AUTHOR’S PREFACE: Understanding the PSYCHO-DYNAMICS of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE

 

Imagine YOURSELF as an ARCHITECT of LANGUAGE. If you do, you will come to a GREAT DIVIDE in ARCHITECTURAL OPTION which can be compared to observing the GATHERING and SCATTERING of ants as the fetch from a pool of honey beneath a dripping bees nest high above. On the flat ground, the ants come and go in WAVES; i.e. they GATHER and SCATTER as the come to collect and depart to deliver the honey. What the OUTSIDE OBSERVER SEES is a GATHERING and SCATTERING pattern which, although it is in continuing flux, impresses upon us a REPRESENTATION featuring “A CLUSTER” which undergoes cycles of GROWTH and SHRINKAGE, even though the actual dynamic is cluster-ING and the CLUSTER part of it is APPEARANCE and WE HAD BETTER BE CAREFUL because if we ARCHITECT a LANGUAGE which employs the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we will end up IMPUTING LOCAL BEING to ‘the CLUSTER’ and compound this FIRST ERROR with the SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR which imputes to the FIRST ERROR, i.e. ‘the CLUSTER’, its own (notional) POWERS OF AUTHORING GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.

This DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING where there is one, gets to play an AMAZING ROLE in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC by GETTING INTO THE PSYCHE OF THE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT through the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR LANGUAGE-BASED FRAGMENTATION scheme.  So, instead of an understanding in terms of GATHERING-SCATTERING as in CLUSTERING (an innately fluid dynamic), we INVERT our understanding and CONJURE UP a SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring LOCAL AUTHORING of GROWTH and SHRINKAGE.  Instead of WAVES of GATHERING and SCATTERING as in CLUSTERING, we have ‘the CLUSTER’ and instead of the GATHERING phase of CLUSTERING, we have GROWTH of the CLUSTER, and instead of the SCATTERING phase of CLUSTERING, we have SHRINKAGE of the CLUSTER, such the we end up constructing a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which imputes AUTHORING POWER to the CLUSTER, a vision-and-psyche contrived ILLUSION.

The SIMPLIFYING of REALITY by reducing the RESONANCE based WAVES of GATHERING and SCATTERING to a LOCAL AUTHOR based SUBSTITUTE REALITY is what distinguishes indigenous aboriginal languages from WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European languages.  Instead of acknowledging as BASIC, the RESONANCE based features such as the CLUSTERING or the TOWNING, our WESTERN CULTURE approach to LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION is to SIMPLIFY, the TOWNING in the same sense as the CLUSTERING EXAMPLE, using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche) to impute LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.

GOODBYE RESONANCE BASED TRANSFORMATION, …HELLO FRAGMENTATION.

UNDERSTANDING the PSYCHO-DYNAMICS of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS WHAT THIS ESSAY IS ALL ABOUT.

 

* * *

 

 

That is, the SHORTCHANGING in the REPRESENTATION of REALITY in indigenous aboriginal languages “IS FAR LESS” than the SHORTCHANGING of REALITY in WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European language architectures, and the following explains (a) how this is the case, and (b) some of the important ramification that come from our ACTING on the basis of these INACCURATE LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS..

 

There must first be a reminder that there are two basically different types of language architectures (A) flow-based (nonlocal-implicit) as with indigenous aboriginal language and Bohm’s ‘Rheomode’ language architecture, and (B) object-based (local, explicit) as with the Common Average European language architecture;

 

–1- EXAMPLE of FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE: “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  Note the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING combined inference, characteristic of FLOW.

 

–2- EXAMPLE OF OBJECT-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE: “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services.  Note the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE inference (This come with the SUBSTITUTION of absolute empty and infinite space IN PLACE OF the FEMALE accommodative conjugate).

 

THAT IS; THERE ARE TWO LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES; (-1-) the “LESS-SIMPLE” (quantum logic) NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FLOW-BASED (indigenous languages, Bohm’s Rheomode) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is capable of DIRECTLY expressing BALANCE and IMBALANCE, and, (-2-) the SIMPLE (binary logic) LOCAL, EXPLICIT OBJECT-BASED (Western Culture Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE) which is INCAPABLE of DIRECTLY expressing BALANCE.

The respective examples illustrate the fact that the FLOW-BASED language architecture (e.g. ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ avoids any LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONSTRAINING so that the entire FIGURE and GROUND combination is free to transform as ONE; i.e. This language architecture which is capable of expressing FIGURE and GROUND as ONE is said to have a QUANTUM LOGIC capability.  This can be understood in that the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is like the BOILING in rapidly flowing stream where BOILING and the FLOWING are ONE.   For example, we would be in error to speak of the BOIL ‘growing’, ‘devloping’ and ‘producing turbulence’ as if it HAD ITS OWN LOCAL AUTHORING POWER, which would also, at the same time, imply its INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE, a inference that would FORCE on the viewer the necessity of CREATING an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

 

In other words, for FLOW-BASED language architecture supports the representation of “FIGURE” and “GROUND” as “ONE” as captured with ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) , …  and DOES NOT INVOLVE the SPLITTING APART of “FIGURE” and “GROUND”, so that the THEN-LIBERATED “TOWN” is free to do its own one-sided MALE-ASSERTING “ACTION”, “DEVELOPMENT”, “PRODUCTION”.

DISCUSSION OF RELATIVE BENEFITS/SHORTFALLS of NONLOCAL-IMPLICIT FLOW-BASED (less SIMPLE) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE versus LOCAL-EXPLICIT OBJECT-BASED (most SIMPLE) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

ONE WORD: “BALANCE” flags the advantage of the LESS SIMPLE flow-based language architecture.  Because of the FEMALE-MALE conjugate structure of the flow-based language architecture, it is capable of expressing BALANCE.  In statements such as ‘there is TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, we have a ‘spherical space, and as on the surface of a sphere, if there is an ICE-CAP that is GROWING, there is a conjugate ICE-FREE region that is CONJUGATELY SHRINKING.  Compare this to a FLAT SPACE where the ICE-COVERED area was GROWING.  This corresponds to our Common Average European language architecture where WE DO FORMULATE FLAT-SPACE REPRESENTATIONS with language constructs such as THE ICE-FREE SURFACE AREA IS CONTINUING TO GROW as the EARTH continues to WARM.

In our CAE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, there is NO EXPLICIT MENTION of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE.  So, supposing we were talking about the CULTIVATED AREA on the earth.  While the Indigenous Aboriginal LESS SIMPLE language architecture delivers representations in the ANDROGYNOUS terms “There is CULTIVATING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, the more SIMPLE Common Average European language would reduce the imagery to THE CULTIVATED AREA IS GROWING which is the FLAT-SPACE view.  In terms of the TRUTH of this statement, we run into the Goedel’s Theorem acknowledgement of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite logical propositions; i.e. TO SPEAK OF GROWTH of the CULTIVATED AREA without mentioning, at the same time, the SHRINKAGE of the WILDERNESS AREA (and the loss of its rich diversity), while it is a TRUE STATEMENT is an INCOMPLETE TRUTH because it is a SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based representations which CHECKS OUT if we constrain our inquiry to ‘leading’ questions like “Is the area of cultivated land GROWING or is it NOT GROWING”.   The TRUTH is that IT IS GROWING but this is an INCOMPLETE TRUTH since it is a FLAT-SPACE TRUTH which is abstraction since the world of our sense-experience is of inclusion in a SPHERICAL SPACE where the dynamics are ADROGYNOUS which requires the LESS SIMPLE LOGIC known as QUANTUM LOGIC, “the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium” where must take account of NOT ONLY the MALE ASSERTING “GROWTH” of the CULTIVATED AREA on the surface of the sphere, BUT ALSO, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “SHRINKAGE” of the WILDERNESS AREA, in this SPHERICAL SPACE actuality.

WHAT would happen if we were a people who adopted a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which served up language based representations in terms of GROWTH  as if GROWTH were something real?  GROWTH on its own implies a FLAT SPACE scenario where there is RATIO based increase and this notion of RATIO supports RATIONALITY aka REASON, and REASON is a DISASTER because it is FLAT-SPACE ABSTRACTION.   This is why Nietzsche makes the following comment;

“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.” —Nietzsche, “Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer”

… and also why Wittgenstein made the following comment;

“Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung  unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache” (Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

  * * *

 

Ok, that was quite a lot of verbiage, which seems necessary, focused on ‘the SHORTFALL or OVER-SIMPLIFICATION we have built into our WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, i.e. we are now using a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that in our making it MORE SIMPLE, we have DROPPED OUT the capability for expressing BALANCE and IMBALANCE as comes with the ADROGYNOUS RELATION where we say ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  But our CAE language would have us building language based representations in terms of the TOWN being “ITS OWN LOCAL AUTHOR” (thanks to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR” as in ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING goods and services, … and SUDDENLY, these words have PUT INTO OUR MIND the impression of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments and this THING NAMED ‘the TOWN’ is represented AS IF IT WERE THE LOCAL AUHOR of this TOWNING. WHERE HAVE WE SEEN MENTION OF THIS KIND OF ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ BEFORE?

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

WHAT WE ARE DOING HERE IS “INVENTING A LOCAL AUTHOR” of actions and developments by constructing a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based (notional) LOCAL AUTHOR; i.e. using LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE to FRAGMENT REALITY, which is what the invoking of a LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and developments does, and thus SIMPLIFY the task of LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION by way of FRAGMENTATION.

* * *

It is time to SUMMARIZE and CLOSE OUT this discussion of these TWO types of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE as distinguished with the two examples

 

–1- EXAMPLE of FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE: “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  Note the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING combined inference, characteristic of FLOW.

 

–2- EXAMPLE OF OBJECT-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE: “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services.  Note the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE inference (This comes with the SUBSTITUTION of absolute empty and infinite space IN PLACE OF the FEMALE accommodative conjugate).

 

SO WHAT CAN WE SAY ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS TO ‘IN OUR MINDS’ DEPENDING ON WHICH OF THESE TWO LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES WE ARE USING, THE “LESS SIMPLE” QUANTUM LOGIC FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE OR THE “MORE SIMPLE” OBJECT-BASED BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE?

We can give the example of the current Ukraine-Russia conflict which is given extensive coverage in the media in terms of -2- The  OBJECT BASED (BINARY LOGIC BASED) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which CONJURES UP the BINARY LOGIC PERPETRATOR-VICTIM REPRESENTATION.  But first, -1- the FLOW-BASED (QUANTUM LOGIC BASED) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE;

 

-1- .In this QUANTUM LOGIC view, the LANDSCAPE is restored to the natural primacy so rather than picturing RUSSIA and UKRAINE as two INDEPENDENT ISLANDS FLOATING IN AN EMPTY MIND-SPACE, we can re-integrate them into the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein they are INEXTRICABLE RELATIONAL FEATURES as Bohm would point out in his primary reality understood in terms of WHOLENESS and IMPLICIT ORDER which is the REALITY of our actual sensory experience of inclusion therein.  In this QUANTUM LOGIC view, UKRAINE and RUSSIA are not yet “PLUCKED OUT” of the transforming relational continuum but are inextricable developments within the transforming relational continuum.  DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE DO NOT OVERRIDE THE FIGURE-and-GROUND-are ONE topology of the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.

-2- In this BINARY LOGIC view, we employ the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to abstract SEPARATE OUT the FIGURE from the GROUND; i.e. the TOWN from the LANDSCAPE and IMAGINE IT  AS IF WE HAD LIFTED “IT” OUT  (AS IF IT WERE AN “IT” RATHER THAN A RELATIONAL COMPLEX) AND DROPPED IT DOWN INTO A NEW AND LESS CLUTTERED CONTAINER; I.E. AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (EUCLIDEAN SPACE).  As DOROTHY  says in the WIZARD OF OZ, … “TOTO, we are NOT in Kansas anymore”.  In other words, our BINARY LOGIC view which LIFTS OUT the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and SETS “THE TOWN” UP “AS IF ON ITS OWN”, WHICH MEANS IT IS NOW IN A NEW “CONTAINER” WHICH IS AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, WE KNOW AS ‘EUCLIDEAN SPACE’.  This is a NEW, ABSTRACT SUBSTITUTE REALITY that we have CREATED so as to SIMPLIFY our language based REPRESENTATION of REALITY in the form of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY (i.e. We DO NOT use LANGUAGE to ‘SIMPLIFY REALITY’, we use LANGAUGE to CONSTRUCT A SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is MORE SIMPLE to REPRESENT than the REALITY of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  BINARY LOGIC allows us to construct a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which SUBSTITUTES for the QUANTUM LOGIC relation where the OBJECT is a CONDENSATION Of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, a BINARY LOGIC based OBJECT  in a NOTIONAL (abstract) EMPTY SPACE.  This makes the LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION of CHANGE much, much SIMPLER.  That is, the ANDROGYNOUS CONJUGATES of WAVE-FIELD and CONDENSATION can be replaced with the much SIMPLER combination of a MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF in ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (the Euclidian space abstraction).

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

 * * *

THUS WE HAVE JUXTAPOSED THESE TWO REALITY-REPRESENTATION APPROACHES;

-1- THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGIANAL AND MODERN PHYSICS QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTATION WHEREIN FIGURE AND GROUND ARE ONE, CONSISTENT WITH THE PHYSICS WHEREIN MATTER IS A CONDENSATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD,  … –

-2- THE POPULAR WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC REPRESENTATION WHEREIN FIGURE AND GROUND ARE TWO, CONSISTENT WITH NEWTONIAN PHYSICS WHEREIN MATTER IS IMPUTED TO EXIST WITHIN A CONTAINING SPACE THAT IS ABSOLUTE EMPY AND INFINITE IN EXTENT, A SIMPLIFICATION THAT BYPASSES THE ANDROGYNOUS COMPLEXITY OF NATURE WHEREIN MATTER IS A CONDENSATION OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

NOTA BENE: ACHTUNG! The SIMPLIFICATION of injecting the BINARY LOGIC based structure of MATTER and EMPTINESS into the foundations of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES leads to major complications due the SHORTFALL in BINARY LOGIC based REPRESENTATIONS, as for example, with talk of the RUSSIA – UKRAINE conflict (a BINARY LOGIC based REPRESENTATION).  In the REAL WORLD of our sense-experience, we share inclusion in the transforming relational continuum wherein STRIFE is relational dissonance that is innately NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in QUANTUM LOGIC relations (e.g. wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE such that we cannot SPLIT OUT “UKRAINE” and “RUSSIA” from the transforming relational continuum since these regions (UKRAINE and RUSSIA) are like CONDENSATIONS within an OVERALL, ALL-INCLUDING RELATIONAL DYNAMIC, and to SPLIT THEM OUT with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR and imagine them as INDEPENDENT UNITS with THEIR OWN AUTHORING POWERS is INTELLECTUAL ABSRACTION that is NOT SUPPORTED by SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY and which leads to PSYCHOLOGICAL as well as SOCIAL FRAGMENTATION.

* * *

PART TWO, My response within a recent EXCHANGE that reviews the PROBLEMS of OVER-SIMPLIFIED REPRESENTATIONS built into the FOUNDATIONS of WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

 

 

hi xxx,

 

yes, I understand the stress that comes with ‘philosophical investigations’ into our language architecture, but that’s the point, that we are tricking ourselves with our own language which we use to simplify the language-based representations of our experiences because our experiences are difficult to capture in language.  that’s why we have adages like ‘la raison du plus fort est toujours la meilleure’ ,

 

and also why Wittgenstein said;

“Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung  unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache”

(Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

 

Language allows us to represent what is going on in the Ukraine in two very different ways;

 

-1 the WESTERN POPULAR BINARY LOGIC way: The conflict between Russia and the Ukraine continues to amplify.

 

-2-relational dissonance in the world continues to erupt regardless of our manner of TILING of the surface of the sphere of the earth with different coloured geometric shapes defined by imaginary boundary lines that we paste name-labels on.

 

We COULD understand STRIFE in the NOTIONAL terms of interactions between the coloured polygons on a map of the world, i.e. red, blue and white for Russia and blue and yellow for Ukraine.  in this way, we wouldn’t have to struggle with the tangled web of relations that take into account the complex global social relations in which Ukrainians are interwoven.  The coloured polygons on the map are so much easier to see and think about than the actual complex of relations which is more like a rhizome that a neat clean and tidy geometric tiling job.

 

However, thanks to BINARY LOGIC, we get to talk about what is going on in the terms of -1-, the COLOURED POLYGONS described above rather than in terms of -2-, the actual rhizome like web of relations which is innately NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT rather than LOCAL and EXPLICIT, … but for those of us addicted to BINARY LOGIC, we would prefer to SIMPLIFY REALITY and construct a SUBSTITUTE REALITY where we picture those different coloured LOCAL and EXPLICIT POYGONS as doing battle with ONE ANOTHER, rather than straining our brain to acknowledge the actual NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RHIZOMATIC COMPLEXITY of such relational dissonance.

 

Because our language is simplifying reality in the manner it is, reducing GLOBAL (nonlocal) tensions which are relational and implicit to the MUCH MORE SIMPLE REPRESENTATION that is SIMPLE because WE PORTRAY IT as LOCAL and EXPLICIT, we can PRETEND that all we have to do is SOLVE this LOCAL and EXPLICIT (substitute reality representation) PROBLEM and the SIMPLEST way to handle such LOCAL and EXPLICIT problems is to PRETEND that BINARY LOGIC applies and that ONE OF THE TWO is the PERPETRATOR of the conflict and the other is the VICTIM, this BINARY LOGIC SIMPLIFICATION suggesting that all we need to do is to RESCUE the VICTIM and PUNISH the PERPETRATOR, which in the RHIZOME understanding, is like chasing the snake under the rug only to find that it is showing up in some new location suggesting that the REAL ISSUE is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT rather than LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

 

Of course all of the presently not ACTIVELY COMBATTING branches in the interdependent rhizome; i.e. our world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence are likely to cheer lead for ONE FACTION or the OPPOSIING FACTION , a development made possible by way of DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE of each of those coloured polygons on the map of the world which simply DECLARE THEMSELVES TO BE INDEPENDENT, an ABSTRACTION that is backed up by nothing other than WEAPONS and BOMBS and getting people to swear to give their lives, as necessary, to continue to feign belief in one of those colour-coded POLYGONS that designate a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF purportedly residing within the complex relational rhizome, the world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence

 

ain’t language great?  without our Common Average European languages, we wouldn’t be able to declare our coloured polygon-based INDEPENDENCE and FREEDOM in which case we would have to accept the reality of our  global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence so that we world have to roll out all the quantum logic BALANCE based social-relational practices instead of investing in TRUMP recommended WALLS to PRESERVE THE IMBALANCES, and not only to PRESERVE the IMBALANCES but to prove the SUPERIORITY of our colour coded POLYGON and confirm the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that IMPUTES the ‘REALITY’ of LOCAL AUTHORING which means COMPETITION is the way to go where the MAXIMIZING OF IMBALANCE if the order of the day,.. of course supplement by a bit of Trickle Down sharing due to the benevolence of those us who have been born superior to most of the others, … as is the DARWINIAN BINARY LOGIC based interpretation; i.e. WE ARE “EITHER” BETTER THAN THE OTHERS “OR” NOT BETTER.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC where there is shifting of BALANCE and IMBALANCE as involves global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence

is not part of our CAE BINARY LOGIC based language architecture.   We are obliged to use BINARY LOGIC, MALE-ASSERTIVE-SPEAK and say “the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING’ (one-sidedly male-assertive) wherein FIGURE and GROUND are TWO and where GROUND is ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE) and competition is the order of the day,  instead of QUANTUM LOGIC where we can admit the FEMALE conjugate  and say “there is TOWNING (male assertive) in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (female accommodative) ” wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE and TRANSFORMATION through interconnectedness and mutual interdependence is the order of the day.

 

of course we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS prefer BINARY LOGIC based language which has us making distinctions between PERPETRATOR and VICTIM because that is what DEFINES US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS and why we SIMPLIFY so as to be able to identify WHAT’S GOOD and WHAT’S BAD and start working on some PURIFCATIONISM which eliminates what’s BAD, … whereas the indigenous aboriginals would using a less simple QUANTUM LOGIC understanding and assuming IMBALANCE (without reducing this to BINARY LOGIC based EITHER GOOD or BAD) and working together to restore BALANCE where there is IMBALANCE as is the way of nature.

* * *