We, ourselves, and all things are INCLUSIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which is a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM that is IMPOSSIBLE TO ‘REPRESENT’ with LANGUAGE.  Not only Lau Tzu is on record as reminding us that ‘the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’, Modern physics has likewise pointed out that we live in an all-including WAVE-FIELD in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.

As has been pointed out, the WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, because it is designed for DIFFERENTIATION, where we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to IMPUTE LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING to CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, and pretend that the all-including WAVE-FIELD, because it is not accessible to our visual sensing, DOES NOT EXIST or in other words, that what exists is ONLY MATERIAL BEINGS that purportedly move about and interact within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  This is an unreal, unsupported by sense-experience and unsupported by Modern physics ILLUSION that, as Benjamin Whorf shows, COMES FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE wherein we DUMB DOWN the INTEGRAL, ALL-PERVADING WAVE-FIELD with its material CONDENSATIONS, a reality with a QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC structure (the condensations are at the same time the containing wave-field there are included in, so that there is no such thing as MOTION (which implies things with persisting ‘being’), but instead only TRANSFORMATION which is purely relational.

A LANGUAGE based on DIFFERENTIATION is a MISTAKE since it FRAGMENTS not only ‘what we are seeing out there’, but ‘what we are thinking in here’.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE “IS SUCH A MISTAKE” as pointed out by Nietzsche in that our WESTERN CULTURE language habit is to give a foundational role to LOCAL AUTHORING in spite of the fact that there is no such thing as LOCAL AUTHORING within the real world of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  Thus THE WORLD OF WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE (not to be confused with the WORLD OF DIRECT SENSE-EXPERIENCE that does NOT have to depend on DUMBED DOWN reductions from sense-experience to intellectual linguistic construction. But we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have become habituated (mesmerized? addicted?) to employing the DUMBED DOWN “LOCAL AUTHORING’ based linguistic constructions of a simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY as our OPERATIVE REALITY, making believe that LOCAL AUTHORING is legitimate … hence the writing of this note entitled   “TIME TO GET HONEST: It’s time to ACKNOWLEDGE that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ .

There’s no problem convincing indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING because that’s where they have been ‘coming from’, and who could have stopped the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL-ORGANIZATIONAL BEHEMOTH from IMPOSING and ENFORCING at least feigned public belief in such LOCAL AUTHORING abstractions as WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-ENDOWING POWER (of both INENTING INDEPENDENT BEING by way of DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE and imputing LOCAL AUTHORIN POWERS to the INDEPENDENT BEINGS. Anyone who tries to state the obvious and expose the WESTERN CULTURE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES, it likely to re-learn that same lesson that Giordano Bruno learned when he was burned at the stake back in 1600, for the HERESY of relativity and his comment that ‘The majority has no monopoly on determining TRUTH’.  Of course, a more experience based wisdom was that cited by Lafontaine; ‘La raison du plus fort est toujours la meilleure’ (‘the reasoning/truth of the most powerful is always the best’.)

The WESTERN CULTURE MAJORITY has decided that ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ is something ‘real’ and not simply a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR MALE ASSERTION as when we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ while DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE ‘the WILDERNESS is SHRINKING’.  So, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, in spite of protests and mocking even, of the indigenous aboriginals and Taoists etc. have in fact supported the language-based promoting of a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” in which “LOCAL AUTHORING”  is a MAJOR PLAYER, leading to pervasive FRAGMENTATION, not only in terms of DECLARATIONS OF NATIONAL AND HUMAN-BEING INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE but in the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-CONDITIONED PSYCHES that play along with such unfounded abstraction.

“LOCAL AUTHORING” is a WESTERN CULTURE “MYTH” and “CRAZY-MAKER” but it has become the OPERATIVE TRUTH of the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT SOCIAL COLLECTIVE which is currently THE MOST POWERFUL and as the indigenous aboriginal cultures have seen, protest by way of laughing, mocking or resisting this WESTERN CULTURE “EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES” fiasco has not succeeded in ‘bringing it down’ because the abstraction of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ is, as systems science would described it, ‘LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS’.

Foremost among these HIGH SWITCHING COSTS is the cost of the loss of INFLATED EGO of those claiming to be the ‘LOCAL AUTHORS’ of amazing achievements, ignoring the SENSE-EXPERIENCE affirmed QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of our inclusion as CONDENSATIONS within the all-including NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the GREAT HARMONY of the indigenous aboriginals aka the Tao of Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.  There is NO LOCAL AUTHORING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. 

The WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR ABSTRACTION of the LOCAL AUTHOR (notionally) transfers the power that is innate in the transforming WAVE-FIELD that manifests THROUGH CONDENSATIONS (which are innately included and never ‘separate out’ as would reduce the QUANTUM LOGIC FIGURE-AND-GROUND-ARE-ONE RELATION to a BINARY LOGIC FIGURE-AND-GROUND-ARE-TWO relation).  LOCAL AUTHORING is an artifact of LINGUISTIC ARCHITECTURE REDUCTION from “BOTH/AND” QUANTUM LOGIC to “EITHER/OR” BINARY LOGIC; e.g. from the HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD to the ‘HUMAN’ in the ABSOLUTE INFINITE EMPTINESS of ABSTRACT EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY.

* * *

 

 

The choice of the ‘TIME TO GET HONEST’ title is to point out the need to OVERTLY DISTINGUISH between BINARY LOGIC which is ABSTRACTION that is responsible for the ABSTRACT notion of LOCAL AUTHORING, on the one hand, and QUANTUM LOGIC which is THE WAY OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN NATURE’S TRANSFORMATION based WORKINGS.  QUANTUM LOGIC captures the reality of our being CONDENSATIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

Take the example ‘the HURRICANE is GROWING LARGER AND STRONGER.  This is the BINARY LOGIC type of LOGIC wherein we conceptualize in terms of an item of CONTENT that is INDEPENDENT of the CONTAINING space (“it’s surroundings”) so that our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE need concern itself ONLY with the ITEM OF CONTENT and ‘ITS MOVEMENT’ and ‘ITS DEVELOPMENT’ and ‘ITS PRODUCTION OF OTHER THINGS etc.   This BINARY LOGIC (unfortunately) plays the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of what amounts to an ABSTRACTION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY since the REAL REALITY as AFFIRMED BY OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION THEREIN as where ‘THERE IS HURRICANING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, and this is called QUANTUM LOGIC which is how NATURE WORKS as supported by Modern physics and by Indigenous aboriginal cultures. 

 

NOTA BENE:  BECAUSE OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS OF INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, IT IS NOT ‘PICTURABLE’ SINCE IT IS LIKE BEING LIFTED UP WITH A TORNADO AND WHILE WE HAVE SENSORY EXPERIENCE OF IT, WE DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO A VOYEUR VIEW OF IT.   AS LAO TZU SAYS, THE WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE CANNOT BE TOLD; “The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao”.  So all of our talk where we describe ‘the TOWN that is growing or the ‘HUMAN’ that is growing (where we relate this to our repeated scrutinizing of ourselves in the mirror is not the TRUE REALITY.   OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE OF BEING LIFTED UP INTO THE TORNADO exemplifies our SENSE-EXPERIENCE BASED “REALITY”.  The VOYEUR VIEW PICTURE OR OURSELVES IN THE MIRROR IS NOT CAPTURING WHO WE ARE IN THE DEEPER SENSE-EXPERIENCE MANNER.  The IMAGE OF OUR ‘SELF’ in the MIRROR is an INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZATION based on a VOYEUR VIEW.

 

A picture held us captive. And we could not get outside it, for it lay in our language and language seemed to repeat it to us inexorably. –-Wittgenstein

 

When we look at ourselves in a mirror, our picture ‘holds us captive’ and we are making use of BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between OBSERVER and OBSERVED, SUBJECT and OBJECT and THIS IS a HOUSE OF MIRRORS trick, which enables us to DESCRIBE OUR SELF (or is it ‘our self’) in great detail, thanks to BINARY LOGIC which equips us for splitting apart subject and object so that we can produce a SUBJECT’S VIEW OF THE OBJECT.   But our sense-experience reality is QUANTUM LOGIC based which means that WE ARE INCLUDED IN WHAT WE ARE LOOKING OUT AT.

 

“The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist. –“ Erwin Schroedinger”

 

The IMAGE OF OURSELVES IN THE MIRROR IS ONLY A BINARY LOGIC based IMAGE which SPLITS APART OBSERVER and OBSERVED;  Consider the following where a person is showing pictures of himself from infancy to adulthood.  “Here is me when I was 5”… “Here I am at age 10”  … “this is me at college graduation when I was 21” etc. etc.

