Archive for year 2022

AWAKENING FROM WESTERN LANGUAGE-BASED PSYCHO-PHYSICAL FRAGMENTATION

0

 

SYNOPSIS:  DIFFERENT LANGUAGES DROP US INTO DIFFERENT ‘REALITIES’.  This has been Benjamin Whorf’s hypothesis and it is also the implication in the philosophical investigations of Nietzsche and Bohm.   This essay is aimed at explaining how it is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have become trapped in a language-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is FRAGMENTATION based which is SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA inducing, on the scale of our WESTERN CULTURE social collective.  This essay points to how the philosophical investigations of Nietzsche and Bohm show that what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS continue to understand to be ‘reality’ by way of linguistic construction is NOT in accord with our sense-experience reality, but is an INTELLECTUAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is the source of FRAGMENTATION, not only in our social dynamic, but also in our individual psyches.

When I say ‘our’, I am am intending ‘WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS; we who are users of the Common Average European languages.  These languages are the source of psychological FRAGMENTATION by promoting ‘belief’ in such abstractions as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, which form the basis of an UNREAL intellectual BEING-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY which ‘squats’ and occupies our psychological awareness and in the process OBSCURES our sense-experience informed INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  By elevating to primary reality status, representations in such terms as ‘the Town is growing’, which is abstract BINARY LOGIC language-based simplification of the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC  ‘there is Towning in the transforming Landscape’, we construct and enter into a simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION (all one-sided male-asserting abstractions) serve up a pseudo-REAL FRAGMENTATION, that “TAKES OVER” from our sense-experience awareness of INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka ‘the WAVE-FIELD’ aka ‘the Tao’.

This essay points out how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, because of our simple BINARY LOGIC based language architecture, are using language that PUTS US INTO and IS KEEPING US IN a “BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY” wherein one-sided “MALE-ASSERTING” abstractions of “LOCALLY AUTHORED” GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, “TAKE OVER FROM” and “SUBSTITUTE FOR” the sense-experience grounded awareness of INCLUSION IN RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION as constituted by the WAVE-FIELD.  The result of this language-based ‘REDUCTION’ of our sense-experience affirmed inclusion in TRANSFORMATION whereby we SPEAK in terms of living within a FRAGMENTED, BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY where, for example, TOWNS are treated as if they are BEING-based local explicit material entities, notionally with their own powers of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services, “TAKE OVER” as the  dominant ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’, OBSCURING our sense-experience affirmed reality of inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka ‘the Tao’.

Our WESTERN CULTURE values and belief system which accepts the abstraction of “LOCAL AUTHORING’ as with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, serves to FURTHER SUPPORT the language-based construction of a FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which reduces ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ to abstract BEING-BASED TOWNS, notionally with “THEIR OWN” (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) powers of AUTHORING “GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services”.   Such language-based representations of a FRAGMENTED, BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY have, through INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based language, TAKEN OVER as our OPERATIVE REALITY, OBSCURING the sense-experience affirmed reality of inclusion within the WAVE-FIELD, aka the transforming relational continuum.

This essay is a reminder of how WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are trapping ourselves within a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the NAMING instantiated abstraction of BEING, whether ‘HUMAN BEINGS’, TOWN-BEINGS or NATION-BEINGS, giving rise to a FRAGMENTED pseudo-world of LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘THINGS-THAT-BE’ which we animate with GRAMMAR, seemingly overcoming, with the abstraction of “BEING” the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of WAVE-FIELD reality.   Modern physics as well as indigenous aboriginal cultures employ language architecture that does NOT attempt EXPLICIT REPRESENTATION but orients to relations that preserve the fluid essence of WAVE-FIELD reality,  In the example; ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, we see that there is NO RESORTING to any dependence on the abstraction of BEING, an abstraction that is introducing so much FRAGMENTATION based confusion within our WESTERN CULTURE social dynamic by OBSCURING our inclusion within the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  BEING-based OBSCURANTISM now characterizes our WESTERN CULTURE language-animated OPERATIVE REALITY and its rising PSYCHO-SOCIAL FRAGMENTATION.

 

FOOTNOTE: QUANTUM LOGIC ‘heals’ the insulating empty space gap in BINARY LOGIC, between material beings, by acknowledging the natural primacy of the WAVE-FIELD which reduces ‘BEINGS’ to ‘CONDENSATIONS’, establishing the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘FIELD’ container  as having natural precedence over the CONDENSATION based CONTENT.  This is not merely a BINARY LOGIC position swap between leader and follower since the ‘FIELD’ does not simply ‘CONTAIN’ but ‘INCLUDES’ the CONDENSATION, bringing forth the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BOTH/AND’ relation and thus doing more than a simple BINARY LOGIC inverting of ‘which prevails over which’.  The ‘LESS SIMPLE’ nature of the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation exposes the shortfall in the BINARY LOGIC based concept of ‘BEING’ and elaborates on Nietzsche’s critique of the concept of ‘BEING’.  ‘BEING’ is OBSCURANTIST in that it introduces simple BINARY LOGIC into representations of WAVE-FIELD phenomena where LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC is required.

QUANTUM LOGIC ‘HEALS’ the insulating empty space gap in BINARY LOGIC, between material ‘BEINGS’.   Acknowledging the natural primacy of the WAVE-FIELD reduces ‘BEINGS’ to ‘CONDENSATIONS’, establishing the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘FIELD’ CONTAINER as having natural precedence over the CONDENSATION based CONTENT that is construed as ‘INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEING in WESTERN CULTURE language representations.

 

* * *

(more…)

The LANGUAGE-ARCHITECTURE ORIGIN OF WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL FRAGMENTATION

0

 

SYNOPSIS

This note is a short summary of philosophical investigation findings in regard to FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE psycho-physical intercourse.

These investigations reveal that while our sense-experience reality is WAVE-FIELD aware, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE formulates representations by BREAKING THE WAVE-FIELD experience DOWN into FEMALE (nonlocal and implicit) and MALE (local and explicit) CONJUGATES and then DISCARDING THE FEMALE CONJUGATE so that our WESTERN CULTURE “COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE” (Whorf’s classification) employs the one-sided MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD ‘on its own’ (i.e. the local and explicit conjugate only, ignoring the nonlocal and implicit female conjugate). This produces language-based REPRESENTATIONS of the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING type such as “the TOWN is GROWING”

Again (for emphasis), this one-sided MALE-ASSERTING representation DROPS OUT the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (the nonlocal implicit female conjugate).  The SHORTFALL in our Common Average European language representations inspired David Bohm’s effort to develop a ‘Rheomode’ language’ which kept the full FEMALE-MALE WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE INTACT; … a language development that Bohm later discovered had already been achieved by indigenous aboriginal cultures in their language development, yielding a language capable of the full FEMALE-MALE WAVE-FIELD composite as in the example; “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

NOTE THAT the ANDROGYNOUS topology of the WAVE-FIELD is found in basic dynamical structures in nature such as INHALING (female accommodating) and EXHALING (male-asserting).  This most basic natural dynamic seems to give way in the WESTERN CULTURE to the KNOW-IT-ALL ‘BLOWHARD’ who reaches a point where further learning ceases and the one-sided flow of ‘hot air’ dominates.

A man’s wisdom is to know that all ends are momentary, that the best end must be superseded by a better. But there is a mischievous tendency in him to transfer his thought from the life to the ends, to quit his agency and rest in his acts: the tools run away with the workman, the human with the divine.  – Emerson.

The key point in this note is that the ANDROGYNOUS relation in nature IS THE WAVE-FIELD REALITY, which WESTERN CULTURE reduces to the MALE-ASSERTING ONLY, CASTING OUT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE.

Our Common Average European language architecture, while DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, incorporates the ABSTRACTIONS of BEING (from NAMING) and LOCAL AUTHORING (from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR), which support FRAGMENTATION in the architectural foundation as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING’.  Such representations contrast with the flow-based Rheomode, the indigenous aboriginal languages and the language architecture variants used by Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, all of which employ the full FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD representations as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

As Vygotsky (‘Thought and Language’) has shown, in contradicting the view of Piaget, the spontaneous/implicit and the deliberate/explicit are conjugate aspects of ONE (WAVE-FIELD) system.  Piaget’s view follows the general WESTERN CULTURE VIEW which considers the LOCAL and EXPLICIT representation to be sufficient.  This has become the ‘operative attitude’ in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT DYNAMICS and it is the SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION and mistaken belief in the concepts of BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING.

In other words, the UNITY of BOTH the SPONTANEOUS/IMPLICIT (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE) AND the SCIENTIFIC/EXPLICIT (MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE) in a seamless ANDROGYNOUS UNION is the basic WAVE-FIELD nature of reality and it is only our LANGUAGE based attempt at REPRESENTATION wherein we “RESORT TO” the SPLITTING into the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the MALE ASSERTING.  Bohm’s ‘Rheomode’ and the indigenous aboriginal languages ACKNOWLEDGE the ANDROGYNOUS UNION of FEMALE AND MALE in WAVE-FIELD reality and Bohm’s WARNING on FRAGMENTATION points IMPLICITLY to PIAGET’S MISTAKE, the mistake incorporated in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IN GENERAL, of the DROP-OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE in our WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European language architecture.

Our WESTERN CULTURE PENCHANT for the SIMPLE and EXPLICIT has contributed to our persisting use of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which REDUCES WAVE-FIELD reality to a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING FRAGMENTATION based “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are problematically employing as our OPERATIVE REALITY.  THIS IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION

FRAGMENTATION IS NOW VERY WIDESPREAD, NOT ONLY THROUGHOUT SOCIETY, BUT ALSO IN EACH INDIVIDUAL  – David Bohm

* * *

(more…)

OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is serving us a SUBSTITUTE REALITY

0

 

INTRODUCTION: Language ‘works’ by using visual and/or oral symbols that trigger in our minds recall of sensory experience, either real or imagined.

Indigenous aboriginal language orients language architecture to our sense-experience of INCLUSION WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (the WAVE-FIELD) wherein, for example, “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN.  This mode of representation captures the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of a realty that is in continual flux, wherein there are no persisting THINGS-THAT-BE since everything is included within ONE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM and thus it would be a mistake to us NAMING in the sense of signifying LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘BEING’.  The indigenous aboriginal scheme of NAMING acknowledges the realty that EVERYTHING IS RELATED (“mitakuye oyasins”) therefore the language based representation is grounded in NAMES which do NOT REPRESENT LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES but relational forms within the transforming relational continuum (the WAVE-FIELD) such as ‘Dances with Wolves’ or ‘Running Bear’ which does not go down the path of creating the ABSOLUTE abstraction of “BEING”.  Instead, indigenous aboriginal language architecture preserves the FLOW-based nature of the ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

IN CONTRAST, “WESTERN CULTURE” language architecture orients to the ABSTRACT CONCEPT of BEINGS created with NAMING and animated with GRAMMAR, thus breaking the WAVE-FIELD apart, extracting only the MALE ASSERTING conjugate and DROPPING OUT the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE,for example, “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services.  This LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION, fabricated with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, allows us to construct a language based “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” by creating LOCAL FRAGMENTS that we can “ASSEMBLE WITH GRAMMAR’.  This ‘BOTTOM UP’ construction JUMPSTARTS by using NAMING to identify LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS which we then shape and arrange with GRAMMAR that allows us to modify and arrange as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, to create an arrangement that serves as a carrier or vehicle for sharing our thoughts.   Hence, in this case, we can describe “THE TOWN” EXPLICITLY, as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing-in-itself and then use GRAMMAR to impute THING-SPECIFIC GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT to it for example, “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING foods and services.  

 

THERE ARE PROBLEMS, BIG PROBLEMS, with our WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, the problems of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM due to our elevating of the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE into A PRIMARY SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTING ROLE and the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which amounts to DROPPING OUT THE WAVE-FIELD and constructing a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD.  The result is FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM within a language-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that makes the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE “CONDENSATIONS” the PRIMARY REALITY and SUBSTITUTES ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE “WAVE-FIELD”.  The constructing of this SUBSTITUTE REALITY “OBSCURES” the natural primacy of the WAVE-FIELD, making FALSE IDOLS, as Nietzsche calls them, out of the CONDENSATIONS.

[In the title Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer (Götzen-Dämmerung, oder, Wie man mit dem Hammer philosophiert), Nietzsche’s use of the Götzen-Dämmerung title was a pun on Wagner’s ‘Götterdämmerung’ (the Twilight of the Gods).  That is, Götze is a German word for “idol” or “false god”. Elevating the stature of the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD to an unnatural PRIMACY within a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE has been SUBSTITUTED for WAVE-FIELD, is what our WESTERN CULTURE is currently doing.   This SUBSTITUTE REALITY is being mocked by Nietzsche, using the metaphor of smashing the CONDENSATIONS we are mistakenly elevating, in our language, to an unnatural primacy over the WAVE-FIELD (reducing the WAVE-FIELD PROPER to a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE so the IDOLIZED CONDENSATIONS are notionally FREE TO STRUT THEIR STUFF.]

 

OBSCURANTISM (the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.) captures what is going on here in this unnatural ELEVATING of the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD within a SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein the PROMOTING of the status of the CONDENSATIONS is matched by the DEMOTING of the WAVE-FIELD to a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE status.  THIS IS OBSCURANTISM AND IT HAS BEEN GIVEN A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF A “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are employing as our OPERATIVE REALITY.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “have our ladder up against the wrong wall” in that we are trying to IMPROVE the functioning within a reality WHICH IS NOT sense-experience grounded reality but a language-based abstract intellectual SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein we have elevated the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD and given them UNNATURAL PRIMACY over the WAVE-FIELD by reducing the WAVE-FIELD to a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

The way out of this UPSIDE-DOWN MESS for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS could by the BACK DOOR ROUTE shared by David Bohm or by the IDOL SMASHING ROUTE advocated by Nietzsche or by a combination thereof.  But FIRST comes the need for recognition of the UPSIDE-DOWN state of affairs which is being blocked by OBSCURANTISM wherein we have come to believe that BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING (the DOUBLE ERROR view) is the “real” nature of the world, rather than an all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.  That is, we may say that we can “SEE” that “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING more products and inhabitants, or is it impossible for the TOWN to inhabit the same LANDSCAPE twice, “for it is NOT the SAME TOWN’, nor is it THE SAME LANDSCAPE” since everything is in flux within the all-including transforming relational continuum aka the wave-field.  We are evidently STUCK, because of our language, in the mode of holding on to the notion of a persisting BEING-based TOWN instead of accepting that there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

A picture held us captive. And we could not get outside it, for it lay in our language and language seemed to repeat it to us inexorably. –-Wittgenstein

 

* * * end of introduction * * *

 

 

 

 

This has all been said before by Friedrich Nietzsche and by David Bohm, but it doesn’t seem to have been ‘that much heard’ because it easy for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to understand.

Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is confusing our understanding.  It puts us into a SUBSTITUTE REALITY, which is a TRAP that is easy to describe BUT NOT EASY TO AVOID FALLING INTO.

(more…)

WESTERN LANGUAGE REDUCES “COMPLEX” WAVE REALITY TO “REAL” MATERIAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY

0

 

NOTA BENE! , … WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS “are to INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS as REAL NUMBERS are to COMPLEX NUMBERS”.

 

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION is LOCAL and EXPLICIT (as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING’) while INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’).

 

Let’s go straight to the point of how we USERS of NAME and GRAMMAR LANGUAGE are constructing a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is driving us NUTS.  Note that BINARY LOGIC is to QUANTUM LOGIC as LOCAL and EXPLICIT is to NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

We can discern what is going on here from the following example of how we use language.

We have the THIN SKULL RULE which “blames” (IMPUTES LOCAL AUTHORING) to that MALE ASSERTING AGENT regardless of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate.

We blame the careless cigarette smoker for AUTHORING the FOREST FIRE regardless of the shift from a soppy wet to a tinder dry FEMALE ACCOMMODATING influence.

We insist that the movements of the planets are fully and solely due to the PLANETS (by imputing space to be empty) because it SIMPLIFIES the LANGUAGE we need to fashion a LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION of what is going on.

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

THE PATTERN IS CLEAR.  IN ORDER TO SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION, WE EMPLOY LANGUAGE THAT REDUCES THE CONJUGATE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING- MALE ASSERTING NATURE OF REALITY, to a ONE-SIDED EMPTY-SPACE- MALE-ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY, replacing the wall-including WAVE-FIELD with its FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE-ASSERTING  “CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM” or natural conjugate unity, to the combination of a MATERIAL MALE ASSERTING “BEING” in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

(more…)

“WE ARE TRANSFORMERS” — BEYOND the LOCAL AUTHOR DELUSION

0

 

STOP PRESS!  HEADLINE: WE ARE TRANSFORMERS WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD, WE ARE NOT LOCAL AUTHORS!

 

OVERVIEW: 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are “TRANSFORMERS” (NOT IN THE SENSE THAT WE HAVE THE POWERS OF AUTHORING TRANSFORMATION, BUT IN THE SENSE THAT ‘TRANSFORMING IS US’).  This Language that we are communicating with at this moment has an ARCHITECTURE that gives a foundational role to BEING and to THINGS-THAT-EXIST when THERE ARE NO BEINGS in the WAVE-FIELD, aka the TRANSFORMING relational continuum.  There is in LOCAL BEING and NO LOCAL AUTHORING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, everything is TRANSFORMATION.  This does not mean that EVERY”THING” is undergoing TRANSFORMATION, which preserves the BEING based notion of THINGS, what it means is that our LANGUAGE and thus our language-influenced perception of reality has a problem in that it gives a foundational role to BEING.  Every time we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS produce a language-based utterance whether in oral or textual form, we are PROMOTING BELIEF IN BEING!

“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.” —Nietzsche, “Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer”

Because we have developed a dependency on language-based sharing of understanding and because our WESTERN CULTURE language has an architecture which gives a foundational role to BEING, we generate PROBLEMS of MISUNDERSTANDING SIMPLY BY USING OUR LANGUAGE to construct SHAREABLE REPRESENTATIONS wherein we have BUILT-IN DEPENDENCIES ON ‘BEING’.  There is NO WAY TO FASHION LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS of a purely FLUID WAVE-FIELD reality using a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that is BEING-based.  For example, once I have said that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ (which imputes “BEING” to the TOWN), I have no way of ‘getting rid of the abstract impression of BEING and language invites us to BUILD on this basis of BEING by speaking of this LOCAL EXPLICIT THING we have NAMED “the TOWN” and are embellishing with GRAMMAR to impute to it its own powers of AUTHORING GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION of goods etc.

ONLY IN A VERY DIFFERENT LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE can we avoid giving a foundational role to BEING, as in the indigenous aboriginal languages which are relational or ‘flow-based’ wherein everything is in flux (i.e. FLUX IS ALL THERE IS and THINGS are only APPEARANCE) and by this I mean that TRANSFORMATION prevails and THERE ARE NO ‘THINGS’ implied by the word ‘everything’, other than the APPEARANCE of THINGS coming from TRANSFORMING FORMS in the flow.  As we know form Modern physics, there are CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD which APPEAR as DISTINGUISHABLE in the FLOW which remain FEATURES OF THE FLOW as in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM where, for example, WHORLS in FLOW APPEAR TO HAVE THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT “BEING” while, to the contrary, they are in sense-experience affirmed reality, relational features in the flow WITHOUT their own INDEPENDENT “BEING”, such abstraction deriving purely from language-based CONSTRUCTIONS that invent BEING.

With respect to ourselves, there is no LOSS of our ‘INDEPENDENT BEING’ since it was only even an abstract inference coming from WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  As inclusions within TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM of life/reality, we are co-creating that which we are moving through.

This is the QUANTUM LOGIC reality that is SYMBOLIZED by the Yin/Yang figure wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the MALE ASSERTING are ONE and NOT TWO, the FEMALE referring to the fluid body of the WAVE-FIELD and the MALE referring to the CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD.  In physical terms the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD is PRIMARY and the MALE CONDENSATION is secondary.  But our WESTERN CULTURE tendency has been to impute the capability of authoring actions and development to material (male-assertive) BEINGS rather than to FEMALE INDUCTIVE WAVE-FIELD INFLUENCES coming from WHAT APPEARS TO BE “EMPTY SPACE”.   However, since what we have thought of as empty space is instead the electromagnetic field which is the source of the material CONDENSATIONS, these material CONDENSATIONS are thus exposed as SECONDARY aspects of the WAVE-FIELD rather than PRIMARY, the STATUS that the abstraction of “BEING” would like to give them.

Thus it is a mistake to understand the CONDENSATIONS  (material forms) as INDEPENDENT BEINGS in the guise of MALES WITH THE ASSERTIVE POWER to STIR UP the WAVE-FIELD WHEN THE REALITY IS THAT THESE MALE AGENTS HAVE BEEN STIRRED UP BY THE WAVE-FIELD THEY ARE INCLUDED IN.  This DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that invents the ASSERTING MALE is a mistake that derives from confusing the invisible WAVE-FIELD for passive EMPTY SPACE and thus WRONGLY attributing LOCAL AUTHORING influence to MALE ASSERTING AGENT instead of to the FEMALE INDUCTIVE OPENING)  Here, we may think of the FEMALE – MALE geometry in a SPHERICAL SPACE, and while we may start off by arguing over whether change is coming from CONTINENTS DRIFTING (MALE ASSERTIVE) or SEAFLOOR SPREADING (FEMALE INDUCTIVE), we eventually COME AROUND to adding a FOURTH DIMENSION which transcends superficial dynamics ON THE SURFACE OF A SPHERE, and understand, instead the FULL BODY SPHERING DYNAMIC with the conjugate FEMALE outside-inward SUBDUCTION and the MALE inside-outward EXTRUSION, these two conjugates COMPRISING THE ONE DYNAMIC OF TRANSFORMATION. in which case there is NO LOCAL BEING-BASED AUTHOR NAMED “THE EARTH’, there is NO LONGER ANY BEING, there is only a CONTINUAL BECOMING as in the overall TRANSFORMING relational continuum.

As in FEMALE geographical basins on earth, FEMALE basins induce and organize rivulets to come together as streams and streams to come together as powerful rivers to transport matter and DEEPEN the FEMALE BASIN that is orchestrating the evolving MALE ASSERTING  This ‘coniunctio oppositorum’ is the basic structure of the WAVE-FIELD which manifests as an all-pervading TRANSFORMATION. While we can architect language that allows us to speak of the FEMALE and MALE as if they are TWO separate BEING-based things, the physical reality involves the FEMALE-MALE “coniunctio oppositorum’ as captured with the Yin/Yang symbol and the Medieval Ouroborus (the snake that forms from swallowing its own tail).  The implication is that the THESE TWO; i.e. the FEMALE OPENING AND ACCOMMODATING, … and the MALE ASSERTING and PENETRATING, … “ARE ONLY ONE”.  This TWO-IN-ONE symbology describes the Modern physics relation between the dual aspects of the WAVE-FIELD; i.e. ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE-FIELD and MATTER as CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.  NOTA BENE!  This whole essay is concerned with the WESTERN CULTURE practice of CONSTRUCTING a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE-ONLY, BEING-BASED  (i.e. DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR, LOCAL AUTHOR BASED) SUBSTITUTE REALITY  which we, AT GREAT COST TO OURSELVES, are employing as our OPERATIVE REALITY.

HOWEVER, that BEING-BASED LOCAL AUTHORING SUBSTITUTE REALITY is a BINARY LOGIC based understanding while the WAVE-FIELD dynamic is a QUANTUM LOGIC understanding wherein LIFE is not something separate from the universe and is something found only in a so-called LIVING ORGANIC realm which, with BINARY LOGIC is split off from a so-called DEAD, INORGANIC realm.  WHY THIS BINARY LOGIC LIVING and DEAD SPLIT?   To answer this, we might turn to the question and answer regarding the THIN SKULL rule in WESTERN JUSTICE where the ‘guilty’ takes the victim as it comes’, meaning that the INJURY to the RECIPIENT of the BLOW is deemed FULLY ATTRIBUTABLE to the “AUTHOR” of the blow.  This comes from the same desire for SIMPLIFICATION as in Copernicus justification of saying ‘THE EARTH TURNS ROUND’ which imputes pure on-sided MALE ASSERTING, liberating (notionally) the EARTH from any innate ‘connection’ with what is DECLARED by this ONE-SIDING of action to be EMPTY SPACE rather than an ALL-INCLUDING (electromagnetic) WAVE-FIELD in which ‘the EARTH’ is a CONDENSATION. as requires QUANTUM BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium.

So, THE UNIVERSE IS THE WAVE-FIELD and QUANTUM LOGIC describes the relation between, …  “NOT SPACE and MATTER’, …  but “FIELD” and “MATTER”, … so NOT MATTER-IN-SPACE as implies BINARY LOGIC based MUTUAL EXCLUSION, but MATTER-IN-FIELD as a NONDUALITY; i.e. as FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE ASPECTS of the ONE, all-including WAVE-FIELD, a WAVE-FIELD with areas of CONDENSATION that we call MATTER, so we have MATTER IN FIELD and NOT MATTER IN EMPTY SPACE and thus we need to employ QUANTUM LOGIC and NOT BINARY LOGIC if we wish to REPRESENT in LANGUAGE what is ACTUALLY GOING ON PHYSICALLY, which is TRANSFORMATION wherein there is no place for the acbstract

This is the GENERAL REALITY as affirmed in Modern physics, thus the HUMANINGS in the WAVE-FIELD are in this QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM RELATION.

So, THE WORLD is NOT something SEPARATE from the MATERIAL FORMS such as ourselves, offering us an EMPTY SPACE that we are able to MOVE THROUGH as if FIGURE and GROUND (MATTER and SPACE) were TWO SEPARATE ONTOLOGIES.  Instead, MATERIAL FORMS such as ourselves are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD and the basic dynamic is TRANSFORMATION as where there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE being our limited visual view of the transforming relational continuum.

The WAVE-FIELD is NOT SOMETHING SEPARATE FROM US BUT INCLUDES US and is ALL-INCLUSIVE.  That is, WAVE-FIELD is not something we are ‘BORN INTO’ and ‘DIE OUT OF’, WE ARE THE FIELD and our material aspect is CONDENSATION based, thus we are included in the all-including TRANSFORMATION (the transforming relational continuum).

The QUANTUM LOGIC understanding that corresponds with (but is LESS SIMPLE than) WESTERN CULTURE “BINARIES” of “LIFE” and “DEATH”, is in terms  wherein everything is transforming in the manner of the CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD (which is our material phase of life) and when we are ‘not there’, everything is transformed by our having been ‘ASSIMILATED” within the WAVE-FIELD.  THIS IS NOT HOW WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE ACCUSTOMING TO UNDERSTANDING THINGS.  Our ACCULTURATED UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IF WE MOVE OUT OF TOWN, THE TOWN HAS A ‘BEING’ BASED NATURE AND THUS PERSISTS. ALTHOUGH WITH A FRAGMENT NOW MISSING (SCRATCH ONE OFF THE CURRENT POPULATION STATISTIC).   That is BINARY LOGIC at work, but in a QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, what is going on is TRANSFORMATION as in ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ wherein SOME OF THE WILDERNESS DIVERSITY LAND is transformed into SOME OF THE CULTIVATED LAND.  WHAT IS “NOT” GOING ON is the GROWTH of the TOWN as would be the BINARY LOGIC based understanding which is grounded in BEING.

We can repeat here, for the purpose of EMPHASIS, that “BEING” is UNREAL ABSTRACTION:

“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.” —Nietzsche, “Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer”

There is a REALITY SHIFT when we use language to shift from TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE to ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING’, .. in that the latter representation of GROWTH imputes to the TOWN “LOCAL BEING” which establishes a notional FIXED, LOCAL, EXPLICIT “BEING” which is the AUTHOR OF ITS OWN GROWTH.  Since “THE TOWN” as a LOCAL BEING is said by our DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to be an INDEPENDENT BEING with POWERS OF AUTHORING ITS OWN GROWTH, such DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR language allows us to BREAK OUT OF THE LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein THERE IS NO BEING and instead we have only TRANSFORMATION wherein what we are calling the GROWTH of the TOWN is NOT SIMPLY THAT (as if it were happening within an EMPTY SPACE), is instead in conjugate relation with the SHRINKAGE of the WILDERNESS which amounts to TRANSFORMATION OF THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE. As Goedel’s theorem of the incompleteness of all finite systems of logic points out, we can rightly claim that we are being TRUTHFUL in our claim that ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ but WE ARE NOT BEING COMPLETE since what is ‘really’ going on in our ‘sense-experience’ based reality is LESS SIMPLE, in that there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS DIVERSITY.  TOGETHER, these CONJUGATES of GROWTH OF the TOWN and SHRINKAGE of the WILDERNESS constitute TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE which is comprised of both MALE-ASSERTING TOWN and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WILDERNESS, a TRANSFORMATION wherein the BALANCE of TOWN and WILDERNESS is shifting.  To speak only in terms of the GROWTH of the TOWN is to DROP OUT MENTION of the CONJUGATE ACCOMMODATING SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS.

 

The WAVE-FIELD forms include an ASSERTING MALE which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT in conjugate relation with an INDUCTIVE FEMALE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  We can understand this in terms of the relation between the HURRICANE and THE ATMOSPHERE where the HURRICANE is a LOCAL, EXPLICIT FIGURE whereas the ATMOSPHERE is the CONTAINING FIELD which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS might wrestle with whether (A) EITHER the HURRICANE is a MALE-ASSERTIVE influence which is STIRRING UP THE ATMOSPHERE, (B) OR the ATMOSPHERE is a FEMALE-INDUCTIVE influence influence which is STIRRING UP the HURRICANE.

Indigenous aboriginal culture as well as Modern physics would understand the cosmic reality in terms of the all-including WAVE-FIELD which manifests not only as material condensations but also as the solar energy field and the gravitational field.  The key point here is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the WAVE-FIELD and the MATERIAL FORMS where the latter are CONDENSATIONS of the FORMER.

But in regard to LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have found that we can simplify LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE-INDUCTIVE CONJUGATE because of the LESS SIMPLE challenge of capturing its NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature, … and so instead, going only with the MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT to construct representations of ‘reality’; i.e. NOT ANY LONGER “REALITY” (since the FEMALE conjugate is replaced with the SIMPLIFYING abstraction of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE), but a distorted ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ABSTRACT ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’.

ALL we need n our SUBSTITUTE REALITY is the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE.  We KNOW HOW TO VISUALIZE ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, thanks to the fact it is LOCAL and EXPLICIT, but to capture the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT we would need he FEMALE CONJUGATE.  As with the gathering and scattering aka ‘clustering’ of ants within a complex ecosystem, to speak in the once-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE TERMS, we can invoke the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR where we say ‘the CLUSTER if GROWING’ (and/or SHRINKING) however, THERE IS NO ‘CLUSTER’ with “ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING GROWTH, that is just ABSTRACTION coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes BEING and conflates this to LOCAL BEING BASED AUTHORING..

The imputing of BEING-based LOCAL AUTHORING is now playing a foundational role in WESTERN CULTURE language-based representations of reality a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are MISTAKENLY USING AS OUR OPERATIVE REALITY which is leading to FRAGMENTATION, SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA (e.g. the COVID 19 PANDEMIC which is an IMBALANCE in the microbial assemblage misinterpreted as a “PATHOGEN ATTACK”).

“TRANSFORMATION” is the primary reality and we, as included participants, are “TRANSFORMERS”.  There ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS of “EITHER” good “OR” bad actions and developments (such abstraction derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR), there is only TRANSFORMATION aka the WAVE-FIELD dynamic, as understood in indigenous aboriginal cultures where the language architecture supports the imagery of TRANSFORMATION (e.g. ‘there is TOWNING iN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) while our WESTERN CULTURE language supports LOCAL ASSERTIVE ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS  (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PREODUCING) which are all ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING DYNAMICS in which the FEMALE CONJUGATE is removed (DEA ABSCONDITA).

* * * .

 

 

 

THE FOLLOWING ARE THE BASIC OBSERVATIONS which support the Modern physics understanding of reality as well as the indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta understanding of reality,… which in turn exposes the ERROR in the WESTERN CULTURE understanding of reality as arising from giving a foundational role to the abstractions of LOCAL BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING, the latter coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

(more…)

OUR WESTERN CULTURE “LOCAL AUTHOR” DELUSION

0

 

INTRODUCTION: WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have grown up learning a language which is LADEN with ABSTRACTION which, by installing the language and giving it a foundational role in the construction of representations of reality, are giving ourselves an exposure to introducing distorting SIMPLIFICATIONS into these language-based representations which have psychological implications.  In this case, our WESTERN CULTURE languages are CARRIERS of BINARY LOGIC which simplifies our representations of reality (i.e. REPRESENTATIONS which are no longer ‘of reality’ but of a SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY).

Our sense-experience reality is of  inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD which involves a QUANTUM LOGIC representational structure wherein our language acknowledges that material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including electromagnetic field.  QUANTUM LOGIC captures the WAVE-FIELD reality wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE; i.e. the MATERIAL FIGURES we see are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, hence the need for QUANTUM LOGIC in our language-based representations which then gives us, for example, ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where there is no ABSOLUTE SPLIT between the FIGURE (the TOWNING) and the GROUND (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE aka all-including, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD).

There are NO LOCAL AUTHORS in the transforming relational continuum wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) as is necessarily the case where the FIGURES are CONDENSATIONS in the GROUND of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD aka transforming relational continuum.

This essay addresses how WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, because the Common Average European language architecture builds representations using BINARY LOGIC which splits FIGURE and GROUND into TWO through the assumption that MATTER and SPACE are mutually exclusive and that SPACE is an ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT.  This BINARY LOGIC based MODEL OF REALITY sets up the SIMPLIFYING SITUATION wherein we need only concern ourselves with the MALE-ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE and its action since the FEMALE CONJUGATE; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD itself, has been REPLACED by the ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE. 

This OBSCURANTISM which removes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD by substituting EMPTY SPACE paves the way for one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE ONLY representation.  INSTEAD OF ACKNOWLEDGING the natural primacy of THE FEMALE CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD relative to its MALE CONJUGATE CONDENSATION in the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation, there is a WESTERN CULTURE RE-CASTING which INVERTS the natural order, imputing PRIMARY REALITY STATUS to the MALE CONJUGATE CONDENSATION and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE FOR THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD.

We thus build OBSCURANTISM into our language with the REMOVAL of the PRIMACY of the FEMALE CONJUGATE (the WAVE-FIELD PROPER) while PROMOTING THE ‘CONDENSATION” which is the secondary MALE-ASSERTING feature of the WAVE-FIELD, to an unnatural PRIMACY. In the indigenous aboriginal culture as in Modern physics, the WAVE-FIELD is PRIMARY and being as it is NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (relational) the language architecture must reflect this primacy of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and establish the secondary nature of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD.  This is NOT THE CASE in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE where we have the OBSCURANTISM of incorrectly PROMOTING the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATION (the material content) into an UNNATURAL PRIMACY OVER THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD (the immaterial containing field).

IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WE LOSE THE ENERGY-LOADED PRESENCE OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD through the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE, while the “CONDENSATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD”, aka the MATERIAL FORM, “TAKES OVER” as the PRIMARY PRESENCE; i.e. as THE LOCAL AUTHOR of ITS OWN actions and developments as is ‘written up’ using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  This “LOCAL AUTHOR DELUSION” is OBSCURANTISM that serves as the WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY.

The MISSING FEMALE CONJUGATE or DEA ABSCONDITA that is ‘sacrificed’ to ‘open the way for the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING LOCAL AUTHOR DELUSION, is the victim of WESTERN CULTURE’S SUBSTITUTING of EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC (CONJUGATE SPLITTING) for BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC (CONJUGATE BALANCING).

WE ARE “NOT” MALE-ASSERTING AGENTS, WE ARE TRANSFORMERS WITHIN THE GREAT TRANSFORMING (WAVE-FIELD).  As inclusions within the GREAT TRANSFORMING we recognize that ‘our assertive actions’ in cultivating the land are NOT ASSERTIVE ACTIONS.  WE ARE NOT INDEPENDENT ASSERTING AGENTS, WE ARE TRANSFORMERS WITHIN the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (WAVE-FIELD). Our movements within the crowd are RELATIVE and thus TRANSFORMATIVE (to portray them as assertive is OBSCURANTISM),  WE ARE NOT ‘INDEPENDENT ACTORS’, we are INCLUDED TRANSFORMERS.

We like to “SPEAK” in terms of OUR OWN ACTIONS or of AN INDIVIDUAL’S ACTIONS but there is NO SUCH THING since our movements are RELATIVE and comprise the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM we share inclusion in; i.e. there is NO ABSOLUTE FIXED REFERENCE FRAME as would be necessary to speak in terms of LOCAL EXPLICIT ACTIONS, or DEVELOPMENT or PRODUCTION.  Because the notions of LOCAL and EXPLICIT are ABSTRACTION, it follows that RELATIONS are the FOUNDATIONAL reality RATHER THAN ‘LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS, notionally with “THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT” The reality is that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.

 

A man’s wisdom is to know that all ends are momentary, that the best end must be superseded by a better. But there is a mischievous tendency in him to transfer his thought from the life to the ends, to quit his agency and rest in his acts: the tools run away with the workman, the human with the divine.  – Emerson.

 

The construction of exquisite HOMES and TOWNS are PSYCHOLOGICAL impressions coming from FRAGMENTATION.  TRANSFORMATION  is the REAL dynamic because there is a connection between the SHRINKAGE of FORESTS and the GROWTH of WOODEN HOME communities covering the same formerly forested hill country; i.e. the SHRINKING of FORESTS and the GROWTH of HOMES are conjugate aspects of the ONE DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION.  To speak of the GROWTH of TOWNS is OBSCURANTISM.

* * *

 

 

 

THERE IS A PROBLEM COMING FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE: – THE LOCAL AUTHOR DELUSION.

 

Our sense experience informs us that we are included within a transforming relational continuum which Modern physics affirms is the all-including WAVE-FIELD and while indigenous aboriginals and Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents have evolved LANGUAGE USAGE that supports this sense-experience grounded understanding, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that gives the primary foundational role to LOCAL AUTHORING.  This LOCAL AUTHORING is NOT REAL but it leads to the construction of A LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which we are USING AS IF IT WERE REALITY.   This is the source of FRAGMENTATION in our view of the world, as Bohm points, is PSYCHOLOGICAL and NOT REAL (i.e. not sense-experience supportable).  Nietzsche identifies the same problem in slightly different terms; i.e. in terms of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is how we use LANGUAGE to construct a fragmented, abstract SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the abstraction BEING. The language based contrivance of BEING is behind the FRAGMENTATION, and can be seen in terms of our construction of ‘IDOLS’, hence Nietzsche’s ‘Twilight of the Idols’ meaning that these things have to go, and this is where his commitment to PHILOSOPHIZING WITH A HAMMER’ comes from.

(more…)

FROM FRAGMENTATION to OBSCURANTISM

0

 

THIS IS A “BREAKTHROUGH” for me, in my understanding and it concerns the relationship between FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

 

 

Consider the following two ‘views of reality’;

 

The ‘thin skull’ rule

 

The thin skull rule makes the defendant liable for the plaintiff’s injuries even if the injuries are unexpectedly severe owing to a pre-exisiting yet stable condition.  The defendant must take the victim as they find them with whatever peculiar weaknesses and predispositions they might have, and is liable even though the plaintiff’s losses are more dramatic than they would be for the average person.

 

The ‘tide in the affairs of men” understanding;  (from Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’;

 

There is a tide in the affairs of men Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries.”

 

* * *

 

In the LATTER aphorism, there is an acknowledgment of our being included in a dynamic greater than ourselves,  (this is the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including electromagnetic field) wherein WE ARE “NOT” AUTHORS OF OUR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS (as the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR asserts) but, gives us to understand that we are immersed in world of potentials that INVITES OUR PARTICIPATION.

  (more…)

A BREAKTHROUGH FOR ME: UNDERSTANDING FRAGMENTATION AS OBSCURANTISM

0

 

The following SYNOPSIS gives an abbreviated account, elaborated in the body of the essay, of how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are employing a language architecture that incorporates OBSCURANTISM wherein the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD nature of reality is OBSCURED by our infusing of a SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  Note that our sense-experience gives us access to the full WAVE-FIELD nature of the world while it is only our WESTERN CULTURE language architecture that OBSCURES the natural WAVE-FIELD reality by infusing SIMPLIFIED (dumbed-down) BINARY LOGIC “EITHER” matter “OR” empty space ABSTRACTION.

 

 

SYNOPSIS:  We (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) could learn from asking ourselves why we have the THIN SKULL rule in our BINARY LOGIC based system of LAW ENFORCEMENT (where if we “abide by the law’ we are among the masses of INNOCENTS UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY).  The answer is, the THIN SKULL rule AVOIDS having to deal with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (as in the easily collapsible skull) which is an innate part of our WAVE-FIELD world with its QUANTUM LOGIC dynamics which are ANDROGYNOUS.  It is not simply WHAT WE DO that ‘counts’, which is the MALE ASSERTIVE conjugate since reality includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING aspect as pointed out in Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’ … “There is a tide in the affairs of men Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries.”

But even if such FEMALE accommodating ‘opportunity’ opens up for us, our WESTERN CULTURE interpretation is to give us FULL AUTHORING CREDIT regardless.  We do the same thing with BLAME as in the example of the THIN SKULL rule, because it is SIMPLER to just ‘GO WITH THE MALE’ (BINARY LOGIC as in ‘He “EITHER” is “OR” is not responsible for AUTHORING this “EITHER” good “OR” bad action and development) rather than to go with the LESS SIMPLE FEMALE-MALE (androgynous) understanding as in Modern physics and as in indigenous aboriginal culture justice where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING aspect is ALSO taken into account and NOT JUST the MALE ASSERTIVE.  But we like to simplify things with BINARY LOGIC and attribute EVERYTHING to the MALE-ASSERTING as if the action were unfolding within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (our WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY which gets rid of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE).

The THIN SKULL RULE demonstrates how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS reduce our language based representation to re-cast the QUANTUM LOGIC reality within a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, wile the ‘tide in the affairs of men’ points to the QUANTUM LOGIC reality wherein what comes of our actions depends upon the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “IN CONJUGATE RELATION WITH” THE MALE ASSERTING. We do not live in an EMPTY SPACE, we are INCLUDED IN THE WAVE-FIELD so that there is a BALANCE between MALE-ASSERTING agency and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING agency.  The THIN SKULL rule is an INTELLECT based OBSCURING of the QUANTUM LOGIC conjugate (androgynous) nature of sense-experience reality by allowing intellectual acceptance of “ONLY” MALE ASSERTIVE language-based representations while the ‘tide in the affairs of men’ representation ACKNOWLEDGES the CONJUGATE (accommodating-asserting) nature of sense-experience reality. WESTERN CULTURE has an EGO problem wherein there is an insistence on imposing the abstraction of one-sided male-assertive “AUTHORING” of actions and developments, by SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the FEMALE accommodating conjugate.  The ‘tide in the affairs of men’, rather than being seen in terms of QUANTUM LOGIC balance of MALE ASSERTING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING MAKE THE MISTAKE OF IMPUTING FULL AUTHORING CREDIT TO THE MALE ASSERTIVE, thus OBSCURING the role of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.

This OBSCURANTISM has been built into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE by way of the BINARY LOGIC based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (which implies one-sided male-assertive action and development).  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed a comprehensive intellectual abstraction based infrastructure which supports the construction of a BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are now using as our OPERATIVE REALITY.  There is no FEMALE CONJUGATE in this one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE, DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, therefore the person throwing the punch that shatters the THIN SKULL’ is charged with AUTHORING the deadly damage done, and likewise those who are masters of profiting from the “tides in the affairs of men” (e.g the Elon Musks etc.) are credit with AUTHORING the tides rather than being manipulators of phenomena based on sensitive dependence on initial conditions (the skier that dislodges snow that turns into an avalanche is not the AUTHOR but the TRIGGER for the avalanche, just as the smoker who carelessly discards his cigarette is not the AUTHOR but the TRIGGER for the resulting conflagration (the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the forest when it is dessicated by solar irradiance).

As in all of these examples, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed a language architecture that OBSCURES THE ACCOMMODATING ROLE OF THE FEMALE and explains all things in the one-sided terms of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (employing the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).

The REDUCTION of the ANDROGYNOUS QUANTUM LOGIC of sense-experience reality to one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE-ONLY BINARY LOGIC constructions INFUSES “OBSCURANTISM” into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT representation.  WHAT ‘GOES MISSING’ is the FEMALE CONJUGATE and with it, the WAVE-FIELD understanding of our sense-experience reality.

* * *

 

(more…)

EASTER REVIEW: OBSCURANTISM: the REDUCING of QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC

0

 

OBSCURANTISM: The practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.

 

SYNOPSIS:  BINARY LOGIC is playing a CAT-and-MOUSE game with QUANTUM LOGIC in our language-stimulated understanding of reality.  If BINARY LOGIC gets into our mind FIRST, it LOCKS OUT QUANTUM LOGIC yet QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE and thus able to bring deeper understandings.  The words “on EARTH as it is in HEAVEN’ in the Christian Lord’s Prayer presupposes a BINARY LOGICAL structure to reality, and EASTER celebrates the existence of this BINARY LOGIC based PAIR which is the very definition of mathematical MUTUAL EXCLUSION.  In the indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, we have a QUANTUM LOGIC structure to reality wherein as suggested by the Yin/Yang symbolism where the Material aspect and the Spiritual aspect are NOT mutually exclusive but are related like MATTER and WAVE-FIELD where MATTER is CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD.  This relational defines QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium (i.e. the WAVE-FIELD includes the condensations that present as MATERIAL forms in the manner that the spirally WHORLS in river flow, while they seem to be ‘their own thing’ as if separate and independent of the flow, as in fact condensations of the flow as defines the QUANTUM LOGIC relation.

The LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES of “EAST” and ‘WEST’ differ in that the former employs a QUANTUM LOGIC foundation while the latter employs a BINARY LOGIC foundation.  It is IMPORTANT to note that the BINARY LOGIC language architecture is SIMPLER than the QUANTUM LOGIC language architecture in the respect that BINARY LOGIC portrays FIGURE and GROUND as TWO separate ONTOLOGICAL entities, QUANTUM LOGIC portrays FIGURE and GROUND as ONE FLUID DYNAMIC.  In the EAST’s QUANTUM LOGIC structure we have BOTH female AND male aspects within a conjugate unity, so that QUANTUM LOGIC language architecture can speak of “TOWNING-IN-THE-TRANSFORMING-LANDSCAPE” which is an ANDROGYNOUS (female and male as ONE) conjugate dynamic.  In the WEST’S BINARY LOGIC structure, we have only to concern ourselves with MALE ASSERTIVE aspect; i.e. with THE TOWN  and its GRAMMAR given MALE ASSERTIVE powers of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.

The difference wherein the EAST’s QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE than the WEST’s BINARY LOGIC shows up in our LANGUAGE based REALITY REPRESENTATIONS.  For example, the WEST’s BINARY LOGIC based language presumes that FIGURE and GROUND are TWO SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT ENTITIES, (e.g. where the TOWN) is INDEPENDENT of the landscape it is included within) which we ‘arrange’ by IMAGINING via our LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS that the TOWN sits within an ABSTRACT EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.  The EAST’s QUANTUM LOGIC based language, on the other hand, presumes that FIGURE and GROUND are ONE where the language capture of this is in terms equivalent to THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, keeping TOWNING and TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE together as ONE.  The QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the TOWNING and TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is thus one of MUTUAL INCLUSION based on BALANCE, the dynamic form of which is RESONANCE as reaffirms the WAVE-FIELD nature of reality. Thus the EAST and WEST language-based ‘realities’ differ on the basis of their respective QUANTUM LOGIC and BINARY LOGIC foundations, the former being LESS SIMPLE than the latter in the sense that the relation between the WAVE-FIELD and its CONDENSATIONS is LESS SIMPLE than the relation between EMPTY SPACE and MATERIAL EXISTENCE.

