SYNOPSIS: While the all-including WAVE-FIELD is the “mother” of “condensations” such as ourselves and other material forms, the representation scheme of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has oriented one-sidedly to the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE which is unfortunate because the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE within the WAVE-FIELD realm is PRIMARY and actually INCLUDES the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE in the sense that the WAVE-FIELD includes the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE FIELD.  The LOGIC of this TOPOLOGICAL RELATION is termed QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium.

The result of our WESTERN CULTURE having ‘built this unnatural PRIMACY of the MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE into our language architecture’ is OBSCURANTISM.  An example of OBSCURANTISM is the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN CULTURE LAW which assigns FULL AND SOLE AUTHORSHIP of the breaking of the skull, to MALE ASSERTING ACTION and thus to the asserting male.  The REALITY is, however, that it is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘give’ of the skull that ‘has the predominating ‘say’ in determining the extent of the damage and THIS IS OBSCURED by our WESTERN CULTURE habit of ATTRIBUTING FULL AND SOLE AUTHORSHIP to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION.

This PSYCHOLOGICAL ERROR is because WESTERN CULTURE employs in its language architectures, as the archetype structure for action and development, the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTION given by the combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR (e.g. “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING products” … in contrast to indigenous aboriginal languages which capture the full WAVE-FIELD; i.e. BOTH FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE AND MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE, an ANDROGYNOUS combination which can be expressed by the phrase “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

The TROUBLESOME RESULT (discussed in the following text of this essay) is that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is OBSCURANTIST, by dropping out the most essential aspect of WAVE-FIELD dynamics, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate, and retaining only the MALE ASSERTING conjugate.   This equates to SUBSTITUTING the simpler BINARY LOGIC for the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC as the basic logic for constructing representations of reality.   The RESULT, as pointed out by both Nietzsche and Bohm, is psychological FRAGMENTATION impacting the users of this language. That is, QUANTUM LOGIC identifies FIGURE and GROUND distinction through CONDENSATIONS within the FLUID WAVE-FIELD so that FIGURE and GROUND are ONE, while BINARY LOGIC identifies FIGURE and GROUND distinction through MATTER in EMPTY SPACE so that FIGURE and GROUND are TWO.

In order to visualize this difference between QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC and BINARY (EITHER/OR) LOGIC we can imagine a PERSON first as a HOLOGIRAM where the CONDENSATION of energy presents the image as the BOTH/AND relation (BOTH CONDENSATION OF FIELD AND FIELD), ... and then we can imagine a PERSON as a MATERIAL BODY in a VOID where the MATTER and VOID presents the image as the EITHER MATTER/OR VOID relation.  Indigenous aboriginal languages are designed to support the QUANTUM LOGIC relation (e.g. THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) while Common Average European languages are designed to support the BINARY LOGIC relation ( e.g. The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services, as if within an empty space)..

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, insofar are we rely on our LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS, are putting ourselves into a popularized ARTIFICIAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY infected with LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM that has believing that we are living in BINARY LOGIC pseudo-world featuring MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS while our psyches are haunted by the DEA ABSCONDITA, the ghost of the missing FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE aka the all-including WAVE-FIELD.

This SUBSTITUTE REALITY has been stripped of its NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT spiritual essence, and refurbished with HOLLOW IDOLS, inspiring Nietzsche’s title; Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer (Götzen-Dämmerung, oder, Wie man mit dem Hammer philosophiert).  Just IMAGINE our improved vision of reality if we smashed the IDOL of the MALE ASSERTING TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING and could again see the ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that is TOWNING.

 

* * *

QUANTUM LOGIC SCHOLIUM:  Language is simpler when it is REDUCED from the QUANTUM LOGIC of sense-experience reality to the intellectual abstraction of BINARY LOGIC, however the price paid for the SIMPLIFICATION is “OBSCURANTISM”.

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

In other words, it is SIMPLER to use OBSCURANTISM to fashion linguistic representations of sense-experience reality in the one-sided (binary logic based) terms of MALE ASSERTING, by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING.  Instead of capturing the all-including, all-pervading WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC which includes the CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using language that REDUCES THE QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience affirmed reality to the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of ABSOLUTE MATTER in ABSOLUTE EMPTY-INFINITE SPACE as in Copernicus’ ‘THE EARTH TURNS ROUND’ which is SIMPLER than the QUANTUM LOGIC capture; ‘THERE IS EARTHING IN THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD’.

Likewise, we have the ‘Thin Skull Rule’ which we have devised because IT IS SIMPLER TO IGNORE the variable FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE that co-determines, with the MALE-ASSERTING action, the unfolding TRANSFORMATION in the holographic WAVE-FIELD.  THAT IS, there is a general pattern of WESTERN CULTURE language-based SIMPLIFYING REDUCTION FROM QUANTUM LOGIC TO BINARY LOGIC by way of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE from our LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS, which amounts to language-based OBSCURANTISM.  Further examples of this pervasive WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM include how we use language to ACCEPT the SIMPLIFIED ASSERTION that the careless smoker “AUTHORS” the forest fire without ACKNOWLEDGING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the forest that has been ‘conditioned’ by its inclusion in the desiccating hot summer atmosphere, and without which the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTION of the discarding of the cigarette (i.e. which could have been into a sopping wet rain-forest); i.e. this same act, would not have “AUTHORED” anything of the kind, this situation SCREAMING OUT TO US that this ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE AUTHORING ACTION is the OBSCURANTIST RESULT of our DROPPING OUT of the real, actual, sense-experience affirmed FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

The same phenomena of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED OBSCURANTISM is found in the case of the skier who, so we say, ‘AUTHORS THE AVALANCHE’ by skiing across a freshly snow-loaded mountain slope which, as in the THIN SKULL RULE has the FEMALE POWER OF ACCOMMODATION, which is perfectly natural in the WAVE-FIELD world we all share inclusion in.  WHAT is NOT NATURAL is the BINARY LOGIC “SIMPLIFYING” ABSTRACTION wherein we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use language to SIMPLIFY and REDUCE the NATURAL QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC to the ABSTRACT SIMPLIFYING TERMS OF BINARY LOGIC where we LINGUISTICALLY BREAK OUT THE MALE ASSERTING ASPECT of QUANTUM LOGIC as if it existed ON ITS OWN, DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (of the snow-loaded slope) and simply IGNORING it in an act of LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have thus developed a general pattern of fashioning an OBSCURANTIST “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” based on the linguistic REDUCTION of the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING “CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM” aka THE WAVE-FIELD REALITY, …  by way of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE CONJUGATE, so as to, as COPERNICUS SAYS and as is evident in the THIN SKULL RULE, “SIMPLIFY” the language-based REPRESENTATION of our actual SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD.  In other words, we OBSCURE by way of SUBSTITUTING BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION for QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY.

Our deploying of this LANGUAGE-based SIMPLIFICATION of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY; i.e. our USING this ILLUSION of A BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL OBJECTS IN EMPTY SPACE “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” has given BEING a foundational role in our ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’.

“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter! –Nietzsche

The employing of BEING as a SUBSTITUTE for QUANTUM LOGIC CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, and the use of BEING in LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY, is the source of WESTERN PSYCHOLOGICAL and PHYSICAL FRAGMENTATION.

* * * END OF QUANTUM LOGIC SCHOLIUM * * *

 

 

 

 

 

My philosophical investigation findings come out to THIS; …. Our WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European Language Architecture (Benjamin Whorf’s designation) has a built-in OBSCURANTISM which REMOVES the FEMALE CONJUGATE of our WAVE-FIELD experience in its method of LANGUAGE CAPTURE/REPRESENTATION of our sense experience.

 

The ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ exemplifies what is a more general practice that we have ‘built in’ to our CAE Language architecture.  What we do with language is to acknowledge the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE and DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and in so doing we OBSCURE the WAVE-FIELD nature of our sense-experience.   In the case of the THIN SKULL RULE, we “PRETEND” that the full damage from a blow to the skull is coming from the MALE-ASSERTING BLOW and we simply DROP OUT any acknowledgement of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING or GIVING IN of the SKULL. We do the same in the case of the tossing of a cigarette butt that we claim AUTHORS the FOREST FIRE without mentioning (i.e. DROPPING OUT AND OBSCURING) the reality of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT hot and dry weather conditioned ACCOMMODATING QUALITY of the environment-conditioned FOREST) and thus formulate LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION that captures this unfolding reality in one-sided MALE-ASSERTING terms.

 

THUS, OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF REALITY DEPARTS FROM OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY because our sense experience informs us of the long hot and dry summer which is TRANSFORMING THE CONTAINING SPACE in which we and the forest are included, so that a LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION based one-sidedly on the MALE-ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is INADEQUATE for explaining WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IN A SENSE-EXPERIENCE context and if we go ahead and use ONLY THE MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE and say that the person discarding the cigarette butt AUTHORED THE FOREST FIRE, we will be guilty of OBSCURANTISM by not mentioning THE OBVIOUS, the stuff we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of DROPPING OUT from our LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS; i.e. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE that ALWAYS comes together with the MALE-ASSERTING CONJGUATE in the WAVE-FIELD world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion therein.

