Archive for year 2023

The CONFUSION that BINARY LOGIC is CAUSING in MEDICINE and JUSTICE

0

 

CONDENSATIONS IN AN ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM (QUANTUM LOGIC) CONSTITUTE THINGLESS TRANSFORMATION.

MATERIAL OBJECTS IN EMPTY SPACE (BINARY LOGIC) MANIFEST AS THING-BASED MOVEMENT AND INTERACTION

“LINGUISTIC NAMING AND GRAMMAR” IS THE DIFFERENTIATOR THAT REDUCES TRANSFORMATION TO MATERIAL MOTION.

EASTERN QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY AND WESTERN BINARY LOGIC REALITY ARE THE TWAIN THAT NEVER MEETS

 

PREFACE: Having ‘grown up’ in a WESTERN CULTURE family and environment, I was taught the REALITY-SHAPING language that is standard in WESTERN CULTURE which is BINARY LOGIC based where EVERYTHING IS INDEPENDENT as if material forms were LOCAL, EXPLICIT objects in an empty containing space, while my indigenous aboriginal brothers and sisters were being taught the REALITY-SHAPING language that is standard for them, which is QUANTUM LOGIC based, wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED in the manner of CONDENSATIONS within an all-including FLOWING (energy-charged PLENUM).  Anthropologist Mircea Eliade explores the respectively differing CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY in his book dedicated to this ONE REALITY-SHAPING LANGUAGE CHOICE; i.e. ‘Mephistopheles et l’Androgyne’, the English Title being ‘the TWO and the ONE’.

Having spent time studying, and contemplating these TWO LANGUAGE-BASED REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING OPTIONS which inform our understanding of REALITY by the STEALTH of packaging ONE OR THE OTHER of the BINARY LOGIC or QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES into the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE so that we WESTERN CULTURE CULTURE ADHERENTS grow up accepting the simpler BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY, while indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents grow up accepting the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY and these differing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF REALITY are the source of DIFFEREING BEHAVIOURAL TRAITS.

The BINARY LOGIC behavioural patterns of WESTERN CULTURE assume the INDEPENDENCE of material forms as if within a notional ABSOUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, while the QUANTUM LOGIC behavioural patterns of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta CULTURES assume the INTERDEPENDENCE of material forms as if CONDENSATIONS within an ALL-INCLUDING energy-charged PLENUM otherwise known as the WAVE-FIELD.

The incorporating of LOGIC into LANGUAGE at the foundational level makes it UNREACHABLE in the course of using the LANGUAGE so that simply by using the language of the culture we are born into, our CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY as we speak and think about it, already includes the basic bias of whether reality has a BINARY LOGIC or QUANTUM LOGIC structure; i.e.

BINARY LOGIC REALITY BUILDS INTO THE UNREACHABLE FOUNDATIONAL LEVEL OF LANGUAGE, the abstract notional REALITY employing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based on LOCAL, EXPLICIT material forms that move about and interact in an absolute empty and infinite space..

QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY BUILDS INTO THE UNREACHABLE FOUNDATIONAL LEVEL OF LANGUAGE, an abstract notional REALITY employing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based material forms that are CONDENSATIONS within an all-including energy-charged PLENUM; i.e. a WAVE-FIELD wherein  based on relational forms that are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT inclusions within the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  Indigenous aboriginal language based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are based on this QUANTUM LOGIC structure, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM and in Modern physics terms, this NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ‘fluid’ ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM with its material condensations manifesting the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation, matches the REALITY of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, which is NOT TRUE of BINARY LOGIC which is INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based and which DOES NOT match the REALITY of our SENSE EXPERIENCE.

EXAMPLE of QUANTUM LOGIC in LANGUAGE:  “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  Here we have the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “TOWNING” as a relational dynamic within a TRANSFORMING landscape wherein everything is in the nonlocal and implicit WAVE-FIELD flux and THERE IS NO ‘LOCAL and EXPLICIT’.

EXAMPLE of BINARY LOGIC in LANGUAGE: “the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”. Here we have the LOCAL and EXPLICIT TOWNS that are INDEPENDENT hanks to a notional EMPTY AND INFINITE “CONTAINING” SPACE.

Here we see the source of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based FRAGMENTATION of REALITY, which CONTRASTS with the Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal THINGLESS-CONNECTEDNESS which AGREES with our SENSE EXPERIENCE wherein EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX in a relationally interdependent ENERGY-CHARGED CONTINUUM.

So, our ‘CHOICE’ of LANGUAGE (the choice that our CULTURE MADE FOR US) serves up for us a language-based “REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION”, which BLOCKS the language user from ‘messing with’ the FOUNDATIONAL LOGIC built into the language. The FOUNDATIONAL LOGIC built into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is BINARY LOGIC wherein our LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS can be EITHER TRUE OR FALSE and those are the only options.  This EXCLUDES the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING  MEDIUM where PROPOSITIONS can be BOTH TRUE and FALSE at the same time, as in Heraclitus ‘‘we can’t step in the same river twice because it is not the same river and we are not the same person stepping into it’.   When we say that the AVALANCHE crashes down the MOUNTAIN into the VALLEY, it is NOT THE SAME MOUNTAIN and NOT THE SAME VALLEY. In other words, what is going on in the overall GESTALT view is TRANSFORMATION which the MOUNTAIN and VALLEY are INCLUDED IN which is QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.

When we use BINARY LOGIC and ask whether there was an avalanche, YES OR NO?  We are asking for affirmation of a BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITION which is TOO SIMPLE to capture the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE based) phenomenon.  Did Jean Valjean steal the loaf of bread YES OR NO?  This is TOO SIMPLE to capture the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE-BASED) phenomenon that gives us a deeper understanding of the unfolding events.  QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM whereas BINARY LOGIC is the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM.   The INCLUDING MEDIUM is the ALL-INCLUDING relational WAVE-FIELD we share inclusion in

There is a SHORTFALL in the CONCEPTUALIZING CAPABILITY in our ENGLISH LANGUAGE (and Common Average European languages) relative to the needs of Modern physics and relative to what has been built into indigenous aboriginal, and the adapted languages of Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, at the basic language architecture level.  This SHORTFALL in WESTERN CULTURE language architecture “SHOWS UP” in such anecdotes as ‘the THIN SKULL RULE‘ in WESTERN JUSTICE where the LAW is limited to LANGUAGE based on ‘WHAT THINGS DO’ which constitutes a REDUCTIVE SIMPLIFICATION of WAVE-FIELD REALITY which captures the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABING —MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE, … by way of simply DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and SUBSTITUTING an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

In the WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE system’s THIN SKULL RULE, one is NOT ALLOWED to acknowledge the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as with the EGG-SHELL COLLAPSING that is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘PUNCH’, even though this supported by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is, meanwhile, based on INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION which only allows for MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING of actions and developments and this goes hand-in-hand with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the SUBSTITITING IN ITS PLACE of ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

In other words, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE uses BINARY LOGIC which constrains our understanding to ‘WHETHER THE PUNCH CAUSED THE SHATTERING OF THE SKULL OR NOT’.  which is a quest to establish “A LOCAL, EXPLICIT CAUSE’ which, while this has no place in our sense-experience grounded understanding of physical phenomena as supported by Modern physics, wherein the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT prevails while the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is ‘APPEARANCE’.

‘APPEARANCE’ is captured in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE in terms of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that implies LOCAL AUTHORING; e.g. ‘the PUNCH SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL’.  WESTERN JUSTICE speaks to support the whole one-sided reduction of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY built into WESTERN LANGUAGE in sayings like ‘TAKE YOUR VICTIMS AS YOU FIND THEM’ which is in effect saying, our traditional way of using language to CONCEPTUALIZE REALITY is to DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE because it is SIMPLER to use language that constrains the conceptualizing to just the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.

This means that we can constrain our language based conceptualizations to terms of ‘what material things do’ as if in an absolute empty space of infinite extent. This language based simplification of our INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY is rooted in our historical cultural development, going back to Copernicus and his attempt to simplify the language based articulating of complex movements of the planets, wherein the Modern physics findings would be understood in terms of the QUANTUM LOGIC relation of PLANETINGS (condensations) in the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD.

Note in the following quote that Copernicus language-based conceptualizing scheme puts INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based DESCRIPTION into primacy over sense-experience (i.e. sense-experience of inclusion in a reality which, as Lao Tzu says, is beyond the direct reach of language; “the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’)

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

The point to remember is that LANGUAGE is not capable of DESCRIBING or REPRESENTING the WAVE-FIELD REALITY of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, … LANGUAGE is ONLY CAPABLE of constructing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS we can use as a supportive ‘go-by’ that is NOT THE TRUE TAO but is THE TAO THAT CAN BE TOLD.

For example, we say that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which is SIMPLER than ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, the former employing BINARY LOGIC which SPLITS THE TOWN OUT from the LANDSCAPE, and the latter employing QUANTUM LOGIC which acknowledges the INCLUSION of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

While the BINARY LOGIC conceptualization is SIMPLER than the QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization, IT COMES WITH THE SAME SORT OF PROBLEM AS RAISED WITH the THIN SKULL EXAMPLE wherein our use of SIMPLIFYING LANGUAGE which SIMPLIFIES the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE,… RUNS INTO TROUBLE of the THIN SKULL RULE type where LANGUAGE that is simplified and constrained to CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based only on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, are actually SIMPLIFYING REALITY (using simplified language-based reality conceptualizations) and introducing OBFUSCATION by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE ‘painting a picture’ wherein the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING can proceed, notionally, without any engagement with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, as if it were transpiring in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE, which ‘works’ as far as INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based CONCEPTUALIZATION goes, but which LACKS CONSISTENCY/AGREEMENT WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.

In SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING … NEVER OCCURS OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF … CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.  For example, WHERE THERE ARE ‘TOWNS THAT ARE GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ (the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALING CONJUGATE), there is ALWAYS, at the SAME TIME, CONJUGATE WILDERNESS that is SHRINKING, and GIVING UP RESOURCES.  The overall REALITY is this TRANSFORMATION which is affirmable by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, and the talk of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION is only INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION which are one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamics that live only in the world of INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION and which, in sense-experience reality, are never WITHOUT THEIR FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as is the nature of our sense-experience of inclusion in WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

In other words, in sense-experience reality, there is only TRANSFORMATION and no such thing as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, all of these being one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PSEUDO-DYNAMICS.  THERE IS NO GROWING OF A TOWN WITHOUT A CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS (in the spherical space of our actual sense-experience), which together ‘point to’ TRANSFORMATION  as being what is REALLY GOING ON.  THE GROWTH OF A TOWN is intellectual abstraction that we ‘conjure up’ with LANGUAGE; i.e. with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.

THIS PREFACE is intended to point out the problem of FRAGMENTATION that we build into our INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING by using our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with its DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.   This contrasts with the flow-based languages of Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta where we use QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualizing in saying, ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in which the TOWNING is innately INCLUDED in a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND SENSE).

This PREFACE has been lengthy because we are using the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE architecture to try to convey how the QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE is capable of LESS SIMPLE CONCEPTUALIZATIONS. The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USER, because of the habitual way of interpreting language in BINARY LOGIC terms will HEAR the QUANTUM LOGIC “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ and reflexively interpret that as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, dropping out the QUANTUM LOGIC relation in the process as if it was not adding anything to the intended meaning.   This practice is grounded in such understandings as when hearing ‘there is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT is raised with the understanding that the HUMAN is an INDEPENDENT BEING, an INHABITANT that is SEPARATE FROM THE HABITAT in the manner of CHRISTIAN BELIEF which is BINARY LOGIC based and unlike the Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal belief which is QUANTUM LOGIC based as in ‘there is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM as with CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD’.

HERE WE SEE THE LANGUAGE BASED SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION which is TROUBLING WESTERN CULTURE which is NOT A PROBLEM in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta where the understanding is ‘mitakuye oyasin’ aka ‘everything is related’ as consistent with the Modern physics understanding of material forms including HUMANINGS as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

The following article; The CONFUSION that BINARY LOGIC is CAUSING in MEDECINE and JUSTICE explores how the SHORTFALL of BINARY LOGIC based conceptualizations relative to QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualizations is creating problems in WESTERN CULTURE MEDICINE and JUSTICE, pointing to the need for an UPGRADE to QUANTUM LOGIC based UNDERSTANDING.

* * * * * *

 

 

I am NOT a BELIEVER in WESTERN CULTURE ‘allopathic medicine’ although I am now largely dependent on it since ‘cancer’, which in Modern physics as also in indigenous aboriginal culture ‘medicine’ would be understood as ‘imbalance’, is understood in Western Medicine as ‘the attack of pathogens’, hence the remedy is to ELIMINATE THE PATHOGEN, as for example in RADIATION TREATMENT for CANCER which is aimed at the DIFFERENTIAL ELIMINATING of the BAD (CANCEROUS) CELLS while doing as little damage as possible to the GOOD HEALTHY CELLS.

 

THIS WESTERN MEDICINE “GOOD CELLS and BAD CELLS” BINARY LOGIC SPLIT IS BULLSHIT coming from the USE OF SIMPLIFYING BINARY LOGIC BASED INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION.  There is NO BINARY LOGIC SPLIT INTO EITHER GOOD OR BAD!   As Modern physics attests, BINARY LOGIC is SIMPLIFYING ABSTRACTION which is displacing our use of LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE and IMBALANCE.

 

Likewise the GOOD HUMANS and BAD HUMANS SPLIT is based on the SIMPLIFYING USE OF BINARY LOGIC in WESTERN JUSTICE.  IN REALITY, there is only BALANCE and IMBALANCE.

 

I am NOT MAKING THIS UP.  This is the understanding not only of MODERN PHYSICS but also indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedant adherents.  In this understanding, ILLNESS is IMBALANCE and HEALTH is BALANCE and MEDICINE is the RESTORING of BALANCE where there is IMBALANCE.

 

Why I am taking “RADIATION” treatments for “CANCER” which is said to destroy MORE cancer cells than HEALTHY cells in such a manner that the growth of new cells will increase the ratio of healthy to cancerous cells.

 

Because, while my view is that ILLNESS is IMBALANCE, just as in RICH and POOR IMBALANCE, when there is an accelerated growth of REBALANCERS (i.e.. ‘thieves’), while the ultimate solution is RESTORING BALANCE, the short term objective may be the reduction of rebalancers together with the longer term objective is the restoring of balance.

 

What I am saying is that because our WESTERN CULTURE MEDICINE persists in the anti-pathogen approach, and that is the form that all publicly supported and easily accessible medical services take, it makes sense to partake of it even though my belief is that the anti-pathogen orientation is mistaken and that what is really going on is that illness is a falling out of balance and the remedy is restoring balance.   In some areas of medicine, this understanding of illness as imbalance (e.g. a deficiency of vitamin C which shows up as scurvy and pneumonia, and a deficiency of important microbial strains in the microbial assemblage of the gut; e.g. in the wake of having been administered an anti-biotic, can be remediated by the infusion of the missing members of the out-of-balance microbial assemblage. 

  (more…)

HOW WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is FRAGMENTING REALITY

0

OVERVIEW: Western Culture Language Architecture incorporates a SIMPLICITY that distinguishes it from the LESS SIMPLE LANGUAGE of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal languages, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta languages.  Instead of the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC foundations in the LANGUAGES of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, WESTERN CULTURE employs a SIMPLER LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on BINARY LOGIC, which, in terms of WAVE-FIELD structure, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and EMPLOY “ONLY” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.  For example, where Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals employ ANDROGYNOUS language structures such as ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which includes “BOTH” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING (‘TOWNING’) “AND” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (‘in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) . 

Note that ‘TOWNING’ is a relational dynamic  which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) rather than an abstract LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘THING-IN-ITSELF’ called ‘the TOWN’ as in standard WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVEOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

NOTE ALSO that ‘TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND expression where the TOWNING and the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE are ONE THING and there is ONLY THE APPEARANCE OF TWO THINGS.   As in turbulent flow, there is WHORLING in the FLOWING and it is NOT POSSIBLE to use a dip-net to scoop out the WHORLING form the FLOWING and store it in a separate TANK because the WHORLING is the APPEARANCE of the FLOWING, and is NOT a separate thing, IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES, BECAUSE THEY GIVE A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO BINARY “EITHER/OR” LOGIC rather than QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC, serve up a conceptualization that SPLITS APART INTO TWO SEPARATE FRAGMENTS, “THE WHORL” and “THE FLOW”, as if the “WHORL” were a separate development within the flow that is capable of INDEPENDENT MOVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT.

THIS IS “NOT” THE CASE in the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, but LANGUAGE can ‘DO WHAT WE WANT’ and in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATION, the COMBINATION that Nietzsche calls ‘the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ is used to CONCEPTUALLY LIBERATE the FORMING-in-the-FLOWING from this natural QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION and RE-CAST it in the BINARY LOGIC terms of ‘THE FORM that is MOVING THROUGH the FLOW’, in effect using LANGUAGE (the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR) to RE-RENDER the QUANTUM LOGIC FORMING IN THE FLOWING in the BINARY LOGIC terms of the ‘FORM IN THE FLOW’, whereby we are using language to CONVERT the FORMING IN THE FLOWING into the simpler BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of the ‘FORM’ that is ‘MOVING THROUGH’ the ‘FLOW”.

This REVISION of the LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY, which REDUCES the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND relation of the FORMING in the FLOWING to the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC FORM IN THE FLOW, synthetically LIBERATING the FORM and re-animating it AS IF IN ITS OWN RIGHT, by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is the general pattern of WESTERN CULTURE language based CONCEPTUALIZATION, so that instead of understanding REALITY as a QUANTUM LOGIC FLUID DYNAMIC wherein the FIGURES in the FLOWING are APPEARANCES (in the manner of quantum logic BOTH/AND relation of WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute “REAL BEING’ to the NAMING-instantiated relational forming in the flowing, and CONFLATING this “FIRST ERROR” with the “SECOND ERROR” of GRAMMAR that imputes to “THE FIRST ERROR (the NAMING-instantiated-BEING”, … “ITS OWN” POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.  This gives is the means of ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZING using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is in terms of ABSTRACT LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES AND WHAT THEY DO.

This BINARY LOGIC based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR PSEUDO-REALITY which imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development by means of NAMING-instantiated LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES is the SIMPLE basis of WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing of QUOTE/UNQUOTE “REALITY”.  This WESTERN CULTURE conceptualizing based on SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC rather than being based on LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and ‘runs’ with ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, so for example, ones speaks in terms of THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN, WITHOUT MENTIONING THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS.  This is CONFUSING BECAUSE of the GOEDEL’s THEOREM understanding that ALL FINITE SYSTEMS OF LOGIC ARE INCOMPLETE in which case we can speak in terms of LOGICAL TRUTHS (the TOWN is GROWING) which are AT THE SAME TIME “INCOMPLETE” (there is mention of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS).

