HOW WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is FRAGMENTING REALITY
OVERVIEW: Western Culture Language Architecture incorporates a SIMPLICITY that distinguishes it from the LESS SIMPLE LANGUAGE of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal languages, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta languages. Instead of the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC foundations in the LANGUAGES of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, WESTERN CULTURE employs a SIMPLER LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on BINARY LOGIC, which, in terms of WAVE-FIELD structure, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and EMPLOY “ONLY” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE. For example, where Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals employ ANDROGYNOUS language structures such as ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which includes “BOTH” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING (‘TOWNING’) “AND” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (‘in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) .
Note that ‘TOWNING’ is a relational dynamic which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) rather than an abstract LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘THING-IN-ITSELF’ called ‘the TOWN’ as in standard WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVEOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.
NOTE ALSO that ‘TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND expression where the TOWNING and the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE are ONE THING and there is ONLY THE APPEARANCE OF TWO THINGS. As in turbulent flow, there is WHORLING in the FLOWING and it is NOT POSSIBLE to use a dip-net to scoop out the WHORLING form the FLOWING and store it in a separate TANK because the WHORLING is the APPEARANCE of the FLOWING, and is NOT a separate thing, IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES, BECAUSE THEY GIVE A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO BINARY “EITHER/OR” LOGIC rather than QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC, serve up a conceptualization that SPLITS APART INTO TWO SEPARATE FRAGMENTS, “THE WHORL” and “THE FLOW”, as if the “WHORL” were a separate development within the flow that is capable of INDEPENDENT MOVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT.
THIS IS “NOT” THE CASE in the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, but LANGUAGE can ‘DO WHAT WE WANT’ and in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATION, the COMBINATION that Nietzsche calls ‘the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ is used to CONCEPTUALLY LIBERATE the FORMING-in-the-FLOWING from this natural QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION and RE-CAST it in the BINARY LOGIC terms of ‘THE FORM that is MOVING THROUGH the FLOW’, in effect using LANGUAGE (the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR) to RE-RENDER the QUANTUM LOGIC FORMING IN THE FLOWING in the BINARY LOGIC terms of the ‘FORM IN THE FLOW’, whereby we are using language to CONVERT the FORMING IN THE FLOWING into the simpler BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of the ‘FORM’ that is ‘MOVING THROUGH’ the ‘FLOW”.
This REVISION of the LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY, which REDUCES the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND relation of the FORMING in the FLOWING to the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC FORM IN THE FLOW, synthetically LIBERATING the FORM and re-animating it AS IF IN ITS OWN RIGHT, by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is the general pattern of WESTERN CULTURE language based CONCEPTUALIZATION, so that instead of understanding REALITY as a QUANTUM LOGIC FLUID DYNAMIC wherein the FIGURES in the FLOWING are APPEARANCES (in the manner of quantum logic BOTH/AND relation of WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute “REAL BEING’ to the NAMING-instantiated relational forming in the flowing, and CONFLATING this “FIRST ERROR” with the “SECOND ERROR” of GRAMMAR that imputes to “THE FIRST ERROR (the NAMING-instantiated-BEING”, … “ITS OWN” POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT. This gives is the means of ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZING using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is in terms of ABSTRACT LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES AND WHAT THEY DO.
This BINARY LOGIC based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR PSEUDO-REALITY which imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development by means of NAMING-instantiated LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES is the SIMPLE basis of WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing of QUOTE/UNQUOTE “REALITY”. This WESTERN CULTURE conceptualizing based on SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC rather than being based on LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and ‘runs’ with ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, so for example, ones speaks in terms of THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN, WITHOUT MENTIONING THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS. This is CONFUSING BECAUSE of the GOEDEL’s THEOREM understanding that ALL FINITE SYSTEMS OF LOGIC ARE INCOMPLETE in which case we can speak in terms of LOGICAL TRUTHS (the TOWN is GROWING) which are AT THE SAME TIME “INCOMPLETE” (there is mention of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS).
