Since the term “GROWTH” depends on the abstract concept of a THING-IN-ITSELF capable of enlarging in its own right, as if isolatable in an absolute empty space, there is NO SUCH THING AS “GROWTH” in the real world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.  There is ONLY “TRANSFORMATION”..

 

* * * 

I would encourage anyone NOT FAMILIAR with the MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTION of WAVES to review the very basics, and would argue that THIS MAKES SENSE BECAUSE WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD.  That is the finding of Modern physics and it agrees with the understanding of the structure of reality as understood by INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

 

I tell you why I am saying this because, if you are like myself and have been ‘born and raised’ speaking one of the Common Average European Languages such as ENGLISH, then you, like myself, have bee CONDITIONED to think in terms of REALITY A SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO REALITY which is BINARY LOGIC BASED, and I can describe this fairly easily but that doesn’t stop us from continuing to have a knee-jerk reflex of THINKING in terms of a BINARY LOGIC BASED SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY.

 

In order to AVOID the use of a SIMPLIFYING BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE based PSEUDO-REALITY CONCEPTUALIZTION, and be able to have LANGUAGE-based exchanges that are capable of QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, we have to change our language architecture and speak language that has the LESS SIMPLE capabilities of the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

 

Our Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS TOO SIMPLE to capture WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATION because it “DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE”, reducing (simplifying) our WAVE-FIELD based SENSE-EXPERIENCE to one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT (e.g. ‘The TOWN IS GROWING’) whereas the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE we need for CONCEPTUALIZING the WAVE-FIELD REALITY we are included in must employ the conjugate WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE which is the ANDROGYNOUS  FEMALE ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE RELATION; e.g. ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’

 

This is QUANTUM LOGIC structure, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.   QUANTUM LOGIC captures the relationship that associates with our understanding of SPACE as an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka the WAVE-FIELD) within which ‘material forms’ are CONDENSATIONS.  That is QUANTUM LOGIC and in order to speak and write in a manner consistent with the actual physical structure of REALITY, we need to us QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE which I have highlighted with BOLD ITALIC AND YELLOW BACKGROUND like this; i.e. ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’

 

We can see that the relational structure here is one in which FIGURE and GROUND are ONE; i.e. the TOWNING is INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation.

We can COMPARE this to our ‘NORMAL’ Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is BINARY LOGIC based where the TOWN is spoken of as being INDEPENDENT of the countryside so that we can say ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ as if there we no need to mention the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS in conjunction with the GROWING of the TOWN.  One can recognize in this the notion that the TOWN is a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF that is undergoing GROWTH.   That is NOT REALITY.  As our sense-experiencing of reality affirms, as the TOWN GROWS, the WILDERNESS SHRINKS and we have the all-pervading WAVE-FIELD relation wherein MALE ASSERTING (the TOWN GROWING) and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (the WILDERNESS SHRINKING) are IN CONJUGATE RELATION and where what is actually going on is that the LANDSCAPE is undergoing TRANSFORMATION.

 

If we revisit the TOWN that has been GROWING, we may search in vain for the lake we used to go fishing in and we will not find it because the TERRAIN HAS BEEN TRANSFORMED.  In other words, the physical reality that has been going on is not THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN, it is the TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE

 

WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IS AS FOLLOWS:

-1- The WILDERNESS is SHRINKING as forest is logged and lakes filled to ‘make room’ for the expanding TOWN.

-2- There is thus an area of WILDERNESS that NO LONGER EXISTS since it has been REPLACED by a newly constructed part of TOWN.

-3- ON BALANCE, there is LESS WILDERNESS and MORE TOWN and as TOWN CONSTRUCTING CONTINUES, the BALANCE is SHIFTING (MORE TOWN, LESS WILDERNESS)

-4- OVERALL, THERE IS TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE as it “LOSES WILDERNESS” and “GAINS TOWN”

-5- THERE IS NO SUCH THING (in the real world of sense-experience) AS “GROWTH OF THE TOWN”, there is only TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE wherein there is a progressive ACCOMMODATING SHRINKING of WILDERNESS LAND in CONJUGATE RELATION with a progressive ENCROACHING GROWTH of TOWNING.

 

* * *

 

WHAT IS BEING EXPOSED HERE?

 

The fact is that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS USE THE TERM “GROWTH” ALL THE TIME and “GROWTH” has a BINARY LOGIC IMPLICATION since a THING “EITHER” GROWS ‘OR” DOES NOT GROW.  Here we take for granted, because BINARY LOGIC based “BEING” is assumed, that “THE TOWN” is a LOCAL, EXPLICIT “THING-IN-ITSELF” with the (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) POWERS of AUTHORING GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT.

 

WHAT IS BEING EXPOSED HERE IS THAT THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE USED IN MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES, TAOISM/BUDDHISM and ADVAITA VEDANTA…. ACKNOWLEDGES THE QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE OF REALITY wherein all MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS come together with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING RECEPTION; e.g. the WILDERNESS IS OPENING UP FOR THE GROWING OF CULTIVATION.

 

MOST WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “WOULD AGREE WITH MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISM/BUDDHISM and ADVAITA VEDANTA THAT OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE AFFIRMS that the ANDOGYNOUS DYNAMIC is “THE REALITY”, whether we call it TRANSFORMATION  or the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC or ‘the TAO’, there is LOSS or SHRINKING Of the WILDERNESS TOGETHER with GAIN or GROWTH of  CULTIVATED LAND, and that WHEN WE SPEAK IN TERMS OF ‘GROWTH’ of the TOWN, that is just the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE which is “MISSING” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, since, in our sense experience reality (as distinguished from our simplifying BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE, … there is BOTH FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS) AND MALE ASSERTING (GROWTH OF THE TOWN) in CONJUGATE RELATION.

 

This is THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING…. CONJUGATE RELATION, which is otherwise known as TRANSFORMATION aka the WAVE-FIELD dynamic which is the sense-experience affirmed reality; i.e. there is no such thing as GROWTH.  As Nietzsche points out all LANGUAGE based IMPUTING OF LOCAL AUTHORING is (of which GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are examples) is the product of a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as with ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.  In the Indigenous aboriginal language as in Bohm’s Rheomode QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE, the phrasing would be akin to ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’  (see points -1- to -5- above which culminate with

 

5- THERE IS NO SUCH THING (in the real world of sense-experience) AS “GROWTH OF THE TOWN”, there is only TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE wherein there is a progressive ACCOMMODATING SHRINKING of WILDERNESS LAND in CONJUGATE RELATION with a progressive ENCROACHING GROWTH of TOWNING.

 

What WESTERN CULTURE has done with LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is to SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (the IMAGINARY COMPONENT IN THE REAL + IMAGINARY COMPLEX SIGNAL LANGUAGE which conveys WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE.  The DROP OUT of the IMAGINARY COMPONENT reduces the LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALLIZATION to the one-sided MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY aka ‘the ‘REAL’ COMPONENT.

 

This is a REDUCTION from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC, where we are left with the MALE ASSERATING COMPONENT on its own where we can suggest EITHER HE DID IT OR HE DID NOT DO IT, … HE EITHER FRACTURED THE MAN”S SKULL OR HE DID NOT, and here the WESTERN CULTURE THIN SKULL RULE says that WE WANT TO STAY WITH MALE ASSERTING ONLY BECAUSE OF ITS SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC BASED MECHANICAL STRUCTURE.  IF WE OPEN UP TO INCLUDE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE then our WESTERN CULTURE SYSTEMS OF JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE will all have to be RE-WRITTEN to upgrade to take them from the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC STRUCTURE they are now in, to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE which is the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE which is ANDROGYNOUS and where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE NATURALLY PREVAILS, as with TRANSFORMATION constituted by CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

 

INSTEAD OF THE BINARY LOGIC of MATERIAL OBJECTS MOVING THROUGH EMPTY SPACE AND INTERACTING WITH OTHER MATERIAL OBJECTS,  the MATERIAL OBJECT that we observe are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVEFIELD which are APPEARANCES which distract us from the PRIMARY DYNAMIC; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC within which the material dynamics are Schaumkommen (APPEARANCE)

 

THE WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC is purely RELATIONAL while the MATERIAL DYNAMICS (movements of ‘material beings’ relative to an absolute reference frame) are SCHAUMKOMMEN, therefore LANGUAGE must track the transforming relations and NOT be LED OFF COURSE by equating the movement of ABSOLUTE MATTER in an ABSOLUTE REFERENCE FRAME with ‘REALITY’.  Bohm’s Rheomode language was for this purpose of basing language on relations without the BINARY LOGIC absolutes of absolute material particles in an absolute empty space,  so as to instead tune in to the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relations of the WAVE-FIELD where matter is acknowledged as a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD establishing the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation which is LESS SIMPLE than the EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC relation.

 

THE BOTTOM LINE is that we need a QUANTUM LOGIC CAPABLE LANGUAGE in order to be consistent with WAVE-FIELD REALITY and the indigenous aboriginals languages with their phrasing such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ provide this, while WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ does not.

 

 * * *