Archive for year 2023
The WESTERN CULTURE Humpty-Dumpty LANGUAGE Dilemma0
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have a LANGUAGE based communications problem in that we have ENGINEERED AN IMPORTANT SIMPLIFICATION into our Common Average European (CAE) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE. For example, Modern physics Rheomode (flow-based language) and the indigenous aboriginal languages, along with language as used by Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta incorporates the full ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD) STRUCTURE with its CONJUGATE Female-Accommodating/Enabling — Male Asserting/Actualizing STRUCTURE, .. while the WESTERN CULTURE CAE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT” the Female Accommodating/enabling component and ‘goes with’ a one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY structure.
Instead of the Modern physics compliant and indigenous aboriginal ANDROGYNOUS LANGUAGE STRUCTURE, an example of which is ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING landscape’, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE reduce this to ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.‘
NOTA BENE: WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (i.e. the ‘transforming landscape’), employing ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE (‘the towning’).
The Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE gives a foundational role to QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC that captures the relationship between the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM also known as the WAVE-FIELD and material CONDENSATIONS within the WAVE-FIELD. This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is critically important and NOTA BENE that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE DROPS OUT the QUANTUM LOGIC language content and SUBSTITUTES BINARY LOGIC relations. This DUMBING DOWN of the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION from the full-blown QUANTUM LOGIC (Wave-field based) CONCEPTUALIZATION to the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION takes us from ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING landscape’, .. to, .. ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.
The latter BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION is a simplification that “FORCES UPON ITSELF” the INVENTING of an ABSOLUTE, EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, … having done away with the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC “energy-charged PLENUM in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including PLENUM (wave-field).
NOTE THAT this WESTERN CULTURE simplifying of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that enables CONCEPTUALIZATION based on what Nietzsche terms ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is used to CONCEPTUALIZE “LOCAL AUTHORING”. This LINGUISTIC CONCEPUALIZATION featuring LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development entails the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJGUATE which is why WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE employs the OBSCURANTIST tactic of ONLY RECOGNIZING THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ACTION CONJUGATE as exemplified by the THIN SKULL RULE which DROPS OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of how the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING “DOMINATES” in relational dynamics while WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS insist on OBSCURING the dominant influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is, of course, the reality that comes with living within this wave-field world.
Because of the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE FROM LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF (QUOTE/UNQUOTE) “REALITY”, we are stuck with using the SIMPLIFIED-to-one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION SCHEME which gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’, and because we are EMPLOYING THIS AS OUR ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’, … LOOK OUT! HERE COMES THE WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYSFUNCTIONS of FRAGMENTATION, EGO INFLATION AND MORE!
THIS PREFACE repeats the WARNING (as given by Bohm and others) as to how our use of our CAE LANGUAGE is INFECTING OUR THOUGHTS with SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based INTELLECTUAL PSEUDO-REALITIES that are inducing in us, actions and interactions that IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE reality are generating FRAGMENTATION. For example, where our language has us talking about how everyone has their heads down, working together in collaboration, on the growth of their TOWNS. This would be fine in a flat space, but in the spherical space we are in, it is at the same time, the source of SHRINKING WILDERNESS, so that the REAL (sense-experience affirmed) REALITY is NOT GROWTH but TRANSFORMATION of the overall LANDSCAPE.
This understanding, that follows from living in a spherical space (wave-field), that there is only TRANSFORMATION and not ‘GROWTH’, ‘DEVELOPMENT’ and ‘PRODUCTION’ is an understanding that is already built into indigenous aboriginal language architecture but which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have stripped out of our language architecture by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and thus giving ourselves the impression that the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING concepts of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are LEGITIMATE CONCEPTS! They would be legitimate in a FLAT SPACE but FLAT SPACES are MATHEMATICAL ABSTRACTION and there are no FLAT SPACES in our sense-experience reality, so that there is NO SUCH THING AS “GROWTH”, there is only “TRANSFORMATION” as is acnowledged with the architecture of indigenous aboriginal languages (and Modern physics) but the PRIMARY REALITY OF TRANFORMIATION is NOT to be found or acknowledged in the simplified BINARY LOGIC based architecture of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES.
This PREFACE is to try to ‘give a view from above’ the confusing influences in our standard WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE due to its being thoroughly SALTED with BINARY LOGIC conceptualizations that may distract the reader from the message in this essay that BINARY LOGIC “IS THE PROBLEM” and to avoid is use. Ideally, this would require a shift to a new, QUANTUM LOGIC (flow-based) language such as a fleshed out version of Bohm’s Rheomode or an indigenous aboriginal language, however, our WESTERN CULTURE INVESTMENTS IN OUR CAE LANGUAGES ARE MASSIVE and we are thus LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS. The alternative is thus to raise the awareness of the pitfalls in our CAE languages and how to ‘work around’ them. .
* * * end of preface * * *
Philosophical Investigators such as Nietzsche, Bohm, Wittgenstein, Schroedinger and Vygotsky have SOMETHING IN COMMON and I would call it “THE INSTINCT OF THE WORLD AS A WAVE-FIELD” which manifests in their appreciation of indigenous aboriginal ‘natural philosophy’ (all things are related). Even though their findings may appear DIFFERENT to us in our casual reading of their works, it is EVIDENT that THEY ALL ‘tuned in’ to the fact that there is a dysfunction WESTERN CULTURE social dynamics that manifests in FRAGMENTATION.
The GRAND SUM-UP0
This short article has been titled ‘THE GRAND SUM-UP’ because it goes straight to the heart of where-and-how WESTERN CULTURE SPLITS OFF from EASTERN CULTURE (indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta); i.e. in their mutually contradicting ARCHITECTURES OF LANGUAGE,
HOW COULD IT BE that two groups of people could come up with such RADICALLY DIFFERING “REALITIES” as (A) THE QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD REALITY where material forms are ‘condensations’ within the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED … and (B) THE BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL OBJECT REALITY where material forms are ABSOLUTELY EXISTING LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE wherein ALL THINGS ARE INDEPENDENT? The former group seeing REALITY in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT terms of a continually flowing wave-field and the latter group seeing REALITY in the LOCAL and EXPLICIT terms of independent material beings interacting in empty space?
[[ we shall see how the WAVE-FIELD nature of REALITY can support BOTH the REAL (LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIALIST) as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, … AND, the IMAGINARY (NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT RELATIONAL) as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, as “OPTIONAL REALITIES”, … and how there is a LINGUISTIC HIJACKING by WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES; i.e. a TAKE-OVER by LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECT based REALITY (composed of INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS IN EMPTY SPACE), that ECLIPSES the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RELATIONAL REALITY, thanks to the SIMPLICITY of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.]]
At the bottom of this is the LANGUAGE-BASED SPLIT between LANGUAGE with a QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY foundation wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) as supported by the Modern physics understanding wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, … versus a BINARY LOGIC REALITY foundation wherein EVERYTHING IS INDEPENDENT, an abstract notion INFUSED INTO WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES and REAFFIRMED by NEWTONIAN physics, giving a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN REALITY to the ABSTRACTION of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS” that notionally reside in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, this WESTERN CULTURE cosmology persisting due to its having been BUILT INTO THE BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that now serves as our WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY.
‘The WESTERN CULTURE supporting the use of a BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE base with its LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, … and the indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta which support the use of a QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE base with its NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, which is consistent with MODERN PHYSICS’
The WESTERN CULTURE “ERROR” which is in fact the Nietzsche identified LANGUAGE-based “DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR” that invokes the UNREAL ABSTRACTION of “LOCAL AUTHORING” is the SOURCE of growing FRAGMENTATION that, in the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is “LOCKED IN BY THE HIGH SWITCHING COSTS” to overcome PRIDE and PROFIT.
* * *
We live in (share inclusion in) the all-including transforming relational continuum, also known as the WAVE-FIELD. As Modern physics attests, we, and all material forms are CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, which is beyond capture in ANY LANGUAGE because the whole of reality is a continuing flow.
Meanwhile, LANGUAGES have been developed which are composed of symbols or words that give persisting meaning. Since everything is in flux, persisting patterns tagged with persisting symbol-based words (allusion to sense-experience based impressions which are ‘patterns’ that persist and do not, once they are uttered, change their meaning, can only INFER the sense-experience reality of inclusion in the flow (aka the Tao). So, while ‘the Tao than can be told is not the true Tao’, as Lao Tzu points out, BECAUSE everything in sense-experience reality is in flux, LANGUAGE based on sounds or symbols that PERSIST in their meaning-giving, cannot directly capture a REPRESENTATION of the FLUID REALITY of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, however, systems based on symbols. There are LANGUAGE-based WORK-AROUNDS, such as described by Wittgenstein, where the symbols are used are not offered as ‘symbols for things’’ but are designed for subservience to the fluid dynamical reality they are inferring.
This LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SCHEME based on ‘symbols for things’ used as an expedient to capture the ‘RELATIONS AMONG THINGS’ which are in constant flux, opens the way to a system of language that works by ‘relational inference’, avoiding persisting ‘thingness’ of material being which BLOCKS the language goal of conveying impressions of a reality in continuing flux. Wittgenstein speaks of this ‘tactic’ where language based on ‘symbols’ such as alphabetic symbols and ‘words’ with ‘fixed meaning’ can appear to ‘overcome’ their ‘static inference foundations’;
6.54 My propositions are elucidatory in this way: he who understands me finally recognizes them as senseless, when he has climbed out through them, on them, over them. (He must so to speak throw away the ladder, after he has climbed up on it.)
He must surmount these propositions; then he sees the world rightly.
7.0 Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. (“Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen”),
–Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Here we can see that what is being suggested is to use language for CONCEPTUALIZATION rather than REPRESENTATION. That is, REPRESENTATION of a transforming relational continuum IS NOT FEASIBLE when the REPRESENTATION SCHEME IS CONSTRAINED TO UNCHANGING BUILDING BLOCK ELEMENTS WITH FIXED, PERSISTING MEANING.
HOWEVER, what Wittgenstein is pointing out is that the basic symbolic elements can be chosen NOT WITH THE PURPOSE OF REPRESENTATION in mind, which is HOPELESS where one is trying to REPRESENT a FLUID REALITY using symbols that convey FIXED MEANING. But this ALTERNATIVE is different where we admit that the symbols, because they are fixed, while they are not capable of REPRESENTATION, “ARE CAPABLE OF CONCEPTUALIZATION” which works by ‘tricking the observing mind’ to get it to recall sense-experience which is part of the ongoing transforming relational continuum
CONCEPTUALIZATION AS THE BASIS OF LANGUAGE RATHER THAN REPRESENTATION takes the LANGUAGE DESIGNER down a DIFFERENT PATH.
LANGUAGES and REALITIES0
This ESSAY has TWO LEVELS OF PREFACE. WHY TWO LEVELS OF PREFACE?
Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache” (Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations
Language based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT has a problem in that the world of our sense-experience, i.e. the all-including transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD is inherently NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (flowing) so that MATERIAL FORMS are APPEARANCES as associate with CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD. This relation between CONDENSATIONS of WAVE-FIELD (material forms) and WAVE-FIELD is NOT a BINARY LOGIC relation; i.e. THERE ARE NOT TWO SEPARATE THINGS HERE, there is only the ONE THING; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD in which CONDENSATIONS manifest as MATERIAL FORMS and here there is a QUANTUM LOGIC relation where the LOGIC captures the understanding that the VISIBLE MATERIAL FORM is NOT INDEPENDENT of its ‘containing space’ as in the BINARY LOGIC relation, the REALITY being that THERE IS NO ‘CONTAINING SPACE’ populated by “INDEPENDENT” MATERIAL FORMS (as in the BINARY LOGIC understanding), there is only the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD within which MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS, thus the physical reality of our inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD entails the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM. In this case, because all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ONE WAVE-FIELD, ALL MATERIAL FORMS ARE RELATED as is acknowledged in Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, which is contrary to WESTERN CULTURE where material forms in the flow are imputed to have INDEPENDENT STATUS thanks to simple DECLARATIONS, which are backed up by military force, and which make no impression at all on on the four-leggeds and winged and slithering ones.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS THEREFORE HAVE A PROBLEM COMING FROM OUR GIVING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE, IN OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, TO BINARY LOGIC. Once BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE is used to construct CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of the world of our sense-experience, THE SIMPLIFYING DEED IS DONE which involves the DROPPING OUT of essential information; i.e. the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which is the INTEGRATING PLENUM, leaving behind as the SOLE MAKE-UP for our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (absolute material entities as if in empty, infinite space).
The DROPPING OUT, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, which gives rise to ABSTRACT ONE SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENTS that we endow with GRAMMAR-based POWERS of LOCAL, JUMPSTART AUTHORING of actions and developments (e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING”) that constitute our WESTERN CULTURE REALITY, which in this essay is referred to as REALITY NUMBER TWO, leaving the label REALITY NUMBER ONE for the full ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY which includes BOTH the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate AND the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.
Discussing this, as in this essay, is challenged by the fact that this language I am using (English) like all the WESTERN Common Average European languages, has a BINARY LOGIC based ARCHITECTURE which is innately TOO SIMPLE to develop language-based QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS; e.g. to get to the full QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, one needs to use language architecture akin to the MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal language architecture which supports “REALITY NUMBER ONE” which one captures in saying the equivalent of “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”
This QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization captures the BOTH/AND relation of CONTENT and CONTAINER, in accord with the CONTENT being a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD CONTAINER). This is in contrast to the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE STANDARD where one speaks in the BINARY LOGIC terms of “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services) which conveys the EITHER/OR relation of CONTENT and CONTAINER, imputing MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY. This WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED INVERSION that puts DIFFERENTIATION into an UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE over INTEGRATION,’DEMOLISHES’ the natural MATERIAL-CONTENT-AS-CONDENSATION-INCLUDED-WITHIN-WAVE-FIELD-CONTAINER relationship wherein everything is naturally INTEGRATED since the material forms are CONDENDSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD. “INSTEAD”, the INTEGRATION IS “DENIED” or rather “OBSCURED” by the use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche) which uses GRAMMAR to equip MATERIAL FORMS WITH THEIR OWN ‘ON-BOARD’ NOTIONALLY ‘SELF-SOURCED’ POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT. THIS “LOCAL AUTHORING” ABSTRACTION IS THE RECIPE FOR FRAGMENTATION WHICH HAS BEEN SALTED INTO WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES WITH THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.
This PREFACE speaks to the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based infusing of FRAGMENTATION which makes its way, thanks to language, into WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHES and from there into the PHYSICAL ACTIONS of WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES. For example, the ENTIRELY UNREALISTIC (as affirmed by sense-experience) DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE of NAMING-INSTANTIATED ‘FRAGMENTS’ where such SYNTHETIC FRAGMENTATION is supported by the ASSOCIATED abstraction of the ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE that WESTERN CULTURE language sets up as a PLAYING FRIELD for the FRAGMENTATION based REALITY NUMBER TWO.
* * *
While the ‘standard preface’ is to give the reader a landscape or CONTEXT that gives a kind of GROUNDING of understanding of where the body of the discussion is ‘coming from’, THIS ESSAY HAS AN EXTRA LEVEL OF PREFACE to guide the reader in THE READER’S APPROACH to INTERPRETING the TEXT, and this is because, as is the basic point that this essay is trying to share, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS commonly use language to CONSTRUCT TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES which I am calling REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality) … AND… REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality).
These TWO LEVELS of REALITY are explained in the text so this PRE-AMBLE is just a GUIDE to this ‘something different’ than the normal straight-forward publication of an essay. Since the thesis here is that WE ARE USING, IN AN ALTERNATING FASHION, TWO LEVELS OF REALITY IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS in a knee-jerk way where we have FORGOTTEN that we are even doing it.
BUT NOW IT IS GIVING US PROBLEMS (problems of fragmentation in understanding which is troubling our social relations) and this is CONFUSING US “BECAUSE WE HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANDGUAGE USAGE, WE ARE DOING THIS”. And here, the “THIS” is referring to our WESTERN CULTURE habitual use of LANGUAGE WHEREIN WE MIX AND MATCH WITHOUT OVERT WARNING, “TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES, REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality) … AND… REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality).
For example, since we are living in a SPHERICAL SPACE which has a conjugate WAVE-FIELD structure where, for example, the MORE LAND WE CULTIVATE, the LESS WILDERNESS REMAINS so that it is TOO SIMPLE to use the standard BINARY LOGIC description where we use language that promotes the understanding that THERE IS SUCH A THING AS THE “GROWTH” of the area of cultivated land which corresponds, in BINARY LOGIC fashion, with a RELATIVE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS. THIS IS STANDARD FLAT-SPACE “THINKING” put into LANGUAGE and this FLAT-SPACE “THINKING” is the source of BINARY LOGIC.
What is REALLY GOING ON is understood by way of the GESTALT OF OVERALL TRANSFORMATION because THERE IS NO FLAT SPACE wherein the GROWTH of cultivated land implies a “RELATIVE” SHRINKING of WILDERNESS. That is A TOO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC BASED WAY OF THINKING THAT WE PUT INTO OUR LANGUAGE-BASED INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING based “REALITY NUMBER TWO” (binary logic EITHER/OR reality) that is “NOT SUPPORTED BY OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE”. What “SENSE-EXPERIENCE DOES SUPPORT IS “REALITY NUMBER ONE” (quantum logic BOTH/AND reality).
The REALITY NUMBER ONE is LESS SIMPLE than the REALITY NUMBER TWO in the sense that REALITY NUMBER ONE is the GESTALT based REALITY wherein our UNDERSTANDING includes our (spherical space) SENSING of ‘BALANCE’ and SENSING of ‘CHANGES IN BALANCE’, as in changes in the relative areas of DEVELOPED LANDS and WILDERNESS LANDS.
If we lived in a FLAT PLANE of infinite extent, as our intellectualizing and lingualizing mind is in the habit of thinking, the relation between the area of CULTIVATED LAND and the area of WILDERNESS LAND is BINARY LOGIC based, meaning that that TWO ARE NOT RELATED so that we can MEASURE the AREA of EACH ONE and garner the RETIO based (‘rational’) understanding that comes from this, and in particular this BINARY LOGIC view equips us for talking about the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND and/or the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS LAND which is important to the WESTERN CULTURE economics of production.
NOTA BENE: The changing GESTALT that associates with a relative DECREASE IN WILDERNESS associated with the INCREASE in CULTIVATED AREA within the FINITE space of the surface of a sphere invokes the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM of Modern physics. We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS tend to HABITUALLY think in terms of FLAT SPACE which is UNREAL ABSTRACTION. Here we think in the GEOMETRIC terms of a FLAT PLANE OF INFINITE EXTENT. Unlike SPHERICAL SPACE which is FINITE with a GESTALT quality (it may be ‘mostly wilderness’ with ‘sparse development’ or it may be ‘mostly developed’ with ‘sparse wilderness’.
There is a REAL QUALITY of BALANCE associated with the CHANGING in the relative areas of WILDERNESS and DEVELOPMENT. Our sense-perception has the capability of perceiving “GESTALT”, an ‘overall impression’ which includes BALANCE and which GOES BEYOND (is “LESS SIMPLE THAN”) QUANTITATIVE MEASURE. Our ability to perceive these LESS SIMPLE QUALITATIVE aspects of “GESTALT” and “BALANCE” or “IMBALANCE” have a QUANTUM LOGIC FOUNDATION that GOES BEYOND THE SCOPE Of BINARY LOGIC.
We could say that BECAUSE GESTALT, BALANCE and IMBALANCE are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and deal directly with the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, they belong in REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality), … WHICH IS “LESS SIMPLE THAN” (and lies beyond the reach of) … REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality).
These CATEGORIES are nothing more or less than the missing labels on the DEA ABSCONDITA, the MISSING FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, which is supporting REALITY NUMBER TWO HAS DROPPED OUT, in going with the one-sided mechanistic MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE ALONE.
IN SHORT, the SPHERICAL SPACE OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE has the property of BALANCE or IMBALANCE and is thus LESS SIMPLE than SIMPLE FLAT SPACE (EUCLIDEAN SPACE) which, being FLAT and INFINITE, does not have the properties of GESTALT and BALANCE and IMBALANCE as available to our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the FINITE SPHERICAL SPACE OF WAVE-FIELD REALITY.
While GROWTH based CONCEPTUALIZING is supportable by LOCAL, EXPLICIT MEASUREMENT, there is a changing GESTALT which is QUALITIATIVE in a SPHERICAL SPACE which is WILDERNESS as it becomes INCREASINGLY DEVELOPED. ‘GROWTH’, since it is CONSTRAINED to BINARY LOGIC, is innately SIMPLER than ‘QUALITATIVE SENSING.
However, in SPHERICAL SPACE THINGS ARE LESS SIMPLE and there arises the GESTALT associated with the BALANCE between WILDERNESS and CULTIVATED LAND. This BALANCE is a REAL THING and it is QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation based as associates with GESTALT, an overall androgynous quality, which derives from LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC and which is not available to SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC. We could say that BINARY LOGIC is FLAT-SPACE LOGIC where it makes sense to speak in terms of the GROWTH of cultivated land, but GROWTH is a TOO-SIMPLE ABSTRACTION when it comes to the language we need to speak about what is going on with the GESTALT of the ANDROGYNOUS SPHERE which changes with the changing BALANCE of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WILDERNESS LAND and MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CULTIVATED LAND.
Once we shift OUR FOCUS from these TWO THINGS to the ANDROGYNOUS GESTALT, the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based RATIO gives way to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE
THE “TWO REALITIES” REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality), … WHICH IS “LESS SIMPLE THAN” (and lies beyond the reach of) … REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality) ARE SHOWING UP IN ASSOCIATION WITH OUR AMBIGUOUS USE OF LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING (REALITY NUMBER TWO), .. and NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING (REALITY NUMBER ONE).
For example, when we are using REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality) we focus on the CULTIVATED AREA in its own right and speak about ‘ITS GROWTH’, … but when we use REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality), we open our view to the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION which is LESS SIMPLE in the sense that BALANCE and IMBALANCE, a JANUS faced (quantum logic) coincidentia oppositorum which HAS NO DEPENDENCY ON LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECTS, and which becomes the PRIMARY REALITY aka REALITY NUMBER ONE.
