My philosophical/sensual investigative experience informs me that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are NOT SENSITIVE to the extent to which LANGUAGE can DISTORT and over-ride our sense-experience informed conceptualizing of reality, and in particular induce us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to translate our sense-experience into LANGUAGE that SIMPLIFIES representation of our sense-experience by the injection of BEING.  The abstraction of BEING allows us to FRAGMENT our language-based representations of reality by INJECTING a notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING base as in the construction of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, implicitly SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT from the actual, sense-experiencing of our inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD, which is captured within indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES as also in Modern physics, with FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE REPRESENTATION such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is entirely fluid and has no dependency on BEING based abstraction.

 

EXAMPLE:

 

WESTERN CULTURE EXPRESSION IN ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING TERMS:     “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING’”  (LOCAL AUTHORING OF EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT).

 

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL AND MODERN PHYSICS (androgynous) WAVE-FIELD REPRESENTATION:  “There is TOWNING in the transforming LANDSCAPE” (NONLOCAL AUTHORING of IMPLICIT RELATIONAL DYNAMICS).

 

Note that the TOWN in the FOREST cannot GROW without DEFORESTATION, or in other words, in reality, the MALE-ASSERTING ACTION is only realized in conjugate relation with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING.  This is the message of Modern physics and it is an understanding that is incorporated in indigenous aboriginal language architecture, but NOT in WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, which employs one-sided male asserting only abstractions such as GROWTH, hence this ‘reminder’ that  the TOWN in the FOREST cannot GROW without some DEFORESTATION

 

 

NOTA BENE:  Within a EUCLIDEAN SPACE assumption (i.e. a FLAT SPACE assumption), our language talk of the GROWTH of the TOWN in the FOREST employs “GROWTH” in the sense of one-sided MALE ASSERTING and does not SPEAK OF the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the FOREST, but in the REALITY of our inclusion in SPHERICAL SPACE, the GROWTH of the TOWN is inextricably tied to a CONJUGATE DEFORESTATION and DEFORESTATION IS AN IMPORTANT PHYSICAL REALITY.  In fact it is the OPENING in the FOREST that is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE that, TOGETHER WITH THE MALE ASSERTING “GROWTH” CONJUGATE, constitutes that actual sense-experience affirmable dynamic of T R A N S F O R M A T I O N.

TRANSFORMATION OF WHAT?

 

TRANSFORMATION OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD IN WHICH MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD (THE WAVE-FIELD CONSISTIN OF GATHERING-SCATTERING WAVE-ENERGY).

 

This is a difficult concept for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS since we have been raised with the notion that we are INDEPENDENT BEINGS rather than CONDENSTIONS of an  ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, the make-up of ALL MATERIAL FORMS.

 

As Schroedinger observes in ‘What is Life?’, we, our sense-experience-building, consciousness-based SELVES, are inclusions in the continual transforming that gain new experiences and share the influence of our prior experiences with those around us like bees being the agents of cross-pollination (gathering-scattering) of the diversity we share inclusion in, resulting in a mutually-informing transformation, and like the cross-pollinating bees, contribute to change without our DELIBERATE INTENTION, by our inclusion in a relational dynamic GREATER THAN OURSELVES that is nevertheless shaping who we are, not as THINGS-IN-OURSELVES but as both beneficiary and contributor in the gathering-scattering of the all-including WAVE-FIELD dynamic.

 

“… Yet each of us has the indisputable impression that the sum total of his own experience and memory forms a unit, quite distinct from that of any other person. He refers to it as ‘I’.  What is this ‘I’?  If you analyse it closely you will, I think, find that it is just a little bit more than a collection of single data (experiences and memories), namely the canvas upon which they are collected. And you will, on close introspection, find that what you really mean by ‘I’ is that ground-stuff upon which they are collected. You may come to a distant country, lose sight of all your friends, may all but forget them; you acquire new friends, you share life with them as intensely as you ever did with your old ones. Less and less important will become the fact that, while living your new life, you still recollect the old one. “The youth that was I’, you may come to speak of him in the third person, indeed the protagonist of the novel you are reading is probably nearer to your heart, certainly more intensely alive and better known to you. Yet there has been no intermediate break, no death. And even if a skilled hypnotist succeeded in blotting out entirely all your earlier reminiscences, you would not find that he had killed you. In no case is there a loss of personal existence to deplore

Nor will there ever be.”

– Erwin Schroedinger, ‘What is Life?’

 

 

Here, in order to grasp this point of our GATHERING-SCATTERING WAVE-FIELD NATURE, we might consider how much we are like the bee that is continually picking up influences from others around us and passing on these influences to those others around us, in a continual GATHERING -SCATTERING dynamic that is WITHOUT OUR DELIBERATE MANAGED INTENTION so that our DEVELOPMENT is NOT coming from WITHIN US through ‘genetic coding’ but from this GATHERING-SCATTERING dynamic which is the WAVE-FIELD dynamic.  As a GATHERING-SCATTERING which is a CONDENSING IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, it is POINTLESS to try to understand OUR DEVELOPMENT in any LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING based sense because there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEINGS in a WAVE-FIELD, although there are CONDENSATIONS.  This means that there is no cause for us to develop a BINARY LOGIC based model in terms of MATERIAL FORM CONTENTS that are INDEPENDENT of their CONTAINING SPACE, or in any terms other than those that orient to NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT relational flow-forms such as the WHORL in the flow or the CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD as involve a QUANTUM LOGIC relation.

GROWTH IS A ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY OVER-SIMPLIFYING ABSTRACTION of the GATHERING-SCATTERING WAVE DYNAMIC, which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and retains only the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ABSTRACTION OF ‘GROWTH’.

 

The TOWN in the FOREST cannot GROW without DEFORESTATION

 

That is according to our sense-experience reality, but in the world of LANGUAGE-BASED ABSTRACTION, it is possible to “DROP OUT” acknowledging of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and SIMPLIFY the representation (here comes ‘BINARY LOGIC’) to HIJACK nature’s ‘QUANTUM LOGIC’) bot the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY representation which we express in the DOUBLE ERROR terms of NAMING and GRAMMAR… ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.

 

HAD WE RETAINED THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT the TOWN in the FOREST cannot GROW without DEFORESTATION, WE COULD “NOT” HAVE USED THE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’.  In other words, WE WOULD NOT BE SPEAKING (AS IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONVENTION) IN SIMPLIFIED ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING TERMS and thus we would not be DEPARTING FROM THE WORLD OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE REALITY AND ENTERING INTO AN ABSTRACT SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHERE MALE ASSERTING IS NOW ‘PARTNERED UP’ WITH ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, A PASSIVE PARTNER THAT IMPLICITLY ATTRIBUTES  FULL AND SOLE ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORING POWER TO THE ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING AGENCY.

 

I REPEAT, for EMPHASIS:  the TOWN in the FOREST cannot GROW without DEFORESTATION,

 

Once one acknowledges the conjugate relation of TOWN GROWTH and DEFORESTATION one acknowledges the sense-experience affirmable inclusion in TRANSFORMATION, .. AND THIS ACKNOWLEDGING COMES WITH THE LANGUAGE OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS AND MODERN PHYSICS.

 

But for those of us who go with language that simplifies by reduction to the one-sided male asserting conjugate, thus constructing a substitute reality wherein ‘growth’ is possible ‘in its own male-asserting right’, … “Toto, I’m afraid we’re not in Kansas any more!”.

In other words, we’re not in the wave-field reality of our natural sense-experience any more, but have entered into an abstract world of language stimulated intellectual constructions where the male-asserting concept of ‘Town Growth’ appears possible WITHOUT its female accommodating conjugate of Deforestation because the intellectual abstracting power of language and thought is able to conjure up pictures of the growth of the town in the sense of a one-sided male-asserting action and development within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

 

But Town Growth is “not possible in sense-experience reality” without Deforestation or in other words, without the overall real context of Transformation of the landscape (the all-including wave-field which consists of both male asserting growth of the town in conjugate relation with female accommodating deforestation).

 

What we have here is a problem with language as it has been architected within WESTERN CULTURE, with a simplifying “drop out” of the female accommodating conjugate so that the one-sided male asserting of action and development, … “on its own and without the female accommodating conjugate of “deforestation”) is deployed as the “operative reality”.  What is getting lost in the language based ‘talk’ is the actual (sense-experience-affirmable) ‘transformation’ of the overall landscape where male-asserting ‘growth’ of the town can only occur together with female accommodating “deforestation”.

 

Deforestation matters because it keys to the overall “Gestalt” of transformation, the wave-field dynamic within which male-scattering and female-gathering are in conjugate relation, the male asserting growth of the town made possible by the female accommodating deforestation.

 

Finally, at the end of all this language game-play, we get back to our sense-experience reality continuum which is in continuing flux, the flux of overall wave-field transformation wherein condensation such as ‘towning in the transforming landscape’ is occurring.

