The WESTERN CULTURE Humpty-Dumpty LANGUAGE Dilemma

PREFACE:

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have a LANGUAGE based communications problem in that we have ENGINEERED AN IMPORTANT SIMPLIFICATION into our Common Average European (CAE) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  For example, Modern physics Rheomode (flow-based language) and the indigenous aboriginal languages, along with language as used by Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta incorporates the full ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD) STRUCTURE with its CONJUGATE Female-Accommodating/Enabling — Male Asserting/Actualizing STRUCTURE, .. while the WESTERN CULTURE CAE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT” the Female Accommodating/enabling component and ‘goes with’ a one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY structure.

Instead of the Modern physics compliant and indigenous aboriginal  ANDROGYNOUS LANGUAGE STRUCTURE, an example of which is ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING landscape’, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE reduce this to ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.‘

NOTA BENE:   WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (i.e. the ‘transforming landscape’), employing ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE (‘the towning’).

The Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE gives a foundational role to QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC that captures the relationship between the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM also known as the WAVE-FIELD and material CONDENSATIONS within the WAVE-FIELD.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is critically important and NOTA BENE that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE  DROPS OUT the QUANTUM LOGIC language content and SUBSTITUTES BINARY LOGIC relations.  This DUMBING DOWN of the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION from the full-blown QUANTUM LOGIC (Wave-field based) CONCEPTUALIZATION to the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION takes us from ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING landscape’, .. to, .. ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

The latter BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION is a simplification that “FORCES UPON ITSELF” the INVENTING of an ABSOLUTE, EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, … having done away with the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC “energy-charged PLENUM in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including PLENUM (wave-field).

NOTE THAT this WESTERN CULTURE simplifying of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that enables CONCEPTUALIZATION based on what Nietzsche terms ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is used to CONCEPTUALIZE “LOCAL AUTHORING”.  This LINGUISTIC CONCEPUALIZATION featuring LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development entails the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJGUATE which is why WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE employs the OBSCURANTIST tactic of ONLY RECOGNIZING THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ACTION CONJUGATE as exemplified by the THIN SKULL RULE which DROPS OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of how the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING “DOMINATES” in relational dynamics while WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS insist on OBSCURING the dominant influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is, of course, the reality that comes with living within this wave-field world.

Because of the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE FROM LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF (QUOTE/UNQUOTE) “REALITY”, we are stuck with using the SIMPLIFIED-to-one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION SCHEME which gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’, and because we are EMPLOYING THIS AS OUR ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’, … LOOK OUT!  HERE COMES THE WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYSFUNCTIONS of FRAGMENTATION, EGO INFLATION AND MORE!

THIS PREFACE repeats the WARNING (as given by Bohm and others) as to how our use of our CAE LANGUAGE is INFECTING OUR THOUGHTS with SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based INTELLECTUAL PSEUDO-REALITIES that are inducing in us, actions and interactions that IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE reality are generating FRAGMENTATION.  For example, where our language has us talking about how everyone has their heads down, working together in collaboration, on the growth of their TOWNS.  This would be fine in a flat space, but in the spherical space we are in, it is at the same time, the source of SHRINKING WILDERNESS, so that the REAL (sense-experience affirmed) REALITY is NOT GROWTH but TRANSFORMATION of the overall LANDSCAPE.

This understanding, that follows from living in a spherical space (wave-field), that there is only TRANSFORMATION and not ‘GROWTH’, ‘DEVELOPMENT’ and ‘PRODUCTION’ is an understanding that is already built into indigenous aboriginal language architecture but which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have stripped out of our language architecture by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and thus giving ourselves the impression that the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING concepts of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are LEGITIMATE CONCEPTS!  They would be legitimate in a FLAT SPACE but FLAT SPACES are MATHEMATICAL ABSTRACTION and there are no FLAT SPACES in our sense-experience reality, so that there is NO SUCH THING AS “GROWTH”, there is only “TRANSFORMATION” as is acnowledged with the architecture of indigenous aboriginal languages (and Modern physics) but the PRIMARY REALITY OF TRANFORMIATION is NOT to be found or acknowledged in the simplified BINARY LOGIC based architecture of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES.

