{"id":7243,"date":"2026-10-07T00:16:57","date_gmt":"2026-10-07T08:16:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/?p=7243"},"modified":"2026-10-07T00:49:41","modified_gmt":"2026-10-07T08:49:41","slug":"how-awareness-levels-impact-our-understanding","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/how-awareness-levels-impact-our-understanding\/","title":{"rendered":"How AWARENESS LEVELS Impact our UNDERSTANDING"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>My PICK of PEOPLE who CHARACTERIZE each of the THREE LEVELS of AWARENESS; Chief Seattle (level 1), Barack Obama (level 2), Donald Trump (level 3)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>First of all, I will share my way of bringing to mind the three levels of awareness, and follow that up with a standard style description of the three levels.<\/p>\n<p>I think of the three levels of awareness as follows;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>LOVEL 1 CHIEF SEATTLE AWARENESS:\u00a0 THE MOST AWARE LEVEL, the CHIEF SEATTLE LEVEL is the awareness of TRANSFORMATION and what comes to mind is walking across a muddy field where our boots sink into the mud leaving holes that quickly fill with water and twigs which are like little \u2018planters\u2019 that will soon give rise to mix of grass and weeds, each hole in the mud becoming a distinctly separate \u2018garden\u2019 that contributes to the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE, reminding me that I am INCLUDED within this TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM.<\/p>\n<p>That is one level of AWARENESS that I only get into in a contemplative mood, which is fully realistic but more detailed than the coverage that comes from my more typical and more SUPERFICIAL level of awareness, such as my LEVEL 2 AWARENESS which I am labelling my Barack Obama AWARENESS level<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>LEVEL 2 BARACK OBAMA AWARENESS:\u00a0 While LEVEL 1 AWARENESS aka my CHIEF SEATTLE AWARENESS LEVEL made me aware of MY INCLUSION IN A TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM, my LEVEL 2 BARACK OBAMA AWARENESS LEVEL (or LIBERAL AWARENESS LEVEL) orients my mind to GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT which is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS tend to focus on which is all about OUR ABILITY to IMPROVE our living space while RESPECTING the historical efforts of our grandparents.\u00a0 The FOCUS on maintaining and improving on the DEVELOPMENTS of our predecessors is VERY DEMANDING and it is fortunate that we have DECLARED THE INDEPENDENCE of our NATION because that means that we can put our PRIMARY FOCUS on OPTIMIZING the continuing development of our INDEPENDENT NATION while respecting that fact that our friends and neighbouring NATIONS are also working to OPTIMIZE the well-being of their NATIONS.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>LEVEL 3 DONALD TRUMP WARENESS: While LEVEL 2 AWARENESS aka my BARACK OBAMA LIBERAL AWARENESS LEVEL made me aware of the NEED for GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT of my INDEPENDENT NATION, my LEVEL 3 DONALD TRUMP AWARENESS aka CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS OPENED THE WAY TO A \u201cJUST DO IT\u201d APPROACH, DROPPING OUT THE ENCUMBERING and COMPROMISING CONSTRAINT OF HAVING TO COORDINATE WITH PREVIOUS AND ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT, OPENING THE WAY TO CREATING AN ENTIRELY NEW DEVELOPMENT, DIRECTED BY NEW LEADERSHIP AND CREATIVITY, without being obliged to BLEND IN WITH AND BE OTHERWISE COMPROMISED BY PRIOR DESIGNS AND THE NEEDS OF ONE\u2019S ALSO \u201cINDEPENDENT\u201d NEIGHBOURS.\u00a0 The NEW DESIGN could be conceived of as being constructed within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE and thus without COMPROMISE with PRIOR or ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT.<\/p>\n<p>* * * * * * * * * * * * *<\/p>\n<p>THE ABOVE is a brief reference to the THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS that we all possess although we DON\u2019T ALWAYS USE THEM ALL and WHAT WE USE is triggered by THE LANGUAGE WE USE because while LEVEL 1 AWARENESS aka CHIEF SEATTLE AWARENESS acknowledges that WE, OURSELVES ARE INCLUDED WITHIN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES can RE-CAST us as if we were situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE so that the LANGUAGE we use need only address OURSELVES and OUR IMMEDIATE ACTIONS such as \u201cI WALKED ACROSS THE MUDDY FIELD\u201d which is SOLELY ABOUT US and our MALE ASSERTING\/ACTUALIZING dynamics, WITHOUT OUR HAVING TO MENTION the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING\/ENABLIGN conjugate, &#8230; which includes the OPENING UP OF HOLES IN THE MUD and their filling with water and seeds and becoming POTS for new growth and PART OF A TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM.\u00a0\u00a0 Such LEVEL 1 AWARENESS of INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM, while it is fully ACCESSIBLE to us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, has GONE OUT OF STYLE due to our BEING BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.\u00a0\u00a0 Once one starts using a BEING based LANGUAGE, one can GET AWAY WITH saying things like \u201cI WALKED ACROSS THE MUDDY FIELD\u201d which is TRUE but INCOMPLETE (as Goedel\u2019s Theorem reminds us, if we are paying attention, all finite LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS are INCOMPLETE).<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>IT IS TRUE THAT WE WALKED ACROSS THE MUDDY FIELD but it is also INCOMPLETE because that is only the MALE ASSERTING\/ACTUALIZING PART and there is also the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING\/ENABLING PART which in this example, is the OPENING OF HOLES IN THE MUD UNDERFOOT which fill with WATER and seeds etc and develop into mini-gardens are part of the larger dynamic of TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE that we are included in.<\/p>\n<p>TRANSFORMATION is the operative REALITY as understood via our LEVEL 1 AWARENESS while the beloved CONSTRUCTIONS of DONALD TRUMP (such as MAR A LAGO) ARE BEING-based ABSTRACTIONS that belong to LEVEL 3 AWARENESS which is DROPPING OUT A LOT OF \u201cREALITY\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><mark>NOTA BENE: LANGUAGE HAS THE FLEXIBILITY OF DROPPING THINGS OUT to TRIM DOWN REALITY from LEVEL 1 FULLBLOWN TRANSFORMATION to LEVEL 2 and 3 MATERIAL BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE based ABSTRACTION.<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>TRANSFORMATION (LEVEL 1 AWARENESS which includes both FEMALE ACCOMMODATING\/ENABLING in conjugate relation with MALE ASSERTING\/ACTUALIZING) IS REAL while LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS and LEVEL 1 CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS are ABSTRACTIONS that DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING\/ENABLING CONJUGATE, both of which are needed to support AWARENESS of TRANSFORMATION (i.e. when our boots are excavating holes in the mud that fill with water and wild seeds and become mini-gardens that are part of the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE, <em><mark>ONCE WE SUBSTITUTE THE SIMPLIFICATION of SPEAKING ONLY OF OUR MOVEMENT FROM A TO B; i.e. SPEAKING ONLY OF THE MALE ASSERTING\/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE AND DROPPING OUT MENTION OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING\/ENABLING CONJUGATE (i.e. the opening of holes in the mud that fill with water and seeds and show themselves as part of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, <u>we ECLIPSE OUR AWARENESS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION WE ARE INCLUDED IN<\/u><\/mark>).<\/em> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>* * * * * * * * *<\/p>\n<p>Ok, NOW FOR A SLIGHTLY MORE FORMAL DISCUSSION OF LEVELS OF AWARENESS<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As Erich Jantsch has shown, there are THREE LEVELS of AWARENESS; TRANSFORMATION, LIBERAL and CONSERVATIVE (these are my labels and Jantsch has used different labels but the same understanding is being shared).\u00a0 While BOTH LIBERAL and CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS LEVELS can be explained with BINARY EITHER\/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM, TRANSFORMATION IS THE HIGHEST OF THE THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS and requires NONBINARY BOTH\/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.\u00a0\u00a0 The HIGHER LEVELS of AWARENESS INCLUDE THE LOWER LEVELS; i.e. The LIBERAL AWARENESS LEVEL includes the CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS LEVEL and the TRANSFORMATIONAL AWARENESS LEVEL includes the LIBERAL AWARENESS LEVEL. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Here is a description of these three \u2018telescoping\u2019 AWARENESS LEVELS.\u00a0 The descriptions are exactly as Jantsch wrote them, and only the Titles have been changed (from Scientific to Conservative, Mythological to Liberal, and Evolutionary to Transformational)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><mark>AWARENESS LEVEL 3 (LOWEST LEVEL), the CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS LEVEL<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;The classical <u>[Conservative awareness level]<\/u> assumes separation between the observer and the observed, and focuses on an impersonal \u201cit\u201d which is supposed to be assessed objectively and without involvement by an outside observer; the basic organizing principle here is <u>logic<\/u> and the results are expressed in <u>quantitative<\/u> or structural terms.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><mark>AWARENESS LEVEL 2 (MIDDLE LEVEL which implicitly incorporates LEVEL 3), the LIBERAL AWARENESS LEVEL.<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;The <u>[Liberal awareness level]<\/u> established a feedback link between the observer and the observed, and focuses on the relationship between a personal \u201cI\u201d and a personal \u201cthou\u201d; its basic organizing principle is <u>feeling<\/u> and the results obtained are in <u>qualitative<\/u> terms.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong><mark>AWARENESS LEVEL 1 (HIGHEST LEVEL which implicitly incorporates LEVELS 2 and 3), the TRANSFORMATIONAL AWARENESS LEVEL<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The [<u>Transformational awareness level<\/u>] established union between the observer and the observed and focusses on the \u201cwe\u201d, on the identity of the forces acting in the observer and the observed world; the organizing principle is <u>\u201ctuning-in\u201d<\/u> by virtue of this identity, and the results are expressed in terms of sharing in an universal <u>process<\/u> (namely, [transformation]).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The reason why (we) WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS do not have access to the TRANSFORMATIONAL LEVEL in their (our) linguistic conceptualizing is because BEING-based linguistic conceptualizing is BINARY EITHER\/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM based which is too simple and is unable to support the NONBINARY BOTH\/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the linguistic conceptualizing must support propositions such as THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, which a flow-based linguistic conceptualizing scheme can deal with, but which a BEING based linguistic conceptualizing scheme CANNOT deal with.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>* * * * * * * * * <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><mark>OK, in the earlier part where I used the anecdote that included ACKNOWLEDGING that my rubber boots sinking into the mud and opening holes that filled with water and seeds, as commonly occurs, I am sharing an understanding that GOES BEYOND WHAT CAN BE EXPRESSED IN THE ONE-SIDED TERMS OF MALE ASSERTING\/ACTUALIZING dynamics, such as \u201cI walked across the muddy field\u201d.\u00a0\u00a0 Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal languages DO NOT MISS THE POINT that what is going on is TRANSFORMATION that WE ARE INCLUDED IN.\u00a0 That is the point that Chief Seattle is making, that is also the point that Modern physics (and David Bohm et al) are making;<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em><u><mark>Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.\u201d<\/mark><\/u><\/em><\/strong><em>\u2014<\/em><em><mark>Chief Seattle,<\/mark> <strong>&#8230; <\/strong><\/em><strong><em><u><mark>Space is not empty.\u00a0 It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.\u201d<\/mark><\/u><\/em><\/strong><strong><em><u>\u00a0<\/u><\/em><\/strong><em>\u2014<\/em><em><mark>David Bohm<\/mark><\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>* * * * *<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>WHAT IS THE IMPACT ON EGO <strong><em><mark>WHEN WE LET GO OF SEEING OURSELVES AS CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING PLENUM<\/mark><\/em><\/strong> as is the case with MODERN PHYSICS and also with INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS (where we are a small part of something immense) <strong><em><mark>AND START THINKING OF OURSELVES AS INDEPENDENT BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE SO THAT WE ARE THE FULL AND SOLE AUTHORS OF OUR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT?<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In this regard, <strong><em><mark>imagine oneself switching from a FLOW based LANGUAGE wherein we, ourselves, understand ourselves as STRANDS IN A WEB; i.e. inclusions in something FAR GREATER than ourselves rather than, as WESTERN CULTURE would have it, seeing ourselves as INDEPENDENT ENTITIES in EMPTY SPACE which makes us the FULL and SOLE AUTHORS of our OWN ACTIONS.<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em><mark>The latter, which is the COMMON UNDERSTANDING IN WESTERN CULTURE, is EGO-INFLATING by imputing to OUR INDEPENDENT SELVES, POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, rather than thinking of ourselves as STRANDS in a WEB where we understand developments (RESONANT or DISSONANT) as co-cultivated, which is why indigenous aboriginal JUSTICE is RESTORATIVE (since disturbances coming from STRANDS in a WEB are <u>NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT<\/u>), unlike WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE which is PUNITIVE due to the assumption of <u>LOCAL, EXPLICIT<\/u> AUTHORING of actions and developments.