COMPOSITE OF RECENT ‘SUMMARY’ POSTS

0

 

 

From: emiliano@goodshare.org <emiliano@goodshare.org>
Sent: October 29, 2022 1:32 PM
Subject: SIMPLE SUMMARY of The COMMON THREAD IN THIS LONG CHAIN OF MESSAGES: OUR WESTERN CULTURE SCREW-UP IN A NUTSHELL

 

MAKE NO MISTAKE:  OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS OUR MAJOR SCREW-UP BECAUSE IT REDUCES THE REPRESENTATOIN OF THE WAVE-FIELD NATURE OF REALITY BY SPLITTING APART THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING AND MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJGUATES AND DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE SO THAT OUR LANGUAGE DOES NOT ‘CAPTURE’ REPRESENTATIONS OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE RELIATY, BUT INSTEAD FABRICATES A SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY.  THIS PUTS OUR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS “AT ODDS WITH” OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  AS BOHM OBSERVES, THIS IS THE SOURCE OF SCHIZOPHRENIA AND PARANOIA IN WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.

 

The world of WESTERN CULTURE language representations is CONSISTENT for all the users of our REALITY-DISTORTING LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS which means this language WORKS as a SUBSTITUTE-REALITY BASED COORDINATING TOOL for its users.  Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTIONS OF A SIMPLIFIED (MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY) SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while a GROSS DISTORTION of sense-experience reality, are THE SAME FOR ALL LANGUAGE USERS thus the SIMPLIFIED (DISTORTED) SUBSTITUTE REALITY implied by the language, EVEN THOUGH IT IS “AT ODDS WITH” our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, PROVIDES A “CONSISTENT” REFERENCE FOR THE USER BASE OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.

(more…)

How Whorf’s Hypothesis Uncloaks Quantum Logic Reality

0

We live in an ANDROGYNOUS QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD reality that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based representations reduce to a one-sided BINARY LOGIC, MALE-ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY, as described herein;

 

The hypothesis of linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis is a principle suggesting that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ worldview or cognition, and thus people’s perceptions are relative to their spoken language.   – https://www.britannica.com/science/Whorfian-hypothesis 

 

LINGUISTIC RELATIVITY is behind the fact that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are stuck in a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY due to our language having ‘dumbed down’ our representation of QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD REALITY by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and constructing MALE ASSERTING ONLY representations of a BINARY LOGIC, MECHANISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  For example, instead of the fluid-dynamical, quantum logical ‘TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, we use language to reduce this reality to the mechanistic, binary logical ‘the TOWN (as if in its own ‘independent’ right) that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’.  This simplified, fragmented, one-sided, MALE-ASSERTING ONLY LINGUISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY has become our WESTERN-CULTURE “OPERATIVE REALITY”.  As systems scientists have noted; this is “inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.

* * *

 

 

INTRODUCTORY NARRATIVE: 

 

Of the logos [aka the Tao, the Wave-field], which is as I describe it, people always prove to be uncomprehending both before they have heard it and once they have heard it. For, although all things happen according to the logos, people are like those of no experience, even when they do experience such words and deeds as I explain when I distinguish each thing according to its phusis (nature / constitution) and declare how it is; but others are as ignorant of what they do when awake as they are forgetful of what they do when asleep.

Those who hear and do not understand are like the deaf. Of them the proverb says: “Present, they are absent.”

— Heraclitus

 

The reason why we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘do not get it’ even ‘after hearing it and seemingly understanding it’ can draw on the experience of Heraclitus and his 500 B.C. era contemporaries in this same respect;

  (more…)

How WAVE-FIELD goes MISSING in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE

0

FORWARD: WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European LANGUAGE has become a powerful force in the world because of its SIMPLICITY.  It is SIMPLE because of its DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, leaving only imagery that associates with MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

“Upon this gifted age, in its dark hour,
Rains from the sky a meteoric shower
Of facts…they lie unquestioned, uncombined.

Wisdom enough to leech us of our ill
Is daily spun; but there exists no loom
To weave it into fabric…”

Edna St Vincent Millay, From Huntsman, What Quarry? (1939)

SIMPLICITY is achieved by the SUBSTITUTING of the SIMPLER MALE-ASSERTING “EITHER IS OR IS NOT” DIFFERENTIATING/EXCLUDING ‘BINARY LOGIC’ in place of the LESS SIMPLE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “BOTH MAYBE WILL AND MAYBE WILL NOT ” INTEGRATING/BALANCING ‘QUANTUM LOGIC’.  QUANTUM LOGIC RESONANCE is a form of BALANCE that does not involve a BINARY DEADBOLT OPEN AND CLOSED DETERMINATION.  CHOOSING BETWEEN THESE FORMS OF BALANCE IS CHOOSING BETWEEN THE WAYS OF EAST AND WEST and the full force of the difference may easily be missed.

“Plato clearly distinguished between Heraclitus’ SIMULTANEOUS unity and plurality of the cosmos and Empedocles’ SEPARATE PERIODS of Love and Strife. At the same time, they are mentioned together as both alike in believing in the unity and plurality of the cosmos; and Aristotle’s coupling of the two might conceivably have been motivated by the Platonic comparison, the important distinction between them being overlooked.” – Kirk, Raven et al, The Presocratic Philosophers

WHY NOT HOLD ON TO THE QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND TENSIONS OF THE OPPOSITES AND RIDE THE RESONANCE THROUGH THE TUNNEL OF TRANSFORMATION RATHER THAN FOMENTING A HARD-ASSED BINARY DEADBOLT SPLIT?

