PART I. 

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are like our indigenous aboriginal brothers and sisters when we are engaging relationally, on a sense-experience basis, BUT WHEN WE START TALKING, LOOK OUT!  

 

When we start relying on LANGUAGE for our understanding of ‘reality’ (the so-called ‘reality’ the we put together with language), we PART WAYS with our indigenous aboriginal brothers and sisters because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use a simplistic language architecture that is BINARY LOGIC based or in other words ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ based whereas, indigenous aboriginal s (and also Modern physics, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta adherents) use a LESS SIMPLE language architecture which is QUANTUM LOGIC based, or in other words, ‘INTEGRATION’ based, … a language that acknowledges the all-including WAVE-FIELD nature of our reality. 

 

A simple example of the difference is where we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which demonstrates our DIFFERENTIATION based approach to LANGUAGE DESIGN; i.e. we differentiate out the TOWN from the LANDSCAPE it is included in and use a form of language that re-establishes ‘the TOWN’ as a THING-IN-ITSELF that we apply GRAMMAR to so as to impute to ‘the TOWN’ … ITS OWN LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.   In our minds’ eye we imagine the TOWN as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF that is ‘getting bigger’ and ‘more populous’ with ‘businesses’ that ‘produce products’.  This is a DIFFERENTIATION based pseudo-reality which we have developed a full system of language for, and LANGUAGE IS A SCHEME WHERE WE USE WORDS THAT PUT US ON THE SAME PAGE, SO THAT WE CAN ‘SHARE’ THOUGHTS BY REDUCING THE THOUGHTS TO A COMMON SHAREABLE SYSTEM OF SYMBOLIC REPRESENTATIONS.

 

The thing is that there is more than one LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE for doing this and the various LANGUAGE schemes divide into TWO basically different approaches; i.e. DIFFERENTIATION which is BINARY LOGIC (EITHER/OR) based and  INTEGRATION which is QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH/AND) based, and while WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using the DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, the indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents are using the INTEGRATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.  For example;

 

The TOWN is GROWING is exemplary of DIFFERENTIATION based language architecture which uses the DOUBLE ERROR combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR to FRAGMENT the world of our sense-experience.  This DOUBLE ERROR based foundation of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE was pointed out by Nietzsche who used the example of ‘Lightning Flashes’, showing how this combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments which is a convenient SIMPLIFYING of language based capture, NOT OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY wherein everything is related, but which simplifies language by introducing a SIMPLIFIED ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ that is BINARY LOGIC based so that we only have to deal with WHAT the MATERIAL CONTENTS DO as if the CONTAINER is an ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT.   We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT ARE STILL USING THIS SIMPLE FORM OF LANGUAGE where the SIMPLIFICATION comes from introducing a SIMPLIFIED REALITY that can be captured with SIMPLE LANGUAGE, the LANGUAGE OF DIFFERENTIATION which breaks out LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTS of REALITY.

 

OF COURSE, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS FRAGMENTS OF REALITY because our sense-experience reality is of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, so what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are actually doing with our language architecture is INVENTING A SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHICH SIMPLIFIES THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE NEEDED TO CAPTURE REPRESENTATIONS OF IT.  The result is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS construct BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY as the basis for our linguistic communication system and we do this by using DIFFERENTIATION (which contrasts with the indigenous aboriginal language approach which used INTEGRATION).

 

DIFFERENTIATION employs BINARY LOGIC and breaks things down into LOCAL, EXPLICIT parts as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’ (note that this is all CONTENT based and we don’t mention the CONTAINER which amounts to an implication of absolve empty space).

 

INTEGRATION is used by indigenous aboriginals in their language architecture which employs QUANTUM LOGIC that ‘pulls things together’ as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’  where CONTENT and CONTAINER are ONE, and since this acknowledges ‘mitakuye oyasin’ where all-things are related including the observing SUBJECT and the observed OBJECT, the assumption built into the language is that ‘all things are one’ as agrees with the Modern physics understanding where the world of our sense-experience is the all-pervading WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD which gives the QUANTUM LOGIC structure.

 

We could say that BOTH of these LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES; i.e. the WESTERN CULTURE DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and MODERN PHYSICS ‘INTEGRATION’ based LANGUAGE ARCHITURES ‘WORK’ by putting us into a language based SUBSTITUTE REALITY in the form of a MENTAL CONCEPTUALIZATION that we fashion with language and grammar.   OK, that being said, … we can compare and RATE the respective pro’s and ‘con’s of DIFFERENTIATION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY and INTEGRATION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, keeping in mind that Modern physics is supporting the INTEGRATION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY but NOT the DIFFERENTIATION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, and WHY IS THAT?

 

Because the language based DIFFERENTIATION scheme, which is the chosen scheme of us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS is the source of FRAGMENTATION; 

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

 

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each indivdiual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them. 

 

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychologic etc. 

 

If we are just using language in casual conversation, without serious intellectual calculations aimed at resolving problems etc, the FRAGMENTATION problem in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE may not amount to any serious dysfunction, but when this PSYCHOLOGICAL FRAGMENTATION gets amplified through GOVERNMENT policies and DECLARATIONS of WAR etc. the opting for DIFFERENTIATION (BINARY LOGIC) instead of INTEGRATION (QUANTUM LOGIC) makes a huge difference.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC supports INTEGRATION and is thus the LOGIC of BALANCE and IMBALANCE (within an integral whole) so that within a social collective, while IMBALANCE may arise that cultivates STRIFE wherein there may be injuries and deaths, there are no programs of SUBOPTIMATION and PURIFICATION where the GOOD people band together in a campaign to ELIMINATE the BAD people since the issue relational IMBALANCE within an INTEGRAL social collective wherein everything is related because every thing is a CONDENSATION of the one, all-including WAVE-FIELD.

 

BINARY LOGIC supports DIFFERENTIATION and is thus the LOGIC of PURIFICATION (within a collective of independent entities) where there is a perceived need to use DIFFERENTIATION to identify GOOD and BAD participants in the social collective so as to PUNISH AND ELIMINATE the BAD while REWARDING and PROLIFERATING the GOOD.

 

As we know, WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTUALIZATION of ‘REALITY’ is DIFFERENTIATION based which, because it imputes LOCAL, EXPLICIT INDEPENDENT BEING to the DIFFERENTIATED ENTITY, and supports social programs of PURIFICATION and SUBOPTIMIZATION where ‘only the best’ are selected for ‘leadership’ and the ranks of the ‘elite’ who are seen as ‘models’ for the rest and whose proliferation is fuelled through programs of disproportionate rewards and privileges for ‘high achievers’.

 

While QUANTUM LOGIC supports INTEGRATION by way of transforming IMBALANCE into BALANCE wherein diversity based RESONANCE is tapped, … BINARY LOGIC supports DIFFERENTIATION as the lead-in to PURIFICATION by way of differential rewarding of SUPERIOR PERFORMERS and exclusion and/or punishment of INFERIOR PERFORMERS.

 

The RUSSIA – UKRAINE CONFLICT is one of the many examples of the persistence of WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ and PURIFICATIONIST orientation

 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky condemned Russia as “absolute evil” on Saturday after a series of deadly strikes were launched on the city of Kherson on Christmas Eve.

“The world must see and understand what absolute evil we are fighting against,” Zelensky said.

 

This BINARY LOGIC based POLARIZING manifests in the DIVIDING of the world into 195 “INDEPENDENT NATIONS”.  The ABSTRACT LINGUISTIC-INTELLECTUAL concept of INDEPENDENT NATIONS ‘sets the stage” for IGNORING the innate INTERDEPENDENCE of what are DECLARED to be INDEPENDENT NATIONS which are IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, in NO WAY ‘INDEPENDENT’ but innately INTERDEPENDENT.

 

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence… — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

 

Modern physics affirms that we are all inclusions in the one transforming relational continuum; i.e. we are condensations in the one WAVE-FIELD; i.e. that we all share inclusion in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence. 

 

The SERIOUSNESS with which WE MAKE OUR DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE does not succeed in bringing about any ‘real independence’ that can be sense-experience affirmed because our sense-experience is of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, and thus over-rides intellectual abstraction and campaigns that argue in favour of putting language stimulated intellectual abstraction into an unnatural precedence over sense-experience reality, as in declaring that all members of a name-based CATEGORY such as RUSSIAN can all be tarred with the same brush and declared to be EVIL.   We are all related (mitakuye oyasin) and as a global social collective we have issues relating to BALANCE and  IMBALANCE which is not BINARY LOGIC and DIFFERENTIATION based by  QUANTUM LOGIC and INTEGRATION based.

 

The world of BINARY LOGIC and DIFFERENTIATION involving DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE is INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION and is not the REAL WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE which is a world of INTEGRATION involving BALANCE and IMBALANCE rather than DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATION.

