SUMMARY:  Indigenous aboriginal language architecture is based on INTEGRATION while WESTERN CULTURE language architecture is based on DIFFERENTIATION.  The FRAGMENTATIVE nature of DIFFERENTIATION is responsible for DROP-OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE in the representational capability of the language architecture.  What this DROP-OUT does is to reduce the REPRESENTATIONS of LANGUAGES such as ENGLISH and the Common Average European Languages (Whorf’s classification) to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTION and DEVELOPMENT-ONLY REPRESENTATION capability which REDUCES the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPT of BALANCE to the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC CONCEPT OF DIFFERENCE.  This ESSAY describes the CULTURE-SHIFTING IMPACT of ‘DUMBING DOWN’ QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC.  

 

* * * 

 

BELIEVE IT OR NOT, OUR WESTERN CULTURE IS SUBSTITUTING DIFFERENCE FOR BALANCE.

 

DIFFERENCE is the BINARY LOGIC REDUCTION OF QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE.

 

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LINGUISTIC UNDERSTANDING IS BASED ON “BALANCE” (QUANTUM LOGIC) WHEREAS WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC UNDERSTANDING IS BASED ON “DIFFERENCE” (BINARY LOGIC)

 

BALANCE and DIFFERENCE offer us TWO APPROACHES to language design based on QUANTUM LOGIC and BINARY LOGIC.

 

The RELATIONSHIP between the CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD and the WAVE-FIELD is one of BALANCE, not DIFFERENCE.

 

NOTA BENE: ‘BALANCE’ IS ‘LESS SIMPLE’ THAN ‘DIFFERENCE’ AND ‘BALANCE’ IS SENSUAL WHILE ‘DIFFERENCE’ IS INTELLECTUAL.

 

An example of QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE) approach to language is where we capture a picture in terms of; ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  Here we CAN see a FIGURE (an item of CONTENT) in a RESONATING or BALANCING BASED INTEGRATION with its CONTAINING GROUND (CONTAINER) wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE.  Alternatively, we CAN see FIGURE and GROUND as TWO which is the BINARY LOGIC (DIFFERENTIATION) based approach to language capture.

 

BOTH QUANTUM LOGIC “BALANCING BASED INTEGRATION” and BINARY LOGIC “DIFFERENTIATION” offer themselves as VIABLE FOUNDATIONS FOR A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and these TWO ARCHITECTURES are what DISTINGUISHES the languages of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS (along with Buddhists/Taoists and Advaita Vedanta adherents), … and , … THE WEST (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT LANGUAGE USERS).

 

THESE DIFFERING LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES PUT US, PSYCHOLOGICALLY, INTO TWO DIFFERENT LANGUAGE-BASED “REALITY ARCHITECTURES”, the ONE employing QUANTUM BALANCING BASED INTEGRATION, where we fashion such linguistic representations as the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ , and the other being where we fashion linguistic representations using BINARY LOGIC; ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’.

 

* * * * * * * * * *

 

Since WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are accustomed to using only ONE OF THESE language based representation schemes; i.e. the BINARY LOGIC DIFFERENTIATION APPROACH, we have conditioned our minds to GO THERE instead of ‘GOING TO WHERE the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE ADHERENTS GO; i.e. to “the QUANTUM LOGIC “BALANCING BASED INTEGRATION” approach, an example of which is ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where we INTEGRATE in a BALANCED FASHION, the FIGURE and the GROUND e.g. the ‘TOWNING’ (MALE ASSERTING) in the ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING) which is the FULL ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD CAPTURE OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, … AND INSTEAD OF THAT, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS opt for the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC DIFFERENTIATION APPROACH where we FRAGMENT OUT the FIGURE from the FIGURE-and-GROUND UNITY, “DISCARD THE GROUND” and REPRESENT THE FIGURE AS IF IT WERE AN INDEPENDENT ENTITY WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.   This DIFFERENTIATION APPROACH is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are giving a foundational role to in our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE in contrast to the INTEGRATION APPROACH that is given a foundational role in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

 

NOTA BENE!  WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIFFERENTIATION APPROACH TO LANGUAGE-based SHARING of sense-experience and ONCE WE HAVE THROWN OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE in our act of DIFFERENTIATION where we FRAGMENT OUT and retain the MALE ASSERTING ‘GROWING TOWN’ for our linguistic representation purposes, we ‘lose touch’ with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE in which, in our sense-experience reality, the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE IS INCLUDED IN; i.e. the TOWNING is INCLUDED in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and the TOWNING and TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE ARE CO-PARTICIPANTS in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  The words I have just used are fashioning a QUANTUM LOGIC statement, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium wherein FIGURE (the TOWNING) and GROUND (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) are ONE and NOT TWO.

