APN

DOES CLUSTERING PRODUCE CLUSTERS?

0

 

FORWARD:  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have engineered a trickiness within our language which REDUCES RESONANCE FEATURES to BEING based OBJECTS, as with CLUSTERING which we reduce to ‘the CLUSTER’ and then we follow up with GRAMMAR to impute to the CLUSTER “ITS OWN AUTHORING POWERS” which ‘WALLPAPERS OVER” its real identity as a RESONANCE FEATURE that is NOT AN “IT” but is a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT relational feature and therefore DOES NOT HAVE “ITS OWN POWER” OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT.  The CLUSTER is nevertheless, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION, endowed by NAMING with BEING and EQUIPPED by GRAMMAR with its OWN notional POWERS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

This LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED BEING based FRAGMENTION OF REALITY used in the construction of a BEING-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY lets us enjoy the FALSE GLORY AND/OR SHAME of LOCAL AUTHORING, and removes us from our INNOCENCE of being included in the transforming relational continuum, without an encounter with snakes and partaking of forbidden fruit.

 

“They were upright and correct without knowing that to be so was righteous. They loved one another without knowing that to do so was benevolence. They were sincere without knowing that to do so was loyalty. They kept their promises without knowing that to do so was to be in good faith. They helped one another without thought of giving or receiving gifts. Thus their actions left no trace and we have no records of their affairs” – Chuang Tzu

 

Can we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS break the habit of giving our one-sided MALE ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE over our ANDROGYNOUS sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD?  Can we find the words to flip from ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ to ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’?

* * *

 

MODERN PHYSICS IS IN AGREEMENT WITH INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY BUT NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH WESTERN CULTURE… HERE’S WHY

 

PROFOUND DIFFERENCES IN UNDERSTANDING can come from basic assumptions, and that is the case in the EAST-WEST SPLIT in LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION of “REALITY”

 

The word is not the thing and language based representation of reality are NOT REALITY but our language based conceptualizations of reality shape our individual and collective behaviours.

 

The difference between EAST and WEST can be illustrated by the difference between the VERB ‘CLUSTERING’ and the NOUN ‘CLUSTER’ (e.g. as in the case of ‘ants’ or in general).

 

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have embraced a language architecture that SIMPLIFIES capture of CLUSTERING (a verb), … which is a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT dynamic, to ‘the CLUSTER’ which is a LOCAL and EXPLICIT THING-BASED dynamic.

 

CLUSTERING is NOT simply the work of the participants in “A CLUSTER”, CLUSTERING occurs within a relational complex as when a drop of honey from a bee-hive INDUCES the CLUSTERING of ants.  In this case, an understanding of CLUSTERING involves developments in the HABITAT involve the relations between the INHABITANTS and the HABITAT and one way of understanding this is in terms of TRANSFORMATION in which case we consider the INHABITANT-HABITAT system be ONE SYSTEM.

 

LANGUAGE makes an important difference to our thinking and understanding here because in those languages which give a foundational role to NAMES (NOUNS), one the NAME ‘CLUSTER’ in injected into the REPRESENTATION, we shift away from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT structure of CLUSTERING within the transforming landscape to LOCAL and EXPLICIT “CLUSTER” as if it exists IN ITS OWN BEING-BASED RIGHT, in which case we are forced to invent a GRAMMAR to describe WHAT WE SEE or rather to CONSTRUCT A SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEINGS aka ‘ANTS’ and in our mind’s eye as we pronounce such words as ‘THE CLUSTER IS GROWING LARGER AND IS SHIFTING TOWARDS THE WATER”S EDGE’.

(more…)

WHOSE REALITY IS THE CORRECT REALITY, OR IS THERE ONE, … AND HOW DO THE DIFFERENT REALITIES DIFFER?

0

 

As someone who believes that our common WESTERN CULTURE REALITY is putting us on a BUSTRIP TO HELL, … it seems an appropriate thing to do share my views on our DIFFERENT REALITY OPTIONS.

 

The THREE POPULAR REALITY OPTIONS have been written up by the Austrian – American physicist Erich Jantsch (Design for Evolution).  People perceive the world differently and these THREE LEVELS of REALITY  describe three of the different ways and to cut to the quick I am going to label them Conservative, Liberal and Zen and the Zen could also be labelled, Indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta reality.

(more…)

The WAVE-FIELD Nature of the World that WESTERN CULTURE has UP-ENDED.

0

The WAVE-FIELD nature of the world has a FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING  CONJUGATE STRUCTURE wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE is in a NATURAL PRIMACY over the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE as in the physical example of the RAGING RIVER that scours out the FEMALE CHANNEL.  In this language based NAMING and GRAMMAR REPRESENTATION we give PRIMARY AGENCY to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION.  THIS IS A MISTAKE!  The FEMALE VALLEY that inductively organizes rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER is the INDUCTIVE AUTHORING SOURCE; i.e. the AUTHORING SOURCE IS NOT THE MALE ASSERTING ACTION.

THIS MISTAKE THAT HAS BEEN BUILT INTO WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is a REALITY INVERTER and MORE.  WE NOT ONLY MAKE THE MISTAKE OF CONSTRUCTING A MALE-ASSERTING AUTHORING AGENCY that we are presenting in our language based representations as our OPERATIVE REALITY, we are introducing ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT as a SUBSTITUTE for the NOW UNNECESSARY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, the net result being that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based REALITY REPRESENTATIONS are of a one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY nature.  For example we speak of the “RAGING RIVER” as having MALE ASSERTING POWER that equips the RAGING RIVER to PLOUGH OUT CANYONS in the earth, as for example, the GRAND CANYON ploughed out by the Colorado river.  In this example the MALE ASSERTING river ploughs up the land in a BINARY LOGIC dynamic wherein we see the COLORADO RIVER and the GRAND CANYON as TWO DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT THINGS; i.e. a MALE ASSERTING AGENCY and the CANYON which is the PRODUCT of the COLORADO RIVER’S MALE ASSERTING AGENCY.

WHAT is LOST in the SHUFFLE is the original FEMALE VALLEY that inductively organizes rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER so that our ‘talk’ in terms of MALE ASSERTING AGENCY is UPSIDE DOWN and BACKWARDS. The FEMALE VALLEY is the inductive author to her own deepening through her ability to GATHER together rain into rivulets, rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER that is SCOURING OUT ITS OWN PASSAGEWAY in an OUROBORUS (ANDROGYNOUS) LIKE DYNAMIC.   WITHOUT THE FEMALE VALLEY there would be NO RAGING RIVER and without the RAGING RIVER, there would be NO FEMALE VALLEY, thus this phenomenon bottoms out in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the MALE ASSERTING ARE ONE, as in the mythical OUROBORUS (snake swallowing its own tail) RELATION.

