Has the WORLD EVER SEEN a more POLARIZED and DYSFUNCTIONAL SOCIETY than today’s WESTERN CULTURE where the extremes are now playing out in the U.S. under the divisive leadership of Donald Trump, where the OPERATIVE POLICY continues to be EVERYONE IS INNOCENT UNLESS PROVEN GUILTY so that in the case of the killing of Charlie Kirk by Tyler Robinson, 340 million Americans caught up in VICIOUSLY POLARIZED SOCIO-POLITICAL TENSIONS which spawned this killing of Kirk, continue to HIDE BEHIND THE “INNOCENT UNLESS PROVEN GUILTY” shield.  There is NO MOVE in the U.S. towards RESTORATIVE JUSTICE which would hold the full 340 million responsible rather than SCAPE-GOATING a SOLO STRAND IN THE TWISTING, TURNING WEB.

A HEALING CIRCLE IS NEEDED but BINARY LOGIC based PURIFICATIONISM continues to dominate in WESTERN CULTURE “JURIS PRUDENCE”.

* * * * * * * * 

 

 

We live in a world wherein different people see things DIFFERENTLY because of our use of DIFFERENT LANGUAGES (LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES).

Much like Erich Jantsch, my philosophical investigations suggest that we have developed within our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING ACTIVITY, THREE DIFFERING WORLD VIEWS based on THREE DIFFERING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, much as in Jantsch’s scheme, but with important differences.

In order to get to the highest of OUR THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS (which is common to Jantsch’s and my own conceptualization) we can consider the MINER’S CANARY situation wherein our AWARE EXPERIENCE derives from our inclusion in what Modern physics calls THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD in which we are CONDENSATIONS, which is consistent with the STRAND-IN-THE-WEB understanding of indigenous aboriginals.  Both David Bohm and Erwin Schroedinger have pointed to this SAME STRUCTURE OF THE WORLD we live in wherein “SUBJECT AND OBJECT ARE ONLY ONE” which acknowledges that we are in relationships that can be conceived of as STRANDS in a WEB consistent with the CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (WAVE-FIELD) understanding which requires NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM.   That is, this “SUBJECT AND OBJECT ARE ONLY ONE” relation gives us an understanding wherein we are “BOTH” ourselves, the condensation “AND” at the same time, the energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD that we are included in.

The Miner’s Canary anecdote recounts how the miners brought canaries into the mines with them because the canaries are SENSITIVE DETECTORS OF DANGEROUS GASES SUCH AS METHANE when mixed in with the common oxygen/air mix, which had led to explosions and loss of miners lives.  Our common WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME does NOT distinguish between a HUMAN working on the surface of the earth and a HUMAN working in a mine.  This is because our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME uses NAME-TAGS with FIXED, UNCHANGING LABELS, for example, “HUMANS” and “CANARIES”, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS give ourselves the impression, THROUGH THIS SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM based scheme, the impression that we are a SELF-CONTAINED SYSTEM constituted by our INTERNAL PHYSICAL “PARTS” including our internal organs, circulatory and resperatory systems etc.

NOTA BENE: THIS IS THE SIMPLE REDUCTIONIST SYSTEM OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which is the LOWEST OF Jantsch’s THREE LEVELS). In this LOWEST of AWARENESS LEVELS we use BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM to cast ourselves as INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS with our own powers of movement and interactions with OTHER INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

[We may keep in mind here Korzybski’s reminder that ‘the WORD IS NOT THE THING’  which comes into play in Bohm’s observation that FRAGMENTATION built into our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME can bring on FRAGMENTATION in our MIND (such as Schizophrenia) and thus FRAGMENTATION in our sociel dynamics].

By constructing our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS in terms of MATERIAL OBJECTS moving and interacting within an EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER, this means that our CONCEPTUALIZING only has to deal with the DYNAMICS of LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL BEING things, as if this “empty containing space” served as ‘insulation’ that rendered “INDEPENDENT” all of the MATERIAL BEINGS within it. This supports a BINARY LOGIC based SIMPLICITY in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS that avoids COMPLEXITIES such as the famous one pointed out by Heracitus; ”

“No man ever steps in the same river twice for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man.”   – Heraclitus

Heraclitus’ understanding that ‘EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX’ has been supported by INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, and also MODERN PHYSICS where it ties to the INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT nature of CONDENSATIONS in WAVE-FIELDS. HOWEVER, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUE TO USE THE SIMPLISTIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which speaks of a FRAGMENTED PSEUDO-REALITY consisting of ABSOLUTE MATERIAL BEING based objects (THANKS TO OUR NAMING the CONDENSATIONS) and our notional equipping them with “THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS”  (which is THANKS TO THE GRAMMER WE HAVE BUILT INTO OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME).

David Bohm has pointed out HOW CONFUSING THIS WESTERN CULTURE FRAGMENTED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME has been and continues to be for our WESTERN CULTURE social collectives; e.g. his following LEAD-IN to the FIRST CHAPTER of Wholeness and the Implicate Order.

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS  (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order, David Bohm)

 

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for afragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

 

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

I HAVE CHOSEN TO FIRST SHARE ALL OF THE ABOVE CONCEPTS TO SUPPORT “BRINGING EVERYTHING TOGETHER”, the title of this sharing.

WE NEED A MODEL STRUCTURE HERE and I will start off by following Jantsch’s THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS approach which I will meanwhile describe using a differing metaphor than Jantsch; e.g. the Miner’s Canary;

LEVEL 3 AWARENESS: (LOWEST as in SIMPLEST AWARENESS LEVEL): CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL AWARENESS IS LIMITED TO THE FACT THAT THE CANARY IS BEHAVING CRAZILY AND THUS our RESPONSE OF ELIMINATING IT MAY BE APPROPRIATE since “ONE BAD APPLE SPOILS THE BARREL”.

LEVEL 2 AWARENESS: (NEXT-TO-LOWEST/SIMPLEST AWARENESS LEVEL) LIBERAL POLITICAL AWARENESS IS LIMITED TO THE FACT THAT SOMETHING APPEARS TO BE TROUBLING THE CANARY, PERHAPS IMBALANCE IN THE COMMUNITY that deserves INVESTIGATION since IT TAKES A WHOLE COMMUNITY TO RAISE A CHILD.

LEVEL 1 AWARENESS: (HIGHEST LEVEL OF AWARENESS) MITAKUYE OYASIN (WE ARE ALL RELATED) as with STRANDS in a WEB in which case WE ARE CO-CULTIVATORS OF THE TOXIC ENVIRONMENT THAT THE CANARY IS INCLUDED IN.

* * * * * *

DISCUSSION:   AWARENESS LEVELS 3 and 2 are UNLIKE AWARENESS LEVEL 1 in that they ASSUME THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE CANARY so that the CANARY’S PROBLEM LIES IN ITS INTERIOR.  The CONSERVATIVE would kick his own child out of the family home for NOT BEHAVING PROPERLY.  The LIBERAL would spend time trying to reform the wayward child ACKNOWLEDGING that dysfunction in the community may be the REAL ISSUE.  The INDIGENOUS people would come together in a HEALING CIRCLE based on the understanding that the social ambiance in the community can lose its NURTURANT quality and become TOXIC and since ‘we are all related’, the REMEDY for the VIOLENT ACTIONS of the CANARY is to TRANSFORM THE TOXIC ENVIRONMENT into a NURTURING ENVIRONMENT.

The AWARENESS LEVEL 3 (LOWEST) CAN BE SEEN, IN AMERICAN POLITICS, with TRUMP and the CONSERVATIVES.  AWARENESS LEVEL 2 (MORE AWARE) CAN BE SEEN, IN AMERICAN POLITICS, with, BIDEN and LIBERALS.  AWARENESS LEVEL 1 (HIGHEST AWARENESS LEVEL) CAN BE SEEN IN THE RESTORATIVE JUSTICE (HEALING CIRCLE) approach of traditionalist INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL COMMUNITIES.

NOTE THE DIFFERENCE IN LEVEL 1; i.e. THERE IS NO ASSUMPTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS: INSTEAD, THERE IS A STRAND IN THE WEB UNDERSTANDING WHERE THE VIOLENT STRAND is NOT THE LOCAL AUTHOR OF THE VIOLENCE but the CONDUIT for the VIOLENT VENTING OF TENSIONS that have built up within THE WEB; i.e. THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE.

This means that THERE IS NO PATHWAY FROM LEVEL 3 and LEVEL 2 CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL AWARENESS to LEVEL 1 AWARENESS.   As with the MINER’S CANARY understanding, IT IS NOT ABOUT ‘WHAT THINGS DO’ IT IS ABOUT HOW THE SOCIAL AMBIANCE, WHETHER TOXIC OR NURTURANT IN THE WEB (SOCIAL COLLECTIVE) INFORMS THE STRANDS.

 

WE live in a world of material condensations within an energy-charged PLENUM where there are NO MATERIAL BEINGS but only THINGLESS RELATIONAL CONNECTEDNESS as is the nature of the WAVE-FIELD.   Understanding THINGLESS RELATIONAL CONNECTEDNESS IS TRICKY.  For example, WE CAN’T GET TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE CLUSTERING OF ANTS BY STARTING WITH THE ANTS AND THEIR ACTIONS.   THE ANTS DO NOT ‘FORM CLUSTERS’.  THERE ARE RESONANCES IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE THAT INDUCTIVELY DRAW THE ANTS TOGETHER in the manner that GRAINS OF SALT ON A VIBRATING TABLE ARE DRAWN TOGETHER.  CLUSTERING IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT, it is NOT LOCAL and EXPLICIT other than in APPEARANCE.

What happens here is that while the PHENOMENA are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, there is the APPEARANCE of LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  The Miner’s Canary typifies this order of things where the DYNAMICS of the CONTAINER (whether toxic or nurturant) are INFORMING the DYNAMICS OF THE CONTENTS and if our MENTAL FOCUS LOCKS ON TO THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENTS as is HABITUAL in WESTERN CULTURE, we will be UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT PRIMARY AUTHORING wherein LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS and their dynamics are SECONDARY to the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and its dynamic.

Because the REALITY is found in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (there are NO LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS), the indigenous aboriginals employ RESTORATIVE JUSTICE (e.g. to resolve RELATIONAL DISSONANCE), by means of the HEALING CIRCLE.   This differs radically from WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE which is PURIFICATIONIST and identifies LOCAL and EXPLICIT AGENTS whose ACTIONS ARE DEEMED RESPONSIBLE FOR NEGATIVE ACTS OF VIOLENCE and DESTRUCTION, or for POSITIVE ACTS of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, as THE OPERATIVE REALITY.

WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION CAPTURES THE IMAGERY OF PEOPLE AS INDEPENDENT BEINGS OPERATING IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE IN WHICH CASE THEY/WE ARE SEEN AS THE FULLY AND SOLELY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORS OF THEIR/OUR OWN (EITHER GOOD OR BAD) ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.  This understanding supports the PURIFICATIONIST APPROACH of WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE which acts to PUNISH and ELIMINATE THE LOCAL AUTHORS OF BAD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS and to REWARD AND PROLIFERATE THE LOCAL AUTHORS OF GOOD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

WE REPEAT, SO AS TO UNDERSCORE AND HIGHLIGHT THIS MOST IMPORTANT FINDING, SINCE IT TENDS WITHIN WESTERN CULTURE COMMON RHETORIC TO BE CONSTANTLY “WALLPAPERED OVER” BY SIMPLER, FRAGMENTATIVE AND OBSCURANTIST BINARY LOGIC, …THIS NONBINARY, BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM BASED CONCLUSION:

while the PHENOMENA are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, there is the APPEARANCE of LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  The Miner’s Canary typifies this order of things where the DYNAMICS of the CONTAINER (whether toxic or nurturant) are INFORMING the DYNAMICS OF THE CONTENTS and if our MENTAL FOCUS LOCKS ON TO THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENTS as is HABITUAL in WESTERN CULTURE, we will be UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT PRIMARY AUTHORING wherein LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS and their dynamics are SECONDARY to the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and its dynamic.

