A BREAKTHROUGH FOR ME: UNDERSTANDING FRAGMENTATION AS OBSCURANTISM
The following SYNOPSIS gives an abbreviated account, elaborated in the body of the essay, of how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are employing a language architecture that incorporates OBSCURANTISM wherein the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD nature of reality is OBSCURED by our infusing of a SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY. Note that our sense-experience gives us access to the full WAVE-FIELD nature of the world while it is only our WESTERN CULTURE language architecture that OBSCURES the natural WAVE-FIELD reality by infusing SIMPLIFIED (dumbed-down) BINARY LOGIC “EITHER” matter “OR” empty space ABSTRACTION.
SYNOPSIS: We (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) could learn from asking ourselves why we have the THIN SKULL rule in our BINARY LOGIC based system of LAW ENFORCEMENT (where if we “abide by the law’ we are among the masses of INNOCENTS UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY). The answer is, the THIN SKULL rule AVOIDS having to deal with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (as in the easily collapsible skull) which is an innate part of our WAVE-FIELD world with its QUANTUM LOGIC dynamics which are ANDROGYNOUS. It is not simply WHAT WE DO that ‘counts’, which is the MALE ASSERTIVE conjugate since reality includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING aspect as pointed out in Shakespeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’ … “There is a tide in the affairs of men Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries.”
But even if such FEMALE accommodating ‘opportunity’ opens up for us, our WESTERN CULTURE interpretation is to give us FULL AUTHORING CREDIT regardless. We do the same thing with BLAME as in the example of the THIN SKULL rule, because it is SIMPLER to just ‘GO WITH THE MALE’ (BINARY LOGIC as in ‘He “EITHER” is “OR” is not responsible for AUTHORING this “EITHER” good “OR” bad action and development) rather than to go with the LESS SIMPLE FEMALE-MALE (androgynous) understanding as in Modern physics and as in indigenous aboriginal culture justice where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING aspect is ALSO taken into account and NOT JUST the MALE ASSERTIVE. But we like to simplify things with BINARY LOGIC and attribute EVERYTHING to the MALE-ASSERTING as if the action were unfolding within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (our WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY which gets rid of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE).
The THIN SKULL RULE demonstrates how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS reduce our language based representation to re-cast the QUANTUM LOGIC reality within a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, wile the ‘tide in the affairs of men’ points to the QUANTUM LOGIC reality wherein what comes of our actions depends upon the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “IN CONJUGATE RELATION WITH” THE MALE ASSERTING. We do not live in an EMPTY SPACE, we are INCLUDED IN THE WAVE-FIELD so that there is a BALANCE between MALE-ASSERTING agency and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING agency. The THIN SKULL rule is an INTELLECT based OBSCURING of the QUANTUM LOGIC conjugate (androgynous) nature of sense-experience reality by allowing intellectual acceptance of “ONLY” MALE ASSERTIVE language-based representations while the ‘tide in the affairs of men’ representation ACKNOWLEDGES the CONJUGATE (accommodating-asserting) nature of sense-experience reality. WESTERN CULTURE has an EGO problem wherein there is an insistence on imposing the abstraction of one-sided male-assertive “AUTHORING” of actions and developments, by SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the FEMALE accommodating conjugate. The ‘tide in the affairs of men’, rather than being seen in terms of QUANTUM LOGIC balance of MALE ASSERTING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING MAKE THE MISTAKE OF IMPUTING FULL AUTHORING CREDIT TO THE MALE ASSERTIVE, thus OBSCURING the role of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.
This OBSCURANTISM has been built into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE by way of the BINARY LOGIC based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (which implies one-sided male-assertive action and development). We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed a comprehensive intellectual abstraction based infrastructure which supports the construction of a BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are now using as our OPERATIVE REALITY. There is no FEMALE CONJUGATE in this one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE, DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, therefore the person throwing the punch that shatters the THIN SKULL’ is charged with AUTHORING the deadly damage done, and likewise those who are masters of profiting from the “tides in the affairs of men” (e.g the Elon Musks etc.) are credit with AUTHORING the tides rather than being manipulators of phenomena based on sensitive dependence on initial conditions (the skier that dislodges snow that turns into an avalanche is not the AUTHOR but the TRIGGER for the avalanche, just as the smoker who carelessly discards his cigarette is not the AUTHOR but the TRIGGER for the resulting conflagration (the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the forest when it is dessicated by solar irradiance).
