Aboriginal Physics Newsletter

This account of The LIES my (WESTERN) CULTURE told me centres on ,

UPGRADING OUR (WESTERN CULTURE) “REASONING” (from LOCAL and EXPLICIT REASONING to NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RELATIONAL UNDERSTANDING)

“Indeed, nothing has yet possessed a more naive power of persuasion than the error concerning being, as it has been formulated by the Eleatics, for example. After all, every word and every sentence we say speak in its favor. Even the opponents of the Eleatics still succumbed to the seduction of their concept of being: Democritus, among others, when he invented his atom. “Reason” in language — oh, what an old deceptive witch she is! I am afraid we are not rid of God because we still have faith in grammar.” – Nietzsche, ‘Twilight of the Idols’

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CANNOT POSSIBLY RESOLVE OUR PROBLEMS AS LONG AS WE STICK TO “REASON”.

TRUST ME in your reading of this short note in which I am pointing out WHAT’S WRONG WITH OUR CONVENTIONAL WESTERN CULTURE REASONING, to the point that you can ‘hear what I am saying’.  There is plenty of opportunity to ponder and criticize after UNDERSTANDING the points being shared but it is important to SUSPEND ONE’S KNEE-JERK REJECTIONS so that what may SOUND LIKE RADICAL OR ERRONEOUS UNDERSTANDINGS are DISMISSED or BLOCKED prior to being FULLY HEARD.

What we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have been doing with LANGUAGE is to swap out the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT for the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (THERE IS NO LOCAL AND EXPLICIT in the world of our sense-experience, IT IS ONLY APPEARANCE).

* * * * * *

– 1-  To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose.

  (more…)

INTRODUCTION:

Schroedinger’s “SUBJECT AND OBJECT ARE ONLY ONE” is saying the same thing as Chief Seattle’s ….“Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”  This means that WE are NOT INDEPENDENT BEINGS because as Modern physics informs us, material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (WAVE-FIELD) which accords with the indigenous aboriginal STRANDS IN THE WEB relation which is the NON-BINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM relation.

This essay explains the INSIDIOUS MISUNDERSTANDING that has been built into WESTERN CULTURE (and Judaic, Christian, Islamic) BELIEF IN BINARY LOGIC-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is having a MAJOR IMPACT on the GLOBAL SOCIAL DYNAMIC through the spread of, and now globally popular use of BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM.  This (TOO-) SIMPLE LOGIC MISREPRESENTS the STRAND IN THE WEB as an INDEPENDENT BEING which leads to PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE (the IDENTIFYING and PUNISHING (or ELIMINATING) of the ‘PURPORTED LOCAL AUTHORS’ of VIOLENT or PROBLEMATIC ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.   I say ‘PURPORTED LOCAL AUTHORS’, because, by contrast, Indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta JUSTICE IS RESTORATIVE due to the UNDERSTANDING that the AUTHORING of EVENTS (VIOLENT or OTHERWISE, is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in the STRAND in the WEB metaphor where the STRAND that becomes VIOLENT is so because it is VENTING a buildup of TENSIONS in the WEB in which case the STRAND that becomes VIOLENT is NOT THE AUTHOR of such VIOLENCE and this is why JUSTICE is RESTORATIVE, where the full community accepts responsibility for RELATIONAL DISSONANCE IN THE WEB  (the actual source of the VIOLENCE) and employs remedial responses such as “the HEALING CIRCLE” that do NOT fall prey to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as is the INSIDIOUS MISUNDERSTANDING OF WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE which WRONGLY IDENTIFIES “A LOCAL AUTHOR” of VIOLENCE even though the AUTHORING is actually NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) since it is coming through the WEB to the STRAND or in other words, THROUGH THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM to the CONDENSATION.

As Schroedinger points out, WE (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) ARE MISTAKEN IN OUR ATTRIBUTING OF the VIOLENCE of a STRAND to the STRAND since the STRAND (individual) in the WEB (social collective) is only the CONDUIT for the VENTING of TENSIONS that build within the WEB (social collective).

 * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Here we are going to reaffirm the UNDERSTANDING that ARISTOTLE MISSED and which CONSTITUTES AN INSIDIOUS MISUNDERSTANDING in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING APPROACH which I would call “THE TRADE-OUT OF THE REAL NON-BINARY BOTH/AND (ANDROGYNOUS) LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM STRUCTURE OF THE WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE for the TOO-SIMPLE, SYNTHETIC BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM WHEREIN WE ‘DROP OUT’ THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, REDUCING THE ANDROGYNOUS BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM which is consistent with our SENSE-EXPERIENCE to the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING OF BINARY LOGIC which is an INTELLECTUAL REDUCTION to a SIMPLE PSEUDO-REALITY WHICH IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  Here is an example of the REDUCTION;

********

-1- The FULL NON-BINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM CONCEPTUALIZATION which is consistent with INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and consistent with MODERN (WAVE-FIELD based) PHYSICS:   “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which is a conceptualization wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX; i.e. there is NO DEPENDENCE ON EITHER/OR ‘BEING’ as the informing by means of this NON-BINARY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is purely RELATIONAL as supported by RELATIONAL FORMS that are CONDENSATIONS of the continually transforming ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM  aka WAVE-FIELD.