 

 * * * * * * *

SUMMARY:

BRINGING EVERYTHING TOGETHER is essential to guard against the LINGUISTIC HIJACKING of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT by the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

For example, the killing of CHARLIE KIRK by TYLER ROBINSON would be seen in an indigenous aboriginal culture in the same sense as ING the CANARY IN THE COAL-MINE whose CRAZY ACTIONS are INDUCED by the TOXIC ENVIRONMENT, THE REMEDY for which is the RESTORING of a NURTURANT ENVIRONMENT rather than the ELIMINATION of the CRAZILY BEHAVING MINER’S  CANARY

OR, ARE WE, UNLIKE THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS WHERE THE FULL COMMUNITY ACKNOWLEDGES RESPONSIBILITY FOR CO-CULTIVATING TOXICITY IN THE WEB that VENTS THROUGH A VIOLENT STRAND IN THE WEB (that is NOT THE LOCAL AUTHOR of the VIOLENCE but the CONDUIT).  IN WESTERN CULTURE, by DECLARING ALL STRANDS TO BE INDEPENDENT AND OPERATING WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE, the STRAND THAT IS VENTING TOXICITY GENERATED BY THE WEB IS SCAPE-GOATED AS THE AUTHOR rather than the VENT.

WHAT WE CAN SEE HERE IS A WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE CLAIMING THAT ALL OF US IN OUR EVIDENTLY SCREWED-UP SOCIETY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SHOOTING OF CHARLIE KIRK by TYLER ROBINSON since in our WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE SYSTEM, EVERYONE IS PRESUMED INNOCENT UNLESS PROVEN GUILTY.  THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF US WHO ARE THUS FALLING INTO THE INNOCENT CATEGORY, AS FAR AS WESTERN JUSTICE SEES IT and WESTERN JUSTICE IS NOT LIKE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE which is RESTORATIVE because of the assumption that “WE ARE ALL RELATED” (INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT and THUS CO-RESPONSIBLE).  IN THIS CASE, the individual that EXPLODES IN VIOLENCE is (IN REALITY) ‘getting that violence’ FROM THE WEB IN WHICH HE IS A STRAND AND HE IS THUS ONLY A CONDUIT AND NOT A ‘LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE’ which is why INDIGENOUS JUSTICE  IS RESTORATIVE rather than PURIFICATIONIST.  The WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD PURIFICATIONIST APPROACH, seen in this light, AMOUNTS TO “A SCAPEGOATING OF THE IDENTIFIED PATIENT”.

 * * * * * * * 

 

APPENDIX:  

Technical Note on the “HUMONGOUS ERROR” made by WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS in their/our commonly employed LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme.

We live within a transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD and the architecture of the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that IS REQUIRED to convey what is actually happening (where everything is in interconnecting, interdepedendent flux) must be like that used by MODERN PHYSICS and the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS wherein IT IS A NO-NO to use any dependency on “BEING” and/or the ABSTRACTION OF “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and developments… BECAUSE WE AND EVERYTHING ARE INCLUDED IN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD using a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME based on FRAGMENTS, as has been pointed out by David Bohm in the introduction to his classic work WHOLENESS AND THE IMPLICATE ORDER.

ACHTUNG!  NOTA BENE!   Bohm’s message is VERY CLEAR.  WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, by using the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based technique of FRAGMENTATION, are BUILDING INTO OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, AN UNREAL PSEUDO-REALITY THAT WE ARE USING AS OUR OPERATIVE REALITY.  This is very relevant to the CONFUSION arising in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS such as the POLARIZING DIVISION between the RESPECTIVE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of what amounts to PSEUDO-REALITIES of CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS, BOTH of which, while providing consistent PSEUDO-REALITIES that achieve the purpose of PUTTING USERS ON THE SAME PAGE, are doing so thanks to the construction of PSEUDO-REALITIES which FALL WELL SHORT OF CONVEYING OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED REALITY.  For example, both the CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION BASED PSEUDO-REALITIES employ MESSAGING which uses the concepts of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, all of which are ABSTRACTIONS which fall well short of CONVEYING our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITIES of our INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (e.g. when we say “THE TOWN IS GROWING”, we are splitting it out of the PLENUM, something which the flow-based linguistic conceptualizing “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” does not do).

