Language Architecture comes in two forms, the nonlocal-implicit QUANTUM LOGIC GESTALT form which assumes INTEGRATION (see upper part of above diagram)

 

And the local-explicit BINARY LOGIC “DIFFERENTIATION” form which assumes EMPTY SPACE SEPARATION (see lower part of above diagram)

 

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA adherents along with MODERN PHYSICS see the world as FLUID INTEGRATION as in a WAVE-FIELD.

 

WESTERN CULTURE, with its concepts such as EVOLUTION see the world in terms of DIFFERENTIATION (how did all those different INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS come to “BE”?

 

BUT WHO SAYS THEY ARE ‘INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS’?   EVIDENTLY, ‘LANGUAGE SAYS SO’, … however, we know that Copernicus FRAGMENTED the model of the cosmos by suggesting that ‘the EARTH TURNS ROUND’ which implies a BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between ‘the EARTH’ and whatever it is TURNING AROUND IN’, … so if the EARTH is made of MATTER as was the WESTERN CULTURE notion.

 

All these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the end for which he form’d them; and these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation.”  –Isaac Newton, Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light

 

HELLO BINARY LOGIC SPLITTING OF REALITY INTO MATTER AND SPACE (DIFFERENTIATION)!   GOODBYE QUANTUM LOGIC INCLUSION OF MATTER IN FIELD (INTEGRATION).

 

HELLO ALSO, with DIFFERENTIATION, to the concept of EVOLUTION of the FORMS “WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE DESIGNED LANGUAGE TO DIFFERENTIATE”. (once we linguistically differentiate and split out relational flow forms, resituating them in empty space, their continuing development is no longer comprehended WITHIN a transforming relational continuum).

NOTA BENE:  The understanding of Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals that EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) as in the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS and thus only by APPEARANCE are FRAGMENTED into SEPARATE, LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING BASED (notional) SEPARATE ENTITIES.

 

The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, by imputing the BINARY LOGIC based SPLITTING of reality into MATTER as ABSOLUTE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT BEING BASED STUFF ( “God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles” – Newton) FORCES UPON US WITHIN THE REALM OF LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION, THE ABSTRACT NOTION OF ABSOLUTE INFINITE EMPTY SPACE, otherwise THERE WOULD BE NO ABSOLUTE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT MATERIAL PARTICLES.

 

This is the LANGUAGE-based SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION of our INTELLECTUAL-CONCEPTUALIZATION-OF-OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE-REALITY, but only in our WESTERN CULTURE wherein we have developed and continue to employ this DIFFERENTIATION imposing LANGUAGE which is in CONTRADICTION to our direct sense-experience of inclusion in a RELATIONAL WORLD based on INTEGRATION rather than DIFFERENTIATION.

 

In our Modern physics and Indigenous aboriginal and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta understanding of INTEGRATION based reality wherein ‘everything is related’ (mitakuye oyasin), we DO NOT speak in terms of LOCAL, EXPLICIT EVENTS as in the lower of the two graphs, but our language instead grasps the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) NATURE OF CURRENTLY EMERGING DEVELOPMENTS.

 

INTEGRATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE leads to understanding which sees currently emerging events as arising from NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT influences as in the FEMALE-NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT being the container for MALE-LOCAL-EXPLICIT action within their CONJUGATE RELATION as in the WAVE-FIELD dynamic (the upper curve in the WAVE diagram).  This can been visualized in the first of the two wave-form diagrams shown above

 

DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE leads to understanding which conceives of currently emerging events as arising from LOCAL, EXPLICIT influences.   DIFFERENTIATION looks ONLY for POSITIVE ACTIONS as in the one-sided MALE ASSERTING CONCEPTUALIZING of ACTION   .  DIFFERENTIATION is dominant in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THOUGHT as in WESTERN MEDICINE, JUSTICE and COMMERCE.  This involves the DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which is present in the LANGUAGE which employes the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMAMR (Nietzsche) which implies LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT EVENTS as in the second of the two WAVE DIAGRAMS shown above.

 

Notice that the FEMALE CONJUGATE, being NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the nature of physical waves is the provider of INTEGRATION of multiple instances of LOCAL and EXPLICIT periods of actions and development.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION, because it DROPS OUT the FEMALE INTEGRATOR, delivers a one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ as in language constructs such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCTING goods’ (which DROPS OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS), which prevails in the SPHERICAL SPACE of WAVE-FIELD reality.  This DROP OUT of the FEMALE CONJUGATE is equivalent to REDUCING SPHERICAL SPACE ABSTRACTION to FLAT SPACE ABSTRACTION and at the same time reduces QUANTUM LOGIC dynamics to BINARY LOGIC dynamics.

