WESTERN CULTURE THOUGHT HAS BEEN “DUMBED DOWN” WITH LANGUAGE THAT REDUCES THE ANDROGYNOUS DYNAMICS OF WAVE-FIELD SENSE-EXPERIENCE TO ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS and PRODUCTION.

However “CLEVER” we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS may be with our use of language, the jiffy scheme we have developed for sharing simplified representations of our sense-experience has become the source of psychological dysfunction that pervades WESTERN CULTURE by SIMPLIFYING language based representation of our sense-experience of inclusion in the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD, by abstractly removing the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and constructing a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” featuring MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION, … MINUS the PRIMARY INDUCTIVE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING INFLUENCE that is the PRIMARY ESSENCE of WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

In short, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have architected a Language that ELEVATES the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS of WAVE-FIELD REALITY by DROPPING OUT ALL REFERENCE TO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ESSENCE OF THE WAVE-FIELD, creating a DUMBED DOWN SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is MECHANISTIC, having had its WAVE-FIELD properties REMOVED by the DROP-OUT Of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.  This is the DROP-OUT, in our language-based representations, of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT PRIMARY ESSENCE of WAVE-FIELD REALITY by the DYSFUNCTIONAL PROMOTING TO PRIMACY of the SECONDARY LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, generating a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that puts MATERIAL FORMS into an UNNATURL PRIMACY by DROPPING OUT THE ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

The WESTERN CULTURE language-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY now features NAMING-INSTANTIATED MATERIAL FORMS with GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development, termed the DOUBLE ERROR by Nietzsche, which unnaturally elevates the LOCAL and EXPLICIT in support of language representations that serve up a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the GRAMMAR-DRIVEN dynamics of MATERIAL FORMS in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.  This is a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which Kings, and “Prime” Ministers and other “AUTHOR”ities have been invented and persist either by inspiration of by intellectual agreement to support the ENGINEERING of a WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC from which NATURAL NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT INFLUENCE of WAVE-FIELD reality is being UNNATURALLY DISPLACED by the ELEVATING of INTELLECTUALLY CONTRIVED LOCAL and EXPLICIT “AUTHORITY”.

The BENEVOLENT KING is SYMBOLIC of the RESPECT we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have for the “LOCAL AUTHOR” and thus figurative “LOCAL AUTHORITY” concept, emotional attachment to which can blur whether the origins of LEADERSHIP in SOCIAL ORGANIZING derive from INSPIRATION (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) or EGOTIST PRIDE (LOCAL and EXPLICIT).  EGO based LEADERSHIP exalts BEING and the POWER of INTERNALLY DRIVEN MALE-ASSERTING ACHIEVEMENT AS BASED ON PLANS AND INTENTIONS while INSPIRATIONAL LEADERSHIP exalts BECOMING and the POWER of RISING TO MEET AND MATCH THE UNFOLDING CIRCUMSTANCES ONE FINDS ONELSELF INCLUDED IN (as a participant in the transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD).

Modern physics is about LIFE IN THE WAVE-FIELD while ROYALTY is about the changing face of AUTHORITY where AUTHORITY has formerly been the IMPOSING of the WILL of the AUTHORITY but this has been giving way to ROYALITY as a sought-for source of INSPIRATION.  The extent to which the dynamics of a social collective are shaped by INSTRUCTIONS or by INSPIRATION defines the ambiguous nature of AUTHORITY and LEADERSHIP.   The extent to which the LEADER employs the power of EGO (as in nationalism) which stresses group achievement relative to the power of INSPIRATION which is not abour achievement but the ability to rise to any and all occasion, points to the spectra of differing leadership types.  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS appear to be in an era where ‘AUTHORITY’ is in TRANSITION, particularly in regard to former EMPIRES which succeeded in building and retaining  their POWER by military strength and are now undergoing transmutation into cooperative associations within loosely knit ‘commonwealths’ or ‘common markets’ as the realization slowly grows that everything is interdependent as it must be in a WAVE-FIELD.   In the words of systems scientists;

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionistic scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

The shift from EGO based organization to INSPIRATION induced organization is a healthy, continuing trend, which ‘makes sense’ in world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.

In this essay, connections are made between Modern physics and the changing role of Royalty.

* * *

 

 

 

The role of language in DUMBING DOWN WESTERN CULTURE THOUGHT is something we have ‘engineered’ by using language to create a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD sense-experience has been RE-CAST in the INTELLECTUAL, ABSTRACT terms of a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY that has DROPPED OUT (from language based representation) the innate PRIMACY of the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, TRADING IT OUT for ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, and at the same time, notionally transferring the creative source of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD to the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE while BACKFILLING the FEMALE CONJUGATE with ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  In this language architecture, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INSPIRATION goes without mention while LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORING becomes “ALL SHE WROTE”.  Note that we still have our sense-experience that is beyond language that ALSO shapes ‘who we are’ but language has proven to be a powerful influence in this shaping as is evident in Bohm’s warning of the WESTERN CULTURE language-based exposure to schizophrenia and paranoia.

 

The concept  of the British Monarchy and the King’s or Queen’s Role in “Modern” Society is in a State of Transition which gives us cause to reflect on our WESTERN CULTURE manner of understanding ‘reality’.

This note explores the basic conflict between the WESTERN CULTURE popular way of conceptualizing ‘reality’ as it continues to be exposed to the findings of Modern physics, which have affirmed the correctness of the LESS SIMPLE indigenous aboriginal linguistic conceptualizing of reality, which is QUANTUM LOGIC based, and the MORE SIMPLE Western Culture linguistic conceptualizing of reality which is BINARY LOGIC based.

The question of AUTHORITY is of particular interest since in WESTERN CULTURE, the perceived NEED for TOP-DOWN AUTHORITY has undergone a transition where the ‘Rule’ of the King has been reduced to a symbolic influence that appears to be exposed to rise and fall on the basis of the Charisma of the current Throne-Sitter.  Where this ‘ends up going’ is tied up in the different types of LOGIC (BINARY and QUANTUM) which are predominantly operative in a region.  BINARY LOGIC, when used in governing, has some serious “side-effects” which include schizophrenia and paranoia, as Bohm has pointed out.  Quantum logic is a natural logic which has none of the shortfalls of Binary Logic and it is the logic ‘built in’ to the language of indigenous aboriginal peoples, while we WESTERN CULTURE adherents have built BINARY LOGIC into our Common Average European languages (Benjamin Whorf).

