IT IS HERE! The ‘EUREKA’ INSIGHT has ARRIVED!  The missing piece in a jigsaw puzzle has been located and fitted into place so that the GESTALT is taking over from the SUM OF THE PARTS.

I will share with you my path to this discovery and why we are more prone to missing it than finding it!  This insight is coming on the heels of the opening of my awareness to the ERROR of DIFFERENTIATION, which we introduce into LANGUAGE by assigning DIFFERENT NAMES to DIFFERENT RELATIONAL FORMS

As T.S. Eliot, an early student of the Vedic QUANTUM LOGIC MINDSET implies in his poetic writing, the richness of INTEGRATION is in no way limited to ‘the sum of the parts’ as DIFFERENTIATION would suggest.  T. S. Eliot writes in Little Gidding, for example; “Not known, because not looked for, But heard, half-heard , in the stillness Between two waves of the sea.”

The reality we live in is the WAVE-FIELD reality which is THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which can’t be captured in LANGAUGE.  As Lao Tzu observes; ‘the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’.

Ok, here is the path of this discovery.  There is a CLUE in my critique of Bohm’s manner of explaining FRAGMENTATION, and I frequently quote him, most often without making any critique.  Bohm says the following, and please note the phrase underlined which is where THE PROBLEM can be detected as I will explain;;

  1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them. 

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc.  Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existing parts, to be exploited by different groups of people.  Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic etc.” 

While I have most often ‘left this alone’, I was STRUCK when I first read this by what I perceived as an ERROR in the phrasing because in my view, THERE IS NO FRAGMENTATION in our sense-experience reality, THERE IS ONLY FRAGMENTATION IN OUR LANGUAGE-STIMULATED PSYCHOLOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

In other words, animals who do not speak a language and indigenous aboriginals who speak a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE are not THEMSELVES subject to this ‘widespread fragmentation’ because this FRAGMENTATION derives from using this particular type of language which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and EMPLOYS ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING CONJGUATE; e.g. Our English language conceptualizations are like this, and we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which is just the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE which drops out all mention of how the WILDERNESS is undergoing FEMALE ACCOMODATING of the GROWING TOWN, and physical reality is actually TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE which includes both the MALE ASSERTING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING in CONJUGATE RELATION.

Thus, the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING is the equivalent of TAKING US OUT OF A SPHERICAL SPACE AND PUTTING US INTO A FLAT EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT where there can be a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF THAT ‘GROWS’, “FULL STOP” because that’s the full story if that LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING is GROWING WITHIN AN EMPTY EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY SPACE, as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS like to think of such things because it SIMPLIFIES our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING by only having to deal with the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE.

In the LESS SIMPLE SPHERICAL SPACE, WHERE THERE IS A GROWING (male asserting) TOWN, THERE MUST BE A CONJUGATE SHRINKING WILDERNESS (female, conjugate area).

* * * OK, THE SUBTLETY HERE IS THAT IN SAYING ; fragmentation is now very widespread

Bohm is putting us into the mindset of those who believe FRAGMENTATATION IS REAL

But what happens is that only those that are employing the Common Average European language architecture which is the source of DUMBED DOWN conceptualizations NOT OF REALITY but of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, are going to ENTER INTO THE FRAGMENTED SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY.   THERE IS NO SUCH THING IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY AS THIS SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, IT IS LANGUAGE-BASED ABSTRACTION.

So, what Bohm SHOULD HAVE SAID (and perhaps what he intended) was ‘CRAZIES WHO BELIEVE THEY ARE LIVING IN A FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE  REALITY ARE NOW VERY WIDESPREAD’.

The only ‘FRAGMENTATION’ that is ‘going on’ is in the minds of those who are using that particular DUMBING DOWN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

So, while we could say ‘CRAZIES  are now very wide-spread’, we have no sense-experience support for claiming fragmentation is now very widespread.

If we say this to an indigenous aboriginal who has retained his own language wherein there is no such exposure to fragmentation, he may rightfully CORRECT us by saying that THE INCIDENCE of BINARY LOGIC language-infused CRAZIES who believe they live in a FRAGMENTATION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY is now very widespread.

IN OTHER WORDS, “THERE IS NO FRAGMENTATION, but THE CRAZINESS OF LANGUAGE-INDUCED BELIEF IN FRAGMENTATION is now very widespread.”

The understanding here is that with LANGUAGE, we are able to construct SUBSTITUTE REALITIES that we believe we are INCLUDED IN, such as the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS that move about and interact in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are employing a SIMPLIFYING BINARY LOGIC BASED REALITY such that, in using that language, we are putting ourselves, notionally, inside of that SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein everything is DIFFERENTIATED and FRAGMENTED into notionally SEPARATE LOCAL, MATERIAL,EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES.

…* * * HOW DO WE GET FROM the FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY to the “REAL WORLD” wherein material forms are condensations of the all-including WAVE-FIELD aka the transforming relational continuum aka the Tao?

In the first place, we do not have to ‘to anywhere’ because we have NEVER LEFT the world wherein we share inclusion within the transforming relational continuum.  We have only been struggling INTELLECTUALLY with our different methods of LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING of our SELVES and our ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

BUT NOT SO FAST!   As CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, we DO NOT HAVE “OUR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT” because we are NOT INDEPENDENT BEINGS, we are relational forms in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao. 

In this case, we are RELATIONAL FORMINGS WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD which means we have a QUANTUM LOGIC relation with the world we are included in, and QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  The CONDENSATION is “BOTH” itself “AND” the medium is included in (like the WHORLING IN THE FLOWING).  In this case, FIGURE and GROUND are ONE, or in other words, that “BOTH” / “AND” relation is the foundational understanding of QUANTUM PHYSICS and it constitutes a radical departure from our standard WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL OBJECT based reality conceptualization wherein FIGURE and GROUND are TWO (MATTER and EMPTY SPACE ARE TWO).

 

NOW LET’S “CUT TO THE QUICK”.  Let’s ask ourselves what has to change, Language Architecture-wise, to satisfy the FIGURE and GROUND are ONE requirement of QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY.

In order to have a language architecture that supports conceptualizing TRANSFORMATION, we have to GET RID OF MATERIAL BEING, a requirement that we ‘know about’ from Modern physics where what we formerly thought about as MATERIAL OBJECTS we NOW UNDERSTAND in terms of CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

BUT THAT’S THE BIGGIE in terms of what needs to change LANGUAGE-WISE, … TRANSFORMATION is EVERYWHERE AT THE SAME TIME, whereas with our simpler WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD LANGUAGE model based on MATERIAL OBJECTS that MOVE ABOUT and INTERACT within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE, the concept of MOTION, as we know from Newtonian physics, derives from FIXED MATERIAL OBJECTS, DISPLACEMENT IN SPACE, the PASSAGE OF TIME and the RELATIONS AMONG THESE. THIS is the MECHANISTIC WORLD of NEWTONIAN PHYSICS where there is a BINARY LOGIC SPLIT WITH NO BLURRINESS between MATTER and SPACE because we have created MATERIAL FORMS that are LOCAL AND EXPLICIT and that move about and interact in a EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.   In that NEWTONIAN view of reality, TIME is a FOUNDATIONAL REFERENCE for MOTION and CHANGE-that-is-ongoing within the ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE OPERATING SPACE.

CONSTRASTINGLY, in the case of  the all-including TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD, we no longer have the OUTSIDER ‘VOYEUR VIEW’ where we can see THINGS MOVING IN SPACE AND TIME.  TRANSFORMATION IMPLIES SPACETIME AND “NO MOTION’, only TRANSFORMATION which is ALL-INCLUSIVE thus no outside VOYEUR VIEWING (only an intuitive sense of INCLUSION).

THE PROBLEM OF SHORTFALL WITH BINARY LOGIC

COME ON, LET’S GET REAL.  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using BINARY LOGIC everywhere for everything within our WAVE-FIELD REALITY which is BEYOND the CONCEPTUALIZING REACH of BINARY LOGIC consructions.

LETS CALL THIS THE PROBLEM OF SWITCHING FROM THE EXPLICIT TO THE IMPLICIT (from particles to waves)

Here are some of the issues we run into all the time, some of which are technical but many are everyday encounters.

-1- In inverse filtering of the convolution of a spike series with a wavelet, we can’t inverse filer without incompleteness.  This is like a HUMPTY DUMPTY fell off the wall problem, the inverse operation putting him back together is missing the GESTALT.

-2- Is the climate going through a shorter term warmer cycle within a longer terms cooling cycle or is the current warming a rounded concave warming bump on a longer term warming bump, something we will wonder about there is less warming.

-3 – In the Zen story of the old man and the horses, it was bad luck that the son fell off the newly arriving wild horses and broke his leg, but since it meant that he was passed over by the warlord who was conscripting all able-bodied young men to go to battle, and since all the men who did go ended up getting slaughtered, getting a broken leg was a good thing.

-4- The thin skull rule says that the person throwing the punch is always the author of the damage from the punch even if his flimsy punch engages craters an ‘eggshell skull’ suggesting that FEMALE ACCOMMODATING over-rides MALE ASSERTING.

-5- As Shakespeare writes into Anthony and Cleopatra, … “There is a tide in the affairs of men Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries.” in which case, there is no way to isolate the local, explicit action of the male asserting agent in space and time since the female accommodating influence is primary.

-6-‘To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose’ .  Here again the WAVE-FIELD reality shows itself wherein the male asserting action cannot be ASSESSED in LOCAL and EXPLICIT thing-in-itself action terms because it is the situation that the male asserting agent is included in that serves as the female accommodating to his male asserting, and only these two together constitute ‘reality’.

* * * 

EVIDENTLY, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which we cannot see because it is the all-including WAVE-FIELD that includes us, has the power to use its CONTEXT (the female accommodating relational influence we share inclusion in) that redefines LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT (the male asserting local development).  The tender seed-sprouts do their male asserting push out from the warm soil regardless of the female “accommodating” embrace which could be that of a short term spring freeze.

While the growth cycle of the plants may be ‘annual’ the climate cycles may be centuries long and the spectrum of cycles of influence highly varied and all of these having influence on all, so that the ‘fortunes’ of a particular plant could never be ascertained by a study of that plant and in the end the relations would be numerous and varied as would describe a field of influence (WAVE-FIELD) rather than a complex network of multiple relational influences.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE conceptualizations, because of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE are are re-rendered in LANGUAGE in one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY terms, as if transpiring in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, are delivered with a LANGUAGE that is OUT OF WHACK with the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC which we intuitively understand by way of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD.   Thus we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS cultivate INTERNAL STRIFE with this LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM of DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE from our LANGUAGE and INTELLECTUAL REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS of “REALITY, putting WORDS AT ODDS WITH SENSE-EXPERIENCE.

This OBSCURANTISM is OVERT IN WESTERN CULTURE as is evident in the THIN SKULL RULE where although we know full well that the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the EGG SHELL SKULL is the reason for its major collapse in relational association with the MALE-ASSERTING FEEBLE PUNCH, the entire HOUSE OF CARD SUBSTITUTE REALITY of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS AND THE SOCIAL COMMITTMENT TO ‘UPHOLDING IT’ rallies in support of CRIMINAL JUSTICE LAWS that determine that the person THROWING the PUNCH is FULLY RESPONSIBLE for the damage to the skull (‘the ‘take-your-vistims-as-they-come’ operative).

The same OBSCURANTIST reduction to the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE (the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE) is true for the man who is careless in disposing of a cigarette butt in the tinder dry forest and thus is held fully “CAUSALLY” responsible for starting a blazing inferno even though the forest in most seasons is sopping wet and resistant to ignition even by a blow-torch.

Here again we have the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM deriving from our having DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so as to SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE, making our SIMPLIFIED LINGUISTIC UNDERSTANDING SIMPLER and THUS “AT ODDS WITH” our SENSE-EXPERIENCE UNDERSTANDING.  In other words, we are fully aware, sense-experience-wise, of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE influence of the tinder-dry forest that meets up with a feeble MALE ASSERTING SPARK from a chain saw striking a rock, … BUT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE PROUD OF THE SIMPLIFYING ARCHITECTURE of our LANGUAGE because it is this OBSCURANTIST REDUCTION to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS ONLY, that gives rise to EGO INFLATION by way of being ‘FALSELY CREDITED’ for AUTHORING developments that are WELL-RECEIVED by the social collective, which unfortunately sets a general binary logic based pattern whereby LOCAL AUTHORING is PRESUMED to be the source, also, of NEGATIVELY-RECEIVED DEVELOPMENTS.

There is NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING”!  As Nietzsche has pointed out, LOCAL AUTHORING is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  As indigenous aboriginals and Modnern physics are both well aware, the source of emergent events is always NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, deriving from the transforming relational continuum and MERELY FINDING MANIFEST EXPRESSION THROUGH A LIGHTNING ROD OR CONDUCTIVE CHANNEL.  To use language to say that LIGHTNING FLASHES is to use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (the lightning IS the flashing) to identify a LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHOR while the sense-experience affirmed REALITY is that the phenomenon is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, an understanding which in indigenous aboriginal culture leads to the ‘HEALING CIRCLE’ which engages with the ‘real source’ of relational dissonance which merely MINIFEST through a LIGHTNING ROD and is not AUTHORED by the LIGHTNING ROD.

Because in WESTERN CULTURE the EGO lays claim to LOCAL AUTHORING of positive development, LOGIC would have it that negative development must therefore be due to LOCAL AUTHORING.  the stage is thus generally set for OPTIMIZING the social dynamic by REWARDING and ENCOURAGING the LOCAL AUTHORING of developments deemed ‘beneficial’ to social well-being and PUNSISHING and DISCOURAGING the LOCAL AUTHORING of developments deemed ‘detrimental’ to social well-being.  This PURIFICATIONIST SOCIAL PRACTICE is in STARK CONTAST to indigenous aboriginal justice wherein, as also in Modern physics, social and other dynamics are understood as having NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT origin where it is only MANIFEST aspect that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT, as when an animal is teased and prodded and eventually BITES at which point the animal is killed for its ‘vicious’ actions in a LOCAL and EXPLICIT incident.

Behavioural management oriented to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is the WESTERN CULTURE approach, as also in the case of the THIN SKULL RULE, while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT relational history giving rise to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT Lightning Bolt are DROPPED OUT of the assessment of what becomes a ’cause’-and-‘effect’ interpretation.  This is where the culture-specific alignment with EITHER DIFFERENTIATION OR INTEGRATION manifests.  DIFFERENTIATION is preparatory to interpretations that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT as with MALE ASSERTING while INTEGRATION is preparatory to interpretations that are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING where the accommodating basin area induces rainfall rivulets to integrate into streams and streams to integrate into the raging river so that LANGUAGE limited to male-asserting can hide how a weak female accommodating can be the mother of a strong male asserting.

* * * 

What we see, in all of the 6 examples, is the LANGUAGE triggered relationship between LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONTENT which is secured with BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC …. and NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONTEXT which is secured with QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC.

By choosing BINARY LOGIC for our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, we can construct conceptualizations of reality in terms of ONE-SIDED MALE MATERIAL ASSERTING OBJECTS acting and interacting within AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE as in a MECHANISTIC REALITY.

By choosing QUANTUM LOGIC for our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, we can construct conceptualizations of reality in terms of the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE relation as in a WAVE-FIELD wherein CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD are continually forming and transforming in a FIGURE-and-GROUND-as-ONE dynamic also known as TRANSFORMATION.

The INSIGHT IN THIS, which may or may not come in a EUREKA UNFOLDING, is that we are looking at something equivalent to the PARTICLE – WAVE DUALITY or NON-DUALITY DILEMMA, which impacts our conception of our SELF and OTHER relation.

While Schroedinger flatly contends that “SUBJECT AND OBJECT ARE ONLY ONE” meaning that all tangible forms are INCLUDED in the WAVE-FIELD, … other physicists are preferring models wherein MATTER and FIELD are related by ‘probabilities’.

What does this matter?  Why do I spend time writing about this micro-level stuff?

The key issue that I wish to bring out and lay out in the bright light of day, is the fact that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES employ a simplified LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE in that it DROPS OUT acknowledging of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, thus reducing, in our LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTIONS of a shareable SUBSTITUTE REALITY, the ANDROGNYOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE to a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY MECHANISTIC REALITY STRUCTURE based on LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITIES moving and about interacting in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

So much for the WESTERN CULTURE ‘LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITY with GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT’.

In the Modern physics and Indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGE-based CONSTRUCTIONS of a SHAREABLE SUBSTITUTE REALITY, we have the full ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE without the DROPOUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  This is important because the WAVE-FIELD while it may appear like an emptiness, is a FULLNESS, an energy-charged PLENUM which is the SOURCE OF EVERYTHING, so what WESTERN CULTURE is doing with the BINARY LOGIC based “one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY MECHANISTIC REALITY STRUCTURE based on LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITIES moving and about interacting in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.” is PROMOTING the CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD to PRIMARY REALITY STATUS and inventing the “DOUBLE ERROR” COMBINATION OF ‘NAMING and GRAMMAR’ to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS to the secondary feature; i.e. the CONDENSATION that we have given a MAKE-OVER into a LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITY notionally with its own LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS.

The problem, restated;

THE PROBLEM OF SHORTFALL WITH BINARY LOGIC

COME ON, LET’S GET REAL.  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using BINARY LOGIC everywhere for everything within our WAVE-FIELD REALITY which is BEYOND the CONCEPTUALIZING REACH of BINARY LOGIC consructions.

LETS CALL THIS THE PROBLEM OF SWITCHING FROM THE EXPLICIT TO THE IMPLICIT (from particles to waves)

Let’s RE-CAST “The PROBLEM” of “SHORTFALL WITH BINARY LOGIC” in terms of our different choices of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE

 

-A- USING LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCT a BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF ‘REALITY’ based on MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES moving about and interacting within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE wherein FIGURE and GROUND are TWO and where FIGURES are MATERIAL, LOCAL and EXPLICIT while GROUND is empty.

-B- USING LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCT a QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of ‘REALITY’ based on an ALL INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM; i.e. a WAVE-FIELD with the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATES , wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE, where FIGURES are CONDENSATIONS of the GROUND (giving rise to the BOTH/AND relation since the CONDENSATION is both ‘ITSELF’ and the WAVE-FIELD it is an inclusion in).

In Mathematical terms, the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based LOCAL AND EXPLICIT REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION as in -1-  is constrained to the REAL only COMPONENT and “IS MISSING” (has ‘dropped out’) the ‘IMAGINARY’ COMPONENT.

In Mathematical terms, the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, TAOIST/BUDDHIST AND ADVAITA VEDANTA LANGUAGE based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION is ‘COMPLEX’ as in -2- in that it has both ‘REAL’ and ‘IMAGINARY’ COMPONENTS which gives it not only a LOCAL and EXPLICIT character BUT ALSO, AT THE SAME TIME, a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT character, the CONDENSATION being LOCAL and EXPLICIT and the WAVE-FIELD ITSELF being NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (the QUANTUM LOGIC relation).

Whatever we do with LANGUAGE, we always have our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD so that, in the end, our sense-experience must be the judge of the quality of conceptualization that is possible with a particular LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.  And as discussed in this note, WESTERN CULTURE COMMON LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE has a PROBLEM with OBSCURANTISM which is underwritten by SENSE-EXPERIENCE in that the one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY constructions of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, incorporate the following SIMPLIFICATIONS in going from sense-experience to linguistic conceptualization. 

-A- REDUCTION of WUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC: The QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the WAVE-FIELD and CONDENSATION is linguistically reduced to a BINARY LOGIC relation by substituting the abstraction of EMPTY SPACE for the WAVE-FIELD and ABSOLUTE MATERIAL BEING for the CONDENSATION.  This simplification employs intellectual abstractions that are not supported by physical senses.

-B- MATERIAL BEING is ABSTRACTION that is imposed by NAMING of fluid forms within the WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, thus MATERIAL BEING is based on Schaumkommen aka ‘appearance’.

IT IS HERE, The ‘EUREKA’ UNFOLDING!

It maybe is, it maybe isn’t. But it could be.

The BIG HOLDUP in WESTERN CULTURE social dynamics stems from the use, in LANGUAGE, to develop understanding by way of DIFFERENTIATION than INTEGRATION which means studying a TOWN in the TRANSFORMING COUNTRYSIDE by studying ‘the TOWN’ rather than by studying the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING COUNTRYSIDE. 

In the first case, we are using DIFFERENTIATION based understanding and thus BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC were we DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE while in the second case we are using INTEGRATION based understanding and thus QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC wherein we include FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.

 

In DIFFERENTIATION mode, we can get to know the TOWN by its LOCAL PARTS in the BINARY LOGIC sense (the TOWN “IS” those parts) and in INTEGRATION mode we can get to know the TOWNING by its relations within the including land (the TOWNING “IS” those relations).

FRAGMENTATION comes comes with continual use of DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE and it is happening not only on the scale of TOWNS but on the scale of NATIONS due to WESTERN CULTURE’s opting for DIFFERENTIATION in priority over INTEGRATION.

The indigenous aboriginal ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (we are all related) does not lead to INTEGRATION in a melting pot unifying assimilation.  The amazing diversity on earth is comprised of diverse condensations in the All-including WAVE-FIELD.  The WAVE FIELD is not a source of DIFFERENTATION producing local explicit forms, it is an all-including oven of mutually-informing TRANSFORMATION.

 * * *

AUTHOR’S SYNOPSIS

 

IT IS HERE! The ‘EUREKA’ INSIGHT has ARRIVED!  The missing piece in a jigsaw puzzle has been located and fitted into place so that the GESTALT is taking over from the SUM OF THE PARTS.

I think that we make a mistake when we infer that our language based constructions about ‘the world’ and about ‘things going on in the world’ are REPRESENTATIONS.

 

They are generally NOT REPRESENTATIONS, but more often CONSTRUCTIONS and this is where things can and do get CONFUSING because we are MISUNDERSTANDING statements such as;  ‘the HUMAN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING things, thinking it is a REPRESENTATION of some part the unfolding reality.

This is NOT a REPRESENTATION but a CONSTRUCTION based on MATTER, SPACE and TIME which we could capture in a cartoon showing a series of snapshots of what we say is a HUMAN.

If we understand the implication of ‘One can’t step into the same river twice because we are not the same person and the river is not the same river’, we are alluding to the sense-experience reality wherein we all share inclusion in the transforming relational continuum wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.  The all-including WAVE-FIELD is EVERYTHING and IT (the WAVE-FIELD not the CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD, is undergoing a continual overall TRANSFORMATION, which is the nature the WAVE-FIELD.

The proposition that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX is referring to overall TRANSFORMATION as in a WAVE-FIELD and it DOES NOT mean that “ALL THINGS ARE IN FLUX” because THERE ARE NO THINGS; i.e. THE GENETIC TAGGING OF A DEVELOPING FORM DOES NOT ESTABLISH THAT ‘IT’ IS A ‘THING”.  It may be a CONDENSATION of the all-including WAVE-FIELD and just as CLOUD may persist for some time, that does not prove its PERSISTING IDENTITY.  Moist air passing through a cool region may give rise to persisting cloud in that cool region that gives the APPEARANCE that the CLOUD is a THING such that we could treat of it with language that refers to ‘IT’ as a ‘THING’ that is right now GROWING or SHRINKING of SHIFTING etc.  when all the time we are looking at a dynamic pattern of CONDENSATION, as in the CONDENSATION of a WAVE-FIELD in which case we have to switch from IMPLYING or THINKING in the BINARY LOGIC terms that there is a “THING” here that has a “BEHAVIOUR”  suc as GROWTH and MOVEMENT and PRODUCTION (for example we may say that IT is producing rain).

