https:\/\/southerncrossreview.org\/9\/kleist.htm<\/a> for \u2018what happens when we let the conscious calculating intellect usurp the natural primacy of sensory experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD, and become the LOCAL AUTHOR OF ACTIONS; i.e. we become SELF-CONSCIOUS and EGO-based.)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
* * *<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
OK, SHAKESPEARE\u2019S JULIUS CAESAR \u201ctide in the affairs of men\u201d comment is suggesting that we are included in forces greater than us that we can \u2018tap into\u2019;<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
-1- WE HUMANINGS IN THE WAVE-FIELD are like WHORLS-IN-THE-FLOW in that we are INCLUDED IN SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES, \u2026 but being INCLUDED, we are not the SLAVES of the FLOW (in QUANTUM LOGIC we ARE the flow at the same time as we are INCLUSIONS in the flow) and while we don\u2019t have powers of LOCAL JUMPSTART AUTHORING of actions and developments, \u2026 we do have the powers of putting our particular SPIN on things as we do, for example, while driving in a heavy traffic flow where we can use our RELATIVE MOVEMENTS to \u201cstir things up\u201d to cultivate harmony or dissonance; i.e. the \u2018tide-in-the-affairs\u201d comment claims that our actions can transform the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT aspects of the dynamics we share inclusion in which implies at the same time, OUR ACTIONS DO NOT DETERMINE LOCAL EXPLICIT RESULTS.\u00a0 Note that NEWTONIAN PHYSICS, which is designed to serve up LOCAL and EXPLICIT UNDERSTANDINGS of DYNAMICS,\u00a0is based on the dynamics of ONLY TWO BODIES at a time. \u201cAn exact solution for three bodies, exceeds, if I am not mistaken, the force of any human mind\u201d \u2013 Isaac Newton\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
NEWTONIAN PHYSICS IS DESIGNED TO DELIVER UNDERSTANDING IN LOCAL, EXPLICIT TERMS, .. \u201cNOT\u201d to address a QUANTUM LOGIC world wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.\u00a0 In orienting to this goal of EXPLICIT SOLUTIONS, NEWTON invoked the notion of ABSOLUTE SPACE as a FIXED AND STABLE CONTAINER for MATERIAL DYNAMICS so that the focus would be on THE DYNAMICS OF \u201cINDEPENDENT MATERIAL BODIES\u201d AS IF WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.\u00a0\u00a0 The LESS SIMPLE challenge of understand movements in a purely fluid sense, as with fluid forms within a fluid medium, in other words, the QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH\/AND) relational dynamic, which NEWTON ACKNOWLEDGED to be the more comprehensive target for understanding, was beyond the scope of his BINARY LOGIC based modeling architecture which split MATTER and SPACE apart into mutually exclusive ontological entities.\u00a0 NEWTON openly acknowledged that the PRINCIPIA explained the dynamics of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, as the real (sense-experience affirmed) reality) was inherently LESS SIMPLE, this qualification being expressed in the preface to PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA;<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
I wish we could derive the rest of the phaenomena of nature by the same kind of reasoning from physical principles; for I am induced by many reasons to suspect that they all may depend upon certain forces by which the particles of bodies, by some causes hitherto unknown, are either mutually impelled towards each other, and cohere in regular figures, or are repelled and recede from each other; which forces being unknown, philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of nature in vain; but I hope the principles laid down will afford some light either to this or some truer method of philosophy.\u201d\u00a0 Newton, Author\u2019s Preface in the \u2018Principia\u2019.<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
In other words, NEWTON acknowledged that his model was constrained to describing the mechanics of existing material bodies as in an absolute empty space, but he stopped short of addressing TRANSFORMATION wherein GATHERING and SCATTERING seems to prevail over the things involved in the gathering and scattering suggesting the presence of a mysterious unknown force (he was not aware of the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein matter which appeared to be composed of, as he described it;<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\nAll these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form\u2019d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the end for which he form\u2019d them; and these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\nNewton quotes from Opticks<\/em><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\nBut NEWTON was trusting in the language architecture he was using (which is limited by BINARY LOGIC as in the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR constructs which impute LOCAL AUTHORING).\u00a0\u00a0 He evidently did not reflect on how we infuse SIMPLIFICATION into language where there are resonance features such as the CLUSTERING OF ANTS as they GATHER and SCATTER in relation to a drop of honey (e.g. \u00a0from an overhead bees nest), where our language RE-CASTS the inherently NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT GATHERING-SCATTERING (FEMALE-MALE) dynamic of the ants by inventing a LOCAL BEING (the \u201ccluster\u201d) using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as in THE CLUSTER IS GROWING LARGER.\u00a0\u00a0 Our use of this DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is OBSCURANTISM<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\u201cOBSCURANTISM\u201d, \u00a0the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE RESONANCE DYNAMIC; i.e. the GATHERING-SCATTERING RESONANCE DYNAMIC?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
We started off with CLUSTERING which is a GATHERING-SCATTERING resonance feature which is a NONLOCAL, RELATIONAL phenomenon, and we SIMPLIFIED it , making it into a notional LOCAL THING-ITSELF with ITS OWN AUTHORING POWER, using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.\u00a0 This is the same thing we did to the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which we made into \u2018the TOWN\u2019 and then used the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute to it, \u201cITS OWN\u201d \u201cBEING\u201d\u00a0 and \u201cITS OWN\u201d \u201cLOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ITS OWN GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT\u201d.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The TOWN, thanks to GRAMMAR, is imputed to be the LOCAL AUTHOR of its own GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT.\u00a0 This is the same ABSTRACTION we used in the case of the CLUSTERING of ANTS where we SIMPLIFIED the NONLOCAL and RELATIONAL DYNAMIC using the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMER to REPRESENT the resonance feature in the overall flow (in the transforming relational continuum) AS IF IT WERE A LOCAL EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF WITH \u201cITS OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS\u201d.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
THE FULL DETAILS of what is going on with TOWNING include the GATHERING-SCATTERING resonance dynamic which is an ANDROGYNOUS dynamic, the GATHERING being FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the SCATTERING being MALE ASSERTING and, like the GATHERING-SCATTERING in SAND DUNING, our VISUAL focus may be on the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT (e.g. \u2018the dune\u2019) which BECOMES LOCAL AND EXPLICIT IN LANGUAGE WITH OUR USE OF THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR WHICH NOT ONLY IMPUTES LOCAL BEING BY WAY OF \u201cNAMING\u201d BUT WHICH IMPUTES LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS BY WAY OF \u201cGRAMMAR\u201d.\u00a0 But once we start using \u201cthe TOWN\u201d as if it were a LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF notionally with ITS OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and development (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCING) , \u2026 WE ARE IN THE BUSINESS OF \u201cOBSCURANTISM\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\u201cOBSCURANTISM\u201d, \u00a0the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The \u201cFULL DETAILS\u201d will include the fact that fact that what we are REALLY TALKING ABOUT is a resonance based dynamic we might more honestly label \u201cthe TOWNING\u201d which is INEXTRICABLY INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE DYNAMIC so that we might better use a language architecture such as the indigenous aboriginal language and speak of \u2018TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE\u201d which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT dynamic.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
But in speaking of \u2018THE TOWN THAT IS GROWING\u2019,<\/em> not only are we OBSCURING THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (relational) RESONANCE PHENOMENON, we are INSERTING SOMETHING FAR SIMPLER IN ITS PLACE.<\/em>\u00a0<\/em> This is like the Cuckoo\u2019s Egg which is laid in another LESS SIMPLE bird\u2019s nest where it will be nurtured and supported to the point that it HIJACKS the whole process substitutes for the less simple, rightful occupants. \u00a0That which is \u201cMORE SIMPLE\u201d in this case SUBSTITUTES for that which is \u201cLESS SIMPLE\u201d so that the \u201cLESS SIMPLE ACTUAL REALITY\u201d is OBSCURED by the \u201cMORE SIMPLE SUBSTITUTE REALITY\u201d<\/em>.\u00a0\u00a0 That is, the MORE SIMPLE SUBSTITUTE REALITY of \u00a0\u2018THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING\u2019 is SUBSTITUTED FOR THE LESS SIMPLE \u201cTHERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE\u201d.<\/em>, \u2026 or in other words, THE MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC WHEREIN FIGURE AND GROUND ARE TWO, IS SUBSTITUTED FOR THE LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC WHEREIN FIGURE AND GROUND ARE ONE (WHEREIN MATTER IS A CONDENSATION OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD).<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
WESTERN CULTURE (CLASSICAL, NEWTONIAN) PHYSICS IS \u201cOBSCURANTIST\u201d AND THAT\u2019S NOT ALL, \u2026 BECAUSE NEWTONIAN PHYSICS COMES FROM LANGUAGE<\/em><\/strong>;<\/strong><\/p>\nIt is sometimes stated that Newtonian space, time, and matter are sensed by everyone intuitively, whereupon relativity is cited as showing how mathematical analysis can prove intuition wrong. This, besides being unfair to intuition, is an attempt to answer offhand question (1) put at the outset of this paper, to answer which this research was undertaken. Presentation of the findings now nears its end, and I think the answer is clear. The offhand answer, laying the blame upon intuition for our slowness in discovering mysteries of the Cosmos, such as relativity, is the wrong one. The right answer is: Newtonian space, time, and matter are no intuitions. They are recepts from culture and language. That is where Newton got them.\u201d\u00a0 \u2013Benjamin Whorf<\/em><\/p>\nSO THE UNDERSTANDING IS ALSO THAT OUR COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE IS OBSCURANTIST, AND THE OBSCURANTISM IS SOMETHING WE INFUSE BY INFUSING BINARY LOGIC INTO THE VERY STRUCTURE OF OUR LANGUAGE AS IN STATEMENTS SUCH AS \u2018THE TOWN IS GROWING\u2019 WHICH INFUSES THE DOUBLE ERROR BASED ABSTRACTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING<\/em><\/strong>.\u00a0\u00a0 The anchor for this OBSCURANTISM is the abstraction of BEING which has no place within a WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are inherently fluid.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\nAs Nietzsche points out, the abstractions of REASON (which is based on RATIO and thus on BEING), and BEING-based LOCAL AUTHORING are language based abstractions that have no support from our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum (the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao). \u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\u201cNothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!\u2014Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. \u201cReason\u201d in language!\u2014oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.\u201d \u2014Nietzsche, \u201cTwilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\nOur judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author\u201d;\u2013but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say \u201clightning flashes,\u201d I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, \u201cis\u201d and does not \u201cbecome.\u201d\u2013To regard an event as an \u201ceffecting,\u201d and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.\u201d \u2013 Nietzsche, \u2018Will to Power\u2019, 531<\/em><\/p>\n* * *<\/p>\n
SO, WHAT MORE MAY WE GET OUT OF ALL OF THIS RHETORIC BEYOND RESTATING WHAT BOHM AND NIETZSCHE HAVE SAID?\u00a0 THAT IS, WHY THE TITLE FOR THIS \u00a0ESSAY;<\/p>\n
THIS IS A “BREAKTHROUGH” for me, in my understanding and it concerns the relationship between FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\nWE MAY RECALL THAT BOHM WENT AFTER THE \u2018FRAGMENTATION\u2019 THAT WE HAVE BUILT INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WHILE NIETZSCHE WENT AFTER THE \u2018IDOLS\u2019 which sounds at face value as if they were on different missions, but if we consider Nietzsche\u2019s attack on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we can see that this is also an attack on the FRAGMENTATION that derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (i.e. from using the double error to notionally construct representations of new developments wherever we choose.)<\/p>\n