Since QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium while BINARY LOGIC is the EITHER/OR logic of the EXCLUDED medium, only the former is Modern physics compliant.  That is, only QUANTUM LOGIC takes into account the BOTH/AND relationship between the WAVE-FIELD and the material forms within the WAVE-FIELD.   BINARY LOGIC is TOO SIMPLE to deal with NATURE’s common QUANTUM LOGIC relations which are the common relations in nature.  As Modern physics affirms, our sense-experience reality is of inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD wherein the WAVE-FIELD is the mother of everything, the ‘material things’ being CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD.  In this understanding, NOTHING ever ‘makes it’ to the state of persisting BEING and everything is in continuum flux.   What appears to be MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM otherwise known as the WAVE-FIELD.

This shift in the understanding of ‘reality’ (from the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC basis to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC basis is ‘currently underway’, but not without problems as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are LOCKED INTO BINARY LOGIC based thinking by ‘HIGH SWITCHING COSTS’ (radical shifts in our WESTERN CULTURE ways of understanding reality).

* * *

 

King Charles III may focus his reign on climate change and politics

By Scott Neuman

Published September 9, 2022 at 8:29 AM CDT

 

 

 

https://www.tpr.org/news/2022-09-09/as-king-charles-iii-takes-the-crown-heres-how-he-may-focus-his-reign

Chris Jackson Getty Images

King Charles III has a history of wading into politics. Above, Charles, then the Prince of Wales, visits Tretower Court on July 5, 2018 in Crickhowell, Wales.

. . .

For Charles, a passion for the environment dates back decades. In an interview posted to the Royal Family’s website in 2020, he recalled how as a teenager he began to feel increasingly alarmed by “the destruction of everything … all this sort of white heat of progress and technology to the exclusion of nature and our surroundings, and also this complete determination to defeat nature and to suppress everything to do with it.”

 

* * *

 

A BINARY LOGIC based OUTLOOK is common in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC.  It is a mistaken outlook that, as both Bohm and Nietzsche have argued, can lead to psycho-social confusion and ultimately as Bohm points out, to schizophrenia and paranoia.  WHY IS THIS?

 

The popular “WESTERN CULTURE” notion of “CLIMATE CHANGE” employs the BINARY LOGIC based notion that HUMANS are INDEPENDENT BEINGS  who are SEPARATE INHABITANTS of the EARTH; i.e. SEPARATE from what we call THE ENVIRONMENT.  This INHABITANT-ENVIRONMENT SPLIT sets up the ABSTRACT scenario wherein HUMANS are sometimes accused of HARMING THE ENVIRONMENT as if HUMANS and the ENVIRONMENT were “MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE” while our sense-experience reality is the QUANTUM LOGIC reality, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium. For example, while a CONSERVATIVE might hold the male-asserting view and say that the HURRICANE is STIRRING UP THE ATMOSPHERE (male-asserting action view), the LIBERAL may say that THE ATMOSPHERE IS STIRRING UP THE HURRICANE (female-accommodating seduction view).  But, beyond both of these linguistic, simple BINARY LOGIC polar-opposing representations, our sense-experience informs us of the WAVE-FIELD view wherein the WAVE-FIELD is ALL-INCLUDING and TRANSFORMING which is QUANTUM LOGIC based such that MATERIAL FORMS (which we think of as MALE-ASSERTING FREE-AGENTS but which are NOT-FREE-AGENTS but MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD) that are bound up in the overall transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED, as is consistent with the indigenous aboriginal understanding of sense-experience dynamics.

 

THE ILLUSION OF A FRAGMENTED ‘REALITY’ THAT WRONGLY INFORMS OUR WESTERN CULTURE WORLD VIEW AND THUS OUR SOCIAL DYNAMICS COMES from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche has pointed out.  ONCE WE SAY, ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ we opt for BINARY LOGIC based representation with SPLITS THE TOWN OUT OF THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE AND SETS IT UP, IN OUR IMAGINATION, IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, which is how THE TOWN can be seen as GROWING IN ITS OWN RIGHT (i.e. thanks to the unconstraining empty space our “DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR” says it is included in). That ABSOLUTE, INFINITE EMPTY SPACE is what makes our BINARY LOGIC representation possible with its REDUCTION of the ‘ANDROGYNOUS’ WAVE-FIELD to a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTION only event.

 

THIS SUBSTITUTION OF ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE FOR THE WAVE-FIELD, elevates or promotes the MATERIAL CONDENSATION and its ACTIONS into the PRIMARY ACTION EVENT, … BUT WAIT A MINUTE because the MATERIAL CONDENSATION IS NOT AN INDEPENDENT THING AND IT DOES NOT HAVE ‘ITS OWN ACTIONS” AS IMPLIED BYTHE TERMS “GROWTH” and “DEVELOPMENT” and “PRODUCTION”.   The PRIMARY SOURCE OF ACTION LIES IN THE WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC ITSELF and the DYNAMIC of CONDENSATION, as seen in CONDENSATIONS that are continually FORMING and UNFORMING, is SECONDARY to the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC in the manner that the WHORLINGS in the FLOWING of OCEAN CURRENTS are SECONDARY to the OCEAN CURRENTS and thus SECONDARY TO THE OVERALL TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  There is NO AMBIGUITY as to whether the WHORL “SOURCES” the OCEAN CURRENT OR WHETHER THE OCEAN CURRENT “SOURCES” the WHORL.  The reality is simply that WHORLING is how FLOW APPEARS; i.e. the WHORLING is an aspect of the APPEARANCE of the OCEAN CURRENT

 

ACHTUNG, NOTA BENE, DON’T MISS THE FOLLOWING!!!

