PREAMBLE:  LOCAL AUTHORING is WESTERN CULTURE MYTH that comes from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche pointed out, and it is SECURED BY ‘PRIDE’.   For example the PRIDE of BELONGING to something or of SOMETHING BELONGING to ONE-SELF (e.g. one’s child) is characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE noun-based inguistic conceptualizing.

Noun-based language: a language, such as English, that relies on nouns (people, places, or things) to convey meaning. Verb-based language: languages, such as Dee- ni’ and other Indigenous languages, rely on verbs (actions) to convey meaning.

In indigenous aboriginal verb-based languages, there are only RELATIONAL DYNAMICS as if in an all-including transforming relational continuum or ‘wave-field’ wherein there is NO LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT and thus NO PRIDE in the sense of INDEPENDENT AUTHORING or OWNERSHIP of actions or developments, since unfolding developments in a relational continuum derive from ‘all my relations’ (mitakuye oyasin).

David Bohm notes that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES support NOUN based CONCEPTUALIZATION which is FRAGMENTATIVE (and OBSCURATIVE).

What is needed, Bohm argued in his book Wholeness and the Implicate Order, is a new sort of language, one based on processes and activity, transformation and change, rather than on the interactions of stable objects. Bohm called this hypothetical language the “rheomode.” It is based primarily on verbs and on grammatical structures deriving from verbs. Such a language, Bohm argued, is perfectly adapted to a reality of enfolding and unfolding matter and thought.

 

David Bohm had not known when he wrote of that concept that such a language is not just a physicist’s hypothesis. It actually exists. The language of the Algonquin peoples was developed by the ancestors specifically to deal with subtle matters of reality, society, thought, and spirituality.

 

A few months before his death, Bohm met with a number of Algonkian speakers and was struck by the perfect bridge between their language and worldview and his own exploratory philosophy. What to Bohm had been major breakthroughs in human thought — quantum theory, relativity, his implicate order and rheomode – were part of the everyday life and speech of the Blackfoot, Mic Maq, Cree and Ojibwaj.” – F. David Peat, ‘Blackfoot Physics’

 

There is NO SENSE OF “LOCAL AUTHORING”, in either MODERN PHYSICS or in indigenous aboriginal langauge-based conceptualization, nor in Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.  In what we call ‘OUR OWN ACTIONS or the ACTIONS of ‘OUR COUNTRY’, … EVENTS are NOT, in sense-experience reality, LOCAL and EXPLICIT as we present them with the DOUBLE ERROR combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  In fact, THEY ARE NOT EVEN ‘EVENTS’ but are relational BOILINGS UP within the unbounded web of relations that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).  What is LOCAL and EXPLICIT are the INTELLECTUAL REDUCTIVE FRAGMENTATIVE ABSTRACTIONS of DUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LANGUAGE while what is affirmed in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT sense-experience grounded FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE is the all-including WEB of RELATIONS aka the all-including WAVE-FIELD in which PEOPLE are CONDENSATIONS.

IN WESTERN CULTURE, HOWEVER, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR gives foundational grounding to “PRIDE” and the EGO-INFLATING that comes with PRIDE OF ACHIEVEMENT or PRIDE OF POSSESSION, the ‘FULFILMENT of an operation or task’.  As is evident, LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES such as those employed in WESTERN CULTURE that develop concepts such as ‘the COMPLETION OF A TASK’ imply, erroneously, both FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.  The highway signs that say, on their flip sides, ENTERING THE TOWN OF PLEASANTVILLE and LEAVING THE TOWN OF PLEASANTVILLE leave the ‘reader’ with the impression that there exists (as long as sufficient influential people feign belief in it) is a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing-in-itself.