 

ONLY IN WESTERN CULTURE DOES OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE GENERATE THIS REDUCTION/SIMPLIFICATION IN OUR LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY THAT SERVES UP A SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein ‘TOWNS (are said to) GROW’ in a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING manner, as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE)

 

NOTA BENE:  It is only in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that we are faced with the problem of constructing ‘reality’ in a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING action and development.  This has led to problems in WESTERN CULTURE’s language based conceptualizing of the overall world dynamic since the use of DIFFERENTIATION FRAGMENTS relational forms in the all-including WAVE-FIELD, re-establishing them in BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE as LOCAL INDEPENDENT BEINGS with their own POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTION and DEVELOPMENT.

 

This has led to DARWINISM which is based on DIFFERENTIATING the INTEGRATED WAVE-FIELD, reducing it to LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTS whose development IS NOW DIFFICULT TO EXPLAIN since the WESTERN CULTURE DIFFERENTIATION PARADIGM forces the notional pseudo-reality of there being a proliferation of LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘organisms’ which are ‘born into’ an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.  This ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY AUTHORING OF BIOLOGICAL FORMS, because it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE to the MALE ASSERTING AGENT, … as far as WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE GOES, … imposes the INVENTING of some other mechanism to explain sense-experience affirmed TRANSFORMATION, but now without the support of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

 

That ‘OTHER MECHANISM’ is that of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes to the now solitary MALE ASSERTING AGENT, “ITS OWN GRAMMAR-GIVEN PSEUDO-POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS”.  In WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTIONS OF REALITY, this ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY CONSTRUCTION has been ‘FIGURATIVELY MADE TO WORK’ with the inventing of the concept of EVOLUTION (entirely unnecessary in the WAVE-FIELD understanding wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD with the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation).

 

EVOLUTION is an ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZING APPROACH which is FORCED by the initial assumption of DIFFERENTIATION which SPLITS OUT relational forms in the transforming relational continuum and RE-CASTS THEM as LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITIES (including ‘ORGANISMS’ such as ‘HUMANS’).   This PERSISTING WESTERN CULTURE ABSTRACTION is a departure from the Modern physics and Indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta understanding of reality in QUANTUM LOGIC terms based on INTEGRATION rather than DIFFERENTIATION; i.e. where the material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING PENUM aka the electromagnetic WAVE-FIELD.

 

Influential proponents of DARWINIAN EVOLUTION such are Richard Dawkins set up a distracting conflict between those who believe that THERE IS A GOD that determines thing and those that believe THERE IS NO GOD that determines things, … such as those like DAWKINS who portray EVOLUTION in terms of REPRODUCTION WITH VARIATION.

 

The DISTRACTION FROM REALITY here lies in the promoting of the BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of REPRODUCTION which is a DIFFERENTIATION based ABSTRACTION, … which sets up the synthetic conflict between GOD-AS-CREATOR  of the various forms in nature and REPRODUCTION with VARIATION.

 

NOTE THAT BOTH OF THESE ARE BASED ON THE ASSUMED EXISTENCE OF A VARIETY OF … INDEPENDENT BEINGS…. so that this captivating debate is a DISTRACTION from the reality that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘REPRODUCTION’.  REPRODUCTION is an ANSWER to the QUESTION; “HOW DO INDEPENDENT BEINGS KEEP POPPING UP?

 

“REPRODUCTION” is BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION that is NOT NEEDED in Indigenous aboriginal culture, nor in MODERN PHYSICS where the understanding of reality is in terms of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD with its CONDENSATIONS which are INTEGRAL FEATURES within the transforming WAVE-FIELD.  SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is NOT the BINARY LOGIC based ‘BIRTH OF NEW INDEPENDENT MATERIAL ENTITIES’.   SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY affirms the QUANTUM LOGIC CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD as the source of overall (all-including) TRANSFORMATION.

 

Nietzsche’s view, and the view of Boscovich wat that the world is one all-including energy-field.  This agrees with Modern physics but runs counter to Darwinism hence Nietzsche’s ANTI-DARWIN commentaries and his affinity with the evolution theory of William Rolph which is essentially WAVE-FIELD based

 

“In developing this aspect of the will to power, Nietzsche drew heavily on the ideas of an obscure Anglo-German zoologist, William Rolph (‘Biologische Probleme’). … Rolph denies the existence of an instinct for self-preservation – or at the very least rejects the notion that such a drive represents the principle motivation of animal behaviour. Rather, life seeks primarily to expand itself. This elementary proposition is expressed as a law of assimilation, a law operative in both the organic and inorganic world. Growth, Rolph argues, is determined by a process of diffusion, in which endosmosis predominates over exosmosis. All organic functions, from nutrition and reproduction right up to evolution, can be explained by, and reduced to, this fundamental activity; they are not, as most contemporary biologists assumed, a manifestation of the instinct of self-preservation.” – Gregory Moore, ‘Nietzsche, Biology and Metaphor’.

 

In Nietzsche’s writing, there is always the acknowledging of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate co-explaining the MALE ASSERTING GROWTH AND DEVELOPLMENT;

 

Anti-Darwinism.. — The utility of an organ does not explain its origin; on the contrary! For most of the time during which a property is forming it does not preserve the individual and it is of no use to him, least of all in the struggle with external circumstances and enemies

  

…                 .

 

The influence of “external circumstances” is overestimated by Darwin to a ridiculous extent: the essential thing in the life process is precisely the tremendous shaping, form-creating force working from within which ‘utilizes’ and ‘exploits’ “external circumstances” — The new forms molded from within are not formed with an end in view; but in the struggle of the parts a new form is not left long without being related to a partial usefulness and then, according to its use, develops itself more and more completely.” – Nietzsche, ‘The Will to Power’, 647

 

DARWINISM’S “REPRODUCTION WITH VARIATION” is a BINARY LOGIC based ONE-SIDE MALE-ASSERTING ONLY CONSTRUCTION.

 

The concept of REPRODUCTION is one of those LANGUAGE based concepts that MESMERIZES the user and puts to sleep his QUANTUM LOGIC awareness where we FLESH OUT EMPTY SPACE by acknowledging its ENERGY-FILLED PLENUM WAVE-FIELD STATUS, INVERTING the BINARY LOGIC order of things secured by the abstract notion of an ALL INCLUDING EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT (coming from the LINGUISTIC DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR based CONSTRUCTION of a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY pseudo-REALITY.)

 

REPRODUCTION is a simplifying concept that supports the use of DIFFERENTATION as the basis of a ‘material reality’ (e.g. the HUMANS and the TOWN are GROWING, DEVELOPING and producing things, and if we say that HUMANS produce INFANTS, we BLOCK OUT the LESS SIMPLE “QUANTUM LOGIC” understanding wherein ‘there is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’.

 

The reason we are STUCK in the over-simplified BINARY LOGIC based pseudo-world of MATERIAL OBJECTS that move about and interact within an ABSOLUTE INFINITE EMPTY SPACE, … as our LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING ‘SAYS’, … and are unable to open up to the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND LOGIC of the transforming relational continuum, is not simply because of long-standing habit, .. there is also the LOCK-IN-by SWITCHING COSTS since in order to acknowledge, in language, our QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC DIFFERENTIATION BASED EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (replaced by empty space), … we have to let go of a whole lot of EGO which is associated with our systems of LAW, MEDICINE and COMMERCE, all of which are based on BINARY LOGIC/DIFFERENTIATION based conceptualization rather than QUANTUM LOGIC/INTEGRATION based conceptualization.  BINARY LOGIC reduces our LANGUAGE based discourse to one-sided MALE ASSERTING, LOCAL, EXPLICIT ACTION based conceptualization.

 

Just as in the example of the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN CULTURE LAW, which follows from the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, so it is generally in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based conceptualization so that we develop the impression that WHATEVER HAPPENS derives from MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.

 

Should we ‘CREDIT’ the MALE or the FEMALE with AUTHORING REPRODUCTION?  This ambiguity is always the problem once the BINARY LOGIC setup is put forth.  Does the HURRICANE stir up the ATMOSPHERE or does the ATMOSPHERE stir up the HURRICANE?

 

Actually, NEITHER, since the LOCAL AUTHOR CONCEPT is UNREAL and we have to look BEYOND THE BINARY for understanding and in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, we remind ourselves that THE SOLAR IRRADIANCE WAVE-FIELD IS ALL-INCLUDING and provides a LESS SIMPLE understanding in which “BOTH” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ATMOSPHERE “AND” MALE ASSERTING ACTION HURRICANE are COMPREHENDED as CONJUGATE ASPECTS.   The ATMOSPHERE doesn’t just LIE THERE as the HURRICANE ploughs through it, … but that is how WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE portrays it by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

 

Western Culture language architecture simplifies (dumbs down) our language capture of sense-experience reality from the less-simple NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT QUANTUM LOGIC (ANDROGYNOUS CONJUGATE) which is INTEGRATING our LINGUISTIC UNDERSTANDING OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY … to the simple LOCAL and EXPLICIT BINARY LOGIC based on one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION which is DIFFERENTIATING our LINGUISTIC UNDERSTANDING OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.

 

* * *

 

SYNOPSIS:  “A majority does not have a monopoly on the truth.”  —Giordano Bruno 1600 (burned at the stake in the Campo dei Fiori near the Vatican for the heresy of relativity)

WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY as based on BINARY LOGIC is supported by majority opinion in many social collectives in the WESTERN CULTURE WORLD.

The ‘THEORY OF EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION’ is a simple BINARY LOGIC based concept of EVOLUTION developed by Charles Darwin in 1859.  The popular embrace of this simple explanation of transforming relational continuum is based on the BINARY LOGIC dynamic of DIFFERATIATION, oriented to the great variety of notionally INDEPENDENT material organisms, notionally WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.  This theory preserves and gives an archetypal role-model to the HUMAN BEING as if it were a ‘BRANCH’ on the evolutionary ‘tree’, thus ignoring ENTIRELY the all-including or reality in terms of an all-including WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS such that EVERYTHING REMAINS RELATED by virtue of the QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH/AND logic of the including medium) relation.

While the QUANTUM LOGIC relation is consistent with the WAVE-FIELD understanding of the universe, the BINARY LOGIC based THEORY OF EVOLUTION is designed to satisfy the simplistic notion of INDEPENDENT ORGANISMS that move about and interact within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, setting up a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that, while it provides a common reference based for WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED COORDINATION infuses FRAGMENTATION into the dynamic of the WESTERN CULTURE social collective.

DARWINIAN EVOLUTION THEORY is a TOO SIMPLE theory based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that is now LOCKED IN AS THE ‘OPERATIVE UNDERSTANDING’ BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS.   The DOUBLE ERROR supports the erroneous belief in LOCAL AUTHORING, for example, ‘child-birth’ wherein smaller variants of humans are said to emerge from the bodies of larger adult humans in an operation called ‘reproduction’.    This is ‘at odds with’ the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of the world as a transforming relational continuum wherein relational forming develops within relational forming as in WHORLING within FLOWING in a fluid dynamic, the latter understanding supported by Modern physics.

The understanding of material particles in empty space remains the foundational support in DARWINIAN EVULTION THEORY; i.e. God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, with the proviso that while the particles persist, for many people (e.g. Richard Dawkins) the ‘God’ part has been removed and it is popular, in science, to accept arm-waving explanations where the particle based explanations wear thin’

Of course there is ‘work in the pipeline’ that may close the gap between WAVE-FIELD understanding and material-chemical reactions which are only superficially explained using language that ‘sounds good’.

The following article speaks to both the need and attempts to move beyond the ‘gene’ to the ‘field’;

https://scientificandmedical.net/living-energy-resonators-transcending-the-gene-to-a-new-story-of-light-and-life-2/

Science has yet to solve major mysteries concerning life’s spontaneous selfassembly into intricate patterns. While explanations may one day be found by focusing entirely on genes and molecules, an elegant alternative already exists. For living beings have the capacity to behave as energy resonators, trapping spatially patterned light (electromagnetic energy) within them. This patterned energy field is called a resonant mode and may guide key aspects of biological development.  

The Gene Myth

It’s in the Genes

…

If we ask a conventional scientist to explain how living things spontaneously create an exquisite something out of nothing, we’ll probably be told the answer is to be found in the living being’s genes. How does a watermelon plant know how to make male and female flowers, respond to pollen grains transferred to the female flowers to swell the ovary into a multi-billion celled structure with a striped rind, juicy pink patterned flesh, and seeds that can recreate more watermelon plants out of thin air, water, and trace soil nutrients? It’s in its genes. This reference to genetic information is somehow assumed to adequately explain most structural, and some behavioral, phenomena exhibited by living beings. How does that spider know how to weave its web? It’s in its genes. We even claim to account for things like alcoholism, obesity, and schizophrenia by making reference to that special something in genes. Yet, in these particular examples, does this reference explain much of anything at all?

A gene does nothing more than encode information required to produce a particular protein. If we consider inherited biological mysteries in more depth, there’s actually an incredibly immense gap between the activity of a protein-producing gene and the precise and involved sequence of movements required for a spider to weave a web, or an explanation for how a mathematically describable, intricate pattern involving billions of cells can spontaneously emerge in a developing life form. There’s a similar lack of connection between genetic activity and why an alcoholic feels compelled to reach for that next drink.

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS such as these suggest the need for going beyond the BINARY LOGIC standard which develops understanding in terms of DIFFERENTIATION to QUANTUM LOGIC which develops understanding in terms of INTEGRATION.  We don’t need to continue to polarize into Conservative and Liberal based on the BINARY LOGIC belief in POLAR OPPOSITES such the Conservative belief that LOCAL AUTHORING originates with the INDIVIDUAL versus the Liberal belief that LOCAL AUTHORING originates with SOCIAL COLLECTIVE.   The indigenous aboriginal QUANTUM LOGIC belief, meanwhile, is THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING, that we share inclusion in an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM and like participants in a crowd dynamic or a heavy flow of traffic, we can move relationally (not absolutely) so as to cultivate harmony or dissonance in the relational dynamic we share inclusion in.

The fact that in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, we are able to PORTRAY ourselves as LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and developments does not mean that such intellectual LANGUAGE based abstraction can OVER-RIDE our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.  The EGO likes to believe in the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR ‘LOCAL AUTHOR’ PORTRAYAL which opens a can of worms since the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR has both a MALE-ASSERTING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘POLARITY” and we are witness to how some WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS (Conservatives) prefer to think of ACTION in the MALE sense of the HURRICANE ASSERTIVELY stirring up the ATMOSPHERE while other WESTERN CUTURE ADHERENTS (Liberals) prefer to think of ACTION in the FEMALE sense of the ATMOSPHERE INDUCING the stirring up the HURRICANE.   In reality, there is NO LOCAL AUTHORING, the atmospheric dynamic; i.e. it is undergoing TRANSFORMATION within the overall transforming relational continuum.

In other words, the EGO based belief in LOCAL AUTHORING which is prevalent in WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENCY, leads to POLARIZATION and FRAGMENTATION.

The above comments point to the REALITY that BINARY LOGIC is simpler than QUANTUM LOGIC but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are LOCKED IN TO THE USE OF BINARY LOGIC by HIGH SWITCHING COSTS due, for example, to having given BINARY LOGIC the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, MEDICINE AND COMMERCE.  The BINARY LOGIC abstraction of the LOCAL AUTHOR plays the cornerstone role in all three of these areas of endeavor, as PATHOGENS in the JUSTICE and MEDICINE understandings and as PRODUCER in COMMERCE.

In the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, there are no BINARY LOGIC, one-sided male-asserting EVIL AUTHORS aka PATHOGENS and there is no BINARY LOGIC, one-sided male-asserting PROFIT AUTHOR, all of these having an existence dependent on the REMOVING of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING agency, the so-called DEA ABSCONDITA, her removal opening the way to linguistically WALLPAPER OVER AND BLANK OUT the primary FEMALE ACCOMMODATING animating influence, reassigning, notionally, ALL AUTHORING ACTION to the MALE ASSERTING AGENT that now (with the removal of the FEMALE CONJUGATE) partners up with an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

This OBSCURANTISM is built into WESTERN CULTURE ARCHITECTURE and while it is pervasive, comes to our attention only occasionally (we have ‘programmed’ ourselves to ignore it) in such situations as lead to the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ where we oblige ourselves to constraint our LANGUAGE CAPTURE of the dynamics of PUNCH to the MALE ASSERTING OF THE PUNCH, ignoring the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the ‘EGGSHELL SKULL’

This, like the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that imputes LOCAL MALE-ASSERTING AUTHORING as the sole change-maker, employs this LINGUISTIC SIMPLIFICATION to preserve language based portrayals in terms of DIFFERENTIATION based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, … DROPPING OUT the INTEGRATION with the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT by substituting ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

The GENE MYTH has the ‘same geometry’ as the LOCAL AUTHOR MYTH; i.e. they are a reduction to one-sided MALE ASSERTING BINARY LOGIC dynamics which is why BOTH are FALLING SHORT of explaining QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION.

As already mentioned, the WESTERN CULTURE LOCK-IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS IS MASSIVE.  The needed change cannot, in this case, come from language based reasoning and action planning.  It is shortfalls in our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that are keeping us ON THE WRONG (binary logic) RAILS, as Bohm explains, while a shift to less simple QUANTUM LOGIC beckons.

* * *