-2- THE COMMON WESTERN CULTURE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM CONCEPTUALIZATION which is given THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and consistent with NEWTONIAN MECHANICS based PHYSICS; “The TOWN (as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF) is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” which is a conceptualization employing the abstractions of ABSOLUTE MATERIAL BEING and ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE in a BINARY LOGIC based COMBINATION wherein ‘the TOWN is “PORTRAYED” AS IF ABLE TO GROW, DEVELOP and PRODUCE goods “BY WAY OF ITS OWN LOCAL AUTHORING POWER” as if it were situated within “AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE”.

**********

ACHTUNG!  NOTA BENE!  This next ‘understanding’ plays the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in the INSIDIOUS MISUNDERSTANDING.

Plato clearly distinguished between Heraclitus’ SIMULTANEOUS unity and plurality of the cosmos and Empedocles’ SEPARATE PERIODS OF Love and Strife.  At the same time, they are mentioned together as both alike  in believing in the unity and plurality of the cosmos; and Aristotle’s coupling of the two might conceivably have been motivated by the Platonic comparison, the important distinction between them being overlooked.” -Kirk, Raven et al, The Prosocratic Philosophers.<.mark>

This MISTAKE of trading out, by way of our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, the NATURAL SIMULTANEOUS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT unity and plurality of the cosmos, BY SUBSTITUTING IN ITS PLACE, the UNNATURAL SEQUENTIAL LOCAL and EXPLICIT independence and fragmentation by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche) PSEUDO-REALITY based construction has inflicted us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS with a FRAGMENTED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of that which in our SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS the NATURAL SIMULTANEOUS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT unity and plurality, … AS IS ACKNOWLEDGED IN FLOW-BASED LANGUAGES such as INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL languages and as in BOHM’S ‘Rheomode’ language.

The WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTING of SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM for the Modern physics grounded and indigenous aboriginal standard of NON-BINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM is providing us with a SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME at the EXPENSE OF the DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (the DEA ABSCONDITA or Goddess in Hiding) which gives us a stripped down BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME supported ONLY by notional INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS as if WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which we ANIMATE (in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS) with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

ACHTUNG!  NOTA BENE!   PROBLEMO!  (the DROP OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which renders IMPOSSIBLE the conveying of WAVE-FIELD dynamics since we are leaving ourselves with a mess of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE which we must ANIMATE with GRAMMAR and where THERE IS NO CAPABILITY OF TRANSFORMATION, only MECHANICAL INTERACTION.  This is the source of INSIDIOUS MISUNDERSTANDING which as Bohm describes and gives UPFRONT NOTICE of in his classic ‘Wholeness and the Implicate Order’, … WARNING us of how this SHORTFALL in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is FRAGMENTING our UNDERSTANDING and literally DRIVING US CRAZY!  David Bohm has exposed our predicament in his LEADOFF CHAPTER (1) in  “WHOLENESS AND THE IMPLICATE ORDER”, copied here as follows;

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

(more…)

* * * * * * * * * *

PREFACE: WARNING IN REGARD TO THE DUMBED DOWN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE USING IN OUR STANDARD COMMUNICATIONS.  My note is in NORMAL ENGLISH which is often SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based where, for example, one may say …“the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”  which captures ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate without mentioning “the conjugate SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS” which is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, these conjugates being two sides of the same concept formation; i.e. the WAVE structure.  Beyond LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION is OUR HIGHEST LEVEL of AWARENESS of ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION (Jantsch’s LEVEL 1 AWARENESS) while LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS can come in EITHER LEVEL 2 “LIBERAL AWARENESS” where we acknowledge BOTH the female accommodating/enabling AND the male asserting/actualizing WAVE-FIELD (conjugate) structure, while LEVEL 3 “CONSERVATIVE” AWARENESS is where we acknowledge ONLY the male asserting/actualizing mechanistic DOER-DEED structure.  Our CHOICE of which of these THREE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “AWARENESS” options to give the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE  to in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING; i.e;   (1) TRANSFORMATIVE AWARENESS where everything is in flux, (2), LIBERAL AWARENESS [where, when there is male-asserting/actualizing GROWTH of the TOWN there is CONJUGATE female accommodating/enabling SHRINKING of WILDERNESS] and CONSERVATIVE  AWARENESS [where there is SIMPLY one-sided male-asserting GROWTH OF THE TOWN as if transpiring in absolute empty and infinite space]. 

These three different levels of AWARENESS are infused into our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES; i.e. MODERN PHYSICS along with INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS give the foundational role in AWARENESS-STIMULATING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to (1) TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT where everything is in flux; e.g. ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  AWARENESS LEVEL (2) of LIBERALS give the foundational role in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to the androgynous combination of male-asserting/actualizing GROWTH of the TOWN together with acknowledgement of CONJUGATE female accommodating/enabling SHRINKING of WILDERNESS.  AWARENESS LEVEL (3) of CONSERVATIVES give the foundational role in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to one-sided male asserting/actualizing… FULL STOP.  This LIMITED CONSERVATIVE LEVEL 3 AWARENESS is the source of BLINDERED male asserting/actualizing (actions, development and production) taken out of the AWARE context of either the LEVEL 2 conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS or LEVEL 1 AWARENESS of TRANSFORMATION.

