially saying that our WESTERN CULTURE habit of reducing our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS to a SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC basis, while it makes for simple LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, is DROPPING OUT RELEVANT UNDERSTANDING with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ENABLING influence.

 

* * * * * * * *

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINT NUMBER #2 coming from Jill Astbury in ‘the Making of Women’s Madness’.  The FEMME that I am writing about is the FEMALE that goes missing in our WESTERN CULTURE mode of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING, which assigns ALL AUTHORING OF DEVELOPMENTS to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING INFLUENCE.  In this example the FEMALE INFLUENCE OF A TOXIC CONTAINING ENVIRONMENT which

 

Jill Astbury raises questions in regard to the LOCAL AUTHORING assumption in ‘Crazy for You: The Making of Women’s Madness’ in her inquiry into the World Health Organization study showing that women have twice the incidence of ‘affective disorders’ (depression, bipolar disorder etc.) as men.

 

Astbury makes the point that psychological stress can manifest in an individual experiencing the stress of being in a group of differing others whose sensitivities may be lower and where the group may be cultivating an environment which is highly stressful so that a sensitive minority may manifest problems which are then assumed to be coming from defectiveness rather than sensitivity of a subset of the group. Research into ‘psychological illness’ will pull the patient out and study the patient and not the group, which thus will be ‘missing the point’ since the stress may be a ‘group based’ phenomenon involving a toxic environment;

 

“The research stemming from this viewpoint had a systemic blindness. It could literally not see what it was doing, as the normative quality of its own presuppositions had made them invisible.” – Jill Astbury

 

In other words, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS and our MEDICAL and PSYCHIATRIC mainstream services TEND to constrain their investigations of “ILLNESS IN THE PATIENT” to investigating the PATIENT to find out WHAT’S WRONG WITH HER, as in the case of a MENTAL BREAKDOWN without considering the MINER’S CANARY effect where what shows up as ILLNESS in the individual is being induced by the TOXIC FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENVIRONMENT so the ABNORMAL MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT of the SENSITIVE INDIVIDUAL are SECONDARY (the crazy male asserting/actualizing behaviours of the miner’s canary are secondary and are brought on by the TOXIC ENVIRONMENT .

 

* * * * * * * * * *

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINT NUMBER #3 The TWIN BROTHER FARMERS who are highly respected in their community for their PRODUCTION of grains and vegetables become divided by one of the brothers being the consistent earner of large income and winner of prizes for his consistent superior production while the other brother, in spite of his equal skill and equal effort, experiences a succession of crop failures from hail storms and local flooding and loses his farm to the mortgage company that forecloses due to his inability to keep up the payments.    As the Folk song goes, “There but for fortune, go you or I”.

 

* * *

 

IN THESE THREE “CHERCHEZ LA FEMME” COMPLAINTS, the pattern is established that in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, we can CHOOSE between BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING where we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS as in crediting the RICH FARMING BROTHER with being THE AUTHOR OF HIS OWN SUCCESS.    Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS tells us that while such propositions may be TRUE, they are inevitably INCOMPLETE, and Modern physics informs us that part of that INCOMPLETENESS is coming from our dropping out mention of the ever-present influence of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS, and as in the indigenous and Modern physics understandings of how different LANGUAGES relate to SENSE-EXPERIENCE reality. 

 

IN SIMPLE TERMS, we cannot (in reality) reduce LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC DYNAMICS which are ANDROGYNOUS, involving, as primary, the ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) in which the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS are included, … to a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY.  But WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “CAN” and “DO” use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that imposes this SIMPLIFYING REDUCTION so , as Kepler points out, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.”

