ABSTRACT: It APPEARS as if something is playing out in our WESTERN CULTURE social collectives, akin to the “MINER’S CANARY” effect.  THAT IS, WESTERN CULTURE’s LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme has DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate and is GOING WITH ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.   Consider what happens when a LESS SENSITIVE PERSON observes a MORE SENSITIVE PERSON as in the analogy of the MINER’S CANARY.  What the less sensitive observer will see is what looks like a CRAZY bird that keeps banging into the ceiling which ‘looks crazy’ because the less sensitive observer is NOT SENSING the rising TOXICITY in the environment  (e.g. as if in a room that is filling from the floor upwards towards the ceiling, with toxic invisible odorless gas).  What the less sensitive observer sees is a bird that has GONE CRAZY.  COULD THIS BE HAPPENING IN MODERN WESTERN CULTURE.  There is a clue to support that this is the case, in that a sizeable fraction of the populace is in EMPATHY with seemingly ‘out of the blue’ ASSASSINS or would-be ASSASSINS such as LUIGI MANGIONE and THOMAS MATTHEW CROOKS (a would-be assassin who shot at and grazed TRUMP).

If we ‘had it in our heads’ that we lived in a gas-filled environment which seemed steady and unchanging to us LESS SENSITIVE OCCUPANTS but was rightly understood as INCREASINGLY TOXIC by the MORE SENSITIVE (or those more exposed to the rising toxicity) then the erratic behaviour of the MORE SENSITIVE would be seen as ABERRANT BEHAVIOUR by the LESS SENSITIVE who were NOT AWARE OF THE ACTUAL RISING TOXICITY IN THE ENVIRONMENT.  IF LUIGI MANGIONE, THOMAS MATTHEW CROOKS and the rising number of other ASSASSINS, were in some form or fashion, MORE SENSITIVE to rising TOXICITY in our SOCIETY, their violent actions could be understood as attempts to combat the RISING TOXICITY.  But as in the story of the Miner’s Canary, most of us lack the sensitivity to PERCEIVE THE RISING TOXICITY in which case we interpret the VIOLENT RESPONSES OF THOSE THAT DO, to THEIR BEING INSANE.

CLUES that this may be the case in TODAY’S WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES are that there are many people who are SENSING the RISING TOXICITY that COME OUT OF THE WOODWORK and SHOW THEMSELVES, in support of a person that throws themself OVERTLY in a BODY and SOUL committing manner, into a COUNTERATTACK against the RISING TOXICITY; e.g. Luigi Mangione.

LET’S NOT FORGET that in the indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita, there is the understanding that ‘everything is related’ in which case THERE ARE NO ‘BEINGS’ to classify as EITHER good OR bad, as is also the understanding in the QUANTUM LOGIC of Modern physics, in which case there is no equivalent to the PURIFICATIONISM of WESTERN CULTURE where, instead of understanding STRIFE as IMBALANCE for which the remedy is the RESTORING OF BALANCE, the REMEDY for STRIFE is the purificationist ELIMINATING of the BAD ‘BEINGS’.  This is leading to problems generally in the WESTERN CULTURE and particularly in the U.S. where there have been a large number of “MASS SHOOTINGS”.   In Cultures where the understanding is that ‘everyone is related” (mitakuye oyasin), the VIOLENCE is understood as relational dissonance impacting STRANDS IN THE WEB wherein EVERYONE IS INVOLVED in which case RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is aimed are resolving relational dissonance and restoring relational resonance among STRANDS in the WEB. In the mental model of STRANDS IN A WEB, when VIOLENCE ERUPTS, as in a relational WEB, the STRANDS that become casualities are not seen as succumbing within a BINARY LOGIC PERPETRATOR VICTIM context; i.e. indigenous aboriginal justice orients to the restoring of balance and harmony among the STRANDS in the WEB rather that to the ELIMINATING OF ‘GUILTY BEINGS’ as in WESTERN CULTURE justice which is HUMAN “BEING” based where the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR informs us in DOUBLE ERROR (NAMING AND GRAMMAR) terms of the LOCAL AUTHORING or VIOLENCE and KILLING.  

SO, because indigenous aboriginals (and Modern physics) see people in the manner of STRANDS IN THE WEB  (or CONDENSATIONS IN THE PLENUM) wherein EVERYTHING is related, outbreaks of VIOLENCE are understood as being of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) instead of LOCAL and EXPLICIT origin, hence JUSTICE is RESTORATIVE as facilitated by the HEALING CIRCLE where the community comes togather to recultivate harmony and balance among the STRANDS-IN-THE-WEB.  This is consistent with the understanding of mitakuye oyasin (everything is related as with strands in a web) and it is consistent with Modern physics wherein material forms are condensations of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka wave-field.   THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS as INDEPENDENT BEINGS, and thus no IDENTIFICATION of GOOD INDEPENDENT BEINGS and BAD INDEPENDENT BEINGS; i.e. where VIOLENCE/STRIFE erupts in the indigenous aboriginal STRANDS IN THE WEB based community, while incurably problematic STRANDS may be removed, that is the exception.  There is nothing comparable to the WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST PUNISHING AND PURGING OF THE BAD BEINGS and REWARDING AND RETAINING of the GOOD BEINGS.  

While WESTERN CULTURE PIONEERS ADMIRED THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY APPROACH, the WESTERN CULTURE BELIEF IN ‘INDEPENDENT BEINGS’ was in BASIC CONTRADICTION to the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL ‘INTERRELATED and INTERDEPENDENT STRANDS-IN-THE-WEB BELIEF.

 

“To Engels, Morgan’s description of the Iroquois [In Lewis Henry Morgan’s Ancient Society and The League of the Haudenosaunee or Iroquois] was important because “it gives us the opportunity of studying the organization of a society which, as yet, knows no state.”  Jefferson had also been interested in the Iroquois’ ability to maintain social concensus without a large state apparatus, as had Franklin.  Engels described the Iroquoian state in much the same way that American revolutionaries had a century earlier: “Everything runs smoothly without soldiers, gendarmes, or police, without nobles, kings, governors, prefects or judges; without prisons, without trials.  All quarrels and disputes are settled by the whole body of those concerned. . . . The household is run communistically by a number of families; the land is tribal property, only the small gerdens being temporarily assigned to the households — still, not a bit of our extensive and complicated machinery of administration is required. . . . There are no poor and needy.  The communistic household and the gens know their responsibility  towards the aged, the sick and the disabled in war.  All are free and equal — including the women.” — Bruce E. Johansen, Forgotten Founders.