This PREFACE is to try to ‘give a view from above’ the confusing influences in our standard WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE due to its being thoroughly SALTED with BINARY LOGIC conceptualizations that may distract the reader from the message in this essay that BINARY LOGIC “IS THE PROBLEM” and to avoid is use.  Ideally, this would require a shift to a new, QUANTUM LOGIC (flow-based) language such as a fleshed out version of Bohm’s Rheomode or an indigenous aboriginal language, however, our WESTERN CULTURE INVESTMENTS IN OUR CAE LANGUAGES ARE MASSIVE and we are thus LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS.  The alternative is thus to raise the awareness of the pitfalls in our CAE languages and how to ‘work around’ them. .

* * * end of preface * * *

Philosophical Investigators such as Nietzsche, Bohm, Wittgenstein, Schroedinger and Vygotsky have SOMETHING IN COMMON and I would call it “THE INSTINCT OF THE WORLD AS A WAVE-FIELD” which manifests in their appreciation of indigenous aboriginal ‘natural philosophy’ (all things are related).   Even though their findings may appear DIFFERENT to us in our casual reading of their works, it is EVIDENT that THEY ALL ‘tuned in’ to the fact that there is a dysfunction WESTERN CULTURE social dynamics that manifests in FRAGMENTATION.

Nietzsche ‘blames’ LANGUAGE with its pervasive use of LOCAL AUTHORING constructs while Bohm points to FRAGMENTATION coming from the fact that we are psychologically breaking apart QUANTUM LOGIC MATTER as CONDENSATIONS of the all-including “energy-charged PLENUM” aka ‘WAVE-FIELD’ into the BINARY LOGIC combination of MATTER and EMPTY SPACE.

Wittgenstein points out in his summary propositions in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus that we can better understand the world by using language in a BOOTSTRAP fashion where we us language that is based on MATERIAL THINGS to weave a web of RELATIONS whereupon we LET GO OF THE MATERIAL THINGS and keep the TAKE-AWAY of a thingless relational complex.  Schroedinger says FLAT OUT that SUBJECT and OBJECT are only ONE, which brings us back to the understanding of material forms as CONDENSATIONS in the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  And Vygotsky, investigating ‘reality’ from the point of view of a child’s natural psychological development, THROWS OUT the basic WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD premise which assumes that SPONTANEOUS THOUGHT is a loosey-goosey THROW-AWAY preliminary on the way to SOLID UNDERSTANDING in EXPLICIT “SCIENTIFIC” terms.  As Vygotsky says;

“Though fundamentally different in nature, the development of scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation:

. . .

“Our disagreement with Piaget centers on one point only, but an important point. He assumes that development and instruction are entirely separate, incommensurate processes, that the function of instruction is merely to introduce adult ways of thinking, which conflict with the child’s own and eventually supplant them. Such a supposition stems from the old psychological tradition of separating the structural from the functional aspects of development.” –Vygotsky

Ok, WHY AM I GIVING MORE “QUOTE SPACE” TO VYGOTSKY than to Bohm or Nietzsche?  While ‘the others’ do a great job of criticizing FRAGMENTATION, Vygotsky is going to the ROOT ISSUE in saying that our basic process of THINKING has an ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD like structure where FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SPONTANEOUS RECEPTACLE works in CONJUGATE RELATION with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DELIBERATE CONJUGATE such that “the development of scientific [local, explicit] and spontaneous [nonlocal, implicit] concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation THAT IS, this ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-MALE conjugate structure is the WAVE-FIELD structure and Vygotsky is saying that  it is the FOUNDATIONAL.  In other words, Vygotsky’s ‘two sides of the same coin’ is the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC structure.

 * * * 

OK, all of the philosophical investigators I have cited above ARE ON THE SAME TACK which is basically endorsing the indigenous aboriginal understanding of ‘REALITY’ as being of an ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD) nature, …WHICH TAKES US BEYOND THE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF MATTER AND EMPTY SPACE WHICH IS A RECIPE FOR FRAGMENTATION, and puts us on the more stable INTEGRATED BASE of the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  The INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD MEDIUM in which LOCAL MATERIAL FORMS ARE ‘APPEARANCE’ gives the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO INTEGRATION by way of the INCLUSION of all APPEARING-AS-SEPARATE FORMS on the basis of their being CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING “ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM” aka “WAVE-FIELD”.

While the indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE captures the understanding that material forms are CONDENSATIONS within the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD (hence mitakuye oyasin, ‘all things are related).  The APPEARANCE of LOCAL, EXPLICIT AND INDEPENDENT material forms is JUST THAT; “APPEARANCE”; i.e. it is how former that are intrinsically NONLOCAL and IMLICIT and INNATELY INTERDEPENDENT FORMINGS-IN-THE-FLOWING CAN “APPEAR” TO US.   BUT CONTRARY to “APPEARANCE”, in physical REALITY, these FORMS are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT being CONDENSATIONS in the all-including ENERGY-GHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.  They are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT because that is the basic nature of the WAVE-FIELD so that ‘“what we are looking at is LESS SIMPLE than ‘what we are seeing’.

ONCE we paste a NAME-LABEL on a CONDENSATION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM, to give it, notionally, LOCAL BEING, and then BUILD ON THAT CREATION OF LOCAL MATERIAL BEING, GRAMMAR given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING, we then have a NEW REALITY, a “REALITY NUMBER TWO” which is SIMPLER than the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “REALITY NUMBER ONE”  in the sense that, as language-using writers and composers, our job of constructing CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of ‘REALITY’ using “REALITY NUMBER TWO” has only to deal with the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZNG WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE; i.e. the LOCAL MATERIAL BEING as if it were moving about and interacting within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

The GOOD NEWS is that this SIMPLIFYING DROP DOWN from “REALITY NUMBER ONE”  to REALITY NUMBER TWO” DOES AWAY WITH BOTH THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and thus DOES AWAY with the AMBIGUITY as to whether, for example, ‘the SHATTERING OF THE SKULL” comes FULLY AND SOLELY FROM THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PUNCH TO THE HEAD, or LESS SIMPLY, FROM THE CONJUGATE SUM OF “BOTH”  FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (e.g. on the part of an ‘EGGSHELL SKULL’ “AND” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING INFLUENCE.

For the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE INFLUENCERS such as COPERNICUS, THE AVOIDANCE OF THE LESS SIMPLE “REALITY NUMBER ONE”  and the use of linguistic conceptualization in the “SIMPLER”  terms of “REALITY NUMBER NUMBER TWO”  was ‘the way to go’.

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

From a SIMPLICITY IN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING point of view, avoiding the REALITY of the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE_FIELD, by invoking the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC relation wherein, after SPLITTING OUT THE CONDENSATION, i.e. the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE from the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and thus making the simplifying shift from “REALITY NUMBER ONE”  to REALITY NUMBER TWO”  the WAY IS CLEARED for the use of SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC in language based conceptualization, rather than the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC.

OK, “EXCEPT THAT” this means that our SIMPLIFICATION comes with the PRICE-TAG of FRAGMENTATION since it is our acknowledging of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE in concert with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE that supports the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE OF INTEGRATION; i.e. when the multitude of different material forms are understood as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING (and thus ALL-INTEGRATING) ENERGY-CHARGED PLANUM (aka WAVE-FIELD), THERE IS NO FRAGMENTATION because the MATERIAL FORMS are, like clouding that is continually ‘forming and unforming’ in the atmosphere, while we speak in terms that imply THEIR (‘the clouds’) AUTHORING ACTION, … THERE IS NO ‘THEY’ and what we are seeing is “CLOUDING” in the transforming relational continuum.

Which means, as Zen guru Akan Watts suggests, that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS NEED A NEW LANGUAGE, like that of the indigenous aboriginals, which employs VERBS for relational forms rather than than NOUNS, so as to AVOID THE LINGUISTICALLY INFUSED FRAGMENTATIVE IMPLICATION OF “LOCAL AUTHORING”

“MAKE NO MISTAKE, … THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THAT EMPLOYS THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR TO SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATING BY GIVING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO “LOCAL AUTHORING”  AS IF IN EMPTY SPACE , … is a FRAGMENTATION-INFUSING LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

RE: AUTHORING”

To say that the person authoring the punch is the author of collapsing of the EGG-SHELL SKULL is that same sort of UNREAL SIMPLIFICATION that COPERNICUS used in saying ‘the EARTH TURNS ROUND’.  The DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is a LINGUISTIC SIMPIFICATION that FALSELY ELEVATES THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT TO THE “APPEARANCE” of being the FULL AND SOLE AUTHOR of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT EVENT (obscuring the reality wherein he or it is an inclusion in the all-including transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD)..

