The WAVE-FIELD Nature of the World that WESTERN CULTURE has UP-ENDED.
The WAVE-FIELD nature of the world has a FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE is in a NATURAL PRIMACY over the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE as in the physical example of the RAGING RIVER that scours out the FEMALE CHANNEL. In this language based NAMING and GRAMMAR REPRESENTATION we give PRIMARY AGENCY to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION. THIS IS A MISTAKE! The FEMALE VALLEY that inductively organizes rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER is the INDUCTIVE AUTHORING SOURCE; i.e. the AUTHORING SOURCE IS NOT THE MALE ASSERTING ACTION.
THIS MISTAKE THAT HAS BEEN BUILT INTO WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is a REALITY INVERTER and MORE. WE NOT ONLY MAKE THE MISTAKE OF CONSTRUCTING A MALE-ASSERTING AUTHORING AGENCY that we are presenting in our language based representations as our OPERATIVE REALITY, we are introducing ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT as a SUBSTITUTE for the NOW UNNECESSARY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, the net result being that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based REALITY REPRESENTATIONS are of a one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY nature. For example we speak of the “RAGING RIVER” as having MALE ASSERTING POWER that equips the RAGING RIVER to PLOUGH OUT CANYONS in the earth, as for example, the GRAND CANYON ploughed out by the Colorado river. In this example the MALE ASSERTING river ploughs up the land in a BINARY LOGIC dynamic wherein we see the COLORADO RIVER and the GRAND CANYON as TWO DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT THINGS; i.e. a MALE ASSERTING AGENCY and the CANYON which is the PRODUCT of the COLORADO RIVER’S MALE ASSERTING AGENCY.
WHAT is LOST in the SHUFFLE is the original FEMALE VALLEY that inductively organizes rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER so that our ‘talk’ in terms of MALE ASSERTING AGENCY is UPSIDE DOWN and BACKWARDS. The FEMALE VALLEY is the inductive author to her own deepening through her ability to GATHER together rain into rivulets, rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER that is SCOURING OUT ITS OWN PASSAGEWAY in an OUROBORUS (ANDROGYNOUS) LIKE DYNAMIC. WITHOUT THE FEMALE VALLEY there would be NO RAGING RIVER and without the RAGING RIVER, there would be NO FEMALE VALLEY, thus this phenomenon bottoms out in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the MALE ASSERTING ARE ONE, as in the mythical OUROBORUS (snake swallowing its own tail) RELATION.
It is only our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that SPLITS these two WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATES APART AND RECASTS the OUROBORUS or COINCIDENTIA OPPOSITORUM IN THE SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC BASED “MALE and FEMALE TERMS’, OBSCURING the actual physical sense experience affirmed QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD structure.
IT IS THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR that introduces BINARY LOGIC into our REPRESENTATION and allows the SPLITTING APART of the WAVE-FIELD INTO TWO SEPARATE (MALE AND FEMALE) COMPONENTS.
The point here is that without the intervention imposing the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which leads to the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between the NOW INDEPENDENTLY MOVING MALE ASSERTING AGENT and this implying immersion in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, we would have been able to retain the “BOTH/AND” QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the MALE-ASSERTING RAGING RIVER and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY, as occurs within FLUIDS of DIFFERING DENSITY and thus requiring QUANTUM LOGIC based understanding rather than BINARY LOGIC based understanding. The INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD that includes CONDENSATIONS (material forms) effectively DEMOTES the material forms which are PRIMARY in BINARY LOGIC construction to secondary CONDENSATION status, NOT ‘SECONDARY’ IN A PHYSICAL sense since the WAVE-FIELD is just ONE ALL-INCLUDING phenomenon, but SECONDARY in a LOGICAL sense; i.e. while the WAVE-FIELD is the OVERALL REALITY, the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD are FEATURES within the OVERALL REALITY and our language based representation of the CONDENSATIONS and “their movements and developments” imply their INDEPENDENCE as if within an uninvolved (or ’empty’) containing space. So, once we focus our language-based description on the CONDENSATIONS, we are CREATING a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which we are imputing the POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT to the CONDENSATIONS and DROPPING OUT the REAL SOURCE of DYNAMICS which is the WAVE-FIELD with its CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY and its MALE ASSERTING AGENCY.
