AUTHOR’S PREFACE:  

 

I am including this AUTHOR’S PREFACE to explain that there is a PROBLEM IN COMMUNICATING USING OUR WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD LANGUAGE since in its STANDARD USAGE MODE, it DROPS OUT the most basic component of WAVE-FIELD expression which is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT component which in mathematics is called the IMAGINARY component which is needed together with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT component.  For example, the expression; “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose” implies that the individual is included in something greater than himself, in which case IF we are instead speaking in LOCAL, EXPLICIT terms such as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, which is in terms of WHAT THINGS DO, we are at a LOWER LEVEL of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING than the previous phrase which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

 

In VERB-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as used in indigenous aboriginal cultures and MODERN PHYSICS that captures a physical reality where everything is in flux (as with CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD) where we may say “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, we have a WAVE-FIELD structure wherein there is the COMBINATION of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ‘CONTAINER” and LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT which are also referred to as IMAGINARY and REAL components in WAVE-FIELED mathematics.  While indigenous aboriginal languages and other flow-based languages (e.g. Bohm’s Rheomode language) have this ANDROGYNOUS conceptualizing capability where there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) together with a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate (THE TOWNING THAT IS “INCLUDED IN” THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE). These two comprise a QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION.  QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, and it plays a foundational role in indigenous aboriginal languages and DIFFERS from the SIMPLER BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC which SPLITS APART the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, and in the process CONCRETIZING “TOWNING” by SUBSTITUTING the BEING based “TOWN” as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for “the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

 

This WESTERN CULTURE REDUCTION of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING from LESS-SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC to SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC, an example of which is where we start with “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, and end up with a new, BEING-based PSEUDO-REALITY such as “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING goods”.   While we started with a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (the WAVE-FIELD), the reduction from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC, by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate, left us with ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate which conveys “BEING-BASED LOCAL AUTHORING” which Nietzsche calls “THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR”.  This DOUBLE ERROR is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in our ongoing WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHOLOGICAL and SOCIAL DYNAMICS.

 

SO, THE WESTERN CULTURE DROPPING OUT of our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, A DROPPING OUT which is sometimes referred to as the DEA ABSCONDITA (the GODDESS IN HIDING), … TOGETHER WITH AN ASSOCIATED SUBSTITUTING OF AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, CREATES A ‘PLAYING FIELD’ for “BEING-BASED LOCAL AUTHORING” (the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).  THERE IS NO SUCH THING as “BEING-BASED LOCAL AUTHORING”; i.e. we live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD, however, the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR BASED CONCEPT OF “LOCAL AUTHORING”  does GREAT THINGS FOR THE EGO so it has been a KEEPER in MODERN WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES even though it is FUNDAMENTALLY AT ODDS with the understanding that WE ARE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD as implied in “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”.

 

The EGO-INFLATING LOCAL AUTHORING POWER that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS lay claim to by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which garners essential support from the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, is CONTRADICTED by “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose” SINCE this CONTRADICTS the notion that we are INDEPENDENT BEINGS with LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS who are situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE which we are giving a foundational role to in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, as where we say ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ and/or ‘the HUMAN IS GROWING’. 

This type of DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR construction is a WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING STANDARD which leads to DOUBLE ERRORS of NAMING and GRAMMAR that are the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM by DROPPING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD CONTAINER and promoting the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT, as seen in constructs such as “HAMAS slaughtered 1200 Israelis”, which is TRUE, in the sense of Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, but it is NOT REALITY in the same sense that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is also TRUE in the Goedel’s Theorem sense of TRUE but INCOMPLETE since there is NO MENTION of the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which is conjugate to the GROWING OF THE TOWN.  In the indigenous aboriginal culture, there is no DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that implies LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development from which follows FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.  The flow-based language supported understanding is that “everything is related” (mitakuye oyasin) in which case, AUTHORING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which rules out PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE and supports RESTORATIVE JUSTICE.  This understanding is supported by MODERN PHYSICS.

“HAMAS slaughtered 1200 Israelis” as a LOGICAL PROPOSITION is INCOMPLETE and is an example of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that implies LOCAL AUTHORING which contradicts the understanding of ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (everything is related) “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” reaffirming that ‘everything is related’ in which case the required response to VIOLENCE cannot be the isolating and ELIMINATING of the perceived LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHOR since there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORS in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT WEB-OF-LIFE which means that JUSTICE must be RESTORATIVE rather than PURIFICATIONIST.

