FORWARD: The impact of using language based on QUANTUM LOGIC versus BINARY LOGIC 

‘QUANTUM LOGIC’ is the logic associated with our understanding that we and all things are ‘condensations’ within an all-pervading electromagnetic WAVE-FIELD.  Quantum logic is thus BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein MATERIAL FORMS as CONTENT and the CONTAINER (the containing) WAVE-FIELD are ONE. ‘BINARY LOGIC’ is the EITHER/OR logic of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM associated with the understanding that all material objects are INDEPENDENT THINGS that move about and interact within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

From this description we can see that QUANTUM LOGIC gives us an IMPRESSION of reality in the GESTALT terms of an all-including transforming relational continuum aka ‘the WAVE-FIELD’ while BINARY LOGIC gives a REPRESENTATION of reality in the FRAGMENTED terms of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BODIES which move about and interact within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT. While QUANTUM LOGIC is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, BINARY LOGIC is LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC has a FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE since the WAVE-FIELD has the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CAPACITY of INCLUDING the MALE ASSERTING CONDENSATIONS in a FIGURE and GROUND as ONE manner (e.g. similar to a local, explicit WHORLING within the nonlocal, implicit FLOWING, where FIGURE and GROUND are CONJUGATE ASPECTS of ONE FLUID DYNAMIC aka the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD.

(An example of QUANTUM LOGIC is ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, where FIGURE (TOWNING) and GROUND (TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) are “ONE” as in the BOTH/AND logic of the including medium)

 

BINARY LOGIC is MISSING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE RELATION leaving only the ASSERTING MALE to do its work of representation ALONE in EMPTY SPACE, in a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING fashion where the ‘GROUND’  aka the ‘CONTAINING MEDIUM’ is ‘EXCLUDED’ (hence ‘the BINARY EITHER/OR Logic of the EXCLUDED medium) leaving only the MALE ASSERTING FIGURE to be perceived as the local, explicit ACTION and DEVELOPMENT AUTHORING AGENT.  This DROPOUT of the nonlocal, implicit female-accommodating energy-charged PLENUM aka ‘WAVE-FIELD’ is the source of fragmentation.

 

(An example of BINARY LOGIC is ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’ ,where FIGURE (the TOWN) and GROUND (EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT) are TWO as in the EITHER/OR logic of the excluded medium.)

QUANTUM LOGIC IS THE STANDARD LOGIC OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE ADHERENTS WHILE BINARY LOGIC IS THE STANDARD LOGIC OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS and is embodied in a foundational manner in the Common Average European language architectures.  Thus, while the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS speak in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms that “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS speak in the BINARY LOGIC terms that ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”.  While QUANTUM LOGIC evokes CONJUGATE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING TRANSFORMATION as in the WAVE-FIELD dynamic, BINARY LOGIC evokes one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT and the EGO-based pride of the (mistaken) notion of LOCAL AUTHORING.

The expression ‘INSPIRATION fills the heart’ while EGO swells the head’,… describes the respective geometries of ‘the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT’ FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING.   INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE has an ARCHITECTURE that incorporates both FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING while WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has an ARCHITECTURE that goes with ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING and substitutes ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE for FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, the latter playing the primary animating role in the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.

* * * END OF FORWARD * * * 

 

Thought and Language are closely tied together, but HOW?  This is the subject explored by Lev Vygotsky (“father of Russian Psychology”) in ‘Thought and Language’

Our understanding  of the relationship is important to our understanding of our own sense-experience and why there is a major difference in how Indigenous aboriginal cultures understand “what they think of as ‘reality’” and how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS understand “what we think of as ‘reality’”.

NOTA BENE: what the indigenous aboriginal cultures “think of as ‘reality’” corresponds to the WAVE-FIELD structure of Modern physics while what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “think of as ‘reality’” corresponds to the REAL COMPONENT of the WAVE-FIELD (complex ‘real’ + imaginary) structure.

EXAMPLE:  the phrase “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” exemplifies the WAVE-FIELD dynamic with its REAL plus IMAGINARY components; i.e. the TOWNING is the “real” component which is given foundational support by the “imaginary” component; i.e. ‘the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

(Language can express the ‘local and explicit’ in a relationship with the ‘nonlocal and ‘implicit’ as also with ‘realism’ and ‘impressionism’ which corresponds with WAVE-FIELD math with its ‘real’ and ‘imaginary’ components’.  Indigenous aboriginal language and Modern physics ‘Rheomode’ language use ‘local and explicit realism’ and ‘nonlocal and implicit impressionism’ in conjugate relation while WESTERN CULTURE language architecture SPLITS OUT AND USES ONLY ‘local and explicit realism’ ON ITS OWN, substituting ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE while DROPPING OUT the ‘nonlocal and implicit impressionism’. That is, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SPLITS OUT AND USES ONLY ‘the TOWN is GROWING, …  substituting ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE as a ‘fill-in’ for DROPPING OUT ‘THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.)