 

It is only our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that SPLITS these two WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATES APART AND RECASTS the OUROBORUS or COINCIDENTIA OPPOSITORUM IN THE SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC BASED “MALE and FEMALE TERMS’, OBSCURING the actual physical sense experience affirmed QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD structure.

 

IT IS THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR that introduces BINARY LOGIC into our REPRESENTATION and allows the SPLITTING APART of the WAVE-FIELD INTO TWO SEPARATE (MALE AND FEMALE) COMPONENTS. 

 

The point here is that without the intervention imposing the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which leads to the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between the NOW INDEPENDENTLY MOVING MALE ASSERTING AGENT and this implying immersion in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, we would have been able to retain the “BOTH/AND” QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the MALE-ASSERTING RAGING RIVER and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY, as occurs within FLUIDS of DIFFERING DENSITY and thus requiring QUANTUM LOGIC based understanding rather than BINARY LOGIC based understanding.  The INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD that includes CONDENSATIONS (material forms) effectively DEMOTES the material forms which are PRIMARY in BINARY LOGIC construction to secondary CONDENSATION status, NOT ‘SECONDARY’ IN A PHYSICAL sense since the WAVE-FIELD is just ONE ALL-INCLUDING phenomenon, but SECONDARY in a LOGICAL sense; i.e. while the WAVE-FIELD is the OVERALL REALITY, the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD are FEATURES within the  OVERALL REALITY and our language based representation of the CONDENSATIONS and “their movements and developments” imply their INDEPENDENCE as if within an uninvolved (or ’empty’) containing space.  So, once we focus our language-based description on the CONDENSATIONS, we are CREATING a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which we are imputing the POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT to the CONDENSATIONS and DROPPING OUT the REAL SOURCE of DYNAMICS which is the WAVE-FIELD with its CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY and its MALE ASSERTING AGENCY.

This “DROPPING OUT” of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the SUBSTITUTING  with an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT is BACKFILL necessitated by the PROMOTING of the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE to UNCONTESTED, SINGULAR PRIMACY in our language-based reality constructions.  Instead of having our language ACKNOWLEDGING the CONCAVE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OPENING OF THE VALLEY that INDUCTIVELY ORGANIZES the collecting of rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER, once we have IN MIND the “RAGING RIVER” together with a GRAMMAR that we have been using to impute LOCAL AUTHORING to OURSELVES, the language tools are in place to GIVE FULL CREDIT to the RAGING COLORADO RIVER for CARVING OUT THE GRAND CANYON, and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OF THE VALLEY ATTRACTOR that is the DEEPER AUTHORING SOURCE of the RAGING RIVER is DROPPED OUT OF OUR LANGUAGE BASED CAPTURE OF THIS PHENOMENON.

AS in the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE we have BUILT INTO our language architecture, THE PRACTICE of OBSCURANTISM where we IGNORE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and build a language architecture around the ONE-SIDED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE at which point WE DISCARD from our language all reference to the ANDROGYNOUS NATURE OF OUR WAVE-FIELD REALITY and put forth a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTION, employing phraseology such as THE RAGING COLORADO RIVER IS DIGGING A HUGE CANYON IN THE VALLEY FLOOR!

GOODBYE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FEMALE VALLEY INDUCTIVE ACCOMODATING, HELLO PROMOTED MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT!

In other words, the FEMALE INDUCTIVE ORGANIZING POWER OF THE VALLEY, where ITS OPENING CONSTITUTES THE PRIMARY AGENCY that pulls and gathers together rivulets into streams and streams into RAGING RIVER … GOES UNMENTIONED…  as the RAGING RIVER gets BRAGGING RIGHTS to its CLAIM of AUTHORING the GRAND CANYON HOLE IN THE GROUND.  The HISTORICAL RECORD SHOWS that CANYONS are the work of MALE ASSERTING RIVERS like the COLORADO RIVER that is credited with AUTHORING the GRAND CANYON.  The initial low-relief FEMALE DEPRESSION aka VALLEY was NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT so it didn’t attract attention like the RAGING RIVER, but it is the quiet MOTHER and the RAGING RIVER is its child, so PROMOTING THE FALSE NOTION THAT THE RAGING RIVER is the AUTHOR of the CANYON is AN ERROR.  It is COMMON WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR as pointed out by Nietzsche.  READ MY LIPS, … “THE COLORADO RIVER CARVED OUT THE GRAND CANYON”,… and again, “THE PUNCH SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S EGG-SHELL JAW, … and one’s more, ‘THE SPARK FROM THE CIGARETTE BUTT” CAUSED THE HUMONGOUR FOREST FIRE”.

Now, come on folks, we know that the MALE EGO likes to be stroked but this BUILDING INTO OUR LANGUAGE, this EXCLUSIVE MALE ASSERTING AUTHORSHIP BIAS is something we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE TAKING TO RIDICULOUS LIMITS.  In all cases, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING is PRIMARY and MALE ASSERTING is SECONDARY.  That is what the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE happens to be.  OCEAN WAVE TROUGH opens up and the MALE ASSERTING PEAK COLLAPSES INTO IT and OF COURSE there is NOT TWO SEPARATE THINGS HERE as BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION SUGGESTS, THERE IS AN ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD which is a COINCIDENTIA OPPOSITORUM symbolized an OUROBORUS, the SNAKE SWALLOWING ITSELF BY SWALLOWING IS OWN TAIL .   WHAT IS GOING ON HERE REQUIRES QUANTUM LOGIC representation; i.e. the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (the WAVE-FIELD medium) WHERE THE WAVE-FIELD IS SWALLOWING IS OWN MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS.  THERE IS NO ‘EMPTY SPACE’ ANYWHERE IN THIS PICTURE.  The EMPTY SPACE comes from BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACT LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS where, after we have NOTINALLY broken out the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE and presented it as ALL SHE WROTE, we need to supply a container for housing our MALE ASSERTING OPERATIONS, a container that will not interfere nor detract from the FULL AND SOLE AUTHORSHIP that is credited to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT.  WHAT WILL DO THE TRICK IS AN EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER to house our MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS WITHOUT INTERFERING.