As in all of these examples, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed a language architecture that OBSCURES THE ACCOMMODATING ROLE OF THE FEMALE and explains all things in the one-sided terms of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (employing the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).
The REDUCTION of the ANDROGYNOUS QUANTUM LOGIC of sense-experience reality to one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE-ONLY BINARY LOGIC constructions INFUSES “OBSCURANTISM” into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT representation. WHAT ‘GOES MISSING’ is the FEMALE CONJUGATE and with it, the WAVE-FIELD understanding of our sense-experience reality.
* * *
The essence of the ‘breakthrough-for-me’ signaled by the title; A BREAKTHROUGH FOR ME: UNDERSTANDING FRAGMENTATION AS OBSCURANTISM is that OUR WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, SPLITS OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE in the all-including FEMALE-MALE WAVE-FIELD reality, and employs GRAMMAR that constructs ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITIES’ that we tend to employ as our BEHAVIOUR-COORDINATING SOCIAL-COLLECTIVE OPERATIVE REALITY. COORDINATING OUR SOCIAL COLLECTIVE BEHAVIOURS on a one-sided MALE ASSERTIVE BASIS gives us a POWERFUL MEANS of achieving GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services.
PROBLEM! …. Language that orients to the construction of ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS (e.g. as implied by the abstraction of “LOCAL AUTHORING”, achieved with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR”) fails to CAPTURE the FEMALE CONJUGATE aspect of our WAVE-FIELD sense-experience. While our POETIC nature gives expression to the MALE-FEMALE WAVE-FIELD nature and the influence of the elusive FEMALE CONJUGATE; e.g. in Shakespeare’s; ‘Julius Caesar’;
There is a tide in the affairs of men.
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.
Our WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European Language Architecture EMPLOY “ONLY” the MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE and “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, so that our CAE LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATIONS are of a MALE-ASSERTIVE ONLY based CONSTRUCTION. This is where the ABSTRACTION of BINARY LOGIC comes from which has us constructing representations of reality that are one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE ONLY, so that we have to engineer WORK-AROUNDS such as ‘the THIN SKULL RULE in the WESTERN LEGAL SYSTEM because OUR DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “LIMITS” our “CONSTRUCTION OF REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY” to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE-ONLY ARCHITECTURE, whereas the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE (as pointed out by David Bohm) employs the LESS SIMPLE “QUANTUM LOGIC” which comprehends BALANCE as having the foundational role in our WAVE-FIELD based sense-experience affirmed reality dynamic. In other words, the reference to the implied FEMALE CONJUGATE in ‘there is a tide in the affairs of men’ that it ‘makes sense’ to acknowledge as a NATURAL ORCHESTRATOR AND RELATIONAL SHAPER of MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS. THIS IS AN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INNATE WAVE-FIELD NATURE OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, as MODERN PHYSICS REAFFIRMS.
WHILE SENSE EXPERIENCE IS OF A FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE NATURE, as is captured in the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, OUR WESTERN CULTURE CAE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE ‘DROPS OUT’ THE FEMALE CONJUGATE SO THAT OUR CAE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS CONSTRUCT ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITIES’. FORTUNATELY, WE STILL HAVE OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE TO GUIDE US, WHICH NATURALLY ATTUNES TO THE FULL-BLOWN WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC, … BUT “WATCH OUT!” FOR PEOPLE WHO PAY MORE ATTENTION TO THE LANGUAGE-BASED ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS THAN THEIR OWN SENSE-EXPERIENCING SINCE THIS LEADS TO THE ABSTRACTION OF ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE ‘MAKING THINGS HAPPEN WHICH IGNORES THE SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY OF OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA THE WAVE-FIELD AKA THE TAO.
“Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache” (Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations
So, the title of this note : A BREAKTHROUGH FOR ME: UNDERSTANDING FRAGMENTATION AS OBSCURANTISM points out the following;
“OBSCURANTISM”, the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.
Our WESTERN CULTURE development of a BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE deliberately OBSCURES the NATURAL PRECEDENCE OF THE FEMALE CONJUGATE in our language-based REPRESENTATIONS, by UNNATURALLY ELEVATING the MALE-ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE INTO THE ‘LEAD ROLE’ and SIMPLY ‘DROPPING OUT’ the FEMALE CONJUGATE and substituting an and ABSTRACT, ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.
THUS, OBSCURANTISM IS THE FOUNDING PRINCIPLE OF ENGLISH (CAE) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and EGO is its GUARDIAN.