 * * * * * * * * * * * * 

The language I just used for LEVEL 3 AWARENESS is composed of a POSITIVE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION which is BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC based which is given a foundational role  in NEWTONIAN PHYSICS and also in the “COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE FAMILY” in general.  As Benjamin Whorf observes, BINARY LOGIC is a SIMPLE LOGIC that derives from the “COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE FAMILY”, and this BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is TOO SIMPLE to capture WAVE-FIELD REALITY which requires the LESS SIMPLE “QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM”, for example “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” .  In this BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM construction, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX and there is NO DEPENDENCY on MATERIAL “BEING” based entities such as “A TOWN”  (there is only “TOWNING IN THE FLOWING”).    In this QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme, THERE IS NO “BEING” that we can conflate with GRAMMAR to impute to “IT” … “ITS” own POWER of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development (e.g. its own GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING) as if a ‘BEING’ within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, the use of which is a recipe for FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM (eclipsing and wallpapering over the sense-experience affirmable REALITY of TRANSFORMATION).

In sLINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based on the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, which is what is used in MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, there is NO DEPENDENCY ON BINARY LOGIC and since BINARY LOGIC is the SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, there is NO FRAGMENTATION nor OBSCURANTISM; e.g; as in our standard WESTERN CULTURE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZINGS, as already stated, we speak in terms such as “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING PRODUCTS whereas when we use QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZINGS, we speak in terms such as “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein everything is in flux and there is no ‘BEING’.

Throughout this essay entitled BECOMING AWARE OF OUR LIVING IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD”  there is the need to point out the limitations of our COMMONLY USED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme which, for example, imputes the existence of INDEPENDENT BEINGS as if in an empty, infinite space which requires simple BINARY LOGIC whereas the MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta understanding of people as strands in the web of life or as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-ENCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, embody the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium make-up; i.e. the STRAND is both ITSELF AND AT THE SAME TIME, THE WEB IT IS INCLUDED IN, and the CONDENSATION is both ITSELF AND AT THE SAME TIME, the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM IT IS INCLUDED IN.

UNLIKE our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC standard wherein we see things as LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECTS, … in our MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta QUANTUM LOGIC undestanding, we see the readily visible LOCAL and EXPLICIT as SECONDARY CONDENSATIONS of the NON-VISIBLE, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD.  WESTERN CULTURE CONFUSION arises through TOO SIMPLE NEWTONIAN PHYSICS which CONFUSES the LOCAL and EXPLICIT for the PRIMARY REALITY (mistaking the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM [the real PRIMARY REALITY] for EMPTY SPACE and assuming its NON-PARTICIPATION when the REALITY is that SPACE IS NOT EMPTY, IT IS AN ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

 “Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

The reader of this note on BECOMING AWARE OF OUR LIVING IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD will be informed that wherever BINARY LOGIC is encountered in citations from our standard WESTERN CULTURE conversations, the reader must do the needed upgrading, thus where there is text that says the TOWN IS GROWING” , the reader must upgrade his own LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, and where there is discussion of WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE where BINARY LOGIC is used to REWARD GOOD BEINGS and PUNISH BAD BEINGS, the reader must upgrade his LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to QUANTUM LOGIC based RESTORATIVE JUSTICE where the understanding is that outbreaks of violence derive from NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT relational influences within the social matrix, in which case, the WESTERN CULTURE kneejerk response of MISIDENTIFYING the AUTHORING SOURCE as the LOCAL and EXPLICIT holder of the smoking gun while the community members at large are considered INNOCENT UNLESS PROVEN GUILTY, is a MISTAKE that derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and AND GRAMMAR based (mis)understanding of LOCAL AUTHORING.

 * * * * * * END OF PREFACE * * * * * *

In Modern physics understanding, as in the strands-in-the-web and the condensations of the energy-charged plenum, EVERYTHING IS RELATED (interconnected and interdependent) in which case RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MAKES SENSE where the cause of violence is understood as relational dissonance and the remedy is the restoring of relational harmony, … and NOT as in WESTERN CULTURE where the notion of people as INDEPENDENT BEINGS insulated by ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE leads to the MISUNDERSTANDING of VIOLENCE in terms of LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORING when the reality is those manifesting as the AUTHORS of VIOLENCE are in reality CONDUITS for the VENTING of TENSIONS that build with in the community relational matrix, in which case WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE is a MISTAKE and RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is what is needed.

WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in general, because it is SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based, is TOO SIMPLE to capture WAVE-FIELD REALITY.  By contrast, the “QUANTUM” BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM capable LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents is capable of ANDROGYNOUS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING whas associates with , , the two conjugates together capturing the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE which  DEVELOPING and

Where this NOTE is ‘going to’, after setting the stage with a comparison of WESTERN CULTURE philosophy versus INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and EASTERN CULTURE philosophy, is to the philosophy of Gregory Franklin whereby he has developed a way of living which BRIDGES between these TWO philosophical understandings of reality.

BACKGROUND:

Much has been written about the REALITY that we are included in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD, but because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have chosen to develop a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme that is based on SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE “EXCLUDED MEDIUM”, we are DIMINISHING OUR “AWARENESS” (the AWARENESS that is shaped by LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS) because the world we actually live in, the world of our SENSE EXPERIENCE of inclusion within it, as linguistically conceptualized through MODERN PHYSICS, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, is a LESS SIMPLE WORLD that demands LESS SIMPLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (than that which is grounded in SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGICOF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM) that is capable of supporting LESS SIMPLE BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, which can be called QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC to distinguish it from the SIMPLE but COMMON (in WESTERN CULTURE) BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC.