* * *

In the example of the FEMALE VALLEY that ORGANIZES runoff into the MALE-ASSERTING RAGING RIVER, if we understand all of this as a RELATIONAL DYNAMIC without OUR IMPOSING OF A BINARY LOGIC BASED “ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE REFERENCE FRAME”, then we can move forward to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING WHEREIN the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY and the MALE ASSERTING RAGING RIVER, “ARE ONLY ONE” as in CLOUD FORMATIONS in the ATMOSPHERE.   IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT WE HAVE THE OPTION TO ARCHITECT LANGUAGE THAT CAN EMPLOY THE LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as captures the WAVE-FIELD phenomena wherein there is the QUANTUM LOGIC relations between the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD and the WAVE-FIELD, … the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC PERSISTS AS THE WESTERN CULTURE LOGIC OF CHOICE DUE TO ITS GREATER SIMPLICITY and NOT LESS because it supports the ABSTRACT CONCEPT OF LOCAL AUTHORING which is EGO INFLATING.   In any case WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS remain “HUNG UP” on BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS and the term ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ is pointing to the fact that BINARY LOGIC is TOO SIMPLE to capture SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY OF INCLUSIONIN THE WAVE-FIELD which requires the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC, the LOGIC that acknowledges that MATERIAL FORMS and the CONTAINING WAVE-FIELD are in a QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION where the WAVE-FIELD is ALL-INCLUDING and within which we have MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVEFIELD.

THERE IS NO SENSE-EXPERIENCE SUPPORTED JUSTIFICATION FOR OUR WESTERN CULTURE INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION BASED EXERCISE OF PROMOTING THE WAVE-FIELD CONDENATIONS TO BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL BEING STATUS WHILE DEMOTING THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD TO AN ALL-INCLUDING EMPTY SPACE.

STILL we continue to use WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION that REDUCE THE LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC RELATIONS TO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC RELATIONS, and it may be because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are ‘HOOKED’ on the GUILE of PRESUPPOSING WE ARE LOCAL AUTHORS OF OUR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS (the ‘double error of namin and grammar) which gives us an EGO and also the method of PURIFICATION based ‘improvement’ to our society wherein, having the concept of LOCAL AUTHORING to work with, we can FEED AND GROW the population of INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL AUTHORS of GOOD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS and STARVE AND SHRINK the population of INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL AUTHORS of BAD ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS as a means of optimizing our society seen as a collection of LOCAL INDEPENDENT BEINGS WITH POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and developments rather than in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of CONDENSATIONS of the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD. ..

 

* * *

 

Our LANGUAGE habit is to INVERT the ANDROGNYOUS reality wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING is in a natural primacy over the MALE ASSERTING and RE-PRESENT the MALE ASSERTING “RAGING RIVER”as the LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHOR of the CANYON; i.e. in the SIMPLE BINARY PLUG-and-SOCKET LOGIC of ASSERTOR and ACCOMMODATRESS, … however, when the FEMALE INDUCTIVE VALLEY and the MALE  RAGING RIVER ARE UNDERSTOOD AS ONE-AND-THE-SAME (i.e. CONJUGATES IN THE WAVE-FIELD SENSE), the BINARY LOGIC OPTION is NO LONGER POSSIBLE and QUANTUM LOGIC, which has been SHUT OUT due to the linguistic formulating of the phenomenon in BINARY LOGIC based terms (i.e. where MATTER and SPACE are deemed MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE).

In the WAVE-FIELD world, the RAGING RIVER and the ACCOMMODATING LANDSCAPE are ONLY ONE.  THERE IS NO BINARY LOGIC ‘SPLIT’ BETWEEN THE TWO, they are both CONDENSATIONS in the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.. 

* * *

The problem with writing about the WAVE-FIELD is that it is a phenomenon wherein FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING ARE ONLY ONE and once the TWO DIFFERENT NAMES are mentioned, THE GENIE IS OUT OF THE BOTTLE and it is next to impossible to PUT HER BACK IN. As Bohm pointed out, we can stir a drop of India ink into clear treacle so that the black thread becomes so fine as to be invisible and all we can see is what looks like homogeneous GRAY TREACLE and only with the most powerful microscope could we see the BINARY DIVISION into LOCAL and EXPLICIT THREADS of INDIA INK WITHIN A SEPARATE CONTAINING FLUID.

THE MORAL OF THE STORY IS, … BEST NOT TO PLAY AROUND WITH BINARY LOGIC as it DULLS our UNDERSTANDING and once ON THE LOOSE, it is very difficult to put back in the bottle.  ONCE we speak in terms of ‘THE RAGING RIVER’, the FEMALE INDUCTIVE POWER OF THE VALLEY that organizes and collects together the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT contributions of rivulet and stream and all of this FEMALE INTEGRATIVE WORK is EXCLIPSED by the IMPRESSIONING PICTURE OF THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT RAGING RIVER AND WHAT WE PERCEIVE AS “ITS” MALE-ASSERTING ‘ACTION AUTHORING POWER’; i.e. the FEMALE INDUCTIVE ORGANIZING AGENCY becomes the DEA ABSCONDITA in our WESTERN CULTURE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

 

 

* * *

 

 

IT IS THE WAVE-FIELD nature of the world that Lao Tzu is referring to where he says;

 

“Know the masculine,

but keep to the feminine:

and become a watershed to the world.

If you embrace the world,

the Tao will never leave you

and you become as a little child

(more…)

How WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE obscures the WAVE-FIELD understanding of our sense-experience reality.

0

SYNOPSIS:  WAVE-FIELD REALITY is our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY; it is an AWARENESS of INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which in WESTERN CULTURE  THAT LIES BEYOND CAPTURE of our COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.  Our CAE language architecture reduces our QUANTUM LOGIC accounts of our sense-experience of inclusion in the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD to accounts of one-sided BINARY LOGIC accounts of MALE-ASSERTING actions and developments within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (Euclidean Space).  Because we are employing this SIMPLIFIED (‘dumbed down’) BINARY LOGIC based INTERLLECTUAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY for our OPERATIVE REALITY, we are generating social dysfunction which we CANNOT RESOLVE since our common investigative TOOL of BINARY LOGIC is “BLIND” to QUANTUM LOGIC and thus BINARY LOGIC, yet QUANTUM LOGIC is essential to understanding of our real, physical sense-experience in the WAVE-FIELD.  Thus the use of our CAE languages results in DROP OUT of essential understanding which is leading to SOCIAL DYSFUNCTION in our modern global social collective wherein languages of the Common Average European architectural structure are playing a key role in communications, representation and understanding.