 

THE SENSITIVITY TO INVISIBLE TOXICITY in the ENVIRONMENT INVOKES LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where there can be substance that is BOTH itself AND the energy-charged PLENUM it is included in.  This requires language that goes BEYOND BINARY LOGIC.  BINARY LOGIC can handle the difference between EITHER material bodies OR empty space, but TOXINS bring into play the LOGIC of the INCLUDING THIRD aka QUANTUM LOGIC.  With BINARY LOGIC, we ask only whether the behaviour of the CANARY is NORMAL or ABNORMAL and there is no ‘complicating inquiry’ (not in our BINARY LOGIC user culture) that opens the door to the possibility that there is a CONTAINING AMBIANCE (such as the WAVE-FIELD) i.e. an INFLUENTIAL HABITAT instead of the EMPTY SPACE, that could change the behaviour of the INHABITANT so that in our inquiry into the behaviour of the INHABITANT, we could not limit our inquiry to THE INHABITANT by itself but would have to expand it to include the INFLUENCE OF THE HABITAT on the INHABITANT and the COMBINATION of the TWO.  This requires an investigative logic that goes beyond BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM to QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM which opens our consideration to the possibility of AMBIENT INFLUENCES on CONTENT behaviour.

WE KNOW THAT WE HAVE TO GO BEYOND ANALYZING THE INDIVIDUAL FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THEIR BEHAVIOUR in the case of the combination of A SENSITIVE INDIVIDUAL and a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT SO IT WOULD BE FOLLY TO, IN GENERAL, LIMIT OUR INVESTIGATION OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE CRAZY ACTING INDIVIDUAL, TO THE INDIVIDUAL, because we would then be OVERLOOKING the POSSIBILITY that THE ENVIRONMENT (SOCIAL AMBIANCE or CHEMICAL AMBIANCE) is SOURCING or HELPING TO SOURCE THE INHABITANT BEHAVIOUR.

AUTHOR’S REAL-TIME INTERJECTION: As I write this, the reader may see that I am having trouble with LANGUAGE as to how to handle the AMBIGUITY associated with that part of the dynamic that belongs to the INHABITANT and that part of the dynamic that belongs to the HABITAT in which case I would suggest that there is NEED for a language that HAS NO DEPENDENCY ON ‘BEING’ in which case we would be better off, as Bohm has said, with a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE (e.g. Bohm’s Rheomode or an indigneous aboriginal flow-based langage) whereby we dould AVOID the use of BEING and the complications it brings by way of constraining our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to BINARY LOGIC based SPLITTING APART “INHABITANT” and “HABITAT”. 

Just as it makes sense to speak in the fluid terms of “THE TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, it makes sense, as well, to speak in the fluid terms of “the INHABITINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING HABITAT” where the operative relationship is the BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM, where the INHABITANT or MATERIAL FORM is understood as a CONDENSATION of the HABITAT or ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD).   This is NOT ONLY AN ADMISSION THAT THE LANGUAGE I/WE ARE USING, which is a BEING-based and thus BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE, is TOO SIMPLE and UNABLE TO DEAL WITH the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITIES that characterize our REAL LIFE EXPERIENCE.  OK, it was ME that for reasons of LINGUISTIC expedience, employed the term TOXIC ENVIRONMENT (TOXIC HABITAT) to try to explain changed behaviour in the INHABITANT, however, this difficulty in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING derives from the imposing of the ABSTRACT CONCEPT OF “BEING” as applied not only to INHABITANT but also to HABITAT, unlike indigenous aboriginal languages where one can speak in terms of HUMANINGS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD where the HUMANINGS are “BOTH” themselves “AND” the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM they share inclusion in.  OK, I will close this note without being able to resolve this issue, which is the NEED for a FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which avoids THE ABSTRACTION OF “BEING”; e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING AND HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” (wherein everything is in flux).   Ok, that’s what the writer NEEDS but its WHAT THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE CHOOSES FOR THE COMMON LANGUAGE that establishes the COMMON GROUND (and how logically ‘complete’ that COMMON GROUND is going to be; i.e. BEING based COMMON GROUND is LIMITING while FLOW-BASED COMMON GROUND makes widespread communication possible, and what has been CHOSEN currently, and which REMAINS THE COMMON LANGUAGE is language that gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO ‘BEING’ which GROUNDS THE LANGUAGE in SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC, which is what is making the writing of this note DIFFICULT.

SIGNS of a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT would be where many SENSITIVE people are SECOND GUESSING what the SYSTEM is BLAMING ON THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE MALE ASSERTING INDIVIDUAL that they know from their own SENSE-EXPERIENCE, is being INDUCED by a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT. IN QUANTUM LOGIC, a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING cannot be separated from its FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (they are two sides of the same concept).  Vygotsky in his study of THOUGHT and LANGUAGE affirms that the SCIENTIFIC (local and explicit) and SPONTANEOUS (nonlocal and implicit) are two sides of one CONCEPT; “Though fundamentally different in nature, the development of scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation.”   

ALL OF THE EVIDENCE SUPPORTS the NON-EXISTENCE of LOCAL BEING-based AUTHORING (it is abstraction as in the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR), in which case, blaming VIOLENCE on a “LOCAL AUTHOR”, whether the VIOLENCE of the CEO or the VIOLENCE of his KILLER is misplaced.

* * *

Understanding “HOW” the Popular Support for Killer Luigi Mangione can be explained by common sensitive awareness to rising TOXICITY in the social NORM.

“What we call ‘normal’ (in WESTERN CULTURE), is a product of repression, denial, splitting, projection, introjection and other forms of destructive action on experience” — R.D. Laing

 * * * * * * * * 

 

 

In order to understand the curious phenomenon of widespread public support for Luigi Mangione, in the wake of his cold-blooded killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, it is useful to review the historical evolution of the popular WESTERN CULTURE notion of ’cause and effect’ and its departure from age-older , more universal understandings of how reality unfolds such as “to everything there is a season and a time to every purpose” 

This aphorism is reminding us that we are included in a dynamic THAT IS GREATER THAN OUR OWN INDIVIDUAL POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and development, in which case, we are NOT getting ‘the full story’ by focusing on LOCAL, EXPLICIT events because we are included in a dynamic THAT IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT.  But we commonly use an abbreviated form of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING when we REPORT on ‘what we do’ which BYPASSES the full story of our INCLUSION in something NONLONAL and IMPLICIT which is GREATER than OURSELVES and serves up a REDUCED view in simplified LOCAL and EXPLICIT terms such as ‘We collectied oysters from the beach’.  This DOES NOT MENTION the ‘something greater’ that we are included in that is shaping our behaviour in an OVER-RIDING WAY, and in this case, inducing a rythm into our actions of the afore-mentation type to everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”.

