The DROP-OUT in going from SENSE-EXPERIENCE informed PSYCHE to LANGUAGE-informed PSYCHE that is a function of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

Indigenous aboriginal INTEGRATING language architecture is to Modern physics’ QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC as Western European Culture DIFFERENTIATING language architecture is to Newtonian physics BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC

SYNOPSIS:

In plain terms, my philosophical investigations have ‘followed up’ on the findings of Nietzsche and Bohm in regard to MISCONCEPTIONS that come to us through THE LATTER of TWO DIFFERENT FORMS of LANGUAGE based communications; INTEGRATION and DIFFERENTIATION: 

INTEGRATION: In Indigenous aboriginal languages as in Modern physics, in the form of INTEGRATION where FIGURE and GROUND are only ONE (i.e. where the GROUND is the all-including WAVE-FIELD and the FIGURE is a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD which is the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation).

DIFFERENTIATION: The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE employs DIFFERENTIATION where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO (i.e. the GROUND is conceived of as ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT and the FIGURE is conceived of as a MATERIAL BASED ABSOLUTE BEING which is captured in a BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR relation.

Languages, such as the Common Average European Languages (Whorf’s classification) are DIFFERENTIATION based and lead to FRAGMENTATION in both the WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHE and in the WESTERN CULTURE social dynamic, a DIFFERENTIATION that is the source of SOCIAL DYSFUNCTION in the form of FRAGMENTATION (see excerpt entitled ‘FRAGMENTATION’ from Bohm’s Wholeness and the Implicate Order in this essay).  The WESTERN CULTURE DOMINATED GLOBAL SOCIAL DYNAMIC is ON A PATH OF PROGRESSIVE FRAGMENTATION that is being SOWN and FUELLED by the DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE of WESTERN CULTURE that is due to the LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTING of ‘EMPTY SPACE’ for the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, so that LANGUAGE-based ‘REALITY’ CONSTRUCTIONS are in a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY language architecture as exemplified by ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, which paints a picture of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, as contrasts with EASTERN (indigenous aboriginal) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which incorporates the full ‘ANDROGYNOUS’ WAVE-FIELD structure as in ‘there is TOWNING (male-asserting) in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (female accommodating).

THIS ESSAY reviews how WESTERN CULTURE social dynamics are FRAGMENTING as a result of the SIMPLIFIED COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and thus ONE-SIDEDLY orienting to the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE.  In MATHEMATICAL TERMS, this means that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is based on a REDUCTIVE SIMPLIFICATION of the REAL + IMAGINARY COMPLEX SIGNALLING to a ONE-SIDED ‘REAL ONLY’ SIGNALLING SYSTEM.  This SIMPLIFICATION can also be described in terms of a REDUCTIVE SIMPLIFICATION from ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE language structure to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY language structure.  This DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (the equivalent to dropping out the IMAGINARY component of a complex signal), as is the case in the Common Average European Language architecture, is the source of progressive FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONSTRUCTIONS of an OPERATIVE REALITY .  This WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE BASED DYSFUNCTION, for example, REDUCES the WESTERN SYSTEMS OF JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE by SIMPLIFYING the QUANTUM LOGIC  (BOTH/AND) relation of BALANCE and IMBALANCE to the BINARY LOGIC (EITHER/OR) options of either IS or IS NOT.

This sets the stage for the reductive substituting of EITHER/OR DIFFERENTIATION in place of BOTH/AND INTEGRATION and thus ‘the TOWNS are GROWING’ in place of ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  In the latter INTEGRATION based conceptualizing, our understanding is that everything is in flux giving us a sense of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of FIGURE  (TOWNING) and GROUND (TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) as with the CLUSTERING of ants, which contrasts with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT nature of the DIFFERENTIATED FIGURE (the TOWN) as with the ant CLUSTER.  In the former DIFFERENTIATION based conceptualization, the imputed  BINARY LOGIC BEING based ‘CLUSTER’ serves as the LOCAL, EXPLICIT influence base for GRAMMAR-given LOCAL AUTHORING of actions such as growth and development, whereas in the latter INTEGRATION based conceptualization , the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘CLUSTERING’ serves as a gathering-scattering influence which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in keeping with the overall ANDROGYNOUS (COMPLEX as in the REAL plus IMAGINARY) relational dynamic of TRANSFORMATION. 

In WESTERN CULTURE, the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE OPTION has been the SIMPLIFYING OPTION which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMODATING CONJUGATE (the ‘imaginary signal component’) and formulates constructions  by way of the REDUCTION of the WAVE-FIELD to the one-sided MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE (the ‘real’ signal component) by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.  This is the equivalent of switching from INTEGRATION to DIFFERENTIATION as the basis for language-based CONSTRUCTIONS of  SUBSTITUTE REALITY; i.e. switching from the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ to the BINARY LOGIC ‘the TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’, as if it were an INDEPENDENT LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHORING AGENCY in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.  Such MISINFORMED FREEDOM invites actions DEEMED INDEPENDENT due to BINARY LOGIC language based on DIFFERENTIATION, actions which are instead, as understood in a QUANTUM LOGIC language based on INTEGRATION, actions within a world of global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence, the WESTERN CULTURE MISINFORMED FREEDOM being the source of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE influenced social dynamics.

* * * 

TITLE:  The DROP-OUT in going from SENSE-EXPERIENCE informed PSYCHE to LANGUAGE-informed PSYCHE that is a function of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

Our experience of inclusion in the all-including transforming relational continuum aka ‘the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao is not something that can be captured in words, but can only be ALLUDED TO or INFERRED by LANGUAGE and the SHORTFALL or DROPOUT depends on the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.   PSYCHOLOGY (how we imagine reality) and PHYSICS (how we model reality) are two forms of understanding our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum that we COMBINE, as well as we can, with LANGUAGE.

The ‘as well as we can’ qualifier is added because our sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao aka the transforming relational continuum is beyond ‘outright capture’ in LANGUAGE and different LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES make use of different simplification or reduction schemes to precipitate in the word-based scheme, triggers that stimulate recall of sense-experiences of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.

Language capture and EXPRESSION of sense experience calls for a complex coordinating scheme between our physical sensations and our psychological interpretation and linguistic expression of such complex experience.  The way that ‘things can go wrong’ here gives us clues to the structure of this complexity; e.g. PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) shows us how our scheme for interpreting visual or oral stimulus is NOT STANDARD but is ‘shaped’ or ‘conditioned’ by the particulars of our life-long sense-experience.  A loud ‘bang’ can draw mirth from children popping balloons at a birthday party but for the old war-veteran with PTSD, that very same stimulus can be TERRIFYING.

The GENERAL CASE is that we cannot SPLIT APART ‘what is to be observed’ from the ‘observer’, as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS commonly do, without OVER-SIMPLIFYING what is a much less simple ‘reality’.  PTSD or in milder terms, OUR EXPERIENCE-SHAPED-SENSE-INTERPRETATION-and-RESPONSE is a basic reality that is part of our coordinated physical and psychological development.  

The science of psychology is auxiliary to physics.  The two mutually support one another, and it is only when they are united that a complete science is formed.  From our standpoint, the antithesis of subject and object, in the ordinary sense, does not exist.” — Ernst Mach. ‘The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical,

My philosophical investigations are strongly informed by the work of Mach, Nietzsche, Bohm and Jantsch and THERE IS A LOT IN COMMON IN THEIR RESPECTIVE WORKS that can contribute to a general understanding of the complexities of LANGUAGE as a ‘simplifying packaging system’ for our complex PHYSICAL SENSATIONS and PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPRESSIONS.

Meanwhile, “The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao. The name that can be named is not the true name.” –Lao Tzu.

In other words, it is unrealistic to think in terms of language as a tool capable of REPRESENTATION of the Tao aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the transforming relational continuum.  The transforming relational continuum IS NOT “RE-PRESENTABLE since, as a transforming continuum it has no capturable beginning and no capturable ending as everything is in flux.

