This note ‘started off’ to be an explanation of the relationship between BINARY LOGIC (two-state EITHER/OR LOGIC) and QUANTUM LOGIC (three state BOTH/AND BALANCE LOGIC). BINARY LOGIC pervades our WESTERN CULTURE while QUANTUM LOGIC pervades indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta. This gets into the different use and influence of LOCAL and EXPLICIT vis a vis the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
In terms of WAVE-FIELD theory, these are referred to as the REAL and IMAGINARY components of a COMPLEX REALITY (the WAVE-FIELD).
EMERSON and NIETZSCHE focused, respectively, on the IMAGINARY and REAL components while BOHM focused on the WAVE-FIELD itself.
So, I have ‘adjusted’ the orientation of this ‘note’ to serve the BRINGING INTO CONNECTIVE CONFLUENCE, all THREE of these contributions to understanding the WAVE-FIELD nature or reality. Emerson is using romantic language to allude to the often forgotten NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT aspect of reality. Nietzsche is alluding to the WESTERN CULTURE popularized LOCAL and EXPLICIT with an aggressive approach that aims to SHATTER its pretention to ‘completeness’ by WESTERN CULTURE language architecture’s attempt to foist the MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE on us, as if to declare that that is all that is necessary for capturing ‘reality’.
Nietzsche’s ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ label is an intentional pejorative used to SMASH the concept of the LOCAL AUTHOR and show that it is an ARTIFICIAL CREATION achieved by GLOMMING TOGETHER the language operatives of NAMING and GRAMMAR so that the NAMING establishes a LOCAL PRESENCE and the GRAMMAR conflates this by imputing the POWER OF AUTHORING ACTION to the LOCAL PRESENCE. The LOCAL AUTHOR concept is thus a DECEPTION that needs to be SMASHED in the same sense that the Celts SMASHED STATUES since they implied that something innately spiritual (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) could be reduced to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.
TODAY, we are in possession of a HUGE ARCHIVE of WRITINGS, most of which are giving a foundational role to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is imputing LOCAL AUTHORING. THESE CONSTRUCTIONS NEED TO BE SMASHED in order to get to the sense-experience affirmable understanding which is FLUID as in the WAVE-FIELD dynamic.
Bohm’s orientation has always been to GET IT RIGHT IN THE FIRST PLACE by employing a FLOW-BASED language architecture (e.g. his Rheomode language, which he has pointed out, is a language architecture that has already been developed and exists in the indigenous aboriginal languages). So, here is where EMERSON, NIETZSCHE and BOHM are respectively “COMING FROM”
Emerson: Pointing out in The Method of Nature, that the ALL-INCLUDING FLUID ASPECT of NATURE is DROPPED OUT by our language architecture and we end up ‘going only with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, having dropped out the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT;
A man’s wisdom is to know that all ends are momentary, that the best end must be superseded by a better. But there is a mischievous tendency in him to transfer his thought from the life to the ends, to quit his agency and rest in his acts: the tools run away with the workman, the human with the divine. — Emerson
In other words, in our use of thought and language, the local and explicit which is meant only as a Wittgenstein Ladder to INFER the fluid reality; i.e. the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM that lies beyond the reach of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, that latter having utility BUT ONLY AS TOOL OF INFERENCE of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
The WESTERN CULTURE SCREW-UP IS THUS the DUMBING DOWN (SIMPLIFYING) of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT. This SIMPLIFICATION or “SIMPLI-FICTION” is done simply by injecting a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which IS capturable in LOCAL, EXPLICIT language constructs, so that is what we END UP WITH using, i.e. bunch of LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘IDOLS’ which are like the STATUES of GODS and MEN that Brennus and the Celts SMASHED because the very existence of these statues implied that the SUBJECTS could be reduced to LOCAL and EXPLICIT components. This was the same issue as induced Charles Dickens to write ‘HARD TIMES’ wherein the school teacher Gradgrind, is mocked for his attempts to PURGE THE POETIC (the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) from his students thinking entirely.
Charles Dickens in ‘Hard Times’ in the sequence where ‘Sissy Jupe’s relational understanding of a horse is ‘put down’ by her teacher Thomas Gradgrind who insists on grounding all understanding in ‘being’-based ‘facts’ as is the way of mainstream ‘science’;
“Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to Facts, sir!”
‘Bitzer,’ said Thomas Gradgrind. ‘Your definition of a horse.’
‘Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds coat in the spring; in marshy countries, sheds hoofs, too. Hoofs hard, but requiring to be shod with iron. Age known by marks in mouth.’ Thus (and much more) Bitzer. — Charles Dickens, ‘Hard Times’
THERE IS A BATTLE GOING ON IN WESTERN CULTURE WHICH HAS BEEN PUSHING THE OVERALL SOCIAL COLLECTIVE IN THE DIRECTION OF GOING EXCLUSIVELY WITH THE ‘LOCAL AND EXPLICIT’ AND ‘DROPPING OUT ENTIRELY’, THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT.
THIS IS NOTHING OTHER THAN THE REDUCTION OF THE WAVE-DYNAMIC WHICH IS MATHEMATICALLY CONSTITUTE BY BOTH ‘REAL’ (LOCAL, EXPLICIT) AND ‘IMAGINARY’ (NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT) ‘COMPONENTS’.
For example, the indigenous aboriginal language will convey the equivalent of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which captures BOTH the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘TOWNING’ but keeps it in context with the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’. MEANWHILE, our WESTERN CULTURE language will SEPARATE OUT the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and use GRAMMAR to ANIMATE IT as if it were an INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF with its own POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and development, strutting its stuff within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE. as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING products and services.
