PREFACE:  I am adding a few follow-up “NOTES on  Martine’s Integral Adventure as background to try to get around THE LIMITATIONS OF LANGUAGE, because in this case, the “STORY” is about the SHIFT from this general type of language I am right now using, which is a DIFFERENTIATION based language (as all the European language are) where we fragment things as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which “DIFFERENTIATES OUT” a notional “BEING-BASED THING-IN-ITSELF” called ‘THE TOWN”, … to an INTEGRATION based language that speaks in terms of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, as is the architecture of Indigenous aboriginal languages, which gives a foundational role to INTEGRATIVE CONTEXT as in ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

In the INTEGRATION based language architecture of the indigenous aboriginals, we LET GO OF THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT because this DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTING approach to constructing REPRESENTATIONS of our sense-experience reality is TOO LIMITING and involves DROPOUT of information essential to the INTEGRATING of BOTH CONTENT (MALE-ASSERTING) and CONTAINER (FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING).  For example, INTEGRATION captures the relations between the male asserting “TOWNING” which is conjoined with the female-accommodating “VALLEY”.  This is the QUANTUM LOGIC view where, as stones are pulled from valley, DEEPENING the valley, the TOWN as a collective of STONE CONSTRUCTIONS is RISING UP, so that what is REALLY going on is the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE which is the ANDROGYNOUS union of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING deepening of the valley and the MALE ASSERTING growth of the TOWNING.

NOTA BENE:  Languages such as English and the Common Average European family of languages (Whorf’s classification) employ DIFFERENTIATION to SELECT THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE; i.e. the “GROWING TOWN” and simply IGNORE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY HOLE produced by the extraction of materials, and this IGNORING or “IGNORANCE” sets up a SUBSTITUTE REALITY where GROWTH (and NOT “TRANSFORMATION”) is the language based pseudo-reality.   This is just “our” WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DESIGN, which appeals because of ITS GREATER SIMPLICITY thanks to the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE CONJUGATE of INTEGRATION (the common valley in which the towns are included) from our ANDROGYNOUS (INTEGRATING wave-trough-valley-DIFFERENTING wave-peak-town) co-comprising WAVE-FIELD REALITY, means that what our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is dealing with (only the MALE aspect) is NO LONGER CONSISTENT WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY but is now the basis for a SIMPLIFIED, ONE-SIDED, MALE-ASSERTING ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ which nevertheless ‘WORKS’ for communications purposes since all of the users of this language are MAKING THE SAME MISTAKE in dropping out the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE

Since everyone is using the ‘short-cut’ involved in saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which drops out the reality that the building materials for the town are extracted from the VALLEY so that what is REALLY going on as affirmed by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE as opposed to our language-based abstract constructions, is TRANFORMATION.

My point about THIS ENGLISH LANGUAGE I AM USING is that in our customary (standard) use of this type of language, WE DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE to SIMPLIFY our task of constructing language based representations, and even though we are right now DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, which makes our language based representations VERY UN-REALISTIC, this still ‘works’ for the COMMUNICATING and SHARING of what is now a DUMBED DOWN MALE-ASSERTING ONLY (SUBSTITUTE-) REALITY REPRESENTATION where can speak of the ‘GROWTH OF THE TOWN’ without mentioning the conjugate SHRINKAGE of the VALLEY due to the extraction of materials employed in the construction of the TOWN (i.e. there is a material balance here which is ignored because we quietly assume we are lining in a FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT rather than in the space on surface of SPHERE).  I am not suggesting that we do this CONSCIOUSLY, but I am suggesting that this is the implication of our DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and SPEAKING AS IF WE WERE LIVING IN A FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT where there is no FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE so that WE DO NOT HAVE TO ACCOUNT FOR THE REALITY THAT OUR EXTRACTION OF MATERIALS IS ACTUALLY TRANSFORMING THE SPHERICAL PLENUM (aka the WAVE-FIELD) WE ARE INCLUDED IN.

SUFFICE IT TO SAY that the language we are now using, i.e. this WESTERN CULTURE brand of language with its one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY reality-constructing architecture, is DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the price we pay for putting our intellectually constructed SUBSTITUTE REALITY into the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY”.  EXAMPLE, we now use language like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITION based on INTELLECTUAL DIFFERENTATION that separates the TOWNING from the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, … UNLIKE the indigenous aboriginal and Modern physics flow-based languages which fashion the equivalent of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which retains the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and thus supports FULL ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING-MALE ASSERTING ‘WAVE-FIELD’ REALITY.

This longish PREFACE will be SOON FORGOTTEN as we continue reading because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are now PSYCHOLOGICALLY HABITUATED TO THE DROP OUT, IN LANGUAGE of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which means that we are ‘used to’ working within the LANGUAGE-STIMULATED MENTAL IMAGERY that associates with a LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY where we believe that WE CAN SEE THE TOWN GROWING, even though this is NOT REAL but a language-stimulated abstraction obtained by DIFFERENTIATING OUT THE FIGURE FROM THE GROUND, the TOWNING from the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and setting it down, notionally, in an absolute empty and infinite space where we can INSPECT IT AS IF IT EXISTS A SEPARATE LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING based THING-IN-ITSELF, that we could extract from its innate inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, in the manner we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS can pick up a grasshopper, ignoring our and ‘its’ inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, and using DIFFERENTIATION as it we pull off its legs and wings to develop a mechanical understanding of that which, in reality, is like us, a CONDENSATION of the all-including transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD, understandable in terms of INTEGRATION, which is an understanding we BYPASS by employing DIFFERENTIATION, as we do with the grasshopper, first extracting the material form from its INTEGRATION within the overall ‘ecosystem’ or WAVE-FIELD, and then ‘getting to know it’ by breaking it down into a collection of material components as if it were a LOCAL, INDEPENDENT MACHINE, rather than a CONDENSATION of the ALL_INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is something we have ARCHITECTED on this abstract basis of BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION, whereas INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE is consistent with Modern physics is acknowledging the need for an INTEGRATION based language which gives understanding in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of CONDENSATIONS in the all-including WAVE-FIELD.

Now that we have discussed HOW SCREWED UP A DIFFERENTIATION BASED LANGUAGE IS, we can proceed with our DIFFERENTIATING LANGUAGE based ESSAY, because circumstances have put me and any potential readership, into this mode using a DUMBED-DOWN and PROBLEMATIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE for our communications.

One might ask me how I am, or if I am, going to avoid the booby-traps in this language I am using which DUMPS DOWN the communication to UNREALISTIC one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY constructions.