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS COMMONLY FALL INTO THE TRAP OF USING BINARY LOGIC WHERE QUANTUM LOGIC IS ESSENTIAL.  BINARY LOGIC IS A SIMPLIFYING OR ‘DUMBING DOWN’ OF QUANTUM LOGIC .  IT IS A ‘DUMBING DOWN’ WHICH “DROPS OUT” THE KEY UNDERSTANDINGS OF PHYSICAL FLOW PHENOMENA, DELIVERING, INSTEAD, A SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  WE DO THIS WHEN WE SPEAK IN TERMS OF ‘CONTINENTAL DRIFT (ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING) INSTEAD OF SPEAKING IN TERMS OF ‘SEAFLOOR SPREADING’ .  NOTE THAT WHILE THE CONTINENTAL DRIFT IS  MALE, ASSERTING (LOCAL AND EXPLICIT), THE SEAFLOOR SPREADING IS FEMALE, ACCOMMODATING (NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT).

 

EXAMPLE:  QUANTUM LOGIC IS THE LESS SIMPLE (THAN BINARY LOGIC) LOGIC THAT CAPTURES THE “BOTH/AND” (LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM) RELATION AS WHERE WE TALK ABOUT THE WHORLING IN THE FLOWING. The “whorling” does not “move through or across the flow”, the whorling and the flowing are ONE phenomena which is also called TRANSFORMATION.  While BINARY LOGIC  SUPPORTS “MISTAKEN” propositions such as ‘THE WHORLING IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING turbulence in the flow” (as if the WHORLING and the FLOW were SEPARATE ENTITIES), … QUANTUM LOGIC captures the ‘real reality’ wherein the WHORLING IS THE FLOWING; i.e. the WHORLING is a CONDENSATION of the FLOWING.   THERE ARE NOT TWO SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT THINGS HERE, so we cannot rightly say ‘the WHORLING is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING turbulence in the FLOW, because that would FRAGMENT the reality continuum (the WAVE-FIELD reality) and serve up a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein we start thinking of the WHORL as something that is GROWING and DEVELOPING and PRODUCING TURBULENCE (right here I am using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as in ‘the WHORL is GROWING’ to imply LOCAL AUTHORING POWER to the WHORL.     NO, NO NO!  THERE IS WHORLING IN THE TRANSFORMING FLOW! 

THERE IS JUST ONE DYNAMIC PHENOMENON WHICH IS THE TRANSFORMING , .. and WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMING always comes with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ASPECTS.   But when we see the two together, the WHORLING IN THE FLOWING WHICH IS THE ANDROGYNOUS RELATION THAT IS CHARACTERISTIC OF FLOW, … Some of us IMAGINE that we are seeing a MALE ASSERTING ‘WHORL” which looks as if it is STIRRING UP THE FLOW .   OTHERS OF US IMAGINE that we are seeing a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING
“WHORL” where the water in the flow is BEING PULLED AROUND by the WHORL-POOL.   Both of these are BINARY LOGIC LOCAL AUTHORING BASED INTERPRETATIONS, but if we stop staring at the WHORLING and look overhead, we see the SUN SHINING DOWN and inducing CONVECTION CELL ROTATIONS, reminding us that we are observing a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT phenomena, so there is no need to put on our CONSERVATIVE HAT and insist that we are watching a MALE-ASSERTING WHORL, and no need to put on our LIBERAL HAT and insist that we are watching a FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING WHORL.  We can acknowledge that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING, … that we live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM where the dynamics are WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  

 

ONLY WHEN WE ATTEMPT TO USE LANGUAGE TO TRY TO OBLIGE OUR NOTION THAT WE HAVE TO EXPLAIN THE PHENOMENON WITH LOCAL AUTHORING DO WE RUN INTO THIS MALE-ASSERTING, FEMALE ACCOMMODATING AMBIGUITY.  IN WAVE-FIELD REALITY, THE AUTHORING IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) so we do not have to let our PSYCHE get CONFUSED and FRAGMENTED when, after assuming LOCAL AUTHORING, we are faced with the two contradictory possibilities of MALE ASSERTING AUTHORING (the hurricane assertively stirs up the atmosphere) and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING AUTHORING where the atmosphere (inductively , seductively) stirs up the hurricane).  NO, NO, NO!  there is no LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING in WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS, … WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

 

WHEN WE ENCOUNTER LANGUAGE THAT FORMS REPRESENTATIONS THAT ARE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT, AS WHERE THERE IS THE IMPUTING OF LOCAL ACTION, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION, SUCH REPRESENTATIONS ARE CULTIVATING AN UNREAL, BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  INDEPENDENT BEINGS WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS “CAN ONLY LIVE” WITHIN AN ABSTRACT BINARY LOGIC BASED “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”.

 

* * *

 

With the above in mind, we can see that MAN-MADE CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT POSSIBLE.  This notion makes use of the BINARY LOGIC abstraction wherein HUMANS are INDEPENDENT of the LIVING SPACE and related abstractions such as “HUMANS are the AUTHORS of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of crops, products etc.”   These are all BINARY LOGIC dependent notions that derive from the DOUBLE EROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  WHAT is REALLY GOING ON is the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC which we experience as TRANSFORMATION and it is ALL-INCLUDING.

 

* * *

 

Ok, back to the HEADLINE STORY:

 

For Charles, a passion for the environment dates back decades. In an interview posted to the Royal Family’s website in 2020, he recalled how as a teenager he began to feel increasingly alarmed by “the destruction of everything … all this sort of white heat of progress and technology to the exclusion of nature and our surroundings, and also this complete determination to defeat nature and to suppress everything to do with it.”

 

 

The Modern physics notion of HUMANINGS in the TRANSFORMING in a QUANTUM LOGIC sense of things is also the indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta sense of things .

 

In the Modern physics understanding, wherein, as Schroedinger says, SUBJECT AND OBJECT ARE ONLY ONE (the WAVE-FIELD is ALL-INCLUDING) we can no longer think of ourselves as SPLIT APART FROM NATURE as in the environmentalist terms of HUMANS ABUSING NATURE.  Such statements and such thinking is BINARY LOGIC based and invokes the notion that FIGURE and GROUND are TWO or that INHABITANT and HABITANT are TWO, but QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC and informs us instead in terms where FIGURE and GROUND are ONE; i.e. where the FIGURE is a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD GROUND.  In this case, it is IMPOSSIBLE for us HUMANS to be abusing the ENVIRONMENT because we are INCLUDED IN THE WORLD WE ARE LOOKING OUT INTO so whatever we are doing to the ‘HABITAT’ we are doing to INHABITANTS such as ourselves.  This is an awkward way of saying that the world is the WAVE-FIELD which is a transforming relational continuum which is ALL-INCLUDING, which we are INCLUDED IN.  It is AWKWARD because of the simplicity of our language architecture which puts MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS into an UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE over FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING RECEPTIONS.