This “DROPPING OUT” of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the SUBSTITUTING with an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT is BACKFILL necessitated by the PROMOTING of the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE to UNCONTESTED, SINGULAR PRIMACY in our language-based reality constructions. Instead of having our language ACKNOWLEDGING the CONCAVE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OPENING OF THE VALLEY that INDUCTIVELY ORGANIZES the collecting of rivulets into streams and streams into the RAGING RIVER, once we have IN MIND the “RAGING RIVER” together with a GRAMMAR that we have been using to impute LOCAL AUTHORING to OURSELVES, the language tools are in place to GIVE FULL CREDIT to the RAGING COLORADO RIVER for CARVING OUT THE GRAND CANYON, and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OF THE VALLEY ATTRACTOR that is the DEEPER AUTHORING SOURCE of the RAGING RIVER is DROPPED OUT OF OUR LANGUAGE BASED CAPTURE OF THIS PHENOMENON.
AS in the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE we have BUILT INTO our language architecture, THE PRACTICE of OBSCURANTISM where we IGNORE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and build a language architecture around the ONE-SIDED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE at which point WE DISCARD from our language all reference to the ANDROGYNOUS NATURE OF OUR WAVE-FIELD REALITY and put forth a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTION, employing phraseology such as THE RAGING COLORADO RIVER IS DIGGING A HUGE CANYON IN THE VALLEY FLOOR!
GOODBYE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FEMALE VALLEY INDUCTIVE ACCOMODATING, HELLO PROMOTED MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT!
In other words, the FEMALE INDUCTIVE ORGANIZING POWER OF THE VALLEY, where ITS OPENING CONSTITUTES THE PRIMARY AGENCY that pulls and gathers together rivulets into streams and streams into RAGING RIVER … GOES UNMENTIONED… as the RAGING RIVER gets BRAGGING RIGHTS to its CLAIM of AUTHORING the GRAND CANYON HOLE IN THE GROUND. The HISTORICAL RECORD SHOWS that CANYONS are the work of MALE ASSERTING RIVERS like the COLORADO RIVER that is credited with AUTHORING the GRAND CANYON. The initial low-relief FEMALE DEPRESSION aka VALLEY was NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT so it didn’t attract attention like the RAGING RIVER, but it is the quiet MOTHER and the RAGING RIVER is its child, so PROMOTING THE FALSE NOTION THAT THE RAGING RIVER is the AUTHOR of the CANYON is AN ERROR. It is COMMON WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR as pointed out by Nietzsche. READ MY LIPS, … “THE COLORADO RIVER CARVED OUT THE GRAND CANYON”,… and again, “THE PUNCH SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S EGG-SHELL JAW, … and one’s more, ‘THE SPARK FROM THE CIGARETTE BUTT” CAUSED THE HUMONGOUR FOREST FIRE”.
Now, come on folks, we know that the MALE EGO likes to be stroked but this BUILDING INTO OUR LANGUAGE, this EXCLUSIVE MALE ASSERTING AUTHORSHIP BIAS is something we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE TAKING TO RIDICULOUS LIMITS. In all cases, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING is PRIMARY and MALE ASSERTING is SECONDARY. That is what the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE happens to be. OCEAN WAVE TROUGH opens up and the MALE ASSERTING PEAK COLLAPSES INTO IT and OF COURSE there is NOT TWO SEPARATE THINGS HERE as BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION SUGGESTS, THERE IS AN ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD which is a COINCIDENTIA OPPOSITORUM symbolized an OUROBORUS, the SNAKE SWALLOWING ITSELF BY SWALLOWING IS OWN TAIL . WHAT IS GOING ON HERE REQUIRES QUANTUM LOGIC representation; i.e. the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (the WAVE-FIELD medium) WHERE THE WAVE-FIELD IS SWALLOWING IS OWN MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS. THERE IS NO ‘EMPTY SPACE’ ANYWHERE IN THIS PICTURE. The EMPTY SPACE comes from BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACT LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS where, after we have NOTINALLY broken out the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE and presented it as ALL SHE WROTE, we need to supply a container for housing our MALE ASSERTING OPERATIONS, a container that will not interfere nor detract from the FULL AND SOLE AUTHORSHIP that is credited to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT. WHAT WILL DO THE TRICK IS AN EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER to house our MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS WITHOUT INTERFERING.
