Author’s Preface: This essay is coming from the same NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM based  understanding as is foundational in indigenous aboriginal cultures and in Modern physics, which is AT ODDS WITH common WESTERN CULTURE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM based understanding.  So, for example, the indigenous aboriginal understanding wherein WE ARE STRANDS in the WEB (interconnected and interdependent) is understood as fundational to our sense-experience reality as is the understanding of Modern physics (where it is expressed in terms where forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM), which is once again the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as with STRANDS in the WEB.  FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE is rampant, and is due to giving the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TO SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM.

The current JEFFREY EPSTEIN AFFAIR, that is giving rise to a lot of FINGER-POINTING based SOCIAL FRAGMENTATION, is MISSING THE BASIC REALITY that EVERYTHING IS INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT  as with CONDENSATIONS in the energy-charged PLENUM, so that as POGO says, “WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US”, in which case, RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is WARRANTED, NOT WESTERN CULTURE STYLE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE THAT SEEKS TO IDENTIFY and ELIMINATE the notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORS of VIOLENT/HARMFUL ACTIONS.

In REALITY, the VIOLENCE of the VIOLENT STRAND IN THE WEB IS NOT LOCALLY AUTHORED.  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and developments.  “LOCAL AUTHORING” is “APPEARANCE” (Schaumkommen in Schroedinger’s language) deriving from the “DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR”  (Nietzsche).   When we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ linguistic conceptualizations such as “The TOWN is GROWING”, we may be TELLING THE TRUTH but as GOEDEL’S THEOREM of the INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE PROPOSITIONS OF LOGIC informs us, establishing that which is TRUE is not equivalent to establishing that which is REAL; e.g. THE TOWN MAY BE GROWING but this fails to mention the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, that together with the GROWING of the TOWN co-constitutes the sense-experience affirmable REALITY of the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE.

 

The Epstein-Maxwell affair brings to mind the WESTERN CULTURE “PRACTICE OF SCAPEGOATING THE IDENTIFIED PATIENT”.   As pointed to in Shakespeare’s Henry IV, one person’s misfortune (poverty and exposure to manipulation) can be another’s advantage (prosperity can become the instrument of manipulation of the impoverished). e.g.

PRINCE HENRY:

Why, then, it is like if there come a hot June, and this civil buffeting hold, we shall buy maidenheads as they buy hob- nails, by the hundreds.

 

“WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US”

Is it NOT TIME for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to STOP TALKING UP THE BULLSHIT OF ‘INDEPENDENT BEINGS” and “INDEPENDENT NATIONS” and OPENLY ACKNOWLEDGE OUR INTERCONNECTION AND INTERDEPENDENCE  as is done by MODERN PHYSICS with its CONDENSATIONS in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM UNDERSTANDING, and by indigenous aboriginals with their STRANDS-IN-THE-WEB UNDERSTANDING?

 

* * * * * * * * * * End of Author’s Preface:

 

 

 

“IF WE REALLY WANT TO KNOW HOW IT COMES TO BE THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE FOLKS ARE SCREWING UP SO BADLY WITH MASS SHOOTINGS ETC.”

 

AND, LET’S FACE IT, “WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS” DO “NOT WANT TO KNOW”, BECAUSE AS POGO points out, it is a case of “WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US!”

 

MANY HAVE SHARED THIS UNDERSTANDING, but “IT JUST SLIPS AWAY AND DOESN’T TAKE ROOT”.  I will share herewith, THIS GREAT WESTERN CULTURE SCREW UP IN TERMS THAT ARE SIMPLE AND STRAIGHT FORWARD which I will NUMBER.  While many have discovered what is going on here, I will follow the example that has been given by Lev Vygotsky who studied how children naturally learn guided by their own sense-experience (before WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SCREW WITH THEIR MINDS).  The WESTERN CULTURE PRACTICE OF SCREWING UP THE MINDS OF ITS YOUTH HAS BEEN POINTED OUT by R.D. Laing, Jules Henry, and Ernest Becker in my earlier notes. This time I will share what Lev Vygotsky has said.  He wrote in RUSSIAN and that was translated into ENGLISH and Alex Kozulin evidently did a GREAT JOB of translating that into ENGLISH, but ENGLISH SPEAKERS will STILL NOT GET THE MESSAGE because we ENGLISH SPEAKERS are in the HABIT of SIMPLIFYING the messages we receive to make them fit our PRE-CONCEIVED IMPRESSSIONS OF REALITY.

 

For example, If Vygotsky were to express something using verbs which implies that we are living within a transforming relational continuum; e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” (wherein everything is in flux), when WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HEAR THIS, WE WILL SPONTANEOUSLY “CORRECT” THIS TO “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS (influenced by the ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, with THEIR BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME) will REDUCE and SIMPLIFY what has been said, to GIVE IT A “BEING” based FOUNDATION, … IN SPITE OF THE FACT; i.e. the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY WHEREIN “EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX”, that we REQUIRE a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE as acknowledged and employed in MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal culture.

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are ADDICTED TO THE USE OF A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME THAT REDUCES THE WORLD FROM A FLOW-BASED TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM TO A NOTIONAL COLLECTION OF MATERIAL ENTITIES THAT WE EQUIP WITH GRAMMAR-BASED POWERS TO MOVE ABOUT AND INTERACT WITHIN A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

 

The FOLLOWING ARE EXAMPLES OF HOW WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE USING BEING-BASED LANGUAGE WHICH IS “TOO SIMPLE” TO CONVEY OUR TRANSFORMING REALITY, AND WHICH THEREFORE SCREWS UP OUR LINGUISTIC ONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF REALITY.

 

(more…)