An inclusional worldview
How we get FOOLED by the Cuckoo’s Egg of BINARY LOGIC
How we get FOOLED by the Cuckoo’s Egg of BINARY LOGIC
WE NEED QUANTUM LOGIC!
QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC
QUANTUM LOGIC is where we say “There is HUMANING in the transforming continuum” (where everything is in flux and humanings are included flow-features)
BINARY LOGIC is where we say “Yesterday, I saw three HUMANS walking down the street” (where Humans are BEING based CONTENT situated in a separate CONTAINER).
QUANTUM LOGIC is “BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM” where “HUMANINGS are BOTH FEATURES in the FLOWING MEDIUM like WHORLINGS in FLOWING, and, are at the same time, the FLOWING MEDIUM”
* * *
BINARY LOGIC is “EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM” where “HUMANS” are INDEPENDENT beings in empty space that we know by their material components.
“Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to the Facts, sir!”
‘Bitzer,’ said Thomas Gradgrind. ‘Your definition of a horse.’
‘Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds coat in the spring; in marshy countries, sheds hoofs, too. Hoofs hard, but requiring to be shod with iron. Age known by marks in mouth.’ Thus (and much more) Bitzer.
— Charles Dickens, ‘Hard Times’
QUANTUM LOGIC is relational and WITHOUT DEPENDENCY ON ‘THINGS’, and we use it to come to understand things PURELY by way of relations. Geoffrey Chew is a QUANTUM PHYSICS researcher and he describes ‘bootstrapping’ (building understanding up solely from relations), like this.
[Geoffrey Chew]: “when you formulate a question, you have to have some basic concepts that you are accepting in order to formulate the question. But in the bootstrap approach, where the whole system represents a network of relationships without any firm foundation, the description of subject can be begun at a great variety of different places. There isn’t any clear starting point. And the way our theory has developed in the last few years, we quite typically don’t know what questions to ask. We use consistency as the guide, and each increase in the consistency suggests something that is incomplete, but it rarely takes the form of a well-defined question. We are going beyond the whole question-and-answer framework’.
BINARY LOGIC IS USED TO UNDERSTAND THINGS IN TERMS OF INDEPENDENT “MATERIAL BEINGS” EXPLAINABLE BY THEIR LOCAL, EXPLICIT COMPONENTS.
QUANTUM LOGIC IS USED TO UNDERSTAND THINGS PURELY IN TERMS OF RELATIONS WITHOUT ANY FOUNDATIONAL DEPENDENCY ON “BEING”
INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES ARE QUANTUM LOGIC BASED (RELATIONS BASED); e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”. (or, “THERE IS HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM”
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES ARE BINARY LOGIC BASED (BEING BASED); e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING GOODS”, (or, “THE HUMAN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING GOODS”
* * * * * *
We can see from this comparison that WHILE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES BUILD IN DEPENDENCY ON ‘BEING’ (“THINGS THAT ARE SAID TO MATERIALLY EXIST”) and “WHAT THINGS DO”, indigenous aboriginal languages are RELATIONAL and without dependency on the ABSTRACTION of NAMING-INSTANTIATED “BEING” (e.g. instead using relational inference such as ‘dances with wolves’).
ACHTUNG! NOTA BENE! THE FOLLOWING POINT IS IMPORTANT!
Indigenous aboriginals, and Modern physics, acknowledge, in their LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, the WAVE-FIELD structure of the world of our physical sense-experience wherein there is a combination of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT; e.g “There is TOWNING and HUMANING (these are local and explicit) IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (this is nonlocal and implicit)”
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS commonly DROP OUT, in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and employ ONLY the LOCAL and EXPLICIT; e.g. “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” (this is local and explicit)
* * * * * *
The COMPLAINT that Charles Dickens has included in ‘Hard Times’ is that WESTERN CULTURE has been MOVING IN THE DIRECTION of using “REDUCTIONIST LANGUAGE” which is GROUNDED in the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, … and MOVING AWAY from using the more poetic HOLISTIC LANGUAGE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT or in other words, RELATIONAL.