 

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS ARE DESIGNED TO DROP OUT THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE!!!  THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ is a clear example wherein full and sole authoring credit is given to the MALE-ASSERTING AGENT and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, which is PRIMARY, is IGNORED.

 

(Note that in the wave-field understanding the ‘whorl in the flow’ is EMBODIED in the flow as requires QUANTUM LOGIC (where figure and ground are only ONE) rather than BINARY LOGIC where (where figure and ground are TWO).

WE MIGHT WONDER ‘WHY’ we DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, and one thing that comes to mind here is EGO which likes to lay claim to the RESULTS of one’s “MALE ASSERTING” actions even if one is the 10’s person to have tried to dislodge a rock from the mountain and send it crashing down into the valley, and succeeds.  That MALE ASSERTING ATTRIBUTION is give even though the rock had become ‘loosened’ and ‘more accommodating’ in a FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING sense; i.e. the event will be captured in the one-sided terms that when the ROCK finally GOES, the PERSSO who did that ‘FINAL’ pushing is the AUTHOR of this ACTION of sending the rock crashing down into the valley.    Likewise the oil-hunter person who drills the 100th well and discovers oil, is said to be the DISCOVERER of the oil and even if he makes some comment like “if I have gone farther than others, it is only because I have stood on the shoulders of giants”, … the event will still be captured in WESTERN CULTURE language in the simple terms of John discovered oil.  Yet the ground can become progressively better ‘known’ and ‘more accommodating (in giving up its goods)’ to the explorer in the wake of many others having added to the understanding of the region so that the adage comes to mind, that ‘we can’t step in the same river twice because it is not the same river and we are not the same person stepping into it’.  IN OTHER WORDS, WE ARE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA THE WAVE-FIELD AKA THE TAO.  This is just to say that every male-asserting action transpires in conjugate relational with a more or less accommodating female containing space.

 

SO, …  even if the ten people in trying to dislodge the rock from the mountain heights had FAILED, they may have made the land ‘more accommodating’ for those coming after in which case a statement of the form “John AUTHORED the ROCK FALLING ACTION or the AVALANCHE EVENT or etc. is OBSCURANTIST in that it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE ASPECT.

 

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONSISTENTLY EMPLOYS this SIMPLIFIED REDUCTION of the WAVE-FIELD reality to the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY, DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and thus serving up a representation that is OBSCURANTIST.

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SAY: ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, without mentioning the DEMALE ACCOMMODATING (the SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS) that opens the way for the MALE-ASSERTING GROWTH, WHEREAS, the REPRESENTATION FORMED in the indigenous aboriginal language system; i.e. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” … includes “BOTH” the MALE ASSERTING “AND” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “CONJUGATES” of the WAVE-FIELD REALITY we are included in.

 

This BOTH/AND LOGIC of the “INCLUDING MEDIUM” has been termed QUANTUM LOGIC and it is the logic employed in (needed by) MODERN PHYSICS in explaining the dynamics of nature, dynamics which are WAVE-FIELD based.

 

The design of our WESTERN CULTURE CAE LANGUAGES involves SIMPLIFICATION BUILT INTO OUR LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION SCHEME, … BUT WHAT IS THAT SIMPLIFICATION FOR?  IS IT FOR ‘EASE OF FORMULATING REPRESENTATIONS’?  OR IS IT ‘TO HIDE SOMETHING’.

 

THAT IS, ‘FEMALE ACCOMMODATING” IS THE ULTIMATE BASIS OF WAVE-FIELD NATURE AND FROM OUT OF THIS FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD COMES CONDENSATIONS THAT WE ‘SEE’ AS ‘MALE ASSERTING AGENTS’ BUT THAT ‘SEEING’, WHICH INVOLVES THE ‘ACTIONS’ OF ‘MATERIAL MALE-ASSERTING BEINGS,’ IS ILLUSION SINCE ‘BEING’ IS ABSTRACTION THAT GOES BEYOND OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE WAVE-FIELD AKA THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.”  Nietzsche, “Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer”

HOW SERIOUS IS THIS ERROR OF …  “BEING”-BASED DISTORTION … OF OUR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE?

 

REFLECTION shows us that our sense-experience reality is of our INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the TAO, and in saying this, I am not going beyond sense-experience grounded findings.   We know that the SIMPLICITY in our language based representations, wherein we have REDUCED AND SIMPLIFIED the FEMALE-ACCCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE by simply DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE gives us, … INSTEAD OF A REPRESENTATION OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, … GIVES US A REPRESENTATION OF A “SIMPLER “BEING-BASED” SUBSTITUTE REALITY” WHICH DOES NOT EXIST IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE, IT ONLY EXISTS IN OUR INTELLECTUAL IMAGINATION where it is possible to IMAGINE THE EXISTENCE of LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES (BEINGS) as if EXISTING IN THEIR OWN RIGHT (as if residing as separate entities in an absolute empty space of infinite extent) instead of understanding relational forms directly from our sense-experience as inclusions in the transforming relational continuum wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, which is the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding.

 

THAT IS, IN OUR LANGUAGE-STIMULATED, INTELLECTUAL, ABSTRACTION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, the relational flow-forms now have PERSISTING THING-IN-ITSELF BEING that we have endowed them with by way of NAMING them, NOT WITH FLUID-RELATIONAL NAMES like DANCES WITH WOLVES, but with ABSTRACT DISCONNECTED BEING-based NAMES like “JOHN DUNBAR” SIGNIFYING THEIR INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE AND THEIR CANDIDACY FOR GRAMMAR BASED LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT. (recall that relation forms in a fluid flow are not LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and developments, we cannot snatch the WHORL out of the FLOW, throw it on the dry deck and see it flipping about like a FISH OUT OF WATER i.e. the WHORL and the flow have QUANTUM LOGIC relation rather than BINARY LOGIC relation).

 

IN NAMING as in the example JOHN DUNBAR,  WE SEE THE EQUIVALENT OF THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’. THE BASIC FORMULA IS TO REMOVE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE FROM OUR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION AND ABSTRACTLY ESTABLISH THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE AS THE FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING AGENCY, OBSCURING THE PRIMARY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD AGENCY.  “DANCING WITH WOLVES” brings fort the QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION while JOHN DUNBAR AUTHORS THIS OR THAT ACTION brings forth the BINARY LOGIC RELATION.  This is also the distinction in the reduction from ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE to … ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’   Our representation moves from purely relational INCLUSION IN TRANSFORMATION which is ANDROGYNOUS, …  to MALE-ASSERTING LOCAL AUTHORING ACTION and RESULTS, implying a reduction of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE to an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFITE SPACE, and an associated RE-ASSIGNMENT OF ALL FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD POWER to the MALE ASSERTING AGENT.  The THROWER OF THE PUNCH is recast as the FULL AND SOLE AUTHOR of the FRACTURING OF THE SKULL of the ‘ACCOMMODATOR’ of the MALE-ASSERTING PUNCHING ACTION.  This is OBSCURANTISM.

  

WHATEVER THE INTENTION, WESTERN CULTURE CAE LANGUAGES are OBSCURANTIST since while our sense-experience is of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD which has a FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE STRUCTURE, our language-based REPRESENTATION SCHEME “REDUCES” the REPRESENTATION to the ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION” which introduces an OBSCURANTISM of the type exemplified in the THIN SKULL RULE where FULL CREDIT FOR UNFOLDING EVENTS is ATTRIBUTED TO THE MALE-ASSERTING which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT in SPACE and TIME though it is evident to us that in ‘going with this’, we are OBSCURING the REAL and ULTIMATELY FOUNDATIONAL INFLUENCE of THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING which is IMPLICIT AND NONLOCAL IN SPACE-TIME.

 

After many have tried to jar loose the large rock at the top of the mountain, someone will come along and be the one to claim that they AUTHORED the launching of that rock into its powerful crashing descent into the valley below.  The rock formation was NOT NEARLY SO ACCOMMODATING to many who had gone before but they had managed to ‘loosen’ it and weaken its attachment to the more stable porting of the rock formation, … so that it was far more ACCOMMODATING to the MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS of the LATTER ROCK-PUSHER, … but TO SIMPLIFY the LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATION of unfolding activity, we are in the habit of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of our WAVE-FIELD sense-experience reality and GO SOLELY WITH THE MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE in constructing our language based SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  Why would we fashion language based representation that FALSELY gives full credit to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION and thus imply FULL AND SOLE ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’?

 

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

 

IT IS SIMPLER TO FASHION LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS BY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE SINCE THE MALE-ASSERTING ON ITS OWN IS SO MUCH SIMPLER.  THE THIN SKULL RULE IS EMPLOYED FOR THIS SAME PURPOSE, TO DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING INFLUENCE SINCE IT IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT AND IS ROOTED IN UNENDING SPACE-TIME.   LET’S FACE IT, SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY IS TOO COMPLEX TO BE CAPTURED IN LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION AND FEMALE ACCOMMODATING IS THE WRENCH IN THE HANG-UP.   MALE-ASSERTING ONLY “OBSCURANTISM” HERE WE COME, THREE CHEERS FOR THE SIMPLICITY OF THE MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE “ON ITS OWN’, ADIOS FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.

