Archive for year 2023

PREAMBLE:  LOCAL AUTHORING is WESTERN CULTURE MYTH that comes from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche pointed out, and it is SECURED BY ‘PRIDE’.   For example the PRIDE of BELONGING to something or of SOMETHING BELONGING to ONE-SELF (e.g. one’s child) is characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE noun-based inguistic conceptualizing.

Noun-based language: a language, such as English, that relies on nouns (people, places, or things) to convey meaning. Verb-based language: languages, such as Dee- ni’ and other Indigenous languages, rely on verbs (actions) to convey meaning.

In indigenous aboriginal verb-based languages, there are only RELATIONAL DYNAMICS as if in an all-including transforming relational continuum or ‘wave-field’ wherein there is NO LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT and thus NO PRIDE in the sense of INDEPENDENT AUTHORING or OWNERSHIP of actions or developments, since unfolding developments in a relational continuum derive from ‘all my relations’ (mitakuye oyasin).

David Bohm notes that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES support NOUN based CONCEPTUALIZATION which is FRAGMENTATIVE (and OBSCURATIVE).

What is needed, Bohm argued in his book Wholeness and the Implicate Order, is a new sort of language, one based on processes and activity, transformation and change, rather than on the interactions of stable objects. Bohm called this hypothetical language the “rheomode.” It is based primarily on verbs and on grammatical structures deriving from verbs. Such a language, Bohm argued, is perfectly adapted to a reality of enfolding and unfolding matter and thought.

David Bohm had not known when he wrote of that concept that such a language is not just a physicist’s hypothesis. It actually exists. The language of the Algonquin peoples was developed by the ancestors specifically to deal with subtle matters of reality, society, thought, and spirituality.

A few months before his death, Bohm met with a number of Algonkian speakers and was struck by the perfect bridge between their language and worldview and his own exploratory philosophy. What to Bohm had been major breakthroughs in human thought — quantum theory, relativity, his implicate order and rheomode – were part of the everyday life and speech of the Blackfoot, Mic Maq, Cree and Ojibwaj.” – F. David Peat, ‘Blackfoot Physics’

There is NO SENSE OF “LOCAL AUTHORING”, in either MODERN PHYSICS or in indigenous aboriginal langauge-based conceptualization, nor in Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.  In what we call ‘OUR OWN ACTIONS or the ACTIONS of ‘OUR COUNTRY’, … EVENTS are NOT, in sense-experience reality, LOCAL and EXPLICIT as we present them with the DOUBLE ERROR combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  In fact, THEY ARE NOT EVEN ‘EVENTS’ but are relational BOILINGS UP within the unbounded web of relations that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).  What is LOCAL and EXPLICIT are the INTELLECTUAL REDUCTIVE FRAGMENTATIVE ABSTRACTIONS of DUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LANGUAGE while what is affirmed in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT sense-experience grounded FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE is the all-including WEB of RELATIONS aka the all-including WAVE-FIELD in which PEOPLE are CONDENSATIONS.

IN WESTERN CULTURE, HOWEVER, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR gives foundational grounding to “PRIDE” and the EGO-INFLATING that comes with PRIDE OF ACHIEVEMENT or PRIDE OF POSSESSION, the ‘FULFILMENT of an operation or task’.  As is evident, LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES such as those employed in WESTERN CULTURE that develop concepts such as ‘the COMPLETION OF A TASK’ imply, erroneously, both FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.  The highway signs that say, on their flip sides, ENTERING THE TOWN OF PLEASANTVILLE and LEAVING THE TOWN OF PLEASANTVILLE leave the ‘reader’ with the impression that there exists (as long as sufficient influential people feign belief in it) is a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing-in-itself.

This ‘announcement’ called ‘the TOWN of PLEASANTVILLE’ which is intellectual abstraction that the four-leggeds and winged and crawling ones do not have to deal with; i.e. they do not have to deal with the psychological FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM that NOUN-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING BRINGS WITH IT (i.e. the PRICE of using a SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that uses INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS that DROP OUT MENTION of the basic RELATIONAL nature of the world of our sense-experience of inclusion therein).  This is a huge pice that is paid for by submission to FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM are the RESULT of our WESTERN CULTURE USE of SENSE-EXPERIENCE-SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  For example, while our sense-experience is of “INCLUSION IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD’, … as sense-experience affirmed reality which “IS CAPTURED” in indigenous aboriginall FLOW-BASED LANGUAGES which are capable of sharing the equivalent of “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  (which is the FULL sense-experience affirming androgynous wave-field reality).

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES that employ BEING-based CONCEPTUALIZATION schemes REDUCE the QUANTUM LOGIC relation associated with material CONDENSATIONS of the all-including fluid WAVE-FIELD, and SUBSTITUTE the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC relation associated with ABSOLUTE MATERIAL OBJECTS notionally moving about and interacting within an ABSTRACT ABSOLUTE, EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

This change in the INFORMING of our physical actions, SHIFTING from our sense-experience of INCLUSION in NATURE’S QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD PLENUM WITH ITS MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, over to an INFORMING by INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based BINARY LOGIC SIMPLIFICATION which ENGINEERS LINGUISTIC SIMPLIFICATION BY DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE ENTENT.

THE “PSYCHOLOGICAL COST” of this WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DROP-DOWN from QUANTUM LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION to BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION is FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, neither of which occur in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedantat where the relational nature of our sense experience of inclusion in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) is captured in our language-based CONCEPTUALIZATION, hence, … ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (wherein everything is in flux) this more complete QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION being employed instead of the WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLIFIED OBJECT-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, ‘‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

To assess the DIFFERENT PERSONAL EMOTIONAL IMPACTS of these different LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, consider the  huge difference in emotional impact of  the QUANTUM LOGIC “THERE IS HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM” as is the understanding of MODERN PHYSICS wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, … AS COMPARED WITH ,…. the emotional impact of the BINARY LOGIC “The HUMAN COMMUNITY IS GROWING , DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services””.

It is evident that in the latter BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is in play which implies LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, whereas in the former QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, there is one overall dynamic that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and is referred to as TRANSFORMATION.

Belief in the BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING gives rise to the BINARY LOGIC emotions of EITHER PRIDE OR SHAME depending on the BINARY LOGIC intellectual assessments of the LOCAL AUTHORING as being EITHER GOOD OR BAD, HELPFUL OR HARMFUL, ENRICHING OR IMPOVERISHING.

BELIEF in the QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience affirmed assessment of relational BALANCE/RESONANCE and IMBALANCE/DISSONANCE wherein there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, it is clear that there is no way to UNDERSTAND (in a sense-experience affirmable way) TOWNING out of the context of its QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND INCLUSION of the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM it is INCLUDED IN, in which case the QUANTUM LOGIC relation can be seen as LESS SIMPLE but MORE COMPLETE than the BINARY LOGIC relation since the BINARY LOGIC relation is too simple to capture the less simple GESTALT as the WILDERNESS SHRINKS in conjugate relation to the GROWTH of the TOWN.   NOT MUCH TOWN AND LOTS OF WILDERNESS has a ‘different aesthetic feel to it’ as an overall ‘package’ (GESTALT) than A LOT OF TOWN and a small remnant of WILDERNESS.

As Goedel’s Theorem WARNS US, all finite systems of logic propositions are INCOMPLETE, and in this case, we can say for sure that IT IS TRUE THAT THE TOWN IS GROWING, but it is INCOMPLETE in the sense that there is NOTHING in the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY abstraction of GROWTH that informs us of the SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDED impact of TRANSFORMATION where we INCLUDE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, these two conjugates COMPRISING THE ONE ANDROGYNOUS DYNAMIC OF TRANSFORMATION (where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘wilderness is shrinking’ and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘growing of the development’ are two faces of a single coinage.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is the way things go in a spherical space of finite extent, as contrasts with the BINARY LOGIC relation which is the way things go in a flat space of infinite extent.