WE ARE AWARE THAT OUR NOUN-and-VERB LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS ‘DROPPING OUT’ the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.  For example, we know, from the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ in WESTERN LAW that we choose to DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and use the SIMPLIFIED MAKE-BELIEVE that a PUNCH to the HEAD is the full and sole source of any resulting damage or injury.  WE HAVE BUILD THIS SIMPLIFICATION OF MODELING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING TERMS BECAUSE IT IS ‘SIMPLER’ TO ARTICULATE (PHYSICS PRIOR TO MODERN PHYSICS MAKES USE OF THIS SIMPLIFICATION AND SO DO OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES).  BUT IN THE REAL WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE; I.E. THE WAVE-FIELD WORLD, THE DYNAMICS ARE ANDROGYNOUS, HAVING BOTH A FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE TOGETHER WITH A MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE.

OUR INTUITION INFORMS US THAT THE DAMAGE ASSOCIATING WITH A PUNCH THE HEAD WILL BE DUE TO THE ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD BASED) COMBINATION OF HOW ‘ACCOMMODATING’ THE HEAD (SKULL) IS (THE ‘FEMALE’ COMPONENT OF WAVE-FIELD PHENOMENA) AND HOW FORCEFULL ASSERTING THE PUNCH IS and unlike our indigeous aboriginal brothers and sisters, and unlike Modern physics, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have BUILT INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THE SIMPLIFICATIONS OF ‘DROPPING OUT MENTION OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE’ so that one is left with the IMPRESSION, based on interpreting language which has an architecture that BUILDS IN this SIMPLIFICATION of the DROP OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJGUATE and presents a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which based on ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS AS IF IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

The ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE is the SUBSTITUTION that we make for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so that we have only to deal with a MALE-ASSERTING ACTION and DEVELOPMENT “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”.  Both Nietzsche and Bohm were ‘ON TO’ this self-deception that we have built into our WESTERN Common Average European languages which are NOW GLOBALLY DOMINANT as the common ground for communications, thus this SIMPLIFIED SUBSTIITUTE REALITY conveyed by ORAL and WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS, even though it’s SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS are NO LONGER SUPPORTED BY SENSE-EXPERIENCE, are serving as our OPERATIVE REALITY.  Thus even though the THIN SKULL FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING aspect of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD, may be the primary contributor to the COLLAPSE of the SKULL, our language architecture assures that the FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING RESPONSIBILITY for the DAMAGE is ATTRIBUTED TO THE MALE-ASSERTING AGENT and there is NO ACKNOWLEDGING of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING because it has been REMOVED from our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE giving the impression that THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE “DOES NOT EXIST” and thus that all ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS are MALE-ASSERTING and transpire NOT IN A WAVE-FIELD as would require QUANTUM LOGIC (the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD medium) but in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT as requires BINARY LOGIC, the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED (empty space instead of wave-field) MEDIUM.

The net result of this WESTERN CULTURE DUMBED DOWN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, wherein we introduced the BINARY LOGIC simplification (Copernicus) to simplify language based representation of the movement of the planets which was simplified by imposing the BINARY LOGIC relation between MATERIAL PLANETS and EMPTY SPACE.  THIS OBSCURANTISM born of simplifying convenience in language based communications, has, as Bohm has pointed out, been screwing with our WESTERN ACCULTURATED MINDS because we are representing with our simplified language, NOT REALITY but a simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is no longer WAVE-FIELD REALITY but a simplified MECHANISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY.   This OBSCURANTISM we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have built into our language is the source of PSYCHOLOGICAL DYSFUNCTION as Bohm points out, giving us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS an exposure to SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA.

* * *

 

 

 

My findings are that the world of our sense-experience matches up with Modern physics and with indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta understandings of reality, BUT NOT WITH OUR COMMON WESTERN CULTURE UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY as has been implemented in Western social customs, Western Medicine, Western Justice and Western Commerce.

 

Now, I am NOT of an opinion that DIFFERS in any fundamental way from Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta as was the case with those who got into Modern physics like Nietzsche (yes he did), Bohm, Schroedinger etc.   They all agreed that, … and here we come to the source of the fundamental split between ‘WEST’ on the one hand, …. And on the other hand ‘EAST’/Indigenous aboriginals/Modern Physics/Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta.

 

More precisely, what this split is based on is BELIEF IN BINARY LOGIC REALITY (where INHABITANTS and HABITAT are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE as with MATERIAL BEINGS and EMPTY SPACE) versus BELIEF IN QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY (where INHABITANTS and HABITAT are MUTUALLY INCLUSIVE; i.e. where the INHABITANTS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD HABITAT)..

 

Now, this is a MAJOR difference in how one sees REALITY and the global populace ran into that with encounters between European colonizers and indigenous aboriginals. 

 

I can point directly to the PROBLEM which is with WESTERN CULTURE which is now globally dominant and that is because it is based on BINARY LOGIC rather than QUANTUM LOGIC, the former being SIMPLER than the latter but that is where the screw-up lies. 

 

BINARY LOGIC supports the MATTER and SPACE understanding of reality as TWO MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE things so that MATTER is seen as “MOVING, GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING more complex things within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC supports the WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality in which ‘MATTER’ is a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD which manifests as TRANSFORMATION.

  (more…)

INTRODUCTION to the SUBSEQENT ESSAY on WAVE-FIELD REALITY

0

Dear all,

 

The following essay goes directly to the point that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have an understanding of reality that is UPSIDE DOWN and twisted sideways. 

 

That is, we live in a WAVE-FIELD world that our language is TAKING APART, meaning that the reality we live in is the WAVE-FIELD REALITY which is ANDROGYNOUS or in other words having a FEMALE-MALE relation as is THE WAVE-FIELD CHARACTERISTIC.   For example, when there is subsidence in the land and valleys open up, there will be avalanches that come down the mountainside.   This description where valleys open up and mountains fall into them is NOT REALLY TWO THINGS like the FEMALE OPENING OF THE VALLEY and MALE ASSERTING FILL-IN OF THE AVALANCHES, it is THE ONE WAVE-FIELD PHENOMENON OF TRANSFORMATION which is PURELY RELATIONAL and by this I mean, THERE IS NO DEPENDENCE ON THE ABSTRACTION OF ‘BEING’ as with MATERIAL THINGS WITH PERSISTING IDENTITY or ‘FIXED BEING’.  In the WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX and what “WE SEE” are RELATIONAL FORMS that while THEY HAVE A PERSISTING APPEARANCE, THERE ARE NO ‘THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES’ WITH PERSISTING IDENTITY. 