 

In short, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have embraced the use of a DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’) whereas the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE ADHERENTS (and also Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, have embraced the use of an INTEGRATION based LANGUAGE (e.g. ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’).

 

The longer we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS continue employing this FRAGMENTATION based linguistic representation scheme, the MORE, EVER-SMALLER, FRAGENTS WE PRODUCE and the greater the LOCAL and EXPLICIT DETAIL we get down to in our language based REPRESENTATIONS.   It is worth noting, even though it may be harder for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS who have grown so accustomed to using FRAGMENTATION, that the INTEGRATION based language group such as the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, while using language that builds representations by INTEGRATION, do NOT RUN INTO THIS PROBLEM OF COMPLEXIFYING REPRESENTATIONS WITH EVER MORE FRAGMENTED CONSTRUCTIONS since the INTEGRATION approach starts with the ENTIRE VALLEY and works downward and inward building a relational web of references which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) to get to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  In QUANTUM LOGIC representation, the BABY is never POPPED OUT OF THE WOMB as in BINARY LOGIC REPRESENTATION because ‘the WOMB’ is the all-including WAVE-FIELD, … the ALL-CONTAINING PLENUM in which the CONTENTS are included as in the physical reality where material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including wave-field.

 

WE ARE CONFUSING THINGS; i.e. WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS in our language architecture are using DIFFERENTIATION to FRAGMENT the TRANSFORMING into MANY PIECES so that we can’t see the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE for the GROWING ‘NUMBER’ of TOWNS because once we start BELIEVING that ‘TOWNS CAN GROW’ we are bringing on board in our PSYCHE that ABSTRACTION OF ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE as a CONTAINER or DISPLAY CASE (SPACE) in which “our TOWNS can ALL GROW AT THE SAME TIME”, … in a kind of FRAGMENTATION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein we have used LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION to SPLIT THE TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE into TWO SEPARATE FRAGMENTS; i.e. the CONTENT and the CONTAINER.  (Note that a town cannot undergo two periods of growth in the same valley it is not the same town and not the same valley).

 

“WE KNOW BETTER”.  WE KNOW THAT THE TOWNING IS A DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE AND THUS THAT CONTENT AND CONTAINER ARE ONE and NOT TWO, and therefore that there is NO SUCH THING AS THE GROWTH OF AN ‘ITEM OF CONTENT’ AS IF IT WERE A SEPARATE THING-IN-ITSELF SITUATED WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

 

REPEAT TO ONESELF FOR GOOD MEASURE HERE; “THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GROWTH OF A NOTIONAL ITEM OF CONTENT ON ITS OWN AS IF WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, … THAT IS JUST LANGUAGE BASED ABSTRACTION.

 

THIS IS WHERE WE CAN REFLECT ON HOW OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THAT GIVES A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO ‘BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION’ (e.g. ‘the town is growing’) CAN CONFUSE OUR IMPRESSIONS OF REALITY AS COMPARED WITH THE ALTERNATIVE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THAT GIVES A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO ‘QUANTUM LOGIC based INTEGRATION’ (e.g. ‘there is towning in the transforming landscape’).

 

Here it is easy to see HOW THE DIFFERENTIATION based language CASTS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE while the INTEGRATION based language INCLUDES the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE TOGETHER WITH THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE.

