PREFACE:  Nature’s dynamic, as understood in Modern physics and in indigenous aboriginal culture, has a WAVE-like CONJUGATE make-up with both FEMALE accommodating and MALE asserting components.  However, WESTERN CULTURE language architecture REDUCES this CONJUGATE REALITY to a SIMPLER one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE SUBSTITUTE REALITY with the help of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  While the capture of natural WAVE-FIELD (Female-Male-conjugate) phenomena is accommodated in the flow-based languages of indigenous aboriginal and Modern physics (Quantum Logic), WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European languages (Whorf’s classification) ARTIFICIALLY REDUCE language-based REALITY REPRESENTATIONS to a ONE-SIDED, MALE-ASSERTIVE AUTHORING BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION.  As Nietzsche has pointed out, by giving a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN LANGUAGE to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR we establish the ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.

While this DOUBLE ERROR REDUCTION SIMPLIFIES language based representation of reality …. BY INTRODUCING A SIMPLIFIED MALE-ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY (e.g. a prime example is ‘the EARTH TURNS ROUND’ which splits apart MATTER and SPACE), there are side-effects of confusion from the DROP-OUT of the FEMALE aspect which can include schizophrenia and paranoia, as has been pointed out by David Bohm.   Obvious examples of the DROP OUT of the FEMALE (accommodating) aspect include the ‘Thin Skull Rule in WESTERN LAW which holds a person fully responsible for AUTHORING of injury as if it derived from the MALE ASSERTIVE ACTION, ignoring the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate.  Another example is the imputing of AUTHORSHIP of a forest fire to a person who has discarded a cigarette butt, which under most circumstances would have no significant effect, such effect being driven by the FEMALE conjugate to a far greater degree than by the MALE ‘trigger’.’

While the reduction to the MALE ASSERTIVE conjugate DOES SIMPLIFY language based representation of REALITY, … what is being REPRESENTED is NO LONGER “REALITY” but is instead manufacturing a MALE ASPECT ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”   The UTILITY of this WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REDUCTION of REALITY to the MALE-ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY comes from its enabling the construction of reality representations that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT, since it is the FEMALE CONJUGATE reality aspect that opens up into the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  For e example, it is simpler to speak of ‘the AVALANCHE’ as a MALE ASSERTIVE pile of rocks crashing down the mountain and destroying the TOWN than to included a description of the OPENING OF A HOLE in the LANDSCAPE which then draws the description into the overall TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE which is the combination of both the FEMALE OPENING and the MALE ASSERTING.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE incorporates this REDUCTION TO THE MALE CONJUGATE in order to SIMPLIFY language based representation by selectively EXTRACTING a LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENT in the manner of a photographic SNAPSHOT which is NOT ONLY no longer ‘included’ in the transforming relational continuum but which, with the aid of GRAMMAR, can become the LOCAL STUB or CENTERPIECE for constructing a new language based SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which case we LET GO OF the natural platform of the transforming relational continuum, and replace it with an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

This SUBSTITUTE REALITY, by its substitution of an ABSOLUTE SPACE REFERENCE FRAME, serves up an artificial INDEPENDENCE from the transforming relational continuum so that our language-triggered psychological perception displays only the local fragment and ITS GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, … dissolving the memory of inclusion in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  This DISENCUMBERING FRAGMENTING greatly SIMPLIFIES constructing language based representation of, for example, TOWNING AS AS INTRINSICALLY INCLUDED WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, however, we are then obliged to come up with our own means of ANIMATING this FRAGMENT we are SYNTHETICALLY LIBERATING within our new SUBSTITUTE REALITY that sports a new ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.  The LOCAL FIGURE is now INDEPENDENT and SEPARATE FROM THE GROUND so that we can use language and grammar to manage the GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION as if LOCALLY AUTHORED by the liberated figure; i.e. “THE TOWN” in the EMPTY EUCLIDEAN SPACE, formerly understood as (and remains in indigenous aboriginal languages as in Modern physics as) “the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.”.

This WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, which reduces relational forms in the flow with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to ‘make them out to be’ LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and development within a new SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while it greatly SIMPLIFIES language based representation of REALITY —CORRECTION — What is going on is not the development of a SIMPLIFIED REPRESENTATION but the introduction of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein ‘the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ has been synthetically CHOPPED OUT of the transforming relational continuum and RE-INVENTED as a LOCAL, INDEPENDENTLY EXISTING THING-IN-iTSELF with its own GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS of AUTHORING actions and development.  The EMPTY SPACE we have installed this ABSTRACT new TOWN in is lacking the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING qualities that come with the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which means that we must now present the MALE as being the FULL AND SOLE LOCAL AUTHOR OF ITS OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.   This is why, in this WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, we have come up with the THIN-SKULL RULE in LAW that establishes the one-sided MALE AUTHOR of the injury,  and the identification of the careless smoker as the one-sided MALE AUTHOR of the forest fire.

Note that these problems are arising from our project of FRAGMENTING REALITY so that we can capture it in our DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based language architecture and thus be able to share and discuss representations of reality from experiences or potential experiences of the past present or as may develop in the future.  This language-capturing, rather than ‘capturing a fragment of ineffable-because-nonlocal-and-implicit reality’, is INVENTING a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is LOCAL AND EXPLICIT which is, in WAVE-FIELD terms, a reduction of he MALE-FEMALE CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD, to the MALE COMPONENT ONLY since this is where the SIMPLIFICATION comes from since the MALE aspect is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and thus EFFABLE while the FEMALE aspect is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  As Lao Tzu suggests; “Know the male.
But keep the role of the female.”

IN THIS PREFACE, the problem is being raised that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed and are using a language architecture that avoids the direct attempt to capture explicit representations of reality (IMPOSSIBLE since everything is in flux) and instead orients to the inventing of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that CAN BE REPRESENTED in LOCAL and EXPLICIT terms; e.g.  the AVALANCHE instead of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  The AVALANCHE is a LOCAL CONCEPT that involves movement of rocks relative to a fixed reference frame which is in effect a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which REPLACES the sense-experience reality of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.  While the AVALANCHE appears to be ‘out in front of us’, TRANSFORMATION is ALL-INCLUDING and CANNOT therefore be captured by language-based propositions that serve up VOYEUR viewable pictures to be understood as FRAGMENTS of reality.  While the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM includes “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, our habit is to use language to fabricate a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that features ‘the TOWN’ that we use GRAMMAR to equip with its own (notional) POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and development. It’s not that this SUBSTITUTE REALITY representation is not a potentially valuable tool, the problem is as Emerson has put it; ‘the TOOL has been running away with the workman, the human with the divine”  We DO NOT LIVE IN THAT SUBSTITUTE REALITY, WE LIVE IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE MISTAKENLY EMPLOYING THE SIMPLIFIED MALE-CONJUGATE ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”; i.e. this language TOOL consisting of NAMING instantiated ‘local things in themselves’ with GRAMMAR-given powers of AUTHORING actions and development’, AS OUR “OPERATIVE REALITY”.  This is our WESTERN CULTURE CRAZY-MAKER!

ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING is exemplary of this aberrant practice of imputing LOCAL AUTHORSHIP by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  As inclusions in the transforming relational continuum, relational forms-in-the-flow including us ANTHROPOIDS are innately without LOCAL AUTHORING POWER, our contributions to the world dynamic coming through the web of relations that ‘are us’, a ‘web of relations’ as associates with condensations within the electromagnetic field as understood with QUANTUM LOGIC rather than BINARY LOGIC.  Thus “things” are NOT the source of relations as would imply a BINARY LOGIC containing space separate from the things contained, but relations are the source of things as in QUANTUM LOGIC.

 

* * *   …. end of PREFACE …

 

 

Our Interpreting of COVID 19 as an ATTACKING PATHOGEN follows the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED CONSTRAINT of expressing EVERYTHING in MALE-ASSERTIVE TERMS, avoiding like the plague, the FEMALE aspect.

 

For example, WESTERN JUSTICE convicts people of AUTHORING the forest fire by carelessly discarding a cigarette butt, as if this act is the CAUSE of the fire, a proposition that is ALL MALE and NO FEMALE; i.e. fails to take into consideration the FEMALE RESPONSE or RECEPTIVENESS to the ‘MALE’ HOT POKER assertion which in the rainy season gets ZERO response.  In other words, the condition of the forest as the recipient of the spark is the major influence as to what manifests.

 

This IGNORING of the FEMALE CONJUGATE is characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.  Instead of TRANSFORMATION as where the contours of the valley SEDUCTIVELY GATHER runoff waters into creeks, streams and then the powerful river, we CREDIT THE MALE RIVER with CARVING OUT THE CANYON when it was the FEMALE VALLEY itching to get her bottom scratched that was the REAL source of the dynamic.

 

So, it is evident that TRANSFORMATION involves FEMALE and MALE conjugates.  Without the inductive gathering organization of the FEMALE VALLEY which harnesses and directs the gravitational field, there would be no MALE ASSERTIVE RIVER, carving out canyons.  TRANSFORMATION entails both FEMALE and MALE conjugates, … HOWEVER, WHILE EASTERN LANGUAGES CAPTURE THIS IN THEIR FLOW-BASED LANGUAGES, WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES REDUCE THE NATURAL FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE DYNAMIC OF TRANSFORMATION TO ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE ACTION SUCH AS “GROWTH”, ”DEVELOPMENT” AND “PRODUCTION”.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, through our JUSTICE system, pretend to be BLIND to the FEMALE CONJUGATE and thus we ALLEGE that the person discarding the cigarette butt is the “AUTHOR” of the forest fire even though this EXACT SAME MALE ASSERTIVE action performed in the rainy season does EXACTLY NOTHING, proving that we need a language that includes FEMALE as well as MALE influence, like Bohm’s Modern physics FLOW-BASED language, RHEOMODE and the indigenous aboriginal languages which retain the FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE nature of physical dynamics.  Give a FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE CAPABLE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, we are not CONSTRAINED to the MALE ASSERTIVE REPRESENTATION OF DYNAMICS.  In this case we can express the conjugate reality where it is not just the MALE ASSERTING that explains dynamics, but the BALANCE between the FEMALE inductive and the MALE assertive as in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

 

There is a need for a FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE language to capture our sense experience of inclusion in TRANSFORMATION since TRANSFORMATION IS THE FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE where it is NOT SIMPLY the mountain dumping avalanches down the slope BUT ALSO the VALLEY inducing its own filling and as Lao Tzu points out, although the valley is only dimly visible, it is the leader in nature’s transformative dynamic.

 

HOW ABOUT THIS.  WHY DON’T WE CALL WESTERN CULTURE, BECAUSE OF ITS  LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WHICH DROPS OUT THE FEMALE, THE CULTURE OF THE DEA ABSCONDITA.   THE REASON I SUGGEST THIS IS BECAUSE, AS HAS BEEN POINED OUT BY BOHM AND NIETZSCHE, OUR ‘DROP OUT’ OF THE ‘FEMALE CONJUGATE’ AND THEN CONSTRUCTING A “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” WHERE WE SPEAK IN ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE TERMS OF “GROWTH”, ‘DEVELOPMENT” AND “PRODUCTION” WHILE “PSYCHOLOGICALLY WALLPAPERING OVER” THE REALITY OF TRANSFORMATION IS DRIVING US NUTS!

 

* * * INSTEAD OF TALKING IN CONJUGATE RELATIONAL (QUANTUM LOGIC) TERMS OF “BALANCE” AND  “IMBALANCE”, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS TALK IN THE STRIPPED DOWN, ONE-SIDED TERMS OF PATHOGENS AND HEROES … OR … ANGELS AMD DEMONS, AS IF THERE WERE TWO SEPARATE BINARY LOGICAL POLAR OPPOSITE AGENCIES OF ‘CREATION AND DESTRUCTION’, AVOIDING LIKE THE PLAGUE, THE ANDROGYNOUS REALITY OF THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION (THE WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC AKA THE TAO).