There is a MAJOR CHALLENGE RIGHT HERE AND RIGHT NOW, ..  IN HAVING TO USE THE SIMPLIFYING TOOL OF “LANGUAGE” TO DEAL WITH SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY that is NOT SIMPLE and is in fact BEYOND THE REACH OF DIRECT LANGUAGE BASED ARTICULATION, forcing us to resort to ‘relational inference’ or poetic formulations, … OR IF NOT, dealing in LANGUAGE that is CAPABLE ONLY OF CONSTRUCTING SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITIES which can only INFER what lies beyond reach of the LOCAL EXPLICIT constructions.

“A man’s reach can exceed his grasp, or what’s a META PHOR?’  — Marshall Mcluhan.

Being constrained to using ‘rational’ LANGUAGE to talk about this subject which ranges into the real world of sense-experience which lies beyond the reach of RATIONAL LANGUAGE-CAPTURE presents a major communications challenge which can be confusing if we don’t make a clear road-map as to where we are going to be going.

ROAD MAP TO DISCUSSION on The DROP-OUT in going from SENSE-EXPERIENCE informed PSYCHE to LANGUAGE-informed PSYCHE that is a function of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

First, let me say that we would be far better equipped to go on this philosophical investigative journey were we employing a language such as Algonquin, which is QUANTUM LOGIC ready, rather than this language of popular English which is BINARY LOGIC constrained.

For example; if ENGLISH were QUANTUM LOGIC ready, we could say;

“There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  Quantum logic is the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium, son in this example, our understanding is that ‘the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is where everything is in flux so that the TOWNING is like a WHORLING in a FLOWING.  There is NO BINARY LOGIC CONTENT IN A CONTAINER SPLIT HERE where the CONTENT is independent of the CONTAINER and con MOVE within the CONTAINER without changing the CONTAINER.  In the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, the CONTENT is the CONTAINER just as the WHORLING IS THE FLOWING and it is NOT THE CASE that ‘the WHORL MOVES THROUGH THE FLOW as in the BINARY LOGIC understanding.  The only way to understand movement and development of the TOWNING is within the overall context of the TRANSFORMING UNUM which includes everything.  This is the nature of QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD reality.

But ENGLISH as popularly employed is BINARY LOGIC based in which case we must ‘manage’ the actions and developments of ‘the TOWN’ as if it were a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing-in-itself with ITS OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT, as if it were situated within A CONTAINING SOMETHING COMPLETELY SEPARATE FROM ITSELF.  This is the nature of BINARY LOGIC MATERIALIST REALITY.

In this continuing discussion, it is necessary to discuss and compare both QUANTUM LOGIC and BINARY LOGIC systems of SIGNALLING (which are NOT systems of REPRESENTATION). The point that is being made is that the BINARY LOGIC signalling as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ is innately SIMPLER (it embodies a DROP OUT of COMPLEXITY) than the QUANTUM LOGIC signaling as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is LESS SIMPLE in that BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC is DIFFERENTIATON based and constrains its constructions to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTION while QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND LOGIC is INTEGRATION based and includes in its constructions the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING receptacle in CONJUGATE RELATION with the MALE ASSERTING ACTION and DEVELOPMENT.

Thus, the indigenous aboriginal QUANTUM LOGIC language captures the SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS to open up a hole for GROWTH of CULTIVATED and DEVELOPED LAND.  In this QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, there is NO NEED FOR AN EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE as in our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based language construction..

* * *

BREATHING and REFLECTION STOP.  Pause for a moment here

* * *

OK, ARE WE ABLE to remember the ground we just covered in discussing The DROP-OUT in going from SENSE-EXPERIENCE informed PSYCHE to LANGUAGE-informed PSYCHE that is a function of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE?

Evidently, there are TWO different “ARCHITECTURAL” approaches that arise which have both been deployed in constructing LANGUAGE based SIGNALLING systems.

It is important to recall, as mentioned, that LANGUAGE is NOT up to the job of constructing REPRESENTATIONS of reality since our sense-experience reality of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum is EVERYTHING.  So, in the WAVE-FIELD understanding, we as CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD are “ONE WITH EVERYTHING” by virtue of ALL THINGS being INCLUSIONS (CONDENSATIONS) in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.  This is the understanding that Schroedinger shares in ‘What is Life?’ that explains the observation; “EAST IS EAST and WEST IS WEST and never the twain shall meet’ – Rudyard Kipling, and why it is that Indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE conveys WAVE-FIELD reality while WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE serves up SIMPLIFIED SIGNALS which convey ONLY THE ‘REAL’ component of the ‘COMPLEX’ WAVE-FIELD signal and DROP OUT the ‘IMAGINARY’ signal component. (aka ‘MALE-ASSERTING’ and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING’).

NOTA BENE: While Indigenous aboriginal language are INTEGRATION based (QUANTUM LOGIC based) their ‘signaling’ scheme is the full-blown WAVE-FIELD scheme with its complex ‘real’ + imaginary structure (i.e. its androgynous female-accommodating — male-asserting conjugate structure as exemplified by ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is reduced to the MALE-ASSERTING AGENCY only ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods (with no mention of the conjugate SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS).

So, this is the LANGUAGE-INFUSED SOURCE of DYSFUNCTION in WESTERN CULTURE that is coming from the use of LANGUAGE that has been DUMBED DOWN from the WAVE-FIELD capable level to the ‘REAL’ component only level, or in other words, the full androgynous FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING language structure has, in WESTERN CULTURE been reduced to a one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY construction by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate.  THIS IS THE SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM OF “FRAGMENTATION” IN THE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-DIRECTED SOCIAL DYNAMIC

To understand this in terms of the DUMBING DOWN from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC, one needs to understand the difference between QUANTUM LOGIC which is INTEGRATION based (as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) which implies NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION, and BINARY LOGIC which is DIFFERENTIATION based as in ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’) which implies LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITIES.  The FRAGMENTATION derives from the LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITIES IN A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTEM EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

As Schroedinger points out, when the creative process is NOT LOCAL AND EXPLICIT but NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, as in WAVE-FIELD reality, every CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD can be understood as part of the overall transformational agency, not only is ‘everything related’ (mitakuye oyasin) but everything is ‘sacred’ part of the all-including creative sourcing of the WAVE-FIELD universe.

… In Christian terminology to say: ‘Hence I am God Almighty’ sounds both blasphemous and lunatic. But please disregard these connotations for the moment and consider whether the above inference is not the closest a biologist can get to proving God and immortality at one stroke.

In itself, the insight is not new. The earliest records to my knowledge date back some 2,500 years or more. From the early great Upanishads the recognition ATHMAN = BRAHMAN (the personal self equals the omnipresent, all-comprehending eternal self) was in Indian thought considered, far from being blasphemous, to represent the quintessence of deepest insight into the happenings of the world. The striving of all the scholars of Vedanta was, after having learnt to pronounce with their lips, really to assimilate in their minds this grandest of all thoughts.

Again, the mystics of many centuries, independently, yet in perfect harmony with each other (somewhat like the particles in an ideal gas) have described, each of them, the unique experience of his or her life in terms that can be condensed in the phrase: DEUS FACTUS SUM (I have become God).

To Western ideology the thought has remained a stranger.  – Erwin Schroedinger, ‘What is LIfe’, ‘Epilogue: On Determinism and Free Will’

“ … the personal self equals the omnipresent, all-comprehending eternal self” is describing the relationship between a CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD and the WAVE-FIELD.

* * *

My focus in this essay, is NOT to debate the religious implications of physical phenomena, … my focus is on trying to explain LANGUAGE based CONFUSION that is the source of rising FRAGMENATION in WESTERN CULTURE social collectives, and to provide further context for Bohm’s observations on FRAGMENTATION.

Schroedinger’s comments are important support for the understanding that we share inclusion in an all-including transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS.  That is ATMAN = BRAHMAN understanding is the equivalent to QUANTUM LOGIC relation “CONDENSATION” – “FIELD”

So, it is useful to reflect on how the less-simple QUANTUM LOGIC (CONDENSATIONS and FIELD) relations come into play here and SUPERSEDE the simpler, BINARY LOGIC (MATTER and EMPTY SPACE) foundations of WESTERN CULTURE reality conceptualization.

There are some WESTERN CULTURE MISIMPRESSIONS of REALITY that need to be addressed in connection with this upgrade from the BINARY LOGIC to the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of reality, such as the misleading WESTERN CULTURE concept of SUBOPTIMIZATION which is the BINARY LOGIC based source of infusing DYSFUNCTION into WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS.  The QUANTUM LOGIC understanding is the WAVE-FIELD understanding and the WAVE-FIELD world is a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

LANGUAGE-based CONFUSION occurs in WESTERN CULTURE due to the common use of BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE signals which serve up FRAGMENTED reality constructions of a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialties, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialties, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

The problem of FRAGMENTATION begins with the LANGUAGE-based DUMBING DOWN of WAVE-FIELD reality with its COMPLEX  REAL + IMAGINARY component structure (MALE-ASSERTING + FEMALE ACCOMMODATING) relational structure, by DROPPING OUT the IMAGINARY component (the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate) and deploying the common WESTERN CULTURE simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY which consists of only the MALE-ASSERTING conjugate or in other words, the ‘REAL’ component. ‘

This is where the FRAGMENTATION that Bohm is talking about, is coming from.

What this WESTERN CULTURE DUMBING DOWN of LANGUAGE to a BINARY LOGIC basis does includes the following;

WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE is based on one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.   There is a LANGUAGE-induced BLINDNESS to the FEMALE-INDUCTIVE conjugate influences, hence, for example, the THIN SKULL RULE where MALE ASSERTING ACTION such as PUNCHING is held to be the FULL AND SOLE AUTHOR OF THE DAMAGE, thus disregarding the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE as is a part of physical reality that is taken into account in Modern physics and in Indigenous Aboriginal language, which is QUANTUM LOGIC based or in other words WAVE-FIELD based which means that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A LOCAL AUTHOR OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS. But the LOCAL AUTHOR ASSUMPTION IS GIVEN A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE.  The DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE CONJUGATE (aka the IMAGINARY COMPONENT of the COMPLEX VARIABLE).

Because WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE it is replete with situations where our sense-experience is reporting on the influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (aka the IMAGINARY COMPONENT of the COMPLEX SIGNAL) which our LANGUAGE IS IN DENIAL, as in the THIN SKULL RULE which obliges us to impute FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING RESPONSIBILITY to the MALE ASSERTING even where FEMALE ACCOMMODATING is clearly the primary influence.

The result of the DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS (though not in indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta language constructions) is the source of FRAGMENTATION due to the one-sided MALE ASSERTING action inference where the DEA ABSCONDITA (the missing, fundamental female accommodating influence) is replaced by ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

REFLECTION shows us, instead, that primary reality is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD in which MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS are APPEARANCES and it is the great mistake of WESTERN CULTURE to construct a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on those APPEARANCES while dismissing the real FOUNDATIONAL ROLE OF THE INVISIBLE WAVE-FIELD.

The MATERIAL FORMS, including HUMANINGS in the WAVE-FIELD, are NOT the LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and development; i.e. THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS, even though WESTERN CULTURE gives the DOUBLE ERROR abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE.

The ‘successes’ of WESTERN JUSTICE and MEDICINE are measured in terms of the elimination of PATHOGENS as associates with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based BELIEF in LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.

The SUCCESSES are DEPENDENTLY BASED on the correctness of the assumption of the INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL and the associated WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC scheme of REWARDING  and PROLIFERATING THE GOOD INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUALS and PUNISHING and ELIMINATING the BAD INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUALS.   This is a PURIFICATION oriented approach based on DIFFERENTIATION which contrasts with the BALANCE oriented  approach based on INTEGRATION.

* * *