For example, we have the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE which GIVES ALL OF THE AUTHORING CREDIT FOR DAMAGE to the MALE ASSERTING AGENT.    This is for precisely the same reason as we have invented EMPTY SPACE which as Copernicus pointed out, was to SIMPLIFY the language based expression of planetary dynamics by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE so that we could reduce our language based representation to one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS and PRODUCTION (in his example, it was to be able to say ‘the EARTH TURNS ROUND’ without mention of any FEMALE ACCOMMODATING PULL as in a RESONANCE FIELD aka WAVE-FIELD as associates with that matrix of planets (or energy-field condensations) moving under one another’s influence.

DYNAMICS are INNATELY ANDROGYNOUS because all real physical dynamics are WAVE-FIELD dynamics and it is only WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that SIMPLIFIES and REDUCES ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS to one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY DYNAMICS.

EVIDENTLY, MALE ASSERTING DYNAMICS ON THEIR OWN (as if in EMPTY SPACE) are NOT REAL.

WAIT A MINUTE!  WHAT ABOUT ALL OF OUR MALE ASSERTING CONSTRUCTION EFFORTS, … THOSE AMAZING STRUCTURES WE HUMANS HAVE BUILT, THE MASSIVE DAMS, the SKYSCRAPERS, the FREEWAY SYSTEMS, the AIRLINE SYSTEMS and on and on it goes.  WHAT ABOUT THE MODERN TOWNS?

 

OH YES!, … there is that problem with grammar where the indigenous aboriginals say  things one way; (Ind. Abo.) ‘there is TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational), while we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS say, (West Cult.) ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products etc.’’ which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

 

WILL THE REAL REALITY PLEASE STAND UP!

 

BUT FIRST, HERE’s A CLUE:  The (Ind. Abo.) statement is QUANTUM LOGIC based; i.e. the TOWNING is INCLUDED in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, … while the (West. Cult.) statement is BINARY LOGIC based as the TOWN is INDEPENDENT of the LANDSCAPE.

 

The BINARY LOGIC VERSION is the COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE STANDARD REPRESENTATION and it is based on the ABSTACTION of BINARY LOGIC which is SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC

 

Copernicus started a trend or perhaps added support to a trend towards SIMPLIFICATION by way of reduction to BINARY LOGIC in our WESTERN CULTURE language based representations.

.

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

 

The simplification comes from the injecting of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE as a SIMPLIFYING CONTAINER and avoiding having to acknowledge the all-including WAVE-FIELD in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, setting up a QUANTUM LOGIC relation which is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION.

There are OTHER HUMAN FACTORS that support the use of the over-simplistic (unrealistic) ABSTRACTION of BINARY LOGIC; e.g. the EGO BOOST that can come with the BELIEF in LOCAL AUTHORING (which is enabled with BINARY LOGIC) and this can attract people by feelings of PRIDE in one having been acclaimed as the LOCAL AUTHOR of some positively received action or development.  The other attribute of the LOCAL AUTHOR ABSTRACTION is in PURIFYING the community of AUTHORS of BAD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

So the LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR has POPULAR SUPPORT in our WESTERN CULTURE.  In the indigenous aboriginal culture, LOCAL AUTHORING is NOT FOUND.  Instead, and consistent with Modern physics, the origin of actions and developments is understood as NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and individual are only the CONDUITS for the release of relational tensions that build within the social matrix.  The person who is the conduit for beneficial or harmful actions and developments is understood, in indigenous aboriginal culture, as the CONDUIT and NOT THE AUTHOR those actions and developments.

This is why the response is NOT SIMPLE ATTENUATING THE BAD BY ELIMINATING THE AUTHOR OF HARMFUL EVENTS, and AMPLIFYING THE GOOD by REWARDING the AUTHOR of GOOD EVENTS, because THERE IS NO ASSUMPTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING in the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE.   The HEALING CIRCLE is a technique to re-cultivate relational harmony throughout the web of social relations because it is relational dissonance within that matrix which is assumed to be the authoring source of rape, murder, violence; i.e. the individual that in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE would be identified on the basis of his having actually enacted the physical rape, murder or theft, would in indigenous aboriginal cultures be seen as the CONDUIT of the release of TENSIONS arising in the web of relations constituting the community and extensions to it.

 

* * *

 

BINARY THINKING leads us to the notion that we HUMANS are SCREWING UP THE ENVIRONMENT as in the alleged ANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE CHANGE.  T

HERE WE GO AGAIN WITH THIS DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR BASED NOTION OF ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’, ON TOP OF THE BOGUS NOTION THAT INHABITANTS SUCH AS HUMANS ARE INDEPENDENT OF THE HABITAT, instead of the INHABITANTS being understood as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD (aka the HABITAT).

This BINARY LOGIC based assessment which notionally SPLITS APART INHABITANT and HABITAT is the WESTERN CULTURE popular view which makes use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING concept where we say; WE HUMANS ARE THE AUTHORS OF, …. We can go on and list all kinds of things here, GOOD and BAD, thanks to our LANGUAGE and the DOUBLE ERROR and NAMING and GRAMMAR tool which we use to fashion our LOCAL AUTHORING REPRESENTATION.

But as Bohm points out, our sense-experience in WAVE-FIELD reality does NOT affirm those simple BINARY LOGIC based representations such as LOCAL AUTHORING or ‘cause-and-effect’.

 

“Bohm felt that an effect could have an infinite number of causes. For example, if you asked someone what caused Abraham Lincoln’s death, they might answer that it was the bullet in John Wilkes Booth’s gun. But a complete list of all the causes that contributed to Lincoln’s death would have to include all of the events that led to the development of the gun, all of the factors that caused Booth to want to kill Lincoln, all of the steps in the evolution of the human race that allowed for the development of a hand capable of holding a gun, and so on, and so on. Bohm conceded that most of the time one could ignore the vast cascade of causes that had led to any given effect, but he still felt it was important for scientists to remember that no single cause-and-effect relationship was ever really separate from the universe as a whole.” – Michael Talbot, ‘The Holographic Universe’.