In plain terms, the tide and the elements in general have the upper hand in shaping our human dynamics so that it is OVER-SIMPLIFICATION when we speak DIRECTLY IN TERMS OF ‘WHAT WE DO’, DROPPING OUT the greater reality of to everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”  which puts an over-riding ‘shaping’ on our actions that we DROP OUT when we say, ‘We collected oysters from the beach’, which, by its lack of reporting on our being included in something greater than ourselves, makes is sound as if ‘the earth is our oyster’ that we simply EXPLOIT according to OUR WILL, while the reality is that we are like PUPPETS ON A STRING in our relationship with NATURE’S DYNAMICS that include ourselves and everything else, .. call it the WAVE-FIELD if we like, since Modern physics informs us that we are CONDENSATIONS  OF THE WAVE-FIELD which AFFIRMS the indigenous aboriginal concept of our being STRANDS in the ALL-INCLUDING WEB of Nature.

BUT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE IN A HURRY WITH OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION based messaging system and we want to SPIT IT OUT QUICKLY and CONCISELY and that is why we are in the habit of REDUCING our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY terms, where we say ‘WE ARE CONSTRUCTING A TOWN’…. WITHOUT BOTHERING TO MENTION the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus without bothering to menation the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE in which we are included (an omission that is ‘catching up with us’ as we continue to speak in terms of our CONSTRUCTIONS of things like TOWNS which is NOT REAL since the REALITY includes the SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS and is the OVERALL TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE.

 * * * * * * 

 

In our common WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach, WE ARE CONSTRUCTING SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITIES such as ‘WE ARE CONSTRUCTING A TOWN’ which is just the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and we are DROPPING OUT MENTION of “PART OF REALITY” which is the “FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” conjugate SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS.   We can’t possibly “GROW THE TOWN” without there being a a conjugate “SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS”, as far as what is going on in physical reality, that is.  But as far as our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING goes, we are constructing simplified PSEUDO-REALITIES by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABING conjugate (i.e. the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS) and in this simplified PSEUDO-REALITY, we are pretending that there is only THE TOWN which according to our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “IS GROWING” as if in its own one-sided male-asserting/actualizing right, as if this were happening in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT (this imputing of a new simplified one-sided male asserting/actualizing seudo reality which DROPS OUT the female accommodating/enabling of the SHRINKING WILDERNESS) is standard practice in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, as allows us to speak in such terms as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ without mentioning the conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS.  This DROP OUT is sometimes mentioned in terms of the DEA ABSCONDITA or GODDESS IN HIDING, since it (the female accommodating/enabling conjugate) is, of course, fully present, although NOT IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING wherein we have DROPPED IT OUT so that we can speak in simplified terms such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ as if this were a one-sided male asserting/actualizing dynamic transpiring in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE (forgetting about the conjugate SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS which is now the DEA ABCONDITA).

WHAT DOES ALL THE ABOVE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SOPHISTRY HAVE TO DO WITH LUIGI MANGIONI’S MURDEROUS ACTIONS and the STRANGE PHENOMON OF WIDESPREAD EXPRESSIONS OF PUBLIC SUPPORT?

One way to explore this is review how things look in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES of other cultures, such as the indigenous aboriginal culture’s STRANDS IN THE WEB-OF-LIFE scheme.  In this scheme, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS’ which means there is no such thing as ONE PERSON AUTHORING THE KILLING OF ANOTHER PERSON, as is the WESTERN CULTURE CAPTURE of the Luigi Mangioni – Brian Thompson event.  In the STRANDS in the WEB linguistic conceptualizing, the dynamics are always NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and NEVER “LOCAL and EXPLICIT”.  While we can identify the LOCAL and EXPLICIT event and seize the person “HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN”, we cannot know the AUTHORING SOURCE of the VIOLENCE because of the complex web of interrelations and interdependencies, as is affirmed in MODERN PHYSICS.  Because of this, indigenous aboriginals have developed RESTORATIVE JUSTICE where the response to EMERGENT VIOLENCE IN THE SYSTEM OF interconnected and interdependent STRANDS IN THE WEB is to RESTORE BALANCE and HARMONY and this is approached by way of the HEALING CIRCLE where the social collective comes together in a HEALING CIRCLE to restore balance and harmony in the social relational web.  The basic assumption here is the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where THE STAND (the individual) is, at the same time, THE WEB (social collective), so that the VIOLENT ACTION OF THE STRAND IS UNDERSTOOD AS ‘ORIGINATING FROM THE WEB’ (the social collective the individual manifesting VIOLENCE is included in).  The HEALING CIRCLE aims to resolve the basic SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM which is relational instability in the web that is MANIFESTING through a particular STRAND.

This MAKES SENSE according to our understanding of our sense-experience reality supported by Modern physics, where material forms are understood to be CONDENSATIONS of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka wave-field, hence everything is interrelated and interconnected in which case THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A STRAND THAT IS THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT SOURCE OF ANYTHING because the STRAND and WEB relation is the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM RELATION.  In simple terms the STRAND is BOTH ITSELF and THE WEB IT IS INCLUDED thus its actions and development ARE OF NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) ORIGIN, rather than LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING based on ABSOLUTE MATERIAL BEING ENTITIES in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE which gives the IMPRESSION of ‘INDEPENDENT THINGS’ with THEIR OWN LOCAL and EXPLICIT BEHAVIOUR, and IMPRESSION THAT DERIVES FROM LINGUISTIC ABSTRACTION that is purely INTELLECTUAL and is NOT SUPPORTED by SENSE-EXPERIENCE, yet it has a SIMPLICITY (though UNREAL) that establishes its WESTERN CULTURE POPULARITY.

So, while the indigenous aboriginal and Modern physics understanding is that Luigi Mangioni’s relational status is the STRAND in the WEB status where his VIOLENCE derives from the WEB where the REMEDIATING ACTION seeks to RESTORE BALANCE AND HARMONY IN THE WEB, which even if it included the ELIMINATION of the VIOLENT STRAND IN THE WEB ‘for starters’, … sees the primary remedial action as being RESTORATIVE (restoring balance and harmony in the web) rather than PURIFICATIONIST ELIMINATING of the STRAND “holding the smoking gun” that is merely the CONDUIT and NOT THE AUTHORING SOURCE of the VIOLENCE EXPRESSED THROUGH HIM.