OK, THAT IS A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF WHERE EMERSON AND NIETTZSCHE ARE COMING FROM; i.e. EMERSON is employing poetic language to get to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT aspect of reality and pointing out that we have abandoned it and are instead making EXCLUSIVE use of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT which one might say is the LESSER ASPECT. NIETZSCHE IS NOW LEFT TO DEAL WITH THE WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHEREIN THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT IS GIVEN THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE (WHICH IS WHERE BINARY LOGIC WHICH AFFIRMS THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT AS IN “EITHER” IS “OR” IS NOT IS GIVEN PRECEDENCE OVER QUANTUM LOGIC WHICH AFFIRMS THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT AS IN BALANCE AND IMBALANCE).
LAST BUT NOT LEAST, DAVID BOHM WHO HAS ‘HELD OUT’ FOR A FULLY ‘WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE’ LANGUAGE (A FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE) SO THAT WE DON’T EVEN BEGIN TO GENERATE MASSIVE FILES OF SCREWED UP LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION BASED ON THE INNATELY DEFICIENT COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WITH ITS DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR, LOCAL AUTHORING STRUCTURES.
BINARY LOGIC IS A DEVICE FOR SERVING UP A SIMPLIFIED REPRESENTATION OF REALITY, OR MORE ACCURATELY, “CONSTRUCTING A SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHICH IS SIMPLER”
There are ANALOGIES here such as (A) The Cuckoo’s egg that inserts a more simple bird into a less simple bird’s supportive milieu, or, (B) Putting a simple Volkswagen engine into a PORSCHE because ‘the simpler thing CAN FIT INTO THE SLOT meant for something LESS SIMPLE. Analogies also include WHAT GOES ON WITH THE ILLNESS “COLITIS” which comes in the wake of the administering of an ANTI-biotic that KILLS many of the BODY’S “ESSENTIAL” (good) COMPLEX MICROBES who’s places are then “OCCUPIED” (‘taken over’) by SIMPLER MICROBES that ‘CAN’T DO THE LESS SIMPLE JOB’ but whose ‘OCCUPATION’ of the key slots BLOCKS THE RETURN of the NEEDED, LESS SIMPLE MICROBES. The ‘work-around’ for this is to RE-LOAD the FULL MICROBIAL ASSEMBLAGE complete with “SOCKETS AND THEIR PROPER OCCUPANTS”.
This process, termed “Fecal Microbiota Transplantation” or FMT resolves the dilemma wherein the ‘fancy microbe apartments’ that were ‘cleared out’ by the antibiotic and then re-occupied by simpler microbes BLOCK RE-ENTRY of the needed “LESS SIMPLE’ microbes. The problem is that the microbes arrange themselves so as to form ‘openings’ based on a full complement of the full diversity of microbes which come together so as to form custom slots hat accommodate the full diversity arranged so as to open up custom slots for each other where the OCCUPANT must MATCH THE SLOT, and the LESS SIMPLE SLOT must be filled with the corresponding LESS SIMPLE OCCUPANT.
This scheme is FOILED in the wake of the antibiotic administering since many microbial species are ELIMINATED IN A WILLY-NILLY manner, so that the matched arrangement of SOCKETS and OCCUPANTS is MESSED UP and we have the WRONG OCCUPANTS in the WRONG SOCKETS and the manifestation of this screw-up is COLITIS, the REMEDY for which is to assist the body in restoring the healthy arrangement of SOCKETS and OCCUPANTS in the microbial assemblage. MORE ANTI-BIOTICS to kill more strains of microbes is NOT the REMEDY since the PROBLEM of COLITIS is the ABSENCE OF ESSENTIAL MICROBES, hence the successful REMEDY of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation which RESTORES those microbial strains THAT HAVE BEEN ELMINATED BY THE ANTI-BIOTICS, a RESTORATION that cannot be achieved by administering MORE ANTI-BIOTICS since ANTI-BIOTICS only REMOVE microbes and COLITIS is resolved by RESTORING essential microbes that are no longer present, having been removed by the antio-biotics.
It is IMPORTANT to note that the IMBALANCE in microbial content has led to the MISTAKEN JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS when observing that unusual ‘rogue’ strains of microbes are proliferating in the body, that these ‘rogue’ microbes ARE THE CAUSE OF ILLNESS. THEY ARE NOT THE CAUSE OF ILLNESS, they are symptomatic of IMBALANCE in the microbial assemblage, THE REMEDY FOR WHICH IS RE-BALANCING the microbial assemblage, for which the 90+ percent successful remedy is Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.
* * *
WHY SO MUCH VERBIAGE ON FMT WHEN THE MAIN TOPIC IS TO ELUCIDATE ON BINARY LOGIC VIS A VIS QUANTUM LOGIC? I.E. …
How WESTERN and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES DIFFER in their SHORTCHANGING REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY.0
AUTHOR’S PREFACE: Understanding the PSYCHO-DYNAMICS of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE
Imagine YOURSELF as an ARCHITECT of LANGUAGE. If you do, you will come to a GREAT DIVIDE in ARCHITECTURAL OPTION which can be compared to observing the GATHERING and SCATTERING of ants as the fetch from a pool of honey beneath a dripping bees nest high above. On the flat ground, the ants come and go in WAVES; i.e. they GATHER and SCATTER as the come to collect and depart to deliver the honey. What the OUTSIDE OBSERVER SEES is a GATHERING and SCATTERING pattern which, although it is in continuing flux, impresses upon us a REPRESENTATION featuring “A CLUSTER” which undergoes cycles of GROWTH and SHRINKAGE, even though the actual dynamic is cluster-ING and the CLUSTER part of it is APPEARANCE and WE HAD BETTER BE CAREFUL because if we ARCHITECT a LANGUAGE which employs the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we will end up IMPUTING LOCAL BEING to ‘the CLUSTER’ and compound this FIRST ERROR with the SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR which imputes to the FIRST ERROR, i.e. ‘the CLUSTER’, its own (notional) POWERS OF AUTHORING GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.
This DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING where there is one, gets to play an AMAZING ROLE in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC by GETTING INTO THE PSYCHE OF THE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT through the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR LANGUAGE-BASED FRAGMENTATION scheme. So, instead of an understanding in terms of GATHERING-SCATTERING as in CLUSTERING (an innately fluid dynamic), we INVERT our understanding and CONJURE UP a SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring LOCAL AUTHORING of GROWTH and SHRINKAGE. Instead of WAVES of GATHERING and SCATTERING as in CLUSTERING, we have ‘the CLUSTER’ and instead of the GATHERING phase of CLUSTERING, we have GROWTH of the CLUSTER, and instead of the SCATTERING phase of CLUSTERING, we have SHRINKAGE of the CLUSTER, such the we end up constructing a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which imputes AUTHORING POWER to the CLUSTER, a vision-and-psyche contrived ILLUSION.
The SIMPLIFYING of REALITY by reducing the RESONANCE based WAVES of GATHERING and SCATTERING to a LOCAL AUTHOR based SUBSTITUTE REALITY is what distinguishes indigenous aboriginal languages from WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European languages. Instead of acknowledging as BASIC, the RESONANCE based features such as the CLUSTERING or the TOWNING, our WESTERN CULTURE approach to LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION is to SIMPLIFY, the TOWNING in the same sense as the CLUSTERING EXAMPLE, using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche) to impute LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.
GOODBYE RESONANCE BASED TRANSFORMATION, …HELLO FRAGMENTATION.
UNDERSTANDING the PSYCHO-DYNAMICS of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS WHAT THIS ESSAY IS ALL ABOUT.
* * *
That is, the SHORTCHANGING in the REPRESENTATION of REALITY in indigenous aboriginal languages “IS FAR LESS” than the SHORTCHANGING of REALITY in WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European language architectures, and the following explains (a) how this is the case, and (b) some of the important ramification that come from our ACTING on the basis of these INACCURATE LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS..
There must first be a reminder that there are two basically different types of language architectures (A) flow-based (nonlocal-implicit) as with indigenous aboriginal language and Bohm’s ‘Rheomode’ language architecture, and (B) object-based (local, explicit) as with the Common Average European language architecture;
–1- EXAMPLE of FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE: “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”. Note the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING combined inference, characteristic of FLOW.
–2- EXAMPLE OF OBJECT-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE: “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services. Note the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE inference (This come with the SUBSTITUTION of absolute empty and infinite space IN PLACE OF the FEMALE accommodative conjugate).
THAT IS; THERE ARE TWO LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES; (-1-) the “LESS-SIMPLE” (quantum logic) NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FLOW-BASED (indigenous languages, Bohm’s Rheomode) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is capable of DIRECTLY expressing BALANCE and IMBALANCE, and, (-2-) the SIMPLE (binary logic) LOCAL, EXPLICIT OBJECT-BASED (Western Culture Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE) which is INCAPABLE of DIRECTLY expressing BALANCE.
The respective examples illustrate the fact that the FLOW-BASED language architecture (e.g. ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ avoids any LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONSTRAINING so that the entire FIGURE and GROUND combination is free to transform as ONE; i.e. This language architecture which is capable of expressing FIGURE and GROUND as ONE is said to have a QUANTUM LOGIC capability. This can be understood in that the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is like the BOILING in rapidly flowing stream where BOILING and the FLOWING are ONE. For example, we would be in error to speak of the BOIL ‘growing’, ‘devloping’ and ‘producing turbulence’ as if it HAD ITS OWN LOCAL AUTHORING POWER, which would also, at the same time, imply its INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE, a inference that would FORCE on the viewer the necessity of CREATING an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.
In other words, for FLOW-BASED language architecture supports the representation of “FIGURE” and “GROUND” as “ONE” as captured with ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) , … and DOES NOT INVOLVE the SPLITTING APART of “FIGURE” and “GROUND”, so that the THEN-LIBERATED “TOWN” is free to do its own one-sided MALE-ASSERTING “ACTION”, “DEVELOPMENT”, “PRODUCTION”.
“Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache” (Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations
This article reviews how LANGUAGE is the ROOT SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION in the dynamics of our Common Average European language speaking social collective, a dysfunction that has spread through the world with the spread of English and other European languages. This FRAGMENTATION is NOT a pervasive problem in those indigenous aboriginal social collectives that have retained their indigenous languages as their first language.
A language-based representation of our sense-experience reality requires a language architecture with a QUANTUM LOGIC foundation. BINARY LOGIC is insufficient (it is innately SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC).
Where BINARY LOGIC splits FIGURE and GROUND (matter and space) into TWO so that we see the material FIGURE as moving through the EMPTY GROUND (space),…
QUANTUM LOGIC comprehends FIGURE and GROUND as ONE so that we understand the FIGURE (matter) as being a CONDENSATION of the electromagnetic WAVE-FIELD (ground). The empty space was part of the BINARY LOGIC simplifying abstraction which is not needed in the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD.
Our COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN language architecture tends to DISTORT REALITY by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD dynamic and substituting an ABSOLUTE, EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE. The loss of the FEMALE CONJUGATE leads to one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE REPRESENTATIONS which are source of FRAGMENTATION.
* * * * * * * * *
What Benjamin Whorf classifies as the Common Average European (CAE) Languages contain within them the seeds of FRAGMENTATION, and this note is written to ELUCIDATE on how this occurs.
The LANGUAGE-based FRAGMENTATION problem, which David Bohm points out is not constrained to FRAGMENTING ‘what goes on out there’ in the dynamics of the social collective, but also ‘what goes on IN HERE’ and can be the source of SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA.
AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS LANGUAGE-BASED FRAGMENTATION IS BINARY LOGIC.