 

WE know that when we speak about the GROWTH of our farm where we are cultivating 160 acres of wheat, and act so as increase the area of cultivation to 640 acres, it makes sense to capture this in language, in terms of the GROWTH of cultivated land where we quadruple it from 160 acres to 640 acres which is simple BINARY LOGIC where we check out each acre of land, making note of the fact that it is EITHER wheat producing OR not wheat producing. This question is SIMPLE because there are only TWO choices and we can quickly establish the GROWTH of acreage planted with wheat.  When we think in terms of GROWTH, since it a one-sided MALE ASSERTING concepts, we are in effect thinking in “FLAT-SPACE” mode.  But if we were thinking in curved space mode, we would be keeping track of the conjugate area such as the WILDERNESS area which is conjugate to, and thus SHRINKING relative to the EXPANDING CROPLANDS.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC brings with it the sense of CONJUGATES such as CULTIVATED LAND and WILDERNESS LANDS where the latter is SHRINKING in CONJUGATE RELATION with the GROWTH of the former.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC is BOTH/AND LOGIC that is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC which is EITHER/OR.

 

The notion that we can SEPARATE OUT ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACTS on ‘NATURE’ automatically presupposes that there is such a thing as ANTHROPOGENIC IMPACTS; i.e. that HUMANS are SEPARATE FROM NATURE and are SCREWING UP NATURE IN OUR OWN INIMICAL WAY.   This is quite a claim because it CONTRADICTS the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein HUMAINS are INCLUDED IN NATURE, proposing instead that HUMANS are SEPARATE from NATURE and are authoring actions that are HARMFUL to nature.  There is NO SUPPORT for this FRAGMENTATION in Modern physics and such notions belong to the same realm as Bohm describes, the tendency to SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA in WESTERN CULTURE CONDITIONING.

 

The problem begins with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which establishes, in the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based worldview, the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.  WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘ACCUSE’ ourselves of AUTHORING a lot of good stuff; i.e. modern cities and hospitals and transportation systems and theatres and sports stadiums.

 

But WAIT A MINUTE.   IS THAT REAL?  DID WE REALLY AUTHOR ALL OF THOSE GREAT DEVELOPMENTS?

 

The Modern physics folks and the indigenous aboriginals and the Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents ARE ALL CALLING BULLSHIT ON THE NOTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING! They are saying that our sense-experience is informing us that we are INCLUDED IN TRANSFORMATION (i.e. we are INCLUDED IN THE WAVE-FIELD) so that our purported LOCAL AUTHORING actions and developments are ABSTRACTIONS coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING stuff’ in place of the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

 

BUT WAIT ANOTHER MINUTE.  IF WE INVENT DOUBLE ERROR BASED “POSITIVE” ACHIEVEMENTS WE WILL HAVE TO INVENT DOUBLE ERROR BASED “NEGATIVE” ACHIEVEMENTS TO SATISFY the BINARY LOGICAL SYMMETRY.  If we have LOCAL AUTHORS OF GOOD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, symmetry demands we have LOCAL AUTHORS of BAD ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS. The Symbolism of a blindfolded woman holding balance scales is symbolic of this WESTERN BINARY LOGIC concept of JUSTICE as is also symbolized in “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth”.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC has a LESS SIMPLE (non-binary) form of symmetry i.e. the BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein, instead of invoking BINARY OPPOSITION wherein ONE POSITION IS JUDGED “RIGHT’ and the OPPOSITE is JUDGED ‘WRONG’, … we have QUANTUM LOGIC as with the WHORLING in the FLOWING relation where the WHORLING HAS A DISTINCT IDENTITY APPEARANCE BUT WITHIN THE INCLUDING FLOW GIVING RISE TO THE RELATION WITHIN WHICH THE WHORL “BOTH” is “AND” is NOT the FLOW implying that there can be MANY WHORLS within ONE ALL-INCLUDING FLOW such that instead of the WHORLS being INDEPENDENT and FRAGMENTING the FLOW, The WHORLS ARE CONNECTORS.

 

This is the basic structure of WAVE-FIELD NATURE.  NATURE IS NOT FRAGMENTED ‘INTO INDEPENDENT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES’.  NATURE IS THE UNUM OF THE WAVE-FIELD WHICH IS DIFFERENTIATED IN A QUANTUM LOGIC MANNER wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE as with the CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD as suggested by the indigenous aboriginal “MITAKUYE OYASIN” (“everything is related”).     BINARY LOGIC is a SIMPLIFYING ABSTRACTION as expressed in Copernicus statement, repeated here.  (the BINARY LOGIC is implied by the FREEING UP of the EARTH from the UNIVERSE so that ‘it can do ITS OWN FURNING ROUND’).

 

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

 

The ABSOLUTIZING of the earth’s motion by introducing an ABSOLUTE SPACE REFERENCE FRAME is a SIMPLIFICATION of CONVENIENCE.   In other words, the BINARY LOGIC as describes the relation between the MATERIAL PLANETS and the EMPTY SPACE is a SIMPLIFICATION born of convenience, the convenience of FRAGMENTATION where we only have to describe ONE THING AT A TIME as in ‘the EARTH TURNS ROUND’, which results in CONFUSION in our REASON-based thinking.

 

Such simplification, a prime example of which is “REASON” leads to MAJOR SCREW-UPS when we employ reason in a manner which OVER-RIDES the LESS SIMPLE UNDERSTANDING coming directly from our sense-experience.

 

As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’

 

The introduction of BEING is implicitly an introduction of BINARY LOGIC into LANGUAGE and thus into the REASON based representations of reality that we construct using language;

 

“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.”  Nietzsche, “Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer”

 

BEING and REASON are the source of DECEPTION-BY-SIMPLIFICATION in our language based representation of ‘REALITY’, the ‘REALITY’ of the all-including WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) but which is re-presented using our WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES (Whorf) as if EVERYTHING IS FRAGMENTED via the deployment in language of the abstract concepts of BEING and REASON, both of which support the imputing of a BINARY LOGIC foundation to the language based representations we construct.

