OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is serving us a SUBSTITUTE REALITY

INTRODUCTION: Language ‘works’ by using visual and/or oral symbols that trigger in our minds recall of sensory experience, either real or imagined.

Indigenous aboriginal language orients language architecture to our sense-experience of INCLUSION WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (the WAVE-FIELD) wherein, for example, “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN.  This mode of representation captures the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of a realty that is in continual flux, wherein there are no persisting THINGS-THAT-BE since everything is included within ONE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM and thus it would be a mistake to us NAMING in the sense of signifying LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘BEING’.  The indigenous aboriginal scheme of NAMING acknowledges the realty that EVERYTHING IS RELATED (“mitakuye oyasins”) therefore the language based representation is grounded in NAMES which do NOT REPRESENT LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES but relational forms within the transforming relational continuum (the WAVE-FIELD) such as ‘Dances with Wolves’ or ‘Running Bear’ which does not go down the path of creating the ABSOLUTE abstraction of “BEING”.  Instead, indigenous aboriginal language architecture preserves the FLOW-based nature of the ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

IN CONTRAST, “WESTERN CULTURE” language architecture orients to the ABSTRACT CONCEPT of BEINGS created with NAMING and animated with GRAMMAR, thus breaking the WAVE-FIELD apart, extracting only the MALE ASSERTING conjugate and DROPPING OUT the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE,for example, “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services.  This LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION, fabricated with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, allows us to construct a language based “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” by creating LOCAL FRAGMENTS that we can “ASSEMBLE WITH GRAMMAR’.  This ‘BOTTOM UP’ construction JUMPSTARTS by using NAMING to identify LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS which we then shape and arrange with GRAMMAR that allows us to modify and arrange as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, to create an arrangement that serves as a carrier or vehicle for sharing our thoughts.   Hence, in this case, we can describe “THE TOWN” EXPLICITLY, as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing-in-itself and then use GRAMMAR to impute THING-SPECIFIC GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT to it for example, “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING foods and services.  

THERE ARE PROBLEMS, BIG PROBLEMS, with our WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, the problems of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM due to our elevating of the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE into A PRIMARY SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTING ROLE and the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which amounts to DROPPING OUT THE WAVE-FIELD and constructing a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD.  The result is FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM within a language-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that makes the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE “CONDENSATIONS” the PRIMARY REALITY and SUBSTITUTES ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE “WAVE-FIELD”.  The constructing of this SUBSTITUTE REALITY “OBSCURES” the natural primacy of the WAVE-FIELD, making FALSE IDOLS, as Nietzsche calls them, out of the CONDENSATIONS.

[In the title Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer (Götzen-Dämmerung, oder, Wie man mit dem Hammer philosophiert), Nietzsche’s use of the Götzen-Dämmerung title was a pun on Wagner’s ‘Götterdämmerung’ (the Twilight of the Gods).  That is, Götze is a German word for “idol” or “false god”. Elevating the stature of the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD to an unnatural PRIMACY within a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE has been SUBSTITUTED for WAVE-FIELD, is what our WESTERN CULTURE is currently doing.   This SUBSTITUTE REALITY is being mocked by Nietzsche, using the metaphor of smashing the CONDENSATIONS we are mistakenly elevating, in our language, to an unnatural primacy over the WAVE-FIELD (reducing the WAVE-FIELD PROPER to a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE so the IDOLIZED CONDENSATIONS are notionally FREE TO STRUT THEIR STUFF.]

OBSCURANTISM (the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.) captures what is going on here in this unnatural ELEVATING of the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD within a SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein the PROMOTING of the status of the CONDENSATIONS is matched by the DEMOTING of the WAVE-FIELD to a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE status.  THIS IS OBSCURANTISM AND IT HAS BEEN GIVEN A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF A “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are employing as our OPERATIVE REALITY.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “have our ladder up against the wrong wall” in that we are trying to IMPROVE the functioning within a reality WHICH IS NOT sense-experience grounded reality but a language-based abstract intellectual SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein we have elevated the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD and given them UNNATURAL PRIMACY over the WAVE-FIELD by reducing the WAVE-FIELD to a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