While EASTERN CULTURE language architectures preserve the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC relation, WESTERN CULTURE language architectures employ the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC relation.  The shift from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC constitutes “OBSCURANTISM”

 

OBSCURANTISM is achieved when  the understanding conveyed is reduced from;

 

(A)  the less simple FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE architectural foundation to;

 

(B) the simple MALE-ASSERTIVE architectural foundation.

 

EXAMPLE: OBSCURANTISM is achieved by the reduction from;

 

(A) There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE to,

 

(B) The TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING within a notional ABSOLUTE, EMPTY, INFINITE SPACE.

 

NOTE: (B) constitutes a SIMPLIFYING MALE-ASSERTIVE SUBSTITUTE for the FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD.  This common WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLIFIED LANGUAGE  based representation brings out a loss of expressive capability that suggests the term, DEA ABSCONDITA.  This term points to the fact that the FEMALE CONJUGATE which is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (nonlocal, implicit relational continuum aka ‘wave-field’) and thus THE WHOLE ALL-INCLUDING FIELD, is DROPPED from the representation leaving only the ORPHANED MALE-ASSERTING AGENT TO ‘POSE’ as the LOCAL AUTHOR of the manifest actions and developments.   The DROPPING OUT of the PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENCY, the FEMALE CONJUGATE which, in the example, is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, WHICH “INCLUDES” the “TOWNING”, explains the choice of “DEA ABSCONDITA”.  NOTIONALLY ENDOWING THE TOWN “ON ITS OWN” with POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS INCLUDING GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION of goods and services, stems from MALE EGO and is achieved through the LOCAL AUTHOR abstraction created with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche points out.

 

* * *

 

 

 

There seems to be a fortuitous (?) synchronicity to my being at the point of summarizing a major problem in our LANGUAGE, as Bohm and Nietzsche have identified, the problem of FRAGMENTATION and the associated confusion of OBSCURANTISM which is where we reduce the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC to SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC.  The OBSCURANTISM comes into play as we employ “BINARY LOGIC” in our language based representations where the phenomena of NATURE demands a QUANTUM LOGIC representation.  For example, where the indigenous aboriginal languages say ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, our Common Average European language architectures SIMPLIFY this by DIFFERENTIATING OUT ‘the TOWNING’, making it over into a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as Nietzsche refers to it.  What this does is to SIDESTEP the innate interdependent inclusion of the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, by abstractly using NAMING to impute LOCAL BEING and conflating this FIRST ERROR with the SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR which we use to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWER to the NAMING-instantiated LOCAL BEING.

 

THIS DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR IS THE BIRTH OF BINARY LOGIC IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

 

THERE IS NONE OF THIS BINARY LOGIC SPLITTING APART OF FIGURE AND GROUND IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE AND WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS NOW KNOW WHY FROM MODERN PHYSICS WHICH HAS SIMPLY REMINDED US OF THE QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE OF REALITY WHEREIN THE MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING (electromagnetic) WAVE-FIELD. WHCH ANSWERS THE AGE-OLD QUESTION OF ‘THE TWO AND THE ONE’ (see anthropologist Mircea Eliade’s ‘Mephistopheles et l’Androgyne’, Engish title ‘the TWO and the ONE’).  That is, there has been division in understanding over whether MATERIAL FORMS MOVE THROUGH THE ‘ETHER’ or whether the ETHER has LUMPS IN IT (now we know that SPACE is the WAVE-FIELD while MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD, a reality that means that QUANTUM LOGIC is the basic LOGIC OF THE WORLD WE LIVE IN.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which is just restating the fact that MATTER is a CONDENSATION of the ALL-PERVADING ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD.  That is, ‘matter’ is a concentration of field strength within the field which makes that intense lump of field visible and tangible.  And because the WAVE-FIELD is in flux the patterns where the intensity is higher (which we recognize as material objects) can change and move without there ever being any persisting ‘material body’ involved.  This is why the world has been described by some as a holographic universe because a hologram has this same property where we can physically distinguish between content and container but rather than this being due to MATTER and EMPTY SPACE, it is due to CONDENSATIONS OF FIELD WITHIN FIELD.

 

RIGHT HERE WE HAVE THE ISSUE OF HOW QUANTUM LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND (matter and space) ARE ONE rather than as BINARY LOGIC would have it, FIGURE and GROUND (matter and space) are TWO, an issue which divides the indigenous aboriginal culture from the “WESTERN EUROPEAN” cultures and which is captured in the respective language architectures.

(more…)

The Linguistic Obscurantism of Western Culture

0

 

 

We are playing a game.  We are playing at not playing a game.  If we show ourselves we see we are, we shall break the rules and we will punish ourselves  We must play our game, of not seeing we see the game.”  — after R. D. Laing (Knots)

 

 

“OBSCURANTISM”, “The practice of preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.”

 

OBSCURANTISM is a game that WE HAVE BUILT INTO WESTERN CULTURE, INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE by way of the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR with its LOCAL AUTHORING ILLUSION.  The LOCAL AUTHORING is the basis of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on BINARY LOGIC which is SIMPLER than our QUANTUM LOGIC  SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.

 

There is OBSCURANTISM in reducing the QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTATION “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” to the BINARY LOGIC REPRESENTATION. “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCTING goods and services”, … for once we LATCH ON to thinking in the SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC terms of LOCAL AUTHORING, the LESS SIMPLE understanding in QUANTUM LOGIC terms is OBSCURED.  Instead of the QUANTUM LOGIC “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which captures the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD “CONTENTS-AND-CONTAINER-ARE-ONE” reality, the INJECTING of the SIMPLIFYING BINARY LOGIC NAMING and GRAMMAR FRAGMENTATION into “the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services” OBSCURES the LESS SIMPLE “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

 

This OBSCURANTISM which injects a SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” in place of the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience-affirmed REALITY PERVADES WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS and as David Bohm has pointed out, is the source of much FRAGMENTATION and DYSFUNCTION in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC.

 

OBSCURANTIST LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS SUCH AS RUSSIA ATTACKS UKRAINE …. psychologically break out RUSSIA and UKRAINE like two ISLANDS in the OCEAN, OBSCURING the reality that the profiles of these TWO ISLANDS can be followed down their respective flanks, down below the water’s surface, down into the depths to the ocean floor to the CONTINUOUS surface of the SPHERE of the earth, informing us that the TWO are in fact only ONE, that FIGURE and GROUND are only ONE as is a STATEMENT of QUANTUM LOGIC, which, in our WESTERN CULTURE PENCHANT FOR BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS is OBSCURED.  BINARY LOGIC obscures QUANTUM LOGIC which is LESS SIMPLE and cannot be conveyed by BINARY LOGIC. 

(more…)

Go to Top