 

WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?   What’s wrong is that it is IMPOSSIBLE, in the real world of inclusion in the all-including transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, to SEPARATE FIGURE FROM GROUND.  In modern physics and in indigenous aboriginal language terms, “THERE IS HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD” which involves QUANTUM LOGIC wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONLY ONE.  The FIGURE of me is of a CONDENSATION in the all-including, continually transforming WAVE-FIELD in which case in order understand the different between ‘who I was at age 5’ and ‘who I was at age 10’ CANNOT BE UNDERSTOOD BY STUDING ‘ME” AS IF I WERE AN “INDEPENDENT BEING” with MY OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.

 

IN MODERN PHYSICS as also in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDED UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY, the FIGURE is a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING GROUND (the WAVE-FIELD) and there is NO SUCH THING AS A LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING that is GROWING and DEVELOPING AS IF IN ITS OWN RIGHT OVER TIME.

 

What we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are calling ‘INDEPENDENT MATERIAL THINGS’ are “IN REALITY” CONDENSATIONS OF THE CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD which only APPEAR to be LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, in a sense similar to the LENS of WARM WATER that shows up on a SONAR SCAN and while this LENS appear to GROW and MOVE, what we are REALLY LOOKING AT is an overall TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM in which the warmer, low-density lensings are APPEARANCES.  There are NO GROUNDS for imposing BEING on such a lensing by NAMING it and conflating that FIRST ERROR with a SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR that animates ‘IT’.  This is the DOUBLE ERROR pointed out by Nietzsche where we use LANGUAGE and GRAMMAR to CREATE ‘INDEPENDENT BEINGS’ with “THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT”.

 

When we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS DO THIS, and it is our LANGUAGE-BASED REALITY CONSTRUCTING GENERAL HABIT that we are no longer even conscious of, we set it up as our OPERATIVE REALITY, and what this DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR actually is, is the DIFFERENTIATION OPERATOR which equips us by way of our LANGUAGE stimulated PSYCHE, for CONSTRUCTING FRAGMENT BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITIES such as are given by the language: ‘The TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING things’ and/or ‘The HUMAN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING things’.  INSTEAD OF our SENSE-EXPERIENCE supported QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE, … WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE FRAGMENTS or SPLITS APARTS (DIFFERENTIATES) the TOWN and the LANDSCAPE so that where the LANDSCAPE was the ACCOMMODATING FEMALE CONJUGATE WITHIN WHICH THE MALE ASSERTING TOWNING developed as ONE complex phenomenon (the phenomenon of TRANSFORMATION), …WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SPLITS OUT THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE AND SETS IT UP (IN LANGUAGE) ON ITS OWN AS A MALE ASSERTING AGENT THAT NOTIONALLY RESIDES WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

 

NOTA BENE:  What was just described in the preceding paragraph is the LANGUAGE and associated PSYCHOLOGICAL shift to DIFFERENTIATION from INTEGRATION (fluid holism) which is accompanied by the shift to BINARY LOGIC from QUANTUM LOGIC and the shift from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of TRANSFORMATION to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “MOVEMENT” and DYNAMICS (interactions) of “INDEPENDENT MATERIAL ENTITIES”.   This is where Rudyard Kipling’s following lines are pointing; “EAST is EAST and WEST is WEST and never the twain shall meet”.  In other words, LANGUIST REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS based on QUANTUM LOGIC architecture and LINGUISTIC REALITY CONSTRUCITONS based on BINARY LOGIC architecture WILL NEVER MEET!

 

In indigenous aboriginal cultures, the language architecture is QUANTUM LOGIC based  and it is said that ‘THERE ARE HUMANINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’.

 

In WESTERN CULTURES, the language architectures is BINARY LOGIC based and it is said that ‘The HUMANS are GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’).

 

In the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE we get the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING that is the source of BINARY LOGIC based JUSTICE (REWARD GOOD AND PUNISH BAD), MEDICINE (feed and nurture GOOD elements and processes, STARVE OUT and ELIMINATE BAD elements an processes., … and COMMERCE (feed and grow PRODUCTION of processed goods and services, …consume mine/extract and shrink RAW MATERIALS).

 

These BINARY LOGIC based language structures create an abstract SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is LOCAL AUTHORING based where we speak in terms of DIFFERENTIATED SUBJECT AUTHORS of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION as where THE TOWNS ARE GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services.

