ACKNOWLEDGING OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD

AUTHOR’S INTRODUCTION TO THIS ESSAY:—ACKNOWLEDGING OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD

It is VERY CHALLENGING, because of the limitations of this BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE (LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING) SCHEME I am using, to convey the QUANTUM LOGIC ideas I am sharing. This is because  QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTS TRANSCEND BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTS in the manner that “PURELY RELATIONAL WHORLINGS IN FLOWING” are less simple than “INDEPENDENT BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE”. In the case of  “WHORLINGS IN FLOWING”, we must, instead of having an understanding wherein we can split things apart and focus on “THEM”  as if “THEY”  are “INDEPENDENT”, … “ACKNOWLEDGE that “THERE ARE ONLY “RELATIONS” AND THERE ARE NO “THINGS” (i.e. there are only “condensations of and in the flowing energy-charged wave-field wherein everything is related” as expressed by “mitakuye oyasin”)  This purely FLOW-BASED RELATIONAL REALITY or in other words, THIS QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein THE WHORLINGS “ARE” THE FLOWING recalls Heraclitus’ “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX”  which anticipated the Modern Physics understanding of our inclusion in THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD  wherein “everything is in flux”, including condensations.

We know that we can understand the world in a relational manner that TRANSCENDS our standard way of speaking of REALITY in terms of the dynamics of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEING-THINGS such as HUMANS and NATIONS N FAS IF SUCH SEPARATE THINGS REALLY EXISTED rather than being SIMPLIFYING ABSTRACTIONS designed by GROUPS OF INTELLECTUAL TWO-LEGGEDS who have invented them as part of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, some of which are SEPARATE, INDEPENDENT FRAGMENT BASED, … while we continue to sing with passion, songs in praise of our NATURAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE  such as “WE ARE THE WORLD”  and “IMAGINE”  (e.g. “imagine there’s no (fragmenting) countries, its isnt’ hard to do”).

We sing with honesty and heartfelt fervor because we long for a solution to the persisting FRAGMENTATION and violence in the world and we hunger for the relational resonances we know we are capable of co-cultivating in our informal apolitical relations. DID WE REALLY NEED THE HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed in conjunction with DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE of NATIONS and HUMAN-BEINGS that ABSTRACTLY DIVIDE US AND PUT US IN “SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST” COMPETITION WITH ONE ANOTHER? 

Many of our TWO-LEGGED brothers and sisters (e.g. indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents) have opted for very different LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES which PRESERVE the natural FLUIDITY, INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE of our sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD WORLD, as affirmed by the indigenous aboriginal aphorism “MITAKUYE OYASIN”, … “EVERYTHING IS RELATED”.

SURE, things can go wrong and things have been going wrong in the TWO-LEGGEDS’ development of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION-based communications schemes, which have retained MORE or LESS GROUNDING in sense-experience.  That is, the FLOW-BASED schemes are MORE GROUNDED in sense-experience than the BEING-BASED schemes which are MORE GROUNDED IN INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION.  For example, in the FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, one may say THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which employs the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM; i.e. THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is a FLOWING PLENUM within which the TOWNING is an included FLOW-FEATURE whereby EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.   In the BEING-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is FRAGMENTED by a BINARY LOGIC SPLIT into TWO INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS, ‘THE TOWN’ as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF and the LANDSCAPE as a SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT CONTAINING SPACE.

While there is this choice of FLOW-based and BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, each have their own strong-points and weak points, and while the WESTERN CULTURE has opted for BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, it has been pointed out by MODERN PHYSICS that FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is more consistent with sense-experience than BEING-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the latter being the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

The FRAGMENTATION is a straight forward understanding since the imposing of BEING on relational forms is clearly going to FRAGMENT the PSYCHOLOGICAL TAKE-AWAYS from this type of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  For example, in the process of OBJECTIFYING the “TOWN” in SPLITTING IT OUT OF THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, it has been necessary to INVENT an “IMAGINARY” ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE CONTAINER to support such THING-IN-ITSELF CONCEPTUALIZING.  This is obviously a recipe for FRAGMENTATION and not quite so obviously a recipe for OBSCURANTISM. That is, while we have GRAMMAR to re-animate the now INDEPENDENT TOWN and give it the capabilities of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods, … this is all MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING capability .  WHAT HAPPENED TO THE “CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS”?

In order to MAKE ROOM for the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AS IF IN ITS OWN RIGHT (i.e. as if were situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE), there must be a DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate. This is achieved by the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the MISSING FEMALE (the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING).

Here we can see that we are PAYING A HEAVY PRICE in this BINARY LOGIC based SIMPLIFYING (DUMBING DOWN) of our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING since in order to speak in SIMPLER TERMS of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AS IF ON ITS OWN, we have to arrange for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING which is the ALL-INCLUDING NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD… TO “GO MISSING” so that the “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT” CONDENSATION aka the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, can STRUT ITS STUFF AS IF AN ‘INDEPENDENT BEING’ without sharing performance credits with the “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate.

MEANWHILE, this INDEPENDENT BEING is “APPEARANCE” only, just as the GROWING TOWN is exposed as only “APPEARANCE” when we fill in what we have blanked out; i.e. the conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, which, when re-joined with the GROWING TOWN (there were never split apart except in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING) reaffirms the sense-experience reality of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

In our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, we put the onus on BEING for the AUTHORING of actions and development, since the ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE has NO POWERS OF AUTHORSHIP. Ok, we wanted to SIMPLIFY our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME by promoting the secondary CONDENSATIONS of and in the WAVE-FIELD to PRIMARY STATUS as LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING THINGS living in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, so we FORCED OURSELVES to RELOCATE the PRIMARY ANIMATING INFLUENCE from the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM since were SUBSTITUTING for it, ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE, and weirdly enough, we resituated the AUTHORING ENERGY SOURCE into one of its own AUTHORED creations, the MATERIAL CONDENSATION. This is OBSCURANTISM since it notionally relocates AUTHORING AGENCY FROM the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (which we are simply DROPPING OUT) to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS of the NO-LONGER-EXISTING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM. Those CONDENSATIONS, while APPEARING LOCAL and EXPLICIT, actually OWED THEIR EXISTENCE TO THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUN in which they are CONDENSATIONS, so the SUBSTITUTING of the ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM “PULLED THE RUG OUT FROM UNDER THE FEET of the CONDENSATIONS; i.e. “CONDENSATIONS OF WHAT?  … EMPTY SPACE?”