 

BY INVENTING ‘BEING’ AS IN ‘LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING’, WE INVENT WITH IT, ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, AND THIS BINARY LOGIC BASED COMBINATION SERVES WELL TO SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS … OF, … OF ,…. ER, … NOT OF REALITY, BUT OF A SIMPLIFIED ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ BASED ON EXTRICATING THE MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE FROM ITS CONJUGAL RELATION WITH THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, AND LET’S FACE IT, THAT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE IS A BITCH BECAUSE IT DRAGS US AND OUR REPRESENATIONAL UNDERTAKING INTO THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT AS IS THE TRICKY NATURE OF THE WAVE-FIELD, SO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING JUST GOES ON FOREVER LIKE A NEVER-ENDING LANDSCAPE.  GOING WITH THE MALE ASSERTING ON ITS OWN IS FAR SIMPLER.

 

* * *

 

 

The BOTTOM LINE in this;…  A (N EVEN SHORTER) SHORT SUMMARY  … is thus, …

 

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS DESIGNED TO DEVELOP WORD-BASED REPRESENTATIONS THAT ARE OBSCURANTIST IN THAT THEY ‘DROP OUT’ THE FEMALE CONJUGATE OF THE WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC THAT IS BEING REPRESENTED , SO AS TO SIMPLIFY THE REPRESENTATIONS, CHOPPING THEM BACK TO MALE-ASSERTING-CONJUGATE-ONLY (DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE).

 

NOTE THAT THE AUTHORING AGENCY INNATE IN THE WAVE-FIELD WHICH ONE MIGHT SAY IS COMING FROM THE COMBINATON OF FEMALE ACCOMMODATING PULL AND MALE ASSERTING PUSH AND THUS IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT, … IS RE-CAST IN TERMS OF MALE ASSERTING AUTHORING ACTION.

 

THE REMOVAL OF FEMALE ACCOMMODATING AS THE BASIC ACTIONAL QUALITY OF THE WAVE-FIELD WHICH IS THE SOURCE OF CONDENSATIONS IN THE WAVE-FIELD IS ‘OBSCURANTIST’ IN THE SAME SENSE AS THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ WHERE THE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF ACTION IS REDUCED TO MALE-ASSERTING BY THE REMOVAL OF FEMALE ACCOMMODATING FROM THE LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION, PUTTING THE LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION ‘AT  ODDS WITH’ SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.  HERE THE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION IS GIVING THE ERRONEOUS IMPRESSION OF MALE ASSERTING AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS WITH NO MENTION OF THE PRIMARY ROLE OF FEMALE ACCOMMODATING AS IN THE SKULL GIVING WAY TO ACCOMMODATE THE MALER-ASSERTING PUNCHING ACTION.  THIS ‘CANCELLING’ OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE IS OBSCURANTISM  THAT WE HAVE BUILT INTO WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE OBSCURES THE PRIMARY AGENCY OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD, AND FALSELY PROMOTES THE SECONDARY PHENOMENON OF CONDENSATION, GIVING THE CONDENSATIONS LOCAL ‘BEING’ AND MALE ASSERTING AUTHORING POWERS ‘OF THEIR OWN’, THANKS TO THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR..

 

THIS OBSCURANTISM LEADS TO FRAGMENTATION BY FALSELY ‘LIBERATING’ THE CONDENSATIONS IN THE WAVE-FIELD, RECASTING THEM AS ‘INDEPENDENT BEINGS’, NOTIONALLY WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  This has become the basis for the SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is currently being employed as the WESTERN CULTURE ‘operative reality’.   Because it is OBSCURANTIST, it is leading to constant clashes between our SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONDITIONED BEHAVIOURS that are consistent with the BEING based SUBSTITUTE REALITY and our sense-experience guided BEHAVIOURS shaped directly from our inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD.

 

The fallout is FRAGMENTATION where we are guided by our OBSCURANTIST LANGUAGE where we give it precedence over our sense experience; e.g. where our actions orient to ABSTRACTIONS such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION in a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, … rather than to our sense-experience affirmed inclusion in the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD (wherein material forms are condensations of the WAVE-FIELD as in the BOTH/AND relation) aka the transforming relational continuum aka the Tao.

 

* * *

 

In include Bohm’s observation on FRAGMENTATION which is the result of our having architected our language bey DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and promoting the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGUATE

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc