Aboriginal Physics Newsletter

AUTHOR’S INTRODUCTION TO THIS ESSAY:—ACKNOWLEDGING OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD

It is VERY CHALLENGING, because of the limitations of this BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE (LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING) SCHEME I am using, to convey the QUANTUM LOGIC ideas I am sharing. This is because  QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTS TRANSCEND BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTS in the manner that “PURELY RELATIONAL WHORLINGS IN FLOWING” are less simple than “INDEPENDENT BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE”. In the case of  “WHORLINGS IN FLOWING”, we must, instead of having an understanding wherein we can split things apart and focus on “THEM”  as if “THEY”  are “INDEPENDENT”, … “ACKNOWLEDGE that “THERE ARE ONLY “RELATIONS” AND THERE ARE NO “THINGS” (i.e. there are only “condensations of and in the flowing energy-charged wave-field wherein everything is related” as expressed by “mitakuye oyasin”)  This purely FLOW-BASED RELATIONAL REALITY or in other words, THIS QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein THE WHORLINGS “ARE” THE FLOWING recalls Heraclitus’ “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX”  which anticipated the Modern Physics understanding of our inclusion in THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD  wherein “everything is in flux”, including condensations.

We know that we can understand the world in a relational manner that TRANSCENDS our standard way of speaking of REALITY in terms of the dynamics of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEING-THINGS such as HUMANS and NATIONS N FAS IF SUCH SEPARATE THINGS REALLY EXISTED rather than being SIMPLIFYING ABSTRACTIONS designed by GROUPS OF INTELLECTUAL TWO-LEGGEDS who have invented them as part of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, some of which are SEPARATE, INDEPENDENT FRAGMENT BASED, … while we continue to sing with passion, songs in praise of our NATURAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE  such as “WE ARE THE WORLD”  and “IMAGINE”  (e.g. “imagine there’s no (fragmenting) countries, its isnt’ hard to do”).

We sing with honesty and heartfelt fervor because we long for a solution to the persisting FRAGMENTATION and violence in the world and we hunger for the relational resonances we know we are capable of co-cultivating in our informal apolitical relations. DID WE REALLY NEED THE HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed in conjunction with DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE of NATIONS and HUMAN-BEINGS that ABSTRACTLY DIVIDE US AND PUT US IN “SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST” COMPETITION WITH ONE ANOTHER? 

Many of our TWO-LEGGED brothers and sisters (e.g. indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents) have opted for very different LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES which PRESERVE the natural FLUIDITY, INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE of our sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD WORLD, as affirmed by the indigenous aboriginal aphorism “MITAKUYE OYASIN”, … “EVERYTHING IS RELATED”.

SURE, things can go wrong and things have been going wrong in the TWO-LEGGEDS’ development of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION-based communications schemes, which have retained MORE or LESS GROUNDING in sense-experience.  That is, the FLOW-BASED schemes are MORE GROUNDED in sense-experience than the BEING-BASED schemes which are MORE GROUNDED IN INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION.  For example, in the FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, one may say THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which employs the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM; i.e. THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is a FLOWING PLENUM within which the TOWNING is an included FLOW-FEATURE whereby EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.   In the BEING-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is FRAGMENTED by a BINARY LOGIC SPLIT into TWO INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS, ‘THE TOWN’ as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF and the LANDSCAPE as a SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT CONTAINING SPACE.

While there is this choice of FLOW-based and BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, each have their own strong-points and weak points, and while the WESTERN CULTURE has opted for BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, it has been pointed out by MODERN PHYSICS that FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is more consistent with sense-experience than BEING-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the latter being the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

The FRAGMENTATION is a straight forward understanding since the imposing of BEING on relational forms is clearly going to FRAGMENT the PSYCHOLOGICAL TAKE-AWAYS from this type of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  For example, in the process of OBJECTIFYING the “TOWN” in SPLITTING IT OUT OF THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, it has been necessary to INVENT an “IMAGINARY” ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE CONTAINER to support such THING-IN-ITSELF CONCEPTUALIZING.  This is obviously a recipe for FRAGMENTATION and not quite so obviously a recipe for OBSCURANTISM. That is, while we have GRAMMAR to re-animate the now INDEPENDENT TOWN and give it the capabilities of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods, … this is all MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING capability .  WHAT HAPPENED TO THE “CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS”?

In order to MAKE ROOM for the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AS IF IN ITS OWN RIGHT (i.e. as if were situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE), there must be a DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate. This is achieved by the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the MISSING FEMALE (the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING).

Here we can see that we are PAYING A HEAVY PRICE in this BINARY LOGIC based SIMPLIFYING (DUMBING DOWN) of our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING since in order to speak in SIMPLER TERMS of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AS IF ON ITS OWN, we have to arrange for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING which is the ALL-INCLUDING NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD… TO “GO MISSING” so that the “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT” CONDENSATION aka the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, can STRUT ITS STUFF AS IF AN ‘INDEPENDENT BEING’ without sharing performance credits with the “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate.

MEANWHILE, this INDEPENDENT BEING is “APPEARANCE” only, just as the GROWING TOWN is exposed as only “APPEARANCE” when we fill in what we have blanked out; i.e. the conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, which, when re-joined with the GROWING TOWN (there were never split apart except in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING) reaffirms the sense-experience reality of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

In our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, we put the onus on BEING for the AUTHORING of actions and development, since the ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE has NO POWERS OF AUTHORSHIP. Ok, we wanted to SIMPLIFY our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME by promoting the secondary CONDENSATIONS of and in the WAVE-FIELD to PRIMARY STATUS as LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING THINGS living in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, so we FORCED OURSELVES to RELOCATE the PRIMARY ANIMATING INFLUENCE from the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM since were SUBSTITUTING for it, ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE, and weirdly enough, we resituated the AUTHORING ENERGY SOURCE into one of its own AUTHORED creations, the MATERIAL CONDENSATION. This is OBSCURANTISM since it notionally relocates AUTHORING AGENCY FROM the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (which we are simply DROPPING OUT) to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS of the NO-LONGER-EXISTING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM. Those CONDENSATIONS, while APPEARING LOCAL and EXPLICIT, actually OWED THEIR EXISTENCE TO THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUN in which they are CONDENSATIONS, so the SUBSTITUTING of the ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM “PULLED THE RUG OUT FROM UNDER THE FEET of the CONDENSATIONS; i.e. “CONDENSATIONS OF WHAT?  … EMPTY SPACE?”