Whatever LOGICAL PROPOSITION we formulate, because it is a one-sided male-asserting/actualizing proposition that is missing the female accommodating/including conjugate that is part of any real sense-experience in the all-including WAVE-FIELD, it is INCOMPLETE.  THE PROBLEM in using “TRUE BUT INCOMPLETE” LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS such as “THE TOWN IS GROWING” is that they capture only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD conjugate but DROP OUT or FAIL TO INCLUDE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate which is, in this example, the SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS.  While the LANGUAGE I AM RIGHT NOW USING IS ‘SPEAKING” in terms of TWO THINGS; i.e. the TOWN THAT IS GROWING and the WILDERNESS THAT IS SHRINKING, that SPLITTING APART is coming from my use of BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC which is SIMPLER than QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC.

 

The MOMENT WE THINK OF STRIFE, such as in OUTBREAKS OF VIOLENCE, we may understand STRIFE in terms of RELATIONAL DISSONANCE which is in QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TERMS (wherein ‘we are all related’ as with strands in a web).  In this case, “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” where there is no such thing as a LOCAL AUTHOR of violence, where the violence is instead of a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT source which requires a RESTORATIVE JUSTICE (i.e. subsuming dissonance in the web by co-cultivating resonance), ..OR, … we may understand STRIFE in the BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING terms of INDEPENDENT BEINGS IN POLARIZED CONFLICT, SOME perceived as GOOD and SOME perceived as BAD, engaging with one another as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE PLAYING FIELD, an understanding that leads to PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE (i.e. seeking the elimination of BAD INDEPENDENT BEINGS which is a recipe for mutual annihilation in the event that the combatants, rather than being INDEPENDENT, are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT as in the ‘web-of-life’ ).

 * * * * * * * END OF AUTHOR’S PREFACE  * * * * * * * * * * * 

 

 

 

ERRORS IN “THE TRICKY BIT IN: UNDERSTANDING THE DIVISIVE VIEWS OF HOW THE WORLD WORKS”

THERE ARE TWO ERRORS (that I wish to correct) in the ESSAY i.e. there are two places where I say “ interconnected and interrelated” which is REDUNDANT where I intended to say “interconnected and interdependent”

 This is the actual case and the important difference is that interconnected and interdependent” means influences APPEARING to derive from a particular strand in the web are of a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) nature.  This is a key understanding of the WAVE-FIELD structure which is beyond the scope of being expressed in simple BINARY LOGIC terms wherein, if we were investigating the origin of emergent dynamics, we would assess the contribution of each involved independent element assuming the independent contribution of independent elements.    In the case of a relational web, it is like a web made from attaching elastic bands together to form a large web, anchoring it to the ceiling and hanging weights to the lower bands, then setting things in motion, and a strange motion it will be, that will be continually shifting and involving different strands with different energies and motions.  It is the sort of example given to illustrate the unpredictability of nonlinear dynamics.

 

What I am saying with this example, is that when we have a system containing multiple components that are making joint contributions (as in strands in the web), it is like we are in a BUMPER CAR GAME at the amusement park where at some point, there is a violent collision and we stop to take stock of what happened.  What we know is that there is a serious collision wherein there is a “perpetrator” and a “victim” (and imagine this happening on a crowded freeway where a dog had suddenly darted across the freeway setting everyone to swerving, braking and accelerating and the whole crazy flow goes on for several miles in the traffic ‘line-up’ possibly without there being any collisions.  But if there is a collision, the easy part is to identify a local, explicit perpetrator and victim but as in the case of many strands in the web, it would be INCOMPLETE to consider only the TWO CARS INVOLVED (allowing the reduction to simple binary logic) and to hold the so-called perpetrator RESPONSIBLE for the damage to the “victim”.  Now, I am NOT DENYING that there is a quote/unquote VICTIM who really did get injured and I am NOT DENYING that there is a PERPETRATOR, but here is where GOEDEL’S THEOREM comes in once again which says that ALL FINITE PROPOSITIONS OF LOGIC ARE INCOMPLETE because while THE  PROPOSITION IS VERIFIABLY TRUE that there is a PERPETRATOR that is responsible for CRASHING INTO AND CREATING A “VICTIM”, that LOGIC is INCOMPLETE in that it is only THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT expression of an event that has a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ASPECT.