The REDUCTION of the LESS SIMPLE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC to the SIMPLER LOCAL AND EXPLICIT MECHANICAL DYNAMIC (a DIFFERENTIATING ABSTRACTION involving a loss of BASIC INFORMATION in the act of this REDUCING, as for example, reducing the “TOWNINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” to the “TOWNS THAT ARE GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services” (an impression that DROPS OUT the conjugate shrinking of WILDERNESS).

This LOCAL AUTHORING based FRAGMENTATION is the SAME FRAGMENTATION that Emerson points out is problematic, that arises when we reduce the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  As Emerson says in ‘The Method of Nature”;

A man’s wisdom is to know that all ends are momentary, that the best end must be superseded by a better. But there is a mischievous tendency in him to transfer his thought from the life to the ends, to quit his agency and rest in his acts: the tools run away with the workman, the human with the divine.

Emerson is implying that while we are relational forms living in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD, wherein ‘all ends are momentary’, we tend to (aided by the simplicity of our language architecture) reduce our sense-experience of inclusion in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, to a language based on LOCAL AND EXPLICIT VENTS. (BIRTH and DEATH are only LOCAL and EXPLICIT if they were to occur in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT whereas, in the world of sense-experience, they are INCLUDED in the TRANSFORMING of the RELATIONAL CONTINUUM).

By contrast, by using a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE such as the indigenous aboriginal language architect which preserves the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING — MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD nature of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION THEREIN, we open up a “REALITY NUMBER ONE” based on the “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT”  (relational) that takes us BEYOND the “REALITY NUMBER TWO”  based on the “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT”  (mechanistic).

For example, while the indigenous aboriginal language would say ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which captures the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of the world dynamic, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use language that conceptualizes in LOCAL and EXPLICIT terms such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’..

NOTA BENE:   The reduction to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT constitutes a SIMPLIFICATION coming at the cost of FRAGMENTATION since the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which, as the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM does for the CONDENSATION, supplies INTEGRATION which can be understood as being in a NATURAL PRIMACY over DIFFERENTIATION so that the TOWNING must be understood in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC terms of a CONDENSATION INTEGRALLY INCLUDED within the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka ‘wave-field’).

“REALITY NUMBER TWO” is based on the “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT” where DIFFERENTIATION becomes PRIMARY ONE thanks to the SACRIFICING of INTEGRATION.  “REALITY NUMBER ONE” is based on the “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” wherein  INTEGRATION is PRIMARY, which, while it may appear to be SACRIFICING CLARITY which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS associate with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, is simply realized in a different fashion; i.e. by bringing a multitude of relational understandings into connecting confluence and extracting the coherencies.  In the indigenous aboriginal language architecture, clarity and precision are derived relationally from integration rather than by differentiation. 

“English compared to Hopi is like a bludgeon compared to a rapier.” — Benjamin Whorf.

By understanding ‘TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ by way of integrating in our mind the meaning giving connections’, gives a very different result than differentiation where we try to understand a ‘bee’ by pulling it apart, its legs and its wings and so on, as if to ‘make sense of the bee as a machine’ rather than by understanding the difference in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE without the inclusive participation , in the sense the “BEEING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE'”.

LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE can PLAY THE GAME EITHER WAY, by way of INTEGRATION or by way of DIFFERENTIATION, but NATURE as we understand it by way of our sense-experience of inclusion within it, is fully INTEGRATED as is the basic nature of the WAVE-FIELD dynamic while DIFFERENTIATION derives from INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION so that while INTEGRATION as with BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC brings us “REALITY NUMBER ONE”  (there is BUMBLE-BEE-ING integrated within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE), …. DIFFERENTIATION as with EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC brings us “REALITY NUMBER TWO”  (BUMBLE-BEES are small insects with six legs that gather nectar from flowers to make honey).

There is no way to get to an understanding of INTEGRATION (QUANTUM LOGIC) starting from DIFFERENTIANTION (BINARY LOGIC) since we live in a world wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) in which case it makes sense to architect language as the indigenous aboriginals have, to acknowledge the BOTH/AND INTEGRATIVE QUANTUM LOGIC relation as where one would say ‘there is BUMBLE-BEE-ING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE rather than employing the EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC DIFFERENTIATIONG relation as where one would the BUMBLE BEE is flying around and collecting nectar for making honey

THERE IS NO WAY, ONCE ONE HAS MADE THE INITIAL ERROR OF DIFFERENTATION WHICH FRAGMENTS REALITY (the transforming relational wave-field continuum) TO PUT HUMPTY DUMPTY BACK TOGETHER AGAIN since material forms that we are observing are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including PLENUM (wave-field) which are APPEARANCES and NOT LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, so there is no point in trying to understand what is going on in the world by studying the physical dynamics of NOTIONAL local things-in-themselves, since there are no ‘local things-in-themselves’, these are only APPEARANCES within the all-including transforming relational continuum.  In this case, a NON-FRAGMENTING LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS NEEDED such as the indigenous aboriginal language architecture, which conceptualizes by way of INTEGRATION rather than DIFFERENTIATION, by saying ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE as in  “REALITY NUMBER ONE”  rather than ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services‘ as in “REALITY NUMBER TWO”

MAKE NO MISTAKE!  THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THAT EMPLOYS THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR TO SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING BY GIVING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ IS A FRAGMENTATION INFUSING LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

Unlike CLOUDS in the ATMOSPHERE, which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS describe with LANGUAGE that notionally LIBERATES ALL THINGS from their inclusion in the energy-charged PLENUM (thus FRAGMENTING REALITY) by imposing the DOUBLE ERROR (as Nietzsche calls it) of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  While NAMING “CREATES” a notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, GRAMMARE CONFLATES THIS BY IMPUTING POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT TO THE NAMING INSTANTIATED THING-IN-ITSELF.

It’s NOT DIFFICULT to UNDERSTAND WHAT is GOING WRONG in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC (i.e. the FRAGMENTATION THAT BOHM AND NIETZSHE SHOW IS COMING FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes LOCAL AUTHORING WHERE THERE IS NONE).

LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that delivers in term of the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT, like WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION, first of all in OUR LANGUAGE-BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS and from there into our PSYCHOLOGICAL (MIS-) UNDERSTANDING OF ‘REALITY’ THAT THIS GIVES US.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘KNOW ABOUT THIS’.  The indigenous aboriginal culture THINKS WE WESTERN CULTURE “ARE NUTS” by architecting LANGUAGE that employs CONCEPTUALIZATION based on the NOTIONAL LOCAL MATERIAL THINGS IN THEMSELVES.  WE DOT HIS  in this world of our sense-experience wherein everything is included within an all-including transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are putting  REALITY NUMBER TWO”  which is BINARY LOGIC based into an unnatural PRIMACY over “REALITY NUMBER ONE”  which is QUANTUM LOGIC based

Heraclitus caught this and spoke about the WESTERN CULTURE ADDICTION to (or LINGUISTIC ENTRAPMENT re) “REALITY NUMBER TWO” .

Of the logos [aka the Tao, the Wave-field], which is as I describe it, people always prove to be uncomprehending both before they have heard it and once they have heard it. For, although all things happen according to the logos, people are like those of no experience, even when they do experience such words and deeds as I explain when I distinguish each thing according to its phusis (nature / constitution) and declare how it is; but others are as ignorant of what they do when awake as they are forgetful of what they do when asleep.

Those who hear and do not understand are like the deaf. Of them the proverb says: “Present, they are absent.”

— Heraclitus

Heraclitus is talking about how when he describes “REALITY NUMBER ONE”  (the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY aka LOGOS, aka the WAVE-FIELD) which is LESS SIMPLE (and subtly so) than the popular BINARY LOGIC “REALITY NUMBER TWO”  while they ‘hear it’, they immediately slip back into a way of talking which forgets about it; i.e. they pick up once again in using BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

There is no doubt about what Heraclitus is talking about here.  We can also get to it from his “No man can step into the same river twice because it is not the same river and he is not the same person stepping into it’

Heraclitus is the one who claims EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX or in other words we all share inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD which is “REALITY NUMBER ONE”, a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLOW based REALITY, where there is a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation between the ALL-INCLUDING FLOW and the MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING FLOW.