In the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT conceptualization of GESTALT mode, we see the CHANGING BALANCE and understanding it in terms of what is REALLY GOING ON because the world of our sense-experience is of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD wherein there is no such thing as an EMPTY FLAT SPACE AREA (no more WAVE-FIELD wherein material things are condensations as in the quantum logic relation) wherein we can purportedly assess whether the CULTIVATED AREA is, this year, EITHER BIGGER OR SMALLER than last year (p.s. ‘don’t mention zee wilderness’).
SURE, WE CAN DO THIS “GROWTH” ASSESSMENT but this measure of GROWTH is a very SIMPLE (binary logic) CONCEPTUALIZATION which is based on intellectual abstraction, … while there is more to dynamics than GROWTH since the GESTALT based “BALANCE” of CULTIVATED LAND and WILDERNESS LAND is something innately LESS SIMPLE (it involves quantum logic which is LESS SIMPLE than binary logic). Furthermore, it is our INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTING CAPABILITY and NOT our sense-experience THAT IS COMING UP WITH THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.
The “BOTTOM LINE” here is that while our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE simplifies things for us by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and using ONLY THE ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE in our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, so that we can SIMPLIFY our CONCEPTUALIZING, such an approach REMOVES the quantum logic sense-experience qualities of GESTALT, BALANCE and IMBALANCE from our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING CAPABILITY. In mathematical terms, what we are doing with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is DROPPING OUT the ‘IMAGINARY COMPONENT’ of the COMPLEX REALITY and GOING SOLELY WITH THE ‘REAL COMPONENT’ so that we construct our language based conceptualizations as if within a REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality) rather than constructing our language based conceptualizations within a REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality).
NOTA BENE: REALITY NUMBER TWO “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and develops LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based on BINARY LOGIC as with MATERIAL BEING BASED FORMS AS IF IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, these FORMS being GRAMMAR ENDOWED with notional LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS. THIS IS REALITY NUMBER TWO, and it is MISSING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which IS comprehended in REALITY NUMBER ONE which is endorsed by MODERN PHYSICS and which is the traditional reality of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.
WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the confusing situation wherein WE ARE USING, IN AN ALTERNATING FASHION, TWO LEVELS OF REALITY (one LESS SIMPLE and one MORE SIMPLE) IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS in a knee-jerk way where we have FORGOTTEN that we are even doing it.
Kepler pointed this out as did Nietzsche and Bohm. It started within WESTERN CULTURE SCIENCE which has an early tradition of wanting to construct SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITIES that have SIMPLER LANGUAGE REQUIREMENTS:
“As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’
Copernicus was on ‘this same tack’ of SIMPLIFYING the language based conceptualizing, keeping it BINARY LOGIC based rather than having to open the door to linguistic complexities (language capable of quantum logic BOTH/AND propositions).
And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion
We may imagine ourselves living in the WESTERN CULTURE WORLD which has LOCKED INTO THE HABIT of using a SIMPLIFIED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with a BINARY LOGIC conceptualizing scheme as popularized by NEWTON in regard to PLANETS.
All these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the end for which he form’d them; and these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation.” –Isaac Newton, Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light
So, while indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta HAVE BEEN NATURALLY ON-BOARD THE REALITY NUMBER ONE, having incorporated it in their language architecture, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have incorporated in our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, the NUMBER TWO REALITY.
To RESTATE the thesis stated earlier;
… The thesis here is that WE ARE USING, IN AN ALTERNATING FASHION, TWO LEVELS OF REALITY IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS in a knee-jerk way where we have FORGOTTEN that we are even doing it.
BUT NOW IT IS INCREASINGLY GIVEN US PROBLEMS (problems of fragmentation in understanding which is troubling our social relations) and this is CONFUSING US “BECAUSE WE HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USAGE, “WE” ARE DOING THIS”. And here, the “THIS” is referring to our WESTERN CULTURE habitual use of LANGUAGE WHEREIN WE MIX AND MATCH WITHOUT OVERT WARNING, “TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES, REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum reality) … AND… REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality).
While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, AND ALSO INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS are INTUITIVELY UNDERSTANDING that the continuing GROWTH of CULTIVATING and INDUSTRIALIZING LAND implies the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS LANDS thus TRANSFORMING THE OVERALL GESTALT of the continually transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, .. our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, HAVING ‘DROPPED OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, “IS SPEAKING IN THE ONE-SIDED OBSCURANTIST TERMS OF MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING …. AS IF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (the primary wave-field agency) DID NOT EXIST.
In other words, as far as our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE goes, it is LEGITIMATE to construct one-sided male-asserting language propositions (i.e. BINARY LOGIC propositions) that speak of the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND without ANY MENTION, as would come with QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization, of the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS LANDS and thus in our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC reporting mode, there is NO MENTION OF WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON which is TRANSFORMATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD THAT WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN.
AS FAR AS OUR WESTERN CULTURE (binary logic) LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION OF REALITY goes, we are in REALITY LEVEL TWO (binary logic reality) so that when we are using language to conceptualize *REALITY*, we see ourselves in the BINARY LOGIC, DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based terms of LOCAL AUTHORS of, for example, the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND, all of which is ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, wherein we have DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE wherein the WILDERNESS is at the same time OPENING UP to ACCOMMODATE/ENABLE (shrinking so as to enable expanding of) the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.
The WESTERN CULTURE abstract, linguistic DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that has us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS pushing forward in a one-sided (SO WE THINK, BECAUSE OF THE WAY WE TALK) MALE ASSERTING/DEVELOPMENT MODE, … AND ALL THE WHILE, WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IS ANDROGYNOUS “TRANSFORMATION” and this is an ALL INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMING THAT INCLUDES OURSELVES”.
While Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta adherents ARE ALREADY THERE WITH THIS UNDERSTANDING, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, … “WHETHER WE ARE UNDERSTANDING AND BELIEVING IN IT OR NOT” “IS NOT THE POINT” because we have ENGINEERED A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WHICH DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND DROPS US OUT OF “REALITY NUMBER ONE” down into the simpler, one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY “REALITY NUMBER TWO”.
INTUITIVELY, WE MAY UNDERSTAND THE WORLD IN THE FULL-BLOWN ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD TERMS as affirmed by MODERN PHYSICS and as embraced by indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, so that when we plough up our field, we are conscious of the CONJUGATE LOSS OF WILDERNESS but there is nothing in our LANGUAGE SUPPORTED REALITY NUMBER TWO that makes mention of the LOSS OF WILDERNESS and the Goedel’s Theorem effect comes in here because whiel we may speak TRUTHFULLY about our GROWING THE SIZE OF OUR CULTIVATED LAND AREA, our statement is BOTH TRUE and INCOMPLETE (dropping out any acknowledgement of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERENSS AND THUS THE OVERALL GESTALT OF TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE).
SO, INTUITIVELY WE UNDERSTAND THAT WHAT IS GOING ON IS TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding termed REALITY NUMBER ONE, … but intellectually, in our BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE SUPPORTED CONCEPTUALIZATION MODE, WHAT IS GOING ON IS GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT. Lao Tzu said something akin to ‘know the local and explicit but embrace the nonlocal and implicit).
* * * END OF FIRST LEVEL OF TWO-LEVEL PREFACE * * *
* * * BEGINNING OF PREFACE * * *
The LOCAL and EXPLICIT … and … the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
Because we live in a WAVE-FIELD wherein everything is in flux, including ourselves; i.e. where we are relational forms in the transforming relational continuum, our VISUAL capability falls innately short of bringing us INCLUSIONAL AWARENESS.
Our visual capability, supported by our two eyes on one side of our head, has given us something our general sensory experience of inclusion in the world, which comes to us as relational understanding which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, brings us a VOYEUR view of world, and this VOYEUR perspective comes with a SELF-OTHER SPLIT where, while in the VOYEUR MODE, we DROP OUT our sense-experience of INCLUSION in the world we are looking out at.
While the VISION based perspective is LIMITED to a kind of flashlight illumination of the ‘limited patch of reality’ that we can illuminate, that patch is a patch that we can come to know in very fine LOCAL and EXPLICIT detail, in contrast to our overall senses such as our sense of inertia where the accelerations associated with relative motion can bring to our cognitive awareness, an inertial guidance based awareness of our relative movements within a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT all-including transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, evidently having developed somewhat of an ‘anal-retentive’ tendency, have been SEDUCED by the LOCAL and EXPLICIT nature of our VOYEUR VISUALIZING capability, IN SPITE OF THIS LIMITED SCOPE, and we often DON’T BOTHER to INTEGRATE the LOCAL and EXPLICIT with the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, particularly in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE dialogues where we have fallen into the habit of saying things like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ and stopping right there as if this FRAGMENT we are SPOTLIGHTING has sufficient ‘stand-alone’ meaning it itself (without mentioning the conjugate shrinking of the wilderness).
This has the effect, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, of elevating DIFFERENTIATION which amplifies the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, into an unnatural precedence over INTEGRATION, the latter acknowledging the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, but WAIT A MINUTE, it is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that gives expanded or ‘grounded’ meaning to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT such as the ‘TOWN that is growing’. The more we put first focus on understanding coming from DIFFERENTIATION that gives LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONTENT, the less that our understanding is INFORMED by the INTEGRATING CONTEXT of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
To say ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is a QUANTUM LOGIC, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT formulation UNLIKE ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’ which is a BINARY LOGIC LOCAL and EXPLICIT formulation.
LANGUAGE PRACTICE THAT PUTS LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONTENT INTO AN UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE OVER NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT CONTEXT IS DYSFUNCTIONAL AND IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION.
To say that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, because it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE while RETAINING THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE ‘ON ITS OWN’, implicitly BACKFILLS the CONCEPTUALIZATION stimulated by this language with ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, giving us a BINARY LOGIC based CONSTRUCTION wherein there is “EITHER” the TOWN “OR” nothing. This BINARY LOGIC conceptualization is UNLIKE the QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization wherein ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which has the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD FORM wherein there is a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING condensation within a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD.
Our USE, in LANGUAGE, of the LOCAL-and-EXPLICIT and the NONLOCAL-and-IMPLICIT, gives us the means by which our language based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS can either be FULL-BLOWN ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATIONS termed here “REALITY NUMBER ONE” or, by way of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) and employing ONLY the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate (which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT), we serve up the simpler BINARY LOGIC BASED ‘”REALITY NUMBER TWO”.
If all of this writing sound UNNECESSARILY COMPLICATED, that may be a fair criticism but the fact remains that our choice of LESS SIMPLE and SIMPLE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES opens the way to cat and mouse games which employ OBCURANTISM where needed. If we want to support a social dynamic which celebrates the abstract BINARY LOGIC scheme known as ENTITLEMENT, then we will have to turn our backs on the QUANTUM LOGIC scheme known as BALANCE.
ENTITLEMENT belongs to REALITY NUMBER TWO while BALANCE belongs to REALITY NUMBER ONE.
ENTITLEMENT is supported by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies LOCAL AUTHORING which, although ABSTRACTION, garners support for the concept of ENTITLEMENT. This all stems from BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION (EITHER he is the AUTHOR OR he is NOT the AUTHOR). In Modern physics as in QUANTUM LOGIC, we have the ANDROGYNOUS relation involving the CONJUGATION of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING and MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and when we claim that the PUNCH is fully and solely the AUTHOR of the shattered SKULL, using OBSCURANTISM to ‘DROP OUT’ the FEMALE ENABLING CONJUGATE, this puts us in “REALITY NUMBER TWO”.
In order to GET BACK INTO “REALITY NUMBER ONE” and rejoin Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, from our domicile in “REALITY NUMBER TWO”, we would have to revoke the OBSCURANTISM of the ‘DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODAINT/ENABLING CONJUGATE’ and RESTORE our ACKNOWLEDGING of the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION which entails restoring the NATURAL PRIMACY of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (e.g. RESTORING the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein everything is flux” into precedence over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “the TOWN is is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”).
By REVISING OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE from the BINARY LOGIC base to the QUANTUM LOGIC base which is what is being described here in terms of RESTORING the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT into natural primacy over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, we are shifting back from REALITY NUMBER TWO to REALITY NUMBER ONE, which is the solution to the many dysfunctions that are manifest in the TRANSFORMING relational continuum while we who share inclusion in it are LINGUISTICALLY MIS-CONCEPTUALYZING IT as REALITY NUMBER TWO rather than REALITY NUMBER ONE..
* * * * * * * * *
PARALLEL REALITIES: The GROWTH OF DYSFUNCTION in WESTERN CULTURE
This is an overview of the message shared in prior notes on the topic; The GROWTH OF DYSFUNCTION in WESTERN CULTURE.
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION where indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents are using QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.
The relationship between less simple QUANTUM LOGIC and simple BINARY LOGIC can be shown using a QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE (indigenous aboriginal language, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta languages) …. but is BEYOND THE REACH of simple BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE. Since in WESTERN CULTURE, the simple BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE is the standard for language-based communications, and since it is too simple to carry and share QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualizations, a discussion of the differences in meaning-carrying capability, because it is difficult if not impossible using our Common Average European Language because of its simple, and thus limiting (BINARY LOGIC based) architecture.
For example, in the case of the PUNCH that “IS SAID TO” fracture the SKULL of the recipient, BINARY LOGIC REALITY ‘stops there’ with the one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALZING ACTION, whereas QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY comprehends the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of, for example, the EGG-SHELL thin SKULL. While the WAVE-FIELD reality we share inclusion has this ANDROGYNOUS (conjugate female accommodating/enabling — male asserting/actualizing) nature, WESTERN CULTURE “COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE” employs a SIMPLIFIED structure wherein the simplification comes from DROPPING OUT, in the language based conceptualizing, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.
This LIMITING in the LANGUAGE-based CONCEPTUALIZING built into the Common Average European LANGUAGE architecture inhibit the communicating of COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD REALITY for experience-sharing purposes. That is, the ARCHITECTURE of language needed to convey the workings of WAVE-FIELD dynamics requires a QUANTUM LOGIC FOUNDATION whereas, the innately simpler BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATION is LIMITED IN ITS CONCEPTUALIZING CAPABILITY to the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate which “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate, reducing the WAVE-FIELD dynamic to the SIMPLER ‘material objects in empty space’ BINARY LOGIC dynamic.
It is IMPORTANT to understand the difference in REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING COMPLEXITY between simple BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is our WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD, and less simple QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta language architecture standard AND also the language architecture standard of MODERN PHYSICS.
REALITY NUMBER ONE; QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY: The less simple QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE employs both the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALYING conjugate as in “THERE is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”. This ANDROGYNOUS relation is one where everything is in flux, or in other words, everything is related (mitakuye oyasin [everything is related].
REALITY NUMBER TWO: BINARY LOGIC REALITY; The simpler BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and GOES ONLY WITH the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE. In WAVE-FIELD terms which have a COMPLEX REAL + IMAGINARY STRUCTURE, REALITY NUMBER TWO (BINARY LOGIC PSEUDO-REALITY) DROPS OUT THE “IMAGINARY COMPONENT” and develops with LANGUAGE, a simplified BINARY LOGIC based PSEUDO-REALITY which is a CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME based solely on REAL, LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL AGENTS, as if in ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF ININITE EXTENT as in “The TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.
REMEMBERING “The Lies my Teacher Taught me”?0
We live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD wherein FEMALE ACCOMMODATING-ENABLING opens the way for MALE ASSERTING-ACTUALIZING, and this conjugate combination manifests in our sense-experience as TRANSFORMATION. HOWEVER< OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, by SUBSTITUTING an ABSTRACT ABSOLUTE EMPTY INFINITE SPACE FOR THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE , creates CONCEPTUALIZATIONS which DUMB DOWN TRANSFORMATION, which is inherently NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) to LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION , and this WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, in this manner, synthetically LIBERATES MATERIAL FORMS, “LINGUISTICALLY DIFFERENTIATING THEM OUT OF THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”, USING ‘NAMING’ to SET THEM UP ON THEIR OWN” within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE PSEUDO “CONTAINING SPACE”, enabling these NOW LIBERATED LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with notional GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT to ‘star’ in PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC “REALITY” CONCEPTUALIZAITON SCHEME.
This just-described ABSTRACT WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based ARCHITECTING SCHEME is a PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC DEVICE for REDUCING ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION as is continually transpiring in the all-including WAVE-FIELD, … a REDUCTION that is by way of ‘PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION’, to one-sided (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING in the form of LOCAL, EXPLICIT “ACTIONS”, “DEVELOPMENTS” and “PRODUCTION” as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.
This LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION in the form of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, once it occupies the mind, at the same time “OBSCURES” the less-simple WAVE-FIELD REALITY due to our preoccupation with using LANGUAGE TO IMPLANT INTO THE PSYCHE a notional ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY.
This INTELLECTUAL TOOL of CONSTRUCTING “DUMBED DOWN” LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS is a WESTERN CULTURE psychological preoccupation that FORCES us to DROP OUT OUR COGNITIVE GRASP OF THE FULL WAVE-FIELD nature of our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum (aka our inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD). THAT IS, WE DROP OUT OUR COGNITIVE GRASP OF WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS by DROPPING OUT OF OUR LANGUAGE, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE. This DROPPING OUT leaves in its wake, a “DUMBED DOWN” ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING-ONLY ‘DIFFERENTIATING’ mechanism whose DIFFENTIATED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are hijacking the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED “OPERATIVE REALITY” CONCEPTUALIZATION.
INSTEAD OF QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMATION consistent with our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in an ALL-INCLUDING, INNATELY INTEGRATED, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL (WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM), WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS EMPLOY A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on BINARY LOGIC DIFFERENTIATION. Thus, while our sense-experience is of inclusion in an all-including relational transformation, our WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizations has us ‘speaking’ in terms of DIFFERENTIATED FRAGMENTS, Thus, for example, while our sense-experience informs us of our INTEGRATED living within a TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE uses DIFFERENTIATION to present LANGUAGE BASED FRAGMENTATION featuring INDEPENDENT LOCAL EXPLICIT BEINGS that live in INDEPENDENT LOCAL EXPLICIT TOWNS in INDEPENDENT LOCAL EXPLICIT NATIONS. While the WESTERN CULTURE DIFFERENTIATION SCHEME supports a COMMON VOCABULARY using terms implying MATERIAL BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE such as TOWNS, and HUMANS etc., it lacks the capabilities of other INTEGRATION based languages such as indigenous aboriginal languages, wherein one speaks in terms that incorporate INNATE INTEGRATION; e.g. “there is TOWNING and HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, which supports understanding in the QUANTUM LOGIC sense of CONDENSATIONS in the all-including WAVE-FIELD where INTEGRATION is INNATE, where DIFFERENTIATION “MAKES NO SENSE” since “EVERYTHING IS RELATED” (mitakuye oyasin).
* * *
There is an exposure (like a crippling virus introduced into the innocent youthful WESTERN CULTURE mind) in ‘school based learning’ in that, as trusting children, we may assimilate many understandings, and use them in shaping everyday behaviours that are innately ERRONEOUS (dysfunctional). An EVEN GREATER EXPOSURE is where we are taught to use a TOO SIMPLE LANGUAGE whereby we are conveying an unrealistically SIMPLIFIED understanding which we are nevertheless OPERATIONALIZING as if the SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITIES conveyed by the TOO-SIMPLE LINGUISTIC REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION were qualified for service as THE OPERATIVE REALITY. We fall into this trap when we use BINARY LOGIC based language that DIFFERENTIATES rather than using QUANTUM LOGIC that INTEGRATES, is the focus of this essay.
This is the current plight of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USERS as has been pointed out by Nietzsche and Bohm wherein the popular WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE employs a BINARY LOGIC ARCHITECTURE which supports INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZATION in the form of a SIMPLIFIED DIFFERENTIATION BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which MISINFORMS US and induces in us BEHAVIOURS that are responding to what we think is ‘REALITY’ which is NOT OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, but is instead, an INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACT LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION-based PSEUDO-REALITY CONSTRUCTION that we have grown COMFORTABLE with because ‘ALMOST EVERYONE IS TRUSTING IN IT AND USING IT AS THE OPERATIVE REALITY.
So, for example, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use LANGUAGE that DUMBS DOWN ‘TRANSFORMATION’ to GROWTH. In our society, almost everyone is using language constructs made with the simplified BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE system where one says things like ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’. When statements like this are articulated, as they are in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, our IMAGINATION kicks in and we can ‘see’ in our ‘mind’s eye’, the PICTURE of a notional THING-IN-ITSELF suggested by this NAME, ‘THE TOWN’ and we can further ‘see’ in our ‘mind’s eye’, the PICTURE of a notional EMPTY SURROUNDING, CONTAINING SPACE which we use to accommodate the GRAMMAR given abstraction of the GROWTH of the TOWN. In other words, we may think of a large grassy field as the CONTAINER for the GROWING TOWN, anything will do, really, like a blank page on a sketch pad, the sketch pad of our PSCYCHE as we stimulate IMAGINATION with the words ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.
The MENTAL PICTURE HERE is what Nietzsche describes as the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR where we USE ‘NAMING’ to CREATE a NOTIONAL LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF and conflate this with GRAMMAR to engineer, with our NAMING and GRAMMAR, a PSEUDO-REALITY based on a NAMING-instantiated LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THING-IN-ISELF that we use GRAMMAR to impute to it, its own LANGUAGE-based (PSEUDO) POWERS OF GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services. This has a BINARY LOGIC STRUCTURE wherein we imagine the NAMING-instantiated ‘TOWN’ as something INNATELY SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT of the ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ that we are using language to craft as an EMPTY, PASSIVE CONTAINER to give the ACTIVE MATERIAL ENTITY, “THE TOWN”, A PASSIVE CONTAINING SPACE, in which we can IMAGINE ‘THE TOWN GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services in’.
The PASSIVITY (ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS BASED PASSIVITY) of what in ‘real life sense-experience’ would be the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that comes together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE becomes the DEA ABSCONDITA as far are our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTING SCHEME is concerned, because our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ACHITECTING SCHEME SIMPLY “DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE’ and substitutes an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
Once we, as children, learn to speak this one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY (SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTING) LANGUAGE, the reality we are ‘talking about’ is no longer consistent with our ‘sense-experience reality’.
“Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas any more’!”
The WAVE-FIELD that our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is continually informing us of our inclusion in, … is nothing like the ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LINGUISTIC CONSTRUCTION that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have become accustomed to THINKING OF AND TALKING ABOUT as THE REAL WORLD, and here I shall DROP OUT the extension “OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE’ but this one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LANGUAGE BASED ABSTRACT SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION is “NOTHING LIKE “OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY”. For one thing, there is no such thing as “A TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”, there is only, in our real-life SENSE-EXPERIENCING, “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which is describing the QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH/AND) WAVE-FIELD) STRUCTURE wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD. Note that THERE IS NO “EMPTY SPACE” in this language-based picture because MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED WAVE-FIELD, and this ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED WAVE-FIELD AKA ‘THE PLENUM’ ‘TAKES OVER’ FROM WHAT, IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED REALITY ARCHIECTURE, CONTINUES TO BE CAST AS “ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT”, … A NOTIONAL (LANGUISTIC ABSTRACTION BASED) ‘EMPTY CONTAINER’ DESIGNED TO SET UP A CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME FEATURING AN EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE WHEREIN ‘INDEPENDENT MATERIAL ENTITIES’ MOVE ABOUT AND INTERACTION WITHOUT ANY INVOLVEMENT OF THE ‘CONTAINER’, AS CREATES THE SIMPLIFICATION WE KNOW AS ‘BINARY LOGIC’, A SIMPLIFICATION AS FAR AS LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING GOES, WHICH ‘WORKS’ BY CONSTRUCTING A ‘SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY’ BASED ON INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
This abstract pseudo-reality construction is what merits the response “Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas any more’!”
But, as infants learning the WESTERN CULTURE SYSTEM OF LANGUAGE, we not only do not have an independent means of ‘checking out the integrity of the language architecture which is being loaded into us’ (picture the geese being used as vehicles for producing ‘foie gras’ where the input is ratcheted into us, bypassing our natural mechanisms for assessment and discriminating acceptance or rejection. We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are PRIMED with our BINARY LOGIC UNDERSTANDING of (what is in fact a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE) QUOTE/UNQUOTE “REALITY”.
ONCE the FOIE GRAS APPARATUS HAS US PRIMED WITH WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATIONAL THINKING, it becomes a case of “If one’s only tool is a (BINARY LOGIC) hammer, everything looks like a nail), … thus, for example, the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (this is the QUANTUM LOGIC expression of such WAVE-FIELD PHENOMENA), in the ‘foie gras’ conditioned WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT mind with its ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, is going to LINGUISTICALLY DUMB DOWN the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE, to the SIMPLIFIED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY.
YES, THIS SIMPLIFIED COMMUNICATING SCHEME ‘WORKS’ as far are putting the LANGUAGE USER GROUP ‘ON THE SAME PAGE’, but just what kind of ‘SAME PAGE’ is that? As just pointed out, it is a SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY PAGE which DUMBS DOWN the WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE STRUCTURE by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and PRETENDING THAT THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE “IS ALL THERE IS” and in place of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, all that remains is an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which the language-trained PSYCHE has to ‘get used to’ by reminding the PSYCHE to say ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ which DROPS OUT THE CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS’, to exploit the SIMPLIFICATION that comes with such DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.
While our SENSE-EXPERIENCE continues to inform us in a full WAVE-FIELD manner, our INTELLECTUAL LANGUAGE-BASED BANTER is constructing SUBSTITUTE REALITIES wherein there is NO SIGN OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJGUATE. DID YOU SEE HOW THAT EGG-SHELL SKULL RESPONDED TO THE PUNCH, as if it was WAITING TO ACCOMMODATE and ENABLE the PUNCH by ALMOST ANTICIPATORY CRUMBLING INTO FRAGMENTS however FEEBLE the FORCE OF THE PUNCH? REGARDLESS, LET’S NOT FORGET that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have agreed to ARCHITECT OUR LANGUAGE so as to LIMIT ACTIONS to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ACTIONS as if the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE DID NOT EXIST, which makes LANGUAGE much SIMPLER, … of course, at the same time reducing the LANGUAGE CAPTURE from that of capturing WAVE-FIELD phenomena to capturing only MATERIAL BEING based LOCAL ACTIONS WITH LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION or INTELLECTUAL LANGUAGE-STIMULATED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS wherein we DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.
NOTA BENE: By continually using the SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE we progressively CONSTRUCT and DEVELOP a notional LOCAL EXPLICIT ‘PRESENCE’ such as ‘THE TOWN’ and we load it up with LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS that we can recover with LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION which we come to know and use in our language so that we can come to understand ‘the TOWN’ by way of DIFFERENTIATION of ITS LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL PARTS. This is NOT the same WORLD as the world of MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS which is an INTEGRATION based world which DOES NOT BREAK DOWN, by way of DIFFERENTIATION, INTO LOCAL EXPLICIT PARTS but which we come to know and use language to depict in RELATIONAL TERMS that support INTEGRATION as with ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.
To understand the world by way of QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC wherein we understand TOWNING as a DYNAMIC RELATIONAL INCLUSION “WITHIN” the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM serves up a VERY DIFFERENT WORLD than the one we put together with BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE which uses DIFFERENTIATION to establish SEPEARATE IDENTITIES for notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT FIGURES that move about and interact within a notional ABSOLUTE, EMPTY and INFINITE ‘CONTAINING SPACE’.
* * * THE KEY POINT I WISH TO MAKE HERE IS “NOT ONLY” DO WE HAVE TWO VERY DIFFERENT LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SCHEMES FOR CONVEYING ‘REALITY’, THE ‘MODERN PHYSICS’ and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL SCHEME WHICH IS INTEGRATION BASED (e.g. ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’), … AND ANOTHER ‘NEWTONIAN’ SCHEME WHICH IS, … DIFFERENTIATION BASED, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have, over time, constructed a COMPREHENSIVE BINARY LOGIC BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION which is now FAMILIAR TO THE MANY USERS OF THE LANGUAGE. BECAUSE OUR WESTERN CULTURL ANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ based, we “KNOW” THIS WESTERN CULTURE VERSION OF ‘REALITY’ by understanding it as being comprised by NUMEROUS LOCAL, EXPLICIT INDEPENDENT MATERIAL COMPONENTS such as TOWNS, and BUILDINGS and STREETS and AVENUES, which work together to convey the TOWN by way of the ASSEMBLING of these DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTS.
BUT DIFFERENTIATION IS NOT THE ONLY WAY OF ‘KNOWING’ THE PLACE, there is also, and this accords with Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, “INTEGRATION” which is the WAVE-FIELD way of understanding.
NOTICE THAT the DIFFERENTIATION approach employs FRAGMENTATION of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM in which case the DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE STARTS OFF BY BREAKING THINGS DOWN INTO LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT, SEPARATE PARTS, provoking critiques (within the story-telling-context) such as the following by CHARLES DICKENS;
How does this LANGUAGE GAME work where we mention the name of ONE MAN as the BUILDER of the HOUSING PROJECT? How does this fit in with the overall transforming relational continuum wherein there is the gathering and scattering of a diversity of participants, which is a very NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT dynamic, the dynamic of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM? Here is where RELATIONAL CONTEXT is most surely in primacy over the LOCAL CONTENT, as far as our real-life sense-experience would have it, … but our ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is DEFINITELY NOT A FAN of the WAVE-FIELD UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY. OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SYSTEM HAS THIS BUILT IN SIMPLIFYING DROP OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.
This is what Charles Dickens is pointing out in ‘Hard Times’ in the sequence where ‘Sissy Jupe’s romantic relational CONTEXTUAL understanding of a horse is ‘put down’ by her teacher Thomas Gradgrind who insists on grounding all understanding in ‘being’-based ‘factual CONTENT’ as is the way of WESTERN CULTURE mainstream ‘science’ (prior to Modern physics);
“Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to Facts, sir!”
‘Bitzer,’ said Thomas Gradgrind. ‘Your definition of a horse.’
‘Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds coat in the spring; in marshy countries, sheds hoofs, too. Hoofs hard, but requiring to be shod with iron. Age known by marks in mouth.’ Thus (and much more) Bitzer.
— Charles Dickens, ‘Hard Times’
What we are ‘looking at here’ is a critique of the popular WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OPERATION of DIFFERENTIATION which leads to FRAGMENTATION.
NOTE THAT OUR CHOICE OF DIFFERENTIATION removes the OPTION of INTEGRATION since once we say that ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ (this is DIFFERENTIATION), we are applying the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes the POWER of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments to the NAMING instantiated SUBJECT which FRAGMENTS our CONCEPTUALIZATION of ‘REALITY’. The LANGUAGE; ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, because it is a BINARY LOGIC CONSTRUCTION, is SIMPLER than the corresponding QUANTUM LOGIC CONSTRUCTION; ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (because the BINARY LOGIC version LIMITS the CONCEPTUALIZATION to a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE and DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE). By CONTRAST, were we to go with QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, we would capture the full ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE consisting of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING IN CONJUGATE RELATION WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC.
The POINT that NEEDS TO ‘COME THROUGH’ HERE is that in these LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE VARIANTS (the one-sided BINARY LOGIC MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY) LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION, … vis a vis the ANDROGYNOUS QUANTUM LOGIC FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING — MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC, is also known in mathematics in terms of the “REAL” and “IMAGINARY” COMPONENTS of the COMPLEX SIGNAL (the WAVE-FIELD).
WHAT “CHARLES DICKENS” is, in effect, ‘COMPLAINING ABOUT’ in his mocking of the teaching approach of Thomas Gradgrind, is the SHUTTING DOWN of LANGUAGE BASED WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATION by way of DROPPING OUT of the LANGUAGE STREAM, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, a TREND that was BUILDING in DICKENS’ ERA.
WHAT IS GOING ON HERE IS, in the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTING TREND, the DROPPING OUT of the PRIMARY ROLE OF ‘INTEGRATION” as the basis of LANGUAGE and the DUMBING DOWN OF THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE BASE, TO DIFFERENTIATION, so that INSTEAD OF THE INTEGRATION based FOUNDATION of ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, THE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SHIFTS TO A DIFFERENTIATION based CONCEPTUALIZATION MODE which employs the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR; e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which is ‘backed up’ with DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE where we specify (NAME) BUILIDINGS, STREETS, AVENUES, PARKS, FREEWAYS, CHURCHES, putting together a NAMING and GRAMMAR based NARRATIVE which is DIFFERENTIATION based.
THERE IS NO WAY THAT A LANGUAGE BASED ON ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ CAN CAPTURE ‘the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’ aka the WAVE-FIELD, but what a DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE CAN DO is SCREW THINGS UP by way of IMPOSING DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATION, as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services). WHAT HAPPENS HERE IS THAT WE DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE THAT SUPPORTS INTEGRATION, and without INTEGRATION, we don’t have LANGUAGE capable of TRANSFORMATION as in ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE. WITHOUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND PROCEEDING WITH ONLY THE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, we are DUMBING DOWN the WAVE-FIELD to a SIMPLE CONCEPTUALIZATION IN TERMS OF THE ACTIONS AND INTERACTIONS of notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, AS IF IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
WHERE ARE WE TODAY?
As Ivan Illich pointed out in Silence is a Commons, … the coming of the LOUDSPEAKER followed by the massive roll-out of electronic communications networking has OBSCURED our access to an ordinary people based social network of sense-experience sharing, and has us thinking (believing) that the popular language based substitute reality constructions are viable candidates for directing our social-relational actions.
THIS IS A MISTAKE! THE REALITY WE POPULARLY TALK ABOUT AS ‘REALITY’ IS “NOT REALITY”, as is pointed out in the -8- “LIES MY TEACHER TOLD ME” posted further on in this essay.
Bohm points out in his discussion on FRAGMENTATION that our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATION is the source of progressive SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA in our society.
We INTUITIVELY know that we are using BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that gives the psychological impression of DIFFERENTIATION where we speak about the GROWTH of TOWNS without mentioning the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, the latter acknowledging the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that makes possible the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “GROWTH OF THE TOWNS”.
WHAT IS HARD FOR US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS TO COMPREHEND is that we have used a TOO SIMPLE LANGUAGE to construct a TOO-SIMPLE LANGUAGE-based WORLDVIEW which is FRAGMENTED and otherwise DISTORTED, but we continue to use the same DUMBED DOWN BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE that continues to support the FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY that we are continuing to use as our OPERATIVE REALITY.
This focus on BINARY LOGIC is an example of WESTERN CULTURE THOUGHT and LANGUAGE and it is not the ONLY possible LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME. As has been pointed out, Modern physics, along with indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents MAKE USE OF A DIFFERENT FORM OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which is QUANTUM LOGIC based and thus WAVE-FIELD compliant.
* * * This is the end of the ‘PREAMBLE’ to REMEMBERING “The Lies my Teacher Taught me”? * * *
UNDERSTANDING THE EAST-WEST PSYCHOLOGICAL SPLIT0
Understanding the EAST-WEST PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC SPLIT requires reflection on how it is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have architected LANGUAGE on a VOYEUR VIEWER BASIS where we SEE THE TOWN GROWING. It is this VOYEUR VIEW that has us using BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE. If we are understanding ourselves as INCLUDED IN THE WORLD, our LANGUAGE STRUCTURE shifts and we use non-voyeur lead-off terms like ‘THERE IS”. In the indigenous aboriginal language, ‘THERE IS” humaning and towning in the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE. Sentences like this employ the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM rather than BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC as in ‘the VOYEUR VIEW OF “THE TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.
When we use language that casts us as a VOYEUR of the world dynamic, we are PSYCHOLOGICALLY FRAGMENTING REALITY and TAKING OURSELVES OUT OF THE PLACE WE ARE OBSERVING. This gives us the sense that our own local actions are not tied up within the transforming relational continuum and thus have no bearing on what is happening OUT THERE. This is the FLAT-SPACE view where we dump our rubbish off the stern of the boat without imagining that we will be later ploughing into it ‘bow-first’. One might say that language can give us the impression of living in a FLAT SPACE rather than in a SPHERICAL SPACE because in a SPHERICAL SPACE we have the sense of GESTALT wherein ‘everything is related’ as in WAVE-FIELD reality.
What is happening in the UKRAINE and RUSSIA, as seen through WESTERN CULTURE CONDITIONED ‘EYES’ is not seen asdirectly impacting ‘what is going on LOCALLY’, but in a GESTALT sense, as is supported by MODERN PHYSICS, we live within an all-including transforming relational continuum wherein SUBOPTIMIZATION IS IMPOSSIBLE. Yet in WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENCY, SUBOPTIMIZATION is the PSYCHOLOGICALLY FRAGMENTING NORM wherein, because of the format of our LANGUAGE, it is POPULAR to actually BELIEVE that we can sub-optimize our own ‘NATION’ in spite of the GESTALT impression wherein ‘everything is related’ (mitakuye oyasin). The sense of FRAGMENTATION is coming from the psycho-linguistic dynamics such as DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE which are supported by WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE with its DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.
To WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, NOT ONLY DO ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE’ that seem to ‘make sense’ and to support what seems to be a REALITY articulated by DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based ABSTRACTION, but are now ‘using that “REALITY”‘ as the WESTERN CULTURE POPULAR ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’, which is the source of GROWING FRAGMENTATION of WESTERN PSYCHICAL and PHYSICAL ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS. But as the SYSTEMS SCIENCES remind us, as well as MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, such FRAGMENTATION IS NOT REAL (i.e. does not have a SENSE-EXPERIENCE based foundation) and the motions of millions of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS that affirm abstractions such as INDEPENDENT NATIONS do not MAKE SUCH INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION ‘REAL’ but merely demonstrate that language-stimulated psychological abstraction is capable of cultivating physical systems of organizing that are ungrounded in sense-experience reality. The psyche may be convinced of its ability to ‘walk through fire’ or to ‘suboptimize’ and construct a local independent nation that is superior to all other ‘independent nations’ and this ‘suboptimizing game’ may play out for a long while, as it has been playing out among WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS without ever checking out whether ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE’ had any traction in sense-experience reality beyond the intellectual role-plays they stimulate (since we live in a WAVE-FIELD world wherein everything is related, the DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE can only be a linguistic-intellectual abstraction that stands or falls on the commitment of supporters).
“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence…”
— György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard (International Society of Systems Sciences)
SUBOPTIMIZATION is an UNREAL (BINARY LOGIC based) source of psycho-physical FRAGMENTATION infecting WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES, which is important in understanding THE EAST-WEST PSYCHOLOGICAL SPLIT .
* * * end of introduction * * *
Our use of LANGUAGE ‘CONDITIONS’ the way we THINK about the world. While we live within a WAVE-FIELD, what we loosely call ‘the WEST’ refers to a LANGUAGE GROUP that has DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLLING WAVE_FIELD CONJUGATE from its (our) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and is using a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING STRUCTURE.. So, for example, the basis WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION is, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, “FRAGMENTED” by the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and employing a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which REDUCES REALITY (i.e. reduces language based conceptualization of reality) to the familiar ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY “SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY” where we way things like ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.
This WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT” the female accommodating/enabling WAVE-FIELD FIELD CONJUGATE and ‘goes with’ ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.
THIS HAS MAJOR PROBLEMATIC CONSEQUENCES such as, to give one example, the CONSERVATIVE — LIBERAL POLARIZED OPPOSITION. This coverservative – liberal SPLIT derives from DROPPING OUT, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which, in the real (beyond language) senes-experience world of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD, which is comprised of “BOTH” FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE “AND” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.
This “BOTH” / “AND” CONJUGATE RELATION is basic to the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC, and it is captures in MODERN PHYSICS, and in indigenous aboriginal languages and in the language architectures of Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, BUT NOT IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, because WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE has opted to SIMPLIFY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and going with a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “ONLY” CONCEPTUALIZATION.
SO, INSTEAD OF THE MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta WAVE-FIELD supportive ANDROGYNOUS STRUCTURE in LANGUAGE, the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, leaving WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE WITH ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, … hence the FULL WAVE-FIELD LANGUAGE ARTICULATION such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE goes ONLY WITH THE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE of ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services‘ which SAY NOTHING ABOUT THE CONJUGATE SHIRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE THAT IS INCLUDED IN MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta languages.
This LINGUISTIC DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE FROM WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES is the source of FRAGMENTATION IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONDITIONS PSYCHES AND BEHAVIOURS
This SIMPLIFYING, DIMINISHING REDUCTION of the WAVE-FIELD in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, WHICH REDUCES THE CONEPTUALIZATION TO ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY TERMS INFUSES FREAGMENTATION of VARIOUS TYPES into WESTERN CULTURE DISCOURSE and FROM THERE INTO WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHES AND BEHAVIOURS, as has been described By David Bohm under the heading FRAGMENTATION in his ‘Wholeness and the Implicate Order’.
One of the ways in which FRAGMENTATION MANIFESTS as a result of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE IN LANGUAGE, is in the WESTERN CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL SPLIT. This FRAGMENTATION IS DUE TO THE “FIRST MISTAKE” where the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR “CONJURES UP” the notional SPLIT into TWO TYPES OF “LOCAL AUTHORING” (THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING IN THE REAL WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD).
“LOCAL AUTHORING” is the synthetic artifact created with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is NOT ONLY A NON-EXISTING LANGUAGE BASED ABSTRACTION but an ABSTRACTION which is SPLIT into a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and FEMALE ACOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE FORM. These TWO INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS are the DEFINING BASIS of the terms of LOCAL AUTHORING termed CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL where the former (CONSERVATIVE) is IMAGINED to be AUTHORING which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and described as MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALLIZING actions and developments while the LIBERAL is IMAGINED to be AUTHORING which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as might develop within a social collective while it may MANIFEST through particular individual LIGHTNING RODS is understood as deriving from the social collective.
MEANWHILE, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING”, IT IS THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR as Nietzsche has pointed out, … but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have the BLINDERS ON and are charging forward with the FALSE and FRAGMENTATIVE UNDERSTANDING that LOCAL AUTHORING is something REAL in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONTEXT. LOCAL AUTHORING IS “NOT REALI”! IT IS A DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR.
CAN WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS OVERLOOK THE REALITY THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” AND USE “LOCAL AUTHORING” AS THE BASIS FOR THE “CONSERVATIVE” – “LIBERAL” SCHISM? “YES WE CAN AND WE DO, BECAUSE LANGUAGE IS LIKE THAT; I.E. WE CAN USE LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCT WHAT WE SHALL “REALITY” AS WE SEE FIT AND IN THE CASE OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, we are using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to imply “LOCAL AUTHORING” of TWO TYPES, the CONSERVATIVE “LOCAL AUTHORING” which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT in the sense of ORIGINATING IN AN INDIVIDUAL and in terms of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, … and the LIBIERAL “LOCAL AUTHORING” which is LOCAL and IMPLICIT and manifests through a LIGHTNING ROD who is NOT THE LOCAL ORIGINATING AUTHOR of the action but the CONDUIT to the relation dynamics that brew up within the social collective.
The CONSERVATIVE belief is that the INDIVIDUAL is the PRIMARY AUTHORING SOURCE of actions and development while the LIBEERAL belief is that the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is the PRIMARY AUTHORING SOURCE which operates through INDIVIDUALS as CONDUITS. This is why LIBERALS do NOT believe that the JUSTICE SYSTEM should work by simply ATTRIBUTING the INJURIOUS ACTIONS of an individual TO THE INDIVIDUAL; e.g.
“while representing 4.1 percent of the overall Canadian population, Indigenous adults accounted for almost 30 percent of total custodial admissions in 2016-2017 (Statistics Canada 2016a; Statistics Canada, 2017a
In other words, the LIBERAL view is that individuals can be CONDUITS for relational dissonance that brews up within the social collective, without being the LOCAL JUMPSTART AUTHOR of VIOLENT ACTIONS that “APPEAR” to “ORIGINATE” from him but where he is instead a CONDUIT for the release of tensions developing with the relational matrix of the social collective.
WHERE WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SCREWS UP0
In our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY of inclusion as CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD, we are in a QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION where material forms such are ourselves, being CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, are BOTH DISTINGUISHABLE FORMS and at the same time INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD. “DIFFERENTIATION” is a mathematical abstracting technique wherein, for example, we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR to LINGUISTICALLY SEPARATE the (inherently inseparable) WHORLINGS FROM THE FLOWING (e.g. the HURRICANINGS from the ATMOSPHERING).
Since the reality is the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE wherein the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING are in reality only the ONE DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION, WE ARE MISTAKEN in our WESTERN CULTURE use of LANGUAGE to NOTIONALLY SPLIT THE TWO APART and DISCARD the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, leaving only the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE as if moving and interacting within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE (the passive substitute for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE).
What I am describing here is not some real physical phenomenon but the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based MATHEMATICAL-INTELLECTUAL OPERATION OF DIFFERENTIATION. We may DIFFERENTIATE a MAN and a WOMAN in a LANGUAGE stimulated INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUAL OPERATION but BECAUSE WE SHARE INCLUSION AS CONDENSATIONS IN THE ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DIFFERENTIATE ONE THING FROM ANOTHER other than by APPEARANCE.
When we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’, the SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is capturing TRANSFORMATION and NOT GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION. TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is the only REAL (sense-experience-affirmable) dynamic and it is INTEGRATION based (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is ‘opening up’ and ACCOMMODATING the TOWNING as in the QUANTUM LOGIC relation). BUT the words ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ “BRING TO MIND” (bring into intellectual conceptualization) the imagery of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF (i.e. ‘the TOWN’) which is experiencing DIFFERENTIATION based GROWTH. In other words, the DIFFERENTIATION based SCENARIO wherein ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’.
TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE is “REAL” (sense-experience affirmable) but DIFFERENTIATION based GROWTH as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING is UNREAL ABSTRACTION. For example, there cannot be GROWTH OF A TOWN without SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS in which case what is really going on is TRANSFORMATION.
Within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, EVERYTHING IS INTEGRALLY RELATED and DIFFERENTIATION as where we speak about GROWTH as in the example, ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ is only APPEARANCE as captured with LANGUAGE that imposes the notion of DIFFERENTIATION.
DIFFERENTIATION can ONLY be APPEARANCE in the real sense-experience affirmed WAVE-FIELD WORLD wherein EVERYTHING IS INTEGRALLY RELATED (mitakuye oyasin). Because WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE employs DIFFERENTIATION as LANGUAGE-stimulated INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZATION even where INTEGRATION is the sense-experience affirmed FOUNDATIONAL REALITY, a schism is set up between LANGUAGE based PSEUDO-REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the all-including WAVE-FIELD.
For example, the DIFFERENTIATION of TWO TOWNS wherein we may describe the AREA and POPULATION of EACH TOWN CREATES the PROFILES of TWO DIFFERENT THINGS (the TWO TOWNS), describing their activities as SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT but our SENSE-EXPERIENCE reality is that we live within a COMMON CONTINUUM wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED. In this case, it is only the NAMING and GRAMMAR that sets up the divided notion that EACH TOWN possesses the POWER of LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS and this is CONFUSING, and within that CONFUSION we have the FALSE notion of DIFFERENTIATION whereby we use LANGUAGE and GRAMMAR to impute the SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT IDENTITY of DIFFERENT TOWNS, both of which ‘are GROWING’, but that is just TALK.
There are no SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT “DIFFERENT TOWNS” in our ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD WORLD. So, here we must concede that ‘everything is related’ (mitakuye oyasin) and that the NOTION of DIFFERENT TOWNS is LANGUAGE-STIMULATED INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION. There are only DIFFERENCES IN APPEARANCE; i.e. ‘everything is related’ in that we and all things share inclusion in the all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.
There is a MAJOR ERROR in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY that brings with it FRAGMENTATION. FRAGMENTATION is INVOKED and PERPETUATED BY WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE where DIFFERENTIATED APPEARANCE is CONFUSED for SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY; e.g. where the GROWTH OF THE TOWN is a LANGUAGE based DUMBED DOWN reduction of the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE. There is no such thing as GROWTH in the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD; GROWTH is PSYCHOLOGICAL ILLUSION stimulated by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.
The thing to keep in mind here is that the only SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE REALITY is that of our inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, and while we can and do SPEAK IN TERMS OF ‘THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN’, there is NO SUCH THING without the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS in which case what is going on here is that we share inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ‘has a problem’ here but NOT MODERN PHYSICS and NOT indigenous aboriginal languages and NOT Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, because it is ONLY WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that EMPLOYS the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE on its own (i.e. ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services) as if that constituted ‘REALITY’, without mentioning the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ANABLING OPENING (SHRINKING) OF THE WILDERENESS.
* * *
MODERN PHYSICS understands the world as a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD, consistent with the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta Worldview. This world is a QUANTUM LOGIC world that differs intrinsically from the BINARY LOGIC world of DIFFERENTIATED MATTER and EMPTY SPACE
The QUANTUM LOGIC worldview is where material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, as in Nietzsche’s following description;
Nietzsche’s “Dionysian world” the will to power and the eternal recurrence [from the notebooks, 1885]
And do you know what “the world” is to me? Shall I show it to you in my mirror? This world: a monster of energy, without beginning, without end, a firm, iron magnitude of force that does not grow bigger or smaller, that does not expend itself but only transforms itself; as a whole, of unalterable size, a household without expenses or losses, but likewise without increase or income; enclosed by “nothingness” as by a boundary; not something blurry or wasted, not something endlessly extended, but set in a definite space as a definite force, and not a space that might be “empty” here or there, but rather as force throughout, as a play of forces and waves of forces, at the same time one and many, increasing here and at the same time decreasing there; a sea of forces flowing and rushing together, eternally changing, eternally flooding back, with tremendous years of recurrence, with an ebb and a flood of its forms; out of the simplest forms striving toward the most complex, out of the stillest, most rigid, coldest forms toward the hottest, most turbulent, most self-contradictory, and then again returning home to the simple out of this abundance, out of the play of contradictions back to the joy of concord, still affirming itself in this uniformity of its courses and its years, blessing itself as that which must return eternally, as a becoming that knows no satiety, no disgust, no weariness: this, my Dionysian world of the eternally self-creating, the eternally self-destroying, this mystery world of the twofold voluptuous delight, my “beyond good and evil,” without goal, unless the joy of the circle is itself a goal; without will, unless a ring feels good will toward itself—do you want a name for this world? A solution for all its riddles? A light for you, too, you best-concealed, strongest, most intrepid, most midnightly men? —This world is the will to power—and nothing besides! And you yourselves are also this will to power—and nothing besides! (The Will to Power §1067)
Nietzsche is clearly REMOVING the common WESTERN CULTURE FOUNDATION given to LOCAL MATERIAL BEING, as also in his critique of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which sets up, in LANGUAGE-BASED ABSTRACTION, the concept of LOCAL AUTHORING;
“Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”; -but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.” – To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” — Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531
NO MORE LOCAL AUTHORING based on BINARY LOGIC (“EITHER” is “OR” is not), ONLY TRANSFORMATION based on QUANTUM LOGIC (“BOTH” is “AND” is not), as in MODERN PHYSICS and the all-including TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD medium wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
An EAST/WEST Understanding of How SENSE-EXPERIENCE Informs LANGUAGE and THOUGHT0
“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm
We live “in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard (International Society of Systems Sciences)
“Imagine there’s no countries It isn’t hard to do” , John Lennon, ‘IMAGINE’
* * *
The EARLIER TITLES used for this same subject matter such as “THE HUMONGOUS LIE OF ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’, and the title INTEGRATION and DIFFERENTIATION”, continue to ‘apply’, but in this current note, the ‘exploration’ delves deeper into the EAST/WEST split, hence the title An EAST/WEST Understanding of How SENSE-EXPERIENCE Informs LANGUAGE and THOUGHT
SIMPLY STATED: INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents have opted for QUANTUM LOGIC based INTEGRATION in THOUGHT and LANGUAGE, CONSISTENT WITH SENSE-EXPERIENCE (wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD which gives the BOTH/AND relation wherein the MATERIAL FORM is BOTH ITSELF and at the same time, the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD IT IS A CONDENSATION IN.
WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, by having opted for BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION in THOUGHT and LANGUAGE which is ‘EXPLICIT’ and FRAGMENTATIVE in an EITHER/OR sense, CONFLICTS with our QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE as CONDENSATIONS in the all-including WAVE-FIELD; i.e. ‘CONDENSATIONS’ which are BOTH OURSELVES AND the WAVE-FIELD we are CONDENSATIONS in.
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, by giving a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION as with DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING goods and services), … IS DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (i.e. DROPPING OUT the sense-experience affirmed understanding that the LANDSCAPE IS TRANSFORMING) and thus FALSELY conceptualizing DYNAMICS in reduced (OBSCURANTIST) ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY TERMS.
* * *
Since ‘this’ is a LANGUAGE-BASED attempt to share understanding as to how SENSE-EXPERIENCE informs LANGUAGE and THOUGHT, it is subject to the LIMITATIONS OF THIS LANGUAGE I AM USING, however, it is nevertheless possible to use a limited capability language to discuss the limitations. For example, I can use references to SENSE-EXPERIENCE which is BEYOND CAPTURE IN LANGUAGE as a means of communication and sharing complex understanding. For example, hand based symbols can trigger understanding of sexual relations which, themselves, are well beyond capture in LANGUAGE.
In other words, THOUGHT of SENSE-EXPERIENCE can be TRIGGERED by LANGUAGE as a means of communication. In this case we do NOT use language to actually ‘share an experience’, we use language to trigger remembrance of SENSE-EXPERIENCE that is far too complex to capture in language. This is the ‘wink-wink, nudge-nudge, say-no-more’ (Monty Python) allusion to how understanding of complex sense-experience can be (crudely) shared by using combinations of gestures and words.
In this note entitled An EAST/WEST Understanding of How SENSE-EXPERIENCE informs LANGUAGE and THOUGHT, the aim is to show how MODERN PHYSICS and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL (EASTERN) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, being QUANTUM LOGIC based us LESS SIMPLE and more deeply informative than WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is SIMPLER by being BINARY LOGIC based. While QUANTUM LOGIC language is WAVE-FIELD expression capable, BINARY LOGIC language is only MATERIAL DYNAMICS capable.
QUANTUM LOGIC is the logic associated with a world comprised of an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD within which material forms are CONDENSATIONS so that visible/tangible material forms, instead of being ‘separate and independent’ as in BINARY LOGIC, are instead included and interdependent within the context of an overall, all-including energy-charged PLENUM or WAVE-FIELD.
In the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, the only possible dynamic is TRANSFORMATION and MOTION is IMPOSSIBLE (motion is an abstract concept based on the BINARY LOGIC, MUTUALLY EXCLUDING ‘EXISTENCE’ of MATTER and SPACE. This BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION is “SIMPLER” than the “QUANTUM LOGIC” relation wherein the universe is an energy-filled PLENUM which includes energy-based CONDENSATIONS where the relationship with the PLENUM is a BOTH/AND relation; i.e. where the CONDENSATION which we ‘see’ as a material form, is an INCLUDED ASPECT of the ONE, OVERALL, ALL-INCLUDING PLENUM. In this case, where we see what we might mistakenly refer to as MOTION, what we are seeing is TRANSFORMATION.
RESONANCE IS BEYOND BEING0
My philosophical investigations have found themselves to have much in common with those of Nietzsche and Bohm and also Vygotsky who to me deserves special mention for the CLARITY of his SUM-UP of architecture of THOUGHT and LANGUAGE, not simply ‘as in common practice’, but with respect to our early natural development where its WAVE-FIELD structure is evident. Vygotsky in the following few sentences, not only captures the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of our THOUGHT AND LANGUAGE system but how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘screw up’ by DROPPING OUT (of the model of what is going on) the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and acknowledging ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.
The great problem of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE UNDERSTANDING is rooted in our SIMPLIFYING (dumbing-down) of LINGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS by the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and thus constructing a BINARY LOGIC MATTER-and-SPACE based PSEUDO-REALITY that ‘works’ as a simplistic communications interface even as it DROPS OUT the capability of full-blown WAVE-FIELD conceptualization. While the full WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE Language of indigenous aboriginals communicates the equivalent of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (which is QUANTUM LOGIC based wherein there is capture of BOTH the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate AND the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, … we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, following a habitual to our culture strategy described by Piaget, are teaching our children to DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate and ‘going with’ ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, hence ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’ … which invokes the LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION (at the expense of DROPPING OUT acknowledgement of the all including WAVE-FIELD dynamic).
GOODBYE QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD COMPREHENSION IN LANGUAGE, HELLO REDUCED BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL WORLD VIEW!
The following INSIGHTFUL CRITIQUE by Vygotsky captures this HUMONGOUS DROP-OUT in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that REMOVES THE WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZING capability.
“Though fundamentally different in nature, the development of scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation:
. . .
“Our disagreement with Piaget centers on one point only, but an important point. He assumes that development and instruction are entirely separate, incommensurate processes, that the function of instruction is merely to introduce adult ways of thinking, which conflict with the child’s own and eventually supplant them. Such a supposition stems from the old psychological tradition of separating the structural from the functional aspects of development.” –Vygotsky
Whether we use the terms ‘REAL’ component and ‘IMAGINARY’ component in speaking of WAVE-FIELD reality, or whether we use ‘MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING’ for ‘REAL’ and ‘FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING’, we are speaking of the same ‘ANDROGYNOUS’ WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of reality which WE CAN LOOK AT as LOCAL and EXPLICIT (see that town over there and how it is growing). This is the CROW’S EYE, BINARY LOGIC STARING MODE of the DIFFERENTIATED VOYEUR OBSERVER.
We also have the option of the INCLUDED OBSERVER where we are SWIMMING the all-including WAVE-FIELD REALITY acknowledging that we are CONDSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD and the INTEGRATED QUANTUM LOGIC relation (where the observer is INCLUDED in that which he is observing).
The former (DIFFERENTIATING) view serves up LOCAL and EXPLICIT structure as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ while in the latter (INTEGRATING) view serves up the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT view as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.
Vygotsky terms the LOCAL and EXPLICIT view the ‘SCIENTIFIC VIEW’ and the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT view the ‘SPONTANEOUS VIEW’, and points out that (as in a WAVE-FIELD reality) scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation:
NO-ONE DECREED THAT IN COMING UP WITH ‘LANGUAGE’ AS A MEANS OF SHARING OUR COMPLEX SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE WAVE-FIELD, THAT WE HAD TO ‘SIMPLIFY SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY’ IN ORDER TO SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE BASED REPORTING ON OUR ‘SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY’, … AND WHILE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS AND ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS went forward in their LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with the full un-simplified QUANTUM LOGIC FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate (no fragmentation needed here)
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have been in the habit, perhaps since the era of Parmenides (500 BCE) of using a WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate WHICH SERVES AS THE NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT ‘INTEGRATING VESSEL’ THAT BRINGS RELATIONAL MEANING (“CONTEXT”) TO THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT “DIFFERENTIATED FRAGMENTS” (“CONTENT”).
WESTERN CULTURE: Stuck with a Mechanistic Language in a WAVE-FIELD REALITY.0
This short essay, for me, goes to the heart of the unfolding ‘problem’ in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS which is that we are becoming increasingly FRAGMENTED, FIRST in the LANGUAGE INFORMED PSYCHE which then ‘informs’ the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC. This problem derives from our WESTERN CULTURE use of an overly-simplistic (BINARY LOGIC based) LANGUAGE. This problem has been explored in the work of Nietzsche, Bohm Schroedinger, Vygotsky and others and these findings all point to the same DISCONNECT that, while we live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD, we have DUMBED DOWN our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE to a one-sided BINARY LOGIC, MALE ASSERTING/ACTING mechanistic CONCEPTUALIZATION as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE. This is OBSCURANTISM that NOT ONLY ‘DROPS OUT’ the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, but necessarily LOSES THE “BOTH/AND” CAPABILITY of QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD. This use of over-simplified BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE in our WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTUALIZING of what we call ‘REALITY’ sets WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “AT ODDS” with the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZING of ‘REALITY’ of Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta. Lev Vygotsky’s exposure and explanation of out WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED DUMBING DOWN of the WAVE-FIELD REALITY of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE to INTELLECTUAL SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION is the subject of this note. This DUMBING DOWN to BINARY LOGIC is putting us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS on a proverbial BUSTRIP TO HELL and we are LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS! .
* * *
WE ARE LIVING IN A WAVE-FIELD REALITY WHICH IS ALL-INCLUDING WHERE MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD.
THIS HAS BEEN LONG ESTABLISHED BY INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS AND ADVAITA VEDANTA, … AND MORE RECENTLY AFFIRMED BY MODERN PHYSICS.
MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD SO EVERYTHING IS RELATED (MITAKUYE OYASIN) AS IS UNDERSTOOD WITH QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC BUT NOT BY BINARY (EITHER/OR) LOGIC.
PROBLEM: WESTERN CULTURE EMPLOYS A BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WHICH IS ‘TOO SIMPLE’ TO CAPTURE AN UNDERSTANDING OF OUR WAVE-FIELD REALITY.
The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED REALITY SCREW-UP, IN PERSPECTIVE0
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS need to get out of our BINARY LOGIC FIXATION and move into the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY, but something is clearly HOLDING US BACK! WHAT IS IT!
My sense is that WHAT IS HOLDING US BACK is “TRUTH”.
We have become DEPENDENT on our WESTERN CULTURE LOGICAL TRUTH which gives us a sense of SECURITY and SOLID FOUNDATION on the TRUTH that we can rely on.
UNFORTUNATELY, “LOGICAL TRUTH” is not the same thing as “REALITY”. As Goedel’s Theorem proves, BINARY LOGIC TRUTH is INNATELY INCOMPLETE so that a SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTH can be overtaken by a LESS SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTH.
Modern physics has reaffirmed what the indigenous aboriginal peoples, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents have long held, that QUANTUM LOGIC gives us a LESS SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTH than BINARY LOGIC which is based on BOTH/AND rather than EITHER/OR, so for example, the BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTH of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is a “LESS SIMPLE TRUTH” than “The TOWN is GROWING”. The LESS SIMPLE TRUTH does not “MAKE THE SIMPLE TRUTH WRONG”. MEANWHILE, SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is beyond the reach of LANGUAGE-based LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS THAT CAPTURE LOGICAL TRUTHS. “The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao” –Lao Tzu.
Our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT global social collective HAS A PROBLEM. We are unable to, or are unwilling to UPDATE our old SIMPLE (BINARY LOGIC) TRUTHS with new LESS-SIMPLE (QUANTUM LOGIC) TRUTHS. People resist even LISTENING to the arguments showing the superiority of the new LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTHS. WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS commonly say; ‘READ MY LIPS! I NEVER GOT WHERE I AM TODAY NOT KNOWING WHAT THE TRUTH IS”.
That’s the trouble with LOGICAL TRUTH, it can be TRUE but INCOMPLETE, so that where one man insists that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ can prove this to be TRUE. Likewise, the man who insists that ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, which is a LESS SIMPLE TRUTH, can likewise prove this to be TRUE. As far as REALITY GOES, that is far beyond the reach of LOGICAL TRUTHS as Lao Tzu points out. So we are STUCK WITH TRUTHS that may range from SIMPLE to LESS SIMPLE and we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are now living in an era where Modern physics has confirmed that the LESS SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTHS captured in indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGES are more informative re our sense-experience reality than our WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE captured LOGICAL TRUTHS.
The example given above is a case in point; i.e. the QUANTUM LOGIC “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”:
WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are digging in their heels and are resisting even listening to someone’s purported NEW TRUTH because it seems to infer that their TRUTHS, such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ are NO LONGER TRUE and they react against that think that such a claim is BULLSHIT because “they know for sure that THEIR TOWN IS GROWING”. But that is NOT THE POINT. The point is not that the established TRUTHS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ are “WRONG”, the point is that TRUTHS can be SIMPLE and LESS SIMPLE and the BINARY LOGIC TRUTH ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ is a SIMPLER TRUTH than the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTH ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.
This essay reviews the common misunderstanding, in WESTERN CULTURE, of the INCOMPLETENESS of LOGICAL TRUTH.
* * *
This essay provides a SHORTLIST from the WESTERN CULTURE PATTERN of LANGUAGE-BASED LOGICAL SCREW-UPS I HAVE REVIEWED, which have been pointed out by various philosophical Investigators such as Nietzsche, Bohm, Schroedinger, Wittgenstein, Vygotsky and more.
This list of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC LOGICAL SCREW-UPS POINTS TO ‘ONE PLACE’ that I will try to capture as succinctly and clearly as I can, as follows;
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE that we are using to construct a SHAREABLE CONCEPTUALIZATION that passes for REALITY is BINARY LOGIC based, and thus falls prey to that general exposure of BINARY logic given by Goedel’s Theorem; i.e. “All FINITE BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE”. This means that our BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITIONS can be TRUE but with weaker or stronger grounding in REALITY and therefore that there may be other SYSTEMS of LOGIC, such as QUANTUM LOGIC that are also TRUE but are LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC, and this is what I have been finding in my work and it is the source of the difference in LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of REALITY since WESTERN CULTURE REALITY is commonly based on BINARY LOGIC while INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL REALITY is commonly based on QUANTUM LOGIC.
A simple example comparing the two is as follows;
QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY: “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”. This QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY has an ANDROGYNOUS (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE) as can be understood from the example sentence. QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY is the WAVE-FIELD REALITY of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS, ADVAITA VEDANTA and MODERN PHYSICS.
BINARY LOGIC REALITY : “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”. This BINARY LOGIC REALITY has a one sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY STRUCTURE which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (as can be seen from he example sentence). BINARY LOGIC REALITY is the MECHANISTIC REALITY of MATERIAL FORMS INTERACTING IN EMPTY SPACE OF WESTERN CULTURE
Most Recent Comments