The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED REALITY SCREW-UP, IN PERSPECTIVE
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS need to get out of our BINARY LOGIC FIXATION and move into the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY, but something is clearly HOLDING US BACK! WHAT IS IT!
My sense is that WHAT IS HOLDING US BACK is “TRUTH”.
We have become DEPENDENT on our WESTERN CULTURE LOGICAL TRUTH which gives us a sense of SECURITY and SOLID FOUNDATION on the TRUTH that we can rely on.
UNFORTUNATELY, “LOGICAL TRUTH” is not the same thing as “REALITY”. As Goedel’s Theorem proves, BINARY LOGIC TRUTH is INNATELY INCOMPLETE so that a SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTH can be overtaken by a LESS SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTH.
Modern physics has reaffirmed what the indigenous aboriginal peoples, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents have long held, that QUANTUM LOGIC gives us a LESS SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTH than BINARY LOGIC which is based on BOTH/AND rather than EITHER/OR, so for example, the BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTH of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is a “LESS SIMPLE TRUTH” than “The TOWN is GROWING”. The LESS SIMPLE TRUTH does not “MAKE THE SIMPLE TRUTH WRONG”. MEANWHILE, SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is beyond the reach of LANGUAGE-based LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS THAT CAPTURE LOGICAL TRUTHS. “The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao” –Lao Tzu.
Our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT global social collective HAS A PROBLEM. We are unable to, or are unwilling to UPDATE our old SIMPLE (BINARY LOGIC) TRUTHS with new LESS-SIMPLE (QUANTUM LOGIC) TRUTHS. People resist even LISTENING to the arguments showing the superiority of the new LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTHS. WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS commonly say; ‘READ MY LIPS! I NEVER GOT WHERE I AM TODAY NOT KNOWING WHAT THE TRUTH IS”.
That’s the trouble with LOGICAL TRUTH, it can be TRUE but INCOMPLETE, so that where one man insists that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ can prove this to be TRUE. Likewise, the man who insists that ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, which is a LESS SIMPLE TRUTH, can likewise prove this to be TRUE. As far as REALITY GOES, that is far beyond the reach of LOGICAL TRUTHS as Lao Tzu points out. So we are STUCK WITH TRUTHS that may range from SIMPLE to LESS SIMPLE and we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are now living in an era where Modern physics has confirmed that the LESS SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTHS captured in indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGES are more informative re our sense-experience reality than our WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE captured LOGICAL TRUTHS.
The example given above is a case in point; i.e. the QUANTUM LOGIC “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”:
WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are digging in their heels and are resisting even listening to someone’s purported NEW TRUTH because it seems to infer that their TRUTHS, such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ are NO LONGER TRUE and they react against that think that such a claim is BULLSHIT because “they know for sure that THEIR TOWN IS GROWING”. But that is NOT THE POINT. The point is not that the established TRUTHS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ are “WRONG”, the point is that TRUTHS can be SIMPLE and LESS SIMPLE and the BINARY LOGIC TRUTH ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ is a SIMPLER TRUTH than the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTH ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.
This essay reviews the common misunderstanding, in WESTERN CULTURE, of the INCOMPLETENESS of LOGICAL TRUTH.
* * *
This essay provides a SHORTLIST from the WESTERN CULTURE PATTERN of LANGUAGE-BASED LOGICAL SCREW-UPS I HAVE REVIEWED, which have been pointed out by various philosophical Investigators such as Nietzsche, Bohm, Schroedinger, Wittgenstein, Vygotsky and more.
This list of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC LOGICAL SCREW-UPS POINTS TO ‘ONE PLACE’ that I will try to capture as succinctly and clearly as I can, as follows;
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE that we are using to construct a SHAREABLE CONCEPTUALIZATION that passes for REALITY is BINARY LOGIC based, and thus falls prey to that general exposure of BINARY logic given by Goedel’s Theorem; i.e. “All FINITE BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE”. This means that our BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITIONS can be TRUE but with weaker or stronger grounding in REALITY and therefore that there may be other SYSTEMS of LOGIC, such as QUANTUM LOGIC that are also TRUE but are LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC, and this is what I have been finding in my work and it is the source of the difference in LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of REALITY since WESTERN CULTURE REALITY is commonly based on BINARY LOGIC while INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL REALITY is commonly based on QUANTUM LOGIC.
A simple example comparing the two is as follows;
QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY: “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”. This QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY has an ANDROGYNOUS (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE) as can be understood from the example sentence. QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY is the WAVE-FIELD REALITY of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS, ADVAITA VEDANTA and MODERN PHYSICS.
BINARY LOGIC REALITY : “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”. This BINARY LOGIC REALITY has a one sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY STRUCTURE which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (as can be seen from he example sentence). BINARY LOGIC REALITY is the MECHANISTIC REALITY of MATERIAL FORMS INTERACTING IN EMPTY SPACE OF WESTERN CULTURE
There is a general pattern which crops up in all of my philosophical investigations which accords in a way I about to explain, with the philosophical investigations of David Bohm, Friedrich Nietzsche, Irwin Schroedinger Ludwig Wittgenstein and Lev Vygotsky. Simply stated, the commonality across all of these philosophical investigators is that their FINDING point to the fact that while our sense-experience is of inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD aka PLENUM aka Tao, … Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE DUMBS DOWN our LANGUAGE CAPTURE OF OUR WAVE-FIELD SENSE EXPERIENCE by, in mathematical terms REDUCING the COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE, which is expressed mathematically by having REAL and IMAGINARY components, by DROPPING OUT THE IMAGINARY COMPONENT. The components can also be described as “REAL” = MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE and “IMAGINARY” = FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (as in the PEAK and TROUGH WAVE STRUCTURE.
WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS is suffering from the SCREW-UP that is coming from WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is FRAGMENTING the SOCIAL DYNAMIC and the INDIVIDUAL PSYCHE, as has been CLEARLY stated by David Bohm in a one paragraph comment which I often cite in my essays and will recite once again here, which is NOT THE WHOLE STORY but the basic issue, which I would like to PUT IN A LARGER CONTEXT in this note.
1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)
The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.
Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc
TO BE CLEAR, my view is this is the basic issue in a major ongoing DYSFUNCTION in the SOCIAL DYNAMICS of our WESTERN CULTURE social collective, which manifests in FRAGMENTATION such as U.S. Republican and Democrat polarization, which is a (Conservative-Liberal) polarization of varying severity but notable presence in the WESTERNIZED global populace (I would include Russia and China and India in this). This can be thought of as a global tendency since, for example, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents may not be active promoters but it is very difficult NOT to be ‘fellow travelers’ simply to given one’s children a chance to live and hopefully to help make a change, if that is possible..
While I do consider Bohm’s above quote the best short and precise pointer to what is going wrong in our WESTERN CULTURE DOMINATED GLOBAL SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, is MORE TO IT, for example, Vygotsky has raised a very important critique of WESTERN CULTURE (Piaget’s) CONFUSED VIEWS on the ROLE of LANGUAGE in PSYCHOLOGY and society and this CONFUSION is of the very common type which is where the WAVE-FIELD structure of reality IS MISSED and INCORRECTE ASSUMPTIONS are made on the basis of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, which is the CHRONIC PATTERN in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and PSYCHE based dysfunction as associates with the REDUCING of QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY to BINARY LOGIC REALITY (refer to yellow highlighted definitions cited earlier’) .
* * * END OF PART I, BASIC CONCEPT, BEGINNING OF PART II, EXAMPLES * * *
NOTA BENE: Both QUANTUM LOGIC and BINARY LOGIC use the term ‘TRUTH’ and this can be confusing because REALITY is ‘lying out there beyond the reach of LOGICAL TRUTHS’ and while in my essays I sometimes differentiate binary logic from quantum logic by speaking of quantum logic reality as ‘the truth’ and inferring that the binary logic reality as ‘not the truth’. This is a problem with the sloppy use of language which is common and confusing. First of all BINARY LOGIC can be just as TRUE as QUANTUM LOGIC, the difference being that QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC, so it is a mistake to say, that the BINARY LOGIC proposition (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’) is FALSE and the QUANTUM LOGIC proposition (‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) is TRUE. In FACT, BOTH PROPOSITIONS ARE ‘TRUE’ and the difference between them is that the BINARY LOGIC (local, explicit) ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is “SIMPLER” than the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (nonlocal and implicit) ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING. But we could say that the LOGICAL PROPOSITION that is LESS SIMPLE is (or can be) MORE REAL as far as in resonance with our sense-experience which is intrinsically BEYOND LANGUAGE CAPTURE (the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao).
EXAMPLE OF CONFUSION: If we use the wrong terminology and say that ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ is FALSE because what we mean is that the alternative proposition ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is LESS SIMPLE which we may mistakenly think of as ‘MORE TRUE’ or as ‘THE REAL TRUTH’ but neither of those ‘make sense’ since they would imply that the SIMPLER TRUTH’ is ‘LESS TRUE’ or a ‘FALSE TRUTH’. This is important because people may dig their heels in if one says that what is TRUE is that ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ in which case, ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ “IS NOT TRUE”. This is a mistake that may lead to interminable argument when others who KNOW THAT THE TOWN IS GROWING are going to single-mindedly focus on their knowledge that THIS IS TRUE and the discussion will never get beyond the BINARY LOGIC EITHER TRUE or FALSE argument, … when WHERE WE NEED TO GET TO IS THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE ARE SIMPLE TRUTHS and LESS SIMPLE TRUTHS and it is NOT AS IF the ‘LESS SIMPLE TRUTH’ is FALSE. In those two examples, both are TRUE ‘The TOWN IS GROWING’ is TRUE but it is a SIMPLER TRUTH than ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.
One might imagine his difference by a shift from FLAT SPACE to SPHERICAL SPACE because in SPHERICAL SPACE, when the TOWN IS GROWING, there is a conjugate SHRINKING in WILDERNESS which amounts to an overall “GESTALT” of TRANSFORMATION. Suffice it to say that the FLAT SPACE TRUTH is a SIMPLER TRUTH than the SPHERICAL SPACE TRUTH.
I BRING THIS UP because it is a waste of time to get hung up arguing over sloppy semantics (it is easy to fall into this). And everyday we see people STICKING TO TRUTHS THAT ARE TOO SIMPLE such as NATIONS are INDEPENDENT which is a SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based TRUTH which implies NATIONS distributed on a SIMPLE FLAT SPACE, which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS USE SO OFTEN that it is POLITICALLY INCORRECT to cite SYSTEMS SCIENCES observations such as that of Martine Dodds-Taljaard, that we “live in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence”.
This brings us into the WAVE-FIELD WORLD wherein the LOGICAL TRUTHS are LESS SIMPLE, but nevertheless TRUE. SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY is beyond the reach of SYSTEMS OF LOGIC and LANGUAGE (the Tao that can be told is NOT the TRUE TAO’, so in other words, there are TRUTHS WE CANNOT GET TO as well as SIMPLE TRUTHS and LESS SIMPLE TRUTHS).
What this note NEEDS TO POINT OUT is that in our learning process, many people HOLD BACK from moving from SIMPLE to LESS SIMPLE LOGICAL CONSTRUCTIONS, such as moving from NEWTONIAN PHYSICAL CONCEPTS to QUANTUM PHYSICS CONCEPTS, because one may feel more comfortable DIGGING ONE’S HEELS IN AND INSISTING THAT THE NEWTONIAN PHYSICS TRUTHS ARE TRUE which IS TRUE, but what is not mentioned is that QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTHS are LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC (NEWTONIAN PHYSICS) TRUTHS. For those people who JUST GO BY SOMETHING BEING TRUE and don’t want open up to LESS SIMPLE TRUTHS, ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ will always be the preferred truth and the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC truth (which is standard in indigenous aboriginal language and culture) ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ will remain un-needed by them because they already ‘know the truth’ and it is (the simple) truth that ‘the TOWN is GROWING.
This is why we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are NOT MOVING from SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC TRUTHS to LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTHS because people with sound BINARY LOGIC who already KNOW THE TRUTH (the simple BINARY LOGIC TRUTH) may not even want to listen to open up to talking about something else… i.e. WHAT FOR? … SINCE ONE ALREADY KNOWS THE TRUTH?
One may say ‘the TRUTH IS, THE TOWN IS GROWING’, … and the QUANTUM LOGIC ADHERENT MAY MAKE A MOVE TO ‘UP THE REALITY’ FROM “EITHER/OR” BINARY LOGIC TO ‘BOTH/AND’ QUANTUM LOGIC WHEREIN THE LESS SIMPLE TRUTH IS THAT ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ . ONE MUST BE CAREFUL NOT TO IMPLY THAT THE AUTHOR OF ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ IS A LIAR, BUT HERE THE DIFFICULTY COMES IN THAT ONE MAY HAVE TO BRING PHILOSOPHY INTO THE DISCUSSION AND MANY WESTERN CULTURE PEOPLE, WHEN IT COMES TO BINARY LOGIC, ARE LIKE A DOG WITH A BONE THAT “ARE NOT GOING TO LET YOU TAKE THEIR BINARY LOGIC AWAY FROM THEM”, … AND HERE YOU ARE HAVING TO OPEN UP ROOM FOR PHILOSOPHY WHILE THE RESISTANT BINARY LOGIC SUPPORTER IS TELLING YOU TO “KEEP IT SIMPLE, STUPID”.
But that’s the whole point, QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC so that in order to GET IT, one has to LET GO and come out of the COMFORT ZONE of SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC and that’s no problem for me since I have been studying QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-DYNAMICS since about 1959 (grade 13 physics) and as a result of the past 64 years of focused investigation, I have no trouble seeing that LETTING GO OF BINARY LOGIC SO THAT QUANTUM LOGIC CAN RISE TO FILL ‘THE LOGIC SLOT’ is NOT A PROBLEM and that the ACCEPTANCE of QUANTUM LOGIC AS A LESS SIMPLE TRUTH is NOT SHOOTING DOWN BINARY LOGIC AS ‘WRONG’ or ‘FALSE’, just putting it in perspective as a SIMPLE TRUTH that is superseded by LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTH.
If one is involved in the BINARY LOGIC based POLARIZING of CONSERVATIVE versus LIBERAL POLITICS, one may be unable to DISENCUMBER oneself from SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC THOUGHTS which have entrenched themselves like SQUATTERS IN ONE’S PSYCHE and there is only ONE LOGIC SLOT in the PSYCHE and thus no ENTRY ACCESS for QUANTUM LOGIC while BINARY LOGIC is HOLDING THE FORT; i.e. If one agrees that ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, that BINARY LOGIC based UNDERSTANDING, having been filled, is NAILED SHUT and the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding that ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ can pack up and head off in search of still open minds.
* * *
IMPORTANT WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED SCREW-UPS (PITFALLS)
Vygotaky has clearly pointed out, in contradiction to Piaget, the ‘Spontaneous Learning’ and ‘Scientific Learning’ are two sides of a single coinage. Piaget’s MISTAKE is pervasive in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and it corresponds to the REDUCTION of the COMPLEX (real + imaginary , … aka male-asserting + female accommodating) WAVE-FIELD LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE to the SIMPLE ‘real’-only, or ‘male-asserting explicate only’ LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE. This has been described above in the example of ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ (REAL ONLY) versus ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (REAL + IMAGINARY, or otherwise express as the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE ACCOMMODATING in conjugate relation with MALE ASSERTING).
Vygotsky’s Point is of FUNDAMENTAL IMPORTANCE; it captures the WAVE-FIELD structure of THOUGHT where the ‘spontaneous’ corresponds with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate or ‘IMAGINARY’ component while the ‘scientific’ corresponds with the MALE ASSERTING conjugate or ‘REAL’ component. Thus Piaget’s DROPPING OUT the SPONTANEOUS (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING) corresponds to the REDUCTION of ‘COMPLEX SIGNAL’ (WAVE-FIELD) to ‘REAL ONLY SIGNAL’ (MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY). This constitutes, in LANGUAGE, the reduction of WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE LANGUAGE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to MECHANICAL LANGUAGE which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT
“Though fundamentally different in nature, the development of scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation:
. . .
“Our disagreement with Piaget centers on one point only, but an important point. He assumes that development and instruction are entirely separate, incommensurate processes, that the function of instruction is merely to introduce adult ways of thinking, which conflict with the child’s own and eventually supplant them. Such a supposition stems from the old psychological tradition of separating the structural from the functional aspects of development.” –Vygotsky
THE EFFECT of THIS LANGUAGE BASED DROPOUT and REDUCTION from LESS-SIMPLE (nonlocal, implicit) WAVE-FIELD COMPETENT LANGUAGE (QUANTUM LOGIC) to SIMPLE (local, explicit) MECHANICAL LANGUAGE (BINARY LOGIC) is FRAGMENTATION as pointed out by Bohm and cited earlier.
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, in following in the simple BINARY LOGIC footsteps of Piaget rather than in the QUANTUM LOGIC footsteps of Vygotsky, are , in effect, REDUCING the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD conceptualizing capability wherein material forms are seen as CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, to simple BINARY LOGIC MECHANICAL conceptualizing capability wherein material forms are seen as ABSOLUTE MATERIAL OBJECTS moving about and interacting in an ABSOLUTE SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.
QUANTUM LOGIC comprehends BALANCE while BINARY LOGIC does not.
The assigning of a foundational role in LANGUAGE to the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, contrasts with the assigning of a foundational role in LANGUAGE to simple BINARY LOGIC in WESTERN CULTURE. This difference in LOGIC TYPE LOADED INTO LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE leads to differences in PSYCHOLOGICAL CONCEPTUALIZING of ‘REALITY’. While WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are informed by a BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which casts ‘reality’ in terms of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECTS and their actions and development, as in the example ‘the TOWN is growing’, Indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists, Advaita Vedanta, consistent with MODERN PHYSICS, are informed by a QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that casts ‘reality’ in terms of NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT relational (wave) forms wherein everything is included within an all included relational transformation (the WAVE-FIELD).
In this WAVE-FIELD world wherein ‘everything is in the FLUX of relational transformation’, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) is the FOUNDATIONAL REALITY. In this case, there is no role for DIFFERENTIATION because there are “NO LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS” to “DIFFERENTIATE” and ‘the way of relational nature’ is the ‘less simple dynamic’ of INTEGRATION of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT energized by the natural tendency towards BALANCE which is at the same time, in QUANTUM LOGIC terms, an eschewing of IMBALANCE.
LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC supports ABSOLUTE BEING and the ability to DIFFERENTIATE between ABSOLUTE, LOCAL, EXPLICIT material forms.
LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC supports RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION.
The physics of TRANSFORMATION associates with BALANCE-SEEKING FLOW proceeding from regions of SURPLUS to regions of DEFICIENCY which is the innate animating phenomena in QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-DYNAMICS. NOTE: QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the including medium, the ‘including medium’ being the ‘all-including WAVE-FIELD’.
The IMPORTANT POINT HERE is that QUANTUM LOGIC comprehends BALANCE while BINARY LOGIC implies the PRIMACY of EITHER ONE OR THE OTHER and while BALANCE is immanent in NATURE, WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC supports the quest for the PRIMACY of EITHER ONE OR THE OTHER as seen in such terms as ‘the PRIMACY of GOOD over EVIL’, or ‘RIGHT’ over ‘WRONG’.
Thus, SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC supports the DIFFERENTIATION based PURIFICATIONIST ORIENTATION aimed at the proliferating of GOOD and the ELIMINATING of BAD, while LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC supports the INTEGRATION based BALANCING ORIENTATION as is the source of TRANSFORMATION.
There is a PROBLEM here in that DIFFERENTIATION depends on the use of language that imputes BEING to relational forms in the transforming relational continuum which is done by superficially, with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche points out. Thus, while there is TRUTH in LOGIC such that we can ascertain that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is a VERIFIABLY ‘TRUE’ PROPOSITION, as Goedel’s Theorem reminds us, ALL FINITE BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE. In this case, we have not mentioned the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERENESS and thus the overall TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.
BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, while passing the test of EITHER TRUE or FALSE and being ratified as TRUE is nevertheless subject to Goedel’s Theorem INCOMPLETENESS and in this case, it is IMPOSSIBLE to have GROWTH OF THE TOWN without SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS and thus TRANSFORMATION of the spherical space constituted by the combination of the GROWING TOWN and the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS.
In Indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta and Modern physics, VERBS are used rather than nouns (e.g. TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE rather than the TOWN that is GROWING) so that the language based conceptualization SIDESTEPS the Goedel’s Theorem pitfall of the INCOMPLETENESS of all (BINARY LOGIC) propositions (including ‘the TOWN is GROWING’), since that INCOMPLETENESS of “BINARY LOGIC” propositions is COMING FROM THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (aka the IMAGINARY WAVE-FIELD COMPONENT). The QUANTUM LOGIC PROPOSITION “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” includes BOTH REAL and IMAGINARY WAVE-FIELD COMPONENTS or in other words, BOTH MALE-ASSERTING AND FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATES, bypassing the Goedel’s Theorem INCOMPLETENESS associated with BINARY LOGIC but such INCOMPLETENESS DOES NOT ARISE IN QUANTUM LOGIC PROPOSITIONS since it DERIVES from the MISSING FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which characterizes BINARY LOGIC but NOT QUANTUM LOGIC.
In other words, BINARY LOGIC, but NOT QUANTUM LOGIC, has the exposure to Goedel’s Theorem of Incompleteness. One might say that the INCOMPLETENESS derives from DIFFERENTIATION which is implicit in BINARY LOGIC while COMPLETENESS is supported by INTEGRATION which is implicit in QUANTUM LOGIC
To SUMMARIZE this note; LANGUAGE incorporating BINARY LOGIC is subject to Goedel’s Theorem of INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE “BINARY” LOGIC PROPOSITIONS, and it is important to note that in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE this INCOMPLETENESS shows up as the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE. QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE and since it includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE or in other words, the IMAGINARY WAVE-FIELD component, it does not incur the INCOMPLETENESS ‘ERROR’ as in BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE.
The PROBLEMATIC IMPACT of using BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE lies in the INCOMPLETENESS of the PROPOSITIONS we construct with it, an INCOMPLETENESS which is operative in;
-1- WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE (assumes MALE ASSERTING ACTION ONLY)
-2- WESTERN CULTURE MEDICINE (assumes MALE ASSERTING ACTION ONLY)
-3- WESTERN CULTURE COMMERCE (assumes MALE ASSERTING ACTION ONLY)
In all 3 cases, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE acknowledges “ONLY” the BINARY LOGIC based DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR “LOCAL AUTHORING” of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.
By CONTRAST, Indigenous aboriginal culture and LANGUAGE acknowledge BOTH FEMALE ACCOMMODATING\ENABLING together with MALE ASSERTING ACTION (the full ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD complement of TRANSFORMATION as in; ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.
The DROPPING OUT, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, DROPS OUT the understanding of STRIFE in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of IMBALANCE where the remedy is the RESTORING OF BALANCE as is the understanding and practice in the indigenous aboriginal culture. Thus, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, the BINARY LOGIC STRUCTURE, by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, generates LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS IN ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING LOCAL AUTHORING TERMS which has supported programs of REWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS for those perceived to be the LOCAL, EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING AUTHORS of ‘GOOD’ actions and developments, … along with programs of PUNISHMENTS and DENIGRATION for those perceived to be the MALE ASSERTING AUTHORS of ‘BAD’ actions and developments.
CONVERSELY, the RETAINING, in Indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism, Advaita Vedanta and MODERN PHYSICS, of the ANDROGYNOUS COMBINATION of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING together with (in conjugate relation with) MALE ASSERTING ACTION) supports the understanding of REALITY in the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT terms of RELATIONAL BALANCE and TRANSFORMATION.
There is NO LOCAL AUTHORING (the artefact of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR) in this WAVE-FIELD understanding of an all-including transforming relational continuum. In the transforming relational continuum, the ‘players’ are in the first order of things, CONDUITS and NOT LOCAL AUTHORS as they are perceived to be when the initial assumptions impose the notion of INDEPENDENT BEINGS with LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS residing within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.
The TRIO of WESTERN JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE are all BINARY LOGIC based and lead directly to FRAGMENTATION with its many ‘side-effects’ as discussed in Bohm’s earlier cited excerpt on FRAGMENTATION from ‘Wholeness and the Implicate Order’.
* * END OF PART II, EXAMPLES * * *