The way out of this UPSIDE-DOWN MESS for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS could by the BACK DOOR ROUTE shared by David Bohm or by the IDOL SMASHING ROUTE advocated by Nietzsche or by a combination thereof.  But FIRST comes the need for recognition of the UPSIDE-DOWN state of affairs which is being blocked by OBSCURANTISM wherein we have come to believe that BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING (the DOUBLE ERROR view) is the “real” nature of the world, rather than an all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.  That is, we may say that we can “SEE” that “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING more products and inhabitants, or is it impossible for the TOWN to inhabit the same LANDSCAPE twice, “for it is NOT the SAME TOWN’, nor is it THE SAME LANDSCAPE” since everything is in flux within the all-including transforming relational continuum aka the wave-field.  We are evidently STUCK, because of our language, in the mode of holding on to the notion of a persisting BEING-based TOWN instead of accepting that there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

A picture held us captive. And we could not get outside it, for it lay in our language and language seemed to repeat it to us inexorably. –-Wittgenstein

* * * end of introduction * * *

This has all been said before by Friedrich Nietzsche and by David Bohm, but it doesn’t seem to have been ‘that much heard’ because it easy for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to understand.

Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is confusing our understanding.  It puts us into a SUBSTITUTE REALITY, which is a TRAP that is easy to describe BUT NOT EASY TO AVOID FALLING INTO.

Also, it has been described by Nietzsche and Bohm and one might therefore expect that the general public has ‘picked up on it’ and therefore that the word is getting out so that fewer and fewer people are falling into the trap.  But that is NOT the case, People continue to fall into the trap, which suggests that there is SOMETHING WRONG WITH US

What I mean by that has been stated by psychiatrists such as Cochrane and Sashidharan who make the point that drilling down and in to the symptom bearer may not be a good approach for discovering the ‘source’ of the illness it may be induced by the dysfunctional environment the person is situated in.  The following quote concerns a study an unusual high incidence of schizophrenia among black African immigrants to the U.K. where there is no history of such illness in the families or communities of those afflicted were coming from.

From the outset it will be clear that most of the research in this field has followed the conventional epidemiological or medical paradigm by focusing on mental ill health as the dependent variable. It is, therefore, not surprising that there is a lack of empirically grounded research on mental well-being or the psychological resilience and survival of minority groups in this country” — R. Cochrane (University of Birmingham) and S. P. Sashidharan (North Birmingham Mental Health Trust) in ‘Mental Health and Ethnic Minorities’

The researchers pointed out that if one were studying mental well-being rather than mental ill hearth, then the understanding of the source of the psychological illness could be coming from the environment rather than from the individual.  This was also shown to be the case in the high incidence of Women’s psychological issues (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia) as compared with males on a global basis (World Health organization)

In ‘Crazy For You: The making of women’s madness” Psychiatrist Jill Astbury makes the same point that psychological stress can show up in an individual from the stress of being in a group of differing others sensitivities may be lower and where the group may be cultivating an environment which is highly stressful to a minority within the group.  Research into ‘psychological illness’ will pull the patient out and study the patient, which may be ‘missing the point’ since as in the case of the back African in the U.K. example, the patient may be well and stable in most environments.  The point that the research set up may not ‘have the fish in the net’ is similarly made by Astbury; i.e. The difficulty of the environment and the sensitivity of the person within it must both be understood as potential contributors to breakdown.

“The research stemming from this viewpoint had a systemic blindness. It could literally not see what it was doing, as the normative quality of its own presuppositions had made them invisible.” – Jill Astbury

There is a CONJUGATE FEMALE-MALE structure all natural dynamics which our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE habitually reduces to one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE action only.  For example the THIN SKULL rule in WESTERN CULTURE LAW using the simplifying OMISSIONS of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate which is ever-present in the WAVE-FIELD world of our sense experience, but our LANGUAGE DESIGN is such as to REMOVE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.  This is not the case in indigenous aboriginal languages and/or in the language usage of Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta; i.e. the full WAVE-FIELD (FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE) structure is employed in these languages, hence one would say the equivalent of; ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which preserves the fluid and thus ANDROGYNOUS nature of the dynamic

WESTERN CULTURE language based representation, on the other hand, makes the reduction to one-sided MALE-ASSERTING only geometry; i.e. The TOWN is growing, developing and producing actions and developments.

THIS IS REPRESENTATION IN TERMS OF A SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which the FEMALE CONJUGATE has “GONE MISSING” (the “Dea Abscondita”.     What is going on here is that, …OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is serving us a SUBSTITUTE REALITY

The SUBSTITUTE REALITY is a REDUCTION of the WAVE-FIELD reality to a MALE ASSERTIVE ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” and it is for the purpose of SIMPLIFYING the language based representation by a reduction to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT by way of the DROPOUT of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  In other words, we have TWO choices for REPRESENTATION;

NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT: We have the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL style language representation option; ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ and this gives us the full ANDROGYNOUS view.  This is the reality affirmed by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.