 

 

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME SUM-UP :

 

The MISSING FEMALE is the MISSING “ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE” as in the example where we speak of the GROWTH of the TOWN, and there may be a lot of PRIDE here and going into detail of all of the NEW DEVELOPMENTS, …  DROPPING OUT ALL MENTION OF THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS WHICH IS PART OF THE UNFOLDING REALITY.    WHEN WE ‘CHERCHEZ LA FEMME’, we discover that, sure enough, the ENVELOPING WILDERNESS LANDS and the DIVERSITY WITHIN THEM is undergoing SHRINKING in conjugate relation to the GROWING of the TOWN, in which case, what is happening here is NOT the GROWING OF THE TOWN but, INSTEAD, the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE which included “BOTH” the GROWING of the TOWN “AND” the conjugate SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, or in other words, TRANSFORMATION of the overall LANDSCAPE.

 

All three of these examples, and there are countless more, point the FACT that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is COMMONLY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, MAKING IT APPEAR AS IF THERE IS A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC (e.g. the TOWN IS GROWING) AND THAT IS “ALL THERE IS”, and that reduced representation is due to the fact that ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE as Goedel’s Theorem asserts.

 

LET’S FACE IT, THIS IS A PROBLEM WITH OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING ARCHITECTURE that OTHERS, such as the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS DO NOT HAVE because in using a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as in a WAVE-FIELD where MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS in the TRANSFORMING FLOW in the manner of WHORLINGS in the FLOWING of river or tidal water.   The WHORLINGS are INCLUSIONS IN THE FLOWING in the manner of STRANDS in an ALL-INCLUDING WEB-OF-LIFE.  In other words, there is no way to SEPARATE the WHORLING from the FLOWING because the WHORLING IS PART OF THE APPEARANCE OF FLOWING SO THAT THE ONLY PHYSICAL PHENOMENON IS THE FLOWING AND THE TREATING of the WHORLING with LINTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING THAT USES THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL BEING with LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT is INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION that serves as COMMUNICATIONS TOOL where all that matters is that the participants in the language group are willing to accept the SAME BOGUS MOCKUP AS THE COMMON REFERENCE that gives MEANING to the SHARED MEANING WORDS the members of the GROUP are USING.  That SHARED MEANING DOES NOT HAVE TO BE GROUNDED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, THE LANGUAGE could be BUILT FROM A FAIRY TALE which is close to what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have done in the architecting of our language with this DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.

 

For example, the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of the ISRAELI – PALESTINIAN CONFLICT in terms of TWO INDEPENDENT GROUPS ATTACKING ONE ANOTHER as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE as is the formulation of our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING has NO BASIS IN REALITY, but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are WORKING WITH LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS of a SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC nature where we say things like THEY DID IT which implies LOCAL AUTHORING (i.e. “THEY DID IT” is exemplary of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).  First we use the NAME ‘THEY’  to impute LOCAL, INDEPENDENT BEING, and we conflate this with  the VERB “TO DO” so as to construct the impression of LOCAL AUTHORING involving only TWO INDEPENDENT BEING things as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE, which is an important condition dictated by our imputing of INDEPENDENCE to the TWO BEINGS, … which are NO WAY TWO INDEPENDENT BEINGS in MODERN PHYSICS and/or indigenous aboriginal cultures, where they too are STRANDS IN THE ONE WEB-OF-LIFE aka CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).

 

In the more realistic understanding wherein we are all strands in the ONE WEB-OF-LIFE aka CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, the AUTHORING of actions is NOT NEARLY SO SIMPLE (i.e. that PSEUDO-SIMPLICITY OF PURPORTED “LOCAL AUTHORING” COMES FROM WESTERN CULTURE EGO fuelled by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).

 

In Indigenous aboriginal cultures, the HEALING CIRCLE demonstrates the understanding that emergent events are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) in origin and there is NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.  We all share inclusion within a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM and where there are ERUPTIONS OF MURDEROUS VIOLENCE, THOSE HOLDING THE SMOKING GUNS ARE THE CONDUITS THROUGH WHOM THE BUILDUP OF TENSIONS IN THE SOCIAL RELATIONAL WEB, (which have gathered energy from strands in the web connecting both sides of the polarized matrix) FIND VENTING.  The notion of the VIOLENCE HAVING LOCAL ORIGINATION FROM A SQUAD OF INDEPENDENT EVIL BEINGS, means that the REMEDY is NOT, as would ‘make sense’, to convene HEALING CIRCLES to reconcile and subsume tensions that have been building in the relational social matrix, … BUT orienting instead to the ELIMINATING of the SQUAD of INDEPENDENT EVIL BEINGS, so as to PURIFY THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE.