 

It is IMPORTANT to NOTE that BOTH MODERN PHYSICS and IDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS EMPLOY “FLOW-BASED” rather than “MATERIAL BEING-BASED” LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING since “MATERIAL BEING-BASED” LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING INTRODUCES UNREAL FRAGMENTATION INTO THE CONCEPTUALIZATIONS which are CONFUSING, since FRAGMENTATION, WHICH IS ALREADY A SCREW-UP in trying to convey a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, can be achieved by way of TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, BOTH of which involve FRAGMENTATION.   The CONSERVATIVES OPT FOR A FORM OF FRAGMENTATION WHEREIN THE POWER FOR GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION comes in a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING FORM with NO MENTION OF ANY ‘ASSIST’ IN THE FORM OF a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING FORM (which is always present in the real world of the all-including WAVE-FIELD based TREANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM).  The LIBERALS OPT FOR A FORM OF FRAGMENTATION WHEREIN, WHILE THE POWER FOR GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION IS LIKEWISE coming in a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING FORM … DIFFERS… in the manner that people swimming together in the same swimming pool will become aware of how their ‘splashing’ impacts others and will spontaneously adjust their movements so as limit the extremes of disturbance of ‘making waves’ impacting one another.   While this is the approach, in general, of “BLEEDING HEART LIBERALS”, “INDEPENDENCE-CELEBRATING CONSERVATIVES” such as a DONALD TRUMP, support the unmitigated SUBOPTIMIZING of INDIVIDUAL actions, regardless of the associated ‘SPLASHING’.

This CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL DIFFERENCE in OUTLOOK and BEHAVIOUR shows up in LANGUAGE (or arguably “ORIGINATES” in LANGUAGE) and has proved to be very DIVISIVE in a manner that is NOT found in cultures such as the indigenous aboriginal culture wherein LANGUAGE (i.e. LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING) is FLOW-BASED.

 

Indigenous aboriginal LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is FLOW_BASED and SO IT IS AS WELL IN MODERN PHYSICS, and the use of FLOW-BASED CONCEPTUALIZING which is NONBINARY (BOTH/AND) LOGIC based which AVOIDS THE PROBLEMS OF BINARY EITHER/OR FRAGMENTATION which come with COMMON WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING APPROACHES.  This is why INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE is RESTORATIVE because when we understand the social collective in the sense that EVERYTHING IS RELATED (MITAKUYE OYASIN) we use VERB based language which is FREE FROM FRAGMENTATION, as in the STRAND-IN-THE-WEB configuration which agrees with the MODERN PHYSICS understanding which is in terms of NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM as describes CONDENSATIONS IN THE WAVE-FIELD configuration.  That is, as Bohm and Schroedinger have pointed out, Modern physics does NOT SUPPORT, as Classical physics did, the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT INTO MATTER AND EMPTY SPACE which, while it makes the associated LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SIMPLER by only having to manage the actions and interactions of MATERIAL OBJECTS AS IF IN EMPTY SPACE, fails to capure the INTERCONNECTIONS and INTERDEPENDENCIES of Modern physics CONDENSATIONS WITHIN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which involves the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.

In the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM approach to LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING we can understand the NEED for the “STRAND IN THE WEB” metaphor where we acknowledge THE INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE OF THE ACTIONS OF MULTIPLE STRANDS IN THE WEB, which means that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE “INDEPENDENT BEING OF A STRAND” and THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “INDEPENDENT ACTION OF A STRAND BECAUSE THERE ARE NO INDEPENDENT STRANDS”.  This gives the understanding that when there is a BENEFICIAL EVENT or DEVELOPMENT or a DETRIMENTAL EVENT or DEVELOPMENT, although it APPEARS TO BE LOCALLY AUTHORED BY AN “INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL” (there is no such thing), the “HOLDER OF THE SMOKING GUN” so to speak, IS IN REALITY, A STRAND IN THE WEB wherein the multiple STRANDS are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT as applies in our PHYSICAL REALITY.   Because material forms are STRANDS IN THE WEB where the dynamics involve INTERCONNECTIONS and INTERDEPENDENCIES, JUSTICE CANNOT BE PURIFICATIONIST (oriented to the eliminating of the perceived ‘independent’ local author of the DETRIMENTAL EVENT) because the STRAND IN THE WEB that is ‘HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN’ IS NOT AN ‘INDEPENDENT BEING’ (there are no ‘independent beings’, such abstraction is invented as a convenience for simplifying the linguistic conceptualization-based communications scheme).