EVIDENTLY, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have a PROGRESSIVELY EVOLVING penchant for using language that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT that brings with it COMPUTER LIKE (BINARY LOGIC based) PRECISION which has been leaving behind in the dark, so to speak, the more ROMANTIC relational, poetic metaphorical language such as “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day? Thou art more lovely and more temperate”.
IT IS EVIDENT that there can be aesthetic uplift when the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is situated within a complementary NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ‘SETTING’; e.g. the beautiful girl in the flower filled meadow rather than the beautiful girl in an empty space or contaminated junkyard.
“Sissy Jupe represents all the magic, compassion, and creativity that has been sucked out of life by Gradgrind’s fact-focused utilitarian philosophy. She is the abandoned daughter of a circus performer, and her roots in that imaginative world form who she is.”
The IMPORTANCE of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is GENERAL and it points to the fact that, as in statements like “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”, that WE ARE AN INCLUDED PART OF SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES, in which case THERE IS DROP OUT when we use LANGUAGE that captures only the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT and DROPS OUT THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONTAINER. When I speak in terms that “I launched the Hobie-cat from Fort Walton beach”, that makes me sound like a person that is directed by his own internal will and purpose, but in reality, I was scurrying around and being manipulated by the dynamics of the spaces between the arrival of breaking waves, and by my constraining of the description to terms of WHAT “I” WAS DOING as if “MY” actions were LOCAL and EXPLICIT and were ACCORDING TO MY PURPOSE AND INTENT, gives a MISTAKEN IMPRESSION which is DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, as if the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE was ALL SHE WROTE.
NOTA BENE! THERE IS A REASON FOR THIS DROP OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND IT IS BECAUSE BINARY LOGIC, which is POPULAR and CONVENIENT and SIMPLE, … IS ONLY CAPABLE OF ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in ‘I launched the Hobie-cat, or, ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, where we DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE — “in the trough between two massive BREAKING WAVES THERE WAS AN OPENING THAT BECKONED, WHICH INDUCTIVELY SHAPED MY MALE ASSERTING ACTUALIZING DYNAMICS”
The scope of the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME is herewith EXPANDED by ACKNOWLEDGING the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING, the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING) which is the PRECURSIVE MOTHER of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.
NOTA BENE!
As Nietzsche has pointed out, EGO comes into play here because by DROPPING OUT MENTION OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING that is INDUCTIVELY BIRTHING what we observe to be a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamic, the AUTHORING AGENCY IS REMOVED FROM THE FEMALE INDUCTIVE BIRTHING AND “NOTIONALLY” (by way of revising the linguistic conceptualization) REINSTALLED IN THE GUISE OF MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY (there is a tradeout here which is describable in terms of; “INSPIRATION FILLS THE HEART WHILE EGO SWELLS THE HEAD”).
[[ It is worth reflecting here, on how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS habitually use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate. For example, if two equally skilled farmers plant their crops on equally fertile lands, at harvest time we remark that one them has successfully produced a bumper crop while the other has produced less than half as much. Here we see the ever-present Goedel’s theorem of incompleteness of all finite logical propositions. The statements just made are TRUE but INCOMPLETE (and therefore not capturing REALITY). The statements that express the positive male asserting/actualizing as in “FARMER A produced X bushels of wheat” and “FARMER B produced Y bushels of wheat” are both LOGIC PROPOSITION which are TRUE but as always, INCOMPLETE since they are missing the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is NOT ABOUT WHAT THE FARMER DID OR DIDN’T DO but is about the dynamics of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which these farming activities were taking place, and where the one experiences temperate weather, the other experience hailstorms. This brings to the surface the problem in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING cited by Nietzsche; i.e. the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development. There is NO SUCH THING as LOCAL AUTHORING. While it is common in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme to use BINARY LOGIC based propositions, while they are TRUE, they are INCOMPLETE. In this example, we have used the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL AUTHORING; i.e. the FARMER-AUTHORED PRODUCTION OF WHEAT. This is LOGICALLY TRUE but INCOMPLETE as it is making use of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING while DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (ambient influence) which is an intrinsic component of our WAVE-FIELD REALITY.