Our sense-experience is the same sense-experience as ‘built into’ all relational forms in the transforming relational continuum and this can serve as our behavioral guide and compass, as is the case in the indigenous aboriginal culture (and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta cultures) however, our WESTERN CULTURE has developed the practice of elevating the SUBSTITUTE REALITY BORN OF OUR ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE into an UNNATURAL PRIMACY over our SENSE-EXPERIENCE. THE RESULT IS OBSCURANTISM is wherein we let our LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY ‘take over’ in the SHAPING of our actions and development, serving up a language-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is one-sided MALE ASSERTIVE in which FEMALE ACCOMMODATING has ‘gone missing’. The result is that assertive actions no longer ATTUNE to the TIDE IN THE AFFAIRS OF MEN which serves as a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING SOCKET for the MALE ASSERTING FULL-FILLING, but, thanks to OBSCURANTISM (the ignoring of the FEMALE CONJUGATE) we PUSH FORWARD IN A ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE MANNER, creating FRAGMENTATION as characterizes our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-DRIVEN “MODUS OPERANDI”
NEVERTHELESS, the FEMALE CONTAINING WAVE-FIELD is the PRIMARY REALITY while the MALE ASSERTIVE FIGURES are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, hence QUANTUM LOGIC which supports the WAVE-FIELD REALITY. REGARDLESS, the MALE-ASSERTIVE FIGURES DOMINATE, BECAUSE THEY ARE SIMPLER TO CAPTURE IN LANGUAGE in terms that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT rather than NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the real sense-experience-affirmable nature of WAVE-FIELD reality, ARE GIVEN PRIORITY in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE. This means that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is only good for constructing LOCAL, EXPLICIT ALLUSIONS to the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD reality which is our primary sense-experience affirmed reality.
6.54 My propositions are elucidatory in this way: he who understands me finally recognizes them as senseless, when he has climbed out through them, on them, over them. (He must so to speak throw away the ladder, after he has climbed up on it.)
He must surmount these propositions; then he sees the world rightly.
7.0 Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. (“Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen”),
–Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
THE UNDERSTANDING SHARED IN THIS NOTE IS A “BREAKTHROUGH” for me, in my understanding and it concerns the relationship between FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.
Now, this is a BREAKTHROUGH-FOR-ME and perhaps it could be for the reader, too, since it is a QUANTUM LOGIC based insight and my SENSE is that both BOHM and NIETZSCHE seem to PASS OVER THE TOP OF IT; Bohm with his FRAGMENTATION and Nietzsche with his (equivalent) DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is the ROOT SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION in LANGUAGE-STIMULATED UNDERSTANDING..to
It is NOT DIFFICULT but it is SUBTLE. I am speaking of the difference between FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.
Here’s the subtle difference;
FRAGMENTATION is based on simple belief in BINARY LOGIC
OBSCURANTISM is based on a QUANTUM LOGIC aware purveyor of BINARY LOGIC
OBSCURANTISM is the DELIBERATE ‘DUMBING DOWN’ in our language based representation of THINGS or SITUATIONS so as to make THEM APPEAR SIMPLER, … which is distinct from SIMPLIFYING THE LANGUAGE used to CAPTURE THE THING or SITUATION.
EXAMPLE: the THIN SKULL rule in WESTERN CULTURE administering of the LAW governs how we handle situations such as where one person punches another person in the head and that person, because he already has an unusual fragility, suffers a fractured skull and dies from what would normally do minimal or no injury. The LAW says that the person throwing the punch MUST TAKE FULL OWNERSHIP OF THE RESULTING DEATH regardless of the fact that his action would NORMALLY be of little consequence.
THIS PROBLEM actually arises from our use of BINARY LOGIC rather than QUANTUM LOGIC since if we were using QUANTUM LOGIC, the ‘BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM’, … we acknowledge the WAVE-FIELD nature of dynamics wherein we must consider both the MALE-ASSERTIVE INFLUENCE of the TRANSMITTER of the action) and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING INFLUENCE of the RECEIVER of the action. The THIN SKULL DILEMMA derives from the fact that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE CONJUGATE of the natural WAVE-FIELD dynamic while SUBSTITUTING the abstract notion of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT, leaving only MALE ASSERTIVE ACTION to explain everything. In our sense-experience reality, dynamics are WAVE-FIELD dynamics which are ANDROGYNOUS; i.e. having a FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING conjugate nature.
