The GRAND SUM-UP
This short article has been titled ‘THE GRAND SUM-UP’ because it goes straight to the heart of where-and-how WESTERN CULTURE SPLITS OFF from EASTERN CULTURE (indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta); i.e. in their mutually contradicting ARCHITECTURES OF LANGUAGE,
HOW COULD IT BE that two groups of people could come up with such RADICALLY DIFFERING “REALITIES” as (A) THE QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD REALITY where material forms are ‘condensations’ within the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED … and (B) THE BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL OBJECT REALITY where material forms are ABSOLUTELY EXISTING LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE wherein ALL THINGS ARE INDEPENDENT? The former group seeing REALITY in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT terms of a continually flowing wave-field and the latter group seeing REALITY in the LOCAL and EXPLICIT terms of independent material beings interacting in empty space?
[[ we shall see how the WAVE-FIELD nature of REALITY can support BOTH the REAL (LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIALIST) as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, … AND, the IMAGINARY (NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT RELATIONAL) as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, as “OPTIONAL REALITIES”, … and how there is a LINGUISTIC HIJACKING by WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES; i.e. a TAKE-OVER by LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECT based REALITY (composed of INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS IN EMPTY SPACE), that ECLIPSES the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RELATIONAL REALITY, thanks to the SIMPLICITY of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.]]
At the bottom of this is the LANGUAGE-BASED SPLIT between LANGUAGE with a QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY foundation wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) as supported by the Modern physics understanding wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, … versus a BINARY LOGIC REALITY foundation wherein EVERYTHING IS INDEPENDENT, an abstract notion INFUSED INTO WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES and REAFFIRMED by NEWTONIAN physics, giving a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN REALITY to the ABSTRACTION of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS” that notionally reside in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, this WESTERN CULTURE cosmology persisting due to its having been BUILT INTO THE BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that now serves as our WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY.
‘The WESTERN CULTURE supporting the use of a BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE base with its LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, … and the indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta which support the use of a QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE base with its NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, which is consistent with MODERN PHYSICS’
The WESTERN CULTURE “ERROR” which is in fact the Nietzsche identified LANGUAGE-based “DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR” that invokes the UNREAL ABSTRACTION of “LOCAL AUTHORING” is the SOURCE of growing FRAGMENTATION that, in the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is “LOCKED IN BY THE HIGH SWITCHING COSTS” to overcome PRIDE and PROFIT.
* * *
We live in (share inclusion in) the all-including transforming relational continuum, also known as the WAVE-FIELD. As Modern physics attests, we, and all material forms are CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, which is beyond capture in ANY LANGUAGE because the whole of reality is a continuing flow.
Meanwhile, LANGUAGES have been developed which are composed of symbols or words that give persisting meaning. Since everything is in flux, persisting patterns tagged with persisting symbol-based words (allusion to sense-experience based impressions which are ‘patterns’ that persist and do not, once they are uttered, change their meaning, can only INFER the sense-experience reality of inclusion in the flow (aka the Tao). So, while ‘the Tao than can be told is not the true Tao’, as Lao Tzu points out, BECAUSE everything in sense-experience reality is in flux, LANGUAGE based on sounds or symbols that PERSIST in their meaning-giving, cannot directly capture a REPRESENTATION of the FLUID REALITY of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, however, systems based on symbols. There are LANGUAGE-based WORK-AROUNDS, such as described by Wittgenstein, where the symbols are used are not offered as ‘symbols for things’’ but are designed for subservience to the fluid dynamical reality they are inferring.
This LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SCHEME based on ‘symbols for things’ used as an expedient to capture the ‘RELATIONS AMONG THINGS’ which are in constant flux, opens the way to a system of language that works by ‘relational inference’, avoiding persisting ‘thingness’ of material being which BLOCKS the language goal of conveying impressions of a reality in continuing flux. Wittgenstein speaks of this ‘tactic’ where language based on ‘symbols’ such as alphabetic symbols and ‘words’ with ‘fixed meaning’ can appear to ‘overcome’ their ‘static inference foundations’;
6.54 My propositions are elucidatory in this way: he who understands me finally recognizes them as senseless, when he has climbed out through them, on them, over them. (He must so to speak throw away the ladder, after he has climbed up on it.)
He must surmount these propositions; then he sees the world rightly.
7.0 Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. (“Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen”),
–Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Here we can see that what is being suggested is to use language for CONCEPTUALIZATION rather than REPRESENTATION. That is, REPRESENTATION of a transforming relational continuum IS NOT FEASIBLE when the REPRESENTATION SCHEME IS CONSTRAINED TO UNCHANGING BUILDING BLOCK ELEMENTS WITH FIXED, PERSISTING MEANING.
HOWEVER, what Wittgenstein is pointing out is that the basic symbolic elements can be chosen NOT WITH THE PURPOSE OF REPRESENTATION in mind, which is HOPELESS where one is trying to REPRESENT a FLUID REALITY using symbols that convey FIXED MEANING. But this ALTERNATIVE is different where we admit that the symbols, because they are fixed, while they are not capable of REPRESENTATION, “ARE CAPABLE OF CONCEPTUALIZATION” which works by ‘tricking the observing mind’ to get it to recall sense-experience which is part of the ongoing transforming relational continuum
CONCEPTUALIZATION AS THE BASIS OF LANGUAGE RATHER THAN REPRESENTATION takes the LANGUAGE DESIGNER down a DIFFERENT PATH.
This is where WESTERN CULTURE, where the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SCHEME has stayed on the REPRESENTATION TACK, parts ways with the Indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta path, which has ORIENTED to a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SCHEME based on CONCEPTUALIZATION, … where MEANING is conveyed NOT BY THE SUM OF THE PARTS but by the RELATIONS AMONG THE PARTS in which case the designer of the communication “… must so to speak throw away the ladder he has climbed up on, after he has climbed up on it”
With respect to LANGUAGE ARCHITECTING IN GENERAL, ITS “GOODBYE TO THE VALUE THAT WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS PUT ON THE “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” and HELLO TO THE VALUE THAT MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents PUT ON THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
This thinking/understanding based on the choice between “EITHER” LOCAL AND EXPLICIT “OR” NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” invites an understanding that lies BEYOND BINARY LOGIC ARGUMENTS OVER WHETHER REALITY IS PARTICLE OR WAVE-BASED, and takes into the QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH/AND” understanding reality wherein the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “PARTICLE” is a CONDENSATION of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “WAVE-FIELD”, where we can understand “BOTH” PARTICLE “AND” WAVE as a JANUS-FACED ONE, without getting BOGGED DOWN in an EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC based DILEMMA.
The KEY POINT here is in regard to LANGUAGE DESIGN and TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES (WESTERN CULTURE and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL); the WESTERN APPROACH which MAKES NO ATTEMPT TO AVOID DEPOENDENCY on the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT but FLAUNTS ITS USE OF THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT, …. versus the INDIGENOUS ABORIGNAL APPROACH which “SKATES TO WHERE THE PUCK IS GOING TO BE”, or in other words, develops LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE wherein the FIXED THINGS ARE USED ONLY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MATRIX OF RELATIONS WHICH IS THE REAL TAKE-AWAY while the FIXED THINGS used in the development of the relational matrix are ARBITRARY, as expressed by Physicist Geoffrey Chew;
Modern physics researchers Geoffrey Chew and John Wheeler describe basic dynamics in terms of the ‘Surprise version of the Game of Twenty Questions’. The point here is that in the WAVE-FIELD reality where there are no LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, forms develop in a purely relational manner; i.e.
[Geoffrey Chew]: “when you formulate a question, you have to have some basic concepts that you are accepting in order to formulate the question. But in the bootstrap approach, where the whole system represents a network of relationships without any firm foundation, the description of our subject can be begun at a great variety of different places. There isn’t any clear starting point. And the way our theory has developed in the last few years, we quite typically don’t know what questions to ask. We use consistency as the guide, and each increase in the consistency suggests something that is incomplete, but it rarely takes the form of a welldefined question. We are going beyond the whole question-and-answer framework.”
A constructively interfering matrix of propositions can infer something which lies innately beyond them. The ‘surprise version of the game of Twenty Questions of modern physics (Geoffrey Chew and John Wheeler) makes this case. Understanding can lie in bringing a multiplicity of interfering propositions into connective confluence and extracting the coherency that develops in the confluence as the take-away understanding (as also in holography).”
Here we see the same GEOMETRY OF THOUGHT as in Wittgenstein’s approach where RELATIONS are put into PRIMACY over the THINGS that the “RELATIONS ARE BETWEEN”, which is a way of understanding REALITY that DOES NOT GET HUNG UP ON A LIMITING VIEW by imputing FIXED BEING to MATERIAL FORMS, … something which DOES NOT MAKE SENSE given our assumption of the QUANTUM LOGIC world as an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD in which there are MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS.
While WESTERN CULTURE has, in its LANGUAGE DESIGN, approached design in a TAIL WAGS THE DOG fashion, NAMING and KEEPING THE MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS AND THROWING OUT THE WAVE-FIELD AFTER CONFUSING IT FOR ‘EMPTY SPACE”. PURSUING THE REVERSE ORDER, the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE has, in its LANGUAGE DESIGN, opened up to the PRIMARY REALITY of the RELATIONS IN THE WORLD UNDERSTOOD AS FLOW (as in a fluid ‘wave-field’ world wherein material forms are APPEARANCES, condensations of the all-including fluid wave-field).
EARLY WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, as Benjamin Whorf shows was developed on a BINARY LOGIC basis coming from the notion of a world of EMPTY SPACE locally populated by MATERIAL THINGS-THAT-BE with GRAMMAR-given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development. This LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATION (which was clearly a CONCEPTUALIZATION RATHER THAN A REPRESENTATION) gave support to the abstract notions of LOCAL AUTHORING (CREATION) and once this SIMPLE THOUGHT OCCUPIES THE MIND, there is no longer an OPEN SLOT IN THE MIND which the less simple (QUANTUM LOGIC) REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION in terms of the ALL-INCUDING WAVE-FIELD that includes MATERIAL FORMS that are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD may slot into. CONDENSATIONS HAVE NEITHER THEIR OWN MATERIAL BEING NOR THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT, BECAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE THE STATUS OF ‘BEING’ which is an abstract intellectual FOOTHOLD ‘STUB’ (the FIRST ERROR OF A DOUBLE ERROR)” that supports the SECOND ERROR of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING POWER’ purportedly ‘owned and operated’ by a notional ‘LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING’ that ‘lives in’ an ABSLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE ‘SPACE’.
This LANGUAGE, with its foundational basis in LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING, constituting MATERIAL FORMS that move about and interact in EMPTY SPACE, was given the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in the WESTERN CULTURE understanding of “REALITY”, and as WHORF points out, it was this WESTERN CULTURE (Common Average European) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE (that developed through popular use and was only “cleaned up and codified’ by NEWTON and re-cast as the theoretical, abstract structure of reality, … this cleaned up version of a community evolved language became the foundation for NEWTONIAN PHYSICS and thus for the popular WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTUALIZATION of REALITY.
When one ponders how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS came up with our fragmented view of the world as a collection of material things moving about in empty space, when our sense-experience keeps screaming out to us that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX (i.e. that we are included in a transforming relational continuum aka wave-field), this finding from Benjamin Whorf brings a lot of answers; .
It is sometimes stated that Newtonian space, time, and matter are sensed by everyone intuitively, whereupon relativity is cited as showing how mathematical analysis can prove intuition wrong. This, besides being unfair to intuition, is an attempt to answer offhand question (1) put at the outset of this paper, to answer which this research was undertaken. Presentation of the findings now nears its end, and I think the answer is clear. The offhand answer, laying the blame upon intuition for our slowness in discovering mysteries of the Cosmos, such as relativity, is the wrong one. The right answer is: Newtonian space, time, and matter are no intuitions. They are recepts from culture and language. That is where Newton got them.”
Benjamin Lee Whorf– The Relation of Habitual Thought and Behavior to Language.
There is something about the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT MATERIAL DYNAMICS OF NEWTON’S PHYSICS THAT APPEALS TO OUR ANAL-RENTENTIVE TENDENCY; i.e. the cleanliness of the BINARY LOGIC split into EITHER EMPTY SPACE OR MATERIAL BEING is very clean and neat and appealing and it supports the notion of HUMAN BEING wherein the BEING is GIFTED BY NATURE/GOD WITH ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING, such FREEDOM as one can only DREAM about, as we struggle within a web of relations that is seemingly (and actually) without end.
It is important to note that LANGUAGE is NOT giving us REPRESENTATIONS OF THE WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPXERIENCE (‘The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’ … Lao Tzu), LANGUAGE IS A VEHICLE FOR OUR CONSTRUCTING OF CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, and just as Korzybski has said hat ‘THE WORD IS NOT THE THING’, and ‘THE MAP IS NOT THE TERRITORY’, we can GO FARTHER and point out that ‘the CONCEPTUALIZATION is NOT THE REPRESENTATION’.
But the value of LANGUAGE-based CONCEPTUALIZING is in the TRIGGERING IN THE PSYCHE of RECALL of COMPLEX PHENOMENA such as may have been previously learned through direct sense-experience, or by way of language based transfer/sharing of CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, which brings us back to comparing the two propositions;
-1- THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE. (THIS IS A QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC COMMUNICATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT)
-2- THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services. (THIS IS A BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR COMMUNICATION which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT).
Indigenous aboriginal languages (and Modern physics) employ QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE as in -1- which supports the WAVE-FIELD conceptualization where the WAVE-FIELD is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate that is there to support the conjugate MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING within the ANDROGYNOUS DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION. Here, the TOWNING is an INTEGRAL (INSEPARABLE) ASPECT OF THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE
Western culture languages (and Newtonian physics) employ BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE as in -2- which supports the MATERIAL DYNAMICS conceptualization which DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate so that THERE IS ONLY, in this LANGUAGE-based CONCEPTUALZING OF REALITY, the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
THE GRAND SUM-UP, THEN, is in the following set of propositions;
-A- IN ACCORD WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERINCING OF INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, TAOIST/BUDDHIST and ADVAITA VEDANTA AND MODERN PHYSICS LANGUAGES ALL USE AN ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE serves as an INTEGRATING MEDIUM (the wave-field) within which there is a multiplicity of MALE ASSERTING AGENTS, wherein the combined FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING— MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE IS THE ONE COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC OF THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION.
-B- BASED ON INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTING CREATIVITY, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES such as the COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROP OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ANABLING CONJUGATE and this DROP OUT leaves in its wake FRAGMENTATION since the FEMALE ASPECT as in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD is the NATURAL INTEGRATOR. In the context of this ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE ACCOMMODATIN/ENABLING — MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING combination, we understand MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING in the fully INTEGRATED terms of CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD as in the QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION. HOWEVER, WHERE WESERN CULTURE LANGUAGE INVOKES EMPTY SPACE, WE LOSE THE INTEGRATING ROLE OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD. Such SIMPLIFIED (reduced to one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALYZING) LANGUAGE leaves us with BINARY LOGIC based ABSOLUTE MATERIAL OBJECTS moving about and interacting within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE ‘CONTAINING’ SPACE.
