WHAT IS DIFFERENT IN MY (QUANTUM LOGIC) RESEARCH APPROACH?  I ASK MYSELF and ANSWER.

What I see is that my research has led me into the investigating of the role of language architecture in influencing how we conceive of reality generally and how DIFFERENCES in our language-informed understanding can put us on different paths based on differing language-based conceptions of reality.

For example, while WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS orient to BINARY LOGIC language based understandings, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS orient to QUANTUM LOGIC based understanding.  While the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT sees a scene wherein ‘the TOWN is growing’ since BINARY LOGIC based language splits ‘the TOWN’ out as a separate entity, the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL (and Modern physics) sees a scene wherein ‘there is TOWNING in the transforming landscape’ since QUANTUM LOGIC based language understands TOWNING as BEING INCLUDED WITHIN the transforming landscape. This BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM is the essence of QUANTUM LOGIC.

Because our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is based on the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC structure which splits apart the TOWN and the LANDSCAPE, this makes the notion of GROWTH possible.  In the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE as also in the flow-based LANGUAGE OF MODERN PHYSICS, there is only the LESS SIMPLE possibility of TRANSFORMATION and NOT “GROWTH”.  QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein “THE TOWNING” is INCLUDED IN THE ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ and everything is in flux, and THERE IS NO ‘SEPARATE THING-IN-ITSELF’ that goes by the NAME ‘TOWN’ since we and everything are included in an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao;

The opening lines of the Tao Te Ching by Lao Tzu state, “The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao. The name that can be named is not the true name.” Names, while useful, can be limiting. We must go beyond names and see the Tao in all things.

In other words, we must acknowledge the QUANTUM LOGIC nature of reality wherein TOWNING is a CONDENSATION of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM in the manner of a WHORLING in the FLOWING, and this impacts our language architecture requirements, pointing out that when we use NAMES, we FREEZE relational forms that DO NOT, IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, EXIST AS THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES since everything is in flux and relational forms are condensations of the flux, giving rise to the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE as in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.

NOTA BENE!  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the all-including (electromagnetic) WAVE-FIELD and the material CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD means that we are mistaken in using a BINARY LOGIC language architecture that builds from the material forms as if they were INDEPENDENT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, …a notion which in ‘one fell swoop’ reduces the ENERGY-FILLED PLENUM or in other words the WAVE-FIELD, to an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE so that the ONLY “REALITY” REMAINING is the MATERIAL BEING based (linguistic abstraction based) PSEUDO-REALITY which is a BINARY LOGIC based PSEUDO-REALITY (thanks to the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE).

Evidently, we can THINK about REALITY NOT ONLY IN A SIMPLE “REAL” (NON-COMPLEX) BINARY LOGIC SENSE, BUT ALSO IN A LESS-SIMPLE (COMPLEX CONJUGATE) QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE as associates with WAVE-FIELD reality involving BOTH “REAL” (local and explicit) AND “IMAGINARY” (‘nonlocal and implicit) CONJUGATES.

This line of philosophical investigation has much in common with Vygotsky’s determination that THOUGHT and LANGUAGE are in a CONJUGATE relation.  In fact, understanding the relationship between thought and language invites the understanding that there is a WAVE-FIELD basis to understanding.  This is also suggested in the work of Ernst Mach in “The Analysis of Sensations, and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical”.  So the proposition here, which has previously arisen in my philosophical investigations is that THOUGHT and LANGUAGE are NOT two separate functions but that there is a correspondence wherein THOUGHT is the “IMAGINARY” COMPONENT of our COMPLEX experience (as inclusions in the WAVE-FIELD) while LANGUAGE is the “REAL” COMPONENT.