Instead of designing our language architecture to capture the QUANTUM LOGIC of the non-visible WAVE-FIELD (electromagnetic field) in a meaningful conjugate relation with the visible CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, we have designed a language that conveys a simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY consisting of a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE populated locally by ABSOLUTE INDEPENDENT BEING BASED MATERIAL FORMS.  This BINARY LOGIC based linguistic representation scheme, while it does simplify our language-based representation of reality, does so by constructing language-based representations of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which ‘throws out’ the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  The popularity of this WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED SIMPLIFICATION has led to a “LOCK-IN-BY-HIGH-SWITCHING-COSTS’, so that in spite of its continuing infusing of dysfunction into our social-relational dynamic, our path to extricating ourselves from this predicament remains unclear and continues to be a work in progress.

* * *

 

 

    Linguistic determinism (popularly known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis), argues that INDIVIDUALS EXPERIENCE THE WORLD BASED ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE LANGUAGE THEY HABITUALLY USE.

 

If we say ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ can we still ‘see’ the same thing as indigenous aboriginals ‘see’ when they say ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’?

 

My philosophical investigations say NO!  Once we narrow our focus to ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, our thinking is in BINARY LOGIC based mode where ‘the TOWN’ is seen and understood as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF that is INDEPENDENT of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM IT IS INCLUDED IN.

 

If, on the other hand, we are users of an indigenous aboriginal language where we are saying ‘There is TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, this language construction is conveying QUANTUM LOGIC rather than BINARY LOGIC.

 

CONVERSELY, the BINARY LOGIC formulation of ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING goods’ infers the LOCAL BEING of ‘the TOWN’ and conflates this with the inference that this LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING called ‘the TOWN’ has ‘its own’ GRAMMAR-given POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.  Nietzsche refers to this construction as the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, pointing out that what it does is suggest that the NAMING instantiated THING-IN-ITSELF possesses ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.  Once we COMMIT to saying THE TOWN IS GROWING, we enter into a BINARY LOGIC “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” where all of our language-based FOREGROUND FIGURES such as the TOWN or the PERSON or the TREE are NOTIONALLY (by way of language and grammar stimulated intellectual abstraction) STRIPPED OUT OF THEIR INNATE INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and RESITUATED WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

(more…)

The RELATIVITY of BEING

0

 

My philosophical/sensual investigative experience informs me that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are NOT SENSITIVE to the extent to which LANGUAGE can DISTORT and over-ride our sense-experience informed conceptualizing of reality, and in particular induce us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to translate our sense-experience into LANGUAGE that SIMPLIFIES representation of our sense-experience by the injection of BEING.  The abstraction of BEING allows us to FRAGMENT our language-based representations of reality by INJECTING a notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING base as in the construction of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, implicitly SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT from the actual, sense-experiencing of our inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD, which is captured within indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES as also in Modern physics, with FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE REPRESENTATION such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is entirely fluid and has no dependency on BEING based abstraction.

 

EXAMPLE:

 

WESTERN CULTURE EXPRESSION IN ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING TERMS:     “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING’”  (LOCAL AUTHORING OF EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT).

 

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL AND MODERN PHYSICS (androgynous) WAVE-FIELD REPRESENTATION:  “There is TOWNING in the transforming LANDSCAPE” (NONLOCAL AUTHORING of IMPLICIT RELATIONAL DYNAMICS).

 

Note that the TOWN in the FOREST cannot GROW without DEFORESTATION, or in other words, in reality, the MALE-ASSERTING ACTION is only realized in conjugate relation with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING.  This is the message of Modern physics and it is an understanding that is incorporated in indigenous aboriginal language architecture, but NOT in WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, which employs one-sided male asserting only abstractions such as GROWTH, hence this ‘reminder’ that  the TOWN in the FOREST cannot GROW without some DEFORESTATION

 

 

NOTA BENE:  Within a EUCLIDEAN SPACE assumption (i.e. a FLAT SPACE assumption), our language talk of the GROWTH of the TOWN in the FOREST employs “GROWTH” in the sense of one-sided MALE ASSERTING and does not SPEAK OF the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the FOREST, but in the REALITY of our inclusion in SPHERICAL SPACE, the GROWTH of the TOWN is inextricably tied to a CONJUGATE DEFORESTATION and DEFORESTATION IS AN IMPORTANT PHYSICAL REALITY.  In fact it is the OPENING in the FOREST that is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE that, TOGETHER WITH THE MALE ASSERTING “GROWTH” CONJUGATE, constitutes that actual sense-experience affirmable dynamic of T R A N S F O R M A T I O N.

(more…)

WESTERN Language-Brewed INSANITY

0

 

INTRODUCTION:

Understanding reality in terms of WAVE-FIELD reminds us that (a) Our real life sense-experience is of inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD which has an ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE; and (b) Our WESTERN CULTURE has developed a language that not only SCREWS UP this understanding by SPLITTING the FEMALE-accommodating and MALE asserting conjugates INTO SEPARATE PIECES, but by retaining and making PRIMARY the MALE asserting conjugate while TOSSING OUT the truly primary FEMALE accommodating conjugate.  This is a DOUBLE WHAMMY of misunderstanding since the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE is UNREAL SCHAUMKOMMEN (appearance).

* * *

This essay, WESTERN Language-Brewed INSANITY reviews how WESTERN LANGUAGE has been based on BINARY LOGIC, a TOO SIMPLE LOGIC in that it SIMPLIFIES language-based REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY, and in a particularly devious way; i.e. by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE in the representation of our FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD REALITY.  This has been identified by Nietzsche in his pointing out of the commonly used DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which captures representations of reality in the SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC TERMS of MATERIAL FORMS that ACT and INTERACT within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

Not only Modern physics but also indigenous aboriginal languages, along with Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita ‘adaptions to language’ comprehend the ANDROGYNOUS, FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE nature of our WAVE-FIELD reality, as we understand from our sense experience of inclusion within it; i.e. we understand that mountains erode, shrinking and filling in valleys and the ancients like Lao Tzu have reminded us that the FEMALE influence, e.g. the accommodating influence of the VALLEY plays the lead in this ‘conjugal dance’ with MALE ASSERTING providing the supporting complement.   This relational is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC relationship that has been given a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.  This reduction of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, to a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING SIMPLIFICATION as given by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is a CRAZY-MAKER and the reason for the title of this essay, WESTERN Language-Brewed INSANITY.

Because we have architected language to simplify it by dropping out the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJGUATE and thus REMOVE the WAVE-FIELD NATURE from our Common Average European language based representations, we are in effect constructing a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which as now become our standard WESTERN CULTURE “OPERATIVE REALITY” based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR whereby reality is reduced to MALE ASSERTING actions and developments; e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ instead of the full ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE, as used in indigenous aboriginal languages and as required for consistency with Modern physic, “there is TOWNING in the transforming landscape”.

The CRAZY-MAKER is that we have SIMPLIFIED our language architecture by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE which the BODY of the WAVE-FIELD, and what we have ‘left in’ is the SECONDARY, DEPENDENT MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE, along with the FEMALE CONJUGATE SUBSTITUTION which is ABSOLUTE, INFINITE ‘EMPTY SPACE’.   This PROMOTES the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE to THE LEAD ROLE ON ITS OWN.   But in the real sense-experience affirmed WAVE-FIELD reality, what we have DROPPED OUT is the PRIMARY REALITY and what KEPT IN AND PROMOTED TO PRIMARY was the SECONDARY and INCOMPLETE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE so that instead of saying ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is the ANDROGYNOUS package, we construct representations of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring the MALE ASSERTING CONJGUATE WITHOUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE; i.e. ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING goods and services.’

This brand of language which employs a BINARY LOGIC based DIMINISHMENT to a MALE ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, and is thus at odds with the physical reality wherein there is TOWNING (male-asserting) in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (female accommodating), the DROP OUT giving the MISTAKEN IMPRESSION that “WHAT WE ARE CONSTRUCTING” with our MALE ASSERTING ACTION, is “REAL”.  But WHAT IS REAL is the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM WHICH IS ALL-INCLUDING AND IN WHICH WE ARE INCLUDED and this is what we are experiencing but which we cannot see through VOYEUR VISION as we monitor ‘our own constructions’.

Indigenous aboriginal languages support the Modern physics and sense-experience affirmed understanding that we are included in the all-including, transforming relational continuum also known as the WAVE-FIELD which includes NOT ONLY THE TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING goods, but includes it NOT AS A MALE ASSERTING WITHIN AN EMPTY SPACE but in the ANDROGYNOUS context of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

The MALE ASSERTING REPRESENTATION ON ITS OWN is NOT SIMPLY INCOMPLETE.  THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD INCLUDES WITHIN IT THE MALE ASSERTING MATERIAL CONDENSATION as a DERIVATIVE FORM or APPARITION which Schroedinger calls Schaumkommen.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, KEEPS THE SCHAUMKOMMEN AND PROMOTES IT AS A SUBSTITUTE PRIMARY REALITY while DROPPING OUT the INVISIBLE BODY OF THE WAVE-FIELD which is the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED FULL-BLOWN REALITY from whence the lesser MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS FORM.

Our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD informs us well beyond our visual-intellectual reductions to language wherein we capture one-sided MALE ASSERTING substitute reality dynamics such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, an INCOMPLETE logical proposition based simplification that says NOT A WORD about the conjugate SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS and by such radical DROP-OUT, BLINDS US to the reality of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION that we are included in.

WE ARE NOT LOST (we do not NEED to be lost).  We have our sense-experience which it is essential for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to restore to its natural PRIMACY over our language based intellectual reductions which in the case of our Common Average European languages, are giving us a FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the BINARY LOGIC DROP-OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT..

* * * * * *

 

 

 

 

WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE INVERTS THE NATURAL ORDER OF THINGS by putting the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL DYNAMICS of NAMING-INSTANTIATED FORMS into an unnatural primacy over NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLUID DYNAMICS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

The ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD of our sense-experience is a QUANTUM LOGIC mélange of TRANSPARENT ELECTRO-MAGNETIC FIELD and VISIBLE and TANGIBLE CONDENSATIONS.

WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE delivers REPRESENTATIONS in words and grammar that form the basis for building REPRESENTATIONS, … NOT OF REALITY  (‘the word is not the thing as Korzybski observes) but of an INTELELCTUALLY MANIPULABLE SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

(more…)

DOES CLUSTERING PRODUCE CLUSTERS?

0

 

FORWARD:  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have engineered a trickiness within our language which REDUCES RESONANCE FEATURES to BEING based OBJECTS, as with CLUSTERING which we reduce to ‘the CLUSTER’ and then we follow up with GRAMMAR to impute to the CLUSTER “ITS OWN AUTHORING POWERS” which ‘WALLPAPERS OVER” its real identity as a RESONANCE FEATURE that is NOT AN “IT” but is a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT relational feature and therefore DOES NOT HAVE “ITS OWN POWER” OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT.  The CLUSTER is nevertheless, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION, endowed by NAMING with BEING and EQUIPPED by GRAMMAR with its OWN notional POWERS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

This LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED BEING based FRAGMENTION OF REALITY used in the construction of a BEING-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY lets us enjoy the FALSE GLORY AND/OR SHAME of LOCAL AUTHORING, and removes us from our INNOCENCE of being included in the transforming relational continuum, without an encounter with snakes and partaking of forbidden fruit.

 

“They were upright and correct without knowing that to be so was righteous. They loved one another without knowing that to do so was benevolence. They were sincere without knowing that to do so was loyalty. They kept their promises without knowing that to do so was to be in good faith. They helped one another without thought of giving or receiving gifts. Thus their actions left no trace and we have no records of their affairs” – Chuang Tzu

 

Can we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS break the habit of giving our one-sided MALE ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE over our ANDROGYNOUS sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD?  Can we find the words to flip from ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ to ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’?

* * *

 

MODERN PHYSICS IS IN AGREEMENT WITH INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY BUT NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH WESTERN CULTURE… HERE’S WHY

 

PROFOUND DIFFERENCES IN UNDERSTANDING can come from basic assumptions, and that is the case in the EAST-WEST SPLIT in LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION of “REALITY”

 

The word is not the thing and language based representation of reality are NOT REALITY but our language based conceptualizations of reality shape our individual and collective behaviours.

 

The difference between EAST and WEST can be illustrated by the difference between the VERB ‘CLUSTERING’ and the NOUN ‘CLUSTER’ (e.g. as in the case of ‘ants’ or in general).

 

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have embraced a language architecture that SIMPLIFIES capture of CLUSTERING (a verb), … which is a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT dynamic, to ‘the CLUSTER’ which is a LOCAL and EXPLICIT THING-BASED dynamic.

 

CLUSTERING is NOT simply the work of the participants in “A CLUSTER”, CLUSTERING occurs within a relational complex as when a drop of honey from a bee-hive INDUCES the CLUSTERING of ants.  In this case, an understanding of CLUSTERING involves developments in the HABITAT involve the relations between the INHABITANTS and the HABITAT and one way of understanding this is in terms of TRANSFORMATION in which case we consider the INHABITANT-HABITAT system be ONE SYSTEM.

 

LANGUAGE makes an important difference to our thinking and understanding here because in those languages which give a foundational role to NAMES (NOUNS), one the NAME ‘CLUSTER’ in injected into the REPRESENTATION, we shift away from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT structure of CLUSTERING within the transforming landscape to LOCAL and EXPLICIT “CLUSTER” as if it exists IN ITS OWN BEING-BASED RIGHT, in which case we are forced to invent a GRAMMAR to describe WHAT WE SEE or rather to CONSTRUCT A SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEINGS aka ‘ANTS’ and in our mind’s eye as we pronounce such words as ‘THE CLUSTER IS GROWING LARGER AND IS SHIFTING TOWARDS THE WATER”S EDGE’.

(more…)

WHOSE REALITY IS THE CORRECT REALITY, OR IS THERE ONE, … AND HOW DO THE DIFFERENT REALITIES DIFFER?

0

 

As someone who believes that our common WESTERN CULTURE REALITY is putting us on a BUSTRIP TO HELL, … it seems an appropriate thing to do share my views on our DIFFERENT REALITY OPTIONS.

 

The THREE POPULAR REALITY OPTIONS have been written up by the Austrian – American physicist Erich Jantsch (Design for Evolution).  People perceive the world differently and these THREE LEVELS of REALITY  describe three of the different ways and to cut to the quick I am going to label them Conservative, Liberal and Zen and the Zen could also be labelled, Indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta reality.

(more…)

The WAVE-FIELD Nature of the World that WESTERN CULTURE has UP-ENDED.

0

The WAVE-FIELD nature of the world has a FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING  CONJUGATE STRUCTURE wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE is in a NATURAL PRIMACY over the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE as in the physical example of the RAGING RIVER that scours out the FEMALE CHANNEL.  In this language based NAMING and GRAMMAR REPRESENTATION we give PRIMARY AGENCY to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION.  THIS IS A MISTAKE!  The FEMALE VALLEY that inductively organizes rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER is the INDUCTIVE AUTHORING SOURCE; i.e. the AUTHORING SOURCE IS NOT THE MALE ASSERTING ACTION.

THIS MISTAKE THAT HAS BEEN BUILT INTO WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is a REALITY INVERTER and MORE.  WE NOT ONLY MAKE THE MISTAKE OF CONSTRUCTING A MALE-ASSERTING AUTHORING AGENCY that we are presenting in our language based representations as our OPERATIVE REALITY, we are introducing ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT as a SUBSTITUTE for the NOW UNNECESSARY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, the net result being that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based REALITY REPRESENTATIONS are of a one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY nature.  For example we speak of the “RAGING RIVER” as having MALE ASSERTING POWER that equips the RAGING RIVER to PLOUGH OUT CANYONS in the earth, as for example, the GRAND CANYON ploughed out by the Colorado river.  In this example the MALE ASSERTING river ploughs up the land in a BINARY LOGIC dynamic wherein we see the COLORADO RIVER and the GRAND CANYON as TWO DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT THINGS; i.e. a MALE ASSERTING AGENCY and the CANYON which is the PRODUCT of the COLORADO RIVER’S MALE ASSERTING AGENCY.

WHAT is LOST in the SHUFFLE is the original FEMALE VALLEY that inductively organizes rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER so that our ‘talk’ in terms of MALE ASSERTING AGENCY is UPSIDE DOWN and BACKWARDS. The FEMALE VALLEY is the inductive author to her own deepening through her ability to GATHER together rain into rivulets, rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER that is SCOURING OUT ITS OWN PASSAGEWAY in an OUROBORUS (ANDROGYNOUS) LIKE DYNAMIC.   WITHOUT THE FEMALE VALLEY there would be NO RAGING RIVER and without the RAGING RIVER, there would be NO FEMALE VALLEY, thus this phenomenon bottoms out in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the MALE ASSERTING ARE ONE, as in the mythical OUROBORUS (snake swallowing its own tail) RELATION.

 

It is only our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that SPLITS these two WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATES APART AND RECASTS the OUROBORUS or COINCIDENTIA OPPOSITORUM IN THE SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC BASED “MALE and FEMALE TERMS’, OBSCURING the actual physical sense experience affirmed QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD structure.

 

IT IS THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR that introduces BINARY LOGIC into our REPRESENTATION and allows the SPLITTING APART of the WAVE-FIELD INTO TWO SEPARATE (MALE AND FEMALE) COMPONENTS. 

 

The point here is that without the intervention imposing the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which leads to the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between the NOW INDEPENDENTLY MOVING MALE ASSERTING AGENT and this implying immersion in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, we would have been able to retain the “BOTH/AND” QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the MALE-ASSERTING RAGING RIVER and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY, as occurs within FLUIDS of DIFFERING DENSITY and thus requiring QUANTUM LOGIC based understanding rather than BINARY LOGIC based understanding.  The INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD that includes CONDENSATIONS (material forms) effectively DEMOTES the material forms which are PRIMARY in BINARY LOGIC construction to secondary CONDENSATION status, NOT ‘SECONDARY’ IN A PHYSICAL sense since the WAVE-FIELD is just ONE ALL-INCLUDING phenomenon, but SECONDARY in a LOGICAL sense; i.e. while the WAVE-FIELD is the OVERALL REALITY, the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD are FEATURES within the  OVERALL REALITY and our language based representation of the CONDENSATIONS and “their movements and developments” imply their INDEPENDENCE as if within an uninvolved (or ’empty’) containing space.  So, once we focus our language-based description on the CONDENSATIONS, we are CREATING a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which we are imputing the POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT to the CONDENSATIONS and DROPPING OUT the REAL SOURCE of DYNAMICS which is the WAVE-FIELD with its CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY and its MALE ASSERTING AGENCY.

This “DROPPING OUT” of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the SUBSTITUTING  with an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT is BACKFILL necessitated by the PROMOTING of the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE to UNCONTESTED, SINGULAR PRIMACY in our language-based reality constructions.  Instead of having our language ACKNOWLEDGING the CONCAVE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OPENING OF THE VALLEY that INDUCTIVELY ORGANIZES the collecting of rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER, once we have IN MIND the “RAGING RIVER” together with a GRAMMAR that we have been using to impute LOCAL AUTHORING to OURSELVES, the language tools are in place to GIVE FULL CREDIT to the RAGING COLORADO RIVER for CARVING OUT THE GRAND CANYON, and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OF THE VALLEY ATTRACTOR that is the DEEPER AUTHORING SOURCE of the RAGING RIVER is DROPPED OUT OF OUR LANGUAGE BASED CAPTURE OF THIS PHENOMENON.

AS in the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE we have BUILT INTO our language architecture, THE PRACTICE of OBSCURANTISM where we IGNORE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and build a language architecture around the ONE-SIDED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE at which point WE DISCARD from our language all reference to the ANDROGYNOUS NATURE OF OUR WAVE-FIELD REALITY and put forth a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTION, employing phraseology such as THE RAGING COLORADO RIVER IS DIGGING A HUGE CANYON IN THE VALLEY FLOOR!

GOODBYE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FEMALE VALLEY INDUCTIVE ACCOMODATING, HELLO PROMOTED MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT!

In other words, the FEMALE INDUCTIVE ORGANIZING POWER OF THE VALLEY, where ITS OPENING CONSTITUTES THE PRIMARY AGENCY that pulls and gathers together rivulets into streams and streams into RAGING RIVER … GOES UNMENTIONED…  as the RAGING RIVER gets BRAGGING RIGHTS to its CLAIM of AUTHORING the GRAND CANYON HOLE IN THE GROUND.  The HISTORICAL RECORD SHOWS that CANYONS are the work of MALE ASSERTING RIVERS like the COLORADO RIVER that is credited with AUTHORING the GRAND CANYON.  The initial low-relief FEMALE DEPRESSION aka VALLEY was NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT so it didn’t attract attention like the RAGING RIVER, but it is the quiet MOTHER and the RAGING RIVER is its child, so PROMOTING THE FALSE NOTION THAT THE RAGING RIVER is the AUTHOR of the CANYON is AN ERROR.  It is COMMON WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR as pointed out by Nietzsche.  READ MY LIPS, … “THE COLORADO RIVER CARVED OUT THE GRAND CANYON”,… and again, “THE PUNCH SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S EGG-SHELL JAW, … and one’s more, ‘THE SPARK FROM THE CIGARETTE BUTT” CAUSED THE HUMONGOUR FOREST FIRE”.