 

HOW CRAZY IS THAT?  — In the understanding of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, IT IS TOTALLY INSANE.

 

IT IS INSANE because WE ARE ALL RELATED (MITAKUYE OYASIN within the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein material forms such as ourselves are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD).

 

 

-2-  QUANTUM LOGIC INCLUSION OF MAN-IN-EARTH (CONDENSATION OF WAVE-FIELD IN WAVE-FIELD):  This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”

 

___

 

 

-1-   BINARY LOGIC SPLIT OF MAN AND EARTH (MATERIAL BEING IN EMPTY SPACE): Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

 

IT IS ONE THING TO OVERCOMING DISSONANCE AND IMBALANCE THROUGH RESTORING AND SUSTAINING BALANCE AND HARMONY IN THE RELATIONAL WEB, IN THE WAKE OF EMERGENT VIOLENT DISSONANCE, …  and quite another to SEEK OUT AND ELIMINATE “EVIL INDEPENDENT BEINGS” as ISRAELIS SEEK TO ELIMINATE HAMAS AND VICE VERSA.

 

IN THIS CHERCHEZ LA FEMME SUM-UP, AN IMPORTANT POINT OF NOTE IS THE FOLLOWING: 

 

CHERCHEZ LA FEMME SUM-UP 

 

 

While QUANTUM PHYSICS and Bohm and Schroedinger, and indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents give a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in their LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME TO QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (which is the LOGIC of BALANCE and IMBALANCE), WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS give a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in their LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME to BINARY LOGIC, the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (i.e. absolute empty and infinite space medium). 

 

THE MAJOR DIFFERENCE between these two LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES is that IN THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, there is TOTAL EXCLUSION OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/INCLUDING CONJUGATE (i.e. the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM) THAT IS THE MAINSTAY OF THE QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME Of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

 

So, in the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC ‘excluded medium’ LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, INSTEAD OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM as the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING MOTHER OF MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, there is AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT wherein everything that is NOT EMPTINESS is ACCORDED MATERIAL-based BEING thus forming a BINARY LOGIC (EITHER something OR nothing) based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.

 

ll these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the end for which he form’d them; and these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation.”  –Isaac Newton, Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light

 

This sets forth a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING (in empty space) LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which supports ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY AS WITH LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS such as THE TOWN IS GROWING.  In this case, there is no FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as there is in the indigenous aboriginal and MODERN PHYSICS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, where one employs QUANTUM LOGIC as in “THERE IS TOWNING (male asserting/actualizing) IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (female accommodating/enabling)”

 

POINTS OF NOTE:

 

-1- WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which gives a foundational tole to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in in ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

 

-2- Indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta employ less simple QUANTUM LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which gives a foundational role to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the PLENUM in a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC RELATION

 

-3- The THREE “CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINTS all showed physical situations which could NOT BE CAPTURED IN SIMPLE ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TERMS.  This was because there was a need, in all three cased, to acknowledge the role of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM as was IMPLIED but not directly mentioned in the case studies being pointed to.  For example, Jill Astbury NATURALLY ASSUMED THE REAL POSSIBILITY OF A TOXIC ENVIRONMENT could alter the behaviour of the person or canary within it.  To make the assumption that aberrant behaviour is being authored fully and solely by the ‘independent human being’ that is displaying it, means that he patient can be taken into a clinic and her ‘individual workings’ analyzed to come up with an explanation for her anomalous behaviour.   This limited view is the BINARY LOGIC view where the patient is deemed INDEPENDENT of the environment she is situated in.   CHERCHEZ LA FEMME is a reminder that there is always, in our sense experience of inclusion in the energy-charged PLENUM, a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING wave-field conjugate that comes together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.

 

For example, if the GROWTH OF AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CONTINUES FOR A LONG TIME, the quality of the crops may decline and pollination by bees etc. may become problematic because while the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION “GROWTH OF DEVELOPMENT” does not capture it, there is also CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and the bees and nutrients and other influences that are in decline as a result will be contributing to overall TRANSFORMATION as the WILDERNESS DIVERSITY SHRINKS in conjugate relation to the GROWTH of CULTIVATED CROPLANDS, in which case, it is UNREAL to speak in terms of the GROWTH of the CROPLANDS since there is no mention of the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS LANDS.

 

This ERROR is NOT MADE by indigenous aborignals due to their QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE where they speak in terms of ‘there is CROP-CULTIVATING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which includes FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING (the transforming landscape which is the receptacle for the male asserting/actualizing CROP-CULTIVATING)

 

To DROP OUT MENTION of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and go SOLELY with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘WE ARE GROWING THE CROPLANDS’ is to give the impression that the GROWTH OF CROPLANDS IS “SOMETHING REAL” and in fact SOMETHING GOOD.  However, the GROWTH of CROPLANDS may be OUT OF BALANCE in the sense that what is UNMENTIONED is the SHRINKING OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WILDERNESS LANDS which is part of the REALITY of what is going on, and which figures in the changing BALANCE by way of SHRINKING WILDERNESS DIVERSITY and GROWING of CULTIVATED MONO-CULTURE.

 

WE WESTERN CUILTURE ADHERENTS, by using BOGUS TERMS such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, … all of which are one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY conjugates are at the same time DROPPING OUT of the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which, together with the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “GROWTH”, “DEVELOPMENT” and “PRODUCTION” is referring to the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE that is what our SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS INFORMING US, without dependency on our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING METHOD OF CHOICE. 

 

NOT MODERN PHYSICS, NOT INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, NOT TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and NOT ADVAITA VEDATA FALL INTO THE TRAP OF DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJGUATE in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, however, that is the MISTAKE of WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as with ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’, .. which differs basically (radically) from the MODERN PHYSICS and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, TAOIST/BUDDHIST AND ADVAITA VEDANTA QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which RETAINS the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING conjugate and thus retains a WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATION CAPABILITY.

 

 * * * * * * * * *

THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING IS the ‘MOTHER OF’ MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING..  The MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is “APPEARANCE”, “SCHAUMKOMMEN”. The FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING VALLEY, brings together rain rivulets into streams and streams into mighty rivers which SO WE SAY, CHURN OUT MASSIVE CANYONS, OR IT THE OTHER WAY ROUND?  DO THE VALLEYS ORGANIZE THE RAINFALL GIVE IT ITS SCULPTING POWERS?   When RAIN is falling onto the CONVEX out flanks of the mountain, the RAIN SCATTERS rather than GATHERS, so it appears as if the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT VALLEY possesses the primary authoring power and the power we attribute to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT RAGING RIVER is only APPEARANCE since the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (the WAVE-FIELD) seems to be the AUTHORING SOURCE.

 

The BOTTOM LINE IS, … CHERCHEZ LA FEMME!

 

* * * * *  

 

FOOTNOTE re the NON-UNIVERSALITY OF BINARY LOGIC.