REFLECTION will show that our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, which commonly employs a BINARY LOGIC base, is too simple to capture the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate. So, for example, WESTERN CULTURE CRIMINAL JUSTICE has the THIN SKULL RULE which officially supports the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, by ATTRIBUTING TO THE THROWER OF THE PUNCH THAT ASSOCIATES WITH THE SHATTERING OF THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL, FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING CREDIT, … EVEN if the SKULL is fragile and thus the ever-present FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is primarily responsible for the shattering of the SKULL. The attributing of the damage fully and solely to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PUNCH is catering to APPEARANCE backed by LOGICAL PROPOSITION that is innately INCOMPLETE and at adds with REALITY which DOES INCLUDE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.
The constraining of the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and thus to BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC is TOO SIMPLE and is unable to deal with WAVE-FIELD dynamics which involves the ANDROGYNOUS combination of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING in conjugate relation with MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING. WE INTUITIVELY UNDERSTAND THIS; i.e. we know about EGG SHELL SKULLS but we have ARCHITECTED OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION with ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITIONS which DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, giving rise to the term DEA ABSCONDITA (Goddess in hiding). It turns out that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE is ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (APPEARANCE) with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING is the PRIMARY (WAVE-FIELD) DYNAMIC. This WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING PROBLEM shows up as the PROBLEM of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM due to our DROPPING OUT of our language, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and SUBSTITUTING IN ITS PLACE, ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE. What then arises is an ERROR deriving from the REALITY that the WAVE-FIELD’s MALE and FEMALE CONJUGATES ARE NOT “TWO SEPARATE THINGS” so, it is ‘at odds with REALITY’ to, in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, to DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and thus imply that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE ON ITS OWN is the AUTHOR of the dynamic. That is, this CRIPPLED, BINARY LOGIC one-sided male asserting/actualizing ONLY pseudo-dynamic is NOT SUPPORTED by SENSE-EXPERIENCE. BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, which derives from SPLITTING THE WAVE-FIELD INTO TWO COMPONENTS, then DROPPING THE FEMALE conjugate (SUBSTITUTING EMPTY SPACE), is a DOUBLE ERROR and QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is instead NEEDED.]]
WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have shown ourselves to be INCREASINGLY of a GRADGRIND DISPOSITION in which case our common everyday language is INCREASINGLY DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, so instead of acknowledging the FEMALE CONJUGATE; i.e. “in the trough between two massive BREAKING WAVES THERE WAS AN OPENING THAT BECKONED, WHICH INDUCTIVELY SHAPED MY MALE ASSERTING ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC” which is a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, we “INSTEAD” go DIRECTLY to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate featuring “MY MALE ASSERTING ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC.
WITH THAT REDUCTION FROM THE QUANTUM LOGIC ANDROGYNOUS construction to the BINARY LOGIC MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING construction WE LOSE THE SENSE THAT WE (THE SUBJECT) IS INCLUDED IN SOMETHING GREATER THAN HIMSELF and shift ALL OF THE AUTHORING CREDIT TO OURSELVES, thanks to our use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR;
Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531
Nature was orchestrating my actions as in ‘To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose’‘ and it was the seductive opening of a quiet space between two waves that inductively inspired my male asserting actions of launching the hobie cat. We can (and do) shorten this up to ‘I launched the Hobie cat’. This is missing the tension of the anxious moments as I waited for the nonlocal and implicit containing dynamic to serve up one of the ‘seasons’ or ‘times amenable to my purpose’ which could then be rolled out and cast in local explicit form.
This brings into the ‘picture’ the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate that is the SUPRA- (nonlocal and implicit) AUTHORING AGENCY WHICH INDUCTIVELY ANIMATES THE SUBSIDIARY (local and explicit) MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING OPERATIVE COMMONLY CREDITED WITH LOCAL AUTHORING.
IT IS THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TRADITION THAT, BECAUSE BINARY LOGIC, which is SIMPLE AND CONVENIENT, CANNOT HANDLE THE FULL ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD PACKAGE, IN ORDER TO USE BINARY LOGIC, WE ARE FORCED TO DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING. BINARY LOGIC IS ONLY CAPABLE OF EXPRESSING EITHER ‘MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING’ OR ‘NO MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING’ which IS ONLY GOOD FOR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as “PUSHING” AND NOT CAPABLE OF “SUCKING”, the latter FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING, and in order to get to LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING THAT SUCKS AS WELL AS PUSHES, WE MUST UPGRADE OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME from BINARY LOGIC which is too simple because it only PUSHES as with the PEAKS of waves, to QUANTUM LOGIC which SIMULTANEOUSLY BOTH sucks AND pushes, in the manner of WAVE-TROUGHS and WAVE-PEAKS which are NOT TWO THINGS but ONE; i.e. TROUGH-PEAKS aka WAVES.
