My philosophical investigations have found themselves to have much in common with those of Nietzsche and Bohm and also Vygotsky who to me deserves special mention for the CLARITY of his SUM-UP of architecture of THOUGHT and LANGUAGE, not simply ‘as in common practice’, but with respect to our early natural development where its WAVE-FIELD structure is evident.  Vygotsky in the following few sentences, not only captures the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of our THOUGHT AND LANGUAGE system but how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘screw up’ by DROPPING OUT (of the model of what is going on) the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and acknowledging ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.

The great problem of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE UNDERSTANDING is rooted in our SIMPLIFYING (dumbing-down) of LINGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS by the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and thus constructing a BINARY LOGIC MATTER-and-SPACE based PSEUDO-REALITY that ‘works’ as a simplistic communications interface  even as it DROPS OUT the capability of full-blown WAVE-FIELD conceptualization.  While the full WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE Language of indigenous aboriginals communicates the equivalent of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (which is QUANTUM LOGIC based wherein there is capture of BOTH the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate AND the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, … we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, following a habitual to our culture strategy described by Piaget, are teaching our children to DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate and ‘going with’ ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, hence ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’  … which invokes the LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION (at the expense of DROPPING OUT acknowledgement of the all including WAVE-FIELD dynamic).

GOODBYE QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD COMPREHENSION IN LANGUAGE, HELLO REDUCED BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL WORLD VIEW!

The following INSIGHTFUL CRITIQUE by Vygotsky captures this HUMONGOUS DROP-OUT in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that REMOVES THE WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZING capability.

“Though fundamentally different in nature, the development of scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation:

. . .

“Our disagreement with Piaget centers on one point only, but an important point. He assumes that development and instruction are entirely separate, incommensurate processes, that the function of instruction is merely to introduce adult ways of thinking, which conflict with the child’s own and eventually supplant them. Such a supposition stems from the old psychological tradition of separating the structural from the functional aspects of development.” –Vygotsky

 

Whether we use the terms ‘REAL’ component and ‘IMAGINARY’ component in speaking of WAVE-FIELD reality, or whether we use ‘MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING’ for ‘REAL’ and ‘FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING’, we are speaking of the same ‘ANDROGYNOUS’ WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of reality which WE CAN LOOK AT as LOCAL and EXPLICIT (see that town over there and how it is growing).  This is the CROW’S EYE, BINARY LOGIC STARING MODE of the DIFFERENTIATED VOYEUR OBSERVER.

We also have the option of the INCLUDED OBSERVER where we are SWIMMING the all-including WAVE-FIELD REALITY acknowledging that we are CONDSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD and the INTEGRATED QUANTUM LOGIC relation (where the observer is INCLUDED in that which he is observing).

The former (DIFFERENTIATING) view serves up LOCAL and EXPLICIT structure as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ while in the latter (INTEGRATING) view serves up the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT view as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

Vygotsky terms the LOCAL and EXPLICIT view the ‘SCIENTIFIC VIEW’ and the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT view the ‘SPONTANEOUS VIEW’, and points out that (as in a WAVE-FIELD reality) scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation:

NO-ONE DECREED THAT IN COMING UP WITH ‘LANGUAGE’ AS A MEANS OF SHARING OUR COMPLEX SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE WAVE-FIELD, THAT WE HAD TO ‘SIMPLIFY SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY’ IN ORDER TO SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE BASED REPORTING ON OUR ‘SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY’, … AND WHILE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS AND ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS went forward in their LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with the full un-simplified QUANTUM LOGIC FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate (no fragmentation needed here)

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have been in the habit, perhaps since the era of Parmenides (500 BCE) of using a WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate WHICH SERVES AS THE NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT ‘INTEGRATING VESSEL’ THAT BRINGS RELATIONAL MEANING (“CONTEXT”) TO THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT “DIFFERENTIATED FRAGMENTS” (“CONTENT”).

While this WESTERN CULTURE simplifying ‘shorthand’ language ‘gets A BASIC MESSAGE ACROSS’, it is a SIMPLIFIED CONCEPTUALIZATION that reduces the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BOTH/AND structure to the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR structure.  In terms of WAVE-FIELD structure, as in the Vygotsky – Piaget discourse, it is easy to FALL INTO THE TRAP of thinking that CONTEXT (the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate) and CONTENT (the MALE ASSERTING/ACCTUALIZING conjugate) are in a BINARY LOGIC relation such that we could say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ as if it were a local, explicit thing-in-its-own-right (floating in an absolute empty and infinite containing space) without acknowledging the QUANTUM LOGIC reality wherein ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ so that ‘what looks like GROWTH OF THE TOWN’ is at the same time SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS or in other words, TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.

* * *

The title of this note; RESONANCE IS BEYOND BEING is intended to bring recall to our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao which comes BEFORE LANGUAGE and which we have “INVENTED LANGUAGE” as a TOOL to enable sharing of some sort of CONCEPTUALIZATION of our sense-experience so that we can ‘learn’ from one another without each of us having to learn by way of our own sense-experiencing, some of these experiences being injurious and even lethal.  When Emerson warns of ‘the tool running away with the workman, the human with the divine’, he is warning of how the SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITIES of our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALATION tend to be CONFUSED FOR REALITY, a REALITY that lies innately beyond capture in language; i.e. the reality of our inclusion on the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.