 

“At the core of our spiritual beings we make no artificial distinction between the sacred and the profane. Unlike Western culture, we have not suffered through that artificial separation”

https://anishinabeknews.ca/2015/05/13/divergence-traditional-aboriginal-spirituality-and-mother-earth/

 

According to Tomoko Masuzawa, any cosmology without a sacred–profane binary was rendered invisible by the field of religious studies, privileging Christianity at the expense of non-Christian systems because the binary was supposed to be “universal”,  –Wikipedia

How Sorcery Persists in the WESTERN CULTURE World View

0

AUTHOR’S PREFACE:

The term “SORCERY” commonly refers to Magic (supernatural), the application of beliefs, rituals or actions  employed to subdue or manipulate natural or supernatural beings and sorces. —Wikipedia” 

In my philosophical investigations, as in those of others such as Nietzsche, Bohm and Schroedinger, it is EVIDENT that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is used to INCORRECTLY impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS (i.e. SOURCING POWERS) to figuratively manipulate things so that they are seemingly given life and existence by way of the common ritual of NAMING, along with POWERS of LOCAL SOURCING (unreal) with the “magic” of GRAMMAR.   The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT influences of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD are thus re-cast in the form of material BEINGS, notionally endowed with their own POWERS of LOCALLY SOURCING actions and developments.

For example, while the reality is that there is“TOWNING within the fully fluid context of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX”,  in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, in place of acknowledging the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of dynamics, we make the COMMON ERROR of imputing “LOCAL SOURCING” as in the construction of  “the TOWN IS GROWING”, though this LOCAL SOURCING of GROWTH is UNREAL and it falls into the category of ‘human manipulating of natural beings and forces”.

 

The GROWTH OF THE TOWN is IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS in which case, THERE IS NO LOCAL SOURCING as in “GROWTH” of something LOCAL and EXPLICIT but TRANSFORMATION that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

 

In reality, there are “humanings in the transforming relational continuum aka the energy-charged PLENUM” and there are NO SUCH THINGS as HUMANS that are BEINGS with POWERS OF LOCALLY SOURCING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.  That ERRONEOUS (but common in WESTERN CULTURE) impression is coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

 

In other words, we (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) are commonly using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to contrive the impression of LOCAL AUTHORING, and this LOCAL SOURCING has the credentials of SORCERY in that where we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’‘, we are implying LOCAL SOURCING  of this action and development which is NOT REAL but simply the impression gleaned from our use of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.  WHAT IS REAL is that …’there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ and there is NO LOCAL SOURCING involved since ‘The TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, being included within the overall TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’;.

 

That is, the notion of LOCAL SOURCING derives from the WESTERN CULTURE practice of SIMPLIFYING our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which we have made DIFFICULT (complicated) upfront by imputing a BINARY LOGIC, MATERIAL BEING-IN-EMPTY-SPACE based FOUNDATION in place of the actual QUANTUM LOGIC ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM with its MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS.

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ a BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in our rhetoric; i.e. a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, that reduces (notionally) the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

 

In MODERN PHYSICS as also in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, THERE IS NO “CONJURING UP”, with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, of LOCAL POWERS OF SOURCING actions and developments as there is in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIOATIONS of WESTERN CULTURE, and instead, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, as is the nature of the all-including WAVE-FIELD world we live in where material forms are CONDENSINGS in which case THERE IS NO LOCAL SOURCING as is FOUNDATIONAL in COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.

 

THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, in this manner, gives a foundational role to the application of “beliefs and actions employed to manipulate natural beings and forces” by using propositions such as “The TOWN IS GROWING” which, by DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, impute LOCAL SOURCING POWERS that DO NOT EXIST, to the TOWN.

 

However which way we DRESS THIS ACTION UP IN WORDS, it is EVIDENT that SOMETHING that LOOKS, SMELLS and TASTES like “SORCERY” lurks within what LINGUACIST BENJAMIN WHORF classifies as COMMON, AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE.  As Bohm points out, this IMPUTING of LOCAL SOURCING POWERS to notional NAMING-INSTANTIATED THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with GRAMMAR is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANISM; i.e. the FRAGMENTATION of using NAMING to IMPUTE INDEPENDENT BEING to NAMING-instantiated TOWNS and the OBSCURANTISM of DROPPING OUT OF OUR MENTAL  ACKNOWLEDGING, the SHRINKING WILDERNESS that is CONJUGATE to the “APPEARANCE” and “GROWING” of “TOWNS”. 