 

This ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE ONLY LANGUAGE is OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and what this POLARIZING language does to us is set up divisions everywhere on the BINARY LOGIC basis of “EITHER” good “OR” bad and puts on a course of PURIFICATION of our social dynamic which is driving us CRAZY.

 

* * * NOTA BENE: …. SPLITTING THINGS UP INTO THE POLAR OPPOSITES OF (A) GOOD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS and (B) BAD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS captures our attention in the CONSTRAINED terms of MALE-ASSERTIVE ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, … DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATIVE CONJUGATE, … which includes all of the HOLES in the LOGGED FOREST and the QUARRIES IN THE MINED HILLS and MOUNTAINS, which together in CONJUGATE RELATION with the MALE ASSERTIVE ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS CONSTITUTES “TRANSFORMATION”.

 

It’s bad enough to fool ourselves on the MACRO issues by reducing TRANSFORMATION by knocking out the FEMALE conjugate and going only with the MALE conjugate of positivist CONSTRUCTION as with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION,… but we employ this same self-delusion in the MICRO world of the microbial assemblage by PORTRAYING ILLNESS, NOT in the conjugate relational ANDROGYNOUS terms of BALANCE and IMBALANCE, but in the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE BINARY LOGIC based TERMS of “ALL OUR MICROBES ASSERTING NORMALLY”, or, “the ATTACK OF MICROBIAL PATHOGENS” where we discern whether microbes are EITHER GOOD OR BAD.

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS WITH OUR LANGUAGE WHERE WE REDUCE THE NATURAL QUANTUM LOGIC OF “IMBALANCE” TO THE ABSTRACT BINARY LOGIC OF ‘THE ATTACK OF PATHOGENS’ IS GETTING US INTO A LOT OF TROUBLE (DYSFUNCTION) AS WE PURSUE THE ABSTRACT BINARY LOGIC COURSE OF PATHOGEN ELIMINATION RATHER THAN THE NATURAL QUANTUM LOGIC COURSE OF RESTORING RELATIONAL BALANCE.  SO, YES, ITS TRUE THAT ROBIN HOOD AND JEAN VALJEAN BROKE THE BINARY LOGIC BASED LAW OF ‘THOU SHALT NOT STEAL” but in a relational language rather than our COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN languages, we would be employing QUANTUM LOGIC which is the LOGIC OF RELATIONAL BALANCE AND IMBALANCE which would naturally speak of REBALANCING as HEALING actions where conditions of IMBALANCE based ILLNESS have developed.

 

* * * WHICH SHALL IT BE?  OUR ATTENDING TO THE BINARY LOGIC BASED PURIFICATIONISM OF ELIMINATING BAD AND PROMOTING GOOD?  OR THE QUANTUM LOGIC APPROACH OF RESTORING BALANCE WHERE IMBALANCE DEVELOPS? 

 

OOPS!  I POSED THAT QUESTION IN BINARY LOGIC TERMS RATHER THAN IN QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE-BASED) TERMS, SO MAYBE WE CAN PUT ON OUR QUANTUM LOGIC ‘VIEWING LENSES’ AND SEE THESE TWO ‘MANAGEMENT SCHEMES’ NOT AS SEPARATE CHOICES BUT IN TERMS OF FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATES WHERE THE FEMALE IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT WHILE THE MALE IS LOCAL AND EXPLICIT.   SO, FOR EXAMPLE, WHILE ‘DUNING’ IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL), ‘THE DUNE’ THAT WE SAY ‘GETS LONGER AND HIGHER AND BURIES OUR LAND-ROVER’ IS A CONVENIENT REDUCTION TO THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT THAT SIMPLIFIES LANGUAGE BASED SHARING EVEN THOUGH IT DOES SO BY CONSTRUCTING A “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” WHICH IS NO LONGER PART OF THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (i.e. the SUBSTITUTE REALITY includes LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS in ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE).