This ‘announcement’ called ‘the TOWN of PLEASANTVILLE’ which is intellectual abstraction that the four-leggeds and winged and crawling ones do not have to deal with; i.e. they do not have to deal with the psychological FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM that NOUN-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING BRINGS WITH IT (i.e. the PRICE of using a SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that uses INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS that DROP OUT MENTION of the basic RELATIONAL nature of the world of our sense-experience of inclusion therein).  This is a huge pice that is paid for by submission to FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM are the RESULT of our WESTERN CULTURE USE of SENSE-EXPERIENCE-SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  For example, while our sense-experience is of “INCLUSION IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD’, … as sense-experience affirmed reality which “IS CAPTURED” in indigenous aboriginall FLOW-BASED LANGUAGES which are capable of sharing the equivalent of “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  (which is the FULL sense-experience affirming androgynous wave-field reality).

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES that employ BEING-based CONCEPTUALIZATION schemes REDUCE the QUANTUM LOGIC relation associated with material CONDENSATIONS of the all-including fluid WAVE-FIELD, and SUBSTITUTE the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC relation associated with ABSOLUTE MATERIAL OBJECTS notionally moving about and interacting within an ABSTRACT ABSOLUTE, EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

This change in the INFORMING of our physical actions, SHIFTING from our sense-experience of INCLUSION in NATURE’S QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD PLENUM WITH ITS MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, over to an INFORMING by INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based BINARY LOGIC SIMPLIFICATION which ENGINEERS LINGUISTIC SIMPLIFICATION BY DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE ENTENT.

THE “PSYCHOLOGICAL COST” of this WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DROP-DOWN from QUANTUM LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION to BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION is FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, neither of which occur in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedantat where the relational nature of our sense experience of inclusion in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) is captured in our language-based CONCEPTUALIZATION, hence, … ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (wherein everything is in flux) this more complete QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION being employed instead of the WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLIFIED OBJECT-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, ‘‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

To assess the DIFFERENT PERSONAL EMOTIONAL IMPACTS of these different LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, consider the  huge difference in emotional impact of  the QUANTUM LOGIC “THERE IS HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM” as is the understanding of MODERN PHYSICS wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, … AS COMPARED WITH ,…. the emotional impact of the BINARY LOGIC “The HUMAN COMMUNITY IS GROWING , DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services””.

 

It is evident that in the latter BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is in play which implies LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, whereas in the former QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, there is one overall dynamic that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and is referred to as TRANSFORMATION.

Belief in the BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING gives rise to the BINARY LOGIC emotions of EITHER PRIDE OR SHAME depending on the BINARY LOGIC intellectual assessments of the LOCAL AUTHORING as being EITHER GOOD OR BAD, HELPFUL OR HARMFUL, ENRICHING OR IMPOVERISHING.

BELIEF in the QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience affirmed assessment of relational BALANCE/RESONANCE and IMBALANCE/DISSONANCE wherein there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, it is clear that there is no way to UNDERSTAND (in a sense-experience affirmable way) TOWNING out of the context of its QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND INCLUSION of the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM it is INCLUDED IN, in which case the QUANTUM LOGIC relation can be seen as LESS SIMPLE but MORE COMPLETE than the BINARY LOGIC relation since the BINARY LOGIC relation is too simple to capture the less simple GESTALT as the WILDERNESS SHRINKS in conjugate relation to the GROWTH of the TOWN.   NOT MUCH TOWN AND LOTS OF WILDERNESS has a ‘different aesthetic feel to it’ as an overall ‘package’ (GESTALT) than A LOT OF TOWN and a small remnant of WILDERNESS.

As Goedel’s Theorem WARNS US, all finite systems of logic propositions are INCOMPLETE, and in this case, we can say for sure that IT IS TRUE THAT THE TOWN IS GROWING, but it is INCOMPLETE in the sense that there is NOTHING in the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY abstraction of GROWTH that informs us of the SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDED impact of TRANSFORMATION where we INCLUDE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, these two conjugates COMPRISING THE ONE ANDROGYNOUS DYNAMIC OF TRANSFORMATION (where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘wilderness is shrinking’ and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘growing of the development’ are two faces of a single coinage.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is the way things go in a spherical space of finite extent, as contrasts with the BINARY LOGIC relation which is the way things go in a flat space of infinite extent.

THERE ARE HIDDEN ERRORS IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as in the DUMBING DOWN from less simple QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, … to simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (EMPTY SPACE MEDIUM).

 

There is a LOT tied up in this lingistic sleight of hand, including the REDUCTION FROM LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC, by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes JUMP-START MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in in EMPTY SPACE, thanks to the OBSCURANIST DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, as in the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY of the OPENING UP AS IN ‘SHRINKING’ OF THE WILDERNESS in conjugate relation with the GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT of the TOWN.

YES, OUR “LOGICAL PROPOSITION” that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is “TRUE” but at the same time, “IT IS INCOMPLETE” in that it fails to acknowledge that is ALSO TRUE that the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING in which case we are being DECEPTIVE when we employ LOGICAL TRUTHS such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ since such truthful logical propositions fail to report on the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.

THIS GOEDEL’S THEOREM AFFIRMED DECEPTIVENESS IN COMMON LOGIC SHOCKED THE HELL OUT OF MATHEMATICIANS in the 1930’s when GOEDEL PROVED IT, but the message didn’t get out to the masses and stop us all from putting so much FAITH IN, and the DESIGN OF PLANS AND ACTIONS based on LOCAL PROPOSITIONS that always have this INCOMPLETENESS EXPOSURE.  These INCOMPLETENESSES in our LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS are the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM IN WESTERN CULTURE and Bohm writes about FRAGMENTATION but not so much about OBSCURANTISM, although they are both coming from the same source of the INCOMPLETENESS of BINARY LOGIC.

OBSCURANTISM IS, well, MORE OBSCURE than FRAGMENTATION even though it is coming from the same source, the SUBSTITUTING of SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONCEPTUALIZATION [the TOWN is GROWING] for LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based  ANDROGYNOUS CONCEPTUALIZATION [there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE]… is OBSCURED by the fact that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION is the VISIBLE, TANGIBLE because LOCAL, EXPLICIT component of complex WAVE-FIELD reality even though THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT IS ONLY ‘APPEARANCE’ or ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ because the real body of WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  In order to architect language based conceptualizing in this case, the language must avoid all dependence on the absolute, local, explicit material, and thus must employ NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (relations) IN THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in the linguistic conceptualizing.  For example there is HUMANING in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, … which brings us full circle back around to how WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING is SCREWING UP OUR PSYCHE.

 

There is a CIRCULAR ECONOMY in WESTERN CULTURE that REWARDS those that SUPPORT LINGUIST CONCEPTUALIZATIONS that while BOGUS like SELF-PROCLAIMED BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT NATIONS that attain notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTED EXISTENCE.

INDEPENDENT NATIONS are ABSTRACTIONS supported by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies the ‘existence’ of a LOCAL THING (e.g. the ‘Independent ‘Nation State’).

These abstractions, which overtly conflict with the world of our sense-experience wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED, PERSIST as we have an EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO THEM.   While life is MORE THAN POSSESSIONS, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed a powerful emotion associated with the PRIDE of POSSESSION.

PRIDE associated with the LOCAL, EXPLICIT and TANGIBLE (e.g. material possessions), …  ‘SWELLS THE HEAD’, …while INSPIRATION coming from the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT and INTANGIBLE ‘FILLS the HEART’.

Recall that indigenous aboriginal mocked the WESTERN CULTURE for its LANGUAGE BASED FRAGMENTING OF REALITY, a FRAGMENTATION that FRAGMENTED HUMANINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM out into a VAST UNBOUNDED EMPTINESS call SPACE.

In our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES, we notice the strong ties arising between PRIDE and the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION and how DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE have set up a FRAGMENTED GRID upon which the COLLECTION of SWOLLEN EGOS have been giving themselves their own separate LAUNCHING PADS to STRUT THEIR STUFF, a blatant FRAGMENTATIVE/OBSCURANTIST “INTELLECTUAL-LINGUISTIC” denial of our sense-experience affirmed global interconnectedness and interdependence wherein;

This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”

There is sufficient evidence here, then some, to establish that the reality we share oursense experience of inclusion in, which is the same reality AND FOR for MODERN PHYSICISTS like Bohm, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, and others like some of the Systems Sciences investigators, the LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are the same; i.e. they are QUANTUM LOGIC based while the DOMINATING MINORITY of people, due to the GLOBALLY DOMINANT EUROPEAN LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING STANDARD, A BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING STANDARD.

This BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE STANDARD is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, as is written about in this essay.   THIS FRAGMENTATION AND OBSCURATION IS NOT PRESENT IN THE REALITY SHAPING CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE, nor in the REALITY-SHAPING CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of MODERN PHYSICS, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, as elaborated on in by David Bohm and F. David Peat, AS WELL AS BY “CHIEF SEATTLE” in the above note.

NOW, AS WE WATCH THE FRAGMENTATION OF OUR WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES INTO MORE AND MORE SUB-CATEGORIES LIKE JEWS, CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS WHICH BREAK DOWN INTO THEIR SUBCATEGORIES, WHAT DO WE SEE GOIG ON?  THE INTELLECTUAL RENOUNCING OF WHAT OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS INFORMING US, “The earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— OR, IN OTHER WORDS,, THE WORDS OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE; 

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

Suboptimization is where there is DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE of some thing or group together with policies and programs that aim to IMPROVE the health and overall ‘well-being’ of the NATION or GROP that has been ‘DECLARED INDEPENDENT’.  We know one thing for sure, if Modern physics, Systems sciences, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta are on target with their understanding that we live in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence”  then we can expect, in our operative world dynamic, FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM because that is what our WESTERN CULTURE use of our BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, as our OPERATIVE REALITY, is GOING TO DO TO US; i.e. “IS DOING TO US”.

We have FRAGMENTATION because almost all of our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are operating as if the reality we are living in is the BINARY LOGIC based pseudo-reality of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.  We have OBSCURANTISM because even though the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE of the all-including WAVE-FIELD REALITY is overtly mainifesting; e.g. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS that is conjugate with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH of the TOWN, … WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SPEAK OF THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN as if that were REALITY.

It may be ABSTRACT BINARY LOGIC BASED INTELLECTUAL REALITY WHERE WE GET AWAY WITH DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE because we are forgetting Goedel’s Theorem which warns us that all finite LOGIC PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ are “INCOMPLETE”, and the DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, which we are DROPPING OUT, is NO SMALL DEAL, because only if we acknowledge BOTH IN CONJUGATE CONTEXT do we understand that what is going on IS ‘NOT GROWTH” of this and ‘NOT SHRINKING’ of that,but OVERALL TRANSFORMING that is ALL-INCLUDING, EVERYWHERE AT THE SAME TIME as is the nature of the ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

 

 

From the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING there is consistency with DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE, and all of this is PUT DOWN by the Systems Sciences that use the term ‘the Name of the Devil is Suboptimization.

PRIDE is an intoxicating high that often associates with the FALSE notion of LOCAL AUTHORING which is a WESTERN CULTURE EXPOSURE that comes by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.   The foundations for this DELUSION are put in place by DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE which gives synthetic legitimacy to those making the declaration.

Declarations of Independence GO HAND-IN-HAND with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that sets up the ABSTRACTION of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS’ where there is NO SUCH THING since we live in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence, aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD”

The DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE is a formal announcement of the intention to use THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING, the new NAME DISTINGUISHING YET ANOTHER FRAGMENT, THE NEW LOCAL AUTHOR, INCREASING THE FRAGMENTATION and concretizing the deal with new NATIONAL ANTHEMS where an oath is worn (but only by the two-leggeds since that is the price of residency status, since people began buying and selling pieces of the PLENUM and where military presence was the only inhibitor to a claim-staking gold rush.  Once established, the colonizing armies who were playing musical chairs with the properties traditionally inhabited by long-time ‘local residents’ recast themselves as anti-theft police, the police forces having pulled the plug on the musical chair game, the timing for the freeze having been chosen by the currently most successful and most powerful of the colonizers (‘La raison du plus fort est toujor la meilleure’)

Since this was originally intended to be a PREAMBLE, I will stop it here and now, on the day that the Israeli’s under Netanyahu are in the middle of the throes of BINARY LOGIC based conflict where the usual POLARIZATION is manifesting which has been built into Judaic-Christian-Islamic BINARY LOGIC based linguistic conceptualization, even as the QUANTUM LOGIC linguistic conceptualizing of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC terms of balance/imbalance and/or resonance/dissonance.  In this QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, there are no endless see-saw reversals of the BINARY OPTIONS of GOOD and EVIL in LOCAL, EXPLICIT FORM based on the presumption of LOCAL AUTHORING by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which by the way, is playing the foundational role in the concept of PRIDE which has been the mainstay of FRAGMENTATION into notionally ‘INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS’.

