{"id":4560,"date":"2020-06-17T12:53:30","date_gmt":"2020-06-17T20:53:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/?p=4560"},"modified":"2020-06-17T13:41:27","modified_gmt":"2020-06-17T21:41:27","slug":"surmounting-the-delusion-of-local-sourcing-of-action-development","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/surmounting-the-delusion-of-local-sourcing-of-action-development\/","title":{"rendered":"Surmounting the Delusion of Local Sourcing of Action\/Development"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

When does an ILLUSION become a DELUSION? \u2026 ANSWER: When we employ it as our operative reality.<\/p>\n

Nietzsche\u2019s example the \u201cDOUBLE ERROR\u201d of \u2018LIGHTNING FLASHES\u2019 and Nishitani\u2019s example of \u2018FIRE BURNS\u2019 illustrate how we can use language and grammar to construct representations that \u2018BREAK INTO\u2019 the INEFFABLE-because-NONLOCAL dynamics of Wave-field reality (aka \u2018the Tao\u2019, aka \u2018the transforming relational continuum\u2019).<\/p>\n

As David Bohm points out, our sensory experience is of inclusion in THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (the Wave-field) which is an experience that language can only imply but CANNOT EXPLICITLY CAPTURE since the Wave-field is in flux everywhere-at-the-same-time.<\/p>\n

That is, the Wave-field \u00a0\u201cIS\u201d TRANSFORMATION which is purely RELATIONAL so\u00a0 in order to use the reductive tool of language to even approximately capture TRANSFORMATION, we employ language in a REDUCTIVE, DOUBLE ERROR mode, \u00a0using notional NAMING-instantiated things-in-themselves with GRAMMAR-instantiated powers of SOURCING actions and developments.\u00a0 This DOUBLE ERROR mode of language captures EFFABLE-because-LOCAL representations of the INEFFABLE-because-NONLOCAL dynamic of TRANSFORMATION.<\/p>\n

For example, \u2019DUNING\u2019 is a resonance phenomenon which is NONLOCAL which our INTELLECT can reduce to LOCAL geometric forms that we call DUNES, opening the way to our INVERTING of the dynamics of REALITY with language and grammar, imputing LOCAL BEING with the word \u201cDUNE\u201d and notionally endowing this intellectually-fabricated abstraction with \u201cITS\u201d OWN POWERS of movement and development as in the language and grammar construct; \u2018The DUNE is growing higher and longer and is shifting towards the ocean\u2019.\u00a0 This is the DOUBLE ERROR in action; i.e. in its intellectual-representation-conditioning action.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

In physical reality there is no \u2018DUNE\u2019 as a separate thing-in-itself that can \u2018grow\u2019 and \u2018move\u2019; i.e. where are the defining limits of \u2018the DUNE\u2019?\u00a0 Where does one DUNE stop and the next DUNE begin?\u00a0 The lobes of sand in the continuum are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT rather than LOCAL and EXPLICIT but the DOUBLE ERROR re-renders them in language and grammar stimulated intellectual conceptualization, as LOCAL and EXPLICIT.<\/p>\n

The DUNING as NONLOCAL resonance (aka the Wave-field phenomenon) is left behind<\/em><\/strong> in the wake of our language and grammar DOUBLE ERROR based reduction to a LOCAL \u2018being\u2019 with notional powers of LOCAL SOURCING of actions and developments.\u00a0 Once we condition our intellect so that we can intellectually conceive of a lobular form within the DUNING as a LOCAL THING-in-ITSELF with its own GRAMMAR animated powers of SOURCING actions and developments, we can LET GO OF our sensory experience of walking within the shifting relational DUNING continuum wherein DUNES as LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES are no more than abstractions triggered by the word \u201cDUNE\u201d.<\/p>\n

If we \u2018go back to the language and culture \u2018basics\u2019 of REPRESENTATION\u2019, as modern physics has had to do, we see that we need to correct for how our language and grammar breaks everything down into LOCAL EXPLICIT ENTITIES.\u00a0 As Carlo Rovelli observes in \u2018Quantum Reality\u2019;<\/p>\n

\u00a0In Newtonian and special relativistic physics, if we take away the dynamical entities \u2013 particles and fields \u2013 what remains is space and time. In general relativistic physics, if we take away the dynamical entities, nothing remains. The space and time of Newton and Minkowski are reinterpreted as a configuration of one of the fields, the gravitational field. This implies that physical entities \u2013 particles and fields \u2013 are not all immersed in space, and moving in time. They do not live on spacetime. They live, so to say, on one another. It is as if we had observed in the ocean many animals living on an island: animals \u2018on\u2019 the island. Then we discover that the island itself is in fact a great whale. Not anymore animals on the island, just animals on animals. Similarly, the universe is not made by fields on spacetime; it is made by fields on fields.\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0 \u2014 Carlo Rovelli, in \u2018Quantum Gravity\u2019<\/em><\/p>\n

In other words, language that speaks of DUNES on the DESERT is a language and grammar based intellectual-conceptual REDUCTION that \u2018covers up something else; i.e. not anymore DUNES on the DESERT, just relational forms on relational forms (\u201crelativity\u201d).<\/p>\n

EVERYTHING IN OUR SENSORY EXPERIENCE IS IMPLICIT AND INEFFABLE-because-NONLOCAL AND THERE IS NO EXPLICIT AND EFFABLE-because-LOCAL, \u2026 at least NOT UNTIL, \u2026 we invent and deploy the DOUBLE ERROR reduction in language and grammar.<\/p>\n

BUT, \u2026 ONCE WE FLIP OVER INTO THE INTELLECTUALLY REDUCED REALITY OF THE DOUBLE ERROR CONSTRUCTIONS, the SENSORY reality of our experience of inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the Wave-field aka the Tao, is left behind<\/em><\/strong>.\u00a0 At what point do we pass from DUNE X-37 to DUNE X-38? i.e. from one NAMING-instantiated thing-in-itself to another NAMING-instantiated thing-in-itself?\u00a0 Should we even rely on NAMING in a world that is relationally transforming?\u00a0 As Shroedinger pointed out in \u2018What is Life?\u2019, \u201cGaurisankar and Mt Everest turned out to be the same peak seen from different valleys.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

At what point do we \u2018let go of\u2019 the EXPLICIT-izing and LOCA-izing POWER of NAMING?.\u00a0 What is POLAND? Should it be a POLANDING, a relational resonance developing as with DUNING?\u00a0 How much transformation must occur before a \u2018forming\u2019 within the general TRANSFORMING merits a change in NAMING?\u00a0 eg. \u2018The Changing Borders of Poland\u2019<\/a><\/p>\n

How legitimate is it to speak of POLAND as the LOCAL authoring SOURCE of actions and developments (how legitimate is to employ the DOUBLE ERROR representation of POLAND) when the LEAST INCONSISTENT<\/em><\/strong> attribute we can associate with POLAND is a continual, NONLOCALLY evolving language? \u00a0\u00a0How can we use the word \u2018POLAND\u2019 so confidently, and, likewise, how can we use the word \u2018DUNE\u2019 so confidently as things continually blow into and out of it?<\/p>\n

Ok, we know that everything is in flux (we are included within a transforming relational continuum) and that this reality is NONLOCAL and INEFFABLE so that it is EXPEDIENT to employ the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to deliver something by way of abstraction that is LOCAL and EFFABLE\u2026. AS AN EXPEDIENT TOOL<\/em><\/strong> TO ENABLE SHARING OF EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE INEFFABLE.\u00a0 But to let the tool run away with the workman, the human (EFFBLE) with the divine (INEFFABLE) is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS\u00a0 are doing which is a TRAP that EASTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS and modern physics HAS NOT FALLEN INTO.<\/p>\n

Opening the door to the language and grammar stimulated intellection reduction of TRANSFORMATION that is NONLOCAL-and-thus-INEFFABLE, to the abstract intellectual conceptualizations we know as PRODUCTION-and-CONSUMPTION (\u2018creation-and-destruction\u2019), while it delivers a means of CONTRIVING a crude-but-EFFABLE reduction of the INEFFABLE, has lead to its usage in the EAST as an tool of EFFABLE inference of the INEFFABLE, but to usage in the WEST as a fullblown replacement of the INEFFABLE.<\/p>\n

What results is that we have delivered to ourselves, THREE different understandings of REALITY.<\/p>\n

PART II:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Navigating Across the THREE REALITIES<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The EXPLICIT reality is the one we describe with DOUBLE ERROR based language and grammar; e.g. FIRE BURNS type constructs that impute LOCAL SOURCING<\/p>\n

the IMPLICIT reality is TRANSFORMATION aka \u2018the Tao\u2019, the all-including transforming relational continuum. It is NONLOCAL and INEFFABLE and it is the PHYSICAL reality.<\/p>\n

The EXPLICIT reality comes in two variants both of which portray FIGURE and GROUND are TWO<\/em><\/strong>;<\/p>\n

EXPLICIT-conservative<\/em><\/strong> wherein representations are constructed wherein the dynamics of the FIGURE SOURCES the dynamics of the GROUND. \u2026 and,<\/p>\n

EXPLICIT-liberal<\/em><\/strong> wherein representations are constructed wherein the dynamics of the GROUND source the dynamics of the FIGURE.<\/p>\n

IMPLICIT reality: – FIGURE and GROUND are ONE<\/em><\/strong> as in a persisting whirlpool or hologram where FIGURE is a kind of mottling of the fluid-dynamical GROUND.<\/p>\n

An individual thus has THREE ways of understanding reality based on which of these interpretive approaches he employs; e.g.<\/p>\n

– REALITY 3 – the conservative can see the ATMOSPHERIC FLOW (social collective) as a suffocating wet blanket that the HURRICANE must rise up through to source its standout actions and development, as in; \u201cit is the man that sources the making of the times\u2019 (and NOT \u2018it is the times that source the making of the man\u2019).<\/p>\n

– REALITY 2 – the liberal can see the HURRICANE as a selfish dissident that is disruptive to the harmonies of the ATMOSPHERIC FLOW.\u00a0 The liberal feels as if it takes a whole community to source the raising of a child\u201d; i.e. that \u201cit is the times that source the making of the man\u201d.<\/p>\n

NOTE:<\/em><\/strong> Both – REALITY 3 – and – REALITY 2 – \u00a0are different ways of perceiving the \u2018structure of reality\u2019 and they lead to conflicting understandings of the same phenomena.\u00a0 In addition, both of these \u2018views of reality\u2019 assume that LOCAL SOURCING is a REAL phenomenon.\u00a0 IT IS NOT!\u00a0 As Nietzsche points out, LOCAL SOURCING derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.\u00a0 The FIRST ERROR is NAMING to impute notional \u2018thing-in-itself\u2019 BEING, and this is conflated with the SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR that imputes to the NAMING-instantiated thing-in-itself, its own LOCAL powers of SOURCING actions and developments. LOCAL SOURCING is an UNREAL, ABSTRACT CONCEPT that derives from the DOUBLE ERROR, yet this BOGUS CONCEPT is in common use in our language and grammar, and for good reason, since the REALITY we experience is INEFFABLE-because-NONLOCAL and the DOUBLE ERROR is what we use to render the our articulation of REALITY EFFABLE-because-LOCAL.<\/p>\n

-REALITY 1- Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism\/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta understand reality as the Wave-field; i.e. the transforming relational continuum; i.e. TRANSFORMATION. \u00a0There is no \u201cLOCAL SOURCING of actions and developments\u201d associated with TRANSFORMATION since TRANSFORMATION is entirely relational.\u00a0 Meanwhile, Wavefield TRANSFORMATION is INEFFABLE since EVERYTHING-IS-IN-FLUX.<\/p>\n

Language can serve as no more than a platform for launching an INTUITIVE LEAP to the INEFFABLE – REALITY 1 -.\u00a0 This is where Bootstrapping and the \u2018Wittgenstein ladder\u2019 enter into modern physics.\u00a0 Since everything is relational in the Wave-field understanding of reality, \u2018NAMING\u2019 can\u2019t be used in its normal manner where it invokes the abstract concept of the existence of a LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF.\u00a0 TRANSFORMATION is a resonance phenomenon that is purely relational and NONLOCAL as in DUNING.\u00a0 It is nevertheless possible to REDUCE this NONLOCAL phenomenon of resonance-based TRANSFORMATION to a pseudo-LOCAL and thus EFFABLE language-based surrogate by way of the DOUBLE ERROR which substitutes FIGURE-and-GROUND-as-TWO (DUNE and DESERT) for FIGURE-and-GROUND-as-ONE (the resonance phenomenon of DUNING).<\/p>\n

THE AMBIGUITY PROBLEM:<\/p>\n

The reason for the conservative \u2013 liberal polarized opposition is that there is a basic ambiguity that arises in both \u2013 REALITY 3 \u2013 and \u2013 REALITY 2 \u2013 that associates with \u2018insufficient dimensionality\u2019 in the concept of the FIGURE and GROUND as TWO split. For example; does the hurricane source the flow or does the flow source the hurricane.\u00a0 Should we speak in terms of \u2018continental drift\u2019 or \u2018seafloor spreading\u2019?\u00a0 Which is the source? \u2026 or is the problem that we started off by NAMING these two things \u2018continent\u2019 and \u2018seafloor\u2019 and imputed grammar -given self-SOURCING actions to them both?\u00a0 (by way of the DOUBLE ERROR).\u00a0 If we understand this as TRANSFORMATION where FIGURE and GROUND are ONE, then we don\u2019t have the ambiguity problem, but then the INEFFABLE reappears when the LOCAL SOURCING drops out.\u00a0 \u2026 since everything is in a NONLOCAL flux.<\/p>\n

Relational resonance as in DUNING has no clear LOCAL start or finish, \u2026 NOT in space NOR in TIME.\u00a0 In fact, the concept of LOCAL in SPACE and LOCAL in TIME is abstraction that is not supported in the reality of our sensual experience of inclusion in TRANSFORMATION (aka \u2018the Wave-field\u2019 aka \u2018the transforming spacetime continuum\u2019).\u00a0 Only when we use language and grammar to break apart resonance as in DUNING wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE, \u2026 into the mechanics of DUNE and DESERT where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO do we generate the abstract concepts of ABSOLUTE SPACE and ABSOLUTE TIME.<\/p>\n

The FIGUE-and-GROUND-as-TWO split-up brings with it the BURDEN OF CONCRETENESS noted in Presocratic philosophy wherein, once we break the FIGURE-and-GROUND-as-ONE of TRANSFORMATION apart into FIGURE-and-GROUND-as TWO (i.e. as with the DOUBLE ERROR abstractions of INHABITANT and HABITAT), we create for ourselves a language and grammar management overhead that is termed \u2018the BURDEN OF CONCRETENESS.\u00a0 This can be quite demanding and confusing as well; e.g. trying to \u2018articulate\u2019 and \u2018document\u2019 the development of DUNE-X-37 and\/or the development of POLAND when it is only language and grammar that is EXPLICIT-izing that which is inherently IMPLICIT-because-RELATIONAL.\u00a0 Sure we can plant a flag with DUNE X-37 on it \u00a0on a resonance feature even in a sandstorm and we can fly the flag of POLAND on all the GATES \u2018giving access\u2019 to an imaginary-line-bounded FIGURE that is purportedly EXPLICIT and is the FIGURE part of a purported FIGURE and GROUND as TWO geometric, although if the natural animals of the forest could have a say, \u2026 they would argue that those WESTERN humans are in error because FIGURE and GROUND, SUBJECT (observer) and OBJECT (observed), are only ONE.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist.\u201d \u2013 Erwin Schroedinger<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00a0It is useful for sharing (an effable reduction of) our experience, to have language that can reduce the INEFFABLE-because-NONLOCAL to the EFFABLE-because-LOCAL, and as it turns out, this comes by way of an abstract splitting of FIGURE-and-GROUND-as-ONE (TRANSFORMATION) into FIGURE-and-GROUND-as-TWO (PRODUCTION-and-CONSUMPTION, aka, BIRTH and DEATH).\u00a0 We might ask ourselves whether \u2018the GROWTH\u2019 of cultivated lands and \u2018the SHRINKAGE\u2019 of Wilderness area, REALLY ARE TWO as in FIGURE and GROUND-as-TWO, \u2026 or whether the reality is instead TRANSFORMATION wherein FIGURE-and-GROUND-are-ONE.<\/p>\n

For us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS who blindly push forward investing in GROWTH of cities and towns and production facilities, as if \u2018GROWTH\u2019 were something \u2018REAL\u2019 as it would appear to be in a FLAT SPACE of infinite extent, these DOUBLE ERROR language and grammar constructions put us on a CRAZY-MAKING journey.\u00a0 The reality of our sensory experience is of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the Wave-field aka \u2018the Tao\u2019, as is acknowledged by modern physics and by EASTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.<\/p>\n

GROWTH and SHRINKAGE are FLATSPACE concepts limited by their ambiguous binary construction as in the land-and-sea dichotomy; \u2026 when the land area GROWS, the ocean area reciprocally SHRINKS and vice versa.\u00a0 We need to bring in the sky as the third partner with land and sea.\u00a0 But if we do, because of the limitations of language, we run into a snag in that we have to back off of the EXPLICIT which can\u2019t handle the \u2018three body problem\u2019 and re-ground in the IMPLICIT;<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u201cAn exact solution for three bodies, exceeds, if I am not mistaken, the force of any human mind\u201d \u2013 Isaac Newton<\/em><\/p>\n

Our WESTERN CULTURE penchant for the EXPLICIT has held us back to talking in terms of continents drifting and its ambiguity with seafloor spreading.\u00a0 This comes from the same language and grammar based ambiguity that splits WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS into those of a conservative versus liberal bent.\u00a0 Which polarity of the FIGURE and GROUND as TWO bipolar thinking do WE PREFER? \u2026 the masculine-assertive figure pushing into ground or the female-receptive ground opening up to accommodate figure?\u00a0 DO CONTINENTS DRIFT OR DO SEAFLOORS SPREAD?\u00a0 Evidently, this FLATSPACE conundrum needs one more dimension, not just \u2018land and sea\u2019 but \u2018land and sea and sky\u2019.<\/p>\n

BUT GUESS WHAT!\u00a0 This \u2018three body problem\u2019 is something that we can only deal with by DROPPING THE EFFABLE-EXPLICIT because LOCAL (the \u2018rational\u2019) and embracing the INEFFABLE-IMPLICIT-because-NONLOCAL (the \u2018intuitive\u2019).\u00a0 Modern physics has accepted the primacy of the IMPLICIT over the EXPLICIT, as have the EASTERN cultures of indigenous aboriginals, Taoism\/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, while our WESTERN CULTURE continues to cling to the unnatural promoting of the EXPLICIT over the IMPLICIT.<\/p>\n

A \u2018STUCK\u2019 situation has developed among WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS that is explained by the nonlinear dynamic of \u201cLOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS\u201d, \u2026 as associate with belief in LOCAL SOURCING which has not only resulted in synthetically inflated EGOs and the according of ADMIRATION and HERO status, as well as, on the binary logical opposite of the CREATION\/DESTRUCTION bipolarity, SHAME and CRIMINALIZATION,<\/p>\n

This \u2018LOCK-IN by HIGH SWITCHING COSTS\u2019 has been a steadily strengthening LOCK-IN in our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERING social dynamic as Henri Laborit pointed out in his philosophical treatise \u2018La Nouvelle Grille\u2019 (the New Framework);<\/p>\n

We\u2019 who explore such topics, cannot easily share them because (a) they do not fit into the typical dinner conversation format of our present culture, since to express them takes a lot of relational connections that can\u2019t fit into a rapid-fire repartee, and (b) because the humanism \u00a0implicit in trying to share them is not seen as \u201ca humanism of real worth\u201d since it undermines, besmirches or topples the esteemed icons, pillars of society, founding fathers, and celebrities of the culture-in-place.\u00a0\u00a0<\/em>\u2013 Henri Laborit, \u2018La Nouvelle Grille\u2019\u00a0\u00a0<\/em>https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Henri_Laborit<\/a><\/p>\n

Evidently, then, Surmounting the Delusion of Local Sourcing of Action\/Development <\/strong>is running \u2018head-on\u2019 into the problem of EGO as is inflated by the belief in the EXPLICIT dynamic of LOCAL SOURCING that is holding our INTUITION of relational TRANSFORMATION at bey.\u00a0 By the same token, the DOUBLE ERROR reduction of TRANSFORMATION to the EXPLICIT terms of FIGURE and GROUND as TWO is supported by this need to simplify the INEFFABLE-because-NONLOCAL to the EFFABLE-because-LOCAL.\u00a0 This substitution, which features the unnatural elevating of the EXPLICIT into precedence over the IMPLICIT is locked into place by our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT, sorcery-based emotion of EGO which is in turn supported by language and grammar stimulated RATIONAL thinking.<\/p>\n

And in India, as in Greece, the same mistake was made: \u201cWe must once have been at home in a higher world (instead of a very much lower one, which would have been the truth);\u00a0we must have been divine, for we have REASON!\u201d<\/strong>\u00a0Indeed, nothing has yet possessed a more naive power of persuasion than the error concerning being, as it has been formulated by the Eleatics, for example. After all, every word and every sentence we say speak in its favor. Even the opponents of the Eleatics still succumbed to the seduction of their concept of being: Democritus, among others, when he invented his atom.\u00a0\u201cREASON\u201d in language\u2013oh, what an old deceptive female she is! I am afraid we are not rid of God because we still have faith in grammar.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\u00a0* * *<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0 When does an ILLUSION become a DELUSION? \u2026 ANSWER: When we employ it as our operative reality. Nietzsche\u2019s example the \u201cDOUBLE ERROR\u201d of \u2018LIGHTNING FLASHES\u2019 and Nishitani\u2019s example of \u2018FIRE BURNS\u2019 illustrate how we can use language and grammar to construct representations that \u2018BREAK INTO\u2019 the INEFFABLE-because-NONLOCAL dynamics of Wave-field reality (aka \u2018the Tao\u2019, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apn","count-0","even alt","author-emile","last"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4560"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4560\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4564,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4560\/revisions\/4564"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}