Since we are right now using that particular form of language (CAE) that we could say is INFECTED with this PITFALL that we may or may not FALL INTO, it is a bit tricky to explain WITH this CAE language because the nature of the FRAGMENTATION problem is that important information is DROPPED OUT because of our desire for SIMPLIFICATION in our language-based REPRESENTATION.
This SIMPLIFICATION is NOT FOUND in indigenous aboriginal language or in FLOW-BASED (relational) languages, which is why David Bohm suggested that we CAE language users needed to switch to A NEW LANGUAGE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE such as the flow-based design he called Rheomode. Meanwhile, he discovered that the indigenous aboriginal languages ALREADY EMPLOYED THE FLOW-BASED (NON-FRAGMENTING) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.
My goal in this note is to TAKE THE READER DIRECTLY TO THE ROOT SOURCE OF THE FRAGMENTATION TRAP WHICH IS OUR USE OF WHAT NIETZSCHE HAS LABELLED “THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR” which INFUSES FRAGMENTATION into our rhetoric with the imputing of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development.
WARNING: This language architecture I am right now using employs this DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR but I am going to try to do a work-around in my manner of expressing things.
TEN YEARS AGO, OR LESS, THERE WAS MORE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE (IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE) THAT THERE WAS SUCH A THING AS ‘THE TRUTH’.
THAT IS, THERE HAS BEEN CONFIDENCE THAT THERE IS “TRUTH” AND THAT IT’S JUST A MATTER OF KEEPING AN OPEN MIND AND DOING SUFFICIENT ‘INVESTIGATIONS’ TO DISCOVER ‘THE TRUTH’.
OF COURSE, NIETZSCHE, AMONG OTHERS, INSISTED THAT THERE WAS NO SUCH THING AS ‘THE TRUTH’ AND I GET THE POINT, having been interested for a long while in Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETEMENT of all FINITE SYSTEMS OF PROPOSITIONS.
It only makes sense, being that we are included in a transforming relational continuum, there are no FIXED LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ‘NUGGETS OF TRUTH’.
Our personal experience is UNIQUE so that TRUTH is not the TRUTH that most people talk about. We talk about ‘the TRUTH ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE UKRAINE’. The versions of TRUTH coming from RUSSIA and CHINA differ radically from the versions of TRUTH coming from the U.S. and NATO countries.
We are familiar, from knowledge of prior Wartime periods that many things that were presented as ‘the TRUTH’ were NOT THE TRUTH. And even with the passage of many years, it is not as if “THE TRUTH’ finally ‘floats to the surface’.
There is a problem with TRUTH as a GENERALIZATION since everyone is experience things uniquely. If we want to get to something which approaches a ‘general truth’ it seems as if we have to bring many different accounts of experience into a collective confluence and capture the COHERENCIES in the confluence.
This is effectively what the indigenous aboriginal LEARNING CIRCLE is all about.
As for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, we continue to employ the age-old WESTERN CULTURE method described by Lafontaine; i.e. “La raison du plus fort est toujours la meilleure” (Reason (truth) of the most powerful is always the best’).
The LEARNING CIRCLE approach to the ‘truth’ is also suggested by Nietzsche;
There is only a perspectival seeing, only a perspectival ‘knowing’; the more affects we are able to put into words about a thing, the more eyes, various eyes we are able to use for the same thing, the more complete will be our ‘concept’ of the thing, our ‘objectivity’.– Nietzsche
The “RUSSIAN INVASION of the UKRAINE” passes over the more BASIC PROBLEM OF FRAGMENTATION INTO “INDEPENDENT NATIONS”0
The NORMAL WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT is NOT going to get the DEEPER MESSAGE in this note (without a special effort) because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have been psychologically conditioned to believe in an ABSTRACT PSEUDO-REALITY featuring the INDEPENDENT NATION. THERE ARE NO ‘INDEPENDENT NATIONS’ in THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao. The REJECTION of the EXISTENCE OF THE INDEPENDENT NATION is NECESSARY for one to be ABLE TO SEE/UNDERSTAND the REAL REALITY of our inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD and the Tao. The point is the MODERN CULTURAL CONDITIONING that would have us believe in the INDEPENDENT NATION, while the EGO can’t let go ot it, is ABSTRACTION based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPLIES (A) the EXISTENCE OF THE LOCAL NATION and (B) ITS OWN GRAMMAR-GIVEN LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT. The concept of the INDEPENDENT NATION, embellished by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, has us THINKING (WRONGLY) in terms of the INDEPENDENT NATION with its OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.
The ISSUE concerning RUSSIA’s rejection of the INDEPENDENT NATION status of the UKRAINE, HAS ROOTS WHICH GO MUCH DEEPER AND QUESTION THE LEGITIMACY OF THE VERY CONCEPT OF “THE INDEPENDENT NATION”. If
If WE CONFINE OUR INQUIRY TO THE QUESTION OF THE LEGITIMACY OF THE UKRAINE’S CLAIM TO SOVEREIGN NATION STATUS, THERE WE SHALL BE MISSING THE NEEDED INQUIRY THAT WILL EXPOSE THE ILLEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPT OF THE SOVEREIGN STATE..
* * *
It is common for readers to ACCEPT THE NOTION OF THE INDEPENDENT NATION as if it were REALITY (which it is NOT) which leads to social FRAGMENTATION through belief in the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development (e.g. on the part of the so-called “INDEPENDENT NATION”).