If we CONSIDER CAREFULLY the RELATIONS we are discussing here, we will be reminded that the PEAK and TROUGH COMBINATION is really only ONE THING (the WAVE) and we cannot, without introducing errors, speak of PEAKS or TROUGHS as if such existed ‘in their own right’ and proceed, as we have done in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, to DROP OUT a COMPONENT that DOES NOT EXIST AS A SEPARATE COMPONENT (hence the term DEA ABSCONDITA, the GODDESS IN HIDING). WHERE WE ARE GOING IN THAT CASE IS TO THE INVENTING OF A NEW PSEUDO-REALITY (i.e. where INDEPENDENT BEINGS APPEAR TO MOVE ABOUT IN AN EMPTY SPACE, a PSEUDO-REALITY THAT is NO LONGER GROUNDED in SENSE-EXPERIENCE).
* * * * * *
The CUCKOO’S EGG METAPHOR is meant to illustrate by ANALOGY how it is possible to introduce into a system, a COMPONENT which, although we are able to FIT IT IN, DOES NOT ONLY “NOT” FULLY FULFILL THE NEED, BUT BY OCCUPYING THE SLOT, SHUTS OFF ACCESS TO THE MORE CAPABLE, NEEDED COMPONENT.
THIS IS THE STORY OF OUR WESTERN CULTURE USE OF SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC BECAUSE IT IS LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC that is NEEDED BUT ONCE WE EMPLOY SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC, WE HAVE FILLED THE SLOT, ALBEIT IMPERFECTLY, AND HAVE “BLOCKED OFF ENTRY” TO THE LEGITIMATE LESS SIMPLE OCCUPANT. For example, once we have used simple BINARY LOGIC and stated that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ we are now working with BEING based IMAGERY of this THING, called ‘the TOWN’ where we are FOCUSED on WHAT “IT” IS DOING and the developing STORY is by way of the one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, AS IF IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which COMES AS PART OF THE BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING ‘PACKAGE’.
NOW WE HAVE FILLED THE SLOT (poorly but sufficiently to BLOCK ENTRY) so that what is now DENIED to us is the QUANTUM LOGIC option which is ANDROGYNOUS as with “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” and where EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as is the case with “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which as we can see, restores the NATURAL combination of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONTAINER together with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONTENT of ‘the TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’, … THIS TIME, “NOT” AS A SOLO MALE PRODUCING MACHINE but as a CONJUGATE together with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WILDERNESS, this “COUPLE” co-creating TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, and in the process REMINDING US OF THE INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE (one-sided male-asserting/actualizing) LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, as given by Goedel’s Theorem.
Thus THE PROPOSITION WHICH IS LOGICALLY “TRUE” is not necessarily “REAL” in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMING manner. For example, while it is TRUE that the TOWN is GROWING, it is NOT REAL because it is INCOMPLETE since as we know from our sense-experience, there must be CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS in order for the TOWN TO BE GROWING.
We can construe from this simple example and form Goedel’s Theorem, that BINARY LOGIC is innately INCOMPLETE and QUANTUM PHYSICS informs us as to why, and it is because BINARY LOGIC is only capable of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING constructs such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ which is a TRUE LOGICAL PROPOSITION but it is UNREAL because there is NO SUCH THING as a TOWN THAT IS GROWING, without, as a necessary part of the phenomenon, a SHRINKING OF THE CONJUGATE REGION (e.g. the WILDERNESS).