My answer is that this language IS CAPABLE of POINTING TO ITS OWN SHORTCOMINGS as in the sentence; ‘This language I am right now using has us saying stuff like ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING’ which is all one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION based when the task of using language to represent experiences from our sense-experience reality, needs be using language such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which incorporates both FEMALE ACCOMMODATING in conjugate relation with MALE ASSERTING as in the WAVE-FIELD nature of our sense-experience reality.

THERE, I WAS ABLE TO USE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO CONVEY THE LESS SIMPLE BUT MORE COMPLETE QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONSISTENT REPRESENTATION OF ‘REALITY’ (I am keeping ‘reality’ in quotes because, as Korzybski might have said, “The linguistic representation is not the sense-experience reality).

SO, WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT THE SHORTFALLS OF OUR ENGLISH LANGUAGE VIS A VIS CONSTRUCTING REPRESENTATIONS OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY?

If we reflect on it for a moment, we will see that the BIG WRENCH IN THE WORKS is our WESTERN CULTURE use, in our language based constructions of a go-by SUBSTITUTE REALITY, of the abstract concept of BEING that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘CREATE’ with ‘NAMING’.  NAMING invents LOCAL INDEPENDENT “BEING” THINGS_IN-THEMSELVES that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS USE TO LINGUISTICALLY ‘FRAGMENT’ REALITY by ‘DIFFERENTIATING’ and thus ‘SEPARATING OUT’ relational forms in the transforming relational continuum

and from there, inventing our own constructions of reality on the abstract based of animating the NAMING INSTANTIATED BEING-THINGS that we have used language based DIFFERENTIATION to ‘NOTIONALLY SPLIT OUT’ of the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, and USE THESE LINGUISTIC ABSTRACTION BASED “INDEPENDENT BEINGS”, re-animating them with GRAMMAR in LANGUAGE, to construct a BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION.

SUCCESS!  WE HAVE USED OUR FRAGMENTION BASED LANGUAGE; i.e. our DIFFERENTIATION BASED LANGUAGE, to CONSTRUCT GRAMMAR ANIMATED FRAGMENT BASED REPRESENTATIONS AS BEHAVIOUR GUIDING ‘GO-BYS’.  The DOWNSIDE is that in the real world of our sense-experience, all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of an all-including WAVE-FIELD in which case COORDINATION of the apparent FRAGMENTS is assured because THEY ARE NOT, IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, ‘FRAGMENT’ but are instead ‘CONDENSATIONS’ of the all-including WAVE-FIELD aka the transforming relational continuum.

DANGER!  Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, by its IMPUTING OF ‘BEING’ to relational forms in the flow, is creating a FRAGMENTED ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY” featuring notional INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BODIES in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE (GOODBYE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD).   THE CONNECTING SUBSTANCE OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD IS THUS REMOVES FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE AND WE ARE LEFT WITH AN ASSORTMENT OF NAMING-INSTANTIATED ‘BEING’ BASED ABSTRACTIONS WHOSE MOVEMENTS AND INTERACTIONS “WE MUST INVENT” USING THE ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ COMBINATION OF ‘NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ SO AS TO CONSTRUCT A USABLE BINARY LOGIC (MATTER AND EMPTY SPACE BASED) SUBSTITUTE REALITY, FOR LINGUISTIC SHARING PURPOSES.  Of course, what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have as our language based sharing capability, is a capability for sharing BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITIES, which we have built from DIFFERENTIATING OUT the relational forms in the transforming relational continuum.

So, let’s take another look at the SHORTFALL in our ENGLISH LANGUAGE.  It seems as if THE SHORTFALL IS NOT INTRINSIC IN THE LANGUAGE PER SE, but is coming from how we use the language, as in our assigning a foundational role to words imputing BEING.

“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.”

 

The problem, as Nietzsche points out is BEING-based REASONING.  The introducing of BEING in language is intrinsically FRAGMENTING. It introduces BINARY LOGIC via the ABSTRACTIONS of MATTER and SPACE and over-rides the innate fluidity of the all-including WAVE-FIELD dynamic that is foundational in “NATURE ”

So the problem is not our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES PER SE, but HOW WE USE OUR LANGUAGE and more specifically, our problem is our use of language to REASON’ which gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE to the abstraction of BEING which sets up the BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of “EITHER” is “OR” is not’ which is TOO SIMPLE to adequately capture the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND structure of the transforming relational continuum wherein MATERIAL FORMS CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD so that the CONDENSATIONS are BOTH THEMSELVES AND AT THE SAME TIME THE WAVE-FIELD THEY ARE INCLUDED IN.

It is clear that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE … DROPS OUT A LOT, … by its BUILT-IN BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATION using the abstract concept of BEING which lets us FRAGMENT REALITY in our LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION SCHEME, by equipping ourselves with what is really the tool of DIFFERENTIATION which lets us, notionally, EXTRACT from the transforming relational continuum, a dynamic that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as everything is in flux, a selection of FIGURES seen NOT AS WHORLS IN FLOW but at as LOCAL BEINGS thanks to the powers of LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION where we extract ‘the TOWN that is GROWING’ from our starting sense-experience impression that there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

While there is some REDUNDANCY in these above words, the point that is intended is that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is based on DIFFERENTIATION which DROPS OUT the relational connections that are retained in an INTEGRATION based language architecture.  DIFFERENTIATION brings with it the BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION of MATERIAL BEINGS, the ‘existence’ of which are determined by the simple “EITHER” is “OR” is not ‘reasoning’ test.

Once we have invented BEINGS by DIFFERENTIATING the relational continuum, and are using BEINGS in a foundational role in architecting our language based representation scheme, GRAMMAR is needed to construct a SYNTHETIC MATERIAL REALITY based on the actions and developments of the invented BEINGS.  This DIFFERENTIATION based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based construction of a LOCAL AUTHORING a based LINGUISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while it supports interpersonal communications, does so at the price of POPULARIZING synthetic SUBSTITUTE REALITIES that are FRAGMENTATION BASED.  As Bohm points out, this is NOT ONLY serving up language-based FRAGMENTED VIEWS of the WORLD, it is FRAGMENTING our understanding of OURSELVES bringing on, as a WESTERN CULTURE INBUILT EXPOSURE, SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA.

 

BOTTOM LINE: We live in a world of pervasive INTEGRATION characteristic of the transforming relational continuum (WAVE-FIELD) while we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS put together language based SUBSTITUTE REALITY representations making it APPEAR as if we were living in a DIFFERENTIATED world of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS IN EMPTY SPACE.

 

Martine experienced what it is like to come to the understanding, through her ‘systems sciences’ investigations, of arriving at an understanding that cannot simply be shared as “A NEW PIECE OF UNDERSTANDING” that the recipient can ADD to their COLLECTION OF SUCH UNDERSTANDINGS, but in order to be able to assimilate this NEW UNDERSTANDING, must (A) construct a new and more comprehensive QUANTUM LOGIC CAPABLE STORAGE FACILITY, and (B) REVISE one’s ENTIRE EXISTING BINARY LOGIC based INVENTORY OF UNDERSTANDINGS to the new (QUANTUM LOGIC) STANDARD.  As individuals, we CAN do this, but it involves giving up whatever STATUS we may have as LIVING EXPERTS in the DUMBED DOWN WORLD OF BINARY LOGIC-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, meaning, EXPERTS that enjoy WESTERN CULTURE recognition and rewarding for EXPERT STATUS, and as a result, our COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING progresses, as Max Planck suggested, “with the death of EXPERTS”. 

 

WESTERN CULTURE EXPERTS are predominantly BINARY LOGIC ADEPT EXPERTS who have the ability to consistently come up with the BEST ANSWERS, … ALBEIT WITHIN THE NARROW CONTEXT of Goedel’s Theorem, of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite systems of BINARY LOGIC. The farmer who manages to cultivate more crops and produce more output than his peers is part of a system that REWARDS and RECOGNIZES on the basis of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, … BUT THIS BINARY LOGIC ASSESSMENT is BLIND to the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS and thus BLIND to the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY of INCLUSION in an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA “WAVE-FIELD”.  Our COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING in a QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE will thus progress with the death of BINARY LOGIC EXPERTS.

 

* * * end-of-preface * * *

 

 

 

Martine and I got together thanks to her reading of my website and her understanding that SHE and I were on the SAME PAGE of understanding reality in the QUANTUM LOGIC based way which is the way of Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals rather than the conventional BINARY LOGIC way which is the way of WESTERN CULTURE.

 

What she would say, if she were still here, which is also my view, is that the FRAGMENTATION PROBLEM, which Bohm has also spoken of, is intensifying.   In our WESTERN CULTURE there is no sense of an INTEGRATED foundation to reality as in ‘mitakuye oyasin’ and that NOW applies, also, to indigenous aboriginals in general, with minority exceptions.

 

In Modern physics as also in the SYSTEMS SCIENCES (not generally but in the works of Martine along with some of the founders and a minority of present day SYSTEMS THINKERS, the INTEGRATED understanding of reality is embraced.   You can ‘read it’ in Martine’s comment;

 

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

 

This IS the world of our sense-experience and it is the WAVE-FIELD WORLD which echoes the indigenous aboriginal aphorism ‘mitakuye oysasin’ (“everything is related”)

 

So where that leaves the present state of the world is that while a small minority are overt practitioners of a philosophy that acknowledges that EVERYTHING IS RELATED, the POPULAR WAY OF THINKING AND ACTING in our WESTERN CULTURE is based on BINARY LOGIC belief in local, material BEINGS which are INDEPENDENT, which means that we can understand their ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT as deriving from LOCAL INTERNAL AUTHORING POWERS.   This is a long way from understanding ourselves according to Modern physics and the indigenous aboriginal understanding where MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, and Bohm and Schroedinger and Nietzsche also tried to point this out. e.g; (to be read without being put off by the ‘drama’ in the way it is expressed);

 

“And do you know what “the world” is to me? Shall I show it to you in my mirror? This world: a monster of energy, without beginning, without end; a firm, iron magnitude of force that does not grow bigger or smaller, that does not expend itself but only transforms itself; as a whole, of unalterable size, a household without expenses or losses, but likewise without increase or income …” –Nietzsche, ‘The Will to Power’, 1067

 

In other words, the world is an all-including transforming relational continuum, as is the understanding of Modern physics and that was the understanding of Boscovich who we know Nietzsche ‘read’.

 

Boscovich is the author of ‘Theory of Natural Philosophy’ (1758) which has been described by modern physicists as being “200 years ahead of its time”.

 

WE ARE LIVING CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.  That is the message of Modern physics and it corresponds to the understanding of indigenous aboriginal cultures AND HERE I AM SPEAKING OF THE “TRADITIONAL” INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL sense of reality which, as indigenous aboriginals traditionalist friends of mine have said, is NOW understood and supported by only a small MINORITY of indigenous aboriginal people, so reading the traditional views is ONE THING and listening to modern day indigenous aboriginals POLITICKING is a very different matter.

 

* * *

 

So, what MARTINE would be saying today, is what I am saying today, and what David Bohm has been saying, that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are, in my phrasing and/or however else we want to put in ON A BUSTRIP TO HELL, and there are man examples to support this, but they are invisible to WESTERN CULTURE ANDHERENTS because our use of language puts us in a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which DIFFERS RADICALLY from our REAL, ACTUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY where we are living in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence

 

THAT’S NOT THE WORLD THAT WE SAY WE ARE LIVING IN.  We say that we are living in a world of 195 INDEPENDENT NATIONS wherein each of those nations is working on SUBSOBTIMIZING THEIR OWN GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services.

 

HOW CAN THAT MAKE SENSE IF WE ARE ALSO SAYING  THAT “WE ARE LIVING IN A WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY GLOBAL INTERCONNECTNESS AND MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE”?   in which case the notions of NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE, COMPETITION, and OPTIMIZING ONE’s INDEPENDENT NATION even to the point of PUTTING WALLS AROUND THE NATIONS, ELECTRONIC and CUSTOMS and IMMIGRATION WALLS, all in support of SUBOPTIMIZATION?  what’s that the systems sciences and Modern physics are saying?  that “WE ARE LIVING IN A WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY GLOBAL INTERCONNECTNESS AND MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE”?  

 

somebody is WRONG and common sense points to those who are supporting the notion that DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE refer NOT JUST TO A STATE OF MIND but to PHYSICAL REALITY where the RICH INDEPENDENT NATIONS can CONSUME ALL THE RESOURCES WE CAN GET OUR HANDS ON and DUMP OUR GARBAGE and POLLUTANTS OUT IN THE WILDERNESS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF OUR ‘INDEPENDENT NATION”

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE CRAZY!  That is what Bohm is saying and that is what Martine is saying and that is what I am saying

 

WESTERN MEDICINE IS CRAZY but it is also a good place to see how this CRAZINESS can be MIS-PRESENTED as GOODNESS, and believe me, WESTERN MEDICINE IS KILLING A LOT OF PEOPLE THESE DAYS,   I can take you to the ANSWER SPRINGS but I can’t make you DRINK.

 

HERE GOES:  The REAL WORLD of our sense-experience is the WAVE-FIELD WORLD where the RELATIONAL dynamics of “BALANCE” and “IMBALANCE” are the basic workings of the world of our sense-experience.  ALL I AM SAYING IS THAT QUANTUM LOGIC which is just the LOGIC OF BALANCE; i.e. the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where we can picture the CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD that we identify as a MATERIAL FORM..   ALL THERE IS, is the WAVE-FIELD within which there are MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.   THUS, there is NO EMPTY SPACE and there is thus NO BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between MATTER and SPACE, there is only the QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION between the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD and CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD, as defines QUANTUM LOGIC, the “BOTH/AND” LOGIC of the INCLUDING (WAVE-FIELD) MEDIUM.  The FIGURE (e.g. HUMAN) and GROUND (LIVING AREA) ARE ONLY ONE; i.e. there is only the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD within which there are MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.  That defines QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.

 

PROBLEM!  THE PROBLEM IS LANGUAGE because LANGUAGE puts UNDERSTANDINGS in our mind and BINARY LOGIC based MATTER and EMPTY SPACE as being the TWO MUTUALLY EXCLUDING COMPONENTS OF PHYSICAL REALITY, as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SEE IT, … AND CONTINUE TO SEE IT, … BECAUSE WE HAVE BUILT THIS BINARY LOGIC INTO THE ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURE OF OUR LANGUAGE, … IS A PROBLEM.  OUR BUILDING BINARY LOGIC INTO OUR LANGUAGE IS A PROBLEM!   WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS AUTHORED THIS PROBLEM, … OTHERS LIKE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS DID NOT MAKE THIS MISTAKE, but for the indigenous aboriginals whose first language is FRENCH or ENGLISH, … they too have the PROBLEM where the LANGUAGE DELIVERS A FRAGMENTED UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY which, in MEDICINE shows up in our using BINARY LOGIC to describe HEALTHY and ILL, whereas, QUANTUM LOGIC IS TELLING US that HEALTHY and ILL DERIVE FROM BALANCE and IMBALANCE in the microbial assemblage and in the social collective and IN GENERAL.  The QUANTUM LOGIC RELATIONAL CONDITIONS OF BALANCE and IMBALANCE, … “NOT” … the BINARY LOGIC BEING BASED STATES OF HEALTH (everything working properly) and ILLNESS (stuff working improperly).

 

NOTA BENE: TRICKY PROBLEM!  There is ambiguity in OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE because our LANGUAGE is not designed to take into account the CONJUGATE nature of WAVE-FIELD dynamics as indigenous aboriginal languages are (as affirmed by David Bohm and by his colleague F. David Peat in ‘Blackfoot Physics and elsewhere).  For example the indigenous aboriginal language will say the equivalent of THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and this statement has the QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE which refers to the MALE ASSERTING (i.e. the TOWNING) and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (i.e. the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE).    BUT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS EMPLOY LANGUAGE that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and uses ONLY the MALE ASSERTING ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.

 

OKAY, NOW HERE IS THE PROBLEM.  IN REALITY there IS ALWAYS A FEMALE ACCOMMODATING that comes together with the MALE ASSERTING and that is the way that the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE WORKS, but in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES (e.g. the Common Average European Languages in Whorf’s classification), the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING IS MISSING; i.e. WE DROP IT OUT so that our LANGUAGE is ONE-SIDEDLY MALE-ASSERTING as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ where there is NO MENTION of the CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (eg. the shrinkage of wilderness that is conjugate with the growth of construction, these two together informing us that what is going on is TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE).

 

ACHTUNG!  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE AND PROCEEDING TO DO THE LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTION OF REALITY USING ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING ACTION.(that why EMPTY SPACE is INVENTED as “FILLER” for removing the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

 

KEEP YOUR ‘EYE” on this difference because now we will go back to WESTERN MEDICINE where we have the BINARY LOGIC based concept of the PATHOGEN.  THIS PATHOGEN CONCEPT IS A BIG MISTAKE, … but we make this same mistake in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, and this mistake I am talking about is in our NOT USING THE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING WHICH IS RELATIONAL AND IN TERMS OF BALANCE and IMBALANCE.  INSTEAD WE USING THE BINARY LOGIC OPPOSITES OF ANGEL and DEVIL or BENOGEN and PATHOGEN (the author of good and the author of bad).

 

THIS BINARY LOGIC based usage INVOKES THE ABSTRACTION OF ‘BEING’ using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.   THIS IS WHERE WE GET OUR ABSTRACT CONCEPT OF “THE PATHOGEN” FROM; i.e. from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHOR CONCEPT.  THERE IS NO LOCAL  AUTHOR in QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY, there are only RELATIONAL DYNAMICS, … there is NO ‘BEING’ as is set up by use of NAMING.  In indigenous aboriginal language architecture, NAMES do not create BEINGS, .. NAMES identify relational forms such as DANCES WITH WOLVES.

 

LIKE IT OR NOT, WE HAVE BOTH OF THESE LANGUAGE BASED REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS AT OUR DISPOSAL AND OUR WESTERN CULTURE VERSION employs a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT SCHEME which, for the mathematically minded corresponds to reducing complex (wave-field) math to ‘real’ component and dropping out the ‘female’ or ‘imaginary’ component.

 

LOOK AT THIS AMBIGUITY WHERE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC GIVES US “EITHER” GOOD “OR” BAD  while LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC GIVES BOTH “BALANCE” AND “IMBALANCE” or in other words “RESONANCE” AND “DISSONANCE”  While the BEING based GOOD OR BAD refers to something LOCAL and EXPLICIT, .. the RELATIONS based “BALANCE” and “IMBALANCE” refers to something NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, like ‘too many clostridium difficile’ and not enough of some other microbes, which does not mean that clostridium difficile is a PATHOGEN, … just an imbalance related proliferation.

 

HERE IS A POINT OF CONFUSION.  IMAGINE we are in a community where the number of those PATHOGENS we call THIEVES is GROWING. ONLY IN BINARY LOGIC TERMS would they be given the pejorative lable THIEVES.  In the MODERN PHYSICS view the issue is IMBALANCE and we would give them the name REBALANCERS, so that a PROLIFERATION of REBALANCERS would signify that we have a problem of IMBALACNE and this could be the case in our social collective (e.g. RICH and POOR IMBALANCE) or in the microbial assemblage (IMBALANCE occurs from taking anti-biotics).

 

DEPENDING ON WHETHER WE ARE USING QUANTUM LOGIC OR BINARY LOGIC, OUR ACTIONS WILL BE AS FOLLOWS;

 

QUANTUM LOGIC:  RESTORE BALANCE (e.g. with Fecal Microbial Transplant or with MINIMUM WAGE LAWS to avoid violence from the poor whose kids are starving)

 

BINARY LOGIC:  GO ON THE ATTACK TO ELIMINATE PATHOGENS as with POLICE in the case of human pathogens and with VACCINES in the case of microbial pathogens.

 

NOTE THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “PATHOGEN” and reality in all cases is that THERE IS IMBALANCE as the UNHEALTHY CONDITION where BALANCE is the HEALTHY CONDITION.

 

NOTE THAT IF WE WANT TO MAINTAIN A HIGH RICH AND POOR GAP WE NEED MORE POLICE AND CCTV SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY AND MORE WALLS AROUND COUNTRIES OR PROPERTIES TO STAVE OFF THE REBALANCERS AKA PATHOGENS.

 

VACCINES ARE ANTI-PATHOGEN TECHNOLOGIES.  WE DON”T NEED A VACCINE FOR C. DIFFICILE  (WE NEED REBALANCING REMEDIES) BECAUSE WE KNOW IT IS AN IMBALANCE and that C. DIFFICLE is NOT A PATHOGEN, but we are Getting a VACCINE ANYHOW for C. DIFFICLE from Pfizer and others because the ANTI-PATHOGEN REMEDY BUSINESS IS A HUGE MONEY-MAKER.

 

Pfizer Press release

Phase 3 CLOVER Trial for Pfizer’s Investigational Clostridioides Difficile Vaccine Indicates Strong Potential Effect in Reducing Duration and Severity of Disease Based on Secondary Endpoints

Tuesday, March 01, 2022 – 06:45am

 

If we want to leave the IMBALANCE alone (as in the rich and poor imbalance) we HIRE MORE POLICE and forget about REBALANCING APPROACHES.  in other words, we STAY IN THE BINARY LOGIC MINDSET AND WE DON’T” BOTHER GETTING INTO THE QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE-BASED MINDSET.

 

WHY VACCINES INSTEAD OF REBALANCING?

 

VACCINES HAVE OBTAINED SOME IMPRESSIVE RESULTS.   CCTV CAMERAS HAVE ALSO LED TO THE CAPTURE AND IMPRISONMENT OF MANY CRIMINALS which means we don’t have to bother with REBALANCING approaches if we employ PATHOGEN ELIMINATION APPROACHES (which preserve and protect the IMBALANCES).

 

In other words, ANTI-PATHOGEN TECHNOLOGIES DO WORK, SORT OF, IN THAT THEY KILL OFF THE ALLEGED PATHOGENS, but the trouble is, NEW VARIANTS OF PATHOGEN COMMONLY EMERGE, and from the QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE/IMBALANCE) understanding, this is because ANTI-PATHOGEN technology DOES NOTHING FOR REBALANCING and in fact perpetuates the problem by ELIMINATING THE REBALANCING AGENTS MISIDENTIFIED AS PATHOGENS.

 

VACCINES ‘WORK’ by going to battle against a PARTICULAR STRAIN OF MICROBE.  SO THAT SINCE THE REAL ISSUE IS IMBALANCE, it is likely that a PARTICULAR MICROBE will PROLIFERATE in situations of IMBALANCE and be BLAMED as in PNEUMONIA where there are over a hundred different strains of bacteria and virus that can associate with pneumonia.   But the NOBEL PRIZE winning discoverer that pneumonia was associated with a Vitamin C deficiency based IMBALANCE, Albert Szent-Györgyi, was persistently angered and frustrated by medical reporting that POINTED THE ACCUSING FINGER at the particular strain of microbe associated with the bacterial or viral pneumonia because he could not get the reporting to publicly acknowledge that the pneumonia associated with IMBALANCE for which the REMEDY was REBALANCING by the administering of vitamin C, and he had established by treating himself to cure a serious bout of pneumonia.  The reporting has never shifted away from speaking in terms of ‘deaths by pneumonia’ and providing the name of the bacterium or virus implying that these were the CAUSE of the pneumonia while Szent-Györgyi kept INSISTING that the illness was IMBALANCE based, as shown by the many different types of bug that would proliferate in a body where vitamin C levels were deficient, the particular proliferating strain being cited as THE CAUSE OF ILLNESS AND DEATH, OBSCURING the true cause; i.e. IMBALANCE.

 

* * *

 

OK, IF YOU READ THE ABOVE, YOU WILL FIND THAT THERE IS CONFUSION IN OUR WESTERN MEDICAL SYSTEM WHICH HAS US, AND THIS MEANS DOCTORS AND HOSPITALS INCLUDED,EMPLOYING THE PATHOGEN CONCEPT, WHICH IS AN OVER-SIMPLISTIC BINARY LOGIC CONCEPT, … INSTEAD OF THE LESS SIMPLE, REAL CONCEPT OF IMBALANCE AND REBALANCING..

 

The “REALITY” IS THAT “THERE ARE NO PATHOGENS”, THERE IS ONLY IMBALANCE for which the REMEDY is REBALANCING.  THIS IS THE CASE IN THE REALMS OF BOTH JUSTICE AND MEDICINE.  IN A RICH AND POOR SITUATION, WE CAN CALL THE REBALANCERS PATHOGENS  (e.g. ‘THIEVES’) AND SHOOT OR IMPRISON OR SOMEHOW ELIMINATE THEM, BUT THAT DOESN’T DEAL WITH THE REAL ROOT SOURCE WHICH IS IMBALANCE.  SO, RESPONDING TO IMBALANCE IN AN ANTI-PATHOGEN MANNER IS A CASE OF ‘HAVING THE LADDER UP THE WRONG WALL’  and the result will be a SUCCESSION OF VARIANT STRAINS OF REBALANCERS, PARTICULARLY SINCE WE CONTINUE TO ELIMINATE THE REBALANCERS AND THUS PERPETUATE THE IMBALANCE.  In other words, those REBALANCERS are not SIMPLE PATHOGENS animated by an internal EVIL DESIRE, THAT IS JUST AN OVER-SIMPLISTIC BINARY LOGIC BASED ABSTRACTION. What is REALLY GOING ON is “NOT” THE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC NOTION OF THE ATTACK OF PATHOGENS but the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC “RELATIONAL IMBALANCE”, the NATURAL RESPONSE to which is the RESTORING OF BALANCE rather than the ELIMINATING OF PATHOGENS. 

 

* * *

 

P.S. MARTINE’S INTEGRAL ADVENTURE IS HERE   https://goodshare.org/wp/martines-integral-adventure/

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * 

 

FOOTNOTE:

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have a problem and it is our BELIEF IN BEING that comes from the foundational role we give to BEING in our Language Architecture.

 

As CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, wherein everything IS FLUX, we too ARE FLUX which means that IT IS A MISTAKE TO GIVE A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO BEING.

 

My ‘PICK’ for the basic DIFFERENCE between WESTERN CULTURE on the one hand and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita CULTURES on the other hand IS BEING versus FLUX.

 

Wittgenstein pointed out in ‘Tractatus’ how we could use language to come up with a collection of BEINGS in order set up a WEB OF DYNAMIC RELATIONS to extract the FLOW and FORGET the expedient of BEING.

 

This ostensibly ‘WORKS’ for those of us committed to understanding reality in terms of a FLUID WAVE-FIELD in which MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS which BELONG TO THE FLOW.

 

“CONDENSATIONS” of the all-including fluid WAVE-FIELD are included in the FLOW-CONTINUUM and they ‘STAND OUT’ because our VISUAL SENSING can ‘pick them up’

 

But that does NOT make them SEPARATE from the FLOW they are INCLUDED IN just as WHORLS in FLOW and NOT SEPARATE FROM THE FLOW THEY ARE IN, and as our SONAR visualizing demonstrates, local warm water LENSES in colder water SHOW UP in our ‘sensing apparatus’ as SEPARATE FORMS in a TRANSPARENT medium, and this is just because of a minor difference in density and when the body of water is a river flowing into an ocean, these LOCAL, EXPLICIT LENSE-SHAPED VISUALLY DISTINGUISHABLE “APPEARANCES” have a BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC  RELATION with the medium they are included in rather than an EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC RELATION.  This means that the lens of warmer water CANNOT “MOVE THROUGH” the body of cooler water they are included in, and so RIGHT NOW, I AM CHALLENGED by the limitations of this language I am using, to capture what is going on in the usual terms of WHAT THINGS DO, because, our WESTERN CULTURE language convention is to UNDERSTANDING THINGS we give NAMES to, having an INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE, which turns on the GREEN LIGHT for us to use GRAMMAR to describe the movements and development of the NAMED things AS IF DERIVING FROM THEIR OWN LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS.

 

For example; ‘the warm water lenses are growing larger and more tubular’, using what Nietzsche calls the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, but the reality is that this phenomenon does not belong to the LENSES, but is constituted by an overall TRANSFORMATION wherein FIGURE (i.e. the lens-shaped CONTENT) and the GROUND (i.e. the water based CONTAINER) are only ONE, so that this phenomenon of TRANSFORMATION is what is REALLY GOING on while the FRAGMENTING of this reality by using language with SPLITS the CONTAINED FLUID and the CONTAINING FLUID INTO TWO by imputing BEING to each of them is an ERROR of language and grammar.

 

This is an ERROR that comes about by our use of the ABSTRACTION of BINARY LOGIC, an ABSTRACTION WHEREIN we use the combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR (the so-called DOUBLE ERROR cited by Nietzsche) to construct IMAGERY which FRAGMENTS the flowing continuum into TWO SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT PARTS; i.e. a CONTAINER and CONTENT implying that the CONTAINER is a MALE-ASSERTING AGENT with its own powers of GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT while implying that is situated within an FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONTAINER that is PASSIVE and OPENS UP EXACTLY AS NEEDED TO ACCOMMODATE the GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT of the MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONTENT.

 

Can we imagine the CONTAINER as THE ACTIVE ELEMENT IN THE PURPORTED DUO?

 

EVIDENTLY, WE DID NO DESIGN OUR LANGUAGE WITH A PROVISION TO GRANT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE WITH ‘HER’ OWN POWERS OF, FOR EXAMPLE, SEDUCING THE SWELLING UP OF THE MALE MEMBER OF THE DUO, and instead come up with a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE wherein the MALE ASSERTING AGENT is the full and sole ACTION and DEVELOPMENT ORIGINATING AUTHOR.

 

ALSO EVIDENT is the fact that this one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY SYSTEM OF DYNAMICS sets up movement that is MECHANICAL in the sense of MACHINES whose actions are purely and one-sidedly MALE ASSERTING, that move about and push around in a containing space that is PASSIVELY ACCOMMODATING.  We see the BULLDOZER and scooping out the earth and putting the earth into a pile; i.e. we capture this in our language in terms of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS AUTHORED BY THE BULLDOZER, and so much for ‘OUR LANGUAGE’ and LANGUAGE-stimulated THINKING, but our sense experience is informing us that WE, and THE BULLDOZER are NOT just SIMPLE CONTENTS which are GRAMMATICALLY LIBERATED and EQUIPPED WITH LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, but are in sense-experience reality, INCLUSIONS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, an “ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD’  wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.

 

As the Systems Science is reminding us, ”we  are living in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence” and this OTHER WORLD, the BINARY LOGIC based PSEUDO-WORLD of material fragments (notional independently existing BEING based things-in-themselves with GRAMMAR-given powers of AUTHORING local, explicit actions and developments) is LANGUAGE BASED ABSTRACTION that, while it can serve as a useful tool for sharing crude LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS of a SUBSITUTE REALITY (a FRAGMENT BASED PSEUDO-REALITY).

 

So ‘we’ know, at some level within our sensory selves, that when we speak in terms of ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, which implies the BINARY LOGIC FRAGMENTATION that splits apart the TOWN which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT from the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM loosely referred to as ‘the LANDSCAPE’ or ‘the COUNTRYSIDE’ which is something NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

 

The MATHEMATICAL ABSTRACTING TOOL that our LANGUAGE TECHNIQUE is making use of here is DIFFERENTIATION where we DIFFERENTIATE THE TOWN and notionally BREAK IT OUT of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in which it is, in reality, inextricably included.   This MATHEMATICAL ABSTRACTING TOOL of DIFFERENTIATION can be used REPEATEDLY, with each usage BREAKING OUT AND CAPTURING DESCIPTIONS of FRAGMENTS of REALITY, in a MATRYOSHKA (RUSSIAN DOLL) type of arrangement where each FRAGMENT can be seen as being composed of SMALLER FRAGMENTS, … DOLLS WITHIN DOLLS all the way down to what Newton called the “PARTICLE”.

 

All these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the end for which he form’d them; and these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation.”

 

Newton quotes from Opticks

 

WE NEEDED TO GET CREATIVE ONCE WE DECIDED TO ARCHITECT LANGUAGE IMPUTING ‘BEING’ BASED ‘REALITY’ instead of accepting the FLUID (WAVE-FIELD) nature of reality, as in the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL model of reality wherein “everything is related’ (mitakuye oyasin).

 

The FRAGMENT based reality is like a LEGO-based reality, which is commonly taught in WESTERN CULTURE SCHOOLS; for example;

 

Charles Dickens in ‘Hard Times’ in the sequence where ‘Sissy Jupe’s relational understanding of a horse is ‘put down’ by her teacher Thomas Gradgrind who insists on grounding all understanding in ‘being’-based ‘facts’ as is the way of mainstream ‘science’;

“Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to Facts, sir!”

‘Bitzer,’ said Thomas Gradgrind. ‘Your definition of a horse.’

‘Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds coat in the spring; in marshy countries, sheds hoofs, too. Hoofs hard, but requiring to be shod with iron. Age known by marks in mouth.’ Thus (and much more) Bitzer.

— Charles Dickens, ‘Hard Times’

OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS ARCHITECTED FOR THE FRAGMENTATION APPROACH.   The THIN SKULL RULE prohibits us from using language that implies the reality of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE wherein it is the ACCOMMODATING of the FEMALE rather than the ASSERTING OF THE MALE that gives ‘sense’ to the dynamic phenomena of our sense-experience.  NO, NO, NO!  slap the hand that writes stuff that acknowledges the influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE RULES INSIST THAT REALITY MUST BE CONSTRAINED TO MALE ASSERTING DYNAMICS GIVEN BY THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR WHICH DESCRIBES LOCAL AUTHORING AS THE SOURCE OF ALL DYNAMICS.

 

US GUYS HAVE BANDED TOGETHER TO GET THIS ON THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE BOOKS AND IT IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT GIVES TO US THE CLAIM OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS WHICH CAN MAKE GOD-LIKE HEROES OUT OF US BECAUSE WE NO LONGER HAVE TO ACCEPT THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT ORIGIN OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS AS IN THE LANGUAGES OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS AND ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS, WHICH PUSHES THE GOD-LIKE POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING (CREATION) BACK INTO NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT BODY OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.  WITH OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR, WE CAN PERSONALLY LAY CLAIM TO LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

 

THERE’S JUST ONE ‘HITCH’ TO WATCH OUT FOR.  BY INVOKING BINARY LOGIC TO GIVE US LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHORING (WHICH IS GREAT FOR INFLATING THE EGO), WE CAN NO LONGER GO THE PATH OF THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS WHERE THE WAVE-FIELD REALITY HAS NO ‘BEING’ BASED FRAGNMENTS IN IT AND SUPPORTS ONLY RELATIONAL FLUID DYNAMIC WHICH GIVE RISE TO ‘BALANCE’ AND ‘IMBALANCE’ WHICH ARE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT AND DO NOT SUPPORT ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’; I.E. WHAT LOOKS LIKE THE LOCAL AUTHOR IN THIS RELATIONAL FORMS IS JUST THE CONDUIT FOR THE RELEASE OF RELATIONAL TENSIONS THAT DEVELOP WITHIN THE RELATIONAL MATRIX THAT NEVER ‘BOTTOMS OUT’ IN LOCAL MATERIAL BEINGS.

 

In other words, while the indigenous aboriginals avoidance of BEING allows them to use the relational dynamics of BALANCE and IMBALANCE as the animating influence which is QUANTUM (BOTH/AND)  LOGIC based and thus NON-BINARY LOGIC dependent, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS with our choice of a BEING based language foundation have to constrain our language based representations of dynamics to terms of ‘what BEINGS DO’ which is one-sidedly MALE-ASSERTING, which is why we have the THIN-SKULL RULE etc.  Of course, if we did give the foundational role to BEING, we wouldn’t have to invent the abstraction of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE as a home for MATERIAL BEING because, we could then do as the indigenous aboriginals are doing, which is to use a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE where the opposites are relational rather than absolute (as with BEING) and there is only continual BECOMING instead of BEING as was Heraclitus view of reality that in WESTERN CULTURE was drowned out by Parmenides support for the ABSTRACT ABOLUTENESS OF BEING.

 

To make a long story short, our WESTERN CULTURE opting for giving the foundational role in language to BEING, while great for the EGO of we who can now claim BEING for ourselves and thus claim an ABSOLUTE FOUNDATION as an abstract base for launching GRAMMAR-based abstractions of LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, … leads to the dilemma of having to invent ABSOLUTE NON-BEING as in EMPTY SPACE in order to accommodate MOTION of BEINGS and thus the INTERACTIONS needed to accommodate some (however crude) form of CHANGE to approximate the transforming of the space (weve-field) we are in, that we perceive with our sense-experience.  But since we are investing all the creative power in the MATERIAL BEINGS, we have to also invest in them the power of DESTRUCTION because in order to match our sense-experience of inclusion in a changing world, we need a model that makes sense of what we are using NAMING to make into BEINGS as COMING and GOING and this would the powers of CREATION and DESTRUCTION which we will have to invest in BEINGS to make our language ‘work’ in giving it what it needs for the construction of a material being based pseudo-reality.

 

Now we have a BINARY LOGIC SYSTEM based on BEING which includes the GRAMMAR GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING assigned to BEINGS which, in keeping with its BINARY LOGIC structure, has to account for both CREATION and DESTRUCTION and BEINGS that are AUTHORING POSITIVE/CONSTRUCTIVE ACTS and BEINGS that are AUTHORING NEGETIVE/DESTRUCTIVE ACTS.

 

MEANWHILE, over in the indigenous aboriginal camp where the language is INTEGRATION based instead of DIFFERENTATION based as in WESTERN CULTURE, … the INTEGRATION based language includes both FEMALE ACCOMODATING and MALE ASSERTING as conjugates which OPENS THE WAY TO BALANCE and IMBALANCE, … WITHOUT ANY DEPENDENCY ON “BEING” but coming from relations as where a fluid WAVE PEAK naturally wants to fill a fluid WAVE TROUGH due to the BALANCING TENDENCY which is innate in NATURE (i.e. in the transforming relational continuum).

 

BALANCE and IMBALANCE supports a different kind of linguistic pseudo-reality than does the WESTERN CULTURE ‘BEING’ based linguistic pseudo-reality.

 

The BALANCE and IMBALANCE QUANTUM LOGIC linguistic pseudo-reality is supported be our sense-experience, while the BEING and VACUUM BINARY LOGIC linguistic pseudo-reality is NOT SUPPORTED by our sense-experience, but is only supported by our PSYCHOLOGICAL ABSTRACTING POWERS which are not obliged to be consistent with our sense-experience reality as where there is employing of BEING and ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE.

 

WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS A COMPETITION between WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS which are ABSTRACTION (DIFFERENTIATION) based and NOT GROUNDED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, .. versus INDIGENOUS BORIGINAL CULTURE LINGUISTIC REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS which, while ABSTRACTION (in this case relational INTEGRATION), “ARE GROUNDED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY”, for example, there is NO DEPENDENCY ON the DIFFERENTIATON-based ABSTRACTIONS of “BEING’ and “ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE” as in the WESTERN CULTURE linguistic pseudo-reality.

 

WESTERN CULTURE Language architecture that is based on DIFFERENTIATION based BEING brings to mind Korzybi’s ‘the WORD is NOT the THING’ which doesn’t go far enough since it implicitly and ‘back-handedly’ accepts the REALITY of “THINGS” (BEING).  This implies that while there are ‘THINGS’ OUT THERE, the WORD assigning approach of language is not up to the job of capturing the essence of ‘the THING’ which is a back-handed way of affirming the existence of ‘THINGS’, … suggesting that these ‘THINGS’ are beyond capture with words.

 

While it has been said that “We like to think that we created language, but this is back to front. Language created us. Locating the origins of language could help to shed light on the origins of humanity.” — https://frted.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/altruism-evolution-and-the-importance-of-religion/   This is CONFUSED TALK and it is an advocacy for ‘the tool to run away with the workman’, and the tool of language falls far short of being able to capture our ineffable sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka ‘the WAVE-FIELD’. 

However, it is fair to say that “locating the the origins of language could help us shed light on the origins of humanity”, but in this case we are talking only about our language based conceptualization of ‘humanity’ which boils down to a case of the dog chasing its own tail.  What it will reveal, Bohm has already discovered, as have Emerson and Nietzsche and also Irwin Schreoedinger;

 

“SUBJECT AND OBJECT ARE ONLY ONE”

 

The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist. – Erwin Schroedinger”

 

So, there is something worth contemplating in Korzybski’s ‘the WORD is not the THING’ and for me, it is this RE-ARRANGING OF THE PSYCHE when we take the step of shifting the foundations of our understanding from a RELATIONAL BALANCE BASIS (i.e. a QUANTUM LOGIC BASIS) to a BINARY LOGIC BEING BASIS by way of ‘WORDS’ that signify BEINGS.   Once we become dependent on BEING-based language constructions, ‘TOTO, I’m afraid we are no longer in Kansas’; i.e. we are then using language to construct a BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which has a BINARY LOGIC based foundation where EMPTY SPACE is the PASSIVE CONJUGATE of ABSOLUTE MATERIAL BEING.

 

So, instead of Korzybski’s ‘the WORD is not the THING’ which backhandedly affirms BEING, we might more informatively (in a sense-experience supported manner) say ‘there is no such thing as “BEING’ so don’t be fooled by WORDS that signify “BEING”.  OOPS!  there goes the whole WESTERN CULTURE language based house-of cards! and what remains in the piles of collapsed rubble from the collapse of being is the indigenous aborigonal recommended relational reality based on ‘mitakuye oyasin’ where ‘everything is related’ as in a WAVE-FIELD where things are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including transforming relational WAVE-FIELD continuum.

 

WESTERN CULTURE has designed a language architecture in which a foundational role is given to BEING as in the SUBSTITUTE REALITIES we construct with our NAMING and GRAMMAR, LOCAL AUTHORING based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.  That is, ‘BEING’ is where everything starts in WESTERN CULTURE language based “substitute reality” construction.

 

This note is entitled ‘the ERROR of BEING’  because ‘BEING’ is ABSTRACTION that has NO PLACE IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD that is a FLUID CONTINUUM.  ‘BEING’ gives support to RATIO-BASED REASON as where we speak of GROWTH of THINGS-THAT-BE like we speak of in saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ or ‘the CHILD is GROWING’ which backhandedly imposes the abstraction of BEING and thus sets up a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is BEING BASED in place of the transforming relational continuum world of our sense-experience of inclusion therein.

 

“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.” –Nietzsche

When we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are ‘operating directly form our sense-experience’ without letting our BEING BASED language FRAGMENT our psychological conceptualizing of ‘what we then call ‘reality’’, we can find harmony with the world we share inclusion in; i.e. the transforming relational continuum.  But when we contrive our actions and developments from our intellectual manipulation of BEING based concepts, we are ‘in trouble’ as when we assume that we, ourselves are HUMAN BEING notionally with our own powers of AUTHORING actions and development, as if we were doing so within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, … AS OUR LANGUAGE IS TELLING US IS THE CASE (i.e. the REALITY).    NO! NO! NO!, … This is what Emerson is referring to when he speaks of the TOOL running away with the WORKMAN, the HUMAN with the DIVINE.    WE RELATIONAL FORMS IN THE TRANFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM ARE “NOT” THE BEING BASED LOCAL AUTHORS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS THAT OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS TELLING USE ARE.  THAT IS A CASE OF THE TOOL of LANGUAGE RUNNING AWAY WITH THE WORKMAN. IT IS THE RESULT OF BELIEF IN THE ERROR OF BEING.

 

Of course we ‘know better’ (WHEN we consult our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD) but so long as we put into primacy the language-based scuttle-butt in the construction of an ‘operative reality’, we are putting ourselves on a BUSTRIP TO HELL.  We need to back of the language thing and ‘let the soft animal of our body love what it wants to love’  or in other words, give first dibs on what we do, to our sense-experience reality, because listening to language that is built on a BEING-based foundation, while it puts us into a common ‘substitute reality’ with other users of the same language, is putting us into a substitute world based on one-sided MALE ASSERTING actions and developments, where we use language WHEREIN WE MAKE OURSELVES OUT TO BE LOCAL AUTHORS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS

 

“Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.”  – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

COME ON FOLKS, our sense-experience is telling us we share inclusion in a transforming relational continuum aka the all-including WAVE-FIELD, that doesn’t jibe with the BEING based ABSTRACTION hyped up with the DOULE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that gives us the notional powers of a LOCAL AUTHOR of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, … that is just ABSTRACTION BASED BULLSHIT that is PROTECTED BY EGO.

 

LET’S GET REAL SO THAT WE CAN GET OURSELVES OFF THE BUSTRIP TO HELL!

 

* * *