Because WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS tend to formulate action and development efforts on a BINARY LOGIC TRUTH BASIS; e.g. “IF WE DOUBLE THE AREA OF CROP CULTIVATING, WE CAN DOUBLE OUR PRODUCTION”, this understanding which is based ONE-SIDEDLY on  MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING while we CLASSIFY this as TRUTH, is INCOMPLETE and is therefore UNREAL since it fails to acknowledge the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS LANDS that are an outcome that is in INNATE ASSOCIATION with THE GROWTH OF CULTIVATED CROPLAND, therefore our LOGICAL PROPOSITION in terms of the perceived DOUBLING of CROPLANDS generating a DOUBLING OF PRODUCTION, while TRUE, is INCOMPLETE since it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is EVER-PRESENT in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC we share inclusion in; i.e. in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, is commonly MISINTERPRETED as an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT deemed a NON-PARTICIPANT in material dynamics.

* * *

(more…)

The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS IN LANGUAGE

0

 

INTRODUCTION: This essay, entitled; “The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS IN LANGUAGE”  explores the manner in which WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE simplifies and abbreviates conceptual constructions to the point that the conceptualization of the ‘common language ground’ (serving as a ‘COMMON REALITY’) that enables group communications is no longer consistent with our sense-experience affirmed REALITY, but employs an intellectual conceptual SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on BINARY LOGIC and ‘TRUE’ but ‘INCOMPLETE’ LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.  For example, whereas INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL languages and Modern physics fashion language that speaks in QUANTUM LOGIC terms such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’, … WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS support the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based expression; the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services.

 

NOTE:

QUANTUM LOGIC is based on BOTH/AND logic as with WHORLING in the FLOWING where the WHORLING and the FLOWING are ONE.

BINARY LOGIC is based on the EITHER/OR logic where the WHORLING is understood to be separate from, and MOVING THROUGH the FLOWING.

Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals have the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding that HUMANINGS are included in the TRANSFORMING relational continuum, while WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have the BINARY LOGIC understanding that HUMANS are independent beings that author their own actions and behaviours while moving about within a separate and independent passive containing space.

 

While this here LINGUISTIC communication is in MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms (i.e. in terms of ‘what things do’) which is BINARY LOGIC based, this communication is INCOMPLETE in that it is DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, unlike indigenous aboriginal language (and Modern physics) where BOTH MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AND FEMALE ACCOMMMODATING/ENABLING are included as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where we have a QUANTUM LOGIC proposition that incorporates BOTH MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in ‘TOWNING’ and also FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as in ‘IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

THE FIRST ‘WHAMMY” of The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS IN LANGUAGE can thus be seen as the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which REDUCES QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC to BINARY EITHER/OR LANGUAGE.  In the WAVE-FIELD structure of nature’s dynamic, we have “BOTH” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “AND” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugates, as in the actual sense-experience affirmed physical reality on inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD.

GIVEN THAT the purpose of LANGUAGE is to come up with signal-based messaging with the capability of sharing conceptualizations of sense-experience affirmable dynamics, we must be ‘on guard’, in this case, for a DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is the INTEGRATING agency in language based conceptual constructions.  The effect of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is to impute FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING CAPABILITY to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC, which gives rise to ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ (MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY) WITHOUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING AS ‘IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’)

WHY WOULD WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS JUST DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE IN OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, since it is INNATELY INCLUDED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY?

(more…)

Why Western Culture Adherents Need a NEW LANGUAGE!

0

 

WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD.

 

WE AND ALL MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD.

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE MAKING A HUGE MISTAKE BY BASING OUR LANGUAGE ON MATERIAL FORMS.

 

THE NOTION OF MATERIAL FORMS MOVING ABOUT AND INTERACTING IN EMPTY SPACE IS BINARY LOGIC BASED ABSTRACTION.

 

MODERN PHYSICS AND INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTAT ADHERENTS USE QUANTUM LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE aka VERB-BASED LANGUAGE WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, CONSISTENT WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

 

AN EXAMPLE OF QUANTUM LOGIC VERSUS BINARY LOGIC IS… ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (THIS QUANTUM LOGIC EXPRESSION IMPLIES A ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION SINCE ‘TOWNING’ IS A FEATURE WITHIN THE ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’), … VERSUS ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING GOODS’ (THIS BINARY LOGIC EXPRESSION IMPLIES AN ‘EITHER/OR’ RELATION SINCE THE ‘TOWN’ IS AN ‘INDEPENDENT’ THING-IN-ITSELF WHICH RELATES TO ITS SURROUNDINGS BY WAY OF ‘INPUTS AND OUTPUTS’ RATHER THAN QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND’ RELATIONS.

 

THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY IS FRAGMENTATIVE AND USES ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ IN AN UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE OVER ‘INTEGRATION’, HENCE ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ IN PLACE OF ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ WHERE THE FIGURE AND GROUND RELATION IS UNDERSTOOD AS A QUANTUM ‘BOTH/AND’ LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM.  THE INCLUDING MEDIUM AKA THE ‘GROUND’ IS THE WAVE-FIELD, THE INCLUDED FIGURE AKA THE ‘FIGURE’ IS A CONDENSATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD/GROUND AS CONSTITUTES THE QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION.

 

THAT IS, THE QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION IS A BOTH/AND RELATION WHEREIN THE INCLUDING MEDIUM AND THE INCLUDED ‘FIGURE’ ARE ‘SEPARATE’ ONLY IN APPEARANCE, BUT NOT IN SUBSTANCE, IN THE MANNER THAT A WHORLING IN A FLOWING APPEARS TO BE TWO THINGS; I.E. A FIGURE AND A GROUND AS IN OUR INTELLECTUAL “EITHER/OR” BINARY LOGIC BASED UNDERSTANDING, BUT IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE UNDERSTANDING, THE FIGURE IS INCLUDED IN THE GROUND AS IN THE QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION.  (more…)

The INVERTED LOGIC of WESTERN CULTURE

0

 

QUANTUM LOGIC (i.e. NON-BINARY LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND are ONE as with CONDENSATION) …  is in a NATURAL PRIMACY over BINARY LOGIC (where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO as with MATTER and EMPTY SPACE).  We have a CHOICE of which to give the foundational role to, and the choice we make has a profound impact on the UNDERSTANDING of the world that we draw from our language-based CONCEPTUALIZING of our SENSE-EXPERIENCING of the world, a world-in-flux wherein the NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT is in a NATURAL PRECEDENCE over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.   This is the finding of MODERN PHYSICS wherein material forms (the local and explicit) are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD (the nonlocal and implicit).

BINARY LOGIC , where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO, … while simpler, is intellectual abstraction for which there is no equivalent in our natural SENSE-EXPERIENCE world wherein FIGURE and GROUND are only ONE. 

That is, when we use the simplifying abstraction of BINARY LOGIC in our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, we are IMPOSING this SIMPLIFYING CONCEPTUALIZATION by using LANGUAGE to ‘CONSTRUCT’ impressions of a simplified BINARY LOGIC based PSEUDO-WORLD.  These BINARY LOGIC based simplified CONCEPTUALIZATIONS …. ARE NOT “REPRESENTATIONS” of something that ‘exists out there’, but are instead INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS ‘in here’ that construct a simplified SUBSTITUTE pseudo-world OUT THERE.

Indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGES employ this RELATION wherein the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is INCLUDED in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, implying a QUANTUM LOGIC relation; i.e. the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as is the relation between the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and the MATERIAL FORM that is the CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

The CONDENSATION is at the same time “BOTH” the MATERIAL FORM “AND” the INCLUDING MEDIUM (the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD) so that UNLIKE THE BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION where the MATERIAL FORM ‘moves through’ an EMPTY SPACE, … HERE WE HAVE THE QUANTUM LOGIC SITUATION where THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “THINGS THAT MOVE” as where MOVING FIGURE and STATIONARY GROUND are TWO SEPARATE THINGS, there is only TRANSFORMATION where THERE IS ONLY the “APPEARANCE” of a MOVING FIGURE that is associated with the OVERALL TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

Or in other words, “THE MOVING/CHANGING FIGURE, BE IT A TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING OR A HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING, IS ONLY ‘APPEARANCE’ whereas overall TRANSFORMATION is the REALITY.

TRANSFORMATION, as CONCEPTUALIZED using the BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC conveying of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, IS LESS SIMPLE than than the “EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC matter and space LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY”,  in that the QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is fully FLUID as in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (ACTION-VERB-based) WITHOUT DEPENDENCY ON THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT (i.e. without NAMED-BEING-BASED DEPENDENCY).  i

THERE IS A PROBLEM in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IN THAT PRIORITY IS GIVEN TO THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING which is BINARY LOGIC based and ONCE THE CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION IS LAID DOWN WITH BINARY LOGIC which is SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC, it is NOT POSSIBLE to incorporate, on that SIMPLE LOCAL and EXPLICIT base, the QUANTUM LOGIC CONSISTENT NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZATION.

In other words, after we have used language to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS TO THINGS as if in an EMPTY SPACE (BINARY LOGIC) in our LOCAL AND EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZATION, we cannot mix and match language that imputes BOTH/AND STATUS to MATERIAL FORMS BECAUSE IN THIS CASE AUTHORING AGENCY IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as in overall TRANSFORMATION).

BINARY LOGIC is like the Cuckoo, a simple bird that takes over the nest of less simple birds in that its eggs hatch first and the Cuckoo chicks push out the less simple birds eggs before they hatch, so that the simple supersedes the less simple.