* * *
In the example of the FEMALE VALLEY that ORGANIZES runoff into the MALE-ASSERTING RAGING RIVER, if we understand all of this as a RELATIONAL DYNAMIC without OUR IMPOSING OF A BINARY LOGIC BASED “ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE REFERENCE FRAME”, then we can move forward to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING WHEREIN the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY and the MALE ASSERTING RAGING RIVER, “ARE ONLY ONE” as in CLOUD FORMATIONS in the ATMOSPHERE. IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT WE HAVE THE OPTION TO ARCHITECT LANGUAGE THAT CAN EMPLOY THE LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as captures the WAVE-FIELD phenomena wherein there is the QUANTUM LOGIC relations between the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD and the WAVE-FIELD, … the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC PERSISTS AS THE WESTERN CULTURE LOGIC OF CHOICE DUE TO ITS GREATER SIMPLICITY and NOT LESS because it supports the ABSTRACT CONCEPT OF LOCAL AUTHORING which is EGO INFLATING. In any case WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS remain “HUNG UP” on BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS and the term ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ is pointing to the fact that BINARY LOGIC is TOO SIMPLE to capture SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY OF INCLUSIONIN THE WAVE-FIELD which requires the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC, the LOGIC that acknowledges that MATERIAL FORMS and the CONTAINING WAVE-FIELD are in a QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION where the WAVE-FIELD is ALL-INCLUDING and within which we have MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVEFIELD.
THERE IS NO SENSE-EXPERIENCE SUPPORTED JUSTIFICATION FOR OUR WESTERN CULTURE INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION BASED EXERCISE OF PROMOTING THE WAVE-FIELD CONDENATIONS TO BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL BEING STATUS WHILE DEMOTING THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD TO AN ALL-INCLUDING EMPTY SPACE.
STILL we continue to use WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION that REDUCE THE LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC RELATIONS TO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC RELATIONS, and it may be because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are ‘HOOKED’ on the GUILE of PRESUPPOSING WE ARE LOCAL AUTHORS OF OUR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS (the ‘double error of namin and grammar) which gives us an EGO and also the method of PURIFICATION based ‘improvement’ to our society wherein, having the concept of LOCAL AUTHORING to work with, we can FEED AND GROW the population of INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL AUTHORS of GOOD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS and STARVE AND SHRINK the population of INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL AUTHORS of BAD ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS as a means of optimizing our society seen as a collection of LOCAL INDEPENDENT BEINGS WITH POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and developments rather than in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of CONDENSATIONS of the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD. ..
* * *
Our LANGUAGE habit is to INVERT the ANDROGNYOUS reality wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING is in a natural primacy over the MALE ASSERTING and RE-PRESENT the MALE ASSERTING “RAGING RIVER”as the LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHOR of the CANYON; i.e. in the SIMPLE BINARY PLUG-and-SOCKET LOGIC of ASSERTOR and ACCOMMODATRESS, … however, when the FEMALE INDUCTIVE VALLEY and the MALE RAGING RIVER ARE UNDERSTOOD AS ONE-AND-THE-SAME (i.e. CONJUGATES IN THE WAVE-FIELD SENSE), the BINARY LOGIC OPTION is NO LONGER POSSIBLE and QUANTUM LOGIC, which has been SHUT OUT due to the linguistic formulating of the phenomenon in BINARY LOGIC based terms (i.e. where MATTER and SPACE are deemed MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE).
In the WAVE-FIELD world, the RAGING RIVER and the ACCOMMODATING LANDSCAPE are ONLY ONE. THERE IS NO BINARY LOGIC ‘SPLIT’ BETWEEN THE TWO, they are both CONDENSATIONS in the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD..
* * *
The problem with writing about the WAVE-FIELD is that it is a phenomenon wherein FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING ARE ONLY ONE and once the TWO DIFFERENT NAMES are mentioned, THE GENIE IS OUT OF THE BOTTLE and it is next to impossible to PUT HER BACK IN. As Bohm pointed out, we can stir a drop of India ink into clear treacle so that the black thread becomes so fine as to be invisible and all we can see is what looks like homogeneous GRAY TREACLE and only with the most powerful microscope could we see the BINARY DIVISION into LOCAL and EXPLICIT THREADS of INDIA INK WITHIN A SEPARATE CONTAINING FLUID.
THE MORAL OF THE STORY IS, … BEST NOT TO PLAY AROUND WITH BINARY LOGIC as it DULLS our UNDERSTANDING and once ON THE LOOSE, it is very difficult to put back in the bottle. ONCE we speak in terms of ‘THE RAGING RIVER’, the FEMALE INDUCTIVE POWER OF THE VALLEY that organizes and collects together the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT contributions of rivulet and stream and all of this FEMALE INTEGRATIVE WORK is EXCLIPSED by the IMPRESSIONING PICTURE OF THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT RAGING RIVER AND WHAT WE PERCEIVE AS “ITS” MALE-ASSERTING ‘ACTION AUTHORING POWER’; i.e. the FEMALE INDUCTIVE ORGANIZING AGENCY becomes the DEA ABSCONDITA in our WESTERN CULTURE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY.
