REFERENCE NOTES

These REFERENCE NOTES are temporary for ease of reference.

JUST TO EMPHASIZE THE KEY POINTS IN THE PREVIOUS NOTE;

WHILE WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE BEEN ‘BROUGHT UP’ TO BELIEVE IN LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘GROWTH’ and ‘PRODUCTION’, which are INTELLECTUAL BINARY LOGIC based, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE informs us in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “TRANSFORMATION” terms which are QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC based.

The use of BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE is pervasive in WESTERN CULTURE social discourse, … UNLIKE indigenous aboriginal social discourse where QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE is pervasive.  For example, WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS speak in terms of GROWTH and PRODUCTION where INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS speak in terms of TRANSFORMATION.

It is EVIDENT that this difference comes from two different LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, THE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE where we say things like ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’,… while the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS are saying there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, since the understanding is one of INCLUSION in the all-including GREAT MYSTERY aka the transforming relational continuum aka the Modern physics WAVE-FIELD.

These two different LANGUAGES are NOT simply DIFFERENT WAYS OF SAYING THE SAME THING,!

THE FIRST (WESTERN CULTURE) language architecture IS BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM) based and employs CONCEPTUALIZING that is in terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING.

The SECOND (INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL AND MODERN PHYSICS) language architecture is QUANTUM (BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM) based and employs CONCEPTUALIZING that is in terms of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) where the structure is ANDROGYNOUS, employing A FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE in CONJUGAL UNION with A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.

* * *

If the reader is a WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT like I was raised to be, the DIFFERENCES we have been telling ourselves with our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES as compared with what the indigenous aboriginal languages ‘are saying’, the latter which now affirmed by Modern physics, are SO HUMONGOUS that it is next to UNTHINKABLE to consider the POSSIBILITY that the understanding of our sense-experience reality coming through a language akin to the indigenous aboriginal languages, which is and understanding LESS SIMPLE than our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based understanding of sense-experience reality.

For example, we know that our standard ENGLISH, we base on BINARY LOGIC which is what gives us the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING which is NO LONGER TENABLE when or if we were to implement a QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE such as Bohm’s Rheomode or Algonquin, would bring a TIDAL WAY of CULTURAL CHANGE.  For example, our WESTERN JUSTICE SYSTEM, WESTERN MEDICINE and COMMERCE are all thoroughly infused with BINARY LOGIC structures such as the orienting JUSTICE to the support of GOOD and ELIMINATION of EVIL rather than, as in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC sense which is BALANCE oriented, to the TRANSFORMING of RELATIONAL DISSONANCE into RESONANCE (HARMONY).  Likewise in MEDICINE the WESTERN APPROACH puts BINARY LOGIC ANTI-PATHOGEN approaches into an unnatural precedence over QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE-RESTORING approaches.   In both cases (JUSTICE and MEDICINE, there are FRINGE movements which are trying to bring in QUANTUM LOGIC ‘REBALANCING’ to supersede the ANTI-PATHOGEN approach but the latter is LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS, as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have INVESTED HUGELY in INFRASTRUCTURE and PRACTICES that are BINARY LOGIC ‘PURIFICATION’ based rather than QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BALANCE’ based.  In WESTERN CULTURE COMMERCE, the operations are based on belief in LOCAL AUTHORING rather than TRANSFORMATION so that all around the world, due to WESTERN CULTURE INFLUENCE, business operations are underway to PRODUCE GOODS and SERVICES in keeping with the LANGUAGE BASED ABSTRACTION OF ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ (PRODUCTION) WHICH IS WESTERN CULTURE PERVADING BINARY LOGIC BASED ‘DOUBLE ERROR OF LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR.  THERE IS NO SUCH THING IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY AS LOCAL AUTHORING SINCE WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN A TRANFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

