UNDERSTANDING THE EAST-WEST PSYCHOLOGICAL SPLIT

INTRODUCTION: 

Understanding the EAST-WEST PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC SPLIT requires reflection on how it is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have architected LANGUAGE on a VOYEUR VIEWER BASIS where we SEE THE TOWN GROWING.  It is this VOYEUR VIEW that has us using BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.   If we are understanding ourselves as INCLUDED IN THE WORLD, our LANGUAGE STRUCTURE shifts and we use non-voyeur lead-off terms like ‘THERE IS”.  In the indigenous aboriginal language, ‘THERE IS” humaning and towning in the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  Sentences like this employ the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM rather than BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC as in ‘the VOYEUR VIEW OF “THE TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.

When we use language that casts us as a VOYEUR of the world dynamic, we are PSYCHOLOGICALLY FRAGMENTING REALITY and TAKING OURSELVES OUT OF THE PLACE WE ARE OBSERVING.  This gives us the sense that our own local actions are not tied up within the transforming relational continuum and thus have no bearing on what is happening OUT THERE.  This is the FLAT-SPACE view where we dump our rubbish off the stern of the boat without imagining that we will be later ploughing into it ‘bow-first’.  One might say that language can give us the impression of living in a FLAT SPACE rather than in a SPHERICAL SPACE because in a SPHERICAL SPACE we have the sense of GESTALT wherein ‘everything is related’ as in WAVE-FIELD reality.

What is happening in the UKRAINE and RUSSIA, as seen through WESTERN CULTURE CONDITIONED ‘EYES’ is not seen asdirectly impacting ‘what is going on LOCALLY’, but in a GESTALT sense, as is supported by MODERN PHYSICS, we live within an all-including transforming relational continuum wherein SUBOPTIMIZATION IS IMPOSSIBLE.  Yet in WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENCY, SUBOPTIMIZATION is the PSYCHOLOGICALLY FRAGMENTING NORM wherein, because of the format of our LANGUAGE, it is POPULAR to actually BELIEVE that we can sub-optimize our own ‘NATION’ in spite of the GESTALT impression wherein ‘everything is related’ (mitakuye oyasin).  The sense of FRAGMENTATION is coming from the psycho-linguistic dynamics such as DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE which are supported by WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE with its DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

To WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, NOT ONLY DO ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE’ that seem to ‘make sense’ and to support what seems to be a REALITY articulated by DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based ABSTRACTION, but are now ‘using that “REALITY”‘ as the WESTERN CULTURE POPULAR ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’, which is the source of GROWING FRAGMENTATION of WESTERN PSYCHICAL and PHYSICAL ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS. But as the SYSTEMS SCIENCES remind us, as well as MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, such FRAGMENTATION IS NOT REAL (i.e. does not have a SENSE-EXPERIENCE based foundation) and the motions of millions of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS that affirm abstractions such as INDEPENDENT NATIONS do not MAKE SUCH INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION ‘REAL’ but merely demonstrate that language-stimulated psychological abstraction is capable of cultivating physical systems of organizing that are ungrounded in sense-experience reality.  The psyche may be convinced of its ability to ‘walk through fire’ or to ‘suboptimize’ and construct a local independent nation that is superior to all other ‘independent nations’  and this ‘suboptimizing game’ may play out for a long while, as it has been playing out among WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS without ever checking out whether ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE’ had any traction in sense-experience reality beyond the intellectual role-plays they stimulate (since we live in a WAVE-FIELD world wherein everything is related, the DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE can only be a linguistic-intellectual abstraction that stands or falls on the commitment of supporters).

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence…”

 — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

SUBOPTIMIZATION is an UNREAL (BINARY LOGIC based) source of psycho-physical FRAGMENTATION infecting WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES, which is important in understanding THE EAST-WEST PSYCHOLOGICAL SPLIT .

* * * end of introduction * * * 

Our use of LANGUAGE ‘CONDITIONS’ the way we THINK about the world.  While we live within a WAVE-FIELD, what we loosely call ‘the WEST’ refers to a LANGUAGE GROUP that has DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLLING WAVE_FIELD CONJUGATE from its (our) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and is using a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING STRUCTURE..   So, for example, the basis WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION is, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, “FRAGMENTED” by the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and employing a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which REDUCES REALITY (i.e. reduces language based conceptualization of reality) to the familiar ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY “SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY” where we way things like ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.

This WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT” the female accommodating/enabling WAVE-FIELD FIELD CONJUGATE and ‘goes with’ ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

THIS HAS MAJOR PROBLEMATIC CONSEQUENCES such as, to give one example, the CONSERVATIVE — LIBERAL POLARIZED OPPOSITION.  This coverservative – liberal SPLIT derives from DROPPING OUT, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which, in the real (beyond language) senes-experience world of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD, which is comprised of “BOTH” FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE “AND” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

This “BOTH” / “AND” CONJUGATE RELATION is basic to the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC, and it is captures in MODERN PHYSICS, and in indigenous aboriginal languages and in the language architectures of Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, BUT NOT IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, because WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE has opted to SIMPLIFY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and going with a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “ONLY” CONCEPTUALIZATION.

SO, INSTEAD OF THE MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta WAVE-FIELD supportive ANDROGYNOUS STRUCTURE in LANGUAGE, the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, leaving WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE WITH ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, … hence the FULL WAVE-FIELD LANGUAGE ARTICULATION such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE goes ONLY WITH THE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE of ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services‘ which SAY NOTHING ABOUT THE CONJUGATE SHIRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE THAT IS INCLUDED IN MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta languages.

This LINGUISTIC DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE FROM WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES is the source of FRAGMENTATION IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONDITIONS PSYCHES AND BEHAVIOURS

This SIMPLIFYING, DIMINISHING REDUCTION of the WAVE-FIELD in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, WHICH REDUCES THE CONEPTUALIZATION TO ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY TERMS INFUSES FREAGMENTATION of VARIOUS TYPES into WESTERN CULTURE DISCOURSE and FROM THERE INTO WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHES AND BEHAVIOURS, as has been described By David Bohm under the heading FRAGMENTATION in his ‘Wholeness and the Implicate Order’.

One of the ways in which FRAGMENTATION MANIFESTS as a result of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE IN LANGUAGE, is in the WESTERN CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL SPLIT.  This FRAGMENTATION IS DUE TO THE “FIRST MISTAKE” where the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR “CONJURES UP” the notional SPLIT into TWO TYPES OF “LOCAL AUTHORING” (THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING IN THE REAL WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD).

“LOCAL AUTHORING” is the synthetic artifact created with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is NOT ONLY A NON-EXISTING LANGUAGE BASED ABSTRACTION but an ABSTRACTION which is SPLIT into a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and FEMALE ACOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE FORM.   These TWO INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS are the DEFINING BASIS of the terms of LOCAL AUTHORING termed CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL where the former (CONSERVATIVE) is IMAGINED to be AUTHORING which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and described as MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALLIZING actions and developments while the LIBERAL is IMAGINED to be AUTHORING which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as might develop within a social collective while it may MANIFEST through particular individual LIGHTNING RODS is understood as deriving from the social collective.

MEANWHILE, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING”, IT IS THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR as Nietzsche has pointed out, … but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have the BLINDERS ON and are charging forward with the FALSE and FRAGMENTATIVE UNDERSTANDING that LOCAL AUTHORING is something REAL in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONTEXT.  LOCAL AUTHORING IS “NOT REALI”!  IT IS A DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR.

CAN WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS OVERLOOK THE REALITY THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” AND USE “LOCAL AUTHORING” AS THE BASIS FOR THE “CONSERVATIVE” – “LIBERAL” SCHISM?   “YES WE CAN AND WE DO, BECAUSE LANGUAGE IS LIKE THAT; I.E. WE CAN USE LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCT WHAT WE SHALL “REALITY” AS WE SEE FIT AND IN THE CASE OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, we are using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to imply “LOCAL AUTHORING” of TWO TYPES, the CONSERVATIVE “LOCAL AUTHORING” which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT in the sense of ORIGINATING IN AN INDIVIDUAL and in terms of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, … and the LIBIERAL “LOCAL AUTHORING” which is LOCAL and IMPLICIT and manifests through a LIGHTNING ROD who is NOT THE LOCAL ORIGINATING AUTHOR of the action but the CONDUIT to the relation dynamics that brew up within the social collective.

The CONSERVATIVE belief is that the INDIVIDUAL is the PRIMARY AUTHORING SOURCE of actions and development while the LIBEERAL belief is that the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is the PRIMARY AUTHORING SOURCE which operates through INDIVIDUALS as CONDUITS.  This is why LIBERALS do NOT believe that the JUSTICE SYSTEM should work by simply ATTRIBUTING the INJURIOUS ACTIONS of an individual TO THE INDIVIDUAL; e.g.

“while representing 4.1 percent of the overall Canadian population, Indigenous adults accounted for almost 30 percent of total custodial admissions in 2016-2017 (Statistics Canada 2016a; Statistics Canada, 2017a

In other words, the LIBERAL view is that individuals can be CONDUITS for relational dissonance that brews up within the social collective, without being the LOCAL JUMPSTART AUTHOR of VIOLENT ACTIONS that “APPEAR” to “ORIGINATE” from him but where he is instead a CONDUIT for the release of tensions developing with the relational matrix of the social collective.

In MODERN PHYSICS as also in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS SUCH AS TO OFFER THE QUANTUM LOGIC or WAVE-FIELD option of understanding dynamics wherein the REPRESENTATION of VIOLENCE may be understood in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (WAVE-FIELD) terms and not be constrained ot LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘OBSCURANTIST’ conceptualizations.   Again, the language may speak in the QUANTUML LOGIC terms of ‘TOWNING in the transforming landscape’ rather than in the BINARY LOGIC terms of ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’, the latter being the SIMPLIFIED “LOCAL AUTHOR” conceptualization generated with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

The above may be summarized in terms that The LINGUISTIC DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE FROM WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES is the source of FRAGMENTATION IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONDITIONS PSYCHES AND BEHAVIOURS

When we speak flatly and simply in the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING TERMS OF LOCAL AUTHORING, we are GENERATING FRAGMENTATION.

UNDERSTANDING THE EAST-WEST PSYCHOLOGICAL SPLIT invokes an understanding of how WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE reduces LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of ‘REALITY’ to one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATES by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and thus FRAGMENTAING the WAVE-FIELD REALITY of our SENSE-EXPEIRENCE of INCLUSION IN THE WAVE-FIELD.

The CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL FRAGMENTATION is an ARTEFACT of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE from the WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, which leaves behind ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONCEPTUALIZATION which SPLITS INTO TWO POLAR OPPOSITE OPTIONS akin to whether HURRICANES STIR UP THE ATMOSPHERE or whether THE ATMOSPHERE STIRS UP THE HURRICANES.

NOTE that we have already REDUCED THE ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE to a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY “BINARY LOGIC” CONFIGURATION (does the hurricane stir up the atmosphere or does the atmosphere stir up the hurricane:

ACHTUNG! NOTA BENE:  The wording of that text is imposing the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC OPTION WITH ITS TWO POLAR OPPOSITE CHOICIES.  In the REAL WORLD of our SENSE EXPERIENCE, there is NOT JUST TWO BINARY OPPOSITIE OPTIONS, that is the INCLUDED THIRD of QUANTUM LOGIC.

INSTEAD of thinking with BLINDERS ON in the BINARY LOGIC POLARIZING TERMS OF WHETHER THE (male asserting) HURRICANE STIRS UP THE female accommodating/enabling) ATMOSPHERE OR WHETHER THE (female accommodating/enabling) ATMOSPHERE STIRS UP THE (male asserting/actualizing) HURRICANE, …. WHY NOT STOP BEING A VOYEUR and ACKNOWLEDGE THE SOLAR IRRADIANCE “OVERHEAD’ (in the space ONE IS INCLUDED IN) which is the ENERGIZING SOURCE of the SPLTTING INTO MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING HURRICANE and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ATMOSPHERE?  . Both of those MALE and FEMALE AUTHORING CONCEPTUALZATIONS are exemplifying LOCAL AUTHORING which is innately SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

The CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL POLARIZING STANDOFF IS THE ARTEFACT OF FIRST MAKING THE MISTAKE OF ACCEPTING THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR THAT FABRICATES THE ABSTRACTION OF ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’.  ONLY WHEN WE HAVE BEEN MESMERIZED BY LANGUAGE TO THINKING THAT THERE IS LOCAL AUTHORING DO WE OPEN THE DOOR TO THE CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL POLARIZING SPLIT OVER WITH THE “LOCAL AUTHORING” is CONSERVATIVE (ONE-TO-MANY) OR LIBERAL (MANY-TO-ONE).   BUT THERE IS NO ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ SO THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL SPLIT; it is the ARTEFACT OF BELIEF IN (DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR FABRICATED) “LOCAL AUTHORING”.

This has all been said in this essay series, in a number of different approaches and formulations which arise from the different, competing LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES that are in use.  As stated repeatedly, our WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is a DUMBED DOWN ARCHITECTURE that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is essential in conveying WAVE-FIELD reality which is the REALIT OF OUR SENE-EXPERIENCE.  The REDUCED INTELLECTUAL-LINGUISTIC PSEUDO-REALITIES we come up with and use as simple COMMUNICATIONS TOOLS SIMPLIFY REALITY by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and employing ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALYZING CONJUGATE as if in an ABOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.   This results in the LOSS OF CAPABILITY OF CONCEPTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

So, as it stands, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, which DUMBS DOWN our sense-experience reality by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and thus generating LANGUAGE BASED FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY (e.g. featuring things like TOWNS THAT GROW, DEVELOPING and PRODUCE goods and services) is the current FOUNDATIONAL SOURCE of what we take to be our OPERATIVE REALITY, which is why Bohm is out there with his WARNING because our current and continuing WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SCHEME is the SOURCE OF CONTINUING FRAGMENTION, both PSYCHOLOGICAL and SOCIAL.  E.G. the MASS SHOOTINGS are NOT COMING from the EASTERN and INDIGENOUS ABORIGNAL understanding of mitakuye oyasin (everything is related), the MASS SHOOTINGS are coming the continuing entrenching of misguided belief in LOCAL AUTHORING on the part of the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONDITIONED MIND which has become the continuing source of FRAGMENTATION that is PSYCHOLOGICAL and SOCIAL.

* * *

SHORT VERSION of “Why We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS Need a NEW LANGUAGE”

WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD.   We are CONDENSATIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

THIS IS THE UNDERSTANDING of MODERN PHYSICS and it implies a QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH/AND” structure which means that material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD so that instead of our old BINARY LOGIC understanding in terms of MATTER and SPACE as TWO INDEPENDENT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE THINGS, we now understand reality in terms of ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD within which those things we identify as MATERIAL FORMS are NO LONGER INDEPENDENT of the ‘SPACE’ they are in because that invisible SPACE is now understood as the INVISIBLE WAVE-FIELD WHICH IS THE SOURCE OF EVERYTHING and the MATERIAL FORMS are lumps of energy or energy CONDENSATIONS in the all-including WAVE-FIELD so that what we see as MATERIAL FORMS are regions of the wavefield that have CONDENSED so all there is, the entire space of the universe, is WAVE-FIELD and what we see as PLANETS and MOONS and MATERIAL FORMS whether asteroids of whatever ARE NOT LOCAL MATERIAL THINGS IN THEMSELVES, they are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

How that means we are not seeing MATERIAL BODIES and their ACTIONS and INTERACTIONS as in NEWTONIAN PHYSICS, which employs BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC that implies that MATERIAL FORMS and something unique and independent and separate from the EMPTY SPACE that we have thought of as FILLING the ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

NO! NO! NO! That was the old physics, not MODERN PHYSICS and in MODERN PHYSICS the old BINARY LOGIC split between MATTER and EMPTINESS is not longer a reality (it never was), and in MODERN PHYSICS the entire universe is comprised of WAVE-FIELD within which the MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS which gives us the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation; i.e. the material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which gives a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation.  The material form is BOTH a material form AND the all-including WAVE-FIELD it is included in and this BOTH/AND relation IS THE QUANTUM LOGIC relation.

When we understand reality in this manner, we can see that the WAVE-FIELD field is THE WHOLE REALITY and that the overall dynamic is TRANSFORMATION of the WAVE-FIELD because when IT LOOKS AS IF MATERIAL FORMS ARE MOVING THROUGH THE WAVE-FIELD, there are no FORMS-THAT-MOVE, there is only TRANSFORMATION of the overall WAVE-FIELD and that “APPEARS” to us as if there are THINGS MOVING, but THERE ARE NO THINGS and thus there are no THINGS THAT MOVE, there is only TRANSFORMATION of the overall WAVE-FIELD and WHAT LOOKS LIKE THINGS MOVING AROUND is “APPEARANCE” (Schaumkommen in Schroedinger’s language).

This POINT about REALITY is not only of basic importance, IT IS HARD FOR US TO GET USED TO because OUR POPUARE, EVERYDAY LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “WAS” and “CONTINUES TO BE” “BINARY LOGIC BASED”.

OK, SURE, WE NEED TO UPDATE OUR LANGUAGE TO QUANTUM LOGIC STATUS where what we say makes sense in a QUANTUM LOGIC manner, and IF AND WHEN WE DO (we are not there today, we are flat stuck in BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE MODE), .. then we will have a LANGUAGE like the indigenous aboriginal language architecture and Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta language architecture, all of which give the foundational role to QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where we say things like ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where we can see the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation between the TOWNING and the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE; i.e. the TOWNING IS THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE; i.e. the TOWNING is a FEATURE within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in the same sense that the WHORLING is a feature in the FLOWING as in the case of the HURRICANING IN THE TRANSFORMING ATMOSPHERING.

Note that while language lets us MAKE UP LANGUAGE such as ‘the HURRICANE IS STIRRING UP THE ATMOSPHERE’ and/or ‘the ATMOSPHERE IS STIRRING UP THE HURRICANE, … this BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION is not real because IT IS NEITHER TRUE THAT THE HURRICANE IS AUTHORING THE MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING SPIN  OF THE HURRICANE in the ATMOSPHERE NOR IS IT TRUE THAT THE ATMOSPHERE IS AUTHORING THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SUCKING SPIN OF THE ATMOSPHERE.  What is TRUE is that SOLAR IRRADIANCE is INDUCING this CONJUGATE MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING THRUST-SPIN in conjugate relation with the CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SUCK SPIN.

There is NO BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC (male asserting/actualizing or female accommodating/enabling)  dynamic going on here, that is just APPEARANCE and what is going on is the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where it only WITHIN the INCUDING MEDIUM that we see TWO POLAR OPPOSITE MALE ASSERTING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING DYNAMICS.

This is TRICKY because we tend to think in FLAT SPACE TERMS but if we think in terms of the FLUID SURFACE OF THE EARTH, we know that the MALE ASSERTING EXTRUSIONS OF MOLTEN ROCK FROM VOLCANOS is going on at the same time as FEMALE ACCOMMODATING SUBDUCTION OF SEDIMENTS that UNDERGO MELTDOWN AS THEY SINK DOWN AND INTO THE CENTRE OF THE EARTH and this is what is constituting the SPHERING because there is no SPHERE THA IS EXTRUDING STUFF and no SPHERE THAT IS SUBDUCTING, the inner-outer fluid dynamic shows up as a dynamic SPHERING which is a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD so we can’t legitimately invent a SPHERE with the GRAMMAR GIVEN POWERS OF EXTRUDING AND SUBDUCTING.  THE SPHERE IS NOT THE LOCAL OF ITS OWN TRANSFORMING, IT IS INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION.

This is problematic because we continue to teach our childing that the EARTH extrudes molten materials and that the EARTH subducts older sediments as if ‘the EARTH’ has ITS OWN LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS.   That’s one of those simplifying fairy-tales we feed our children because its easier to talk about;

As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’

How many students or news reporters will stop, after speaking about extrusions from active volcano’s and say, … it is not true that the volcanos are extruding molten rock, the volcano’s are just the male asserting/actualizing conjugate in an overall WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC which includes a female accommodating/enabling conjugate, these two conjugates being aspects of WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION.

WHOOPS, I just mentioned the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND TRUTH of what is going on, which is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR extrusion and subduction polar opposites and in the process ‘strayed’ from our common WESTERN CULTURE TEACHING PRACTICE wherein the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy.

WE JUST CAUGHT OURSELVES IN A COMMONLY MADE “LIE” that we used to SIMPLIFY REALITY.  In this case we pretended that we could understanding the dynamics of the earth without mentioning that the EARTH is a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which requires QUANTUM LOGIC while we used a BINARY LOGIC SIMPLIFICATION so that we could ignore the innate primacy of the WAVE-FIELD in which the EARTH is a CONDENSATION.  SHOULD WE BE CONCERNED?   This is the SAME DOUBLE ERROR based LIE that we commonly put into our language that has been described by Nietzsche.  We use it so as to make pretend that the dynamics we are describing are LOCAL AND EXPLICIT which is a lot SIMPLER because if we open things up to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT then our explanations of what is physically going on would have to acknowledge the whole universe.   We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS involve the abstract notion of the LOCAL AUTHORING to avoid such ‘real world’ complication;

“Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”; -but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting.  If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.” – To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” — Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

We KNOW that there is a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC relation between MATTER (condensation of the wave-field) and WAVE-FIELD the uncondensed WAVE-FIELD which means THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A ‘LOCAL AUTHOR’ because what appears to a LOCAL THING is a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD meaning that EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE DIGGING OURSELVES INTO A HOLE HERE BY BUILDING THESE SIMPLIFICATIONS OF REALITY INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, as with the using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to INVOKE the ABSTRACT SIMPLIFYING PSEUDO-REALITY of LOCAL AUTHORING, by way of he DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

There DOUBLE ERROR IS THE SOURCE OF THE FRAGMENTATION that Bohm is pointing out that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are FALSELY INVOKING by BUILTING FRAGMENTATION INTO OUR LANGUAGE.

This is what I have been describing in terms of the LOCAL AUTHORING dodge where we invoke BINARY LOGIC to SIMPLIFY that which is in reality involving QUANTUM LOGIC understanding which is LESS SIMPLE.  LOCAL AUTHORING is the source of FRAGMENTATION;

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and Wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

OVERALL, we have a mess on our hands due to LANGUAGE-based FRAGMENTATION.    We are not yet addressing it because we are using this PROBLEM LANGUAGE whose ARCHITECTURE has this FRAGMENATION PROBLEM BUILT INTO IT, by way of its DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and deploying ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’

… INSTEAD OF INCLUDING THE FULL WAVE-FIELD WITH BOTH FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING and MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and in ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

This is a STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM.  THE PROBLEM POINTS TO THE NEED TO ‘UPGRADE OUR WESTERN CULTURE ‘Common Average European’ LANGUAGE which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE TO A FULL WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE LANGUAGE’ like the indigenous aboriginal language, the Taoist/Buddhist language and the Advaita Vedanta language.

While Bohm, Nietzsche, Schroedinger and others have written about this, the message does not seem to ‘get through’, perhaps because there tends to be great confidence in our WESTERN CULTURE use of our language AS IT IS, that we can get any message across that we need to get across.  Although this is NOT TRUE, we do not generally see the weakness in our language (the DROP OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE) because we feel as if we can say anything and everything we need to say with our current language.

Even when we say ‘the PUNCH shattered the man’s skull’ and we find out that the man has an EGG-SHELL SKULL, we do not react by saying, OH, YES, it was the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE that explains the shattering of the skull as the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE was too weak to be understood as the primary cause.

WE CAN’T SAY THAT because we have ENGINEERED our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE so as to DUMB DOWN the WAVE-FIELD reality of our sense-experience by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and PRETENDING as if there is NO WAVE-FIELD but that we live in a BINARY LOGIC based world consisting of MATERIAL FORMS in EMPTY SPACE, in which case, we only need the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE in our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE because we have simplified our LANGUAGE by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

So while our sense-experience is of INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which has the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING —MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE, our intellectual language based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of ‘reality’ have DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.   When I say ‘our’, I am referring to ‘us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS because MODERN PHYSICS, the indigenous aboriginals, the Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, have retained in their language architecture, THE FULL WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZING CAPABILITY.

* * * END OF SHORT VERSION OF “Why We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS Need a NEW LANGUAGE”

Why We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS Need a NEW LANGUAGE.

We NEED a NEW LANGUAGE because we live in a WAVE-FIELD and we have DUMBED DOWN our LANGUAGE to CONVEY ONLY the MATERIAL ‘APPEARANCES’.

For example, where there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, with our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE we re-craft this and SPEAK OF ‘the TOWN’ that is ‘GROWING’, ‘DEVELOPING’ and ‘PRODUCTING’ goods and services.  In other words, we have crafted a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that RE-CASTS the WAVE-FIELD in MATERIAL TERMS.  As Schroedinger and others have pointed out, we WESTERN CULTRUE ADHERENTS are USING LANGUAGE to CONSTRUCT an INTELLECTUAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on APPEARANCE.

When we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, we are using the mathematical technique of DIFFERENTIATION where we start with our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and we use VISUAL and TANGIBLE DIFFERENTIATING together with a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with a DOUBLE ERROR STRUCTURE based on WORDS that NAME (NOUNS) that imply MATERIAL BEING (first error) conflating this with the SECOND ERROR of WORDS that ANIMATE the MATERIAL BEINGS (VERBS) so as to craft, with this kind of LANGUAGE a MENTAL PICTURE of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITIES with GRAMMAR-GIVEN (notional) POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of (their own) ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

While this LINGUISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON THE DYNAMICS (MOVEMENT AND INTERACTIONS) OF NOTIONAL MATERIAL THINGS IN THEMSELVES “DOES SUCCEED” in CRAFTING LANGUAGE based PORTRAYALS based on DIFFERENTIATION where we FRAGMENT within an INTELLECTUAL LANGUISTIC CONSTRUCTION SCHEME the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD of our sense-experience.

This DIFFERENTIATION created the ABSTRACT CAPABILITY of using words to CONSTRUCT MENTALLY PICTURABLE SCENARIOS which are like CARTOONS based on LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS AND THEIR ACTIONS and INTERACTIONS, as a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that RECALLS, but only in the CRUDE TERMS OF LOCAL MATERIAL FIGURES, FRAGMENTS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD we share INCLUSION IN.

CONTRASTINGLY, Indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists, and Advaita Vedanta adherent have developed LANGUAGE that sustains the INTEGRATED NATURE of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY wherein EVERYTHING IS IN AN INTEGRATED FLUX as captured in the indigenous aboriginal expression ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (everything is related).  Thus where the indigenous aboriginal language will say the equivalent of “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which “AVOIDS DIFFERENTIATION” and supports the ALL-INCLUDING INTEGRATION that is manifest in our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed, and are continuing to used LANGUAGE based on DIFFERENTIATION wherein we assign NAMES to DIFFERENTIATED FIGURES.

NOTE THAT THESE NAMED FIGURES that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have DIFFERENTIATED OUT of the WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM are considered, in this WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SCHEME to tbe INDEPENDENT MATERIAL ENTITIES, notion with “THEIR OWN” (GRAMMAR GIVEN) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT; For example, ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services.

HERE WE CAN SEE THE RESULTS OF “DIFFERENTATION” where we are using the “DOUBLE ERROR” COMBINATION OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR, to CONSTRUCT WITH LANGUAGE BASED SYMBOLS, an IMPRESSION which features the NOW-LIBERATED MATERIAL FORM (the produce of DIFFERENTIATION) notionally endowed, with GRAMMAR, with its own LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS, … as the basis of a NEW SYNTHETIC LANGUAGE-based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION, which is like a sophisticated scheme of SMOKE SIGNALS or DRUM BEATS that serve as a basis for constructing MESSAGES.

These MESSAGES are put together using the DIFFERENTIATED SYMBOLS such as the word-symbol ‘TOWN’ which is the LANGUAGE BASED SYMBOLIC STAND-IN for ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

NOTE THE IMPORTANT FACT that the SYMBOL ‘TOWN’ is no longer the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE DYNAMIC UNDERSTOOD THROUGH SENSE-EXPERIENCE AS THE ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  INSTEAD, THIS ‘DIFFERENTIATED SYMBOL’ OF ‘THE TOWN’ IS NOW UNDERSTOOD AS A LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF, SO WE HAVE A ‘NEW BALL-GAME’ HERE WHEREIN THE ‘DIFFERENTIATED SYMBOLS’ ARE TAKING OVER THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SYMBOL BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION WHICH TAKES US INTO A NEW, SYNTHETIC LANGUAGE BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHERE WE MIGHT APPROPRIATELY SAY; “Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas any more’!”

In this NEW WORLD CRAFTED BY WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITURE, the dynamic is no longer IMMANENT in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD but is instead INFUSED into the DIFFERENTIATIATED FRAGMENT by the DOUBLE ERROR ABSTRACTION of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies LOCAL AUTHORING, as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’, … AND WHEN WE HEAR THIS, A PICTURE FORMS IN OUR MIND of ‘A TOWN OUT THERE IN FRONT OF OUR VOYEUR EYES’ that we are NO LONGER INCLUDED IN but are now VOYEUR OBSERVERS OF.

This is where we bring into (LANGUAGE-TRIGGERED INTELLECTUAL PLAY) DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR (the DOUBLE ERROR a Nietzsche labels it).  DIFFERENTIATION is a MATHEMATICAL OPERATION where we SPLIT OUT FORMS by way of DIFFERENCES as, for example, where we SPLIT OUT THE TOWN as if it were notionally a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF (which LANGUAGE allows us to REDUCE IT TO) rather than, as in our actual sense-experience, “a TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, the latter being  supported by our real-life sense-experience and giving the understanding RETAINED in indigenous aboriginal culture LANGUAGE architecture which is FLOW-BASED’

In the writing of Heraclitus, to a larger degree than ever before, the images do not impose their burden of concreteness but are entirely subservient to the achievement of clarity and precision”

“Heraclitus had declared ‘being’ a perpetual ‘becoming’ and had correlated the two concepts with his ‘hidden attunement.’ Now Parmenides declared the two to be mutually exclusive, and only ‘being’ to be real.” — ‘The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man’, — ‘Henri Frankfort, H. A. Frankfort, John A. Wilson, Thorkild Jacobsen, and William A. Irwin.

THERE IS AN IMPORTANT POINT TO MAKE NOTE OF HERE; i.e. WHILE THE DEVELOPMENT OF RELATIONAL FEATURES IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD ARE CONTINUALLY SUBJECT TO INFLUENCES IMMANENT IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, LANGUAGE THAT IS BASED ON ‘DIFFERENTATION’ … ‘INSULATES’, .. THE DIFFERENTIATED FIGURE FROM THE GROUND IT IS INCLUDED IN.   WHILE HERACLITUS HAD SUPPORTED THE UNDERSTANDING IN WHICH FIGURE AND GROUND ARE ONE, ESTABLISHING A NATURAL PRIORITY WHEREIN THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING FIGURE IS SECONDARY TO THE INFLUENCE OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING GROUND, OUR WESTERN CULTURE DESIGNED A LANGUAGE ARCHIECTURE WHICH PROMOTES THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, IN EFFECT, BY “DROPPING OUT ENTIRELY” THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.   This ‘the TOWNING in the TRANFORMING LANDSCAPE’, in WESTERN CULTURE DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE, becomes ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’, … a DIFFERENTIATION based RE-CONCEPTUALIZATION (i.e. this is NOT a REPRESENTATION).

In PLAIN TERMS, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE uses DIFFERENTIATION to RE-CONCEPTUALIZE what starts off as our SENSE-EXPERIENCE informed understanding of a reality that we share inclusion in, .. SHIFTING OPERATIONS OVER from our SENSE-EXPERIENCE to our INTELLECTUAL LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED CONSTRUCTIONS (where ABSOLUTE LOCAL MATERIAL BEING is one of the available BUILDING BLOCKS).  This is where we shift into DIFFERENTIATION where we have to leave our sense-experience behind, at the entry door.“Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas any more’!”

That is, once we shift from ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is QUANTUM LOGIC based and SENSE-EXPERIENCE grounded, … to ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’, … WE ARE NO LONGER IN THE SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE WORLD, but have entered into the INTELLECTUAL LANGUAGE SUPPORTED WORLD OF DIFFERENTIATION where TOWNS are treated of with LANGUAGE and PSYCHE as if they were LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES notionally WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS like GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.

We are NO LONGER INCLUDED IN A SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED WORLD of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, but thanks to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we find ourselves in an INTELLECT-CONCEPTUAL DIFFERENTIATION based LINGUISTIC CONSTRUCTION; e.g. we find ourselves TO BE one of the INHABITANTS who is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services in THE TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services.  This LOCAL AUTHORING POWER we give to OURSELVES and to other things like THE TOWN and to NATIONS and WOLVES is the general pattern that comes together with DIFFERENTIATION where we use LANGUAGE to FRAGMENT our sense-experience reality and do a BE-BUILD that gets us out of the all-including WAVE-FIELD where material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.  In our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SCHEME, the BASIC MOVERS AND SHAPERS OF REALITY come in the DOUBLE ERROR form of LOCAL MATERIAL BEINGS (first error is NAMING) with their own (notional) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS (second error is GRAMMAR).  This use of DIFFERENTIATION in conjunction with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR sets up a notional SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on ABSOLUTELY EXISTING MATERIAL BEINGS as if contained within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE and as if VESTED WITH POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

This SYSTEM OF LANGUAGE with its DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR allows us to CONSTRUCT A LANGUAGE based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that facilitates sharing and discussion, leaning and understanding.

THAT BEING SAID, this WESTERN CULTURE DIFFERENTIATION based SYSTEM, while ‘IT WORKS’ as far as SHARING “SOMETHING” GOES, is very UNLIKE the indigenous aboriginal, Toaist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta LANGUAGE SCHEME, which, like MODERN PHYSICS, preserves the FLOW-BASED and thus INTEGRATION based dynamics of our sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD.

WHAT IS BETTER ABOUT THE MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal INTEGRATION based LANGUAGE vis a vis the WESTERN CULTURE material being, DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE?

The INTEGRATION based LANGUAGE has us understand the essential NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS wherein there is NO SUCH THING as LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL based AUTHORING of actions and developments.

MEANWHILE our WESTERN CULTURE DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE has us understand things in terms of a DIFFERENTIATED PSEUDO-WORLD of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ‘BEING’ based forms, notionally WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, which is BINARY LOGIC based and which gives rise to EGO and ATTRIBUTION OF CREDIT AND BLAME and is in general VERY UNLIKE the understanding of reality in terms of the all-including WAVEFIELD wherein ‘everything is related’ (mitakuye oyasin).

CURRENTLY, WE FIND OURSELVES IN A HELL OF A MESS BECAUSE OF OUR USE OF THE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE THAT DIFFERENTIATES AND FRAGMENTS OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.

I SAY ‘WE’ EVEN THOUGH IT IS NOT THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISS AND ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS WHO ARE PROMOTING THIS DIFFERENTIATION THEME, IT IS THE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS AND EVEN THOUGH I AM NOT A SUPPORTER OF SUCH THINKING, I FIND MYSELF INCLUDED IN A SOCIAL DYNAMIC THAT IS GREATER THAN ME OR ANY INDIVDIUAL PARTICIPANT, WHERE IT IS THE COLLECTIVE ACTION THAT IMPOSES ITSELF ON EVERYONE, LIKE BEING IN A SWIMMING POOL WHERE, WHEN SOME OF THE OCCUPANTS START STIRRING UP THE WAVES TOGETHER, EVERYTHING IS TOSSED AROUND EVEN IF THEY CHOOSE NOT TO PARTICIPATE; I.E. WE ARE ALL INVOLVED WHETHER WE CHOOSE TO PARTICIPATE OR PUSH AGAINST THE COLLECTIVE IMPACT.

IN THE SAME SENSE WE HAVE A RUN-AWAY LANGUAGE THAT IS INFECTED WITH DIFFERENTIATION WHICH IS FRAGMENTING EVERYTHING E.G. LGBTQ, BLACKS, WHITES ETC.

LIKE THE PERSON IN THE SWIMMING POOL THAT IS BEING STIRRED UP, I PERSONALLY THINK THAT ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ IS A SELF-DECEPTION SINCE OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS INFORMING US THAT WE LIVEIN AN INTEGRATED WORLD WHEREIN MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, IN WHICH CASE ‘MITAKUYE OYASIN’ (EVERYTHING IS RELATED) ACTUALLY APPLIES.  SO THIS ‘DIFFERENTIATON’ THAT IS COMING FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR IS A TOTAL SCREW-UP SINCE IT HAS ‘GOT INTO EVERYONE’S HEADS’ AND IS HAVING AN EFFECT LIKE IN THE SWIMMING POOL WHERE IT DOESN’T MATTER THAT WE ARE PERSONALLY NOT GOING ALONG WITH THE CROWD THAT IS STIRRING THINGS UP FOR EVERYONE, BECAUSE WE CAN’T HELP BUT SHARE INCLUSION IN THE OVERALL DYNAMIC MIX THAT IS ARISING FROM EVERYONE’S CO-CONTRIBUTIONS.   So, it doesn’t matter that ‘the indigenous aboriginals’ and Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta along with MODERN PHYSICS have this understanding of reality ‘sorted out’ and understanding DIFFERENTIATION is FRAGMENTATIATIVE and NOT THE WAY TO GO while INTEGRATION MAKES NATURAL SENSE.

In other words, it makes no sense to say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’ because this is DIFFERENTIATION based CONCEPTUALIZATION is UNREAL and FRAGMENTATIVE.  The TROUBLE IS, there are a majority of people who are WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS and have thus bought into the DIFFERENTIATION based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION SCHEME and we are all in that same SWIMMING POOL that the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are STIRRING UP based on their belief in DIFFERENTIATION where ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’ …  instead of INTEGRATION wherein ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’

In the latter case, there is an AWARENESS or CONSCIOUSNESS “THAT WE ARE INCLUDED WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM” AND THAT WE ARE “NOT IN CHARGE” or in other worlds, “THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING BECAUSE THAT IS JUST LANGUAGE BASED ABSTRACTION COMING FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR”

WE ARE NOW EXPERIENCING RISING FRAGMENTATION coming from the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT belief in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments which is NOT REAL but is INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION triggered by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, and that ‘WE’ is everyone in our shared ‘swimming pool’ and not just the WESTERN CULTURE DIFFERENTIATION PRACTICING PERPETRATORS, because, being in the same swimming pool together and co-creating the wave dynamics, the concept of “AN EXPLICIT PERPETRATOR” is not viable since we are all CO-CONTRIBUTORS to the swimming pool dynamic.

In the case of the RUSSIA – UKRAINE conflict, we INTEGRATION orienting folks will affirm that ‘everything is related’ and that we all share inclusion in the overall social-relational dynamic therefore there is no such thing as BINARY LOGIC based division into ‘the GOOD and the BAD’, there is only one relational collective wherein there can be RESONANCE or DISSONANCE and it is up to the group as a whole, that is the QUANTUM LOGIC of the situation (QUANTUM LOGIC IS THE BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE COMMON INCLUDIING MEDIUM).

We all share inclusion in the ONE SWIMMING POOL where the RUSSIANS and UKRAINIANS are opting for BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC which is a PURIFICATION oriented LOGIC that seeks to resolve CONFLICT by REMOVING THE LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE as is the make-up of a BINARY LOGIC based EITHER/OR conceptualization rather than a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND conceptualization.

BECAUSE IT IS POPULAR (and EGO supported) TO BELIEVE IN BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT BEING which supports the ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING which in turn suggests that the REMEDY for RELATIONAL DISSONANCE , because it is seen as arising from LOCAL AUTHORING of INJURIOUS ACTIONS, is ‘PURIFICATION’, the ELIMINATION of LOCAL AUTHORING OF INJURIOUS ACTIONS.

WHAT GETS IGNORED, because it is LESS SIMPLE and we never GET TO IT when we keep going for the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC “WHO IS THE AUTHOR OF THIS INJURIOUS ACTION’, is the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING which is in terms of RELATIONAL BALANCE AND IMBALANCE where DISSONANCE is understanding as deriving from IMBALANCE where the remedy is to the relational remedy of RESTORING BALANCE.

OK, THAT MAKE MORE SENSE but because we share inclusion in the SWIMMING POOL (WAVE-FIELD) reality, there is no option to REMOVE THE TROUBLE-MAKERS because everything is mixed in together, so those who are CONSCIOUS of the SOURCE of the DISSONANCE being those who believe in LOCAL AUTHORING, can constrained to working for a more general awareness of the BOGUS NOTION of LOCAL AUTHORING which is amounts to looking for a cure for the SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA that pervades WESTERN CULTURE CONDITIONED PSYCHES.

BECAUSE we are all splashing around in the same swimming pool together, calming things down is not going to come from being more aggressive about MAKING THE RIGHT STUFF HAPPEN (PURICATION based on DIFFERENTIATION), the wave-field world is more subtle than that.

* * *