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are supposed to conform to LAWS that are BINARY LOGIC (EITHER OK behaviour OR NOT OK behaviour) applied to the INDIVIDUAL seen as an INDEPENDENT BEING which simplifies the administering of JUSTICE by NOT ACKNOWLEDGING the INTERCONNECTIONS AND INTERDEPENDENCIES as in the STRANDS-in the WEB reality.   This WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST SCHEME “REDUCES” each strand-in-the-web to a NOTIONAL INDEPENDENT BEING which is “DEEMED” THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT, FULLY RESPONSIBLE AUTHOR OF HIS OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS which DIFFERS RADICALLY from the STRAND IN THE WEB understanding wherein actions and developments that manifest in the LOCAL and EXPLICIT STRAND are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT IN ORIGIN, thus calling for RESTORATIVE JUSTICE rather than PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE.

 * * * * * * * 

SUPPORT FOR THIS “INDEPENDENT BEINGS WITH POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING” per the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is STANDARD in WESTERN CULTURE is “LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS” because WESTERN CULTURE’S MODEL OF LOCAL AUTHORING leads to, as Nietzsche has pointed out, EGO INFLATION as people “TAKE CREDIT” for such things as CONSTRUCTING a SHOPPING CENTRE, … WITHOUT, … HAVING to assume RESPONSIBILITY for the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and overall TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE in which they and others are INCLUDED, and this one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and fails to mention the REALITY of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in which we SHARE INCLUSION, is NOW the POPULAR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME in WESTERN CULTURE COLLECTIVES.

NOW WE HAVE, IN THE ABOVE EXPLANATION, the answer to;

 

(A) WHY SO MANY PEOPLE DO NOT SEE THINGS IN THE REALITY-GROUNDED QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH/AND) TERMS OF OUR BEING INDIVIDUAL STRANDS IN AN INTERCONNECTING, INTERDEPENDENT WEB wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).  That is, there are no INDEPENDENT BEINGS with THEIR OWN LOCALLY AUTHORED ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS but THERE ARE INTER-DEPENDENT STRANDS IN THE WEB SUCH THAT THE VIOLENCE OF A PARTICULAR STRAND IS OF NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) ORIGIN, AND VIOLENCE, while LOCAL and EXPLICIT in its EXPRESSION, IS NOT LOCALLY AUTHORED AS IS THE MISTAKEN DOUBLE ERROR OF BEING AND GRAMMAR based MIS-IMPRESSION.

(B) WHY THE PEOPLE DESCRIBED IN (A) SEE LUIGI MANGIONE IN BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC TERMS AS A BAD INDEPENDENT BEING DOING HARM TO OTHER GOOD INDEPENDENT BEINGS.

(C) WHY MANY OTHER PEOPLE (other than those in the (A) category), SEE MANGIONE’S ACTION in the POSITIVE SENSE of CONSTITUTING AN OVERT REBELLION AGAINST ENTRAPMENT AS STRANDS WOVEN INTO A DYSFUNCTIONAL WEB.

 

 

ELABORATION OF POINTS A, B and C; 

What is being BROUGHT TO THE FORE here is differing understanding (LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING) of the same situation using QUANTUM LOGIC (the BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM) rather than the SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC. 

One way to think about this difference is that while our common WESTERN CULTURE HABITUAL WAY OF THINKING is BINARY LOGIC based which has us imagining PEOPLE as INDEPENDENT MATERIAL THINGS moving about and interacting within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, the Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta way of thinking of things is in in terms of our being STRANDS in an INTERCONNECTED, INTERDEPENDENT WEB-OF-LIFE.  This same QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM RELATION where the STRAND is, at the same time, BOTH ITSELF and the WEB it is included in, can equally be expressed in terms of the CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) wherein the CONDENSATIONS are at the same time, “BOTH” themselves “AND” the energy-charged PLENUM they are included in.

If we elect to understand HUMANINGS in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in these QUANTUM LOGIC terms where we are BOTH our “SEEMINGLY INDEPENDENT” LOCAL EXPLICIT material things in ourselves, “AND” we are at the same time, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM we share inclusion in, we are now speaking of the COMPLEX REAL (local and explicit) + IMAGINARY (nonlocal and implicit) WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE.

In understanding eality as the all-including WAVE-FIELD in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS, the primary reality of the WAVE-FIELD is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (e.g. the ‘energy-charged-PLEUNUM’)  within which there are LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS which, like WHORLINGS IN FLOWING, have no ‘LOCAL MATERIAL BEING’ but are “APPEARANCES”, Schroedinger’s “Schaumkommen”.

ACHTUNG! NOTA BENE!:   WESTERN CULTURE gives PRECEDENCE in REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT while indigenous aboriginal cultures, like  Modern physics, give precedence to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as corresponds to the WAVE-FIELD wherein the LOCAL and EXPLICIT are secondary CONDENSATIONS of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD.  For example, in indigenous aboriginal flow-based language one would say the equivalent of ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) while the TOWN is LOCAL and EXPLICIT.   WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, by CONTRAST, use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to create BEING (i.e. ‘the TOWN’) which is the ‘first error’ and then use GRAMMAR in the second, compounding error, to impute the POWER OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT to the ‘first error’ of NAMING instantiated BEING.

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

I have included this point made by Nietzsche which feeds into the larger point that WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is the source of FRAGMENTATION as also hit on by David Bohm;

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

 

BOHM’S REJECTION OF FRAGMENTATION IS AN AFFIRMING THAT EVERYTHING IS RELATED (MITAKUYE OYASIN)

THERE ARE INTER-DEPENDENT STRANDS IN THE WEB SUCH THAT THE VIOLENCE OF A PARTICULAR STRAND IS OF NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) ORIGIN, AND VIOLENCE, while LOCAL and EXPLICIT in its EXPRESSION, IS NOT LOCALLY AUTHORED AS IS THE MISTAKEN DOUBLE ERROR OF BEING AND GRAMMAR based MIS-IMPRESSION.

 * * * * * * * * * * 

SHOULD indigenous aboriginal RESTORATIVE JUSTICE BE APPLIED in the case of LUIGI MANGIONE’S killing of BRIAN THOMPSON?