IN A WORLD OF FLOW, the FLUID FORMS that APPEAR to be THINGS MOVING THROUGH THE FLOW, are instead FORMING and UNFORMING as part of the FLOW, as with WHORLINGS or EDDIES that are continually FORMING and UNFORMING IN THE FLOW, and are THE WAY FLOWING APPEARS where “THE WHORLING IS THE FLOWING” which is the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION which is the basis for what we can refer to as “REALITY NUMBER ONE”.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE “SPEAKS” as if the world is constituted by INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS that MOVE ABOUT and INTERACT within AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.  What this does is that it ALLOWS US TO USE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS THAT NEED DEAL ONLY WITH THE MATERIAL FORMS AND THEIR MOVEMENTS AND INTERACTIONS, which requires only the SIMPLER BINARY EITHER/OR LANGUAGE (i.e. there is either EMPTY SPACE or MATERIAL PRESENCE [i.e. ‘material being’] in which case our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE needs only to address the MALE ASSERTING MATERIAL FORMS and ‘what they do’ (their ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS and PRODUCTION of other things).  This is all ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING AUTHORING BASED and there is NO ROLE HERE FOR A FEMALE, although in EASTERN CULTURE as in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, the LANGUAGE architecture is comprised of BOTH MALE and FEMALE; i.e. “BOTH” THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE “AND” the MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT.

SO, WHEREAS the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT WILL SAY ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ etc. (MALE ASSERTING PROPOSITION), the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE WILL SAY ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which CONCEPTUALIZES NOT ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE but INCLUDES the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, and this ANDROGYNOUS RELATIONAL UNION IN THIS INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION AVOIDS the FRAGMENTATION that associates with the problem of TOO MANY DICKS ON THE DANCE-FLOOR (MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENTS ONLY, MOVING ABOUT AND INTERACTING IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE’.

* * *

LET’S CONSIDER WHAT IS GOING ON HERE LANGUAGE-WISE and WHY “BINARY LOGIC” , which PERVADES WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USAGE, IS INADEQUATE (AND PROBLEMATIC) IN THAT IT CAN ONLY SUPPORT “REALITY NUMBER TWO”  and is UNABLE TO SUPPORT “REALITY NUMBER ONE”  because the one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY DYNAMIC is INNATELY TOO SIMPLE.

The SOURCE OF THE FRAGMENTATION that Bohm is talking about, which continues to be ongoing today in our WESTERN CULTURE SUPPORTED “REALITY NUMBER TWO”  is “TOO MANY DICKS ON THE DANCE FLOOR” (too many one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATES that have only EMPTY SPACE to ENGAGE WITH, and an engaging with EMPTY SPACE is NO ENGAGEMENT AT ALL).

The PROBLEM is, “the WESTERN CULTURE USE OF ONE-SIDED BINARY LOGIC”.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUE to use LANGUAGE THAT SUPPORTS the ONE-SIDED DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR BASED ABSTRACTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING.  That is NOT ONLY  the source of FRAGMENTATION, it is the source of EGO and the PRIDE in our belief in our LOCAL AUTHORING ACCOMPLISHMENTS, whether the so-called GROWTH OF OUR BUSINESS OR THE GROWTH OF OUR TOWN. NONE OF THIS IS HAPPENING IN “REALITY NUMBER ONE”  which is the reality of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.

In “REALITY NUMBER ONE”  we are all included in the transforming relational continuum, and MATERIAL FORMINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING such as OURSELVES, are in a BOTH/AND relation with the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which means we do NOT, in “REALITY NUMBER ONE”, have LOCAL AUTHORING POWER, and as we understand things while driving in a major freeway in heavy traffic, our movements on our voyage ARE RELATIONAL and our driving is (can be) in the service of sustaining relational harmony in the flow, so that we slow or swerve or speed up to open up safe-space holes for one another, an action that we put in priority over the shortest path to our current destination.   This“REALITY NUMBER ONE” is the reality where we acknowledge ‘we are one with everything’, where our sense-experience of our relative movements in the traffic flow have a kind of POTLATCH or BODHISATTVA feeling where we open up space for others as if to assist them to climb the ladder and enter Nirvana before us, where we will be the last one in.

* * *

OK, everyone knows all of this and yet the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT GLOBAL SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, IN GENERAL, REMAINS STUCK IN “REALITY NUMBER TWO”, WHY IS THIS?