Because WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS tend to formulate action and development efforts on a BINARY LOGIC TRUTH BASIS; e.g. “IF WE DOUBLE THE AREA OF CROP CULTIVATING, WE CAN DOUBLE OUR PRODUCTION”, this understanding which is based ONE-SIDEDLY on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING while we CLASSIFY this as TRUTH, is INCOMPLETE and is therefore UNREAL since it fails to acknowledge the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS LANDS that are an outcome that is in INNATE ASSOCIATION with THE GROWTH OF CULTIVATED CROPLAND, therefore our LOGICAL PROPOSITION in terms of the perceived DOUBLING of CROPLANDS generating a DOUBLING OF PRODUCTION, while TRUE, is INCOMPLETE since it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is EVER-PRESENT in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC we share inclusion in; i.e. in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, is commonly MISINTERPRETED as an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT deemed a NON-PARTICIPANT in material dynamics.
* * *
THE POINT IS THAT WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS “FRAGMENTING REALITY” BY ITS NOTIONAL ‘INFILLING” WITH “EMPTY SPACE” the area UNOCCUPIED BY MATERIAL STRUCTURES, … an UNDERSTANDING that ONLY ARISES with the use of SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC and such FRAGMENTATION “DOES NOT ARISE” with the use of the LESS SIMPLE “QUANTUM LOGIC” whereby MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD”.
CLEARLY, THERE IS NO FRAGMENTATION IN THE QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY WHEREIN ‘FIGURE AND GROUND ARE ONE’, WHERE THE FIGURE IS A “CONDENSATION” OF THE GROUND of “THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD”
WHILE WE HAVE OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE TO ‘OVER-RIDE’ WHAT OUR INADEQUATE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES MAY BE COMING UP WITH AS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF REALITY, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE BECOME MORE AND MORE DEPENDENT FOR OUR UNDERSTANDING OF ‘REALITY’ ON OUR LANGUAGE BASED EXCHANGES TO THE POINT THAT OUR “IMPRESSIONS OF REALITY” ARE ‘CANTILEVERED’ WELL BEYOND THE LIMITS OF OUR PERSONAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE, GIVING US AN EXPOSURE TO CONSTRUCTING LANGUAGE-BASED ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITIES’, THAT MAY BE ACCIDENTALLY OR INTENTIONALLY SPURIOUS; E.G. THE EXEMPLARY CASE OF THE 1949 ORSON WELLES BROADCAST OF A DRAMATIZATION OF THE ‘WAR OF THE WORLDS’ WHICH MANY MISCONSTRUED AS A PRESENTLY UNFOLDING EVENT.
The point is, therefore, and Ivan Illich also makes this point in ‘Silence is a Commons’, that because of our use of language based conceptualizing to inform our understanding of REALITY that extends such ‘REALITY’ well beyond the limits of our first-hand sense-experience, “WE HAVE AN EXPOSURE to LANGUAGE-BASED CONSTRUCTIONS OF SPURIOUS PSEUDO-REALITIES THAT WE EMPLOY AS OUR OPERATIVE REALITY”.
WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, DUE TO GIVING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN LANGUAGE TO BINARY LOGIC, and thus to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY, in the AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS”, have an exposure to employing linguistic constructions which DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which leaves FULL AND SOLE POWERS OF AUTHORING CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF REALITY TO MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMICS.
WITH THIS WESTERN CULTURE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LANGUAGE CAPABILITY, WE HAVE MANY VARIATIONS OF THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE” where we IMPOSE FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING RESPONSIBILITY TO THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY BECAUSE IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, WE HAVE ‘DROPPED OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ACTIONS AND HAVE LEFT OURSELVES SOLELY WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘CONCEPTUALIZING’ OF DYNAMICS. Thus, if a FIRE flares up within the FOREST, it is seen as being fully and solely due to the person who was careless in discarding his cigarette butt, because that is all that is possible in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE which is reduced to a BINARY LOGIC, one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conceptualizing.
In Modern physics as in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, language conceptualizing of phenomena has a QUANTUM LOGIC capability which takes into account the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING that is in CONJUGATE relation with MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING. This is a LESS SIMPLE (than BINARY LOGIC) understanding which acknowledges that the SHATTERING OF THE SKULL is NOT SIMPLY DUE TO THE FORCE OF THE PUNCH, but to the FEMALE ACOMMODATING/ENABLING of the EGG-SHELL SKULL. WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, and WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DISCOURSE IN GENERAL, DOES NOT ACKNOWLEDGE, … IN LANGUAGE, THAT IS, … THE ACTIVE ROLE OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is part of the WAVE-FIELD structure of our reality.
In other words, while Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal languages, and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta use of language acknowledges in language, the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD structure of reality (i.e. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING — MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE structure of reality), WESTERN CULTURE DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (i.e. DROPS OUT ACKNOWLEDGING OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD) and SUBSTITUTES ABSOLUTEMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE in place of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.
This WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is SIMPLIFIED or ‘DUMBED DOWN’ from the QUANTUM LOGIC physical reality of our sense-experience to the INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION of BINARY LOGIC is deployed as our WESTERN CULTURE “OPERATIVE REALITY” which is the source of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE that is both PHYSICAL and PSYCHOLOGICAL.
While this WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is the source of MENTAL AND SOCIAL FRAGMENTATION, the use of this dysfunctional language architecture is LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS. For example, the BINARY LOGIC based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is the source of belief in LOCAL AUTHORING where there is NO SUCH THING in sense-experience reality. LOCAL AUTHORING has been given a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT, and it is the source of rising levels of FRAGMENTATION (THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING in the all including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.
* * * end of OVERVIEW * * *
This is a COMPACT “SUMMARY OF HOW WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS FRAGMENTING REALITY”
There are TWO major ERRORS that have found their way into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE AND USAGE that are responsible for FRAGMENTATION in how we understand REALITY (quote/unquote) through language. Let’s not forget that our LANGUAGE based understanding of REALITY (quote/unquote), which is what we mostly use, is NOT AS RELIABLE as our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, … if it were, we would not have had the huge fiasco back in 1949 when Orson Welles Radio Dramatization of ‘War of the Worlds’ was broadcast when many people tuned in AFTER the announcement that it was just a dramatization and believed that there was a real attack from extra-terrestrials, and many fled to the hills to ‘save their lives’.
To some extent, this sort of thing is going on all the time but it is just part of the crazy social dynamic and we don’t know who is moving about with different ideas about REALITY such as the PROUD BOYS or others who understand REALITY in different ways. All the while, the television broadcasting systems and newscasts etc. are spreading impressions of REALITY one or another of which WE MAY ACCEPT as a REASONABLE account of REALITY that, meanwhile, goes FAR BEYOND THE SCOPE OF OUR OWN SENSE-EXPERIENCE. While our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is SOLID the BROADCAST DATA is something else, and Ivan Illich suggested in ‘Silence is a Commons’, that once the LOUDSPEAKER and MICROPHONE came along, the old way of communicating where people shared their sense-experience was OVERTAKING by whoever has THE BEST ACCESS TO THE MICROPHONE and while we may laugh at what the North Korean general public is believing which is coming to them through their state-controlled loudspeakers, North Americans and Europeans etc. ARE NOT WITHOUT EXPOSURE to being MISINFORMED about “REALITY”.
OUR BEING MISINFORMED is NOT only coming from the media and the SILENCE OF THE COMMONS effect, where whoever is holding the microphone that connects with the major ‘LOUDSPEAKERS’, but our WESTERN CULTURE MISINFORMATION is also coming from “The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS in LANGUAGE” and these are both REAL UNDERSTANDING-DISTORTING INFLUENCES that are basic to WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS since they come from the BINARY LOGIC based structure of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES and from the Goedel’s Theorem of INCOMPLETENESS (of all finite logic propositions), NEITHER OF WHICH IMPACT understanding that comes by way of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal language users, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta language users.
This understanding has been shared in part by Friedrich Nietzsche and in part by David Bohm but the message HAS NOT BEEN ASSIMILATED INTO THE WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE OVERALL, so the PROBLEM of FRAGMENTATION continues to develop, in some cases, such as the LGBTQ movement and/or the RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR with ‘the best of intentions’, but ‘best intentions’ based on BINARY LOGIC (good versus bad orientation) rather than QUANTUM LOGIC (balance versus imbalance-orientation) is PROBLEMATIC. Modern physics, as well as indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, orient to QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which we can understand in terms of the world being an all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM; i.e. a WAVE-FIELD in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the PLENUM (WAVE-FIELD). This understanding of REALITY which is supported by Modern Physics does NOT acknowledge BINARY LOGIC as having any role in our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, though we can and use BINARY LOGIC to construct INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACT BASED PSEUDO-REALITIES.
So the PROPOSAL here, which is NOT NEW but which has been put forth by Nietzsche and Bohm. is that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, because of our LANGUAGE architecture and use, are stirring up baseless FRAGMENTATION (both psychological and physical) in the social collective which is NOT PRESENT in either MODERN PHYSICS consistent LANGUAGE nor in indigenous aboriginal languages nor in the language deployments of Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.
The TWO COMPOUNDING LINGUISTIC SOURCES OF SCREW-UP IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USAGE ARE AS FOLLOWS:
-1- The OBSCURANTIST use of “SIMPLE” BINARY LOGIC where “LESS SIMPLE” QUANTUM LOGIC is naturally needed; i.e. where WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use the BINARY LOGIC propositions such as; ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ (this is a MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING proposition) where indigenous aboriginals use the QUANTUM LOGIC propositions such as; ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (this includes BOTH the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING proposition of TOWNING together with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING implicit “in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”
Once the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC is used (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING), it is TOO LATE TO EMPLOY THE LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) and since the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE habit is to use the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC option, the less simple alternative is SHUT OUT, which is OBSCURANTISM since it is more richly informing; i.e. while the BINARY LOGIC option employs only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING proposition, the QUANTUM LOGIC option includes BOTH WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATES; i.e. “BOTH” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING … :”AND” … the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE. We could say that there is WAVE-FIELD compliance in the QUANTUM LOGIC option while the BINARY LOGIC option DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and employs a SIMPLIFIED REALITY based solely on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING. Again, the QUANTUM LOGIC FULL WAVE-FIELD LINGUISTIC ARTICULATION is ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, … which the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC ‘half-wave’ articulation is ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ (note that there is no mention of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS) as is implicit in the ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.
-2- The OBSCURANTIST use of the Goedel’s Theorem understanding of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite (BINARY) LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS comes into play due to the distinction between TRUE and INCOMPLETE and our WESTERN CULTURE tendency to use propositions that are TRUE without regard for their INCOMPLETENESS. For example, the proposition ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is “TRUE” but INCOMPLETE since it fails to inform us of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS, these two together (GROWTH of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and the conjugate SHRINKING of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WILDERNESS) constituting TRANSFORMATION, which is supported by LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which is undergoing TRANSFORMATION.
HOW OFTEN do we use the BINARY LOGIC ‘TRUE’ status to support LOGIC that is INCOMPLETE? The support for LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS THAT are TRUE but INCOMPLETE is, once again, OBSCURANTISM. To speak of the GROWTH of cultivated land, which can be proven to be TRUE fails to be the COMPLETE story since it does not mention the conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS LANDS. If we sign a contract to clear an X acre tract of land, the action of ‘CLEARING LAND’ is taken for granted to be a legitimate TRUTH but it us certainly an INCOMPLETE TRUTH since it makes no mention of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.
TO speak in terms that the CULTIVATED LANDS are GROWING to DOUBLE their former size is to SPEAK THE TRUTH but the TRUTH is INCOMPLETE and OBSCURANTIST since it DROPS OUT MENTION of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS, and the latter may be most important to the indigenous aboriginal who may rightly claim that THE TRUTH spoken by WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS is a FORKED TONGUE TRUTH where, over and over again, the TRUTHFUL LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS to cultivate X acres of land are RADICALLY INCOMPLETE (in the sense of Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite BINARY LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS) and in that INCOMPLETENESS, there is OBSCURANTISM in that there is a failure ACKNOWLEDGE the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS and WILDERNESS DIVERSITY.
* * *
The above is;
“A SUMMARY OF HOW WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS FRAGMENTING REALITY per “The Double Whammy of Binary Logic and Incompleteness in Language”
(A) BY THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, AND,
(B) BY the use of BINARY LOGIC propositions that are ‘contaminated by ‘incompleteness’..
NEITHER (A) nor (B) arise in Modern physics, or in indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta adherents all of whom are quantum logic language users
QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the medium is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD within which there are MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS which are NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT ‘APPEARANCES’ in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which have NO LOCAL, EXPLICIT ACTION AUTHORING POWERS.
Of course, by architecting LANGUAGE that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is ARTIFICIALLY PROMOTED to PRIMARY AUTHORING STATUS, as in the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE where the built in linguistic OBSCURANTISM credits the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT WITH AUTHORING RESULTS THAT ARE IN REALITY ATTRIBUTABLE to the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.
* * *