 

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is based on the understanding that the social collective (and the world in general) is an INTERCONNECTED, INTERDEPENDENT RELATIONAL MATRIX were we are all STRANDS IN THE WEB.  In this case, we cannot know the AUTHORING SOURCE of a VIOLENT EVENT because the STRAND that becomes VIOLENT is a CONDUIT within the RELATIONAL MATRIX.   This undestanding that we are all STRANDS in the INTERCONNECTED, INTERDEPENDENT WEB is not only the understanding of indigneous aboriginals, but it is also supported by Modern physics and it points to the need for RESTORATIVE JUSTICE where THERE IS NO ATTEMPT TO IDENTIFY AND ELIMINATE A “PURPORTED LOCAL AUTHOR OF A VIOLENT EVENT” because “THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A LOCAL AUTHOR in a system of INTERCONNECTED, INTERDEPENDENT STRANDS in the ALL-INCLUDING WEB”.  Instead, the remedial action orients to the RESTORING of relational balance and harmony IN THE INTERCONNECTED, INTERDEPENDENT RELATIONAL SOCIAL WEB.

We know that in WESTERN CULTURE, JUSTICE is PURIFICATIONIST and based on belief in there being a LOCAL AUTHOR of a VIOLENT ACT who we identify using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, based on a WITNESSING of the LOCAL, EXPLICIT VIOLENT ACTION.    This approach is supported by the ABSTRACTIONS of PEOPLE as LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT BEINGS notionally with THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, who move about and INTERACT within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  While this ABSTRACT and SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based model has long been exposed as INCOMPLETE (Goedel’s Theorem) and generally BOGUS, it has been BUILT INTO WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING HABITS and into the LONG-STANDING ‘BINARY EITHER GUILTY OR INNOCENT’ JUDGEMENT TRADITION.

In the indigenous aboriginal RESTORATIVE Justice tradition, the understanding that we are all STRANDS IN THE COMMON WEB means that we cannot identify a LOCAL AUTHOR of a VIOLENT event since the AUTHORING dynamic in the case of STRANDS IN THE WEB is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and the practical approach is therefore RESTORATIVE (restoring balance and harmony) rather than PURICATIONIST (finding and eliminating the AUTHOR of the VIOLENCE or imbalance.)

As we have seen, WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE is PURIFICATIONIST and seeks to find and eliminate the perpetrators of ILLEGAL or PROHIBITED ACTS, while relational DISSONANCE and IMBALANCE are tolerated and IMBALANCE is actually encouraged and venerated (getting ahead of the pack).  The WESTERN CULTURE LAWS support IMBALANCE under the proviso of ENTITLEMENT and the lack of BALANCE-based MODERATION has led to REVOLUTIONS as ENTITLEMENT-SUPPORTED IMBALANCES become extreme.

Because ENTITLEMENT prevails over BALANCE, individuals can find themselves on the PAINFUL side of IMBALANCE while the ENTITLEMENT based systems ride roughshod over them.  This has been the historical source of REVOLUTION but as it rises to such a point, the polarization can continue to build and those suffering from GOVERNMENT and POLICE PROTECTED IMBALANCE become a relatively silent UNDERGROUND, so that, as in the days of Marie Antoinete, one can see tolerance transforming into intolerance, particularly when inspired by the rebel acts of those who risk their own lives and future to bring needed change.

 * * * * * * * 

CONCLUSIONS: 

We can see in Luigi Mangione’s actions and the different WESTERN CULTURE responses to them, both the PENETRATION of QUANTUM LOGIC and the CONTINUING REJECTION OF QUANTUM LOGIC (i.e. the ENTRENCHMENT of BINARY LOGIC.)

Luigi Mangione as a Miner’s Canary.  The confusing thing about a “Miner’s Canary” is that the canary’s exceptional sensitivity is picking up on an ambient TOXICITY that is BEYOND THE LESS SENSITIVE DETECTING POWERS of MOST OTHERS, with some exceptions, those that ‘strangely’, to the majority, applaud the canary’s seemingly ABERRANT behaviour.

Picture the canary’s CRAZY behaviour as it tries to ‘get above’ the toxicity, crashing into the ceiling and the celiing fixtures such as lighting.  This LOOKS CRAZY to less sensitive others who are NOT AWARE of the pervading layering of toxicity wherein the exposure to the toxicity lessens with elevation, giving rise to behaviours of the sensitive that appear ABERRANT to the less sensitive.

This confusing scenario has been deciphered in psychiatry in Jill Astbury’s investigations (in ‘Crazy For You’) which showed that the greater incidence of psychological breakdowns in women derives from their greater sensitivity to toxicity in the social relational ambiance (e.g. the workplace situation).  Since only those most sensitive to ambient toxicity had ‘breakdowns’, the response has been to hospitalize those with ‘breakdowns’ without addressing the toxic ambiance since it remains INVISIBLE to the more psychologically hardy because less sensitive majority.

In such situations, there will be ‘sensitives’ who ‘sense the toxicity’ but are able to ‘put up with it’ while there may be a MAJORITY that is either LESS SENSITIVE to the point of not being aware of it, or who are operating in situations that avoid much of the TOXICITY. 

PROBLEM! WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and constructs LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based solely on WHAT THINGS DO (MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING) as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  In such a CULTURE, the investigating of an individual that is behaving aberrantly orients exclusively to his/her internal make-up as a SO-CALLED ‘INDEPENDENT BEING OPERATING IN AN EMPTY SPACE), thus MISSING the TOXIC ENVIRONMENT THAT IS SOURCING THE ABERRANCE.

AS JILL ASTBURY NOTED: “The research stemming from this viewpoint had a systemic blindness.  It could literally not see what it was doing, as the normative quality of its own presuppositions had made them invisible.”

THERE IS EVERY SIGN THAT WESTERN CULTURE SOCIETY IS CULTIVATING TOXIC ENVIRONMENTS WHICH ARE INDUCING ABERRANT BEHAVIOURS AND YET WESTERN CULTURE CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATIONS CONTINUE TO HAVE THE BLINDERS ON, FOCUSING EXCLUSIVELY ON THE ‘MINER’S CANARY’ AND TURNING THEIR BACK TO THE ‘TOXIC ENVIRONMENT’ AS THE SOURCE DUE TO THE FACT THAT MOST OF THOSE DOING THE INVESTIGATING ARE SITUATED IN LESS TOXIC ENVIRONMENTS.  THIS IS EXPOSING A BLIND SPOT IN THE WESTERN CULTURE WORLD VIEW, ALSO KNOWN AS ‘THE DEA ABSCONDITA’, THE GODDESS IN HIDING WHICH DESCRIBES THE SITUATION WERE WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS USE SIMPLE ‘CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION’ APPROACHES THAT ASSUME THAT CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR DERIVES FROM THE INTERIOR OF THE CRIMINAL, ABOUT WHICH WE CAN SAY; “The research stemming from this viewpoint had a systemic blindness.  It could literally not see what it was doing, as the normative quality of its own presuppositions had made them invisible.”

TOXIC ENVIRONMENT! TOXIC ENVIRONMENT! TOXIC ENVIRONMENT!  LET’S NOT FORGET THIS PRIMARILY IMPORTANT GAME-PLAYER!  THERE ARE MINER’S CANARIES AMONG US WITH NOT ONLY MORE THAN AVERAGE SENSITIVITY BUT WHO FIND THEMSELVES IN SITUATIONS THAT HAVE MORE THAN AVERAGE TOXICITY.

QUANTUM LOGIC leads to RESTORATIVE JUSTICE where there is an awareness that we are in a STRANDS in the WEB relational world where there is NO SUCH THING as LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development.  Here, we are reminded of “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose” where the transforming world we share inclusion in, has its own FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING nature which our MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING must learn how to get into conjugate union with.   In a simple example, .

‘There is a tide in the affairs of men, Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries. … Shakespeaere’s ‘Julius Caesar’. 

This is about the WAVE-FIELD structure of our reality, there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT that invites a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZATION that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

THIS CONJUGATE RELATION requires QUANTUM LOGIC but WESTERN CULTURE’S habit of using BINARY LOGIC DUMBS US DOWN so that we become addicted to the use of simple BINARY LOGIC and as a result, lose touch with FULLBLOWN WAVE-FIELD awareness and slip into the reduced world of BINARY LOGIC where we speak of the TOWN that is GROWING but cannot see the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.

 

(A) WHY SO MANY PEOPLE DO NOT SEE THINGS IN THE REALITY-GROUNDED QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH/AND) TERMS OF OUR BEING INDIVIDUAL STRANDS IN AN INTERCONNECTING, INTERDEPENDENT WEB wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).  That is, there are no INDEPENDENT BEINGS with THEIR OWN LOCALLY AUTHORED ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS but THERE ARE INTER-DEPENDENT STRANDS IN THE WEB SUCH THAT THE VIOLENCE OF A PARTICULAR STRAND IS OF NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) ORIGIN, AND VIOLENCE, while LOCAL and EXPLICIT in its EXPRESSION, IS NOT LOCALLY AUTHORED AS IS THE MISTAKEN DOUBLE ERROR OF BEING AND GRAMMAR based MIS-IMPRESSION.

(B) WHY THE PEOPLE DESCRIBED IN (A) SEE LUIGI MANGIONE IN BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC TERMS AS A BAD INDEPENDENT BEING DOING HARM TO OTHER GOOD INDEPENDENT BEINGS.

(C) WHY MANY OTHER PEOPLE (other than those in the (A) category), SEE MANGIONE’S ACTION in the POSITIVE SENSE of CONSTITUTING AN OVERT REBELLION AGAINST ENTRAPMENT AS STRANDS WOVEN INTO A DYSFUNCTIONAL WEB.

 

 

FOOTNOTE: 

In our philosophical discussions I keep coming back to Nietzsche’s attack on the concept of BEING and how it crops up in the “thin skull rule” etc. where we reduce our language capture of reality to a one-sided male asserting basis and simply drop out the female accommodating conjugate so that the male assertor is portrayed as the full and sole AUTHOR of a cause-effect action and development.

I see this as a basic flaw in the ENGLISH LANGUAGE (and European languages) as Nietzsche also did because once we commit to representations  based on BEING we cannot get to the concept of BALANCE without invoking the interplay of two things “that be”.

“balance” is ONE DYNAMIC in the QUANTUM LOGIC of the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC without dependency on BEING so EINGLISH screws up by assigning a foundational role to BEING because then there is no way to get to balance without invoking dependency on BEING.

Furthermore, BEING-free balance implies a CONJUGATE MALE-FEMALE relation as in “the TOWN is GROWING” which implies the WILDERNESS is undergoing CONJUGATE SHRINKING, something we don’t mention.

 

We know that WAVE-FIELD TRANFORMATION is basic to the WAVE-FIELD dynamic and it has NO dependency on BEING so like Nietzsche says, inserting into our llanguage architecture a foundational dependency on BEING is a SCREW-UP.

 

It is the SCREW UP THAT SPLITS OUR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION of the ANDROGENOUS WAVE INTO THE TWO BINARY LOGICAL COMPONENTS OF “MALE” and “FEMALE”, blocking us (in our language based representations) from directly expressing androgeny as is innate in the WAVE-FIELD and which we know in sense-experience as BALANCE.

I AM SAYING THAT WE NEED A LANGUAGE THAT CAN GO DIRECTLY TO BALANCE (androgeny) WITHOUT THE ENCUMBERMENT OF HAVING TO DEAL WITH THE BINARY LOGIC of MALE and FEMALE.

Does the hurricane do a male asserting stir up of the atmoosphere or does the atmosphere do a female incuductive stirring up of the hurricane?

* * *

I wanted to share with y’all an anlalysis of the negative reaction to praise of Luigi Mangione.

The thing is that we are all strands in an interconnected, interdependent web, or if preferred, condensations of the wave-field (same quantum logic relation) and it is the double error of naming and grammar that INVENTS the BOGUS LOCAL AUTHOR ABSTRACTION.

There are no LOCAL AUTHORS because we live in a transforming relational continuum aka wave-field.

The world dynamic is more complex than the simple binary logic picture of singling out  Luigi Mangione and setting him up as the full and sole problem.  i.e. why mass shootings?  why support for Mangione? why berserk Miner’s Canaries?

Answer: TOXIC ENVIRONMENT that many sensitives are feeling.

WHY the WESTERN JUISTICE THIN SKULL RULE? WESTERN CULTURE BANISHES THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and substitutes empty space so as to simplify LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.  Once we build SPACE as EMPTINESS into our LANGUAGE by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, we can no longer have a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT to explain ABERRANT BEHAVIOUR.

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE (MODERN PHYSICS and Indigenous aboriginal) acknowledges the error of PURIFICATIONIST “JUSTICE” which lays the blame on the “identified patient” in the dysfunctional “family”, a scapegoating that lets the TOXIC  ENVIRONMENT “off the hook”.