The science of psychology is auxiliary to physics. The two mutually support one another, and it is only when they are united that a complete science is formed. From our standpoint, the antithesis of subject and object, in the ordinary sense, does not exist.” — Ernst Mach. ‘The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical,
IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, however, we constrain our language-based REPRESENTATIONS of actions to ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE ACTIONS and we do this with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which generates artificial FRAGMENTATION, as noted by both Bohm and Nietzsche. THIS FRAGMENTATION has another UNMENTIONED attribute WHICH IS THE DROP OUT OF THE FEMALE CONJUGATE (we intellectually/abstractly compensate for this by using a language-based INTRODUCING of a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE EUCLIDEAN SPACE). The FEMALE CONJUGATE thus GOES MISSING thanks to the SUBSTITUTING of the notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.
IN THE REAL WORLD, we have WAVE-FIELD dynamics which the QUANTUM LOGIC, FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE STRUCTURE which is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR based representations. SO where NEWTON’s 3rd Law says “for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction”, have to back off this LEAD-OFF WHICH STARTS WITH A MALE-ASSERTING ACTION and MEETS UP WITH A BINARY LOGIC BASED OPPOSITE. In QUANTUM LOGIC reality, we have to LET GO of the notion of LOCAL MALE ASSERTING ACTION as if we were justified in conceiving this ONE-SIDED DYNAMIC as REAL, and then using that to IMPUTE AN EQUAL AND OPPOSITE DYNAMIC. What is BEING LOST HERE is the QUANTUM LOGIC phenomenon of BALANCE which is ANDROGYNOUS rather than BINARY in nature. In other words, BALANCE in the QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE, is FUNDAMENTAL and not SOMETHING WHICH CAN BE ACHIEVED BY MECHANICAL ACTIONS. QUANTUM LOGIC “IS” BALANCE and it is FOUND IN NATURE. It is the QUANTUM LOGIC that is IMMANENT IN NATURE.
So, the THIN SKULL RULE is something that ARISES FROM A SHORTFALL IN OUR LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION OF REALITY, because we have GIVEN A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN OUR LANGUAGE-BASED REALITY REPRESENTATIONS TO ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS THE ROLE OF THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR WHICH SUPPORTS “FRAGMENTATION” SO THAT WE DON’T HAVE TO ACKNOWLEDGE REALITY IN TERMS OF AN ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC AND CAN HAVE A LANGUAGE THAT LET’S US PIECE-MEAL (FRAGMENT) OUR REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY.
IN SHORT: THE THIN SKULL RULE IS A “CRUDE FIX” FOR OUR OWN SIMPLIFICATION IN OUR LANGUAGE BASED REALITY REPRESENTATION SCHEME WHERE WE BUILD ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE STRUCTURES WHILE ‘DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE’ AND SUBSTITUTING INTO OUR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS, AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.
THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ THUS COMES ABOUT AS A CRUDE FIX FOR THE ‘DEA ABSCONDITA’, OUR REMOVAL OF THE FEMALE CONJUGATE THAT DERIVES FROM OUR SIMPLIFYING OF OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE. DON’T FORGET THAT WHILE THE MALE-ASSERTIVE IS “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT”, THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT. THE MOUNTAIN IS LOCAL AND EXPLICIT BUT THE VALLEY IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT. THE MATERIAL CONTINENTS ARE ‘DRIFTING’ AS IN ‘CONTINENTAL DRIFT’, AND THESE DYNAMICS ARE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT WHILE SEAFLOOR SPREADING IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT, … but these male assertive and female accommodating dynamics are bound up within a coniunctio oppositorium, an ANDROGYNOUS UNITY, … but nobody said that we couldn’t architect a language that splits them apart into two separate entities and DROPS OUT the less simple FEMALE entity. This is “OBSCURANTISM”, the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known. It is moving in the opposite direction to that suggested by Lao Tzu; Know the male but keep the role of the female.
Our WESTERN CULTURE language cultivated practice is a practice of not only ‘knowing the male’ but KEEPING THE ROLE OF THE MALE. This is contrary to waiting for the tide so that we can take it on the flood, and to follow insult with injury, to ignore the existence of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (thank you very much ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE EUCLIDEAN SPACE for standing in as SUBSTITUTE REALITY, thus freeing up MALE ASSERTING as the FULL AND SOLE AGENCY.