The DROPPING OUT, in the BEING based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, of any/all “ACKNOWLEDGEMENT” of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate CRIPPLES our conceptualizing of dynamics by constraining the dynamic to one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  and here’s the KICKER, … THE DROPPED OUT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate is the source of influence which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT  (coming from the containing energy-charged PLENUM).  The RETAINED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate is the source of influence which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT (coming from the male asserting/actualizing).

WAIT A MINUTE!  The WAVE-FIELD DOES NOT ACTUALLY SPLIT APART INTO MALE and FEMALE COMPONENTS, that is only APPEARANCE since these “TWO” are really only TWO APPEARANCE BASED ASPECTS of the ONE WAVE-FIELD, … so those words that seem to treat the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as TWO SEPARATE agencies are MISLEADING, and that is what is cropping up with the DEA ABSCONDITA (Goddess in hiding) because while we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have designed a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, … THIS CAN’T BE DONE IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, it can only be done in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS which can be CONFUSING because we are using these LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS AS OUR “OPERATIVE REALITY”.

Social relational dynamics are being shaped by our choice of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, the major difference being FLOW-BASED QUANTUM LOGIC based) and BEING-BASED (BINARY LOGIC based) SCHEMES  The indigenous aboriginal organizing approach is FLOW-BASED and supports the understanding that ‘WE ARE ALL RELATED’ (mitakuye oyasin) which is a QUANTUM LOGIC based understanding (that we are all strands in the one-web aka condensations in the one energy-charged plenum) and lies beyond the simplicity of our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based model wherein we see ourselves as INDEPENDENT BEINGS with OUR OWN POWERS of AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

This has led to the development of a corresponding JUSTICE system which is NOT RESTORATIVE (resolving dissonances within the INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT RELATIONAL WEB), … but PURIFICATIONIST (eliminating those LOCAL INDEPENDENT BEINGS notionally equipped with THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING BAD ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.   The HUGE DISCONNECT between these two understanding of the basic physics of social dynamics is a REALITY that complicates my task of sharing the DIFFERENCES that arise in QUANTUM LOGIC thinking and acting relative to BINARY LOGIC thinking and acting.   For example, understanding reality using QUANTUM LOGIC opens our minds to the world as a relational matrix of INTERCONNNECTIONS and INTERDEPENDENCIES; a WEB-OF-LIFE that is understood in MODERN PHYSICS, in terms of CONDENSATIONS of an all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD wherein the FLUID PLENUM is PRIMARY and the CONDENSATIONS are only APPEARANCE (Schaumkommen) in the same sense as WHORLINGS in FLOWING where the FLOWING (wave-field) is PRIMARY and the WHORLINGS (condensations) are “APPEARANCE”.

Distinguishing terms such as BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC and QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC and others, are clearly needed.  In any case, if you put yourself in my shoes and contemplate the task of writing on the topic ACKNOWLEDGING OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, you may get a sense of the challenge of putting into writing what it would take to switch one’s LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY from a MATERIAL basis to a WAVE-FIELD basis as has been done by Bohm and Schroedinger and others, which involves a profound shift in understanding that has induced many to shift from either atheism, Judaism, Christianity or Islam which are all strongly BINARY LOGIC oriented, to Taoism and Advaita Vedanta which are strongly QUANTUM LOGIC oriented.

What most of us don’t think of because of the way we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are educated from birth which is highly BINARY LOGIC grounded, is the more informative (in a sense-experience affirming context) QUANTUM LOGIC way of understanding the world as compared to the BINARY LOGIC alternative.  This very basic shift in one’s worldview that comes with upgrading from SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC to LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC is the message of David Bohm and Krishna Murti and Schroedinger and many others including myself.  It is a psychological shift and not simply an updating of our intellectual knowledge banks.

QUANTUM LOGIC is the logic on indigenous aboriginals which is advocated in this familiar phrase;

“Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.  —Chief Seattle”

(more…)

First came the TEN COMMANDMENTS which was an ATTEMPT to describe ideal behaviour in a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING context, so that messages such as ‘Thou shalt not kill’ gave enormous power to those who had no qualms about killing.  These TEN COMMANDMENTS are BINARY LOGIC based, assigning EITHER RIGHT or WRONG categorization to one-sided male-asserting/actualizing dynamics (what a person does OUT OF THE CONTEXT of the situation one is included in, a CONTEXT such as being the only person present that could stop a mass killer in which case it could be argued that there would be justification in doing what was necessary to disable the person and prevent the LARGER tragedy). Ambiguity in this regard leads to euphemisms such as PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKES and COLLATERAL DAMAGE which are mentioned here as examples of the shortfall of INFLEXIBLE COMMANDMENTS in dealing with CONTEXT in complex situations.

Earlier than the TEN COMMENDMENTS came the understanding that “TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON and TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE” which acknowledges that unfolding developments are NOT SIMPLY MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING based, but are inductively shaped by the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING enveloping circumstances or in other words the exposure to the CONTEXT of our BEING INCLUDED WITHIN A DYNAMIC GREATER THAN OURSELVES which invokes less simple QUANTUM LOGIC rather than BINARY LOGIC.  QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which informs us in a manner that GOES BEYOND THE SIMPLE BINARY OF “IS HE, OR IS HE NOT, THE AUTHOR OF THIS ACTION?

IS HE OR IS HE NOT THE AUTHOR OF THIS CATCH of FIVE DOZEN OYSTERS?  Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS such as this hints at the REALITY of there being a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate that is associated with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamic, and in this case, THE AUTHOR OF THE CATCH was aware of the fact that TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON and TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE” in which case, like the child that is skilled in getting herself ‘in phase’ in entering into the cyclic skipping rope operated by her two friends, gets himself ‘in synch’with the rising and falling tides in his action of collecting five dozen oysters.  IT IS OUR WESTERN CULTURE ‘BEING’ BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that “DROPS OUT ALL MENTION OF THE WAVE-FIELD ASPECT OF THIS DYNAMIC”, reducing it (the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION) to; ‘the man collected five dozen oysters from the rocks in Halfmoon bay’, a proposition that is ALL MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING with NO (MENTION OF) FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING and thus constructing a proposition this is PURELY, ONE-SIDEDLY MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING; i.e. ‘the man collected five dozen oysters from Halfmoon bay’, DROPPING OUT MENTION OF THE SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED WAVE-FIELD REALITY WHEREIN …”TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON and TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE”

While BINARY LOGIC is the SIMPLE EITHER/OR LOGIC which asks, for example, DID THE MAN COLLECT OYSTERS FROM HALFMOON BAY OR NOT, simple BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITIONS which are characterized by the Goedel’s Theorem qualification that all finite logical propositions are INCOMPLETE as explained with the example ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which is INCOMPLETE since it is impossible for ‘THE TOWN TO GROW’ without, at the same time, the ‘SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS”, where these two conjugates constitute the REALITY of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in thich THE ‘TOWNING” is an INCLUDED DYNAMIC wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.

This Goedel’s Theorem INCOMPLETENESS in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME IS ALSO EVIDENT in ‘THE MAN COLLECTED OYSTERS FROM HALFMOON BAY’, since it DROPS OUT MENTION of the actual, ‘full-blown’ WAVE-FIELD REALITY WHEREIN …”TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON and TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE”

That is, OUR BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, such as THE MAN EITHER COLLECTED OYSERS FROM HALFMOON BAY OR DID NOT COLLECT OYSTERS FROM HALFMOON BAY, … IS OBSCURANTIST since it HIGHLIGHTS the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE WHILE “DROPPING OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, and IN PLACE OF THE LATTER, injects an ABSTRACT ABSOLUTE INFINITE EMPTY SPACE so that ALL THAT WE USERS OF THIS SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME HAVE TO CONCERN OURSELVES WITH IS THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE; i.e. the part about the gathering of the oysters which is 100% based on the MAN and his ACTIONS of GATHERING THE OYSTERS, AS IF WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE WHERE HE IS SEEN AS THE FULL AND SOLE AUTHOR OF THE ACTION, i.e. where there is NO MENTION OF WAVE-FIELD REALITY WHEREIN …”TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON and TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE”.

EVIDENTLY, because our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME is “BINARY LOGIC” BASED, it lacks the necessary QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM COMPLEXITY wherein MATERIAL FORMS are understood as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD (which gives the BOTH/AND relation wherein the material forms are BOTH THEMSELVES and at the same time, the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD they are included in).

If we confine our thinking to SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC TERMS, we have only TWO MUTUALLY EXCLUDING CHOICES, (A) THE MAN DOES OR DOES NOT GATHER OYSTERS, whereas (B), the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC acknowledges a THIRD player (the SEASON) which is like a cyclic GATE, a FEMALE “ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” which, like the changing tide, can also be a GATE that closes, a FEMALE “DISACCOMMODATING/DISABLING” as if we were dealing NOT with a simple BINARY ON or OFF DIODE, but with a less simple QUANTUM BOTH/AND GATE or TRIODE . 

Using this analogy, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS need to “OWN UP TO”  our BANISHING OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, known as the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING).

WHILE our SENSE-EXPERIENCE informs us of our inclusion in a WAVE-FIELD REALITY WHEREIN …”TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON and TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE”, our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and SUBSTITUTES ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  This DROP-OUT describes the REDUCTION from QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

From a sense-experience point of view, we are AWARE of our inclusion in a WAVE-FIELD REALITY WHEREIN …”TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON and TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE”, but in our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, WE “DROP OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, SUBSTITUTING IN ITS PLACE, ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE in which case REALITY is downgraded from QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD REALITY to BINARY LOGIC MECHANICAL PSEUDO-REALITY.

WAIT A MINUTE!  WHAT THIS DOES IS THAT IT NULLS OUT the PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENCY which is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.  How does one NULL OUT that which is NON-VISIBLE?  (i.e. the energy-charged PLENUM).

Something has to change in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING WHEN WE SWITCH from an UNDERSTANDING that what we call ‘EMPTY SPACE’ is an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and IS THE PRIMARY SOURCE of the WORLD DYNAMIC to an UNDERSTANDING that what we call ‘EMPTY SPACE’ is a energyless void and thus a NON-CONTRIBUTOR to the WORLD DYNAMIC, and “THAT SOMETHING THAT CHANGES” is that, the AUTHORING SOURCE of the WORLD DYNAMIC “SHIFTS”, in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, from the NON-VISIBLE WAVE-FIELD (NOW THE EMPTY SPACE) TO THE MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, which are CONDENSATIONS of the NON-VISIBLE WAVE-FIELD.

NOTE THAT THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT regions of the WAVE-FIELD in which MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS are ABSENT IS THE ENERGY-CHARGED SOURCE OF DYNAMICS in which case the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS ARE a DISTRACTION which puts us into a frame of mind where we are TRYING TO MAKE SENSE OUT OF AN IMAGINARY DYNAMIC WHERE WE CONCEIVE OF  LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS AS THE SOURCE OF THE OVERALL ACTION AND CHANGE.  THIS IS UPSIDE DOWN, it is the NON-VISIBLE FIELD THAT IS THE SOURCE OF THE OVERALL ACTION AND CHANGE and NOT the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS.  To understand the actual dynamics, we must use BOOTSTRAPPING to get to the INVERSE of THINGS MOVING and get to how the WAVE-FIELD is TRANSFORMING.   We don’t want to focus on HOW THE TOWNS ARE GROWING, which comes in the form of a multiplicity of independent FRAGMENTS ‘doing their own thing as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, we want to open our mind to HOW THE WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT but interconnected and interdependent.  Focusing on the SHRINKING WILDERNESS rather than LOCAL, EXPLICIT TOWNS is like focusing on SEAFLOOR SPREADING rather than CONTINENTAL DRIFT; i.e. in the former cases, there is NO dependency on a BINARY LOGIC, LOCAL, EXPLICIT VIEW OF “MULTIPLE INDEPENDENT THINGS” and WHAT THEY ARE DOING (e.g. continents drifting) which is a FRAGMENTING and OBSCURANTIST VIEW, but INSTEAD, a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM VIEW of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ‘SEAFLOOR SPREADING’ wherein “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX”.

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, EVIDENTLY, TEND TO PREFER THE FRAGMENTED (LOCAL and EXPLICIT) and OBSCURANTIST view of CONTINENTAL DRIFT rather than the UNIFYING view of SEAFLOOR SPREADING.  (note that the FRAGMENTATION derives from the BINARY LOGIC VIEW of “MULTIPLE INDEPENDENT THINGS” and what they are doing, while the OBSCURANTISM derives from the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate aka energy-charged PLENUM.  This “DROP-OUT” of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE is also referred to as the DEA ABSCONDITA or ‘GODDESS IN HIDING”)

In the COLLECTING OYSTERS example, it is evident to our sense-experience, that when we put our actions in harmony with the WAVE-FIELD dynamics we are included in, and wait for the RECEDING WATERS of the LOW TIDE to open up access to the OYSTER BEDS, in which case THERE IS MAJOR DROP OUT IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING where we speak in such simple BINARY LOGIC based terms as “DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT GATHER OYSTERS FROM THE OYSTER BEDS IN HALF-MOON BAY?” Whether we answer YES or NO, the CASE IS THEN CLOSED because the BINARY LOGIC based INQUIRY has been COMPLETED/SATISFIED and the TAKE-AWAY UNDERSTANDING is that THE PERSON EITHER DID OR DID NOT GATHER OYSTERS from THE OYSTER BEDS IN HALF-MOON BAY which is a CONCLUSION that is in ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING TERMS in which the SEASONAL (WAVE-FIELD) TIDAL ASPECT IS MISSING.

EVEN THOUGH our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is that … TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON and TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE”, which opens up our understanding to acknowledge that WE ARE INCLUDED IN SOMETHING GREATER THAN (LESS SIMPLE THAN) WHAT WE PUT TOGETHER IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS that are in terms of OURSELVES and “OUR ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS” as if we were the FULL AND SOLE AUTHORS AND SHAPERS OF OUR BEHAVIOUR.  BUT WHAT SUCH BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS DROP OUT, which is included in QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS (QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM), IS THE ACKNOWLEDGING THAT WE ARE INCLUDED IN A DYNAMIC THAT IS GREATER THAN OUR OWN PERSONAL DYNAMIC, i.e. WE ARE INCLUDED IN A WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC WHEREIN “TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON and TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE” ; i.e. a nature-based rhythm or ‘tune’ that we must learn to dance with to survive and thrive.

This means that BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as …’I collected oysters from Half-moon bay’  …IS A TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based proposition that DROPS OUT MENTION/ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the reality hat “I AM INCLUDED IN A DYNAMIC GREATER THAN MY OWN (local, self-authored) DYNAMIC.  That is, our SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OBSCURES the reality of our inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD in which we are CONDENSATIONS, whereby our actions are NOT SIMPLY LOCALLY AUTHORED BY OURSELVES as if we were BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, but are of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT  origin, as with CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka “WAVE-FIELD”.

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

(and as condensations in the wave-field, WE ARE ALL RELATED , as is the message of ‘mitakuye oyasin’)  

SO, WE ARE INSTEAD, INDUCTIVELY FORMED CONDENSATIONS within the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that ‘WE’, as MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS whose dynamics are inseparable from the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM WE SHARE INCLUSION IN, nevertheless “APPEAR” as LOCAL, EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENTS in our BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING PICTORIALS, PICTORIALS based on ABSOLUTE MATERIAL FORMS moving about and interacting within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY, INFINITE SPACE.

QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  QUANTUM LOGIC can be understood if we, for the moment, SET ASIDE our WESTERN CULTURE thinking in terms of ourselves as “LOCAL, EXPLICIT” “HUMAN BEINGS” operating in an INFINITE EMPTY SPACE that is INDEPENDENT of ourselves, since in thinking in this manner, we put our thinking in SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC MODE where it can GET STUCK; i.e. Once we have started using the BINARY LOGIC concept of GROWTH of the TOWN as if it were “sense-experience affirmed REALITY”, we have made it IMPOSSIBLE to employ QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMATION wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, as with “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”,  because we have already used LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in a manner that gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO MATERIAL BEING, AS WITH “THE TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”, … MATERIAL BEING that conflicts with the LESS SIMPLE, FLUID, “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX and there are no such things as LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES such as TOWNS that are purportedly capable of GROWING.

QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which agrees with the understanding that WE HUMANINGS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, which is our current MODERN PHYSICS understanding WHICH HAS LONG BEEN THE UNDERSTANDING of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, and it implies that EVERYTHING IS RELATED (“mitakayu oyasin” in indigenous aboriginal linguistic terms) as it must be if MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS within the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD aka the “WEB-OF-LIFE”  (in indigenous aboriginal terms).

In this QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, our personal actions are impacting the overall social collective we are situated in, in a manner similar to our driving in heavy traffic (the kind where every ‘individual’s’ actions ARE RELATIVE to the transforming matrix of the collective one is situationally included in, where ‘THE HOLES THAT OPEN UP’ inductively shape one’s steering on a priority GREATER than one’s goal of reaching a LOCAL, EXPLICIT DESTINATION).  For example, if one’s destination is the Eiffel Tower and one is driving through Paris in rush hour, one’s personal trajectory will give FIRST PRIORITY to the random opening of passageways within the traffic that MAY, ALBEIT THROUGH A VERY CIRCUITOUS PATH, give access to the desired DESTINATION.    In this case, we LET GO OF BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM where the guidance is from the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and we SUBSTITUTE QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM where guidance is from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT where the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is in a SUPPORTING ROLE.

Vygotsky describes this in the context of our natural method of LEARNING wherein we are putting the SPONTANEOUS (nonlocal and implicit) in primacy over the SCIENTIFIC (local and explicit).   WESTERN CULTURE has fallen into the dysfunctional habit of ELEVATING THE SCIENTIFIC INTO AN UNNATURAL PRIMACY OVER THE SPONTANEOUS, and once we do this, WE LOSE access to the MORE INFORMED COMBINATION of the SPONTANEOUS (the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) as the foundation on which the SCIENTIFIC (the LOCAL and EXPLICIT) can stand, at which point “the SCIENTIFIC” becomes “ALL SHE WROTE”.

In the WAVE-FIELD understanding, the priority of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is INNATE, and this SHOWS UP in old adages such as“To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”, which encourages us NOT TO RUSH INTO THE OCEAN TO COLLECT OYSTERS, but to wait for a LOW TIDE which will make the access far easier.  The MESSAGE here is that WE ARE INCLUDED IN A DYNAMIC GREATER THAN OURSELVES (the WAVE-FIELD) which embodies a CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING CONTEXT so that we, ourselves, as CONTENT within this continually transforming CONTEXT, are in a situation wherein; “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”.

And this is complicated by the fact that our opportune ‘seasons’ may come but once, as alluded to by Shakespeare in Julius Caesar as well as in ancient wisdoms that have been captured in the Bible even though they are somewhat ‘at odds with’ the TEN COMMANDMENTS which are EXPLICIT and do not attach maybe yes, maybe no ‘conditions’ to their dictates.

“There is a tide in the affairs of men Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries. …  Sharkespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’.

“To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: a time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted.” Ecclesiastes 3:1 – 8

(more…)

FORWARD/OVERVIEW to: The Tricky Linguistics of Wave-Field PEAK and TROUGH

This STORY, TOLD DIRECTLY, is that we live in a WAVE-FIELD world which means that our LANGUAGE, in order to convey our ACTUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE must be capable of conveying ANDROGYNOUS dynamics, wherein the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING agency and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING recipient ARE ONLY ONE.  This is describing the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the MALE ASSERTING is INCLUDED IN the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, as in TRANSFORMATION.

ACHTUNG! NOTA BENE!  WHERE WHESTERN CULTURE IS GOING WRONG in developing a LANGUAG HABIT (linguistic conceptualizing habit) which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (i.e. the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM) by substituting ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE and KEEPING ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, as is the now popular WESTERN CULTURE language usage, which is equivalent to INVENTING A NEW ABSTRACT PSEUDO-REALITY based ON BINARY LOGIC wherin the PRIMARY physical phenomen;i.e. the WAVE-FIELD, is OBSCURED while in its place there remains ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate as if operating NOT AS A CONDENSATION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM but as a NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE, INDEPENDENT MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF moving and developing WITHIN A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH CAREFULLY because what I have learned in my philosophical explorations into how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are “SCREWING UP OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING”, is that while our sense-experience is of our living in a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC world wherein material forms BOTH THEMSELVES AND AT THE SAME TIME, THEIR CONTAINING MEDIUM (e.g. consider a WHORLING in a FLOWING.  In this sitation, ‘THE WHORLING IS THE FLOWING’; i.e. it is part of the APPEARANCE of flowing and THE WHORLING is “NOT” a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, but only an ‘APPEARANCE’.  That applies generally so that, for example, while there is HUMANING and TOWNING and FORESTING in the WAVE-FIELD (aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM), there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES as are referred to as HUMANS, TOWNS and FORESTS, notionally with THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods.

This understanding of reality as an all-including energy-charged plenum bearing within it material condensations is the understanding of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

In this reality (Modern physics and Eastern/indigenous aboriginal reality), LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is FLOW-BASED and FLOW is QUANTUM LOGIC

wer have to describe the fact that the WAVE-FIELD energy is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and is PRIMARY while the LOCAL and EXPLICIT energy is APPEARANCE.   We may give credit to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT for actions and development but that is only APPEARANCE (Scheumkommen) and real credit for actions and developmment is coming from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

The LOCAL and EXPLICIT statement; “the men are constructing a village in the countryside ” makes NO MENTION of the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS in which case the CONSTRUCTION OF THE VILLAGE “IS NOT REALITY” but is only APPEARANCE and if we ‘add back in’ the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, we get the LESS SIMPLIFIED UNDERSTAND OF REALITY as the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE that includes “BOTH” the CONSTRUCTION of the VILLAGE “AND” the conjugate schrinking of WILDERNESS.