 

CONTRAST THIS with QUANTUM LOGIC based language structures employed in Indigenous aboriginal cultures and in MODERN PHYSICS which IS TRANSFORMATION BASED which means that authoring IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT where we speak in terms of INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT as in TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

 

* * * * MAKE NO MISTAKE * * * THIS IS WHERE THE REALITY OF THE EAST SPLITS WITH  THE REALITY OF THE WEST * * * *

 

In other words, THESE TWO DIFFERENT LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, (the one based on BINARY LOGIC AND the other based on QUANTUM LOGIC) PUT US INTO TWO DIFFERENT ‘REALITIES’.

 

DIFFERENTIATION serves up BINARY LOGIC REALITY as with expressions like ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

 

INTEGRATION serves up QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY as with expressions like ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

 

While DIFFERENTIATION informs WESTERN CULTURE, INTEGRATION informs INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and TAOIST/BUDDHIST AND ADVAITA VEDANTA

 

There are PARALLELS in MATHEMATICAL INFLUENCE on the PSYCHOLOGY of PERCEPTION.

 

DIFFERENTIATION has us VISUALIZE “A TOWN” or a ‘NATION’ as a local, explicit thing in itself that GROWS, DEVELOPS and PRODUCES things’ where there is MOVEMENT that is mechanistic as if in an empty space of infinite extent.

 

INTEGRATION has us VISUALIZE THINGS by QUANTUM LOGIC INTEGRATION where there is TOWNING or NATIONING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where ‘everything is in relational transformative flux’.

 

NOTE THE SHIFT WITHIN THESE ‘TWO REALITIES’ (of WEST and EAST) IN THE SOURCE of AUTHORING of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

 

LANGUAGE based on DIFFERENTIATION establishes a LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING BASE (the TOWNS are GROWING) which is the source of FRAGMENTATION and DISSONANCE.  This is analogous to MATHEMATICAL DIFFERENTIATION which reduces the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT; e.g. In a bumper car game at the amusement park, the LOCAL, EXPLICIT COLLISION is the DERIVATIVE of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) transforming matrix of relations.

 

LANGUAGE based on INTEGRATION establishes a NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT AUTHORING BASE (there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING) which serves up the impression of RESONANCE based UNION as in the GATHERING-SCATTERING CLUSTERING of ants induced by a drop of honey.

 

* * * NOTE THAT as with HURRICANING in the ATMOSPHERING as also with TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and one could add ‘ HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING, … the manner that I have just expressed these dynamics is with the use of QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which is LESS SIMPLE than the alternative option of BINARY LOGIC where one would DROP OUT the female conjugates which is to drop out the CONTAINER; i.e. ‘the ‘in the ATMOSPHERING’, … ‘in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, … and the ‘in the TRANSFORMING’, and instead use language based one-sidedly on the MALE-ASSERTING as if the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONTAINER were instead an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

 

Note the PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT of whether we use BINARY LOGIC wherein, for example, we use DIFFERENTIATION to present ourselves and material forms as the LOCAL AUTHOR OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, whereas when we use QUANTUM LOGIC, the language based REALITY switches to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT wherein SUBJECT and OBJECT are ONLY ONE, … which is a good way to describe QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND Logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein the FIGURE is a CONDENSATION Of the GROUND which is the all-including WAVE-FIELD.

 

* * * *

 

OK, it may sound as if I am going around in circles and this is because of the LIMITATIONS of this ENGLISH LANGUAGE used in the BINARY LOGIC fashion I am using it which is the STANDARD “RATIONAL” WAY OF USING ENGLISH, outside of poetry etc. which is where we express things in terms of WHAT THINGS DO which is the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE without the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which is needed in using language to express the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING —MALE ASSERTING ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD nature of reality.

 

If you read what is written between these two lines of symbols;

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§   and  ¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥

 

 

you will get an explanation of how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are getting SCREWED UP BY OUR OWN LANGUAGE.  This will be consistent with the understandings shared by Nietzsche and Bohm.  One can consider my work to this point as comprised largely of figuring out how to use language to express the fact that language plays with the psyche and thus how differing language architectures put us into differing intellectual (language based) substitute realities.  Our sense-experience reality is working fine, but NOT SO the language-based intellectual pseudo-reality. In order to write about WAVE-FIELD dynamics, it is useful to speak in terms of the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.  In WAVE-FIELD mathematics the conventional terminology is ‘REAL’ for the MALE ASSERTING and ‘IMAGINARY’ for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING.