THERE IS NO “IT” in the case where the persisting form is a CONDENSING of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM AS IN ‘CLOUDING IN THE ATMOSPHERING’.  We may say that ‘THAT THING is a RAIN CLOUD and “IT” is “PRODUCING RAIN”.  This is another case of what Nietzsche calls ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’, and it points to the GENERAL PROBLEM with using the abstract concept of ‘THING’, and our associated language constructs a pseudo-REALITY based on THINGS with GRAMMAR GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, a whole house of cards SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD as with CONDENSATIONS of MOISTURE in the ATMOSPHERE.

In WAVE-FIELD reality, everything is in flux and material CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD are NOT ‘THINGS’ that would then be in a BINARY LOGIC relation with the space THEY ARE MOVING THROUGH.  Giving them THINGNESS by calling them CLOUDS is WRONG.  We can only go so far as to speak in terms of CLOUDING in the ATMOSPHERING in order to hold back from imposing THINGNESS on ‘the CLOUD’.   This may be more subtle but it is pointing to the same DOUBLE ERROR problem pointed to by Nietzsche where we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to INVENT IDENTIFIABLE LOCAL THINGS when the reality is that there are NO THINGS in the transforming relational (wave-field) continuum.

As Schroedinger points out, what LOOKS like MATERIAL THINGS is just APPEARANCE; i.e. it is how CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD “APPEAR”.

What this means is that Indigenous aboriginal languages are CORRECT in that they employ QUANTUM LOGIC (figure and ground are ONE or in other words BOTH/AND LOGIC) where WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ BINARY LOGIC (figure and ground are TWO or in other words EITHER/OR LOGIC).

The QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC is UNLIKE BINARY (EITHER/OR) LOGIC as in the CLOUD example where QUANTUM LOGIC of BOTH/AND prevails where the MATERIAL CONTENT “IS” “AT THE SAME TIME” THE CONTAINER as with “BOTH” CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD “AND” WAVE-FIELD.

THERE ARE NO “THINGS” and CONDENSATIONS are only APPEARANCES like CLOUDS as explained above and to follow this understanding through in terms of its impact on LANGUAGE and PSYCHE leads F. David Peat’s perspective in BLACKFOOT PHYSICS due to the Modern physics SUPPORT for QUANTUM LOGIC and to Bohm’s view that WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENCY is the source of FRAGMENTATION due to the LANGUAGE cultivated belief in the EXISTENCE OF THINGS’.   THERE ARE NO ‘THINGS’ (as require BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE) IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, there are only CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD (as require QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE).

It is the notional EXISTENCE OF THINGS captured in LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that leads to FRAGMENTATION in the social collective and in the individual PSYCHE.

IT IS HERE! The ‘EUREKA’ INSIGHT has ARRIVED!  THERE ARE NO THINGS! ‘THINGS’ are the TRIGGER that invokes BINARY LOGIC.

The missing piece in a jigsaw puzzle has been located and fitted into place so that the GESTALT is taking over from the SUM OF THE PARTS.  Since ‘PARTS’ are “THINGS’ , when we dissolve the “PARTS” INTEGRATION is achieved by the QUANTUM LOGIC relation of the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD and the WAVE-FIELD.

WHEN THE PARTS DROP OUT AND GIVE WAY TO CONDENSATIONS, DIFFERENTIATION in its usual context becomes IMPOSSIBLE and INTEGRATION subsumes DIFFERENTIATION (seafloor spreading is an integrated thingless-connectedness which subsumes continental drift which is thing-based differentiation).

 * * *