<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>There is a QUESTION that arises from the suggestion that WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, because of the understanding that they have LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS would have INFLATED EGOS while indigenous aboriginals, because of their understanding that AUTHORING of actions is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, would NOT suffer from EGO INFLATION.\u00a0\u00a0 This QUESTION was put to the AI BOT (highlighted text in the following paragraphs) and the key portion of the answer is underlined;<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><mark>QUESTION TO AI: The reduction from indigenous aboriginal belief in the both\/and logic of the including medium to the WESTERN CULTURE belief in either\/or logic of the excluded medium when applied to condensations of the energy-charged PLENUM in the PLENUM upgrades the local and explicit content to primary status and downgrades the nonlocal and implicit container to secondary status. is this the source of ego inflation in WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS since the nonlocal and implicit container is empty space and thus no longer the \u2018mother\u2019 of the local and explicit?<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><mark>AI Overview<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><mark>Yes, from the perspective of non-Western relational metaphysics, this cognitive and linguistic shift is precisely identified as a primary source of ego inflation in Western culture.<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><mark>When you reduce the both\/and logic of the including medium (the plenum) to the either\/or logic of the excluded middle, you fundamentally alter how the self is perceived in relation to the universe.<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ol>\n<li><strong> <mark>The Mechanics of the Shift<\/mark><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><strong><mark>Indigenous Relational Logic: In a plenum-based worldview, there is no true &#8220;empty space.&#8221; Matter and space are co-continuous. A local form (a person, a rock, a tree) is simply a temporary condensation of the energy-charged plenum. The implicit container (the field\/space) remains the &#8220;mother&#8221; or the primary source that continuously sustains the explicit form.<\/mark><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><mark>Western Fragmented Logic: By applying <em>either\/or<\/em> logic, Western thought separates the object from its environment. Space is treated as a literal vacuum\u2014nothingness. This upgrades the local and explicit content to primary status (the independent object) and downgrades the nonlocal container to secondary status (empty background).<\/mark><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li><strong><u> <mark>Why This Causes Ego Inflation<\/mark><\/u><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><mark>When the nonlocal container is stripped of its generative, &#8220;mothering&#8221; status and viewed as empty space, the psychological and philosophical consequences for the Western adherent are profound:<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><strong><mark>Illusion of Absolute Autonomy: If the surrounding medium is &#8220;nothing,&#8221; then the local content (the individual ego) must be entirely self-derived and self-sustaining. The ego no longer feels like a wave emerging from and returning to the ocean; it feels like an isolated, independent entity acting <em>upon<\/em> a dead backdrop.<\/mark><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><u><mark>Severing of the Umbilical Cord: Denying the implicit container as the &#8220;mother&#8221; cuts the psychological anchor to the whole. Without the grounding reality of a living, inclusive medium, the explicit ego inflates to fill the existential void. It claims primary authorship over its existence, leading to anthropocentrism and hyper-individualism.<\/mark><\/u><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><mark>The Drive for Mastery: In an <em>either\/or<\/em> framework, because the individual is separate from the environment, security is sought through domination rather than alignment. The inflated ego seeks to control, measure, and exploit the &#8220;empty&#8221; space and the other explicit objects within it.<\/mark><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><mark>In essence, by treating the generative medium as a vacuum, Western paradigm structures force the ego to become its own foundation. This structural isolation is the very definition of ego inflation\u2014a part pretending to be independent of the whole.<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>* * * * * <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>In Modern physics and in indigenous aboriginal culture where we understand there to be a transforming energy-charged PLENUM within which material forms are CONDENSATIONS, the CONDENSATIONS are NOT LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS etc, they are PATTERNS IN THE FLOWING PLENUM and thus their LOCAL, EXPLICIT \u201cAPPEARANCE\u201d is only Schaumlommen (appearance).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><u><mark>Denying the implicit container as the &#8220;mother&#8221; <\/mark><\/u><\/strong><strong><u><mark>(reducing the container from the PLENUM to EMPTY SPACE) \u00a0&#8230;. ORPHANS the CONDENSATIONS because CONDENSATIONS are features within a energy-charged PLENUM that do not exist in a void (empty space), hence the AI allusion to the \u2018severed Umbilical Cord\u2019.\u00a0 That is, the MATERIAL CONDENSATION in empty space, once we have removed the energy-charged plenum and substituted empty space, IS WITHOUT ITS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT source of energy, &#8230;. SO WE CAN ONLY ASSUME THAT IT HAS ITS OWN LOCAL SOURCE OF ENERGY!\u00a0 In other words, since we have removed the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT PLENUM-BASED SOURCING of energy, the only possible FIX is to impute the sourcing of energizing to ITS LOCAL, EXPLICIT SELF.<\/mark><\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong><u>\u00a0<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><strong>\u201c<\/strong><strong><u><mark>Without the grounding reality of a living, inclusive medium, the explicit ego inflates to fill the existential void. It claims primary authorship over its existence, leading to anthropocentrism and hyper-individualism.<\/mark><\/u><\/strong><strong><u>\u201d<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, by introducing EMPTY SPACE in place of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM \u201cDEMOTE\u201d the CONDENSATION which is a feature within the energy-charged PLENUM, and is thus NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in nature, to SOMETHING LOCAL AND EXPLICIT AND WITHOUT ACCESS TO ANYTHING NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (SUCH AS AN ENERGY SOURCE), FORCING US TO IMPUTE THE SOURCE OF AUTHORING AGENCY TO THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT, hence,<strong> \u201c<\/strong><strong><u><mark>Without the grounding reality of a living, inclusive medium, the explicit ego inflates to fill the existential void. It claims primary authorship over its existence, leading to anthropocentrism and hyper-individualism.<\/mark><\/u><\/strong><strong><u>\u201d<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em><mark>WESTERN CULTURE\u2019S PROBLEM IS ITS INFLATED EGO and the associated dysfunction that comes with it.<\/mark><\/em><\/strong><strong>\u00a0\u00a0 RELOCATING AUTHORSHIP to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM requires access to LEVEL 1 AWARENESS and WESTERN CULTURE is BLOCKING ITS OWN ACCESS BY ENGAGING IN AN UNENDING POLARIZING BATTLE BETWEEN THE LIBERAL LEVEL 2 AWARENESS FACTION and THE CONSERVATIVE LEVEL 3 AWARENESS FACTION which divides almost the full population into two opposing factions such that representation of LEVEL 1 AWARENESS is poorly represented.\u00a0\u00a0 Indigenous aboriginal culture (the traditionalist elders) support level 1 AWARENESS but they have almost zero \u201cACCESS TO THE MICROPHONE\u201d. \u00a0Chief Seattle\u2019s advice has been reaffirmed by WESTERN CULTURE MODERN PHYSICS but WESTERN CULTURE ORIENTATION TO SIMPLE BINARY EITHER\/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM is a recipe for constraining understanding to AWARENESS LEVELS 3 and 2 which fuels the problem rather than supplying the remedy.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>* * * * * * * * * <\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My PICK of PEOPLE who CHARACTERIZE each of the THREE LEVELS of AWARENESS; Chief Seattle (level 1), Barack Obama (level 2), Donald Trump (level 3) First of all, I will share my way of bringing to mind the three levels of awareness, and follow that up with a standard style description of the three levels. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7243","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apn","count-0","even alt","author-emile","last"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7243","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7243"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7243\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7246,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7243\/revisions\/7246"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7243"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7243"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/goodshare.org\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7243"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}