(QUANTUM) BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM describes the world in the MODERN PHYSICS terms of an all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM within which there are CONDENSATIONS so that we have a relationship akin to WHORLINGS (condensations) IN FLOWING (containing energized flow) where the WHORLINGS are only visually distinguishable flow-features or APPEARANCE based, thus the WHORLING is BOTH itself AND the flowing in which case we CANNOT PHYSICALLY separate the WHORLING from the FLOWING so that the only possible MOVEMENT is TRANSFORMATION because EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.

(BINARY) EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM describes the world in the NEWTONIAN PHYSICS terms of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, LOCALLY POPULATED BY MATERIAL OBJECTS, as gives rise to a PSEUDO-REALITY whererein there is EITHER ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OR ABSOLUTE MATERIAL PRESENCE (BEING).  Here we PSYCHOLOGICALLY and LINGUISTICALLY split the WHORLINGS apart from FLOWING using what Nietzsche calls ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’.  For example, when we say ‘the WHORLING IS GROWING LARGER’, we are using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to notionally (psychologically) endow the WHORLING with “ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT” as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  The Rudyard Kipling poem “EAST IS EAST AND WEST IS WEST AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET” stems from this just described difference in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING the world of our sense-experience; i.e. the WESTERN CULTURE NEWTONIAN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING based on BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM (e.g. THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE) and the MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING based on QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC (e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING PLENUM” where the TOWNING is a condensed feature within the TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM”).

* * *

OUR AWARENESS of the world, which is conditioned by our differing schemes for LINGUISTICALLY CONCEPTUALIZING the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION therein, … is influenced (shaped) by the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME we use, and we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have historically opted for a SIMPLE, BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING goods” … FULL STOP), whereas MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS all employ a LESS SIMPLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which is “QUANTUM” BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM based (e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”).  In this LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND CONCEPTUALIZATION, we are reporting on the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which INCLUDES the CONDENSATION, whereas, in the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, we report on notional LOCAL and EXPLICIT FORMS (which are BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.

In this BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION, there is FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM since the notion of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE serves as an INSULATOR that keeps separate and independent, the NAMING-INSTANTIATED “MATERIAL OBJECTS” insulated by EMPTY SPACE.  This is a manifesting of the DIFFERENTIATING (FRAGMENTING) POWER OF OUR SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.

The LOCAL and EXPLICIT FRAGMENTS produced by DIFFERENTIATION (which is a psycho-linguistic operation triggered by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR) sets up the notion of the LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and development, as in the example THE TOWN IS GROWING.  This SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION substitutes the SIMPLE LOCAL and EXPLICIT for the LESS SIMPLE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT flow-field dynamic aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein FIGURE (local and explicit) and GROUND (nonlocal and implicit) ARE ONLY ONE as in ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

Our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME FRAGMENTS into LOCAL and EXPLICIT objects, the RELATIONAL CONTINUUM of the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM (the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD) which is UNBOUNDED in SPACETIME and which is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT source of ‘MATERIAL’ CONDENSATIONS.

(more…)

Why bother READING this essay, which looks DIFFICULT?  My answer is that this essay EXPLAINS where we have built MISTAKES into our WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing scheme which are conjusing us and rendering our actions and interactions confused.  For example, we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which enables us to say things (construct linguistic conceptualizations) such as ‘the TOWN is growing’ which is only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate aspect of what our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is reporting on, which is that THE LANDSCAPE is TRANSFORMING.  The TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE included NOT ONLY that “the TOWN is GROWING” which is just the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate of the ANDROGYNOUS dynamic of transformation wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which opens up in conjugate relation with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWING of the TOWN.  OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION BACKED AWARENESS can OPEN UP to THREE LEVELS of AWARENESS here, only ONE OF WHICH is given MAINSTREAM use in our WESTERN CULTURE common LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach; i.e. the one where we speak in terms of ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ (male asserting/actualizing) without bringing into play our AWARENESS of the conjugate ‘SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS’ that comes together with ‘the GROWING OF THE TOWN’, these two ‘AWARENESSES’ combining with a THIRD LEVE OF AWARENESS to go with the other two.  So LEVEL 3 AWARENESS is the GROWTH of the TOWN, the LEVEL 2 AWARENESS is the SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS, and the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS is the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.

As Erich Jantsch has pointed out, LEVEL 1 AWARENESS (the LANDSCAPE IS TRANSFORMING) includes LEVEL 2 AWARENESS (the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING) which included LEVEL 3 AWARENESS (the TOWN IS GROWING).   We know that if we speak in LEVEL 3 AWARENESS terms, sayinig ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, this PROPOSITION is INCOMPLETE, and this is an example of Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE PROPOSITIONS OF LOGIC.  That is, while the proposition ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is “TRUE”, it is INCOMPLETE because it fails to acknowledge the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS and the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE, and all of these THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS are TRUE IN A LOGICAL SENSE but INCOMPLETE in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONTEXT.