Mangione “IS” the “MINER’S CANARY whose insane behaviour is brought on by the toxic environment, so the rallying of support is for the nutty miner’s canary that is flying into walls and breaking the silence (whistle blowing) in regard to the TOXIC ENVIRONMENT which other ‘sensitives’ acknowledge..

The Mangione supporters “cheering on” the nutty miner’s canary are, in effect, “cheering on” the overt informing on the toxicity of BINARY LOGIC cultural “normality”.  It is BINARY LOGIC that brings with it the EMPTY SPACE that, being EMPTY, cannot support the understanding of a “TOXIC ENVIRONMENT” in which case, the NUTTINESS of the NUTTY MINER’S CANARY CAN ONLY DERIVE FROM THE MINER’S CANARY and its INTERNALS, thus the TOXIC ENVIRONMENT and ITS CONTRIBUTORS GET OFF THE HOOK.

What good are sensitive MINER’S CANARIES once WESTERN CULTURE has used BINARY LOGIC to declare the energy-charged PLENUM to be an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE, because the only way to interpret the crazy behaviour of the miner’s canary if assumed to be in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE is that “IT” IS CRAZY.

 

 

* * *

Once one is depending on a binary logic understanding such as “the town is growing”, one has dropped out the female conjugate and is substituting empty space, one has blocked access to wave-field reality because one has introduced dependency on BEING (as in “the TOWN”)

In the toxic enviroment, the canary flew about in a wild and crazy fashion in a desperate search for a patch of fresh air.

This is QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM, or in other words, ANDROGYNOUS language which includes BOTH the female accommodating/enabling atmosphere AND the male asserting/actualizing dynamic.  If the air is fresher closer to the ceiling then the canary will go there.

BUT IF WE DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and say: “the bird flew about crazily”, having DROPPED OUT the female accommodating/enabling conjugate, the implication is that the bird has gone nuts.

Since we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies LOCAL BEING-BASED AUTHORING, the female accommodating/enabling conjugate is DROPPED OUT and a passive empty containing space is implied.  THE CRAZY BEHAVIOUR OF THE CANARY IS NOW , EVIDENTLY, FOR NO REASON AT ALL, which means the canary is nuts.

We need ANDROGYNOUS QUANTUM LOGIC in this case which acknowledges ambient female inductive/enabling influence.

“in the toxic environment the canary flew about in a wild and crazy fashion in a desperate search for a patch of fresh air.”

THIS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM BASED.

We WESTERN CULTUE ADHERENTS have a problelm.  We have a habit of DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and substituting EMPTY SPACE.

As in this example, this makes the canary out to be doing somehing for no reason because we speak in the one-sided terms of DOUBLE ERROR based LOCAL AUTHORING which is male/asserting and fails to acknowledge the over rifding ambient influence of female/accommodating.

* * * * * * * 

 

APPENDIX: A SIMILAR PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION into the case of the person whose shot grazed DONALD TRUMP

Was Thomas Matthew Crooks a ‘MINER’S CANARY’?

 

The note on this, two days ago, finished with this paragraph;

 

 

Do we have, in the case of Thomas Matthew Crooks, the combination of a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT and a SENSITIVE PERSON, or can we make the usual BINARY LOGIC assumption where we need study only Thomas Matthew Crooks as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE; i.e. as if within a NON-TOXIC ENVIRONMENT wherein all aberrant behaviours derive from the material experient, giving us the right to ELIMINATE the aberrant behaving individual rather than taking upon ourselves our fair share of the responsibility for the development of a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT.  Are our WESTERN CULTURE LEADERS UP FOR THAT?

 

TRUST ME, … when we upgrade our logic from BINARY LOGIC to QUANTUM LOGIC, many things which ‘don’t make sense’ from a BINARY LOGIC based view, do make sense from a QUANTUM LOGIC based view.  The case of Thomas Mathhew Crooks shooting aimed Donald Trump is a case in point.  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “MISS A LOT” by using SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC to try to figure things out, because QUANTUM LOGIC gives the DEEPER ANSWERS while BINARY LOGIC gives SHALLOW ANSWERS.

 

For example, REWARD and PUNISHMENT (carrot and stick) are BINARY LOGIC schemes to shape behaviour, while INSPIRATION and DISCOURAGEMENT are QUANTUM LOGIC schemes that can shape behaviour.  The BINARY LOGIC scheme is a PHYSICAL, MATERIAL based manipulation that plays with the INTELLECT (I would do a lot to have a chance at getting hold of that much money), while the QUANTUM LOGIC scheme touches the HEART (I will be so happy if we can pull the child out of the raging river and I will be so sad if we fail to pull him to safety).

 

If we are successful in rescuing the child, the GAIN accrues to the STATE OF THE WHOLE WAVE-FIELD (the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM) that we share inclusion in, and if we fail, the STATE OF THE WHOLE WAVE-FIELD aka ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM takes a hit. The DYNAMICS here are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (the logic of the MATERIAL CONDENSATION being BOTH itself AND the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM it is included in.

 

BINARY LOGIC is the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (the medium is EMPTY SPACE) where there is EITHER some material thing there OR nothing (empty space).

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS don’t usually think about it, but we habitually use BINARY LOGIC linguistic conceptualizing where we fashion pictures in words that are OF LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES as if in EMPTY SPACE, as in the sentence ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’.

 

Indigenous aboriginals habitually use QUANTUM LOGIC linguistic conceptualizing, fashioning pictures in words that are of NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT SITUATIONS  that have NO DEPENDENCY on MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES and NO DEPENDENCY on EMPTY SPACE, as in the sentence ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’   Here, the linguistic conceptualization brings to mind the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALING TOWNING together with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is opening up in conjugate relation with the developing TOWN or ‘TOWNING’.

 

* * * * *  OK IT TOOK ME A LOT OF WORDS TO SHARE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, but it was needed to show how QUANTUM LOGIC incorporates BOTH the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING (the TOWN IS GROWING…) AND the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ( the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING), …. which TOGETHER express that what is going on is overall TRANSFORMATION.

 

OK, I am now ready to discuss this question; …  Was Thomas Matthew Crooks a ‘MINER’S CANARY’?