Know the male but keep the role of the female … is EXACTLY WHAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE “NOT” DONE. We have GONE WITH MALE ASSERTIVE ACTIONS OF GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION while at the same time IGNORING THE ROLE OF THE FEMALE. IN NATURE, the AVALANCHE is the PRODUCER of great piles of MATERIAL, but not without OPENING OF A HOLE such that the MALE ASSERTING AVALANCHE and the CONJUGATE FEMALE OPENING OF THE HOLE co-constitute TRANSFORMATION of the overall landscape.
In order to comprehend TRANSFORMATION, we need to open up to the understanding of reality in terms of an all-including SPHERICAL SPACE. This gives us a kind of 4th Dimension which accommodates EXTRUSION and SUBDUCTION (INTRUSION) which is OVERALL TRANSFORMATION, something that can’t happen in a FLAT EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT such as EUCLIDEAN space.. GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE ONLY DYNAMICS which are BINARY LOGIC based and only possible in a FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT; i.e. EUCLIDEAN SPACE. In SPHERICAL SPACE there is TRANSFORMATION which is QUANTUM LOGIC based; i.e. THE BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium wherein EXTRUSION and SUBDUCTION are conjugate aspects of the ONE DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION. Note that the SPHERE as a LOCAL EXPLICIT THING disappears, giving way to the COMPLEX CONJUGATES of continuing EXTRUSION and SUBDUCTION or Heraclitus’ SCATTERING and GATHERING, a CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM that is the very BASIS of TRANSFORMATION, and which WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION REDUCES to the BINARY LOGIC of BIRTH and DEATH which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT rather than NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in the EXTRUSION-INTRUSION or SCATTERING-GATHERING of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD. QUANTUM LOGIC, THE BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD MEDIUM, DESCRIBES THE DYNAMIC OF TRANSFORMATION.
INCLUSION IN TRANSFORMATION AS THE BASIC DYNAMIC OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS SUPPORTED BY MODERN PHYSICS AND IS INFERRED IN SOME RELIGIOUS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS SUCH AS IN THE GOSPEL OF THOMAS;
“Again when Jesus saw infants being nursed by their mothers he said, “These infants being suckled are like those entering the Kingdom.” And the disciples asked, “Shall we, then, as little children, enter the Kingdom?” He answered them, “When you make two one, and when you make the inside the outside and the outside the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and female one and the same…then you will enter (the Kingdom).” — The Gnostic gospel of Thomas.
Jesus said, “What you look forward to has already come, but you do not recognize it…the Kingdom of the Father is spread out on the earth, but men do not see it.” The Gospel of Thomas
WESTERN CULTURE FOR THE MOST PART, EMPLOYS BINARY LOGIC IN THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF A BINARY LOGIC BASED “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”, WHERE THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS SUCH AS TO ENABLE “FRAGMENTATION” AS IN THE “DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR” TO SIMPLIFY THE LANGUAGE-BASED ARTICULATION OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY BY INTRODUCING A “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” BASED ON BINARY LOGIC ARCHITECTURES WHERE FIGURE AND GROUND ARE TWO, … RATHER THAN ‘ONE’ AS IN QUANTUM LOGIC WHERE MATTER IS A CONDENSATION OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AS ASSOCIATES WITH GATHERING AND SCATTERING AND/OR EXTRUSION AND INTRUSION (SUBDUCTION). Our WESTERN CULTURE KNEE-JERK is to impute the existence of LOCAL FORCES to explain the BINARY LOGIC of EXTRUSION and INTRUSION, however, CONDENSATIONS OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD manifest as TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in the WAVE-FIELD dynamic, which invokes the QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE relation, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium (the ‘including medium being the all-including electromagnetic wave-field).
SO, with the BINARY LOGIC and QUANTUM LOGIC option in hand, we can revisit Lao Tzu’s Know the male.
But keep the role of the female because in the WAVE-FIELD understanding the FEMALE CONTAINER (the FIELD) “INCLUDES” the MALE CONTENT, and this WESTERN CULTURE ARCHITECTING OF LANGUAGE has FRAGMENTED OUT the MALE ASSERTIVE and BACKFILLED with an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SUBSTITUTE CONTAINER WHICH IMPARTS TO THE MALE ASSERTIVE DYNAMIC, THE FULL AND ENTIRE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTING ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ WHICH IS DISENCUMBERED OF THE CONJUGATE MALE-FEMALE RELATION. So what our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based REALITY CONSTRUCTING has gone to is to “know the male and keep the role of the male and simply ignore the role of the female by architecting language that DROPS OUT the FEMALE”.
HERE WE GO! (but just us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS WITH OUR CAE BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE);…
“OBSCURANTISM”, the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.
THAT’S RIGHT! OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE comes complete with a FEMALE CONJUGATE ERADICATION package which is achieved by fabricating a LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein there is no FEMALE CONJUGATE although the presence of the FEMALE CONJUGATE is innate in the WAVE-FIELD reality of our sense-experience. In our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based system of REPRESENTATION, there is only an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, opening the way for the MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE to be elevated to the FULL AND SOLE AUTHOR of actions and developments. So in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, we SUBSTITUTE ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE as a notional CONTAINER in place of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the result being that our language-based representations of reality need only concern themselves with the MALE ASSERTIVE CONSTRUCTIONS. For example, we need only address GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION which are MALE-ASSERTIVE CONJUGATES that don’t mention the FEMALE OPENINGS IN OUR SPHERICAL EARTH from whence the ACCOMMODATING SUPPLY OF MATERIALS derive.
One might think that the MIND would be BOTHERED by this one-sided ACCOUNTING that only speaks to the MALE-ASSERTIVE GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION and NOT to the FEMALE ASPECT, the HOLES in the EARTH which are CONJUGATE to the GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, the two being CONJUGATE ASPECTS OF THE ONE DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION. BUT THE MIND IS NOT BOTHERED because it has INTELLECTUAL ACCESS to the EUCLIDEAN SPACE GEOMETRIC ABSTRACTION which just goes on and on forever so in thinking in terms of EXTRACTIONS of MATERIAL from a FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, we are in a BINARY LOGIC mindset and do not have to worry about QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BALANCE’ as in a spherical space where there is a CONJUGATE RELATION between the GROWING PRODUCTION of THINGS and the OPENING OF HOLES in the finite SPHERICAL SPACE, these two CONJUGATES manifesting in the overall TRANSFORMATION of the spherical space. THERE IS NO TRANSFORMATION in our ABSTRACT FLAT SPACE CONCEPTUALIZING, which is what we get from our one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS which give us “GROWTH”, “DEVELOPMENT” and “PRODUCTION” but “NO TRANSFORMATION” since that requires QUANTUM LOGIC rather than BINARY LOGIC. WHEN WE SAY ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING” we mean it “NO IFS, ANDS, OR BUTS”, because it is complete in itself as is the nature of one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE PROPOSITIONS.
“OBSCURANTISM”, the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.
BUT LET’S BE HONEST. AS GOEDEL’S THEOREM SAYS, ALL FINITE PROPOSITIONS OF LOGIC ARE INCOMPLETE.
This says that we can make statements which are logically truthful and verifiable, but which are innately incomplete. If we say ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ that may be a true statement and if we assume the town is situated within a EUCLIDEAN SPACE which is an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, there is no DECEPTION, but in our sense-experience reality, we are in a spherical space of finite extent whereupon, in the case that ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, in which case the TRUTH of our statement ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is TRUE but INCOMPLETE since we haven’t mentioned the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS as is the reality in the spherical space of our sense experience.
This is “OBSCURANTISM”, the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.
because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have a deliberate intention of promoting the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR based abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING and there is a lot of EGO tied up with these CLAIMS of LOCAL AUTHORING. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING (it is the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING GRAMMAR which is BINARY LOGIC based. HE “EITHER” authored this act “OR” he did NOT author it. We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ this bogus BINARY LOGIC based concept of LOCAL AUTHORING anyhow, and we have built it into our system of REWARDS and PUNISHMENTS and have given it a foundational role in what we call ‘the ECONOMY’ which also recognizes GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION … “OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF TRANSFORMATION”; i.e. IGNORING the FEMALE CONJUGATE OPENING OF HOLES without which GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are impossible
The WESTERN CULTURE promoting of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION as REAL is “OBSCURANTISM”, the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.
Now, the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT “BIG PRODUCERS” may be leaving holes all over the place, not to mention fumes and waste products all of which is TRANSFORMING OUR LIVING SPACE, making a mockery of using the terms GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION as if they are MEANINGFUL IN THEIR OWN RIGHT, but this is “OBSCURANTISM”, the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known. because the economics of TRANSFORMATION have never been figured out.