 

HERE GOES:

 

§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§

  

MALE-ASSERTING LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHORING IS THE SCREW UP:  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is a screw up in that it is DIFFERENTIATION based and the DIFFERENTIAL COMPONENT of language-based understanding has the effect of selecting only MALE ASSERTING PROPOSITIONS and DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATES, which is a DUMBING DOWN that gives us the BINARY LOGIC structure such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ without any mention of the WILDERNESS’S FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘OPENING’ that is CONJUGATE to the TOWN’s MALE-ASSERTING GROWTH’.  The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING which is accomplished by DIFFERENTIATION (we see the TOWN as GROWING in its own right; i.e. we DIFFERENTIATE OUT ‘THE TOWN’) and this is the source of FRAGMENTATION, that impacts the PSYCHE and the PHYSICAL social dynamic and this BELIEF in LOCAL AUTHORING is brought into language by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

 

That is the problem with our COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES and it is because they have built in the LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION.

 

The LANGUAGE STRUCTURE OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISM/BUDDHISM and ADVAITA VEDANTA MATCHES THE RHEOMODE LANGUAGE STRUCTURE OF MODERN PHYSICS wherein there is NO LOCAL AUTHORING and NO FRAGMENTATION PROBLEM.  Here is the description of that language structure.

 

NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION (NO LOCAL AUTHORING) IS the nature of WAVE-FIELD REALITY as understood in Modern physics and in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.   The languages of these cultures are NOT DIFFERENTIATION (BINARY LOGIC) DEPENDENT and are, instead, consistent with Modern physics language in being QUANTUM LOGIC based.  Here one employs the ANDROGYNOUS (FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE structure in the language so that there is NO DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, and thus no ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY “FRAGMENTATION” problem (as in the WESTERN CULTURE unbalanced one-sided MALE ASSERTING, LOCAL AUTHORING LANGUAGE STRUCTURE).   The Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal language architecture is INTEGRATION based and one never ends up with the one-sided ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ unbalanced MALE-ASSERTING ONLY proposition; i.e. one says instead, ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (i.e. there is TOWNING in the transforming relational continuum).  This is the QUANTUM BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein, as Schroedinger points out, ‘SUBJECT AND OBJECT ARE ONLY ONE’.  In other words, the TOWNING is an activity that is INCLUDED within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  That is the meaning of the BOTH/AND relation termed ‘QUANTUM LOGIC’ and it is supported by Modern physics and it does not suffer from the FRAGMENTATION of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE which is arising from the LOCAL AUTHORING implied in the DOUBLE ERROR NAMING and GRAMMAR STRUCTURE.

  

¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥

 

FOOTNOTE:    I wanted to document, as clearly as possible, the MAJOR DYSFUNCTION in our GLOBAL social dynamic.  That is what is expressed above between the §§§§§§§§§§§§ and the ¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥¥  designators.

There is much more to this story because the use of language based implying of LOCAL AUTHORING is ubiquitous in WESTERN CULTURE.  We are looking at THE LOCAL AUTHORING ERROR everywhere in WESTERN JUSTICE, WESTERN MEDICINE and WESTERN COMMERCE and we see it playing out in the NATO/UKRAINE – RUSSIA conflict.  THe dysfunction that is described in this note is going on at the BOOTSTRAP LEVEL which lies below our intellectual deliberations and assessments; i.e. it lies down at the level of the PRIMITIVES which lie at a deeper level below the level of our discussions and arguments.

That is, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES have a built in foundation of BINARY LOGIC which is SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC so that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS argue at the BINARY LOGIC level (which is simple and less realistic) rather than at the QUANTUM LOGIC level (which is less simple and more realistic).  Did the PUNCH shatter the recipient’s skull?   Western law uses BINARY LOGIC where the answer is clearly YES.   But what about the EGGSHELL SKULL which is the female accommodating aspect?   Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal cultures employ QUANTUM LOGIC  in language which acknowledges the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING component of dynamics such that LOCAL AUTHORING cannot be assumed, and reflection shows that our language-based models must go beyond the simple LOCAL AUTHOR ASSUMPTION which is the one-sided MALE ASSERTING ABSTRACTION coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, … and we must open up to acknowledge the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE such as in the case of eggshell skull.

 

In general, there is no such thing as LOCAL AUTHORING.  That mistake is where FRAGMENTATION is coming from which is driving us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS nuts!

 

* * *

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

 

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

 

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.”

 

* * *