ALL THE WHILE WE ARE IN ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ MODE AS LOGGING AND MILLING LUMBER IN THE AMAZON WE ARE ‘INCLUDED IN TRANSFORMATION’ BUT LOGGING AND MILLING LUMBER IS CONSIDERED TO BE ‘IMPORTANT TO THE ECONOMY’ AND THAT IS ‘TRUE’ but here we come back to Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite systems of logic so that, IF WE REFLECT ON THIS and access our SENSE-EXPERIENCE based understanding, we find that our MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING that can be measured and affirmed in millions of board-feet of LUMBER is NEVER WITHOUT A FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE wherein the land has HOLES in the FOREST where materials are being given up for the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING based PRODUCTION, which would be one thing if we lived on a FLAT PLANE of INFINITE EXTENT which is an implicit assumption we build into our language to keep it simple (i.e. so we don’t have to INCLUDE a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as we must in actions that transpire in a SPHERICAL SPACE such as the living space of our actual sense-experience.

ALL OF THIS IS KNOWN TO US and NOT REFUTED and thus it is SCREAMING OUT THE NEED FOR AN ANDROGYNOUS LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with BOTH a FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE WHICH, TOGETHER, SPELL ‘TRANSFORMATION’ which is characteristic of WAVE-DYNAMICS which is the stuff that the UNIVERSE is MADE OF, as MODERN PHYSICS has AFFIRMED and as indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents have long been contending the inter-relatedness of all things in the sense of common INCLUSION within the GREAT HARMONY..

The interconnected relationships with all living things is called the Sacred Circle of Life. First Nations teachings guide us to show respect for all within this Sacred Circle. An intense and deep connectedness with all that surrounds us is a foundational concept of First Nations philosophy. This includes a connection to Mother Earth and all that the Universe contains, including other people (personal relationships, family, neighborhoods, communities, nations), all of the plant beings and four legged brothers and sisters, the finned and flying beings, and ultimately the Great Spirit that animates all.

“HOW IS INDIGENOUS WORLDVIEW DIFFERENT FROM WESTERN WORLDVIEW?

Most commonly, Western worldview is based on the assumption that man is superior. Instead of all living things being equal, living things are structured in a hierarchy.” Western worldview traditionally treats humans as “the top” of the hierarchy and everything else falls below them, which shapes the way we treat plants, animals, and nature. This often leads to misusing, mistreating, or disrespecting other life — because it labels humans as “most important.”

As stated in the previous note, this Modern physics view of an all-including world in which individual things are NOT INDEPENDENT but are CONDENSATIONS in the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (Bohm) aka the GREAT HARMONY

The following is from “INTERCULTURE – Issue 113 Fall 1991–  THE MOHAWK NATION and its COMMUNITIES”  — Robert Vachon

Kayanerakowa  (word/concept in Iroquois language)

Kayanerakowa (literally: the Great Peace, the Great Good, the Great Nice, the Great Harmony) refers to:

-1.- the whole reality, cosmos, universe, as a great beautiful harmony and balance, and to the instructions inscribed in the nature of each and every thing:

-2.- the cultural, ceremonial and political interpretation given to it historically by Deganawidah, the Peace Maker and which constitutes the basis for the harmony between the Iroquois nations on the one hand, and between all nations on the other.

* * *

The Indigenous aboriginal conceptualization of reality, as in the Iroquois culture which is typical is a LAYOVER to MODERN PHYSICS Wave-Field based conceptualization.  The circle with its four directions Meanings of the Four Directions; e.g. Stages of life: birth, youth, adult (or elder), death. Seasons of the year: spring, summer, winter, fall. Aspects of life: spiritual, emotional, intellectual, physical. Elements of nature: fire (or sun), air, water, and earth.  There is a sense that BALANCE is implied by the associated relations.

QUANTUM LOGIC is BALANCE and Deganawidah is not mentioned for his male-asserting warrior power but for his Peace-Maker power of cultivating (catalyzing) harmony.