BUT NIETZSCHE was also critical of EGO which inflates through the belief in LOCAL AUTHORING that comes from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR so Nietzsche wanted to COLLAPSE those IDOLS that were artificially created by the FALSE notion of LOCAL AUTHORING.<\/p>\n
I<\/em>n the title Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer (<\/em><\/strong>G\u00f6tzen-D\u00e4mmerung, oder, Wie man mit dem Hammer philosophiert)<\/em>, Nietzsche\u2019s use of the G\u00f6tzen-D\u00e4mmerung <\/em>title was a pun on Wagner\u2019s \u2018G\u00f6tterd\u00e4mmerung\u2019<\/em> (the Twilight of the Gods).\u00a0 That is, G\u00f6tze is a German word for \u201cidol\u201d or \u201cfalse god\u201d. <\/em><\/p>\n* * *<\/p>\n
SO, we can consider the fact that there are two levels of looking at the same thing here.\u00a0 Bohm is looking at this in terms of FRAGMENTATION which, while it does derive from the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR, Bohm doesn\u2019t dwell on that, but goes \u2018straight to the point of FRAGMENTATION since where he wants to \u2018take us to\u2019 is the understanding of reality in terms of the \u2018IMPLICATE ORDER\u2019 which is QUANTUM LOGIC based.<\/p>\n
Bohm\u2019s and Krishamurti\u2019s position seems to be; WHY DWELL ON OUR MISTAKEN UNDERSTANDINGS WHEN WE CAN MOVE ON TO OUR CORRECTED UNDERSTANDING through different approaches to dialogue.\u00a0 FRAGMENTATION as in the EXPLICATE ORDER of things is the problem and we can now acknowledge QUANTUM LOGIC and the natural primacy of the IMPLICATE ORDER which lies BEYOND our traditional form of discourse.<\/p>\n
Bohm presents the problem of FRAGMENTATION as follows;<\/p>\n
1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS\u00a0(from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)<\/p>\n
The title of this chapter is \u2018Fragmentation and wholeness\u2019. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual<\/em><\/strong>; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.<\/p>\nThus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man\u2019s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the \u2018normal\u2019 limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc<\/p>\n
* * *<\/p>\n
SO, LET\u2019S REFLECT ON THIS.\u00a0 BOHM WANTS TO GET TO THE IMPLICATE ORDER which AVOIDS FRAGMENTATION but Nietzsche wants to EXPOSE HOW LANGUAGE IS SCREWING UP OUR REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY BY INJECTING LOCAL AUTHORS with the use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.<\/p>\n
Nietzsche is going after those unreal LOCAL AUTHORS and he wants us to SMASH THEM so as to STOP THEM FROM OBSCURING OUR ACCESS TO REALITY.<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0 So Nietzsche wants to us to do some \u201cpsychoanalysis\u201d on ourselves and clear up the confusion in our minds that he points out is being caused by infusing of the abstract notion of BEING.\u00a0 Nietzsche reflects that; \u201cEven the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\nIn other words, Nietzsche sees THE PROBLEM \u00a0for we are included in a transforming relational continuum, of the FALSE IDOLS that WE have created in our minds with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.\u00a0 We have created a whole HIERARCHY of perceived LOCAL AUTHORS within our language based house of cards constructions, but in reality, there are no LOCAL AUTHORS, and Nietzsche was big on Emerson and as Emerson points out (in the earlier cited quote), we are included in a dynamic greater than ourselves, an awareness of which allows us to put our actions in the service of cultivating resonance within the transforming relational continuum (aka the WAVE-FIELD).\u00a0 The HIJACKING of WHO WE REALLY ARE, the WE that is included in the WAVE-FIELD, \u2026 by our INTELLECTUAL CENTRE THAT INSISTS THAT WE ACCEPT THE ROLE OF THE LOCAL INDEPENDENT AUTHOR OF OUR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS. \u00a0In other words; i.e. in EMERSON\u2019S WORDS; \u2026 \u201cthere is a mischievous tendency in us to transfer our thought from the life to the ends, to quit our agency and rest in our acts: the tools run away with the workman, the human with the divine.\u201d<\/em><\/strong> –<\/p>\nIN OTHER WORDS, WE HAVE A TENDENCY TO TAKE OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE \u201cLITERALLY\u201d AND WHAT WE HAVE BUILT INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR BASED LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION.\u00a0 This LOCAL AUTHORING built into the language ARCHITECTURE sources FRAGMENTATION.\u00a0\u00a0 BUT WHAT NIETSZSCHE IS COMPAINING ABOUT IS \u201cNOT\u201d FRAGMENTATION BUT \u201cOBSCURANTISM\u201d WHEREIN OUR INJECTING OF AUTHORS EVERYWHERE TO CREATE A SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON LOCAL SOURCING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS SETS UP EGO-INFLATED PEOPLE AND NATIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS, WHO NOW BELIEVE IN THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.\u00a0 I am speaking of \u2018WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS who teach this abstraction based belief to our children\u2019..<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\nIt’s not just PERSONAL EGO that gets inflated here but NATIONAL EGO and GROUP EGO and RACE EGO and LGBTQ CATEGORY EGO, so that IDENTITY is FRAGMENTED (and SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA is following as Bohm is pointing out).\u00a0 FRAGMENTATION leads to MECHANISTIC PROCESSES of COORDINATING all the FRAGMENTS which is like teaching a MACHINE how to DANCE in harmony with the WAVE-FIELD WORLD in which it is a CONDENSATION.<\/p>\n
WAITING IN THE WINGS is the QUANTUM LOGIC awareness of inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD and awareness that relegates the MECHANISTIC INTELLECTUAL CONSTRUCTIONS of our language-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY to a SUPPORT ROLE WITHOUT LETTING SUCH CONSTRUCTIONS HI-JACK THE HELM and have us PRETENDING TO BE AN INDEPENDENT LOCAL AUTHOR, as is the current affliction of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENCY.<\/p>\n
* * *<\/p>\n
OK, NIETZSCHE sees our problem in terms that we are creating all these G\u00d6TZE as individuals and organizations that BELIEVE THEY HAVE LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS.\u00a0 This has become an EMPEROR\u2019S NEW CLOTHES delusion on the scale of the WESTERN CULTURE social collective.\u00a0\u00a0 This BULLSHIT has been exposed by many philosophical investigators including the SYSTEMS SCIENCES, who have \u2018sounded the alarm\u2019 as follows;<\/p>\n
\u201cThe above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization\u2019), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio\u2010economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic\u2010reductionistic scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict\u2010generating and dysfunctional in <\/em>a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence \u2026\u201d<\/em><\/strong> \u2014 Gy\u00f6rgy Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard\u00a0 (International Society of Systems Sciences)<\/p>\nTHERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING!\u00a0 WE LIVE IN \u201cA WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY GLOBAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE\u201d.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\nOK, PLEASE EXCUSE THE POSSIBLE JOLT OF INFUSING SUCH RADICAL (COMPARED TO THE WESTERN CULTURE NORMAL) UNDERSTANDING, if the reader isn\u2019t \u2018already there\u2019, but the whole HIERARCHICAL SET UP WITH KINGS AND PRESIDENTS AND POLITICIANS THAT WE PURPORT TO BE AUTHORING THE DYNAMIC OF THE GLOBAL SOCIAL COLLECTIVE<\/em><\/strong> IS BULLSHIT, BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING.<\/p>\nIs it possible for Putin to LOCALLY AUTHOR a NUCLEAR WAR?\u00a0\u00a0 Did HITLER\u2019s GERMANY LOCALLY AUTHOR WWII?\u00a0\u00a0 Newspaper cartoons back at the end of WWI in 1919 (at the time of the TREATY of VERSAILLES, predicted that the harsh terms of the treaty that would be experienced by young GERMANS, would create the conditions for another war when they reach the age of maturity (i.e. in 1939).\u00a0\u00a0 The point is to do with our use of language since in another language we could understand WAR in terms of internal strife within the global social collective.\u00a0 In the indigenous aboriginal culture, authorship of strife derives from NONLOCAL RELATIONAL TENSIONS that erupt through a local LIGHTNING ROD or CONDUIT which is NOT the AUTHOR of the WAR but which can be the LIGHTNING ROD, the AUTHORING being NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT while the LOCAL and EXPLICIT LIGHTNING ROD derives from TENSIONS which are NONLOCAL and develop within a global we of relations.. The LIGHTING ROD which is a conduit for release of social-relational tensions, however, nasty, does not alter the reality that strife develops within a relational web and does not JUMPSTART from \u201cA LOCAL AUTHOR\u2019 as WESTERN CULTURE OBSCURANTISM pretends; i.e. that \u201cLOCAL AUTHOR\u201d is not the \u201cAUTHOR\u201d but the LIGHTNING ROD that is the conduit for release of NONLOCAL TENSIONAL BUILDUP. \u00a0.<\/p>\n
NOTE THAT THE (SO-CALLED) POWER TO AUTHOR, AND THE POWER TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT AIRPLANES AND RAILWAYS AND NUCLEAR MISSILES IS LIKE THE POWER OF CONSTRUCTING \u2018TOWNS\u2019.\u00a0 IT IS ONLY LOCAL AUTHORSHIP SO LONG AS WE USE OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION WHERE WE PUT THE WORDS TOGETHER TO FORM IMAGERY IN THE PSYCHE WHICH, SO LONG AS OTHERS ARE USING THE SAME IMAGERY (AS IN A COMMON LANGUAGE GROUP), PUTS US \u2018ON THE SAME INTELLECTUAL-CONCEPTUAL PAGE\u2019.\u00a0\u00a0 As Bohm says in his example of the death of Lincoln, \u2026 John Wilkes Booth was just one of many contributing factions including \u201cthe invention of gunpowder\u201d.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The WESTERN CULTURE habit of reducing language based representation of things to a BINARY LOGIC basis is common and it misrepresents OBSCURES what is really going on..<\/p>\n
SO, THERE ARE NO \u2018TOWNS\u2019 THAT \u2018GROW, DEVELOP AND PRODUCE goods and services.\u00a0 That is just the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR ABSTRACTION \u00a0or the MALE-ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE.\u00a0 AS IN THE BINARY LOGIC BASED SEPARATION OF \u2018THE TOWN\u2019 AS IF IT WERE A LOCAL EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF WITH ITS OWN GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, SUCH IDEAS COME FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.\u00a0 WHAT THERE IS, AS OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE CAPTURES IT AND AS INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES CAPTURE IT, IS; \u2026 \u2018TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE\u2019 WHICH IS A QUANTUM LOGIC BASED UNDERSTANDING WHEREIN FIGURE AND GROUND ARE ONE, WHEREAS \u2018THE TOWN\u2019 THAT GROWS, DEVELOPS AND PRODUCES\u2019 IS A BINARY LOGIC BASED UNDERSTANDING WHEREIN FIGURE AND GROUND ARE NOTIONALLY TWO SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, WITH THE LATTER HAVING BEEN MADE OVER INTO AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT IN ORDER TO LET US SPEAK OF THE TOWN SEPARATELY AS IF IT WERE A \u2018LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF\u2019 WITH GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING goods and services.<\/p>\n
Ok, the issue here is that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has encouraged us to construct a lot of IDOLS such as HUMANS and TOWNS and NATIONS that are language based representations that OBSCURE the fluid reality of our sense experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.\u00a0 In indigenous aboriginal languages, as in Bohm\u2019s Rheomode language, everything is included in the WAVE-FIELD (e.g. things are condensations of the WAVE-FIELD) and expressed as verbs, such as TOWNINGS, HUMANINGS and NATIONINGS etc.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Nietzsche\u2019s TWILIGHT OF THE IDOLS points to the OBSCURANTISM that comes with NAMING.<\/p>\n
In the title Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer (<\/strong><\/em>G\u00f6tzen-D\u00e4mmerung, oder, Wie man mit dem Hammer philosophiert)<\/em>, the G\u00f6tzen-D\u00e4mmerung <\/em>title was a pun on Wagner\u2019s \u2018G\u00f6tterd\u00e4mmerung\u2019<\/em> (the Twilight of the Gods).\u00a0 That is, G\u00f6tze is a German word for \u201cidol\u201d or \u201cfalse god\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\nALL OF THE IDOLS WITH POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS \u2018HAVE TO GO\u201d because they are OBSCURING <\/em><\/strong>what is really (in sense-experience) going on which is TRANSFORMATION.\u00a0 WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF (SUBSTITUTE) REALITY IS NOT JUST FRAGMENTED, IT IS OBSCURANTIST.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\u201cOBSCURANTISM\u201d,<\/strong> \u00a0the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.<\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\nWhen we say \u201cRUSSIA ATTACKED UKRAINE\u201d<\/em><\/strong> we are using this DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based ABSTRACTION which is OBSCURANTISM<\/em><\/strong> since \u201cwe live in<\/em><\/strong> a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence\u201d<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\nTHERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING!\u00a0 WE LIVE IN \u201cA WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY GLOBAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE\u201d.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\nWhat we are looking at is a WESTERN CULTURE dominated way of TALKING and THINKING which IS in terms of LOCAL AUTHORING.\u00a0 This reduction to the MALE ASSERTIVE conjugate and the DROP OUT Of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE was our WESTERN CULTURE move to SIMPLIFY language based representation.\u00a0 It is NOT ONLY FRAGMENTATIST but OBSCURANTIST since it OBSCURES the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC of reality by imposing BINARY LOGIC REPRESENTATION.\u00a0 There is no way to get from THE TOWN IS GROWING to the THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE because the former is a representation that strips reality down to the MALE ASSERTING ONLY CONJUGATE while the latter representation retains full androgynous FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE representation and thus preserves the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) essence of our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD.<\/p>\n
IT IS NOT THAT RUSSIA ATTACKED UKRAINE (which is the one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE LINGUISTIC ABSTRACTION), but that RUSSIA is serving as a CONDUIT or LIGHTNING ROD for the release of tensions within the global relational matrix.\u00a0 THOSE LOBAL TENSIONS are clearly present and are taking shape in the usual WESTERN CULTURE manner which is BINARY LOGIC BASED POLARIZATION.<\/p>\n
THE BASIC ISSUE IS the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC IMBALANCE while the WESTERN CULTURE OBSCURANTISM is reducing this to the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based GOOD and EVIL CONFLICT, reducing the view of what is going on from its innate NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) actuality to the BINARY LOGIC basis of LOCAL and EXPLICIT representation of POLAR OPPOSITION based CONFLICT.<\/p>\n
In Modern physics, as in indigenous aboriginal understanding, any global social-relational complex can become TENSIONED and while the tensions are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in their basic nature, the manifestation is LOCAL and EXPLICIT.\u00a0 The POLARIZED CONDUIT in such cases is not the PRIMARY STORY , since the LOCAL and EXPLICIT POLARIZED conduit through which the nonlocally arising tensions find release does not speak to the NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT ORIGINS OF THE TENSIONS, but only to the lightning bolt of their release which illuminates two endpoints neither of which is the SOURCE of the stored up tensions.\u00a0 The source of the tensions is dispersed within the commons that both poles are \u2018tapped into\u2019 so that the two antagonistic poles might be considered the \u2018scape-goats\u2019 for releasing tensions co-owned and co-authored by the overall nonlocal relationally tensioned web which, rather than acknowledging their own involvement, will form into cheer-leading teams in support of the polarized view of the conflict.\u00a0 This polarizing is otherwise known as;<\/p>\n
\u201cOBSCURANTISM\u201d, the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n* * *<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
THIS IS A “BREAKTHROUGH” for me, in my understanding and it concerns the relationship between FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM. \u00a0 \u00a0 Consider the following two \u2018views of reality\u2019; \u00a0 The \u2018thin skull\u2019 rule \u00a0 The thin skull rule makes the defendant liable for the plaintiff’s injuries even if the injuries are unexpectedly severe owing to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5585","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apn","count-0","even alt","author-emile","last"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5585","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5585"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5585\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5589,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5585\/revisions\/5589"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5585"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5585"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5585"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}