LOCAL AND EXPLICIT: We also have our WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN language representation option;  ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ and this  is giving us the MALE ASSERTING conjugate ON ITS OWN.  This serves up an intellectual SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is NOT AFFIRMED BY OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE,

OUR WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE, because it makes the reduction to the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT, is serving us a SUBSTITUTE REALITY.   The “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT” is only the MALE ASSERTING conjugate. 

The SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING) is CONJUGATE to the GROWING OF THE TOWN (MALE ASSERTING).

This is the ANDROGYNOUS CONJUGATE NATURE OF WAVE-FIELD SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY.

* * *      * * *      * * *

OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is serving us a SUBSTITUTE REALITY

OBSCURANTISM:IS BUILT INTO WESTERN CULTURE LOCAL and EXPLICIT LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION.

As in the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ in WESTERN JUSTICE, there is an unwritten rule to develop language-based representations that are one-sided male-asserting.  As Nietzsche points out, this is done with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR WHICH IMPUTES “LOCAL AUTHORING”.  This is OBSCURANTISM since in our real-life sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD world, there is no MALE-ASSERTING without FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and these two together constitute TRANSFORMATION.

The INVENTING of LANGUAGE that equips us for SHARING REPRESENTATIONS of our sense-experience reality of inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE_FIELD aka the Tao, has followed TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES, the approach of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta wherein the language architecture PRESERVES THE FLUID NATURE OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, and the approach of what we loosely refer to as WESTERN CULTURE, which is to introduce a LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the ABSTRACTIONS of “BEING” created by “NAMING” and conflated in the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to imply LOCAL AUTHORING, opening the way to language based representation in terms of FRAGMENTATION (by way of abstract, BEING-based LOCAL AUTHORING).

EXAMPLES:

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE (simulated with ENGLISH):  –There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE: — The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products. (impllies containing space) 

Here we see the deployments of DIFFERENT TYPES OF LOGIC.

QUANTUM LOGIC is the relational BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE as is the nature of the WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD and thus NOT SEPARATE OR INDEPENDENT of the WAVE-FIELD.

BINARY LOGIC is the fragmentating EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED medium where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO as is the ABSTRACT CONCEPTUAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY notionally composed of MATTER and SPACE as TWO MUTUALLY SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT ONTOLOGICAL REALMS.

NOTA BENE:  While the all-including WAVE-FIELD reality is affirmed with its QUANTUM LOGIC FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE STRUCTURE is affirmed by our sense-experience, the BINARY LOGIC MALE-ASSERTING “ONLY” MONO-STRUCTURE is INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION designed to SIMPLIFY the task of reducing sense-experience impressions to LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION.

THE SIMPLIFYING BY (DROPPING OUT) THE WAVE-FIELD FEMALE-CONJUGATE IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

THE COST OF THIS BINARY LOGIC BASED SIMPLIFICATION, THIS DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE CONJUGATE, IN LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE, which serves up REPRESENTATIONS that are ONE-SIDED, MALE-ASSERTING ONLY, is the LOSS of the FEMALE CONJUGATE and the associated OVERHEAD of having to deal with the SUBSTITUTE of EMPTY SPACE as is noted in the above example where we see the LOSS of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE in going from “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, … to The TOWN  is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products.

This language, English, that is being used in this description has the CAPABILITY of using the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT representational mode that is necessary if one is to include the FEMALE CONJUGATE together with the MALE CONJUGATE, and this has been done in the example (There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) by REVERSING OUT the abstract use of BEING as in ‘the TOWN’, and the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that imputes the power of LOCAL AUTHORING as in ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING).  The BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING structures are used in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES order to SIMPLIFY REPRESENTATIONS by creating a LOCAL FRAGMENT BASED “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”.

SUBSTITUTE REALITY:

The term SUBSTITUTE REALITY is used to HIGHLIGHT the DROPOUT of the FEMALE CONJUGATE in the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION of “REALITY”; that is, we cannot claim that our language is constructing REPRESENTATIONS OF WAVE-FIELD REALITY when we are INTRODUCING THE SIMPLIFICATION of REMOVING THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, reducing our REPRESENTATION to that of a MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”.