 

Our western culture use of language which ‘fragments reality’ and serves up representations featuring double error of naming and grammar based local authoring agents that set the stage for a one-sided male-asserting actions and development based substitute reality, … an ersatz language-architected pseudo-reality that ‘works’ as a linguistic coordinator of actions within the simplified substitute reality wherein ‘growth’ as in ‘the town is growing’ is seen as a real male-asserting action event without mention of female conjugate of ‘deforestation’.  This type of incomplete thinking is chronic in WESTERN CULTURE due to WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE.

 

Binary logic lets us simplify reality by validating representations that can be affirmed with question and answer formulations such as ‘is this town growing larger or is it not’. Such truth is subject to Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE SYSTEMS OF LOGIC.  ‘the Town is growing’ is a proposition that is true but incomplete.  What is missing is the reality that the male asserting proposition ‘the Town is growing’ is in conjugate relation with the ‘female accommodating conjugate of Deforestation’

 

By substituting ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the ‘female accommodating conjugate of DEFORESTATION, DEFORESTATION IS IGNORED WHILE MALE ASSERTING GROWTH IS PURSUED AS IF IT EXISTS IN ITS OWN INDEPENDENT RIGHT, A MISUNDERSTANDING THAT LEADS TO FRAGMENTATION (e.g. where the GROWING TOWN is viewed as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF that is its own LOCAL AUTHOR OF GROWTH.

This gives a free hand to developers and other growth-oriented agencies and is foundational to the abstract (and unfounded) notion of the free market economy wherein the abstract concept of one-sided male asserting independent local development is operative wherein ‘deforestation’ and the female-accommodating wave-field conjugate in general, is simply ‘dropped out’ of linguistic-cognitive representations of reality, LEAVING THE SIMPLISTIC ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY as the ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’.

 

* * * *

 

The above are COMMENTS ON THE THEME “I WAS BORN INTO A CULTURE WITH A STRANGE SLANT TO IT, … THAT I HAVE BEEN SLOW TO FIGURE OUT.”

At issue is that our CRAZY-MAKING LANGUAGE DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of WAVE-FIELD reality and deploys in language a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION AGENCY ONLY, as gives rise to the abstract notion of LOCAL AUTHORING.  EGO supports REDUCTIVE SIMPLIFICATION to the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE made possible by the DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate such as in, for example, the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN LAW where there is a general DENIAL of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE that is in a natural primacy in physical WAVE-FIELD reality.  The opening of the valley induces the coming together of rivulets into streams and streams into “RAGING RIVER” so that the MORE BASIC QUANTUM LOGIC FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate is WALLPAPERED OVER by the GREATER SIMPLICITY of the BINARY LOGIC MALE ASSERTING conjugate.

Once we start saying and believing that THE RAGING RIVER CARVED OUT THE VALLEY, we have engineered a SIMPLISTIC UPSIDE-DOWN MALE-ASSERTING BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that STEALS THE RIGHTFUL SLOT IN LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION that would naturally go to the QUANTUM LOGIC based FEMALE ACCOMMODATING QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY.

In our WESTERN CULTURE, we are employing this UPSIDE DOWN SUBSTITUTE REALITY ARCHITECTURE AS OUR OPERATIVE REALITY, speaking in terms that suggest that ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ which invokes the support of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, passing over the sense-experience affirming reality wherein the TOWN in the FOREST cannot GROW without DEFORESTATION, a reminder that there is NO SUCH THING AS GROWTH in its own right, or more generally, there is no such thing as MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT IN THEIR OWN RIGHT, these being ABSTRACTIONS because of their NOT being ‘kept honest’ by conjugate relation with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the WAVE-FIELD.

 

If we were to employ verbs instead of nouns, in the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, so as to capture the all-including transforming relational continuum, we could speak of TOWNING in the FORESTING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, in which case we do not need to introduce the concept of DEFORESTATION.  But when we say that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ we must acknowledge the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the FOREST or the DEFORESTATION.   So, “GROWTH”  is ABSTRACTION that builds on the DOUBLE ERROR ABSTRACTION of BEING (first error)  that establishes the presence of THE TOWN, notionally endowed with its own GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWER (second error) of LOCALLY AUTHORING ITS OWN GROWTH.  The DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, implying that this GROWTH was transpiring in EMPTY SPACE, otherwise we would have to acknowledge the conjugate FEMALE ACCOMMODATING DYNAMIC of DEFORESTATION. 

 

The concept of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING is over-ridden, in WESTERN CULTURE linguistic representation, by capture of a simplified reality in MALE ASSERTING TERMS (i.e. the RAGING RIVER) in spite of inductive influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY being in a natural primacy within the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.

 

NO MENTION OF DEFORESTATION IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN IMPLIES THAT “GROWTH” BRINGS WITH IT, ITS OWN ABSTRACT ‘CONTAINER”, … i.e. ITS OWN ABSTRACT EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT as a kind of SYNTHETIC BUFFER to support “GROWTH” as a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ACTION WITHOUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE COMPLICATION OF ‘DEFORESTATION’.

But the common usage of GROWTH as in the GROWTH of the TOWN makes no mention of anything of likes of DEFORESTATION, … THE IMPLICATION BEING THAT THE TOWN IS NO LONGER CONSIDERED A ‘TOWNING’ SITUATED IN THE SPHERICAL SPACE WHERE “ITS” GROWTH CAN ONLY COME WITH A “CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE” of the NON-TOWNING SPACE.  INSTEAD, “THE TOWN” IS CONSIDERED A NOTIONAL LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF THAT DWELLS WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE where it is FREE TO GROW WITHOUT ANY ‘CONJUGATE RELATION” COMPLICATIONS.  SO, WITH THE ADVENT OF “GROWTH”, ITS “GOODBYE TO SPHERICAL SPACE WITH ITS INNATE CONJUGATE COMPLEXITY, HELLO TO SIMPLE EUCLIDEAN FLAT SPACE”.

PROBLEM!  SPHERICAL SPACE IS THE SPACE OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY SO THAT THE SWITCH TO EUCLIDEAN SPACE PUTS OUR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION INTO AN ALTERNATIVE, ABSTRAC SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

 

THAT IS, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has opted to employ the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE on its own to develop a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based ONE-SIDEDLY on MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS as suggested by ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, leaving in the lurch THE ACTUAL PRIMARY INFLUENCE of THE FEMALE OPENING of DEFORESTATION.

 

LANGUAGE stimulates our conscious thinking wherein we construct mental representations of reality.  LANGUAGE that DROPS OUT the FEMALE OPENING of DEFORESTATION (for example) and GOES WITH ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING is the source of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE, putting us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS IN CONFLICT WITH OUR OWN SENSE-EXPERIENCE informed understanding.

 

* * *

 

 

FOOTNOTE: The Title “The RELATIVITY of BEING” points to the fact that while we use BEING-based NOUNS such as ‘the TOWN’, we have the option to use ‘TOWNING’ as also in the case of the CLUSTERING of ants where we can use the BEING based version of CLUSTER which is then supported by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to inject the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING as in ‘the CLUSTER is GROWING LARGER even though THERE IS NO CLUSTER per say, there is only a resonance based CLUSTERING as also in the case of TOWNING.   As has been discussed the choice of which to use in a foundational role in language architecture has divided WEST (opting for the BEING based language foundation) and EAST (and indigenous aboriginal cultures) who have opted for the RESONANCE based forms of TOWNING and CLUSTERING as in ‘there is TOWNING in the transforming landscape’.  Hence the ‘TOWN’ and the ‘CLUSTER’ which superficially and linguistically convey ‘BEING’ can at the same time be thought of in their alternative RELATIVE identities as TOWNING and CLUSTERING.   TOWNING and LUSTERING are suggestive of a dynamic containing medium (the transforming relational continuum) whereas ‘the TOWN’ and ‘the CLUSTER’ imply STAND-ALONE BEING suggestive of inclusion in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE that does not ‘interfere’ with or COMPROMISE the BINARY LOGIC based dynamics of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of the TOWN or CLUSTER, and thus SIMPLIFIES this BEING-based type of REPRESENTATION of reality.

On the other hand, TOWNING in the transforming landscape and CLUSTERING in the transforming landscape suggests that the the transforming landscape is a PLENUM within which TOWNING and CLUSTERING are like WHORLS in FLUID FLOW where there is a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation where the TOWNING and CLUSTERING are NOT INDEPENDENT OF THE LANDSCAPE (the transforming relational continuum) but relational features included within it.

These two options for constructing representations of reality; i.e. BINARY LOGIC and QUANTUM LOGIC distinguish between the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS (BINARY LOGIC based reality constructionists) and the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta ADHERENTS (QUANTUM LOGIC based reality constructionists).  Only the latter employ a system of language-based reality construction which is consistent with Modern physics.  Thus only the latter escape the contradictions and over-simplifications that come with the BINARY LOGIC based reduction of reality to the one-sided MALE ASSERTING conjugate which DROPS OUT the primary FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD conjugate and substitutes ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.   THIS IS A CONTINUING “DISASTER” by way of promoting a language-based, over-simplified and psychologically confusing misconception of reality.

* * *