* * *
IT IS THE WAVE-FIELD nature of the world that Lao Tzu is referring to where he says;
“Know the masculine,
but keep to the feminine:
and become a watershed to the world.
If you embrace the world,
the Tao will never leave you
and you become as a little child
We can understand this in WAVE-FIELD terms and it connects with other references in our culture to the MALE-FEMALE ANDROGYNOUS nature of everything, that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, because of our language architecture, tend to reduce to a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”. For example, instead of saying (as indigenous aboriginal language users would say) “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANFORMING LANDSCAPE”, we WESTERN CULTURE ADERHENTS “REDUCE” this to the MALE-ASSERTING ONLY (by SUBSTITUTING EMPTY SPACE FOR THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE) and we say “THE OWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services”.
WHAT we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE DOING with this LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is to reduce our language based representation of reality, by SUBSTITUTING A NEW SIMPLER PSEUDO-REALITY that substitutes EMPTY SPACE for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, so that we fabricate a SUBSITUTE REALITY that is ONE-SIDEDLY MALE ASSERTING, as in the “TOWN” example above. If we blink our eyes and step back and back off our crows-eye staring at ‘the TOWN’, we can relax and open up to an awareness of OUR being INCLUDED in a continually unfolding sense-experience reality which is undergoing overall transformation whereby the words “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (relational continuum)” … give a MORE COMPLETE REPRESENTATION of our sense-experience reality, because WE, TOO are INCLUDED in the CHANGING WORLD or ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ that includes the TOWNING and like the TOWNING our INCLUSION is INSEPARABLE because we are PART of this overall TRANSFORMATION.
This understanding wherein there is an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING relational continuum that we too are included in, is the WAVE-FIELD understanding of Modern physics which, in the informal sense of relational awareness and understanding, is the indigenous aboriginal conceptualization that explains our sense-experience of inclusion in a living, transforming world which has been called ‘the Tao’ and which in Modern physics is understood as “THE WAVE-FIELD”, which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have SIMPLIFIED in our LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATIONS to a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING material dynamics world, where we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING which features LOCAL AUTHORING as the “WORLD DYNAMIC” which is ONE-SIDEDLY MALE ASSERTING ONLY.
THIS SIMPLE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY REPRESENTATION “WORKS” as a CRUDE LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION TOOL to enable us, in our social collectives, to SHARE as in COMMUNICATE a SIMPLIFIED representation of the sense experience of inclusion in the WORLD; i.e. our inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.
THERE IS NO SUCH SIMPLIFICATION built into indigenous aboriginal language based representations and they INSTEAD employ a language architecture that captures THE FULL ANDGROYNOUS (FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING— MALE ASSERTING ) WAVE-FIELD REALITY, as in words equivalent to ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which captures the full ANDROGYNOUS REALITY that is affirmed by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION therein (i.e. our inclusion as relational forms in the WAVE-FIELD or ‘in the Tao’).
NOTA BENE: Our ENLISH LANGUAGE and in fact all of the Common Average European languages are architected so as to SIMPLIFY the linguistic articulation and they engineer the simplification of DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of WAVE-FIELD reality OUT OF THE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF “REALITY”, … and here it must be pointed out that the “REALITY” is no longer our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, that is being crafted in this one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY manner, but it is a “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” wherein there are MALE ASSERTING MATERIAL FORMS with GRAMMAR GIVEN actions and development which are described in our language, as moving about and interacting WITHIN AN ABSOUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT. YES, THAT IS WHAT WE HAVE BUILT INT OUR EVERYDAY WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that we use for constructing REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY, … which as I have mentioned, … is no longer ‘REALITY’ but REPRESENTATIONS of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is the REMNANTS of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD that remain after our CHOPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE. NOW we have “THE TOWN” without the LANDSCAPE, which we say is GROWING, … as if in an empty space container, and is NO LONGER INCLUDED WITHIN THE OVERALL TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE aka RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, … but is instead implicitly situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, which is the TRICKERY that enables our thinking of ‘the TOWN’ as if it were a SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF with “ITS OWN LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPING.
