FORWARD: WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European LANGUAGE has become a powerful force in the world because of its SIMPLICITY.  It is SIMPLE because of its DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, leaving only imagery that associates with MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

“Upon this gifted age, in its dark hour,
Rains from the sky a meteoric shower
Of facts…they lie unquestioned, uncombined.

Wisdom enough to leech us of our ill
Is daily spun; but there exists no loom
To weave it into fabric…”

Edna St Vincent Millay, From Huntsman, What Quarry? (1939)

SIMPLICITY is achieved by the SUBSTITUTING of the SIMPLER MALE-ASSERTING “EITHER IS OR IS NOT” DIFFERENTIATING/EXCLUDING ‘BINARY LOGIC’ in place of the LESS SIMPLE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “BOTH MAYBE WILL AND MAYBE WILL NOT ” INTEGRATING/BALANCING ‘QUANTUM LOGIC’.  QUANTUM LOGIC RESONANCE is a form of BALANCE that does not involve a BINARY DEADBOLT OPEN AND CLOSED DETERMINATION.  CHOOSING BETWEEN THESE FORMS OF BALANCE IS CHOOSING BETWEEN THE WAYS OF EAST AND WEST and the full force of the difference may easily be missed.

“Plato clearly distinguished between Heraclitus’ SIMULTANEOUS unity and plurality of the cosmos and Empedocles’ SEPARATE PERIODS of Love and Strife. At the same time, they are mentioned together as both alike in believing in the unity and plurality of the cosmos; and Aristotle’s coupling of the two might conceivably have been motivated by the Platonic comparison, the important distinction between them being overlooked.” – Kirk, Raven et al, The Presocratic Philosophers

WHY NOT HOLD ON TO THE QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND TENSIONS OF THE OPPOSITES AND RIDE THE RESONANCE THROUGH THE TUNNEL OF TRANSFORMATION RATHER THAN FOMENTING A HARD-ASSED BINARY DEADBOLT SPLIT?

Instead of designing our language architecture to capture the QUANTUM LOGIC of the non-visible WAVE-FIELD (electromagnetic field) in a meaningful conjugate relation with the visible CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, we have designed a language that conveys a simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY consisting of a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE populated locally by ABSOLUTE INDEPENDENT BEING BASED MATERIAL FORMS.  This BINARY LOGIC based linguistic representation scheme, while it does simplify our language-based representation of reality, does so by constructing language-based representations of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which ‘throws out’ the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  The popularity of this WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED SIMPLIFICATION has led to a “LOCK-IN-BY-HIGH-SWITCHING-COSTS’, so that in spite of its continuing infusing of dysfunction into our social-relational dynamic, our path to extricating ourselves from this predicament remains unclear and continues to be a work in progress.

* * *

 

 

    Linguistic determinism (popularly known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis), argues that INDIVIDUALS EXPERIENCE THE WORLD BASED ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE LANGUAGE THEY HABITUALLY USE.

 

If we say ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ can we still ‘see’ the same thing as indigenous aboriginals ‘see’ when they say ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’?

 

My philosophical investigations say NO!  Once we narrow our focus to ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, our thinking is in BINARY LOGIC based mode where ‘the TOWN’ is seen and understood as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF that is INDEPENDENT of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM IT IS INCLUDED IN.

 

If, on the other hand, we are users of an indigenous aboriginal language where we are saying ‘There is TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, this language construction is conveying QUANTUM LOGIC rather than BINARY LOGIC.

 

CONVERSELY, the BINARY LOGIC formulation of ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING goods’ infers the LOCAL BEING of ‘the TOWN’ and conflates this with the inference that this LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING called ‘the TOWN’ has ‘its own’ GRAMMAR-given POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.  Nietzsche refers to this construction as the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, pointing out that what it does is suggest that the NAMING instantiated THING-IN-ITSELF possesses ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.  Once we COMMIT to saying THE TOWN IS GROWING, we enter into a BINARY LOGIC “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” where all of our language-based FOREGROUND FIGURES such as the TOWN or the PERSON or the TREE are NOTIONALLY (by way of language and grammar stimulated intellectual abstraction) STRIPPED OUT OF THEIR INNATE INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and RESITUATED WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

The notional EMPTY SPACE LIBERATES the NAMING-instantiated FIGURE (the TOWN formerly seen as the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) from its innate inclusion (its QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION) in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and SETS IT FREE IN AN EMPTY SPACE which supports BINARY LOGIC representation.  The BINARY LOGIC of EITHER matter OR empty space LIBERATES the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE so that it becomes (can be understood as) the SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT ‘TOWN’ whose SEPARATENESS and INDEPENDENCE are secured by IMPUTING THE “EXISTENCE” of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.  This EMPTY SPACE ABSTRACTION serves as a notional CONTAINER that supports our SPLITTING OUT and LIBERATING of CONTENT such as that we are calling ‘the TOWN’, giving ‘the TOWN the GRAMMATICAL support for ITS OWN NOTIONAL “LOCAL AUTHORING” of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION of goods etc.

 

As previously discussed, this TRICK of introducing EMPTY SPACE facilitates the removing of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the SUBSTITUTING of EMPTY SPACE which recalls MICHELANGELO’’s chipping off the FEMALE CONJUGATE limestone cover to reveal the MALE ASSERTING FIGURE ‘on its own’.  In Modern physics, the world is an energy-filled plenum populated locally by CONDENSATIONS so there is a topological similarity here in that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE takes the tack of stripping away the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE to present the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE AS IF IN ITS OWN RIGHT.

 

Not only the indigenous aboriginal culture but also Modern physics, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, stand together in NOT ONLY INSISTING that the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE IS NOT TO BE DROPPED OUT, but that the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE must be acknowledged as the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD while the MALE ASSERTING FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.

 

NOT ONLY ARE THE MALE ASSERTING FORMS “NOT PRIMARY”, THERE ARE NO MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES IN THE WAVE-FIELD WORLD.

 

***SUBTLETY ALERT ***

 

The REVEALING OF THE MATERIAL FORMS which are PRIMARY in WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY, WHEN WE GO WITH MODERN PHYSICS AND RETHINK OF THINGS IN TERMS WHERE MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE FIELD, … IS NOT A SIMPLE INVERSION THAT FLIPS THE PRIMACY FROM MATTER OVER EMPTINESS TO FIELD OVER MATTER, … because we must now acknowledge the new QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH/AND) relation between the containing FIELD and the CONDENSATION based MATERIAL FORM ‘CONTENT’.  There is a TENDENCY for us, in making the switch away from the MATTER IN EMPTY SPACE, to retain the BINARY LOGIC relation thinking and simply put FIELD in PRIMACY over MATTER instead of MATTER in PRIMACY over SPACE, forgetting that we now have the situation in the case of FIELD and MATTER, where the TWO and JUST ONE (the FIELD) and that within the ONE there are secondary ‘included’ features’ aka ‘material forms’.  NOTA BENE!  this introducing of QUANTUM LOGIC into our understanding which is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC is EASILY MISSED, whereupon we FALL INTO THE TRAP of inverting the BINARY LOGIC RELATION and putting FIELD first instead of MATTER without address the QUANTUM LOGIC reality that MATTER-IS-FIELD.

 

CONSIDER THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’.  The new understanding is that the SKULL is a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD and so is the HUMAN so that thinking of the interactions between the TWO THINGS (the PUNCH and the SKULL) is no longer viable and we must understand what is going on, instead, in terms of TRANSFORMATION.  We can see this in the sense that A MAN CAN’T STEP INTO THE SAME RIVER TWICE because it is NOT THE SAME RIVER and IT IS NOT THE SAME MAN STEPPING INTO IT.   This points to our MISTAKE in NAMING relational forms in the flow because while the NAMES remain fixed and persisting, the FORMS that we have attached the NAMES to are “FORMINGS”, innately “FLUID” “FORMINGS” bound up in the overall transforming continuum wherein everything is in flux.

 

THE NECESSARY REVISION TO “THE PUNCH SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL”, now that we are of the understanding that matter is a CONDENSATION of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, is to recast our language based representation in revised terms which do not involve LOCAL AUTHORING, as is already the case with indigenous aboriginal languages e.g;  THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which is fully fluid and without BEING-based dependencies or LOCAL AUTHORING INSTANTIATIONS.   In the transforming relational continuum, where the transforming lies BEYOND LOCAL AUTHORING, the CREATIVE AGENCY is now TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) which implies the WAVE-FIELD basis of RESONANCE.  So, RESONANCE ‘takes over” as the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT CREATIVE AGENCY and it is CONSTITUTED by ANDROGYNOUS CONJUGATION where the ANDROGYNOUS NONDUALITY is of a NON-BINARY, QUANTUM LOGIC nature.

 

SO ITS GOODBYE to NAMES that imply  STATIC BEING because NAMES with PERSISTING MEANING are TOO SIMPLE for language based constructions implying a FULLY FLUID reality.

 

FIXING UP our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE to make it QUANTUM LOGIC READY REQUIRES THE REMOVAL of NAMES implying BEING from the language architecture.

 

THE REMOVAL OF NAMES may seem like a RADICAL THOUGHT, BUT it is a NECESSARY THOUGHT.  WE HAVE TO JUNK OUR  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES AS THEY NOW EXIST BECAUSE THEY ARE INFECTED WITH THE CRIPPLING ABSTRACTION OF NAMES that imply LOCAL, EXPLICIT, PERSISTING BEING.  These names are unlike “DANCES WITH WOLVES” or similar constructions which DO NOT BOG DOWN IN ‘LOCAL and EXPLICIT, PERSISTING BEING’ such as the name JOHN DUNBAR, a NAME that belongs to BINARY LOGIC schemes of identification that make no ATTEMPT TO CAPTURE A SENSE OF THE QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION wherein there is acknowledgement of the FIGURE-and-GROUND-as-ONE relation where the INHABITANT is INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING HABITAT in which case EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.  That is, as the HABITAT TRANSFORMS, SO ALSO IS THE INHABITANT BOUND UP IN THAT TRANSFORMATION (the transforming habitat is the WAVE-FIELD and the included inhabitant is the CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD).

This QUANTUM LOGIC reality is supported by Modern physics and acknowledged by indigenous aboriginal culture, as can be seen in warnings to us colonizers whose BINARY LOGIC based languages impute to us our own INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE, an INDEPENDENCE that (WRONGLY) separates our PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT from the DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONTAINING SPACE IN WHICH WE ARE SITUATIONALLY INCLUDED.

 

“This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”

 

* * * END OF SUBTLETY ALERT * * *

.

We could express the above-described subtlety as follows;  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have constructed a TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATION for our REALITY MODEL.  The BINARY LOGIC STRUCTURE lets us (we continue to give it the foundational representational role in our language) speak in terms of TOWNS and PEOPLE that GROW, DEVELOP and PRODUCE goods and services.  We PICTURE ourselves as INDEPENDENT FIGURES moving about and interacting in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.  This EMPTY SPACE allows us to present OUR ACTIONS of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION as ONE-SIDED LOCAL SELF-AUTHORED ACTIONS.  But in the sense-experience supported QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTATION there is BOTH/AND LOGIC based TRANSFORMATION wherein the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD IS PRIMARY and the material forms, which are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, are secondary.  In this understanding, the AUTHORING shifts from the prior abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT AUTHORING of TRANSFORMATION.  AS NOTED, in this QUANTUM LOGIC reality, there is no place for BEING since BEING is too SIMPLE to fit within this continually flowing reality.

 

PROBLEM:  LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THAT IS BINARY LOGIC BASED IS TOO SIMPLE FOR CONVEYING the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTATIONS.  For example, BINARY LOGIC REPRESENTATIONS, because they are based on MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS are like the Cuckoo’s egg where the SIMPLE BIRD, once hatched, TAKES OVER THE WHOLE NEST and supporting system.   BINARY LOGIC, when used in language based representation, is like this.  Once we employ BINARY LOGIC in saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, we shut the door to the less simple but more accurate QUANTUM LOGIC ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.   So, the former is simple BINARY LOGIC based wile the latter is LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based so that if we FIRST employ the BINARY LOGIC abstraction; —‘the TOWN is GROWING’,… we have simplified and “dumbed down” our language based representation scheme and we cannot back out of expressions such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’ and all the associated detail we have likely added, because what we have done is that we have constructed an internally consistent BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY.   Our BINARY LOGIC based REPRESENTATION which has CLOSED IN ON AND PUT THE LOGICAL FOCUS ON ‘the TOWN’, cannot in the same fell stroke, give us a glimpse of the QUANTUM LOGIC TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.   The TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT wherein EVERYTHING IS IN AN INTERDEPENDENT FLUX.

 

DISCUSSION OF THE ‘PROBLEM’:

 

As Bohm understood when he set out to develop a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE (Rheomode), our BEING-BASED WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, because it is BINARY LOGIC BASED, IS INNATELY INADEQUATE for use in constructing QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTATIONS as our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD requires.

 

INTUITIVELY, we ENGLISH (CAE) LANGUAGE SPEAKERS may insist that the ‘language of SHAKESPEARE’ is capable of expressing anything and everything about our earthly experience, but the warning signs are ‘out there’ like the Zen ‘the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’.

 

We ENGLISH SPEAKERS are CONFIDENT of being able to express anything in language because our understanding of ANYTHING tends to be in the MATERIAL CONTEXT which entails MALE-ASSERTING constructs where we DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, hence, for example, we can speak of the PUNCH that “SO WE SAY” shatters the egg-shell skull, … but we know that our language, which is constrained to MALE ASSERTING actions and developments CANNOT GO THE DISTANCE to address the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which is PHYSICALLY REAL and part of the natural WAVE-FIELD phenomenon.  And here we MAY BE REMINDED that IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, SHAKESPEARE’S ENGLISH INCLUDED, WE HAVE BEEN DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

Copernicus overtly made the case that “IT IS SIMPLER TO SAY THAT THE EARTH TURNS ROUND” because the reality of there being EARTHING as a CONDENSATION in the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD requires a “quantum leap” to a QUANTUM LOGIC language architecture THAT IS LESS SIMPLE THAN our simple BINARY LOGIC abstraction of MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES MOVING ABOUT AND INTERACTING IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

 

SHAKESPEARE’S ENGLISH IS EXPRESSIVE AS HELL as far as MALE ASSERTING CONSTRUCTIONS GO but like our WESTERN CULTURE languages in general, they have a limit and that LIMIT shows up in the EGGSHELL SKULL RULE where we find that the MALE ASSERTING BASIS of LANGUAGE ‘runs out of steam’ in that it is UNABLE to CONVEY REALITIES WHEREIN FEMALE ACCOMMODATING IS IN PRECEDENCE OVER MALE ASSERTING, the latter being EFFABLE and the former being INEFFABLE but nevertheless inferable.

 

Indigenous aboriginal language architecture, by being FLOW-BASED can handle the expression of WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS WHILE WESTERN CULTURE MALE-ASSERTING LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE CANNOT because it is MISSING the capability of expressing the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD dynamic.  If we go back to Copernicus’ statement, we can see what happened to our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE; i.e. we DUMBED IT DOWN FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF SIMPLIFYING OUR LANGUAGE-BASED EXPRESSION OF COMPLEX REALITY (in mathematical terms, the complexity stems from the reality having both ‘real’ and ‘imaginary’ aspects, the ‘real’ aspect being the MALE ASSERTING ACTION and the ‘imaginary’ aspect being the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OPENING..

 

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

 

OK, we (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) wanted a SIMPLE way to describe things and WE BUILT IT INTO OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and this BUILT-IN-SIMPLFYING IS STILL IN OUR LANGUAGE so that we construct representations in terms of NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES that notionally move about and interact in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  This is BINARY LOGIC BASED and innately simpler than the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL QUANTUM LOGIC representation of, for example, TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein the TOWNING is a CONDENSATION of the ENERGY FILLED PLENUM in which it is included.

THERE ARE NO TWO SEPARATE THINGS IN THE QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTATION, THE “TOWNING” IS INCLUDED IN THE “TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, THAT IS WHAT QUANTUM LOGIC IS ALL ABOUT; i.e it is the BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM.  The INCLUDING MEDIUM is the all-including WAVE-FIELD and the TOWNING is a CONDENSATION of activity within the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD MEDIUM.  The TOWNING is NOT a SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT ENTITY but a RELATIONAL FEATURE within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

 

Because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS opted for SIMPLICITY (e.g. Copernicus splitting apart of the EARTH and its CONTAINING SPACE) we went down a different language architecting path than the indigenous aboriginals who chose a language architecture that acknowledges and preserves the FLUID nature of our sense-experience affirmed reality, consistent with the MODERN PHYSICS WAVE-FIELD understanding.

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are presently in a tough spot as far as updating our language architecture is concerned, to support the FLUID DYNAMICS of WAVE-FIELD REALITY because of the SIMPLICITY that we have built into our language architecture by giving BINARY LOGIC a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE, as in the example ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’, … whereas the indigenous aboriginal language backed off the infusing of the abstraction of BEING into the language architecture and supported the understanding that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX including the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (i.e. the transforming relational continuum)

 

SO, because our SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC based WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has become a POPULAR GLOBAL STANDARD, WE ARE NOW STUCK WITH A BEING-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THAT IS CAUSING PROBLEMS WITH ITS OVER-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC ARCHITECTURE so that this TOO SIMPLE LANGUAGE will have to be ABANDONED and REBUILT FROM SCRATCH unless all of us Common Average European language speakers are willing to learn Ojibwa or some other FLOW-BASED language architecture which opens the door to QUANTUM LOGIC based comprehension.

 

MEANWHILE, there is a MOUNTING BUILD-UP of LANGUAGE-BASED SCREWUPS DUE TO THE BINARY LOGIC CONSTRAINT WE CONTINUE TO BUILD IN TO OUR REPRESENTATIONS.  Our WESTERN CULTURE CONFLICTS are NOT the RELATIONAL DISSONANCE CONFLICTS of indigenous aboriginals where the solution is to re-cultivate relational harmony, our WESTERN CULTURE CONFLICTS are BINARY LOGIC based CONFLICTS where RESOLVING is by way of PURIFICATION where those of us WHO ARE RIGHT must OVERPOWER ‘those others’ WHO ARE WRONG.

 

THIS IS WHERE WE AT (and there are many more screwups due to our language based use of too-simple BINARY LOGIC) and the remedy is the implementing of a new FLOW-CAPABLE LANGUAGE to get out of the hole we are digging ourselves into.  But how do we change the wheels of the car while we are speeding down the road in it?

 

COMPLICATION: EGO breeds (false) confidence of being able to solve any problem trusting in the old traditional ways of going about things which have NEVER WORKED THE WAY WE CONTINUE TO SPEAK OF THEM WORKING, i.e. in a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING MODE.  WE BELIEVE THIS LOCAL AUTHORING IS WORKING EVEN AS IT IS POWERING US ON A BUSTRIP TO HELL because what is REALLY going on in our QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD REALITY is TRANSFORMATION, an all-including transformation that includes ourselves..

 

Meanwhile, we are pursuing a course of ACTION, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION that DOES NOT EXIST.  WE ARE INCLUDED IN TRANSFORMATION AS IN THE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING.

 

Like four-leggeds and winged and crawly ones and the indigenous aboriginal culture adherents, we need to trust our sense experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum where the optimizing orientation is the cultivating of balance and harmony in the relational web we share inclusion in.  The notion of LOCAL AUTHORING has to go.  It is rooted in the abstraction of BEING and the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR BASED LOCAL AUTHORING.   NONE OF THIS IS SENSE-EXPERIENCE REAL.  It belongs instead to a WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

 

CURRENTLY, we are LOCKED INTO OUR DYSFUNCTION by HIGH SWITCHING COSTS; e.g. by the BINARY LOGIC based systems of REWARDS and PUNISHMENTS that have been GLOBALLY BOUGHT INTO and are supported by EGO, the inflating of which feeds on REWARDS given for LOCAL AUTHORING which is abstraction based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

 

* * *

 

WHORF’S HYPOTHESIS IS OPERATIVE HERE.    We are stuck in a synthetic, BINARY LOGIC based substitute reality.  The corrective action of Switching to QUANTUM LOGIC is not currently in on our popular radar screens.

 

FOOTNOTE:  BINARY LOGIC LEADS TO FRAGMENTATION:

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc