Why refer to WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS as a SLEEPWALKER CONFEDERACY?

The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is a language architecture designed to put the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE TO SLEEP, leaving only the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ‘AWAKE’.

It is a SLEEPWALKER CONFEDERACY in the sense that millions of people have adopted a common language architecture wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE has been “PUT TO SLEEP” so that only the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE IS ‘AWAKE’.

This has been achieved with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is used to invent the ABSTRACT NOTION of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’.

In this BINARY LOGIC based Mode of REPRESENTATION wherein the FIRST ERROR is the NAMING that imputes BEING and the SECOND ERROR is the GRAMMAR that conflates the FIRST ERROR by bestowing LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS on the NAMING-instantiated BEING.

As we know from Modern physics and as has been the understanding of Indigenous Aboriginal cultures Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedant, we are included in an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD REALITY and WAVE-FIELDS are constituted by FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE RELATIONS as where the ACCOMMODATING OPENING or SHRINKING of the VALLEY LANDSCAPE and the CONJUGATE ASSERTING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS and PRODUCTION together are the agents of TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE.

In the SPHERICAL SPACE we live in, as with waves in the ocean, when a hole or depression opens up this ‘valley’ is balanced out the rising of a hill or mountain.   THESE MOVEMENTS ONLY APPEAR TO BE TWO POLAR OPPOSITE ACTION, but in the land on the surface of a sphere, there can be NO subducting and opening of a hole or valley without a conjugate uplifting and protruding of a mound or mountain since this motion is relative.

The practice of using geometry to approximate this CONDENSATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD we call ‘the EARTH’ may give us a PERFECT SPHERICAL ‘DATUM’ which we could ‘overlay’ on our measurements of the EARTH and use this as a reference to pretend that the EARTH is a round THING-IN-ITSELF that we could COMPARE WITH ITSELF and say that “IT” is bulging UP over here and “IT” is slumping down over there, … but there is no LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘IT” even if we choose to hang the name PLANET on “IT” and use a SPHERE or ELLIPSOID to approximate “IT” as if it were an “IT” instead of a CONDENSATION in the ALL-PERVADING WAVE-FIELD.

This loose practice of approximating relational features in the all-including WAVE-FIELD can be a useful simplification to facilitate language based referencing and discussion, but there is the danger, and it is areal one, that we may become forgetful and start thinking that there spherical geometric shaped CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD are LOCAL AND EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES and once we start THINKING in this way and using LANGUAGE to support our THOUGHTS, we are in effect FRAGMENTING the UNFRAGMENTED WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

PROBLEM:   WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE ALREADY IN THAT LANGUAGE-BASED FRAGMENTING PROBLEM SITUATION, having used language to speak of the COSMOS in terms of a vast multiplicity of MATERIAL BODIES moving about in EMPTY SPACE.   OK, we were influenced to proceed down this BINARY LOGIC based representation path by Democritus and Copernicus on the grounds that it was SIMPLER than employing a QUANTUM LOGIC scheme like the indigenous aboriginals were using where the planets were understood as being made of the same energy as the AESTHER or energizing medium they were included in.

The BINARY LOGIC representation provided a SIMPLIFIED language based means of speaking about the celestial dynamics, simpler than the QUANTUM LOGIC representation which involved the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the MEDIUM is understanding as INCLUDING CONDENSATIONS that are VISIBLE as PLANETINGS in the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING ENERGERIZED MEDIUM, which was formerly the TAO and which we now refer to as the WAVE-FIELD.

The WESTERN CULTURE OPTION to use LANGUAGE with a BINARY LOGIC ARCHITECTURE that SIMPLIFIED the representation was an early practice that STUCK;

“And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language” . —Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

The logic of the SIMPLER LANGUAGE is BINARY LOGIC, which the QUANTUM LOGIC requires a LESS SIMPLE LANGUAGE which captures the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, the INCLUDING MEDIUM being the WAVE-FIELD in which the FIGURES and GROUND are BOTH SEPARATELY DISTINGUISHABLE BUT NOT ONTOLOGICALLY INDEPENDENT, as is the physical relationship between CONDENSATIONS in a FLUID and the FLUID (the FLUID in this case being the WAVE-FIELD and the CONDENSATIONS being MATERIAL FORMS).

As ‘systems scientists’ have shown, the MATERIAL FORMS in the WAVE-FIELD are not INDEPENDENT of ONE ANOTHER since they are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.  Thus it makes NO SENSE to DECLARE A FORM ‘INDEPENDENT”, on the basis of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes it to be possessed of ITS OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING AND DEVELOPMENT, whether it be a ‘TOWN’ or a ‘PERSON’ and undertake to IMPROVE THE CONDITION of that SO-CALLED ‘INDEPENDENT’ relational form on that basis; i.e. to SUBOPTIMIZE the form which APPEARS INDEPENDENT but which is in reality a CONDENSATION of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  The systems sciences have pointed out this ERROR which is rampant within our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT SOCIETY which continues to support a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY and the attempt at SUBOPTIMIZATION.

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

There are no INDEPENDENT SYSTEMS in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao as would be the necessary base for SUBOPTIMIZATION.  Pretending that one INDEPENDENT NATION is doing better than the OTHER INDEPENDENT NATIONS is, in reality, a case of ROBBING PETER TO PAY PAUL.

In Modern physics, as also in the indigenous aboriginal culture, the reality associated with the distribution of material things is relational as in BALANCE and IMBALANCE and it is only the WESTERN CULTURE language based concept of LOCAL AUTHORING that leads to the concept of ENTITLEMENT and thus to systems of distribution of wealth that are ENTITLEMENT based.  This calls on the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING as a measurement basis for differential ENTITLEMENT, and this has degenerated in WESTERN CULTURE to such assessments where the CEO’s of companies were assumed to have 17 times the ‘entitlement’ as average employees in the 1960s which has escalated to where the CEOs are rewarding themselves more than a thousand times the ‘entitlement’ of their average employee in the year 2020.

A study of 300 top US companies released by the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) on Tuesday found the average gap between CEO and median worker pay jumped to 670-to-1 (meaning the average CEO received $670 in compensation for every $1 the worker received). The ratio was up from 604-to-1 in 2020. Forty-nine firms had ratios above 1000-to-1.  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/07/us-wage-gap-ceos-workers-institute-for-policy-studies-report 

The point is NOT that there is a discrepancy in the measuring of relative AUTHORING contributions, the point is that the concept of AUTHORING is BOGUS.  There is no LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.

* * *

The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is a language architecture designed to put the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE TO SLEEP, leaving only the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ‘AWAKE’.

Whether the topic is WESTERN CULTURE corporate wage scales or the EGGSHELL SKULL rule in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, there is dysfunction arising from the common practice of imposing BINARY LOGIC based simplification on material dynamics, where the reality is that QUANTUM LOGIC is operative.

This means that there is NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, as has been pointed out by Nietzsche to be a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.   David Bohm has likewise shown that this DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR based invoking of LOCAL AUTHORING is the source of FRAGMENTATION in our society, not only in our social dynamics by internally in the PSYCHE of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS who are users of our one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY language architecture.  As Bohm says;

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

 

 

The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is a language architecture designed to put the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE TO SLEEP, leaving only the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ‘AWAKE’.

 

The QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD REALITY CORRESPONDS WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE, HOWEVER, OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS THE SOURCE OF SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC BASED REPRESENTATIONS WHICH INTRODUCE A FRAGMENTED-BECAUSE NOTIONALY “LOCALLY AUTHORED” REPRESENTATION OF REALITY.   THE FOLLOWING LISTS SOME OF THE POPULAR BINARY LOGIC DISTORTIONS OF WAVE-FIELD REALITY:

 

-1- The DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR supports the FALSEHOOD of “LOCAL AUTHORING”

There is no such thing as ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’.  We live in an all-including transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD aka ‘the Tao’.

-2- BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR JUDGEMENTS are over-simplification based ONE-SIDEDLY on the MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, hence the ‘THIN SKULL’ rule in WESTERN “JUSTICE” which PROHIBITS the acknowledging of the REAL FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and CONSTRAINS all LANGUAGE-based expression of DYNAMICS to ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS; The person through the PUNCH is thus mistakenly held to be the full and sole author of the collapse of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING FRAGILE SKULL, the SKIER is held responsible for AUTHORING THE AVALANCHE  and the SMOKER is held responsible for AUTHORING the forest fire, IGNORING IN ALL CASES, the ACCOMMODATING FEMALE CONJUGATE and assign ALL AUTHORING responsibility to the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE and thus REDUCING REALIT, or in other words inventing a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is based on MALE-ASSERTING ONLY, thus OBSCURING the real influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

-3- The introduction of the BINARY LOGIC concepts of AUTHORS OF GOOD/CONSTRUCTIVE WORKS and AUTHORS OF BAD/DESTRUCTIVE WORKS CONSTRAINS ALL PHENOMENA TO THESE TWO OPPOSIGING CATEGORIES, IGNORING (DROPPING OUT) understanding in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of relational BALANCE and IMBALANCE.  EXPLANATION IN ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING TERMS, OBSCURES the reality that unfolding events are in general due to FEMALE ACCOMMODATING whereas MALE ASSERTING is only “APPEARANCE” (Schroedinger’s “SCHAUMKOMMEN”).  For example, in the general cause of relational dissonance, a local eruption of violence derives from a long chain of relational dissonances which ultimately manifests through someone or something; i.e. a LIGHTNING ROD or CONDUIT that is, in WESTERN CULTURE, MISTAKENLY IDENTIFIED AS THE LOCAL AUTHOR of the action or development.  In Indigenous Aboriginal cultures as in Modern physics and WAVE-FIELD understanding, the LOCALLY MANIFESTING ACTION is the EXPRESSION of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) DYNAMICS, hence the need recognized in indigenous aboriginal communities, for the “LEARNING CIRCLE” to develop understanding of how relational tensions in the social collective, which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, can be the source of LOCAL and EXPLICIT ERUPTIONS OF VIOLENCE that manifest through a LOCAL and EXPLICIT “LIGHTNING ROD” that is NOT the “AUTHOR” of the EVENT but the “CONDUIT” through which relational tensions find a path to overt expression.  Nietzsche uses the example of “LIGHTNING FLASHES” to illustrate how the LANGUAGE based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR can be (and is ‘popularly’) used to generate the IMPRESSION or APPEARANCE of LOCAL AUTHORING where there is no such LOCAL AUTHORING; i.e. where the AUTHORING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational as in a relational matrix under tension where the TENSIONS find a pathway for release that is FALSELY CONSTRUED as a LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE.  While MALE ASSERTING is LOCAL AND EXPLICIT (MECHANICAL), FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (ACTUAL WAVE-FIELD) AUTHORSHIP is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  The THIN SKULL RULE DENIES THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING as an ACTIVE INFLUENCE and makes it out to be a PURELY PASSIVE PARTICIPANT, as in the invoking of a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, creating a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which MALE ASSERTING is seen as the FULL AND SOLE ACTIVE AGENCY.

REGARDLESS of the REAL NON-PASSIVE INFLUENCE OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (which is FAR from the popular modeling of the FEMALE AS A PASSIVE EMPTY SPACE, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE HAS ADOPTED THE STANCE THAT MALE ASSERTING WITHIN AN EMPTY SPACE (the SUBSTITUTE REALITY THAT DISMISSES THE REAL WAVE-FIELD POWER OF FEMALE ACCOMMODATING) IS THE ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’.  This DROP-OUT OF THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGASTE is the source of the evident MISTAKES in LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATION in that EMPTY SPACE is used to BACKFILL for the UNREALISTIC DROPOUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE. 

BY REMOVING THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE FROM LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION, THE REPRESENTATION OF ALL DYNAMICS IS LEFT UP TO THE NOTION OF MALE ASSERTING, FORCING THE ‘KLUGE’ OF THE BINARY LOGIC OPPOSITES, both of which involve MALE ASSERTING but in this case the combination of a regular MALE ASSERTING in conjunction with an INVERTED MALE ASSERTING, a DOING and an UNDOING or in other words, MALE ASSERTING CONSTRUCTION and MALE ASSERTING DESTRUCTION, this BINARY LOGIC COMBINATION SEVERING AS A SIMPLE, ALL MALE-ASSERTING, NO FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” in place of “WAVE-FIELD REALITY”.

This BINARY LOGIC CONSTRUCTION AND DESTRUCTION COMBINATION serves as a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE FOR THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE wherein the NEGATIVE MALE ASSERTING FILLS IN FOR THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING.    Thus, for example, the THIN SKULL RULE constrains the representation by PROHIBITING THE USE OF FEMALE ACCOMMODATING so that we must explain all action in MALE ASSERTING TERMS, even to the point of GIVING AUTHORSHIP CREDIT to a weak MALE ASSERTING PUNCH for a MASSIVE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, but where our WESTERN CANGUAGE REPRESENTATION blithely represents the event as being FULLY AND SOLELY MALE ASSERTING BASED.