While the FLOW-BASED linguages of indigenous aboriginals and MODERN PHYSICS serves up LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which includes, in a TWO-IN-ONE sense, “BOTH” the GROWTH of the VILLAGE “AND” the onjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS which, taken together, are the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of using a simplified form of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that employ only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, substituting in its place, ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

 * * * * * * * 

What I want to emphasize, because it tends to get LOST IN THE SHUFFLE, is that we cannot TRUST LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that treats WAVE-PEAK and WAVE-TROUGH as TWO SEPARATE THINGS which is what BINARY LOGIC allows us to do, and then we say that the WAVE-PEAK is PUSHING (asserting) and the WAVE-TROUGH is PULLING (accommodating) and after we do this, WESTERN CULTURE EGOTISTS will affirm that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate “IS DOING ALL THE WORK” and we may as well DROP OUT MENTION of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate and simplify our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING by employ ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

This is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE NOW DOING, but as Nietzsche has pointed out, this is achieved with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  This gives us a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING capability that supports FRAGMENTATION because ONCE ONE GETS RID OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, which BRINGS TO BEAR the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD ASPECT, we have unleashed a DUMBED DOWN LANGUAGE that is capable of producing FRAGMENTED perspectives which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT, as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINTITE SPACE.

The KEY THING HERE IS THAT THE GRAND SCREW-UP IN WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS is coming from the WESTERN CULTURE ABSTRACT, LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING where we (A) SPLIT UP the WAVE-FIELD into TWO SEPARATE PARTS; e.g. the PEAK and the TROUGH.   This is NONSENSE because while the PEAK appears to be LOCAL and EXPLICIT, the TROUGH is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is NOT STAND-ALONE CONTENT but is CONTENT that must be INFORMED BY NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RELATIONAL CONTEXT.

The DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as pointed out by Nietzsche, is a recipe FRAGMENTATION in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  We may say that the WAVE-PEAKS keep bashing the stranded boat against the reocks but it is the WAVE-TROUGH that keeps sucking it back in and setting it up from another WAVE-PEAK bashing.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are IMPRESSED by the WAVE-PEAK, the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  and are employing LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING wherein we credit THE WAVE-PEAK with CRASHING INTO THE CROCKS as if it were legitimate to understanding such phenomena in one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALING ONLY TERMS; i.e. in LOCAL and EXPLICIT TERMS without taking into consideration the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING  WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.   Linguistic conceptualization-wise, it is far simpler to STICK TO the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as if there was NO NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INFLUENCE, thus while vionce in an indigenous aboriginal culture manifests, the entire community comes together in a HEALING CIRCLE sine the ASSUMPTION IS that the violence derives from the INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT social relational matrix in which case the INDIVDUAL HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN is the CONDUIT BUT VIOLENT ENERGY RELEASE but NOT THE SOURCE.

WESTERN CULTURE, by using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TO (A) EMPLOY NAMING to IDENTIFY A LOCAL AUTHOR and (B) EMPLOY GRAMMAR ‘ARM’ the NAMING-INSTANTIATED NOTIONAL ‘AUTHOR’, imputes a LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE for everything. This LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of events, must first EXPLAIN AWAY that everything is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in nature (Which makes sense when we understand we are living in a relational matrix wherein EVERYTHING is INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT.

show nietzsche quote on DOUBLE ERROR HERE.

& &  & & 7

For those peoples or tribes whose languages ackowledge that we are living in a WAVE-FIELD, as indigenous aboriginals IN EFFECT acknowledge with their understandIng expressed by MITAKUYE OYASIN (everything is related) which is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation; i.e. the BOTH/AND logic of the including medium where SPACE is NOT EMPTY, IT IS FULL; i.e. it is the all-including WAVE-FIELD wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.  These CONDENSATIONS are, at the same time, BOTH themselves, material condensations AND, at the same time, the ENERGY-CHARGED-MEDIUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) they are included in.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is exemplified by the WHORLING in the FLOWING in a stream or in the atmosphere; i.e. the WHORLING “APPEARS to be an INDEPENDENT THING but that is just APPEARANCE or as Schroedinger says ‘Schaumkommen’.

As Heraclitus said, and as reaffirmed by indigenous aboriginals, and by Nietzsche and Bohm, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.  This is how it is when one lives in a WAVE-FIELD reality as we all do.

NOW COMES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, and as Nietzsche pointed out, in our WESTERN CULTURE, EGO has progressively pushed the notion that HUMANS are INDEPENDENT BEING, notionally with their own POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, hence WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS identify individuals are LOCAL AUTHORS of particular material actions, development and production.

POST-SHAKESPEAREAN WESTERN CULTURE

The TRICKY LINGUISTICS of Wave-Field PEAK and TROUGH

The “WAVE-PEAK” is treated of in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as a LOCAL and EXPLICIT “BEING” based influence.  This is Schaumkommen (Appearance), that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THINKING “PORTRAYS” in a BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC sense as if THE “WAVE-PEAK” (there is no such thing in sense-experience reality as a “WAVE-PEAK” since WAVES DO NOT SPLIT into a PEAK and a TROUGH; i.e. the PEAK and TROUGH form is only ‘APPEARANCE’‘.

In using ‘APPEARANCE’ as the basis for LINGUISTIC DISCUSSION of WAVE-FIELD dynamics, we speak of a ‘WAVE’ as having BOTH a PEAK and a TROUGH and in WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, we speak of a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY that is fully and solely responsible for LOCAL and EXPLICIT actions and development; e.g. ‘The waves crashed into the beached boat and demolished it.’  Though, in sense-experience affirmed actuality, the WAVE-TROUGH repetitively pulled the boat partly off the rocks before the WAVE-PEAK returned to hammer it into and onto the rocks, our standard WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing mentions ONLY the WAVE-PEAK action which is the BINARY LOGIC “LOCAL, EXPLICIT” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-PEAK ACTION.