In other words, once BINARY LOGIC is infused in the CONCEPTUALIZING STREAM, it TAKES OVER.  If we start off saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, we have established the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC MODE OF CONCEPTUALIZING (which implies :LOCAL AUTHORING, implying an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER) and our continuing story is then in terms of THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT which BLOCKS THE ENTRANCE of the QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ , … where there is NO SENSE OF LOCAL AUTHORING as “the TOWNING is INCLUDED WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in a BOTH/AND SENSE;” i.e. the TOWNING is to the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE as the WHORLING is to the FLOWING in a FLUID DYNAMIC (Figure and Ground are ONLY ONE).  

As in the Cuckoo’s egg hatching metaphor, once the starting out of a linguistic exchange commences on the basis of BINARY LOGIC conceptualization, the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization is shut out.

The use of simple BINARY LOGIC in LANGUAGE is OBSCURANTIST in that its LOCAL and EXPLICIT configuration BLOCKS THE  EXPRESSION OF the less-simple NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as where everything is in flux and THER IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING) which is PRIMARY in SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.  That is, if we use BINARY LOGIC and say “THE TOWN IS GROWING” we have assigned the AUTHORING POWER to the TOWN for its own GROWTH and this “LOCAL AUTHORING” is innately SIMPLER that if we had said ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which gives the AUTHORING POWER to the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (i.e. to the WAVE-FIELD rather than than to the material CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD).

This is the REDUCTION of QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC that changes LANGUAGE-BASED-UNDERSTANDING in a manner that is a CULTURE SHIFTER since it applies not only to ‘the TOWN’ but to ‘the HUMAN’ and while indigenous aboriginal culture LANGUAGE speaks in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, Common Average European LANGUAGE speaks in the BINARY LOGIC terms of HUMANS as LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEINGS with “THEIR OWN (grammar-given) POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

WESTERN CULTURE, because of the popular use of BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE, persists in the use of LANGUAGE that is OBSCURANTIST, reducing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING which in our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is in an INNATE PRIMACY over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING requires QUANTUM LOGIC as in the languages of Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is putting SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC into an unnatural primacy over LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC with the result that LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, instead of being based in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION, is based in LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING sourced ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.  The result is that WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING, by virtue of giving the foundational role in LANGUAGE to the SIMPLE LOCAL and EXPLICIT, is DROPPING OUT the LESS SIMPLE ALL-INCLUDING, ALL-CONNECTING, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”, the wave-field base, and because WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE engineers this DROP OUT in its language based conceptualizing, the conceptualizations, (REDUCED FROM QUANTUM LOGIC NON-LOCAL and IMPLICIT to TO BINARY LOGIC LOCAL AND EXPLICIT)  are FRAGMENTING both WESTERN CULTURE INTELLECT and BEHAVIOUR.

* * *  

 

(more…)

REFERENCE NOTES

0

These REFERENCE NOTES are temporary for ease of reference.

 

JUST TO EMPHASIZE THE KEY POINTS IN THE PREVIOUS NOTE;

 

WHILE WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE BEEN ‘BROUGHT UP’ TO BELIEVE IN LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘GROWTH’ and ‘PRODUCTION’, which are INTELLECTUAL BINARY LOGIC based, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE informs us in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “TRANSFORMATION” terms which are QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC based.

 

The use of BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE is pervasive in WESTERN CULTURE social discourse, … UNLIKE indigenous aboriginal social discourse where QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE is pervasive.  For example, WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS speak in terms of GROWTH and PRODUCTION where INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS speak in terms of TRANSFORMATION.

 

It is EVIDENT that this difference comes from two different LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, THE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE where we say things like ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’,… while the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS are saying there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, since the understanding is one of INCLUSION in the all-including GREAT MYSTERY aka the transforming relational continuum aka the Modern physics WAVE-FIELD.

 

These two different LANGUAGES are NOT simply DIFFERENT WAYS OF SAYING THE SAME THING,!

 

THE FIRST (WESTERN CULTURE) language architecture IS BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM) based and employs CONCEPTUALIZING that is in terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING.

 

The SECOND (INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL AND MODERN PHYSICS) language architecture is QUANTUM (BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM) based and employs CONCEPTUALIZING that is in terms of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) where the structure is ANDROGYNOUS, employing A FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE in CONJUGAL UNION with A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.

 

* * *

(more…)

The PONZI SCHEME known as THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE

0

In a Ponzi scheme, a con artist offers investments that promise very high returns with little or no risk to their victims. The returns are said to originate from a business or a secret idea run by the con artist. In reality, the business does not exist or the idea does not work in the way it is described.  –Wikipedia

The “DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE” is a form of PONZI SCHEME, as in COLONIZATION wherein the abstract notion of OWNERSHIP OF LAND is used in conjunction with a DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE to invoke the INTELLECTUAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL ABSTRACTION of BEING-based FRAGMENTS of REALITY which are said to have an INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE that can notionally be supported by LOCAL, INTERNAL AUTHORING POWER known as GOVERNMENT.  This has all the trappings of a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that INCARNATES a notional LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and developments.

 

Unlike the Advisory “COUNCILS” in indigenous aboriginal cultures that undertake to cultivate and sustain INNER-OUTER BALANCE in what is understood as a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation with the overall world they are included in, the GOVERNING SYSTEMS in WESTERN CULTURE ‘DECLARED-to-be-INDEPENDENT NATIONS’ manage their activities AS IF THEY REALLY WERE ‘INDEPENDENT’ OF THE OVERALL SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED CONTINUUM (the all-including, transforming relational continuum).  RIGHT HERE is a PSYCHOLOGICAL SPLIT between LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION and SENSE-EXPERIENCE.

The DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE is thus the initiating of an UNDECLARED PONZI SCHEME wherein the supporters must submit to being GOVERNED on the basis of BELIEF IN, and SUPPORT FOR the “SUBOPTIMIZATION” of an imaginary linguistic (double error of naming and grammar) formulation that PURPORTS, by ‘DECLARATION’ TO BE AN INDEPENDENT NATION”.   This WESTERN CULTURE “DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE” based “PONZI SCHEME”, supported by LANGUAGE-CULTIVATED DELUSIONS of the LOCAL BEING-based EXISTENCE of INDEPENDENT NATION-FRAGMENTS, is the source of a TRANSNATIONAL (in reality ‘unbounded’) SOCIAL COLLECTIVE developing the characteristic dysfunctions of SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA.

The DEEPLY INFUSED and STERNLY ENFORCED (by establishing the absolute NEED for ‘CITIZENSHIP’) PRETENCE OF ‘INDEPENDENCE” secured by the abstract BELIEF in the BOUNDING POWERS of imaginary lines used to DEFINE the “INDEPENDENT NATION” has induced, in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL BEHAVIOURS, on the scale of FRAGMENTED NATIONS, the incidence of Schizophrenia and Paranoia.  Inhabitants of unbounded natural landscapes in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence,  are transformed as a result of the PONZI scheme-like INVESTMENT in the FRAGMENTATIVE BELIEF IN NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE, in spite of this being in FULL contradiction to our sense-experience informed awareness of our inclusion in the UNBOUNDED transforming relational continuum, into INDEPENDENT BEINGS living in INDEPENDENT NATIONS, to which OWNERSHIP can be applied to finalize the seal the PONZI scheme like deal.

* * * A comment from Bohm is appended as a reminder of the psychological confusion deriving from the use of fragmentation.

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

 * * * * * * 

 

 

 

 

SERIOUSLY, try this on for a bogus business idea.  It is possible, with armed back-up, to DECLARE THE INDEPENDENCE of a LAND AREA within the transforming relational continuum nd designate it as being OWNED, a intellectual abstract ‘secret’ idea (if one had never seen the purported ‘supporting documents’ or been apprehended by ‘those in know’, one would never know) based on nothing more than the confidence of the operating collective who are taking control of land and who are given shares in the OWNERSHIP investment.  The COST of the shares will be the commitment to BEAR ARMS and give one’s life, if necessary (as determined by random chance similar to a dice toss).  The ‘stake-holders’ themselves will constitute the resources necessary to take control of an area of prime land that will be designated OWNED property. The operating collective may begin to collect dividends from the time of commitment through access to the ‘fruits of the soil’ even though stakeholders may not yet have been called on to make any significant payment.  Random chance is involved here since the call for payment as in military service may come early to some and may be delayed for many to such time that income from stakeholder access to the land has become significant.

 

The DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE opens the way to FRAGMENTATION and to the DECLARATION OF OWNERSHIP (of resources) and this is backed up and secured by POLITICAL SUPPORT leading to PARANOIA and SCHIZOPHRENIA an the scale of the FRAGMENTED INTER-NATION basis.   That is, there are extremely strong political and military/police based PRESSURES to ensure that one’s BEHAVIOURS conform with the ABSTRACT POLITICALLY SUPPORTED PSYCHOLOGICAL FRAGMENTATION (i.e. IN CONFLICT with our sense-experience which affirms the reality of our being included in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.  The socio-political pressures in support of FRAGMENTATION that does NOT exist in sense-experience reality is a continuing contributor to rising rates, In WESTERN CULTURE, of schizophrenia and paranoia.

(more…)

The WESTERN CULTURE Humpty-Dumpty LANGUAGE Dilemma

0

 

PREFACE:

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have a LANGUAGE based communications problem in that we have ENGINEERED AN IMPORTANT SIMPLIFICATION into our Common Average European (CAE) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  For example, Modern physics Rheomode (flow-based language) and the indigenous aboriginal languages, along with language as used by Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta incorporates the full ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD) STRUCTURE with its CONJUGATE Female-Accommodating/Enabling — Male Asserting/Actualizing STRUCTURE, .. while the WESTERN CULTURE CAE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT” the Female Accommodating/enabling component and ‘goes with’ a one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY structure.

 

Instead of the Modern physics compliant and indigenous aboriginal  ANDROGYNOUS LANGUAGE STRUCTURE, an example of which is ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING landscape’, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE reduce this to ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

 

NOTA BENE:   WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (i.e. the ‘transforming landscape’), employing ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE (‘the towning’).

 

The Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE gives a foundational role to QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC that captures the relationship between the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM also known as the WAVE-FIELD and material CONDENSATIONS within the WAVE-FIELD.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is critically important and NOTA BENE that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE  DROPS OUT the QUANTUM LOGIC language content and SUBSTITUTES BINARY LOGIC relations.  This DUMBING DOWN of the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION from the full-blown QUANTUM LOGIC (Wave-field based) CONCEPTUALIZATION to the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION takes us from ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING landscape’, .. to, .. ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

The latter BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION is a simplification that “FORCES UPON ITSELF” the INVENTING of an ABSOLUTE, EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, … having done away with the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC “energy-charged PLENUM in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including PLENUM (wave-field).

 

NOTE THAT this WESTERN CULTURE simplifying of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that enables CONCEPTUALIZATION based on what Nietzsche terms ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is used to CONCEPTUALIZE “LOCAL AUTHORING”.  This LINGUISTIC CONCEPUALIZATION featuring LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development entails the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJGUATE which is why WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE employs the OBSCURANTIST tactic of ONLY RECOGNIZING THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ACTION CONJUGATE as exemplified by the THIN SKULL RULE which DROPS OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of how the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING “DOMINATES” in relational dynamics while WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS insist on OBSCURING the dominant influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is, of course, the reality that comes with living within this wave-field world.

 

Because of the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE FROM LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF (QUOTE/UNQUOTE) “REALITY”, we are stuck with using the SIMPLIFIED-to-one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION SCHEME which gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’, and because we are EMPLOYING THIS AS OUR ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’, … LOOK OUT!  HERE COMES THE WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYSFUNCTIONS of FRAGMENTATION, EGO INFLATION AND MORE!

 

THIS PREFACE repeats the WARNING (as given by Bohm and others) as to how our use of our CAE LANGUAGE is INFECTING OUR THOUGHTS with SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based INTELLECTUAL PSEUDO-REALITIES that are inducing in us, actions and interactions that IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE reality are generating FRAGMENTATION.  For example, where our language has us talking about how everyone has their heads down, working together in collaboration, on the growth of their TOWNS.  This would be fine in a flat space, but in the spherical space we are in, it is at the same time, the source of SHRINKING WILDERNESS, so that the REAL (sense-experience affirmed) REALITY is NOT GROWTH but TRANSFORMATION of the overall LANDSCAPE.

 

This understanding, that follows from living in a spherical space (wave-field), that there is only TRANSFORMATION and not ‘GROWTH’, ‘DEVELOPMENT’ and ‘PRODUCTION’ is an understanding that is already built into indigenous aboriginal language architecture but which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have stripped out of our language architecture by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and thus giving ourselves the impression that the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING concepts of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are LEGITIMATE CONCEPTS!  They would be legitimate in a FLAT SPACE but FLAT SPACES are MATHEMATICAL ABSTRACTION and there are no FLAT SPACES in our sense-experience reality, so that there is NO SUCH THING AS “GROWTH”, there is only “TRANSFORMATION” as is acnowledged with the architecture of indigenous aboriginal languages (and Modern physics) but the PRIMARY REALITY OF TRANFORMIATION is NOT to be found or acknowledged in the simplified BINARY LOGIC based architecture of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES.

 

This PREFACE is to try to ‘give a view from above’ the confusing influences in our standard WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE due to its being thoroughly SALTED with BINARY LOGIC conceptualizations that may distract the reader from the message in this essay that BINARY LOGIC “IS THE PROBLEM” and to avoid is use.  Ideally, this would require a shift to a new, QUANTUM LOGIC (flow-based) language such as a fleshed out version of Bohm’s Rheomode or an indigenous aboriginal language, however, our WESTERN CULTURE INVESTMENTS IN OUR CAE LANGUAGES ARE MASSIVE and we are thus LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS.  The alternative is thus to raise the awareness of the pitfalls in our CAE languages and how to ‘work around’ them. .

* * * end of preface * * *

 

 

Philosophical Investigators such as Nietzsche, Bohm, Wittgenstein, Schroedinger and Vygotsky have SOMETHING IN COMMON and I would call it “THE INSTINCT OF THE WORLD AS A WAVE-FIELD” which manifests in their appreciation of indigenous aboriginal ‘natural philosophy’ (all things are related).   Even though their findings may appear DIFFERENT to us in our casual reading of their works, it is EVIDENT that THEY ALL ‘tuned in’ to the fact that there is a dysfunction WESTERN CULTURE social dynamics that manifests in FRAGMENTATION.

(more…)

The GRAND SUM-UP

0

 

This short article has been titled ‘THE GRAND SUM-UP’ because it goes straight to the heart of where-and-how WESTERN CULTURE SPLITS OFF from EASTERN CULTURE (indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta); i.e. in their mutually contradicting ARCHITECTURES OF LANGUAGE,

 

HOW COULD IT BE that two groups of people could come up with such RADICALLY DIFFERING “REALITIES” as (A) THE QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD REALITY where material forms are ‘condensations’ within the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED … and (B) THE BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL OBJECT REALITY where material forms are ABSOLUTELY EXISTING LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE wherein ALL THINGS ARE INDEPENDENT? The former group seeing REALITY in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT terms of a continually flowing wave-field and the latter group seeing REALITY in the LOCAL and EXPLICIT terms of independent material beings interacting in empty space?

 

[[ we shall see how the WAVE-FIELD nature of REALITY can support BOTH the REAL (LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIALIST) as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, … AND, the IMAGINARY (NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT RELATIONAL) as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, as “OPTIONAL REALITIES”, … and how there is a LINGUISTIC HIJACKING by WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES; i.e. a TAKE-OVER by LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECT based REALITY (composed of INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS IN EMPTY SPACE), that ECLIPSES the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RELATIONAL REALITY, thanks to the SIMPLICITY of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.]]

 

At the bottom of this is the LANGUAGE-BASED SPLIT between LANGUAGE with a QUANTUM LOGIC  REALITY foundation wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) as supported by the Modern physics understanding wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, … versus a BINARY LOGIC REALITY foundation wherein EVERYTHING IS INDEPENDENT, an abstract notion INFUSED INTO WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES and REAFFIRMED by NEWTONIAN physics, giving a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN REALITY to the ABSTRACTION of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS” that notionally reside in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, this WESTERN CULTURE cosmology persisting due to its having been BUILT INTO THE BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that now serves as our WESTERN  CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY.

 

‘The WESTERN CULTURE supporting the use of a BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE base with its LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, … and the indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta which support the use of a QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE base with its NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, which is consistent with MODERN PHYSICS’

The WESTERN CULTURE “ERROR” which is in fact the Nietzsche identified LANGUAGE-based “DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR” that invokes the UNREAL ABSTRACTION of “LOCAL AUTHORING” is the SOURCE of growing FRAGMENTATION that, in the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is “LOCKED IN BY THE HIGH SWITCHING COSTS” to overcome PRIDE and PROFIT.

* * * 

 

 

We live in (share inclusion in) the all-including transforming relational continuum, also known as the WAVE-FIELD.  As Modern physics attests, we, and all material forms are CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, which is beyond capture in ANY LANGUAGE because the whole of reality is a continuing flow.

 

Meanwhile, LANGUAGES have been developed which are composed of symbols or words that give persisting meaning.  Since everything is in flux, persisting patterns  tagged with persisting symbol-based words  (allusion to sense-experience based impressions which are ‘patterns’ that persist and do not, once they are uttered, change their meaning, can only INFER the sense-experience reality of inclusion in the flow (aka the Tao).  So, while ‘the Tao than can be told is not the true Tao’, as Lao Tzu points out, BECAUSE everything in sense-experience reality is in flux, LANGUAGE based on sounds or symbols that PERSIST in their meaning-giving, cannot directly capture a REPRESENTATION of the FLUID REALITY of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, however, systems based on symbols.   There are LANGUAGE-based WORK-AROUNDS, such as described by Wittgenstein, where the symbols are used are not offered as ‘symbols for things’’ but are designed for subservience to the fluid dynamical reality they are inferring.

 

This LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SCHEME based on ‘symbols for things’ used as an expedient to capture the ‘RELATIONS AMONG THINGS’ which are in constant flux, opens the way to a system of language that works by ‘relational inference’, avoiding persisting ‘thingness’ of material being which BLOCKS the language goal of conveying impressions of a reality in continuing flux.  Wittgenstein speaks of this ‘tactic’ where language based on ‘symbols’ such as alphabetic symbols and ‘words’ with ‘fixed meaning’ can appear to ‘overcome’ their ‘static inference foundations’;

 

6.54 My propositions are elucidatory in this way: he who understands me finally recognizes them as senseless, when he has climbed out through them, on them, over them. (He must so to speak throw away the ladder, after he has climbed up on it.)

He must surmount these propositions; then he sees the world rightly.

7.0 Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. (“Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen”),

–Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

 

Here we can see that what is being suggested is to use language for CONCEPTUALIZATION rather than REPRESENTATION.   That is, REPRESENTATION of a transforming relational continuum IS NOT FEASIBLE when the REPRESENTATION SCHEME IS CONSTRAINED TO UNCHANGING BUILDING BLOCK ELEMENTS WITH FIXED, PERSISTING MEANING.

 

HOWEVER, what Wittgenstein is pointing out is that the basic symbolic elements can be chosen NOT WITH THE PURPOSE OF REPRESENTATION in mind, which is HOPELESS where one is trying to REPRESENT a FLUID REALITY using symbols that convey FIXED MEANING.  But this ALTERNATIVE is different where we admit that the symbols, because they are fixed, while they are not capable of REPRESENTATION, “ARE CAPABLE OF CONCEPTUALIZATION” which works by ‘tricking the observing mind’ to get it to recall sense-experience which is part of the ongoing transforming relational continuum

 

CONCEPTUALIZATION AS THE BASIS OF LANGUAGE RATHER THAN REPRESENTATION takes the LANGUAGE DESIGNER down a DIFFERENT PATH.

(more…)

LANGUAGES and REALITIES

0

 

This ESSAY has TWO LEVELS OF PREFACE.   WHY TWO LEVELS OF PREFACE?

Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung  unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache” (Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

Language based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT has a problem in that the world of our sense-experience, i.e. the all-including transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD is inherently NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (flowing) so that MATERIAL FORMS are APPEARANCES as associate with CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  This relation between CONDENSATIONS of WAVE-FIELD (material forms) and WAVE-FIELD is NOT a BINARY LOGIC relation; i.e. THERE ARE NOT TWO SEPARATE THINGS HERE, there is only the ONE THING; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD in which CONDENSATIONS manifest as MATERIAL FORMS and here there is a QUANTUM LOGIC relation where the LOGIC captures the understanding that the VISIBLE MATERIAL FORM is NOT INDEPENDENT of its ‘containing space’ as in the BINARY LOGIC relation, the REALITY being that THERE IS NO ‘CONTAINING SPACE’ populated by “INDEPENDENT” MATERIAL FORMS (as in the BINARY LOGIC understanding), there is only the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD within which MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS, thus the physical reality of our inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD entails the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  In this case, because all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ONE WAVE-FIELD, ALL MATERIAL FORMS ARE RELATED as is acknowledged in Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, which is contrary to WESTERN CULTURE where material forms in the flow are imputed to have INDEPENDENT STATUS thanks to simple DECLARATIONS, which are backed up by military force, and which make no impression at all on on the four-leggeds and winged and slithering ones.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS THEREFORE HAVE A PROBLEM COMING FROM OUR GIVING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE, IN OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, TO BINARY LOGIC.  Once BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE is used to construct CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of the world of our sense-experience, THE SIMPLIFYING DEED IS DONE which involves the DROPPING OUT of essential information; i.e. the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which is the INTEGRATING PLENUM, leaving behind as the SOLE MAKE-UP for our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (absolute material entities as if in empty, infinite space).

The DROPPING OUT, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, which gives rise to ABSTRACT ONE SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENTS that we endow with GRAMMAR-based POWERS of LOCAL, JUMPSTART AUTHORING of actions and developments (e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING”) that constitute our WESTERN CULTURE REALITY, which in this essay is referred to as REALITY NUMBER TWO, leaving the label REALITY NUMBER ONE for the full ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY which includes BOTH the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate AND the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.

Discussing this, as in this essay, is challenged by the fact that this language I am using (English) like all the WESTERN Common Average European languages, has a BINARY LOGIC based ARCHITECTURE which is innately TOO SIMPLE to develop language-based QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS; e.g. to get to the full QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, one needs to use language architecture akin to the MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal language architecture which supports “REALITY NUMBER ONE” which one captures in saying the equivalent of “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”

This QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization captures the BOTH/AND relation of CONTENT and CONTAINER, in accord with the CONTENT being a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD CONTAINER).  This is in contrast to the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE STANDARD where one speaks in the BINARY LOGIC terms of “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services) which conveys the EITHER/OR relation of CONTENT and CONTAINER, imputing MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY.  This WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED INVERSION that puts DIFFERENTIATION into an UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE over INTEGRATION,’DEMOLISHES’ the natural MATERIAL-CONTENT-AS-CONDENSATION-INCLUDED-WITHIN-WAVE-FIELD-CONTAINER relationship wherein everything is naturally INTEGRATED since the material forms are CONDENDSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.  “INSTEAD”, the INTEGRATION IS “DENIED” or rather “OBSCURED” by the use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche) which uses GRAMMAR to equip MATERIAL FORMS WITH THEIR OWN ‘ON-BOARD’ NOTIONALLY ‘SELF-SOURCED’ POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.  THIS “LOCAL AUTHORING” ABSTRACTION IS THE RECIPE FOR FRAGMENTATION WHICH HAS BEEN SALTED INTO WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES WITH THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.

This PREFACE speaks to the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based infusing of FRAGMENTATION which makes its way, thanks to language, into WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHES and from there into the PHYSICAL ACTIONS of WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES.  For example, the ENTIRELY UNREALISTIC (as affirmed by sense-experience) DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE of NAMING-INSTANTIATED ‘FRAGMENTS’ where such SYNTHETIC FRAGMENTATION is supported by the ASSOCIATED abstraction of the ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE that WESTERN CULTURE language sets up as a PLAYING FRIELD for the FRAGMENTATION based REALITY NUMBER TWO.

 

 * * * 

 

 

 

While the ‘standard preface’ is to give the reader a landscape or CONTEXT that gives a kind of GROUNDING of understanding of where the body of the discussion is ‘coming from’, THIS ESSAY HAS AN EXTRA LEVEL OF PREFACE to guide the reader in THE READER’S APPROACH to INTERPRETING the TEXT, and this is because, as is the basic point that this essay is trying to share, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS commonly use language to CONSTRUCT TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES which I am calling REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality) … AND… REALITY NUMBER TWO  (binary logic reality).  

These TWO LEVELS of REALITY are explained in the text so this PRE-AMBLE is just a GUIDE to this ‘something different’ than the normal straight-forward publication of an essay.  Since the thesis here is that WE ARE USING, IN AN ALTERNATING FASHION, TWO LEVELS OF REALITY IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS in a knee-jerk way where we have FORGOTTEN that we are even doing it. 

BUT NOW IT IS GIVING US PROBLEMS (problems of fragmentation in understanding which is troubling our social relations) and this is CONFUSING US “BECAUSE WE HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANDGUAGE USAGE, WE ARE DOING THIS”.  And here, the “THIS” is referring to our WESTERN CULTURE habitual use of LANGUAGE WHEREIN WE MIX AND MATCH WITHOUT OVERT WARNING, “TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES, REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality) … AND… REALITY NUMBER TWO  (binary logic reality).  

For example, since we are living in a SPHERICAL SPACE which has a conjugate WAVE-FIELD structure where, for example, the MORE LAND WE CULTIVATE, the LESS WILDERNESS REMAINS so that it is TOO SIMPLE to use the standard BINARY LOGIC description where we use language that promotes the understanding that THERE IS SUCH A THING AS THE “GROWTH” of the area of cultivated land which corresponds, in BINARY LOGIC fashion, with a RELATIVE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS. THIS IS STANDARD FLAT-SPACE “THINKING” put into LANGUAGE and this FLAT-SPACE “THINKING” is the source of BINARY LOGIC.

What is REALLY GOING ON is understood by way of the GESTALT OF OVERALL TRANSFORMATION because THERE IS NO FLAT SPACE wherein the GROWTH of cultivated land implies a “RELATIVE” SHRINKING of WILDERNESS.  That is A TOO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC BASED WAY OF THINKING THAT WE PUT INTO OUR LANGUAGE-BASED INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING based “REALITY NUMBER TWO” (binary logic EITHER/OR reality) that is “NOT SUPPORTED BY OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE”.  What “SENSE-EXPERIENCE DOES SUPPORT IS “REALITY NUMBER ONE” (quantum logic BOTH/AND reality).

The REALITY NUMBER ONE is LESS SIMPLE than the REALITY NUMBER TWO in the sense that REALITY NUMBER ONE is the GESTALT based REALITY wherein our UNDERSTANDING includes our (spherical space) SENSING of ‘BALANCE’ and SENSING of ‘CHANGES IN BALANCE’, as in changes in the relative areas of DEVELOPED LANDS and WILDERNESS LANDS.

If we lived in a FLAT PLANE of infinite extent, as our intellectualizing and lingualizing mind is in the habit of thinking, the relation between the area of CULTIVATED LAND and the area of WILDERNESS LAND is BINARY LOGIC based, meaning that that TWO ARE NOT RELATED so that we can MEASURE the AREA of EACH ONE and garner the RETIO based (‘rational’) understanding that comes from this, and in particular this BINARY LOGIC view equips us for talking about the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND and/or the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS LAND which is important to the WESTERN CULTURE economics of production.

NOTA BENE:  The changing GESTALT that associates with a relative DECREASE IN WILDERNESS associated with the INCREASE in CULTIVATED AREA within the FINITE space of the surface of a sphere invokes the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM of Modern physics.  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS tend to HABITUALLY think in terms of FLAT SPACE which is UNREAL ABSTRACTION.  Here we think in the GEOMETRIC terms of a FLAT PLANE OF INFINITE EXTENT.  Unlike SPHERICAL SPACE which is FINITE with a GESTALT quality (it may be ‘mostly wilderness’ with ‘sparse development’ or it may be ‘mostly developed’ with ‘sparse wilderness’.

There is a REAL QUALITY of BALANCE associated with the CHANGING in the relative areas of WILDERNESS and DEVELOPMENT.  Our sense-perception has the capability of perceiving “GESTALT”, an ‘overall impression’ which includes BALANCE and which  GOES BEYOND (is “LESS SIMPLE THAN”) QUANTITATIVE MEASURE.  Our ability to perceive these LESS SIMPLE QUALITATIVE aspects of  “GESTALT” and “BALANCE” or “IMBALANCE” have a QUANTUM LOGIC FOUNDATION that GOES BEYOND THE SCOPE Of BINARY LOGIC.

We could say that BECAUSE GESTALT, BALANCE and IMBALANCE are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and deal directly with the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, they belong in REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality), … WHICH IS “LESS SIMPLE THAN” (and lies beyond the reach of) … REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality).  

These CATEGORIES are nothing more or less than the missing labels on the DEA ABSCONDITA, the MISSING FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, which is supporting REALITY NUMBER TWO HAS DROPPED OUT, in going with the one-sided mechanistic MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE ALONE.

IN SHORT, the SPHERICAL SPACE OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE has the property of BALANCE or IMBALANCE and is thus LESS SIMPLE than SIMPLE FLAT SPACE (EUCLIDEAN SPACE) which, being FLAT and INFINITE, does not have the properties of GESTALT and BALANCE and IMBALANCE as available to our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the FINITE SPHERICAL SPACE OF WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

While GROWTH based CONCEPTUALIZING is supportable by LOCAL, EXPLICIT MEASUREMENT, there is a changing GESTALT which is QUALITIATIVE in a SPHERICAL SPACE which is WILDERNESS as it becomes INCREASINGLY DEVELOPED.  ‘GROWTH’, since it is CONSTRAINED to BINARY LOGIC, is innately SIMPLER than ‘QUALITATIVE SENSING.

However, in SPHERICAL SPACE THINGS ARE LESS SIMPLE and there arises the GESTALT associated with the BALANCE between WILDERNESS and CULTIVATED LAND.  This BALANCE is a REAL THING and it is QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation based as associates with GESTALT, an overall androgynous quality, which derives from LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC and which is not available to SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC.  We could say that BINARY LOGIC is FLAT-SPACE LOGIC where it makes sense to speak in terms of the GROWTH of cultivated land, but GROWTH is a TOO-SIMPLE ABSTRACTION when it comes to the language we need to speak about what is going on with the GESTALT of the ANDROGYNOUS SPHERE which changes with the changing BALANCE of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WILDERNESS LAND and MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CULTIVATED LAND.

Once we shift OUR FOCUS from these TWO THINGS to the ANDROGYNOUS GESTALT, the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based RATIO gives way to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE

THE “TWO REALITIES” REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality), … WHICH IS “LESS SIMPLE THAN” (and lies beyond the reach of) … REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality) ARE SHOWING UP IN ASSOCIATION WITH OUR AMBIGUOUS USE OF LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING (REALITY NUMBER TWO), .. and NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING (REALITY NUMBER ONE).

For example, when we are using REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality) we focus on the CULTIVATED AREA in its own right and speak about ‘ITS GROWTH’, … but when we use REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality), we open our view to the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION which is LESS SIMPLE in the sense that BALANCE and IMBALANCE, a JANUS faced (quantum logic) coincidentia oppositorum which HAS NO DEPENDENCY ON LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECTS, and which becomes the PRIMARY REALITY aka REALITY NUMBER ONE.

 

In the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT conceptualization of GESTALT mode, we see the CHANGING BALANCE and understanding it in terms of what is REALLY GOING ON because the world of our sense-experience is of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD wherein there is no such thing as an EMPTY FLAT SPACE AREA (no more WAVE-FIELD wherein material things are condensations as in the quantum logic relation) wherein we can purportedly assess whether the CULTIVATED AREA is, this year, EITHER BIGGER OR SMALLER than last year (p.s. ‘don’t mention zee wilderness’).

SURE, WE CAN DO THIS “GROWTH” ASSESSMENT but this measure of GROWTH is a very SIMPLE (binary logic) CONCEPTUALIZATION which is based on intellectual abstraction, … while there is more to dynamics than GROWTH since the GESTALT based “BALANCE” of CULTIVATED LAND and WILDERNESS LAND is something innately LESS SIMPLE (it involves quantum logic which is LESS SIMPLE than binary logic).  Furthermore, it is our INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTING CAPABILITY and NOT our sense-experience THAT IS COMING UP WITH THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.

The “BOTTOM LINE” here is that while our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE simplifies things for us by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and using ONLY THE ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE in our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, so that we can SIMPLIFY our CONCEPTUALIZING, such an approach REMOVES the quantum logic sense-experience qualities of GESTALT, BALANCE and IMBALANCE from our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING CAPABILITY.  In mathematical terms, what we are doing with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is DROPPING OUT the ‘IMAGINARY COMPONENT’ of the COMPLEX REALITY and GOING SOLELY WITH THE ‘REAL COMPONENT’ so that we construct our language based conceptualizations  as if within a REALITY NUMBER TWO  (binary logic reality)  rather than constructing our language based conceptualizations within a REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality).

 

NOTA BENE:  REALITY NUMBER TWO “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and develops LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based on BINARY LOGIC as with MATERIAL BEING BASED FORMS AS IF IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, these FORMS being GRAMMAR ENDOWED with notional LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  THIS IS REALITY NUMBER TWO, and it is MISSING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which IS comprehended in REALITY NUMBER ONE which is endorsed by MODERN PHYSICS and which is the traditional reality of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the confusing situation wherein WE ARE USING, IN AN ALTERNATING FASHION, TWO LEVELS OF REALITY (one LESS SIMPLE and one MORE SIMPLE) IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS in a knee-jerk way where we have FORGOTTEN that we are even doing it. 

Kepler pointed this out as did Nietzsche and Bohm.  It started within WESTERN CULTURE SCIENCE which has an early tradition of wanting to construct SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITIES that have SIMPLER LANGUAGE REQUIREMENTS:

As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’

Copernicus was on ‘this same tack’ of SIMPLIFYING the language based conceptualizing, keeping it BINARY LOGIC based rather than having to open the door to linguistic complexities (language capable of quantum logic BOTH/AND propositions).

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

We may imagine ourselves living in the WESTERN CULTURE WORLD which has LOCKED INTO THE HABIT of using a SIMPLIFIED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with a BINARY LOGIC conceptualizing scheme as popularized by NEWTON in regard to PLANETS.

All these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the end for which he form’d them; and these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation.”  –Isaac Newton, Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light

 

So, while indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta HAVE BEEN NATURALLY ON-BOARD THE REALITY NUMBER ONE, having incorporated it in their language architecture, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have incorporated in our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, the NUMBER TWO REALITY.

To RESTATE the thesis stated earlier;

 

… The thesis here is that WE ARE USING, IN AN ALTERNATING FASHION, TWO LEVELS OF REALITY IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS in a knee-jerk way where we have FORGOTTEN that we are even doing it. 

BUT NOW IT IS INCREASINGLY GIVEN US PROBLEMS (problems of fragmentation in understanding which is troubling our social relations) and this is CONFUSING US “BECAUSE WE HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USAGE, “WE” ARE DOING THIS”.  And here, the “THIS” is referring to our WESTERN CULTURE habitual use of LANGUAGE WHEREIN WE MIX AND MATCH WITHOUT OVERT WARNING, “TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES, REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum reality) … AND… REALITY NUMBER TWO  (binary logic reality).  

While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, AND ALSO INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS are INTUITIVELY UNDERSTANDING that the continuing GROWTH of CULTIVATING and INDUSTRIALIZING LAND implies the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS LANDS thus TRANSFORMING THE OVERALL GESTALT of the continually transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, .. our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, HAVING ‘DROPPED OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, “IS SPEAKING IN THE ONE-SIDED OBSCURANTIST TERMS OF MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING …. AS IF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (the primary wave-field agency) DID NOT EXIST.

In other words, as far as our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE goes, it is LEGITIMATE to construct one-sided male-asserting language propositions (i.e. BINARY LOGIC propositions) that speak of the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND without ANY MENTION, as would come with QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization, of the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS LANDS and thus in our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC reporting mode, there is NO MENTION OF WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON which is TRANSFORMATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD THAT WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN.

AS FAR AS OUR WESTERN CULTURE (binary logic) LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION OF REALITY goes, we are in REALITY LEVEL TWO (binary logic reality) so that when we are using language to conceptualize *REALITY*, we see ourselves in the BINARY LOGIC, DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based terms of LOCAL AUTHORS of, for example, the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND, all of which is ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, wherein we have DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE wherein the WILDERNESS is at the same time OPENING UP to ACCOMMODATE/ENABLE (shrinking so as to enable expanding of) the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

The WESTERN CULTURE abstract, linguistic DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that has us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS pushing forward in a one-sided (SO WE THINK, BECAUSE OF THE WAY WE TALK) MALE ASSERTING/DEVELOPMENT MODE, … AND ALL THE WHILE, WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IS ANDROGYNOUS “TRANSFORMATION” and this is an ALL INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMING THAT INCLUDES OURSELVES”.

While Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta adherents ARE ALREADY THERE WITH THIS UNDERSTANDING, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS,  … “WHETHER WE ARE UNDERSTANDING AND BELIEVING IN IT OR NOT” “IS NOT THE POINT” because we have ENGINEERED A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WHICH DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND DROPS US OUT OF “REALITY NUMBER ONE” down into the simpler, one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY “REALITY NUMBER TWO”.