 

The “MINER’S CANARY” is known for becoming DISORIENTED and GOING CRAZY when he finds himself  IN A TOXIC ENVIRONMENT, and this analogy has been used in PSYCHIATRY to describe sensitive humans becoming DISORIENTED and HAVING PYSYCHOLOGICAL ‘BREAKDOWNS’ WHEN the environment they are living and working in becomes STRESSFUL.   For less sensitive people, an environment in question can SEEM PERFECTLY OK TO MOST PEOPLE thus it will only be the SENSITIVE ONES that are the first to CRATER in the TOXIC ENVIRONMENT.

 

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS express PRIDE in WESTERN SOCIETY AS IT IS EVOLVING, so the suggestion of TOXIC ENVIRONMENTS is basically OFF THE RADAR SCREEN when it comes to talking about MASS SHOOTINGS, and other ABERRANT behaviours that are INCREASING IN FREQUENCY and in severity. WESTERN CULTURE is cultivating increasingly PSYCHOLOGICALLY TOXIC ENVIRONMENTS, as has been documented by a large number of psychiatrists, including Jill Astbury, “Crazy for you”   Ronald Laing in “The Divided Self”, anthropologist Jules Henry in “Culture Against Man”, and anthropologist Ernest Becker in ‘the “Denial of Death”, and also, the Invisible Plague: The Rise of Mental Illness from 1750 to the Present: E Torrey Fuller M.D., and Judy Miller.

 

Should we be IGNORING the MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal culture’s understanding wherein PEOPLE ARE CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD SO THAT ‘EVERYTHING IS RELATED’ (mitakuye oyasin) so that the social collective is co-conditioning the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is at the same time conditioning the CONDENSATIONS of the PLENUM.  In other words, it has been suggested that we are collectively cultivating a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT which, as in the case of the MINER’S CANARY (which is far more sensitive than us humans) will be DRIVE THE MOST SENSITIVE ONES NUTS while the LESS SENSITIVE or those that ADAPT to the TOXIC ENVIRONMENT express CONFUSION when someone, for no evident reason at all, AUTHORS SOME CRAZY BEHAVIOUR which seems TOTALLY OUT OF CHARACTER.   Can you imagine a VICIOUS CANARY THAT GOES ON THE ATTACK, and while almost everyone, since almost everyone is LESS SENSITIVE than the CANARY, says WHAT THE HELL!!!!.

 

This is the COMBINATION of a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT and a SENSITIVE “CANARY”.  This combination has been suggested in the work of psychiatrists including Jill Astbury and

 

 

Jill Astbury raises questions in regard to the assumption of INTERNAL rather than TOXIC ENVIRONMENT BASED SOURCING of psychological disorder in ‘Crazy for You: The Making of Women’s Madness’Her inquiry explored a World Health Organization finding that women have twice the incidence of ‘affective disorders’ (depression, bipolar disorder etc.) as men.

 

Astbury makes the point that psychological issues can manifest in an individual experiencing the stress of being in a group of differing others whose sensitivities may be lower so that rising ambient stress or toxicity goes unnoticed by the less sensitive while the most sensitive suffer ‘breakdowns’.  In this situation, the immediate assumption may be that those suffering breakdowns have a weakness in that they are prone to psychological illness rather than sensitive to toxic environments.  Meanwhile, those falling ill will be studied for ‘what is wrong with them’ and the toxic environment will be passed over.

 

“The research stemming from this viewpoint had a systemic blindness. It could literally not see what it was doing, as the normative quality of its own presuppositions had made them invisible.” – Jill Astbury

 

Similar observations of this ‘miner’s canary’ effect have been made in mixed groups of ‘locals’ and ‘immigrants’ in the UK where research by Cochrane and Sashidharan shows that the incidence of schizophrenia in non-native born blacks in the U.K. is 3-5 times higher than native born blacks.

 

From the outset it will be clear that most of the research in this field has followed the conventional epidemiological or medical paradigm by focusing on mental ill health as the dependent variable. It is, therefore, not surprising that there is a lack of empirically grounded research on mental well-being or the psychological resilience and survival of minority groups in this country” — R. Cochrane (University of Birmingham) and S. P. Sashidharan (North Birmingham Mental Health Trust) in ‘Mental Health and Ethnic Minorities’

 

Mental well-being can associate with having become desensitized to inclusion in a toxic environment

 

Was Thomas Matthew Crooks a ‘MINER’S CANARY’?

 

Everybody knows that WESTERN CULTURE ‘NORMAL’ ENVIRONMENTS ARE BECOMING INCREASINGLY TOXIC (more difficult work environments, both partners working, major investments in education to land a job in a hamburger joint, as can occur).

 

What we call ‘normal’ (in WESTERN CULTURE), is a product of repression, denial, splitting, projection, introjection and other forms of destructive action on experience” — R. D. Laing

 

* * * * * *

 

The moment we say; “WHAT WAS WRONG WITH THAT KID?’, we impose the BINARY LOGIC framework where we ask WAS THAT KID A SCREWUP OR NOT?  The QUANTUM LOGIC alternative, which is more general and makes more sense is. WAS the DISSONANCE that led to the ABERRANT BEHAVIOUR AND VIOLENT EVENT coming from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the including social dynamic or WAS THE DISSONANCE coming from the MALE ASSERTING/ENABLING ACTION IN ITS OWN, LOCAL, EXPLICIT RIGHT?

 

In the case of a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING will be the source of dysfunction, however, the notion of a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT is NOT A POPULAR CONCEPT since it is QUANTUM LOGIC based and CONFLICTS with the BINARY LOGIC STANDARD of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE which can only be NEUTRAL.

 

In the use of terminology in my prior notes I have referred to WHO IS HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN and while it was clearly Thomas Matthew Crooks, … as pointed out a few days ago, the SMOKING GUN can be a VENT for RELEASE of RELATIONAL TENSIONS belonging to the social collective but finding escape through an individual.

 

It seems to me that THERE IS A HUGE and UNJUSTIFIED RESISTANCE on the part of WESTERN CULTURE, to accepting ANYTHING OTHER than the INDEPENDENT LOCAL AUTHOR of events as in ‘INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY’ which is a REAFFIRMATION of the ABSTRACT NOTION of the INDEPENDENT BEING, which DOES NOT EXIST, but it is imposed by way of our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which infuses BINARY LOGIC everywhere (as in the case of the INDEPENDENT BEING)  QUANTUM LOGIC opens our view to REALITY wherein EVERYTHING is related (mitakuye oyasin), which is why we ALL need to use the HEALING CIRCLE instead of pursuing PURIFICATIONISM as is being pushed to EXTREME LIMITS in the UKRAINE-RUSSIA and ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICTS.

 

* * * * * * *