The “WAVE-TROUGH” is something NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT,  which is A PURELY RELATIONAL influence that is without its own BEING,   which, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THINKING is PORTRAYED in a SECONDARY LIGHT, as if it were the PASSIVE INTERVAL BETWEEN TWO ACTIVE PEAKS; i.e. as if the PEAKS were LOCAL, EXPLICIT, “INDEPENDENT” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  AGENTS, while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING TROUGHS WERE SECONDARY NON-CONTRIBUTING ‘FILLERS-IN’ like the SPANDREL in Cathedral architecture.

THE HUMONGOUS ERROR of WESTERN CULTURE is the DESIGNING of LANGUAGE that FALSELY PROMOTES THE “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT WAVE-PEAK TO PRIMARY ACTION SOURCING AGENT WHILE DROPPING OUT THE ACTUAL PRIMARY ACTION SOURCING AGENT; i.e THE “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-TROUGH.

The SPLITTING OUT of the WAVE-PEAK and setting it up ON ITS OWN, requires the ABSTRACT NULLING OUT of its WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the WAVE-TROUGH, which is in reality, the PRIMARY AGENCY since the WAVE-FIELD is innately NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT while its LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “DUMB-DOWN” to “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” is “APPEARANCE” based; i.e. THERE IS NOTHING LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ABOUT WAVE-FIELD PHENOMENA.

The terms NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT DESCRIBE THE BASIC NATURE OF THE WAVE-FIELD and the fact that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS LIMIT OUR FOCUS to certain aspects of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) and use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is supported by what Nietzsche has pointed out is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, to come up with a reduction to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT does not mean that such SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (e.g. BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE) is in accord with the QUANTUM LOGIC world of our SENSE EXPERIENCE  (e.g. QUANTUM LOGIC CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM AKA WAVE-FIELD).

THE “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” PEAKS together with THE “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” TROUGH comprise the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.  The perceived MULTIPLICITY of LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘INDEPENDENT’ PEAKS are only APPEARANCE but have been given FOUNDATIONAL STATUS in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING practice, SHUTTING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TROUGH which is a LESS SIMPLE FOUNDATION WHEREIN ALL MATERIAL THINGS ARE RELATED BY VIRTUE OF ALL MATERIAL THINGS BEING CONDENSATIONS OF THE ONE, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM AKA WAVE-FIELD. 

TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE 

(more…)

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

What this means is that“WE ARE ALL RELATED” (mitakuye oyasin)  as with the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM where material “CONDENSATIONS -OF-THE-MEDIUM”, like WHORLINGS in the FLOWING, while having a DISTINGUISHING APPEARANCE, are INCLUDED FEATURES OF THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

The indigenous aboriginal culture understands this QUANTUM LOGIC pattern in NATURE wherein ALL THINGS ARE RELATED, where there is no such thing as LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, as is basic in the BINARY LOGIC based linguistic conceptualizings of WESTERN CULTURE.  In the aboriginal culture, the violent act is understood as having been cultivated in the relational social matrix so that the violent PERSON is seen as the CONDUIT through whom the tensions brewed in the social collective are vented.  RESTORATIVE JUSTICE by means of the HEALING CIRCLE is the natural response to outbursts of violence rather than scapegoating the CONDUIT through which community-brewed tensions are vented.

BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC IS TOO SIMPLE A BASE FOR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC REALITY IN THAT BINARY LOGIC REQUIRES EMPTY SPACE AS ‘INSULATOR’ TO SUPPORT THE ABSTRACTION OF SEPARATE OBJECTS which WESTERN CULTURE makes out to be the LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (using the device of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).  This is in marked contrast to the QUANTUM PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal ‘relational web-of-life’ understanding of actions and developments being of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational origin) and only LOCAL and EXPLICIT in APPEARANCE in the manner that SOLAR IRRADIANCE FIELDS which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT are the primary source of LOCAL and EXPLICIT high pressure and low pressure circulations in the oceans and atmosphere,’

WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, in spite of our sense-experience affirming that everything is in flux, employs the ‘DOUBLE ERROR” combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘push’ to the high pressure and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘pull’  to the low pressure, thus providing a pseudo-explanation of these CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD COMPONENTS in LOCAL, EXPLICIT terms.   This tactic may be popularly affirmed by the ‘petitio principii of ‘does this low pressure suck?’ … and… ‘does this high pressure push’?   The petitio pincipii error akin to Nietzsche’s example of ‘lightning flashes’ where the lightning IS THE flashing.  Likewise, the low pressure IS THE sucking and the high pressure IS THE pushing.  Meanwhile, the DOUBLE  ERROR construct WRONGLY implies LOCAL AUTHORING which is a a work-around for the problem faced by linguistic conceptualizing challenge associated with capturing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

BINARY LOGIC itself is a simplifying ‘ruse’ that when applied to explain the WAVE-FIELD phenomena DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate which makes it incapable of capturing the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD relation which is comprised of the conjugate relation of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING together with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.   BINARY LOGIC’S “EITHER/OR” linguistic conceptualization CAN ONLY ‘HANDLE’ the LOCAL and EXPLICIT such as “IS THE TOWN GROWING?”.   There is a problem here in that whether the reality and/or the answer is EITHER yes OR no, … this makes no mention of the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus no mention of the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.  This suggests that the question “IS THE TOWN GROWING” is NOT about our sense-experience reality since what is going on according to our sense-experience reality is that ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

Some may ARGUE that the simple BINARY LOGIC proposition (IS THE TOWN GROWING) and response is adequate but to an indigenous aboriginal who is likely to be sensitive to, and accustomed to speaking in the flow-based language terms, it is important NOT TO CONCEAL the reality that there is CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS together with GROWING OF THE TOWN.   The CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN PART is only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and this is standard in WESTERN CULTURE to DROP OUT mention of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and this has been called the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING) because the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM while the material CONDENSATION such as ‘the TOWN that is GROWING’ … IS NOT SOMETHING REAL, … IT IS ONLY APPEARANCE as is the case with all CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.  What is REAL is the CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

BINARY LOGIC is something we apply to “THE TOWN” as in “THE TOWN IS EITHER LARGER THIS SUMMER THAN LAST SUMMER, or NOT”.   SUCH A QUESTION DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE SO THAT IN USING BINARY LOGIC, WE ARE NOT ‘PLAYING WITH A FULL DECK’.  We have the issue of the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING).