What is CONFUSING is that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have the LANGUAGE-based HABIT of NAME-TAGGING INNATELY TRANSIENT BUT OFTEN PERSISTING RESONANCE-BASED RELATIONAL FORMS IN THE OVERALL TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD WHICH MAKE A SUSTAINED IMPRESSION IN THE VISION-INSPIRED INTELLECT AS “MORE OR LESS THE SAME SHAPE”, and once we use NAME-TAGS to build a persisting, articulable REPRESENTATION of THE FORM-FILLED WAVE-FIELD, we generate the IMPRESSION of a collection of FIXED MATERIAL FORMS that become the dominant VISUAL CONTENT.   GIVEN an abstract BEING-based LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION SCHEME which consists of NAMES that signify FIXED BEING and GRAMMAR that conflates the NAMING based assignment of the FIXED BEING with notional POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING, we achieve a BINARY LOGIC MATTER-IN-TEMPTY SPACE based LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION SCHEME.

 

“LOOK, there is a huge ROGUE WAVE forming in the OCEAN and IT is heading for those kayakers and is very likely to capsize them wash them up on the rocks or worse”

 

This sentence demonstrates our use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR wherein we use NAMING to ASSIGN “BEING” to a relational form in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, and CONFLATE this with GRAMMAR to impute the LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS to the NAMING-INSTANTIATED THING-IN-ITSELF.

  (more…)

ACCEPTING THAT WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD (ACCEPTING A QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY).)

0

 

SUB-TITLE:

HOW WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE “NOT PLAYING WITH A FULL DECK” (BY ACKNOWLEDGING ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONDENSATION AND SUBSTITUTING EMPTY SPACE FOR THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD)

 

I am going to share what I see as TWO important comments by Nietzsche to set the stage for explaining how it is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, thanks to the system of language we are using, are keeping ourselves locked in to a BINARY LOGIC MUTUALLY EXCLUDING MATTER AND EMPTY SPACE SUBSTITUTE REALITY and thus depriving us of access to our natural inclusion within QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY which is the WAVE-FIELD REALITY.  For example once we accept propositions that establish our sense of reality such as THE TOWN IS GROWING, it is no longer possible, as we build on this LOCAL AUTHORING representation, to get to the QUANTUM LOGIC expression THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE because WE ALREADY HAVE IN MIND the BINARY LOGIC PICTURE based understanding that ‘the TOWN IS GROING’.  Can’t you just see the TOWN spreading out over the land like giant pancake poured onto a griddle?  If we can ENVISAGE this, TWO THINGS:  -1- WE CANNOT AT THE SAME TIME ENVISAGE THE QUANTUM LOGIC “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” BECAUSE THE ONLY WAY WE CAN THINK OF SOMETHING GROWING in physical reality is when its SURROUNDINGS OPEN UP IN A FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OF THE MALE-ASSERTING GROWTH.

 

Our use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR sets up a BOGUS ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING GROWTH which is missing the natural FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, and the thing about this once-sided MALE-ASSERTING construction, even though ABSTRACTION , is that is SIMPLIFIES our language based REPRESENTATION.   That SIMPLIFICATION is the reduction of the ANDROGYOUS WAVE-FIELD to an one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY DYNAMIC which is the equivalent of REDUCING QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC and thus reducing the understanding CONDENSATION IN THE WAVE-FIELD to the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC understanding of MATTER in EMPTY SPACE.   This is the source of psychologic confusion including BINARY LOGIC based FRAGMENTATION of our material world language based conceptualizing of reality, as Bohm points out.   WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS persist in using a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the BINARY LOGIC of MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE MATTER and SPACE and we have not yet migrated to REPRESENTATIONS that put us in the REAL, SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUND QUANTUM LOGIC WORLD wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including (electromagnetic) WAVE-FIELD.

 

This is just establishing the nature of the SCREWUP and why it is WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS that suffer the psychological screwup and not INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, TAOISTS/BUDDHIST and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS.   Only those who use language which builds in the DOUBLE ERROR as in the belief in ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING PREIMISES OF GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and service, … IN PLACE OF THE FULLY RELATIONAL ‘TRANSFORMATION OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, … run into the psycho-physical problems of FRAGMENTATION (e.g as into MALE and FEMALE or into LGBTQ categories, notionally INDEPENDENT HUMANS and INDEPENDENT NATIONS and INDEPENDENT CORPORATIONS).

(more…)

Modern Physics and Royalty in the Era of King Charles III

0

 

WESTERN CULTURE THOUGHT HAS BEEN “DUMBED DOWN” WITH LANGUAGE THAT REDUCES THE ANDROGYNOUS DYNAMICS OF WAVE-FIELD SENSE-EXPERIENCE TO ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS and PRODUCTION.

However “CLEVER” we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS may be with our use of language, the jiffy scheme we have developed for sharing simplified representations of our sense-experience has become the source of psychological dysfunction that pervades WESTERN CULTURE by SIMPLIFYING language based representation of our sense-experience of inclusion in the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD, by abstractly removing the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and constructing a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” featuring MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION, … MINUS the PRIMARY INDUCTIVE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING INFLUENCE that is the PRIMARY ESSENCE of WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

In short, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have architected a Language that ELEVATES the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS of WAVE-FIELD REALITY by DROPPING OUT ALL REFERENCE TO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ESSENCE OF THE WAVE-FIELD, creating a DUMBED DOWN SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is MECHANISTIC, having had its WAVE-FIELD properties REMOVED by the DROP-OUT Of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.  This is the DROP-OUT, in our language-based representations, of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT PRIMARY ESSENCE of WAVE-FIELD REALITY by the DYSFUNCTIONAL PROMOTING TO PRIMACY of the SECONDARY LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, generating a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that puts MATERIAL FORMS into an UNNATURL PRIMACY by DROPPING OUT THE ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

The WESTERN CULTURE language-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY now features NAMING-INSTANTIATED MATERIAL FORMS with GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development, termed the DOUBLE ERROR by Nietzsche, which unnaturally elevates the LOCAL and EXPLICIT in support of language representations that serve up a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the GRAMMAR-DRIVEN dynamics of MATERIAL FORMS in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.  This is a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which Kings, and “Prime” Ministers and other “AUTHOR”ities have been invented and persist either by inspiration of by intellectual agreement to support the ENGINEERING of a WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC from which NATURAL NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT INFLUENCE of WAVE-FIELD reality is being UNNATURALLY DISPLACED by the ELEVATING of INTELLECTUALLY CONTRIVED LOCAL and EXPLICIT “AUTHORITY”.