 

The CONJUGATE RELATION of SHRINKING WILDERNESS and GROWING TOWN is NOT a ‘SIMPLE CONJUGATE RELATION’ as involves the MECHANICS of TWO SEPARATE THINGS, CLINKING into a CONJUGATE RELATION LIKE TWO RAILWAY CARS HOOKING UP TOGETHER, but a COMPLEX AFFILIATION with REAL and IMAGINARY components  where the RESIDENTS OF THE GROWING TOWN are not only AWARE of the INNATE RELATIONAL GATHERING-SCATTERING NATURE of what is better understood in the DYNAMIC TERMS OF ‘TOWNING’ since the developing MATERIAL STRUCTURE is like the ‘the CLUSTER”  or dynamic GATHERING-SCATTERING CLUSTERING of ants induced by some ATTRACTOR such as a DROP OF HONEY or TRADING CENTER. The IMPRESSION of A PERSISTING BEING or LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘ENVELOPE’ or ‘CLUSTER’ does not OVER-RIDE the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT NATURE of the overall TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE within which the RESONANT RELATIONAL FORM is an “APPEARANCE” within the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

 

Here we see the BINARY LOGIC —QUANTUM LOGIC LINGISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DIFFERENCE that underlies the expression “EAST is EAST and WEST is WEST and NEVER the TWAIN SHALL MEET” (Rudyard Kipling). 

 

While the “WEST” employs LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that uses SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC such as the PROPOSITION “THE TOWN IS GROWING”, … without acknowledging the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate”  (i.e. here, there is PERSISTING BEING in the form of a LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECT (the TOWN) where the LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECT IS THE ONLY THING “MOVING” or “CHANGING”), … the “EAST” employs LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based as with the PROPOSITION “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  (i.e. here, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, where theTOWNING is INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

By the “WEST” , I am referring to the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach, and by the “EAST”, I am referring to the QUANTUM LOGIC, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach.

ACHTUNG! … NOTA BENE!…

It is imortant to keep in mind the intrinsic difference between simple BINARY LOGIC in that it “IS NOT CAPABLE” of QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION while QUANTUM LOGIC “IS CAPABLE” of QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.  This has already been mentioned but it is tricky because it concerns the difference in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES associated with BINARY LOGIC versus QUANTUM LOGIC; i.e. this example was already given but I am repeating it because it is KEY to understanding how we are using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that can either DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate or INCLUDE IT.

THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, in this manner, gives a foundational role to the application of “beliefs and actions employed to manipulate natural beings and forces” by using propositions such as “The TOWN IS GROWING” which, by DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, impute LOCAL SOURCING POWERS that DO NOT EXIST, to the TOWN.

Consider the relationship between ‘the TOWN’ and ‘the WILDERNESS’ first of all in a FLAT SPACE WORLD, and then again ini a SPHERICAL SPACE WORLD (the spherical space equates to the WAVE-FIELD).

In the FLAT SPACE, the TOWN can GROW in a one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING manner WITHOUT THERE BEING ANY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE because that only arises in a SPHERICAL SPACE or WAVE-FIELD.  Thus we are perfectly correct in using the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING when the TOWN grows on a FLAT PLANE.  CONVERSELY, by USING BINARY LOGIC, WE IMPOSE THE SIMPLE FLAT SPACE CONDITION ON OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS AND THAT IS A MISTAKE BECAUSE WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD WHICH REQUIRED WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION such as in Bohm’s Rheomode language, and in the indigenous aboriginal languages, the Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta use of language (as in the flow-based examples of Zen guru Alan Watts).

When we consider the relationship between ‘the TOWN’ and ‘the WILDERNESS’ in the CURVED SPACE WORLD aka the WAVE-FIELD WORLD, this must included “BOTH” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE AND the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, … in their TOGETHER STATE as a “CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM”, they are INVISIBLE.  The material CONDENSATIONS are what we can SEE, yet the WAVE-FIELD is the PRIMARY PHENOMENON.  This is why BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DOES NOT WORK (leads to FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM) and why we need a FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME such as the indigenous aboriginal languages.

