<\/p>\n
There is an intriguing topology in a \u2018smile\u2019 or \u2018puckering up\u2019 and it is called NONLOCALITY.\u00a0 Like the \u2018whorl\u2019 in river flow, it seems to demand our obedient attention as it says; \u2018READ MY LIPS: I AM COMING FROM MY OWN CENTRE!\u201d.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 But that is just a lie.\u00a0\u00a0 The LOCAL voice has hijacked the NONLOCAL reality.\u00a0 If we INVERT our gaze and turn it upwards, we see the brilliant sun, and what\u2019s more, we FEEL the radiating warmth that we intuitively know is the REAL SOURCE of the river-whorl.<\/p>\n
In spite of the APPEARANCES, the whorl\u2019s egotistical claims of LOCALITY is just self-centered make-believe.\u00a0\u00a0 The whorl, like all forms in the flow, is inherently NONLOCAL, like the Buddha\u2019s smile.<\/p>\n
How did we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS reduce the NONLOCAL to the LOCAL?\u00a0 We did by way of the \u2018double error\u2019 of language and grammar, as Nietzsche pointed out.\u00a0 The first error is NAMING.\u00a0 We invent a \u2018name\u2019 for whorl, and because the name persists without changing, even though the whorl is \u2018made of continual change\u2019 (We cannot step into the same river twice for it is not the same river, and we are not the same person stepping into it).<\/p>\n
Naming decrees the persisting thing-in-itself being.\u00a0 This \u2018decree\u2019 is an intellectual decree since our sensory experience is clearly informing us that the whorl is relational form in the flow that we cognitively freeze by our intellectual act of naming it.\u00a0\u00a0 Which should we believe?\u00a0 Should we believe our intellect that, having named the flow-form, insists on its persisting thing-in-itself LOCAL BEING, or should we believe in our sensory experience of inclusion in a transforming relational continuum wherein everything is in flux?<\/p>\n
Well, it is clear that if we want to use language to share our experience of inclusion within the transforming relational continuum, we need a scheme to refer to forms that shares what we are referring to as we are continuing to discuss it; i.e. hurricane Katrina may, in its basic nature be as NONLOCAL and thus as elusive as Mona Lisa\u2019s smile, a special smile that binds us together as if we are both inclusions in ONE transforming relational continuum, which we are.\u00a0 This is impossible to capture \u2018on its own\u2019, without actually experiencing it, but that is the artists talent to work away at trying the capture that which is impossible to capture; i.e. fixed imagery of our lived experience of inclusion in the Tao.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Tao that can be told is not the true Tao\u201d \u2013 Lao Tzu<\/em><\/p>\n (sound of trumpets announcing the ENTRY OF THE DOUBLE ERROR).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Yes, it is true, \u2026 it is impossible to capture in words (language and grammar) the fluid reality of the Tao aka the \u2018wave-field\u2019 wherein all forms are flow-forms.<\/p>\n However, even though all flow-forms are NONLOCAL phenomena within the transforming relational continuum and are thus without persisting \u2018being\u2019, \u2026 many formings have a persisting APPEARANCE like the whorl in the river-bend.<\/p>\n Into the same rivers we step and do not step, we are and are not. (Heraclitus Homericus)<\/em><\/p>\n It is not possible to step twice into the same river according to Heraclitus, or to come into contact twice with a mortal being in the same state. (Plutarch)<\/em><\/p>\n Such innate fluidity is the understanding that \u2018fits\u2019 with the understanding of the world as a Wave-field in which all forms are \u2018appearances in the flow (the Tao, the Wavefield).\u00a0 The whorl we call \u2018hurricane Katrina\u2019 has no persisting \u2018being\u2019 other than \u2018by appearance\u2019 but is frozen into LOCAL thing-in-itselfness, in our intellectualizing mind, by our intellectual act of naming the form.\u00a0 That is, the notional PERSISTING EXISTENCE of THE FORM AS IF IT WERE AN INDEPENDENTLY-EXISTING THING-IN-ITSELF is intellectual abstraction that is definitely NOT supported by sensory experience.\u00a0 What are we to believe?<\/p>\n Clearly, the naming gambit is very useful.\u00a0 How is it useful?\u00a0 \u2018Naming\u2019, even though it artificially freezes a fluid flow-form in an unchanging name-word, makes it possible for us to capture in language and thus share and discuss abstract \u2018replicas\u2019 of purely transient relational forms in the flow.\u00a0 \u2018Naming\u2019 together with \u2018Grammar\u2019 constitute a \u2018double error\u2019 wherein, for example, the NONLOCAL (and thus ineffable) phenomenon of \u2018duning\u2019 can be reduced in a first error to an abstract local independent thing-in-itself \u2018a Dune\u2019 (by naming), and conflated with the use of grammar wherein we impute to it (the Dune) its own powers of growing larger and longer and shifting to the south etc.<\/p>\n The double error thus allows us to reduce (in our abstracting, intellectualizing minds), the NONLOCAL to the LOCAL and thus render the ineffable effable, although in a radically reduced form.\u00a0 Instead of NONLOCAL RESONANCE of \u2018duning\u2019, we come out with LOCAL double error based reality in terms of name-instantiated things-in-themselves (Dunes) with grammar endowed powers of sourcing actions and developments (growing longer and higher and shifting across the \u2018desert floor\u2019.<\/p>\n The invention of the \u2018desert floor\u2019 is the manifesting of our obligation coming from the INHABITANT-HABITAT split; i.e. once reduce \u2018duning\u2019 (NONLOCAL resonance phenomena) to a LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF by NAMING it a \u2018DUNE\u2019, we are obliged by logical consistency to invent a HABITAT to contain this INHABITANT we have created by \u2018naming\u2019 a flow-form.<\/p>\n So, we are creating a whole ne BINARY world by using language and grammar in \u2018double error\u2019 mode to (a) use naming to create a notional (intellectual abstraction) thing-in-itself, and (b) conflate the first error with the second error (Grammar) of endowing the newly created thing-in-itself with the powers of sourcing actions and developments.<\/p>\n NONLOCALITY has thus been replaced (wallpapered over) with LOCALITY in the guise of name-instantiated LOCAL BEINGS (independently-existing things-in-themselves) notionally with THEIR OWN LOCAL POWERS of SOURCING actions and developments.<\/p>\n OK, we reduced the NONLOCAL Tao to abstract double error LOCAL terms of independently-existing things-in-themselves with their (our) own powers of sourcing actions and developments, \u2026 a double error that we use to \u2018do an end run\u2019 around the ineffable because NONLOCAL Tao, so that we can effable-ize the Tao, \u2026 A VERY USEFUL TOOL THAT DISTINGUISHES HUMANINGS FROM OTHER ANIMALINGS IN THE TAO, BUT IT IS ONLY A TOOL OF EXPEDIENCE TO REDUCE THE INEFFABLE TO A CRUDE EFFABLE RE-PRESENTATION.<\/p>\n THIS IS WHERE EAST AND WEST SPLIT, BECAUSE WHILE THE EAST DOES NOT LET THE TOOL RUN AWAY WITH (REDEFINE) THE WORKMAN, THE WEST DOES INDEED LET THE TOOL RUN AWAY WITH THE WORKMAN.<\/p>\n Sure, I can speak in terms of the Dune growing larger and longer and shifting to the south, \u2026 and if I am \u2018of the EAST\u2019, I will regard this language and grammar based reduction of NONLOCAL resonance to LOCAL name-instantiated things-in-themselves (INHABITANTs) residing in a binarily separate HABITAT as a \u2018Wittgenstein ladder\u2019, an intellectual abstracting device that allows me to talk about (effable-ize) the ineffable, not to confuse if for reality but for the purpose of sharing this half-assed reduction of my ineffable experience of inclusion in the Tao (whe Wavefield) which, although it is only a half-assed reduction, is a SHAREABLE half-assed reduction that does an end-run around the ineffability of the Tao).<\/p>\n But if am \u2018of the WEST\u2019, I will MISTAKENLY regard this language and grammar based reduction of NONLOCAL resonance, as a legitimate and explicit representation of reality and use to wallpaper over and obsolete the ineffable reality of our actual sensory experience of inclusion in the Tao, and this is a CRAZY-MAKER on the scale of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENCY.<\/p>\n If I say to you; \u2018the dune is growing larger and shifting to the south\u2019 and is about to bury your land-rover and tent, \u2026 you won\u2019t know whether I am (a) of the EAST or (b) of the WEST because I am capable of BOTH understandings and you can\u2019t \u2018read my mind\u2019.<\/p>\n But there are ways to distinguish the deeper interpretation which distinguishes EAST from WEST.\u00a0 For example, if I say \u2018Jean Valjean stole a loaf of bread\u2019 and is thus guilty of perpetrating a criminal act, \u2026 this implies a literal interpretation of the \u2018double error\u2019 of language and grammar; i.e. wherein Jean Valjean is a name-instantiated thing-in-itself with his own powers of sourcing actions and developments.<\/p>\n In this case, the language is being used literally rather than as a reductionist tool to provide a reduced and approximate pictorial of reality, which is all that the EAST expect of language and grammar.<\/p>\n How could simple \u2018double error\u2019 based language and grammar constructs capture the complexity of the Tao, the transforming relational continuum, the roots of the relational development including the relational imbalance if access to food which is the source of the starving children that induced Jean Valjean\u2019s \u2018relational rebalancing cation of moving some bread from regions of excess to regions of deficiency, which is what is \u2018really going on\u2019 here.<\/p>\n The \u2018double error\u2019 of language and grammar is our common way of reducing an interminably complex transforming relational continuum (an ineffable unending web of relational influences) to \u00a0effable terms of explicit LOCAL BEINGS with THEIR OWN LOCALLY SOURCED \u00a0POWERS of actions and developments.<\/p>\n Jean Valjean is seen, in double error terms, as the SOURCE of an act of thievery.<\/p>\n IN THE EAST, the \u2018source\u2019 of the \u2018crime\u2019 or \u2018rebalancing action\u2019 is NONLOCAL as in imbalances arising in the transforming relational continuum, so that while the simplistic double error construction of \u2018Jean Valjean stole a loaf of bread\u2019 <\/em>is useful for sharing a reduced DEPICTION of what is going on, reality is NONLOCAL and that which is LOCAL and VISIBLE is NOT REALITY but a superficial visual account captured in double error based language and grammar terms.\u00a0 In the case of Jean Valjean and the loaf of bread, inductive influence arising within the relational dynamic (people with plenty and a child starving from deficiency within the relational dynamic) gave rise to a relational rebalancing.\u00a0 Jean Valjean was an instrument within the rebalancing, however, he was not the \u2018source\u2019 of the action.\u00a0 A social relational dynamic that allows relational imbalances to develop or which even encourages the growth of such imbalances is where remediation is needed.<\/p>\n The \u2018double error\u2019 of language and grammar would have us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS believe in SORCERY, and this double error based \u2018sorcery\u2019 abstraction is applied, by WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS in the understanding NOT ONLY in the cases of the SORCERY of actions and developments perceived as GOOD (which \u2018merit rewards\u2019), but also in the cases of the SORCERY of actions and developments perceived as BAD (which merit \u2018punishments\u2019).<\/p>\n As you can see, the \u2018double error\u2019 of language and grammar is where the abstraction of LOCAL BEING and LOCAL SOURCING of actions and developments comes from, and among WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, the reduction of reality by way of the double error is not just a tool for developing a crude reduced \u2018picture\u2019 or \u2018effable reduction\u2019 of reality, but is being used as an operative \u2018surrogate reality\u2019 that wallpapers over and eclipses the ineffable NONLOCAL reality of our actual relational experience.<\/p>\n In the EAST, however, the double error based reality\u00a0 of name-instantiated LOCAL BEINGS with notional powers of LOCAL SOURCING of actions and developments is not a tool that has run away with the workman, the human with the divine, as it has in the WEST.\u00a0 In the EAST, the \u2018divine\u2019 remains embodied in the ineffable Tao while the effable double error reduction is used only as a \u2018ladder\u2019 to trigger one\u2019s sensory awareness of something that lies innately beyond the ladder of double-error based language and grammar construct.\u00a0 As Wittgenstein points out, in order to reduce the ineffable relational flow to effable terms, we can capture the continually transforming relational flow in terms of multiple images where our mention of the images is just an expedient for getting to the relations that constitute flow, the flow being the real reality.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u00a06.54 My propositions are elucidatory in this way: he who understands me finally recognizes them as senseless, when he has climbed out through them, on them, over them. (He must so to speak throw away the ladder, after he has climbed up on it.<\/em><\/p>\n He must surmount these propositions; then he sees the world rightly.<\/em><\/p>\n \u201c7.\u00a0Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u2014 Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico Philosophicus<\/em><\/p>\n CONCLUSION:<\/p>\n BOTH EAST AND WEST use language and grammar to enable sharing of allusions to one\u2019s respective ineffable experience. The double error reduction is an abstraction based overcoming of NONLOCALITY wherein resonance such as Duning, which is innately NONLOCAL is made to appear LOCAL in the guise of a name-instantiated LOCAL thing-in-itself, the DUNE, which is grammar-endowed with the notional power of sourcing its own actions and developments; \u2018The DUNE is growing longer and higher and is shifting to the south\u2019.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n For the EAST, this double error reduction does not \u2018qualify\u2019 as a substitute for the ineffable NONLOCAL reality of the Tao, but only qualities as \u2018inference\u2019 of a reality that lies innately beyond the LOCAL and EFFABLE.\u00a0 Thus \u2018Jean Valjean\u2019 stole a loaf a bread is acceptable as a crude reductive inference that implies a deeper REAL reality that is NONLOCAL wherein relational imbalance between regions of surplus and regions of deficiency is the animator in the dynamic of relational transformation.<\/p>\n For the WEST, this double error reduction is employed as a direct and explicit substitute for the ineffable NONLOCAL reality of the Tao.\u00a0 Thus \u2018reality\u2019 in the WEST is formed from taking the double error LITERALLY and constructing a reality that is LOCAL and EFFABLE, in which case Jean Valjean REALLY IS THE SOURCE OF THE ACTION OF THIEVERY OF A LOAF OF BREAD.\u00a0 In other words, in the WEST where the double error is interpreted directly and explicitly as REALITY, Jean Valjean is understanding as a LOCAL thing-in-itself with LOCALLY INCIPIENT POWERS OF SOURCING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS which is \u2018fully and solely responsible for his own actions and developments.<\/p>\n In the WEST, Western religions such as Christianity have helped to entrench this belief in the \u2018double error\u2019; e.g;<\/p>\n \u201cMan is rational and therefore like God; he is created with free will and is master over his acts.<\/em><\/p>\n 1731 Freedom is the power, rooted in reason and will, to act or not to act, to do this or that, and so to perform deliberate actions on one\u2019s own responsibility. By free will one shapes one\u2019s own life. Human freedom is a force for growth and maturity in truth and goodness; it attains its perfection when directed toward God, our beatitude.<\/em><\/p>\n 1732 As long as freedom has not bound itself definitively to its ultimate good which is God, there is the possibility of choosing between good and evil, and thus of growing in perfection or of failing and sinning. This freedom characterizes properly human acts. It is the basis of praise or blame, merit or reproach.\u201d \u2013 Vatican Archives, The Catholic Catechism<\/em><\/p>\n This \u2018rationality\u2019 as an \u2018operative mindset\u2019 is a CRAZY-MAKER that is putting WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS in the psyche wards and\/or on drugs.\u00a0 These ‘treatments’ are administered to soften the effects of the schizophrenia that WESTERN CULTURE infuses into the psyche which manifests in the WESTERN social collective as, for example, the Conservative \u2013 Liberal split and within the WESTERN CULTURE MINDTHINK pressured resident member as a split within their own psyche (termed schizophrenia or bipolar disorder).\u00a0 Opting for either the Conservative or Liberal mind-spit can make the split into an exosplit or ‘projection’ instead of endosplit or introjection.<\/p>\n Both of these WESTERN crazinesses derive from the same source, the LITERAL acceptance of the ‘double error’ as the ‘operative reality’.<\/p>\n This is where EAST departs from WEST since the EAST (as well as modern physics) employs the double error merely as a ‘Wittgenstein ladder’ of IMPLICIT inference that sets us up for a mental\u00a0 leap that can give us an intuitive sense of the ineffable, while the WEST uses the double error EXPLICITLY to construct a surrogate ‘operative reality’ that is taken to be the ‘real reality’, with crazy-making consequences.<\/p>\n * * *<\/p>\n The Double Error and the Buddha\u2019s Smile have this in common; that which is EXPLICIT and LOCAL is merely a signal suggesting the possibility of something sublime and ineffable that is IMPLICIT and NONLOCAL.\u00a0 The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao.<\/em><\/p>\n We know that the ‘double error’ is an intellect-tricking device that we use to generate the intellectual abstractions of LOCAL BEING and LOCAL SOURCING (e.g. the LOCAL dune-thing-in-itself that signifies to which grammar imparts the LOCAL powers of sourcing actions and developments.\u00a0 This double error combination renders the ineffable and NONLOCAL effable and LOCAL so that we can talk ‘rationally’ about the effable things and share and discuss them.\u00a0 The ineffable remains ineffable, like the smiling Buddha.<\/p>\n We pay a price to effable-ize the ineffable and some might say we ‘make a deal with the devil’ as in ‘Mephistopheles et l’Androgyne’ (Mircea Eliade).\u00a0 \u00a0In order to localize the material aspect, we create a nonlocal immaterial aspect.\u00a0 \u00a0Duning is a wave-field dynamic but if in order to localize the material aspect as ‘the dune’, we create a nonlocal immaterial aspect we call the ‘desert’.\u00a0 In other words, if we employ the psycho-trickery of ‘naming’ to create in our mind the notion of a local ‘thing-in-itself’, we generate in the same creative fell swoop, an imaginary containing space for the ‘thing-in-itself’ to reside in.\u00a0 We call this the ‘habitat’, but no matter in how much detail we describe the ‘inhabitant’ and ‘his\/her\/its actions and developments within the usual double error context, … we do not, at the same time, flesh out our description of the containing ‘habitat’.<\/p>\n That is, we describe the inhabitant as if it were ‘independent’ of the ‘habitat’ and equipped with its own internally sourced powers of development and action.\u00a0 The ‘habitat’ is treated as a ‘thing-in-itself’ that gets ‘fleshed out’ indirectly by our intellectual process of continually adding ‘inhabitants’ so that the habitat is the reciprocal ‘negative space’.<\/p>\n In the Art world, what is not explicitly fleshed out as a figure or figures is termed the ‘negative space’, like the spaces between the explicitly portrayed leaves and branches of a tree in a photograph or a painting.\u00a0 We could insert some birds and butterflies to flesh out the ‘negative space’ a bit better, but nevertheless, our approach to visually representing the world we live in is positivist (figure-oriented) just as our approach to speaking of dynamics is ‘positivist’ in that it is ‘producer-product’ oriented.<\/p>\n Such positive approaches to intellectual representation are problematic since we are living within a transforming relational continuum aka a wave-field.\u00a0 For example, reducing duning that is NONLOCAL resonance, to positivist producer product dynamics wherein ‘Dunes’ are things-in-themselves with their own powers of sourcing actions and developments (the Dune is growing larger and longer and shifting to the south), is a double error based reduction that SPLITS the relational field into FIGURE and GROUND.<\/p>\n Thanks to grammar, this sort of split is no longer just ‘appearance’ as in the relational transformation of the fluid Tao or wave-field, because grammar has made it LOCAL BEING based; i.e. the ‘Dune’ is psychologically conceived of through the double error of language and grammar is a LOCAL thing-in-itself with its own powers of sourcing actions and development.\u00a0 The same double error applies to the humaning as to the duning such that we conceive of the ‘human’ as a thing-in-itself with its own notional powers of sourcing actions and developments.\u00a0 This is just abstraction that can be used as a tool of inference, as it is in the EAST and as in modern physics (e.g. the Surprise version of the game of Twenty Questions), indigenous aboriginal cultures (mitakuye oyasin – ‘we are all related’), Taoism\/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.<\/p>\n BUT WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS DO NOT EMPLOY THE DOUBLE ERROR AS A TOOL OF INFERENCE, THE WEST EMPLOYS THE DOUBLE ERROR AS THE OPERATIVE REALITY!\u00a0 THUS ‘DUNING’ AND ‘HUMANING’ AS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS GIVE WAY, IN THE MINDS OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, TO LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES (DUNES AND HUMANS) WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF SOURCING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.\u00a0 This is where WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT ‘reality’ is coming from; i.e. it is coming from the ‘double error’ of language and grammar used NOT simply as a tool of implicit inference, but as the EXPLICIT REALITY.<\/p>\n WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are confounding ourselves with our literal treatment of our ‘double error’ but what has emerged as a clue that has become more and more bothersome is the conservative – liberal split.\u00a0 This split comes from the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT’s practice of EMPLOYING THE DOUBLE ERROR not as a tool of inference as in the EAST, but AS THE OPERATIVE REALITY. This double error employs grammar that splits apart ‘INHABITANT’ and ‘HABITAT’ leading to the same ambiguity as in the Zen koan of wind-and-flag; i.e. does the dynamic of the inhabitant source changes in the dynamics of the habitat or do the dynamics of the habitat source changes in the dynamics of the inhabitants?<\/p>\n Are changes in the inhabitants’ dynamics the source of changes in the habitat dynamics (e.g. climate change) or are changes in the habitat’s dynamics (e.g. climate change) the source of changes in the inhabitant’s dynamics’?<\/p>\n THE ANSWER IS:<\/p>\n THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘SOURCING’ IN THE REALITY OF OUR INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.<\/p>\n This understanding holds, also for the Zen koan of wind and flag (does the moving air source the movement of the flag or does the moving flag source the movement of the air?)\u00a0 THERE IS NOT SUCH THING AS SORCERY, THERE IS ONLY TRANSFORMATION.<\/p>\n THE WESTERN CULTURE SPLIT BETWEEN CONSERVATIVES AND LIBERALS COMES FROM THE FACT THAT THE CONSERVATIVE EGO SEES THE INDIVIDUAL AS THE SOURCE OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS WHILE THE LIBERAL EGO SEES THE COLLECTIVE AS THE SOURCE OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.<\/p>\n BOTH ARE WRONG!\u00a0 THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘SORCERY’.\u00a0 SORCERY IS AN ARTIFACT OF EGO.\u00a0 EGO COMES FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR, AND IT PIVOTS FROM ‘NAMING’\u00a0 IF WE NAME THE INDIVIDUAL AS THE SOURCE OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS WE GET THE CONSERVATIVE VIEW, AND IF WE NAME THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE AS THE SOURCE OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, WE GET THE LIBERAL VIEW.\u00a0 BOTH ARE WRONG!\u00a0 THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SORCERY.\u00a0 IT IS A DOUBLE ERROR OF LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR.\u00a0 THERE IS ONLY RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION.<\/p>\n RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION IS INEFFABLE, SO WE HAVE EMPLOYED THE DOUBLE ERROR TO EFFABLE-IZE THE INEFFABLE.<\/p>\n THE EAST EMPLOYS THE DOUBLE ERROR AS ‘INFERENCE’ (A WITTGENSTEIN LADDER) WHICH CANNOT GO ALL THE WAY TO EXPLICITIZING AN INNATELY INEFFABLE REALITY (THE TAO) BUT WHICH CAN BE USED AS A TOOL OF INFERENCE.<\/p>\n THE WEST EMPLOYS THE DOUBLE ERROR DIRECTLY, AS THE EXPLICIT REALITY.\u00a0 THE ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ IS ALSO DESCRIBED IN TERMS OF THE ‘FREE WILL’ OF THE ‘LOCAL, RATIONAL, INDEPENDENT BEING’;<\/p>\n \u201cMan is rational and therefore like God; he is created with free will and is master over his acts.<\/em><\/p>\n 1731 Freedom is the power, rooted in reason and will, to act or not to act, to do this or that, and so to perform deliberate actions on one\u2019s own responsibility. By free will one shapes one\u2019s own life. Human freedom is a force for growth and maturity in truth and goodness; it attains its perfection when directed toward God, our beatitude.<\/em><\/p>\n 1732 As long as freedom has not bound itself definitively to its ultimate good which is God, there is the possibility of choosing between good and evil, and thus of growing in perfection or of failing and sinning. This freedom characterizes properly human acts. It is the basis of praise or blame, merit or reproach.\u201d \u2013 Vatican Archives, The Catholic Catechism<\/em><\/p>\n THIS IS A CRAZY MAKER WHICH HAS BEEN SOWN INTO THE WESTERN PSYCHE VIA WESTERN PSYCHOLOGICAL INFUSIONS OF BOTH SECULAR AND RELIGIOUS BELIEF; I.E. THE DOUBLE ERROR INCORPORATES THE CONCEPT OF A LOCAL INDEPENDENTLY EXISTING ‘BEING’ WITH ‘FREE WILL’ (THE NAME-INSTANTIATED, INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF’S OWN INCIPIENT POWERS OF SOURCING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.\u00a0 \u00a0THIS BELIEF IS FIRSTLY ‘WESTERN’ LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR BASED AND CAN BE FOUND IN BOTH WESTERN SECULAR AND RELIGIOUS INTELLECTUAL PERSPECTIVES.<\/p>\n THE CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL SPLIT IS A MANIFESTATION OF THE CRAZY-MAKING DOUBLE ERROR OF LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR WHEN TAKEN LITERALLY AS IN THE WEST RATHER THAN INFERENTIALLY AS IN THE EAST.<\/p>\n * * *<\/p>\n <\/p>\n ADDENDUM TO CONSOLIDATE THE ABOVE OBSERVATIONS;<\/strong><\/p>\n There is no such thing as the \u2018mind\u2019 \u2013 \u2018body\u2019 split.\u00a0 As Ernst Mach pointed out, the division between physics (matter) and psychology (mind) does not really exist.<\/p>\n The double error of language and grammar creates the impression of the mind-matter split<\/p>\n What he doesn\u2019t say is that this splitting apart of matter and mind is to render the ineffable all-including wave-field (the Tao) effable.\u00a0 We can\u2019t talk about the reality of an all-including flow continuum since word-names for things impute persisting existence and there are none in a flowing continuum (the Tao, the wave-field).<\/p>\n The mind-matter split is necessitated in order to render the ineffable Tao ineffable since this effable-izing comes by breaking things down into notional (name-instantiated) material things-in-themselves, notionally endowed (by means of grammar) with their own powers of sourcing actions and developments.<\/p>\n Note that this mind-body split opens the way for the picture wherein the mind is directing the actions of the body.\u00a0 This is why invent the psychological splitting of mind and body in the first place; i.e. so that we can break the transforming relational continuum down into manageable (effable) pieces.\u00a0 Instead of \u201cduning\u201d which is an innately NONLOCAL (purely relational resonancs based) dynamic, we reduce this to Dunes that we then invent GRAMMAR to mobilize in our language game which informs our psychological creation of \u2018reality\u2019.\u00a0 Thus the wave-field phenomenon (transforming relational continuum) of NONLOCAL resonance (i.e the Tao that cannot be told) is reduced to a local form so that it is LOCAL (dune) and \u2018effable\u2019 (the dune is growing larger and longer and shifting to the south).<\/p>\n This is all language and grammar based MIND and MATTER games, and we apply it to the forms of resonance such as \u2018humaning\u2019 as well as to \u2018duning\u2019..\u00a0 It is all purely relational shape-forming within the continuing transformation of the Tao, aka the \u2018wave-field\u2019, \u2026 in the same manner as the storming in the atmosphere where we assign \u2018names\u2019 to mere \u2018appearances\u2019 such as \u2018Katrina\u2019 and then we apply the double error of language and grammar and make them out to be things-in-themselves with their own powers of sourcing actions and developments.<\/p>\n While we do have omni-perspectival sensing capabilities as manifests when we are swimming in a lake on a warm day and our feet which are deepest are in icy cold water while our torso is in the upper layer of sun heated water, our visual sensing is limited by the geometry of our having two eyes on one side of our head, so that while our overall sensing is omniperspectival, our visual sensing is only bi-lateral and we get a \u2018flatspace\u2019 view of what we are included in (the transforming relational continuum).<\/p>\n There is necessity for us to put our limited binary vision into precedence over our omni-sensory capability, but that is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have the habit of doing BECAUSE we have construct language based on visual imagery.\u00a0\u00a0 If we are talking about the development of the town we live in, we may speak in terms of our town growing larger in area over the years.<\/p>\n THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE GROWTH OF A TOWN!\u00a0\u00a0 As the town \u2018grows\u2019, the undeveloped land shrinks, and the reality is instead relational TRANSFORMATION.<\/p>\n We make the same mistake in referring to the \u2018growth of population\u2019 of humans or etc.\u00a0 ONLY IN THE FLATSPACE ABSTRACTION OF AN ABSOLUTE HABITAT INDEPENDENT OF THE INHABITANTS, CAN THERE BE \u2018GROWTH OF INHABITANT POPULATION\u2019.<\/p>\n How often do we use the word growth?\u00a0 It is never \u2018reality\u2019 when we speak of \u2018growth\u2019, it is always abstraction.\u00a0 We put pencil marks on a door frame so that our children can monitor \u2018their growth\u2019.\u00a0\u00a0 We have a measuring scale for hurricanes with classifies them according to THEIR size and strength.\u00a0 There is always this assumption, coming from the double error of language and grammar, that relational forms into the transforming relational continuum can be IMAGINED as local things-in-themselves with their own powers of sourcing actions and development.<\/p>\n Whether we are saying \u2018my child is growing larger and getting stronger\u2019 or \u2018the hurricane is growing larger and getting stronger\u2019, we are, in the process, exclipsing or wallpapering over the understanding of the FIGURE-AND-GROUND as ONE.\u00a0 As Schroedinger pointed out, FIGURE AND GROUND (SUBJECT AND OBJECT, INHABITANT AND HABITAT) can only be ONE, and it is simply language based on visual observing coming from two eyes on side of our head that gives us the impression of a subject-object split.<\/p>\n In Western culture, everything is about GROWTH.\u00a0 There is no fucking \u2018growth\u2019, there is only transformation.\u00a0 The growth of a city is transformation of the countryside; i.e. the undeveloped space shrinks by the same amount that the developed space grows, so there is no such thing as \u2018growth\u2019 other than as a language-based abstraction.<\/p>\n HOW COMMON IS THIS MISTAKING OF THIS FLATSPACE ABSTRACTION OF \u2018GROWTH\u2019 FOR SOMETHING \u2018REAL\u2019?<\/p>\n AMONG US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, IT IS SO COMMON THAT WE SLIP IT IN AS THE FOUNDATION OF WHAT WE CALL OUR \u2018ECONOMY\u2019.<\/p>\n OUR (MIS)CONCEPTION OF REALITY BASED ON \u2018GROWTH\u2019 is commonly promoted through language and grammar in the \u2018producer-product concept\u2019.\u00a0 We speak of the \u2018growth of production\u2019 as if that is something real, but the growth of wheat production in Canada is associated at the same time, with chopping down trees and \u2018clearing\u2019 land.\u00a0 THE REALITY IS TRANSFORMATION, \u2026 THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GROWTH IN THE SPACE ON A SPHERE BECAUSE AS THE GROWTH OF THE DEVELOPED LAND INCREASES IT IS MATCHED BY THE SHRINKAGE OF THE UNDEVELOPED LAND.\u00a0 in other words, relational transformation is what is really going on.<\/p>\n ONLY IF WE LIVED ON A FLAT PLANE OF INFINITE EXTENT COULD WE HAVE GROWTH WITHOUT RECIPROCAL SHRINKAGE.\u00a0 Our sensory experience informs us of inclusion in a finite space as if on the surface of a sphere where growth and shrinkage go hand-in-hand, as complementary aspects of the one dynamic of relational transformation.\u00a0 If there is a rotten spot on the apple, we are implying that the rot is \u2018on the apple\u2019, BUT IF THE ROT IS \u2018ON THE APPLE\u2019 THEN WE HAVE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS, THE ROTTEN AREA WHICH IS GROWING AND THE UN-ROTTEN AREA THAT IS SHRINKING.<\/p>\n This is like the Zen koan of flag and wind; i.e. does the moving of the air source the flapping of the flag or does the flapping of the flag source the moving of the air?\u00a0 There is no answer to this question since there is no such thing as \u2018sourcing\u2019 which is the notion used in both of those two conflicting propositions.\u00a0 THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS \u2018SOURCING\u2019 AKA \u2018SORCERY\u2019, THERE IS ONLY RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION, AS MODERN PHYSICS HAS CONFIRMED.<\/p>\n WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE CAUGHT IN THE TRAP OF THE ABSTRACTIONS OF THE LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR WE ARE USING (THE EAST HAS ESCAPED THIS CONFUSION BY REGARDING LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR AS ONLY A \u2018WITTGENSTEIN LADDER\u2019 OR \u2018TOOL OF INFERENCE\u2019 THAT IT MAKES NO SENSE TO INTERPRET\/UNDERSTANDING \u201cLITERALLY\u201d.\u00a0\u00a0 That is, the \u2018dune is growing larger and longer and is shifting across the desert floor\u2019 is A USEFUL ABSTRACT REDUCTION OF OUR INEFFABLE EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE TAO, \u2026 but it is not to be taken seriously and thought of EXPLICITLY as if the \u2018DUNE\u2019 really were a LOCAL thing-in-itself with the power of sourcing its own action, growth and development.<\/p>\n Ok, you can probably accept that, but your ego may BALK at accepting that the same thing applies to duning and the dune as applies to \u2018humaning\u2019 and the \u2018human\u2019, \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 HOWEVER, THAT IS WHAT MODERN PHYSICS HAS DISCOVERED, but which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to not want to admit because the whole double error fiasco is what we use to REWARD AND ELEVATE AND PUNISH AND PISS ON PEOPLE.<\/p>\n This all goes back to the mind-matter split which is entirely artificial and language and grammar insinuated.\u00a0 Ernst Mach made this point in his massively popular work; \u2018The Analysis of Sensations\u2019; i.e. he said that the split between spsyche and body was synthetic and a product of our language and grammar.\u00a0 In other words, there is no mind and matter split, but that\u2019s where we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are screwed up and the screw up leads to a division among us as to whether we should put matter in precedence over mind (conservative) or \u2018mind in precedence over matter\u2019 (liberal).\u00a0 In the former, \u2018one bad apple spoils the whole barrel\u2019, and in the latter, \u2018it takes a whole community to raise a child\u2019.<\/p>\n The hard-nosed conservative notion is that the child\u2019s genetic make-up determines the final product and the final outcome should be recognizable by the time the person reaches the age of 16.<\/p>\n The soft-hearted liberal believes that the child\u2019s development \u00a0is influenced by its surroundings (it takes a whole community to raise a child) and so if the child\u2019s behaviour is warped, it is warped by outside-inward influence from the social dynamics that is situationally immersed in.<\/p>\n Similarly, if a person gets rich and successful, the conservative view is that it is from their own internal make-up (having \u2018the right stuff\u2019) while the liberal believes that finding oneself in a nurturing environment is where the manifesting of strong action and development capability come from.<\/p>\n BOTH OF THESE ASSUMPTIONS ARE WRONG BECAUSE THEY BOTH ASSUME THE REALITY OF \u2018LOCAL SORCERY\u2019, \u2026 FOR CONSERVATIVES, THE SORCERY ORIGINATES IN THE INDIVIDUAL, AND FOR THE LIBERAL, THE SORCERY ORIGINATES IN THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE.<\/p>\n THERE IS NO FUCKING \u2018SORCERY\u2019, AS MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, TAOIST\/BUDDHIST AND ADVAITA VEDANTA CULTURES ATTEST, THERE ARE ONLY RELATIONS AND RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION.<\/p>\n \u2018SORCERY\u2019 IS ABSTRACTION COMING FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR; i.e. \u2018naming\u2019 that imputes LOCAL thing-in-itself BEING conflated with grammar that imputes to the name-instantiated thing-in-itself, the power of SOURCING actions and developments.<\/p>\n CONSERVATIVES ATTRIBUTE SORCERY TO THE INDIVIDUAL (WHICH IS JUST A NAME-INSTANTIATED THING-IN-ITSELF AND COULD BE A PERSON, NATION OR CORPORATION).<\/p>\n LIBERALS ATTRIBUTE SORCERY TO THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE (WHICH IS JUST A NAME-INSTANTIATED COLLECTIVE-IN-ITSELF AND COULD BE A NATION, CORPORATION OR ASSOCIATION).\u00a0 \u00a0CONSERVATIVES CAN \u2018GO ALONG WITH THIS\u2019 BUT WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE GOODNESS OR BADNESS OF THE NATION OR CORPORATION \u2018BOTTOMS OUT\u2019 IN THE GOODNESS OR BADNESS OF THE INDIVIDUALS CONSTITUTING THE NATION OR CORPORATION.<\/p>\n REALITY SAYS THAT BOTH OF THESE ABSTRACT OPTIONS FOR \u2018SORCERY\u2019 ARE WRONG AND THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS \u2018SORCERY\u2019, THERE ARE ONLY RELATIONS AS IN THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL \u2018MITAKUYE OYASIN\u2019 (ALL MY RELATIONS) AND AS IN MODERN PHYSICS WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS RELATED WITHIN THE WAVE-FIELD (THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM).<\/p>\n WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUE TO DIVIDE AND POLARIZE INTO OPPOSITE FACTIONS BASED ON WHOSE CONCEPT OF \u2018SORCERY\u2019 IS THE CORRECT CONCEPT.\u00a0 THIS CONTINUING POLARIZING DEBATE DISTRACTS US FROM REALIZING THAT, AS IN THE ZEN KOAN OF WIND AND FLAG, BOTH ARE WRONG; i.e. it is neither the case that the wind motion sources the movement of the flag nor that the motion of the flag sources the wind.\u00a0 In a transforming relational continuum there is no such FIGURE and GROUND (flag and wind) BINARY SPLITTING.<\/p>\n The hurricane as a whorl in the flow comes from the psychological influence of NAMING the whorl (Katrina) and imputing to it \u2018thing-in-itself BEING\u2019 (first error) and conflating this with grammar (second error) to impute to the name-instantiated thing-in-itself the powers of sourcing actions and development.\u00a0 NOW WE HAVE CREATED THE NOTION OF \u2018SORCERY\u2019 THAT JUMPSTARTS FROM THE HURRICANE WHICH IS, IN REALITY, A PURELY RELATIONAL FEATURE WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.<\/p>\n WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS thus use language and grammar to create a matter and mind split which is precisely what Mach is telling us in his Analysis of Sensations\u2019 which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have simply cast aside and ignored because of LOCK-IN-BY-HIGH-SWITCHING-COSTS\u2019; i.e. because WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have built our system of reality, including rewards and recognition and punishment and contempt on the basis of the \u2018double error\u2019 of language and grammar with its abstract concept of SORCERY as the basis of dynamic (rather than relational transformation), we have this whole system of sucking up to the GOOD and pissing on the BAD<\/p>\n THE BIG DISTRACTION AMONG US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, is the CONSERVATIVE -LIBERAL SPLIT, where the argument is over whether SORCERY derives from the individual (conservative view) or whether SORCERY derives from the social collective (liberal view).<\/p>\n THIS \u201cIS\u201d HOW THE MATTER-MIND SPLIT MANIFESTS; i.e. once one accepts the matter-mind split, there is right away an ambiguity that arises as to whether our behaviour (based on seeing ourselves as an independent self-sourcing thing-in-ourselves) IS FIRSTLY DETERMINED BY OUR MATTER OR FIRSTLY DETERMINED BY OUR MIND.<\/p>\n THIS IS A FUCKING WILDGOOSE CHASE.\u00a0 THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SORCERY, THEREFORE THERE IS NO REASON TO SQUABBLE OVER WHETHER THE SORCERY DERIVES \u201cFIRSTLY\u201d FROM OUR MATERIAL BODY AND ITS ELECTRO-MECHANICAL DYNAMICS OR \u201cFIRSTLY\u201d FROM OUR MIND (PSYCHE) AND ITS IMAGINATIVE CREATIVITY.<\/p>\n THAT IS, THERE IS NO MIND-MATTER SPLIT IN A RELATIONAL FORM WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.<\/p>\n OBSERVE that humaning as he cultivates the growth of wheat plantation or coconut plantation of whatever, then ask yourself; CAN WE REALLY TALK ABOUT GROWTH OF THE PLANTATION, OR IS THE REALITY IN TERMS OF TRANSFORMATION RATHER THAN \u2018GROWTH\u2019 SINCE IN DIRECT RECIPROCAL RELATION TO THE GROWTH OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAND, THERE IS THE SHIRINKAGE OF UNDEVELOPED LAND, WHICH WOULD SAY THAT THE \u2018ACTUAL REALITY\u2019 IS RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION AND THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS \u2018GROWTH\u2019., \u2026 unless you can show me an absolute containing box or \u2018habitat\u2019 which is unaffected by things GROWING larger within it.\u00a0 If, on the other hand, the containing space is changed by the growth of things within it, AS IN FUCKING REALITY,\u00a0 then we can only talk of this in terms of relational transformation and NOT GROWTH.<\/p>\n AS WE ALL KNOW,\u00a0 we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are fucking always talking about GROWTH as if it were a real thing, starting with our own children.\u00a0 This is NOT TRUE of indigenous aboriginals wherein \u2018mitakuye oyasin\u2019 (everything is related) applies, so that there are no name-instantiated independently-existing things-in-themselves with their own powers of sourcing actions and development, \u2026 NOT REAL ONES, ALTHOUGH NAMES LIKE \u2018DANCES WITH WOLVES\u2019 ARE AN EXPEDIENT to share our impressions of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum wherein mitakuye oyasin applies.<\/p>\n THE CONCEPT OF GROWTH IS BULLSHIT.\u00a0 THERE IS ONLY RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION.<\/p>\n THE CONCEPT OF PRODUCER-PRODUCT DYNAMICS IS BULLSHIT, THERE IS ONLY RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION.<\/p>\n We don\u2019t have to think of ourselves as a LOCAL BEING as in the double error of language and grammar; i.e. modern physics doesn\u2019t see us this way nor are we seen this way in the understanding of indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism\/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta; i.e. we can understand ourselves as inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, and thus NOT as \u2018LOCAL BEINGS\u2019 with notional \u2018POWERS OF SOURCING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS\u2019;<\/p>\n Schroedinger: \u2014 Understanding the NONLOCAL Self<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u201c \u2026 Yet each of us has the indisputable impression that the sum total of his own experience and memory forms a unit, quite distinct from that of any other person. He refers to it as \u2018I\u2019 and What is this \u2018I\u2019? If you analyse it closely you will, I think, find that it is just the facts little more than a collection of single data (experiences and memories), namely the canvas upon which they are collected. And you will, on close introspection, find that what you really mean by \u2018I\u2019 is that ground-stuff upon which they are collected. You may come to a distant country, lose sight of all your friends, may all but forget them; you acquire new friends, you share life with them as intensely as you ever did with your old ones. Less and less important will become the fact that, while living your new life, you still recollect the old one. \u201cThe youth that was I\u2019, you may come to speak of him in the third person, indeed the protagonist of the novel you are reading is probably nearer to your heart, certainly more intensely alive and better known to you. Yet there has been no intermediate break, no death. And even if a skilled hypnotist succeeded in blotting out entirely all your earlier reminiscences, you would not find that he had killed you. In no case is there a loss of personal existence to deplore. Nor will there ever be.\u201d \u2013 Erwin Schroedinger, \u2018What is Life?\u2019<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Ok, I guess I have hammered on this enough, and brought in the supportive understandings of Mach, Nietzsche, Schroedinger and Wittgenstein, all of whom are saying the same thing, that the concept of LOCAL BEINGS with notional INCIPIENT POWERS OF SOURCING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS,\u00a0 is just ABSTRACTION, \u2026 a DOUBLE ERROR of language and grammar.<\/p>\n We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS like to use the double error to claim that we are SOURCING the GROWTH of cultivated land or that we are SOURCING the expansion of our town, BUT THERE IS NO SUCH THING IN THE REALITY OF OUR ACTUAL SENSORY EXPERIENCE AS \u2018GROWTH\u2019.<\/p>\n IN ORDER TO HAVE \u2018GROWTH\u2019, THERE HAS TO BE A FIXED REFERENCE FRAME AND THERE ARE NONE IN THE REALITY OF OUR SENSORY EXPERIENCE.\u00a0 THE FIXED REFERENCE FRAME IS NON-EXISTING ABSTRACTION AND THAT IS WHAT MAKES \u2018GROWTH\u2019 SEEM LIKE A VIABLE CONCEPT; E.G. THE GROWTH OF OUR TOWN.\u00a0 HOW CAN WE GROW A TOWN WITHOUT TRANSFORMING THE RELATIONAL SPACE THE TOWN IS INCLUDED IN?\u00a0 ANSWER: WE CAN\u2019T.<\/p>\n The concept of growth is, first of all, \u2018ILLUSION\u2019 that can be useful in rendering the ineffable effable (i.e. in reducing the ineffable to a crude facsimile so as to render it effable, hence \u2018duning\u2019 which is inherently NONLOCAL and thus ineffable (we can infer something going on implicitly but we can\u2019t explicitize it), \u2026 so we reduce it to DUNE which is explicit and made effable through this reduction.<\/p>\n GUESS WHAT!\u00a0 after we reduce \u2018duning\u2019 to \u2018dune\u2019 we fucking forget about the fact that we have lost a whole lot of understanding in this reduction, and we merely carry on using this reduced reality as the new \u2018surrogate\u2019 reality to that point that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS forget about having made this reduction and simply use the reduction as our new replacement operative reality.<\/p>\n THIS REDUCTION IS NOT FORGOTTEN IN THE EAST NOR IN MODERN PHYSICS.\u00a0\u00a0 THAT IS, IN THE EAST (AND WE ALL HAVE THE CAPABILITY OF UNDERSTANDING IN THE RELATIONAL MANNER OF THE EAST), DUNING\u2019 IS STILL THE PRIMARY REALITY AND IT IS A NONLOCAL PHENOMENON AND THUS INEFFABLE.\u00a0 Our ability to use language and grammar (the double error) to come up with an EFFABLE REDUCTION does not mean that we are justified in REPLACING the ineffable reality with our double error REDUCTION to LOCAL BEING BASED DYNAMICS as in the double error. \u00a0The double error reduction is only good for INFERENCE as in the Wittgestein ladder usage, \u2026 it is not good for EXPLICIT USE as a replacement for the ineffable Tao of our actual sensory experience.<\/p>\n The double error reduction splits apart mind and matter.\u00a0 That is where that split comes from; i.e. from language and grammar.\u00a0 As pointed out, this IMAGINARY split into FIGURE AND GROUND (INHABITANT AND HABITAT) divides the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERING collective into two opposing camps, CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL based on an INHERENT AMBIGUITY that arises with this artificial mind and matter split.<\/p>\n I have already described this in the above text, but to repeat it; the whorl in the flow are how relational transformation APPEARS and there is only ONE flow and the FIGURE AND GROUND split into WHORL and FLOW is just appearance based and NOT REAL, as in the wind-and-flag enigma where we trap ourselves with language and grammar by imputing SORCERY to EITHER wind OR flag.\u00a0 This ambiguity is unresolvable BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH FUCKING THING AS \u2018SORCERY\u2019.\u00a0 the concept of SORCERY comes from the DOUBLE ERROR of language and grammar; the first error is to use \u2018naming\u2019 to impute \u2018thing-itself existence\u2019 to \u2018the whorl in the flow\u2019 (it is really only how purely relational form APPEARS), and we conflate this with the second error of grammar to impute the power of SOURCING actions and development to the (first error) name-instantiated thing-in-itself.<\/p>\n The GOOD NEWS \u00a0is that this double error reduction allows us to effable-ize (a crude representation of) the ineffable, which is great so as we don\u2019t confuse this crude representation for REALITY.\u00a0 But that is just what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE DOING and that\u2019s why EMERSON pointed out that \u2018the tool (of crude reduction of the ineffable to effable) has RUN AWAY WITH THE WORKMAN, THE HUMAN WITH THE DIVINE\u2019.\u00a0\u00a0 That is, the humaning is a NONLOCAL phenomena like the hurricaning and that is what Emerson intends by \u2018DIVINE\u2019; i.e. the flow-form is not extricable from the flow aka the transforming relational continuum, so that we can never drill down and in to extract an EXPLICIT understanding of the flow-form such as the \u2018humaning\u2019 or the \u2018duning\u2019 because there are intrinsically NONLOCAL phenomena.<\/p>\n OK, THE GOOD NEWS WAS THAT THIS DOUBLE ERROR REDUCTION ALLOWED US TO EFFABLE-IZE A CRUDE REPRESENTATION OF THE INEFFABLE TAO\u00a0 (WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC) BUT THAT DOESN\u2019T QUALIFY IT FOR USE AS A SURROGATE REALITY, WHICH IS THE MISTAKE THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE MAKING, WHICH IS NOW \u2018LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS\u2019 since the double error imputes to the individual the notional powers of LOCAL instantiation of actions and developments which WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS APPRAISE AS EITHER GOOD OR BAD and respond with EITHER rewards OR punishments so that we have established social classes and rankings on this basis<\/p>\n In EASTERN CULTURES and this can be clearly seen in indigenous aboriginal cultures, the double error of language and grammar is used only as a TOOL OF INFERENCE and not as a notional EXPLICIT capture of reality.\u00a0 In other words, in EASTERN CULTURES, it does not hold that \u2018the tool has run away with the workman, the human with the divine\u2019.\u00a0\u00a0 In indigenous cultural understanding as in modern physics, the humaning is a relational form within the transforming relational continuum AND NOT A SEPARATE, LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF, as in our WESTERN CULTURE double error based conceptualizing of \u2018reality\u2019.<\/p>\n The mind-matter split is a WESTERN CULTURE problem and it is what splits apart \u2018Conservatives\u2019 and \u2018Liberals\u2019 based on their different notions of SORCERY, whether is coming from the individual dynamic and manifesting through the social collective or from the social collective dynamic and manifesting through the individual.<\/p>\n JUST AS IN THE ZEN KOAN OF WIND AND FLAG, BOTH ARE WRONG!<\/p>\n FOR THE SAME REASON; I.E. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SORCERY AND THERE IS NOT SUCH THING AS THE DIVISION BETWEEN \u2018MIND\u2019 AND \u2018MATTER\u2019 AND NO DIVISION BETWEEN SUBJECT AND OBJECT; I.E. THAT COMES FROM THINKING IN VISUAL TERMS WHERE WE USE TWO EYES ON ONE SIDE OF OUR HEAD TO DELIVER A BINARY SELF-AND-OTHER SPLITTING VIEW, UNLIKE THE INCLUSIONAL \u00a0SENSING COMING FROM FULL BODY SENSATIONS OF INCLUSION IN A RELATIONALLY TRANSFORMING SPACE (cold toes in icy deep water and warm chest in sun-warmed waters etc. etc..<\/p>\n SORCERY COMES FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR WHEREIN WE INTELLECTUAL RECONSTRUCT REALITY IN TERMS OF LOCAL BEINGS WITH POWERS OF SOUCRCING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.\u00a0\u00a0 WE EXPLAIN THE ACTIONS OF THESE LOCAL BEINGS BY WAY OF THE INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION OF SPLITTING THE LOCAL BEINGS INTO MATTER AND MIND (BODY AND PSYCHE) SO THAT WE IMAGINE THE BEING AS A BODY (MATTER) BEING DRIVEN BY PSYCHE (MIND), \u2026 ALL OF WHICH SPLITTING IS A FICTION DERIVING FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR.<\/p>\n WE DON\u2019T NEED THE MIND-MATTER SPLIT SO LONG AS WE ARE UNDERSTANDING REALITY IN TERMS OF INCLUSION WITHIN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.<\/p>\n THE MIND-MATTER SPLIT COMES BUNDLED IN WITH THE DOUBLE ERROR OF LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR.<\/p>\n * * *<\/p>\n <\/p>\n