 

If we keep these sense-experience grounded realities in mind then we can have undestandings in hand to help AVOID WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY ENTRAPMENT. 

 

* * *

  

 

 

PART II.

 

According to Indigenous Aboriginal understanding and Modern physics, and as requires QUANTUM LOGIC to give it language-based expression, we are included in an all-including WAVE-FIELD so that WE ARE THE WAVE-FIELD we are included in, which means we are more than the material condensations that we commonly ‘equate’ with ‘who we are’.  It is only through the intellectual technique of DIFFERENTIATION that we develop language based representations that SPLIT US OUT of the WAVE-FIELD.  In reality, INTEGRATION characterizes the relation between material condensations and the all-including WAVE-FIELD (the energy-charged PLENUM) while DIFFERENTIATION produces an UNREAL ABSTRACT SPLIT OUT of material forms which WESTERN CULTURE equips with GRAMMAR-given POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING,… which is what WESTERN CULTURE language is based on. 

This gives rise to WESTERN CULTURE language and grammar based SUBSTITUTE REALITY constructions featuring local, explicit, independent material entities, notionally with their own powers of AUTHORING actions and developments that move about and interact within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE .    This has us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘talking’ in the BINARY LOGIC terms of Hurricanes that ‘move through the atmosphere’ instead of in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of HURRICANING IN THE ATMOSPHERING (in keeping with condensations in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD).  This is the source of language based psychological confusion which Bohm points out is leading WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS who dominate in the manifest organizing of the global social dynamic, into a condition of FRAGMENTATION (social and psychical).

 

* * *

 

 

INTRO to https://goodshare.org/wp/more-on-the-big-lie-phenomenon-of-western-culture/

 

We all know, at some level, that when we say that ‘the Hurricane is moving through the atmosphere’, we are screwing up with this DIFFERENTIATION based representation that SPLITS APART the FIGURE and the GROUND (the Hurricane and the Atmosphere) because as with WHORLING in the FLOWING, we have, in NATURE, a QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH/AND” relation wherein the WHORLING AND THE FLOWING are ONE and NOT TWO; i.e. the WHORLING is “NOT” MOVING THROUGH the FLOWING, the WHORLING IS INCLUDED IN THE FLOWING so that we need an INTEGRATION capable LANGUAGE and not a DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE. 

 

Note that WESTERN CULTURE language that gives a foundational role to DIFFERENTIATION as in ‘the WHORL is moving through the FLOW’, or ‘the HURRICANE is moving through the ATMOSPHERE’ implies the BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR DIFFERENTIATION which is problematic.  What it does is put into our minds the possibility of LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND EVENTS which is SIMPLER than, and thus OBSCURES the less simple REALITY of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION.  That is, as COPERNICUS said, it is SIMPLER to say ‘the EARTH TURNS ROUND’ than to formulate language that explains the LESS SIMPLE reality that everything is in relational flux (as associates with the reality that the material bodies are condensations of an all-including WAVE-FIELD).

 

DIFFERENTIATION operates on QUANTUM LOGIC INTEGRATION based reality to reduce it to BINARY LOGIC abstraction.  It is where the WHORLING in the FLOWING (where these are in a BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC INTEGRATED RELATION) is reduced to ‘the WHORL’ that is an independent feature that is MOVING THROUGH the flow as an ITEM OF CONTENT moves through a mutually exclusive CONTAINER (where CONTENT and CONTAINER are in an EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC relation).

 

The WESTERN CULTURE habitual use and reliance on DIFFERENTIATION for REPRESENTATIONS of (pseudo-) “reality” (as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’) is a CRAZY-MAKER.  The alternative for SANE reality construction, as in Modern physics and Indigenous aboriginal culture is, INTEGRATION-based as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.   The WESTERN CULTURE promoting of BINARY LOGIC DIFFERENTIATION in place of QUANTUM LOGIC INTEGRATION is a continuing source of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE psyches and social relations.

 

* * *

 

 

 

 PART III.

 

DIFFERENTIATION SPLITS THE WHORLING OUT OF THE FLOW (THIS IS BINARY LOGIC) AND IMPLIES THAT THERE IS A MALE ASSERTING WHORL THAT LIVES WITHIN AND AUTHORS THE WHORLING, hence “THE WHORL IS WHORLING”  (as also with ‘lightning flashes’).  This is the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL MALE-ASSERTING AUTHOR construction which is the SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION.    

 

“Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”; -but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting.  If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.” – To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” — Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

INTEGRATION INCLUDES THE WHORLING WITHIN THE FLOWING ((THIS IS QUANTUM LOGIC) AND IMPLIES THAT THE MALE ASSERTING FIGURE and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING GROUND are only ONE  IN WHICH CASE, THERE IS NO ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’, there is only “TRANSFORMATION” . 

 

 

DIFFERENTIATION is the INTELLECTUAL JUDGEMENT of the EXCLUDED VOYEUR OBSERVER.

 

INTEGRATION is the INTUITIVE IMPRESSION of the INCLUDED SENSORY EXPERIENT.

 

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS put DIFFERENTIATION (the VOYEUR VIEW) into an UNNATURAL PRIMACY so that  FIGURE and GROUND “APPEAR” as TWO (BINARY LOGIC).

 

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS put INTEGRATION into a NATURAL PRIMACY since FIGURE and GROUND ARE ONE (QUANTUM LOGIC).

 

 

The BOTTOM LINE is that WESTERN CULTURE is inflicting itself with FRAGMENTATION because of its VOYEUR VIEW of REALITY and thus the DENIAL of INCLUSION within the WAVE-FIELD.

 

* * * * * * * * * * *

 

CLOSING THOUGHTS re; “How to AVOID WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY ENTRAPMENT”

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are firmly entrenched in the use of BINARY LOGIC based “SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS”.  David Bohm’s views, which are similar to Nietzsche’s, is that our WESTERN CULTURE “Common Average European Language, because of its ARCHITECTURE that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is driving us CRAZY.  There is no mistaking that this is the message in both Bohm’s works which speak of FRAGMENTATION and in Nietzsche’s which speaks of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING which is simply ‘spelling out’ the source of the FRAGMENTATION.

Schroedinger was making the same point in underscoring the affirmation that SUBJECT and OBJECT are ONLY ONE whereupon the FRAGMENTING into LEADER (ASSERTING MALE) and FOLLOWER (ACCOMMODATING FEMALE) is resolved as the concept of LOCAL AUTHORING as by an ‘AUTHORITY’ is subsumed by RELATIONAL BALANCE.

 

“AUTHORITY” is a BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACT reduction of QUANTUM LOGIC “BALANCE”, the former pivoting from the claim of ENTITLEMENT as in the “AUTHORITY” that comes with the “TITLE” of “KING” which is used as an ABSTRACT SUBSTITUTE for the NATURAL dynamic of BALANCE. The stories of Robin Hood and Jean Valjean (Les Misérables) bring forth the tensions between the mechanistically enforced INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION of BINARY LOGIC based ‘ENTITLEMENT’ and the natural dynamic of QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BALANCE’ within a WESTERN CULTURE which has opted to put SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC ‘ENTITLEMENT’ into an unnatural PRIMACY over the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BALANCE’.  This intellectual ‘inversion’ which puts BINARY LOGIC ‘ENTITLEMENT’ in PRIMACY over QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BALANCE’ is the source of ‘FRAGMENTATION’ where the natural adjudicator of relational ‘BALANCE’ (as in the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING —MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE RELATION) is displaced by the SIMPLER ABSTRACTION of ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’.  The INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING as granted to ‘the KING’ is characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE’S practice of elevating INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION such as BINARY LOGIC based ‘ENTITLEMENT’ into an UNNATURAL PRIMACY over QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BALANCE’.

 

All of these observations point to the FRAGMENTATION that we are building into our conceptualizing of reality with BINARY LOGIC which WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are applying to OUR OWN RELATIONSHIP with the world; i.e. our language is designed to keep repeating ourselves repeating to ourselves that SUBJECT and OBJECT are TWO as when we speak of ourselves as INHABITANTS of a HABITAT such as the PLANET EARTH, as if we are ‘little things’ living on ‘a great big thing’, and we continue to ‘write that up’ in our language based accounts of our continuing lives, even though, out the other side of our mouths, comes the Modern physics story that Bohm is also sharing, that we all share INCLUSION in a transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD where we, and all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD which is a QUANTUM LOGIC relation and “NOT” a BINARY LOGIC relation.

What has to change before we acknowledge that we live in a QUANTUM LOGIC reality and “NOT” in a BINARY LOGIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY?

Evidently, what has to change is the architecture of our LANGUAGE because, right now, our Common Average European language architecture is grounded in BINARY LOGIC and so we keep telling ourselves things like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ because of our continuing construction and development projects.  We don’t listen to the indigenous aboriginals who respond to that with NO NO NO! we are included in a transforming relational continuum aka the GREAT HARMONY and because we are included within it, the simplified BINARY LOGIC based portraits of ourselves as INDEPENDENT BEINGS is NOT real, … or rather, our language-based portraits of ourselves as ‘INDEPENDENT BEINGS with GRAMMAR-given POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING’ is only real within our language based construction of an UNREAL (BINARY LOGIC BASED) SUBSTITUTE REALITY that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using as our OPERATIVE REALITY.

While ‘the writing is on the wall’, LETTING GO is being held up by EGO since belief in LOCAL AUTHORING is one of the BINARY LOGIC language architecture features that is playing an important role in our SUBSTITUTE REALITY, and unlike the indigenous aboriginal culture whose reality is QUANTUM LOGIC based and therefore does NOT support LOCAL AUTHORING and thus does not support a BINARY LOGIC based JUSTICE SYSTEM where individuals are credited with LOCAL AUTHORING OF GOOD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS and LOCAL AUTHORING OF BAD ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS; i.e. in Modern physics as in indigenous aboriginal QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING of dynamics, everything is related (mitakuye oyasin).

This means that INJURIOUS ACTIONS develop within the relational continuum and manifest ‘relationally’ through ‘lightning rods’ as in situations of IMBALANCE that become violent where the remedy is the RESTORING OF relational BALANCE, a ‘RESTORATIVE JUSTICE’ approach pursued through the HEALING CIRCLE, in radical contrast to the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC PURIFICATION based JUSTICE which assumes LOCAL AUTHORING of EITHER ‘GOOD’ OR ‘BAD’ actions and developments and seeks to REWARD and CELEBRATE the former and PUNISH and DENIGRATE the LATTER.

In these CLOSING THOUGHTS re; “How to AVOID WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY ENTRAPMENT”, I have tried to bring to the surface the problematic role of DIFFERENTIATION which is DISPLACING INTEGRATION which is an UNNATURAL precedence.   Once we focus on the TOWN (the MALE-ASSERTING CONTENT ) we lose touch with the LANDSCAPE (we substitute a notional empty containing space) and thus we lose touch with ‘the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONTAINER.  WE pass by Lao Tzu’s advice to give precedence to the FEMALE.  The FEMALE is the all-including WAVE-FIELD CONTAINER within which the MALE-ASSERTING CONDENSATIONS form. In the QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the WAVE-FIELD and the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, the WAVE-FIELD is “BOTH” the all-including FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONTAINER “AND” the MALE ASSERTING CONTENT.   

The ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD relation is less simple than the BINARY LOGIC relation which means that understanding WAVE-FIELD reality is beyond the reach of BINARY LOGIC.  Thus, the pursuit of understanding based on BINARY LOGIC is our WESTERN CULTURE PROBLEM which is showing up as DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATION as in the BINARY LOGIC CATEGORIZATION into ‘GOOD’ and ‘EVIL’ , which PRE-EMPTS the less SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH/AND) INTEGRATION based on BALANCE which is at the same time subsuming IMBALANCE.  

Where we have strife, WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC propensity for using BINARY LOGIC PRE-EMPTS the possibility of using the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BALANCE’ based resolution. In WESTERN CULTURE, the priority given to the ‘more simple’ BINARY LOGIC based system of ENTITLEMENT has led to extreme IMBALANCE as was the precursor to the French Revolution aka the French REBALANCING.  The more simple BINARY LOGIC is intellectual abstraction based on DIFFERENTIATION as in MALE ASSERTING while the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC is based on INTEGRATION as in CONJUGATE RELATION.  

 

The key point lies in recognizing how, in our WESTERN CULTURE, the “LESS SIMPLE” natural ‘QUANTUM LOGIC’ dynamic of BALANCE has been strong-armed into submission by physical enforcement of the MORE SIMPLE intellectual ‘BINARY LOGIC’ abstraction of ENTITLEMENT.  That is, ‘INTELLECTUAL BINARY LOGIC ENTITLEMENT’ that USURPS the natural primacy of SENSE-EXPERIENCE-QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE is the nature of WESTERN CULTURE ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY ENTRAPMENT’.

* * *