THIS, BY THE WAY, IS THE SAME FORMULA WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE USING FOR CONSTRUCTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY VERSIONS OF OUR ‘SELF”, AS NOTIONAL LOCAL, INDEPENDENT BEINGS, NOTIONALLY WITH OUR OWN LOCAL INTERNAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, … A LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION SCHEME THAT ALLOWS US TO CONSTRUCT A SIMPLIFIED, FRAGMENT BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY THAT WHEREIN WE CAN USE THIS LANGUAGE BASED FRAGMENTATION TO FOCUS ATTENTION ON LOCAL, EXPLICIT PIECES OF REALITY, such as ‘THE TOWN’, and ANIMATE these LOCAL EXPLICIT PIECES IN OUR LANGUAGE SCHEME so as to CONSTRUCT A FRAGMENT BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which serves as a crude GO-BY for sharing stories of our INEFFABLE sense-experience of inclusion in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, IN USING THIS MALE-ASSERTING ONLY LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION SCHEME WHICH NO LONGER INCLUDES THE FEMALE ACCOOMMODATING CONJUATE WORKS AS A SYSTEM TO SHARE A REDUCED TO MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ACTION ONLY, COMMUNICATIONS SCHEME, but as BOHM and NIETZSCHE imply, this is SCREWING UP OUR THINKING because of the DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE WHICH IS WHAT CONNECTS EVERYTHING WITH EVERYTHING SINCE THE MATERIAL THINGS are in fact CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD so that while the WAVE-FIELD is ONE TRANSFORMING THING IN WHICH THE MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS WITHIN IT ARE SECONDARY FEATURES “WHICH ARE DEFINITELY NOT INDEPENDENT”, … by using a CAE LANGAUGE ARCHITECTURE with its “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMIGN and GRAMMAR “LOCAL AUTHORING” BASIS, we construct FRAGMENT BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPESENTATIONS, which are “LOCAL” and “EXPLICIT” such as where ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services’, IN PLACE OF THE REAL WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE WHERE WE HAVE RELATIONAL FORMS AS CONDENSATIONS OF AN ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD wherein these FORMINGS within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM are, like clouds forming in the atmosphere, NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT.
THE REALITY OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS and parts of THE EAST is this WAVE-FIELD REALITY wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX and where the MATERIAL FORMS are SCHAUMKOMMEN (APPEARANCES) sine they are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD. THERE ARE NO ‘THINGS-THAT-BE” in this physical reality because the reality is the transforming WAVE-FIELD wherein everything is in flux so that instead of using ABSTRACT NAMES that imply BEING like “John Dunbar”, the NAMING scheme is meant to preserve the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein the FORM is a FLOW-FORM within the WAVE-FIELD as alluded to be by ‘DANCES WITH WOLVES’ and/or TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which preserves the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of the FORMINGS in the FLOWING (the CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD). The QUANTUM LOGIC captures the relationship of the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD with the WAVE-FIELD. It is a BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the FORMS are BOTH ‘themselves’ and at the same time, the INCLUDING MEDIUM, which describes the WAVE-FIELD structure.
In the WAVE-FIELD structure the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “INCLUDES” the MALE ASSERTING which turns things upside down by comparison with our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONVENTION where we SUBSTITUTE EMPTY SPACE for the FEMALE and IMPUTE FULL AND SOLE REALITY TO THE ASSERTING MALE THAT NOTIONALLY ASSERTS WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.
This is something that confuses us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS because of our having made the adjustment, through our language based representations to THINK in terms of the SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITIES MOVE ABOUT AND INTERACT WITHIN A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE. THIS DIFFERS RADICALLY FROM THE MONDERN PHYSICS and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY WHEREIN THE WAVE-FIELD is the PRIMARY REALITY and the CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD are SECONDARY. The WESTERN CULTURE ‘ELEVATING’ of the CONDENSATIONS TO PRIMARY STATUS is, as Bohm points out, the source of SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA as an EXPOSURE which is BASIC to WESTERN CULTURE, coming through its BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS, which as mentioned, have us employing an abstract SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on ABSOLUTE LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATIERAL BEINGS that move about and interact within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT. THIS IS THE FOUNDATIONAL ARCHITECTURE OF OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES which continues to support the ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring LOCAL MATERIAL BEINGS residing in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE notionally gifted with (grammar-given) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.
This WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE has us constructing SUBSTITUTE REALITIES wherein the dynamic is NO LONGER the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD dynamic but a CHOPPED DOWN SIMPLIFIED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY DYNAMIC WHICH IS MISSING THE ESSENTIAL FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC, which puts us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, as far as we are using language based representations over sense-experience to understand “REALITY”, into a new SUBSTITUTE REALITY where the dynamics are exclusively MALE-ASSERTING so that, for example, in the WESTERN JUSTICE SYSTEM, the THIN SKULL RULE exemplifies the WESTERN CULTURE DROP OUT OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD COMPONENT. THE THIN SKULL RULE CONSTRINS AUTHORSHIP CREDIT TO THE MALE ASSERTING so that the natural PRIMACY of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING in the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE IS SIMPLY DROPPED OUT AND TREATED AS NON-EXISTENT. So that in the THINK SKULL RULE ALL AUTHORING CREDIT IS ASSIGNED TO THE MALE ASSERTING ACTION OF THE PERSON AUTHORING THE PUNCH and the FRAGILITY or ROBUSTNESS of the JAW’s FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE to the MALE-ASSERTING ACTION is IGNORED in constructing the language-based representation so that only the MALE-ASSERTING is ACKNOWLEDGED. Thus we have the GLASS JAW rule in WESTERN CULTURE LAW where the interpretation is that the AUTHOR OF THE PUNCH is the FULL AND SOLE SOURCE of the resulting damage to the recipient of the punch, an interpretation which DENIES the REALITY of the natural PRECEDENCE of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJGUATE.
This ERROR is PERVASIVE in WESTERN CULTURE because it BUILT INTO THE LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION SCHEME where developments are construed to be of a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY NATURE and this is supported by the abstraction of imputing that the MALE ASSERTING ONLY DYNAMICS are transpiring in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (a GEOMETRIC ABSTRACTION otherwise known as ‘EUCLIDEAN SPACE) . This one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONCEPTUUALIZATION is serving as the WESTERN CULTURE ‘OPERATIVE REALITY” and this is the source of growing SOCIAL DYSFUNCTION that manifests In the BINARY LOGIC POLARIZATIONS such as in the current UKRAINE-RUSSIA CONFLICT and MUCH MUCH MORE.
BINARY LOGIC is the LOGIC which enables THINKING in terms of LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL BODIES within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER.
QUANTUM LOGIC is the LOGIC which enables THINKING in terms of NONLOCAL IMPLICIT CONDENSATIONS within an ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-FILLED WAVE-FIELD.
A NOTE ON HOW WE ARRIVE AT THE CONFUSING PLACEMENT OF MALE ASSERTING IN (ABSOLUTE) PRECEDENCE OVER FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (which we reduce to absolute empty space)
Our WESTERN CULTURE “ACCULTURATION” through LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATIONS which are LIMITED to the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY, … have us thinking by envisioning, from an early age, of such impressive MALE ASSERTING phenomena as ‘the RAGING RIVER’ and we tend to be impressed and even mesmerized by our exposure to such a powerful phenomenon. But because this powerfulness is so LOCAL and EXPLICIT (i.e. if we fall into it from our position on its banks, it will dash us to death on the rocks), we tend to stop our thoughts with that conclusion, that the might raging river is a powerful thing-in-itself, and in stopping there, with this MALE ASSERTING ACTION CONSTRUCT, … we stay with the BINARY LOGIC based understanding of the MALE-ASSERTING AGENT, … but if we were born and raised within an indigenous aboriginal culture, we would OPEN UP our understanding to include our sense-experience based awareness of how the concave curvature of the valley is accommodating and organizing the run-off water so that the valley is the MOTERH of this powerful raging river and without that FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING AUTHORING ROLE, there would be no MALE ASSERTING AUTHORING ROLE, so it is “more than a bit unfair” to do as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE DOING and SUBSTITUTE ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE so as to SIMPLIFY OUR LANGUAGE by REDUCING our androgynous sense-experience reality to an ABSTRACT INTELLECTUAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is based on ONE-SIDED-MALE-ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVLOPMENTS based SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein we maintain that the RAGING RIVER CARVES OUT THE CANYON.
NO! THE FEMALE VALLEY SEDUCED THE ORANIZING AND AGGREGATING OF MALE RIVULETS INTO MALE STREAMS INTO THE MALE RAGING RIVER THAT THEN PLOUGHS THE FURROW OF THE BOTTOM OF THE VALLEY WHICH SEEMS TO HAVE GATHERED THE RAGING RIVER TOGETHER FOR THAT PURPOSE; I.E. SO THAT THE VALLEY CAN GET HER FURROW PLOUGHED. AT ANY RATE, IT IS A CLEAR MISTAKE TO REDUCE THE ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC TO A ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING REPRESENTATION BECAUSE IN DOING SO, WE ARE GIVING THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE WHICH IS, AS SCHROEDINGER POINTS OUT ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (APPEARANCES). THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE IS ‘APPARANCES’ OR ‘SECONDARY PHENOMENA’ WHILE THE PRIMARY PHENOMENON IS THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING AS IN THE VALLEY THAT GATHERT TOGETHER AND ORGANIZES THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE OF MALE RIVULETS INTO THE RAGING RIVER. THEY COULDN’T POSSIBLE ‘DO IT ON THEIR OWN’. THE FEMALE VALLEY ORGAIZING INFLUENCE IS THE PRIMARY REALITY WHILE THE MALE ASSERTING RAGING RIVER IS SECONDARY EVEN THOUGH IT IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT AND SO IS NOT SEEN AND NAME-LABELLED AS SOMETHING LOCAL AND EXPLCIT SUCH AS THE MALE-ASSERTING FRIVER.
BUT IF WE USE LANGUAGE TO SIMPLIFY REALITY AND KEEP TO THE MALE WHILE KNOWING THE FEMALE, WE DO THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT LAO TZU SUGGESTS;
Know the masculine; cleave to the feminine.
Be the valley for the world.
To be the valley for the world,
do not swerve from your innate nature
and return to the state of infancy. –Lao Tzu
As the VALLEY, we understand that what goes on in the world of male-asserting is not coming from as in “originating from” LOCAL AUTHORING but is INDUCED by the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING.
When we substitute ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE for the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so that we can raise the MALE ASSERTING TO PRIMARY STATUS, we toss the baby out with the bath water.
LET’S BE HONEST, the MALE ASSERTING is SECONDARY, … the MALE-ASSERTING RAGING RIVER IS SECONDARY TO THE ACCOMMODATING INFLUENCE OF THE VALLEY.
If we are RECEPTIVE to the needs of others, rather than ignoring those around us while we focus on perfecting our own MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, we participant in this popular WESTERN CULTURE GAME of FRAGMENTING the social dynamic, and in doing this we argue that this is the DARWINIAN way; i.e. this is how the WORLD IS SUPPOSED TO WORK, by SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST through COMPETITION, not through COOPERATION which must be kept down as something lesser, as we are managing to do in our WESTERN CULTURE social dynamic in keeping with NATURE’s (or is it NATURE’S) survival of the fittest evolutionary ethic. If we are standing on the heads of others to get to the top, there will be trickle-down benefits accruing to the lesser gifted, but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS would not want to interfere with the survival of the fittest natural ethic, an understanding that comes to us through the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which defines LOCAL AUTHORING so that we know WHO THE FITTEST ARE and ‘step aside’ to let them through so that they can ADVANCE DEVELOPMENT that will benefit all of us.
Or have we got that right? IS the MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT SCHEME what is really going on? In the MIGHTY MALE ASSERTING RIVER REALLY PLOUGHING THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT VALLEY OR IS THE VALLEY INDUCING THE COMING TOGETHER OF THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT RUNOFF INTO THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT RAGING RIVER?
Let’s face it! WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE AN EGO COMPLEX WHEREBY WE HAVE DESIGNED OUR LANGUAGE TO DELEBRATE AS PRIMARY AUTHORING SOURCE, MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS AND CLEARED THE DECKS FOR THIS UNRIVALLED MALE AUTHORING STATUS BY SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE FOR THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD INFLUENCE, WHICH, BEING NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT, IS LESS SIMPLE THAN THE MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE WHICH IS LOCAL AND EXPLICIT.
WHEN WE CAN SAY THAT THE PERSON AUTHORING THE PUNCH IS THE AUTHOR OF THE EGG-SHELL SKULL COLLAPSE, WE HAVE A LOCAL AND EXPLICIT AUTHOR THAT WE CAN DEAL WITH, WHEREAS IF WE OPEN UP THE CAN OF WORMS WHERE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, SUCH AS THE SKULL THAT IS RECEIVING THE MALE-ASSERTING PUNCH, IS MORE DETERMINATIVE OF THE COALLAPSING OF THE SKULL THAN THE MALE ASSERTING PUNCH, WE OPEN THE DOOR TO A COMPLICATING AMBIGUITY , WHICH WE COULD DO WITHOUT WHICH WE CAN AVOID IF WE ASSUME THAT ONLY ONE OF THE WAVE-FIELD’S FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATES IS THE PRIMARY AUTHOR. IF WE CHOOSE THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE, WE EFFECTIVELY NULL OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE AND SUBSTITUTE ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE, … AND IF WE CHOOSE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, WE RECAST THE MALE ASSERTING AGENCY AS ‘APPEARANCE’ ONLY; I.E. AS A MALE ASSERTING CONDENSATION INDUCED BY THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, AKIN TO THE RAGING MALE ASSERTING RIVER THAT IS INDUCED BY THE OPEINING OF THE VALLEY.
SYNOPSIS: If we kick off our LANGAUGE ARCHITECTING GAMBIT with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (the VALLEY that INDUCES THE MALE ASSERTING RAGING RIVER) we have a SOCKET that will ACCOMMODAT a PLIGGING INTO, however, if we set up that RAGING RIVER as MALE ASSERTING THING-IN-ITSELF, we have not choice, linguistically, but to invert the natural order of things and have the MALE ASSERTING “RAGING RIVER” PLOUGH OUT ITS OWN MALE-MADE CANYON/FURROW. Do we credit the Colorado river as the LOCAL EXPLICIT AGENCY that merits credit for ploughing out the GRAND CANYON, of do we propose that there was an invisible because NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT VALLEY that inductively authored what became the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT GRAND CANYON? From the point of view of WESTERN JUSTICE and its approach to establishing authorship and GUILT, we have the COLORADO RIVER in ‘CUSTODY’ and it is still holding the SMOKING GUN, the instrument of the MALE ASSERTING CARVING OUT OF THE CANYON.
When the rains come, we can see what TERRIBLE POWER this COLORADO RIVER HAS WHEN IT GETS ANGRY AND BECOMES A RAGING TORRENT that RIPS into the flesh of the terrain, tearing out massive pieces and TRANSFORMING the LANDSCAPE, … ER, UH, … or is it the other way around; i.e. is the FEMALE VALLEY ORGANZING THE MALE ASSERTING RIVER-RAGE WHICH SO CATCHES OUR ATTENTION WITH ITS LOCAL AND EXPLICIT TEARING OUT THE EARTH.
PERHAPS the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INDUCING OF THE FEMALE VALLEY and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING OF THE RAGING RIVER, are CONJUGATE ASPECTS of the ONE WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION dynamic which is evidently the agency of the ALL-ENCOMPASSING WAVE-FIELD.
From a LANGUAGE ARCHITECT’S viewpoint in this case, we would have to RE-THINK our FOUNDATIONAL use of the MALE-ASSERTING which forced us to SUBSTITUTE ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE because it now appears as if the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is the PRIMARY AGENCY as in the case of the VALLEY that induces the development of the RAGING RIVER which we have been MISTAKENLY CREDITIING with the PRIMARY AUTHORING POWER seen as the MALE ASSERTING AUTHORING POWER, ECLIPSING THE REAL PRIMARY AUTHORING POWER of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VELLEY with its INDUCTIVE INFLUENCE that ‘GIVES RISE TO’ the MALE ASSERTING “LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHORING ACTIONS” which we can see, on reflection ARE “SECONDARY APPEARANCES” of a LOCAL and EXPLICIT nature, whereas what is REALL PRIMARY is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING INFLUENCE which is “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT’” as is the INFERENCE in the indigenous aboriginal language phrasing “there is TOWNING IN THE TRANFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX (everything is nonlocal and implicit as is the nature of a fluid dynamic as in a transforming WAVE-FIELD).
* * *
WHAT IS CLEAR IS THAT THE MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have used language to PACKAGE UP as the ostensible REALITY that we are using as our OPERATIVE REALITY go-by’ is only SCHAUMKOMMEN (APPEARANCES) because what we are assuming to be the LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL MALE AGENTS notionally with GRAMMAR-given POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING, are INSTEAD, “SECONDARY FEATURES”, … “CONDENSATIONS OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE-FIELD” that are secondary to the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and PRIMARY. So our WESTERN CULTURE ELEVATING of that which is SECONDARY (the MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS which are CONDENSATION LEVEL APPEARANCES)) and making it out (FALSELY) to be the PRIMARY REALITY is a SCREW UP that as BOHM is pointing out is the SOURCE of serious ARTIFICIAL (LANGUAGE-STIMULATED PSYCHOLOGICAL) FRAGMENTATION of our understanding of reality.
1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)
The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.
Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc
* * *
The source of many current problems lies in the screwups identified in the above, including many forms of dysfunction coming from our MISTAKEN use of BINARY LOGIC which is TOO SIMPLE to cover to capture in language based representations the QUANTUM LOGIC physics of our sense experience of inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE DUG OURSLVES INTO A DEEP BINARY LOGIC BASED HOLE and we have not yet found the handle on our QUANTUM LOGIC shovel needed to dig ourselves back out again.
* * *