A picture held us captive. And we could not get outside it, for it lay in our language and language seemed to repeat it to us inexorably. –-Wittgenstein

There is no such thing as the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT, in our WAVE-FIELD WORLD OF FLUX, there is only the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT so I would say that THE PICTURE HOLDING US CAPTIVE IS THAT OF THE WORLD GIVEN TWICE, ONCE IN OUR MIND AND ONCE OUT THERE IN OUR VOYEUR VIEW.  As Ernst Mach suggests

The science of psychology is auxiliary to physics.  The two mutually support one another, and it is only when they are united that a complete science is formed.  From our standpoint, the antithesis of subject and object, in the ordinary sense, does not exist.” — Ernst Mach. ‘The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical,

And, then again, Schroedinger;

“The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist. –“ Erwin Schroedinger”

As CONDENSATIONS of the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD WE ALL BELONG TO “REALITY NUMBER ONE”, however, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is built to SPLIT US OUT as BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL INDEPENDENT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-OURSELVES WITH GRAMMAR GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT WHO MOVE ABOUT AND INTERACT IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE which takes us down into “REALITY NUMBER TWO” .

I AM NOT MAKING THIS UP.  THIS “REALITY NUMBER TWO”  CONTINUES TO BE WHAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE TEACHING OUR CHILDREN.  WE ARE STILL ‘DECLARING THE INDEPENENCE’ OF IMAGINARY LINE BOUNDED NATIONS, AND WE THINK OF HUMANINGS THAT ARE CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD AS INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS WITH THEIR OWN LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPING THAT MOVE ABOUT IN EMPTY SPACE.  LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS DO NOT HAVE TO BE ‘REAL” IN A SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDED WAY TO SERVE AS A DEVICE TO ‘PUT PEOPLE ON THE SAME PAGE’ IN AN ‘INTELLECTUAL-CONCEPTUAL BASIS, … BUT WHAT KIND OF “SAME PAGE”!?

WE WESTERM CULTURE ADHERENTS STILL TEACH OUR CHILDREN THAT ‘THE EARTH TURNS ROUND’ as if it were a material entity in an empty space rather than a condensations of the all including TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.  We are WELL INTO THAT DYSFUNCTIONAL GROUND MENTIONED BY KEPLER;

“As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’

When are we going to give our children access to the ‘straight goods’; i.e. that we live in a QUANTU LOGIC world of the all-including WAVE-FIELD in which material forms, including ourselves, are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD as is the point being made by Schroedinger, Mach, Witgenstein, Nietzsche and Bohm.  Meanwhile, the FRAGMENTATION CONTINUES…

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

* * *

RE THE TITLE;

The WESTERN CULTURE Humpty-Dumpty LANGUAGE Dilemma

WESTERN CULTURE has been ‘operating’ for a long time using language that FRAGMENTS ‘REALITY’ creating an INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based PSEUDO-REALITY referred to as “REALITY NUMBER TWO”

“REALITY NUMBER ONE” refers to the UNFRAGMENTED, FULLY INTEGRATED TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD world of our ACTUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENS HAVE BEEN ACCUMULATING A MASSIVE AMOUNT of DATA such as, for example, the histories all of the so-called INDEPENDENT NATIONS of the world.  Each NATION claims to have THEIR OWN HISTORY which is documented on the basis of “REALITY NUMBER TWO” since this is what WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SUPPORTS.

The REAL STORY, i.e. the “REALITY NUMBER ONE STORY”  requires a “REALITY NUMBER ONE – CAPABLE LANGUAGE” such as Algonquin or Bohm’s Rheomode which does not use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR aka LOCAL AUTHORING FOUNDATION, but employs language that supports the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of our sense-experience reality, of inclusion in the all-including transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD.

For example, there is NO PLACE in the.“REALITY NUMBER ONE STORY”  for statements such as ‘We achieved the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND from X to Y’, because our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is based in “REALITY NUMBER TWO”  where what is REALLY GOING ON, as attested to by our SENSE-EXPIERIENCE rather than by our INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTING is that there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where it would make NO SENSE to trade out the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and FRAGMENT OUT “THE TOWN” as if it were a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF floating in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

THAT IS, once HUMPTY DUMPTY has a great fall, all the King’s horses and all the King’s men cannot put HUMPTY together again.