The concept of the ‘INDEPENDENT NATION’ is DELUSION which has nevertheless come to play A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in our GLOBAL APPROACH to CONCEPTUALIZING “REALITY”, or more aptly, ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’. Our GLOBALLY POPULAR ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’ is this DOUBLE ERROR based SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring INDEPENDENT NATIONS as LOCAL ACTION and DEVELOPMENT AUTHORING AGENTS. However, our sense-experience reality is of our inclusion in ONE transforming relational continuum wherein THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ‘INDEPENDENT NATION’. Modern physics and systems sciences have pointed this out but the HABIT of constructing SUBSTITUTE REALITIES incorporating the ABSTRACTION of INDEPENDENT NATIONS continues to infuse the ERRONEOUS notion of “INDEPENDENT NATIONS” into the MODERN PSYCHE, inducing ARTIFICIAL FRAGMENTATION and UNNECESSARY CONFLICT.
The UNCRITICAL acceptance of the CONCEPT of the INDEPENDENT NATION succeeds because of the popularity of the EGO inflation deriving from the ERRONEOUS sense of LOCAL AUTHORING implied by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that comes bundled in with that ABSTRACTION of the INDEPENDENT NATION.
The QUESTION IS “NOT” … “DOES THE UKRAINE QUALIFY AS A LEGITIMATE “INDEPENDENT NATION”?. THE QUESTION IS INSTEAD: HOW HAVE WE BEEN HOODWINKED INTO ACCEPTING THE UNREAL ABSTRACTION OF “THE INDEPENDENT NATION”, being as how we live “in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence?
A fixed lattice-work of INDEPENDENT NATION grid-cells may be laid over the global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence so that new developments may be labelled according to their grid-cell of emergence. The fact remains that while those grid cells signify INDEPENDENT NATIONS, this does not mean that developments that emerge through them derive from them’ since we live ”in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.”. In KORZYBSKI’s terms; ‘the map is not the territory”
* * * end-of-author’s-preface * * *
NATIONALISM, the now GLOBAL game of PRETENDING the “INDEPENDENCE” of “NATIONS” stems from the ABSTRACTION of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche has pointed out.
If we choose to OVERLOOK THE SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA in our modern GLOBAL CULTURE that, as Bohm and Nietzsche both point out, is the source of FRAGMENTATION that is both PSYCHOLOGICAL and PHYSICAL and NATIONALISM is part of it.
The battle over the STATUS of the UKRAINE stems from the ABSTRACT PROMOTION OF FRAGMENTATION by way of NATIONALISM.
There is no such thing as an INDEPENDENT NATION. The FRAGMENTATION into NATIONS is not grounded in our sense-experience, it is ABSTRACTION that is popularized ONLY by groups of people coming together and AGREEING TO SUPPORT THE UNREAL ABSTRACTION OF NAMING-BASED INDEPENDENT NATIONS. This is a crazy intellectual abstraction based idea that breeds WARS.
Sentient forms in nature do not participate in this ABSTRACT CREATION OF IMAGINARY “INDEPENDENT NATIONS” or “INDPENDENT BEINGS” of any type. Indigenous aboriginals DO NOT PARTICIPATE in the ABSTRTACT CREATION OF IMAGINARY “INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS” of SPACE that are DEFINED by IMAGINARY BOUNDARY LINES. This inventing of INDEPENDENT STATES FRAGMENTS THE PSYCHE and from there it FRAGMENTS the social collective.
FRAGMENTATION is ILLUSION. We live within a transforming relational continuum where FRAGMENTATION DOES NOT EXIST other than in the LANGUAGE STIMULATED ABSTRACTIONS OF THE PSYCHE. HERE’s HOW THIS FRAGMENTATION HAPPENS,
-1-A social collective invents a name such as UKRAINE and associates it with a GEOMETRIC (imaginary line based) CLOSED FIGURE superimposed on a MAP based REPRESENTATION of the EARTH. This FRAGMENTING of the SURFACE AREA of he earth is PURELY AND SOLELY IMAGINARY IN ITS FOUNDATIONAL ASPECT and the GEOMETRIC AREAL FORMS are simply DECLARED TO EXIST and this is BACKUP UP by FORCE OF ARMS of the SUPPORTERS who are DEFINING the AREA and DECLARING IT TO BE SOMETHING that REALLY EXISTS.
-2- The EXISTENCE of these FRAGMENTED land areas is something that is INVENTED BY INTELLECTUAL DECLARATION and is sustained by FORCE by the SUPPORTERS who organizing POLICING INFRASTRUCTURE to SECURE the IMAGINARY FRAGMENTATION that they have INTELLECTUALLY INVENTED. There is NO OTHER BASIS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS than INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION, but once many people SWEAR OATHS OF ALLEGIEANCE to COMMIT THEIR LIVES TO THE DEFENCE OF THE EXISTENCE OF THE IMAGINARY “INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS”, we have the system that is now in place that we refer to as NATIONALISM. It is established by BUTE FORCE as we know from the wars between European COLONIZERS who have been imposing this system around the globe and indigenous peoples who have never agreed to put such INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACT FRAGMENTATION into an unnatural precedence over sense-experience of inclusion in A SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY OF INCLUSION IN A WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY GLOBAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE.
-3- The problem of the UKRAINE begins with the problem of INTELLECTUAL FRAGMNTING of our sense-experience of INCLUSION IN A WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY GLOBAL INTERCONNECTION AND MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE as is the fining of ‘systems scientists’ and as is the finding of indigenous aboriginals and ANYONE who opts for the NATURAL understanding of the world wherein our sense-experience is kept in a natural precedence over our intellectual abstraction. As David Bohm and Nietzsche have pointed out, LANGUAGE of a certain type has given us the habit of construction SUBSTITUTE REALITIES based on BINARY LOGIC. This SUBSTITUTE REALITIES FEATURE the SPLITTING APART of FIGURE and GROUND using BINARY LOGIC by way of the DOUBLE ERROR (Nietzsche) of NAMING and GRAMMAR. Once we popularize language usage such as POLAND is GROWING in POPULATION and is continuing to advance in its DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services, this “DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR” inserts into the INTELLECT, the MISTAKEN CONCEPT OF “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and development. Thus the language based popular usage of POLAND does this and that or ‘the UKRAINE does this and that’ builds a matrix of related propositions that impute support for the LOCAL EXISTENCE and LOCAL AUTHORING POWER of the IMAGINED ENTITY associated with the NAME in the DOUBLE ERROR combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR; e.g. “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services” is a DOUBLE ERROR based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that takes shape IN THE INTELLECTUALIZING MIND even though the world of our sense-experience continues to be one of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.