This SUBSTITUTE REALITY “has problems” because of our DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which is present in our REAL sense-experience affirmed reality, one type of which is exemplified by the THIN-SKULL RULE in WESTERN JUSTICE, a systems of justice that models dynamics in ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING terms as if MATERIAL FEATURES are INTERACTING within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, … thus REMOVING the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, … DEPARTING FROM SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY and (notionally) ENTERING INTO A NEW, SIMPLIFIED AND REDUCED ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”.

The THIN SKULL RULE is reminding us of the DROPOUT of the FEMALE CONJUGATE of our FEMALE-MALE WAVE-FIELD, where the dynamics of sense-experience are of an ANDROGYNOUS nature, as is fully accepted and affirmed in Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, and which should DRAW OUR ATTENTION TO THE ROLE OF DIFFERENT LANGUAGES IN THAT SOME LANGUAGES, at least in their manner of use, DROP OUT THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and ‘go with’ the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE “ON ITS OWN” as in the THINK SKULL RULE example WHERE IT CAN BE SEEN THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE LIMITED THE ROLE OF OUR LANGUAGE TO MALE-ASSERTING ACTION EXPRESSION ONLY, AND HAVE EXCLUDED THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.

That GREATLY SIMPLIFIES the art of using language to REPRESENT real world goings on, and it does so by INVENTING A SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE HAS BEEN REMOVED, so that we can construct REPRESENTATIONS, … which are no long of sense-experience reality, but which are now of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY and so long as all the users are ON BOARD with the use of the SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, we have a viable system of language based sharing of representations of reality  a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

That is, whether we employ the language based representation scheme such as; ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, … or ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’, … BOTH OF WHICH SUCCEED IN USING LANGUAGE TO BUILD SHAREABLE REPRESENTATIONS OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE AND THUS COME TO A COMMON UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE WORDS ARE REFERRING TO, THESE ARE TWO VERY DIFFERENT FORMS OF REPRESENTATION, AND WHILE BOTH OF THEM ‘WORK’ AS SCHEMES FOR SHARING REPRESENTATIONS OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED ‘REALITY’, ONE OF THEM (OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SCHEME) EMPLOYS THE SIMPLIFICATION OF REDUCING THE WAVE-FIELD REALITY BY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE, WHICH IS LESS SIMPLE BECAUSE IT IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT, AND EMPLOYING ONLY THE MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE WHICH IS LOCAL AND EXPLICIT.  THIS CONSTITUTES THE INTRODUCING OF A SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY AS EXEMPLIFIED BY THE REDUCTION OF ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ … to…. ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’, … [and here comes the DROP OUT and the SUBSTITUTION] within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

THIS IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY  OF INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, BY WAY OF SUBSTITUTING AN INTELLECTUALLY SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHEREIN WE DROP OUT THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and DEPLOY A MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY based SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  This is the reason for the THIN SKULL RULE which exemplifies the sort of problems we make for ourselves in SIMPLIFYING by REDUCING the complex conjugate WAVE-FIELD REALITY to the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTION and DEVELOPING “ONLY” SIMPLIFIED “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”.

Such simplifications, all of which involve OBSCURANTISM since we SIMPLIFY our language based REPRESENTATIONS by simply DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, which DOES NOT DISAPPEAR from our sense experience reality just because WE HAVE MADE IT DISAPPEAR from our language-based REPRESENTATIONS of reality.  The result is that the SUBSTITUTE REALITIES we are constructing with language we have simplified by dropping out the FEMALE CONJUGATE as “HAUNTED” by the FEMALE CONJUGATES that we have DROPPED OUT of our LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS which we CAN’T DROP OUT OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE, so the fact that we CHOOSE to give FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING CREDIT to MALE ASSERTING AGENTS (by means of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR) leads directly to our OVER-SIMPLIFICATION based BREAKDOWNS like the case of the THIN SKULL RULE where we have to FORCE FIT real life experience CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD PHENOMENA into one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION.

This illustrates the GENERAL PROBLEM OF “OBSCURANTISM” that we have BUILT INTO our COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION SCHEME, the OBSCURANTISM deriving from the DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, through our devising of a language architecture based on the abstractions of BEING by way of NAMING and LOCAL AUTHORING by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, supporting a LOCAL and EXPLICIT SUBSTITUTE REALITY where our TALK that has us focus on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT GROWTH OF THE TOWN makes us forgetful of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE which is the understanding that is LESS SIMPLE than the LOCAL and EXPLICIT representation yet INCLUDES the LOCAL and EXPLICIT  in a NON-SEPARABLE way, just as the landscape which is composed largely of WILDERNESS is a nonlocal and implicit (relational) transforming continuum whose internal features we use NAMING and GRAMMAR to RECAPTURE as LOCAL and EXPLICIT features.   The SIMPLIFIED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY that we construct with NAMING and GRAMMAR is an intellectual conceptualization that facilitates language based sharing of REPRESENTATIONS of reality.

OUR WESTERN CULTURE MISTAKE IS IN DEPLOYING THE LINGUISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY AS OUR OPERATIONAL REALITY IN SPITE OF OUR HAVING BUILT SIMPLIFICATION INTO IT BY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE of WAVE-FIELD reality and creating a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ that is OBSCURANTIST (missing the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING  WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE hence reference to the DEA ABSCONDITA). 

(i.e.Given that in the WAVE-FIELD reality, the FIELD is the FEMALE and the CONDENSATION is the MALE, the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY TURNS THINGS UPSIDE DOWN by SUBSTITUTING empty space for the FEMALE FIELD which by IMPLICATION, PROMOTES the secondary MALE material CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD to PRIMARY AUTHOR STATUS, the FEMALE AUTHORING AGENCY of the FIELD having been reduced to PASSIVE EMPTY SPACE, as far as our WESTERN CULTURE language based representations in terms of this MALE-ASSERTIVE SUBSTITUTE REALITY is concerned, which has become our OPERATIVE REALITY.)

PROBLEM:

ONLY ONE OF THESE TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION  (-1- THE TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, and -2- THE TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING,  KEEPS US ALERT AND AWARE TO THE CONJUGATE FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE NATURE OF OUR WAVE-FIELD REALITY WHEREIN THE GROWTH OF CULTIVATED LAND IS CONJUGATE WITH THE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS LAND SO THAT WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON, IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, IS TRANSFORMATION AS COMPRISED BY THE WAVE-FIELD FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE UNITY.

If there were ONE PERSON we could hold RESPONSIBLE for designing the WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLIFIED one-sided MALE ASSERTING LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, … we could ask him; “WHAT WERE YOU THINKING OF WHEN YOU CHOSE TO SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE BY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE AND GOING SOLELY WITH THE MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE?   YOU KNOW THAT IS BUILDING OBSCURANTISM INTO LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.

He might reply; DON’T LOOK AT ME FOR ANSWERS TO SUCH HYPOTHETICAL QUESTIONS, AS FAR AS I CAN SEE, PEOPLE HAVE EGOS AND THE EGO WANTS A LANGUAGE STRUCTURE THAT SUPPORTS LOCAL AUTHORING WITHOUT ANY WATERING DOWN OF THE MALE ASSERTING BY INVISIBLE HELPING HANDS FROM FEMALE ACCOMMODATING.  THAT IMPOSED TWO REQUIREMENTS; (-1-) THE INVENTING OF ‘BEING’ AS A STAKE-IN-THE-GROUND TO SUPPORT A ‘LOCAL AUTHOR’, AND (-2) THE INVENTING OF ‘THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ TO INVOKE THE DYNAMIC OF ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’.  THESE TWO ABSTRACTIONS GIVE US THE BINARY LOGIC BASED MAKINGS OF BEING-BASED LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, WHICH OPENS UP A SUBSTITUTE REALITY SO THAT WE CAN ‘CLIMB OUT OF OUR’ INCLUSION AS RELATIONAL FORMS IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM, DRESS UP AS BEINGS AND STRUT OUR STUFF IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

Of course, what we have thus done is to FRAGMENT REALITY so that we now have the problem of managing the FRAGMENTATION.  the new base of ‘BEING’ could be latched upon by any of the relation forms in the transforming relational continuum that wants to exploit the SUBSTITUTE REALITY for it’s granting of INDEPENDENT FRAGMENT STATUS to all who choose to join the BINARY LOGIC DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based SUBSTITUTE REALITY game.

Ok, we have seen popular trends to burn people for witches and the huge popularity in WESTERN CULTURE of the BINARY LOGIC splitting into GOOD and EVIL and MATTER and SPACE so a solid answer to our question as to WHY DID WE BUILD OBSCURANTISM INTO OUR LANGUAGE (the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE) may be out of reach, apart from guessing games.

Judging from the IMPORTANCE that the NAMING and GRAMMAR based ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING has taken on in WESTERN CULTURE and how EGO PRIDE has been built upon it, it seems clear that we can understand that we are “LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS” since we have built a comprehensive system of REWARDS and PUNISHMENTS ON THE BASIS of BELIEF IN LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR..

WESTERN CULTURE LOCK-IN TO SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

The GENERAL PREDICAMENT is that we are using SIMPLIFIED, ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY language architecture TO CONSTRUCT A SUBSTITUTE REALITY that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are employing as OUR OPERATIVE REALITY.

The situation we are now in is that we have developed, WITHIN THE SUBSTITUTE REALITY, a SOCIAL HIERARCHY based on language based ILLUSION.

FORGET ABOUT ‘GROWTH’, ‘DEVELOPMENT’ and ‘PRODUCTION’ as REALITIES, … they are NOT REALITIES, … TRANSFORMATION is the SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY while GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION only exist in the abstract world of the ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” which DISTRACTS US from what is REALLY GOING ON, according to our SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD dynamic which is TRANSFORMATION.

We may TALK ABOUT the progress we are making in our SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein the notions of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION … “MAKE SENSE”…. even though they are ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ABSTRACTIONS which suck us into another INTELLECTUALLY CONSTRUCTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have taken to using as our OPERATIVE REALITY, as if it were not enough to use it intellectually as the SIMPLISTIC support tool.   As EMERSON has said, this TOOL has RUN AWAY WITH THE WORKMAN, the HUMAN with the DIVINE.

Now we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS teach our children that “WE HUMANS” are the AUTHORS of the WORLD AS WE KNOW IT.

…. BUT HOW DO WE KNOW IT?

THE OPTION WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS DID NOT TAKE::  If we were to use the indigenous aboriginal language to understand ‘realty’ our understanding would be of ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (relational continuum) wherein we HUMANINGS and the TOWNINGS are inclusion within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD dynamic.

THE OPTION WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE NOW EMPLOYING::  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have opted to use our COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN language based representations of SUBSTITUTE REALITY for our OPERATIVE REALITY wherein THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services.

THIS SUBSTITUTE REALITY IS NOT MATCHING UP WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.  IN THE SUBSTITUTE REALITY WE ARE IN AN ABSTRACT WORLD WHICH WE BREAK UP INTO SEPARATE FRAGMENTS BY USING LANGUAGE TO ‘NAME’ RELATIONAL FORMS IN THE WAVE-FIELD FLOW TO RECAST THEM AS ‘LOCAL BEING’ THINGS, AND WE FOLLOW UP AND CONFLATE THAT FIRST ERROR WITH THE SECOND ERROR OF GRAMMAR WHICH IMPUTES THE POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORING TO THE NAMING-CREATED NOTIONAL LOCAL BEING.: THESE TWO LANGUAGE BASED ERRORS UNDERLIE THE SUBSTITUTE REALITY THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE CREATING AND ARE USING AS OUR OPERATIVE REALITY.

These two following comments by Nietzsche point to the artificiality of the abstractions of BEING and BEING-based ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’.

“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.” —Nietzsche, “Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer”

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

WHERE ARE WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS NOW?

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE IN THE DEEP DOO-DOO OF HAVING INTELLECTUALLY EMBRACED THE SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON THE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE OF THE REAL WAVE-FIELD REALITY AS OUR “OPERATIVE REALITY” EVEN THOUGH THIS PSEUDO-REALITY DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.  THIS IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION IN THE REAL WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE, WHICH AS BOHM POINTS OUT IS NOT ONLY FRAGMENTING OUR MATERIAL ACTIONS BUT IS FRAGMENTING OUR PSYCHE.

THE STATUS OF OUR WESTERN CULTURE CURRENTLY IS THAT WE ARE RESISTING GIVING UP OUR DYSFUNCTIONAL HABIT OF EMPLOYING OUR ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY AS OUR INTELLECTUAL OPERATIVE REALITY, EVEN AS OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS OF THE FRAGMENTATION THAT IS RESULTING FROM THIS CONFUSION.

THE CATCH-22 FOR US THAT THE LANGUAGE-BASED ‘REASON’ THAT WE ARE USING TO TRY TO RESOLVE THIS MESS IS CONTAMINATED BY THE SAME ABSTRACT SIMPLIFICATION THAT HAS BEEN GETTING US INTO TROUBLE IN THE FIRST PLACE; I.E. THE GROUNDING OF OUR REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY IN ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ABSTRACTION.

OUR DIVIDING AGAINST OURSELVES IN THE EXTERNAL REALM IS AT THE SAME TIME A DIVIDING AGAINST OURSELVES IN THE INTERNAL REALM.

THE ‘WAY OUT’ IS AS BOHM AND NIETZSCHE RECOGNIZED, TO STOP THE FRAGMENTATION, AND FOR BOHM, THIS WAS GOING TO BE BY WAY OF A NEW FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE, AND FOR NIETZSCHE, IT WAS GOING TO BE BY ‘SMASHING THE IDOLS’, THOSE SYNTHETIC AUTHORS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS WE ARE CREATING WITH THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.

* * *      * * *       * * *       * * *      * * *

SYNOPSIS

This essay has been to review and to hopefully add support and further clarity to the psychological confusion coming from WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based promoting of belief in BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING (through the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR) which serve to construct an UNREAL ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ which has been and continue to be employed as the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL-POLITICAL OPERATIVE REALITY.

One way to describe how the DYSFUNCTION coming from given credence to BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING is to compare the functioning of indigenous aboriginal societies with our typical WESTERN CULTURE societies.  As Bohm has pointed out, and F. David Peat in ‘BLACKFOOT PHYSICS’, understanding how our WESTERN CULTURE language (with its BEING-based and LOCAL AUTHORING based architectural forundation) breeds social dysfunction through FRAGMENTATION, including the MAJOR ERROR of developing language that SPLITS APART the FEMALE-MALE conjugate relation inherent in WAVE-FIELD REALITY and IN EFFECT developing and using language which constructs a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based solely on the MALE-ASSERTING LOCAL, EXPLICIT conjugate (corresponding to CONDENSATIONS IN THE WAVE-FIELD) and DROPPING OUT the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (CORRESPONDING TO THE NON-MATERIAL PRIMARY FIELD ENERGY.

This mistaken (dysfunctional WESTERN CULTURE language based REDUCTION of FEMALE–ACCOMMODATING–MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE (WAVE-FIELD) REALITY to a SUBSTITUTE PSEUDO-REALITY based on a MALE-ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE ONLY REPRESENTATION, has been pointed out (using somewhat different language but which is ‘saying the same thing’ as I am saying here in language that I hope will be more easily understood), by both Bohm and Nietzsche.

The CHALLENGE in using ENGLISH to report on the findings of Bohm and Nietzsche can be illustrated with the example I have used in several places in this text as a ‘reminder’ of ‘what is going on’; i.e. the QUANTUM LOGIC language representation of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is something which we commonly reduce BINARY LOGIC language representation of ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’  which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

NOTE THAT in the QUANTUM LOGIC language rendering, the relationship between the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and the TOWNING is like that between the WAVE-FIELD and a CONDENSATION within the WAVE-FIELD where everything is in flux and therefore NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

NOTE ALSO THAT in our normal WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC language rendering, the relationship between the TOWN and the LANDSCAPE is one of MUTUAL EXCLUSION as if the TOWN was LOCAL and EXPLICIT whereupon, as is only possible in INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION, once one crosses an IMAGINARY LINE BOUNDARY, in accordance with the INDEPENDENT BEING based illusion implied by NAMING, one passes out of one BEING based regime into another one.

The DIFFICULT PART TO UNDERSTAND for those of us well-conditioned in the use of BINARY LOGIC based language is that our general understanding WHEN WE SPEAK or WRITE is not about sense-experience REALITY, but is about the SUBSTITUTE REALITY, as if we were all LIVING IN THE SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

NOTE THAT OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE IS NOT IMPACTED BY OUR LANGUAGE/INTELLECTUAL SCREW-UP so that when our language is teaching us that REALITY is split up into independent FRAGMENTS called NATIONS, our sense-experience knows this is NOT PHYSICALLY REAL; i.e. it is part of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is SUPPORTED by having a QUORUM of BELIEVERS, perhaps who have sworn oaths to give their lives, if necessary, to support general popular BELIEF in such SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

Indigenous aboriginals were never party to the agreement in imaginary line boundary defined “INDEPENDENT NATIONS” and continue to have periodic ‘demonstrations’ such as those along the U.S. Canada international border which ‘cuts through’ Kahnewake (indigenous aboriginal) territory.

INDEPENDENT NATIONS along with INDEPENDENT BEINGS and LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS are all aspects of the SUBSTITUTE REALITY constructed using ENGLISH and the Common Average European family of languages, all of which give a foundational role to the abstraction of BINARY LOGIC in their language-based representations.  GOOD and EVIL as INNATE and not just in the relational context of HARMONY and DISSONANCE as in indigenous aboriginal language and culture, is common across CAE language family.

With life becoming more and more fragmented and dysfunctional in WESTERN CULTURE social collectives, as is particularly evident in (but certainly not limited to) the United States (where many of the erroneous, fragmented, SUBSTITUTE REALITY beliefs, such as LOCAL AUTHORING are most vigorous held and defended, there is widespread DISMAY and CONFUSION which is ‘on the rise’.

What is unfolding is captured in the opening paragraph on FRAGMENTATION in David Bohm’s ‘Wholeness and the Implicate Order’.

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

NO-ONE-IS SERIOUSLY LISTENING to this remarkable treatise by David Bohm that has captured what is happening within our WESTERN CULTURE social dynamic as highlighted by FRAGMENTATION.  Or if people ARE listening, only a small minority are committing to try to take appropriate action while most of the WESTERN CULTURE populace remain committed to FIXING the current system and IMPROVE its workings.   This is not working and cannot work because the problem is THAT WE ARE WORKING ON FIXING THE WRONG REALITY.  THE SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHICH WE ARE MISTAKING FOR THE REAL REALITY “IS THE PROBLEM”.  THINGS ARE NOT WORKING and DYSFUNCTION IS MOUNTING BECAUSE THE SUBSTITUTE REALITY WE ARE TRYING TO REPAIR IS NOT THE REAL REALITY (i.e. is NOT our sense-experience reality).

Our sense-experience reality is what Bohm is capturing in his Rheomode language and that indigenous aboriginals are capturing in their QUANTUM logic based reality, but this is not the same reality as the WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is based on the ABSOLUTES of BEING and the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR that implies LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  EMPLOYING THAT SUBSTITUTE REALITY AS OUR OPERATIVE REALITY IS FRAGMENTATIVE, OBSCURANTIVE and is DRIVING US NUTS.

What is needed is to change our language from a language based on BINARY LOGIC and ABSOLUTE BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING to a language based on QUANTUM LOGIC, relational TRANSFORMING (not-being) and and thus NONLOCAL AUTHORING..

Perhaps there are other ways to get there, as with Bohm’s ‘Bohmian Dialogue’ or Nietzsche’s IDOL SMASHING which sounds like a DE-FRAGMENTATION APPROACH given that IDOLS are the basis of FRAGMENTATION.

TRYING to FIX what we have is not going to ‘do it’ since ‘what we have’ is a language scheme which supports a SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  In the SUBSTITUTE REALITY, we see ourselves as the LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS and PRODUCTION of goods and services.  THAT “IS” THE PROBLEM, RIGHT THERE.  WE ARE INCLUSIONS IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AND THUS WE ARE RELATIONAL FORMS IN THE WAVE-FIELD WITH THE POWERS OF CULTIVATING HARMONY AND DISSONANCE, IN THE QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE OF WHORLS IN FLOW.  WE KNOW WHEN WE ARE IN THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC IN A BUSY FREEWAY, WE ARE “NOT IN CONTROL” BUT WE CAN MOVE SO AS TO CULTIVATE HARMONY OR DISSONANCE AND LIFE IS LIKE THAT, … BEFORE WE START USING LANGUAGE WHERE WE PORTRAY OURSELVES AS ABSOLUTE INDEPENDENT ‘BEINGS’ NOTIONALLY ENDOWED WITH LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS (THANKS TO THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR).

The TOWN doesn’t “REALLY” “GROW and DEVELOP and PRODUCE stuff.  THERE IS NO ‘TOWN” even if the signs tell us we are NOW ENTERING and NOW LEAVING the TOWN.  There’s those damn imaginary line boundaries again that we say define some LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF (the TOWN, the NATION, the HUMAN) which we use GRAMMAR to support the claim that these are local BEING THINGS with their own LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS in a world that, where it is not populated by an ABSOLUTE LOCAL MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF “BEING” with GRAMMAR-given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING, … is ABSOLUTELY EMPTY as in a SEA OF EMPTINESS THAT EXTENDS OUT TO INFINITY.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have been waiting for a more sensible conception of reality for a long time, like the one in Modern physics which indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents all have, but now when we most need it, we are so locked in to our dependency on the old BINARY LOGIC matter and space fragmented SUBSTITUTE REALITY that the SWITCHING COSTS have become formidable.  At present, we are too distracted by trying to make a go of what we already have which is NOT going to work.because we can’t FIX problems in a SUBSTITUTE REALITY when the root issue is OBSCURANTISM wherein we are constructing BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience reality in that it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

* * *.