Why Western Culture Adherents Need a NEW LANGUAGE!
WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD.
WE AND ALL MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE MAKING A HUGE MISTAKE BY BASING OUR LANGUAGE ON MATERIAL FORMS.
THE NOTION OF MATERIAL FORMS MOVING ABOUT AND INTERACTING IN EMPTY SPACE IS BINARY LOGIC BASED ABSTRACTION.
MODERN PHYSICS AND INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTAT ADHERENTS USE QUANTUM LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE aka VERB-BASED LANGUAGE WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, CONSISTENT WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
AN EXAMPLE OF QUANTUM LOGIC VERSUS BINARY LOGIC IS… ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (THIS QUANTUM LOGIC EXPRESSION IMPLIES A ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION SINCE ‘TOWNING’ IS A FEATURE WITHIN THE ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’), … VERSUS ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING GOODS’ (THIS BINARY LOGIC EXPRESSION IMPLIES AN ‘EITHER/OR’ RELATION SINCE THE ‘TOWN’ IS AN ‘INDEPENDENT’ THING-IN-ITSELF WHICH RELATES TO ITS SURROUNDINGS BY WAY OF ‘INPUTS AND OUTPUTS’ RATHER THAN QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND’ RELATIONS.
THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY IS FRAGMENTATIVE AND USES ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ IN AN UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE OVER ‘INTEGRATION’, HENCE ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ IN PLACE OF ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ WHERE THE FIGURE AND GROUND RELATION IS UNDERSTOOD AS A QUANTUM ‘BOTH/AND’ LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM. THE INCLUDING MEDIUM AKA THE ‘GROUND’ IS THE WAVE-FIELD, THE INCLUDED FIGURE AKA THE ‘FIGURE’ IS A CONDENSATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD/GROUND AS CONSTITUTES THE QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION.
THAT IS, THE QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION IS A BOTH/AND RELATION WHEREIN THE INCLUDING MEDIUM AND THE INCLUDED ‘FIGURE’ ARE ‘SEPARATE’ ONLY IN APPEARANCE, BUT NOT IN SUBSTANCE, IN THE MANNER THAT A WHORLING IN A FLOWING APPEARS TO BE TWO THINGS; I.E. A FIGURE AND A GROUND AS IN OUR INTELLECTUAL “EITHER/OR” BINARY LOGIC BASED UNDERSTANDING, BUT IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE UNDERSTANDING, THE FIGURE IS INCLUDED IN THE GROUND AS IN THE QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION.
IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, A VERY BASIC MISTAKE IS MADE BY ‘GIVING THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION TO BINARY LOGIC’, WHICH PUTS ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ INTO AN UNNATURAL PRIMACY OVER INTEGRATION. FOR EXAMPLE, IN QUANTUM LOGIC TERMS, WE ARE IMPLYING ‘INTEGRATION’ IN SAYING ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ WHILE IN BINARY LOGIC, WE ARE IMPLYING ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ IN SAYING ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRDUDUCING goods’.
NOTA BENE: WESTERN CULTURE’S TACTIC OF GIVING PRIMARY STATUS IN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE TO BINARY LOGIC BASED ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ IS ‘OBSCURANTISM’ IN THAT IT CAPTURES ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE AND ‘DROPS OUT ‘INTEGRATION’ AS COMES WITH THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, … SUBSTITUTING IN ITS PLACE, ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
IN THIS ‘ONE FELL SWOOP’, … THE PRIMARY AUTHORING SOURCE IN LANGUAGE BASED REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING SHIFTS FROM THE ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC TO A ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC AS IF TRANSPIRING IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
THIS IS A ‘DROPPING OUT’ OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE WHICH PLAYS THE ESSENTIAL, PRIMARY ROLE OF ‘INTEGRATION’ WHICH IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, SUPPORTS THE SECONDARY MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC. IN OTHER WORDS, THE WAVE-FIELD HAS AN ALL-INCLUDING NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING PRESENCE WHICH IS THE SOURCE OF THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC, HOWEVER, IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, WE ARE ‘DROPPING OUT’ THE FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING INFLUENCE AND ‘PRETENDING’ (IN ORDER TO SIMPLIFY THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE) THAT WE NEED ONLY ACKNOWLEDGE THE MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC AS IF IT TRANSPIRES IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, IN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED MANNER, ‘END UP WITH’ A LANGUAGE WHICH SPLITS APART THE WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC, CASTS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND PROCEEDS WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF REALITY WHICH ARE SOLELY MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING BASED WHEREIN ABSOLUTE EMPTY INFINITE SPACE IS SUBSTITUTED FOR THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.
SINCE THE INTEGRATION WHICH WAS SUPPLIED BY THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE HAS ‘GONE MISSING’, THE LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS ARE NOW REDUCED TO ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY, WHICH IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION SINCE, IN BEYOND LANGUAGE SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, NOT ONLY IS THERE A FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, BUT IT PLAYS THE PRIMARY FOUNDATIONAL ROLE, SERVING AS THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM WITHIN WHICH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘CONDENSATIONS’ ‘PUSH FORTH FROM’.
WHILE MODERN PHYSICS AND INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS EMPLOY LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES WHICH ARE ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD BASED) WHICH ACCOMMODATE THIS QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION BETWEEN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD AND THE MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, .. WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE HAS BEEN SIMPLIFIED AND REDUCED BY ‘DROPPING OUT’ THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJGUATE AND ‘GOING WITH’ ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE. SO INSTEAD OF THE ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD) “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS USE LANGUAGE WHICH REDUCES THIS TO A NOTIONAL ‘LOCAL AUTHOR BASED ABSTRACTION’; I.E “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING goods and services).
THIS ‘LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION’ COMING FROM LANGUAGE, WHICH NIETZSCHE POINTS OUT IS COMING FROM THE ‘DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ IS A SOURCE OF ‘FRAGMENTATION’ IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE. THIS IS THE KEY TO;
UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EAST AND WEST: … the PROBLEMS in WESTERN LANGUAGE based conceptualizing of REALITY which fails to agree with SENSE-EXPERIENCE.
In our use of this LANGUAGE, as Zen guru ALAN WATTS and others have pointed out, the basic PROBLEM stems from the use of the combination of NAMES and GRAMMAR which impute LOCAL AUTHORING. THIS LOCAL AUTHOR ABSTRACTION IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION in LANGUAGE-based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS which induces FRAGMENTATION in the WESTERN LANGUAGE USER PSYCHE.
“Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”; -but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.” – To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” — Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531
BECAUSE OF THIS LOCAL AUTHOR based FRAGMENTATION PROBLEM THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE BUILT INTO OUR LANGUAGE, it has been suggested, e.g. by Zen author Alan Watts, that we users of ENGLISH and the Common Average European languages that have this problem of introducing FRAGMENTATION into our linguistic conceptualizations and into our psyche, that we shift to using only VERBS and avoid NAMING since the combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR underpins LOCAL AUTHORING which is the source of FRAGMENTATION.
As choosers of a language architecture, we have the ‘other option’, the option taken by indigenous aboriginal cultures and by Bohm and modern physics; i.e. we can design and employ language that conveys meaning in a purely relational manner as with ‘Dances with Wolves’ and ‘there is ‘HUMANING’ in the LANDSCAPING’, … which does not give a foundational role to LOCAL AUTHORING.
This relational language architecture is the choice of Zen, as pointed out by Zen scholar Alan Watts;
As soon as one sees that separate things are fictitious, it becomes obvious that nonexistent things cannot “perform” actions. The difficulty is that most languages are arranged so that actions (verbs) have to be set in motion by things (nouns), and we forget that rules of grammar are not necessarily rules, or patterns, of nature. This, which is nothing more than a convention of grammar, is also responsible for (or, better, “goes with”) absurd puzzles as to how spirit governs matter, or mind moves body. How can a noun, which is by definition not action, lead to action?” —Alan Watts, ‘Book on the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are’
* * *
HOW TO SUMMARIZE: —UNDERSTANDING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EAST AND WEST: … the PROBLEMS in WESTERN LANGUAGE based conceptualizing of REALITY which fails to agree with SENSE-EXPERIENCE
THE PROBLEM, IN A NUTSHELL, IS OUR USING OF LANGUAGE WHICH IMPLIES ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ which is the source of FRAGMENTATION of the PSYCHE and the SOCIAL DYNAMIC. WE SAY ‘THE RUSSIANS ARE THE AUTHORS OF THIS VIOLENCE’, when the reality is that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A LOCAL AUTHOR since we live in (share inclusion in) THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD in which we and all material forms are CONDENSATIONS and are thus in a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION with the all-including WAVE-FIELD, so that THERE ARE NO INDEPENDENT NATIONS or INDEPENDENT HUMAN BEINGS and ‘everything is related’ (MITAKUYE OYASIN).
WE ARE CONTINUALLY ‘INFECTING OUR MINDS’ with FRAGMENTATION coming from our LANGUAGE and in particular coming from our use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING where there is no such thing.
NO, RUSSIA DID NOT ATTACK UKRAINE as our simplifying language asserts. The notion of LOCAL AUTHORING stems from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR and NAMING imputes the abstraction of a LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF and we conflate this with GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS to the abstract NAMING-INSTANTIATED THING-IN-ITSELF, however, in the real world of our sense experience, WE SHARE INCLUSION IN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein the relational forms or humanings are CONDENSATIONS of the ONE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD so that everyone is related (mitakuye oyasin) and the concepts of INDEPENDENCE and LOCAL AUTHORING are language inferred abstractions. In relational dynamics, (e.g. as between CONDENSATIONS in the one all-including WAVE-FIELD) there is relational resonance and relational dissonance BUT THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING, and the roots of emergent STRIFE that shows up as LOCAL HEAD-BUTTING CONFLICT are in general NONLOCAL and RELATIONAL (IMPLICIT), … leading to a philosophy of FORGETTING ABOUT TRYING TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF “WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AUTHORING THIS’, and instead forming a healing circle the aim of which is to restore resonance in the overall relational matrix of community, … SINCE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO GET TO A ROOT SOURCE AUTHORING AGENCY as there is no such thing in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM we share inclusion in.
BUT THE WESTERN CULTURE IS HUNG UP ON BELIEF IN ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ of actions and developments and this belief has been supported by EGO where one uses LANGUAGE that supports the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING’. Alan Watts suggestion of getting rid of the notion of LOCAL AUTHORS (As soon as one sees that separate things are fictitious, it becomes obvious that nonexistent things cannot “perform” actions) MAKES SENSE, but EGO is an anchor that supports the retention of belief in LOCAL AUTHORS.
So, in spite of the blurriness between designations like RUSSIANS and UKRAINIANS, LANGUAGE HAS THE POWER, in the social collective of language users who use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING, to DECLARE THE INDEPENDENCE OF THINGS based on THEIR NAMES, over-riding our sense-experience understanding of ‘mitakuye oyasin’, we are all related due to our common inclusion in the ONE all-including WAVE-FIELD locally punctuated by material CONDENSATIONS which are in a QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH/AND” relation with the all-including WAVE-FIELD.
WHAT’S AT STAKE HERE is whether one’s understanding of STRIFE is in terms of;
-A- The QUANTUM LOGIC terms of RELATIONAL DISSONANCE within a collection of material forms as CONDENSATIONS of the ONE all-including WAVE-FIELD, where the remedy for relational dissonance is the co-cultivating of relational resonance … or
-B- The BINARY LOGIC INTELLECTUAL-CONCEPTUAL ABSTRACTION of a collection of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS sharing inclusion in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT, wherein there is a mix of GOOD BEINGS and BAD BEINGS which calls the GOOD BEINGS into action to ELIMINATE or SUBDUE the BAD BEINGS in a BINARY LOGIC based program of PURIFICATION.
WESTERN CULTURE HAS DESIGNED LANGUAGES WHICH ARE BINARY LOGIC BASED which assume LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments which may be EITHER GOOD OR BAD, and have put systems in place for the REWARDING OF GOOD LOCAL AUTHORING ACTIONS and the PUNISHING OF BAD LOCAL AUTHORING ACTIONS. This is a SIMPLER CONCEPTUALIZATION than the QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING which comprehends dynamics as relational dynamics that can be resonant or dissonant, without there being any identifiable ROOT AUTHORING SOURCE, hence the response to dissonance is actions designed to restore resonance, as in the HEALING CIRCLE of indigenous aboriginals which is supported by the understandings of MODERN PHYSICS. There is no move towards WESTERN CULTURE STYLE PURIFICATIONISM since there is NO ASSUMPTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, emergent events being understood as having long relational roots such as found in the build-up of relational tensions in the social collective where the LIGHTNING ROD that is the ‘evident source’ of HELPFUL or HARMFUL ACTION is the CONDUIT for energies coming from the relational matrix, where the CONDUIT is NOT THE LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE.
WESTERN CULTURE NAME AND GRAMMAR BASED (DOUBLE ERROR BASED) LANGUAGE IS THE SOURCE OF CONTINUING FRAGMENTATION and there is a clear need for MODIFICATIONS to the LANGUAGE of the type suggested by Alan Watts. Without something like this, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUE OUR JOURNEY ON A BUSTRIP TO HELL that is manifest by continuing FRAGMENTATION sourced by the shortfall in our NON-WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE LANGUAGE which is DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (this drop out is the source of FRAGMENTATION).
* * *