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, in dealing with RAPE, MURDER and VIOLENT EVENTS are AWARE, as MODERN PHYSICS ALSO IS, that all emergent events are of a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) ORIGIN in which case the ‘corrective action’ is RESTORATIVE since the events are NOT SIMPLY LOCAL and EXPLICIT (this MISTAKEN IMPRESSION derives from the use of simplistic WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based linguistic conceptualizing schemes that SUBSTITUTE A LOCAL and EXPLICIT “EVENT” for the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT reality (e.g. the fluidity of “the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” where everything is related within the continuing transformative flow, is REPLACED by the FRAGMENTED SUBSITUTE “THE TOWN is GROWING, DEVEOPING and PRODUCING goods”).

 

What we have done here is that we have used LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to SUBSTITUTE a LOCAL, EXPLICIT material being based “THING” for a fluid, relational forming in the all-including FLOWING which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  When Korzybski says ‘THE WORD IS NOT THE THING’, this applies here in this description wherein we are grounding our understanding in our sense-experience reality wherein EVERYTHING IS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLUX (aka WAVE-FIELD) so that SNAPSHOTS that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT are innately INCOMPLETE and thus “UNREAL”.  For example, WESTERN CULTURE IS MISTAKEN IN USING THE TERMS “GROWTH”, “DEVELOPMENT” and “PRODUCTION” because these terms are REDUCING FLUID FORMINGS IN THE FLOWING (features within the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM) to notional LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITIES SITUATED WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.   This is how we are using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to extract LOCAL and EXPLICIT FRAGMENTS from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT reality;i.e. to extract LOCAL and EXPLICIT TOWNS from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein TOWNING is an INCLUDED RELATIONAL FEATURE.  “TOTO, I’VE A FEELING WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANYMORE”; i.e. what is happening is a LINGUISTIC “CHANGE OUT” by WESTERN CULTURE COMMON PRACTICE, which REDUCES the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (wherein the flow-features are at the same time, the flow) to the notional BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM, where INTRODUCES FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANISM whereby the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TOWNINGS in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE are linguistically “POPPED OUT” by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche) as LOCAL and EXPLICIT TOWNS in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, giving them room to exercise their newly infused (grammar-given) powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

 

The PITFALLS that NOW OPEN UP derive from the CHOICES of supportive ABSTRACTION needed to REMOBILIZE, in our scheme of ABSTRACTION, the MATERIAL OBJECTS, … they are only PSEUDO-MATERIAL OBJECTS, .. and if we are satisfied with the SIMPLEST OF SCHEMES, we can (A) put the MATERIAL OBJECTS INSIDE A TOTALLY EMPTY SPACE, but if we want to be a LITTLE LESS UNREALISTIC, we can (B) PUT THE MATERIAL OBJECTS INSIDE SOMETHING LIKE A SWIMMING POOL so as to HALFWAY ACKNOWLEDGE that there is some kind of INTERCONNECTION or INTERDEPENDENCE among them and their actions as with swimmers in a pool, since our INTUITION is NOT IMPRESSED by the GROSS INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION OF INDEPENDENCE we are infusing into our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.  The above options describe the TWO BOGUS PSEUDO-REALITIES OF CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS and OF COURSE THEY ARE GETTING INTO ALL KINDS OF QUARRELS OVER WHICH ABSTRACTION IS CORRECT BECAUSE NEITHER IS CORRECT AND THE CONSERVATIVES HAVE ONE FAMILY OF ABSTRACTIONS THAT SEEM TO WORK WHERE THE LIBERAL ABSTRACTIONS DON’T, WHILE THE LIBERALS HAVE ANOTHER FAMILY OF ABSTRACTIONS THAT SEEM TO WORK WHERE THE CONSERVATIVE ABSTRACTIONS DON’T WORK.

The LIBERALS are seen by the CONSERVATIVES as UNREALISTIC and SOFT-HEARTED  due to their AWARENESS and CONSIDERATENESS as in swimming in the same swimming pool with others; i.e. after getting hit by their making large waves which we don’t like, we are made conscious of their having done so because of our thoughtless making of waves which have previously bothered them.  The RESULT is that we may adjustt and move together in an AWARE manner that ensures the sustaining of resonance and accord in our relative movements rather than initiating dissonance and conflict.  One can imagine that this LEVEL 2 AWARENESS is stimulated by sensitivity and vulnerability and that it may NOT HAPPEN to those who have elected LEADERS who have a history of ‘getting their own way’ and who have adopted the uncompromising approach as their ‘operating strategy’.   CONSERVATISM can thus come from a LACK OF EMPATHY for others perhaps because of NEVER (in one’s younger, developing life, as with the son of a powerful man) having been PUSHED AROUND by someone else and thus believing that shutting off one’s AWARENESS of how a fellow competitor may suffer when the competition loses its LEVEL 2 AWARENESS and normalizes in the LEVEL 3 LESS AWARE STATE where one has only known dominating power.   Those who see one-sided TOP-DOWN POWER as the norm without experience-based empathy of having been ‘on the bottom’ may fall into the AWARENESS LEVEL 3 category where LEADERSHIP is likely to be SINGULAR and ABSLUTE.  By comparison, those who are SENSITIVE to having been the underdog and NOT WISHING to bo be ABSOLUTELY INSENSITIVE to  others in the circle of competition but to be more in the guise of one of the LEADERS OF THE WOLFPACK and maybe even the overall CHIEF OF THE WOLFPACK but continuing to sustain the LEVEL 2 COOPERATING LIBERALISM of the LEADER-PACK combination without disbanding it in LEVEL 3 CONSERVATISM which has a more SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST management structure.

 

LEVEL 3 AWARENESS and LEVEL 2 AWARENESS are BOTH orienting to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘making things happen’ as in LEADERSHIP or HOW TO DEPLOY ONESELF AND ONE’S RESOURCES TO GET THINGS DONE (LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT) which involves MANAGERIAL DIRECTION AND CONTROL OVER RESOURCES and PEOPLE, whether that be in a CONSERVATIVE SOLO LEADER DIRECTED sense or in a LIBERAL WOLF-PACK LED SENSE, …but so much for LEVEL 3 and LEVEL 2 awareness because is also AN OVER-RIDING LEVEL 1 AWARENESS which recalls situations involving an ambiance of relational harmony as implied in the aphorism; ‘To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose’ which reminds us WHAT MINER’S CANARIES KNOW, that our positive asserting actions must take into account our situational inclusion in the overiding influce of the anvironment (energy-charged PLENUM) which can be of varying natures, ranging from NURTURANT to TOXIC.   As Bohm emphatically startes; “Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.”.

The fact that we are condensations of the energy-charged PLENUM we are included in, has led to LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS with a NONBINARY “BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM” structure such as a STRAND IN THE WEB structure where the CONDENSATIONS of the PLENUM are BOTH themselves AND the PLENUM in which they are included.  This is the understanding of Modern physics which is ALSO THE UNDERSTANDING OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS which is where “THE STRAND IN THE WEB” metaphor comes from which reminds us that we (and everythings are INCLUDED in the world that is an all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

As Chief Seattle observes “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” 

Likewise, Schroeder affirms; The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived.  Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist.”  This is an alternative restatement of “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.”

* * * * 

Given these understandings of the THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS (Erich Jantsch) we can see that CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS are caught up in an UNRESOLVABLE CONFLICT OVER WHETHER TO UNDERSTAND “REALITY” by way of LEVEL 3 AWARENESS (CONSERVATIVE VIEW) OR LEVEL 2 AWARENESS (LIBERAL VIEW).  BOTH OF THESE VIEWING LEVELS ARE CAPTURING AN UNDERSTANDING IN ONE-SIDED TERMS OF ‘WHAT THINGS DO’ which is all that BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM IS CAPABLE OF.   For example, BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM is capable of describing GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods, but NONE OF THESE ARE REAL since they are MISSING THE NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM CONJUGATES.  These MISSING FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATES are …. “SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS” (female accommodating/enabling conjugate of GROWTH) …. “DECAY and DECLINE” (female accommodating/enabling conjugate of DEVELOPMENT) …. and “CONSUMPTION” (female accommodating/enabling conjugate of PRODUCTION).

 

WESTERN CULTURE COMMON USE OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS involving GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION which are UNREAL APPEARANCE based (Schaumkommen in Schroedinger’s language) leads to a MISTAKEN CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY which is FRAGMENTED and OBSCURANTIST as Bohm has pointed out.   The FLAT SPACE, FRAGMENTED PSEUDO-REALITY where there are TOWNS that we say “ARE GROWING” puts us into a SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based PSEUDO-REALITY where we talk about an ECONOMY FUELLED BY GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.

 

Our sense-experience affirmed REALITY is as captured with the stories of the Miner’s Canary and the STRANDS IN THE WEB which involve NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein the STRANDS are BOTH THEMSELVES and the WEB THEY ARE INCLUDED IN, which is why RESTORATIVE JUSTICE rather than PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE is needed Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” 

The VIOLENCE of the STRANDS IN THE WEB cannot be RESOLVED by RIPPING OUT “IDENTIFIED STRANDS”.   The STRANDS are CONDUITS for VENTING TENSIONS that build in the WEB.   Justice must be RESTORATIVE rather than PURIFICATIONIST because the VENTING STRAND is only a CONDUIT and NOT THE SOURCE.  LIKEWISE, the VIOLENT CANARY IN THE MINE is the MESSENGER that is reporting on a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT.

WESTERN CULTURE’s COMMON USE of simple BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING ONLY SUPPORTS MATERIAL ENTITIES NOTIONALLY IN AN EMPTY AND UNVOLVED SPACE, however, it is EVIDENT that “Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.”, so that the PLENUM may be NURTURANT or TOXIC and know that the PLENUM has become HIGHLY TOXIC as is manifest via the political polarizing of LIBERALS and CONSERVATIVES and the Tyler Robinson slaying of Charlie Kirk.

The message of the Miner’s Canary and the notion of the STRANDS in the WEB relation is that “SPACE IS NOT EMPTY”, that ‘the PLENUM’ aka THE ENVIRONMENT CAN BE NURTURANT OR TOXIC in which case we would be MISTAKEN to attribute violent actions to the INTERNALS of HUMANINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM (Wave-Field) without opening our inquiry to the influence of the energy-charged PLENUM that the individual is a condensation of.

Indigenous aboriginal culture supports the understanding of the world as the WEB in which we are all STRANDS so that when we see A VIOLENT STRAND, we know that the PROBLEM stems from the WEB and manifests through the VIOLENCE of the STRAND in which case the VIOLENCE of the STRAND does NOT derive from the STRAND.  Indigenous aboriginal JUSTICE is thus RESTORATIVE because IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO GET TO THE ROOT SOURCE of VIOLENCE which merely manifests THROUGH a STRAND in the WEB although ENGENDERED BY THE WEB.

 

The CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL POLARIZED DIFFERENCE IN CONCEPTUALIZING “REALITY” derives from the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the attempt by BOTH CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS to construct EGO-BASED one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONCEPTUALIZATIONS which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT and  FRAGMENTED.  Talk of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION DOES NOT, AND CANNOT deal with TRANSFORMATION since the latter entails the deployment of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE.  For example, “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  This employs the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the TOWNING is at the same time an inclusion within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein EVERYTHING IS FLUX (this is LEVEL 1 AWARENESS).  This is BEYOND THE LEVEL 3 and Level 2 AWARENESS of CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL where there polarizing disagreement over which of those TWO TYPES OF MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is in fact OPERATIVE.  The answer is NEITHER (both are HUNG UP on simple BINARY LOGIC constructions in the UNREAL LOCAL and EXPLICIT realms of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, which are not only the source of FRAGMENTATION but because of WESTERN CULTURE POPULAR FOCUS on them (including heated disgreements between LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVES and LEVEL 2 LIBERALS), are OBSCURING in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, ACCESS to the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION  

* * * *