The DROPPING OUT, in the BEING based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, of any/all “ACKNOWLEDGEMENT” of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate CRIPPLES our conceptualizing of dynamics by constraining the dynamic to one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  and here’s the KICKER, … THE DROPPED OUT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate is the source of influence which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT  (coming from the containing energy-charged PLENUM).  The RETAINED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate is the source of influence which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT (coming from the male asserting/actualizing).

WAIT A MINUTE!  The WAVE-FIELD DOES NOT ACTUALLY SPLIT APART INTO MALE and FEMALE COMPONENTS, that is only APPEARANCE since these “TWO” are really only TWO APPEARANCE BASED ASPECTS of the ONE WAVE-FIELD, … so those words that seem to treat the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as TWO SEPARATE agencies are MISLEADING, and that is what is cropping up with the DEA ABSCONDITA (Goddess in hiding) because while we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have designed a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, … THIS CAN’T BE DONE IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, it can only be done in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS which can be CONFUSING because we are using these LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS AS OUR “OPERATIVE REALITY”.

Social relational dynamics are being shaped by our choice of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, the major difference being FLOW-BASED QUANTUM LOGIC based) and BEING-BASED (BINARY LOGIC based) SCHEMES  The indigenous aboriginal organizing approach is FLOW-BASED and supports the understanding that ‘WE ARE ALL RELATED’ (mitakuye oyasin) which is a QUANTUM LOGIC based understanding (that we are all strands in the one-web aka condensations in the one energy-charged plenum) and lies beyond the simplicity of our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based model wherein we see ourselves as INDEPENDENT BEINGS with OUR OWN POWERS of AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

This has led to the development of a corresponding JUSTICE system which is NOT RESTORATIVE (resolving dissonances within the INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT RELATIONAL WEB), … but PURIFICATIONIST (eliminating those LOCAL INDEPENDENT BEINGS notionally equipped with THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING BAD ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.   The HUGE DISCONNECT between these two understanding of the basic physics of social dynamics is a REALITY that complicates my task of sharing the DIFFERENCES that arise in QUANTUM LOGIC thinking and acting relative to BINARY LOGIC thinking and acting.   For example, understanding reality using QUANTUM LOGIC opens our minds to the world as a relational matrix of INTERCONNNECTIONS and INTERDEPENDENCIES; a WEB-OF-LIFE that is understood in MODERN PHYSICS, in terms of CONDENSATIONS of an all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD wherein the FLUID PLENUM is PRIMARY and the CONDENSATIONS are only APPEARANCE (Schaumkommen) in the same sense as WHORLINGS in FLOWING where the FLOWING (wave-field) is PRIMARY and the WHORLINGS (condensations) are “APPEARANCE”.

Distinguishing terms such as BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC and QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC and others, are clearly needed.  In any case, if you put yourself in my shoes and contemplate the task of writing on the topic ACKNOWLEDGING OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, you may get a sense of the challenge of putting into writing what it would take to switch one’s LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY from a MATERIAL basis to a WAVE-FIELD basis as has been done by Bohm and Schroedinger and others, which involves a profound shift in understanding that has induced many to shift from either atheism, Judaism, Christianity or Islam which are all strongly BINARY LOGIC oriented, to Taoism and Advaita Vedanta which are strongly QUANTUM LOGIC oriented.

What most of us don’t think of because of the way we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are educated from birth which is highly BINARY LOGIC grounded, is the more informative (in a sense-experience affirming context) QUANTUM LOGIC way of understanding the world as compared to the BINARY LOGIC alternative.  This very basic shift in one’s worldview that comes with upgrading from SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC to LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC is the message of David Bohm and Krishna Murti and Schroedinger and many others including myself.  It is a psychological shift and not simply an updating of our intellectual knowledge banks.

QUANTUM LOGIC is the logic on indigenous aboriginals which is advocated in this familiar phrase;

“Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.  —Chief Seattle”

David Peat (Blackfoot Physics), together with Bohm, point out the many agreements between indigenous aboriginal QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of reality (wherein we are included in the dynamics ‘we are looking out at’).  That is, QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which means that those CONDENSATIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD INCLUDE OURSELVES.  As QUANTUM LOGIC inclusions in the all-including purely relational WAVE-FIELD, we are more like HOLOGRAMS than SOLID BEINGS IN A SEPARATE EMPTY SPACE.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SIMPLIFIED our model of ourselves by DECLARING OURSELVES to be INDEPENDENT while MODERN PHYSICS has gone in the opposite direction by agreeing with indigenous aboriginals that we are all related (mitakuye oyasin) by virtue of our being CONDENSATIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

This essay describes how our standard WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING MUST CHANGE in order to develop a capability for QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which is less simple than our WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD of BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.   For example, our BINARY LOGIC expressions ‘The TOWN is GROWING, or The HUMAN is GROWING’ must ‘upgrade’ to bring our INNATE INCLUSION in the world INTO THE PICTURE as is done in indigenous aboriginal languages which CORRECTLY (according to Modern Physics) speak in terms of the HUMAN(ING), NOT AS AN ‘INDEPENDENT BEING” but as an INCLUDED STRAND IN THE WEB-OF-LIFE, in statements such as above statement by Seattle.

ACKNOWLEDGING OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD involves, among many other things, acknowledging the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of social interactions and of JUSTICE which brings support for RESTORATIVE JUSTICE rather than WESTERN CULTURE “PUNITIVE JUSTICE” with its CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTES since, in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, emergent events are understood as deriving from NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT sourcing and NOT, as in BINARY LOGIC, from LOCAL and EXPLICIT sources.  The dynamic of community as a collection of CONDENSATIONS within an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD is BOTH AN INTERRELATED and INTERDEPENDENT DYNAMIC, hence the origin of emergent events is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (the holder of the smoking gun is the VENT for tensions forming in the interconnected social collective and NOT the locally authored product of the gun-holder).   This understanding of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT origin of emergent events, of indigenous aboriginals, is backed up by Modern physics and it suggests that JUSTICE needs to be RESTORATIVE rather than PUNITIVE, due to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT rather than LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORING of events.  RESTORATIVE JUSTICE proceeds with the forming of HEALING CIRCLES in the wake of outbreaks of VIOLENCE, since the WEB-OF-LIFE is a RELATIONAL DYNAMIC which oscillates between RELATIONAL RESONANCE and RELATIONAL DISSONANCE within the social collective.  In this understanding, which accords with Modern Physics, a rape , murder of theft is seen as RELATIONAL DISSONANCE which is coming from the web of social relationships while the person HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN is the VENT through which unaddressed buildups of relational tensions find expression.

The explanations in this essay;  ACKNOWLEDGING OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD must BYPASS the TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based INVESTIGATIVE APPROACH where we are content to CONVICT the person whose PUNCH was seen to SHATTER the recipient’s SKULL as if the PUNCH were the FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING SOURCE, …  and instead acknowledge the contribution of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate that is ALWAYS partnered with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.

Because WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING ‘DROPS OUT’ the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE; i.e. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, and regards AS REALITY, the LOCAL and EXPLICIT or MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, the latter is TAKEN TO BE THE FULL STORY, while the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD conjugate is DROPPED OUT AND IGNORED.  As WESTERN CULTURE NON-MAINSTREAM PSYCHIATRISTS have pointed out with the example of the Miner’s Canary, VIOLENT BEHAVIOUR can derive from a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT so that those co-producing the TOXICITY are given the statistical cloak of NORMALCY which excepts them as INNOCENTS (in WESTERN CULTURE PUNITIVE JUSTICE, though a sensitive minority (the ‘miner’s canary’) may have a ‘breakdown’ and manifest violent behaviour.   In indigenous aboriginal RESTORATIVE JUSTICE, the understanding of TOXIC ENVIRONMENTS is already in place, in which case the TOXICITY hiding in the relational matrix is addressed by the HEALING CIRCLE which is community scale DE-TOXING program.  There is thus no need in this QUANTUM LOGIC RESTORATIVE JUSTICE approach, as there is in case of the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based assumption of INDEPENDENT BEINGS, to use the BINARY LOGIC INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY FILTER to SELECT OUT for punishment or exectution, in a PURIFICATIONIST OPERATION, those INDEPENDENT BEINGS deemed GUILTY.

That is, those deemed “GUILTY” are identified by the IMPOSING of BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR JUDGEMENT.   While the indigenous aboriginal culture assumes that we are all included in the web-of-life and thus are all co-participants in the authoring of events, WESTERN CULTURE assumes that we are all INDEPENDENT BEINGS who are FULLY and SOLELY RESPONSIBLE for the AUTHORING of LOCAL and EXPLICIT EVENTS (note that indigenous aboriginals, like Modern physics, understand that LOCAL and EXPLICIT (CONDENSATION) dynamics are only APPEARANCE while NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (WAVE-FIELD) dynamics are REAL.  For example, the LOCAL and EXPLICIT GROWTH of the TOWN is NOT REAL since it does not include the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, but it is a LOGICALLY TRUE proposition to state that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, but as Goedel’s Theorem points out, ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE, and we know from this example and there are countless more,… that THIS IS THE TRUTH, but our WESTERN CULTURE MISTAKE is to confuse TRUTH for REALITY.  The GROWTH of the TOWN, while TRUE, is NOT REALITY because it does NOT ACKNOWLEDGE the conjugate SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS which must be mentioned in its conjugate role with THE GROWTH of THE TOWN in order to move from simple, “TRUE” BUT INCOMPLETE GROWTH to the less simple BUT “REAL” TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE .

THE CONTAINER AND THE CONTENT are not separate in the world of our sense-experience where the CONTAINER is the WAVE-FIELD and the CONTENT is the CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD as defines the QUANTUM LOGIC relation, the DEGENERATE case of which is BINARY LOGIC where the CONTAINER is absolute empty space and the CONTENT is absolute material being.

The WAVE-FIELD is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT container of many CONDENSATIONS and these CONDENSATIONS are all related by being BOTH THEMSELVES and the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD in which they are inclusions so that EVERYTHING IS RELATED as with STRANDS in IN A WEB.   The understanding that  “man is a strand in the relational web-of-life”, where the web remains HIDDEN and OBSCURED by the WESTERN CULTURE practice of using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development to each (perceived as independent) “STRAND”, “reducing”  (by way of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION), the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT dynamics of the RELATIONAL WEB (there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING landscape) to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT  mechanics of the INDEPENDENT STRAND (the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods).

The understanding that “we are strands in the web-of-life” is pointing to problems ‘living in the dynamics of the social collective’; i.e. the web, that can become a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT as in the case of the sensitive Miner’s Canary in the toxicity of a noxious medium, reminds us that we are NOT LIMITED to “BLAMING” the internals of the Canary as in the WESTERN CULTUER model of MATERIAL BEINGS in EMPTY SPACE.  That is, in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of material forms as CONDENSATIONS of an including PLENUM since the PLENUM (the WAVE-FIELD) is the AUTHOR of both the condensations and their dynamics which is why the dynamics are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in origin and why RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is needed.

The notion of LOCAL and EXPLICIT dynamics is popular WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based abstraction stemming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which as Nietzsche has pointed out, is supported by the EGO boost which comes from the FALSE notion of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.  The LOCAL and EXPLICIT ACTS of HAMAS and NETANYAHU is BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which DROPS OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD INFLUENCE WHICH IS PRIMARY.

Since all propositions of logic are INCOMPLETE (Goedel’s Theorem), LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS which employ propositions such as ‘The TOWN is GROWING’ or ‘HAMAS killed 1200 Israelis’, are incomplete in the Goedel’s Theorem sense, they do not mention the conjugate NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS or the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT losses of Palestinians.  The incompleteness of logical propositions comes from the fact that logical propositions report only on the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LOCAL and EXPLICIT while DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD dynamic.  While such INCOMPLETE propositions may be TRUE, they are not LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZINGS OF REALITY in a sense-experience affirmable context since the REALITY of our sense-experience is of inclusion as condensations in the ALL-INCLUDING NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.

If the views expressed in this note seem strange, the ‘strangeness’ in this text lies in its departure from the traditional BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme as comes with the RE-CASTING of ‘the data’ in QUANTUM LOGIC terms which brings the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING back in harmony with our sense-experience.  For example, BEING based scenarios such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, while a verifiably TRUE PROPOSITION that “SOUNDS SOLID” as is the nature of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITIONS, is UNREAL-BECAUSE-INCOMPLETE, since IN REALITY, there can be no GROWTH OF A TOWN without at the same time and as part of the same dynamic, the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, the overall REAL dynamic being capturable as in indigenous aboriginal flow-based language by “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

We could say that the GOOD NEWS is that many of us are trying to make this erronous BINARY LOGIC based system design WORK, but it is fundamentally flawed, as described in the above note, and as the systems sciences would put it, WE ARE LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS because many people are making out very well in this dysfunctional system and those of this favorable experience are predominantly in higher positions of influence and control over what changes will be made to the current system.  In the gatherings of these more influential ‘authorities’ who are responsible for the continuing steady performance of the current BINARY LOGIC based system, how many are concerned with the needed move to a QUANTUM LOGIC operating alternative?  An alternative which, among other changes, would OBSOLETE the abstract concept of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL LOCAL AUTHOR/PERFORMER, by acknowledging the natural PRIMACY of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM IN WHICH WE ARE INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT CONDENSATIONS?

Many have read Erich Jantsch’s Design for Evolution, Fritjof Capra’s The Tao of Physics, Davod Bohm’s The Implicate Order and F. David Peat’s Blackfoot Physics, all of which support the wave-field based understanding of the world of our sense-experience.  But one has to go elsewhere to find more in-depth focus on how OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE holds us down to a too-simple BINARY LOGIC view which is an obstracle to the needed shift to a QUANTUM LOGIC view.

This ‘homework’ has been incorporated into this essay. In Linguistics, there is Benjamin Whorf inThe Relation of Habitual Thought and Behavior to Language  who realized that Newtonian physics was EXTRACTED FROM LANGUAGE, .and in psychology, Vygotsky was onto this needed shift to acknowledge the complex structure of thought, although his observations of Spontaneous conceptualizing and Scientific conceptualizing being conjugates (as appropriate to our wave-field world) were buried beneath the more popular but too simple binary logic based views of Piaget.  In fact, there is a long list of those who have been tuned in to the need for a complex (real + imaginary) language structure, such as already exists in the indigenous aboriginal culture (it is implicit in flow-based language structure) and in Bohm’s ‘Rheomode’ language.  But as we can see, WESTERN CULTURE’S POPULARIZING OF BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is deeply and firmly LOCKED IN PLACE (by high switching costs) so that getting off the BINARY LOGIC BANDWAGON to do the needed upgrade to QUANTUM LOGIC language is prohibitive in a sense akin to changing the wheels on one’s car while speeding down the road in it.

But if you would like a relatively simple ‘rule’ to stay out of the WESTERN CULTURE PITFALL of dumbing down reality with oversimplistic BINARY LOGIC, remember this;  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” (it is APPEARANCE aka Schaumkommen) as with CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD which we can handle with the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM; i.e. the CONDENSATIONS are BOTH visibly distinguishable but included features of the WAVE-FIELD like WHORLINGS IN FLOWING.  WHAT IS NOT JUST ‘APPEARANCE’ BUT PRIMARY REALITY IS THE “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” which is the TRANSFORMING PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate which INCLUDES the LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS.

I REPEAT:  THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INCLUDES THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  For example, THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and here as one can see from that phrase, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX which is why it makes sense to have a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE.  Alan Watts (A Zen scholar) suggested, and I agree, if starting with English, DROP OUT ALL NOUNS and employ verbs in their place, as in THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  This is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, but we can see that if we substitute an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE REFERENCE FRAME for the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and use what Nietzsche calls the THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR where we substitute a BEING based TOWN for the TOWNING (the TOWNING that is a feature within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE), together with GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWER to the BEING based TOWN, we can see the DROP OUTS that were used in getting to what Whorf classifies as the Standard Average European Languages.

The inserting of the EMPTY SPACE in place of the ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM removes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which is the PRIMARY DYNAMIC (the TRANSFORMING PLENUM) in our sense-experience reality, mistakingly PROMOTING Schaumkommon (APPEARANCE), which is what the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate is, to PRIMARY AUTHOR STATUS.

This is the common WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING REDUCTION from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  Recall that the Gravitational field and the Electromagnetic field, while NON-VISIBLE, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT constitute the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, underscoring the fact that giving a foundational role to LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS (appearance) and substituting EMPTINESS for the FOUNDATIONAL ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, which is the basis of our WESTERN CULTURE Standard Average European Language, is the screw-up which is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

 * * * * * END OF AUTHOR’S INTRODUCTION * * * * * 

* * * * * * 

WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD and the SUBSET “WE” I am focusing on that set of intellectual understandings and social practices known as “WESTERN CULTURE” and within that, the WESTERN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME aka LANGUAGE which DUMBS DOWN our understanding of LIVING IN THE WAVE-FIELD, by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (i will explain these terms) AND EMPLOYING ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.

We can see an example of this where we use ONE-SIDED (male asserting actualizing) propositions such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS”.  There can be NO SUCH THING AS ‘GROWING’ of a TOWN without conjugate ‘SHRINKING’ of WILDERNESS, a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING in conjugate relation with a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING that co-constitute TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE.

The DROPPING OUT, in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme, of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate , has been referred to as the DEA ABSCONDITA (the Goddess in hiding).  This DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate; e.g. the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS that is a reality that comes bundled together with the GROWTH of THE TOWN DOES NOT HAPPEN IN FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES such those of indigenous aboriginal cultures and MODERN PHYSICS where one speaks in such terms as “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which retains the INTEGRATED NATURE of the TRANSFORMING world we share inclusion in.  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, by using our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and GOES WITH the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE “ON ITS OWN” are generating PROBLEMS for ourselves in the form of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.  For example to speak in terms that ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, as Nietzsche has pointed out, is to create a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that suggests the POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORING belonging to the NAME-INSTANTIATED (notional) THING-IN-ITSELF, the TOWN in this example.

GROWTH AND FRAGMENTATION

GROWTH IS AN ABSTRACT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION  which is the SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION.  There is NO GROWTH  in the sense-experience grounded dynamics we are included in, which are flow-based  and which warrant flow-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION such as “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  which conveys, NOT GROWTH  as if occurring to an INDEPENDENT OBJECT in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE where FIGURE (THE TOWN) and GROUND (ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE) are TWO, but the FLUID DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION wherein FIGURE (TOWNING) and GROUND (TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) are “ONE”.

GROWTH implies LOCAL AUTHORING of DEVELOPMENT which is ABSTRACTION that is based on, as Nietzsche points out, the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR  as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.  WHILE TRANSFORMATION IS FLUID AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ‘EVERYTHING IS RELATED’ (mitakuye oyasin), GROWTH applies to particular, independent things (which are abstractions since everything is in the transforming WAVE-FIELD flux), thus GROWTH  is an abstraction that is FRAGMENTATIVE.

Indigenous aboriginal culture LANGUAGE which is flow-based and MODERN PHYSICS language which is also flow-based (wave-field based) make use of BOTH the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATES.  In other words, flow-based LANGUAGE employs WAVE-FIELD-CAPABLE linguistic conceptualizing such as “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  while WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS commonly employ a DUMBED DOWN, one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY based linguistic conceptualizings such as“the TOWN is GROWING” .

OBSCURANTISM:  THE DEA ABSDONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING)

The DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate is OBSCURANTIST since it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate which conveys the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT aspect of WAVE-FIELD structure, leaving ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate ON ITS OWN, REDUCING the CONCEPTUALIZING to just the LOCAL and EXPLICIT whereby the MISSING FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE becomes the “DEA ABSCONDITA (the GODDESS IN HIDING”) since, while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD INFLUENCE persists in our sense-experience, it is no longer mentioned in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

This is the OBSCURANTIST aspect of our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that COMPOUNDS the FRAGMENTATION ASPECT; i.e. it is the SECOND ERROR of Nietzsche’s DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR reference; i.e. by NAMING features in the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM, we FRAGMENT REALITY and by using GRAMMAR to impute to the FRAGMENTS the notional powers of LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING, we OBSCURE the “GREATER REALITY of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT AUTHORING as in “there is TOWNING (local and explicit) in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (nonlocal and implicit).   NOTA BENE: the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (i.e. “the TOWN that is GROWING”) is INCLUDED WITHIN THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (“the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”) which is the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM relation.

“OBSCURANTISM” is the result of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that presents the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, which is “APPEARANCE” (Schaumkommen) as if it exists IN ITS OWN RIGHT, e.g. as if “THE TOWN IS GROWING” exists in its own right (as invokes the notion that it is contained within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE) while our SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMS US, the TOWNING is a FEATURE WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and is thus INCLUDED (in a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC SENSE) in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (LANDSCAPE) wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, in which case there is no need to INVENT the ABSTRACTION of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE which brings with it the REDUCTION TO BINARY LOGIC “EITHER THE TOWN OR THE EMPTY SPACE”. 

FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM are being given FOUNDATIONAL ROLES in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING  as comes with DROPPING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT  (e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which is QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF INCLUDING MEDIUM BASED) and substituting the SIMPLIFIED LOCAL and EXPLICIT  (e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING” which is BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC based). 

The WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE QUANTUM LOGIC scheme that indigenous aboriginals and MODERN PHYSICS uses gives a FLOW-BASED linguistic conceptualizing wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as in “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  The TOWNING is “BOTH” itself “AND” the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE it is included in, in the same sense as a WHORLING in FLOWING where the APPEARANCE of INDEPENDENT BEING of the WHORLING is only just that; i.e. “APPEARANCE” aka Schaumkommen.  The CONDENSATIONS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM such as TOWNINGS are NOT separable from the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM or in other words, all material CONDENSATIONS are RELATED in the manner of WHORLINGS in A FLOWING and in the manner of TOWNINGS in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).

SO, LET’S REVIEW THIS IMPORTANT CULTURE-SWITCHING-UNDERSTANDING; … the WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD linguistic conceptualizing DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate so that only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is operative since we SUBSTITUTE ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the MISSING FEMALE which has, as a result, been termed the DEA ABSCONDITA or GODDESS IN HIDING. in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.  Because of this, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is loaded with ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING propositions “ON THEIR OWN” (without the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE ), hence we say ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING WITHOUT MENTIONING THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus we FAIL to capture that which is actually occurring with is the “TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE”, which IS ACKNOWLEDGED when BOTH FEMALE AND MALE CONJUGATES are used as in “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

* * * * * *  BEGIN AUTHOR’S HIGHLIGHTED “MUST KEEP-IN-MIND” NOTE * * * * *

This is about the “LIMITATIONS OF LANGUAGE” .  The previous paragraph is pointing out the SHIFT FROM  ……LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING wherein we speak in terms of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD (the energy-charged plenum) which INCLUDES the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS.…..TO LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING wherein we speak ONLY of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS AS IF THEY WERE INDEPENDENT ENTITIES SITUATED WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE; i.e. WHERE THE NON-VISIBLE WAVE-FIELD AKA the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM IS NO LONGER UNDERSTOOD AS THE PRIMARY AUTHORING SOURCE, BUT IS MISINTERPRETED AS  “PASSIVE EMPTY SPACE” SO THAT THE “LOCAL AUTHORING POWER” IS SHIFTED FROM THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (the FIELD) to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (the CONDENSATIONS).  This shift in the LOCATION of AUTHORING POWER from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (of the WAVE-FIELD) to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (of the CONDENSATION) is what WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS DOING BUT IT IS NOT WHAT NATURE IS DOING. NATURE CONTINUES TO PUT THE POWER OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN THE NON-VISIBLE, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD and DEFINITELY “DOES NOT” PUT THE POWER OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS, as WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS DOING, and in the process, INDUCING FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM  because while CONDENSATIONS in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FIELD are ALL RELATED (INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT), CONDENSATIONS THAT ARE, MEANWHILE, ”LINGUISTICALLY CONCEPTUALIZED” AS BEING LOCAL and EXPLICIT as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE and thus implied to be INDEPENDENT, are given an “INDEPENDENCE” THAT IS ONLY AS REAL AS THE ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS AND INFINITENESS OF THEIR CONTAINING SPACE; i.e. it is UNREAL. 

In other words, “INDEPENDENCE” is a BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION, A SIMPLIFICATION which notionally LIBERATES the CONDENSATIONS from their QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC RELATIONS within the TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM that they are “CONDENSATIONS OF” , falsely making the “CONDENSATIONS” out to be LOCAL, EXPLICIT and INDEPENDENT and thus FREE to move about or ‘grow’ within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE “CONTAINING SPACE” which is, as Nietzsche points out, THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR.  

The WAVE-FIELD is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT while the CONDENSATIONS are LOCAL and EXPLICIT “IN APPEARANCE”.  Like WHORLINGS IN FLOWING, the CONDENSATIONS are APPEARANCES without ONTOLOGICAL STATUS or LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS of their own, which forces us to DROP BACK in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, from reliance on the BEING-based status of CONDENSATIONS that ‘nominally’ and ‘grammatically’ supports their LOCAL AUTHORING POWER, and to REGROUND in the more basic context of RELATIONS which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT that inform us in terms of the ALL-INCLUDING RELATIONAL FIELD in which WE, as RELATIONAL FLOW-FEATURES aka (CONDENSATIONS) SHARE INCLUSION.  As “APPEARANCES”, we are, like WHORLINGS in FLOWING, providing a RELATIONAL and NOT A BEING-BASED view of  the TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM/CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD 

There is an EAST-and-WEST LIKE SPLIT here, as to how DIFFERING PEOPLES prefer to do their LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as regards the SOURCE of AUTHORING POWER; i.e. do we, as indigenous aboriginal cultures and the QUANTUM PHYSICS informed do, prefer authoring power to be seen as immanent in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM of the WAVE-FIELD which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and includes CONDENSATIONS as QUANTUM LOGIC based RELATIONAL FEATURES, as would invoke BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM (where the CONDENSATIONS are understood as “BOTH” THEIR LOCAL AND EXPLICIT-APPEARING SELVES “AND” AT THE SAME TIME” as condensation based features of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD, as if comprised of BOTH “REAL” and “IMAGINARY” components, … OR, …. DO WE PREFER the BINARY LOGIC material CONDENSATIONS IN EMPTY SPACE understanding wherein, since SPACE IS EMPTY, all actions and developments must be sourced through the ONE-SIDED AUTHORING POWERS OF THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS without DEPENDENCE on the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT?

As we have seen from the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN JUSTICE, WESTERN CULTURE standard LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING has a LOCAL AUTHORING capability which is CONSTRAINED TO ONLY MALE ASSERTING ACTUALIZING even though the damage from a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING action such as a PUNCH may be insufficient to explain the result since the result MUST INCLUDE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate, … e.g. the female accommodating collapse of the “EGGSHELL SKULL”…. MAKES THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE “LOOK GOOD” by our WESTERN CULTURE habit of DROPPING OUT and failing to acknowledge the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING that is CONJUGATE with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.  This DROP OUT means that our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS can NO LONGER CREDIT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING with the collapsing of the SKULL (COLLAPSING IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT) but must allocate FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING CREDIT to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PUNCH . 

This DROPPING OUT of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and PROMOTING of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING AGENT has been built into WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, thus in USING WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, all actions and developments are FULLY and SOLELY of a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING NATURE, which REDUCES all WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF DYNAMICS to LOCAL, EXPLICIT and FULLY and ENTIRELY DISMISSES ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT SOURCING, hence we speak in terms of ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ and DROP OUT MENTION of the ‘SHRINKING WILDERNESS” and thus the overall TRANSFORMATION.  As mentioned Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS means that WE CAN UNDERSTAND talk such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ as “TRUE” so that our mind may accept this and move on without tuning in to the INCOMPLETENESS of this proposition in its failure to acknowledge that IN REALITY, there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS and an OVERALL TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.  IN WESTERN CULTURE, THE HABIT of ACCEPTING WHAT IS TRUE and NEGLECTING WHAT IS REAL LEADS TO FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

 * * * * * * * 

HOW MUCH OF REALITY IS DUE TO MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AND HOW MUCH IS DUE TO FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING?   We have all experienced a variety of situations which differ in regard to how compliant they are to our asserting efforts so that it is impossible to limit our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING …. WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGING the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.   For example, my WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING habit has me report on my complex dynamic of LAUNCHING A HOBIE-CAT from a SURF POUNDED BEACH wherein our sense experience is that “TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON AND A TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE” , but where our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME has us report on in the SIMPLIFIED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY terms of “I launched the Hobie Cat from Fort Walton beach”.  DID I SAY IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO LIMIT OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING …. WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE? ….. I JUST DID THAT VERY THING, i.e. I DROPPED OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE as is COMMONLY DONE in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

I should have qualified my remark and instead said that …IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO LIMIT OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TO MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING….WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE…. (here comes the zinger) … WITHOUT LOSING ESSENTIAL MEANING.   This LOSS OF MEANING in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is AN EXPOSURE because in order to capture IN LANGUAGE our sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD WORLD wherein everything is in flux, we need A LANGUAGE that has such a capability; i.e. our language must be capable of dealing with WAVE-FIELD structure which has “BOTH” REAL “AND” IMAGINARY aspects as in REPRESENTATION which consists of BOTH the “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” (i.e. that which we refer to as “REAL”)  and the “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” (i.e. that which we refer to as “IMAGINARY”). 

FLOW-BASED LANGUAGES or rather FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS can have this capability, as for example, where we take the trouble to INCLUDE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as in; THE TOWN IS GROWING and there is a conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS SO THAT WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON IS TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE.   We “COULD” but WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “DO NOT” SAY THIS while indigenous aboriginals, speaking in FLOW-BASED rather than BEING-based terms say the equivalent of “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” where there is NO NEED TO MESS AROUND WITH MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATES because FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE does NOT SPLIT FLOW , such as TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE down into BEING-based FRAGMENTS such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING and the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING’ .  By REMOVING the NOUNS “TOWN” and “WILDERNESS” and substituting FLOW-based terms (VERBS), we get “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  where EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX and is in a RELATIONAL CONTEXT without depency on BEING and the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING and thus is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.  “The TOWN is GROWING” divides out this FRAGMENT and provides an IMPRESSION of a SOLITARY TOWN that is GROWING as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which is OBSCURANTIST in that it DROPS OUT the conjugate SHRINKING WILDERNESS.

There are the basics of what we have to GET STRAIGHT as preparation for ACKNOWLEDGING OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

* * * * * *  END AUTHOR’S HIGHLIGHTED “MUST KEEP IN MIND” NOTE * * * * *

THE SHIFT…… “FROM”In this case our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is loaded with ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITIONS “ON THEIR OWN” (without the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE), hence we say ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ without mentioning the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus we fail to capture the TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE, which “IS” CAPTURED when both conjugates are used as in “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”

There are a few things to pull together in one’s mind here, and I will LIST them as follows;

-1-  The WESTERN CULTURE use of phrases such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING” ‘cheats’ in the sense captured by Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite logical propositions, such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ and while this may be a PERFECTLY “TRUE” PROPOSITION, “IT IS NOT COMPLETE” because it is impossible for the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamic of THE TOWN IS GROWING, without at the same time having a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS”

-2- THE WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing scheme gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE to the abstraction of BEING (there is no such thing in the transforming relational continuum aka the all-including WAVE-FIELD).  In MODERN PHYSICS as also in indigenous aboriginal culture linguistic conceptualizing, as in nature, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, which is why the indigenous aboriginals and MODERN PHYSICS employ linguistic conceptualizing that gives the equivalent of “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”

-3- To say ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is describing something that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as contrasts with linguistic conceptualizing that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.  Keep in mind that the indigenous aboriginal may be thinking about how much the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING while observing what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are talking about in terms of ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’, and since the indigenous aboriginal is using a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE, there is no suggestion of BEING-based THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES like “TOWNS” that are “GROWING and DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”, a is our WESTERN CULTURE common “BEING-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING”.

-4- Nietzsche points out that when we use the combination of a NAME and A VERB, this is a DOUBLE ERROR because when we put these two together, we FABRICATE the impression of LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.  THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD dynamic aka the TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (Bohm).  LOCAL AUTHORING IS A DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, and to infuse LOCAL AUTHORING INTO OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS TO INJECT THE NOTION OF FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

For example, the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE has a problem BECAUSE WESTERN CULTURE has DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “WAVE-FIELD” CONJUGATE and SUBSTITUTED ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE which DUMBS DOWN the “WAVE-FIELD” by SUBSTITUTING ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE …. * * * * NOTA BENE, … A WAVE-FIELD DOES NOT ACTUALLY BREAK DOWN INTO A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PEAK AND A FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING TROUGH, that is just a description of APPEARANCE.  WHAT I AM SAYING IS THAT WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, in coming up with the THIN SKULL RULE, is LIMITING THE AUTHORING OF THE DAMAGE FULLY AND SOLELY TO THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and NOT ACKNOWLEDGING THE CONJUGATE ROLE OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING because everywhere we look, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is BLOCKING FROM OUR CONSIDERATION, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE influence.   Consider how the careless smoker will be convicted of starting the forest fire BY HIS ACT OF CARELESS DISPOSAL OF A CIGARETTE BUTT even if in a RAIN FOREST which is most of the time SOPPING WET and would require a BLOW-TORCH to get a fire going, … but even RAIN FORESTS GET TINDER DRY in the SUMMER HEAT and ready to explode into flames with the spark from a chain saw striking a rock.

We live in a WAVE-FIELD REALITY which is all taken care of if one has a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE but if one has a BEING-based language where action is captured by LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is LIMITED to WHAT MATERIAL THINGS (THINGS-THAT-BE) DO, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, then all one ‘talks about’ is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE …. AS IF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING TINDER DRY CONDITION of the FOREST HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT, and THAT WE NEED ONLY ACKNOWLEDGE THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CARELESS TOSSING OF THE CIGARETTE BUTT.

RECALL GOEDEL’S THEOREM of the INCOMPLETENESS of all LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.  WE CAN SAY THAT ‘THE CIGARETTE BUTT CAUSED THE FOREST FIRE’ but that is NOT the FULL STORY because in rainy season that would never happen, and what is REALLY GOING ON is the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC involving the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE TOGETHER WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJGUATE.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

WE could speak of this in terms of LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM versus BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM and who indigenous aboriginal cultures are using the former while we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using the latter.   BINARY LOGIC is only good for whether the cigarette butt EITHER did OR did not cause the forest fire THIS HAS US FOCUS ON THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT.  QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE and takes into account the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INCLUDING MEDIUM that OVER-RIDES THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

Indigenous aboriginal JUSTICE is RESTORATIVE JUSTICE which is QUANTUM LOGIC based.  The HEALING CIRCLE is formed to address the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT influence on what MANIFESTS as LOCAL and EXPLICIT (i.e. the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is understood as ONLY ‘APPEARANCE’ as is also the case in MODERN PHYSICS, while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (the hot weather that made the forest tinder dry which is nonlocal and implicit, … the influence of which DOMINATED OVER the LOCAL and EXPLICIT careless discarding of the cigarette butt).

Likewise, unaddressed buildups of relational tensions in the social collective, if left unaddressed, may give rise to some VIOLENT OUTBURSTS for which the local and explicit OUTBURST is only the LOCAL and EXPLICIT APPEARANCE aspect (e.g. the HMAS killings).  While WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE tends to be SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based, as has been foundation in the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, indigenous aboriginal belief traditions, like MODERN PHYSICS, have an understanding the EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) in which case VIOLENT OUTBURSTS are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) in origin, hence the convening of HEALING CIRCLES with full community representation and not simply those directly associated with the VIOLENCE.   The understanding is that unadressed NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TENSIONS in the SOCIAL MATRIX are the PRIMARY SOURCE while the actual VIOLENT ACTS with the individual HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN are ‘Schaumkommen’ (APPEARANCE).

If this seems STRANGE, it is worth bringing to mind that traditional indigenous aboriginal world-view is a copy of MODERN PHYSICS understanding (the QUANTUM LOGIC based understanding wherein everything is related [mitakuye oyasin] as where material forms are condensations of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  Bohm has pointed out this agreement between indigenous aboriginal traditional understanding and MODERN PHYSICS understanding.

WESTERN CULTURE has opted to put BINARY LOGIC in the foundational role for understanding rather than QUANTUM LOGIC which means that the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ascends to the PRIMARY REALITY position, a result of SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which means that the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “GOES MISSING” (hence the term DEA ABSCONDITA = GODDESS IN HIDING).

WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC BASED PUNITIVE JUSTICE derives from the WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTING Of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, meaning that the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is taken to be the full and complete reality, which is in conflict with MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal culture RESTORATIVE JUSTICE where the understanding is that the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is the PRIMARY REALITY (e.g. THERE IS TOWNING AND HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) while the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is Schaumkommen (APPEARANCE such that The TOWN is GROWING and the HUMAN is GROWING which are BEING based and they are LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS which as Goedel’s Theorem shows us, are TRUE but INCOMPLETE and now we can see that the INCOMPLETENESS of BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITIONS is coming from the fact that they are only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATES which we have coupled up with a kind of NULL version of the FEMALE; i.e. an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE in place of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate which is needed to make the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE ‘REAL’ (it does not exist out of the context of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

* * * * * *

There are many differences in understanding which are in favour of the indigenous aboriginal and MODERN PHYSICS options discussed above, as manifest for example, in RESTORATIVE JUSTICE and in the understanding that the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is in a NATURAL PRECEDENCE over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.  The WESTERN CULTURE HABIT of DROPPING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT comes with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as imputes LOCAL AUTHORING as Nietzsche points out.  There is NO SUCH THING in our sense-experience reality as (BEING-BASED) LOCAL AUTHORING since everything is in flux and there are no ‘BEINGS’, there are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

If we forget most of the above because of our continuing BOMBARDMENT with the WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD HABITS in the ubiquitous media based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the keystone item to remember is that the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is in a natural primacy over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and that the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is APPEARANCE.  The GROWTH of the TOWN is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and it is only APPEARANCE since the REALITY is the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE in which the GROWTH of the TOWN COMES TOGETHER WITH THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, the result overall being TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.

* * * * *

Last but not least.  While what is written here suggests that indigenous aboriginals and MODERN PHYSICS are on a more realistic tack than WESTERN CULTURE with its current BINARY LOGIC based RUSSIA – UKRAINE and ISRAEL – ISLAMIST WARS, there is no sign of WESTERN CULTURE ‘seeing the light’ and embracing the natural primacy of QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC over BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR LOGIC.   While WESTERN CULTURE IS MANY THINGS, what has got us STUCK is the BINARY LOGIC based WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE SYSTEM which we can’t get rid of because WESTERN SOCIETY is split into POLAR OPPOSITES of CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL WHICH “BOTH HAVE THEIR LADDERS UP THE WRONG TREE” which is BELIEF IN LOCAL AUTHORING which impacts the EGO among other things.  The notion of LOCAL AUTHORING is, as Nietzsche points out, something we (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) have BUILT INTO OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.

LOCAL AUTHORING is ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and as GOEDEL’s THEOREM REMINDS US, “IT IS TRUE” i.e. OUR CLAIMS OF THE SUCCESS OF OUR NATION’S PRODUCTION and DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES ARE TRUE, but the REALITY goes beyond the INCOMPLETE TRUTHS OF LOGIC and, if we pay attention instead of only LISTENING TO THE TRUTH, we will CONFIRM the INCOMPLETENESS OF THE TRUTH in not having informed us of the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS that comes with the GROWTH OF DEVELOPMENT, … in which case the LARGER REALITY is that of TRANSFORMATION that we are INCLUDED IN, which will not be told of no matter how much detail we put into our accounts of the TRUTH of our AUTHORING of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services.

The systems problem we have is called ‘LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS’.  In our WESTERN CULTURE case, we have been giving out all kinds of REWARDS and RECOGNITION for ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ of actions such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods, … which, although we don’t mention it, comes bundled with the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus with OVERALL TRANSFORMINING OF THE LANDSCAPE.

But this is minor compared to our failure to see the case for QUANTUM LOGIC RESTORATIVE JUSTICE rather than BINARY LOGIC PUNITIVE and PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE.

The WESTERN CULTURE “SYSTEM” is in far more of a mess than the WESTERN CULTURE PEOPLE in their informal activities, yet WESTERN CULTURE PEOPLE CONTINUE TO SUPPORT and PUT THEMSELVES IN THE HANDS of the DYSFUNCTIONAL WESTERN CULTURE TOP-DOWN ADMINISTERED SYSTEM.  PEOPLE ARE UPSET WITH THE SYSTEM AND WANT TO BREAK WITH IT BUT THE TWO ALTERNATIVES (CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL) ARE BOTH INFECTED WITH THE BINARY LOGIC OBSESSION WHICH IS THE SOURCE OF THE DYSFUNCTION.

* * * * * * * *