 

NOTA BENE:  OUR WESTERN CULTURE DIFFERENTIATION BASED LANGUAGE ‘DUMBS DOWN’ (SIMPLIFIES) our linguistic representations of ‘reality’ by simply DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE thus reducing WAVE-FIELD REALITY to MECHANICAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY based solely and one-sidedly on MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  GOODBYE TRANSFORMATION, HELLO MECHANIZATION.  Here comes the one-sided MALE ASSERTING AVALANCHES (shhh! Don’t Mention Zee HOLE!).  If we mention the HOLE then we can no longer contain our action to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT because the HOLE is a change in the overall transforming landscape which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  Capturing the FEMALE conjugate in language is a real BITCH!  Going with the MALE ASSERTING ON ITS OWN is far SIMPLER, so WHY NOT ENFORCE IT!   Supposing someone objects to our removing the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING collapse of the skull associated with a MALE ASSERTING punch to the head.  We can simply craft a LAW where everyone must agree to LETTING GO OF ANY ACKNOWLEDEMENT of the REAL INFLUENCE of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and PRETENDING that the MALE ASSERTING IS FULLY AND SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL ASSOCIATED ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

If we adopt this as a RULE OF GRAMMAR, then every time we encounter it in our sense-experience reality, we can use language based representation that DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.  This way, we do not have to deal with the ANDROGYNOUS complexity of WAVE-FIELD reality as far as our language based representations are concerned.  We can instead DROP OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE form our language-based representations and go with a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY REPRESENTATION which will serve us as a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY but one which is more efficiently formulated and shared.  Such simplification in our REPRESENTATIONS of sense-experience reality is not new in WESTERN CULTURE; e.g;

 

“And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language” . —Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

 

All we have to do is to FRAGMENT OUT the relational forms we are interested in discussing and resituate them in an empty space where we are no longer distracted by all their relations with other things, to the point that we start thinking that the web of relations is the PRIMARY REALITY and the THINGS in the relational web do not play the foundational role but are secondary CONDENSATIONS of the relational substance of an all-including WAVE-FIELD.  Of course, once we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS to a MATERIAL FORM, the CONDENSATIONS are no longer SECONDARY, but are instead PRIMARY and we no longer need to acknowledge any all-pervading energy-charged WAVE-FIELD, we can instead go with LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEINGS in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which is a BINARY LOGIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is much SIMPLER to craft representations for than the QUANTUM LOGIC arrangement of an all-including energy-charged wave-field in which material forms are condensations of the wave-field.   QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE in that we have to understand reality as a transforming energy-charged field-unum wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS.

 

This brings us back to how our choices here impact our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE REQUIREMENTS; i.e. THE DIFFERENTIATION based language CASTS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE while the INTEGRATION based language INCLUDES the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE TOGETHER WITH THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE.

 

WHICH WORLD DO WE WANT TO PUT OURSELVES INSIDE OF, THE WORLD OF DIFFERENTIATION BASED FRAGMENTS OR THE WORLD OF INTEGRATION BASED RELATIONAL BALANCING?

 

DO WE WANT TO SPEAK OF ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, … OR DO WE WANT TO SPEAK OF ‘THE TOWN THAT IS A LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF BEING THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING PRODUCTS, IN A WORLD WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS DEAD MATTER FLOATING IN EMPTY SPACE UNLESS WE BRING IT TO LIFE WITH THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.

 

While the indigenous aboriginal culture adherents had no problem in giving LIFE to the whole transforming relational continuum as matches the WAVE-FIELD reality, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, having divided our LANGUAGE-based world into DEAD MINERAL MATTER LOCALLY ‘INFECTED’ WITH LIVING ORGANIC LIFE, the DIFFERENTIATION being a HARD BINARY LOGIC BASED SPLITTING APART OF INANIMATE MINERAL MATTER and LIVING CELLULAR MATTER.

 

IT WOULD MAKE MORE SENSE TO GO WITH AN ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD WITH CONDENSATIONS AS WOULD CONSTITUTE A BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION.  THEN WE COULD GET RID OF THE BINARY LOGIC NONSENSE OF THE ‘ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, … purportedly populated with “solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles”.

 

All these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the end for which he form’d them; and these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation.”  –Isaac Newton, Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light

 

The PARTICLES are much better off as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD PLENUM where they belong to something greater than themselves, rather than being ALONE in ABSOLUTE EMPTY INFINITIE SPACE.

 

BESIDES, IT MAKES MORE PHYSICAL SENSE TO UNDERSTAND REALITY IN TERMS OF AN ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM within which there are CONDENSATIONS that show up as MATERIAL FORMS, than it does to UNDERSTAND THE SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON THE ABSTRACTION OF BINARY LOGIC BASED COLLECTION OF MATERIAL FRAGMENTS IN A DISCONNECTING ABSOLUTE AND INFINITE EMPTINESS.