-4- The UKRAINE DOES NOT EXIST. The notion of its LOCAL EXISTENCE of a NATION derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR and THE NATION takes on a notional LOCAL EXISTENCE by popular usage of this NAMING and GRAMMAR based (DOUBLE ERROR BASED) construction of an INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION BASED SUBSITUTE REALITY. In other words, the NATION OF POLAND (or etc.) ONLY EXISTS IN THE LANGUAGE-STIMULTATED INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTING MIND. This technique of INVENTING NATIONS with notional LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is unique to the COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES (which includes the RUSSIAN language) and DOES NOT INCLUDE indigenous aboriginals whose language is FLOW BASED and does NOT give itself up to the trickery of FRAGMENTATION by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR. For example, Bohm’s RHEOMODE language was designed to AVOID FRAGMENTATION and the indigenous aboriginal languages also have this design, thus, for example, one would say the equivalent of THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, where WE, with our Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE would say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services, IMPLYING LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS, which, as already noted, the systems scientists have exposed as DELUSION since our sense-experience affirms OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY OF INCLUSION IN A WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY GLOBAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE.
FORWARD: The Mephistophelian Gynocide of our Android Western Language Cult.
“GYNOCIDE” refers to the ELIMINATING of the FEMALE CONJUGATE in developing representations of the all-including transforming relational continuum. While the WILDERNESS OPENS UP TO ACCOMMODATE the CONJUGATE GROWTH of cultivated lands, this ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION is habitually, in our WESTERN CULTURE, PRESENTED in the ONE-SIDED, MALE-ASSERTIVE TERMS of “GROWTH”, as if the ACCOMMODATING FEMALE OPENING that makes such GROWTH possible “NEVER OCCURRED” . INSTEAD of architecting our language to capture the sense-experience affirmed ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION, we are SUBSTITUTING for the FEMALE ASPECT of ANDROGYOUS TRANSFORMATION, an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (Euclidean Space). The result is that our Common Average European language based representations of reality are serving up a one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE SUBSTITUTE REALITY which we are now using as our WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY.
In simple terms; there is no such thing as GROWTH in a WAVE-FIELD, there is only TRANSFORMATION.
* * *
In 1914, Ernst Mach wrote the classic ‘The Analysis of Sensations, and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical’, … and there is a lot more understanding in Mach’s “Analysis that YET MADE ITS WAY INTO THE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN language based representation of reality.
Mach assumed that ‘we’ (Western Culture Adherents) were well on our way to bringing the PHYSICAL and the PSYCHICAL into connective meaningful CONFLUENCE.
As it turns out, this unifying of the PSYCHICAL and PHYSICAL understanding has STALLED and we are BULLING AHEAD with the PHYSICAL, launching satellites into Earth Orbits and many other weird and “wonderful” physical enterprises, regarding the PHYSICAL world as INDEPENDENT of the PSYCHICAL.
The science of psychology is auxiliary to physics. The two mutually support one another, and it is only when they are united that a complete science is formed. From our standpoint, the antithesis of subject and object, in the ordinary sense, does not exist.” — Ernst Mach. ‘The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical,
CURRENTLY, we are suffering from RISING FRAGMENTATION in our physical dynamics, the divisions into notional INDEPENDENT NATIONS and CORPORATIONS etc. such that each of these NOTIONALLY INDEPENDENT ENTITIES, … WHICH ARE IN NO WAY ‘INDEPENDENT’ in our sense-experience reality of inclusion in an all-including WAVE-FIELD dynamic, … are the source of GROWING FRAGMENTATION, … first of all PSYCHOLOGICAL FRAGMENTATION where we PROCLAIM THE INDPENDENCE of NATIONS and HUMANS and CORPORATIONS, … in BLATANT IGNOR-ANCE of the sense experience reality wherein all things are related (as in the indigenous aboriginal aphorism MITAKUYE OYASIN or ALL THINGS ARE RELATED) which is AFFIRMED BY MODERN PHYSICS.
GROWING FRAGMENTATION IN THE WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC …. STARTS IN THE PSYCHE
PREFACE: David Bohm’s theoretical work in modern physics inured in him a philosophical outlook that had much in common with that of Friedrich Nietzsche, who was also versed in modern physics principles through his familiarity with the prescient works of Roger Boscovich who’s ‘Theory of Natural Philosophy’ (175) has been described by modern physicists such as being “200 years ahead of its time”. The following essay is a simulated dialogue between these two great thinkers who were on remarkably similar paths of discovery. While Bohm was developing new ideas on the physics of how things actually function, Nietzsche’s “philosophizing with a hammer” oriented to the smashing of the persisting over-simplistic conceptualizations of Newtonian physics rooted in BINARY LOGIC. We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, as a social collective, remain in the Newtonian mindset based on belief in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments and have in no way assimilated into our social collective, the understanding of the world that is common to Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta. The Western World’s popular belief in a mechanistic substitute reality regulated by BINARY LOGIC persists while the modern physics understanding in terms of QUANTUM LOGIC (balance and imbalance) remains an outlier, as explored in this simulated dialogue between Bohm and Nietzsche.