We know that when TRUMP says “DRILL BABY DRILL”, he is using language that corresponds to LEVEL 3 AWARENESS wherein, while it may be TRUE that oil may be discovered and produced, there is no mention of the SHRINKING of the underground oil accumulation leading to earthquakes and collapsing of oil-filled porous rocks when the oil is removed.  This is LEVEL 3 AWARENESS whereas AWARENESS LEVEL 2 will include cognition of the SHRINKING of the fluid content of the porous rock and AWARENESS LEVEL 1 will acknowledge the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE as understood from an AWARENESS wherein SUBJECT and OBJECT are ONLY ONE; i.e. where we are AWARE of our INCLUSION in the world that we are looking out at;

THINGS ARE DIFFERENT where we are in a state of AWARENESS of our INCLUSION in SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES (TRANSFORMATION)

–––  QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC INCLUSION OF MAN-IN-EARTH (CONDENSATION OF WAVE-FIELD IN WAVE-FIELD): 

 This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”

But we continue to struggle with a lesser, BINARY LOGIC based form of AWARENESS

––– BINARY (EITHER/OR) LOGIC SPLIT OF MAN AND EARTH (“MATERIAL BEING” IN EMPTY SPACE): 

Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

This supports the LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE and LEVEL 2 LIBERAL modes of AWARENESS wherein we believe we are INDEPENDENT BEINGS with our own DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments as if we were NON-INCLUDED VISITORS.

The whites, too, shall pass – perhaps sooner than other tribes. Continue to contaminate your bed, and you will one night suffocate in your own waste. When the buffalo are all slaughtered, the wild horses all tamed, the secret corners of the forest heavy with the scent of many men, and the view of the ripe hills blotted by the talking wires, where is the thicket? Gone. Where is the eagle? Gone. And what is it to say goodbye to the swift and the hunt? The end of living and the beginning of survival.

 * * * * * * * * * * * 

READER BEWARE:

“AWARENESS” is a kind of OPENING UP of our SENSES to the WORLD we are included in, and AWARENESS is GRADATIONAL in that it can range from our SENSE OF INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM to our CROW’S EYE SCRUTINIZING of particular things at a distance which we can FOCUS INTENSELY ON.  For example, it was noted during the French Revolution that women observing beheadings on the Guillotine became so transfixed as they watched people getting their heads removed that they became prey for street urchins who would come behind them, lift their skirts and freely grope them without encountering any resistance from the women transfixed by their AWARENESS of the grotesque goings-on.

Erich Jantsch describes THREE DIFFERENT LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED DEPTHS of AWARENESS that range from “MOST AWARE” through “LESS AWARE” to “LEAST AWARE” which we know as CONSERVATIVE (LEAST AWARE), LIBERAL (next to LEAST AWARE) and TRANSFORMATIONAL (most aware), and shows that while MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta constitute the MOST AWARE condition, WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZIN tends to be BLOCKED from ACCESSING the MOST AWARE CONDITION due to BELIEF IN LOCAL AUTHORING.

“LOCAL AUTHORING” is ABSTRACTION based on LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which as Nietzsche points out makes use of the “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR that DIVIDES PEOPLE INTO TWO OPPOSING, POLARIZED collectives.  While the CONSERVATIVE GROUP believes in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments wherein the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is the primary world dynamic, the LIBERAL GROUP believes in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments in a CONJUGATE combination of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING together with MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.  For example, while the CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS supports the understanding that the TOWN IS GROWING, the LIBERAL AWARENESS supports the understanding of “THE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS…”TOGETHER WITH” … THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN”.   TRUMP’S CONSERVATIVE “DRILL BABY DRILL” exemplifies the use of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PRODUCTION” as if in ITS OWN RIGHT (out of the context of TRANSFORMATION); i.e. within a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME wherein GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are ‘taken to be’ “REAL” (without, as in the LIBERAL AWARENESS, being seen TOGETHER WITH the conjugates of “SHRINKING of WILDERNESS”, “DEGENERATION of DEVELOPMENT” and “CONSUMPTION of PRODUCTION”).

A WESTERN CULTURE PROBLEM IS THAT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF AWARENESS IS COMMONLY CONSTRAINED to LEVELS 3 and 2 and is “HELD BACK” FROM EVER GETTING TO AWARENESS LEVEL 1 (TRANSFORMATION) BECAUSE OF A PERSISTING POLARIZING CONFLICT between CONSERVATIVES WITH THEIR LOCAL AUTHORING BASED ON MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AND LIBERALS WITH THEIR LOCAL AUTHORING BASED ON THE COMBINATION OF FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “AND” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS ARE SO PRE-OCCUPIED WITH PROMOTING and DEFENDING THEIR PREFERRED, RADICALLY DIFFERING  “LOCAL AUTHORING” SCHEMES THAT THEY ARE BOTH “BLINDED” TO THE EXISTENCE of the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS which RESOLVES the POLARIZING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AWARENESS LEVELS 3 (CONSERVATIVE) and LEVEL 2 (LIBERAL).  For example, while the CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS of “DRILL BABY DRILL” SUPPORTS MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘PRODUCTION’ while IGNORING the conjugate FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING, THE LIBERAL ENVIRONMENT-SENSITIVE AWARENESS NOT ONLY ENVISAGES GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION BUT IS ALSO AWARE OF THE CONJUGATE … “SHRINKING of WILDERNESS”, “DEGENERATING of DEVELOPMENT” and “CONSUMPTION of PRODUCTION”.    While it is common for CONSERVATIVES to speak in terms of the CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN as if this one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate was MEANINGFUL, the extended LIBERAL AWARENESS which includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS is also ‘taken into account’, and this constitutes an EXPANDED LIBERAL AWARENESS (which is getting close to acknowledging the overall TRANSFORMING of the the LANDSCAPE) as compared to the LIMITED CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS.  

Suppose that LIBERALS were NOT using LANGUAGE that supported the ‘DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ based (ego-inflated) ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ of actions and developments but were instead on the same AWARENESS LEVEL as Chief Seattle where the AUTHORING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in TRANSFORMATION that we all share inclusion in?  This is the understanding that is supported by MODERN PHYSICS and by AWARENESS such as; Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” —Chief Seattle .

In this LEVEL 1 TRANSFORMATIONAL AWARENESS, WE BECOME ONE WITH THE WORLD.  That is, our LEVEL 1 LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME shifts from employing a “BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM” basis of MATERIAL FORMS in ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE to a QUANTUM “BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM” basis of MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS in the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (transforming relational continuum).  In LEVEL 1 AWARENESS, there is NO LONGER ANY BINARY LOGIC splitting into MATTER and SPACE as prevails in AWARENESS LEVELS 3 (CONSERVATIVE) and AWARENESS LEVEL 2 (LIBERAL) and there is ONLY ONE THING, i.e. the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which material forms are “SCHAUMKOMMEN” (appearance), in the manner of WHORLINGS in FLOWING where the WHORLINGS are NOT SEPARATE THINGS but part of the APPEARANCE of FLOWING.  As Schroedinger points out;  

“The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist.” …Erwin Schroedinger

“What we observe as material bodies and forces are nothing but shapes and variations in the structure of space. Particles are just schaumkommen (appearances)” —Erwin Schroedinger

In this LEVEL 1 mode of AWARENESS understood by indigenous aboriginals and by MODERN PHYSICS, all ‘things’ are condensations of and within the energy-charged plenum aka the transforming relational continuum aka wave-field.

 * * * * * * * * 

NOW I NEED TO TIE SOME LOOSE ENDS TOGETHER WHICH BELONG TOGETHER and which have BECOME SEPARATED DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “REMAIN STUCK WITH THE HABITUAL USE OF A TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME” WHICH is the SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

THE MISTAKEN (“DOUBLE ERROR” based) BELIEF IN “LOCAL AUTHORING” ON THE PART OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS has led to the POLARIZING SPLIT INTO CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL FACTIONS.

THE REALITY IS that NEITHER THE CONSERVATIVE NOR LIBERAL MODES OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING ‘WORK’ BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH DEPENDENT ON TOO-SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC.  The POLARIZED CONFLICT between CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS has meanwhile DIVIDED the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE which has become so PRE-OCCUPIED with POLITICAL OPPOSITION that the POINT IS BEING MISSED that their DISAGREEMENT DERIVES FROM THEIR GIVING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC IN THEIR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES. 

The TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME OF THE CONSERVATIVE FACTION comes from the use of ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ while the LESS SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME of the LIBERAL FACTION comes from an evolving acknowledgement of our INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE (Note that while INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS  (as well as MODERN PHYSICS) understand this INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE to be THE BASIC REALITY as in “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”, the WESTERN CULTURE PRACTICE, encouraged by WHATEVER CONCEPTUALIZATIONS WE BUILD INTO OUR LANGUAGE, continues to support INDEPENDENT BEING which is MOST PRONOUNCED in CONSERVATIVE politics while IN LIBERAL POLITICS, is giving way to AWARENESS of INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE by way our inclusion in a common ENVIRONMENT (note: one can imagine this continuing shift in WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTUALIZING as an ongoing acknowledgement of the importance of the environment we are evidently included in which is most evident in LIBERALISM while CONSERVATIVES persist in supporting the full abstraction of MATERIAL HUMAN BEINGS IN EMPTY INFINITE SPACE as persists in our linguistich conceptualizing scheme).

Already in the 1970s numerous studies of legislative voting on environmental measures, both in the U.S. Congress and in a number of state administrations, found conservative legislators to have significantly lower pro-environmental voting records than their liberal colleagues (see Kamieniecki 1995 and the references therein). This tendency has not changed since but rather, the cleavage between liberals and conservatives on environmental issues has grown substantially in the past decades (Dunlap, Xiao, and McCright 2001). For example, a number of current studies, especially on the topic of climate change, find in general that liberals show higher levels of environmental concern than conservatives   (Wood and Vedlitz, 2007; McCright and Dunlap, 2010, 2011b).—The politics of environmental concern: A cross-national analysis, Raphael J Nawrotzki

THE HOLD UP in our move to less simple QUANTUM (BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM) from simple BINARY (EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM) is the DEEP ENTRENCHEMENT in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of the ABSOLUTE DIVISION between MATTER and “EMPTY SPACE” and since we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS continue to employ BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ which exemplifies the ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING by way of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we PERPETUATE OUR OWN ENTRAPMENT in TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

MODERN PHYSICS has meanwhile ENDORSED THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE ARE ALL INCLUDED AS CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is an ENDORSEMENT of Chief Seattle’s observation; … “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”

FINALIZING THIS “READER BEWARE” COMMENT:   In this “READER BEWARE” comment, I am trying to encourage the reader’s cognizance of the fact that this language I am using is TOO SIMPLE to convey what I would like to convey.  I am in the same plight as Lao Tzu when he wrote “The Tao that can be told is NOT THE TRUE TAO”.