 

We’d better be CAREFUL WHAT WE SAY NOW, because if we are to BELIEVE in the REALITY that we are constructing with our LANGUAGE and use it to OPERATIONALIZE OUR BEHAVIOURS, then we’d better get it pretty close to our sense-experience affirmable reality.   What if we were to rely on the FRAGMENTING LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and say things like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’?

 

In MAKING NO MENTION OF THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS we could encourage a lot of THOUGHTLESS DAMAGE TO THE WILDERNESS BY CONVINCING OURSELVES THAT WE WERE ‘CULTIVATING THE LAND’ WHICH SOUNDS VERY ONE-SIDEDLY MALE ASSERTING AS IN MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION of stuff.

 

SO MUCH FOR DIFFERENTIATION, but WHAT ABOUT INTEGRATION where we ACKNOWLEDGE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the MALE ASSERTING so that we ACKNOWLEDGE HOW THE WILDERNESS with its FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the MALE ASSERTING REALIZES THE TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE, exposing the INCOMPLETENESS (Goedel’s Theorem) of our ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS which TYPIFY WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  

 

LET’S NOT FORGET THAT WE HAVE SENSE-EXPERIENCE WHICH CAN SERVE AS THE ARBITER OF OUR VARIOUS LANGUAGE BASED ‘REPRESENTATIONS’ OF REALITY, none of which are going to be A COMPLETE MATCH-UP WITH SENSE-EXPERIENCE (because of what Goedel’s Theorem is saying about the limitations of our LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS due to the FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITION FORMAT).

 

But, at least when we use an INTEGRATION oriented LANGUAGE and say ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANFORMING LANDSCAPE’, … we are better off than when we use a DIFFERENTIATION oriented LANGUAGE and say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’, … because the latter DIFFERENTIATION based REPRESENTATION not only FRAGMENTS OUT A SMALL PIECE OF REALITY but GIVES IT LEGS AND WINGS to support, NOTIONALLY, “ITS OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT”.   These LANGUAGE ANIMATED FRAGMENTS including ‘The TOWN’ and ‘the HUMAN’ are great resource for CONSTRUCTING A REPRESENTATION that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT which enables us to FRAGMENT REALITY into whatever size bits we want, but of course, NOT WITHOUT THE EXPOSURE to having ourselves BELIEVE in the MEANINGFULNESS of the FRAGMENTED SUB-REALITIES where WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have been known to make DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE so that they can embark on PROGRAMS OF SUBOPTIMIZATION of the DECLARED-INDEPENDENT FRAGMENT.

 

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

 

AGAIN, … SO MUCH FOR DIFFERENTIATION, but WHAT ABOUT INTEGRATION where we ACKNOWLEDGE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the MALE ASSERTING

 

As the systems sciences also remind us, we LOCK OURSELVES INTO ERRONEOUS CONCEPTIONS OF REALITY BY ‘HIGH SWITCHING COSTS’ and there are A LOT OF SWITCHING COSTS because we have BUILT INTO OUR WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT “OPERATIVE REALITY” the BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATIONS WHERE WE CATEGORIZE ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS AS “EITHER GOOD OR BAD” which has us inventing LOCAL AUTHORIS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS which can be JUDGED ‘GOOD’ or ‘BAD’ and this LOCAL AUTHORING IS IMPORTANT because it allows us to FINGER the LOCAL AUTHOR of such acts, whereas, in the reality of the indigenous aboriginal culture which employs QUANTUM LOGIC, there is only BALANCE and IMBALANCE and this derives from the relational social matrix so it is impossible to tie down a LOCAL AUTHOR since everything is related (mitakuye oyasin) and there is only a LOCAL CONDUIT in which case the MISTAKE is being made of FRAGMENTING the notional AUTHORING of actions and developments and CREATING the ABSTRACTIONS of LOCAL AUTHORS assigning these ID’s to the LOCAL CONDUITS of relational TENSIONS that are forming in the social relational collective.

 

FRAGMENTATION associated with the imputing of LOCAL AUTHORING to the LOCAL CONDUITS in the relational matrix is equivalent to HARDENING QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BALANCE’ (the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM) where it is important to consciously apprehend the changing BALANCE of WILDERNESS and CULTIVATED LAND as we “GROW” the area of CULTIVATED LAND.  COMPREHENDING and MANAGING THIS ‘BALANCE’ as belongs to the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE is something REAL and VALUABLE whereas acknowledging GROWTH as something real and MANAGING GROWTH is UNREAL and FRAGMENTATIVE and contributes to SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA, as Bohm reminds us;

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

 

* * * * * * *

 

SO, WHERE DO WE START THE NEEDED JOB OF DEFRAGMENTING OUR FRAMENTED WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY?

 

We could start with correcting our DISTORTED CONCEPTIONS of MEDICINE, JUSTICE and COMMERCE and remove all of the BINARY LOGIC based dependencies, substituting in their place the QUANTUM LOGIC concept of BALANCE.  For example, ‘COVID’ as a BINARY LOGIC based PATHOGEN “HAS TO GO” and to be replaced by IMBALANCE as is accommodated by QUANTUM LOGIC but NOT by BINARY LOGIC.  This means that there are REMEDIES JUST WAITING TO BE DISCOVERED IN THE REALM OF BALANCE THAT ARE “NOT KNOWN BECAUSE NOT LOOKED FOR” (does this sound like T.S. Eliot because it should do as he was into the VEDIC QUANTUM LOGIC MINDSET early on, and in LITTLE GIDDING he writes; Not known, because not looked for But heard, half-heard, in the stillness Between two waves of the sea.)

WESTERN MEDICINE is NOT SEEING that illness is IMBALANCE because the focus is on PATHOGENS as the ’cause’ and VACCINES are ANTI-PATHOGEN technologies which is the WESTERN CULTURE FOCUS that misses the real cause of IMBALANCE which is “Not known, because not looked for But heard, half-heard, in the stillness Between two waves of the sea”.

VACCINES are like POLICE; i.e. they are on a constant vigil to protect against the emergence of PATHOGENS.  The job of POLICE is, in effect, to SUPPORT IMBALANCE even to the point that the IMBALANCE reaches the extreme where REVOLUTION is needed to RESTORE BALANCE.  While the focus of police and vaccines is on PATHOGEN SUPPRESSION OR ELIMINATION, the deeper, root source issue of IMBALANCE persists…  “Not known, because not looked for But heard, half-heard, in the stillness Between two waves of the sea.”  

ANTIPATHOGEN remedies such as vaccines fail to address IMBALANCE and the undealt with IMBALANCE can be the source of NEW REBALANCING VARIANTS once again mistaken for PATHOGENS.  A capable VACCINE is like a CAPABLE police force in that it can be very effective in suppressing the natural forces of REBALANCING mistaken for PATHOGENS, not only without addressing the root issue of IMBALANCE but protecting and preserving the IMBALANCE and driving it ‘underground’, as in the case of rich and poor where, like the snake under the rug, REBALANCING agents will emerge in some new variant manner.

 

The distraction of the PATHOGEN derives from a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that gives the (false) impression of a LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and developments, notably a PATHOGEN in the case of offensive actions and developments.

 

COVID is a QUANTUM LOGIC IMBALANCE in the microbial assemblage and NOT the BINARY LOGIC ‘attack of a PATHOGEN’.  Of course there is an AMBIGUITY HERE because our less simple QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of IMBALANCE can always be DUMBED DOWN to a simple BINARY LOGIC understanding of the CLASH of OPPOSITIES (i.e. GOOD and EVIL).

 

No matter what subject areas we are looking at, we have the option of using language based representation in “BOTH” DIFFERENTIATION mode “AND” INTEGRATION mode, the former giving rise to BINARY LOGIC language structure and the latter giving rise to QUANTUM LOGIC language structure.

 

PSYCHOLOGICALLY, DIFFERENTIATION can lead to PURIFICATIONISM by the continual process of DIFFERENTIATING between GOOD and BAD and removing the BAD and retaining (and thus concentrating) the GOOD.

 

PSYCHOLOGICALLY, INTEGRATION can lead to cultivating of BALANCE and its dynamic form, RESONANCE which is AT THE SAME TIME, the subsuming of IMBALANCE and its dynamic form, DISSONANCE

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE IN NEED OF OUR RETURN FROM DIFFERENTIATING TO BALANCING

 

* * *