SYNOPSIS:  We live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD which is in continual flux, where the persisting VISIBLE FORMS are APPEARANCES in the manner of WHORLING IN FLOWING where the WHORLING “IS” THE FLOWING; i.e. it is HOW FLOWING “APPEARS TO US”.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DESIGN gives PRIMARY STATUS to the FORMINGS in the FLOWING by way of the “DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR” (Nietzsche), making it APPEAR as if the FORMS are LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and developments, rather than ‘THE OTHER WAY ROUND’ wherein, as understood in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism, Advaita Vedanta and affirmed by Modern physics, the persisting forms are “Schaumkommen” (appearance) as Schroedinger and Bohm and other Modern physics researchers have pointed out and affirmed with physical experiment.

So, while WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING to MATERIAL FORMS, as if these MATERIAL FORMS with their movements and interactions in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE were the PRIMARY REALITY, Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents employ LANGUAGE that correctly comprehends material forms as SECONDARY CONDENSATIONS of the PRIMARY ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD and the WESTERN CULTURE MISINTERPRETATION is the source of FRAGMENTATION since the CONDENSATIONS which are secondary to the all-including WAVE-FIELD are, in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, mistakenly elevated to PRIMARY REALITY STATUS, reducing the rightful PRIMARY REALITY CLAIMANT of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka THE WAVE-FIELD to a NON-PARTICIPATING VOID.

HERE WE SEE THE INNATE INTEGRATION of WAVE-FIELD REALITY GIVE WAY TO LINGUISTIC INTELLECTUAL DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATION.  

In other words, instead of a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in terms of overall FLUID WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION, an OVERALL (ALL-INCLUDING) TRANSFORMATION that is foundational, wherein the “APPARENTLY LOCAL and EXPLICIT” CONDENSATION is “APPEARANCE” associated with an INEXTRICABLE RELATIONAL FLOW-FEATURE in the all-including, CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD), … there is in the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, a BUILT-IN OBSCURANTISM which deceptively elevates the SECONDARY CONDENSING in the PLENUM to PRIMARY (PSEUDO-) REALITY STATUS, REDUCING in one fell swoop, the ALL-INCLUDING PLENUM to an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.

(NOTE: language gives us the means of, for example, objectifying the CLUSTERING of ants which occurs WITHIN A COMPLEX RELATIONAL TERRAIN by imposing the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR and saying ‘the CLUSTER is GROWING LARGER and CHANGING SHAPE’ and SHIFTING this way or that way, thus elevating, with the ABSTRACTION of LANGUAGE-IMPLIED “BEING”, an “APPEARANCE” within the CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, whereupon the full complexity of the resonance feature with its terrain-based FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING in conjugate relation with MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is OBSCURED as we shift our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION from the less simple CLUSTERING-IN-THE-TRANSFORMING-TERRAIN to the simple “CLUSTER” which we linguistically endow with INDEPENDENT BEING to by way of notional INCLUSION in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.  This REDUCTION of the QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein RELATIONAL FORMS are INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE to BINARY LOGIC BASED ‘INDEPENDENT THINGS’ WITHIN AN EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, is achieved with the “DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR”, as Nietzsche points out, which gives the sense of “LOCAL AUTHORING AGENCY”). 

This use of LANGUAGE achieves the REDUCING of less-simple QUANTUM LOGIC (the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM [PLENUM]) in which the condensing is forming, where this forming is, at the same time, the energy-charged PLENUM (WAVE-FIELD) it is included in, …to simple BINARY LOGIC (the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM, this EXCLUDED MEDIUM being understood as an EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER).  This reduction from QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION to BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION is OBSCURANTIST since it involves the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which is present where the CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM is at the same time, the ENERGY CHARGED PLENUM, the result of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE leaving in its ‘LINGUISTIC WAKE’ an ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT. 

[[Nota Bene:   The length and awkwardness of these above three yellow-highlighted paragraphs is due to first employing COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which supports simple BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION which is insufficient for conveying less simple QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.   For example, while the expression ‘the TOWN is GROWING’  is BINARY LOGIC  based, IMPLYING an EMPTY CONTINING SPACE, the expression ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’  is QUANTUM LOGIC based implying an ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD relation wherein there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING LANDSCAPE within which there is a MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DEVELOPMENT.  The repeated CONCEPTUALIZING statements, first in simple BINARY LOGIC mode of LINGUISTIC expression followed by their expanded corresponding less simple QUANTUM LOGIC mode of LINGUISTIC expression gives rise to the LENGTHY TEXT in this essay.  A comparison would be notices that are written in both BOTH FRENCH and ENGLISH for a BILINGUAL READERSHIP.]] 