I AM TRYING TO AROUSE THE (LEVEL 1) CORE OF YOUR (the READER’S) AWARENESS to SHARE LEVEL 1 AWARENESS based UNDERSTANDING and this is, in WESTERN CULTURE DIALOGUE, DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE because ONCE ONE PROCESSES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS and brings them onboard into AWARENESS LEVEL 3 or AWARENESS LEVEL 2, there NO LONGER EXISTS any LOCAL AWARENESS LEVEL 1 CONTENT. One might express this in the terms that while AWARENESS LEVEL 1 is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, AWARENESS LEVELS 2 and 3 are alternative forms of  LOCAL and EXPLICIT expression (e.g. SOLAR IRRADIANCE THAT IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INDUCES the EMERGENCE of (A) HURRICANE DYNAMICS that stir up the ATMOSPHERE, or (B) ATMOSPHERIC DYNAMICS that stir up HURRICANES. If we FORGET about the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATIVE origin of what is going on here, we may DIVIDE INTO TWO OPPOSING GROUPS, A CONSERVATIVE GROUP CONTENDING THAT THE HURRICANE IS STIRRING UP THE ATMOSPHERE and a LIBERAL GROUP CONTENDING THAT THE ATMOSPHERE IS STIRRING UP THE HURRICANE [note that these propositions are both LOCAL and EXPLICIT and there is no mention of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATIVE origin of what is going on here.]

ONCE we break the AWARENESS down into 3 different categories whereby Chief Seattle’s AWARENESS is understood as the HIGHEST LEVEL 1 AWARENESS, we can understand LEVEL 2 AWARENESS and LEVEL 3 AWARENESS as LESSER (INCOMPLETE) AWARENESS LEVELS and thus we have the tools to understand the ARTIFICIALITY of the POLARIZING DISAGREEMENT between supporters of LEVEL 3 (CONSERVATIVE) and LEVEL 2 (LIBERAL) AWARENESS in which case, IT IS A WASTE OF TIME to participate in ARGUMENTS AS TO WHICH IS CORRECT, LEVEL 3 AWARENESS or LEVEL 2 AWARENESS, because NEITHER IS “CORRECT” and what is CONFUSING is that BOTH CAN BE TRUE due to Goedel’s Theorem of INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITION.

The LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS GIVEN BY EITHER/OR PROPOSITION such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ may be TRUE but they are INCOMPLETE in that they are LOCAL and EXPLICIT TRUTHS.

The LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS GIVEN by EITHER/OR PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING and the WILDERNESS is SHRINKING’ may be TRUE but they are INCOMPLETE in that they are LOCAL and EXPLICIT TRUTHS.

The LEVEL 1 TRANSFORMATIVE AWARENESS GIVEN by BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as given by; ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is beyond the simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM ‘reality’ based on that which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT, and is instead the less simple QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM reality based on that which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  That is, ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and our INCLUSION THEREIN is in the same ‘QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM’ relational sense as the CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

SO, THE KEY POINT IN FINALIZING THIS “READER BEWARE” COMMENT”: is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have access to THREE LEVELS of AWARENESS; the CONSERVATIVE, LIBERAL and TRANSFORMATIONAL LEVELS OF AWARENESS and that the LOWER TWO LEVELS OF AWARENESS; i.e. the LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS and the LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS ARE BOTH CONSTRAINED TO THE CONSTRUCTIONS that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT and thus BINARY LOGIC based, and only the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS is an AWARENESS of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

WESTERN CULTURE, by using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that supports both LEVEL 3 AWARENESS and LEVEL 2 AWARENESS sets the stage for UNRESOLVABLE CONFLICT between CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL AWARENESS LEVELS, BOTH OF WHICH ARE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ORIENTED BUT WHICH DIFFER IN THAT; “in general liberals show higher levels of environmental concern than conservatives” 

FOR ANYONE TO SHOW CONCERNS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND AN ASSOCIATED NEED TO “TAKE BETTER CARE OF THE ENVIRONMENT”, THE INFERENCE IS THE BINARY LOGIC based view wherein THEY DO NOT CONSIDER THEMSELVES TO BE ‘INCLUDED’ IN AN ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AS UNDERSTOOD IN MODERN PHYSICS; The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist.” …Erwin Schroedinger

THE ‘BOTTOM LINE’ IS THAT THERE ARE NO ‘LOCAL AUTHORS’ of actions and development (all action is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) in which case the BASIS for DIFFERENCES in policies and views of CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS DO NOT EXIST.

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

END OF: “READER BEWARE” COMMENT: 

 * * * * * * * * 

ABSTRACT:  ALL MATERIAL FORMS, INCLUDING OURSELVES ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka “ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM” aka “WAVE-FIELD”.   Our WESTERN CULTURE has developed a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that is based on the ABSTRACTIONS of “LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING BASED ENTITIES” and “ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE”, while MODERN PHYSICS along with INDIGENENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, TAOISM/BUDDHISM and ADVAITA VEDANTA have developed a FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME THAT ACKNOWLEDGES our INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

The TITLE ; “What’s Wrong with TRUMP and MUSK? (and ‘what’s wrong with us?’) draws attention to the fact that our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme ‘works’ by CONSTRUCTING A SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY using the ABSTRACTIONS of NAMING-INSTANTIATED, LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BODIES with NOTIONAL (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.

This constitutes a SUBSTITUTE PSEUDO-REALITY based on FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM (the transforming plenum is dropped out and ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE is SUBSTITUTED, which constitutes the REMOVAL of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (wave-field) conjugate TOGETHER WITH THE ‘PROMOTING’ OF THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate as the LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE).

Thus, instead of the TRANSFORMATION based understanding wherein, for example, “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING substitutes “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”  (that’s all that is spoken of in the CONSERVATIVE  version of linguistic conceptualizing of reality), and (as is included in the LIBERAL version of linguistic conceptualizing of reality) “AND there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS”.

What we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are thus doing with our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme is that we are giving ourselves what Erich Jantsch refers to as THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS that we can BRING FORTH WITH LANGUAGE in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING; i.e.  THE FULLY AWARE TRANSFORMATION based understanding which is LEVEL ONE AWARENESS ,  (e.g. THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” ) or, we may BRING FORTH in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the LESS AWARE LIBERAL based undestanding which is LEVEL TWO AWARENESS, (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING AND there is a conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS) or, we may BRING FORTH in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING the LEAST AWARE CONSERVATIVE  based understanding which is LEVEL THREE AWARENESS (e.g. the the TOWN IS GROWING … full stop).

 * * * 

For indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, there is a tradition of grounding understanding in LEVEL ONE AWARENESS which acknowledges INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).

For WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, the common belief in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, which Nietzsche has pointed out DERIVES FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR, is the source of LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS, and LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS.  BOTH LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES endorse the ERROR of LOCAL AUTHORING and while CONSERVATIVES (e.g. DONALD TRUMP and ELON MUSK) succumb to the SIMPLE AWARENESS LEVEL 3 based on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING e.g. “OUR OPERATIONS ARE GROWING” , … LIBERALS (e.g. JOE BIDEN) succumb to the LESS SIMPLE AWARENESS LEVEL 2 based on MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING … and conjugate … FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.

Whatever we do in the sense of our MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, there is at the same time, a CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING that comes with it (for example, WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN COMES THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING opening up by way of the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS).

WE ARE FAMILIAR with how CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS POLARIZE HERE in that TRUMP’S ‘DRILL BABY DRILL’ is exemplary of one-sided, “ALL MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING” while DROPPING OUT any ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the conjugate “FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” (the changes in the land assocated with extraction).  This CONSERVATIVE focus on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DRILLING and PRODUCTION while IGNORING the conjugate FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING collapse of depleted oil and gas reservoirs, loss of clear air from oil and gas combustion products, distinguishes the CONSERVATIVE from the LIBERAL APPROACH.  The CONSERVATIVE LEVEL 3 AWARENESS based focus on GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of hydrocarbons (DRILL BABY DRILL), is a one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING approach that is MISSING LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS of the need for balancing the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING, DEGENERATIING and CONSUMING.

The CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS LEVEL 3 IGNORING of an important part of what is actually happening i.e. the ignoring that there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (such as ‘the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING’) together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH OF CONSTRUCTION, IS NOT THE CASE WITH LIBERALS due to their LEVEL 2 AWARENESS.  This DIFFERENCE in CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL AWARENESS LEVELS is the source of POLARIZING CONFLICT wherein WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES SPLIT into POLARIZED CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL FACTIONS.

THIS SPLIT INTO POLARIZED CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL FACTIONS DERIVES FROM THE EGO-based BELIEF IN LOCAL AUTHORING.

LOCAL AUTHORING DOES NOT EXIST IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY.

LOCAL AUTHORING IS ABSTRACTION DERIVING FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche)

THE CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL SPLIT IS A BOGUS LOCAL AUTHORING BASED DIVISION THAT WAS MOCKED BY JONATHAN SWIFT IN HIS DEPICTION of TORIES and WHIGS as Brobdignabmians and Lilliputians in GULLIVER’S TRAVELS.  SWIFT exposured their polarizing differences as being equivalent to an argument over which was the PROPER END of a boiled egg to make entry; i.e. the ROUNDY END OR THE POINTY END.

Today’s version of this POINTLESS DIVISION in WESTERN CULTURE social collectives, into CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS is based on whether LOCAL AUTHORING should be understood in a (ONE-TO-MANY; “one bad apple spoils the barrel”) context (CONSERVATIVE) or in a (MANY-TO-ONE; “it takes a whole community to raise a child”) CONTEXT.

WAIT A MINUTE!  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” since we share inclusion in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX. As Nietzsche has pointed out,  “LOCAL AUTHORING” is a “DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR”.

As in Jonathan Swift’s GULLIVERS TRAVELS SATIRE, the SPLIT into CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS is based on the BOGUS, EGOTISTICAL BELIEF IN “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and development.   As MODERN PHYSICS affirms, as also indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and developments.   The indigenous aboriginal “HEALING CIRCLE” acknowledges, as MODERN PHYSICS also acknowledges that the dynamics we share inclusion in as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING”, THUS THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE AWARENESS LEVEL 3 and 2 CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL CONFLICT, but there is instead a LEVEL 1 AWARENESS of our INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

* * * * * END OF ABSTRACT * * * * * 

(more…)