This is very different from WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based interpretations.  As in the prior note which quoted Jill Astbury “The research stemming from this viewpoint had a systemic blindness. It could literally not see what it was doing, as the normative quality of its own presuppositions had made them invisible.”.  Her point was that the WESTERN CULTURE research into why people do the things they do (woman having breakdowns in her research) ASSUMES that there is an INTERNAL AUTHORING SOURCE.  Her research showed that the breakdowns were induced by the dissonant social dynamics in which the persons having breakdowns were included in.  This was the same finding as in the research by R. Cochrane (University of Birmingham) and S. P. Sashidharan on tribal Blacks coming to live in the U.K. and developing Schizophrenia.

What’s at play here is that our Western Culture interpretations are in LOCAL and EXPLICIT (MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING) terms and researchers who come up with NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING) terms basically ‘go unheard’.

Likewise, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS will ‘blame’ the cigarette butt ember for the FOREST FIRE, ignoring the fact in the rainforest in the rainy season would resist burning if attacked with a blow torch, and as MODERN PHYSICS would again say, … we live in a wave-field world where all dynamic have an ANDROGYNOUS structure with “BOTH” a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate “AND” a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and this conjugate structure is acknowledged and incorporated in indigenous aboriginal languages, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

So, guess what the result of WESTERN CULTURE’S USE OF LANGUAGE THAT IS DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE IS!

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

 * * *

As mentioned earlier, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS which come from our having infused BINARY LOGIC into so many common understandings and practices that unravelling ourselves, linguistically, from those well-established language patterns, is not yet even on our WESTERN CULTURE radar screens.  How many WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are ready to acknowledge that LOCAL AUTHORING IS A CROCK, … A DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR based CROCK as Nietzsche pointed out?

* * *

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE BEEN ‘BROUGHT UP’ TO BELIEVE IN ‘GROWTH’ and ‘PRODUCTION’

There is a major problem with our belief in GROWTH and PRODUCTION and it is like the problem with the Cuckoo, a simple bird that lays its eggs in the nest of a less simple bird so that the eggs hatch out and take over, kicking out the rightful, less simple occupants.

That’s what is happening in WESTERN CULTURE in the sense that simple BINARY LOGIC has been hatched into the home of our thinking and PUSHED OUT the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC.

BINARY LOGIC is the logic of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.  Here we visualize “EITHER” the GROWING TOWN “OR” EMPTY SPACE

QUANTUM LOGIC is the logic of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING landscape’.  Here we visualize “BOTH” the TRANSFORMING landscape “AND” the included TOWNING.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE ACCEPTING THE SIMPLER CONCEPTUALIZATION OF GROWTH which, in our language, is DISPLACING the LESS SIMPLE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF TRANSFORMATION.

The LESS SIMPLE CONCEPTUALIZATION is that of the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING which is like a WHORLING in the FLOWING which is a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC structure.

BUT WHAT IF I START SAYING THINGS SUCH AS ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING” which is SIMPLER because I have DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is an essential component of WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE, so this is a reduction from the WAVE-FIELD REALITY to a MECHANISITIC ABSTRACTION where things APPEAR to be INDEPENDENT of the SPACE they are ‘working’ in

While a BULLDOZER may appear INDEPENDENT of the LANDSCAPE it is ploughing up, if we LET GO OF OUR VOYEUR VIEW and consider that we, and the BULLDOZER and everything else, are included in an all-including WAVE-FIELD then we move into an understanding in terms of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in ‘the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM’, and if we watch the material forms more closely, since they are continually changing but in a coordinated kind of way, as if everything were interdependent, in which case, maybe we should not jump to the conclusion that these forms are independent and moving about ‘in their own right’ but are more like forms in hologram that are apparitions that belong to an invisible field as with the relation between condensations of the vaporous atmosphere and the atmosphere, constituting a QUANTUM BOTH/AND relation rather than BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR relation.

OF COURSE, this QUANTUM LOGIC relation is what the indigenous aboriginals have built into their language structure, but there we go again with the problem that that which is simpler, if it gets slotting into a system, like binary logic is slotted into language, may take over the whole operation like the cuckoo, and kick out the rightful, less simple occupants.