 

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SUCCEEDS IN ‘PUTTING ITS LANGUAGE USERS ON THE SAME PAGE’ but that ‘PAGE’ is NOT that of CONTENT-CONTAINER UNITY as with CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, but as ABSOLUTE, LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS that purportedly move about and interact within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS of INFINITE EXTENT.  This WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based MATTER-AND-EMPTY SPACE PSEUDO-RELITY (wherein a material form EITHER exists OR does not exist) is SIMPLER than the QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE affirmed LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION wherein material forms are understood as CONDENDATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.

This essay reviews the logic (bringing both BINARY LOGIC and QUANTUM LOGIC into explanatory context) while supporting the Modern Physics QUANTUM LOGIC interpretation of our sense-experience reality which is AT ODDS WITH the WESTERN CULTURE POPULAR BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE based PSEUDO-REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION.

BOTH the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY and the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY support interpretive schemes that put us, as social collectives, ON THE SAME PAGE, however, the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC (EITHER RIGHT OR WRONG, GOOD OR BAD) based ‘SAME PAGE’  is very different from the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH RIGHT AND WRONG, GOOD AND BAD BALANCE-BASED) ‘SAME PAGE’. 

The FINDING in this review REAFFIRMS the REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION based on the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE STRUCTURE as is also affirmed by Bohm, Schroedinger, Nietzsche, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta,  Also explained is how the SIMPLER WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE is generating SOCIAL and PSYCHOLOGICAL FRAGMENTATION through a BINARY LOGIC based PURIFICATION orientation which contrasts with the QUANTUM LOGIC (WAVE-FIELD) BALANCING orientation of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM is perpetrated by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and employing one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ABSTRACTION using ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE as a SIMPLIFYING SUBSTITUTE or PATCH for the DROP-OUT.  This constitutes a restructuring of LANGUAGE  (and thus LANGUAGE based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION) that elevates the LOCAL and EXPLICIT to PRIMARY CONCEPTUALIZING STATUS , as the patch for DROPPING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (WAVE_FIELD).  This is OBSCURANTISM that substitutes BINARY LOGIC FRAGMENTATION for QUANTUM LOGIC INTEGRATION in WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTUALIZING.

* * * * * * 

 

 

The world of our sense-experience is a WAVE-FIELD, not only according to Modern physics but according to indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

This WAVE-FIELD structure of reality is easy to understand by way of our sense-experience wherein “To everything there is a season and time to every purpose’.   [[the SEASON is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE while the PURPOSE is the MALE ASSERTING ACTION]].

Or, as Shakespeare put it in Julius Caesar “There is a tide in the affairs of men, Which taken at the flood, leads on to fortune. Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries. On such a full sea are we now afloat. And we must take the current when it serves, or lose our ventures. [[The flood and ebb of the tide characterizes our sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD reality]]

These are ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS OF a WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.

So, while our WESTERN CULTURE language ‘HAS THE CAPABILITY of ALLUDING TO THE WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of reality, our Standard Average European Language architecture is based on a REDUCTION from this ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD) architecture which is QUANTUM LOGIC based, reducing our language to a BINARY LOGIC basis.

QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein, for example, ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’. 

Here we have the ANDROGYNOUS STRUCTURE of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING) … “within which” … there is a LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING MATERIAL STRUCTURE.

NOTA BENE:  How to understand and express this linguistically is where ‘the EAST’ meaning indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents … PART WAYS WITH ‘the WEST”, the latter (Western Culture Adherents) opting for the BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach while Modern physics along with the EAST, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, opt for the QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING APPROACH.

EXAMPLE:

 

BINARY LOGIC:  ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.  Here ‘the TOWN’ is implied to be a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing (thanks to NAMING) with the GRAMMAR-given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development.  This combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use to construct LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of REALITY in LOCAL and EXPLICIT terms.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC: ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.   Here ‘the TOWING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is implied to be a NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT relational dynamic which is A FEATURE WITHIN the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  As Schroedinger points out in general terms, this TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, is purely APPEARANCE (SCHAUMKOMMEN) based on relations that are continually in flux.  As Modern physics researchers such as Bohm also point out.  That is, material forms are only CONDENSATIONS within the one all-including WAVE-FIELD and while they have distinguishable forms, are NOT ontologically separate from the TRANSFORMING FLOW just as the WHORLING in the FLOWING is NOT SEPARATE from the FLOWING.

Because THERE IS NO LOCAL, EXPLICIT STAKE-IN-THE-GROUND FOUNDATION for RELATIONAL FORMS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD, in order to have a LANGUAGE capable of CAPTURING this FLUID DYNAMIC, it has to have a purely relational BOOTSTRAP based FOUNDATION so that the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE preserves the INHERENT NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of WAVE-FIELD reality and AVOIDS ALL LOCAL and EXPLICIT DEPENDENCIES; i.e. where the “LOCAL and EXPLICIT’ will be understood as SCHAUMKOMMEN (APPEARANCE).    In the case of the WHORLING in the FLOWING, while the FLOWING is physically real, the WHORLING is “APPEARANCE”.

The DESIGN of LANGUAGE to support the understanding that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX and without any LOCAL, EXPLICIT FOUNDATIONS has led to a BOOTSTRAP technique.  BOOSTRAPPING is a LANGUAGE based means of using a relational network of  LOCAL and EXPLICIT pseudo-ENTITIES (based on APPEARANCE) as an expedient to extract from their RELATIONS, CONCEPTUALIZATION that are BEYOND CAPTURE IN LOCAL AND EXPLICIT terms, consistent with the fluid basis of the WAVE-FIELD.  Modern physics researcher Geoffrey Chew describes this BOOTSTRAPPING approach as follows;

[Geoffrey Chew]: “when you formulate a question, you have to have some basic concepts that you are accepting in order to formulate the question.  But in the bootstrap approach, where the whole system represents a network of relationships without any firm foundation, the description of subject can be begun at a great variety of different places.  There isn’t any clear starting point.  And the way our theory has developed in the last few years, we quite typically don’t know what questions to ask.  We use consistency as the guide, and each increase in the consistency suggests something that is incomplete, but it rarely takes the form of a well-defined question.  We are going beyond the whole question-and-answer framework’.

The PITFALL of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM is what such Modern physics techniques for capturing WAVE-FIELD reality is trying to OVERCOME.  That is, if we use language where we ‘open up with’ ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, we are implying that this “GROWING” is transpiring in ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE since the words ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ are BINARY LOGIC based and depict a LOCAL MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF notionally with ITS OWN “GRAMMAR-GIVEN” POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

THIS LOCAL AUTHORING IS OBSCURANTISM since we KNOW from our sense-experience that WE LIVE IN AN ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD WORLD where we are not ‘free to launch our own local and independent actions and development given that … To everything there is a season and time to every purpose’ which is to say that THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where such MALE-ASSERTING ACTION and DEVELOPMENT, … rather than pushing out into an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE, … is being INDUCTIVELY DEVELOPED WITHIN a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, which is how Modern physics is understanding it, and also indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

So, the point is that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE ‘DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and substitutes ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE in which case LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING is SIMPLIFIED as one only has to deal with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate. 

This ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY CONCEPTUALIZING, as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE sets up a SUBSTITUTE OBSCURANTIST PSEUDO-REALITY.

For example, the BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ makes NO MENTION of its being INCLUDED in something greater than itself, in which IT, ITSELF is a FEATURE, as with TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, which is a QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION where the LOGIC is NO LONGER SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC but is LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC which is relational with a BALANCE based FOUNDATION where we say, for example, ‘the GROWTH of DEVELOPED LANDS is at the same time, the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS LANDS’.

IF WE LIVED IN A FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, WE COULD RIGHTFULLY USE LANGUAGE THAT CONCEPTUALIZED IN TERMS OF LOCAL EXPLICIT GROWTH, as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, but while this proposition is TRUE, it is at the same time INCOMPLETE (as Goedel’s Theorem points out is the case for ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS).  In this case, the INCOMPLETENESS in speaking of ‘the GROWTH of the TOWN’ is in our DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABING conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS. 

When we use LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING in the manner if WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and going SOLELY WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, our CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are NO LONGER supported by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY which has the WAVE-FIELD ARCHITECTURE wherein there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ANABLING conjugate together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.

NOTA BENE:  This is where we run into an unaddressed problem we have been carrying with us through our discussion by way of our use of the TERMS MALE and FEMALE as if these were BOTH “REAL”, but as we know from our sense-experience grounded investigations, the WAVE-FIELD dynamic has what are called “REAL” and “IMAGINARY“ COMPONENTS which describe a COMPLEX STRUCTURE or COINCIDENTIA OPPOSITORUM which is the basic nature of the WAVE-FIELD dynamic.

While the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is LOCAL and EXPLICIT, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which means that if we are talking in terms that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT, we are NOT TALKING ABOUT WAVE-FIELD phenomena since “the WAVE-FIELD (Tao) that can be told is not the true WAVE-FIELD (Tao)” as Lao Tzu said.

That is, the WAVE-FIELD has a QUANTUM LOGIC ANDROGYNOUS STRUCTURE and NOT a BINARY LOGIC DIVIDED STRUCTURE. QUANTUM LOGIC describes the ANDROGYNOUS relation between the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and the CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD).  BINARY LOGIC describes the relation of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE to ASOLUTE MATERIAL BEING.

Modern physics is reaffirming the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of reality which has he same ‘geometry’ as in “To everything there is a season and time to every purpose’.  This is a natural conceptual understanding whereby we wait for low tide to collect clams, and sunny days to do street performances.

BUT GUESS WHAT, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, as commonly employed, features the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  This is equivalent to the REDUCTION of the LOGIC we are using from QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC to BINARY ‘EITHER/OR” LOGIC.  Instead of, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, employing the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, … the ERROR of the SIMPLIFYING DROP-OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING has us serving up the ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, as if ‘IN ITS OWN INDEPENDENT RIGHT’ (i.e. as if situated within an absolute empty space of infinite extent)

Here, there is NO LONGER any acknowledgement, WITHIN THIS LINGUISTIC ONE-SIDED BINARY LOGIC based MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING form of CONCEPTUALIZATION, of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS LANDS and associated DIVERSITY, because OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (i.e. instead of ‘THERE IS TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is androgynous as in the QUANTUM LOGIC of Modern WAVE-FIELD physics, and indigenous aboriginal languages etc., WESTERN  CULTURE is going with LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is based on SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC instead of LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC.

 * * *

So, WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE ANDROGYNOUS STRUCTURE as given by “To everything there is a [female accommodating/enabling] season and time to every [male asserting/actualizing] purpose’?

This aphorism resonates with our sense-experience of being INCLUDED in something greater than ourselves, such as when we are in freeway traffic or in a bumper-car game at the amusement park, where it is TOO SIMPLE to speak in terms of OUR INDIVIDUAL ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT since we share inclusion in an all-including relational dynamic or ‘TRAFFIC FLOW’ wherein our movements are NOT SIMPLY OUR OWN LOCALLY AUTHORED MALE ASSERTING MOVEMENTS RELATIVE TO AN EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE, but are movements within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

WHAT IS CONFUSING HERE is that as we read this text, we are reading LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING that is BINARY LOGIC based whereas OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE is informing us of our INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are accustomed to using LANGUAGE where one is CONCEPTUALIZING in BINARY LOGIC terms (EITHER material forms OR empty space), … such a scheme is TOO SIMPLE to accommodate the LESS SIMPLE ANDROGYNOUS reality of our actual sense-experience of inclusion therein where “To everything there is a [female accommodating/enabling] season and time to every [male asserting/actualizing] purpose’“.

WESTERN CULTURE has evolved a language architecture that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING which is where the ‘[female accommodating/enabling] season and time to every purpose’ is ‘coming from, and having GOTTEN THAT CONTAINING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM OUT OF THE WAY SIMPLY BY LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM, …  WHAT REMAINS in our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT LANGUAGE SCHEME IS AN EMPTY SPACE AS OPERATING ARENA for a NOW LIBERATED, ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY.

THIS ABSTRACT REDUCTION of our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms IS THE PREDOMINATING WESTERN CULTURE “OPERATIVE REALITY” and it is not only UNREAL ABSTRACTION, it is the SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS, as BOHM points out;

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

NOW TO SUMMARIZE THE ABOVE COMMENTARY;

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUE TO USE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING BASED ON BINARY LOGIC, the ABSTRACT SPLITTING APART of MATTER AND SPACE.  This is a GREAT MISTAKE which Nietzsche has labelled ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ which WRONGLY SETS UP THE ABSTRACT NOTION OF ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ which brings with it, the notional BINARY LOGIC STRUCTURE of ‘REALITY’.

NO!, NOT ‘REAL REALITY’ but a BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE SUPPORTED OPERATIVE REALITY, where we say things like ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS accept as ‘the TRUTH’ and while IT IS THE LOGICAL TRUTH, it is subject to the reality that all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE, and what is not mentioned in the same breath, is THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which means, overall, TRANSFORMING of the overall LANDSCAPE.

 

SO, we have at our disposal, TWO VERY DIFFERENT LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE OPTIONS, the BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE OPTION WHICH HAS BEEN ADOPTED AS THE WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and the QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which has been ADOPTED AS THE MODERN PHYSICS STANDARD LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and which has already been the chosen LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents. 

SO, WHATEVER HAPPENED TO WESTERN CULTURE QUANTUM LOGIC based LINGUISTIC EXPRESSION such as “To everything there is a [female accommodating/enabling] season and time to every [male asserting/actualizing] purpose’?

Evidently, if we continued to acknowledge the natural sense-making in the ‘to everything there is a season…’  aphorism, BEYOND THE WORDS THEMSELVES, we would be able to understand the QUANTUM LOGIC ANDROGYNOUS dynamic that it implies.  However, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have become VERY BINARY LOGIC oriented, which has been no doubt aided and abetted by the rise of BINARY LOGIC based COMPUTING wherein we CONSTRAIN out JUDGEMENT and QUESTION FORMULATIONS to comparisons between things TAKEN TOGETHER TWO AT A TIME, which basically ELIMINATES access to QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE-BASED) UNDERSTANDING which, if we can get to it, opens up understanding that is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC based understanding.  Here is an example taken from the indigenous aboriginal culture teaching by way of a story by Paula Underwood entitled ‘My Father and the Lima Beans’

https://goodshare.org/wp/my-father-and-the-lima-beans/

In the terms that I am accustomed to working with (from my background in geophysics) Paula is bringing forth in her writing, the less simple ‘nonlinear dynamics’ in our life experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum wherein our relational actions can co-cultivate resonances which go beyond the ‘sum of the parts’ which comes with our Western Culture habitual BINARY LOGIC interpretations.

While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of formulating our LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS using LINEAR DYNAMICS such as where we assume that the result of DOUBLING THE AREA of CULTIVATED LAND will result in DOUBLING OUR PRODUCTION OF CROPS but here once again, we run into the Goedel’s Theorem INCOMPLETENESS of all FINIITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.  The INCOMPLETENESS in this LINEAR LOGIC is that it fails to acknowledge the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS LAND and DIVERSITY that is CONJUGATE to the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND, pointing out that what we have here is the NONLINEAR DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION as associates with the conjugate combination of the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND and the SHIRINKING of WILDERNESS DIVERITY. 

In general, In QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/and LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium, one can’t have ‘the GROWTH of the TOWN without the conjugate SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS as amounts to TRANSFORMATION OF THE overall LANDSCAPE wherein there is no dependence on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and where the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT instead ‘rules’; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD ‘rules’.

We capture this in LANGUAGE with ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which involves a BALANCE based relationship as also in RESONANCE based interpretations of TOWNING wherein, for example, there may be GATHERING and SCATTERING as in the CLUSTERING of ants as they come to fetch honey dripping from an overhead beehive and deliver it to their homes.

This is an example where we can see the relationship between the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as the ENVELOPE to RESONANCE phenomena and also see the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of the gathering-scattering resonance phenomena.

SHOULD WE BE USING LANGUAGE THAT IS IN TERMS OF THE CLUSTER that is SUCCESSIVELY (in the passage of time) ‘GROWING and SHRINKING’ or SHOULD WE BE UNDERSTANDING the same phenomena in terms of CLUSTERING where THERE IS NO BEING BASED “CLUSTER” that is purportedly the AUTHOR of its own successive GROWING and SHRINKING (as if it is the AUTHOR of such change).  In other words, we have the option, as voyeurs of nature and designers of LANGUAGE, to concoct a VOYEUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE where we OBJECTIFY as LOCAL-and-EXPLICIT, the CLUSTERING which is a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) resonance (WAVE-FIELD) phenomenon.

We do this reduction of CLUSTERING-IN-THE-TRANSFORMING-LANDSCAPE to the CLUSTER THING-IN-ITSELF with its own powers of AUTHORING GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT, by using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche), conceiving of ‘the CLUSTER’ as a LOCAL NAMING-INSTANTIATED ‘being-based’ independent material THING-IN-ITSELF, notionally with ITS OWN GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT/DECLINE.

While we are in the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘CLUSTERING-IN-THE-TRANSFORMING-LANDSCAPE language mode’, our understanding is that the anting is including in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein everything is in relational flux.   It is ONLY when and if we impute LOCAL EXPLICIT BEING to “THE CLUSTER” (formerly the CLUSTERING), taking the CLUSTER out of its innate inclusion in a system of RELATIONAL RESONANCE that extends far beyond the BOUNDING ENVELOPE of the RESONANCE FEATURE.

It is only thanks to the combination of LANGUAGE and VOYEURISM (our CROW’S EYE VIEW and our OBJECTIFYING LANGUAGE) that this CLUSTERING resonance feature that is inextricably bound up in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE could be BROKEN OUT as a notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT, THING-IN-ITSELF, notionally with ITS OWN (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development.

There is a general ‘formula’ here for LANGUAGE based FRAGMENTING of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR. It has a major exposure to infusing synthetic FRAGMENTATION.

 

THE RELATIVE IMPACT on UNDERSTANDING that comes with using CLUSTERING  or CLUSTER IN LANGUAGE is EXPLORED AS FOLLOWS:

-1- the “CLUSTERING” AS A NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (relational) INNER-OUTER RESONANCE FEATURE BASED IN the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE “INCLUDES” THE RESONANCE FEATURE aka ‘CLUSTER’.  This was the choice implied in the ‘My Father and the Lima Beans’ indigenous aboriginal story where the relational structure forms outside-inwardly according to openings that need filling matched up with occupants with corresponding asserting/actualizing capabilities.  An important point being that the opening needs inductively shape the coming together of the male-asserting/actualizing structure in the manner that the valley induces the coming together of rain based rivulets organizing them into streams, and the valley inducing the streams to come together into the raging river which the superficial observation may capture In LANGUAGE in one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION and DEVELOPMENT terms. That is, while the VALLEY is the PRIMARY inductive influence, the male asserting raging river makes the greatest impression.

As Lao Tzu counsels, ‘Know the male, yet keep to the female: receive the world in your arms. If you receive the world, the Tao will never leave you and you will be like a little child.’

There is a TRICKY CHALLENGE TO UNDERSTANDING here in that the PRIMARY INFLUENCE IS THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT while the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT is ONLY ‘APPEARANCE’ (Schaumkommen).

-2- the “CLUSTER” CONCEIVED OF AS A LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORM shifts the whole ‘axis of reality’ from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITY given by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche) as in ‘the GLUSTER is FORMING and GROWING’, … ‘the CLUSTER is DEGENERATING and DISSOLVING.  This understanding has bypasses the understanding of “CLUSTERING” which is a resonance feature innately tangled up in the overall TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

Note the NEGATIVE SENSE OF ROT AND DECAY AND DEGENERATION here (as in ‘the CLUSTER is DEGENERATING) since this OBJECTIFYING view fails to get a grip on the overall ANDROGYNOUS process of TRANSFORMATION wherein there is a continual reaching out to new beginnings wherein the DEGENERATION cannot be understood IN ITS OWN RIGHT out of the context of conjugate REGENERATION, these two together comprising TRANSFORMATION.  The caterpillar’s cocoon based degeneration is only the REAL COMPONENT of the COMPLEX WAVE DYNAMIC which also included the IMAGINARY COMPONENT.

But while the CLUSTERING ‘REALLY’ BELONGS TO THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE IN WHICH IT IS AN INCLUSION AND THUS A PARTICIPANT IN THE OVERALL TRANSFORMATION, THE ISOLATING of THE ‘CLUSTERING’ BY WAY OF OBJECTIFYING IT WHICH AT THE SAME TIME DROPS OUT ITS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RELATIONAL ESSENCE, the imposing LOCAL BEING by way of NAMING and GRAMMAR LIBERATES ‘THE CLUSTER’ and credits it WITH ITS OWN NOTIONAL POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING OF GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT.,

The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DESIGN employs this REDUCTION from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of WAVE-FIELD reality, … to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL/MECHANICAL PSEUDO-REALITY which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using as our “OPERATIVE REALITY” so that, NOW, when we speak of the CLUSTERS of ANTS or HOUSES or other things and ‘THEIR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT’, we have SYNTHETICALLY (LINGUISTICALLY) EXCISED THEM from the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which they are APPEARANCES, setting them up, instead, with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as NOTIONAL LOCAL MATERIAL ENTITIES, NOTIONALLY WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS that purportedly RESIDE and INTERACT within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

* * *

SUMMARY: From the above elaboration, it is possible to glean a sense of how our WESTERN CULTURE choice of the DUMBED DOWN BINARY LOGIC version of LANGUAGE-BASED CONCEPTUALIZING of the world of our sense-experience is impacting us.

By using BINARY LOGIC based language, we blind ourselves to understandings such as “To everything there is a [female accommodating/enabling] season and time to every [male asserting/actualizing] purpose’.

This BLINDING comes in the form of OBSCURANTISM as in the example of the DUMBING DOWN of the relational dynamic of CLUSTERING to the ‘CLUSTER’ which we use with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to operationalize within LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING as LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHORS of actions and developments.  This creates a whole new DUMBED DOWN PSEUDO-REALITY based on INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BODIES IN EMPTY SPACE which does away with the complexity of RELATIONAL SPACE where material forms are CONDENSATIONS within an ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM such that there is a basic AMBIGUITY between relational forms as CONTENT and the CONTAINER (PLENUM) in which they are operating such that CONTENT and CONTAINER (FIGURE and GROUND) are ONLY ONE (the CONTAINER is the WAVE-FIELD and the CONTENTS are CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD whereupon MOVEMENT and INTERACTION OF LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS is SUPERSEDED BY NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION).

If we now apply this understanding to such things as https://goodshare.org/wp/my-father-and-the-lima-beans/ we can see the difference between each new team member being selected on the basis of THEIR OWN INDIVIDUAL MERITS versus on the basis of a resonance based relational structure where the ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING HOLES forming from relations inductively shape the evolving MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ORGANIZATION.   IN other words, in a continually transforming relational world constituted by an all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM within which material forms are CONDENSATIONS and thus part of the PLENUM in the sense of a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION, there is no place for BINARY LOGIC.

One way to visualize this QUANTUM LOGIC reality wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED, since ALL MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, is to intuitively question the problems or potential for problems wherein BINARY LOGIC has been employed in situations which clearly require QUANTUM LOGIC understanding and response.