WORSE THAN THIS!  BY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE we are DROPPING OUT THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and PRETENDING THAT THE MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, WHICH ARE ‘APPEARANCE’ only (THE WAVE-FIELD IS NON-VISIBLE) ARE THE OPERATIVE REALITY. 

The “TOWN that is GROWING “is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that suggests the presence of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, notionall with ITS OWN POWERS of AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.  That is the WESTERN CULTURE view.   In the indigenous aboriginal view as also the QUANTUM LOGIC view, what is going on is that we all share inclusion in the transforming relational continuum and in this case there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein everyting is in flux and there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES such as ‘TOWNS’ that ‘GROW’ and ‘DEVELOP’ and ‘PRODUCE GOODS’; these are the products of DIFFERENTIATING the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).

The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT provides CONTEXT for the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT, but there is a problem here when BINARY LOGIC is employed since BINARY LOGIC is ONLY CAPABLE OF ADDRESSING THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES SITUATED IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which means OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF THE CONJUGATE RELATION WITH THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE

THUS, THE POINT IS THAT BINARY LOGIC ACTS AS A FILTER THAT REMOVES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING’S ACCESS TO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE WHICH MEANS THAT BINARY LOGIC REMOVES ACCESS TO WAVE-FIELD BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION (BINARY LOGIC GIVES ACCESS ONLY TO MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING). 

BECAUSE LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE CONSTRAINED BY BINARY LOGIC “DROPS OUT” THE CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, THERE WILL BE DROP OUT OF THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which is the CONTEXTUAL CONTAINER that ENRICHES understanding of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘CONTENT”.

AS WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, WE HAVE ACCESS TO SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDING IN OUR UNDERSTANDING, but for those of us who place UNBALANCED DEPENDENCE on BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, there is NO SUPPORTING CONTEXTUAL GROUNDING and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, which, on its own (without CONTEXTUAL ENRICHMENT from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT), sources FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS. 

* * *AUTHOR’S NOTE:  The way I think of the above is that BINARY LOGIC, by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE that comes with QUANTUM LOGIC, brings in, instead, an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE which gives a FREE TICKET to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DOMINANCE which means that linguistic conceptualizing (expressibility of thought and language) is LIMITED to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (what the TOWN is doing) while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (transforming landscape influence) is DISABLED, but it is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that enriches the understanding constrained by the limited reach of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT that is generated by the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.* * *

* * * * * * * * *

The WESTERN CULTURE Hijacking of Quantum Logic by Binary Logic is the reason why we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are NOT on the ‘same page’ as indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, all of whom are, as David Point pointed out, in accord with QUANTUM PHYSICS.

WESTERN CULTURE is in serious trouble that is manifesting in FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTIST DROP-OUT built into our linguistic conceptualizing scheme.  The FRAGMENTATION is coming from the use of NAMING to invent LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING/S and the OBSCURANTISM is coming from the use of GRAMMAR to impute one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING agency (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’) which DROPS OUT the WAVE-FIELD conjugate of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as is the basic nature of the WAVE-FIELD.  WESTERN CULTURE’s use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCTING GOODS’ is linguistic conceptualizing that implies the EXISTENCE of a MATERIAL BEING (‘the TOWN’) that has its own powers of GROWING).

The REALITY affirmed by our sense-experience is that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ … where everything is in flux.   There can be no ‘TOWN THAT IS GROWING’ without a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, with both of these conjugates being aspects of the ONGOING, and ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is otherwise known the WAVE-FIELD.   The MATERIAL FIGURE or “TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is in a “QUANTUM BOTH/AND RELATION” where “THE TOWNING” is a CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is “BOTH” its “LOCAL, EXPLICIT SELF”, … “AND”, … at the same time, the ALL-INCLUDING, NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.   This QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH”/”AND” RELATION describes a relation such as a WHORLING in a FLOWING where there in only ONE dynamic entitity, the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD BUT THERE IS THE APPEARANCE of TWO; i.e. the WHORLING and the FLOWING which is just ONE since WHORLING is part of the APPEARANCE of FLOWING and we cannot ‘scoop out a WHORLING’ in a net and put it in a separate ‘holding tank’ because “IT” (the WHORLING) is APPEARANCE and is NOT a THING THAT EXISTS.

I am proceeding ‘carefully’ here as I compose my linguistic conceptualizations because what I am sharing here is a TRICKY MATTER that requires from us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS an OPEN MIND (so as not to be ‘held captive’ by our WESTERN CULTURE common linguistic conceptualizations that are erroneous but which we HABITUALLY employ on a routine basis in spite of their being ‘infected’ with errors.

The KEY POINT is that while our sense-experience is of INCLUSION IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is a WAVE-FIELD dynamic that requires QUANTUM LOGIC expression, our intellectual modeling and our simple BEING-based linguistic conceptualizations are SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based while QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE and requires a less simple lingiustic conceptualizing scheme.   In particular, in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of MODERN PHYSICS, which accords with the indigenous aboriginal linguistic conceptualizing scheme, EVERYTHING IS RELATED in the manner of CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in the PLENUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.  This is why researchers such as Zen scholar Alan Watts recommends that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “DROP” our BEING-BASED LANGUAGE and adopt a FLOW-BASED (relational) LANGUAGE.

(more…)