-C- The INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL culture and the WESTERN CULTURE cultivate very different social dynamic ways due to their different language supported understandings of reality. In particular, the WESTERN CULTURE, by employing LANGUAGE that DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, leaves the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USER with a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALYZING ONLY reality conceptualizing faculty, WHERE, FOR EXAMPLE, ONE SPEAKS OF THE AVALANCHE in the one-sided MALE ASSERTING terms of a pile of rocks crashing down the mountainside. This ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONCEPTUALIZATION FAILS TO ACKNOWLEDGE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJAGATE in which case the HOLES manifesting the DEPARTURE of the AVALANCHE MATERIALS are NEITHER CONVEYED IN LANGUAGE NOR ACKNOWLEDGED IN RATIONAL THOUGHT. Thus, full SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY of TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE is NOT CAPTURED IN THIS SIMPLIFIED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LINGUISTIC REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION. Thus THE WESTERN CULTURE is using LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THAT OBSCURES THE LESS SIMPLE REALITY OF TRANSFORMATION and CONVEYS DYNAMICS IN THE SIMPLER, ONE-SIDED BINARY LOGIC, MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY TERMS. The INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, meanwhile, is using LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that ACKNOWLEDGES ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION and CONVEYS DYNAMICS in the TWO-SIDED QUANTUM LOGIC, BOTH/AND TERMS, where the avalanche is understood, NOT SIMPLY IN THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT MECHANICAL TERMS, but in the LESS SIMPLE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT SENSE of the transforming relational continuum where there is acknowledgement of the CONJUGATE RELATION of collapsing mountains and infilling valleys, seeing material forms and structures as CONDENSATIONS within the all-including energy-charged plenum aka the all-including WAVE-FIELD. In this case, we do not leave ourselves with a HALF-TOLD STORY focused one-sidedly as in a crows-eye voyeur stare, on MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZATION, but ‘step back’ and open ourselves up to the BEYOND VOYEUR ACKNOWLEDGING OF OUR INCLUSION in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. While in mathematical physics, the former VOYEUR VIEW corresponds to the REAL WAVE-FIELD COMPONENT, the latter INCLUSIONAL AWARENESS corresponds to the ‘IMAGINARY’ or ‘COMPLEX’ WAVE-FIELD COMPONENT. What is pointed out by this is that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, does the equivalent of reducing the REAL + IMAGINARY WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE by DROPPING OUT THE IMAGINARY COMPONENT and constructing a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY where we talk about, for example, avalanches crashing down mountainsides WITHOUT MENTIONING THE HOLES OPENED UP IN THE TERRAIN, perhaps because opening up the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE to the FEMALE CONJUGATE effectively acknowledges INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, which is ANYTHING BUT ‘LOCAL and EXPLICIT’ as is the preferred MAKINGS of WESTERN CULTURE REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION.
FINALLY, BECAUSE OF THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTICALLY MISINFORMED UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY COMING THROUGH LANGUAGES SUCH AS ENGLISH WHICH ARE ‘TAKING OVER’ in the WORLD as the popular ‘OFFICIAL CHANNELS communications tool’, and thus SPREADING the MIS-UNDERSTANDING, PERVASIVE FRAGMENTATION IS UNDERWAY.
As a ‘side-note’ for those who feel a ‘love’ for the ENGLISH LANGUAGE and its expressive conceptualizing capabilities, which in the comments in this note MAY APPEAR to be being accused of distorted messaging, … “IT AIN’T WHATCHA GOT, ITS HOWYA USE IT” and when we watch the TALKING HEADS of WESTERN CULTURE politicians in the ELECTRONIC MEDIA, who are already ‘winning the battle’ of FRAGMENTING THE GLOBAL SOCIAL COLLECTIVE (through linguistic triggering of the the imagination), … we are find ourselves (in our imaginary role as INDEPENDENT BEINGS of ONE OR OTHER OF 195 PURPORTEDLY “INDEPENDENT NATIONS” whose self-perceived as INDEPENDENT CITIZENS gather together and promote the abstraction of SUBOPTIMIZATION (which is borrows its CRAZINESS from belief in INDEPENDENT BEING) which is MADNESS since, in our sense-experience reality, as the four-leggeds, winged and slithering ones full well know, there is no such thing as an ‘INDEPENDENT NATION’ because as we know from our sense-experience, we live in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence…”
“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence…”
— György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard (International Society of Systems Sciences)
IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BRINGS WITH IT “ITS OWN REALITY” WHICH IS A SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC BASED “REALITY” THAT SUPPORTS A CONVINCING VOYEUR VIEW SUCH AS ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ WHERE THERE IS NO SIGN OF THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS NOR THE COMBINED REALITY OF TRANSFORMATION (THE SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY WHICH IS UNDERSTOOD PRIOR TO LINGUISTIC DUMBING DOWN WITH THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE). IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY, THERE IS NO ‘TOWN THAT IS GROWING’, THERE IS ONLY ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, SO THAT THE WESTERN CULTURE HABIT OF CELEBRATING GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT (WHICH IS NOT REAL SINCE TRANSFORMATION IS REAL AND GROWTH IS AN ABSTRACTION BASED ON ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY LANGUAGE STRUCTUCTURE) IS ONE OF THOSE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES SCAMS (ON THE SCALE OF A CULTURE) WHICH HAS BEEN POPULARIZED TOGETHER WITH THE ‘INDEPENDENCE’ OF NATIONS.
It is worth noting that when almost everyone in the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is playing this WESTERN CULTURE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE “DROP-OUT” game (indigenous aboriginals while they may not join in ‘in spirit’ may find it easier to ‘go through the motions’ to save the physical hassle whenever they find themselves in WESTERN CULTURE DOMINATED surroundings; i.e. the indigenous aboriginal body is in the game but not the heart. As Giordano Bruno said, “A majority has no monopoly on defining reality”. But when it comes to intellectual opinions on such things, as Lafontaine says ; « La raison du plus fort est toujours la Meilleur » (“the reasoning of the most powerful is always the best”).
The WESTERN CULTURE LEMMING-LIKE PROUD pursuit of the BINARY LOGIC concepts of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, that CONTRADICTS our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY OF INCLUSION IN TRANSFORATION, derives from an ERROR OF LANGUAGE, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which implies LOCAL AUTHORING as in GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.
The DROPPING OUT, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, which gives rise to ABSTRACT ONE SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENTS that we endow with GRAMMAR-based POWERS of LOCAL, JUMPSTART AUTHORING of actions and developments (e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING”) that constitute our WESTERN CULTURE REALITY, which we may refer to as REALITY NUMBER TWO, leaving the label REALITY NUMBER ONE for the full ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY which includes BOTH the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate AND the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.
Discussing this, as in this and the previous essay, is challenged by the fact that this language I am using (English) like all the WESTERN Common Average European languages, has a BINARY LOGIC based ARCHITECTURE which is innately TOO SIMPLE to develop language-based QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS; e.g. to get to the full QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, one needs to use language architecture akin to the MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal language architecture which supports “REALITY NUMBER ONE” which one captures in saying the equivalent of “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”.
This BINARY LOGIC “REALITY”, since there is ‘only room for ONE REALITY” for any organized social collective, … OBSCURES the REAL QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY of our inclusion in the transforming relational continuum. THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USERS ARE USING LANGUAGE IN AN OBSCURANTIST FASHION (dropping out the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE,) TO CONSTRUCT ABSTRACT, SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC BASED REALITY NUMBER TWOS FEATURING DOUBLE-ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR BASED LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS. THIS LANGUAGE ENCOURAGES THE DYSFUNCTIONAL PURSUIT OF DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATION and LOCAL SUBOPTIMIZATION AND OBSCURES THE QUANTUM LOGIC, SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY NUMBER ONES OF OUR INCLUSION IN THE ONE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA THE WAVE-FIELD, WHICH ENCOURAGES INTEGRATION and the CULTIVATING of RELATIONAL RESONANCE.
END OF ‘GRAND SUM-UP’.
Let’s NOT be ‘caught’ by the slippery slope in LANGUAGE that lets us fall from the level of less simple QUANTUM LOGIC to the level of BINARY LOGIC. This can happen very easily for those of brought up speaking a Common Average European Language because the this language family gives a foundational role to BINARY LOGIC and simply DROPS OUT QUANTUM LOGIC.
LANGUAGE triggers CONCEPTUALIZATION and our Common Average European Language Architecture IS BINARY LOGIC based and triggers BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, but we are NOT PRISONERS TO OUR LANGUAGE BASED BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS so for example, when we hear people speak of plans to CULTIVATE a thousand acres of prime lands for growing this or that crop, we may be VERY CONSCIOUS of the CONTINUING SHRINKINGOF WILDERNESS which is TRANSFORMING the GESTALT of the overall PLANETARY LANDSCAPE, and GESTALT is a TOUGH THING for straight forward BINARY LOGIC and Artificial Intelligence programs to ‘pick up on’ because they may not have within their algorithm, the memory of how things were before the WILDERNESS became REDUCED to where it is today, or next year etc. but our sensory experience ‘picks up’ on this SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS when we go for drives in the country, … and therefore, the MEANING we take from “plants to CULTIVATE a thousand acres of prime lands” automatically incorporates the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING associated with the GIVING UP OF WILDERNESS that associates with the GROWTH OF CULTIVATED LAND, and the GESTALT that is informed by the BALANCE between CULTIVATED LAND and WILDERNESS.
As far as our BINARY LOGIC is concerned, everything is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and ALL WE NEED TO KNOW is the SIZE of the acreage to be prepared for cultivation, and this SIZE says nothing about the current balance of WILDERNESS TO CULTIVATED LAND which is QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC based which goes beyond the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT GROWTH OF CULTIVATED which answer to the BINARY LOGIC question of “IS” CULTIVATED “OR” IS NOT CULTIVATED, to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT GESTALT associated with the CHANGING BALANCE of WILDERNESS and CULTIVATED LAND. For this QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM we need to understand also the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the SHRINKING WILDERNESS as it OPENS UP TO ENABLE THE GROWTH of the CULTIVATED LAND. This QUANTUM LOGIC understanding is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC understanding.
BINARY LOGIC gives us REALITY NUMBER TWO while QUANTUM LOGIC brings us REALITY NUMBER ONE.
If we are a decision maker and are asked to review a proposal for the cultivating of a thousand acres of land, because the proposal is for MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING actions and development, there may be no ‘environmental impact assessment and even if there is, it is unlikely to be sufficiently NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to give a sense of how the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM WE SHARE INCLUSION IN IS GOING TO BE IMPACTED. There is always a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE THAT COMES WITH MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY, The WESTERN CULTURE MAN WHO THROWS A PUNCH and SHATTERS the RECIPIENT’S EGGSHELL SKULL will not be allowed to make an appeal on the basis of MODERN PHYSICS which ACKNOWLEDGES THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE THAT IS “ALWAYS” IN CONJUGATE RELATION WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, because WESTERN CULTURE HAS CHOSEN TO GO FOR LANGUAGE SIMPLIFICATION WHICH DUMBS THINGS DOWN FROM QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGICBY IMPOSING AN ABSOLUTE (EUCLIDEAN) SPACE FRAME, so that all that needs to be considered is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE;
And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion
So, don’t be ‘caught’ by the slippery slope in LANGUAGE that lets us fall from the level of less simple QUANTUM LOGIC to the simpler level of BINARY LOGIC where we need consider only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALING AGENT AND PRETEND THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE “DOES NOT EXIST”.
What is involved here is NOT SIMPLY the ERROR of DROPPING out the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, it is the shift from REALITY NUMBER ONE to REALITY NUMBER TWO.
REALITY NUMBER ONE; QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY: The less simple QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE employs both the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALYING conjugate as in “THERE is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”. This ANDROGYNOUS relation is one where everything is in flux, or in other words, everything is related (mitakuye oyasin [everything is related].
REALITY NUMBER TWO: BINARY LOGIC REALITY; The simpler BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and GOES ONLY WITH the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE. In WAVE-FIELD terms which have a COMPLEX REAL + IMAGINARY STRUCTURE, REALITY NUMBER TWO (BINARY LOGIC PSEUDO-REALITY) DROPS OUT THE “IMAGINARY COMPONENT” and develops with LANGUAGE, a simplified BINARY LOGIC based PSEUDO-REALITY which is a CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME based solely on REAL, LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL AGENTS, as if in ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT as in “The TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.
THESE TWO DIFFERENT LANGUAGE-BASED REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES distinguish between INDIGENOUS ABORIGiNAL CULTURE ADHERENTS and WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS. (‘cultures are shaped by their languages’. —Benjamin Whorf)
So, … don’t be ‘caught’ by the slippery slope in LANGUAGE that lets us fall from the level of less simple QUANTUM LOGIC to the level of BINARY LOGIC. This can happen very easily for those of us brought up speaking a Common Average European Language because this language family gives a foundational role to BINARY LOGIC and simply DROPS OUT QUANTUM LOGIC.
* * *