RECTIFYING THIS IS NON-TRIVIAL in the language case because the whole field of discussions about problems and solutions is now reduced to a level of binary logic simplicity which is incapable of addressing quantum logic complexities.  I there are problems with the TOWN that is GROWING, focusing on the TOWN as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing-in-itself as in BINARY LOGIC is an exercise in FUTILITY given that what is going on is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein we have a QUANTUM LOGIC dynamic wherein the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is INCUBATING THE TOWNING so there no point in trying to fix a problem as if it were developing within the TOWN.

This is PROBLEM with WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE STIMULATED OBSCURANTIST APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING where the mistake is to assume LOCAL AUTHORING, DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING Wave-Field conjugate..

Jill Astbury raises questions in regard to the LOCAL AUTHORING assumption in ‘Crazy for You: The Making of Women’s Madness’ in her inquiry into the World Health Organization study showing that women have twice the incidence of ‘affective disorders’ (depression, bipolar disorder etc.) as men.

Astbury makes the point that psychological stress can manifest in an individual experiencing the stress of being in a group of differing others whose sensitivities may be lower and where the group may be cultivating an environment which is highly stressful so that a sensitive minority may manifest problems which are then assumed to be coming from defectiveness rather than sensitivity of a subset of the group. Research into ‘psychological illness’ will pull the patient out and study the patient and not the group, which thus may be ‘missing the point’ since the stress may be a ‘group based’ phenomenon;

“The research stemming from this viewpoint had a systemic blindness. It could literally not see what it was doing, as the normative quality of its own presuppositions had made them invisible.” – Jill Astbury

Similar observations have been made in mixed groups of ‘locals’ and ‘immigrants’ in the UK where research by Cochrane and Sashidharan shows that the incidence of schizophrenia in non-native born blacks in the U.K. is 3-5 times higher than native born blacks.

From the outset it will be clear that most of the research in this field has followed the conventional epidemiological or medical paradigm by focusing on mental ill health as the dependent variable. It is, therefore, not surprising that there is a lack of empirically grounded research on mental well-being or the psychological resilience and survival of minority groups in this country” — R. Cochrane (University of Birmingham) and S. P. Sashidharan (North Birmingham Mental Health Trust) in ‘Mental Health and Ethnic Minorities’

This DROPPING OUT is built into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and runs SOLELY WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.

* * *

PONZI re the DIFFERENCE between TRANSFORMATION and GROWTH

While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have ‘grown up’ speaking a language that employs GROWTH as a LEGITIMATE and FOUNDATIONAL ACTION IN OUR PHYSICAL REALITY, Moden physics, indigenous aboriginals cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta ALL UNDERSTANDING TRANSFORMATION as the FOUNDATIONAL ACTION IN OUR PHYSICAL REALITY.

TRANSFORMATION entails QUANTUM LOGIC herein MATERIAL FORMS within the PLENUM (the energy-charged PLENUM which in WESTERN CULTURE has been regarded as EMPTY SPACE) re in a BOTH/AND relation where the material forms are distinguishable forms that are AT THE SAME TIME, the PLENUM they are included in, … in the manner of WHORLING-IN-FLOWING in fluid flow where “THE WHORLING IS THE FLOWING” and while there is only ONE INTEGRAL DYNAMIC which is an OVERALL TRANSFORMATION in which we can observe FORMS that APPEAR to be MOVING WITHIN THE FLOW which are, IN REALITY, FEATURES “OF THE FLOW”.

REALITY AS AN ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD IN WHICH MATERIAL FORMS ARE ‘APPEARANCES’ IN THE MANNER OF WHORLING-IN-FLOWING wherein FIGURE and GROUND are only ONE; i.e. the FIGURE is like a WHORLING-in-the-FLOWING so that the REAL STORY is that there is OVERALL TRANSFORMATION.  Since it is all one continuously transforming UNUM, it lies BEYOND CAPTURE IN LANGUAGE.  As Lao Tzu says, the Tao that can be told is NOT the TRUE TAO.

While LANGUAGE, being made of a finite collection of signals or inferences cannot CAPTURE A LIKENESS of the transforming relational continuum, we are aware of the TWO approaches in LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that “ALLUDE TO” or “INFER” the continually flowing world of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, WHICH ARE, RESPECTIVEL;

TRANSFORMATION of the WAVE-FIELD as employed by Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta cultures, and,

GROWTH AND MOTION of MATERIAL FORMS as if within an EMPTY SPACE as employed by WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS

TRANSFORMATION as in FLUID FLOW, is seen by the observer as being composed of WHORLINGS-IN-THE-FLOWING; i.e. FORMS which are DISTINGUISHABLE from the CONTINUUM of the FLUID FLOW, but which are NOT FOUNDATIONAL to the FLOW, a reality that is recognized in indigenous aboriginal language architecture which is VERB-based (FLOW-BASED) and thus does NOT use BEING-based conceptualization which would be ‘THROWING OUT THE BABY WITH THE BATHWATER’, in that WHORLING-IN-THE-FLOWING is APPEARANCE and there is nothing LOCAL and EXPLICIT or in other words BEING-based In the all-including WAV-FIELD FLOW.  In simple terms, since the WHORLING IN THE FLOWING is the REALITY, the WESTERN CULTURE use of the language based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which INVENTS a LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL AGENT with GRAMMAR-given POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, as plays the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

This WESTERN CULTURE MATERIAL BEING-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME is a type of SIMPLIFICATION that forces upon the user the INVENTING of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE ‘CONSTAINING SPACE’ as the price of having SPLIT OUT AS IF ‘ON THEIR OWN’, the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

THIS IS A REDUCTION FROM “TRANSFORMING OF THE PLENUM” (QUANTUM LOGIC) to “MATERIAL GROWTH & MOVEMENT IN EMPTY SPACE” (BINARY LOGIC). and each of these LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE OPTIONS supports their own differing PSYCHOLOGICAL CONCEPTUALIZATION SCHEME, the FORMER ‘QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC’ supporting TRANSFORMATION and the LATTER ‘BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC supporting “MATERIAL GROWTH & MOTION IN EMPTY SPACE”

“TRANSFORMING OF THE PLENUM” gives rise to QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC as used by Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta.

“MATERIAL GROWTH & MOVEMENT IN EMPTY SPACE” gives rise to BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC as used by WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.

* * *

While TRANSFORMATION “INCORPORATES INTEGRATION, MATERIAL … GROWTH & MOVEMENT IN EMPTY SPACE INCORPORATES DIFFERENTIATION (GRAGMENTATION) which, as Bohm points out, is literally ‘driving us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CRAZY.

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, because of OPTING FOR THE SIMPLISTIC BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY have oriented to activity which in WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE is CONCEPTUALIZED as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of material goods’ (as if in EMPTY SPACE), … while in the less simple and far more realistic (sense-experience affirmed) Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta cultures, WHICH HAVE OPTED FOR QUANTUM LOGIC BASED CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY which is in terms of an all-including, INTEGRATING “TRANSFORMATION”.

These DIFFERENT REALITY-CONCEPTUALIZING LANGUAGES “TRANSFORMING OF THE PLENUM” … which is QUANTUM LOGIC based and, … “MATERIAL GROWTH & MOVEMENT IN EMPTY SPACE” which is BINARY LOGIC based, support the sense, on the ONE HAND, of a FULLY INTEGRATED (mitakuye oyasin) REALITY-CONCEPTUALIZATION, and on the OTHER HAND, of a FULLY DIFFERENTIATED (FRAGMENTED) REALITY-CONCEPTUALIZATION.

While the term ‘REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION’ may appear to be an OXYMORON, it is (or can be) a REMINDER that “The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao” as Lao Tzu rightly affirms.

We might therefore devise some sort of MEASURE OF RELATIVE QUANLITY of LANGUAGES, for example, based on their relative ability, which cannot be in terms of the quality of REALITY CAPTURE since REALITY is BEYOND CAPTURE in LANGUAGE, but COULD BE MEASURED IN TERMS OF RELATIONAL DISSONANCE in the SENSE-EXPERIENCE realms stemming from poor match-ups between “what we SAY (our language-summed up intellectual assessment) is physically transpiring and what our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is directly informing us as to what is physically transpiring).

ON THIS ASSESSMENT BASIS, THIS SCHEME ‘LOSES POINTS’ —  “MATERIAL GROWTH & MOVEMENT IN EMPTY SPACE” gives rise to BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC as used by WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS”, by comparison with TRANSFORMING OF THE PLENUM” gives rise to QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC”.

DISCUSSION:  Because TRANSFORMATION incorporates NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INTEGRATION, it DOES NOT FALL INTO THE EXPOSURE TO OBSCURANTISM associated with MATERIAL GROWTH AND MOVEMENT which is BASED on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as if in EMPTY SPACE.  We know that when we SPEAK and thus THINK (CONCEPTUALIZE) in the one-sided terms of the GROWTH of the TOWN, such binary logic based talk is OBSCURANTIST in that it FAILS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY OF THE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESSS that is CONJUGATE with the GROWTH OF THE TOWN as is INNATELY INCLUDED IN ‘TRANSFORMATION’.

SUCH OBSCURANTISM comes with the use of BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE and it flags the fact the LINGUISTIC SIMPLIFICATION purchased at the price of the LOSS OF the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING Wave-Field CONJUGATE (e.g. where there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, we have the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein TOWNING and TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE ARE ONE: i.e. where the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (TOWN) and the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE are ONE, and AS WE KNOW, the ‘TOWN’ gets its LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘ness through our intellectual-conceptual imposing of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE EMPTY SPACE in place of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE LANDSCAPE, as included in our SENSE-EXPERIENCING.

The SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY of INCLUSION IN TRANSFORMATION which is handled within the QUANTUM LOGIC of Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, while LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, is FREE OF THE OBSCURANTISM that comes with the DROPPORING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING Wave-field conjugate in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

SO, in spite of the fact that ‘the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’, … so that we cannot critique a language based conceptualization for failing to capture REALITY, we can critique language based conceptualization on the on the basis of its being more or less INFORMATIVE, using our sense-experience as a reference.  In this case, we can give a higher rating to languages on the basis of LESS SIMPLE DUE TO LESS DROP-OUT as compared to OTHER LANGUAGES.  In this case, languages based on QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMATION are INTEGRATION based and “DROP OUT” LESS than languages based on BINARY LOGIC which are DIFFERENTIATION based and “DROP OUT” the essential FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ANABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the KEY ELEMENT of INTEGRATION thus exposing the language based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS to FRAGMENTATION where THERE ARE NONE (i.e. our sense-experience reality is of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka ‘wave-field’).

LESS SIMPLE:  “TRANSFORMING OF THE PLENUM” gives rise to QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC as used by Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta.

SIMPLIFIED at the price of OBSCURANTISM: “MATERIAL GROWTH & MOVEMENT IN EMPTY SPACE” gives rise to BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC as used by WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.

* * *

Where TRANSFORMATION (a QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPT) is given a foundational role in LANGUAGE-based CONCEPTUALIZING, .. “THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “GROWTH”  (a BINARY LOGIC CONCEPT)

GROWTH is OBSCURANTIST and implies a FLAT SPACE REALITY which is a space where we COULD speak in terms of ‘the GROWTH OF CULTIVATED LAND’ and stop right there, without, or order to be true to our sense-experiencing, being obliged to include mention of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, and if not acknowledging this FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, OBSCURING an essential aspect of our sense-experience reality, that of our inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the Wave-Field aka the Tao.

EMPLOYING THE WORD ‘GROWTH’ as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING”, establishes a DUMBING DOWN of the continuing language exchange since it establishes the WORLD that the continuing LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is fleshing out, is a BINARY LOGIC based world where the TOWN is included in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

The Common Average European Language architecture is BINARY LOGIC based as in the GROWTH example and infuse OBSCURANTISM into language based conceptualization.  This is the source of FRAGMENTATION.

The concept of GROWTH IS BOGUS; i.e. it is an artifact of the simplification imposed with WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE using BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION, which is also present in the FOUNDATIONAL WESTERN CULTURE ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING, which derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche pointed out.  This is the seat of OBSCURANTISM wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING Wave-Field CONJUGATE is DROPPED OUT of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATION SCHEME.

THIS WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION WHICH IS PSYCHOLOGICAL and OPERATIONAL.

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

 * * * * * * 

The NOTA BENE point here is that while TRANSFORMATION has no dependence on LOCAL AUTHORING, … FRAGMENTATION IMPOSES ON LANGUAGE, THE NEED for the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that supports LOCAL AUTHORING.  So, while the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (which is the all-including INTEGRATING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM) gives rise to our WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European Language based form of conceptualization wherein TRANSFORMATION is replaced by FRAGMENTATION.

ENGLISH and the CAE languages, wherein FRAGMENTATION is given a foundational role, become OBSCURANTIST.  It is a WESTERN CUSTOM SOCIAL CUSTOM to interpret LITERALLY the words ‘The PUNCH shattered the recipient’s SKULL’ which constrains the conceptualization to one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING which is IN CONFLICT WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE informing which acknowledges the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the EGG-SHELL SKULL.  This is a sign of the general denial in WESTERN CULTURE of TRANSFORMATION which has been traded out, in language and in the psyche by LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEINGS and thus by FRAGMENTATION.

WHERE DOES ENGLISH get its desired SIMPLIFYING FROM that allows LOCAL and EXPLICIT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION?  Well, it is clearly the (MISSING) FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE that supports the FLOW-BASED INTEGRATION and this is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and thus lies beyond reach of the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT.

As Zen Scholar Alan Watts observes, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS need a VERB BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE to avoid the DUMBING DOWN that is coming from our use of the NOUN and VERB ‘DOUBLE ERROR of LOCAL AUTHORING’ language constructions that is OBSCURING our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.

The SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS construct, wherein we present ourselves (thanks to the double error of naming ang grammar) as INDEPENDENT BEINGS with our own LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS …  is the source of FRAGMENTATION but after centuries, in WESTERN CULTURE, of using such over-simplifying language that tends to INFLATE the EGO of the user, we are LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS, constituted by STATUS and REWARDS and RECOGNITION, as well as PUNISHMENTS and DENIGRATIONS we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have handed out TO OURSELVES, often with a bitterness and sense of alienation INTENSIFIED by the linguistic abstraction of INDEPENDENT BEING.

While the QUANTUM LOGIC sense of INTEGRATION wherein the material form is a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING energy-charged plenum (aka wave-field) leads indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta towards the cultivating and sustaining of resonance in relations, the BINARY LOGIC sense of DIFFERENTIATION of WESTERN CULTURE is leading to PURIFICATION  based on REMOVAL of BAD BEING and PROLIFERATING of GOOD BEINGS.

LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE MATTERS!

* * * *

Our WESTERN CULTURE CONTINUING EFFORTS ORIENTED TO ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS and PRODUCTION of goods, … PUT US INTO A WORLD OF INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION and DISCONNECT US from the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE wherein ‘what we are doing’, IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY , is we are PARTICIPATING IN THE “GREAT HARMONY”, THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION which is NOT OUT THERE IN FRONT OF US in our VOYEUR VIEWS which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are capturing in language and employing as our OPERATIVE REALITY.

Our choice of the SIMPLER OPTION TWO is not working out and a shift to LESS SIMPLE OPTION ONE is our way out of FRAGMENTATION and related dysfunction;

SESS SIMPLE:  “TRANSFORMING OF THE PLENUM” gives rise to QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC as used by Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta.

SIMPLIFIED at the price of OBSCURANTISM: “MATERIAL GROWTH & MOVEMENT IN EMPTY SPACE” gives rise to BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC as used by WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.

* * *