 

We could alternatively say, putting on our LANGUAGE ARCHITECT’S HAT, that the LAST THING we need is a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME THAT GIVES A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO “MATERIAL BEING” since what we have been thinking of as “MATERIAL BEINGS” are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD such as “TOWNINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  By giving “BEING” PRIMARY STATUS as with ‘the TOWN’, we DEMOTE that which is PRIMARY; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD, to exactly NOTHING (absolute empty infinite space), while ELEVATING ‘APPEARANCES’ to PRIMARY REALITY STATUS. 

 

Thus, while we are SENSE-EXPERIENCING INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, which includes the SHRINKING WILDERNESS together with our growing selves and the growing MATERIAL ‘TOWN’ we say we are constructing, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, thanks to our BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING CHOICE are DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and EMPLOYING A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that is constrained to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, hence we use language to report on ‘the TOWN GROWING’ FULL STOP (as if in an absolute empty and infinite space), as if that were ‘REALITY’.

 

LIKEWISE, NETANYAHU is reporting on ‘HAMAS ATTACKING’ FULL STOP, …as if that cherry-picked one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate linguistic conceptualization constituted ‘REALITY’.

LANGUAGE is DRIVING US NUTS!  Or, as Wittgenstein puts it;

 

Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung  unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache”

(Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)”

– Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

 

WESTERN CULTURE POLITICIANS seem too preoccupied with their BINARY LOGIC game play to have time for philosophy.

 

END OF AUTHOR’S PREFACE:

 

(more…)

Where the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT WORLD (GLOBAL SOCIAL DYNAMIC) IS HEADED.

0

 

Bohm, Nietzsche and others have MADE THIS PREDICTION but VERY FEW IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE ARE PAYING ATTENTION because IN ORDER TO SEE where we are headed, we need to shift from BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING, and at the present time, OUR WESTERN CULTURE WAY OF CONCEIVING OF REALITY is BINARY LOGIC based which is TOO SIMPLE to convey the REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE affirmed QUANTUM LOGIC dynamic that we share inclusion in.

 

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS common construct LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of “REALITY” a PSEUDO-REALITY which is BINARY LOGIC based as where we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ …. WITHOUT MENTIONING THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.

 

What this DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS …. DOES TO OUR PSYCHE, IS THAT IT HAS US THINKING AND UNDERSTANDING IN TERMS OF “REALITY” A PSEUDO-REALITY which is SIMPLER than the “REAL REALITY” of our “SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE WAVE-FIELD” and it is SIMPLER in the respect that in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, we are DROPPING OUT all mention of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and “PRETENDING” that “REALITY” can be LINGUISTICALLY CONCEPTUALIZED in the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING TERMS of NAMING and GRAMMAR; e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.

 

This kind of LINGUISTIC CONCETUALIZING, … SUBSTITUTES a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “INTELLECTUAL” “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION” for the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC (transformation) of our actual SENSE-EXPERIENCE (of inclusion therein).

 

The WORLD OF OUR PHYSICAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE is very different from the WORLD OF OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.  For example, we speak about the GROWTH of the TOWN or the growth of the HUMAN BEING as if GROWTH were something REAL in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE VERIFIABLE CONTEXT, but THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “GROWTH’ outside of BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, since EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX (as is the nature of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD).

 

THIS REAL-WORLD (sense-experience affirmed) FLOW aka TRANSFORMATION is ANDROGYNOUS meaning that IT IS NOT SUFFICIENT to PORTRAY REALITY in the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms of ‘the TOWN is GROWING.  This ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWING OF CULTIVATED LAND is IMPOSSIBLE in its own right and must be in conjugate relatiol with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.

(more…)

Go to Top