BEING gives us a LOCAL MATERIAL PRESENCE while REASON lets us use RATIO which together with BEING delivers the impression of GROWTH and the use of GROWTH allows us to SIDESTEP our sense experience of inclusion in TRANSFORMATION by making available a SIMPLIFIED FORM of TRANSFORMATION; i.e. “GROWTH”.  By using language to construct representations based on BEING and GROWTH (the by-product of REASON or RATIO), we open the way to representations of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein GROWTH (a RATIO or REASON based linear concept) is SUBSTITUTED for TRANSFORMATION (an INTUITIVE QUANTUM LOGIC representation) so that we may say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which gives a RATIO-based or REASON-based impression and AVOIDS reference to TRANSFORMATION as implied in the indigenous aboriginal language based treatment of the subject; “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

 

* * *

 

In the above note, an explanation is given as to how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have used a language design that allows us to SIMPLIFY our representations of ‘reality’ using ONLY the MALE-ASSERTING (RATIO-BASED) abstractions of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION. TRANSFORMATION, which would require the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE together with the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE, is AVOIDED by giving preference to the linear, ratio based (REASONED) MALE ASSERTING concepts of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.

 

The UNNATURAL ONE-SIDED-MALE-ASSERTING-ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS OF WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS serves up a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is exclusively MALE-ASSERTING, thanks to the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

 

This one-sided MALE ASSERTING SUBSITUTE REALITY WHICH IS “MISSING” THE FEMALE ACCOMMDOATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE CONTINUES TO BE EMPLOYED AS THE WESTERN CULTURE ‘OPERATIVE REALITY”.  The IMPACT of our BINARY LOGIC based “DUMBING DOWN” of our LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATION of reality is the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  This leaves us (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) with a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY representation, NOT OF ‘REALITY’ but of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is MISSING the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BALANCE’ RELATION.  But it is this BALANCE-RELATION in our SENSE-EXPERIENCE whereby we attune to IMBALANCE as associates with the SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS in CONJUGATE RELATION with the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND, a TRANSFORMATIVE DYNAMIC which IS “NOT ACKNOWLEDGED” in our language-based representations when we speak in the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING terms of “GROWTH”, ‘DEVELOPMENT” and “PRODUCTION”.

 

The IMPACT of our WESTERN CULTURE PRACTICE of DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE in our language-based representations is IMBALANCE since WITHOUT incorporating the FEMALE CONJUGATE into our language-based representations, we see only the new development such as the GROWTH of the areas we have been building up such as new housing and industrial developments and since GROWTH is a one-sided-male-asserting action concept, our orientation to growth leaves TRANSFORMATION, which is the sense-affirmable reality, flapping like a loose sheet in a gale.   We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have become a social collective that is BOASTFUL of our SUBSTITUTE REALITY construction which features amazing GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of products, but EXACTLY HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO THE TRANSFORMATION WE SENSE BEING INCLUDED IN?

 

WHAT IS HAPPENING TO US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS IS THAT WE HAVE OUR LADDER UP THE WRONG WALL; I.E. WE ARE SUPPORTING GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION, AND THESE ONLY ‘LIVE’ IN A BINARY LOGIC BASED ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ WHILE TRANSFORMATION ‘LIVES’ IN OUR QUANTUM LOGIC BASED SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.

 

TRANSFORMATION of the overall LANDSCAPE is the (sense-experience affirmable) REALITY, … ‘GROWTH’ is NOT REALITY but is instead a RATIO-based (i.e. REASON-based) INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZATION that ‘lives’ only in a NOTIONAL FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT  (e.g. EUCLIDEAN SPACE).

 

CONCLUSION:

 

Because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS accept the LANGUAGE-based SIMPLIFIED REPRESENTATIONS OF A SUBSTITUTE REALITY expressed in BINARY LOGIC TERMS which SUBSTITUTE for the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.  This leaves us with only the MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE to serve as our OPERATIVE REALITY in which case we are UNABLE TO ACKNOWLEDGE QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BALANCE’ which corresponds with our sense-experience reality.  The OPTING FOR THE MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC REPRESENTATION BLOCKS OUT THE OPPORTUNITY TO SATISFY THE REPRESENTATIONAL NEED WITH QUANTUM LOGIC.  For example, if we FIRST SAY that the TOWN is GROWING, we have opted for BINARY LOGIC based conceptualization which is SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization where we would have to say; There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’

 

BUT IS THIS BINARY LOGIC based NOTION THAT “TOWNS CAN GROW” REALISTIC?

 

NO!  IT IS NOT SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE “REALISTIC” because it requires a BINARY LOGIC structure wherein the MATERIAL TOWN is MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE of its CONTAINING SPACE as the ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING CONCEPT OF “GROWTH” REQUIRES.   IN OTHER WORDS, GROWTH IS IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT THE MATERIAL FORM THAT IS PURPORTEDLY ‘GROWING’ BEING SITUATED IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

 

In sense-experience reality, we comprehend the ANDROGYNOUS CONJUGATE RELATION BETWEEN MATERIAL FORMS and THEIR CONTAINMENT, A RELATION THAT IS QUANTUM LOGIC based; i.e. where the MATERIAL FORM is a CONDENSATION of the CONTAINING WAVE-FIELD it is included in.

 

Understanding what is going on here is not that difficult, but what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS may struggle with is our habitual PSYCHOLOGICAL ENTRAPMENT BY BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING, and IF THAT BINARY LOGIC ENTRAPMENT ARRIVES PRIOR TO OUR HAVING REACHED THE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING, THE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC ‘SOLUTION’ WILL FILL THE NEEED FOR “AN UNDERSTANDING” and the “OPENING” FOR THE LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING WILL DISAPPEAR.

 

For example, once we use the BINARY LOGIC based expression THE TOWN IS GROWING, … even though ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE IS LESS SIMPLE BUT MORE COMPREHENSIVE’, … the REPRESENTATIONAL NEED IS SATISFIED (THE OPEN SOCKET IS CRUDELY FILLED), … so that the LESS SIMPLE BUT MORE COMPLETE QUANTUM LOGIC expression THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE never gets “USED”.   The situation mentioned by Copernicus is the same.  BINARY LOGIC REPRESENTATIONS are INNATELY SIMPLER THAN QUANTUM LOGIC (WAVE-FIELD CONSISTENT) REPRESENTATIONS, so for people who put a high value on SIMPLIFICATION in language based representation, such as us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS with our KISS motto, BINARY LOGIC based representations are commonly filling our language based representational needs, leaving the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC BASED REPRESENTATIONS “OUT IN THE COLD”.