The BENEVOLENT KING is SYMBOLIC of the RESPECT we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have for the “LOCAL AUTHOR” and thus figurative “LOCAL AUTHORITY” concept, emotional attachment to which can blur whether the origins of LEADERSHIP in SOCIAL ORGANIZING derive from INSPIRATION (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) or EGOTIST PRIDE (LOCAL and EXPLICIT).  EGO based LEADERSHIP exalts BEING and the POWER of INTERNALLY DRIVEN MALE-ASSERTING ACHIEVEMENT AS BASED ON PLANS AND INTENTIONS while INSPIRATIONAL LEADERSHIP exalts BECOMING and the POWER of RISING TO MEET AND MATCH THE UNFOLDING CIRCUMSTANCES ONE FINDS ONELSELF INCLUDED IN (as a participant in the transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD).

Modern physics is about LIFE IN THE WAVE-FIELD while ROYALTY is about the changing face of AUTHORITY where AUTHORITY has formerly been the IMPOSING of the WILL of the AUTHORITY but this has been giving way to ROYALITY as a sought-for source of INSPIRATION.  The extent to which the dynamics of a social collective are shaped by INSTRUCTIONS or by INSPIRATION defines the ambiguous nature of AUTHORITY and LEADERSHIP.   The extent to which the LEADER employs the power of EGO (as in nationalism) which stresses group achievement relative to the power of INSPIRATION which is not abour achievement but the ability to rise to any and all occasion, points to the spectra of differing leadership types.  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS appear to be in an era where ‘AUTHORITY’ is in TRANSITION, particularly in regard to former EMPIRES which succeeded in building and retaining  their POWER by military strength and are now undergoing transmutation into cooperative associations within loosely knit ‘commonwealths’ or ‘common markets’ as the realization slowly grows that everything is interdependent as it must be in a WAVE-FIELD.   In the words of systems scientists;

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionistic scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

The shift from EGO based organization to INSPIRATION induced organization is a healthy, continuing trend, which ‘makes sense’ in world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.

In this essay, connections are made between Modern physics and the changing role of Royalty.

* * *

 

 

 

The role of language in DUMBING DOWN WESTERN CULTURE THOUGHT is something we have ‘engineered’ by using language to create a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD sense-experience has been RE-CAST in the INTELLECTUAL, ABSTRACT terms of a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY that has DROPPED OUT (from language based representation) the innate PRIMACY of the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, TRADING IT OUT for ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, and at the same time, notionally transferring the creative source of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD to the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE while BACKFILLING the FEMALE CONJUGATE with ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  In this language architecture, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INSPIRATION goes without mention while LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORING becomes “ALL SHE WROTE”.  Note that we still have our sense-experience that is beyond language that ALSO shapes ‘who we are’ but language has proven to be a powerful influence in this shaping as is evident in Bohm’s warning of the WESTERN CULTURE language-based exposure to schizophrenia and paranoia.

 

The concept  of the British Monarchy and the King’s or Queen’s Role in “Modern” Society is in a State of Transition which gives us cause to reflect on our WESTERN CULTURE manner of understanding ‘reality’.

This note explores the basic conflict between the WESTERN CULTURE popular way of conceptualizing ‘reality’ as it continues to be exposed to the findings of Modern physics, which have affirmed the correctness of the LESS SIMPLE indigenous aboriginal linguistic conceptualizing of reality, which is QUANTUM LOGIC based, and the MORE SIMPLE Western Culture linguistic conceptualizing of reality which is BINARY LOGIC based.

The question of AUTHORITY is of particular interest since in WESTERN CULTURE, the perceived NEED for TOP-DOWN AUTHORITY has undergone a transition where the ‘Rule’ of the King has been reduced to a symbolic influence that appears to be exposed to rise and fall on the basis of the Charisma of the current Throne-Sitter.  Where this ‘ends up going’ is tied up in the different types of LOGIC (BINARY and QUANTUM) which are predominantly operative in a region.  BINARY LOGIC, when used in governing, has some serious “side-effects” which include schizophrenia and paranoia, as Bohm has pointed out.  Quantum logic is a natural logic which has none of the shortfalls of Binary Logic and it is the logic ‘built in’ to the language of indigenous aboriginal peoples, while we WESTERN CULTURE adherents have built BINARY LOGIC into our Common Average European languages (Benjamin Whorf).

Since QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium while BINARY LOGIC is the EITHER/OR logic of the EXCLUDED medium, only the former is Modern physics compliant.  That is, only QUANTUM LOGIC takes into account the BOTH/AND relationship between the WAVE-FIELD and the material forms within the WAVE-FIELD.   BINARY LOGIC is TOO SIMPLE to deal with NATURE’s common QUANTUM LOGIC relations which are the common relations in nature.  As Modern physics affirms, our sense-experience reality is of inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD wherein the WAVE-FIELD is the mother of everything, the ‘material things’ being CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD.  In this understanding, NOTHING ever ‘makes it’ to the state of persisting BEING and everything is in continuum flux.   What appears to be MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM otherwise known as the WAVE-FIELD.

This shift in the understanding of ‘reality’ (from the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC basis to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC basis is ‘currently underway’, but not without problems as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are LOCKED INTO BINARY LOGIC based thinking by ‘HIGH SWITCHING COSTS’ (radical shifts in our WESTERN CULTURE ways of understanding reality).

* * *

 

King Charles III may focus his reign on climate change and politics

By Scott Neuman

Published September 9, 2022 at 8:29 AM CDT

 

 

 

https://www.tpr.org/news/2022-09-09/as-king-charles-iii-takes-the-crown-heres-how-he-may-focus-his-reign

Chris Jackson Getty Images

King Charles III has a history of wading into politics. Above, Charles, then the Prince of Wales, visits Tretower Court on July 5, 2018 in Crickhowell, Wales.

. . .

For Charles, a passion for the environment dates back decades. In an interview posted to the Royal Family’s website in 2020, he recalled how as a teenager he began to feel increasingly alarmed by “the destruction of everything … all this sort of white heat of progress and technology to the exclusion of nature and our surroundings, and also this complete determination to defeat nature and to suppress everything to do with it.”

 

* * *

  (more…)

The PSYCHO-SOCIAL IMPACT of opting for QUANTUM LOGIC instead of BINARY LOGIC

0

OVERVIEW:

The world we live in; i.e. the world of our sense-experience of inclusion in a transforming relational continuum, is knowable only by inference since we cannot ‘get outside of it’ to capture an understanding of it as an independently existing world.  This means that what we SEE OUT THERE as LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES as we speak of in such terms at THE TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products is only a SUBSTITUTE REALITY or SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE for the INEFFABLE WAVE-FIELD REALITY WE AND EVERYTHING IS INCLUDED IN.  Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE FRAGMENTS the transforming relational continuum of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, reducing and simplifying the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE to LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTS such as ‘the TOWN’ which we give a life of its own to with GRAMMAR as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products, as if we are an external observer enjoying a voyeur view on which we can overlay a MEASURING GRID of the WORLD we are observing AS IF FROM THE OUTSIDE.  If we can see it from the outside, it is not the reality we are included in, but is instead a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which WE ARE MISSING.  We must there be careful with our use of language based representations because if they are voyeur views, they are not view of REALITY since REALITY is something we are included in.

In this context, we may remind ourselves of Nietzsche’s point about the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR whereby we establish a language based description of a NAMING-instantiated notional LOCAL THING IN ITSELF (a BEING) such as ‘the TOWN’ and we conflate this with the second error of GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT to the FIRST ERROR of the NAMING-INSTANTIATING of a notional THING-IN-ITSELF.

This language-based REPESENTATION is NOT of REALITY but of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY where the THING in our FOCAL POINT, we are using GRAMMAR to equip with POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

NOTA BENE:  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” (i.e. as in ‘the TOWN that does its own GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING) in our real-life sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.  The LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta DOES NOT EMPLOY THE ABSTRACT NOTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING IN THEIR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS.  E.g. their languages fashion representations in terms of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as in TRANSFORMATION as Heraclitus maintained was the actual sense-experience affirmed REALITY and in a reality wherein everything is in flux, there are no LOCAL AUTHORS of ANYTHING.

While it is CORRECT to say, in keeping with the all-including transforming WAVE-FIELD, that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, it is INCORRECT to say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, or DEVELOPING or PRODUCING something’… which imputes the POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORING to the TOWN as within the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR language structure.  This is INCORRECT and it brings forth REPRESENTATIONS that purport to be REPRESENTATONS OF REALITY when they are actually REPRESENTATIONS of an ABSTRACT SUBSTITUTE REALITY, the SUBSTITUTE REALITY OF A BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING THINGS, as if it were INDEPENDENT of the SPACE it is included in.  And by our language based construction of such SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE, we SHUT OUT FROM  OUR MENTAL ACCESS, the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT REMAIN UNDER THE PSYCHOLOGICAL INFLUENCE OF OUR BINARY LOGIC based SUBTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS that, as Bohm is saying, is the source of SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA as in the COVID 19 PATHOGEN ATTACK (there are no PATHOGENS in QUANTUM REALITY, only IMBALANCES).  PATHOGENS are BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION that DO NOT EXIST in our relational world where there is relational BALANCE and IMBALANCE but NO LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING AGENTS and thus no LOCAL, EXPLICIT GOOD and EVIL AUTHORING AGENTS.  We can be CHANNELS or LIGHTNING RODS through which RELATIONAL DISSONANCE can ‘surface’ but THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, GOOD, BAD or INDIFFERENT.  WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN A WAVE-FIELD world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …”  The FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY COMMISSIONED BY LINGUISTIC DOUBLE ERRORS OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR IS, as SCHROEDINGER OFFERS, ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (APPEARANCES).

* * * 

 

 

We might ask ourselves, Why do we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS choose to THINK and SPEAK in terms of CONTINENTAL DRIFT (where the continents are understood as LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING objects) .. rather than SEAFLOOR SPREADING (where the ocean basins are understood as NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ACCOMMODATING holes).

 

We find, if we reflect on this, that SEAFLOOR SPREADING implies CIRCULATION since if we focus on the SPREADING, there must be new material being extruded from the interior of the Earth sphere to fill in behind the spreading which involves older material subducting.  Because the surface area of the sphere of the Earth remains the same size, there must be a SUBDUCTION ZONE here older material on the surface SINKS INTO THE BODY of the Earth to ‘make way’ for the OUTWELLING extrusion of material that adds material on top of the pre-existing surface.   What we are comparing here in CONTINENTAL DRIFT (which concerns “LOCAL, EXPLICIT” CONTINENTS) vis a vis SEAFLOOR SPREADING which is comprised of EXTRUSION and SUBDUCTION are understandings with DIFFERING DIMENSIONALITY since the CONTINENTAL DRIFT is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and SUPERFICIAL while SEAFLOOR SPREADING IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and TRANSFORMATIVE (everything is in flux, as was the observation of Heraclitus and as is supported by Modern physics with its WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD).

 

HOW DOES LANGUAGE DEAL WITH THESE DIFFERENT UNDERSTANDINGS?

 

ANSWER:  “DIFFERENTLY” (i.e. different language architectures have been developed which different groups of people have embraced which deliver differing views of ‘reality’.  The power of different languages to put us (psychologically) into different “realities” is the finding of Benjamin Whorf, and it has been controversial because many of us prefer to understand that there is only ONE reality and it is the reality that our social group ‘lives in’.  Thus for the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT the very different reality understood by indigenous aboriginals can be ignored because, “as everyone knows” (so say the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS), we are all INDEPENDENT HUMAN BEINGS who live on a spherical planet which moves about within a collection of planets, stars and material bodies within a vast and ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

(more…)

List of 8 BINARY LOGIC based BOGUS NOTIONS

0

List is taken from previous essay entitled

THE DELUSION of the BINARY LOGIC based WORLDVIEW

 

 

* * *

 

THE SCREW UP IS THE EMBRACE OF BINARY LOGIC  (which opens the way to the LOCAL AUTHOR DELUSION) which, although exposed as over-simplistic and in need of being discarded and replaced by QUANTUM LOGIC, we have nevertheless built into our LANGUAGE-BASED conceptualization scheme, as follows;

 

-1- The BOGUS notion that the world is divided into the ORGANIC and INORGANIC sectors.

 

-2- The BOGUS notion of the EVOLUTION OF MAN as in DARWINISM and the ‘tree of life’

 

-3- The BOGUS notion of the PRESENCE OF GOOD AND EVIL in the world

 

-4- The BOGUS notion of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments

 

-5- The BOGUS notion of the HUMAN ‘BEING’ as an INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF

 

-6- The BOGUS notion of the INDEPENDENT NATION with its own powers of AUTHORING actions and development

 

-7- The BOGUS notion of the GLOBAL ECONOMY based on GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION

 

-8- The BOGUS notion of the existence of the PATHOGEN such as COVID 19

* * *

RE: The SUBSTITUTE REALITY WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE ACCEPTING AND USING AS OUR OPERATIVE REALITY

0

PREAMBLE: The language-and-grammar-built notion of MALE-ASSERTING actions and developments transpiring within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE is playing a foundational role in WESTERN CULTURE conceptualizing of ‘reality’.  This abstract BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY is being used within our WESTERN CULTURE language scheme to coordinate actions and understandings; i.e. this BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY is being used as our WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY.   This “SIMPLISTIC” BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY now serves as our WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY which differs substantially from the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based reality of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta comprehends TOWNING and TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE  AS ONE (where the MATERIAL INHABITANT FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD HABITAT).  

The SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC understanding is of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY where TOWN and COUNTRYSIDE are psycho-LOGICALLY (using BINARY LOGIC) divided into TWO SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT ONTOLOGICAL REALMS; the separate realms of  (a) A LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF, and (b), AN IMPLIED EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.  The latter over-simplistic BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY has been and continues to be used as the WESTERN CULTURE “standard operative reality”, the consequence of which is rising dysfunction due to the GAP between the intellectual abstraction of the BINARY “EITHER/OR” LOGIC based substitute reality and the SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC (where the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD are BOTH distinct relational forms in the flow AND are the flow, … as with the QUANTUM LOGIC whorl and flow relation in fluid turbulence.)

* * *

 

My philosophical investigations into how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS seem to be screwing up have steadily converged on the following understanding; i.e. that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USAGE is BINARY LOGIC based which is THE SCREW UP.  Modern physics gives us a QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of reality.  QUANTUM LOGIC is basically about BALANCE and IMBALANCE; i.e. it is the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  Here we can think in terms of TOWNING as a developing within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  There, … I have just described the QUANTUM LOGIC relation which is between the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and the TOWNING within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

 

Notice that there is a separate REFERENCE FRAME when we picture a TOWN GROWING within a MAP GRID so that we can watch the TOWN GROW as if it were a THING-IN-ITSELF getting larger, and we can measure it relative to the fixed MAP GRID.  However, in the space on the surface of a sphere, as the area of a development grows, there is a conjugate shrinking of the ‘wilderness area’ so that what is going on overall is TRANSFORMATION and there is only GROWTH with respect to an abstract ABSOLUTE REFERENCE FRAME which is intellectual abstraction and not sense-experience affirmable.

In other words, GROWTH could only happen within an ABSOLUTE SPACE and in the space on the surface of a sphere, GROWING (MALE ASSERTING) is only found in CONJUGATE RELATION with SHRINKING (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING).

 

WITHOUT THE MEASURING GRID we see only TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where the TOWNING is NOT A SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT THING but a relational FEATURE within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

 

So, we can imagine two groups of people where;

 

-1- ONE GROUP decides to FOCUS their observations on the TOWN that is growing within the ABSOLUTE MEASURING GRID

 

-2- ANOTHER GROUP decides to FOCUS their observations on the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where the TOWNING BELONGS TO THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and is a FEATURE WITHIN the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  Here, there is no dependence on ABSOLUTE SPACE with ABSOLUTE REFERENCE GRIDS.

 

It would be a MISTAKE in example 2, to say ‘the TOWNING is GROWING because ‘the TOWNING’ is NOT an independent THING-IN-ITSELF with its own powers of GROWING, the TOWNING is a relational feature inextricably included within the ONE-NESS of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  That FIGURE-and-GROUND “ONE-NESS” is “QUANTUM LOGIC”.

 

The common WESTERN CULTURE MISTAKE is that we condition ourselves to think in language-based MALE ASSERTING terms even though, in our sense-experience reality, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING always takes PRECEDENCE.  If we are a race-car driver and our movements an the track are recorded by a paint sprayer installed on one of the wheels so as to leave a continuing trajectory traced out on the pavement so that we can review the trajectory when the cars have all departed, the interpretation of the trajectory in terms of our MALE-ASSERTIVE AUTHORING ACTIONS would be meaningless because our steering and movement has been inductively shaped by the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OPENINGS in the relational traffic configuration and our MALE ASSERTING actions and developments are SECONDARY to the inductive influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING opening that is the PRIMARY SHAPER OF OUR ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.

Why even invoke the abstraction of a “REFERENCE FRAME” (since motion is relative as in ‘transformation’, why pretend movements are absolute by referring them to an absolute reference frame?  The imposing of the reference frame is what reduces relative movement to “NOTIONALLY ” ABSOLUTE MOTION (i.e. the reference frame is itself moving and if the reference frame is thought to be INFINITE in extent, we are thus INVENTING a BINARY LOGIC based on the distinction between the LOCAL and EXPLICIT FIGURE and the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.  With QUANTUM LOGIC, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD INCLUDES EVERYTHING, including the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “CONDENSATIONS” which are not SEPARATE from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD but INCLUDED WITHIN IT.  Thus the LOCAL and EXPLICIT aspect is, as Schroedinger points out, SCHAUMKOMMENT (APPEARANCE).  WELCOME TO THE HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE!.

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

In FACT, we might ask whether there is any such thing as MALE-ASSERTING ACTION other than as a grammatical abstraction.

THAT IS, … it is NOT THE SAME THING to understand our movement relative to the openings in the relational matrix of participants, as understanding our movement relative to an absolute reference frame or ‘coordinate system’.  In the first case, there are only relations as in QUANTUM LOGIC and there is no BINARY LOGIC based SPLIT between BEING and EMPTY SPACE.

Here we come up against the question of the “REALITY” of the notion of MALE ASSERTING ACTION since it seems to depend on the PERSISTING IDENTITY OF THE MALE ASSERTING AGENT and the PERSISTING IDENTITY OF THE FIELD OF OPERATIONS the MALE ASSERTING AGENT IS ENGAGING WITH, raising questions of the type “One can’t step into the same river twice because it is not the same river and not the same person stepping into it.  The short summary is; we are inclusions in transformation.

That is, here we come up against the question; WHEN is it appropriate to speak of our actions as MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS as if our actions are transpiring within an absolute empty space so that we can claim total ownership of ‘our own’ actions?

ANSWER:  NEVER!.   There is no such thing as INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE (i.e; that is BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION) and our sense-experience affirms our quantum logic inclusion as CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD aka the transforming relational continuum.

(more…)

Go to Top