In general discourse, we speak of these different forms of relation, also, in terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  By way of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT we get to REPRESENTATIONS of sense-experience reality and by way of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT we get to IMPRESSIONS of sense-experience reality.

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, Taoists/Buddhists and Modern physics combine these as in the mathematical description of the WAVE-FIELD with its ‘REAL’ and ‘IMAGINARY’ components which correspond to our different modes of thought and language which we refer to as REALISM and IMPRESSIONISM; i.e. the REALISM corresponds to what is REPRESENTABLE (the ‘real component in wave-field maths) while the IMPRESSIONISM (imaginary component in wave-field maths)

In the understanding of WAVE-FIELDS, we have the COMPLEX relation of ‘REAL’ plus ‘IMAGINARY’ components which can be thought of as ‘MALE ASSERTING’ (the ‘peak’ part of the wave) plus ‘FEMALE ACCOMMODATING’ (the ‘trough’ part of the wave). In Indigenous aboriginal culture and Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, BOTH the MALE ASSERTING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING components are used in LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTIONS OF “REALITY” which we can distinguish as “QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY” which include  “BOTH” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “AND” the MALE ASSERTING components.

 

HOWEVER, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTIONS OF “REALITY” we DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, and go with ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING ACTION COMPONENT which we can distinguish as BINARY LOGIC REALITY and use this in our language supported ‘operative action based reality’, so that we speak and think in such terms as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’, … AS IF THIS ACTION WAS THE FULL AND SOLE ACTION, IMPLYING A CONTAINING SPACE THAT IS ABSOLUTE, EMPTY AND INFINITE.  This is leading to FRAGMENTATION since it is MISSING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD “CONTAINER” within which the LOCAL MATERIAL FIGURES are CONDENSATIONS or in  Schroedinger’s terms, ‘Schaumkommen’ (= “appearances”).

 

The fact that the ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE-FIELD aka the PLANUM, IS NOT VISIBLE means that the MATERIAL FORMS that are CONDENSATIONS WITHIN IT which ARE VISIBLE give us the impression that what looks like the MOVEMENT of the MATERIAL FORMS within an EMPTY SPACE is the OPERATIVE REALITY (it is instead an intellectual ‘substitute reality’).  However, the MATERIAL FORMS ARE “NOT “THINGS THAT ARE” MOVING” because when we open our mind to the understanding that these MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGE WAVE-FIELD PLENUM, then we have to UPGRADE OUR CONCEPTUALIZING to “BOTH/AND” LOGIC (QUANTUM LOGIC) wherein the MATERIAL FORMS are INCLUSIONS in the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD.

In this case, THEY DO NOT HAVE; (a) “THEIR OWN BEING” and THEY DO NOT HAVE; (b) “THEIR OWN MOVEMENT” because the actual dynamic is the “GESTALT” dynamic of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD wherein the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS in the “MOTHER GROUND” of the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD are only ONE.  As Schroedinger points out, this impacts our WESTERN CULTURE psychological conceptualizing of reality because it means that SUBJECT and OBJECT are ONLY ONE.  In other words, the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD and the WAVE-FIELD are only ONE THING THAT IS UNDERGOING TRANSFORMATION.

This is to say that reality is all one thing, the WAVE-FIELD which includes material condensations including ourselves.  As POGO says, ‘we have found the enemy and it is us’.   WE ARE RELATIONAL FORMS IN A COMMON WAVE-FIELD AND WHILE OUR RELATIONS CAN BE HARMONIOUS (RESONANT) OR  CONFLICTUAL (DISSONANT), since there are no INDEPENDENT BEINGS in ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE , there can be NO BINARY LOGIC SPLITTING INTO SEPARATE ‘INDEPENDENT BEING-based FACTIONS’.  Nevertheless, it is possible, and WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTS have done it, … to simplify the language based representation of the WAVE-FIELD dynamics of RESONANCE and DISSONANCE by REDUCING such relational dynamics to the ABSOLUTE INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEING based terms of the BINARY LOGIC CONFLICT OF OPPOSITES as between GOOD BEINGS and EVIL BEINGS.

When RELATIONAL DISSONANCE develops in indigenous aboriginal culture, the remedy is the HEALING CIRCLE because the assumption is that the dissonance is nonlocal and implicit aka “relational” and gestates within the broad matrix of relations in the social collective AND DOES NOT ARISE “LOCALLY” FROM A LOCAL AUTHOR.  The “LOCAL AUTHOR” seen as a LOCAL BEING notionally with its own POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING, as Nietzsche has pointed out, an UNREAL ABSTRACTION which is FABRICATED with THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR, as in the earlier example ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’.  This is a language structure that implies LOCAL AUTHORING while the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and Modern physics ‘Rheomode’ (flow-based) language structure uses the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING “CONJUGATE” construction; …  i.e. the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘- There is TOWNING in the transforming landscape’, in which case THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and development as in the BINARY LOGIC based construction ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’, … INSTEAD, there is the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION wherein ‘the TOWNING’ is the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE which is INCLUDED WITHIN the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

SO, IN SUM,

… WESTERN CULTURE language architecture is built for constructing one-sided MALE-ASSERTING action and development based reality substitute reality.

… INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL AND MODERN PHYSICS language architecture is built for constructing FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING transformation based WAVE-FIELD reality.

 

LET’S NOT FORGET!  we have our sense-experience to be the adjudicator of our different linguistic representation based ‘realities’ and our sense-experience comes out in support of the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL language based representations of reality based on the WAVE-FIELD’s conjugate pair of female accommodating IMPRESSIONS and male-asserting REPRESENTATIONS, where the IMPRESSIONS serve as the CONTAINER for the REPRESENTATIONS, or in other words, ‘the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT’ TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE serves as the container for the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT TOWNING, and there is a clear LOSS OF UNDERSTANDING along with FRAGMENTING in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTING SCHEME where we DROP OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE by substituting an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT’ and “GO WITH” A language architecture based solely on the one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT.

THIS IS A RECIPE FOR “FRAGMENTATION” AND WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE A BAD CASE OF FRAGMENTATION BY OUR LANGUGE-BASED IMPOSING OF ‘INDEPENDENT MALE-ASSERTING BEING’ ON EVERYTHING even to the point of imputing the powers of ‘GROWTH’ to a ‘TOWN’ as if that could happen without a conjugate shrinking of WILDERNESS and thus an overall TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE.

The abstract WESTERN CULTURE concept of GROWTH is thanks to the inventing of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER which GETS RID OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE of the ‘transforming landscape’ so that we can pretend to be able to fully capture dynamics in one-sided MALE ASSERTING terms, which not only SIMPLIFIES LANGUAGE (by SIMPLIFYING WHAT WE TALK ABOUT AS ‘REALITY’) but INFLATES THE EGO by giving rise to the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING.

 

In the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE’s LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, both of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD components are incorporated as in the afore-mentioned example ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which delivers the WAVE-FIELD view while in WESTERN CULTURE, the ‘ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT is SUBSTITUTED for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so that there is no longer any sense of a WAVE-FIELD dynamic.

 

My scrutinizing of the POSTSCRIPT suggests to me that the POSTSCRIPT is a PRETTY GOOD SUMMARY of the EAST-WEST SPLIT which brings out the SCREW-UPS in our WESTERN CULTURE language based reality-conceptualizing scheme (WCLBRCS).

Here is a list of some of the screwups in our WESTERN CULTURE social outlook coming from our WCLBRCS.

-1- The WCSC (WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE) remains BINARY LOGIC oriented because of the NAME-AND-VERB LOCAL AUTHORING CONSTRUCT.

-2- The WCSC remains GOOD and EVIL DIVIDED due to -1-

-3- The WCSC divides people into Conservatives and Liberals due to belief in LOCAL AUTHORING (there is none) which splits into Individual sourced LOCAL AUTHORING (Conservative view) and social collective sourced LOCAL AUTHORING (Liberal view)

-4- The WCSC gives rise to WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC JUSTICE which is based on rewarding good and punishing evil.

-5- The WCSC health concept is of BINARY LOGIC based WELLNESS and ILLNESS.

* * * *

COMMENT:  Indigenous aboriginal culture and Taoism/Buddhism and also Modern physics, embrace the LESS SIMPLE (than BINARY LOGIC which is POLAR OPPOSITE DIFFERENTIATION based) QUANTUM LOGIC which is BALANCE based. In other words, BINARY LOGIC with its polar EITHER/OR LOGICAL FRAGMENTATION, IS NOT the dominant logic within Indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Modern physics representations of reality. The dominant logic is the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BALANCE-BASED LOGIC so that while the WESTERN CULTURE orients to PURIFICATION by way of the amplifying of (LOCAL AUTHORING OF GOOD and the ELIMINATING of LOCAL AUTHORING OF EVIL, the Indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta and also Modern physics understands reality in terms of BALANCE and IMBALANCE and orients to the CULTIVATING of BALANCE which is equivalent to the SUBSUMING of IMBALANCE.

 

There is always the option both within LANGUAGE and within SOCIAL DYNAMICS to use QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE AND IMBALANCE) or BINARY LOGIC (RIGHT OR WRONG) in interpreting physical phenomena although BINARY LOGIC is SIMPLER as exemplified by EMPTY SPACE and MATTER where we can IGNORE EMPTY SPACE and concern ourselves only with the BINARY LOGIC based dynamics and interactions of abstract ‘independent material entities’.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC is the logic of BALANCE and IMBALANCE as exemplified by the (electromagnetic) WAVE-FIELD and CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD where the relationship between the WAVE-FIELD and the CONDENSATIONS is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium.  The INCLUDING medium is the WAVE-FIELD and material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD so the relation between the two is the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium, which differs radically from the BINARY LOGIC relation; i.e. the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM; e.g. The QUANTUM LOGIC where the MATERIAL forming “IS” the energy-charged (WAVE-FIELD) it is forming in so there is never any “MATERIAL BODY that MOVES”.

As with CLOUDS that appear to grow and shrink and move through the moisture loaded atmosphere, there are no BEING-based THINGS with persisting ontology, what we are seeing is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein the FORMS are energy GATHERING-SCATTERING features like SAND DUNES, which are clearly NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT aspects of the transforming relational continuum (WAVE-FIED), although we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to break into the GESTALT of the continuum and speak in NAME based terms of DUNES, SAND-MOUND THINGS (note the fragmentation into multiple being-things that we substitute for the unfragmented continuum) and use GRAMMAR to impute to “THEM” (these NAMING-INSTANTIATED-NOTIONAL-‘THINGS'”), their own POWERS OF GROWTH, MOVEMENT and DEVELOPMENT.

If we can use our language and grammar to break into the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT GESTALT (of the sand-filled WAVE-FIELD), using language and grammar to BREAK IT DOWN into LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTED MATERIAL BEINGS called DUNES and conflate this with GRAMMAR (second error of the DOUBLE ERROR as Nietzsche calls it) to give ‘the DUNE’ ‘ITS’ OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, then we have to LET GO OF OUR MENTAL LOCK-ON TO THE GESTALT as our whole language-based capture of the visual dynamic shifts its representational gear to LOCAL EXPLICIT FRAGMENT mode.

Just as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use language based conceptualizations such as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING and DEVELOPING’, we say ‘the DUNE is GROWING and DEVELOPING’.  In both cases we use DIFFERENTIATION to FRAGMENT the GESTALT of the transforming relational continuum (the WAVE-FIELD), and construct a LOCAL EXPLICIT THING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is SIMPLER to capture in LANGUAGE although our sense-experience remains AWARE of the reality of the transforming relational wave-field continuum.

While we live in the ONE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that puts us into a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT which has become so convincing in WESTERN CULTURE that we have come to believe in the INDEPENDENCE of the FRAGMENTS WE INVENT with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (our belief is so strong that we convince ourselves that we are SUBOPTIMIZING the FRAGMENT that we have ‘staked a claim to’ as if it was an ISLAND we could ‘perfect’ in its own “INDEPENDENT” right.    So much for our putting LANGUAGE and INTELLECT FIRST because our SENSE-EXPERIENCE continues to inform us of our inclusion in the transforming relational continuum wherein everything is related (mitakuye oyasin).

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

Our sense-experience REALITY is of our inclusion in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD aka the transforming relational continuum with its overall GESTALT. Our INTELLECTUAL FRAGMENTATIONS cannot overcome the reality that we live in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.

QUANTUM LOGIC affirms as much; i.e. the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the “INCLUDING MEDIUM” aka the “WAVE-FIELD” where in WE and material forms in general are, like the CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD, “BOTH OURSELVES AND THE WAVE-FIELD WE ARE INCLUDED IN”.

An example of QUANTUM LOGIC is in the relation; ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where we can imagine the TOWNING as an area of new construction within the overall WILDERNESS so that as the TOWNING GROWS, there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS, so we perceive that there is a BALANCE of some sort, or IMBALANCE, in the relation between the TOWNING (male-asserting) and the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (female accommodating).

OF COURSE, since QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC and since WESTERN CULTURE has given SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, there is no simple CORRECTION to get from the BINARY LOGIC foundation to a QUANTUM LOGIC foundation, and so in spite of Modern physics coming out in favour of the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, there is no simple ADD-ON CORRECTION.

Furthermore, WESTERN CULTURE EGO based on the DOUBLE ERROR ABSTRACTION of “LOCAL AUTHORING” PERMEATES THE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED ‘REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS’, and this ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING OBSCURES the conjugate FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING – MALE ASSERTING conjugate structure of the all-including WAVE-FIELD reality.   As we see in the Thin Skull Rule in WESTERN CULTURE LAW, that the one-sided MALE ASSERTING OBSCURANTISM is not about to give way without some kind of exceptional change from BINARY LOGIC to QUANTUM LOGIC in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES.

 

 * * *