 

SUMMARY TO THIS POINT:

 

We have at our disposal, TWO DIFFERENT ARCHITECTURES FOR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY;

 

BINARY LOGIC ARCHITECTURE:  BINARY LOGIC imagines a world in which there are MATERIAL OBJECTS and EMPTY SPACE which is in effect a world in which there are “ONLY” MALE ASSERTIVE ACTIONS and the FEMALE CONJUGATE is simply DROPPED OUT so that we can represent reality in terms of LOCAL and EXPLICIT constructions as exemplified with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION in a purely one-sided MALE ASSERTIVE approach.  This is a world of the BINARY OPPOSITES of “EITHER” GOOD “OR” BAD, … “EITHER” CORRECT “OR” INCORRECT”, .. a world of HEROES and VILLAINS or ANGELS and DEMONS.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC ARCHITECTURE: QUANTUM LOGIC imagines a world where there is one all-including fluid WAVE-FIELD that is locally occupied by MATERIAL FORMS that are CONDENSATIONS of the (electromagnetic energy) FIELD.  The FORMS in the QUANTUM LOGIC world are all part of the overall CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING FIELD which is like a turbulent flow where the BOILS in the FLOW (condensations) are not SEPARATE from the FLOW in a BINARY LOGIC based sense, but are only DISTINGUISHABLE from the flow in a QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE-BASED) sense.  The forms are RESONANCE based features in the flow akin to the tornado or the water spout.   These relational features appear to be “THEIR OWN THING” with THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE and they provide us with a LOCAL, THING-IN-ITSELF configuration to which we can attach a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING capability for language-based capture purposes, … but which is, in spite of this language treatment, a FIGURE and GROUND-as-ONE QUANTUM LOGIC relation within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. WHILE BINARY LOGIC supports a world of HEROES AND VILLAINS, QUANTUM LOGIC SUPORTS A WORLD OF BALANCE and IMBALANCE .

 

CONSIDERATION of the RELATIVE MERITS of these DIFFERENT LOGICS for use in REPRESENTING SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.

 

BINARY LOGIC, the EITHER/OR logic of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM excels in REDUCING fluid reality to a notional LOCAL and EXPLICIT SUBSTITUTE REALITY where we concern ourselves ONLY with notionally INDEPENDENT material objects, their movements and interactions AS IF WITHIN an EMPTY SPACE of INFINTE EXTENT.  This mathematically abstract ‘empty space’ that is termed EUCLIDIAN SPACE.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC. this BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDED MEDIUM preserves the understanding of reality as an all-included energy field MEDIUM wherein MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS are continually precipitating and dissolving within the TRANSFORMING WHOLE.  In this case, while the forms appear to be independent and free-to-move within a (seemingly) empty space, they are like ‘clouds’ in that they are ‘condensations’ in the invisible, all-including (electromagnetic) energy field.  In this case, there is ONLY ONE THING, the FIELD, which has a DUAL or CONJUGATE FEMALE-AND-MALE nature with a LOCALLY VISIBLE MALE ASPECT that is INCLUDED WITHIN AN OTHERWISE NON-VISIBLE, NONLOCAL (everywhere-at-the-same-time) ENERGY-FIELD.   This TRANSFORMING FIELD is partly visible to us by way of the CONDENSATIONS which, though they appear to be independently-existing and ‘moving and changing under their own power’, are in reality, shapes within the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING ENERGY-FIELD.

 

THE SIMPLICITY FACTOR. 

 

As Poincaré has pointed out, the BINARY LOGIC language option pivoting from a representation of matter in empty space (absolute motion) is the simplest language option;

 

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

 

While Poincaré explains how the SIMPLIFICATION of BINARY LOGIC got into our WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, one has to read on (most of us don’t) to discover what the complications are that are being AVOIDED.  What is being avoided is the complication of BALANCE which makes things indeterminate and fuzzy.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC is the logic of BALANCE where the material object and the electromagnetic field related in the manner of the whorl in the flow or the hurricane in the atmosphere where it is SIMPLER for language capture, to split the FIGURE and GROUND into TWO BINARY LOGIC based independent entities.  In this way we can FOCUS ON THE MALE ASSERTIVE MATERIAL ASPECT and regard space as a great emptiness of infinite extent that we don’t have to talk about.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC is the logic of what is actually occurring which is relational energy BALANCE since the material particle and the energy-charged space it is included in are NOT REALLY TWO MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE, SEPARATE ‘ontological regimes’.

 

While the QUANTUM LOGIC of the WAVE-FIELD allows us to understand this balancing act that is basic in nature, our reduction, within our language architected representation,  to a BINARY LOGIC BASED SPLITTING APART of MATTER and SPACE as if SPACE were PURE and ABSOLUTE AMPTINESS, while SIMPLFYING our challenge of representing reality with language based constructions, is in effect securing the DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE CONJUGATE and REDUCING REALITY to the MALE or MATERIAL ASPECT ONLY.

 

HEY!  GETTING RID OF THE FEMALE CONJUGATE IN ORDER TO SIMPLY OUR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF REALITY COULD COME BACK TO HAUNT US!

 

Having got rid of the FEMALE CONJUGATE by just DESIGNING OUR LANGUAGE IN PURE MALE ASSERTIVE TERMS, we now have only to deal with MALE ASSERTIVE ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, … SO THAT WE CAN EMPLOY THE MALE ASSERTIVE CONCEPTS OF “GROWTH”, ‘DEVELOPMENT” AND “PRODUCTION” AS IF THEY EXISTED IN THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT RIGHT.

 

We can imagine all the HOLES all over the countryside where materials have been taken for the MALE ASSERTIVE GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION activities and how it has been part of the TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE, so it is not just the GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION we need to focus on, for if we do, we are kind of quietly DEVOURING OURSELVES instead of managing the TRANSFORMATION that is the REAL REALITY and NOT the GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION which, in the  spherical space we are included in, is merely the abstract MALE CONJUGATE.

 

LET’S NOT FORGET THAT WE HAVE DROPPED OUT, FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, THE FEMALE CONJUGATE, FOR THE REASON THAT THE MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE ON ITS OWN IS SO MUCH “SIMPLER” i.e. it is MORE CERTAIN AND EXPLICIT AS CAN BE SEEN IN THAT IT ALLOWS US TO SPEAK IN TERMS OF A SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION AS IF THESE WERE ‘REAL’ AND WERE “STAND ALONE IN THEIR OWN RIGHT”.  Of course, if we lived in a FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, THESE MALE ASSERTIVE ABSTRACTIONS OF GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION …. “WOULD BE REAL AND STAND ALONE IN THEIR OWN RIGHT”

 

HOWEVER, in the real world of our sense experience of inclusion in a spherical space, every MALE ASSERTIVE ACTION has a CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ACTION, so when we PRODUCE stuff, there are conjugate FEMALE HOLES from where materials have been extracted so that the OVERALL dynamic is TRANSFORMAITON which includes both MALE and FEMALE conjugates.

 

Sometimes, it almost seems as if we might not be better off without language and speech because there is plenty of scope for screwing up once we start trying to use language to capture REPRESENTATIONS of our sense experience reality.  Without language, we can nevertheless continue to, as the poet said; ‘let the soft animal of our body love what it wants to love’

 

BUT NO, LET’S SORT OUT THIS LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE FIASCO and admit right up front that our WESTERN CULTURE language when used for constructing representations of reality employs SIMPLIFICATION based on BINARY LOGIC where we simply GO WITH THE MALE CONJUGATE which is convenient and simple because it is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and expresses things in such terms as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, … and just DROP OUT the FAMALE CONJUGATE which is so much more complex because it draws in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).  For example, it is one thing to describe the construction of the local town in MALE ASSERTIVE terms of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION because that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and SIMPLE TO TALK ABOUT, but if we want to include a full discussion of all of the HOLES in the ground and in the FOREST etc. where we EXTRACTED MATERIALS for the CONSTRUCTION, our representation has to take on the NONLOCAL and the IMPLICIT like where we gouged out the side of  hill to get sand and gravel for construction.  While the piles of sand and gravel are ready-to-go materials are LOCAL and EXPLICIT, the CONJUGATE FEMALE HOLE involves TRANSFORMATIVE CHANGE IN THE LANDSCAPE that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).

 

In order to keep our language SIMPLE, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have simply dropped out the FEMALE CONJUGATE and gone solely with the MALE CONJUGATE with the consequences that TRANSFORMATION is REDUCED AND SIMPLIFIED to GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, all MALE ASSERTIVE ABSTRACTIONS that PRESUPPOSE an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE in place of the FEMALE CONJUGATE as in the QUANTUM LOGIC of the WAVE-FIELD understanding.

 

HOW DOES THIS BINARY LOGIC “SIMPLIFICATION” CHANGE OUR UNDERSTANDING OF DYNAMICS?

 

Consider how our understanding of BALANCE ‘weighs in’ here.  In the case of the RICH and POOR imbalance that leads to starvation of the children of the poorest people (children are more exposed to death by starvation than adults since the adults have more flesh as reserves.)  REBALANCING is one way (a natural, non-judgemental way) of understanding the actions of a ROBIN HOOD or JEAN VALJEAN and so, on a QUANTUM LOGIC basis, they would be termed ‘REBALANCING AGENTS’ rather than PATHOGENS, and the same holds true at the level of the microbial assemblage that is ‘us’ where the sustaining of living is the sustaining of resonance in the microbial assemblage.  This QUANTUM LOGIC understanding in terms of BALANCE is supported by physical actuality.  The concept of the PATHOGEN, on the other hand, is BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION where we are deprived of the QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE option.

 

SO, TO ANSWER THE ABOVE QUESTION, the SIMPLIFICATION that BINARY LOGIC brings to this issue of IMBALANCE is simply the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ASPECT which is INDUCING the REBALANCING ACTION and instead considering ONLY THE MALE ASSERTIVE ACTION ON ITS OWN AS IF THAT ‘MADE SENSE’; I.E. AS IF THE PERSON WAS AN INDEPENDENT BEING OPERATING IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE THAT HAD NO INVOLVEMENT IN THE DYNAMICS SO THAT WE COULD INTERPRET ROBIN HOOD’S AND JEAN VALJEAN’S ACTIONS  AS IF THEY WERE PURELY ONE-SIDEDLY MALE ASSERTIVE ACTIONS THAT COULD BE JUDGED ‘IN THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT RIGHT’, as if the FEMALE CONJUGATE DID NOT EXIST.

 

THIS IS THE CHOICE WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE BUILT INTO THE ARCHITECTURE OF OUR LANGUAGE IN ORDER TO SIMPLIFY IT; I.E. WE HAVE REDUCED THE COMPLEX FEMALE-MALE CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM OF THE WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC TO THE ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE COMPONENT.   THIS GREATLY SIMPLIFIES OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE BUT PUTS THE ONUS FOR EXPLAINING MOVEMENT FULLY AND SOLELY ON THE MALE ASSERTIVE SIDE AND WE SEE THIS PLAY OUT IN WESTERN JUSTICE, AS IN THE CASES OF ROBIN HOOD AND JEAN VALJEAN, where our understanding of what went on is INFORMED in terms of BALANCE and IMBALANCE while the WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, consistent with WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, employs language that REDUCES the full FEMALE-MALE CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM with its natural BALANCE cultivating dynamic, to the one-sided MALE ASSERTIVE conjugate.

 

HOW INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE USERS DO NOT FALL INTO THE ‘DROPOUT’ TRAP THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USERS FALL INTO.

 

The indigenous aboriginal language representation will give a language based rendering in flow-based (FEMALE-MALE conjugate based) terms such as ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ and this avoids what Nietzsche calls the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use in our language architecture to enable FRAGMENTATION of the language based representation into ABSTRACT LOCAL, EXPLICIT pieces to avoid having to try to articulate a moving target; i.e. the entire transforming relational continuum, an issue which the indigenous aboriginal language architecture AVOIDS by employing a purely relational flow-based language architecture as in “the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING” example.

 

While this fails to reduce the representation to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, it also does not fall into the trap of distorting reality by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE as happens when ‘the TOWN’ is made into a notional AUTHOR of its own actions and development as happens with the use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  What the indigenous aboriginal language also avoids that is a great distortion and distraction in the WESTERN CULTURE “Common Average European” language architecture is the problem of EGO-inflation and EGO-collapse that associates with the ABSTRACT imputing of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.

 

WHERE ARE WE TODAY WITH RESPECT TO THIS WESTERN CULTURE ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ WHERE WE ‘DROP OUT’ THE FEMALE CONUGATE?

 

TODAY, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUE TO MOVE DEEPER INTO THE MINE-FIELD WE HAVE CREATED IN REDUCING OUR REPRESENTATIONS OF WAVE-FIELD REALITY TO THE MALE CONJUGATE AND SIMPLY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE.

 

One of the major ways in which we are impacted is in our orienting to the UNREAL ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE concepts of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, which distracts us from the SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY of our inclusion in TRANSFORMATION which is the ANDROGYNOUS combination of opening of holes (female) and material asserting (male).  Our WESTERN CULTURE MISTAKE in DETACHING the MALE ASSERTING from the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE in our language architecture means that TRANSFORMATION is let loose like the sail that is let loose in a windstorm by a loose sheet, … in the sense that the MALE CONJUGATES of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION push on forward as if they were pushing on forward in an absolute empty space of infinite extent, while what is really going on is full blown ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION.

 

BINARY LOGIC understands GROWTH in RATIONAL terms of the ratio-based extension of an area on a flat space of infinite extent, however, QUANTUM LOGIC employs spherical space so that PROGRESS is NOT RATIO based and as on the surface of a sphere, an EXPANDING circle of CULTIVATED land comes with a conjugate SHRINKING circle of WILDERNESS lands.  Since our WESTERN CULTURE economic system is REATIONAL, our continuing focus on GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION  is MISSING THE FEMALE CONJUGATE and thus NOT INFORMING US of the REAL REALITY of TRANSFORMATION which includes the shrinking of the WILDERNESS.

 

So, the TOWN that we say is GROWING is not REAL and the indigenous aboriginals with their flow based language are correct in capturing instead that THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and not only is that TOWNING included in a ‘dynamic that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, WE TOO are included in something larger than ourselves, and this makes our language based representations that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT as signalled by “HUMAN” and “TOWN” “UNREAL”, at least “UNREAL IN OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY”.  I make this qualification because we consider the LOCAL and EXPLICIT to be “REAL’ because we use the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as ‘building blocks’ to construct a SUBSTITUTE REALITY” ( a ‘FLAT-SPACE’ reality where it is possible to have GROWTH instead of TRANSFORMATION) in which the LOCAL and EXPLICIT APPEAR TO BE REAL.  So, the SUBSTITUTE REALITY features (A) an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, and (B) ABSOLUTE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES that we use NAMING to ASSOCIATE with some or other RELATIONAL FORMS OF OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM;  i.e. the RELATIONAL FORMS of our SENSE EXPERIENCE are the CONDENSATIONS of the ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD.

 

THUS, whenever we are employing the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, we are conjuring up a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which, while it may serve to enable experience sharing within a language group, does so at the cost of having the participants enter into a SUBSTITUTE REALITY such as the absolute space based SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein TOWNS are presented as LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS with GRAMMAR-given powers of AUTHORING their own actions and development.

 

The problems with our employing of the this SUBSTITUTE REALITY include the SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA that Bohm has spoken of as well as the problem of EGO inflation and EGO deflation associated with the DOUBLE ERROR based belief in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.

 

To understand the origins of the mistaken belief in ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING, it is necessary to understand the DOUBLE ERROR based notion of LOCAL AUTHORING that establishes the SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

 

The REAL REALITY is the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is the ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD and the FORMS that CONDENSE and DISSOLVE (gather and scatter) WITHIN IT.

* * *