As in the incident of Orson Welles 1939 radio broadcast of a DRAMATIZATION of H.G. Welles WAR of the WORLDS, people who tuned in late and heard what appeared to be a LIVE NEWS REPORTING of an attack by aliens, PANICKED, because no matter how UNGROUNDED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, the radio/television new-broadcasts may be (e.g. they differ immensely between North Korea, the U.S., Russia and China)

RESONANCE is BEYOND BEING suggests that our experience as inclusions in the all-including WAVE-FIELD is BEYOND CAPTURE in BEING-based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, suggesting that we need a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that is FLOW-BASED where forms are RELATIONAL FLOW-FEATURES and NOT ‘LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, as was the choice Piaget which Vygotsky was objecting to.  In Vygotsky’s approach to ARCHITECTING LANGUAGE, scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation.  (or in other words, ‘real’ and ‘imaginary’  WAVE-FIELD components represent two sided of the same WAVE-FIELD concept formation.

The FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is the INTEGRATOR, and when it is DROPPED OUT OF THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE as WESTERN CULTURE DROPS IT OUT, we no longer have the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJGUATE to INTEGRATE the multiplicity MALE of ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENTS and FRAGMENTATION is the result.  As the Flight of the Conchords song goes, ‘Too many Dicks on the Dance-Floor’, the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE is the source of FRAGMENTATION.

We live in a WAVE-FIELD reality and this we understand at the level of our sense-experience which is deeper than and NOT YET SCREWED UP BY OUR ATTEPTS TO ARTICULATE IT WHICH REQUIRES US TO REDUCE AND CAPTURE IT IN LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALZATION SCHEMES, some of which (QUANTUM LOGIC based) are LESS SIMPLE than others (BINARY LOGIC based).

LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of sense-experience reality come in MORE SIMPLE (BINARY LOGIC) and LESS SIMPLE (QUANTUM LOGIC) architectures and while both of these fall far short of capturing our actual SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, there are significant differences between them, which is what Vygotsky is pointing out in his critique of Piaget’s approach which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (spontaneous concept) which together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate (scientific concepts) captures the WAVE-FIELD structure of our sense-experience.

IN WAVE-FIELD REALITY, THERE ARE NO MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES WITH THEIR OWN LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS, THERE ARE ONLY RELATIONAL RESONANCE FEATURES WITHIN THE RELATIONAL WAVE-FIELD

 

ALL of this plays into our efforts to develop LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS that serve to stimulate shareable (though necessarily limited) impressions of our respective sense-experiences, in order that we may learn from one another’s experience, so as to ‘find our way to resonant sense-experiences’ while ‘avoiding the dissonant sense-experiences’.

The central issue in this note pivots from awareness that THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS (that is just a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche has pointed out) and that the REALITY of our sense-experience is of INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, which, in order to understand in word-based language-sharing, we must resist all foundational dependence on MATERIAL BEING.  This is a point which Schroedinger was convinced his physicist colleagues in Modern physics research were SCREWING UP ON by trying to perpetuate a material particle pase to ‘reality’ using the ‘mathematical device’ probability to suggest a foundational role for material particles whose physical observability was governed by probability.

“Let me say at the outset, that in this discourse, I am opposing not a few special statements of quantum physics held today (1950s), I am opposing as it were the whole of it, I am opposing its basic views that have been shaped 25 years ago, when Max Born put forward his probability interpretation, which was accepted by almost everybody.” (Schrödinger E, ‘The Interpretation of Quantum Physics’). … “I don’t like it, and I’m sorry I ever had anything to do with it.” (Erwin Schroedinger speaking about the ‘legitimate science’ interpretation of Quantum Physics).

In Schroedinger’s view, RESONANCE IS BEYOND ‘BEING’.  INSTEAD OF ‘THINGS THAT RESONATE’, IT IS RESONANCE THAT THINGS’ (THE WAVE-FIELD PRECIPITATES CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD AS DEFINES THE QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION.

No-one ever said that it would be easy to capture WAVE-FIELD reality with the abstract constructs of LANGUAGE, becasuse there is every evidence that the world of our sense-experience reality is of inclusion a continually transforming flow-field without a material foundation.   This is why Schroedinger was so frustrated by his Physicist colleagues who were so insistent on imposing a MATERIAL (PARTICLE) Foundation in the Modern physics .

This is LIKEWISE at the core of the Vygotsky – Piaget difference, since Vygotsky’s WAVE-FIELD view wherein scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation:  is expressing the view that while we are in the habit of using language to speak of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (scientific) and the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (spontaneous), these are in reality ‘two sides of the WAVE-FIELD phenomena).

BUT THE WESTERN CULTURE PRACTICE AS REGARDS ASSOCIATING LANGUAGE WITH PHYSICAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY has been to;

-A- SPLIT APART the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONUGATES.

-B- DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING COMPONENT AND SUBSTITUTE ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE.

As in the example, ‘The TOWN is GROWING’ which constitutes a REDUCTION OF QUANTUM LOGIC TO BINARY LOGIC.

 

BY CONTRAST, the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta practice is to retain the full QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization a in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is an acknowledging that scientific  (local and explicit) and spontaneous concepts (nonlocal and implicit) represent two sides of the same concept formation: i.e. the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD. 

Piaget’s support for -A- SPLITTING APART the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate from the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate , and -B- DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate was perhaps coming from long established tradition within WESTERN CULTURE which had oriented to belief in a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE for DIFFERENTIATION into the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and thus FRAGMENTED reality unlike indigenous aboriginal tradition which supported the primacy of INTEGRATION of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in reality as ‘the GREAT HARMONY’.

The WESTERN CULTURE DECK, with Piaget ‘dealing’, was thus ‘stacked against Vygotsky’ in the latter’s pitch to acknowledge the WAVE-FIELD basis of reality which could be seen in the natural development of children and their learning process.

Today, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS REMAIN “LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS” and unable to make the needed SWITCH to a QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD consistent LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.  This is a switch that comes with the understanding that RESONANCE IS PRIMARY and that RESONANCE IS BEYOND BEING.

 * * *