The DROPPING OUT, in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of the conceptualizing capability of INSPIRATION which is FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING, is what has left us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS with a SIMPLE one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conceptualizing scheme, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE having turned the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE INTO A PUMPKIN of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

* * * 

 

 

We live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, a WAVE-FIELD dynamic which is ANDROGYNOUS, having BOTH FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING … AS WELL AS … MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING influences.   For example, THE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWING OF THE TOWN … is, at the same time, … THE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS.

These TWO developmental approaches are co-contributors to TRANSFORMATION as when there is a SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS … IN CONJUGATE RELATION… with the GROWING of DELIBERATELY DEVELOPED TOWNS..

Transformation can bring with it an overall change in GESTALT.  For example, for those animals whose survival depends on finding shelter from their predators, their security may take a sudden DROP if conditions change so that there are no more ‘hollow logs’ to protect small animals ‘of prey’ from their predators, or no more vesicular rocks that povide hiding places for insects to protect them from larger animals such as bears.

The point I want to explore is our differing INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL (and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta) VERSUS WESTERN CULTURE assumptions about CONSCIOUSNESS and how it impacts our LANGUAGE based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING.

For example, for indigenous aboriginals and also MODERN PHYSICS, CONSCIOUSNESS is a property of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD while in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, CONSCIOUSNESS IS SOMETHING ‘LOCAL’  THAT SUPPORTS THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING DYNAMICS OF ‘THE INTELLECTUALIZING BRAIN’.

It is possible, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF ‘REALITY’, to DIVIDE ‘the CREATION’ up into the CONSCIOUS (e.g. HUMANS) and UNCONSCIOUS (e.g. ROCKS), however, in indigenous aboriginal cultures as in MODERN PHYSICS, the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD is a FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS.

“For most of human history, the word ‘consciousness’ was generally taken to indicate not the sort of individual awareness to which the word now refers, but rather a universal entity variously named Atman, Brahman, Allah, Jehovah, God, the Unmoved Mover (Aristotle), Absolute Spirit (Hegel), or any number of other names according to who was writing about it.” — Dr. Susan Pockett, University of Auckland

MODERN PHYSICS suggests that the source of all matter and motion and thus the organizing which develops therein is the WAVE-FIELD which is very much aligned with the pre-Darwinian theory and to Nietzsche’s ‘anti-Darwin’ thinking.

Nietzsche’s view was that Darwin’s theory was ANTHROPOMORPHIST as it is clearly based on one-sided male asserting/actualizing dynamics, dropping out the female accommodating/enabling wave-field conjugate.

The MODERN PHYSICS foundations of living in the transforming relational continuum, as Bohm and F. David Peat have pointed out, agree with indigenous aboriginal conceptualization wherein ‘everything is related’ as with QUANTUM LOGIC wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

The QUANTUM LOGIC relationships involved here support the indigenous aboriginal cultures and many others’ conceptualizing’of ‘consciousness’.

“For most of human history, the word ‘consciousness’ was generally taken to indicate not the sort of individual awareness to which the word now refers, but rather a universal entity

The all-including “energy-charged PLENUM” aka the “WAVE-FIELD” seems to be ‘an’ if not ‘the’ obvious candidate for the job of understanding what we mean by ‘consciousness’

In our understanding of the body as a microbiome or in our understanding of the resonance feature of ‘clustering’ as a LOCAL thing-in-itself (by way of APPEARANCE), we use language to engineer a transfer of notional ‘authorship’ from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational as in ‘there is clustering in the transforming landscape) to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT; e.g the CLUSTER IS GROWING and MOVING TO THE SOUTH, … imputing LOCAL AUTHORING BY AN INDEPENDENT MATERIAL ENTITY, WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE REFERENCE FRAME, …  to a NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT RESONANCE FEATURE IN A QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION WITH the RESONANCE-FIELD (aka WAVE-FIELD) as also the case with the microbiome (microbial assemblage).

Once we have used the abstracting power of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute to a RESONANCE FEATURE in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS habitually do, the notional status of LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and developments, we have traded out a less simple QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING for a simple BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

The clustering “IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which is a relational dynamic, .. BECOMES, by our act of DROPPING OFF the “ING” suffix that supports the QUANTUM LOGIC relational resonance based understanding, the lingistically reduced conceptualization of a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY agent,  We also DROP OFF … “IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, …the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, resituating the now reduced to BINARY LOGIC ‘CLUSTER’, a local material thing-in-itself, into an absolute empty space of infinite extent.

What we have here is a general formula for reducing LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS to SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS and we are doing this when we reduce CONSCIOUSNESS AS A FIELD or “UNIVERSAL ENTITY” THAT INCLUDES NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FORMINGS, to CONSCIOUSNESS AS “INDIVIDUAL AWARENESS” that purportedly evolved in ‘higher order forms of life’, notional independent material beings that ‘use this consciousness’ as they move about and interact in a notional absolute empty space.

 

SUMMARY: Why WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are suffering from FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM

 

“cogito, ergo sum, (Latin: “I think, therefore I am)” dictum coined by the French mathematician and philosopher René Descartes in his Discourse on Method (1637) as a first step in demonstrating the attainability of certain knowledge.

 

PRIDE coming from the LOCAL, EXPLICIT and TANGIBLE, …  ‘SWELLS THE HEAD’, …while INSPIRATION coming from the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT and INTANGIBLE ‘FILLS the HEART’.

 

CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT LOCAL AS IN THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING SENSE OF ‘THE INTELLECTUALIZING BRAIN’.

 

CONSCIOUSNESS IS THE SENSE EXPERIENCING OF INCLUSION IN THE NON-LOCAL ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.  We are NOT the LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS THAT ‘DIFFERENTIATE.’ as in SCATTERING-GATHERING (OOPS! scratch the GATHERING).   WE ARE QUANTUM LOGIC CONDENSATIONS OF THE NONLOCAL TRANSFORMING THAT IS UNDERGOING CONTINUING “INTEGRATION” as in GATHERING-SCATTERING.

Note that if we first DIFFERENTIATE, we FRAGMENT because we have NOT yet put GATHERING in and given it the foundational role (as the all-including energy-charged PLENUM).  INTEGRATION (the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) must precede DIFFERENTIATION (the LOCAL and EXPLICIT).

 

The WESTERN CULTURE BELIEF in CONSCIOUSNESS as in a CONSCIOUS HUMAN is an ABSTRACT CAPABILITY associated with a HUMAN INDEPENDENT is very different from the understanding of CONSCIOUSNESS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  In the former case we are speaking of an ABSTRACT CAPABILITY that is said to be LOCAL and EXPLICIT like a ‘radiant’ CANDLE  notionally situated IN THE INTERIOR of ‘an INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL’ and THIS is a MISTAKE.   CONSCIOUSNESS IS INNATELY “NONLOCAL” and part of nature.  The SIMPLICITY of BINARY LOGIC imposes upon us, the notional existence of “HUMAN BEINGS”, material forms which, while we say they are INDEPENDENT, retain this as an INTELLECTUAL BELIEF, and in WESTERN CULTURE, there are WARS fought based on the PRIDE that people have for their NOTIONAL MEMBERSHIP in imaginary line-bounded social collectives deemed INDEPENDENT STATES, that they have sworn to defend BY GIVING UP THEIR LIVES IN SUPPORTING SUCH ABSTRACT CONCEPTS, if called for.

 

CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT LOCAL AS IN THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING SENSE OF ‘THE INTELLECTUALIZING BRAIN’.

 

CONSCIOUSNESS IS THE NON-LOCAL ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.  We are NOT the LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS THAT ‘DIFFERENTIATE’   WE ARE QUANTUM LOGIC CONDENSATIONS OF THE NONLOCAL TRANSFORMING THAT IS UNDERGOING CONTINUING “INTEGRATION”.

 

We know that when we chop down WILDERNESS to AUTHOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN, we are not simply creating a new FRAGMENT OF REALITY but if our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE only employs the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING in our LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING then we will only have visions in our mind of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONSTRUCTION of the TOWN which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and, at least as far as our language based CONCEPTUALIZATION is concerned there is no FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE because we (our language archtiecture) has DROPPED IT OUT and put EMPTY SPACE in its place.  But what we are DROPPING OUT is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING-ENABLING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is the INTEGRATOR of all CONDENSATIONS as also with the FLOWING in which thereare WHORLINGS.   These WHORLINGS can’t be separated out as if with a SPORTS FISHING NET and stored in a holding tank as they are only APPEARANCES or Schaumkommen (Schroedinger)  AS IS THE CASE WITH ALL MATERIAL FORMS aka CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD.

The WAVE-DYNAMIC is an ANDROGYNOUS GATHERING – SCATTERING wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING GATHERING is in a natural PRIMACY over the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING SCATTERING.  In the androgynous circulation (extruding, subducting) that constitutes the ‘PLANET’ which we can refer to as the PLANETING since it is continually emerging and subducting, the MALE ASSERTING-ACTUALIZING of planetary extrusion is a STRIKING APPEARANCE that catches the eye while the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of SUBDUCTION is OBSCURANTIVE.   Similarly, in focusing on the growth of the town, we cognitively miss the shrinking of the wilderness.  This pitfall of obscurantism plays out in WESTERN CULTURE due to the architecting of language in the one-sided terms of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and in the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING by way of substituting an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

What WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DROPS OUT is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING which is the INTEGRATING INFLUENCE.

What WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE LEAVES IN is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING which is the DIFFERENTIATING (FRAGMENTING) INFLUENCE.  Hence, the TOWN is GROWING.  This exemplifies the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that implies LOCAL AUTHORING.

Indigenous aboriginal language flow-based and thus retains in first priority, the INTEGRATING INFLUENCE.  Example, there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

NOTA BENE:  WESTERN CULTURE social dynamics are FRAGMENTING because WESTERN CULTURE LINGISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is FRAGMENTING.

 

“…[WESTERN] society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

 

As Lao Tzu says;

 

  “Know the male [the differentiator], but hold to the female [integrator]

  

We can work for many years on the construction of the TOWN and by keeping our focus on the male-asserting, we can become FORGETFUL of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the LANDSCAPE, which, in conjugate relation with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, is the source of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

 

WESTERN CULTURE FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM is coming from the FORGETFULNESS of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, a forgetfulness that is brought on by PRIDE and in fact is the ORIGIN of PRIDE.

 

WESTERN CULTURE is undergoing the LANGUAGE based dysfunctions of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM as the result of  INVENTING “CONSCIOUSNESS” AS SOMETHING “LOCAL” WHICH IS THE SEAT OF “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and developments.

 

CONSCIOUSNESS IS NOT LOCAL AS IN THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPT OF ‘THE INTELLECTUALIZING BRAIN’.

 

CONSCIOUSNESS IS THE NON-LOCAL ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.  We are NOT the LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS THAT ‘DIFFERENTIATE.’   WE ARE QUANTUM LOGIC CONDENSATIONS OF THE TRANSFORMING THAT ‘INTEGRATES’.

 * * *

NOTE RE HAMAS and ISRAELI CONFLICT:  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ WE ARE ALL RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).  THERE IS ONLY RELATIONAL RESONANCE AND RELATIONAL DISSONANCE.  Relational Dissonance cannot be resolved by ELIMINATING those involved in DISSONANCE.  That would be the view coming from a reduction to too simple BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION which is SIMPLE EITHER/OR ABSTRACTION based, and a recipe for FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

* * *