The LESS SIMPLE UNDERSTANDING OF DYNAMICS is in the WAVE-FIELD terms of relational IMBALANCE and BALANCE.  BUT BALANCE AND IMBALANCE are QUANTUM LOGIC based.  BUT if there is an AIDS EPIDEMIC, we may speak in the flat measures MALE ASSERTING TERMS OF THE GROWTH OF CONDOM PRODUCTION as if this is a MALE ASSERTING PHENOMENON, and we can visit the factories and AFFIRM that what is going on is the MALE ASSERTING FULLY INTENTIONAL AND DELIBERATE INCREASE IN CONDOM PRODUCTION.  This is the BINARY LOGIC INTERPRETATION where we may ask; DID THE CONDOM FACTORY INCREASE ITS PRODUCTION OR NOT?  This bring out the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING.   As in Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE SYSTEMS OF LOGIC, this is one of those cases where we can capture what is going on in terms of the GROWTH OF PRODUCTION of CONDOMS and while this is TRUE, it is INCOMPLETE because it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which is like focusing all our attention on the AVALANCHE without mentioning the HOLE that is OPENING UP on the side of the mountain, AND IF WE DID ACKNOWLEDGE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE we would then be describing TRANSFORMATION which is the CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING AND MALE ASSERTING as in the WAVE-PEAK and WAVE-TROUGH transformational dynamic.

NOTE THAT WHILE THE REAL DYNAMIC HERE IS TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE, Language allows us to reduce this to the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC TERMS of SUPPLY and DEMAND which is MATERIAL QUANTITY TRANSACTION BASED.

In the case of the AVALANCHE, a certain quantity of rocks and gravel and sand was moved from LOCATION A to LOCATION B and that is the BARE-BONES MALE ASSERTING VIEW which fails to mention the big HOLE that OPENS AND changes the MOUNTAINSIDE TOPOGRAPHY and the big MOUND that changes the whole VALLEY TOPOGRAPHY.

WE HAVE TWO WAYS TO APPROACH THIS WITH LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION; (A) USE REPRESENTATION THAT ORIENTS TO THE DIFFERENCE; i.e. the LOCAL HOLE and The LOCAL MOUND, or (B) USE REPRESENTATION THAT ORIENTS TO THE TRANSFORMED LANDSCAPE which orients to the relational BALANCE as in how much is over here relative to how much is over there, both here and there referring to the transforming relational continuum aka the transforming landscape.

The REPRESENTATION in terms of HOLES and MOUNDS is representation that is DIFFERENCE BASED as in DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS and when we orient to differentials, we LOSE TRACK OF WHAT IS GOING ON WITHT THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE since the LANDSCAPE is CONTINUOUS and has an OVERALL GESTALT and while we may constrain our LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION to the DIFFERENTIALS, the OVERALL GESTALT is meanwhile UNDERGOING TRANSFORMATION and this overall GESTALT is something we are INCLUDED IN and we can FEEL OUR INCLUSION IN IT and this is NOT COVERERED by the PIECEMEAL DIFFERENCES such as the HOLES that associate with our EXCAVATIONS for material extraction and the MOUNDS constituted by our CONSTRUCTION.

SO WHICH IS THE ‘REALITY’?  ARE THE DIFFERENTIALS REAL; i.e. the HOLES and the MOUNDS? … or is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (GESTALT) REAL?

THE DIFFERENTIALS bring to mind Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE SYSTEMS OF LOGIC, in other words the holes and mounds are REAL in the sense of LOGICALLY TRUE BUT INCOMPLETE.

The OVERALL GESTALT that is the overall sense-impression of the INTEGRAL WHOLE of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is LESS INCOMPLETE in the same sense as QUANTUM LOGIC (balance and imbalance) is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC (EITHER is OR is not), which raises the question as to ‘what sort of trouble we might get into’ as we build our ‘linguistic coverage of reality’ based on the separate pieces constituted by the DIFFERENTIALS; i.e. the HOLES and the MOUNDS WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE OVERALL RELATIONAL BINDING OF THE ALL-INCLUDING NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (WAVE-FIELD) GESTALT.  RECONSTRUCTING THE GESTALT by way of bringing together and INGRATING the SUM OF THE PARTS is NOT going to bring the GESTALT BACK TO LIFE because by FOCUSING on the LOCAL HOLES and LOCAL MOUNDS we have used DIFFERENTIATION which DROPS OUT the long wavelength components of the WAVE-FIELD GESTALT and retains only the LOCAL and EXPLICIT HOLES and the MOUNDS as in our TERSE and EXPLICIT language based representations.

SO, HOW DO WE ANSWER THIS FOLLOWING QUESTION:

WHICH IS THE ‘REALITY’?  ARE THE DIFFERENTIALS REAL; i.e. the HOLES and the MOUNDS? … or is the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (GESTALT) REAL?

WE KNOW WHAT THE ANSWER IS, the ALL-INCLUDING TRANFORMING LANDSCAPE GESTALT IS REAL so the practical question is; HOW BADLY COMPROMISED IS THE SUBSTITUTE REALITY WE DEVELOP FROM LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION INTO HOLES AND MOUNDS or in other words, POSITIVE and NEGATIVE MALE ASSERTING DIFFERENTIALS from which the FEMALE INTEGRATING GESTALT HAS GONE MISSING?

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are currently LIVING OUT THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION as we use AS OUR OPERATIVE REALITY, the REPRESENTATIONS of our SIMPLIFIED MALE ASSERTING ONLY LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS.

 

-4- “SIDE-EFFECTS” of the LANGUAGE BASED SIMPLIFYING REDUCTION OF WAVE-FIELD REALITY TO BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY INCLUDE THE CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL MINDSET SPLIT

The EGO-CONCEPT derives from the BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING.  While LOCAL AUTHORING IS ILLUSION, there is a LANGUAGE GENERATED IMPRESSION within THE WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE that the unfolding reality is being LOCALLY AUTHORED.  This is a MISTAKE but within the LANGUAGE SUPPORTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which LOCAL AUTHORING is IMPLIED, THERE IS A BINARY LOGICAL DIVISION INTO the CONSERVATIVE VIEW OF LOCAL AUTHORING WHEREIN THE INDIVIDUAL IS SEEN AS THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF LOCAL AUTHORING and the LIBERAL VIEW OF LOCAL AUTHORING WHEREIN THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE IS SEEN AS THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF LOCAL AUTHORING (BOTH ARE WRONG SINCE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘LOCAL AUTHORING”).

In Modern physics as in Indigenous aboriginal cultures, THERE IS NO ASSUMPTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING; i.e. instead of the BINARY LOGIC based REPRESENTATION; e.g., ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING’ (as if split apart from the general landscape), we have the  QUANTUM LOGIC REPESENTATION: “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’

Once there is an undertaking to apply the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING as a way of REPRESENTING the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC, the AMBIGUITY arises of the type; DOES THE HURRICANE (male) STIR UP THE ATMOSPHERE (female) or DOES THE ATMOSPHERE (female) STIR UP THE HURRICANE (male).

 [[These two binary opposite choices OVERLOOK the BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING THIRD; i.e. these binary opposites are what occurs within the solar energy field (we haven’t mentioned the SUN) where TWO POLAR OPPOSING things we are talking about are like the high pressure and low pressure cells that arise in the atmospheric from the all including SOLAR IRRADIANCE.  The SOLAR IRRADIANCE is the INCLUDING THIRD that explains the BINARY OPPOSITES of the HIGH PRESSURE MALE ASSERTING AGENCY and the LOW PRESSURE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING AGENCY)]] The INCLUDING THIRD leads us to the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD view.

What happens here (with the question of whether HURRICANE of ATMOSPHERE is the AUTHOR of the stirring up) is that our WESTERN CULTURE has seen a TRADEOUT in which a COLLECTION of MALE ASSERTING AGENTS can be used to SUBSTITUTE FOR THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.  This is like the liberal saying “It takes a whole community to raise a child”  as contrasts with the conservative ‘one bad apple spoils the barrel’.

What is going on here is a RESISTANCE to LETTING GO of the MALE ASSERTING AUTHOR notion but moderating it as in conceding that it takes many small streams to create a RAGING RIVER, but without going so far as to ACKNOWLEDGE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING INFLUENCE OF THE VALLEY.   There is NO MENTION OF INDUCTIVE VALLEY INFLUENCE in our WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS with their DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR “LOCAL AUTHORING” STRUCTURES. That is, EVERYTHING is MALE ASSERTING BASED (BINARY LOGIC BASED) in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE; i.e. the BINARY LOGIC ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ substitutes for the QUANTUM LOGIC; ‘there is TOWNING in the transforming landscape’.

There is a POLITICAL POLARIZING SPLIT (the CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL POLARIZING SPLIT) associated with choice between LOCAL AUTHORING by way of LOCAL MALE-ASSERTING BY INDIVDIUALS (conservative) and LOCAL AUTHORING by way of LOCAL MALE-ASSERTING by SOCIAL COLLECTIVES (liberal). NOTA BENE, there is no acknowledgement of FEMALE ACCCOMMODATING IN EITHER OF THE CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL “LOCAL AUTHORING” SCHEMES, the difference is simply in the question of whether the LOCAL AUTHORING originates in the INDIVIDUAL or the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE..

The POLARIZING DISPUTE where each side uses all their intellectual effort to support their OPPOSITE VIEWS on the ONE AGREED THEME OF LOCAL AUTHORING; i.e. whether directed by an INDIVIDUAL COMMANDER IN CHIEF who organizes by issuing orders or whether directed by the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE that knows how to employ orchestrating techniques to cultivate harmoniously focused collective action.

ONE CAN GET LOST IN DEBATING THE RELATIVE MERITS OF THIS CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL POLAR OPPOSITE CHOICE unless one wakes up to the reality that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING which is what the argument is all about that leads to the DIVISION into MUTUALLY POLARIZED CONSERVATIVE — LIBERAL RACTIONS.   THIS UNDERSTANDING that there this SPLIT is BASELESS comes with the acknowledging of the SUBSUMING OF SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC with the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC reality with its ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD structure.  It’s NOT ABOUT ‘whether LOCAL AUTHORING must work by way of the CONSERVATIVE ORGANIZING STRUCTURE or must work by way of the LIBERAL ORGANIZING STRUCTURE because THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING.

* * *

The QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD REALITY CORRESPONDS WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE, HOWEVER, OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS THE SOURCE OF SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC BASED REPESENTATIONS WHICH INTRODUCE A FRAGMENTED-BECAUSE NOTIONALY “LOCALLY AUTHORED” REPRESENTATION OF REALITY.   THE FOLLOWING 4 POINTS DOCUMENT POPULAR BINARY LOGIC DISTORTIONS OF WAVE-FIELD REALITY:

 

* * *

SUMMARY:

The TITLE of this essay; The Western Culture SLEEPWALKER CONFEDERACY points to the fact that while we live in a WAVE-FIELD REALITY in which we are included CONDENSATIONS which thus calls for a QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM) representation, Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE has DROPPED OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and constrains its representations to one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY constructions.  “THE SLEEPWALKER” refers to how our LANGUAGE puts us to sleep and has us WAKE UP into a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is BINARY LOGIC based.   While our sense-experience primed intuition informs us that we are included in a transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao, our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC representations use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to BREAK DOWN the transforming relational continuum into separate parts, creating A SUBSTITUTE REALITY that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have been using as our “OPERATIVE REALITY”.  OF COURSE, while the stories of our MALE ASSERTING construction of TOWNS and HIGHWAYS etc. are LOGICALLY TRUE, they are INCOMPLETE and they do not mention the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS that is OPENING UP SPACE TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROWING TOWNING (this is what happens in a SPHERICAL SPACE and it is otherwise known as TRANSFORMATION and TRANSFORMATION is innately LESS SIMPLE than GROWTH.

As SLEEPWALKERS, we live in a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is BINARY LOGIC BASED, where the concepts of LOCALLY AUTHORED GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services SEEM REAL.  And within this simplified BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, things ARE AT LEAST ‘LOGICAL’ with the proviso given by Goedel’s Theorem that ALL FINITE SYSTEMS OF LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE.  So it is NOT SUFFICIENT to speak of ‘THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN’ although it is a TRUE STATEMENT.  It is NOT SUFFICIENT because of the INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE LOGIC PROPOSITIONS and here we can INTUIT, from our sense-experience, that the indigenous aboriginals are correct in their corresponding language capture of reality in the terms of ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is a QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTATION that TRANSCENDS the MORE SIMPLE concept of GROWTH and acknowledges the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS that is CONJUGATE with the MALE ASSERTING GROWTH of the TOWN.

Here we can see the PITFALLS in BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION as pointed out by Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE SYSTEMS OF LOGIC. When we are imagining ourselves, with the help of BINARY LOGIC, to be INDEPENDENT BEINGS moving about and interacting with OTHER INDEPENDENT BEINGS in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, WE ARE A CONFEDERACY OF SLEEP WALKERS.  The ABSTRACTIONS OF BINARY LOGIC based language, in this case, are riding roughshod over our natural sense-experience grounded intuitions of our inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, wherein, as the systems sciences allow, we are living in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence”.

* * *