-1- WESTERN JUSTICE

-2- WESTERN MEDECINE

-3- WESTERN COMMERCE

WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE is BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR based whereas indigenous aboriginal justice is QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND based.   QUANTUM LOGIC implies BALANCE.  it is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as implied in the Yin/Yang symbol.

Here we have the FEMALE and the MALE as suggested in the relative OPENNESS and FULLNESS interplay of CONTAINER (stomach) and CONTENT (nurturant food).  This QUANTUM LOGIC “BALANCE” is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of FULL and EMPTY, the gap between them understood by the stomach

QUANTUM LOGIC is also known as the BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING THIRD (or ‘including medium’) which was formalized by Stéphane Lupasco, as follows;

To every phenomenon or element or logical event whatsoever, and accordingly to the judgment which thinks of it, the proposition which expresses it, to the sign which symbolizes it must always be associated, structurally and functionally, a logical antiphenomenon, or anti-element or anti-event and therefore a contradictory judgment, proposition or sign in such a fashion that the former can only be potentialized by the actualization of the latter, but not disappear such that either could be self-sufficient in an independent and therefore rigorous non-contradiction – as in all logic, classical or otherwise, that is based on an absoluteness of the principle of non-contradiction.”

The point half-way between actualization and potentialization is a point of maximum antagonism or ‘contradiction’ from which, in the case of complex phenomena, a T-state (T for “tiers inclus”, included third term) emerges, which is capable of resolving the contradiction (or ‘counter-action‘), at another, higher level of reality. “  – Lupasco, Stéphane., Le principe d’antagonisme et la logique de l’énergie, 1951.

[see also; ‘Stéphane Lupasco et le tiers inclus. De la physique quantique à l’ontologie’, by Basarab Nicolescu]

I am including this not so the reader has to study it because we can intuit quantum logic simply through our natural sense-experience understanding of BALANCE and IMBALANCE which is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC of THIS WAY or THE OTHER WAY (EITHER one state OR the opposite state).

I am including it because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are DROWNING IN OVER-SIMPLISTIC BINARY LOGIC EXPLANATIONS of EVERYTHING as with ‘the TOWN is GROWING), so that, when someone says something different and LESS SIMPLE which is meanwhile solidly grounded in our sense-experience (as in QUANTUM LOGIC terms such as ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE), it is spontaneously dismissed and ignored because NOT NEEDED in the sense that SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC seems to do the job.  This practice of using SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC IN PLACE OF LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC is what separates WESTERN CULTURE (along with its BINARY LOGIC based NEWTONIAN THINKING) from INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and TAOIST/BUDDHIST and ADVAITA VEDANTA CULTURE (along with QUANTUM LOGIC based MODERN PHYSICS WAVE-FIELD THINKING).

* * *

CONCLUSIONS:

The world of our sense-experience requires a QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION which is WAVE-FIELD based.  Here we say things like ‘there is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, aka a CONDENSING in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD).

The WESTERN CULTURE INTELLECTUAL-CONCEPTUAL PSEUDO-REALITY employs a BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING such as here are HUMANS with their own powers of authoring actions and development that move about and interact in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

In terms of THOUGHT, we are all capable of understanding the WAVE-FIELD structure of our reality; “To everything there is a [female accommodating/enabling] season and time to every [male asserting/actualizing] purpose’.

What ‘gets in the way’ of this LESS SIMPLE CONCEPTUALIZING of sense-experience reality is BINARY LOGIC because BINARY LOGIC is subject to Goedel’s Theorem which proves that “ALL FINITE SYSTEMS OF LOGIC ARE INCOMPLETE”, meaning that our comments can be TRUE without being COMPLETE as where we say ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ which may be TRUE but which fails to mention the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which is part of REALITY, so that we can use LANGUAGE to PROVE THINGS TO BE LOGICALLY TRUE THAT ARE NOT REAL.

 The proposition that the TOWN is GROWING is TRUE but NOT REAL SO LONG AS WE FAIL TO MENTION THE CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS.

BUT WHAT THE MIND DOES WITH THIS IS TO HAVE US THINK IN THE UN-REAL TERMS WHERE THE TOWN IS SITUATED WITHIN A FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, IN WHICH IT CAN GROW WITHOUT ENTANGLEMENT WITH A CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS BECAUSE THERE IS NO ‘CONJUGATE’ IN A FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, THE CONJUGATE IN THIS CASE DERIVING FROM INCLUSION IN A SPHERICAL SPACE (WAVE-FIELD)

IF WE EXCEPT, IN OUR PSYCHE, THE ABSTRACTION OF THE ‘GROWTH’ OF A ‘LOCAL EXPLICIT THING’, WE ARE IMPLICITLY ASSUMING INCLUSION IN A FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, SO THAT THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WE EMPLOY CAN REVERSE-ENGINEER OUR WORLDVIEW, AND IN THIS CASE, DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE THAT ‘COMES WITH’ SPHERICAL SPACE BY IMPUTING OUR ENCONCEMENT IN A FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (AS IN THE MATHEMATICAL ABSTRACTION OF EUCLIDEAN SPACE).

Space is not Euclidian’ … “Space is a participant in physical phenomena” … “Space not only conditions the behaviour of inert masses, but is also conditioned in its state by them.”, … “the recognition of the fact that ‘empty space’ in its physical relation is neither homogeneous nor isotropic, compelling us to describe its state by ten functions (the gravitation potentials g(μ,ν), has, I think finally disposed of the view that space is physically empty.”…”Relativity forces us to analyze the role played by geometry in the description of the physical world.” . . . “A thrown stone is, from this point of view, a changing field, where the states of greatest field intensity travel through space with the velocity of the stone” —Einstein

WHAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE FACED WITH IS THAT WE HAVE RETAINED In OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, THE BINARY LOGIC BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS WHICH ARE FRAGMENTATIVE AND CONFUSING AND WHICH ARE PROLIFERATING THROUGH THE BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES OF WESTERN;

-1- JUSTICE

-2- MEDECINE

-3- COMMERCE

Where the BINARY LOGIC is used in a PURIFICATION style approach rather than in a BALANCE oriented approach as with QUANTUM LOGIC.

There is INNATE AMBIGUITY between the BINARY LOGIC ASSESSMENT of the GUILTY PATHOGEN ATTACKING THE INNOCENT VICTIM versus QUANTUM LOGIC ASSESSMENT of the IMBALANCE between those with access to PLENTY and those with a deficiency of such access.

What is implicit here is that the condition of plenty or scarcity can be attributed to either MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING or FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as both of these conjugates are operative in the WAVE-FIELD REALITY, however, in the REDUCTION to the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC conceptualization, THERE IS ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is replaced with ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

This means that in the BINARY LOGIC ASSESSMENT, WE “DROP OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and we ‘end up with’ the OBSCURANTISM of one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY explanations as in WESTERN JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE where we DROP OUT acknowledgement of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE so that as in the example of the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN CULTURE, there is NO ACKNOWLEDGING of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘EGG-SHELL SKULL’ which contributes MORE to the shattering of the skull than the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PUNCH.

The same is true in forest fires and all manner of dynamics where, for example, it is not simply the MALE ASSERTING tossing of the cigarette butt that AUTHERS the forest fire since the rain forest is often too sopping wet to ignite even with a blowtorch, but in ambient (FEMALE) conditions of tinder dryness from a long hot summer, the VERY SAME ACT of tossing out the cigarette butt (the male asserting  conjugate) together with the tinder dry condition of the forest (the female accommodating/enabling conjugate) co-contribute to the fire.

* * *

There are countless examples of the BASIC AMBIGUITY of AUTHORING AGENCY as coming from EITHER or BOTH of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and/or FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING which is RESOLVED in understanding dynamics in terms of TRANSFORMATION which is ANDROGYNOUS, having a combined MALE-ASSERTING, FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING ASPECT.

THE BOTTOM LINE INTERPRETATION is that while the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, when we try to understand it by way of LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATION splits the population into those who perceive things in BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR terms and those who perceive things in QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND terms.  QUANTUM LOGIC is the less simple CONCEPTUALIZING which preserves the WAVE-FIELD nature of reality while BINARY LOGIC which now dominates in WESTERN CULTURE, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is essential to WAVE-FIELD based understanding, leaving only a TOO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC basis for CONCEPTUALIZATION which is mechanistic and FRAGMENTS reality into the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, dropping out the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT contribution essential to WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATION.

This continuing to manifest in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS as FRAGMENTATION and POLARIZATION.  The POLARIZATION derives from BINARY LOGIC imposing the EITHER/OR LOGIC and relational dynamics that involve BALANCE and IMBALANCE where resolution is REBALANCING rather than the PURIFICATIONIST REMOVAL of perceived PATHOGENS or AUTHORS of BAD ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS so as to hopefully improve the concentrations of AUTHORS of GOOD ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.  This WESTERN JUSTICE APPROACH ‘has its ladder up the wrong wall’ since the reality is in terms of the QUANTUM LOGIC relational dynamics of BALANCE and IMBALANCE rather than in the BINARY LOGIC terms of RIGHT and WRONG which leads to a SISYPHUS like pursuit of the abstract IMPOSSIBLE and UNNATURAL condition of PURIFICATION; i.e. ALL RIGHT and NO WRONG.

The CHALLENGE here is that the DYSFUNCTION of orienting to BINARY LOGIC based PURIFICATION is BUILT INTO the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE, presenting a problem, the solution to which is akin to having to change out the wheels on our car while speeding down the road in it.

* * *