INTUITIVELY, WE MAY UNDERSTAND THE WORLD IN THE FULL-BLOWN ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD TERMS as affirmed by MODERN PHYSICS and as embraced by indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, so that when we plough up our field, we are conscious of the CONJUGATE LOSS OF WILDERNESS but there is nothing in our LANGUAGE SUPPORTED REALITY NUMBER TWO that makes mention of the LOSS OF WILDERNESS and the Goedel’s Theorem effect comes in here because whiel we may speak TRUTHFULLY about our GROWING THE SIZE OF OUR CULTIVATED LAND AREA, our statement is BOTH TRUE and INCOMPLETE (dropping out any acknowledgement of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERENSS AND THUS THE OVERALL GESTALT OF TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE).

SO, INTUITIVELY WE UNDERSTAND THAT WHAT IS GOING ON IS TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding termed REALITY NUMBER ONE, … but intellectually, in our BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE SUPPORTED CONCEPTUALIZATION MODE, WHAT IS GOING ON IS GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT.   Lao Tzu said something akin to ‘know the local and explicit but embrace the nonlocal and implicit).

 * * *   END OF FIRST LEVEL OF TWO-LEVEL PREFACE * * *

 

 

* * * BEGINNING OF PREFACE * * *

 

 

 

The LOCAL and EXPLICIT  … and … the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

Because we live in a WAVE-FIELD wherein everything is in flux, including ourselves; i.e. where we are relational forms in the transforming relational continuum, our VISUAL capability falls innately short of bringing us INCLUSIONAL AWARENESS.

Our visual capability, supported by our two eyes on one side of our head, has given us something our general sensory experience of inclusion in the world, which comes to us as relational understanding which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, brings us a VOYEUR view of world, and this VOYEUR  perspective comes with a SELF-OTHER SPLIT where, while in the VOYEUR MODE, we DROP OUT our sense-experience of INCLUSION in the world we are looking out at.

While the VISION based perspective is LIMITED to a kind of flashlight illumination of the ‘limited patch of reality’ that we can illuminate, that patch is a patch that we can come to know in very fine LOCAL and EXPLICIT detail, in contrast to our overall senses such as our sense of inertia where the accelerations associated with relative motion can bring to our cognitive awareness, an inertial guidance based awareness of our relative movements within a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT all-including transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, evidently having developed somewhat of an ‘anal-retentive’ tendency, have been SEDUCED by the LOCAL and EXPLICIT nature of our VOYEUR VISUALIZING capability, IN SPITE OF THIS LIMITED SCOPE, and we often DON’T BOTHER to INTEGRATE the LOCAL and EXPLICIT with the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, particularly in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE dialogues where we have fallen into the habit of saying things like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ and stopping right there as if this FRAGMENT we are SPOTLIGHTING has sufficient ‘stand-alone’ meaning it itself (without mentioning the conjugate shrinking of the wilderness).

This has the effect, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, of elevating DIFFERENTIATION which amplifies the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, into an unnatural precedence over INTEGRATION, the latter acknowledging the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, but WAIT A MINUTE, it is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that gives expanded or ‘grounded’ meaning to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT such as the ‘TOWN that is growing’.   The more we put first focus on understanding coming from DIFFERENTIATION that gives LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONTENT, the less that our understanding is INFORMED by the INTEGRATING CONTEXT of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

To say ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is a QUANTUM LOGIC, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT formulation UNLIKE ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’ which is a BINARY LOGIC LOCAL and EXPLICIT formulation.

LANGUAGE PRACTICE THAT PUTS LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONTENT INTO AN UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE OVER NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT CONTEXT IS DYSFUNCTIONAL AND IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION.

To say that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, because it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE while RETAINING THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE ‘ON ITS OWN’, implicitly BACKFILLS the CONCEPTUALIZATION stimulated by this language with ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, giving us a BINARY LOGIC based CONSTRUCTION wherein there is “EITHER” the TOWN “OR” nothing.  This BINARY LOGIC conceptualization is UNLIKE the QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization wherein ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which has the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD FORM wherein there is a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING condensation within a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD.

Our USE, in LANGUAGE, of the LOCAL-and-EXPLICIT and the NONLOCAL-and-IMPLICIT, gives us the means by which our language based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS can either be FULL-BLOWN ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATIONS termed here “REALITY NUMBER ONE” or, by way of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) and employing ONLY the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate (which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT), we serve up the simpler BINARY LOGIC BASED ‘”REALITY NUMBER TWO”.

If all of this writing sound UNNECESSARILY COMPLICATED, that may be a fair criticism but the fact remains that our choice of LESS SIMPLE and SIMPLE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES opens the way to cat and mouse games which employ OBCURANTISM where needed.  If we want to support a social dynamic which celebrates the abstract BINARY LOGIC scheme known as ENTITLEMENT, then we will have to turn our backs on the QUANTUM LOGIC scheme known as BALANCE.

ENTITLEMENT belongs to REALITY NUMBER TWO while BALANCE belongs to REALITY NUMBER ONE.

ENTITLEMENT is supported by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies LOCAL AUTHORING which, although ABSTRACTION, garners support for the concept of ENTITLEMENT.  This all stems from BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION (EITHER he is the AUTHOR OR he is NOT the AUTHOR).  In Modern physics as in QUANTUM LOGIC, we have the ANDROGYNOUS relation involving the CONJUGATION of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING and MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and when we claim that the PUNCH is fully and solely the AUTHOR of the shattered SKULL, using OBSCURANTISM to ‘DROP OUT’ the FEMALE ENABLING CONJUGATE, this puts us in “REALITY NUMBER TWO”.

In order to GET BACK INTO “REALITY NUMBER ONE” and rejoin Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, from our domicile in “REALITY NUMBER TWO”, we would have to revoke the OBSCURANTISM of the ‘DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODAINT/ENABLING CONJUGATE’ and RESTORE our ACKNOWLEDGING of the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION which entails restoring the NATURAL PRIMACY of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (e.g. RESTORING the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein everything is flux” into precedence over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “the TOWN is is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”).

By REVISING OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE from the BINARY LOGIC base to the QUANTUM LOGIC base which is what is being described here in terms of RESTORING the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT into natural primacy over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, we are shifting back from REALITY NUMBER TWO to REALITY NUMBER ONE, which is the solution to the many dysfunctions that are manifest in the TRANSFORMING relational continuum while we who share inclusion in it are LINGUISTICALLY MIS-CONCEPTUALYZING IT as REALITY NUMBER TWO rather than REALITY NUMBER ONE..

 * * * * * * * * *

 

 

 

 

 PARALLEL REALITIES: The GROWTH OF DYSFUNCTION in WESTERN CULTURE

 

This is an overview of the message shared in prior notes on the topic; The GROWTH OF DYSFUNCTION in WESTERN CULTURE.

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION where indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents are using QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.

 

The relationship between less simple QUANTUM LOGIC and simple BINARY LOGIC can be shown using a QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE (indigenous aboriginal language, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta languages) ….  but is BEYOND THE REACH of simple BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE.  Since in WESTERN CULTURE, the simple BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE is the standard for language-based communications, and since it is too simple to carry and share QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualizations, a discussion of the differences in meaning-carrying capability, because it is difficult if not impossible using our Common Average European Language because of its simple, and thus limiting (BINARY LOGIC based) architecture.

 

For example, in the case of the PUNCH that “IS SAID TO” fracture the SKULL of the recipient, BINARY LOGIC REALITY ‘stops there’ with the one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALZING ACTION, whereas QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY comprehends the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of, for example, the EGG-SHELL thin SKULL.  While the WAVE-FIELD reality we share inclusion has this ANDROGYNOUS (conjugate female accommodating/enabling — male asserting/actualizing) nature, WESTERN CULTURE “COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE” employs a SIMPLIFIED structure wherein the simplification comes from DROPPING OUT, in the language based conceptualizing, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.

 

This LIMITING in the LANGUAGE-based CONCEPTUALIZING built into the Common Average European LANGUAGE architecture inhibit the communicating of COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD REALITY for experience-sharing purposes. That is, the ARCHITECTURE of language needed to convey the workings of WAVE-FIELD dynamics requires a QUANTUM LOGIC FOUNDATION whereas, the innately simpler BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATION is LIMITED IN ITS CONCEPTUALIZING CAPABILITY to the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate which “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate, reducing the WAVE-FIELD dynamic to the SIMPLER  ‘material objects in empty space’ BINARY LOGIC  dynamic.

 

It is IMPORTANT to understand the difference in REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING COMPLEXITY between simple BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is our WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD, and less simple QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta language  architecture standard AND also the language architecture standard of MODERN PHYSICS.

 

REALITY NUMBER ONE; QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY:  The less simple QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE employs both the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALYING conjugate as in “THERE is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  This ANDROGYNOUS relation is one where everything is in flux, or in other words, everything is related (mitakuye oyasin [everything is related].

 

REALITY NUMBER TWO: BINARY LOGIC REALITY; The simpler BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and GOES ONLY WITH the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.   In WAVE-FIELD terms which have a COMPLEX REAL + IMAGINARY STRUCTURE, REALITY NUMBER TWO (BINARY LOGIC PSEUDO-REALITY) DROPS OUT THE “IMAGINARY COMPONENT” and develops with LANGUAGE, a simplified BINARY LOGIC based PSEUDO-REALITY which is a CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME based solely on REAL, LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL AGENTS, as if in ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF ININITE EXTENT as in “The TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.

(more…)

Go to Top