In a FLAT EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT we can dig stuff out OVER HERE and pile it up OTHER THERE these are TWO SEPARATE ACTS, but in the all-including spherical space of our sense-experience, these are female and male aspects of the one dynamic of TRANSFORMATION and to treat them as TWO SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT EVENTS as is our WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD APPROACH, is OBSCURANTISM.
OK, that is sufficient, I think to cover the ground of; THIS IS A “BREAKTHROUGH” FOR ME, in my understanding and it concerns the relationship between FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.
BOHM has put his finger on the problem of WESTERN CULTURE being the problem of FRAGMENTATION
1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)
The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.
Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc
NIETZSCHE has put his finger on the problem of WESTERN CULTURE being the problem of BEING, the FIRST of TWO ERRORS in a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR issue that leads to LOCAL AUTHOR based FRAGMENTATION.
“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.” —Nietzsche, “Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer”
Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531
* * *
OK, you may ask, WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE between FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM and what comes to my mind is the EGO that is associated with OBSCURANTISM as associates with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is used to imply LOCAL AUTHORING where THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING because LOCAL AUTHORING is UNREAL ABSTRACTION. PRESTIGE of INDIVIDUALS, NATIONS, and CORPORATIONS can INFLATE on the basis of their perceived ACCOMPLISHMENTS which means their SELF-AUTHORED ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.
But THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING attributable to an INDIVIDUAL, NATION or CORPORATION since we live within a transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD wherein everything is in flux and when things are GOING WELL or GOING POORLY for an individual, town or notion, this can be understood in relational terms; i.e. in terms GATHERING-SCATTERING resonances. This is not to say that the ‘person’, ‘townspeople’ or national citizenry’ HAVE NOTHING TO DO with when things are GOING WELL or GOING POORLY, but it IS saying that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments. Just because our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE allows us to put together word combinations such as the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR so SPELL OUT things like ‘THIS TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods services, this IMPUTED LOCAL AUTHORING is, as Nietzsche points out a “DOUBLE ERROR” of “NAMING” and “GRAMMAR”.
Modern physics and our own sense-experience affirm that; … “WE LIVE IN A WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY GLOBAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE”
The WESTERN CULTURE VISIONS of TOWNS as LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES notionally WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTIONG of goods and services “IS NOT SENSE-EXPERIENCE-REAL”, it is LANGUAGE-BASED “INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION” PUT TOGETHER WITH THE “DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR” that is like a TOKEN REALITY that we CIRCULATE AMONG OURSELVES as a SIMPLIFIED STORY—TELLING PIECE. Modern physics is like a WAKE-UP CALL, not for everyone, because the indigenous aboriginal culture (those who still speak their native languages) have never fallen into the trap of constructing DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based SUBSTITUTE REALITIES. Indigenous aboriginals who were raised speaking their own languages, have an understanding of reality which is UNFRAGMENTED and is common to what Bohm’s Rheomode serves up where everything is in flux; e.g. were one would craft the QUANTUM LOGIC representation “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” rather than as we do with our WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European BINARY LOGIC language architecture; i.e. “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.
In the QUANTUM LOGIC representation, the TOWNING (FIGURE) and TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (GROUND) are only ONE.
In the BINARY LOGIC representation, the TOWN (FIGURE) is situated in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY INFINITE SPACE ‘CONTAINER” which amount the SPLITTING OUT the MALE ASSERTIVE FIGURE from the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING GROUND, and delivering a SUBSTITUTE REALITY where ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE is SUBSTITUTED for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING GROUND to SIMPLIFY the REPRESENTATION since the FEMALE-MALE ‘coniuncto oppositorum’ of the WAVE-FIELD is all-including and since it includes ourselves, we can’t be observers and give a visual pictorial account of what we share inclusion in.
While language based representations such as THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT and QUANTUM LOGIC based (the TOWNING is INCLUDED in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE are employed by indigenous aboriginals, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS put together BINARY LOGIC based language representations which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT such as “the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING goods and services” THE TOWN is in an EITHER/OR relation with the ABSOLUTE EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.
The full details are in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding wherein the FIGURE and GROUND are only ONE; i.e. the FIGURE is a CONDENSATION OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
I don’t believe that our WESTERN CULTURE use of BINARY LOGIC to support the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING is JUST A MISTAKE; as the label ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR suggests. If it were JUST A MISTAKE, it could be EASILY CORRECTED, but many people PREFER TO MAKE THIS MISTAKE AND TO CULTIVATE POLITICAL SUPPORT FOR THE CONTINUING USE OF THIS MISTAKE which imputes FALSE AUTHORING CREDITS on the basis of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as in the case of RUSSIA and UKRAINE which is a currently manifesting BOIL-UP in the GLOBAL WEB OF SOCIAL RELATIONS.
OBSCURANTISM is put into play here in the characterizing of STRIFE in the BINARY LOGIC terms of AGGRESSOR and VICTIM. Who would argue that the RAPIST is FULLY AND SOLELY RESPONSIBLE for the damage done to the RAPE VICTIM? INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS WOULD! THEY WOULD SAY: ‘WE ARE ALL RESPONSIBLE BECAUSE WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN A WEB OF RELATIONAL INTERDEPENDENCIES WHERE SOMEONE GETTING ZAPPED DERIVES FROM TENSIONS IN THE RELATIONAL WEB THAT CREATE THEIR OWN CONDUIT. THE PERSON WHO IS THE LIGHTNING ROD IS MEANWHILE NOT “THE LOCAL AUTHOR” AS IS THE SIMPLIFICATION THAT, IN WESTERN CULTURE, COMES FROM LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION AS WITH THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.
THIS SIMPLIFICATION is a reduction from;
‘IMBALANCE’ IN THE SOCIAL RELATIONAL MATRIX as understood in terms of QUANTUM LOGIC, THE ‘BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM
‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ ON THE PART OF ONE OF THE MEMBERS OF THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, A MULTIPLICITY OF INDEPENDENT BEINGS, EACH WITH THEIR OWN (double error of naming and grammar) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, which can be sifted through using BINARY LOGIC (a FILTER that determines whether an individual EITHER is OR is not THE LOCAL AUTHOR of an action or development.)
In the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, the BINARY LOGIC FILTER is only capable of SELECTING the lightning rod and NOT THE LOCAL AUTHOR since in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHOR and the person HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN can only be a CONDUIT or LIGHTNING ROD for the release of tensions incubating within the social relational matrix. WESTERN CULTURE social collectives have developed the habit of OBSCURING the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT origins of actions and developments, by introducing the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes a LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHOR
ONCE a LOCAL AUTHOR is identified, there social collective, apart from that individual, is decreed innocent of all authoring responsibility. ONCE the GUILTY PERSON IS IDENTIFIED AND APPREHENDED and PUNISHED, the CASE IS CLOSED and all members of the community, apart from the guilty party, are declared INNOCENT and without BLAME, leading to a social practice of ‘DO IT, BUT JUST DON’T GET CAUGHT’. In the indigenous aboriginal society, since the entire social collective are considered co-influencers of the ROOT-SOURCE TENSIONS that give rise to a short-circuit in the relational social dynamic, the SHORT CIRCUITING AGENT OF LIGHTNING ROD is NOT designated the AUTHOR of the VIOLENCE that he becomes the CONDUIT of.
BUT IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES, FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE COMPLICIT BODY OF THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, it is SIMPLER to let the LIGHTNING ROD take the AUTHORSHIP HIT.
THE INNOCENT MAJORITY in the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE can nevertheless sense the IMBALANCE associated with the BINARY LOGIC based CONVICTING of the LIGHTNING ROD, like Jean Valjean, for STEALING A LOAF OF BREAD than having to deal with the QUANTUM LOGIC reality of IMBALANCE as a tension that develops within the overall social-relational matrix, which would have to be addressed and resolved by the entire community. In the WESTERN CULTURE MAJORITY RULE system, the option has been voted on to regard everyone as an INDEPENDENT BEING with their own DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR based POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, and to have a system of REWARDS and PUNISHMENTS on this basis.
This is a system based on OBSCURANTISM, which is perhaps one level deeper than the identifications of BOHM and NIETZSCHE where FRAGMENTATION has been identified as the grass roots problem. FRAGMENTATION is SIMPLER than OBSCURANTISM in the same sense as BINARY LOGIC is simpler than QUANTUM LOGIC, the latter in both cases being rooted in BALANCE.
FRAGMENTATION will split apart the INNOCENT and the GUILTY while OBSCURANTISM points to how such BINARY LOGIC based SPLITTING is a SCAM which simply hides the less simple reality of QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE and IMBALANCE which is purely relational and which cannot be reduced to BINARY LOGIC based terms of EITHER GUILTY OR INNOCENT.
* * *