THERE ARE HIDDEN ERRORS IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as in the DUMBING DOWN from less simple QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, … to simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (EMPTY SPACE MEDIUM).

There is a LOT tied up in this lingistic sleight of hand, including the REDUCTION FROM LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC, by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes JUMP-START MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in in EMPTY SPACE, thanks to the OBSCURANIST DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, as in the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY of the OPENING UP AS IN ‘SHRINKING’ OF THE WILDERNESS in conjugate relation with the GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT of the TOWN.

YES, OUR “LOGICAL PROPOSITION” that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is “TRUE” but at the same time, “IT IS INCOMPLETE” in that it fails to acknowledge that is ALSO TRUE that the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING in which case we are being DECEPTIVE when we employ LOGICAL TRUTHS such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ since such truthful logical propositions fail to report on the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.

THIS GOEDEL’S THEOREM AFFIRMED DECEPTIVENESS IN COMMON LOGIC SHOCKED THE HELL OUT OF MATHEMATICIANS in the 1930’s when GOEDEL PROVED IT, but the message didn’t get out to the masses and stop us all from putting so much FAITH IN, and the DESIGN OF PLANS AND ACTIONS based on LOCAL PROPOSITIONS that always have this INCOMPLETENESS EXPOSURE.  These INCOMPLETENESSES in our LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS are the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM IN WESTERN CULTURE and Bohm writes about FRAGMENTATION but not so much about OBSCURANTISM, although they are both coming from the same source of the INCOMPLETENESS of BINARY LOGIC.

OBSCURANTISM IS, well, MORE OBSCURE than FRAGMENTATION even though it is coming from the same source, the SUBSTITUTING of SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONCEPTUALIZATION [the TOWN is GROWING] for LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based  ANDROGYNOUS CONCEPTUALIZATION [there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE]… is OBSCURED by the fact that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION is the VISIBLE, TANGIBLE because LOCAL, EXPLICIT component of complex WAVE-FIELD reality even though THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT IS ONLY ‘APPEARANCE’ or ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ because the real body of WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  In order to architect language based conceptualizing in this case, the language must avoid all dependence on the absolute, local, explicit material, and thus must employ NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (relations) IN THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in the linguistic conceptualizing.  For example there is HUMANING in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, … which brings us full circle back around to how WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING is SCREWING UP OUR PSYCHE.

There is a CIRCULAR ECONOMY in WESTERN CULTURE that REWARDS those that SUPPORT LINGUIST CONCEPTUALIZATIONS that while BOGUS like SELF-PROCLAIMED BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT NATIONS that attain notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTED EXISTENCE.

INDEPENDENT NATIONS are ABSTRACTIONS supported by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies the ‘existence’ of a LOCAL THING (e.g. the ‘Independent ‘Nation State’).

These abstractions, which overtly conflict with the world of our sense-experience wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED, PERSIST as we have an EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO THEM.   While life is MORE THAN POSSESSIONS, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed a powerful emotion associated with the PRIDE of POSSESSION.

PRIDE associated with the LOCAL, EXPLICIT and TANGIBLE (e.g. material possessions), …  ‘SWELLS THE HEAD’, …while INSPIRATION coming from the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT and INTANGIBLE ‘FILLS the HEART’.

Recall that indigenous aboriginal mocked the WESTERN CULTURE for its LANGUAGE BASED FRAGMENTING OF REALITY, a FRAGMENTATION that FRAGMENTED HUMANINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM out into a VAST UNBOUNDED EMPTINESS call SPACE.

In our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES, we notice the strong ties arising between PRIDE and the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION and how DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE have set up a FRAGMENTED GRID upon which the COLLECTION of SWOLLEN EGOS have been giving themselves their own separate LAUNCHING PADS to STRUT THEIR STUFF, a blatant FRAGMENTATIVE/OBSCURANTIST “INTELLECTUAL-LINGUISTIC” denial of our sense-experience affirmed global interconnectedness and interdependence wherein;

This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”

There is sufficient evidence here, then some, to establish that the reality we share oursense experience of inclusion in, which is the same reality AND FOR for MODERN PHYSICISTS like Bohm, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, and others like some of the Systems Sciences investigators, the LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are the same; i.e. they are QUANTUM LOGIC based while the DOMINATING MINORITY of people, due to the GLOBALLY DOMINANT EUROPEAN LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING STANDARD, A BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING STANDARD.

This BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE STANDARD is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, as is written about in this essay.   THIS FRAGMENTATION AND OBSCURATION IS NOT PRESENT IN THE REALITY SHAPING CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE, nor in the REALITY-SHAPING CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of MODERN PHYSICS, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, as elaborated on in by David Bohm and F. David Peat, AS WELL AS BY “CHIEF SEATTLE” in the above note.

NOW, AS WE WATCH THE FRAGMENTATION OF OUR WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES INTO MORE AND MORE SUB-CATEGORIES LIKE JEWS, CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS WHICH BREAK DOWN INTO THEIR SUBCATEGORIES, WHAT DO WE SEE GOIG ON?  THE INTELLECTUAL RENOUNCING OF WHAT OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS INFORMING US, “The earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— OR, IN OTHER WORDS,, THE WORDS OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE; 

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

Suboptimization is where there is DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE of some thing or group together with policies and programs that aim to IMPROVE the health and overall ‘well-being’ of the NATION or GROP that has been ‘DECLARED INDEPENDENT’.  We know one thing for sure, if Modern physics, Systems sciences, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta are on target with their understanding that we live in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence”  then we can expect, in our operative world dynamic, FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM because that is what our WESTERN CULTURE use of our BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, as our OPERATIVE REALITY, is GOING TO DO TO US; i.e. “IS DOING TO US”.

We have FRAGMENTATION because almost all of our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are operating as if the reality we are living in is the BINARY LOGIC based pseudo-reality of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.  We have OBSCURANTISM because even though the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE of the all-including WAVE-FIELD REALITY is overtly mainifesting; e.g. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS that is conjugate with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH of the TOWN, … WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SPEAK OF THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN as if that were REALITY.

It may be ABSTRACT BINARY LOGIC BASED INTELLECTUAL REALITY WHERE WE GET AWAY WITH DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE because we are forgetting Goedel’s Theorem which warns us that all finite LOGIC PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ are “INCOMPLETE”, and the DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, which we are DROPPING OUT, is NO SMALL DEAL, because only if we acknowledge BOTH IN CONJUGATE CONTEXT do we understand that what is going on IS ‘NOT GROWTH” of this and ‘NOT SHRINKING’ of that,but OVERALL TRANSFORMING that is ALL-INCLUDING, EVERYWHERE AT THE SAME TIME as is the nature of the ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

From the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING there is consistency with DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE, and all of this is PUT DOWN by the Systems Sciences that use the term ‘the Name of the Devil is Suboptimization.

PRIDE is an intoxicating high that often associates with the FALSE notion of LOCAL AUTHORING which is a WESTERN CULTURE EXPOSURE that comes by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.   The foundations for this DELUSION are put in place by DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE which gives synthetic legitimacy to those making the declaration.

Declarations of Independence GO HAND-IN-HAND with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that sets up the ABSTRACTION of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS’ where there is NO SUCH THING since we live in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence, aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD”

The DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE is a formal announcement of the intention to use THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING, the new NAME DISTINGUISHING YET ANOTHER FRAGMENT, THE NEW LOCAL AUTHOR, INCREASING THE FRAGMENTATION and concretizing the deal with new NATIONAL ANTHEMS where an oath is worn (but only by the two-leggeds since that is the price of residency status, since people began buying and selling pieces of the PLENUM and where military presence was the only inhibitor to a claim-staking gold rush.  Once established, the colonizing armies who were playing musical chairs with the properties traditionally inhabited by long-time ‘local residents’ recast themselves as anti-theft police, the police forces having pulled the plug on the musical chair game, the timing for the freeze having been chosen by the currently most successful and most powerful of the colonizers (‘La raison du plus fort est toujor la meilleure’)

Since this was originally intended to be a PREAMBLE, I will stop it here and now, on the day that the Israeli’s under Netanyahu are in the middle of the throes of BINARY LOGIC based conflict where the usual POLARIZATION is manifesting which has been built into Judaic-Christian-Islamic BINARY LOGIC based linguistic conceptualization, even as the QUANTUM LOGIC linguistic conceptualizing of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC terms of balance/imbalance and/or resonance/dissonance.  In this QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, there are no endless see-saw reversals of the BINARY OPTIONS of GOOD and EVIL in LOCAL, EXPLICIT FORM based on the presumption of LOCAL AUTHORING by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which by the way, is playing the foundational role in the concept of PRIDE which has been the mainstay of FRAGMENTATION into notionally ‘INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS’.

The DROPPING OUT, in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of the conceptualizing capability of INSPIRATION which is FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING, is what has left us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS with a SIMPLE one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conceptualizing scheme, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE having turned the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE INTO A PUMPKIN of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

* * * 

We live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, a WAVE-FIELD dynamic which is ANDROGYNOUS, having BOTH FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING … AS WELL AS … MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING influences.   For example, THE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWING OF THE TOWN … is, at the same time, … THE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS.

These TWO developmental approaches are co-contributors to TRANSFORMATION as when there is a SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS … IN CONJUGATE RELATION… with the GROWING of DELIBERATELY DEVELOPED TOWNS..

Transformation can bring with it an overall change in GESTALT.  For example, for those animals whose survival depends on finding shelter from their predators, their security may take a sudden DROP if conditions change so that there are no more ‘hollow logs’ to protect small animals ‘of prey’ from their predators, or no more vesicular rocks that povide hiding places for insects to protect them from larger animals such as bears.

The point I want to explore is our differing INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL (and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta) VERSUS WESTERN CULTURE assumptions about CONSCIOUSNESS and how it impacts our LANGUAGE based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING.

For example, for indigenous aboriginals and also MODERN PHYSICS, CONSCIOUSNESS is a property of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD while in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, CONSCIOUSNESS IS SOMETHING ‘LOCAL’  THAT SUPPORTS THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING DYNAMICS OF ‘THE INTELLECTUALIZING BRAIN’.

It is possible, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF ‘REALITY’, to DIVIDE ‘the CREATION’ up into the CONSCIOUS (e.g. HUMANS) and UNCONSCIOUS (e.g. ROCKS), however, in indigenous aboriginal cultures as in MODERN PHYSICS, the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD is a FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS.

“For most of human history, the word ‘consciousness’ was generally taken to indicate not the sort of individual awareness to which the word now refers, but rather a universal entity variously named Atman, Brahman, Allah, Jehovah, God, the Unmoved Mover (Aristotle), Absolute Spirit (Hegel), or any number of other names according to who was writing about it.” — Dr. Susan Pockett, University of Auckland

(more…)

This is a spell-corrected version of the note by this title previously sent to a distribution list.  I am spell-correcting it and am herewith archiving it on my Aboriginal Physics Newsletter website because I feel it manages to capture the subtle issues associated with understanding the differences between QUANTUM LOGIC and BINARY LOGIC more clearly, perhaps, than usual.  For example while BINARY LOGIC is simple and captures only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC, QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS simple and captures, AS WELL, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, where these TWO CONJUGATES correspond to the REAL and IMAGINARY components of the WAVE-FIELD dynamic.

Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is dropping out the IMAGINARY COMPONENT of the COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD dynamic.  In other words, SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC is only capable of expressing MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamics such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ while the LESS SIMPLE combination of MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate is capable of capturing THE FULL COMPLEX (real plus imaginary) WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ wherein everything is in flux and there is no EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER since the ANDROGYNOUS combination captures the CONDENSATION within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD in the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE (where the CONDENSATION [figure] is a feature of the ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM [ground].

This is really the key point of this essay, that we are included in the all-including transforming relational continuum aka ‘the wave-field’ which has a COMPLEX (real plus imaginary structure).  By this I mean that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate corresponds to the REAL component which is tangible and visible but only in the sense of a CONDENSATION in the all-including WAVE-FIELD which is ITSELF NONLOCAL and NON-VISIBLE as is the nature of wave-fields.  The CONDENSATION is ONLY APPEARANCE  because while the WAVE-FIELD is in continuing flux of a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) nature, the CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD appears LOCAL and EXPLICIT and while it APPEARS “REAL”, it is only “REAL” in the sense of being a LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘APPEARANCE’ as with a CLOUD which is a CONDENSATION of an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.  MATERIAL FORMS such as HUMANINGS understood as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD are part of the overall, all-including ENERGY CHARGED PLENUM aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, which exemplifies the QUANTUM LOGIC relation, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the CONDENSATION is both a LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORM and at the same time, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

BINARY LOGIC IS “TOO SIMPLE” to capture the COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD basis of reality, but WHAT BINARY LOGIC CAN DO, is CAPTURE the ‘REAL COMPONENT’ of the COMPLEX (REAL + IMAGINARY or LOCAL-EXPLICIT + NONLOCAL-IMPLICIT) WAVE-FIELD structure.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has been based on LINGUAFYING the REAL, LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD and simply DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE because it is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) and requires, for its linguistic sharing, LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE, the BOTH/AND LOGIC based LANGUAGE of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, as where one says, ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  This language is COMPLEX in the sense that the TOWNING is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and is in an innate conjugate relationship with the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS opted for LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which DROPS OUT THE NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, leaving ABSOLUTE EMPTY, INFINITE SPACE to ‘work with’ the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE which serves as the LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITY designated by NAMING and given notional LOCAL AUTHORING POWER with GRAMMAR.  This SIMPLIFIED ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL DYNAMIC IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY PSEUDO-REALITY is WESTERN CULTURE ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’.  It is a PSEUDO-REALITY that is REDUCED to the DYNAMICS of MATERIAL OBJECTS THAT WE PURPORT TO MOVE ABOUT and INTERACT as if in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL languages and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta language, have the same COMPLEX (real + imaginary, or LOCAL/EXPLICIT + NONLOCAL/IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE.  In THIS INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL COMPLEX, WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE (REAL + IMAGINARY) LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING where we can speak in terms of TOWNING (local, explicit) in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (nonlocal, implicit), not as TWO SEPARATE THINGS but as ONE COMPLEX RELATIONAL STRUCTURE wherein the LOCAL, EXPLICIT TOWNING is INCLUDED IN THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

The above INTRODUCTION to this SPELL-CORRECTED VERSION of the previous note summarizes the structures of the TWO DIFFERENT LANGUAGE BASED REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATIONS; i.e. the MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING ARCHITECTURE and the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC REALITY CONCEPTUALING ARCHITECTURE.

The original essay, now spell corrected and augmented to clarify key passages, follows;

* * *

(more…)

PREFACE:   We live in a WAVE-FIELD world that requires a COMPLEX (real + imaginary) LANGUAGE STRUCTURE as employed in Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal languages, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

In our ENGLISH LANGUAGE (and in the Common Average European family of languages) we give credit for ACTION-AUTHORED RESULTS to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as if the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE DID NOT EXIST, but it DOES EXIST which means that a language architecture that constrains conceptualizatoin to one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, as is the nature of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, will produce CONCEPTUALIZATIONS that are INCOMPLETE in that they DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as is the case in  ‘To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose’.  This aphorism is reminding us of the WAVE-FIELD NATURE of our sense-experience reality, wherein we cannot attribute action and development simply to MALE ASSERTING as we have engineered into our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and GRAMMAR based CONCEPTUALIZING, but we must, as Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents do, acknowledge the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE. 

But in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, we give BINARY LOGIC a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in which case, we speak only in the one-sided terms of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING development without acknowledging the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONTRIBUTION which can vary just as well as the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY can vary.  The aphorism ‘To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose’ reminds us, in effect, of the QUANTUM LOGIC structure of reality which is OBSCURED in BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  We say that ‘the BLOW EITHER shatters the sea-creature’s shell OR DOES NOT, without acknowledging that the shell may be newly formed and fragile or old and hard as rock, so that our WESTERN CULTURE HABIT of LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING that is ONE-SIDEDLY MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, FALSELY gives FULL and SOLE CREDIT for the RESULTS of ACTION to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING without acknowledging an ever-present role of CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.

As a result, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is SIMPLER than indigenous aboriginal language in the same way that Newtonian physics is simpler than Quantum physics.  While WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is grounded in the abstraction of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING BASED MECHANICS,  indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta languages are  grounded in NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FLOW-BASED TRANSFORMATION.  While the Newtonian language has a BINARY “EITHER/OR” LOGIC base coming from the assumption that reality is comprised of material objects that are ‘separate from’ and ‘moving about in’ an all-including ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT, … the indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta language usage are in accord with Modern physics in being based on the QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC based coming from the assumption of an all-including FLUID PLENUM within which the FORMS which comprise the world dynamic are RELATIONAL FORMS which are inegral to the all-including flow aka the WAVE-FIELD or ‘the Tao’, akin to ‘whorlings in the all-including flowing’.

The QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE based worldview of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta cultures is is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE based worldview of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS in the same way that the concept of KAIROS differs from the concept of CHRONOS.  CHRONOS is the TIME of the LOCAL, EXPLICIT, EGO, while KAIROS is the TIME of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT SOUL.  In terms of MODERN PHYSICS, CHRONOS is the “REAL” component of the complex WAVE-FIELD while KAIROS is the “IMAGINARY” component of the complex WAVE-FIELD; i.e.

KAIROS = the understanding of the world and who we are are and what we are doing in the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based sense of reality wherein we are included in something greater than ourselves so that our understanding of who we are and what we are doing comprehends that we are ‘going with the flow’ whether we like it or not so that our construction is of a simplified substitute world wherein we portray ourselves as the LOCAL AUTHORS of our actions and developments, as if in a TIME-BASED progression. KAIROS is our awareness of inclusion in something beyond our control which can open up and close down opportunity in which case our personal achievements are NOT based ONE-SIDEDLY on our MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, but depend on the TIDES IN THE AFFAIRS OF MAN that, taken at the flood, can lead on to fortune; i.e. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD that is in CONJUGATE RELATION with MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS can OPEN UP and ACCOMMODATE/ENABLE our MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS AND GREATLY AMPLIFY/EMBELLISH THEM.

CHRONOS = the understanding of the world and who we are and what we are doing in the SIMPLE, BINARY LOGIC based sense of a LANGUAGE-based pseudo-reality wherein we portray ourselves as the LOCAL AUTHORS of our own ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, as if we are ABSOLUTELY EXISTING material forms within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE where our actions and development unfold in TEMPORAL SEQUENCE (CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER), this SIMPLIFIED INTELLECTUAL CHRONOS view arising from BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC FRAGMENTATION of REALITY.  Note that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is a CHRONOS view wherein things are seen as changing PROGRESSIVELY’over TIME’.  This is a VOYEUR VIEW wherein SUBJECT and OBJECT are understood as TWO.  In reality we are included in TRANSFORMATION wherein as Shroedinger expounds,“SUBJECT and OBJECT ARE ONLY ONE!”.

The phrase “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”  expresses that which in Modern physics would be termed the COMPLEX (REAL and IMAGINARY) WAVE-FIELD components of reality, the SEASON referring to our sense-experience of being included in a world wherein “There is a tide in the affairs of men, Which taken at the flood, leads on to fortune. Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries. On such a full sea are we now afloat. And we must take the current when it serves, or lose our ventures”.   — Shakespeare, Julius Caesar.

In simple terms, WE ARE INCLUDED IN SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES SO THAT WE ARE NOT THE SIMPLE MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AUTHORS OF “OUR OWN” LOCAL EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, but, as in the manner of drivers in the FLOW of freeway traffic, our movements are relative to the opening of co-created corridors of opportunity, the continuing transforming of which we are included contributors within, but not in ‘control of’.  This is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE in our WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

But we can, if we choose (as is the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SUPPORTED HABIT), to think of ourselves in the CHRONOS based terms of ‘independent beings with our own self-sourced powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development’ in which case we IGNORE our REAL KAIROS based ROLE as PARTICIPANTS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, … a participation in that which is greater than ourselves by way of our being included in the all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is influenced by (all of) our relative actions and developments.  To the extent that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ LANGUAGE-constrained THINKING that is in the BINARY LOGIC based terms of INDEPENDENT BEINGS that move about and interact in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY, INFINITE SPACE, as in a CHRONOS based dynamic, we become prisoners of a BINARY LOGIC based way of being in the world that is the source of FRAGMENTATION, as Bohm is pointing out.

So, this PREFACE has been included as a reminder of our being included in the all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, an inclusion that is OBSCURED when we employ our TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE which is fully capable of constructing ‘pseudo-realities’ based on material forms and their actions and interactions as if in absolute empty and infinite space, … a linguistic conceptualizing approach that is OBSCURANTIST in that once we employ LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based on SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC actions and developments, the communication need has been filled and there is no longer any ‘OPENING’ to bring into play LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION such as;‘To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose’.

That is, once we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ wherein we make no mention of the conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, our one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY SIMPLIFICATION, which implies ‘WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE’ which provides a non-participating ‘container’ for the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALZING ONLY ACTION and DEVELOPMENT, the understanding is COMPLETE albeit in an INCOMPLETE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC SENSE (in the sense of Goedel’s Theorem of INCOMPLETENESS of all finite systems of BINARY LOGIC)..

Once we accept the BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITION (recall Goedel’s Theorem that all finite logical propositions are INCOMPLETE) that ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, OUR REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION IS AN ESTABLISHED ‘TAKE-AWAY’, … been there, know that’, … which in the same fell swoop SHUTS OUT (OBSCURES) the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC proposition, ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

“TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is exemplary of the QUANTUM LOGIC dynamic which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT or in other words ‘RELATIONAL’ (the basic nature of TRANSFORMATION).

Here we can see that in order to architect language to deliver an understanding of reality that is NOT subject to BINARY LOGIC based OBSCURANTISM that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE as supports ‘the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, we need a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme that has a BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC capability wherein the material form is a CONDENSATION of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is captured in the words ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

BUT IN THE EVENT THAT LANGUAGE BASED EXPRESSION STARTS OFF WITH the SIMPLE CONCEPTUALIZATION; ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, we have IMPLICITLY INJECTED the ABSTRACTION of an ABOLUTE EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE.  The words ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ comprise, as Nietzsche pointed out, ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ that invents the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development.   BUT THERE IS NO “LOCAL AUTHORING” in the REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE WORLD OF THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM since TRANSFORMATION is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).

Our SENSE-EXPERIENCE does NOT support the SIMPLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ with its implied LOCAL POWER OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, but our INTELLECT is fully capable of such BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZATION and also our EMPLOYING of such ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZATION as our INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based OPERATIVE REALITY.   Thus, for example, we proceed with the notion that we are GROWING our TOWNS and our AGRICULTURAL and INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS …. WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGING AT THE SAME TIME, THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, in which case what is actually going on is TRANSFORMATION and there is NO SUCH THING IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY (but only in INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based PSEUDO-REALITY) AS “THE GROWTH OF TOWNS AND THE GROWTH of AGRICULTURAL and INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS”, such words EMBODYING THE OBSCURANTISM of DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that is the IMAGINARY component of the COMPLEX REAL + IMAGINARY WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.

NOTA BENE:   The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE IS THE FOUNDATIONAL REALITY WHILE THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS’ are SECONDARY ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (APPEARANCE), as Bohm, Schroedinger and other Modern Physics interpreters have pointed out.  This is why the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ , which is the KAIROS (to everything there is a season) qualitative INCLUSIONAL understanding, is the first order understanding of reality while the simple CHRONOS (tempus fugit, the linear ‘passage of time’) is the quantitative understanding as in linear duration; ‘we do not have much time left in our lives’.

CHRONOS is the ONE-SIDED (MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING) realm of ‘what things do’ as in ‘done over time’ or CHRONOLOGICALLY as in GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT which is BINARY LOGIC based (were a ‘thing-in-itself’ is EITHER ounger and smaller OR older and larger) which says NOTHING about qualitative or androgynous change.  If we use simple TIME as chronological development, we are using only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DEVELOPMENT and DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, these two together supporting the LESS SIMPLE dynamic of TRANSFORMATION, which lies beyon reach of GROWTH which is a one-sided dynamic as if transpiring in EMPTY SPACE. KAIROS brings to bear then sense of ‘opportune timing’ which is no longer ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

To say “the seed sprouts”, is a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING BINARY LOGIC TRUTH which implies ‘in an absolute empty and infinite space which is implies a CHRONOLOGICAL framing giving a LINEAR SEQUENCE of DEVELOPMENTAL EVENTS.   However, our QUALITATIVE sense-experience is our feeling of being included in the arrival of the WARMTH of SPRING and this INCLUSIONAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE is beyond articulation in the SIMPLE TERMS of WHAT THINGS DO or HOW THINGS CHANGE which is all that BINARY LOGIC is capable of.   CONCEPTUALIZATION that involves SENSE-EXPERIENCING OF INCLUSION entails LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC expression such as WITHIN THE SOLAR IRRADIATED INCUBATOR OF THE WARMING SOIL, the seed’s built-in understanding that ‘to everything there is a season and a time to every purpose was invoked so that the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING influence and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamic unfolded in CONJUGATE SYMBIOTIC RELATION, the OPPORTUNE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONTAINING CONDITION inducing conjugate expression of OPPORTUNE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.  Here we can see the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION where there is JUST ONE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM within which, a WHORLING or CONDENSATION giving the APPEARANCE of TWO when, in fact, there is only ONE; i.e. the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

ONLY IF WE FOCUS SINGLE-MINDEDLY ON THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE (as if it were floating in absolute empty and infinite space) do we CONTRIVE the LINGUISTIC DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR BINARY LOGIC “LOCAL AUTHOR” based CONCEPTUALIZING of QUOTE/UNQUOTE “REALITY” .

ONCE we start speaking (using LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATION) wherein actions and results develop in a forward in time fashion, as if in an EMPTY SPACE (so that there is no ANDROGYNOUS relation) and employ ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms such as GROWTH, we OBSCURE the LESS SIMPLE (YET MORE TRUE) REALITY of ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION.  While the SIMPLE abstraction of GROWTH goes together with CHRONOS, the LESS SIMPLE concept of TRANSFORMATION goes together with KAIROS.   OVER TIME, so we say, the Colorado River ‘carved out’ the GRAND CANYON, but this PROMOTION of the MALE ASSERTING as the AUTHORING SOURCE, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING DYNAMIC wherein it was the opening of the valley that seduced the coming together of male rivulets into streams and streams into a “RAGING RIVER” which we then say is the MALE ASSERTING AUTHOR of the CARVING OUT of the GRAND CANYON.  This is a MISTAKE since it is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING VALLEY that inductively shaped the development of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING RIVER.   In other words, it is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT that is the mother of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, as also in the relation between KAIROS and CHRONOS.   

One term — chronos— expresses the fundamental conception of time in measure, the quantity of duration, the length of periodicity, the age of an object or artifact, and the rate of acceleration as applied to identifiable bodies, whether on the surface of the earth or in the firmament beyond.  The questions relevant to this conception of time are; ‘How fast?’, ‘How frequent?’, ‘How old’?’ and the answers to these questions can be given, in principle at least, in cardinal numbers or in terms of limits that approach these numbers.  The other term —kairos— points to a qualitative character of time, to the special position an event or action occupies in a series, to a season when something appropriately happens that cannot happen at any time, but only at ‘that time’, in a time that marks an opportunity which may not recur.  The question especially relevant to kairos time is ‘when?’, ‘At what time?’  ‘Kairos’, or ‘the right time’, as the term is often translated, involves ordinality or the conception of a special temporal position, …  such that what happens benefits from being launched within a propitious, opportune moment for decision and action.

At the end of the day, one can see that QUANTUM LOGIC, like KAIROS, offers a LESS SIMPLE understanding of reality than the more simple BINARY LOGIC. which, like the more simple CHRONOS, offers us ONLY A SIMPLE LINEAR PROGRESSIVE CONCEPTUALIZING OF CHANGE as with GROWTH where the LESS SIMPLE ALTERNATIVE is TRANSFORMATION which takes us from CHRONOS to KAIROS.

We know how CONSTRUCTION ‘works’; i.e. we assume that there is an imaginary thing-in-itself such as a TOWN which is floating around in psychological empty space , naked and without any landscape to situate itself within, so that BUILDERS are given PLANS of the TOWN as if it will be possible to construct the TOWN and sit it down on top of the LANDSCAPE so that we do not have to admit to the true (sense-experience affirmed) reality wherein the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is the PRIMARY REALITY and thus there is no such thing as the CONSTRUCTION of a TOWN, but there is instead, “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, and this “TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING that we ourselves are included in.

So, while CHRONOS goes with SIMPLE GROWTH and BINARY LOGIC, KAIROS goes with LESS SIMPLE TRANSFORMATION and QUANTUM LOGIC.

“TO EVERY THING THERE IS A SEASON AND A TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE” affirms that it is only NATURAL to accept that WE ARE NOT INDEPENDENT BEINGS IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE as our BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE HABIT leads us to believe and which has as ASSERTING DIRECTLY OUT OF OUR NOTIONAL LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS, but given that we are INCLUSIONS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, it ‘makes sense’ for us to let our actions be shaped by the potentials for us to cultivate resonance in our relations within the world we share inclusion.

RECALL that Chronos is the time of the LOCAL, EXPLICIT Ego while Kairos is the time of the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT Soul. While CHRONOS “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE KAIROS EMBODIES IT.  That is, CHRONOS and KAIROS are related in the same manner as the REAL and IMAGINARY components of the COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD.   

* * * * * * END OF PREFACE * * * * * * * 

How a ‘death in the family’ is transformation (quantum both/and logic) rather than a ‘loss’ (binary either/or logic) in accord with modern physics and indigenous aboriginal, Buddhist/Taoist and Advaita Vedanta understanding.

This understanding that the world dynamic is that of our inclusion in an all-including transforming relational continuum is consistent with Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

The indigenous aboriginal aphorism ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (everything is related) captures the Modern physics understanding of reality as an all-including, continually transforming, ENERGY-CHARGE-PLENUM (David Bohm), otherwise known as the WAVE-FIELD in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, so that we, ourselves, as CONDENSATIONS of the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD are QUANTUM LOGIC features that GATHER and SCATTER within the WAVE-FIELD, rather than ABSOLUTE MATERIAL BEINGS that move around and interact within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which is the BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have built into our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, because it is BINARY LOGIC based, acknowledges ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE so that we speak, for example, in terms such as ‘the TOWN is growing’ (male asserting/actualizing only) without acknowledging the conjugate ‘shrinking of WILDERNESS’ (female accommodating/enabling conjugate).

In the WESTERN CULTURE over-simplistic BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING of ‘REALITY’ that we have given the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, we speak in the BINARY LOGIC terms of BIRTH and DEATH, rather than in the Modern physics consistent QUANTUM LOGIC terms of CONDENSATION and ASSIMILATION wherein there are relational features that GATHER and SCATTER in the all-including fluid continuum (the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD).

The QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY is the REALITY as we know it from our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion therein as affirmed in our Modern physics understanding where, as Bohm (coming from modern physics) , ‘systems scientists’, and others are emphasizing;

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.”  — David Bohm

We live “in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

“Imagine there’s no countries It isn’t hard to do” —John Lennon, ‘IMAGINE’

(more…)

This NOTE entitled ‘LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME’ is a TITLE inspired by James Loewen’s ‘LIES MY TEACHER TOLD ME’, and also by Howard Zinn’s ‘A People’s History of the United States’, and then again by Charles C. Mann’s “1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus.  In all cases, there is the sense that the development of POPULAR historical impressions of REALITY  are impacted NOT ONLY by writers’ and speakers’ perspectives and particular experiences, but by THE LANGUAGE THEY ARE USING FOR SUCH “CONCEPTUALIZING”.  Here I use CONCEPTUALIZING to underscore the IMPOSSIBILITY of REPRESENTING  a FRAGMENT OF HISTORY OR a FRAGMENT of ANYTHING extracted from the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

For example, we may LOOSELY speak of a REPRESENTATION of the BIRTH of a VOLCANIC ISLAND where we show pictures of ‘the VOLCANIC ISLAND at various stages of “ITS DEVELOPMENT”, however, here we are using the SIMPLIFYING CAPABILITIES of LANGUGE and our sense-experience is affirming that what is going on is an overall TRANSFORMATION which INCLUDES “ISLANDING”, where there is no PHYSICAL FRAGMENTING of the ISLAND from the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM as would justify our use of LANGUAGE wherein we impute GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT “TO THE ISLAND”, a CONCEPTUALIZING only made possible by our IMAGINATIVE INVENTING OF THE ABSTRACTION of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, which is IMPLIED by the LANGUAGE based concepts of GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT.  This is NOT a “REPRESENTATION” of the physical reality, the physical reality is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which INCLUDES the “VOLCANIC ISLANDING” as a relational dynamic within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE REALITY.

WHEN WE USE LANGUAGE TO “CHOP OUT” A FRAGMENT such as ‘the VOLCANIC ISLAND’ and USE LANGUAGE TO SPEAK OF ‘ITS GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT’, this is NOT the REPRESENTATION of some REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE PHENOMENON, this FRAGMENTATION is an ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZING AND NOT A “REPRESENTATION”.  That is, what our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMS is that THERE IS ISLANDING in the PLANETING wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as is the nature of MATERIAL CONDENSINGS in the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

Because we are INCLUDED in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, WE CANNOT ‘GET OUTSIDE OF IT’ TO DEVELOP A ‘REPRESENTATION OF IT”.  IT IS ‘NON-REPRESENTATABLE’, i.e. ‘The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’ — Lao Tzu.

HERE we can see HOW IT IS that the language architectures of indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, because they give the foundational role to FLOW rather than BEING, … AVOID FRAGMENTATION, as for example, by saying ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ instead of, as with WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, giving the foundational role to BEING rather than FLOW and saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services. 

GIVING the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO ‘BEING’ CONCEPTUALIZES ‘the TOWN’ as a ‘LOCAL AUTHOR’ of actions and developments, by way of, as Nietzsche calls it, ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’).  In SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY as affirmed in Modern Physics, THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS as ‘THINGS THAT GROW’ such as ‘TOWNS’ or ‘HUMANS for that matter, since everything is in flux so that there is ‘TOWNING’ and ‘HUMANING’ within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (aka ‘the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM’ aka ‘the WAVE-FIELD’). 

HERE we can see HOW IT IS that the language architectures of indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, because they give the foundational role to FLOW rather than to BEING, … AVOID FRAGMENTATION, as for example, by saying ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE instead of, as with WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, giving the foundational role to BEING by saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’, which CLEARLY CONCEPTUALIZES ‘THE TOWN’ as a ‘LOCAL AUTHOR’ of actions and developments. 

The “LOCAL AUTHOR” CONCEPT is ABSTRACTION created by ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ (i.e. the TOWN is GROWING’).  By CONTRAST, in SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY as affirmed by MODERN PHYSICS, there are NO SUCH THINGS as ‘THINGS THAT GROW’ such as ‘TOWNS’, or ‘HUMANS’ for that matter, since EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX (as condensations in the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD) so that there is ‘TOWNING’ and ‘HUMANING’ within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

To use LANGUAGE that tells tales of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with GRAMMAR given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments … IS A LIE!  It is the LIE of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ . This EGO-BOLSTERED LIE of LOCAL AUTHORING is the source of FRAGMENTATION in both WESTERN CULTURE “PSYCHICAL” and “PHYSICAL” DYNAMICS.

* * * 

The AIM of this NOTE entitled “LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME”  is as much concerned with the ARCHITECTURE of LANGUAGE based LYING  as with the CONTENT of the LIES and in particular, the WESTERN CULTURE CHOICE OF SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC in preference to LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC as is the choice of MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA

What is CLEAR is that LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS CAN BE MORE OR LESS FAITHFUL TO SENSE-EXPERIENCE IMPRESSIONS in spite of the fact that LANGUAGE can never CAPTURE SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY; i.e. as Lao Tzu observes, ‘The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’.

So, in some sense, ALL LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING is ‘LYING’ based, but this NOTE addresses how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of using BINARY LOGIC as a means of assessing WHAT IS TRUE versus WHAT IS FALSE and this COMPLICATES matters because SPEAKING THE TRUTH is not the same as REVEALING REALITY, and if I say, ‘the TOWN is GROWING, LOGICALLY, THIS MAY BE CORRECT but the REALITY lies beyond the LOGICAL TRUTH since, in this case, for example, there is at the same time the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS which is CONJUGATE to the GROWTH of the TOWN, and so while my LOGICAL PROPOSITION WAS TRUE or CORRECT, IT WAS AT THE SAME TIME “INCOMPLETE” since I made NO MENTION of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS and thus the overall TRANSFORMATION which is available to our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  This Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite logical propositions points to JUST ONE of the FOUR ‘LIES’ I am discussing in this note, the word ‘LIE’ pivoting from our WESTERN CULTURE use of the BINARY LOGIC based terms of TRUTH and LIES (aka FALSEHOOD).

While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS speak of TRUTH and FALSEHOOD as if they had ROCK SOLID MEANING, that is itself a FALSEHOOD, and having said that, I have stepped knee deep into the ambiguity that comes into play in regard to BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING which inspired Goedel’s research and his ‘Goedel’s Theorem’ of the incompleteness of all finite logical propositions. This “incompleteness” of all finite logical propositions casts a shadow over TRUTH in general;

“What then is truth? A mobile army of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphisms — in short, a sum of human relations, which have been enhanced, transposed, and embellished poetically and rhetorically, and which after long use seem firm, canonical, and obligatory to a people: truths are illusions about which one has forgotten that is what they are; metaphors which are worn out and without sensuous power; coins which have lost their pictures and now matter only as metal, no longer as coins.

 We still do not know where the urge for truth comes from; for as yet we have heard only of the obligation imposed by society that it should exist: to be truthful means using the customary metaphors – in moral terms, the obligation to lie according to fixed convention, to lie herd-like in a style obligatory for all…” – Nietzsche  (On truth and lie in an extra-moral sense’)

In this NOTE, may aim is NOT SIMPLY to point to LIES but to point to LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME and to point out how these LIES lead to CONFUSION and PSYCHOSIS in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, as has been explored by Nietzsche and Bohm, putting the findings in this LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME format so as to SPELL OUT the DAMAGE DONE

and HOW TO AVOID THE PITFALLS,  since there are overall PATTERNS here, in particular the pattern of how we are infusing BINARY LOGIC into our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THOUGHT is such a manner as to FRAGMENT, not simply our WORLDVIEW but our basic THINKING APPARATUS, leading, as Bohm observes, to a WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED EXPOSURE TO PARANOIA and SCHIZOPHRENIA AND OTHER FORMS OF LANGUAGE-INFUSED FRAGMENTATION .  WHILE THE SOURCE OF THIS DYSFUNCTION IS THE “LIES” WE HAVE BUILT INTO OUR WESTERM CULTURE LANGUAGE” ARCHITECTURE, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE NOT YET, AS A SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, ‘TUNED IN TO” OUR LYING WAYS, AND THAT AWARENESS CAN ONLY COME WHEN (“AND IF”) WE SHIFT FROM BINARY LOGIC (e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING”) TO QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE (e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”)  WHEREUPON the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE WILL BE RESTORED AS WILL THE FULL ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD THOUGHT and LANGUAGE CAPABILITY. 

* * * 

What is presented is a series of EXAMPLES OF FOUR TYPES OF LIES AND HOW THESE LIES DO DAMAGE IN WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING” ;

LIE # 1.   “Kepler points out that in order to simplify our language based CONCEPTUALIZING of “REALITY”, we instead simplify (LIE ABOUT) the phenomena we are conceptualizing.” 

As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’

DAMAGE DONE:  Because it is EASIER to speak in the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms of, for example, CULTIVATING and DEVELOPING LAND without mentioning the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING LOSS OF WILDERNESS DIVERSITY, there is no MENTION, VALUE ASSESSMENT or OVERT CONSIDERATION of what is ACTUALLY GOING ON which is TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE.  This OBSCURANTISM conceals the LOSS of DIVERSITY and SUSTAINABILITY  

 * * * 

LIE # 2.   “Nietzsche points out that the COMMON DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR creates the LIE of FALSELY implying LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development”.

“Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”; – but this conclusion is already mythology:  it separates that which effects from the effecting.  If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.” – To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” — Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

DAMAGE DONE:  Because it is SIMPLER FROM A LANGUAGE MESSAGING POINT OF VIEW, to FRAGMENT THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING DYNAMIC WE SHARE INCLUSION IN, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ the LINGUISTIC SHORTCUT where we use the COMBINATION of NAMING and GRAMMAR TO IMPUTE LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, and avoid the difficulty of capturing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) dynamic of the all-including TRANSFORMATION (WAVE-FIELD) that we and all things are included in.  That is, we employ, instead, a VOYEUR view that we intellectually/linguistically reduce to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT where we are NO LONGER discussing our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  Our PLANS and ACTIONS, while our language based discourse has us reduce them to the BINARY LOGIC terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, are, IN REALITY, of a QUANTUM LOGIC NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (TRANSFORMATIVE) NATURE.  Because we are INTELLECTUALLY employing BINARY LOGIC and orienting to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT while we are in SENSE-EXPERIENCE, included in a QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, our linguistic reporting on ‘what is going on’ (which is in the BINARY LOGIC terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT) is AT ADDS WITH our QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

IN SHORT, THE MOMENT WE INTRODUCE the linguistic fragmentation of BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL AUTHORING by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we DROP OUT QUANTUM LOGIC based NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING.  The LIE of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ is particular to WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing.

* * *

LIE # 3.  “Goedel’s Theorem EXPOSES THE LIE that while “finite systems of logical propositions” are presented as if they are TRUE, “all finite systems of logical propositions are INCOMPLETE”; e.g. While it is “TRUE” that “the Avalanche crashed down the Mountain into the Valley, it is “INCOMPLETE” since, as our sense-experience informs us, it is NO LONGER THE SAME MOUNTAIN and NO LONGER THE SAME VALLEY (while the simple BINARY LOGIC based rhetoric in the one-sided MALE ASSERTING terms of the AVALANCHE and its actions is TRUE, it is “INCOMPLETE” and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED “REALITY” is informing us of our inclusion in an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION. 

So, for example. while it may be proven true that the TOWN is GROWING, this logical proposition is INCOMPLETE since it fails to mention that there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS which takes us BEYOND BINARY LOGIC (the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM) to QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  The BINARY LOGIC based concept of the TOWN GROWING implies … ‘within an absolute empty and infinite containing space’, … while the QUANTUM LOGIC based concept of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE implies that the TOWNING is INCLUDED within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and thus lacks the INDEPENDENT STATUS necessary for ‘its own GROWTH’.   Here we see how BINARY LOGIC, in referring to GROWTH, implies an INCOMPLETENESS relative to sense-experience reality wherein there is NO GROWTH in its own BINARY LOGIC ‘right’, there instead being a QUANTUM LOGIC CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the including WILDERNESS (rather than the BINARY LOGIC supporting ‘EMPTY SPACE’), where the OPENING UP (SHRINKING) of the WILDERNESS plays a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING role in CONJUGATE RELATION with the GROWING of the TOWN.

We might therefore say that the INCOMPLETENESS of BINARY LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO contrasts with the  COMPLETENESS of QUANTUM LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND are ONE.

DAMAGE DONE:  Our WESTERN CULTURE FAILURE to acknowledge THAT “THAT WHICH IS LOGICALLY TRUE” is …. “NOT (sense-experience) REAL”, …  is the source of much damaging and confusing action.  While it is LOGICALLY TRUE to reckon that the DOUBLING of our CULTIVATED LAND AREA will produce DOUBLE THE VOLUMES of GRAIN, FRUIT and other “PRODUCE”, this LOGICAL TRUTH FAILS TO CAPTURE THE SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY OF THE CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS DIVERSITY which plays an ESSENTIAL ROLE in the SUSTAINING of general health and fertility of the OVERALL LANDSCAPE which INCLUDES the CULTIVATED CROPLAND.  Thus the TRUTH of the GROWTH OF PRODUCTION is an INCOMPLETE TRUTH as is the case for ALL LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS as proven in Goedel’s Theorem.  This WESTERN CULTURE IGNORING OF THE RADICAL DIFFERENCE between ‘LOGICAL TRUTH’ and ‘SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY’ is the source of much LINGUISTIC MISREPRESENTATION which plays out in MISGUIDED BEHAVIOURS that deliver UNINTENDED RESULTS.  

LIE # 4.   “David Bohm points out how we are using LANGUAGE to FALSIFY our CONCEPTUALIZING of “REALITY”, creating UNTRUE FRAGMENTED INTELLECTUAL PSEUDO-REALITIES that we are using as our OPERATIVE REALITY.”

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

DAMAGE DONE:

The DAMAGE summarized here by Bohm is coming from FRAGMENTATION that is the SPECIALITY of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITURE, as described in LIE #1 (the DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, … LIE #2, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that FALSELY IMPUTES LOCAL AUTHORING, and LIE #3, the GOEDEL’S THEOREM RELATED LIE where we CONFUSE LOGICAL TRUTH (which is ALWAYS INCOMPLETE) for REALITY as in the example ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ which is TRUE but INCOMPLETE and OBSCURANTIST (it is A LIE) in that it FAILS to acknowledge the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS the LOSS of the important LIFE and HEALTH SUPPORTING DIVERSITY.

FRAGMENTATION, LIE #4, IS THE RESULT OF THINKING DISTORTED by LIE #1, LIE #2 and LIE #3 that CO-CONTRIBUTE to FRAGMENTATION. That is, …. LIE #1; the DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, LEAVING MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING TO SERVE UP REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS ‘ON ITS OWN’, … LIE #2 the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that FALSELY IMPUTES ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING based LOCAL AUTHORING, … and LIE #3, the GOEDEL’S THEOREM RELATED LIE where we IGNORE THE INCOMPLETENESS OF LOCAL PROPOSITIONS AND THUS, FOR EXAMPLE DECIDE that the LOGICAL PROPOSITION ‘PRODUCTION IS GROWING’ is a “GOOD THING”, without considering the INCOMPLETENESS of this logical proposition “PRODUCTION IS GROWING” SINCE IT FAILS TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.  LIES #1, #2, and #3 ALL SUPPORT THE CONSTRUCTION of a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY PSEUDO-REALITY which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, leading to a simplified PSEUDO-REALITY based one-sidedly on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.   

THAT IS, … THESE THREE LIES #1, #2 and #3 SUPPORT LIE #4 which is FRAGMENTATION which is the overall distinguishing characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE (i.e. the FRAGMENTING by way of ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE and by way of CATEGORIZATION (LGBTQ, BLACK, WHITE) etc wherein we put DIFFERENTIATION BASED CONCEPTUALIZING into PRIMACY over INTEGRATION BASED CONCEPTUALIZING, in CONTRADICTION to MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta wherein the understanding of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is that ALL THINGS ARE RELATED by way of material forms being CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

“FRAGMENTATION” is THE CULMINATION of BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING wherein we REDUCE QUANTUM LOGIC NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION to BINARY LOGIC LOCAL and EXPLICIT BEING-based FRAGMENTATION.  THIS LIE OF A FRAGMENTED REALITY BASED ON BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS IN TERMS OF LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE IS A HUGE LIE THAT IS THE SUPPORTING CENTRE-PIECE OF WESTERN “REALITY”, the LINGUISTIC PSEUDO-REALITY that IS SUPPORTED AND SUSTAINED THROUGH OUR CONTINUING USE OF IT..

* * * SUMMARY: …. The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD Me * * * 

These FOUR LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME all have a BINARY LOGIC based, strongly distorting influence on my PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC conceptualizing of REALITY that is the source of, as Bohm has said, a FRAGMENTED VIEW (UNDERSTANDING) of REALITY.

BECAUSE WE HAVE BUILT THIS FRAGMENTATION INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, WE “KEEP REPEATING IT TO OURSELVES, OVER AND OVER AGAIN THROUGH OUR CONTINUING USE OF OUR “LIE-INFUSED” LANGUAGE.

There is a kind of CATCH-22 ENTRAPMENT here in that the NEEDED FIX to resolve the LIES could be compared to changing the wheels on one’s car while one is speeding down the road in it.

Meanwhile, the FOUR LIES cited above continue to appear in BINARY LOGIC based USAGE such as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, SHUTTING OUT ACCESS to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC alternative ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’. 

Like the Cuckoo that lays is eggs in another LESS SIMPLE bird’s nest, when the SIMPLE CUCKOOS HATCH OUT  in the nest, and  they do so prior to the natural offspring in the nest, they PROMPTLY PUSH THE INCUMBENT’S EGGS OUT OF THE NEST so that the full resources of the non-Cuckoo parents are devoted to the nurturing of the fledgling freeloader Cuckoos.

AS  with this relation between the SIMPLE and LESS SIMPLE, so it is with LIES, and because LIES are often SIMPLER than the TRUTH, they can easily DISPLACE the TRUTH; i.e.  ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ can easily DISPLACE ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ since the former’s BINARY LOGIC (LOCAL, EXPLICIT) STRUCTURE is SIMPLER than the latter’s QUANTUM LOGIC (NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT) relational structure.

Note that the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC option has a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING-ONLY LOGIC STRUCTURE while the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC option has an ANDROGYNOUS, TWO-SIDED FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING — MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE; i.e. a QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE..

* * * 

‘The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD Me’  have not only been TOLD TO ME, but I have been inadvertently PASSING THEM ON TO OTHERS.

It is EVIDENTLY A MAJOR CHALLENGE to LIVE, within the WESTERN CULTURE SYSTEM, ON THE BASIS OF NO LONGER ADHERING to THE LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME.   I would compare this to the MAHAVIT – ATMAVIT challenge of ADVAITA VEDANTA discussed by Erwin Schroedinger, whose orientation to the WORLD ACCORDING to MODERN PHYSICS (wherein everything is related and everything has the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE) is difficult to overtly comply with in one’s manner of behaving as would be the way of the ATMAVIT, but where it is possible, to at least intellectually understand and ‘partly follow’, while sustaining relatively good relations within the WESTERN CULTURE social collective, trying at the same time to encourage a shift from the BINARY LOGIC INTELLECTUALLY ABSTRACT WESTERN WORLD to QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONFORMANCY.

For example, while there are pressures within WESTERN CULTURE to commit to the BINARY LOGIC genre of support for the UKRAINE in its CONFLICT WITH RUSSIA when one’s QUANTUM LOGIC understanding is in terms of conflict as IMBALANCE where the remedy is RESTORING BALANCE, rather than in the BINARY LOGIC terms of “RIGHT” against “WRONG” or “GOOD” against “EVIL”.  While the BINARY LOGIC mission is to SURMOUNT and OVERCOME if not DESTROY/ELIMINATE the forces of EVIL, the QUANTUM LOGIC mission is to RESOLVE the RELATIONAL DISSONANCE and RESTORE RELATIONAL RESONANCE.

The combination of ‘INDEPENDENT TRIBAL IDENTITY’ in the sense of INDEPENDENT BEING without the MITAKUYE OYASIN (all things are related) ethic of indigenous aboriginal cultures and Modern physics, leads to knee-jerk fallback to PURIFICATIONISM where the challenge is understood in terms of WE, THE GOOD or SUPRIOR PEOPLE are overcoming THEY, THE BAD or INFERIOR PEOPLE, rather than resolving relational dissonance within one all-including relational collective.  The indigenous aboriginal ‘eating the heart’ of a courageous enemy warrior taken down in battle signals an understanding of life as a relational web or matrix rather than a hierarchy

(The WESTERN CULTURE “great chain of being” is a hierarchical structure of all matter and life, thought by medieval Christianity to have been decreed by God. The chain begins with God and descends through angels, humans, animals and plants to minerals.)

In the Modern Era, the BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT BEING or the INDEPENDENT TRIBE has been BOLSTERED by the MODERN TREND to ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE’ which now DIVIDE the people of the world which CONTRASTS with the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding that ALL THINGS ARE RELATED.   The understanding of Modern physics, meanwhile, is that ALL THINGS ARE, in a PHYSICAL REALITY SENSE, CONDENSATIONS of and within the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

This QUANTUM LOGIC understanding continues to be TOP-SIDED AND OBSCURED by the BINARY LOGIC based INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION of self-declared ‘INDEPENDENT NATIONS’ (195 of them), such intellectual abstraction being put into an unnatural primacy over the sense-experience of all things being related (mitakuye oyasin).  The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD me include this LIE of the INDEPENDENCE OF NATIONS on the basis of LANGUAGE based INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION pivoting from ‘DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE”  which is ENTIRELY “WITHOUT SUPPORT” from SENSE-EXPERIENCE, and which leads to the further LIE of SUBOPTIMIZATION of a notional INDEPENDENT NATION that DOES NOT, in sense-experience reality, EXIST

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

The LIES MY CULTURE TOLD ME …. ARE LIES WE CONTINUE TO TELL,  and these lies CONTINUE TO FORM THE BASIS OF THE PERSISTING UNREAL PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC  PSEUDO-REALITY of the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, promoted through BINARY LOGIC infused LANGUAGE and GRAMMAR.  This BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE CONTINUES to be the WESTERN CULTURE POPULAR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE CHOICE and it is NOW “LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”, NAMELY THE WESTERN CULTURE “EGO” DERIVING BACKING OF THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR BASED “LOCAL AUTHORING” ABSTRACTION.

 * * *