* * *
NOTE: “DOUBLE ERROR” refers to the practice of using the DOUBLE combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL AUTHORING as in Nietzsche’s example “Lightning flashes” where the Lightning IS the flashing which substitutes a LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORING sense for that which is in reality NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT. The combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR is used to ‘BREAK IN’ to the transforming relational continuum where the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT rule, and inject a SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring LOCAL and EXPLICIT authoring agency.
* * *
FRIEDRICH (Friedrich Nietzsche) and DAVID (David Bohm) enter into dialogue as follows;
DAVID; You know, Friedrich, … I’ve had a hell of a time trying to share with people my ideas on how the European languages we use, such as English, are confusing our understanding, and by ‘our’, I mean the general understandings we European language based cultures have developed as a social collective.
FRIEDRICH: As you know DAVID, I share your concern here and I have expended much effort in trying the describe what ‘we are doing to ourselves’ with our language-induced confusion. I made the point that we use a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to FALSELY impute to ourselves the notional POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING actions and developments. People have ‘read my words’ and comprehended my words, BUT HAVE NOT “EMBODIED” THE MEANING!
DAVID: I know, I know! I have made the point that we FRAGMENT reality by the way we use language. My research in physics convinced me of the fluidity of reality, of the all-including WAVE-FIELD we share inclusion wherein THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING but we have a language architecture that nevertheless has us constructing representations in which we are the LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS. This puts us, psychologically, into an ALL-MALE pseudo-reality which is MISSING the FEMALE CONJUGATE that is inherent in our WAVE-FIELD reality.
FRIEDRICH: Yes! As you know, I attribute this one-sided reduction to EGO since EGO persuades us that WE ARE THE LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and developments, and of course this EXCLUSION of the role of the FEMALE, by designing a language that explains everything in one-sided MALE assertive terms, has led not only to our WESTERN CULTURE system of REWARDS and RECOGNITION for notional LOCALLY AUTHORED actions and developments, but also PUNISHMENT and DENIGRATION.
PROLOGUE: We and everything are inclusions in the WAVE-FIELD which means that we are of a CONJUGATE FEMALE-MALE nature. We are NOT independent of the WAVE-FIELD ‘space’ we share inclusion in, HOWEVER WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have DECLARED OURSELVES TO BE INDEPENDENT of the all-including WAVE-FIELD and what that DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE has led to is to our constructing of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on BINARY LOGIC wherein the relational forms in the flow ARE TREATED WITH THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which, NOTIONALLY RE-INVENTS relational forms in the flow as LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITIES that ostensibly move about and interact within a NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT (Euclidean Space).
This DOUBLE-ERROR LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY has been adopted as our WESTERN CULTURE ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’; that is, we let our actions and interactions be informed by this BINARY LOGIC, INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION BASED “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”. which is based on the BANISHMENT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE. In other words, OUR WESTERN CULTURE OPERATING REALITY is a REDUCTION of the WAVE-FIELD to the MALE CONJUGATE ONLY which is easily managed within a BINARY LOGIC based paradigm featuring MATTER and SPACE seen as TWO MUTUALLY EXCLUDING ONTOLOGICAL components. That is, while the MALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE can be easily captured in a BINARY LOGIC representation systems composed of MATTER and SPACE, the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, being NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, eludes direct language capture. The result is that the MALE CONJUGATE must serve as the basis for articulating BOTH FEMALE and MALE language based representations.
This leads to KLUGES such as the THIN-SKULL RULE in WESTERN LAW where the MALE participant in a MALE-FEMALE interaction is tagged with FULL RESPONSIBILITY for damages in an altercation even if his MALE ACT OF STRIKING another results in massive damage due to the ACCOMMODATING nature of the FEMALE CONJUGATE (the collapse of the ‘thin skull’). This PROBLEM WITH WESTERN LANGUAGE being one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE-CONJUGATE ONLY, crops ups in cases of establishing AUTHORING RESPONSIBILITY in general; e.g. a person’s action of discarding a still glowing cigarette butt in a wet forest in winter is of NO consequence, but when that forest is tinder dry at the end of a long hot summer, the same MALE ASSERTIVE act may trigger a massive conflagration DUE TO THE FEMALE CONJUGATE response of the tinder-dry-forest. As in the case of the THIN SKULL RULE, WESTERN CULTURE ‘CUSTOM’ is to IMPUTE LOCAL AUTHORING RESPONSIBILITY to the MALE ASSERTIVE ACTION, regardless of the REALITY of the dominant role of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, due the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR architectural structure of WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European LANGUAGE.
When one’s only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail, so the forest fire is interpreted as being AUTHORED by the person discarding the cigarette butt and the FEMALE ENCLOSING OF THE FOREST IN OVEN-LIKE DESICCATING CONDITIONS is simply IGNORED in deference to the ALL-MALE and ONLY-MALE CAE language architecture available, . This FORCED REDUCTION of the MALE-FEMALE CONJUGATE of WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS into ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE ONLY REPRESENTATION not only makes MALE ASSERTIVE ATTRIBUTIONS that are FALSE, but HAUNTS THE PSYCHE by letting loose a DEA ABSCONDITA, a FEMALE AUTHORESS that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT but is are physically present aspect of the all-pervading WAVE-FIELD phenomena of NATUR.
We can’t REALLY BELIEVE that just because we like the language architecture based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that gives us the concept of the LOCAL AUTHOR for all actions and developments, that we are going to be able to KLUGE the full expressing of a FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE phenomena, with a one-sided MALE ONLY language architecture. But WHAT’S AT STAKE HERE IS THE CONCEPT OF THE “LOCAL AUTHOR” and that has the full backing of “EGO” and we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are known for having no shortage in that department. IF WE WANT THE LOCAL AUTHOR CAPABILITY IN OUR LANGUAGE, WE HAVE TO DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATION phenomenon and PRETEND it does not exist, by DROPPING IT OUT OF OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and substituting MALE ASSERTING which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT in place of the excluded FEMALE CONJUGATE.
