Western CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS have been shown to be troubled by DYSFUNCTION arising from TOO SIMPLE LANGUAGE and how this leads to FRAGMENTATION and OBCURANTISM in the WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHE which manifests in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS.

 

-1- FRAGMENTATION, as Nietzsche and Bohm both show, derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which REDUCES our natural understanding of REALITY as TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational), and RECASTS REALITY in LOCAL and EXPLICIT TERMS.  Our SENSE EXPERIENCE informs us of our INCLUSION IN A TRANSFORMING WORLD, which DOES NOT LEND ITSELF TO LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING BASED ON THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT, as Nietzsche points out with his ‘LIGHTNING FLASHES’ example which REDUCES this “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” phenomena (buildup of electromagnetic field based tensions) to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “LIGHTNING FLASHES”.

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are AWARE, at some level in our psyche, that the REAL WORLD OF OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE is a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, as Heraclitus sussed out, and which indigenous aboriginals NOT ONLY SUSSED OUT but CAPTURED IN THEIR LANGUAGE DESIGN.  By building in a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE for acknowledging our inclusion in TRANSFORMATION that is NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT the indigenous aboriginal language THUS AVOIDS THE ERROR of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING WHEREIN “LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING” HIJACKS THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANFORMATION.  In the film ‘DANCES WITH WOLVES’ the indigneous aboriginal naming convention that suggests inclusion in ‘the transforming web-of-life’ is used, suggesting that our primary status is INCLUSION IN THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, whereas our WESTERN CULTURE ‘DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR gives us “JOHN DUNBAR” as an ‘INDEPENDENT BEING WITH HIS OWN POWERS LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

 

WESTERN CULTURE HABITUALLY EMPLOYS THE ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR to FRAGMENT the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM of our sense-experience (of inclusion therein).  The term ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ was applied by Nietzsche who pointed out the ARTIFICIALITY OF THE NOTION of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ which is CREATED by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which is the source of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT, which is PROBLEMATIC.

 

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” because, as indigenous aboriginals have NOT FORGOTTEN and as MODERN PHYSICS has affirmed, MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is an ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS, constituting a BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM relationship wherein the CONDENSATION is “BOTH” ITSELF “AND” the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM IT IS INCLUDED IN.

 

NOTA BENE!  This BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM RELATION is a FUNDAMENTAL DEPARTURE in UNDERSTANDING REALITY, … FROM THE SIMPLE WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD BINARY EITHER/OR LOGICOF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM based UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY which we have BUILT IN TO OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.  THIS BOTH/AND LOGIC IS THE DEPARTURE supported by Heraclitus that has been affirmed by Modern physics and which is the foundational belief in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.  THIS LESS SIMPLE THAN BINARY LOGIC, (QUANTUM) BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM based UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY wherein TRANSFORMATION is FOUNDATIONAL, and wherein CONDENSATIONS are “APPEARANCES” that are continually FORMING and RE-FORMING (TRANSFORMING) within an ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (like WHORLINGS IN FLOWING where the WHORLINGS are part of the APPEARANCE of FLOWING and ARE NOT LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES).  This is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM relationship which is LESS SIMPLE than SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM wherein the WHORL is ‘spoken of’ and thus regarded as a LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF with ITS OWN POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE DEVELOPED A KNEE-JERK HABIT OF USING LANGUAGE THAT IMPUTES LOCAL EXPLICIT “BEING” to WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING that are APPEARANCE based NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLOW PHENOMENA, which is without dependence on the abstraction of LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING.

 

This is the  point of the discussion where we can break out in a chorus of OH, EAST IS EAST AND WEST IS WEST AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET”… because what is being described here is how INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS, as also MODERN PHYSICS are building into their LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein ALL FORMS ARE FLOW-FORMS which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT AND THERE IS NO FOUNDATIONAL ROLE for THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT because EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as is the nature of TRANSFORMATION.  As Alan Watts and others have pointed out, THIS IS WHY LINGUAGE NEEDS TO BE VERB-BASED (RELATIONAL AS IN NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT) and WITHOUT ANY FOUNDATIONAL ROLE FOR “LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING”.

 

IN THIS FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, RELATIONS PLAY THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE as affirmed in the worldview of indigenous aboriginals with the aphorism ‘MITAKUYE OYASIN’ (EVERYTHING IS RELATED), which signifies the INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE of all RELATIONAL FORMS (suggesting the same relationship as with CONDENSATIONS in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM).

 

THIS UNDERSTANDING IS SUPPORTED BY MODERN PHYSICS SO “NO WONDER WHY WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE SUFFERING THE SELF-INFLICTED WOUNDS OF FRAGMENTATION WHICH WE HAVE BUILT INTO OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USING THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR THAT IMPLIES LOCAL AUTHORING.   LOCAL AUTHORING IS THE ROOT SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION.  EVERYONE IS GOING AROUND SAYING “I DID THIS so that WESTERN CULTURE has become a place where EGOTIST PSEUDO-REALITY HAS HIJACKED THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE and there is DENIAL of the natural NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT NATURE of the world dynamic whereby WE WERE CORRECT in saying “TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON AND TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE” which acknowledges the REALITY that WE ARE INCLUDED IN SOMETHING GREATER THAN OUR (LOCAL) SELF, … SOMETHING NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (e.g. the energy-charged PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD) WHICH IS GREATER THAN OUR MATERIAL CONDENSATION ASPECT. 

 

What we are POINTING TO HERE is the COMPLEX (REAL + IMAGINARY) STRUCTURE wherein the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT is only the LESSER “APPEARANCE” part of ‘who we are’ (WHICH WE REFER TO AS ‘REAL’) while our PRIMARY ASPECT is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which corresponds to the “IMAGINARY” aspect , which IS NOT JUST ‘APPEARANCE’ BUT AS WITH THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONDENSATION AND THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and/or the WHORLING in the FLOWING, … the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “REAL” component is only “APPEARANCE” while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “IMAGINARY” component is the FOUNDATIONAL component; i.e. it is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

 

MAJOR TAKE-AWAY: EASTERN CULTURE CONFUSION (FRAGMENTATION) DERIVES FROM THE EGOTIST PRACTICE of FALSELY ELEVATING THE “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT” which is only “APPEARANCE” AND DROPPING OUT the “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” which is the PRIMARY REALITY.  For example, in the PRIMARY REALITY of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, the words “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” capture the natural primacy of TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, … BUT IN WESTERN CULTURE WE HAVE THE HABIT OF REDUCING OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING BY PROMOTING THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT TO FALSE PRIMARY STATUS and simply DROPPING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE WHICH IS THE ‘REAL PRIMARY’ by saying ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’.  In this proposition, the PRIMARY DYNAMIC OF TRANSFORMATION has been “DROPPED OUT” and the SECONDARY ‘APPEARANCE’ (Schaumkommen) of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT has been PROMOTED to PRIMARY STATUS in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.

 

DONALD TRUMP and ELON MUSK are BOTH using BINARY LOGIC based THINKING in an aggressive attempt to RESOLVE FRAGMENTATION which is, IN FACT, coming from WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that employs SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC.  What BINARY LOGIC does is it REDUCES TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to the BOGUS terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT so that WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, including TRUMP and MUSK, have understandings of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT type such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ whereby it APPEARS as if the path to overcome FRAGMENTATION is to GET RID OF ALL ALLIANCES because they are COMPLICATING what TRUMP and MUSK are imagining to be the IDEAL PRODUCING MACHINE which is CLEARLY and PURELY LOCAL AND EXPLICIT as in ‘THE UNITED STATES’ as ONE LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING ENGINE unimpeded by LIBERAL BLURRINESS of TRADING PARTNERSHIPS or by the BLURRINESS of INTER-NATION ALLIANCES.

 

TRUMP AND MUSK WANT TO STREAMLINE U.S. OPERATIONS as if these OPERATIONS WERE LOCAL and EXPLICIT and thus ONE-SIDED (LOCALLY AUTHORED).  THIS IS A MISTAKE FLAGGED BY Nietzsche as “THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR” .

 

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

Nietzsche FURTHER expounds on how it is EGO that is responsible for WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING based on “LOCAL AUTHORING”.

 

In its origin language belongs in the age of the most rudimentary form of psychology. We enter a realm of crude fetishism when we summon before consciousness the basic presuppositions of the metaphysics of language, in plain talk, the presuppositions of reason. Everywhere it sees a doer and doing; it believes in will as the cause; it believes in the ego, in the ego as being, in the ego as substance, and it projects this faith in the ego-substance upon all things — only thereby does it first create the concept of “thing.” Everywhere “being” is projected by thought, pushed underneath, as the cause; the concept of being follows, and is a derivative of, the concept of ego. In the beginning there is that great calamity of an error that the will is something which is effective, that will is a faculty. Today we know that it is only a word.” – Nietzsche, ‘Twilight of the Idols’

 

Bohm reaffirms what Nietzsche is claiming in that the abstraction of NAMING-INSTANTIATED LOCAL BEING WITH GRAMMAR-INSTANTIATED POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING IS A DOUBLE ERROR… “OF WHICH WE ARE GUILTY”.  It is also the RECIPE FOR FRAGMENTATION because in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, we impute the presence of an EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE which SIMPLIFIES the LINGUISTIC CAPTURE of MATERIAL DYNAMICS by reducing MOTION to one-sided terms of the ACTIONS OF MATERIAL OBJECTS (as if in ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE).

 

That is, BOHM REAFFIRMS NIETZSCHE’S POINTS by clarifying that; “Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

 

WHAT THIS MEANS IS THAT “TRANSFORMATION IS THE FOUNDATIONAL DYNAMIC” wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS OF AND IN THE TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and as such have a LOCAL and EXPLICIT APPEARANCE  but only APPEARANCE, so we are MISTAKEN in attaching a PERSISTING NAME implying LOCAL and EXPLICIT BEING as we do when we speak in terms of ‘THE TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING’, when the REALITY is that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM in which case a VERB BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is needed such as ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which supports the REALITY wherein material forms are INCLUSIONS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

 

THE COMMON MISTAKE IS WHERE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USERS SLIP INTO THE SIMPLIFYING HABITUAL ERROR OF USING BINARY LOGIC BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, SAYING ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’ which OBSCURES AND OVER-RIDES WITH SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC, … the needed LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is LESS SIMPLE and REQUIRES the (QUANTUM) BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” as is the MODEN PHYSICS CONSISTENT CONCEPTUALZING employed in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

 

IN THIS IMPORTANT EXAMPLE, we can see CLEARLY that what is going on is THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING HABIT OF REDUCING THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING AS IN “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  …. TO THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONSTRUCTION  ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’

 

It is IMPORTANT NOT TO MISS the full message being expressed here that is that WE ARE BUILDING INTO OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME A REDUCTION FROM THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as given by the BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM, to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as given by the BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM.  EQUALLY IMPORTANT AND NOT TO BE MISSED IS HOW GOEDEL’S THEOREM PLAYS INTO THIS REDUCTION; i.e. Goedel’s Theorem being “the INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS”.  THAT IS, when we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using our LOCAL and EXPLICIT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, and saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’, such LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS MAY WELL BE “TRUE” BUT AT THE SAME TIME ‘UNREAL’ DUE TO THEIR ’INCOMPLETENESS’ which in this case is an INCOMPLETENESS IN FAILING TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT WHAT IS GOING ON IS “TRANSFORMATION” wherein “THE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS” is CONJUGATE to “the GROWING OF THE TOWN”.  In OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY, “IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ‘THE TOWN TO GROW’ WITHOUT THERE BEING, AT THE SAME TIME, A CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS” and here we are merely describing the foundational nature of what we know as TRANSFORMATION which is what is really going on (according to our sense experience) but which for BEING-BASED LANGUAGE USERS, must be BROKEN DOWN INTO TWO PARTS, a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING) and a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE (THE TOWN IS GROWING).

 

WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS GENERALLY CHARACTERIZED BY THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.

 

WHAT FOLLOWS IS THE SUBSTITUTING OF SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM FOR LESS SIMPLE (QUANTUM) BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM; i.e. the SUBSTITUTING of the one-sided LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING” (which says nothing about the shrinking wilderness) for the ANDROGYNOUS “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which is a COMBINATION of BOTH the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING …“IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” …AND the LOCAL and EXPLICIT  MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING … “TOWNING”.

 

THIS COMPLETES THE OVERVIEW OF HOW LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as employed by indigenous aboriginals and MODERN PHYSICS (based on the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM) INCORPORATES THE FULL ANDROGYNOUS NATURE OF ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION based on an ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM populated by substantive CONDENSATION,  and how WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (based on the BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM) DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE notionally POPULATED BY LOCAL and EXPLICIT OBJECTS with GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

 

* * * * * *

 

THERE ARE MAJOR PROBLEMS IN THE WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC THAT DERIVE FROM THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT OVERALL INTEGRATOR; i.e. the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which there are LOCAL AND EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS .

 

BECAUSE OF THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DROP OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, there is FRAGMENTATION because there is NO LONGER ANY REFERENCE TO THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.  Bohm has pointed this out as follows;

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

 

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

 

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

 

THESE PROBLEMS OF FRAGMENTATION INCLUDE THE POLARIZATION BETWEEN CONSERVATIVES AND LIBERALS, WHO BLAME ONE ANOTHER FOR THE FRAGMENTATION, HOWEVER, THEY ARE BOTH WRONG because the FRAGMENTATION IS COMING FROM THE MISTAKEN BELIEF IN “LOCAL AUTHORING” which has been incorporated into WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IN THE SAME FELL SWOOP AS THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.

 

The FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, corresponds to the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is the OVERALL INTEGRATOR of material CONDENSATIONS which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

 

THE WESTERN CULTURE MISTAKE IS THE BELIEF IN LOCAL AUTHORING per the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche points out.

 

This DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR comes in TWO POLAR OPPOSITE OPTIONS (CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL).

 

The CONSERVATIVE OPTION corresponds to LOCAL AUTHORING such as ‘the ‘male’ HURRICANE THAT IS ASSERTIVELY STIRRING UP THE ATMOSPHERE.

 

The LIBERAL OPTION corresponds to LOCAL AUTHORING such as ‘the ‘female’ ATMOSPHERE THAT IS INDUCTIVELY STIRRING UP THE HURRICANE’

 

BOTH ARE WRONG BECAUSE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” (it is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).

 

TRUMP IS IN THE PROCESS OF ABANDONING THE LIBERAL APPROACH TO LOCAL AUTHORING THAT IS INDUCTIVE AND DEPENDS ON COLLABORATION AND ALLIANCE.

 

CONSERVATIVES DO NOT TRUST LIBERALS AND VICE VERSA BUT THEY BOTH BELIEVE IN, AND PROMOTE, THE EGO-INFLATING NOTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING WHICH IS FALSE AND WHICH MAKES THEM BOTH IN ERROR IN THEIR JUDGEMENTS AND STRATEGIES.

 

TRUMP SEES THE PROBLEM AS ONE OF HAVING TO CATER TO THE MANY PARTNERS IN THE NATION’S ALLIANCES AND THE SOLUTION AS ‘GOING IT ALONE’ AND ABANDONING THE PARTNERSHIPS, USING THE “PERCEIVED” ONE-SIDED MIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES.  BUT IT IS NOT ONE-SIDED MIGHT BECAUSE OF ‘MITAKUYE OYASIN’ (EVERYTHING IS RELATED) WHICH MEANS THE U.S. IS ONE OF THE STRANDS IN THE WEB, ALONG WITH RUSSIA, CHINA, AND INDIA, AS WELL MANY POWERFUL OTHERS.   IN THE STRAND IN THE WEB SITUATION, THE WISE APPROACH IS TO USE THE HEALING CIRCLE TO RESTORE AND SUSTAIN RELATIONAL BALANCE AND HARMONY AND OVERCOME ANY LOPSIDEDNESS FROM INDIVIDUAL STRANDS ‘GOING ON THE RAMPAGE’.

 

NOTE THAT BECAUSE OF THE INTERCONNECTION AND INTERDEPENDENCE OF THE STRANDS IN THE WEB, A STAND THAT APPEAR TO BE STRONGER THAN THE REST AND CAPABLE OF ‘TAKING OVER THE WEB’ MAKES NO SENSE BECAUSE OF THE INTERCONNECTION AND INTERDEPENDENCE (IN FACT, THOSE WHO SUPPORT ‘THEIR STRAND’ IN A PLAN TO DOMINATE THE REST’ IS INSANITY, COMING FROM THE MISTAKEN SENSE OF THEIR OWN ‘INDEPENDENCE’, WHICH IS FOUNDATIONAL TO THE FALSE NOTION OF THEIR OWN “SUBOPTIMIZATION”.  THE NOISY AND FAT STRAND IN THE WEB CAN ONLY BE SO BY DRAWING FROM OTHER STRANDS IN THE WEB SINCE IN THESE RELATIONS WITHIN AN ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT IS IN A NATURAL PRIMACY OVER THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT.

 

IN OTHER WORDS, THE STRANDS IN THE WEB ARE NOT ‘INDEPENDENT CONTRIBUTORS’ AS THEY MAY BOASTFULLY CLAIM BUT DRAW FROM ONE ANOTHER SINCE THEY ARE INNATELY INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT AS THE “BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM”.

 

THE NOTION OF ‘INDEPENDENT STRANDS’ AND THE AIM OF ONE STRAND BECOMING THE DOMINATING STRAND THAT TAKES SEIZES OVERALL CONTROL, AS IN THE CASE OF DONALD TRUMP, IS ‘DELUSIONAL’.  The MASSIVE SHIFTING OF RESOURCES that are one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING resources IS NOT WHAT IT APPEARS TO BE.  WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IS TRANSFORMATION which is now flapping like a loose sheet in a gale as TRUMP is secure in his power to MAKE CHANGES, but such SUPERFICIAL HIRINGS AND FIRINGS ARE NOT THE SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY.  The SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY IS THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION THAT WE SHARE INCLUSION IN WHICH IS NOT CONTROLLABLE BY ANY OF US.  Just as in the case where we are confident we can double our factory production, this is one of those INCOMPLETE TRUTHS warned about by Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite logical propositions, … i.e. our doubling of factory production says nothing about the conjugate shrinking of wilderness which is influencing the TRANSFORMING of the overall landscape which WE ARE INCLUDED IN and thus UNABLE TO LAY OUR BEADY EYES ON, which case we can GO INTO THE GREATEST DETAIL as to what is going on in the area of LOCAL and EXPLICIT PRODUCTION ACTIVITY, which can be TRUE in the Goedel’s Theorem of INCOMPLETENESS of all finite LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS goes, but which is totally UNREALISTIC because we are DROPPING OUT the BULK OF WHAT MATTER; i.e. NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

 

* * * * * * * * * * * *