 For example, if we were involved in such an incident and were labelled the PERPETRATOR in the BINARY LOGIC PERPETRATOR-VICTIM  DESCRIPTION, we would want to point out that WE WERE PUSHED FROM BEHIND WHICH WAS THE CAUSE OF THE COLLISION.  But the PROSECUTOR could establish the TRUTH (supported by eye-witnesses) that MY CAR had CRASHED INTO the VICTIM’S CAR, making me the PERPETRATOR of the resulting DAMAGE and INJURIES.  The FRUSTRATION I would be feeling as I protested this over-simplistic analysis would be intensified by having to answer questions from the PROSECUTION wherein I could not avoid acknowledging that IT WAS TRUE THAT MY CAR HAD CRASHED INTO THE VICTIM’S CAR.  My frustration would be coming from the fact that THAT TRUTH WAS INCOMPLETE, making NO MENTION of being pushed from behind by…? a whole line-up of cars, the drivers of which were in some cases having their foot on the brakes and in other cases having their foot on the accelerator.

THE THIS IS WHERE GOEDEL’S THEOREM OF THE INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS GIVES US AN IMPORTANT INSIGHT … BUT WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE IS BINARY (EITHER/OR) LOGIC based FOR THE VERY REASON THAT BINARY LOGIC PROVIDES IRON-GATED JUDGEMENTS OF “EITHER” GUILTY “OR” INNOCENT of charges prepared in the form of LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, … LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS THAT ARE “INNATELY INCOMPLETE”, WHICH ARE FOR THAT REASON, NEVER USED IN AN INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE which is RESTORATIVE rather than PUNITIVE.

 

That is, Indigenous aboriginal JUSTICE , as formulated in language that is less simple (than BINARY LOGIC) QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC  of the INCLUDING MEDIUM based (wherein everything is INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT) and for this reason is RESTORATIVE JUSTICE because emergent outcomes DO NOT HAVE A LOCAL, EXPLICIT SOURCE since everything is INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT, where, when one strand in the web ‘BECOMES VIOLENT’ , it is impossible to determine a LOCAL and EXPLICIT SOURCE of the VIOLENCE since the INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE of the strands in the web give rise to dynamics that are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).  This is why, when there is a VIOLENT INCIDENT, the response is the HEALING CIRCLE where the community comes together to resolve hidden tensions in the social relational web, that MANIFEST THROUGH A PARTICULAR STRAND IN THE WEB BUT WHICH ARE NOT “SOURCED” BY THAT STRAND.   A RESTORATIVE JUSTICE based approach follows from this understanding, as constrasts with WESTERN CULTURE PUNITIVE JUSTICE which follows from the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of COMMUNITY as a COLLECTION OF INDEPENDENT BEINGS that move about and interact in a NON-CONNECTING, INFINITE EMPTY SPACE.

The indigenous aboriginal “STRANDS IN THE WEB” understanding is supported by MODERN PHYSICS since the same INTERCONNECTING and INTERDEPENDENT relations apply to MATERIAL FORMS that are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD .  Because of the INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE of the CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka the strands in the web), the ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT of the ‘LOCAL CONDENSATION’ (aka local strand in the web) CANNOT BE ATTRIBUTED TO THE ‘LOCAL CONDENSATION’ (aka local strand in the web) due to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT NATURE OF EVENTS (i.e. the person “holding the smoking gun” is the strand in the relational web that is VENTING the tensions in the web AND NOT THE LOCAL AUTHOR OF THE VIOLENT ACTIONS which are VENTING THROUGH HIM, the origins of which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) as in a web of interconnecting, interdependent elastic strands where a particular LOCAL EXPLICIT strand may LOAD tensions FROM other LOCAL, EXPLICIT strands or  UNLOAD tensions onto other LOCAL, EXPLICIT strands so that a PARTICULAR LOCAL, EXPLICIT STRAND THAT IS SEEN AS THE AUTHOR OF VIOLENT ACTIONS IS NOT THE “LOCAL, EXPLICIT SOURCE” OF THE VIOLENCE BUT THE LOCAL VENT FOR THE UNLOADING OF TENSIONS WHICH ARE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT(RELATIONAL) IN ORIGIN.

This understanding of overall INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE is what is affirmed in the indigenous aboriginal expression MITAKUYE OYASIN (everything is related), and this structure of reality is equally affirmed by MODERN PHYSICS wherein all material forms (Their “INDEPENDENCE” as if in an empty space is “APPEARANCE” aka “SCHAUMKOMMEN”), though they may APPEAR INDEPENDENT, by virtue of their being CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, ARE INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT.  

 

GIVEN THAT one’s model of reality is this LESS SIMPLE but sense-experience affirmed model which acknowledges the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT AUTHORING of what transpires, it would not make sense to prosecute the person ‘holding the smoking gun’ (the alleged perpetrator) as in the BINARY LOGIC based PERPETRATOR-VICTIM LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.   YES, IT IS TRUE that CAR 17 was the PERPETRATOR that crashed into CAR 51 driven by the VICTIM, but as Goedel’s Theorem says, that is an INCOMPLETE TRUTH as is the nature of all finite LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.

 

To say that HAMAS is the perpetrator and Israelis are the victim is TRUE, but it is an INCOMPLETE TRUTH because it is only the BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL and EXPLICIT capturing of what went on, which is included within a QUANTUM LOGIC NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT unfolding which is MORE REALISTIC and WITHIN WHICH the TRUE-but-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC CONSTRUCTION is INCLUDED.

 

The less simple but more realistic understanding calls for RESTORATIVE JUSTICE, which is what indigenous aboriginal cultures have developed while the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC “LESS REALISTIC but MORE CONCISE AND DEFINITIVE” PUNITIVE JUSTICE is what WESTERN CULTURE has chosen to go with and there is a CLEAR REASON for this which has been ‘seen through’ by Nietzsche and it is EGO.   In order to be LOGICALLY CONSISTENT, those who make use of the SIMPLE CONCEPT OF LOCAL AUTHORING that comes with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which as we have seen IS LOGICALLY TRUE; i.e. THE LOCAL AUTHOR of the CAR CRASH is the identified PERPETRATOR, but while it is TRUE, it is INCOMPLETE.

 

BUT CONSIDER THE MAN WITH THE BIG EGO, or the STATE with the BIG EGO, … WHY NOT GO WITH THE LOGICAL TRUTH of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, as WE BUILT THE TOWN, which is PROVABLY TRUE?  But at the same TIME, it is INCOMPLETE because it DROPS OUT THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which covers the reality of the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.

 

Here we can see HOW IT CAN BE that indigenous aboriginals have developed RESTORATIVE JUSTICE because the concept of LOCAL AUTHORING (of the perpetrator), while TRUE is INCOMPLETE because it is only dealing with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, e.g. where CAR 17  CRASHES INTO CAR 51 but here we are only looking at STRANDS IN A COMPLEX WEB OF RELATIONS as develop in the BUMPER CAR GAME.  As we know from being in a BUMPER CAR WE ARE DOING SO MUCH BUMPING OF OTHERS AND AT THE SAME TIME GETTING SO MUCH BUMPING FROM OTHERS that the REAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SHAPE OF OUR TRAJECTORY IS CERTAINLY NOT ‘OURS ALONE’ and as a matter of fact, it is likely to be LESS OURS than the MANY OTHERS, and IMPOSSIBLE to SOLVE FOR, in which case, in a comparable real life situation, it may be WISER to FOCUS ON RESTORING HARMONY than to try to IDENTIFY IN QUANTITATIVE TERMS, THE AUTHORS OF DISSONANCE.

 

* * * * * *

WESTERN CULTURE PERSISTS IN USING THE CONCEPT OF LOCAL AUTHORING IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT WHILE IT IS TRUE, IT IS NOT CAPTURING REALITY, BUT IT IS GREAT FOR THE EGO BECAUSE IT IS POSSIBLE TO USE INCOMPLETE TRUTH TO LAY CLAIMS TO ACHIEVEMENTS VIA LOCAL AUTHORING THAT ARE TRUE BUT NOT REAL.  For example, the claim that WE CONSTRUCTED A TOWN may be TRUE but it will be INCOMPLETE because we do not mention the SHRINKING OF and DAMAGE to the WILDERNESS.

 

WESTERN CULTURE IS A CULTURE THAT HAS ASSIMILATED WITHIN OUR REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS SYSTEMS, THE USE OF BINARY LOGIC based TRUTHS which can be PROVEN TRUE but which are UNREAL and which support the construction of a PSEUDO-REALITY that is UNREAL, such as where THE TOWN IS GROWING … FULL STOP… which as Bohm points out is FRAGMENTATIVE and OBSCURANTIST and which Nietzsche points out is “A DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR”;


Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

This supports claims of LOCAL AUTHORING that INFLATE THE EGO;

 

Nietzsche is pointing to basic issues with LANGUAGE, including how our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME CAN BE USED TO “INFLATE THE EGO”;

 

In its origin language belongs in the age of the most rudimentary form of psychology. We enter a realm of crude fetishism when we summon before consciousness the basic presuppositions of the metaphysics of language, in plain talk, the presuppositions of reason. Everywhere it sees a doer and doing; it believes in will as the cause; it believes in the ego, in the ego as being, in the ego as substance, and it projects this faith in the ego-substance upon all things — only thereby does it first create the concept of “thing.” Everywhere “being” is projected by thought, pushed underneath, as the cause; the concept of being follows, and is a derivative of, the concept of ego. In the beginning there is that great calamity of an error that the will is something which is effective, that will is a faculty. Today we know that it is only a word.” – Nietzsche, ‘Twilight of the Idols’

 

 

* * * * * END OF “ERRORS IN “THE TRICKY BIT IN: UNDERSTANDING THE DIVISIVE VIEWS OF HOW THE WORLD WORKS” * * * *

 

 

THE TRICKY BIT IN: UNDERSTANDING THE DIVISIVE VIEWS OF HOW THE WORLD WORKS.

The Tricky bit for a WESTERN CULTURE RAISED READER is in getting past CAPTIVITY by BINARY LOGIC thinking so that we can EVEN “TRY OUT” THINKING IN A QUANTUM LOGIC MANNER.   TEST YOURSELF on whether you can put yourself in the shoes of an indigenous aboriginal person that understands the world as a world wherein everything is interconnected and interdependent wherein we are STRANDS in the all-including WEB of life.

This is to test in our ability to let go of the opposites of GOOD and BAD as is the case with indigenous aboriginals;

 

“At the core of our spiritual beings we make no artificial distinction between the sacred and the profane.  Unlike Western culture, we have not suffered through that artificial separation”  — Anishinabek source

 

This means that we cannot speak in terms where we impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS to ourselves or anyone or anything (we are all included in the transforming relational continuum aka web-of-life aka energy-charged plenum).

 

We need to be able to let go of the binary in order to understand ourselves as being included in something GREATER THAN OURSELVES in which case we CANNOT HAVE LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS but as we have experienced from driving in freeway traffic, our powers come through our being able to move relatively and influence the HOLES that open up in the traffic flow configuration, holes to let other in, as they tend to open up for us to move into, but this can only come from collective coordination (cooperation).  The WAY THAT WE COME UP WITH THE NOTION OF OUR OWN LOCAL AUTHORING POWER, we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR where the NAMING imputes BEING and the GRAMMAR mobilizes the BEING as if in EMPTY SPACE since if our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS I DROVE TO CALGARY it is one of those TRUE but INCOMPLETE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS akin to “I LAUNCHED THE HOBIE CAT” which is MISSING WHAT?

 

REFLECTION WILL SHOW THAT what we did with our LANGUAGE was to present the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE  ON ITS OWN by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is the LESS SIMPLE ONE because it is about being INCLUDED IN SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES; i.e. picture the complexity of launching the HOBIE CAT on a SURF POUNDED BEACH, … one’s experience is that ‘TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON AND A TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE” or the same thing in different words.  “There is a TIDE in the AFFAIRS of MAN which, TAKEN AT THE FLOOD, LEADS ON TO FORTUNE, Omitted, … “

 

Being included in something greater than ourselves is the general case for we are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, however, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS BINARY LOGIC BASED, or it may be more accurate to say that when we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SPEAK we are in the habit of speaking in BINARY LOGIC terms such as “THE TOWN IS GROWING” and we have gotten lazy and are dropping out the full QUANTUM LOGIC expression of ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ wherein everything is in flux including ourselves; i.e. wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  When we use BINARY LOGIC propositions such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’, we TAKE OURSELVES OUT OF THE DYNAMIC AND RECAST OURSELVES AS UNINVOLVED OBSERVERS, even though the reality is that WE ARE INCLUDED IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD in which case there is no such thing as our own LOCALLY AUTHORED ACTIONS as suggested by “I launched the Hobie Cat from the beach at Fort Walton” because this is one of those Goedel Theorem logical propositions that is TRUE but INCOMPLETE and this INCOMPLETENESS DROPPED OUT THE FACT THAT I WAS INCLUDED IN A REALITY GREATER THAN MYSELF wherein IT WAS INDUCTIVELY SHAPING MY ACTIONS as in TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON (making me scurry around IN TIME WITH THE SURFING to get the hobie cat sails and rudder working so as to get me off the beach when in between the crashing surf.  So GOEDEL HAS A POINT; WHEN I SAY THAT I LAUCHED THE HOBIE CAT FROM FORT WALTON BEACH, THAT IS JUST THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ASPECT OF WHAT WAS GOING ON, and I WAS INCLUDED IN, AND HAVING TO DEAL WITH, SOMETHING MUCH GREATER.

 

So, to say, “HE LAUNCHED THE HOBIE CAT FROM FORT WALTON BEACH” includes only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and TAKES IT OUT OF CONTEXT by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate influence WHICH I WAS INCLUDED IN AND WHICH WAS SHAPING MY ACTIONS.  I.E. THERE WAS A LOT MORE TO IT THAN A SIMPLE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LOGICAL PROPOSITION CAPTURED.

 

Likewise, to say, “HAMAS murdered 1200 Israelis” includes only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and TAKES IT OUT OF CONTEXT by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate influence which HAMAS was INCLUDED IN and which was SHAPING THEIR ACTIONS”  I.E. THERE WAS A LOT MORE TO IT THAN A SIMPLE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LOGICAL PROPOSITION CAPTURED.

 

This is NOT A POLITICAL STATEMENT, IT IS A PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE DIFFERENT WORKINGS OF DIFFERENT FORMS OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALING, with a focus on the DIFFERENCE between INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL FORMS OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and WESTERN CULTURE FORMS OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

* * * * * * * *

 

 

 

Have you ever pondered the EAST is EAST and WEST is WEST SPLIT?

 

When we inquire into the social impact of those two very particular different worlds views of EAST (of indigenous aboriginal) wherein we are STRANDS IN THE WEB OF LIFE, and WEST wherein we are INDEPENDENT BEINGS MADE OF THE “RIGHT STUFF”, what we see are two different suites of guides to behaviour.

 

For example, if we consider ourselves to be STRANDS IN THE WEB OF LIFE, we are going to design a very different approach to sustaining JUSTICE and ORDER in our community because of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT origin of dynamics, as in the MODERN PHYSICS understanding that we are included as CONDENSATIONS in an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD which is an alternative way of understanding that the world is ONE ALL-INCLUDING CONTINUUM with contents that are ALL RELATED by being CONDENSATIONS of and within the ONE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

 

This indigenous aboriginal STRANDS IN THE INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT WEB OF LIFE clearly sets up an ethical message to all of those who understand things this way, such as; Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”  which is attributed to Chief Seattle but which is a common indigenous aboriginal ‘belief’.  In the midst of bloody, lethal strife, as happens, it remains an IDEAL that nevertheless shapes how one feels about oneself and others, which GOES A STEP FURTHER than ‘Do unto others as you would have them do unto you’ which we hear in the WESTERN CULTURE where the assumption is that we are all DISCONNECTED INDEPENDENT BEINGS.  The STEP FURTHER is the understanding our actions are not GRACIOUS AND HONORABLE making us NICE GUYS AND GALS for behaving in this manner, but coming INSTEAD, from a deep awareness that ‘THOSE OTHERS ARE US’ because we are all STRANDS IN THE INTERCONNECTING, INTERDEPENDING WEB-OF-LIFE as CONDENSATIONS OF AND IN THE ONE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD. This leads to guidance of the form;  “Let one’s interactions be informed by the understanding of ‘mitakuye oyasin’, ‘we are all related’ as strands in the one web-of-life”.

 

In the ethic of ‘mitakuye oyasin’, there is no BINARY LOGIC based SPLIT into EITHER good OR bad and the accompanying REWARS and PUNISHMENTS because it is only natural to invest in the HARMONY in the dynamics of the interconnected and INTERdependent strands in the web.  It just makes natural SENSE, for a strand in the interconnected and interdependent web, to move so as to co-cultivate resonance rather than dissonance, and where dissonance does develop, the remedy is clear, as with driving in a traffic jam, to back off and support one another in moving towards their objectives as we move towards ours, and thus restoring overall resonance, since all movements within the web are interconnected and interdependent.

 

The REALITY that this makes sense in the world we live in has been affirmed by MODERN PHYSICS with its understanding of material forms as CONDENSATIONS of an all-including WAVE-FIELD, however, the WESTERN CULTURE “HABIT” of regarding ourselves as INDEPENDENT BEINGS is something we have LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS; i.e. by BINARY LOGIC based programs of REWARDING and PUNISHING.  This approach is made possible by EMBRACING THE ABSTRACTION OF THE INDEPENDENT BEING (notionally) with his own LOCALLY AUTHORED ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT (as a GOOD BEING or a BAD BEING) which can be judged and REWARDED or PUNISHED by the social collective or by the administrative systems set up for the purpose of PURIFYING the social collective by removing, reforming or emasculating the BAD BEINGS.

 

Thus, the WESTERN CULTURE support for believing in BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT BEINGS is now deeply LOCKED IN by the REWARDS and PUNISHMENT scheme that has been infused into the popular LANGUAGE by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that implies LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, thus supporting an understanding of all ‘events’ on the ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ basis, which differs fundamentally from the ‘strands-in-the-web’ understanding where the source of unfolding dynamics is seen as NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, making it impossible to identify a LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORING SOURCE and leading to remediation of relational dissonance by collective approaches such as in the traffic example where there is a backing off of all participants in order that overall relational resonance is restored.  In this indigenous aboriginal approach, which ‘makes sense’ in the MODERN PHYSICS understanding, there is NO PURIFICATIONIST ACTION as in WESTERN CULTURE based on the notion of LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING of actions and development rather than NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) authoring.

 

The NON-PURIFICATIONIST APPROACH to RESOLVING RELATIONAL DISSONANCE.

 

As the Anishinabe say, WESTERN CULTURE seems to have assumed that BINARY LOGIC GOOD AND EVIL is BASIC TO REALITY, although this is NOT TRUE in the understanding of indigenous aboriginal cultures nor in a MODERN PHYSICS understanding which is based on QUANTUM LOGIC rather than on BINARY LOGIC.  While BINARY LOGIC assumes the existence of INDEPENDENT BEINGS which may be EITHER innocent OR guilty of LOCAL AUTHORING of VIOLENT EVENTS, QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as in a matrix of INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT STRANDS that make up the WEB.  The behaviour of a particular STRAND is thus NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT by virtue of becoming manifest THROUGH THE STRAND while the actions of the strand are INFORMED by the overall relational web.   The INDIVIDUAL STRAND is thus not an INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL STRAND but a participant within an interconnected and interdependent web of relations whereupon its movements are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) and thus beyond the scope of BINARY LOGIC which is limited to THIS STRAND IS EITHER THE SOURCE OR NOT THE SOURCE of the ACTION IT IS MANIFESTING.

 

One may therefore say that in this interconnecting, interdepending STRAND IN THE WEB situation, it is TOO SIMPLE to assess each strand in the web as to whether IT AUTHORED THE DISTURBANCE or IT DID NOT AUTHOR THE DISTURBANCE and this points to the difference in the conceptualizing of JUSTICE in indigenous aboriginal cultures, which is NON-BINARY (but instead QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC based) and JUSTICE in WESTERN CULTURE … WHICH IS BINARY.  As the Anishinabe explain;

 

“At the core of our spiritual beings we make no artificial distinction between the sacred and the profane[no binary logic based pseudo-reality]. Unlike Western culture, we have not suffered through that artificial separation

https://anishinabeknews.ca/2015/05/13/divergence-traditional-aboriginal-spirituality-and-mother-earth/

According to Tomoko Masuzawa, any cosmology without a sacred–profane binary was rendered invisible by the field of religious studies, privileging Christianity [and Judaism and Islam] at the expense of non-Christian [non-Abrahamic] systems because the binary was supposed to be “universal”,  –Wikipedia

The BINARY is WELL-EVIDENT HERE:

 

PRIME MINISTER NETANYAHU’S STATEMENT stressing the BINARY LOGIC view; Ladies and gentlemen, the real war criminals are not in Israel. They’re in Iran. They’re in Gaza, in Syria, in Lebanon, in Yemen. Those of you who stand with these war criminals, those of you who stand with evil against good, with the curse against the blessing, those of you who do so should be ashamed of yourselves.

 

There is no sign of acknowledgement that HAMAS and ISRAELI are “STRANDS IN A COMMON WEB of interconnections and interdependencies” since the WESTERN CULTURE has given a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE to BINARY LOGIC.

 

It is clear that MODERN PHYSICS supports the understanding of the QUANTUM LOGIC relation between material forms and the all-including energy-charged PLENUM (WAVE-FIELD) wherein the material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the PLENUM giving rise to the BOTH/AND LOGICAL RELATION wherein the MATERIAL FORMS are, at the same time, the WAVE-FIELD the are included in.   This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is the relation that we see where there is a WHORLING in a FLOWING; i.e. while the two are SEPARATE IN “APPEARANCE”, we cannot scoop the WHORLING out of the FLOWING.

 

If the impression of ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (everything is related as with strands in a web) is in our mind when we observe or are informed of a violent or lethal altercation, our sense is of the tragedy of internal strife within a family, but how far does this notion of ONE INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT THING GO?  As users of a QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC FLOW-based LANGUAGE where forms are BOTH themselves AND the containing PLENUM, we may visualize two separate ‘family members’ as “SEPARATE ONLY IN APPEARANCE” but as fellow inhabitants in the of the PLENUM, being innately interconnected and interdependent as in strands in a web.  But, as users of BINARY LOGIC and seeing material BEINGS such as two ‘family members’ as SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT by virtue of being insulated by their inclusion in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

 

WHICH LOGIC SHALL WE USE?  QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC which supports the interconnectedness and interdependence of the strands-in-the-web conceptualization, … or QUANTUM EITHER/OR LOGIC which supported the DIVISION and INDEPENDENT BEING of the BINARY LOGIC MATTER IN EMPTY SPACE conceptualization.

 

We know that

 

-A- The QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of reality is supported by MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta.

 

-B- The BINARY LOGIC understanding of reality is supported by NEWTONIAN  PHYSICS, WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS as dominate in the modern world, and includes (some) members of the Judaic, Christian and Islamic religious belief groups

 

-C- The BINARY LOGIC understanding is LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS; i.e. the WESTERN CULTURE systems of REWARDS and PUNISHMENTS and ADMIRING and DESPISING is BINARY LOGIC based, and has been used to develop hierarchies of SOCIAL POWER  which includes PROTECTING and STRENGTHENING TRADITIONAL BELIEFS such as the BELIEF IN BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION and the PURIFICATIONISM which derives from it.

 

WESTERN CULTURE IS CURRENTLY DOMINANT HENCE THERE IS WIDESPREAD SUPPORT FOR BINARY LOGIC based THINKING such as the following, expressed by Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu;

 

those of you who stand with evil against good, with the curse against the blessing, those of you who do so should be ashamed of yourselves.

 

WHAT IS UNSPOKEN in this statement is the assumption that, instead of people being INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT as in a relational web Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” people are (said to be in WESTERN CULTURE) “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” notionally WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING.

 

The latter WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE INCORPORATED COMMON BELIEF, sets the stage, together with BINARY LOGIC, for the notional LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments WHICH ARE “EITHER” good “OR” bad.  This leads to the notion of improving the general condition of the community dynamic by the ELIMINATION of BAD actions and developments and the PROLIFERATING of GOOD actions and developments WHICH CONFLICTS with the NON-BEING WEB-OF-LIFE based understanding of reality wherein everything is interconnected and interrelated Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”

 

Because there are no INDEPENDENT BEINGS in the ‘web-of-life’ understanding which is supported by MODERN PHYSICS condensations in the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD understanding, wherein these condensations are interconnected and interrelated by the unifying WAVE-FIELD in which they are “BOTH/AND” inclusions.  In this QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION, there is no place for BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR DISCRIMINATIONS since EVERYTHING IS RELATED.  This relational reality with its QUANTUM LOGIC relations, while it has the exposure to RELATIONAL dissonance that can be restored to RELATIONAL resonance, offers NO “INDEPENDENT BEING” BASIS for declaring SOME INDEPENDENT BEINGS to be GOOD and other INDEPENDENT BEINGS to be BAD since ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (everything is related.

 

“At the core of our spiritual beings we make no artificial distinction between the sacred and the profane. Unlike Western culture, we have not suffered through that artificial separation”

 

THAT ‘ARTIFICIAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN GOOD BEINGS AND BAD BEINGS’ IS MADE POSSIBLE BY INCORPORATING THE ABSTRACTION OF “BEING” IN A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘BEING’ IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.  As Schroedinger pointed out, the introduction of PROBABILITY THEORY in an attempt to PRESERVE ‘BEING’ by concealing it within a CLOUD of PROBABILITY does not alter the reality of the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE of the WAVE-FIELD.

 

* * * * * * *

In the WAVE-FIELD understanding, we have the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD which is the foundational reality within which there is the LOCAL and EXPLICIT of the material condensations WHICH ARE SECONDARY TO THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.

 

WHILE THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE TO THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING MATERIAL CONDENSATION, the FORMER is, in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “DROPPED OUT”; e.g. While the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH OF THE TOWN comes in conjugate relation to the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and SUBSTITUTES AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE IN ITS PLACE.  The result is the REDUCED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION “THE TOWN IS GROWING” as if, judging by these words, THE TOWN WAS GROWING IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  This has been a problem in WESTERN CULTURE as LAND DEVELOPERS AND CULTIVATORS have pushed ahead on their projects as if REAL in themselves without maintaining an AWARENESS of the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which, understood TOGETHER with the GROWTH OF LAND DEVELOPMENT and CULTIVATION equates to the overall TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE.

 

* * * * *