We can THUS consider our one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS to be UNREAL because INCOMPLETE and DECEPTIVE in the sense that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are commonly giving BINARY LOGIC a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF WHAT WE OFFER UP AS “REALITY” which is NOT REALITY. For example, when indigenous aboriginals use QUANTUM LOGIC FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and speak in terms of ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, this accords with our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, but when WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use BINARY LOGIC ‘BEING-BASED’ LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and speak in terms of ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING good’, this is NOT ONLY NOT REAL, it is having us fall into the DOUBLE ERROR based PSEUDO-REALITY trap pointed out by Nietzsche;
Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have grown ACCUSTOMED to using BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that lifts us out of our QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONSISTENT REALITY, and plunks us down in a SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC PSEUDO-REALITY which is MISSING the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD CONTAINER (the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE) and is SUBSTITUTING IN ITS PLACE, A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE as the ‘housing’ for the newly promoted MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT which, with the absence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, “TAKES OVER ALL AUTHORING DUTIES” which in reality continue to be ‘owned’ by the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, … which, due to the imposing of the one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as SOLE AUTHORING AGENCY, is “BANISHED” and become the DEA ABSCONDITA (Goddess in hiding), making way for her SUBSTITUTE of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
Whether we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS want to ADMIT IT OR NOT, the use of BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING puts us into a simplified PSEUDO-REALITY wherein there is only MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE, where we say things like ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ as if this were meaningful and as if we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS could INVEST IN CONSTRUCTION as if it were a REAL ACTION, without factoring in the REALITY of the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.
As fare as LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING GOES, this SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC SCHEME ‘WORKS’, and by that I mean that such BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS ARE “TRUE” and we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are TAKING THEM AND RUNNING WITH THEM ON THAT BASIS, … the PROBLEM BEING that WHAT IS LOGICALLY TRUE IS NOT NECESSARILY ‘REAL’ in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE CONTEXT, therefore, our WESTERN CULTURE ‘REALITY’ that we share by way of BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is an UNREAL PSEUDO-REALITY that, while it can PUT US ON THE SAME PAGE and have us all working together, let’s say, on the construction of a NEW TOWN, is doing so within a “SAME PAGE” that is definitely NOT the ‘sense-experience shared page used by indigenous aboriginals as made available with FLOW-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION’. Our WESTERN CULTURE ‘SAME PAGE’, is the LOCAL and EXPLICIT BEING based PSEUDO-REALITY spoken of by THOMAS GRADGRIND and BITZER and is no longer the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RELATIONAL REALITY spoken of by SISSY JUPE.
CHARLES DICKENS was trying to preserve as the foundational standard, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, which could serve as the FOUNDATION for the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, however, GRADGRIND and BITZER were riding on the popular bandwagon of an initiative to get straight to the ‘facts’ aka the ‘CONTENTS’ without being encumbered by CONTEXT that could shift the meaning, in the manner that indigenous aboriginal RESTORATIVE JUSTICE puts relational context in a (natural) primacy, casting out the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as makes sense when the structure of reality is one of strands in a web or condensations of a PLENUM, where the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is primary and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is only APPEARANCE or Schaumkommen.
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS continue to elect leaders like GRADGRIND e.g. Netanyahu and Ismail Haniyeh who cannot see the nonlocal and implicit for the local and explicit, a local and explicit which as Schroedinger has pointed out, is SCHAUMKOMMEN aka APPEARANCE.
* * * * *
When the indigenous aboriginal social collective, when confronted with a violent event with someone right there, holding the smoking gun that identifies the local author of the violence, will instead of mobilizing the purificationist process of executing the guilty individual, convene a HEALING CIRCLE cince the indigenous aboriginal understanding is that each of us is a STRAND in an all-including WEB of life, meaning that the real origin of conflict is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT rather than LOCAL and EXPLICIT. In the complex dynamics of freeway traffic, there may be swerving, braking and accelerating EN MASSE in which case the WESTERN CULTURE practice is it to identify a PERPETRATOR and VICTIM, putting the LOCAL and EXPLICIT into an unnatural precedence over the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT. The intellectual test for substantiating the alleged local and explicit AUTHORING of the VIOLENCE will be he BINARY LOGIC question of whether the alleged perpetrator struck the victim or not, a determination that is the basis of PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE which REWARDS the AUTHORING OF GOOD WORKS and PUNISHES the AUTHORING of BAD WORKS.