Thanks to this adaption in our language architecture that SUBSTITUTES EMPTY SPACE for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, we can have a MECHANICAL REALITY featuring the LOCAL and EXPLICIT that is unencumbered by the reality of its being ENSCONCED WITHIN THE ACCOMMODATING FEMALE CONJUGATE. Of course the COST of this SIMPLIFICATION in the reduction of the MALE-FEMALE CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD architecture to JUST THE MALE (since the MALE CONJUGATE is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and readily captured in language while the FEMALE CONJUGATE is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and real bitch to capture with language).
Indigenous aboriginals, having opted for a FLOW-BASED language architecture, DO NOT HAVE TO REDUCE THE CONJUGATE WAVEFIELD structure to the ONE-SIDED MALE CONJUGATE only format that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have opted for. Thus the language of the indigenous aboriginals can handle conjugate form such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, an expression grounded in QUANTUM LOGIC where we see the TOWNING as a FEATURE WITHIN the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE rather than in BINARY LOGIC TERMS as given by WESTERN CULTURE CAE language architecture in expressions based on ‘THE TOWN’ as the AUTHOR of its own actions and developments, where we say that “the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services”. THIS INJECTING OF THE DOUBLE ERROR BASED NOTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING IS WHAT IT TAKES TO FRAGMENT REALTY; i.e. to CONSTRUCT A SUBSTITUTE REALITY which SPLITS APART the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE, … and RE-CONCEIVES this in the FRAGMENTED TERMS wherein we now have a LOCAL TOWN which, thanks to the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR is given the notional power of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development..
NOW WE ARE IN ALL-MALE NO FEMALE COUNTRY where the MALE is the LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and developments and WHAT USED TO BE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/INDUCTIVE CONTAINING FIELD, is now ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE EUCLIDEAN CONTAINING SPACE. GOODBYE QUANTUM LOGIC, HELLO BINARY LOGIC1
TOTO, WE ARE NO LONGER IN KANSAS! We are in the land of the THIN-SKULL people who insist that all action is MALE AUTHORED ACTION, the FEMALE CONJUGATE having been BANISHED by imposing the SUBSTITUTE CONTAINER of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE EUCLIDEAN SPACE. THIS ALL MALE-NO-FEMALE SUBSTITUTE REALITY IS MUCH SIMPLER AND TIDIER since it only contains the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICITY having been discarded by our SUBSTITUTING of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE EUCLIDEAN SPACE frame. By BLANKING OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE, we don’t have to attribute the forest fire to NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT astronomical and atmospheric conditions, but can instead home in on the MALE CONJUGATE which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and something we can attribute LOCAL AUTHORSHIP TO, so that we can sidestep the problem of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT AUTHORSHIP which is TOO SPOOKY for our WESTERN CULTURE mechanistic tastes and our demand for ACCOUNTABILITY which is so important to our MANAGEMENT OF LIFE, or at least management of our SUBSTITUTE REALITY.
* * * * * * THIS PROLOGUE has been to make clear how QUANTUM LOGIC which is innate in nature, is set aside in our WESTERN CULTURE language-based representations of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALTY based on BINARY LOGIC. THIS SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY is not up to the job of deployment as our OPERATIVE REALITY, but that is what is currently happening, and it is putting us all on a BUSTRIP TO HELL, as is reviewed in this article * * * * * * *
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS continue to cultivate a social relational movement that is based on BINARY LOGIC as built into the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which cultivates the concept of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.
This leads to SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS which are one-sided as in MALE ASSERTIVE LOCAL AUTHORING where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE has been DROPPED OUT because the architecture of our language DOES NOT SUPPORT THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE needed to complement the MALE ASSERTIVE which can be expressed in terms that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT. Because of the INCAPABILITY of our CAE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE to convey the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE due to its NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT nature, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have fallen into the habit of DUMMYING OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE by SUBSTITUTING an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE (EUCLIDEAN) SPACE for the FEMALE CONJUGATE. This amounts to the TRADING OUT of QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE) for BINARY LOGIC which manifests as the ONE-SIDED use of MALE-ASSERTIVE CONSTRUCTS. Things which EITHER exist OR do not exist which is virtually a DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE FROM THE FEMALE-MALE CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM of the WAVE-FIELD world.. Instead of ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, there is now, instead, ‘THE TOWN THAT IS LOCALLY AUTHORING ITS OWN GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION OF GOODS AND SERVICES’.
This REDUCTION from COMPLEX CONJUGATE REALITY of QUANTUM LOGIC (as in FLOW-based language architecture) to the SUBSTITUTE MALE ASSERTIVE ACTION of BINARY LOGIC, when used as the source for constructing representations of reality, has been a mine-field for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS and continues to put us on a BUSTRIP TO HELL. .
* * * * * *
My Philosophical Investigations Reaffirm the findings of Nietzsche, that we employ the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to INVENT a SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, including GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.
VACCINES are ALLEGED REMEDIES to counter PATHOGEN ATTACKS such as the ATTACK OF COVID 19
The problem is, that COVID 19 is NOT A PATHOGEN. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A PATHOGEN, … COVID 19 PROLIFERATION is IMBALANCE in the MICROBIAL ASSEMBLAGE that is US.
QUESTION: ON what basis do we CONCLUDE that a REMEDY is “a REMEDY”?
(A) THE COMPLAINT STOPS FOR A WHILE, although it RETURNS in a VARIANT FORM..
(B) THE COMPLAINT IS RESOLVED AND CEASES INDEFINITELY.
What are (A) and (B) telling us? We have TWO ALTERNATIVE INTERPRETATIONS depending on whether we understand ILLNESS as;
(C) The attack of PATHOGENS