 

INSTEAD OF “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, the linguistic representation need gets filled by the SIMPLER “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services” and suddenly the REAL REALITY where there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is “OUT OF THE PICTURE” and we have only the SIMPLIFIED PICTURE of the TOWN-IN-ITSELF (as if there were such a thing as a TOWN-IN-ITSELF floating in empty space) and because it is now ON ITS OWN, we can start talking in terms of “ITS GROWTH” as if this could happen without any CONJUGATE BALANCING WITH ITS “DYNAMIC SURROUNDINGS”.  OOPS! THAT’S RIGHT, IT DOESN’T HAVE TO CO-CULTIVATE “BALANCE” WITH ITS SURROUNDINGS BECAUSE WE ARE USING LANGUAGE THAT SUBSTITUTES ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT FOR THOSE SURROUNDINGS SO THAT WE CAN PROPOSE THAT ‘THIS LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF EITHER EXISTS OR DOES NOT EXIST”.  There is no notion of a FIT here, no Cinderella’s shoe to try the foot in to see if it fits.  There is just EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT and the sense of BALANCE in an ANDROGYNOUS context has gone missing.

 

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE has designed it this way by creating a SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE HAS GONE MISSING and we are left with ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING AGENT, hence our language-based representations are in terms of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION and those are the things we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS BRAG ABOUT and we are so focused on these one-sided MALE-ASSERTING actions and developments WE CLAIM WE ARE LOCALLY AUTHORING, … that we cans see OUT THERE IN FRONT OF US, … that we have LOST TOUCH with what is REALLY GOING on which is the WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION that we are INCLUDED IN, that is ALL-INCLUDING.

 

So, “The TOWN” PASSES THIS BINARY LOGIC COMPLIANCE TEST to affirm a LOCAL and EXPLICIT EXISTENCE STATUS, but TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and while it DOES NOT PASS the BINARY LOGIC COMPLIANCE TEST, TOWNING is evidently the embodiment of the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM relation where this LOCAL CONDENSING OF THE WAVE-FIELD IS BOTH “ITSELF”, THE ITEM OF CONTENT, AND THE “CONTAINER”, the WAVE-FIELD PRECIPITATING IT, so that INSTEAD of speaking in terms of the MOVEMENT OF THE THING THROUGH THE WAVE-FIELD, the QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION obliges us to speak in terms of TRANSFORMATION where there is an innate ambiguity between the MATERIAL FORM and the WAVE-FIELD in which it is included as given by QUANTUM LOGIC but which is beyond the reach of the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC.

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE CHOSEN TO GO WITH A BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WHICH FRAGMENTS ‘REALITY’ (I.E. “FRAGMENTS” THAT WHICH WE ‘CALL’ ‘REALITY’ WHICH IS A BINARY LOGIC BASED “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”).

 

THIS IS ‘GETTING US INTO TROUBLE’ BECAUSE (A) IT SIMPLIFIES REALITY, AND (B) WE ARE USING THE SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY AS OUR “OPERATIVE REALITY”.  SO WHILE WE (A) SPEAK OF OUR ACTIONS IN SIMPLIFIED TERMS OF GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION AS IF WE ARE LOCALLY AUTHORING ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, (B) WE ARE EXPERIENCING INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM WHEREIN THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘LOCAL AUTHORS’ OF ANYTHING, THE ‘LOCAL AUTHORING CONCEPT’ DERIVING FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR AS POINTED OUT BY NIETZSCHE..

 

THUS, OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF ‘REALITY’ IS COMPRISED OF A BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY FEATURING THE ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ OF LOCAL MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES AKA ‘BEINGS’ (FIRST ERROR) NOTIONALLY WITH ‘THEIR OWN (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS (SECOND ERROR)

As discussed, this SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while it continues to enjoy POPULAR USE in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATIONS, is putting us on a BUSTRIP TO HELL since there is a RADICAL MISMATCH between our language based INTELLECTUAL BINARY LOGIC REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY and the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY OF OUR ACTUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD.

 

* * *

 

POSTSCRIPT: 

 

This note was, in part, concerning how King Charles III may focus his reign on climate change and politics

Maybe he will be able to leave climate change alone and maybe he won’t, but insofar as he, and/or our WESTERN CULTURE social collective, continue to believe that we are HUMAN BEINGS with our own powers of LOCALLY AUTHORING actions and developments including actions which, so we say, are the source of global warming, leave us in a state of DENIAL of the reality of our INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which is not a place from which we can be said to be the AUTHORS of GLOBAL WARMING

 

By the same understanding as rejects the notion of ANTHROPOGENIC ANYTHING, the understanding of reality as the all-including WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION DYNAMIC would have us understand ourselves as being INCLUDED IN SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES, implying that the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR constructs that we use to imply our own POWERS OF LOCAL AUTORING, is just that; i.e. “ERROR”, the invented ERROR of BEING by way of NAMING as a PLATFORM for holding AUTHORING POWER by way of CONFLATING NAMING based BEING with GRAMMAR-based LOCAL AUTHORING POWER.    This is language trickery that we can use to construct LOCAL AUTHORING based REPRESENTATIONS.  This is what sets up the SCARE that we HUMANS are AUTHORING CLIMATE CHANGE.  We have to SPLIT APART HUMANS from ENVIRONMENT in order to think in this mistaken way.  This is SCHIZOPHRENIA since we are included in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD of our sense-experience reality and we are NOT SPLIT OUT and APART from the WAVE-FIELD.

 

The WESTERN CULTURE NOTION THAT HUMANS ARE INDEPENDENG BEINGS WHO ARE THE AUTHORS OF WONDERFUL MALE-ASSERTING GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services is SURPRISINGLY BLIND to the AWARENESS of TRANSFORMATION of OUR WAVE-FIELD LIVING SPACE.   KING CHARLES III has focused on the tremendous INJURY we are doing to the environment, our ‘habitant’ in which we are said to be, in Christian thinking, unique and special inhabitants with powers of AUTHORING AMAZING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS AND PRODUCTION of products, evidently, at some cost to what we refer to as the ‘environment’.

King Charles III is worried about ‘the environment’.

 

For Charles, a passion for the environment dates back decades. In an interview posted to the Royal Family’s website in 2020, he recalled how as a teenager he began to feel increasingly alarmed by “the destruction of everything … all this sort of white heat of progress and technology to the exclusion of nature and our surroundings, and also this complete determination to defeat nature and to suppress everything to do with it.”

 

David Bohm is WORRIED ABOUT US, … about our WESTERN CULTURE SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA which is coming from our erroneous notion that we human inhabitants of the EARTH are ABUSING THE EARTH.  This is NOT POSSIBLE because we are included in the all-including WAVE-FIELD which includes the EARTH.

 

The problem, then, seems to be our WESTERN CULTURE misplaced belief in our own AUTHORING POWERS.  We believe we are authoring this or that and all the while we are included in TRANSFORMATION and our role in transformation is NOT something we are managing because we are too busy managing our LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS and PRODUCTION of things.  In other words, our ship is sailing in a gale with three sheets to the wind.  TRANSFORMATION IS HAPPENING TO US WHILE WE ARE FOCUSED ON OUR MISTAKEN BELIEF IN OUR OWN AUTHORING POWERS.

Such THINKING shows the relation between SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA as outlined by David Bohm.  The FIRST MISTAKE is to assume that we HUMANS are SEPARATE FROM NATURE and this SCHIZOPHRENIC THOUGHT comes from our DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR where we are continually using LANGUAGE which imputes LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS to ourselves, so that we see things in terms of our having AUTHORED GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION on an impressive scale, HOWEVER, this is all language based fabrication because there is only ONE REALITY, the reality of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD.   What we are confusing for REALITY is a language based SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein we SET OURSELVES UP AS LOCAL AUTHORS OF REMARKABLE GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION of things.

 

HOW CAN WE BE LOCAL AUTHORS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS AND PRODUCTION if there is only ONE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD?    THERE ARE THOSE LIKE NIETZSCHE WHO HAVE CLAIMED THAT THE ‘LOCAL AUTHOR BUSINESS’ IS BULLSHIT, THAT IT IS THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR AND IT JUST SETS UP A LANGUAGE BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY IN WHICH WE HUMANS (I NEED TO QUALIFY THAT TO ‘WESTERN CULTURE’ HUMANS) USE THIS DOUBLE ERROR TO IMPUTE LOCAL AUTHOR POWERS TO OURSELVES AND TO OTHER NAMING-INSTANTIATED LOCAL AUTHORS SUCH AS NATIONS AND CORPORATIONS.

 

WHEN WE HEAR INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS USE OF LANGUAGE TO SAY THINGS LIKE ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING AS THERE IS IN ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING AND DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING products’, … AND WHO ARE WE SAYING IS THE AUTHOR OF ALL OF THIS?  WE ARE SAYING THAT WE HUMAN BEINGS ARE THE AUTHOR OF ALL OF THIS.   HOWEVER, IN THE RELATIONAL LANGUAGE OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, THE HUMANINGS ARE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AND WHILE THE INCLUSIONS ARE CONTRIBUTING TO THE TRANSFORMING IN A RELATIONAL SENSE, THERE ARE NO ‘LOCAL AUTHORS’ OF ANYTHING.  THAT KIND OF TALK WHICH FEATURES LOCAL AUTHORING IS, AS NIETZSCHE POINTED OUT, COMING FROM THE ABSTRACTION OF THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR WHERE WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SAY THINGS LIKE ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ WHICH IMPLIES THAT WE ARE THE AUTHORS OF THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN, …WHEREAS IN THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES, IT IS SAID THAT ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE WHICH IS FULLY RELATIONAL IN A NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT SENSE; I.E. IN A WAVE-FIELD SENSE, … SO THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING OF ANYTHING.

 

AS BOHM POINTS OUT, THEN WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE STUCK OURSELVES IN A SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHICH IS GIVING US DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR AS LOCAL AUTHORS OF AMAZING DEVELOPMENTS ALONG WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA (WE ARE SPLITTING OURSELVES OUT OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD AKA TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM) AND PARANOIA (AS IN KING CHARLES VIEWS OF ‘REALITY’ (HIS REALITY, WHICH IS A POPULAR WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALIY) WHICH ARE OVERTLY SCHIZOPHRENIC AND PARANOID; all this sort of white heat of progress and technology to the exclusion of nature and our surroundings, and also this complete determination to defeat nature and to suppress everything to do with it.”

 

How CAN WE HUMANS DEVELOP TECHOLOGY ‘TO THE EXCLUSION OF NATURE’  AND HOW CAN WE ‘DEFEAT NATURE’?  IN OTHER WORDS, WE ARE OBSESSED WITH THE CRAZY NOTION THAT WE ARE SPEARATE FROM NATURE AND ENGAGED IN A BATTLE WITH NATURE AND THAT ‘NATURE IS COMING TO GET US’.  THIS IS THE SCHIZOPHRENIA AND PARANOIA OF WESTERN CULTURE THAT BOHM IS TALKING ABOUT IN HIS COMMENTS ON ‘FRAGMENTATION’;

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

 

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

 

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

 

* * *

 

BINARY LOGIC IS THE SOURCE OF OUR WESTERN CULTURE SCHIZOPHRENIA.  IN THE FIRST PLACE, IT SECURES THE NOTION OF OUR LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS BUT WE CAN’T REALLY GET AROUND THE FACT THAT WE ARE INCLUDED IN TRANSFORMATION AND SINCE WE ARE REDUCING TRANSFORMING TO LOCAL AUTHORING, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO INCLUDE SOME DESTRUCTION TO OFFSET OUR CREATION IN THIS BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTION.    ON THE OTHER HAND, WE COULD ACCEPT THE WAVE-FIELD UNDERSTANDING WHEREIN QUANTUM LOGIC INFORMS US THAT WE ARE INCLUDED IN SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES; I.E. THE WAVE-FIELD AKA THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  UNDERSTANDING OURSELVES AS CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD MAKES MORE SENSE THAN OUR BINARY LOGIC SELF-PORTRAIT AS LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECTS IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

  * * *