But in the indigenous aboriginal understanding as also in Modern physics, we share inclusion as STRANDS IN A WEB or in Modern physics as CONDENSATIONS in the energy-charged PLENUM wherein, the LOGIC of the dynamics is QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM as befits the ‘strand-in-the-web’ relation, AND NOT BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC as in the MATTER and EMPTY SPACE metaphor.
THERE IS NO BINARY LOGIC IN THE STRAND-IN-THE-WEB and/or the CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD dynamic.
As the Anishnabe say;
“At the core of our spiritual beings we make no artificial distinction between the sacred and the profane. Unlike Western culture, we have not suffered through that artificial separation”
According to Tomoko Masuzawa, any cosmology without a sacred–profane binary was rendered invisible by the field of religious studies, privileging Christianity [and Islam and Judaism] at the expense of non-Christian systems because the binary was supposed to be “universal”, –Wikipedia
The indigenous aboriginal response to outbreaks of violence is thus NOT the identification of those who are GOOD and those who are BAD and to follow up with the disabling or elimination of ‘those who are BAD’, … the understanding is instead, that RELATIONAL DISSONANCE has developed within the social relational dynamic and the needed response is to re-cultivate and sustain harmony in the social matrix. In the strand-in-the-web view, while it may be expedient to eliminate a ‘strand-in-the-web’ that is a recurrent outlet for the VIOLENT VENTING of buildups of tension, there is no assumption that that ‘strand’ is a LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING SOURCE of the VIOLENCE. The SOURCING of tensions, deriving as it does from the INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT social-relational matrix, is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, while the manivest VENTING is LOCAL and EXPLICIT.
BINARY LOGIC is too simple to deal with this QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM relational dynamic where the behaviour of the STRAND cannot be isolated from the behaviour of the WEB which means that it is an exercise in futility to set up a JUSTICE SYSTEM based on the IDENTIFICATION and ELIMINATION or PUNISHING of the BAD while PRESUMING ALL OTHERS INNOCENT and DESERVING of REWARDS and RECOGNITIONS for their GOOD OR INNOFFENSIVE BEHAVIOURS.
* * * * *
BINARY LOGIC is a too-simple logic that is like the Cuckoo’s eggs that are laid in the nest of a less simple bird where they hatch out first and dump out the eggs of the rightful owner prior to their hatching so as to HIJACK and take over the more sophisticated operations that they will be INCAPABLE of dealing with.
WESTERN CULTURE social collectives have been building BINARY LOGIC into the ‘system’ and we are now LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS. We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS understand, on some level, what is wrong with the THIN SKULL rule in WESTERN JUSTICE which holds the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AUTHOR of a PUNCH FULLY AND SOLELY RESPONSIBLE for the SHATTERING of the RECIPIENT’S SKULL even if that SKULL is an EGGSHELL SKULL that was ready to shatter with the smallest of blows. The problem here is the GENERAL PROBLEM in WESTERN CULTURE; i.e. the refusal to acknowledge, in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate. The problem is that LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC is OPERATIVE which require LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC capable LANGUAGE.
To start with a simple example; Instead of using simple BINARY LOGIC and saying “THE TOWN is GROWING” which has a one-sided male asserting/actualizing structure, we may want to ‘get real’ and acknowledge the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate, as well, by saying “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC construct wherein everything is in flux as our sense-experience attests.
Similarly, our habit is to say ‘THE PUNCH SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL’ which has a one-sided male asserting/actualizing structure, but we may want to ‘get real’ and acknowledge the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE as well, by saying “The eggshell skull was a female accommodating/enabling infirmity ready to conjugate with a male asserting/actualizing agent.
In these example, we can see that (A) the dynamics of nature have a wave-field structure incorporationg a female accommodating/enabling together with a male asserting/actualizing where these opposites are in a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC flip-sides of a single coin structure; e.g. THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where everything is undergoing TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and there is NO LOCAL and EXPLICIT BEING-based DYNAMIC other than ‘in appearance’ (the physical phenomena is nonlocal and implicit as is the nature of the WAVE-FIELD dynamic).
BINARY LOGIC is TOO SIMPLE for use in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of WAVE-FIELD REALITY and where used, is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM
BINARY LOGIC HAS TO GO!
* * * * * * end of How we get FOOLED by the Cuckoo’s Egg of BINARY LOGIC
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.