Archive for August, 2021
The MYTH of the PATHOGEN derives from USING BINARY LOGIC to reduce RELATIONAL IMBALANCE to POLAR OPPOSITION.0
The PATHOGEN is BINARY LOGIC and the REBALANCER is QUANTUM LOGIC
I know that many if not MOST people have ‘faith’ in VACCINES.
The APPARENT success of VACCINES is like the APPARENT SUCCESS of POLICE in dealing with APPARENT ‘PATHOGENS’
There is a deeper understanding upstream from our BINARY LOGIC.
If the gap between RICH and POOR becomes large, it induces REBALANCERS which are initially called PATHOGENS (CRIMINALS, ROBBERS) but if the GAP between RICH and POOR continues to build to huge levels, there may be REVOLUTION which is a radical REBALANCER which lowers the TENSIONS of IMBALANCE which is the amplifying the rate of emergence of REBALANCERS which are popularly identified as PATHOGENS.
TRANSFORMATION -and/or- CONSTRUCTION0
AUTHOR’s PREFACE: There is no way to DIRECTLY capture a REPRESENTATION of REALITY, in this COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN (CAE) LANGUAGE (as Benjamin Whorf calls it) that I am herewith using. This is because REALITY is inclusion in TRANSFORMATION and TRANSFORMATION is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT while our CAE languages are archtiected for delivering representations in terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT. Thus while the REALITY of TRANSFORMATION is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (which is why indigenous aboriginal language architectures employ a relational architecture which allows inference of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT), our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATIONS are not ‘OF REALITY’ but are REPRESENTATIONS of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT. Our WESTERN CULTURE language based representations are constructions of SUBSTITUTE REALITIES which “ARE” LOCAL and EXPLICIT. It should therefore be kept in mind by the reader, that while I am writing this essay in a CAE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, I am constrained by this language to representations that have a LOCAL and EXPLICIT BASE but which may be used to INFER the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the basis of TRANSFORMATION. For example, if I employ specific statements based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (which is all this CAE LANGUAGE ALLOWS as its ‘base-case’ means of representation, I will only be using this as an expedient for developing the relational inference necessary for capturing TRANSFORMATION with is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT. Thus, if I say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, I am intending, by inference, that ‘the LANDSCAPE is TRANSFORMING.
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have constructed a whole SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT from which we COULD INFER the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT sense-experience-affirmed REALITY of TRANSFORMATION, … but our habit has been to employ the REDUCED-TO-LOCAL-AND-EXPLICIT “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” which is a PROBLEM. As Bohm and Nietzsche point out, it is a problem that is DRIVING us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CRAZY by FRAGMENTING REALITY with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR. When we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE-REALITY is that ‘the LANDSCAPE is TRANSFORMING’ which implies QUANTUM LOGIC wherein FIGURE-and-GROUND-are-ONE (the TOWN and the surrounding LANDSCAPE are ONE). By using the term GROW, engender with our language a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and ‘forget about’ our sense-experience REALITY of inclusion in TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
Sine I am using the CAE language, ENGLISH, the reader may keep in mind that the REALITY I am speaking of, albeit with terms that ‘SOUND’ LOCAL and EXPLCIT such as ‘the HUMAN BEING’ are employed with a matrix of relations such that the TAKE-AWAY is purely relational as is necessary for capturing reality that is TRANSFORMATION BASED. With this comment, I am more or less replicating what Wittgenstein is saying as follows;
6.54 My propositions are elucidatory in this way: he who understands me finally recognizes them as senseless, when he has climbed out through them, on them, over them. (He must so to speak throw away the ladder, after he has climbed up on it.)
He must surmount these propositions; then he sees the world rightly.
7.0 Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. (“Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen”),
–Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
This AUTHOR’s PREFACE is just to point out to the reader that while inclusion in TRANSFORMATION is our sense-experience, our LANGUAGE-based representation in terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT gives representations of a CONSTRUCTION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is good only for INFERENCE even though we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are making the major mistake of employing it as our OPERATIVE REALITY. By our ‘closing our mind to the reality that there is no such thing as a TOWN THAT IS GROWING and that we are the AUTHORS of this alleged GROWTH; i.e.our sense-experience affirms that the LANDSCAPE is TRANSFORMING and we are included in this TRANSFORMATION.
* * *
Most Recent Comments