Now, come on folks, we know that the MALE EGO likes to be stroked but this BUILDING INTO OUR LANGUAGE, this EXCLUSIVE MALE ASSERTING AUTHORSHIP BIAS is something we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE TAKING TO RIDICULOUS LIMITS.  In all cases, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING is PRIMARY and MALE ASSERTING is SECONDARY.  That is what the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE happens to be.  OCEAN WAVE TROUGH opens up and the MALE ASSERTING PEAK COLLAPSES INTO IT and OF COURSE there is NOT TWO SEPARATE THINGS HERE as BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION SUGGESTS, THERE IS AN ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD which is a COINCIDENTIA OPPOSITORUM symbolized an OUROBORUS, the SNAKE SWALLOWING ITSELF BY SWALLOWING IS OWN TAIL .   WHAT IS GOING ON HERE REQUIRES QUANTUM LOGIC representation; i.e. the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (the WAVE-FIELD medium) WHERE THE WAVE-FIELD IS SWALLOWING IS OWN MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS.  THERE IS NO ‘EMPTY SPACE’ ANYWHERE IN THIS PICTURE.  The EMPTY SPACE comes from BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACT LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS where, after we have NOTINALLY broken out the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE and presented it as ALL SHE WROTE, we need to supply a container for housing our MALE ASSERTING OPERATIONS, a container that will not interfere nor detract from the FULL AND SOLE AUTHORSHIP that is credited to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT.  WHAT WILL DO THE TRICK IS AN EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER to house our MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS WITHOUT INTERFERING.

* * *

In the example of the FEMALE VALLEY that ORGANIZES runoff into the MALE-ASSERTING RAGING RIVER, if we understand all of this as a RELATIONAL DYNAMIC without OUR IMPOSING OF A BINARY LOGIC BASED “ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE REFERENCE FRAME”, then we can move forward to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING WHEREIN the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY and the MALE ASSERTING RAGING RIVER, “ARE ONLY ONE” as in CLOUD FORMATIONS in the ATMOSPHERE.   IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT WE HAVE THE OPTION TO ARCHITECT LANGUAGE THAT CAN EMPLOY THE LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as captures the WAVE-FIELD phenomena wherein there is the QUANTUM LOGIC relations between the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD and the WAVE-FIELD, … the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC PERSISTS AS THE WESTERN CULTURE LOGIC OF CHOICE DUE TO ITS GREATER SIMPLICITY and NOT LESS because it supports the ABSTRACT CONCEPT OF LOCAL AUTHORING which is EGO INFLATING.   In any case WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS remain “HUNG UP” on BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS and the term ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ is pointing to the fact that BINARY LOGIC is TOO SIMPLE to capture SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY OF INCLUSIONIN THE WAVE-FIELD which requires the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC, the LOGIC that acknowledges that MATERIAL FORMS and the CONTAINING WAVE-FIELD are in a QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION where the WAVE-FIELD is ALL-INCLUDING and within which we have MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVEFIELD.

THERE IS NO SENSE-EXPERIENCE SUPPORTED JUSTIFICATION FOR OUR WESTERN CULTURE INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION BASED EXERCISE OF PROMOTING THE WAVE-FIELD CONDENATIONS TO BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL BEING STATUS WHILE DEMOTING THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD TO AN ALL-INCLUDING EMPTY SPACE.

STILL we continue to use WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION that REDUCE THE LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC RELATIONS TO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC RELATIONS, and it may be because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are ‘HOOKED’ on the GUILE of PRESUPPOSING WE ARE LOCAL AUTHORS OF OUR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS (the ‘double error of namin and grammar) which gives us an EGO and also the method of PURIFICATION based ‘improvement’ to our society wherein, having the concept of LOCAL AUTHORING to work with, we can FEED AND GROW the population of INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL AUTHORS of GOOD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS and STARVE AND SHRINK the population of INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL AUTHORS of BAD ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS as a means of optimizing our society seen as a collection of LOCAL INDEPENDENT BEINGS WITH POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and developments rather than in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of CONDENSATIONS of the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD. ..

 

* * *

 

Our LANGUAGE habit is to INVERT the ANDROGNYOUS reality wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING is in a natural primacy over the MALE ASSERTING and RE-PRESENT the MALE ASSERTING “RAGING RIVER”as the LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHOR of the CANYON; i.e. in the SIMPLE BINARY PLUG-and-SOCKET LOGIC of ASSERTOR and ACCOMMODATRESS, … however, when the FEMALE INDUCTIVE VALLEY and the MALE  RAGING RIVER ARE UNDERSTOOD AS ONE-AND-THE-SAME (i.e. CONJUGATES IN THE WAVE-FIELD SENSE), the BINARY LOGIC OPTION is NO LONGER POSSIBLE and QUANTUM LOGIC, which has been SHUT OUT due to the linguistic formulating of the phenomenon in BINARY LOGIC based terms (i.e. where MATTER and SPACE are deemed MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE).

In the WAVE-FIELD world, the RAGING RIVER and the ACCOMMODATING LANDSCAPE are ONLY ONE.  THERE IS NO BINARY LOGIC ‘SPLIT’ BETWEEN THE TWO, they are both CONDENSATIONS in the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.. 

* * *

The problem with writing about the WAVE-FIELD is that it is a phenomenon wherein FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING ARE ONLY ONE and once the TWO DIFFERENT NAMES are mentioned, THE GENIE IS OUT OF THE BOTTLE and it is next to impossible to PUT HER BACK IN. As Bohm pointed out, we can stir a drop of India ink into clear treacle so that the black thread becomes so fine as to be invisible and all we can see is what looks like homogeneous GRAY TREACLE and only with the most powerful microscope could we see the BINARY DIVISION into LOCAL and EXPLICIT THREADS of INDIA INK WITHIN A SEPARATE CONTAINING FLUID.

THE MORAL OF THE STORY IS, … BEST NOT TO PLAY AROUND WITH BINARY LOGIC as it DULLS our UNDERSTANDING and once ON THE LOOSE, it is very difficult to put back in the bottle.  ONCE we speak in terms of ‘THE RAGING RIVER’, the FEMALE INDUCTIVE POWER OF THE VALLEY that organizes and collects together the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT contributions of rivulet and stream and all of this FEMALE INTEGRATIVE WORK is EXCLIPSED by the IMPRESSIONING PICTURE OF THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT RAGING RIVER AND WHAT WE PERCEIVE AS “ITS” MALE-ASSERTING ‘ACTION AUTHORING POWER’; i.e. the FEMALE INDUCTIVE ORGANIZING AGENCY becomes the DEA ABSCONDITA in our WESTERN CULTURE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

 

 

* * *

 

 

IT IS THE WAVE-FIELD nature of the world that Lao Tzu is referring to where he says;

 

“Know the masculine,

but keep to the feminine:

and become a watershed to the world.

If you embrace the world,

the Tao will never leave you

and you become as a little child

(more…)

How WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE obscures the WAVE-FIELD understanding of our sense-experience reality.

0

SYNOPSIS:  WAVE-FIELD REALITY is our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY; it is an AWARENESS of INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which in WESTERN CULTURE  THAT LIES BEYOND CAPTURE of our COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.  Our CAE language architecture reduces our QUANTUM LOGIC accounts of our sense-experience of inclusion in the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD to accounts of one-sided BINARY LOGIC accounts of MALE-ASSERTING actions and developments within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (Euclidean Space).  Because we are employing this SIMPLIFIED (‘dumbed down’) BINARY LOGIC based INTERLLECTUAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY for our OPERATIVE REALITY, we are generating social dysfunction which we CANNOT RESOLVE since our common investigative TOOL of BINARY LOGIC is “BLIND” to QUANTUM LOGIC and thus BINARY LOGIC, yet QUANTUM LOGIC is essential to understanding of our real, physical sense-experience in the WAVE-FIELD.  Thus the use of our CAE languages results in DROP OUT of essential understanding which is leading to SOCIAL DYSFUNCTION in our modern global social collective wherein languages of the Common Average European architectural structure are playing a key role in communications, representation and understanding.

WE ARE AWARE THAT OUR NOUN-and-VERB LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS ‘DROPPING OUT’ the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.  For example, we know, from the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ in WESTERN LAW that we choose to DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and use the SIMPLIFIED MAKE-BELIEVE that a PUNCH to the HEAD is the full and sole source of any resulting damage or injury.  WE HAVE BUILD THIS SIMPLIFICATION OF MODELING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING TERMS BECAUSE IT IS ‘SIMPLER’ TO ARTICULATE (PHYSICS PRIOR TO MODERN PHYSICS MAKES USE OF THIS SIMPLIFICATION AND SO DO OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES).  BUT IN THE REAL WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE; I.E. THE WAVE-FIELD WORLD, THE DYNAMICS ARE ANDROGYNOUS, HAVING BOTH A FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE TOGETHER WITH A MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE.

OUR INTUITION INFORMS US THAT THE DAMAGE ASSOCIATING WITH A PUNCH THE HEAD WILL BE DUE TO THE ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD BASED) COMBINATION OF HOW ‘ACCOMMODATING’ THE HEAD (SKULL) IS (THE ‘FEMALE’ COMPONENT OF WAVE-FIELD PHENOMENA) AND HOW FORCEFULL ASSERTING THE PUNCH IS and unlike our indigeous aboriginal brothers and sisters, and unlike Modern physics, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have BUILT INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THE SIMPLIFICATIONS OF ‘DROPPING OUT MENTION OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE’ so that one is left with the IMPRESSION, based on interpreting language which has an architecture that BUILDS IN this SIMPLIFICATION of the DROP OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJGUATE and presents a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which based on ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS AS IF IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

The ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE is the SUBSTITUTION that we make for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so that we have only to deal with a MALE-ASSERTING ACTION and DEVELOPMENT “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”.  Both Nietzsche and Bohm were ‘ON TO’ this self-deception that we have built into our WESTERN Common Average European languages which are NOW GLOBALLY DOMINANT as the common ground for communications, thus this SIMPLIFIED SUBSTIITUTE REALITY conveyed by ORAL and WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS, even though it’s SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS are NO LONGER SUPPORTED BY SENSE-EXPERIENCE, are serving as our OPERATIVE REALITY.  Thus even though the THIN SKULL FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING aspect of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD, may be the primary contributor to the COLLAPSE of the SKULL, our language architecture assures that the FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING RESPONSIBILITY for the DAMAGE is ATTRIBUTED TO THE MALE-ASSERTING AGENT and there is NO ACKNOWLEDGING of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING because it has been REMOVED from our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE giving the impression that THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE “DOES NOT EXIST” and thus that all ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS are MALE-ASSERTING and transpire NOT IN A WAVE-FIELD as would require QUANTUM LOGIC (the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD medium) but in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT as requires BINARY LOGIC, the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED (empty space instead of wave-field) MEDIUM.

The net result of this WESTERN CULTURE DUMBED DOWN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, wherein we introduced the BINARY LOGIC simplification (Copernicus) to simplify language based representation of the movement of the planets which was simplified by imposing the BINARY LOGIC relation between MATERIAL PLANETS and EMPTY SPACE.  THIS OBSCURANTISM born of simplifying convenience in language based communications, has, as Bohm has pointed out, been screwing with our WESTERN ACCULTURATED MINDS because we are representing with our simplified language, NOT REALITY but a simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is no longer WAVE-FIELD REALITY but a simplified MECHANISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY.   This OBSCURANTISM we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have built into our language is the source of PSYCHOLOGICAL DYSFUNCTION as Bohm points out, giving us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS an exposure to SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA.

* * *

 

 

 

My findings are that the world of our sense-experience matches up with Modern physics and with indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta understandings of reality, BUT NOT WITH OUR COMMON WESTERN CULTURE UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY as has been implemented in Western social customs, Western Medicine, Western Justice and Western Commerce.

 

Now, I am NOT of an opinion that DIFFERS in any fundamental way from Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta as was the case with those who got into Modern physics like Nietzsche (yes he did), Bohm, Schroedinger etc.   They all agreed that, … and here we come to the source of the fundamental split between ‘WEST’ on the one hand, …. And on the other hand ‘EAST’/Indigenous aboriginals/Modern Physics/Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta.

 

More precisely, what this split is based on is BELIEF IN BINARY LOGIC REALITY (where INHABITANTS and HABITAT are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE as with MATERIAL BEINGS and EMPTY SPACE) versus BELIEF IN QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY (where INHABITANTS and HABITAT are MUTUALLY INCLUSIVE; i.e. where the INHABITANTS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD HABITAT)..

 

Now, this is a MAJOR difference in how one sees REALITY and the global populace ran into that with encounters between European colonizers and indigenous aboriginals. 

 

I can point directly to the PROBLEM which is with WESTERN CULTURE which is now globally dominant and that is because it is based on BINARY LOGIC rather than QUANTUM LOGIC, the former being SIMPLER than the latter but that is where the screw-up lies. 

 

BINARY LOGIC supports the MATTER and SPACE understanding of reality as TWO MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE things so that MATTER is seen as “MOVING, GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING more complex things within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC supports the WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality in which ‘MATTER’ is a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD which manifests as TRANSFORMATION.

  (more…)

INTRODUCTION to the SUBSEQENT ESSAY on WAVE-FIELD REALITY

0

Dear all,

 

The following essay goes directly to the point that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have an understanding of reality that is UPSIDE DOWN and twisted sideways. 

 

That is, we live in a WAVE-FIELD world that our language is TAKING APART, meaning that the reality we live in is the WAVE-FIELD REALITY which is ANDROGYNOUS or in other words having a FEMALE-MALE relation as is THE WAVE-FIELD CHARACTERISTIC.   For example, when there is subsidence in the land and valleys open up, there will be avalanches that come down the mountainside.   This description where valleys open up and mountains fall into them is NOT REALLY TWO THINGS like the FEMALE OPENING OF THE VALLEY and MALE ASSERTING FILL-IN OF THE AVALANCHES, it is THE ONE WAVE-FIELD PHENOMENON OF TRANSFORMATION which is PURELY RELATIONAL and by this I mean, THERE IS NO DEPENDENCE ON THE ABSTRACTION OF ‘BEING’ as with MATERIAL THINGS WITH PERSISTING IDENTITY or ‘FIXED BEING’.  In the WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX and what “WE SEE” are RELATIONAL FORMS that while THEY HAVE A PERSISTING APPEARANCE, THERE ARE NO ‘THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES’ WITH PERSISTING IDENTITY. 

What is CONFUSING is that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have the LANGUAGE-based HABIT of NAME-TAGGING INNATELY TRANSIENT BUT OFTEN PERSISTING RESONANCE-BASED RELATIONAL FORMS IN THE OVERALL TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD WHICH MAKE A SUSTAINED IMPRESSION IN THE VISION-INSPIRED INTELLECT AS “MORE OR LESS THE SAME SHAPE”, and once we use NAME-TAGS to build a persisting, articulable REPRESENTATION of THE FORM-FILLED WAVE-FIELD, we generate the IMPRESSION of a collection of FIXED MATERIAL FORMS that become the dominant VISUAL CONTENT.   GIVEN an abstract BEING-based LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION SCHEME which consists of NAMES that signify FIXED BEING and GRAMMAR that conflates the NAMING based assignment of the FIXED BEING with notional POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING, we achieve a BINARY LOGIC MATTER-IN-TEMPTY SPACE based LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION SCHEME.

 

“LOOK, there is a huge ROGUE WAVE forming in the OCEAN and IT is heading for those kayakers and is very likely to capsize them wash them up on the rocks or worse”

 

This sentence demonstrates our use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR wherein we use NAMING to ASSIGN “BEING” to a relational form in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, and CONFLATE this with GRAMMAR to impute the LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS to the NAMING-INSTANTIATED THING-IN-ITSELF.

  (more…)

Go to Top