The following comment suggesting this relationship is from https://goodshare.org/wp/from-balance-quantum-logic-to-differentiation-binary-logic-and-back/

The point being made in this comment is, again, that THOUGHT and LANGUAGE are NOT TWO SEPARATE REALMS as in a BINARY LOGIC view, but that LANGUAGE is a CONDENSATION of THOUGHT and that while LANGUAGE is LOCAL and EXPLICIT, THOUGHT is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in a shared relational ‘cloud’ from which the LOCAL and EXPLICIT PRECIPITATES, these two (the ‘imaginary’ NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and the ‘real’ LOCAL and EXPLICIT)  being in a QUANTUM LOGIC relation where the “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” LANGUAGE is a CONDENSATION of the “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” THOUGHT,  rather than being understood as separate entities. each existing “in their own right”, as in the commonly accepted BINARY LOGIC based ‘disconnected’ view of THOUGHT and LANGUAGE.

“While THOUGHT and LANGUAGE are understood in our WESTERN CULTURE educated social collective (as comes from the influence of Piaget) is that they are two separate schemes, however, consistent with QUANTUM LOGIC, the relationship between Thought and Language deriving from the psychological investigations of Lev Vygotsky as captured in ‘Thought and Language’ is as follows;

In ‘Thought and Language’, Lev Vygotsky points out that ‘spontaneous concept formation’ induced by the dynamic relational situation we find ourselves in, … and ‘scientific concept formation’ which we can think of as our corresponding intention-driven response that is inductively actualized by the unfolding situation, are a single system; i.e. a situational-intentional nonduality.

This is, in fact, an expression of QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which manifests in our WAVE-FIELD world wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.

In other words, Vygotsky has established that LANGUAGE precipitates from the FIELD of THOUGHT in the manner that MATTER precipitates from the WAVE-FIELD, this QUANTUM LOGIC relationship having been DUMBED DOWN in our WESTERN CULTURE so that our understanding is that THOUGHT and LANGUAGE are TWO SEPARATE THINGS in a BINARY LOGIC SENSE, rather than, in reality, their having the CONJUGATE IMAGINARY (nonlocal and implicit)-plus-REAL (local and explicit) relation of conjugate WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE”

This distinguishing of different but related forms of understanding can explain the FRAGMENTATION that Bohm is pointing out is impacting our WESTERN CULTURE social dynamic.  This FRAGMENTATION appears to be coming from the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE by invoking simple BINARY LOGIC whereby we reduce the ‘androgynous’ (quantum logic) ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ to the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING (binary logic) ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’ by way of SUBSTITUTING EMPTY SPACE for the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (this, in effect, ‘GET’S RID OF’ the female wave-field conjugate).

MEANWHILE, the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is the ‘INTEGRATING PLENUM’ in which the MALE ASSERTING conjugates are the “INCLUDED CONDENSATIONS” opening the door to “FRAGMENTATION” should the FEMALE PLENUM be ‘mistaken’ for EMPTY SPACE).

As Bohm points out, the PROBLEM OF FRAGMENTATION is REAL (if its REAL in the PSYCHE, it can be a REAL PROBLEM in the PHYSICAL SOCIAL DYNAMIC) and it is impacting WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT, BINARY-LOGIC-USING social collectives.

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

The point being made here is that the PROBLEM OF FRAGMENTATION is evidently deriving from the WESTERN CULTURE practice of DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE by way of SUBSTITUTING an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.  We see this DROP-OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE in the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ of WESTERN JUSTICE.  This RULE essentially PROHIBITS THE ACKNOWLEDGING OF A CONJUGATE RELATION BETWEEN THE MALE ASSERTING AGENT’S PUNCH and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING RECEPTION OF THE ‘EGGSHELL’ SKULL

This ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION is a feature of how our STANDARD AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE formulates representations; i.e. in terms of the GROWTH OF THE TOWN without mentioning the SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS as if the TOWN were in a FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT as implied by the MISSING “ACCOMMODATING FEMALE” characteristic of our QUANTUM LOGIC ‘WAVE-FIELD’ reality wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

This DROP-OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE constitutes the REDUCTION-TO-MORE SIMPLE-BINARY-LOGIC of the LESS SIMPLE “QUANTUM LOGIC”, a DROP-OUT based SIMPLIFICATION ‘BUILT IN’ to the ARCHITECTURE of WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European LANGUAGES.

WHAT IS DIFFERENT IN MY RESEARCH APPROACH?  I ASK MYSELF and ANSWER.

And the ANSWER is that I am NOT ACCEPTING the LANGUAGE-BASED DUMBING DOWN from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have BUILT INTO our COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, that we are right now using in our INVESTIGATIVE ANALYSIS.  Once we include in our everyday language based representations, statements such as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’, … we achieve a BINARY LOGIC based “DUMBING DOWN” that represents the TOWN as a LOCAL EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF in an ENVIRONMENT that is SEPARATE FROM THE TOWN.  Starting from this use of a “dumbed down” (BINARY LOGIC) language, it is no longer possible to resolve the DUMBING DOWN with commentaries which include any dependency on ‘the TOWN’ which is a NAME that is the carrier of BINARY LOGIC.

For example, there is no way to first accept the statement ‘the PUNCH SMASHED THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL’ and then make excuses for the PUNCHER as to the ‘fact’ that the recipient had a ‘fragile skull’.  The BASIC PROBLEM resides in the BINARY LOGIC premise of THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING AUTHOR.  THERE IS NO AUTHOR in a transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD.  The WAVE-FIELD nature of reality requires QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein the TRANSMITTER/AUTHOR and the RECEIVER/RECIPIENT are the MALE-ASSERTING and FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING aspects of the ONE DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE and “NOT TWO”

This need for a language that can form QUANTUM LOGIC representations amounts to the need for FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE such as the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL languages and Bohm’s Rheomode language which have NO DEPENDENCY ON BINARY LOGIC and thus NO DEPENDENCY ON THE ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING.  In the flow-based language architectures that have no dependency on LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHORS of actions and developments, (dynamics that are FLUID are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) and since unfolding actions and developments are nonlocal and implicit, they do not have an AUTHORING SOURCE that can be identified and promoted or eliminated as in BINARY LOGIC based purification programs.

In this QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD reality where the dynamic is inherently NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT, the understanding of STRIFE does not involve a LOCAL and EXPLICIT SOURCE since the nature of STRIFE is IMBALANCE which is relational and thus NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT so that the REMEDY is the RESTORING OF BALANCE as in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT dynamics of the social collective.

* * *

FRAGMENTATION occurs where the LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY that are being used as the OPERATIVE REALITY are AT ODDS WITH SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY. Examples include activities THAT WE SAY are oriented to ‘GROWTH’ or ‘DEVELOPMENT’ or “PRODUCTION’, all of which are BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTIONS based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is where the ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING arises.

In the WORLD OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE as captured using QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, as describes the QUANTUM LOGIC of MATERIAL FORMS as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, … the understanding is that the MATERIAL FORM is BOTH ‘ITSELF’ AND the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM it is included in.   THERE IS NO FRAGMENTATION HERE, not in any ‘LANGUAGE DESCRIBED OPERATIVE REALITY’ and NOT IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.  The FRAGMENTION is in the BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTING, LANGUAGE-CONDITIONED MIND (relational dissonance is fluid).

MEANWHILE, WESTERN CULTURE PEOPLE who employ language with a FRAGMENTING CAPABILITY, as comes with BINARY LOGIC, can and do use LANGUAGE to construct DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE and SECURE SUCH DECLARATIONS with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as for example is the case with ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which, if acknowledged, obviates the FALL into the LANGAUGE based PSYCHOLOGICALLY INDUCED IMPRESSION of being in a world that is CAPABLE of FRAGMENTATION which takes us into BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION that is LOCAL MATERIAL-BEING based and lies beyond the realm of relational BALANCE and IMBALANCE.

* * *

The world of QUANTUM LOGIC is a relational world that is BEYOND THE REACH of BINARY LOGIC based FRAGMENTATION.

The world of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, is an all-including energy-charged PLENUM, a QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD, as Bohm observes, wherein we and all material forms are condensations of that field.   This QUANTUM LOGIC reality is innately LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC world of our COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, and is thus OUT OF REACH of the constructions of us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS whose intellectual operative reality is the BINARY LOGIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY of MATERIAL FORMS in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

The REALITY SUPPORTING SHORTFALLS of WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGES IS NO SECRET; i.e.

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

Because this Wave-field includes all, we cannot get outside it to ‘take a look at “it” and describe “It” since “we are it” (we are ‘all our relations’ as in mitakuye oyasin).

“The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist. –“ Erwin Schroedinger”

While we can understand that we live within a transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao, it is not an “it” that we can describe;

“The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao. The name that can be named is not the true name.” Names, while useful, can be limiting. We must go beyond names and see the Tao in all things. — Lao Tzu

All of this wisdom is daily spun yet the WESTERN CULTURE social collective has not been able to ‘put it together’ and thus it is being persistently overtaken by our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based constructions of a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS promote this BINARY LOGIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY consisting of representations such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION as if these were ‘REAL’ in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE affirmable context.  They are NOT REAL (they do not live in a wave-field based transforming relational continuum) but belong to a BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE-based, non sense-experience affirmable, fragmented SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

* * *

“Upon this gifted age, in its dark hour,
Rains from the sky a meteoric shower
Of facts…they lie unquestioned, uncombined.

Wisdom enough to leech us of our ill
Is daily spun; but there exists no loom
To weave it into fabric…”

Edna St Vincent Millay, From Huntsman, What Quarry? (1939)

 

FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE is a BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE-BASED ILLUSION that, as Bohm points out, is leading to WESTERN CULTURE PERVADING PSYCHOSIS.  As Bohm says in his comment on FRAGMENTATION in our WESTERN CULTURE social collective;

… Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

 * * *

 

FOOTNOTE:

This essay entitled EXPLANATION of my QUANTUM LOGIC RESEARCH APPROACH includes some self-searching WHAT IS DIFFERENT IN MY RESEARCH APPROACH?  I ASK MYSELF and ANSWER.

As far as I can see the difference in my investigative approach to most investigative approaches is the same difference noticed by Vygotsky in comparing his approach to that of Piaget.

In ‘Thought and Language’, Lev Vygotsky points out that ‘spontaneous concept formation’ induced by the dynamic relational situation we find ourselves in, … and ‘scientific concept formation’ which we can think of as our corresponding intention-driven response that is inductively actualized by the unfolding situation, are a single system; i.e. a situational-intentional nonduality.

Here we have the familiar juxtaposition of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING) and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (MALE ASSERTING) and while Piaget and perhaps almost all WESTERN CULTURE INVESTIGATORS of WHAT MAKES OUR WESTERN CULTURE TICK, … see these two FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING OPTIONS as “SEPARATE OPTIONS” which has led us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS into giving preference to the MALE ASSERTING LOCAL and EXPLICIT LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTIONS OF ‘REALITY’, Vygotsky and others (including myself) see the ANDROGYNOUS (QUANTUM LOGIC) UNION as the primary reality and the separate FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate and MALE ASSERTING conjugate as NON-EXISTENT ABSTRACTIONS.

I think we will find, if we explore it, that the issue that is dividing Piaget and Vygotsky is the same issue that divided Heraclitus and Aristotle;

“Plato clearly distinguished between Heraclitus’ SIMULTANEOUS unity and plurality of the cosmos and Empedocles’ SEPARATE PERIODS of Love and Strife. At the same time, they are mentioned together as both alike in believing in the unity and plurality of the cosmos; and Aristotle’s coupling of the two might conceivably have been motivated by the Platonic comparison, the important distinction between them being overlooked.” – Kirk, Raven et al, The Presocratic Philosophers

 

This difference IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN QUANTUM LOGIC (simultaneous unity and plurality of the cosmos) and BINARY LOGIC (separate split apart periods of integration and differentiation).

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *